DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN A PATIENT
Difficult airway
E u r o p e a n S o c i e t yRefresher Course o f A n a e s t h e s i o l o g i s t sD IFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT AND REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA8 RC 2Pia DI BENEDETTOOrthopaedic Traumatological Centre,AnaesthesiologyRome,ItalySaturday May 31,2003Euroanaesthesia 2003 - GlasgowA standard definition of difficult airway is taken from ASA practice guideline as “…the clinical situationin which a conventionally trained anaesthesiologist experiences difficulty with face mask ventilation of the upper airway,difficulty with tracheal intubation or both”.Difficulty with airway management a major concern for anesthesiologists and failed intubation is the single most important cause of major anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. In order to provide an adequate airway protection and ventilation,anaesthesiologists have to focus their attention on patient history of documented difficulties with general anesthesia,intecurrent diseases or congenital syndromes that influence airway management (1) (table 1).T ABLE1Down Large tongue,small mouth make laryngoscopy difficult;small subglottic diameter possibleLaryngospasm frequentGoldenhar (oculoauriculo-Mandibular hypoplasia and cervical spine abnormalityvertebral anomalies make laryngoscopy difficultKlippel-Feil Neck rigidity because of cervical vertebral fusionPierre Robin Small mouth,large tongue,mandibular anomaly;awake intubation essential in neonateTreacher Collins (Mandibu-Laryngoscopy difficultlofacial dysostosisTurner High likelihood of difficult intubationSuccessful management of a difficult airway begins with recognizing the potential problem and all patients should be examined to anticipate a possible difficult airway. Physical examination allows evaluation of pathological conditions that could adversely affect ventilation.Four basic problems may occur alone or in combination•Difficult ventilation•Difficult intubation•Difficulty with patient cooperation or consent•Difficult tracheostomyThe most critical situation occurs after induction of general anaesthesia (GA) when spontaneous ventilation is abolished from administering a muscle relaxant. The life-threatening situation happens when the anesthesiologist “cannot intubate and cannot ventilate”.The predictive criteria for difficult airway management and difficult intubation are mainly morphometric such as mandibulo-hyoid,thyromental and sternomental distances (2) the flexion-extension mobility of the cervical vertebrae (3) (4) the mobility of the mandible associated with temporo- mandibular joint (5).Mallampati (6) suggested that the size of the base of the tongue is an important factor in determining the degree of difficulty of direct laryngoscopy. He developed a preoperative grading system which involves ability to visualize the faucial pillars,soft palate and base of uvula.The definition of difficult laryngoscopic tracheal intubation is based on the best laryngoscopic view and the number of laryngoscopy attempts. The view at laryngoscopy was graded in the following manner:grade 1 if part of the vocal cords is visible,grade 2 if only the arytenoids are visible,grade 3 if only the epiglottis is visible, and grade 4 if the epiglottis is not visible (6,7)808182。
困难气道评估的临床应用进展
2 气 道 外 观 评 估
某些疾病如 先 天 性 颅 颌 面 畸 形,创 伤、感 染、肿 瘤致口腔颌面部畸 形 或 缺 损,烧 伤 后 瘢 痕 粘 连 致 小 口 畸 形 、颏 胸 粘 连 ,手 术 或 放 疗 后 引 起 气 道 附 近 解 剖 结构异 常,颞 下 颌 关 节 强 直,肥 胖、颈 短、小 下 颌、高 喉头、巨舌等,都是发生困难气道的高危因素 。 [5]
传 统 的 评 估 通 常 为 体 格 检 查 的 外 观 指 标,如 张
口度 (interincisorgap,IIG)、甲 颏 距 离 (thyromental distance,TMD)、头 颈 活 动 度、颞 颌 关 节 活 动 度 等。 Chhina等 [8] 研 究 表 明:IIG、TMD、Mallampati分 级 (mallampatitest,MMT)、颈 围 (neckcircumference, NC)、咬 上 唇 试 验 (upperlipbitetest,ULBT)、颈 部 活 动度(neckmovement,NM)与 困 难 插 管 有 显 著 相 关 性。Prakash等 研 [9] 究 表 明 胸 颏 距 离 和 胸 颏 距 离 运 动度是预测困难气道有效指标。颈前部的脂肪量也 对预测困难气道 有 一 定 意 义 。 [10] 但 外 观 评 估 指 标 因不能准确反映气 道 内 部 异 常 解 剖 结 构,因 而 准 确 性不 高。 Mallampati分 级 与 喉 镜 暴 露 分 级 相 关 性 差,尽管这可 能 与 患 者 的 配 合 度 有 关 [11],但 侧 面 反 映常规的困难气道评估方法仍有其临床应用的局限 性。
AirwayManagement(气道管理)PPT课件
Glossocoma
Glossocoma is the most common reason of upper airway obstruction.
Symptoms and Signs ❖ In less severe cases: Snore ,the throat was dragged. ❖ In severe cases:Abnormal chest breathing,
❖ The trachea bifurcates into the right and left main stem bronchi at the carina. The right main stem bronchus is approximately 2.5 cm long with a takeoff angle of approximately 25°. The left main stem bronchus is approximately 5 cm long with a take-off angle of approximately 45°.
❖ No anesthetic is safe unless diligent efforts are devoted to maintaining an intact functional airway.
❖ The same principles of airway management outlined in this chapter are applicable to all clinical situations in which respiratory inadequacy may develop.
three depressions sign during inspiration. SPO2 decrease, Cyanosis Treatment jaw thrust, nasopharyngeal airway or oropharyngeal airway.
Airway Management, Ventilation, Oxygen Therapy:气道管理,通风,氧疗
Glottis
Kansas Airway Supplement Kansas BEMS EMS Educator Task Force
3
Respiratory Anatomy
Cricoid cartilage
Larynx (voice box). Bronchi Lungs – Visceral pleura (surface of lungs) – Parietal pleura (internal chest wall) – Interpleural space (potential space)
relax decreasing the size of the thoracic cavity.
– Diaphragm moves upward, ribs move downward and inward.
The positive pressure inside the chest
cavity causes air flow out of the lungs.
Kansas Airway Supplement Kansas BEMS EMS Educator Task Force 13
Opening the Airway
Head-tilt, chin lift maneuver – Adults vs.. Infants and Children
Jaw thrust maneuver
Kansas Airway Supplement Kansas BEMS EMS Educator Task Force 11
Infant and Child Considerations
困难肺隔离
• 其他:直接喉镜经后磨牙路径插管,清醒经鼻插 管再全身麻醉下经口DLT
• 对于已知困难气道或颈椎病患者,麻醉或清醒FOB 插管
• 无共识指出VL优于直接喉镜,相关临床研究和小 样本研究支持这一观点
Anaesthesia. 2012;67:411–415
Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1847–1852
Therefore, we conclude that R-DLTs present no increased risk of complications for left-sided thoracic surgery and should not be abandoned.
尽管DLT最常使用,支气管封堵器可使某些 气道解剖条件特殊的患者受益 需要熟悉下困难气道的因子 • Mallampati 及改良分级 • 解剖学特征描述,突出的上切牙、颈短、下颌
后缩 • 加权风险因子评分系统 • 多变量气道风险指数 • 源于逻辑回归的临床模型 • 敏感性高、特异性低、插管失败的阳性预测率
Anesthesiology.1998;88:346–350 Br JAnaesth. 2009;103(Suppl 1):i66–i75.
