航空公司《维修工作程序》03-11-03der修理项目的工程评估检查单

DER/DOA修理项目的工程评估检查单
DER/DOA Engineering Review Checklist
第一部分 / SECTION 1
Vendor: 厂家
Part name: 零件名称
Part number: 零件件号
AirlineP/N: 航空公司件号
Used on: 使用于Engine/Aircraft Type 发动机/飞机型号
ATA number: 章节号
Annual Usage: 年用量
______DER/DOA package from the Vendor. 厂家提供的DER/DOA资料
FAA approval Form 8110-3 FAA 8110-3表格EASA表格
Summary pages DER/DOA维修摘要
Repair procedure 修理方案
Inspection requirements 检查方式和标准
Repair Source Substantiation (if required) 维修方法的验证（如果需要）
Sample Part (if necessary) 样品（如果需要）
______Is this repair vendor approved by QA? Yes___ No___ 修理厂家是海航QA批准的吗？
______Does supplier have a warranty policy? Yes___ No___
供应商是否提供索赔条款？
Does supplier's warranty cover resultant damage caused by failure of the part? Yes___ No___
供应商的索赔条款是否包括由该零件造成的损伤？
______Does the repair provide DER/DOA have a history of supplying reliable parts?
Yes___ No___
该修理厂家是否有提供优质产品的记录？
______Is part marked to indicate DER/DOA repair:
零件是否标识DER/DOA修理
Name of symbol/trademark of repair source Yes___
No___
修理厂家的标记
_______I unDER/DOAstand my responsibility to protect any proprietary information supplied with this DER/DOA data.
我明白我有责任对厂商所提供的DER/DOA维修资料保密
Is any Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued against the OEM part? Yes___ No___
此OEM零件是否有颁发过AD？
If yes, DER/DOA repair cannot be accepted unless approved in AD or in AMOC.
如果有，DER/DOA修理不能接受除非在AD或AMOC中被批准
_______Part review consider DER/DOA actions: 对零件的评估考虑
∙ Does the OEM part have a failure problem? Yes___ No___
该OEM零件是否有失效问题？
∙ Does the OEM part have a durability problem? Yes___ No___
该OEM 零件是否有耐久性方面问题？
∙ Does the OEM part have an availability problem? Yes___ No___
该OEM零件是否有适用性问题？
∙ Does the OEM Manual provide a repair solution? Yes___ No___
OEM手册里是否有该零件的维修方法？
∙Will the repair change the part’s function? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA 修理是否会改变零件的功能？
∙Will the repair change the part’s weight or center of gravity? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA 修理是否会改变零件的重量或重心？
∙Will the repair change the part’s physical properties or vibratory response? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA 修理是否会改变零件的物力特性或振动反应？
∙Will the repair change the part’s running clearances beyond Manual limits? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA 修理是否会改变零件的配合间隙而超出手册要求？
∙Will the repair change the part’s expected durability? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA 修理是否会改变零件的预期耐久性？
If yes, explain _________________________________________________________________
如是，请解释
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_______Repair Evaluation: 修理评估
∙Is the DER/DOA repair equivalent to an OEM Manual repair? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA修理方式是否等同于OEM手册修理方式？
∙Does the Manual repair require RSS (Repair Source Substantiation)? Yes___ No___
是否手册的修理方式要求修理方案验证？
∙Does the DER/DOA repair require RSS (Repair Source Substantiation)? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA维修是否要求修理方案验证？
∙Has RSS approval been provided? Yes___ No___ 是否提供修理方案验证？
_______Repair Process Substantiation: 修理工艺验证
∙Is the DER/DOA repaired part material equal/better than original? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA维修的材料是否等同或优于OEM的原材料？
∙Is the DER/DOA repaired part strength equal/better than original? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA维修的零件的强度是否等同或优于OEM零件？
∙Is the DER/DOA repaired part coating equal/better than original? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA维修的零件的涂层是否等同或优于OEM零件？
∙Is the DER/DOA repaired part performance equal/better than original? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA维修的零件的性能是否等同或优于OEM零件？
_______Indicate what additional tests, if any, are desired. Supplier may have accomplished tests, inquire if necessary.
. Results of any additional testing must be provided to DER/DOA Coordinator to be filed with review package.
