智能电网概念模型

1 NIST 智能电网参考架构（概念）

2 NIST 智能电网参考架构（描述）

3 IEEE P2030电力角度

PS-IAP

(1)从

电力

系统

角度

看，用

户侧

领域

分为5

个实

体：

(2)用户领域实体和智能电网其他领域实体之间的接口：

(3)内部实体之间的接口

4 IEEE P2030通信角度

Figure 2. P2030 CT-IAP

(1)从通信角度看，用户侧领域(customer domain)分为5个实体：Smart Meter/Energy Services Interface s，Energy Services Interfaces/Customer Premises

Network，Distributed Energy Resources Network，Plug-in Electric Vehicle，Loads

(2)用户领域实体和智能电网其他领域实体之间的接口：

(3)用户领域实体之间的接口：

5 IEEE P2030信息角度

Figure 3. P2030 IT-IAP

(1)信息实体包括DER（local generation）和customer energy management and control

(2)用户领域实体和智能电网其他领域实体之间的接口：

(3)用户领域实体之间的接口：

6 欧洲CEN/CENELEC/ETSI JWG

欧洲在美国NIST参考架构基础上，把输电和配电合并，把用户分开industrial customer和home/building customer 2个部分分别描述。

7 IEC SG3 mapping chart

IEC SG3 mapping chart把智能电网分为13个子系统。

8 ITU-T 国际电信联盟

智能电网标准化的关键领域需要标准化的五个接口（5 domains+5 reference points）

Intelligent Grid Management Advance Metering

Infrastructure

Home Automation

(Appliances, Vehicles)

Smart Grid Services/Applications Security Control & Management

Information Communication Infrastructure

⏹RP 1—Interface between grid Domain and the Service Providers domains ⏹RP 2—For metering information exchange

⏹RP 3—Interface between operators/service providers and customers

⏹RP 4--services and applications to all actors

⏹RP 5—optional（可选）, between Smart metering and Customer domain

9 国家电网公司

1个体系、8个专业分支、26个技术领域、92个标准系列、若干具体标准。

标准体系的第一层是专业分支：包括综合与规划、智能发电、智能输电、智能变电、智能配电、智能用电、智能调度、通信信息等8个专业分支；标准体系的第二层是技术领域：划分的原则是关注智能电网各环节的主要发展方向以及我国智能电网研究与建设工作的重点，共包括26个技术领域；标准体系的第三层是标准系列：第三层中各标准系列构建的内在逻辑关系为“基础与综合”、“工程建设”（含设计、改造、验收、测试）、“运行与检修”、“设备与材料”，共包括92个标准系列；准体系的第四层是具体标准。

与智能电网用户接口PC118标准范围比较相关的主要有智能用电、及智能配电及通信信息专业。在智能电网技术标准体系中，智能用电专业分支重点关注五个关键技术领域：双向互动服务、用电信息采集、智能用能服务、电动汽车充放电和智能用电检测；智能配电专业分支重点关注三个关键技术领域：配电自动化、配电分布式电源并网和配电储能系统并网；通信信息专业重点关注七个关键技术领域：通信传输网、配电和用电侧通信网、业务网、通信支撑网、智能电网信息基础平台、智能电网信息应用、通信与信息安全。

10 总结分析

（1）NIST 智能电网架构和P2030之间的映射问题（摘自July 12, 2011，IEEE P2030 – SGAC Conceptual Architectural Harmonization Working Party，John Ruiz）

Mapping between P2030 and the Conceptual Architecture is difficult because they are slightly different viewpoints on the architecture. P2030 is more of a"solution“, not a conceptual architecture. P2030 focused more on the operation, not the actor and the use case.

●P2030 has developed a centralized solution (implementation), where Operations controls Transmission, Distribution, and AMI.

●P2030 Architecture is sometimes based upon physical location instead of logical domain.

There are some areas that are not covered in P2030 that are identified in the SGAC Conceptual Architecture.

●Weather related data is not mentioned in P2030.

●System Simulation is not identified in P2030.

Mapping between P2030 and the Conceptual Architecture identified areas that need review.

●P2030 explicitly talked about Meter Data Management in the Operations domain. Conceptual architecture does not explicitly identify Meter

Data Management.

●The conceptual architecture seems to be missing services on Bulk Storage. There were several references to bulk energy storage in P2030.

●P2030 uses the term Geographic Information Management, conceptual architecture uses Topology. We assume them to be the same thing, but

we may need to enhance it to Topology and Geographic Information in the conceptual model.

●P2030 identifies Customer Domain DER, the SGAC conceptual architecture does not address Customer DER.

●P2030 identifies Spares Management as a service, the SGAC conceptual architecture does not explicitly address this.

●Recommend moving the SGAC Conceptual Architecture business services for Communications to the Cross Cutting section. There are a few

redundant services in the list.

（2）IEC SG3 Mapping chat 对用户进行了划分，包括工业用户和居民/商业用户。每类用户对外的连接包括AMI网络和英特网。对应两种接口。（3）用户侧所有标准关注的对象（或者实体）基本是一致的。

（4）基于各种不同视角的智能电网总体架构分析，电网与用户的连接架构（或者智能电网用户接口架构）可在一定程度上达到统一。

（5）国家电网公司的标准体系分为8个专业：综合与规划、智能发电、智能输电、智能变电、智能配电、智能用电、智能调度、通信信息。8个专业主要是电网物理本身的技术领域，不涉及到市场和商业方面（如其他架构设计中考虑的市场、服务提供商等），这样做优势是不受各