• 困难气道时,DLT置入与准确定位十分困难; 由于自身特性和达到的咽喉暴露程度,DLT 难于SLT。上牙列突出使套囊破损可能性大。
• 一项左侧DLT套囊破裂的研究(1169例)中, 支气管套囊1例,气管套囊11例。润滑牙垫, 润滑两个套囊,和/或插管送管使用视频喉 镜
Difficult intubation score Other outcomes Cormack and Lehane grade Number of intubation attempts. Airway trauma
喉罩的类型与型号选择新进展
喉罩的类型与型号选择新进展2019-10-18喉罩(Laryngeal Mask Airway,LMA)由英国⿇醉医⽣Archie Brain于1981年发明,是⼀种介于⽓管导管与⾯罩之间的通⽓⼯具,具有操作简便、放置成功率⾼、术后并发症少、对⽓道刺激⼩、⼼⾎管反应弱、可以保留⾃主呼吸维持⿇醉等优点,⽬前⼴泛⽤于国内外全⿇⼿术的⽓道管理、急症⽓道的处理和困难⽓道的插管[1],由于喉罩的种类甚多,型号多样,如何根据⼿术选⽤⼀款最适合患者的喉罩,故很有必要对其类型和型号进⾏⼀个全⾯的介绍。
⼀、喉罩的类型喉罩的类型较多,本⽂根据喉罩的发展历史,可以将喉罩分为第⼀代喉罩、第⼆代喉罩、第三代喉罩和⽆套囊喉罩。
1. 第⼀代喉罩即标准型喉罩。
临床上主要有LMA-Classic,LMA-Flexible,LMA-Unique和LMA-Ambu AuraOnce。
LMA-Classic主要⽤于择期⾏四肢、体表、短⼩的⼿术,可保留⾃主呼吸或短时间的机械通⽓,也可以⽤于紧急⽓道,但其具有密封性差、可调整性差、防误吸能⼒差等缺点。
⽬前有8种型号可供选择。
LMA-Flexible主要⽤于⽿⿐喉科、头颈外科和⼝腔科⼿术的⿇醉。
LMA-Flexible的通⽓管长度增加使其对⼿术野的影响⼩,通⽓管⼝径较细,减少⼝腔内⼿术空间的占⽤,钢丝加强型通⽓管不易成⾓和堵塞,但其具有通⽓阻⼒较⾼、根据通⽓管位置不易判断通⽓罩的位置、不适⽤于困难⽓道、防误吸能⼒差等缺点。
⽬前有6种型号可供选择。
LMA-Unique是⼀次性使⽤的普通喉罩,罩囊由PVC材料制成,主要⽤于急救复苏和有传染病的患者,其优缺点与LMA-Classic相同,共有7种型号可供选择。
LMA-Ambu AuraOnce是Ambu公司于2004年上市的⼀次性单管喉罩,它的通⽓管被预塑成⼀定⾓度以便于置⼊喉罩,通⽓道末端⽆栅栏。
Ambu AuraOnce喉罩⼀次置⼊成功率与Classic喉罩相当[2],置⼊时间短,⼝咽部漏⽓压⾼,可⽤于保留⾃主呼吸[3]和机械通⽓[4]的⿇醉。
Difficult Airway Management
4. WHERE do we want to do this? - not USUALLY a key issue in the PACU itself, however… - unless EMERGENT, avoid manipulating the questionable airway in a remote location (e.g. CT scanner, MRI, wards, angio) - inadequate equipment, inadequate backup personnel…. IN OTHER WORDS…
Difficult Airway Management
Airway Management
• First…
a few words of wisdom….
“Airway Management” DOES
NOT
(NECESSARILY)
INTUBATION
MEAN
And… as we’ll see later…there’s even an algorithm!
The Artificial Airway: WHAT are the Risks and Benefits?
• allows mechanical/positive-pressure ventilation and PEEP • allows suctioning of secretions/pulmonary toilet • allows fiberoptic bronchoscopy/lavage/biopsy
Catch all that???
产科麻醉困难气道处理_赵怡
使功能残气量进一步减小。 此外, 虽然孕妇的气道 阻力增加并不明显, 肺顺应性没有改变, 但是由于 吸气过程中的耗氧量增加 50% 。 总体来说, 这些因 素综合作用使得孕妇氧储备功能下降 , 麻醉过程中 一旦发生通气量不足或窒息, 将大大增加处理和抢 救的困难。 消化系统方面,孕期子宫体积增大产生的压迫 使得胃内压增高,且雌激素水平升高引起食管下段 事实上,一项研究发现约 80% 的孕妇在孕期会发生 胃食管返流
·3·
[34 ]
同发表了首个产科全麻困难气道和插管失败后处理 的麻醉管理指南
[25 ]
认为环状软骨按压力度应到达 44N
, 但这个压力
[33 , 35 ]
。下面将结合英国最新指南以及
通常会引起气道梗阻, 反而使插管变得困难 应,更易造成返流误吸
[36 ]
。
其它研究结果,阐述产科困难气道处理方面的进展 。 患者清醒时, 按压力度到达 20N 就会引起呕吐反 1. 困难气道的评估: 值得引起重视的是,即使 采用椎管内麻醉, 气道评估仍然很重要。 虽然实施 椎管内麻醉是避免困难气道的一种方式 , 但并不能 解决困难气道本身的问题, 一旦发生椎管内麻醉效 果不佳或是全脊麻等并发症, 仍需紧急实施全身麻 醉。在困难气道定义方面, 不同研究和指南给出的 各有不同,但在对比多个临床研究之后发现, 困难 气道的最低标准是 “给予单次计量的司可林后无法 完成气管插管 ”
作者单位: 430022 武汉,华中科技大学附属协和医院麻醉科 ( 赵怡、陈向东、姚尚龙) 美国中佛罗里达州立大学医学院 ( 黄建宏) mail : xiangdong_ chen@ yahoo. com 通讯作者: 陈向东,E-
·2·
Gynecology and Genetics, Mar 2016 , Vol. 6 , No. 1 妇产与遗传( 电子版) 2016 年 3 月第 6 卷第 1 期 Obstetrics[6 ]
困难气道管理研究进展
世界最新医学信息文摘 2018年 第18卷 第44期37投稿邮箱:sjzxyx88@·综述·困难气道管理研究进展李文俊(山西医科大学,山西 太原 030001)0 引言气道管理是麻醉医生在日常的各种麻醉中必备的一项关键的基本技能。
在进行麻醉工作时假如对气道的管理不当或是不及时,将会使患者发生低氧血症,甚至可能发生严重的窒息,进而引起全身各脏器的缺氧,以至于诱发患者室颤、心律失常或心跳骤停。
美国一项长达6年的麻醉相关死亡研究结果显示,由困难气管内插管引起者可达2.3%。
在困难气道的各种发生率中,困难喉镜显露为1%-18%,困难气管内插管为1%-4%,困难面罩通气为2.35%,其中面罩通气失败为0.15%[1]。
所以,熟练的掌握各种气道管理技术是每一位麻醉医生必备的技能。
本研究就近几年困难气道的一些新理念及管理技术进行综述。
1 困难气道的定义2012年ASA 更新的困难气道管理指南中指出,困难气道指经过常规训练的麻醉医生遇到面罩通气困难或者气管内插管困难,或二者兼具[2]。
中华医学会麻醉学分会于2008年将困难气道定义为具有五年以上临床麻醉经验的麻醉医生在面罩通气或气管内插管时遇到困难的一种临床情况。
困难面罩通气指有经验的麻醉医生在无他人帮助的情况下经过多次或超过一分钟的努力仍不能获得有效的面罩通气[3]。
困难喉镜显露指直接喉镜经过三次以上努力仍看不到声门的任何结构。
2 困难气道评估2.1 张口度。
张口度指最大张口时上下门齿间的距离。
成人正常值3.5-5.6 cm 之间,张口度小于3 cm 或检查者两横指时喉镜无法置入,导致困难喉镜显露。
2.2 改良Mallampati 分级。
患者取正坐位,检查者视线与张口处呈同一水平,嘱患者张口伸舌并用力至最大(不能发出声音),我们可以根据可见腭垂及咽喉部的其他结构的程度来判断分级。
Ⅰ级:可见软腭、咽腭弓、腭垂;Ⅱ级:可见软腭、咽腭弓、部分腭垂;Ⅲ级:仅见软腭、腭垂基底部;Ⅳ级:看不见软腭。
气道的评估和管理Airway-Evaluation-and-Management
1. Specific findings that may indicate a difficult airway include the following: a. Inability to open the mouth. b. Poor cervical spine mobility. c. Receding chin (micrognathia).
basilar skull fracture, or intracranial injury.
6. Previous surgery, radiation, or burns may produce scarring, contractures,
and limited tissue mobility.
visible. b. Class II. Faucial pillars and soft palate may be seen,
but the uvula is masked by the base of the tongue. c. Class III. Only soft palate is visible. Intubation is
not at risk for regurgitation of gastric contents.
2 .Mask placement.
with one hand
with two hands
predicted to be difficult. d. Class IV. Soft palate is not visible. Intubation is
predicted to be difficult.
