中文杂志修改意见回复范文

中文杂志修改意见回复范文
中文杂志修改意见回复范文

中文杂志修改意见回复范文

众所周知,国内学者的学习和研究成果是通过学术论文来体现的。还有数量众多的高校学生通过发论文获得相应的学位证书。而重点期刊的数量是有限的,激烈的学术竞争导致期刊发文章很难,对论文质量的要求也极高。那么如何才能快速且有效的发论文呢?今天就给大家分享一位资深核心期刊主编的论文审稿建议,从的角度谈一谈,如何快速的找到合适期刊发论文?

一、研究期刊的栏目设置、发文传统和文风等

从目前来看,中国的各个期刊,都在建立自己的审稿制度。在制度建设越来越完善的前提下,如果你对部或者刊物自身了解比较清楚的话,投稿的命中率会更高一些。

1.研究期刊的栏目设置

有的期刊是根据学科来设置栏目;有的是根据问题来设置的。如果你能把握好这一点的话,投稿会更轻松一点。例如《晋阳学刊》,有一个文学的栏目,如果你研究这类问题,把文章投入这样的期刊,命中率可能就会高一些。还有《江汉学刊》,往年它会发表一些学术创新的文章。这类文章需要打破学科局限,你如果能从

不同的学科切入去谈,效果可能更好一些。还有各高校的刊物更加注重学术性,而党校的刊物,往往更加偏重时效性和实用性。

2.研究的发文风格

研究发文的风格,才能有针对性的为自己的论文选择一个合适的刊物,或者为自己接下来的写作找到方向。中国刊物的与外国不一样,他不是简单地文字加工,更多的是把握选题、把握方向,把握学科。在这样的基础上,一个刊物的学术可能已经形成了自身的一些风格,主编的风格就是刊物的一部分风格。这种风格最直接的影响是,他在选稿用稿的时候,一些稿子一看到,他就会觉得你的论证方式或切入点就不对。比如有的喜欢问题式的,一上来就是基于社会现实问题,再去谈这个理论,怎么去解决这个问题,然后进行学术创新。而有的比较喜欢你一上来就是理论问题,这个理论遇到什么困境了,自身去加以解决,然后进而能够关照到现实。风格不一样,可能就会决定对你的稿件态度和后续的处理

3.研究期刊的文风

有些刊物在长期的发展过程中,已经形成了自己的一整套体系和风格。在投稿前,只有细心的去了解和把握,加以琢磨和对比,就

能了解到相关的区别。比如有些刊物关注现实问题,还有一些关注重大的理论问题,之间的区别还是很大的。

建议:搜寻所投刊物3到5年内发表的文章

为什么要研究3到5年内的学术论文呢?因为这两年期刊界都面临一个问题。伴随着五零后六零后这种新老的更替,所以很多刊物的刊风、栏目设置、议题的选定以及文章的刊发都在发生变化。一方面,会有一些年轻继承老的一些理念和方法,但同时保留着自己的一些视角。那么在这个过程当中,如果你能看到其中的变化就很好。比如老,他选的文章希望更稳一点,不喜欢创新性太强的文章,而年轻的想法可能又不同,所以需要关注到期刊对于文章风格的筛选。

二、为何爱发“熟人稿件”?政治风险和抄袭风险

很多人也许会很困惑,为什么总喜欢发一些“熟人”稿件。当然可能有人会说,这里面肯定有关系之类的。不可否认,肯定会有一些人情因素。但更重要的因素是什么呢?我们要弄清楚期刊会担心什么?

