基于语料库和 语料库驱动的研究方法

分歧与前景展望
The neo-Firthians: aim to build theory from scratch, completely free from pre-corpus theoretical premises; base theories exclusively on corpus data; often reject corpus annotation (as a precorpus theoretical commitment).
‘Corpus-as-theory’: corpus linguistics is a separate sub-field of linguistics and that there is no role in corpus linguistics for theories of language that do not emerge from the study of corpus data.
语料库研究方法的起源
语言研究方法 基于直觉：理性主义的方法 内省数据 基于实证：经验主义的方法 诱发数据 真实数据
基于语料库的研究方法
University College London Univ. of Lancaster, Univ. of Oslo, Univ. of Bergen The Survey of English Usage (1950’s) London-Lund Corpus (Svartvik 1990), LOB, FLOB, Frown, BNC, ICE B. Aarts, J. Aarts, Aijmer, Baker, Biber, Greenbaun, Johansson, Leech, Mair, Quirk, Svartvik Methodologists
分歧与前景展望
Corpus-based linguists approach corpus data with moderate corpus-external premises, with the aim of testing and improving such theories, and often use corpus annotation.
语料库驱动的研究方法
University of Birmingham (1970’s) Rooted in the work of J. R. Firth The COBUILD corpus, the Bank of English John Sinclair Carter, Hoey, Hunston, Krishnamurthy, Louw, Scott, Teubert, and Tognini-Bonelli ‘Theoretical status’
研究方法的差异：并非分歧
Hypothesis-testing
分歧与前景展望
互相交流； 互通思想； A major point of distinction between neoFirthian and methodologist traditions spact over time.
梁茂成
Many of the ideas in this presentation come from Hardie & McEnery (2010) , S. Th. Gries (2010) and some other papers in the bootcamp debate.
主要内容
语料库研究方法的起源 基于语料库的研究方法 语料库驱动的研究方法 两种方法对语言研究的贡献 分歧与前景展望
Even Halliday (2005), revered by many corpus-driven linguists, writes “a corpusdriven grammar is not one that is theoryfree”.
研究方法的差异：并非分歧
Trust the text, corpus-internal Trust the clean text Bottom-up Concordance, node, context Collocation, colligation, semantic preference, semantic prosody
分歧与前景展望
‘Corpus-as-methodology’: corpus methodology can be applied in different fields of language study, and within different theoretical frameworks.
主要内容主要内容?语料库研究方法的起源语料库研究方法的起源?基于语料库的研究方法基于语料库的研究方法?语料库驱动的研究方法语料库驱动的研究方法?两种方法对语言研究的贡献两种方法对语言研究的贡献?分歧与前景展望分歧与前景展望语料库研究方法的起源语料库研究方法的起源语言研究方法语言研究方法基于直觉
基于语料库和 语料库驱动的研究方法
两种方法对语言研究的贡献
Lexicography: Collins COBUILD dictionaries Centrality of meaning across context Centrality of collocation (Idiom Principle, Pattern Grammar) The linking of the study of discourse to the study of lexis
分歧与前景展望
Many corpus-driven studies start out from some notion of a word;
POS are not uncommon in so-called corpusdriven studies (Linear Unit Grammar at least starts out without POS);
分歧与前景展望
研究者需要做什么？ 研究中应该使用什么样的数据？ 这些数据用来做什么？ 研究方法上存在什么差异？
分歧与前景展望
The neo-Firthian priority: they believe the methodologist approach to corpus linguistics is a degeneration or a hijacking of neoFirthian corpus linguistics.
两种方法对语言研究的贡献
Grammar: Quirk et al. (1985) and Biber et al. (1999) Corpus annotation: Garside et al. (1997) Diachronic and synchronic work Language variation