Canonical Forms for Unitary Congruence and Congruence
《你是我的不二闺蜜—女性朋友间的话语解读》(第六章)翻译实践报告
A Report on the Translation of You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside theLanguage of Women’s Friendships(Chapter 6)ByLi QiuyuA Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Schoolof Sichuan International Studies UniversityIn Partial Fulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree ofMaster of Translation and InterpretingUnder the Supervision of Associate Professor Xia XindongMay, 2018《你是我的不二闺蜜——女性朋友间的话语解读》(第六章)翻译实践报告摘 要本翻译报告的原文选自 《你是我的不二闺蜜——女性朋友间的话语解读》一书中第六章。
该书由美国语言学教授黛博拉·坦嫩所著,探讨了过分亲密给友谊带来的潜在伤害。
本报告分为四章:第一章是介绍翻译报告的背景、目标、和结构。
第二章是介绍源文文本相关内容,包括介绍作者、源文内容以及对源文特征的分析。
根据彼得·纽马克的文本类型理论,源文属于信息型文本,翻译该类文本时,应该确保译文的可读性。
第三章主要是对翻译指导理论的选择和应用,同时本章还提到翻译过程中的相应策略。
本翻译报告以彼得·纽马克的交际翻译为理论基础,并结合自身翻译实践,探讨了其在翻译过程中的指导作用。
第四章是对翻译报告的总结,包括翻译过程中积累的经验教训及遗留的个别问题。
关键词: 翻译报告;信息型文本;交际翻译;翻译技巧A Report on the Translation of You’re the Only One I Can Tell:Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships(Chapter 6)AbstractThis is a report on the translation of Chapter 6 of You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships authored by Deborah Tannen, an American academic professor. The book is about general information of intimacy and its potential harm to friendships. This translation report is mainly classified into four chapters: Chapter 1 gives a brief introduction to project background, objectives and structure of the translation report. Chapter 2 consists of the author’s basic information, publishing facts and main ideas of the original text. Based on Peter Newmark’s text theory, the source text belongs to informative texts. The translation of such text focuses on the accuracy. Chapter 3 contains a careful description of guiding theory and its direction to this translation project. For the reason that the source text is categorized into informative text, the translator adopts Newmark’s “communicative translation” strategy as guidance. Chapter 4 concludes with the experience and lessons from the translation as well as the problems to be resolved.Key words: translation project report; informative text; communicative translation; translation skillsAcknowledgementsUpon the completion of the project report, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all the people who have helped me a lot in the two years.First of all, I would like to offer my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Ms. Xia Xindong, who is very amiable and patient. She has spent much time reading through each of my draft and pointed out mistakes in the paper patiently. With her enlightening instructions and careful modifications, I have finished my paper.I also would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the teachers who have taught me over the past two years. They helped me to know translation better. Their words and deeds also have enormous influences on the formation of my personality.Moreover, I am deeply indebted to my parents and my friends, who are very considerate and kindhearted. They have accompanied and encouraged me in the writing of the translation project.Last but not least, my indebtedness also goes to those who are willing to spend their time and energy in reading this paper.CONTENTS摘 要....................................................................................................................... i i Abstract . (iii)Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. i v Chapter 1 General Introduction (1)1.1Background of the Report (1)1.2Objectives of the Report (2)1.3Structure of the Report (2)Chapter 2 An Introduction to the Source Text (3)2.1About the Author (3)2.2 About the Source Text (4)2.2.1 Publishing Facts of the Source Text (4)2.2.2 Content of the Source Text (4)2.2.3 Linguistic Feature of the Source Text (5)Chapter 3 Theoretical Basis, Translation Difficulties and Solutions (6)3.1 Guiding Theory (6)3.1.1 Introduction to Communicative Translation (6)3.1.2 Application of Communicative Translation (7)3.2 Translation Difficulties (9)3.3 Translation Methods (11)3.3.1 Inversion (11)3.3.2 Conversion (12)3.3.3 Amplification (14)3.3.4 Sentence Division (15)Chapter 4 Conclusion (17)4.1 Lessons Learned from the Translation Practice (17)4.2 Problems to be Resolved (18)References (19)Appendix I Source Text (20)Appendix II 中文译文 (36)Chapter 1 General IntroductionThis chapter makes an introduction to the translation project, involving project background, objectives and structure of the report.1.1Background of the ReportAccording to a survey, most college students nowadays belong to the only child group. Those spoiled children tend to be self-centered and always fail to take others’ feelings into account. When they go to college, they find it hard to get on well with their roommates. In recent years, the media reported several tragic cases which resulted from disharmonious relationship among roommates. Since there are tragic accidents happening in dormitory, people begin to pay more attention to college students’ mental health. As for a generation of the only child, many college students have problems with people and some don’t even know how to interact with others. It is necessary for college students to gain some knowledge of interpersonal communication to deal with tricky things in their life. Thus, based on the translation of Chapter 6 of the book You’re the Only One I Can Tell, the significance of the project is mainly embodied in the following two aspects: firstly, it can make college students realize the subtlety of interpersonal communication and call their attention to behave themselves. Besides, by translating the book, it is hoped to instruct the translation practice and provide guidance for others in the future.This book is not like those theory-oriented ones. It offers many real-life examples which is easy to understand and more instructive. From casual chatting to intimate confiding, from talking about problems to telling what you had for dinner, Tannen uncovers the patterns of communication and miscommunication that affect friendships at different points in our lives. She shows how even the best of friends—with the best intentions—can say wrong things, and how words can repair the damage done by words. Through Tannen’s insight, humor, and ability to present pitch-perfect real-life dialogues, readers will see themselves and their friendships on every page. So, to translate this book will provide references for college students to better understand one another.1.2Objectives of the ReportThe translation report is based on the Chapter 6 named “Too Close for Comfort” which deconstructs the ways in which women friends talk and how those ways can bring friends closer or pull them apart. The project helps readers grasp the notion of “cutoffs” and “poaching” in friendship which are rarely realized by them and makes them understand friendship better. The translation of this text also aims to explain the multiple roles of friendships and to benefit college students who want to gain some knowledge of interpersonal communication from real-life examples. In addition, it is hoped that the translation of the text can help the author to understand Peter Newmark’s communicative translation better and make a summary of two-year studies as a postgraduate.1.3Structure of the ReportThe translation report includes the following chapters. Chapter 1 makes an introduction to the translation project, which involves project background, objectives and structure of the report. Chapter 2 gives a brief introduction to the author and an analysis of the source text, containing publishing information and main contents of the original. Chapter 3 offers a detailed description of “communicative translation” theory, followed by its guidance to this translation project. At the same time, this chapter also points out the difficulties encountered in the translation and the application of translation methods. Chapter 4 is the conclusion, which summarizes the lessons learnt from the translating process and the problems left to be solved.Chapter 2 An Introduction to the Source TextThis chapter is about the author and the analysis of the source text, containing publishing information and main contents of the original.2.1 About the AuthorYou’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships is written by Deborah Tannen, who is an American academic and professor of linguistics at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C..Deborah Tannen focuses on the expression of interpersonal relationships especially in the conversational interaction. Tannen has researched conversational interaction and style differences at various levels and related to different situations, involving differences in conversation styles in connection with gender and cultural background. Particularly, Deborah Tannen has done many gender-linked researches and writing which put stress on miscommunications between men and women.Tannen also wrote some general-audience books about interpersonal communication and public discourse. She became a household name in the United States after the book You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, which was published in 1990. It has been on the New York Times Best Seller list for