我个人认为期刊担心两点,一是政治风险,二是抄袭风险。政治风险即研究没有限制,但是发布是有限制的。要考虑文章研究的选题、论证和内容,甚至包括一些语句的表达,有没有政治风险,这对甚至对整个刊物的生死存亡来说都很关键。所以,期刊在选文的时候,就会考虑到这一点。如果一些选题暗含政治风险的话,原则上是不考量的。

接下来就是抄袭风险。尽管现在有论文不端检测系统,论文拿到手之后,都要先拿去检测,有的甚至要你自己提交检测报告。但是在这种制度之外,还有良心的把握。一些期刊对学者的为人和学风,都要有基本的价值判断。长期交往的学者,就会很了解。同样一篇文章,如果说这个人人品没有问题的话,哪怕文章弱一点都可以用,但是他如果人品有问题,这种文章风险就很高。

比如有的作者喜欢与学生共同署名,明明是学生写的,却顶替了学生的名额。一旦两者将事情闹大,遭殃的就是期刊。所以很多私下交流比较多的学者,就会对这个人有全盘的把握,相关风险就会低一些。其实绝大多数国内,对于一些学者,心里都是有一笔账的。

建议:联系

如果你有精力,把这篇稿子写出来,你觉得它的分量还可以拿得出手,你有选好的刊物,又瞅准了这个,那你不妨就是给他写一封信,哪怕是邮件发也行,或者你把稿子打印出来,然后手写一封信。这个信件的内容主要是什么呢?比如你为什么要选这个选题,第二这个选题国内外研究的现状是什么?第三你自己的理解是什么,你认为它的创新点是什么?这样可能有助于期刊对你的文章有一个大的把握。

因为每天案头上的纸质稿件或者电子稿件都很多,如果你能够与他进行联系和沟通,对于的工作是很有帮助的。下次发就很容易,因为之前打交道,已经基本上对这个情况了解了。

三、认识:学术会议,导师推荐,朋友举荐,联合发文等等。

在投稿的时候,需要找到合适的跟他沟通,找到合适的刊物跟他去交流。然后在这个过程中让了解你,你去了解这个刊物:它的历史,它的传统,它的发文风格等等。

这些渠道包括学术会议,导师的推荐,朋友的举荐,联合发文等等。

手中有资源,发文的难度会小很多。对于自己各方面的能力来说,也是一种锻炼

四、结语

总之站在角度来讲,要发表1篇论文的话,与其抱着试试看的态度,不如重点去研究某些刊物,研究,研究刊物的风格等等。因为时间是很宝贵的,与其这样浪费,不如去做这些准备工作,在这个过程当中去找到适合你的,这样能够及时提高命中率。这是对刊物的一种尊重,也是对自己的一种尊重。在与刊物沟通的过程,也是给自己找定位的一个过程。比如你适合写哪一类的文章,哪些文章适合发表到哪些刊物上等等。如果能够持续到3到5年,你已经在学术圈里面做得差不多了。

( ___:高校不搞笑)

谢邀。

合同一方如果违反合同或法律法规的规定,造成另一方的财产或精神损失,可以向违反合同一方提出赔偿或要求对方承担责任,此时出具的书面材料叫“索赔函”。那么,针对对方出具的索赔函,一般会进行回复,这叫“索赔回复函”。

索赔函回复主要是针对对方的索赔函的内容,按照己方的观点,逐项进行回复,包括理由和结论。可参考以下范文:

《索赔回复函》

以下属54#、55#楼在建桩基础工程施工阶段发生的四项单项索赔,同时处理则可以定义为一揽子索赔,甲乙双方应以法律法规及合同约定协商解决。

承包单位提出索赔:

1、土方开挖未提供详细管网分布图,造成承包商在施工作业区域内不能采取积极有效保护措施或无作业面致使停工。

2、增加人防工程承包商已在进行桩基础工程量70%(8.25)后接到通知,至9月10日完成自搅拌砼浇灌后停止大面施工;后留两个班组(4人)于54#挖桩至10月14日下午完成商品砼浇灌,后期停工至11月5日下午铺路、着手土方外运。即大面停工时间段为9月10日至10月13日,10月15至11月4日。

以上事实客观存在,我方认为承包商可提出工期索赔及合理适当的管理、器械租货投入费用索赔。

业主提出反索赔:

1、在桩基础施工过程中,由于承包商的质量行为造成桩成品砼标号等级降低,带来设计变更及工期滞后。

2、开工后承包商不依据甲乙双方订立合同、不服从管理及时报送方案、进度计划、质量报表、测量成果及办理开工报告等,造成管理混乱。

以上业主亦有理可依、有据可查,我方认为承包商应对以上事项作出必要解释并承担违约赔偿责任。

北京XXXX有限责任公司

XX年X月X日

在实践中,我们应该在回复函中,针对对方的索赔内容和依据一一进行回复,在回复中要注意有理有据,还可以提出自己的反索赔,也可以要求和对方再行商榷。

(1) Thank you !(2) Thanks !(3) Many thanks for you !(4) To give many thanks for!(5) Express gratitude for !(6) To be in acknoweldgement for !(7) Be grateful to somebody for sth(8) To be highly indebted to somebody !如果满意,请及时采纳谢谢!