美国空域管理英语作文范文
美国空域管理英语作文范文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成,希望大家下载以后,能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。
文档下载后可定制随意修改,请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,如想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!The US airspace management is a complex and crucialtask that requires constant monitoring and coordination. It involves various stakeholders, including air traffic controllers, pilots, airlines, and government agencies, all working together to ensure the safety and efficiency of air travel.Air traffic controllers play a vital role in managing the airspace. They are responsible for directing andguiding aircraft, ensuring that they maintain a safe distance from each other and follow designated flight paths. Their job requires quick thinking, good communicationskills, and the ability to make split-second decisions.Pilots also have a significant role in airspace management. They must adhere to air traffic control instructions and regulations to ensure the smooth flow ofair traffic. They communicate with air traffic controllers, report any issues or emergencies, and follow the prescribedroutes and altitudes.Airlines are responsible for planning and operatingtheir flights within the airspace. They must considerfactors such as weather conditions, air traffic congestion, and fuel efficiency. Airlines work closely with air traffic control to optimize their flight routes and schedules, minimizing delays and maximizing passenger comfort.Government agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), have the overall responsibility for managing the airspace. They develop and enforce regulations, oversee air traffic control operations, and ensure compliance with safety standards. These agencies also conduct research and development to improve airspace management technologies and procedures.The US airspace is divided into different sectors, each with its own air traffic control facilities. Thesefacilities are equipped with radar systems, communication networks, and advanced software to monitor and manage air traffic. They work together to ensure seamless coordinationand handover of aircraft as they pass through different sectors.Emergencies and unexpected events can pose challenges to airspace management. Air traffic controllers and pilots must be prepared to handle situations such as severe weather, equipment failures, or security threats. They follow established protocols and procedures to ensure the safety of aircraft and passengers.In conclusion, the US airspace management is a complex and dynamic process that involves various stakeholders working together to ensure safe and efficient air travel. Air traffic controllers, pilots, airlines, and government agencies all play crucial roles in managing the airspace and maintaining the highest standards of safety and efficiency.。
2022版人工气道指南解读
2022版人工气道指南解读English.2022 Airway Management Guidelines Interpretation.Introduction.The 2022 Airway Management Guidelines, published by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of airway emergencies. These guidelines are essential for healthcare providers involved in airway management, including anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and intensivists. This article provides a comprehensive解读 of the key updates and recommendations in the 2022 guidelines.Key Updates.The 2022 guidelines include several important updates, including:New Algorithm for Airway Management: The guidelines introduce a new algorithm for airway management that emphasizes the importance of early recognition of airway compromise and a systematic approach to airway management.Emphasis on Bag-Mask Ventilation: The guidelines emphasize the importance of bag-mask ventilation as thefirst-line intervention for respiratory distress.Recommendations for Supraglottic Airway Devices: The guidelines provide updated recommendations for the use of supraglottic airway devices, including indications, contraindications, and techniques for insertion and removal.Guidance on Difficult Airway Management: Theguidelines offer comprehensive guidance on the managementof difficult airways, including strategies for airway visualization, intubation, and ventilation.Recommendations.The 2022 guidelines provide specific recommendationsfor the management of airway emergencies, including:Early Recognition of Airway Compromise: Healthcare providers should assess patients for signs and symptoms of airway compromise early in the course of care.Bag-Mask Ventilation: Bag-mask ventilation should be initiated immediately in patients with respiratory distress.Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Supraglotticairway devices can be considered as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airwaysor when intubation is not possible.Intubation Techniques: The guidelines recommend theuse of video laryngoscopy, bougie-assisted intubation, and retrograde intubation for difficult airway management.Management of Difficult Airways: The guidelines emphasize the importance of team approach, proper equipment, and a systematic approach to the management of difficultairways.Conclusion.The 2022 Airway Management Guidelines provide essential guidance for healthcare providers involved in airway management emergencies. By following these evidence-based recommendations, healthcare providers can improve patient safety and outcomes in these critical situations.中文回答:2022 年气道管理指南解读。
1例新型冠状病毒肺炎危重型患者行体外膜氧合治疗中的气道管理
Vol.41No.3Mar.2021上海交通大学学报(医学版)JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE)Vol.41No.3Mar.2021JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE)1例新型冠状病毒肺炎危重型患者行体外膜氧合治疗中的气道管理朱丽1,李云1,奚慧琴2,王维俊1,陈飞1,陆詹婷1,夏凌1,占梦点1,张天瑶11.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院心血管外科,上海200127;2.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院护理部,上海200127[摘要]该文总结了1例新型冠状病毒肺炎危重型患者行体外膜氧合(extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ,ECMO )治疗后肺功能改善的护理经验。
该患者经口插管辅助通气、抗感染等对症支持治疗后,仍不能脱离呼吸机,并出现持续二氧化碳潴留,气体交换严重受损。
予气管切开术和ECMO 治疗;同时,采取吸痰护理、雾化吸入治疗、支气管冲洗和侧卧位通气联合体位引流等一系列改善肺功能的护理措施。
经过7d ECMO 治疗及护理,患者肺部功能改善,予以撤机。
[关键词]新型冠状病毒肺炎;体外膜氧合;气道管理;护理[DOI ]10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.03.022[中图分类号]R473[文献标志码]BAirway management in a critically ill patient with novel coronavirus pneumonia undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenationZHU Li 1,LI Yun 1,XI Hui -qin 2,WANG Wei -jun 1,CHEN Fei 1,LU Zhan -ting 1,XIA Ling 1,ZHAN Meng -dian 1,ZHANG Tian -yao 11.Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China;2.Department of Nursing,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China[Abstract ]This article summarizes the nursing experience in a critically ill patient with novel coronavirus pneumonia after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)treatment for lung function improvement.After oral intubation-assisted ventilation,anti-infection,and other symptomatic support treatments,the patient was still unable to breathe without the ventilator.For the sustained carbon dioxide retention and severe gas exchange impairment,he was treated with tracheotomy and ECMO.During the treatment,a series of nursing measures to improve lung function were adopted,such as sputum suction care,atomized inhalation therapy,bronchial irrigation,and lateral ventilation combined with postural drainage.After 7days of ECMO treatment and nursing,the patient 's lung function improved and then he was weaned from the machine.[Key words ]new coronavirus pneumonia;extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO);airway management;nursing新型冠状病毒肺炎(简称新冠肺炎)具有传染性强、人群普遍易感、病情变化快的特点[1]。
Airway_Management(气道管理)详解
Evaluation of Difficult Airway
Physical examination :
Specific findings that may indicate a difficult airway include the following: Inability to open the mouth(<1.5cm) Poor cervical spine mobility. thyromental distance is less than 6 cm Receding chin (micrognathia). Large tongue (macroglossia). Prominent incisors. Short muscular neck. Morbid obesity
Difficult Airway
Ding Lirong
Difficult Airway
Definition : The formal training anesthesiologist or doctors in emergency and ICU fail to ventilate patients by mask or intubate patients with conventional laryngoscopy . The ASA defines a difficult airway as failure to intubate with conventional laryngoscopy after three attempts and/or failure to intubate with conventional laryngoscopy for more than 10 min.