almost four years (eight months at No.1) and it was rendered into 30 other languages. She has also written several other books, such as:That's Not What I Meant!: How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Relationships(published by William Morrow Paperbacks in 2011);The Argument Culture: Stopping America's War of Words (published by Ballantine Books in 1999); andI Only Say This Because I Love You: Talking to Your Parents, Partner, Sibs, and Kids When You're All Adults(published by Ballantine Books in 2002).2.2 About the Source Text2.2.1 Publishing Facts of the Source TextIn 2017, You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships was first published in the United States by Ballantine Books and in Great Britain by Virago Press. The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post highly recommended the book. ISBN:9781101885802. Up to now, there is no Chinese version published.2.2.2 Content of the Source TextFriendship is to us what sunshine to trees. Friendship acts as multiple roles in our lives. Sometimes, friends instruct and encourage us like a mentor or a therapist; sometimes, friends take good care of us like a mother or a big sister. Now that friendship is so important, we should treasure it carefully. The goal of the book You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships is to help readers understand women’s friendships—how they work or fail, how they help and hurt, and how we can make them better.This book also aims to figure out what it means to be a friend and how we connect to other people. Apart from some occasional examples from novels and short stories, all the examples which the author gave are based on real ones.Though Deborah Tannen focuses on women’s friendships, but some of what she writes might also be true of friendships between women and men, and among men.In the chapter 6 “Too Close for Comfort”, Deborah Tannen explains friendship is like a double-edged sword which is “for your growth” but also “ for your pruning”. Especially when a friendship gets too close, it is more likely to be for your pruning. The translation project selects chapter 6 (10000 words) as the source text which gives a detailed introduction to “cutoffs” and “poaching” and makes some analyses.2.2.3 Linguistic Feature of the Source TextPeter Newmark is a famous British translation theorist, who classified texts into three categories: expressive text, informative text and vocative text on the basis of Karl Buhler’s theory of language and Katharina Reiss’s typology.According to Newmark, informative texts include textbooks, memos, reports, papers and so on, and put stress on the external situation, the topic and the reality beyond the language(Newmark, 1988, p.40), therefore, this type of text is to convey the information and mainly focuses on the content or topic. The target translation of this type calls for receptors’ response and understanding. Thus, Newmark advised adopting the approach of communicative translation, attempting to exert an effect on its receptors as close as possible to that obtained on the readers of the source text and stress the truth and accuracy during the translating process. In terms of this aspect, Newmark’s opinion is similar to Eugene Nida’s dynamic equivalence, that’s, the readers of a translated text should be able to comprehend it to the point that they can conceive of how the original readers of the text must have understood and appreciate it.(Nida,1982, p. 118)In the book You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships, Tannen applies case-study method by interviewing more than 80 women from all over the word ranging in age from 9-97 to explore how patterns of communication and miscommunication have influences on friendships; and the language of the source text is characterized by concision and dialogues. As is known, the focus of an informative text is to deliver plain facts or referential content and topic. The source text can be categorized into the informative text. “The target text (TT) of an informative text should transmit the full referential or conceptual content of the source text (ST). The translation should be in plain prose, without redundancy and with the use of explication when required.”(Munday, 2001, p.73) Thus, in the translation of You’re the Only One I Can Tell: Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships, the translator should pay attention to the linguistic differences and apply various translation skills so that the version is more understandable and readable for Chinese readers.Chapter 3 Theoretical Basis, Translation Difficulties and SolutionsThis chapter contains a careful description of guiding theory and its direction to this translation project. For the reason that the source text is categorized into informative text, the translator adopts Newmark’s “communicative translation” strategy as guidance.3.1 Guiding TheoryAccording to Newmark’s text typology, the source text is under the category of informative text. The focus of an informative text is to deliver plain facts, logical or referential content and topic. According to Katherina Reiss, the ideal translation would be one “in which the aim in the target language is equivalence as regards the conceptual content, linguistic form and communicative function of a source language text.”(Reiss, 1987, p.112) Hence, the translator selects the communicative translation theory of Peter Newmark as the guiding theory of the thesis, where the translator attempts to exert the same effect on the target text readers as the original produced on the source text readers to guarantee the target text readers can receive the same meaning as readers of the original language.3.1.1 Introduction to Communicative TranslationPeter Newmark is an English professor of translation at the University of Surrey. He is renowned for Approaches to Translation, About Translation and A Textbook of Translation and so on. He put forward two translation models: semantic translation and communicative translation. In A Textbook of Translation, he noted “while semantic translation is used for expressive texts, communicative translation is for informative and vocative texts” (Newmark, 1988, p.47) According to Newmark, “communicative translation attempts to produce on its readers an effect as close as possible to that obtained on the readers of the original.”(马会娟&苗菊, 2009, p. 33)“Communicative translation addresses itself solely to the second reader, whodoes not anticipate difficulties or obscurities, and would expect a generous transfer of foreign elements into his own culture as well as his language where necessary.”(马会娟&苗菊, 2009, p. 33)Normally, by making and adapting the thought and cultural content of the original,the translator makes the version more easier, smoother, clearer and more idiomatic to read. In this case, the translator has a high degree of freedom to explain the source text, adjust the style, eliminate the ambiguity and even correct the mistake of the original author.3.1.2 Application of Communicative TranslationThis project takes the communicative translation as the guiding theory. According to Newmark ,“communicative translation attempts to render the exact contextual meaning of the original in such a way that both content and language are readily acceptable and comprehensible to the readership.”(Newmark, 2001, p.47)Example 1ST: But friends can also be for your pruning.TT:但是朋友也会使你退步。
应用地球化学元素丰度数据手册-原版
应用地球化学元素丰度数据手册迟清华鄢明才编著地质出版社·北京·1内容提要本书汇编了国内外不同研究者提出的火成岩、沉积岩、变质岩、土壤、水系沉积物、泛滥平原沉积物、浅海沉积物和大陆地壳的化学组成与元素丰度,同时列出了勘查地球化学和环境地球化学研究中常用的中国主要地球化学标准物质的标准值,所提供内容均为地球化学工作者所必须了解的各种重要地质介质的地球化学基础数据。
本书供从事地球化学、岩石学、勘查地球化学、生态环境与农业地球化学、地质样品分析测试、矿产勘查、基础地质等领域的研究者阅读,也可供地球科学其它领域的研究者使用。
图书在版编目(CIP)数据应用地球化学元素丰度数据手册/迟清华,鄢明才编著. -北京:地质出版社,2007.12ISBN 978-7-116-05536-0Ⅰ. 应… Ⅱ. ①迟…②鄢…Ⅲ. 地球化学丰度-化学元素-数据-手册Ⅳ. P595-62中国版本图书馆CIP数据核字(2007)第185917号责任编辑:王永奉陈军中责任校对:李玫出版发行:地质出版社社址邮编:北京市海淀区学院路31号,100083电话:(010)82324508(邮购部)网址:电子邮箱:zbs@传真:(010)82310759印刷:北京地大彩印厂开本:889mm×1194mm 1/16印张:10.25字数:260千字印数:1-3000册版次:2007年12月北京第1版•第1次印刷定价:28.00元书号:ISBN 978-7-116-05536-0(如对本书有建议或意见,敬请致电本社;如本社有印装问题,本社负责调换)2关于应用地球化学元素丰度数据手册(代序)地球化学元素丰度数据,即地壳五个圈内多种元素在各种介质、各种尺度内含量的统计数据。
它是应用地球化学研究解决资源与环境问题上重要的资料。
将这些数据资料汇编在一起将使研究人员节省不少查找文献的劳动与时间。
这本小册子就是按照这样的想法编汇的。
Ergodic solenoidal homology
arXiv:math/0702501v1 [math.DG] 16 Feb 2007
˜ ´ VICENTE MUNOZ AND RICARDO PEREZ MARCO Abstract. We define generalized currents associated with immersions of abstract solenoids with a transversal measure. We realize geometrically the full real homology of a compact manifold with these generalized currents, and more precisely with immersions of minimal uniquely ergodic solenoids. This makes precise and geometric De Rham’s realization of the real homology by only using a restricted geometric subclass of currents. These generalized currents do extend Ruelle-Sullivan and Schwartzman currents. We extend Schwartzman theory beyond dimension 1 and provide a unified treatment of Ruelle-Sullivan and Schwartzman theories via Birkhoff’s ergodic theorem for the class of immersions of controlled solenoids. We develop some intersection theory of these new generalized currents that explains why the realization theorem cannot be achieved only with Ruelle-Sullivan currents.