如有需要，指明所需额外测试。

询问厂家是否完成并要求厂商提供测试结果
∙ Metallurgical testing? 晶相测试∙ Test cell running? 试车台测试
∙ Bench performance test? 实验室性能测试∙ Service Evaluation? 使用评估
_______Additional Consider DER/DOA actions: 其它考虑
∙How long has the DER/DOA repair been in production? ____________ 该DER/DOA修理已被采用并进入生产有多久？
∙Time/cycles on high time part? ____________ 最长的使用时间和循环？
∙What operators use the DER/DOA repair?
_____________
有那些航空公司采用该DER/DOA维修？
∙Have service related problems been encountered with the repair? Yes___ No___
该DER/DOA维修的零件在运营中有无任何问题产生？
∙Have in-service parts completed one or more on-wing/repair cycles? Yes___ No___
该DER/DOA 修理的零件是否已运行过一个或一个以上的大修循环？
∙At completion of on-wing/repair cycle what is serviceability rate?
____________
一个大修循环后的该零件可以再维修使用的比例？
_______Is Engine Manual (Inspections & Repairs) adequate to
maintain DER/DOA repaired part? Yes___
No___
该DER/DOA维修后的零件OEM维修手册是否能够满足其未来的维修？
_______Is part serialized? 该零件是否有序号？ Yes___ No___ If yes, does repair supplier maintain quality records by serial number? Yes___ No___
如有，修理厂家的维修质量记录是否按序号存档？
_______Can condition of part be monitored by either ECM or currently specified periodic visual and/or borescope inspections? Yes___
No___
零件的状态是否能够按照ECM或现有的目视或孔探进行检查？
_______Significant Part? 关键性零件？ Yes___ No___
A significant part is defined as a part whose failure would result in an uncontained
event, inflight fire, inflight shutdown and/or repair costs of $250K or more.
关键零件的定义是，可能造成非包容性事故，
空中起火，空中停车或维修成本在25万美金以上的零件。

The following additional reviews are required if the part is determined to be a significant part.
如认为是重要零件则需进行以下的特殊评估
_______Engineer must schedule review of DER/DOA repair with managers of Engineering, Quality and Purchasing.
Additional reviews that might be required include:
工程技术人员要与工程部门经理，质量部门经理及航材部门经理共同评估DER/DOA修理，具体内容包括
_____ Review of subcontractor quality programs (under DER/DOA repair source)评估转包商的质保体系
_____ Vendor approval by Purchasing / Quality 供应商要得到采购及质量部门批准
_____ Include report to file of review decision and participants 将评估人员及结论存档
__________________________________________ __________________________________ Approved - Signature签名Date日期 Print name姓名（打印）
For significant parts only仅针对关键部件: Management review team approval 管
理层批准
__________________________________________ __________________________________ Approved - Signature签名Date日期Print name姓名（打印）