今年《英雄联盟》的比赛已经结束了,很多的选手也都是进入到了转会期,最明显的就是LCK赛区,因为今年的成绩非常的差,所以大多数的强队开始了重组,而且曾经的Pawn将军也是宣布将会在S9回归,就在近日的直播中,他也是遇到了尺帝,并且多次在同一个队伍之中。

Pawn用中文调戏尺帝

去年尺帝获得了世界总决赛的冠军,在今年的比赛中表现并不佳,亚运会中被Uzi压制的非常厉害,导致在比赛结束之后失声痛哭,虽然在冒泡赛中成功突围,但是Gen.g战队却因为战术不符合版本,最终在小组赛中拿下了1-5的成绩,最终无缘八强。随后Gen.g战队也是围绕尺帝进行重组,现在已经有了小花生的加入,不知道接下来还会有谁。

Pawn在近日的直播中也是连续的遇到了尺帝,但是游戏进行的却是不怎么顺利,几乎全部都失败了,等到第五局失败以后,Pawn 打开了和尺帝的聊天框,想要用中文和调侃一下尺帝,毕竟Pawn在LPL待过一年,和7酱也学习了一点骚话,而尺帝则一直在LCK赛区,所以可能不了解中文。

随后Pawn一直用拼音问尺帝:“ni shi sha bi?”观众都笑爆了,但是让我们惊讶的是,尺帝居然回复了过来,用拼音表示,我是韩国人,你是谁呀。随后Pawn称自己是神,看的出来Pawn自己也有些不敢相信,毕竟尺帝都在LCK,对于中文的讲解肯定不如自己。

现在的Gen.g战队已经引进了小花生,再加上尺帝,可以说是很强的队伍,这次尺帝能够看懂中文,很有可能是在为了来到LPL赛区做准备,毕竟很多的LCK的选手都喜欢来到LPL赛区打上一两年,然后选择退役或者再次回到LCK。真的希望我们能够不在接受这样的过期援助,自己培养自己的新人。

北京时间7月14日,火箭队总经理莫雷在仍在为火箭的第三巨头计划,策划着各种交易。尽管莫雷为了这个事情已经忙得焦头烂额,但是他仍抽空在个人instagram上回答了球迷们提出的各种问

题,其中有一个球迷的问题就谈到了中国球员周琦,而莫雷的回答更是让球迷们乐开了花!

今天,火箭队总经理莫雷就在个人instagram上一一回答了球迷们提出的问题。其中重点的问题有几个,第一个就是提到在接下来球员发生交易的可能性大,还是签约的概率高?莫雷回答道:“交易的可能性更高一些。”

球迷说火箭队今年面临的最大难题是什么呢?莫雷表示:“最大的对手是金州勇士。”由此可见勇士队获得NBA总冠军给火箭队的确带来了很大的冲击!球迷还问到:“你做过最冒险的交易是什么?”莫雷:“最冒险的交易就是用阿尔斯通交易了洛瑞。”

球迷提问到:“你最喜欢的火箭角色球员是谁?”莫雷表示:“巴蒂尔和路易斯-斯科拉。”球迷继续问到:“你觉得见过的球员中,最有趣的NBA球员是哪个?”莫雷毫不犹豫地回答:“YaoMing”,也就是中国球员姚明。

