剑桥雅思6test3大作文范文
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
求:雅思剑6 TEST3 WRITING TASK2高分范文
.。
剑6test3作文求打分求修改~雅思ielTS!剑6test3
1,第二段It is obvious that following .因为be动词后接形容词,不能接副词.2,第二段第二行they can live in other countries .因为情态动词(can,should等)都接动词原形.3,第二段第四行,thirdly不合适,它常和firstly,secondly一起,这里最
好用whats more 或者直接去掉.同一行:benefit不能放在is后,is接形容词,用benefitial,意思是有益的,有利的.同一行:contact with and assimilation 中with 去掉.第三段:immigration or tourists 中immigration改immigrants,因为后面引导词是who而且or连接并列的成分.同段最后,interesting on改为interests in.以上为个人意见,仅供参考,。
剑桥雅思6test2 小作文,高手来估分,谢谢
"per person per year" can be used in speaking but not academic writing.
You should not use "we" in academic writing as well.
"the chart describe us" is a translation of Chinese which has a grammar mistake. It should be "the chart tells us" but unfortunately, not in academic writing again. U may use "the chart shows that the trend of travelling more often than before。
What do u mean "As the car saw a dramatic growth"? I guess its another grammar mistake.
"In sum" should be "in conculsion" or "In summary".
The other reason is you didnt point out the trend that people prefer to go further. Thats why the usage of car, long distance bus and taxi increases but walking and bicycle drops.
I suggest that you should spend 2-3 mimutes to analyse and find out the relationship between the figures first. Then you can start writing.
Practicing more helps you to improve your writing skill. Good luck and fighting!
雅思《剑6》 test3 阅读38到40题有问题
严格地说,全错Lz 没有什么“虽然和答案不一样,但是我觉得我这样也是对的啊”这样的说辞不客气地说一句这种心态是一种侥幸的心态,觉得自己写的和书里给的答案沾上边了,意思都一样,只不过部分单词不同没错,你现在可以这么和我们
说,可是你考试的时候跟谁说去,考官才不管你想表达的意思是一样的,对就是对,错就是错,只要你写的和参考答案上所给的所有答案都不一样,你的答案就是错的IELTS阅读题是客观题,all keys are from the passage,所以不存在模棱两可的情
况我最后强调一遍你必须要改掉这种侥幸心理,严格按照答案上给的形式来,到
时候考试才不会因为拼写和格式这些低级错误犯错而扣冤枉分!ok,说完心态,
下面具体anylyse这三道题原则性的东西先交代下原则一:这种题目最好只能减
词(冠词--介词--修饰词)其他的一概不要变动38 先定位到答案是 the amount of glucoseno more than three words: amount of glucoseno more than two words: amount glucose ,发现说不通,继续减,变成答案glucose不要把 amount提到后
面去因为已经有介词of了 amount of 是一个整体要省一起省,要留一起留,题目
规定是no more than two words,所以只能省略 39 首先看到原文两句话是One possibility relates to the ATP-making machinerys emission of the free radicals,which are thought……age-related diseases as cancer by damaging cells.Reduced operation
of the machinery should limit their……正确的做题是定位到第一句话,第二句话是
干扰项,根本就是个坑等着你跳的,然后你就毫不犹豫的跳下去了……看题干 cells less damaged by disease because fewer_____ are emitted题干里cells less damaged
对应原文 by damaging cells disease 对应原文 such age-related diseases as cancer emitted(发出光射线)对应原文 emission of free radicals综上所述题干就是第一句话的同意转化只不过原文是which引导的一个被动语态的从句题干则是主动态
说的都是一个意思那么答案还找不到么?肯定是第一句的 free radicals你的答案
现在知道荒唐的地方了吧?你根本就是定位错了地方,找到第二句去了……第二句
正好有什么 operation of the machinery 后面也有一个damage来干扰你但是你读
读整句话,是题干的同意转化么?你句子都找错了地方,还敢说“虽然和答案不一样,但是我觉得我这样也是对的啊。
”
现在觉得你的振振有词有点底气不足了吧?再看第三题彻底让你印象深刻,记住
阅读的心态和方法!40 先看原文emphasizes preservation of the organism……再看
题干cells focus on___because……emphasizes与focus on明显同意转化,原文里emphasizes后紧跟的是 preservation of the organism以后的分析同38关于补充,这没有普遍的规律,最主要还是看题目要求只能具体问题具体分析但有个原则你
记住是没错的:言多必失,像这种no more than……的回答三个字不如回答两个字,回答两个字不如回答最核心的名词如果你不是百分百肯定,写最简单的核心名词
是最保险的。
ok,题目说完了最后说几句题外话,孩子,IELTS是有难度的,你
当随便大街上拉个人去考IELTS都能先迅速定位再梳理主谓宾最后分析出这些语
法确定是同意转化么?只有不断地练习才能在实战里总结出IELTS的技巧和规律
就像我说的这些原则,有些是培训班老师说过,有些没人跟我说过,是我剑桥系列做过N遍后自己总结出来的,并且屡试不爽。
所以要想在阅读上不犯错误,如鱼得水,每道题都能分析的头头是道,事先你要
付出的努力是平常人数倍的辛苦和汗水。
究竟怎么权衡,还是要自己多想想关于
LZ补充的补充……首先很高兴你能说我的回答是中肯的我就怕有人看我语气强烈
点批评多点就不高兴了但实际上我说的都是实情,使用棒喝有助于你们尽快警醒
自身的问题其次不要用您来称呼我我表示鸭梨很大我才21最后回答剑7-test2-14听力原文是……you can visit the fine 16th century palace here built for the king with its beautiful formal gardens答案给的是(formal)garden修饰词+核心名词
其中formal 是修饰词,可以省略,关于这个gardens,我确实纠结了一下,录音和scripts给的都是加了s的,答案没有s,我只能猜测这是印刷错误:答案少印了s,或者忘在s上面打上括号当然,这也可以算我的狡辩吧,如果这里面真有什么很特殊的含义,我也相信这只是小小的例外,绝大部分情况的答案是完美的印证了我所说的原则,并且我说的按照答案来规范书写格式,我继续保留意见,我相信照着做比天马行空的按自己想的来,要保险的多英国人是保守而刻板的,IELTS考试也是
一样。
剑桥雅思 3 Test3 小作文柱状图的范文急求
求雅思6分左右作文模版3篇,要速度
A chimpanzee is perhaps the animal most closely related to humans; but instead
of treating the animal with love and respect, we subject it to cruel and
inhumane scientific and medical experiments to further human development. What
a
cruel fate for the unfortunate chimpanzee. Or perhaps, in life as in the jungle
it is survival of the fittest, and so, as the most intelligent animal we are
just exercising our right to dominate and use other animals as we wish.
For many people the issue of using animals for science is black and
white; either very pro-animal rights, or very much in favour of using animals
since we are the highest level creature. On the one hand, some people say that subjecting animals to pain and torture is truly barbaric; higher-level animals
share with us feelings, thoughts and behaviors and so we should look after them
and respect them. They may also feel that if we are so unsure about the effects
of a drug for example then we should do further chemical testing before doing
Others, however, believe that
we must use animals for the benefit of our own species (humans); to test drugs, cosmetics and new developments in science which will provide a safer and better
lifestyle for us. Very few people are inherently cruel, but they still believe it is either them or us; it is better to test the drugs on a monkey rather than on a person.
Being cruel for the sake of being cruel and with no
tangible results to show for it is definitely stepping over a boundary of explicit, tangible and valuable then I feel that the research is justified.。