Congruences of a square matrix and its transpose
1
1
Introduction
We work over a field F of characteristic not two with involution a → a ¯, that is, a bijection (perhaps the identity) on F such that a+b=a ¯+¯ b, ab = ¯ ba ¯, ¯ = a. a
T
For each matrix A = [aij ] over F, we define A∗ = A = [¯ aji ]. If S ∗ AS = B for some nonsingular matrix S , then A and B are said to be *congruent (or congruent if the involution a → a ¯ is the identity). Except for (8), all our matrices are over F. In 1980, Gow used Riehm’s classification of bilinear forms [4] to show that any nonsingular square matrix A over any field is congruent to its transpose: AT = S T AS for some nonsingular S ; moreover, Gow showed that S can be chosen such that S 2 = I , that is, S can be chosen to be involutory [3]. Independently at about the same time, Yip and Ballantine obtained the same theorem without the hypothesis of nonsingularity [8]. Apparently unaware of [3] and [8], Docovi´ c and Ikramov (using Riehm’s classification again ([4] and [5])) showed in 2002 that A and AT are congruent [1]. We are interested in a broader result: Over F, any square matrix A is *congruent to AT ; moreover, a matrix S that gives the *congruence can be ¯ = I , that is, S can be chosen to be coninvolutory. Since chosen such that SS the involution on F can be the identity, our result includes that of [8] except for the case of a field of characteristic two.
丘成桐大学生数学竞赛数学专业大纲(英汉对照版)
S.T.YAU College Student Mathematics Contests
Algebra, Number Theory and Combinatorics (second draft)
代数、数论和组合(修改稿)
Linear Algebra Abstract vector spaces; subspaces; dimension; matrices and linear transformations; matrix algebras and groups; determinants and traces; eigenvectors and eigenvalues, characteristic and minimal polynomials; diagonalization and triangularization of operators; invariant subspaces and canonical forms; inner products and orthogonal bases; reduction of quadratic forms; hermitian and unitary operators, bilinear forms; dual spaces; adjoints. tensor products and tensor algebras; 线性代数 抽象向 量空间 ;子 空间; 维度; 矩阵 和线性 变换 ;矩阵 代数 和群; 行列式 和迹 ;特 征向量 和特征 值; 特征多 项式和 最小 多项式 ;对 角化和 三角 化;不 变子空 间和 典范 形式; 内积和 正交 基;二 次型的 化简 ;埃尔 米特 算子和 酉算 子;双 线性型 ;对 偶空 间;伴随矩阵,张量积和张量代数; Integers and polynomials Integers, Euclidean algorithm, unique decomposition; congruence and the Chinese Remainder theorem; Quadratic reciprocity ; Indeterminate Equations. Polynomials, Euclidean algorithm, uniqueness decomposition, zeros; The fundamental theorem of algebra; P olynomials of integer coefficients, the Gauss lemma and the Eisenstein criterion; Polynomials of several variables, homogenous and symmetric polynomials, the fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials. 整数和多项式 整数 , 欧 几里 得 算法 , 唯 一分 解 ; 同余 和 中国 剩 余 定理 ; 二次 互 反 性; 不 定方 程. 多项式 ,欧几 里得 算法, 唯一分 解, 零点; 代数 基本定 理; 整系数 多项式 ,高 斯引 理和爱 森斯坦 判别 法;多 元多项 式, 齐次多 项式 和对称 多项 式;对 称多项 式基 本定 理. Group Groups and homomorphisms, Sylow theorem, finitely generated abelian groups. Examples: permutation groups, cyclic groups, dihedral groups, matrix groups, simple groups, Jordan-Holder theorem, linear groups (GL(n, F) and its subgroups), p-groups, solvable and nilpotent groups, group extensions, semi-direct products, free groups, amalgamated products and group presentations. 群 群和同态, 西罗定 理,有限 生成阿 贝尔群. 例子:置 换群、循 环群、二 面体群、 矩阵 群、单群、若尔当-赫尔德定理、线性群(GL(n,F)及其子群)、p群、可解群和 幂零群,群扩张,半直积,自由群,融合积和群表示. Ring Basic properties of rings, units, ideals, homomorphisms, quotient rings, prime and maximal ideals,
新理念职场英语综合教程
新理念职场英语综合教程English Answer:Unit 1: The Changing Workplace.1. What are the key factors driving change in the workplace?Globalization.Technology.Demographics.Environmental concerns.2. How is the workplace becoming more diverse?Increasing number of women and minorities in the workforce.Globalization is bringing together people from different cultures.3. What are the challenges of managing a diverse workforce?Communication barriers.Cultural differences.Conflict resolution.4. How can organizations create a more inclusive workplace?Provide training on diversity and inclusion.Create a mentorship program.Establish a diversity council.Unit 2: Professional Communication.1. What are the key elements of effective communication? Clarity.Conciseness.Coherence.Courtesy.2. How can you improve your communication skills?Practice active listening.Be clear and concise in your speech.Proofread your writing.Be respectful of others.3. What are the different types of business communication?Written communication (letters, emails, reports)。
Constructible Sheaves and the Fukaya Category
a rX iv:mat h /64379v4[mat h.SG]16J un28CONSTRUCTIBLE SHEA VES AND THE FUKAYA CATEGORYDAVID NADLER AND ERIC ZASLOW Abstract.Let X be a compact real analytic manifold,and let T ∗X be its cotangent bundle.Let Sh (X )be the triangulated dg category of bounded,constructible com-plexes of sheaves on X .In this paper,we develop a Fukaya A ∞-category F uk (T ∗X )whose objects are exact,not necessarily compact Lagrangian branes in the cotangent bundle.We write T wF uk (T ∗X )for the A ∞-triangulated envelope of F uk (T ∗X )consisting of twisted complexes of Lagrangian branes.Our main result is that Sh (X )quasi-embeds into T wF uk (T ∗X )as an A ∞-category.Taking cohomology gives an embedding of the corresponding derived categories.Contents 1.Introduction 21.1.Microlocal geometry 31.2.Summary 41.3.Mirror symmetry 72.A ∞-categories 82.1.Preliminaries 82.2.A ∞-modules 92.3.Triangulated A ∞-categories 92.4.Twisted complexes 102.5.Homological perturbation theory 103.Analytic-geometric categories 113.1.Basic definitions 113.2.Background results 114.Constructible sheaves 134.1.Standard objects 144.2.Standard triangles 144.3.Standard objects generate 154.4.Open submanifolds164.5.Smooth boundaries174.6.Morse theory195.The Fukaya category245.1.Basics of T ∗X grangians285.3.Brane structures305.4.Definition of Fukaya category336.Embedding of standard objects386.1.Preliminaries386.2.Variable dilation396.3.Separation406.4.Perturbations426.5.Relation to Morse theory457.Arbitrary standard objects497.1.Submanifold category507.2.Morse theory interpretation517.3.Identification with standard branes527.4.Other objects54References5512DAVID NADLER AND ERIC ZASLOW1.IntroductionIn this paper,we study the relationship between two natural invariants of a real analytic manifold X.Thefirst is the Fukaya category of Lagrangian submanifolds of the cotangent bundle T∗X.The second is the derived category of constructible sheaves on X itself.The two are naively related by the theory of linear differential equations –that is,the study of modules over the ring D X of differential operators on X.On the one hand,Lagrangian cycles in T∗X play a prominent role in the microlocal theory of D X-modules.On the other hand,in the complex setting,the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence identifies regular,holonomic D X-modules with constructible sheaves. In what follows,we give a very brief account of what we mean by the Fukaya category of T∗X and the constructible derived category of X,and then state our main result. Roughly speaking,the Fukaya category of a symplectic manifold is a category whose objects are Lagrangian submanifolds and whose morphisms and compositions are built out of the quantum intersection theory of Lagrangians.This is encoded by the moduli space of pseudoholomorphic maps from polygons with prescribed Lagrangian boundary conditions.Since T∗X is noncompact,there are many choices to be made as to which Lagrangians to allow and how to obtain well-behaved moduli spaces of pseudoholomor-phic maps.One approach is to insist that the Lagrangians are compact.With this assumption,the theory is no more difficult than that of a compact symplectic mani-fold.One