__________ All data and/or forms have been completed and filed.
所有的资料完成后需存档
第二部分 / SECTION 2
DER/DOA Repair Source DER/DOA修理厂家
Quality Assurance质量保证
______ Does the supplier have a current FAA approved quality system ? Yes___ No___
修理厂家家是否有FAA批准的质保系统？
______ Is supplier included in the CEA approved suppliers list?
Yes___ No___
修理厂家是否在东航批准的承修厂家名单上吗？
______ Has the supplier been audited by CEA QC? Yes___ No___ 修理厂家是否经东航QC检查？
Mail-in audit? Date _____________
文件检查
Facility audit? Date _____________
现场检查
______ Does supplier have industry quality ratings? Yes___ No___
修理厂家家是否有行业质量等级认可？
List: ISO, CASE, Etc.______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
______ Does the supplier use sub-contractors for the part repair / manufacture? Yes___ No___
修理厂家家是否有转包项目？
______ Are sub-contractors controlled by the Repair Station QA system? Yes___ No___
转包商是否受修理厂家QA系统控制？
______ Does Repair Station maintain quality tracing records by serial number?
Yes___ No___
修理厂家是否按序号进行质量跟踪存档？
If No, how is quality tracing recorded? _________________________
如不是，如何操作？
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
______ Is the OEM part subject to any Airworthiness Directive action? Yes___ No___
该零件是否出现过AD？
______ Does supplier have other airline customers for the part?
Yes___ No___
修理厂家家是否有其他客户使用过该零件？
If Yes list: _______________________________________________
请提供清单
________________________________________________________
______ Supplier’s experience with the repair. Any known operational problems?
Yes___ No__
根据修理厂家家的经验，该DER/DOA维修是否出现过问题？
Years produced by supplier __________________________________
年维修量
Approximate quantity repaired to date____ _____________________
至今的总修理量
Supplier in business since (year) ______________________________
修理厂家家的业务从何时开始
______ Has the part been determined by CEA to be a significant part? Yes___ No___
该零件是否被东航认为是关键零件？
______ Will the part require receiving inspection by CEA? Yes___ No___ 该零件是否需要东航做接受检查？
If Yes, determine inspection method:
如需，请提供检查方式
100% v.s. sampling or batch _____________________________
100%还是抽样调查
Inspection method: (NDT, dimensional, etc.) ________________
检查方式：（NDT，尺寸测量等）
Key features only? _____________________________________
针对的检查重点
_____________________________________________________
______ Can the DER/DOA repair part be mixed with OEM parts in inventory? Yes___ No___
DER/DOA 修理零件能否与OEM零件混装？
______ Is the part completely interchangeable with OEM parts? Yes___ No___ 该件是否能与OEM零件互换？
If No, state restrictions: _________________________________
如否，说明限制性
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
______ Can the part be inspected per the existing OEM Shop Manual? Yes___ No___ 该零件能否按现有的OEM手册标准进行检查？
______ Are supplementary ICA required and/or provided by the supplier? Yes___ No___ 是否需要增加检查方式来维持持续适航性，是否需要厂家提供
额外的检查方式保证持续适航性？
Shop level inspection ____________________________________
车间检查
On-wing bore scope Inspection _____________________________
在翼孔探检查
第三部分 / SECTION 3
DER/DOA Repair analysis DER/DOA修理分析
Cost benefit: 成本分析
Product name 零件名称
Part Number 件号
ATA identification (IPC) ATA章节号
OEM Part Price Repair Price
List price
目录价
Scrap rate
报废率
Units per engine
装机数量
Cost saving per engine
单台发动机成本节约
Engine shop visits per year
年发动机维修数量
Cost savings per year
年维修成本节约
Availability of part from OEM
OEM的零件适用性
Risk analysis: 风险分析
____ Major rotating Life Limited Part? Yes___ No___
是否是主要旋转时寿件？
____ Significant part regarding cost of possible repair failure? Yes___ No___ 如维修有问题是否会造成费用增加？
____ Significant part regarding safety in case of possible repair failure?
Yes___
No___
如维修有问题是否会造成飞行安全？
Likely to result in uncontained event? _________________
有可能造成非包容性事故？
Likely to result in inflight shutdown? _________________
有可能造成空中停车？
____ OEM part known to be causing operational problems? Yes___
No___
该OEM零件是否有已知的运行问题？
____ OEM part subject of Airworthiness Directive? Yes___
No___
该OEM零件是否出现过AD？
____Risk assessment (check one): High ____, Medium ____, Low ____, Very low____ 风险评估高中低很低。