周琦一直是火箭队总经理莫雷欣赏的球员,尤其在本季的夏季联赛当中,周琦在场上出色的表现更是让莫雷情不自禁地连连叫好,还曾为周琦鼓掌加油。

最后球迷问到了最关键的问题:“周琦在下一年能否得到更多的上场时间?”莫雷则直接用中文回答“是”,这个回答让球迷们非常满意和开心。

莫雷特意用中文回答这个问题,目的可能就是让更多的中国球迷看到,同时也说明了周琦将有可能会进入轮换。这不禁让我想到在之前采访火箭队教练德安东尼的时候,他就曾表明过在下一赛季会给更多的机会周琦上场的。

现在周琦进入火箭队是双重保障了,火箭队在这个赛季人员会进行一次大调整,而这个大调整也给周琦制造了很多的机会。即使火箭队与卡佩拉续约成功,但卡佩拉的替补内内的年龄是又大了一岁,所以周琦是很有机会挤进轮换阵容,成为4号位和5号位的替补。

周琦!机会要来了!加油!

其实找个好老师学,比买任何教材都有用!

循序渐进。读懂英文杂志需要的是一定的词汇量,这是基本要求。但不是唯一的要求。比单词量要求更高的是你的知识面,或者说你平日里的积累。有时候一篇文章上的字你都认识,语法也没有

问题,可仍然看不懂。为什么?没有相关的背景知识。比如下面这一段话就是摘自最近的英文杂志。试一试,能看懂吗?

The Rise and Fall of Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage

Both men have receded to the political margins, but there's no ___ing if that's where they'll stay.

首先短文里提到了两个人物,一个美国人班农,另一个是英国人法拉奇。两个都是红极一时的政治人物,都曾经在政坛沉浮。现在也都被边缘化了,不过他们能就此甘心而洗手不干了吗?

如果不了解这个背景,单词全部认识,仍然是云里雾里如同读天书。

如果让我做美食杂志,我会开设这样的栏目:1.每期提醒,在每期的首页,告诉大家如何吃出健康。2.各地美食,为你介绍全国各地的美食。3.海外美食,为你介绍国外的美食。4.我要当厨师,教你做一桌丰盛的美食。5.你问我答,回答读者提出的美食问题。红包是你的,对提出好的建议,宝贵意见的读者给予奖励。6.在适当的时候,举办读者有奖联谊会!

女生回复好吧!有多个意思,第一是对你要求的肯定,第二就是很心不甘情不愿的,第三就是对你的敷衍,第四就是好吧你可以滚了,不想给你聊天了,那要具体看你们聊的什么内容了

模板,内容仅供参考

一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板

最近在审一篇英文稿,第一次做这个工作,还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿,我想不会枪毙它的,给他一个major revision后接收吧。呵呵 网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1、目标和结果不清晰。 It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. 2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。 In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 3、对于研究设计的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨: The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见规范文本材料模板全集

SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見範文模板大全 修改稿回答審稿人の意見(最重要の部分) List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿號). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corr ections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……) Response: ×××××× 。。。。。。 逐條意見回答,切忌一定不能有遺漏 針對不同の問題有下列幾個禮貌術語可適當用用: We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

审稿意见回复模板,中文

审稿意见回复模板,中文 篇一:审稿意见模板 如何学习审稿 专家学者为什么愿意拿出大量的时间审稿呢?为期刊审稿是义务,也是一份荣耀,更是自我价值的实现,那就是为进步做出了一份贡献。审稿人都是志愿提供服务而不计报酬。当然,通过审稿还会得到其他好处,(1)首先是精神上的收获,能够增加科学知识,体验科学交流和论争的乐趣;(2)最新的研究进展在发表之前就有机会看到(不亦快哉!);(3)通过对照其他审稿人的评论和编辑的稿件处理意见,可提高自己的审稿技能;(4)通过发现论文中的错误,可以学习如何写出更有竞争力的稿件;(5)会得到编辑的尊敬,甚或有机会被邀请加入学会或编委会;例如美国呼吸与危重监护杂志(AJRCCM)编委会的任命,就是完全根据审稿人的审稿是否中肯、严谨、及时。 一个优秀的审稿人又有什么特征呢? Black等曾对英国杂志(BMJ)的审稿人进行过评价,其目的是想明确高水平审稿人的特征,特别是在审稿花费时间和审回时间方面。他们对BMJ的420份稿件的审稿人进行了调查,2位编辑和稿件的责任作者对审稿质量进行独立评估。结果编辑和论文作者的评估都显示,经过流行病学或统计学培训是提供高质量