perturbs the Lagrangians so that their intersections are transverse,and then convexity arguments guarantee compact moduli spaces.Our version of the Fukaya category F uk(T∗X)includes both compact and noncom-pact exact Lagrangians.We work with exact Lagrangians that have well-defined limits at infinity.To make this precise,we consider a compactification of T∗X,and assume that the closures of our Lagrangians are subanalytic subsets of the compactification. Two crucial geometric statements follow from this assumption.First,the boundaries of our Lagrangians are Legendrian subvarieties of the divisor at infinity.Second,for any metric on thefibers of T∗X,its restriction to one of our Lagrangians has no critical points near infinity.These facts allow us to make sense of“intersections at infinity”by restricting our perturbations to those which are normalized geodesicflow near infinity for carefully prescribed times.Given suitable further perturbations(which are available in intended applications),we then obtain compact moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic maps.The resulting Fukaya category F uk(T∗X)has many of the usual properties that one expects from both a topological and categorical perspective.The second invariant of the real analytic manifold X which we consider is the derived category D c(X)of constructible sheaves on X itself.This is a triangulated category which encodes the topology of subanalytic subsets of X.To give a sense of the size of D c(X),its Grothendieck group is the group of constructible functions on X–that is,functions which are constant along some subanalytic stratification,for example a triangulation.Examples of objects of D c(X)include closed submanifolds equipped withflat vector bundles.More generally,we have the so-called standard and costandard objects associated to a locally closed submanifold Y⊂X equipped with aflat vector bundle rmally,one may think of the standard object as the complex of singular cochains on Y with values in E,and the costandard as the complex of relative singularCONSTRUCTIBLE SHEAVES AND THE FUKAYA CATEGORY3 cochains on(Y,∂Y)with values in E.A key observation is that morphisms between these objects are naturally the singular cohomology of certain subsets of X with values inflat vector bundles.One formulation of our main result is the following.As we outline below,it may be viewed as a categorification of the characteristic cycle construction.Theorem1.0.1.Let X be a real analytic manifold.Then there is a canonical embed-ding of derived categoriesD c(X)֒→DF uk(T∗X).The result reflects an underlying quasi-embedding of dg and A∞-categories.Further arguments shows that this is in fact a quasi-equivalence[28].The remainder of the introduction is divided into several parts.In the section im-mediately following,we discuss motivations for our main result result from the long-developing theory of microlocal geometry.In the section after that,we explain the general outline of the proof of our main result.Finally,we speculate on possible appli-cations in the context of mirror symmetry.1.1.Microlocal geometry.The main result of this paper has a natural place in the context of microlocal geometry.Broadly speaking,sheaf theory on a real analytic manifold X may be thought of as a tool to understand local analytic and topological phenomena and how they assemble into global phenomena.Many aspects of the theory are best understood from a microlocal perspective,or in other words as local phenomona on the cotangent bundle T∗X.We collect here a short account of some results from this subject that naturally point toward our main result.What we present is not intended to be an exhaustive overview of the subject.For that we refer the reader to the book of Kashiwara-Schapira[20].It contains many original results,presents a detailed development of the subject,and includes historical notes and a comprehensive bibliography.Our main result may be viewed as a categorification of the characteristic cycle con-struction for real constructible sheaves introduced by Kashiwara[17].(For foundational material on microlocal constructions such as the singular support,see Kashiwara-Schapira[19].)Given a constructible complex of sheaves F on X,its characteristic cycle CC(F)is a conical Lagrangian cycle in T∗X(with values in the pullback of the orientation sheaf of X)which encodes the singularities of the original complex.The multiplicity of CC(F)at a given covector is the Euler characteristic of the local Morse groups of the complex with respect to the covector.If a covector is not in the support of CC(F),it means that there is no obstruction to propagating local sections of F in the direction of the covector.So for example,the characteristic cycle of aflat vector bundle on X is the zero section in T∗X with multiplicity the dimension of the vector bundle.More generally,the characteristic cycle of aflat vector bundle on a closed sub-manifold is the conormal bundle to the submanifold with multiplicity the dimension of the vector bundle.As mentioned earlier,the Grothendieck group of the constructible derived category D c(X)is the space of constructible functions on X.The characteristic cycle construc-tion descends to an isomorphism from constructible functions to the group of conical4DAVID NADLER AND ERIC ZASLOWLagrangian cycles in T∗X.From this vantage point,there are many results that might lead one to our main result.First,there is the index formula of Dubson[6]and Kashi-wara[17].This states that given a constructible complex of sheaves F,its Euler char-acteristicχ(X,F)is equal to the intersection of Lagrangian cycles CC(F)·[d f]where d f is the graph of a sufficiently generic function f:X→R.More generally,given two constructible complexes of sheaves F1,F2,a formula of MacPherson(see the in-troduction of[11],the lectures notes[13],and a Floer-theoretic interpretation[21,22]) expresses the Euler characteristic of their tensor product in terms of the intersection of their characteristic cyclesχ(X,F1L⊗F2)=CC(F1)·CC(F2).The most direct influence on our main result is the work of Ginsburg[11](in the complex affine case)and Schmid-Vilonen[32](in general)on the functoriality of the characteristic cycle construction.Thanks to their work,one knows how to calculate the characteristic cycle CC(Ri∗F)of the direct image under an open embedding i:U֒→X. (The functoriality of the characteristic cycle under the other standard operations is explained by Kashiwara-Schapira[20].)In the subanalytic context,given an open subset i:U֒→X,one can always choose a defining function m:X→R≥0for the boundary∂U⊂X.By definition,m is a nonnegative function whose zero set is precisely∂U⊂X.With such a function in hand,the formula for open embeddings is the limit of Lagrangian cyclesCC(Ri∗F)=limǫ→0+(CC(F)+ǫΓd log m)whereΓd log m⊂T∗U is the graph of the differential,and the sum is set-theoretic.The proof of our main result may be interpreted as a categorification of this formula.We explain this in the next section.1.2.Summary.To relate the constructible derived category D c(X)to the Fukaya category F uk(T∗X),we proceed in several steps,some topological and some categorical. It is well-known that usual notions of category theory are too restrictive a context for dealing with the geometry of moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic maps.To be precise,F uk(T∗X)is not a usual category but rather an A∞-category.Relations among compositions of morphisms are determined by the bubbling of pseudoholomorphic disks, and this is not associative but only homotopy associative.The A∞-category formalism is a means to organize these homotopies(and the homotopies between the homotopies, and so on).In particular,morphisms in an A∞-category are represented by chain complexes to provide some homotopicflexibility.When this is the only added wrinkle, so that compositions of such morphisms are in fact associative,one arrives at the special case of a differential graded(dg)category.To an A∞-category one can assign an ordinary(graded)category by taking the cohomology of its morphism complexes. This allows for the perspective that these notions only differ from that of an ordinary category by providing more homotopicflexibility.