英语作文-涉外旅游事务管理行业:提升服务质量,提升国际竞争力
英语作文-涉外旅游事务管理行业:提升服务质量,提升国际竞争力In the dynamic field of international travel and tourism management, enhancing service quality is pivotal to boosting competitiveness on the global stage. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the expectations of travelers continue to evolve, demanding higher standards of service across all facets of their journey. This necessitates a comprehensive approach to improving service quality within the realm of foreign travel affairs management.Effective service quality enhancement begins with a thorough understanding of customer expectations. Travelers today seek more than mere accommodation and transportation; they crave personalized experiences that cater to their individual preferences and cultural sensitivities. To meet these demands, it is imperative for service providers to adopt a customer-centric approach. This entails not only anticipating the needs of travelers but also proactively addressing potential concerns to ensure a seamless experience.Moreover, embracing technological advancements is instrumental in elevating service standards. The integration of innovative solutions such as artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and mobile applications can streamline operations and enhance service delivery efficiency. For instance, AI-powered chatbots can provide real-time assistance, while data analytics can offer insights into customer preferences, enabling tailored recommendations and personalized services.Furthermore, investing in the continuous training and development of staff plays a crucial role in maintaining service excellence. Equipping employees with the necessary skills and knowledge empowers them to deliver superior customer service consistently. This includes cross-cultural communication training to bridge language barriers and cultural differences effectively, thereby fostering positive interactions with international clientele.In addition to operational improvements, collaboration within the industry is essential for driving collective growth and competitiveness. Establishing partnerships with local businesses, tour operators, and destination management organizations facilitates the exchange of best practices and promotes destination appeal. Such collaborative efforts not only enrich the travel experience but also contribute to sustainable tourism development, addressing environmental and socio-cultural impacts responsibly.Moreover, leveraging customer feedback as a cornerstone for improvement is indispensable. Establishing robust feedback mechanisms enables travelers to voice their opinions and experiences, providing valuable insights for service enhancement initiatives. By actively listening to customer feedback and implementing necessary adjustments, travel service providers demonstrate their commitment to continuous improvement and customer satisfaction.Ultimately, the pursuit of service quality excellence in foreign travel affairs management is not merely a competitive advantage but a strategic imperative. By aligning operational strategies with evolving customer expectations, harnessing technological innovations, nurturing talent, fostering industry collaboration, and prioritizing customer feedback, service providers can effectively elevate their international competitiveness. This comprehensive approach ensures that every traveler's journey is not only memorable but also reflective of the highest standards of service excellence. Thus, fortifying the position of the travel and tourism industry in the global marketplace.。
产科困难气道
J Anesth (2008) 22:38–48DOI 10.1007/s00540-007-0577-zReview articleManagement of the diffi cult and failed airway in obstetric anesthesiaG URINDER M. V ASDEV 1, B ARRY A. H ARRISON 2, M ARK T. K EEGAN 1, and C HRISTOPHER M. B URKLE 11 Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA 2Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USAthrough his meticulous approach, superb clinical skills, and his renown from anesthetizing Queen Victoria [1]. In the 1950s, obstetric anesthesiologists recognized the need for the use of a cuffed endotracheal tube, as a result of Mendelson’s documentation of the problems of the pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents [2]. Later in the twentieth century, the specialty of obstetric anesthesia recognized the morbidity and mortality asso-ciated with diffi cult and failed intubation in obstetrics [3]. This led to the development of a “Failed intubation drill” by Tunstall [4] and the improvement of local anes-thetic agents and techniques [5]. Although obstetric anesthesia is, at times, infl uenced by fashions and trends, safety remains constant as the most important and central aspect of obstetric anesthesia. The maternal mortality rate is regarded as a direct indicator of the health-care of a nation. Estimated global maternal mor-tality is more than 500 000 per year [6]. Nearly 99% of this mortality occurs in developing countries and 1% in developed ones. In the United States, an article by Hawkins et al. [7] estimated that for the 1988–1990 tri-ennium the maternal mortality was 1.7 per million live births and during the same period the England and Wales maternal mortality was also 1.7 per million mater-nities. The most recent data, from the report on Confi -dential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, demonstrated that there were seven cases of anesthetic-related maternal deaths during the 2000–2002 triennium and four of these were directly due to poor airway management [8,9].A 2003 analysis of the American Society of Anesthe-siologists (ASA) Closed Claims database revealed that 635 of the 5300 cases (12%) were associated with obstet-ric anesthesia care; 71% of these 635 cases were asso-ciated with cesarean section [10]. The most common claim was maternal death (22%), which was more fre-quently associated with general anesthesia than regional anesthesia. Critical events involving the respiratory system were the most common precipitants of injury inAbstract Diffi culty with airway management in obstetric patients occurs infrequently and failure to secure an airway is rare. A failed airway may result in severe physical and emotional morbidity and possibly death to the mother and baby. Additionally, the family, along with the medical and nursing staff, may face emotional and fi nancial trauma. With the increase in the number of cesarean sections performed under regional anes-thesia, the experience and training in performing endotracheal intubations in obstetric anesthesia has decreased. This article reviews the management of the diffi cult and failed airway in obstetric anesthesia. Underpinning this important topic is the difference between the nonpregnant and pregnant state. Obstetric anatomy and physiology, endotracheal intubation in the obstetric patient, and modifi cations to the diffi cult airway algorithms required for obstetric patients will be discussed. We emphasize that decisions regarding airway management must consider the urgency of delivery of the baby. Finally, the need for specifi c equipment in the obstetric diffi cult and failed airway is discussed. Worldwide maternal mortality refl ects the health of a nation. However, one could also claim that, par-ticularly in Western countries, maternal mortality may refl ect the health of the specialty of anesthesia.Key words Diffi cult airway · Failed airway · Obstetric anesthesiaIntroductionIn 1847 James Young Simpson (1811–1870) pioneered the concept of anesthesia and pain relief in childbirth. This idea, however, did not win immediate acceptance, owing to a major concern about “safety.” Within 10 years, John Snow (1813–1858) succeeded in lifting theo-retical restrictions on the use of obstetric anesthesiaAddress correspondence to : G.M. VasdevReceived: June 12, 2006 / Accepted: September 3, 2007these cases. Respiratory system problems included dif-fi cult intubation, aspiration, esophageal intubation, inadequate ventilation/oxygenation, bronchospasm, airway obstruction, inadequate fractional inspired oxygen (F i O2), seizures, and problems with equipment. Published incidences of diffi cult and failed obstetric airway are detailed in Table 1 [11–16]. The Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopy grade may be used to classify the diffi culty of intubation, and the grades are presented in Fig. 1. The contribution of airway diffi culties to maternal morbidity and mortality has heightened the awareness of the need for expert airway management in obstetrics.Anatomy and physiology of the obstetric airwayAn understanding of the anatomical and physiological changes in pregnancy aids the management of the problems associated with the obstetric diffi cult airway [17].The effects of estrogen and increased blood volume contribute to edema and friability of the upper airway mucosa. This change may cause nasal congestion and an increased risk of mucosal bleeding, especially with airway manipulation. Laryngeal edema can cause diffi -culty in passing the endotracheal tube. There have been a number of reports describing diffi culties with endotra-cheal intubation due to facial and laryngeal edema in patients with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Smaller-size endotracheal tubes should be used in obstetrics [18,19].As it enlarges, the gravid uterus displaces the dia-phragm cephalad and increases the abdominal circum-ference, while the hormonal changes induced by pregnancy increase the subcostal angle of the ribs. These factors result in the diaphragm and intercostal muscles contributing equally to the tidal volume. Anatomical changes lead to a 20% decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC), which