评阅的审稿人的唯一显著性相关因素。在编辑的质量评估中,年轻是高质量评阅的独立预测因素。评审花费的时间与审稿质量的提高相关,但超过3小时则无更大意义。通常认为,正在从事研究工作的人员、拥有学术职位者、科研资助团体成员,应该会提供更高质量的审稿,但令人意外的是,这项研究并没有发现审稿质量与上述特征相关。这一结果对于编辑的意义是,要发现优秀的审稿人,只有不断试用新人,评估他们的表现,然后决定是否继续用他们。建议征集接受过流行病学和统计学训练的、年龄在40岁左右的审稿人。 那么年轻学者如何学习、提高审稿技能呢?最重要的是在实践中提高,就是通过审稿提高审稿水平。认真研读自己投稿得回的评审意见,以学习他人是如何审稿的。再就是比较同一稿件自己的审稿意见和其他审稿人的意见,发现新的视角,得到有益反馈。对于有条件的年轻学者,可以替自己的上级(例如老师、上级医师等)草拟审稿意见,由此可得到更为全面的训练和提高。 做好审稿工作需要什么?第一是能动性。对同行要有绝对的责任感,坚信通过同行评阅认定的高水准的文献,对科学进步是至关重要的。要珍惜这样的机会,审阅一篇好文章,即得到知识,又得到乐趣,不亚于参加一场研讨会。审稿的质量具有重要的感染力,可影响到作者的学术态度和学术行

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全 修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分) List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corr ections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 。。。。。。 逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用: We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

(完整版)SCI审稿意见回复模板

List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× ...... 逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用: We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that…… We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that…… Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have …… 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见: Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: ×××××× Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………” 2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

(完整word版)回复审稿人意见模板

如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见(精典语句整理) 如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见 1.所有问题必须逐条回答。 2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。 3.满足不了的也不要回避,说明不能做的合理理由。 4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用,并讨论透彻。 以下是本人对审稿人意见的回复一例,仅供参考。 续两点经验: 1. 最重要的是逐条回答,即使你答不了,也要老实交代;不要太狡猾,以至于耽误事; 2. 绝大部分实验是不要真追加的,除非你受到启发,而想改投另外高档杂志----因为你既然已经写成文章,从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story” 了。 以上指国际杂志修稿。国内杂志太多,以至于稿源吃紧,基本没有退稿,所以你怎么修都是接受。 我的文章水平都不高,主要是没有明显的创新性,也很苦恼。但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外,其他都在国际杂志(也都是SCI)发表。以我了解的情况,我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿,退稿的极少,只有一次被《某某科学进展》拒绝。究其原因,除了我上面说的,另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃,导师把关也比较严的缘故。 自我感觉总结(不一定对): 1)国内杂志审稿极慢(少数除外),但现在也有加快趋势; 2)国内杂志编辑人员认真负责的人不多,稿子寄去后,少则几个月,多则一年多没有任何消息; 3)国内杂志要求修改的稿子,如果你自己不修,他最后也给你发; 4)国外杂志要求补充实验的,我均以解释而过关,原因见少帖)。还因为:很少杂志编辑把你的修改稿再寄给当初审稿人的,除非审稿人特别请求。编辑不一定懂你的东西,他只是看到你认真修改,回答疑问了,也就接受了(当然高档杂志可能不是这样,我的经验只限定一般杂志(影响因子1-5)。 欢迎大家批评指正。 我常用的回复格式: Dear reviewer: I am very grateful to your comments for the manuscript. According with your advice, we amended the relevant part in manuscript. Some of your questions were answered below. 1)