(We collect some of the basic notions of A∞-categories in Section2below.)The derived category D c(X)is the cohomology category of a dg category Sh(X) whose objects are constructible complexes of sheaves.The morphisms in Sh(X)areCONSTRUCTIBLE SHEAVES AND THE FUKAYA CATEGORY5 defined by starting with the naive definition of morphisms of complexes,and then passing to the dg quotient category where quasi-isomorphisms are invertible.Our first step in reaching F uk(T∗X)is to observe that Sh(X)is generated by its full subcategory consisting of standard objects associated to open submanifolds.In the subanalytic context,given an open subset U⊂X,one can always choose a defining function m:X→R≥0for the complement X\U.By definition,m is a nonnegative function whose zero set is precisely X\U.To keep track of the choice of such a function, we define a dg category Open(X)as follows.Its objects are pairs(U,m)where U⊂X is open,and m is as described.Its morphisms are given by complexes of relative de Rham forms,and are naturally quasi-isomorphic with those for the corresponding standard objects of Sh(X).In the language of dg categories,one can say that Sh(X) is a triangulated envelope of Open(X),and that D c(X)is the derived category of both Sh(X)and Open(X).The aim of our remaining constructions is to embed the A∞-category Open(X)into the Fukaya A∞-category F uk(T∗X).It is simple to say where this A∞-functor takes objects of Open(X).To explain this,we introduce some notation in a slightly more general context.Given a submanifold Y⊂X and a defining function m:X→R≥0for the boundary∂Y⊂X,set f:X\∂Y→R to be the logarithm f=log m,and define the standard Lagrangian L Y,f⊂T∗X|Y⊂T∗X to be thefiberwise sumL Y,f=T∗Y X+Γd f|Y,whereΓd f⊂T∗X|X\∂Y denotes the graph of d f,and the sum is takenfiberwise in T∗X|Y.By construction,L Y,f depends only on the restriction of m to Y.In particular, for an open subset U⊂X,we could also take m to be a defining function for the complement X\U.In this case,the definition simplifies so that L U,f is just the graph Γd f over U.Now given an object(U,m)of Open(X),where U⊂X is open,and m:X→R≥0is a defining function for X\U,we send it to the standard Lagrangian L U,f⊂T∗X,where f:U→R is given by f=log m.If U is not all of X,this is a closed but noncompact Lagrangian submanifold of T∗X.To properly obtain an object of F uk(T∗X),we must endow L U,f with a brane structure.This consists of a grading(or lifting of its squared phase)and relative pin structure.We check that standard Lagrangians carry canonical brane structures with respect to canonical background classes.We make L U,f an object of F uk(T∗X)by equipping it with its canonical brane structure.What is not immediately clear is what our A∞-functor should do with morphisms. To answer this,wefirst identify Open(X)with an A∞-category Mor(X)built out of the Morse theory of open subsets of X equipped with defining functions for their complements.The construction of Mor(X)is a generalization of Fukaya’s Morse A∞-category of a manifold.As with Open(X),the objects of Mor(X)are pairs(U,m), where U⊂X is open,and m:X→R≥0is a defining function for X\U.As usual, it is convenient to set f=log m as a function on U.For afinite collection of objects (U i,m i)of Mor(X)indexed by i∈Z/(d+1)Z,the morphisms and composition maps among the objects encode the moduli spaces of maps from trivalent trees into X that take edges to gradient lines of the functions f j−f i with respect to some Riemannian metric on X.For example,the morphism complexes are generated by the critical points6DAVID NADLER AND ERIC ZASLOWof Morse functions on certain open subsets,and the differentials are given by countingisolated gradient lines.There are several delicate aspects to working out the details of this picture.As usualwith such a construction,we must be sure that the functions f i and the Riemannianmetric are sufficiently generic to ensure we have well-behaved moduli spaces.But inour situation,we must also be sure that the gradient vectorfields of the differencesf i+1−f i are not wild at the boundaries of their domains U i∩U i+1.To accomplish this, we employ techniques of stratification theory to move the boundaries and functionsinto a sufficiently transverse arrangement.Then there will be an open,convex space of Riemannian metrics such that the resulting moduli spaces are well-behaved.The upshot is that we obtain an A∞-structure on Mor(X)whose composition maps count so-called gradient trees for Morse functions on certain open subsets of X.Furthermore,an application of arguments of Kontsevich-Soibelman[25]from homological perturbation theory provides a quasi-equivalenceOpen(X)≃Mor(X).Finally,we embed the Morse A∞-category Mor(X)into the Fukaya A∞-categoryF uk(T∗X)as follows.Let(U i,m i)be a collection of objects of Mor(X)indexed byi∈Z/(d+1)Z,and let L Ui,f i be the corresponding collection of standard branes ofF uk(T∗X)where as usual f i=log m i.After carefully perturbing the objects,we check that the moduli spaces of gradient trees for the former collection may be identified with the moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons for the latter.When all of the open sets U i are the entire manifold X,this is a theorem of Fukaya-Oh[9].These authors have identified the Morse A∞-category of the manifold X and the Fukaya A∞-category of graphs in T∗X.To generalize this to arbitrary open sets,we employ the following strategy.First,using area bounds,we check that all pseudoholomophic maps with boundary on our standard branes in fact have boundary in a prescribed region. Next,we dilate our standard branes so that the theorem of Fukaya-Oh identifies the relevant moduli subspaces.Finally,we check that the homogeneity of the area bounds guarantees that no critical event occurs during the dilation.Thus we obtain an A∞-embeddingMor(X)֒→F uk(T∗X).Putting together the above functors gives a quasi-embedding of the A∞-category Sh(X)of constructible complexes of sheaves on X into the A∞-category of twisted complexes T wF uk(T∗X)in the Fukaya category of T∗X.Taking the underlying coho-mology categories gives an embedding of the corresponding derived categories.For future applications,it is useful to know where the embedding takes other objects and morphisms.In particular,we would like to know not only where it takes standard sheaves on open submanifolds,but also standard sheaves on arbitrary submanifolds. One approach to this problem is to express standard sheaves on arbitrary submanifolds in terms of standard sheaves on open submanifolds,and then to check what the rel-evant distinguished triangles of constructible sheaves look like under the embedding. This requires identifying certain cones in the Fukaya category with symplectic surg-eries.Rather than taking this route,we will instead show in thefinal section that we may explicitly extend the domain of the embedding to include standard sheaves onCONSTRUCTIBLE SHEAVES AND THE FUKAYA CATEGORY 7arbitrary submanifolds and morphisms between them.This has the added value that given constructible sheaves on a stratification,it obviates the need to further refine the stratification in order to construct the embedding:one may use the standard sheaves themselves as a generating set.Consider the standard sheaf Ri ∗L Y