can be decreased by another 25% when changing from the sitting to the supine posi-tion. This decrease is in the residual volume and the expiratory reserve volume. Pain and fatigue of labor can exacerbate the change in FRC. The decrease in FRC will accelerate the onset of oxygen desaturation during hypoventilation and apnea.There is no signifi cant alteration in total airway resistance during pregnancy. Chest wall compliance is decreased but lung compliance is unchanged. The net effect of these changes is a 50% increase in the oxygen cost of breathing. Ventilatory drive is increased during pregnancy, giving rise to hyperventilation. Progester-one is responsible for ventilatory stimulation but the specifi c mechanism is unknown [20]. Both oxygen con-sumption and carbon dioxide production are increased by 20%–40% at term.There is a delay in gastric emptying and a decrease in gastric pH during pregnancy. In addition, there is an increase in intragastric pressure associated with an incompetent gastro-esophageal sphincter. Heartburn occurs in 20% of pregnant women during their fi rst trimester, and in more than 70% of pregnant women during their third trimester [21]. A “full stomach” should always be a concern in this group of patients. While some of the changes associated with morbid obesity are similar to those seen in pregnancy, the two conditions are different and as such require differentTable 1.Incidence of diffi cult and failed obstetric airwayStudy Intubation measurement Obstetric incidenceGeneral incidenceCormack and Lehane [12]Diffi cult: laryngoscopic view, grade 3 1 : 2000Yeo et al. [16]Diffi cult: laryngoscopy, grade 3, 4 1 : 46 (2.1%) Gynecologic 1 : 56 (1.8%) 1 : 50 (2.0%) Lyons [13]Failed 1 : 300 (0.33%)Samsoon and Young [15]Failed 1 : 283 (0.35%) 1 : 2230 Rocke et al. [14]Failed 1 : 750 (0.13%)Benumof [11]Cannot ventilateCannot intubate0.001%–0.02%Fig. 1.Illustrates a diffi cult airway defi ned by the laryngeal view on laryngoscopy [15]. Reprinted with permissionsolutions. For example, because adipose tissue has a lower metabolic rate compared to other tissues the increase in oxygen consumption seen in obesity is pro-portionally less than the increase in weight. Oxygen consumption expressed per kilogram is less in the obese patient than in the parturient [22]. In contrast, the decreased FRC and increased oxygen consumption seen in the obstetric patient is more reminiscent of the neonate than of the obese patient.Endotracheal intubation in the obstetric patient IndicationsApart from endotracheal intubation for elective cesar-ean section under general anesthesia and postpartum procedures, e.g. tubal ligation under general anesthesia, all other intubations are performed as emergencies. During emergency endotracheal intubation, a full airway assessment may not be performed and the avail-ability, appropriateness, and function of induction drugs, monitors, and other equipment may not have been checked. Preexisting and pregnancy-related diag-noses, maternal hypovolemia, or coagulopathy may not be fully appreciated. Skilled help may not be readily available. These factors mean that establishing an airway in the emergency setting poses a higher risk than in an elective setting.General anesthesia for cesarean section, often in the setting of fetal distress, is the commonest indication for endotracheal intubation in the obstetric patient. However, a failed regional technique, high spinal or high epidural block, local anesthetic toxicity, cardiac arrest, and respiratory and neurological emergencies may each result in the need for endotracheal intubation. The pur-ported advantages of general anesthesia include a faster onset and less hemodynamic disturbance. However, regional techniques are advocated by some experts who believe that they are associated with better outcomes than general anesthesia, especially with respect to the baby [23]. A recent Cochrane systematic review of regional versus general anesthesia for cesarean section included elective and urgent cases. The techniques did not differ in the resultant umbilical arterial pH. Results from the analysis of umbilical venous pH favored the regional group, but the numbers were small and the values were above the cutoff for acidosis. Although the reviewers found that the mean Apgar scores at 1 and5 min favored the regional group, when Apgar scores of6 or less were analyzed there was no difference between the regional and general anesthetic groups [24]. Obstetric airway assessmentAn adequate airway assessment prior to all anesthesia and analgesia procedures on the labor fl oor is essential.A complete assessment can be performed in approxi-mately 1–2 min. Table 2 outlines a scheme for airway assessment, while Fig. 2 demonstrates the Mallampati classifi cation [25]. Some advocate that all patients on the labor fl oor should undergo an airway assessment examination on admission. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that the obstetric care team should “be alert” for the general anesthesia risk factors, and if present, specialist consul-tation should be obtained, and consideration be given for the placement of an epidural catheter in early labor [26]. In assessing the obstetric airway it is important to take into account maternal congenital abnormali-ties; for example, Noonan syndrome, Pierre Robin syn-drome, hereditary telengiectasis, and neurofi bromatosis. Important acquired maternal conditions include pre-eclampsia, morbid obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. Both congenital and acquired conditions may contrib-ute to the diffi cult obstetric airway.Table 2.Essentials of airway assessment1Facial edema2Obesity and short neck3Neck fl exion and extension-atlanto-occipital extension 4Mandibular space-thyromental distance5Mouth opening6Dentition—protruding maxillary incisors, missing teeth 7Oropharyngeal structures—Mallampati classification Fig. 2.Mallampati classifi cation [15]. Reprinted with permissionUnfortunately, only a few obstetric studies have eval-uated airway assessment prospectively. Rocke et al. [14] performed an airway assessment in 1500 parturients undergoing emergency and elective cesarean section under general anesthesia. This group discovered a strong correlation between oropharyngeal structures and the laryngoscopy view and diffi culty at intubation. Multi-variate analysis demonstrated that failure to visualize oropharyngeal structures, and the presence of a short neck, receding mandible, and protruding maxillary inci-sors were associated with a less favorable laryngoscopy view. It is important to note that one of the endpoints in this study was diffi cult intubation, as judged by a scoring system developed by the authors. In this study there were only two cases of failed intubation, giving an incidence of 1 : 750 or 0.13%. Yeo et al. [16] demon-strated that the Mallampati score was predictive of a diffi cult intubation. Their endpoint was the laryngeal view. However, in their study, intubation diffi culty was observed even in some patients with Mallampati grade 2 views.Preparation for intubationA prophylactic regimen to neutralize and minimize stomach acid is usually administered in an effort to decrease the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in pregnant women. The nonparticulate antacid sodium citrate (0.3 M) and the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine are administered to neutralize the stomach’s acidity and prevent further gastric acid pro-duction. Metoclopramide will facilitate gastric emptying and raise the gastro-esophageal sphincter tone [27–29]. Although these are “time-honored practices” the end-points used to measure the effi cacy are usually secondary. Because of the low incidence of aspiration pneumonitis, it is diffi cult to prove that these medica-tions decrease the incidence or improve the outcome of the complication.While it may seem obvious, it is vital that all essential monitoring, drugs, and equipment must be checked and ready prior to any regional or general anesthetic proce-dure in the obstetric operating room. Emergency airway adjuncts, such as oral and nasal airways, endotracheal tube stylets, gum elastic bougie, light wand, and a fi ber-optic intubating device should be readily available. Endotracheal intubationPaying close attention to all aspects of the performance of endotracheal intubation is especially important in obstetric anesthesia, and in some cases modifi cation of the technique may be required [17]. The patient needs to be correctly positioned. The neck needs to be fl exed at the cervico-thoracic junction and extended at the atlanto-occipital joint. Properly positioned pillows help to exaggerate the position by bringing the anatomi-cal axes into line while optimizing and improving success [30]. At least 3 min of inspiring 100% oxygen with an anesthesia closed-face mask is the ideal for the denitro-genation technique. When time is limited, four deep breaths (DB), i.e., vital-capacity breaths of 100% oxygen (4 DB/30 s) or 8 DB in 60 s (8 DB/60 s) can be used [31,32].General anesthesia is usually induced intravenously with thiopental, propofol, or ketamine. Cricoid pressure should be in position at the onset of induction and fully applied as the patient is induced. There may be diffi culty inserting the scope due to poor positioning of the patient, the size of the chest wall and breasts, and improperly positioned cricoid pressure. Surprisingly, there has been no study suggesting which laryngoscope blade is optimal. At present the recommendation is that the blade with which the operator is most familiar should be used. Following endotracheal intubation, con-fi rmation is necessary by quantitative and qualitative measurement