审稿意见模板

如何学习审稿 专家学者为什么愿意拿出大量的时间审稿呢?为期刊审稿是义务,也是一份荣耀,更是自我价值的实现,那就是为进步做出了一份贡献。审稿人都是志愿提供服务而不计报酬。当然,通过审稿还会得到其他好处,(1)首先是精神上的收获,能够增加科学知识,体验科学交流和论争的乐趣;(2)最新的研究进展在发表之前就有机会看到(不亦快哉!);(3)通过对照其他审稿人的评论和编辑的稿件处理意见,可提高自己的审稿技能;(4)通过发现论文中的错误,可以学习如何写出更有竞争力的稿件;(5)会得到编辑的尊敬,甚或有机会被邀请加入学会或编委会;例如美国呼吸与危重监护杂志(AJRCCM)编委会的任命,就是完全根据审稿人的审稿是否中肯、严谨、及时。 一个优秀的审稿人又有什么特征呢? Black等曾对英国杂志(BMJ)的审稿人进行过评价,其目的是想明确高水平审稿人的特征,特别是在审稿花费时间和审回时间方面。他们对BMJ的420份稿件的审稿人进行了调查,2位编辑和稿件的责任作者对审稿质量进行独立评估。结果编辑和论文作者的评估都显示,经过流行病学或统计学培训是提供高质量评阅的审稿人的唯一显著性相关因素。在编辑的质量评估中,年轻是高质量评阅的独立预测因素。评审花费的时间与审稿质量的提高相关,但超过3小时则无更大意义。通常认为,正在从事研究工作的人员、拥有学术职位者、科研资助团体成员,应该会提供更高质量的审稿,但令人意外的是,这项研究并没有发现审稿质量与上述特征相关。这一结果对于编辑的意义是,要发现优秀的审稿人,只有不断试用新人,评估他们的表现,然后决定是否继续用他们。建议征集接受过流行病学和统计学训练的、年龄在40岁左右的审稿人。 那么年轻学者如何学习、提高审稿技能呢?最重要的是在实践中提高,就是通过审稿提高审稿水平。认真研读自己投稿得回的评审意见,以学习他人是如何审稿的。再就是比较同一稿件自己的审稿意见和其他审稿人的意见,发现新的视角,得到有益反馈。对于有条件的年轻学者,可以替自己的上级(例如老师、上级医师等)草拟审稿意见,由此可得到更为全面的训练和提高。 做好审稿工作需要什么?第一是能动性。对同行要有绝对的责任感,坚信通过同行评阅认定的高水准的文献,对科学进步是至关重要的。要珍惜这样的机会,审阅一篇好文章,即得到知识,又得到乐趣,不亚于参加一场研讨会。审稿的质量具有重要的感染力,可影响到作者的学术态度和学术行为。其次是要具备科学技能。审稿人面临的挑战是,要发现那些作者本人没有发现的东西。这是一项艰巨的任务,需要两项科学技能,一是对文献有全面掌握,即熟悉进展,又熟悉经典;二是掌握相关的科学知识,能够将科理和科学发现应用到新的科学研究中。当然,审稿人也会碰到自己不熟悉的知识点,这时可以向他人请教、学习,或者谢绝审稿,请编辑另找他人。第三要有乐于助人的态度。做好审稿工作需要相当大的智力投入,又不能很快得到审稿人所在学术机构或同行的认可。令作者满意的是文章被接受,而不是审稿质量。不满意的作者对审稿人会有一些负面看法:挑剔、草率、武断、教条、肤浅、傲慢、不公正、忌妒、自私自利。但是,一份中肯的、深入的、表达清楚的评审意见,能够提高稿件的科学性和易读性,能够增加作者的知识,提高作者从事和报道科学研究的能力。审稿时应该对作者及其工作充满敬意,要耐心、客观公正地阅读,对新观点新方法持开放态度,但又不能“放水”。提出的意见要有正当理由,观点表达清楚,让人看得懂;要提出明确的建议(但不一定明确是接受或拒绝)。最后,审稿当然需要时间。如果只读一遍,恐怕会错失重要的深入看法。在提出全面的、明确的观点之前,常常需要反复斟酌。不同稿件需要的时间可能不同,有的3个小时也不一定够。审稿给审稿人带来的好处,已如前述。但审稿肯定会与自己的工作、甚至生活发生冲突,看病、、科研、申请课题、休假等等,不一而足。