associated to a local system L Y on an arbitrary submanifold i :Y ֒→X .Suppose that we are given a defining function m :X →R ≥0for the boundary ∂Y ⊂X .Recall that we define the standard Lagrangian L Y,m ⊂T ∗X to be the fiberwise sum L Y,f =T ∗Y X +Γd fwhere T ∗X Y ⊂T ∗X is the conormal bundle to Y ,and Γd f ⊂T ∗X is the graph of the differential of f =log m .We write L Y,f,L Y for the corresponding standard object of F uk (T ∗X )given by L Y,f equipped with its canonical brane structure and the pullback of the flat vector bundle L Y ⊗or X ⊗or −1Y ,where or X ,or Y denote the orientation bundles of X,Y respectively.The main consequence of the final section is the following.Theorem 1.2.1.Under the embedding D c (X )֒→DF uk (T ∗X ),the image of the stan-dard sheaf Ri ∗L Y is canonically isomorphic to the standard brane L Y,f,L Y .1.3.Mirror symmetry.The connection of this current work to mirror symmetry is somewhat speculative,though several appearances of constructible sheaves in the context of mirror symmetry deserve mention.First,the announced results of Bondal and Bondal-Ruan [4]relate the derived cat-egories of coherent sheaves on toric Fano varieties with the Fukaya-Seidel category on the Landau-Ginzburg side.Their method is to establish equivalences of both with the derived category of constructible sheaves on a torus with respect to a specific (non-Whitney)stratification determined by the superpotential.One can view the result of Bondal-Ruan from the perspective developed in this paper by identifying (C ∗)n with T ∗((S 1)n ).Second,Kapustin-Witten [16]place the geometric Langlands program in the context of topological quantum field theory.In particular,they relate the harmonic analysis of the geometric Langlands program to mirror symmetry by equating Hecke operators on D -modules with ’t Hooft operators acting on branes.In this setting,one may interpret the results of this paper as lending some mathematical evidence to this physical per-spective.For example,according to Kapustin-Witten [16],given a generic eigen-brane for the ’t Hooft operators,there is a corresponding regular,holonomic Hecke eigen-D -module.One might hope to provide an explicit construction of the eigen-D -module by first identifying the eigen-brane as the microlocalization of some constructible sheaf,and then applying the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence.Third,braid group actions have been an active area of interest especially in the context of branes in the cotangent bundle of flag varieties B .In the case of coherent sheaves,braid group actions on D b coh (T ∗B )have been studied by many authors (see for example Seidel-Thomas [34]).One may use the results of this paper to construct the corresponding actions in the symplectic ly,under the embedding of this paper,the kernels giving the usual braid group action on the constructible derived category D c (B )(see for example Rouquier [31])induce a corresponding action on DF uk (T ∗B ).8DAVID NADLER AND ERIC ZASLOWFourth,the work of Kontsevich-Soibelman[26]and Gross-Siebert[14]paints the large complex structure limit of a Calabi-Yau n-fold as a collapse into a real n-fold with integral affine structure and a Monge-Amp`e re metric.The complex n-fold is recovered from the limit manifold as a quotient of the tangent(or cotangent)bundle by the lattice of integer tangent vectors.It is intriguing to imagine a quotient construction creating a torusfibration from the cotangent bundle.Finally,it would be interesting to understand whether our result is the local pic-ture of a relationship that holds more generally for compact symplectic manifolds. One may consider modules over the deformation quantization as a global analogue of constructible sheaves.(See for example Kontsevich[24],Kashiwara[18],or Polesello-Schapira[30].)Clear comparisons can then be made between such modules and the Fukaya category.There is great interest in understanding more precisely how to inter-polate between the local nature of the modules and the global nature of the Fukaya category.Acknowledgments.We have benefited greatly from discussions with Melissa Liu,Paul Seidel,and Chris Woodward.We would also like to thank Yong-Geun Oh for comments about the context of our work and its exposition.Finally,we are grateful to an anony-mous referee whose comments have led to significant improvements in the paper.The work of D.N.is supported in part by NSF grant DMS–0600909and DARPA. The work of E.Z.is supported in part by NSF grant DMS–0405859.Any opinions,findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).2.A∞-categoriesWe collect here standard material concerning A∞-categories,dg categories,and tri-angulated categories.Our reference is Chapter1of Seidel’s book[33].2.1.Preliminaries.Our aim here is not to recall complete definitions,but only to establish notation.Let A be a(not necessarily unital)A∞-category with set of objects Ob A,Z-graded vector space of morphisms hom A(X0,X1),and composition mapsµd A:hom A(X0,X1)⊗···⊗hom A(X d−1,X d)→hom A(X0,X d)[2−d],for d≥1.A dg category is an A∞-category A whose higher composition mapsµd A,for d≥3are equal to zero.Let H(A)denote the Z-graded cohomological category of A with set of objects ObH(A)=Ob A,and Z-graded vector space of morphismshom H(A)(X0,X1)=H(hom A(X0,X1),µ1A).Let H0(A)denote the ungraded cohomological category with set of objects ObH0(A)= Ob A,and vector space of morphismshom H0(A)(X0,X1)=H0(hom A(X0,X1),µ1A).An A∞-category is said to be cohomologically unital or c-unital if H(A)is unital.CONSTRUCTIBLE SHEAVES AND THE FUKAYA CATEGORY9 Let F:A→B be an A∞-functor between A∞-categories with map on objects F:Ob A→Ob B,and morphism mapsF d:hom A(X0,X1)⊗···⊗hom A(X d−1,X d)→hom B(F X0,F X d)[1−d],for d≥1. An A∞-functor is said to be c-unital if H(F)is unital.Throughout what follows,we assume that all A∞-categories are c-unital,and all A∞-functors are c-unital.We say that an A∞-functor F is a quasi-equivalence if the induced functor H(F)is an equivalence.We say that F is a quasi-embedding if H(F) is full and faithful.2.2.A∞-modules.Let Ch denote the dg category of chain complexes,considered as an A∞-category.Given an A∞-category A,an A∞-module over A is an A∞-functor A opp→Ch.Let mod(A)denote the A∞-category of A∞-modules over A.The functor category mod(A)inherits much of the structure of the target category Ch.For example,mod(A)is a dg category,and its cohomological category H0(mod(A)) is a triangulated category.In particular,we have the obvious shift functor S on modules and the cohomological notion of exact triangle of modules.Note that the shift functor may be recovered by taking the cone of the zero morphism to the trivial module,or to the cone of the identity morphism of any module.For any object Y∈Ob A,we have the A∞-module Y(X)=hom A(X,Y)with µd Y=µd A.This provides an A∞-Yoneda embedding J:A→mod(A)which is co-homologically full and faithful.Since the ambient category mod(A)is a dg category, the image J(A)of the Yoneda embedding is as well.Thus each A∞-category A is canonically quasi-equivalent to a dg category J(A).2.3.Triangulated A∞-categories.Given an A∞-category A,an exact triangle in H(A)is defined to be any diagram in H(A)which becomes isomorphic to an exact triangle of H(mod(A))under the Yoneda embedding.A shift SX of an object X is any object which becomes isomorphic to the shift in H(mod(A))under the Yoneda embedding.A nonempty A∞-category A is said to be triangulated if the following hold:(1)Every morphism in H0(A)can be completed to an exact triangle in H(A).Inparticular,every object X has a shift SX.