of end-tidal CO2.Stress and the obstetric airwayPsychological stresses involved in the diffi cult airway in obstetrics have been largely ignored. Obstetrics is one of the few areas of medicine where there is a “true” emergency. There are two lives at risk, those of the mother and the baby. Not uncommonly, the anesthesi-ologist is an infrequent practitioner in the labor ward and is not completely comfortable with obstetric prac-tice or the pathophysiological changes of the mother and baby. Sometimes the practitioner can be one of the most junior of the anesthesia care team. The access to skilled help can be limited. There has also been a decrease in the number of cesarean sections performed under general anesthesia, leading to a decrease in expe-rience, both at the consultant and trainee level [33]. All these factors precipitate stresses that have the potential to infl uence the behavior of the obstetric anes-thesiologist at the most crucial time—during the man-agement of the airway. Although the impact of the psychological stress has been ignored, diffi cult airway algorithms and education regarding the cognitive and technical skills required for the diffi cult airway help to alleviate these stresses and prepare the anesthesiologist in managing the diffi cult obstetric airway.Diffi cult airway algorithms and failed intubation drills ASA diffi cult airway algorithmThe ASA diffi cult airway algorithm has standardized the approach to the diffi cult airway [34]. Such stand-ardization aims to minimize the morbidity and mortalityassociated with the diffi cult airway and aids in education and research. However, the ASA diffi cult airway algo-rithm needs to be adapted for obstetric patients.Signifi cant differences between the obstetric and ASA algorithms include:1. M ost obstetric cases are emergency rather than elective2. C onsiderations related to maternal, uterine, and fetal physiology3. I n obstetrics, both the mother and the fetus need to be assessed and considered4. S pontaneous breathing is preferred in the nonobstet-ric patient In the same manner as for the ASA diffi cult airway algorithm, initial assessments are required and subse-quent decisions are made based on these assessments. The initial assessments include evaluation of the mater-nal airway and fetal status. The clinician needs to decide whether the airway is diffi cult, as an expected diffi cult airway is easier to manage than an unexpected diffi cult airway. If one is faced with an “expected diffi -cult airway,” the next decision is whether to perform a regional technique versus an awake-intubation tech-nique, and if an awake-intubation is chosen, whether to perform a surgical technique versus a non-surgical technique.Cardiac arrestAs diffi cult or failed intubation may lead to cardiac arrest, the potential for maternal cardiac arrest must be assessed. Aspiration and lung injury will exacerbate the hypoxia of the diffi cult and failed airway, further increasing the potential for cardiac arrest. Protocols for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pregnancy advocate perimortem cesarean delivery within 5 min of cardiacarrest [35]. In the diffi cult or failed intubation, earliercesarean section may aid resuscitation.Obstetric diffi cult and failed airway algorithmsThere are a number of diffi cult and failed obstetric airway algorithms. Most are complicated, aiming to cover all contingencies [30,36,37]. The nature and quality of evidence for these algorithms is not stated and they are based mainly on a compilation of case reports. Importantly, there is no evidence of effective-ness. The development of a simpler algorithm may increase its ease of use and allow a determination of the algorithm’s effectiveness. The desire for the development of a simple algorithm has led to the intro-duction of “drills” to be used in the event of a failed-intubation in an obstetric patient. A 17-year review of a failed-intubation drill at St. James’s University Hospital in the United Kingdom illustrated some of the benefi ts of this approach [38]. Of 5802 cesarean sections between 1987 and 1994, there were 23 (0.4%) failures to intubate the trachea. The algorithm used was simple and specifi c for unexpected failed intubation. Most of the failures were for emergency situations. Eighteen patients were allowed to waken and regional techniques utilized. Manual ventilation was diffi cult in 7 patients and impossible in 2. Four patients had a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) inserted. Using the LMA in this situation, the lungs were diffi cult to ventilate in two episodes and impossible to oxygenate on one occasion.No anesthesia or obstetric anesthesia association or society has developed evidence-based guidelines for the obstetric diffi cult airway or failed obstetric intubation. Approaches to the expected and unexpected diffi cult airway are outlined in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. The guidelines are intended to promote discussion of airway management techniques.Expected difficult intubationRegional anesthesia Non surgicalFiberoptic - specialized laryngoscope - lighted stylet - LMA, ILMAAwake intubationNon fiberopticSurgicalFig. 3. Algorithm for expected diffi cultintubation. LMA , laryrigeal mask airway; ILMA , intabating LMAExpected diffi cult intubationOnce the assessment has determined that the airway is expected to be diffi cult, a decision must be made between the use of regional anesthesia for the patient or an awake intubation followed by general anesthesia. If awake intubation is decided upon, a surgical or non-surgical technique must be chosen. For the obstetric diffi cult airway an awake surgical airway is of limited utility. Most likely the technique would be of benefi t in a parturient who has suffered upper airway trauma or when an obvious pre-existing airway problem exists. There have been two case reports describing insertion of tracheotomy prior to delivery [39,40]. In one case the patient subsequently underwent cesarean section under regional anesthesia with the tracheotomy used as a backup. In the other case, the parturient underwent an elective tracheotomy due to her past medical history of diffi cult and failed intubation attempts.Regional anesthesia and the diffi cult obstetric airway Regional anesthesia is usually selected in the case of an airway that is expected to be diffi cult. In nonemergency obstetric situations, the choice of a regional technique is dependent on anesthesiologist and patient preference and characteristics. In emergency situations, when rapid attainment of surgical conditions is required, general anesthesia may be chosen. However, the need to swiftly attain surgical anesthesia is not a contraindication to a regional technique in the hands of an experienced anesthesiologist. The only absolute contraindications to regional anesthesia in obstetrics are patient refusal and coagulopathy. This is especially important in the case of an anticipated diffi cult airway, where a regional tech-nique may be advantageous. Although the literature suggests that outcomes are equivalent after regional or general anesthesia in emergency situations, there is no literature to support the optimal regional technique.Although “conventional wisdom” endorses a regional technique in the expected diffi cult airway, complications or failure of the regional technique may make it neces-sary to intubate the trachea. Thus, a backup plan is nec-essary, with the availability of appropriate equipment. Hawksworth and Purdie [41] described a patient with a failed combined spinal epidural technique who failed an endotracheal intubation, and was then woken up and underwent an awake fi beroptic intubation. This is one of many case reports illustrating the potential dif-fi culties of regional anesthesia. When deciding on the regional technique, it is important to select the technique that minimizes the potential for airway, cardiac, and respiratory emergencies for the individual parturient.Unexpected difficult intubationManual ventilationYes Urgent delivery LMA, CombitubeYesmask ventilation, LMAregionala i s e h t s e n a intubationpr o ceed wake o t surgery patientregional anesthesiaor awake intubationTTJV No wake patient up urgent delivery No NoYesawake Fig. 4. Algorithm for unexpected diffi cult intubation. TTJV , transtracheal jet venti-lation. Combitube (Kendall-Sheridan Catheter, Argyle, MA, USA)Awake intubation techniquesLocal anesthesia and the upper airwayLocal anesthesia plays an important role in the success of an awake intubation technique. It is necessary to provide adequate upper airway anesthesia before every awake intubation technique. The use of selective nerve blocks or direct application of local anesthetic agents will provide adequate anesthesia of the upper airway. The hormonal changes in pregnancy increase the sensi-tivity of peripheral nerves to local anesthetic agents [42]. In pregnancy, the upper airway membranes have increased vascularity, increasing the uptake and decreas-ing the duration of action of the local anesthetic. Thus, these two factors may balance out. However, it is impor-tant to be vigilant for local anesthetic toxicity. The local anesthetic agent prilocaine may induce a dose-related methemoglobinemia. The fetus may be more susceptible because of immature reductase enzyme pathways that predispose it to methemoglobinemia from oxidizing agents such as metabolites of prilocaine [43].Awake nonfi beroptic intubation techniquesThere are many techniques for awake nonfi beroptic intubation. These vary from basic to more modern tech-niques. Different-sized Macintosh and Miller laryngo-scope blades, as well as specialized laryngoscopes with fi beroptic light