EASA Verification

EASA VerificationMilen DentchevANS Standardisation Section ManagerReceived dataAnswersJustifications / commentsEvidence / referencesANSP evidence should be available atNSA level and will only be requested if needed•/ 岩棉板岩棉管硅酸盐保温涂料硅酸铝 EoSM and JC verification data flowEASA verification methodologyThree methods of Safety KPI verification:1)Light verification through desktop audits based on availabledocumentation (e.g. written evidences provided to EASA,information published on the Internet or available in ECTL) + clarification on the phone (interviews)2)Thorough verification during Standardisation inspectionsusing Checklists and based on Findings and UNCs3)Trustful verification through desktop audits based onreports on closure of Corrective actions (further verifiedduring follow-up inspections)Light verificationSampling 3 to 5 answers from each questionnaireIf OK, then move to the next oneIf not, then thorough check Thorough verification for some NSAs randomlyUse external information as far as practicalPhone call / email if necessaryVerify the main ANSP for each State Sampling 3 to 5 answers from eachquestionnaireIf OK, then move to the next oneIf not, then thorough checkVerify at least one additional ANSP with the same method as above.Thorough verification for some ANSPs randomlyUse external information as far as practical Phone call / email to NSA if necessaryEASA thorough verificationStructure of ANS checklist CA/NSA:LEG/REGORGInitial OversightOngoing OversightPELRSCMORStructure of ANS checklist Undertakings: ANSP (ATS/CNS/AIS/MET/TOs)EASA thorough verificationStep 1 –mapping ANS checklists with EoSM questionsStep 2 –adding reference to ANS Checklists Step 3 –on site auditingStep 4 –If finding is raised, checkinganswers in EoSMEASA thorough verification1st step –mapping ANS checklist with EoSM questionsExamples of matching PQs with EoSM Q:MO1.1: Implement the EU safety legislative and regulatory framework, including where necessary, by aligning the national framework.Q1-3 There are national secondary regulations that address requirements stemming from primary legislation, international obligations and they are in line with the EU Regulatory Framework in relation to ATM/ANS.Question # 20 of LEG ChecklistHas the State developed and promulgated ANS regulations to enable the implementation of the provisions related to ICAO Annexes?EASA thorough verificationMO2.1: Establish controls which govern how service providers’safety management systems (SMS) will identify hazards and manage safety risksQ2.1 The competent authority has established oversight procedures which aim to monitor compliance with the SMS requirements by the service providers in particular the requirements for hazardsidentification and risk assessment and mitigation.Question # 100 of On-going Oversight Checklist Does the process address the implementation of safety objectives, safety requirements and other safety-related conditions identified in risk assessment and mitigation procedures required by safetyregulatory requirements applicable to air navigation services, ATFM and ASM?#ICAORef.EURef.Area QuestionsStatusExample of evidence(guidance to auditors)Implementation Comments CEAdding referenceto checklist2nd step –adding reference to ANSChecklistsNext step –on site auditIf answer is not satisfactory, then auditor will check theanswer in EoSM QuestionnaireInitiatingThe competent authority oversees the service provider’s risk assessment process on ad hoc basis.Planning/ InitialImplementation All of Initiating plus:A formal procedure for continuous oversight of the risk assessment processes of the serviceprovider has been prepared but it has not been approved neither implemented.Implementing All of Planning/ Initial Implementation plus:A formal procedure for continuous oversight of the risk assessment processes of the serviceprovider has been implemented. The service provider procedure for hazard identification andrisk assessment and mitigation has been approved by the competent authority.Managing & Measuring All of Implementing plus:The procedure for overseeing the service provider’s risk assessment processes issystematically applied.Continuous Improvement All of Managing & Measuring plus:The procedure for overseeing the service provider’s risk assessment processes is constantlyreviewing for continuous improvement and for introducing riskoversight approach.E A B C D Q2.1The competent authority has established oversight procedures which aim to monitor compliance with theSMS requirements by the service providers in particular the requirements for hazards identification and risk assessment and mitigation.Component 2 Safety risk managementElement 2.1 Safety requirements for the air navigation service provider’s SMSMO2.1: Establish controls which govern how service providers’ safety management systems (SMS) will identify hazards andmanage safety risksA B C DEIn this case correction would be requiredEASA trustful verificationCorrective ActionsStatus of their closureVerification process: outputThe overall computed scores as provided by the NSA will not change, but the process will verify them.Verification resultsLight / trustful verificationEASA may ask States for additional evidence to support the score providedEASA will inform PRB of the verification results when completedThorough verificationBased on evidence EASA asks the State tochange the computed scores and reflects it inthe EASA standardisation inspection report.EASA will inform PRB of the request to the State, after the FCC meeting.。