(2)For each object X,there is an object˜X such that S˜X≃X in H0(A).If A is a triangulated A∞-category,then H0(A)is a triangulated category in the usual sense.Furthermore,if F:A→B is an A∞-functor between triangulated A∞-categories,then H0(F)is an exact functor.Let A be a full A∞-subcategory of a triangulated A∞-category B.The triangulated A∞-subcategory of B generated by A is the smallest full subcategoryA,F)consisting of a triangulated A∞-category A such that the objects in the image of F generate A) is independent of the choice of envelope up to exact equivalence.It is sometimes called the derived category of A and denoted by D(A),but we will sometimes reserve this to10DAVID NADLER AND ERIC ZASLOW mean a localized version of H0(CONSTRUCTIBLE SHEAVES AND THE FUKAYA CATEGORY11 of degree0such thatπ1◦π1=π1,and a linear mapT1:hom B(X0,X1)→hom B(X0,X1)of degree−1such thati1◦π1−id=µ1B T1+T1µ1B.In this case,if we takehom A(X0,X1)=π1(hom B(X0,X1)),then the resulting A∞-functors i:A→B,π:B→A are quasi-equivalences.3.Analytic-geometric categoriesWhen working with sheaves on a manifold X,it is often useful if not indispensable to restrict to subsets of X that have strongfiniteness properties.In this section,we collect basic material from the theory of subanalytic sets that plays a role in what follows.All of the results and arguments that we use hold in the context of analytic-geometric categories.Since this seems to be a natural level of generality,we adopt it as our framework.What follows is a brief summary of relevant results from van den Dries-Miller[36].For a discussion of subanalytic sets alone,see Bierstone-Milman[3]. The reader may prefer to ignore the generality of analytic-geometric categories and consider all discussion to take place in the subanalytic category.Throughout what follows,all manifolds are assumed to be real analytic unless oth-erwise specified.3.1.Basic definitions.To give an analytic-geometric category C is to equip each manifold M with a collection C(M)of subsets of M satisfying the following properties:(1)C(M)is a Boolean algebra of subsets with M∈C(M).(2)If A∈C(M),then A×R∈C(M×R).(3)If f:M→N is a proper analytic map and A∈C(M),then f(A)∈C(N).(4)If A⊂M,and(U i)i∈I is an open covering of M,then A∈C(M)if and only ifA∩U i∈C(U i),for all i∈I.(5)For every bounded set A∈C(R),the boundary∂A isfinite.Given the above data,one defines a category C as follows.An object is a pair(A,M) with M a manifold,and A∈C(M).A morphism(A,M)→(B,N)is a continuous map f:A→B whose graphΓ(F)⊂A×B belongs to C(M×N).Objects of C are called C-sets,and morphisms are called C-maps.When the codomain of a map is R, we refer to it as a function.The basic example of an analytic-geometric category is the subanalytic category C an of subanalytic sets and continuous maps with subanalytic graphs.For any analytic-geometric category C,the subanalytic subsets of any manifold M belong to C(M). 3.2.Background results.Most of the fundamental results about subanalytic sets hold in any analytic-geometric category(although it is unknown whether the uni-formization and rectilinearization properties of subanalytic sets have analogues).We limit our discussion here to include only those results which we use.。
Chapter 1 Chemical Bonding
One of these, called a bonding orbital, has a lower energy than the original atomic orbitals (otherwise a bond would not form), and the other, called an antibonding orbital, has a higher energy. Orbitals of lower energy fill first. Since the two original atomic orbitals each held one electron, both of these electrons can now go into the new molecular bonding orbital, since any orbital can hold two electrons. The antibonding orbital remains empty in the ground state. The greater the overlap, the stronger the bond, although total overlap is prevented by repulsion between the nuclei.
1.1.1 COVALENT BONDING
Wave mechanics is based on the fundamental principle that electrons behave as waves(e.g., they can be diffracted) and that consequently a wave equation can be written for them, in the same sense that light waves, sound waves, and so on can be described by wave equations. The equation that serves as a mathematical model for electrons is known as the Schrodinger equation, which for a one-electron system is
The Dynamics
a rXiv:g r-qc/4519v 119May24Abstract:This article—summarizing the authors’then novel formulation of General Relativity—appeared as Chapter 7,pp.227–264,in Gravitation:an introduction to current research ,L.Witten,ed.(Wiley,New York,1962),now long out of print.Intentionally unretouched,this posting is intended to provide contemporary accessibility to the flavor of the original ideas.Some typographical corrections have been made:footnote and page numbering have changed—but not section nor equation numbering,etc.Current institutional affiliations are encoded in:arnowitt@ ,deser@ ,mis-ner@ .R.Arnowitt,i S.Deser,ii and C.W.Misner iii The Dynamics of General Relativity 1.Introduction iv The general coordinate invariance underlying the theory of relativity creates basic problems in the analysis of the dynamics of the gravitational fiually,specification of the field amplitudes and their first time derivatives initially is appropriate to determine the time development of a field viewed as a dynamical entity.For general relativity,however,the metric field g µνmay be modified at any later time simply by carrying out a general coordinate transformation.Such an operationdoes not involve any observable changes in the physics,since it merely corresponds to a relabeling under which the theory is invariant.Thus it is necessary that the metric field be separated into the parts carrying the true dynamical information and those parts characterizing the coordinate system.In this respect,the general theory is analogous to electromagnetic theory.In particular,the coordinate invariance plays a role similar to the gauge invariance of the Maxwell field.In the latter case,this gauge invariance also produces difficulties in separating out the independent dynamical modes,although the linearity here does simplify the analysis.In both cases,the effectof invariance properties(both Lorentz and“gauge”invariance)is to introduce redundant variables in the original formulation of the theory to insure that the correct transformation properties are maintained.It is this clash with the smaller number of variables needed to describe the dynamics (i.e.,the number of independent Cauchy data)that creates the difficulties in the analysis.In Lorentz covariantfield theories,general techniques(Schwinger,1951,1953)(valid both in the quantum and classical domains)have been developed to enable one to disentangle the dynamical from the gauge variables.We will see here that,while general relativity possesses certain unique aspects not found in other theories,these same methods may be applied.Two important advantages are obtained by proceeding in this fashion.First,the physics of Lorentz covariantfield theory is well understood. Consequently,techniques which relate back to this area of knowledge will help one to comprehend better the physics of general relativity.Second,insofar as quantization of the theory is concerned, a formulation closely associated with general quantization techniques which include consistency criteria(i.e.,the Schwinger action principle)will be more appropriate for this highly non-linear theory.Direct correspondence principle quantization(which is suitable for linear theories without constraints)may well prove inadequate here.A precise determination of the independent dynamical modes of the gravitationalfield is arrived at when the theory has been cast into canonical form and consequently involves the minimal number of variables specifying the state of the system.At this level,one will have all the relevant information about thefield’s behavior in familiar form.The canonical formalism,involving only the minimal set of