sources of different shapes can be used. Airway adjuncts, such as stylets, intubating bougies, and external manipulation of the larynx may all play a role in aiding intubation. The lighted stylet can also be used as a means to secure an “awake” airway without need for use of a fi beroptic bronchoscope. Although blind nasal intubation can be used, bleeding from the vascular membranes may further complicate the already diffi cult intubation.The LMA, intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), or the ventilating LMA can be used for awake airway management. The ILMA is probably the preferred choice, as a defi nitive cuffed airway can be readily intro-duced. There are case series and case reports describing the use of the ILMA and one case report describing the use of the LMA to facilitate awake endotracheal intuba-tion in obstetric patients with diffi cult airways [44–46]. There are no reports of the use of the ventilating LMA for awake airway management in obstetrics.Awake fi beroptic intubationFiberoptic scopes may be nonfl exible or fl exible. Of the nonfl exible scopes, only the Bullard has been reported to have been used in an awake obstetric patient with a diffi cult airway [47]. Flexible fi beroptic intubation tech-niques are popular for the expected diffi cult airway, especially in the parturient. Fiberoptic techniques require expensive equipment that may not be easily portable and may have steep training curves. The fi ber-optic devices should allow the delivery of supplemental oxygen, as hypoxia is a common complication during these procedures.There are multiple case reports describing the success of fi beroptic bronchoscope-guided intubation in both the expected and the unexpected diffi cult obstetric airway. These reports describe the use of the fi berscope in patients predicted to have a diffi cult airway based on preoperative evaluation, as well as in those patients in whom obvious defects were present, includ-ing congenital facial abnormality, goiter, and odontoid fracture [48–53]. Some anesthesiologists prefer awake fi beroptic intubation over regional anesthesia in the predicted diffi cult airway parturient [54]. They argue that the use of regional anesthesia in a patient with an expected diffi cult airway does not solve the airway problem, and complications from regional anesthesia can lead to an emergency diffi cult airway situation. However, the failure and complication rates of awake fi beroptic intubation in the parturient are unknown. Potential complications include hypoxia, trauma to the laryngeal structures, and bleeding from the vascular membranes, especially if the nasal route is chosen. Diffi culty in passing the endotracheal tube may be seen in pre-eclampsia, where patients may have laryngeal edema.Retrograde intubation techniqueA retrograde intubation technique can be utilized in the expected or unexpected diffi cult obstetric airway. When an awake fi beroptic intubation technique has failed, bleeding and edema may result, increasing the diffi culty of subsequent attempts. A retrograde technique may be useful in this scenario [55]. Once the guidewire has been passed through the cricothyroid membrane and has exited the mouth or nose, it can be threaded up the suction channel of the fi beroptic scope. The fi beroptic scope is then advanced along the guidewire under direct vision through to the trachea.Unexpected diffi cult intubationWith a nonobstetric unexpected diffi cult airway, demon-stration that mask ventilation is possible is performed before the administration of neuromuscular blockers and an attempt at intubation. In obstetric anesthesia, a rapid sequence induction is usually performed due to the aspiration risk; thus, it is unknown whether mask ventilation is successful before intubation attempts. When intubation is diffi cult, as demonstrated by the laryngeal view, or when there is failure to intubate, mask ventilation must be attempted to ensure oxygenation and ventilation. Because of the increased weight in。
肥胖患者困难喉镜显露的危险因素研究
肥胖患者困难喉镜显露的危险因素研究发布时间:2021-08-20T10:16:29.578Z 来源:《中国医学人文》(学术版)2021年7月7期作者:黄秋绮曾秋谷杨华俊陈汶[导读] 找出能精准预测出困难喉镜显露的危险因素,为临床麻醉工作提供一定的参考价值。
阳江市人民医院麻醉科 529500【摘要】目的:通过研究肥胖患者的气道评估因素,找出能精准预测出困难喉镜显露的危险因素。
方法:选择60例拟行气管插管全麻的肥胖患者,术前测量记录体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、改良Mallampati分级modified Mallampati classification,MMP)、上下切牙间距离(interincisor gap,IIG)、甲颏距离(thyromental distance,TMD)、身高-甲颏距离比(ratio of height to thyromental distance,RHTM)、颈长、颈围及颈前软组织厚度,以Cormack-Lehane(C-L)分级III-IV级评估为困难喉镜显露,并对各因素进行预测困难喉镜显露的Logistic回归分析。
结果:在诸多因素中,仅颈围在回归模型中具有统计学意义,对其进行预测困难喉镜显露的ROC曲线分析,AUC为0.97,由此确定的颈围的阳性标准值为>42.5cm,可得其预测困难喉镜显露的灵敏度(81.8%)、特异度(80.0%)(P <0.05)。
结论:颈围为困难喉镜显露的危险因素,具有较高的预测价值。
【关键词】困难喉镜显露;肥胖;危险因素[Abstract]Objective:By studying the airway assessment factors of obese patients,to find the risk factors that can accurately predict difficult laryngoscopy.Methods:60 patients who planned to undergo endotracheal intubation general anesthesia were enrolled.Preoperative measurements including body mass index(BMI),modified Mallampati classificat(MMP),distance between upper and lower incisors,distance between nail and chin,and ratio of height to thyromental distance were recorded.RHTM),neck length,neck circumference and the thickness of the neck soft tissue were measured and record.Cormack-Lehane(C-L)grade III-IV were evaluated as difficult laryngoscopy and Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict difficult laryngoscopy for each factor.Results:Among thses factors,only neck circumference had statistical significance in the regression model.The ROC curve analysis of predicting difficult laryngoscopy showed the AUC was 0.97.Thus,the standard for predicting difficult laryngoscopy of neck circumference was greater than 42.5cm.Meanwhile,the sensitivity and the specificity were 81.8% and 80.0% respectively (P<0.05).Conclusion:Neck circumference was a risk factor of difficult laryngoscopy and had high predictive value.[Key words] Difficult laryngoscopy;Obesity;risk factor在气道管理中,未预测到的困难气道是麻醉医师面临的严峻挑战。
人工气道气囊最佳压力水平的临床研究
人工气道气囊最佳压力水平的临床研究徐静娴【摘要】目的探讨人工气道气囊的最佳压力水平及气囊管理方法,为临床工作提供理论依据.方法选取2013年3月~2014年7月温州市中西医结合医院采用人工气道进行机械通气治疗的患者228例,测定不同气囊压力下气体的泄露和最小漏气技术下气囊的压力,确定气囊的最佳压力水平.结果随着气囊内的压力加大,气体泄露逐渐减少,气囊压力从10 cm H2O以每5 cm H2O增加,升高至40 cm H2O时,漏气例数从198例逐渐减少到18例.在最小漏气技术下,气囊压力值的差异比较大,当气囊压力值在5~10 cm H2O时,30例患者达到最小漏气的压力水平,每增加5 cm H2O,达到最小漏气压力水平的例数分别如下:10~15 cm H2O为37例、15~20 cm H2O为57例、10~25 cm H2O为24例、25~30 cm H2O为6例、30~35 cm H2O为18例、35~40 cm H2O为24例、40~45 cm H2O为12例、45~50 cm H2O为5例、50~55 cm H2O为6例、55~60 cm H2O为3例、60~65 cm H2O为3例和65~70 cm H2O为3例.结论气囊的压力值必须保持精准和狭小的范围来预防各种并发症.通过合理的选择插管型号、结合使用专用的气囊测仪器以及最小封闭压力技术充气,并加强气囊内压力的监测和调整等措施,可以更加完善人工气道患者气囊的管理,达到人工气道气囊最佳的充气量.【期刊名称】《中国医药导报》【年(卷),期】2015(012)005【总页数】4页(P161-164)【关键词】人工气道;气囊;最佳压力【作者】徐静娴【作者单位】浙江省温州市中西医结合医院ICU,浙江温州325000【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R614人工气道是治疗呼吸衰竭最常用的方法,合理的气道管理能避免各种机械通气相关并发症的发生[1-2]。
过高的气囊压力会导致气管内黏膜受压缺血、水肿、甚至糜烂,但气囊的压力过低,又会导致气道漏气,引发吸入性肺炎[3]。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN A PATIENT WITH TREACHER-COLLIN’S SYNDROME WITH INTUBATING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAYM. Gharebaghian*Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran IranAbstract-Treacher Collin’s syndrome (TCS) is a rare inherited condition characterized by bilateral and symmetric abnormalities of structures within the first and second bronchial arches. Patients with TCS present a serious problem to anesthetists maintaining their airway as upper airway obstruction and difficult tracheal intubation due to severe facial deformity. Because of retrognathia, airway management of these patients is often challenging. We report the case of a 25-yr-old patient with TCS undergoing microtia repair under general anesthesia twice. In the first time he could not be intubated via direct laryngoscopy and was intubated via blind nasal intubation. In the second time, he was intubated through an ILMA using endotracheal tube.Acta Medica Iranica, 44(4): 281-284; 2006© 2006 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.Key words:Treacher-Collin’s syndrome, difficult intubation, intubating laryngeal mask airwayINTRODUCTIONTreacher Collin’s syndrome (TCS) or mandibulofacial dysostosis, is a rare inherited condition characterized by bilateral and symmetric abnormalities of structures within the first and second bronchial arches. The mechanism of inheritance is autosomal dominant with variable expressivity. Because of this variability in expression, some affected individuals exhibit virtually no overt clinical manifestations. However, most patients with TCS present with the following classic facial features: down-sloping palpebral fissures, colobomata of the lower eyelid, scanty lower eyelashes, malar hypoplasia, and micro- or retrognathia (1).Received: 23 Dec. 2004, Revised: 7 July 2005, Accepted: 8 Aug. 2005* Corresponding Author:M. Gharebaghian, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranTel: +98 21 66438634Fax: +98 21 66438634E-mail: mahin40@Patients with TCS present a serious problem to anesthetists maintaining their airway as upper airway obstruction and difficult tracheal intubation due to severe facial deformity make such a task difficult (2, 3). Because of retrognathia, airway management of these patients is often challenging (2). Awake fiberoptic intubation, the well-accepted technique for difficult intubation, can be uncomfortable and stressful for the patient and requires expertise, and hence may not be suitable for emergency patients and those who refuse to be intubated awake (4). Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA, commercial name Fastrach) is a novel device for use in cases of difficult or failed intubation (5).We report the case of a 25-yr-old patient with TCS undergoing microtia repair twice.In the first time he could not be intubated via direct laryngoscopy and was intubated via blind nasal intubation. In the second time, he was intubated through an ILMA using endotracheal tube (ETT).Difficult airway management in TCs282 Acta Medica Iranica , Vol. 44, No. 4 (2006)CASE REPORTA 25-year-old male patient, known case of Treacher Collin’s syndrome, presented with bilateral microtia. He needed multiple stages of bilateral auriculoplasty. At the first time in April 2004, the patient was scheduled for procedures to correct microtia of the left side, i.e. framework insertion and local correction under general anesthesia. He had no history of pervious general anesthesia or difficult tracheal intubation. Protruding upper incisors (Fig. 1), prominent premaxillas, retrognathia, short thyromental (5 cm) and sternomental (12 cm) (Fig. 2) and interincisor distances (4 cm) and Mallampathi class of IV (6) and upper lip bite test (ULBT) class of III (7) were revealed on preoperative airway examination and difficult intubation was anticipated. A difficult intubation tray was made available in the operating room. The patient was connected to EKG, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximeter monitors. After premedication with iv fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg and midazolam 2 mg and preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced with thiopentone 5 mg/kg followed by succinylcholine 1 mg/kg. Face mask oxygen ventilation was easy. The plan was to pass an intratracheal tube (ID 8 mm) via direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade (size 3). On laryngoscopy the patient was classified as Grade 3 Cormack and Lehane view (8) and was not intubated after several attempts. Later, he was intubated via blind nasal way (ETT 7.5) and he labeled as difficult tracheal intubation but with easy face mask ventilation after induction of anesthesia.Fig. 1. Treacher Collin’s syndrome patient showing protruding upper incisors (front view) and retrognathia(lateral view).Fig. 3. Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway showing an ETTinserted through a metal stem of ILMA.After four months, in another session of right auriculoplasty and framework insertion reconstructive surgery under general anesthesia, because the patient was unwilling to undergo awake intubation, he was planned for intubation of trachea through the ILMA, after induction of anesthesia. He was premedicated and anesthetized as before and patency of the airway was attained. After achieving sufficient jaw relaxation, a size 4 ILMA (ILMA; LMA-Fastrach TM , Laryngeal Mask Company, Ltd., Henley on Thames, UK) (Fig. 3) passed with ease. An airtight seal was achieved by inflating the cuff with 30 mL air. The trachea was intubated with a size 7.5-mm internal diameter (ID) silicone-cuffed tracheal tube that was passed through the ILMA (Fig. 4). Correct placement of the tracheal tube was confirmed by auscultation of the chest. The ILMA was removed over the tube. The remainder of the anesthesia management was uneventful.Fig. 4. The trachea was intubated with a size 7.5 mm (ID)silicone-cuffed tracheal tube that was passed through a size 4 ILMA.M. GharebaghianActa Medica Iranica , Vol. 44, No. 4 (2006) 283DISCUSSIONIn the present case, we report a patient with previous history of difficult tracheal intubation but not difficult ventilation. During one of the operative sessions the anesthetist could strenuously intubate the trachea and in the second attempt he was easily intubated using ILMA. Difficult intubation, however uncommon it may be, remains the greatest challenge during the administration of anesthesia (4). TCS is a first-arch congenital defect which often manifests with severe facial deformity (9). Cleft palate is present in up to 35% of patients and an additional 30-40% have congenital palatopharyngeal incompetence. Abnormalities of the ear are very common and vary from minor malformations to severe microtia and hearing loss . (1). The disease offers challenges to the anesthetists during surgical procedures. The challenges are difficulty in maintaining airway as well as difficult tracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia (9). The alternatives routinely available to an anesthesiologist in a case of difficult intubation include awake fiberoptic intubation, blind nasal intubation, cricothyroidotomy, indirect laryngoscopy with the Bullard laryngoscope, Combitube (The Kendall Co Ltd, Basingstoke, England), blind oral intubation via the Augustine guide, and LMA. Cricothyroidotomy and combitube are emergencyprocedures for airway maintenance (4). The standardLMA can be used to enable ventilation of the lungsin patients in whom tracheal intubation has failed (4). It has been recognized as a useful adjunct duringdifficult intubation and appears in the AmericanSociety of anesthesiologists’ difficult airwayalgorithm, both as an emergency airway and theconduit of choice for the fiberoptic bronchoscope(10). But it does not prevent aspiration and thus isnot recommended for patients in whom the risk ofaspiration is high. Blind intubation can be achievedthrough the standard LMA, but it admits a cuffedtube with a maximum internal diameter of 6.0 mm(4). To improve the success of blind intubationthrough a laryngeal mask, Brain et al . constructedthe intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA),marketed under the name Fastrach. The newconstruction allows blind intubation with highlyflexible endotracheal tubes up to 8 mm ID with cuff(straight Woodbridge type), securing the airway around the intubation process and maintaining most of the characteristics of a standard laryngeal mask airway, including contraindications (11). Also its success rate improves from 30% to 97% compared with ILMA, which can be used as a conduit for a tracheal tube of up to 8.0-mm ID with a success rate of 82% to 99.3% (4).There are several studies reporting that the ILMA is a remarkable device for failed or difficult intubation (12) with no serious complications (4, 13, 14). Joo et al. accounts ILMA as a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and as a valuable alternative to awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway (5). In one report, a laryngeal mask airway was used successfully to intubate the trachea in Treacher Collin’s syndrome patient (2).Therefore, the ILMA might be helpful for endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult or failed intubation. In addition, it requires minimal mouth opening and does not require head and neck manipulations on insertion and allows ventilation to continue during attempts of intubation. The ILMA could easily be inserted, and subsequent insertion of the tracheal tube through it was accomplished without any difficulty.Acknowledgment Author wishes to thank Farkhondeh Foladfar, M.S. of nursing anesthesiology.REFERENCES 1. Muraika L, Heyman JS, Shevchenko Y. Fiberoptic tracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask airway in a child with Treacher Collins syndrome. Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov; 97(5):1298-1299. 2. Ebata T, Nishiki S, Masuda A, Amaha K. Anaesthesia for Treacher Collins syndrome using a laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Nov; 38(8):1043-1045. 3. Bucx MJ, Grolman W, Kruisinga FH, Lindeboom JA, Van Kempen AA. The prolonged use of the laryngeal mask airway in a neonate with airway obstruction and Treacher Collins syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Jul; 13(6):530-533.Difficult airway management in TCs284 Acta Medica Iranica , Vol. 44, No. 4 (2006)4. Saini S, Hooda S, Nandini S, Sekhri C. Difficult airway management in a maxillofacial and cervical abnormality with intubating laryngeal mask airway. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr; 62(4):510-513.5. Joo HS, Kapoor S, Rose DK, Naik VN. The intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways. Anesth Analg. 2001 May; 92(5):1342-1346.6. Khan ZH, Kashfi A, Ebrahimkhani E. A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: a prospective blinded study. Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb; 96(2):595-599.7. Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia. 1987 May; 42(5):487-490. 8. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov; 39(11):1105-1111. 9. Tsaur GR, Liaw WJ, Wong CS, Yu FK, Hwang JJ, Chen SG, Ho ST. [Treacher-Collin's syndrome and translaryngeal guided intubation--case report]. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1994 Sep; 32(3):223-228. Japanese.10. Wakeling HG, Ody A, Ball A. Large goitre causing difficult intubation and failure to intubate using the intubating laryngeal mask airway: lessons for next time. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Dec; 81(6):979-981.11. Langenstein H, Moller F. [Intubating laryngeal mask]. Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1998; 23(2):41-42. German.12. Moller F, Andres AH, Langenstein H. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) seems to be an ideal device for blind intubation in case of immobile spine. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Sep; 85(3):493-495.13. Thienthong S, Horatanarung D, Wongswadiwat M, Boonmak P, Chinachoti T, Simajareuk S. An experience with intubating laryngeal mask airway for difficult airway management: report on 38 cases. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Oct; 87(10):1234-1238.14. Langeron O, Semjen F, Bourgain JL, Marsac A, Cros AM. Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the fiberoptic intubation in anticipated difficult airway management. Anesthesiology. 2001 Jun; 94(6):968-972.。