完整版一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板

完美格式整理版 一些英文审稿意见的模板 最近在审一篇英文稿,第一次做这个工作,还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿,我想不会枪毙它的,给他一个major revision后接收吧。呵呵 网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1、目标和结果不清晰。 It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. 2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。 In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 3、对于研究设计的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨: The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation. 5、对hypothesis的清晰界定: A hypothesis needs to be presented。 6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念: What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio? 7、对研究问题的定义: Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem

sci审稿意见回复范文

论文题目:Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B (一种病毒)所投杂志:Life Sciences 投稿结果:这次大修后又经过一次小修,被接受发表 编辑信内容(注:有删节): Dear Mr. XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below. If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures. A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission. … You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area. We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript. To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely, Joseph J. Bahl, PhD Editor Life Sciences , Format Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style. Reviewers' comments:

回复审稿人意见

Dear Professor xx: Thank you very much for your letter dated xxx xx xxxx, and the referees’reports. Based on your comment and request, we have made extensive modification on the original manuscript. Here, we attached revised manuscript in the formats of both PDF and MS word, for your approval. A document answering every question from the referees was also summarized and enclosed. A revised manuscript with the correction sections red marked was attached as the supplemental material and for easy check/editing purpose. Should you have any questions, please contact us without hesitate. 2. Dear reviewer: I am very grateful to your comments for the manuscript. According with your advice, we amended the relevant part in manuscript. Some of your questions were answered below. 1)

回复审稿意见,模板

回复审稿意见,模板 篇一:SCI 审稿意见回复范文 论文题目:Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B (一种病毒) 所投杂志:Life Sciences 投稿结果:这次大修后又经过一次小修,被接受发表 编辑信内容(注:有删节): Dear Mr. XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below. If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.

(完整word版)如何回复审稿人意见

如何回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见 Response to Editor and Reviewer 这是我的英文修改稿回复信 Dear Editor, RE: Manuscript ID We would like to thank XXX (name of Journal) for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We thank the reviewers for their careful read and thoughtful comments on previous draft. We have carefully taken their comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which has resulted in a paper that is clearer, more compelling, and broader. The following summarizes how we responded to reviewer comments. Below is our response to their comments. Thanks for all the help. Best wishes, Dr. XXX Corresponding Author 下面是如何对Reviewer的意见进行point by point回答: 一些习惯用语如下: Revision —authors’ response Reviewer #1:

(完整版)审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全

_______________________________________ The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed comments are as follows: 1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a well-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research. 2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area. 3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word "research". 4. On Section 1: · This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed. · Review on the directly relevant refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, time-frequency and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration. · A few sentences on the organization of the paper will be helpful. 5. On Section 2: · Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditional wavelet scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former. · Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and "2" is missed. · The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohen's book for details about the cross-terms. 6. On Sections 3 and 4: The description needs to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs. 7. On Section 5: · The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presented in the time-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the authors should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the phenomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods. · In fact, it is possible to interpret most of the phenomena in the time-frequency planes using

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Realtime Monitoring of Xylitol Fermentation by Micro-Raman Spectroscopy”(LANL-2014-0001). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The ma in corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: 1. Response to comment (Reviewer 1): (The proposed method was established with the lack of the process of the optimization. The curve was adopted to illustrate the changes of absorption peak in the process of fermentation, but the absorption peak couldn’t be confirmed the identical to the reference peak of xylitol. It needs more data to prove the reliability of the method) Response: C onsidering the Reviewer’s suggestion, the experiment of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is added to verify the reliability of the Raman data. Raman paek is a kind of inelastic scattering paek(not absorption peak), Raman spectrum of the standard xylitol and xylose solutions was uesd to selecte the most appropriate characteristic bands of xylitol and xylose for our experiment based on their comparative strength without overlap with other bands. 2. Response to comment(Reviewer 1): (The literature data(table 1) was used in

SCI审稿意见回复模板

创作编号:BG7531400019813488897SX 创作者:别如克* List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× ...... 逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用: We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that…… We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments. We have re-wr itten this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that…… Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have …… 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见: Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: ×××××× Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………” 2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript.

相关文档
最新文档