两种方法联合检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的应用价值

两种方法联合检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的应用价值
刘静;于静波;王玉红;赵汐渟;齐志丹;张明磊
【期刊名称】《检验医学与临床》
【年(卷),期】2015(12)20
【摘要】Objective To explore the application value of Treponema pallidum antibody detection by combining CLIA and TPPA .Methods Treponema pallidum antibodies in serum were detected by CLIA ,and a total of 425 posi‐tive samples and 90 negative samples were collected ;then the collected samples were confirmed by TPPA .According to the S/CO values ,the samples were divided into four groups and the coincidence rate of CLIA and TPPA in each group was analyzed .Results According to the CLIA results ,the samples were divided into 4 groups:group A
(S/CO<1 .20 ,n=90) ,group B (S/CO 1 .20-10 .00 ,n=139) ,group C
(S/CO>10 .00 -20 .88 ,n=124) ,group D (S/CO>20 .88 ,n=162) .The coincidence rates of CLIA and TPPA in group A ,B ,C ,and D were
100 .0% ,68 .3% , 92 .7% ,and 100 .0% ,respectively .The coincidence rate in group B was the lowest ,which was significantly different from the other three groups (P<0 .05) .Conclusion CLIA is a highly sensitive and automated method ,which is suitable for clinical routine screening of a large number of specimens .The positive results of CLIA should be confirmed by TPPA .%目的：探讨化学发光（CLIA）法与梅毒螺旋体抗体明胶颗粒凝集试验（TPPA）对梅毒螺旋体抗体检测的应用价值。

方法采用CLIA法对患
者血清进行梅毒螺旋体抗体检测，收集阳性血清标本425例，阴性血清标本90例，用T PPA进行确认；根据测定S／CO值将标本分为4组，统计各组CLIA法与T PPA的符合率。

结果根据CLIA法检测结果，将标本分为4组：A 组（S／CO＜1．20，n＝90）；B组（S／CO为1．20～10．00，n＝139）；C组（S／CO
＞10．00～20．88，n＝124）；D组（S／CO＞20．88，n＝162）。

A ～D组CLIA 法与 TPPA 的检测符合率分别为100．0％、68．3％、92．7％、100．0％，B组的检测符合率最低，与其他3组比较差异有统计学意义（ P＜0．05）。

结论CLIA法检测梅毒具有敏感性高，自动化程度高，适合大批量标本
常规筛查，CLIA法检测阳性结果需进一步做TP‐PA进行确证。

【总页数】2页(P3026-3027)
【作者】刘静;于静波;王玉红;赵汐渟;齐志丹;张明磊
【作者单位】沈阳军区总医院检验科 110016;沈阳军区总医院检验科 110016;沈
阳军区总医院检验科 110016;沈阳军区总医院检验科 110016;沈阳军区总医院检
验科 110016;沈阳军区总医院检验科 110016
【正文语种】中文
【相关文献】
1.两种方法联合检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的临床应用 [J], 罗米
2.酶联免疫吸附试验两种方法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体结果比较 [J], 张鹏;张薇娜;汤荣华;张英
3.两种方法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的比较 [J], 关盼香;张桂芹
4.探讨TRUST和TPPA法联合检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的临床价值 [J], 林明春;肖礼红;赵洪民;夏凤琼
5.两种方法检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体的对比 [J], 崔秀明;杨金新;程占庆
因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买。