variables(which will turn out to be four),is also essential to the quantization program,since it yields directly simple Poisson bracket(P.B.)relations among these conjugate,unconstrained, variables.Two essential aspects of canonical form are:(1)that thefield equations are offirst order in the time derivatives;and(2)that time has been singled out so that the theory has been recast into3+1dimensional form.These two features are characteristic of Hamilton(or P.B.)equations of motion,in contrast to the Lagrange equations.Thefirst requirement may be achieved in general relativity,since its Lagrangian may be written in a form linear in the time derivatives(which is called the Palatini form).The type of variable fulfilling the second requirement is dictated by the desire for canonical form,and will be seen also to possess a natural geometrical interpretation.The use of the Palatini Lagrangian and of3+1dimensional notation does not,of course,impair the general covariance of the theory under arbitrary coordinate transformations.In possessing this covariance,general relativity is precisely analogous to the parameterized form of mechanics in which the Hamiltonian and the time are introduced as a conjugate pair of variables of a new degree of freedom.When in parameterized form,a theory is invariant under an arbitrary re-parameterization, just as general relativity is invariant under an arbitrary change of coordinates.The action of general relativity will thus be seen to be in“already parameterized”form.The well-known relations between the usual canonical form and the parameter description will thus provide the key for deriving the desired canonical form for the gravitationalfield.We will therefore begin,in Section2,with a brief review of parameterized particle mechanics.In Section3,the Lagrangian of general relativity will be cast into Palatini and3+1dimensional form,and the geometrical significance of the variables will be discussed.We will see then that relativity has a form identical to parameterized mechanics. Section4completes the analysis,to obtain the canonical variables and their relations as well as the P.B.equations of motion.Once canonical form is reached,the physical interpretation of quantities involved follows di-rectly as in other branches of physics.Thus,the canonical variables themselves represent the independent excitations of thefield(and hence provide the basis for defining gravitational radi-ation in a coordinate-independent way).Further,the numerical value of the Hamiltonian for a particular state of the system provides the primary definition of total energy(a definition which amounts to comparing the asymptotic form of the spatial part of the metric with that of the ex-terior Schwarzschild solution).Similarly,the total momentum is defined from the generator of spatial translations.The energy and momentum are invariant under coordinate transformations not involving Lorentz rotations at spatial infinity,and behave as a four-vector under the latter.It is also possible to set up the analysis of gravitational radiation in a fashion closely analogous to electrodynamics by introducing a suitable definition of the wave zone.In this region,gravitational waves propagate as free radiation,independent of the strongfield interior sources.The waves obey ordinary(flat-space)wave equations and consequently satisfy superposition.The Poynting vector may also be defined invariantly in the wave zone.In contrast,the Newtonian-like parts of the metric cannot be determined within the wave zone;they depend strongly on the interior non-linearities. These points are discussed in Section5.When the analysis is extended to include coupling of other systems to the gravitationalfield (Section6),the above definition of energy may be used to discuss self-energy questions.In this way,the static gravitation and electromagnetic self-masses of point particle systems will be treated rigorously in Section7.Here the canonical formalism is essential in order that one may recognize a pure particle(no wave)state.The vanishing of the canonical variables guarantees that there are no independentfield excitations contributing to the energy.The total clothed mass of a classical electron turns out to befinite,independent of its bare mass and completely determined by its charge.Further,a“neutral”particle(one coupled only to the gravitationalfield)has a zero clothed mass,showing that the mass of a particle arises entirely from its interactions with other fields.The physical origin of thesefinite results is discussed at the beginning of Section7in terms of equivalence principle considerations.The self-stress T ij of the electron vanishes,showing that the particle is stable,its repulsive electrostatic self-forces being precisely cancelled by gravitational attraction without any ad hoc compensation being required.Thus,a completely consistent classical point charge exists when gravitation is included.These rigorous results are in contrast to the higher and higher infinities that would arise in a perturbation analysis of the same problem.Whether gravitational effects will maintain thefiniteness of self-energies in quantum theory (and if so,whether the effective cutoffwill be appropriate to produce reasonable values)is at present an open question.In thefinal section(8),some speculative remarks are made on this problem. Since a complete set of P.B.’s has been obtained classically in Section4,it is formally possible to quantize by the usual prescription of relating them to quantum commutators.However,the non-linear nature of the theory may necessitate a more subtle transition to the quantum domain. Section8also discusses some of these questions.2.Classical Dynamics Background2.1.Action principle for Hamilton’s equations.As was mentioned in Section1,general relativity is a theory in“already parameterized form.”We begin,therefore,with a brief analysis of the relevant properties of the parameter formalism(see also Lanczos,1949).For simplicity,we deal with a system of afinite number M of degrees of freedom.Its action may be written asI= t1t2dt L= t1t2dt M i=1p i˙q i−H(p,q) (2.1) where˙q≡dq/dt and the Lagrangian has been expressed in a form linear in the time derivatives.(This will be referred to as thefirst-order form since independent variation of p i and q i gives rise to thefirst-order equations of motion.)The maximal information obtainable from the action arises when not only p i and q i are varied independently,but t is also varied and endpoint variations are allowed.Postulating that the totalδI is a function only of the endpoints[δI=G(t1)−G(t2)] leads to:(1)the usual Hamilton equations of motion for p i and q i;(2)conservation of energy (dH/dt=0);and(3)the generating functionG(t)= i p iδq i−Hδt(2.2)Hereδq i=δ0q i+˙q iδt whereδ0q i denotes the independent(“intrinsic”)variation of q i.The gen-erating function can easily be seen to be the conventional generator of canonical transformations. Thus G q= i p iδq i generates changes q i→q i+δq i,p i→p i while G t=−Hδt generates the translation in time.That is,for G q one has[q j,G q]= i[q j,p i]δq i=δq j,where[A,B]means the Poisson bracket(P.B.),and for G t one has[q i,G t]=−[q i,H]δt=−˙q iδt by the P.B.form of the equations of motion.The above elementary discussion may be inverted to show that,for the action of(2.1),if every variable occurring in H is also found in the p˙q term,then the theory is in canonical form and p i and q i obey the conventional P.B.relations.This is the classical equivalent of the Schwinger action principle(Schwinger,1951,1953).2.2.The action in parameterized form.The motion of the system(2.1)is described in terms of one independent variable t(the“coordinate”).The action may be cast,as is well known,into parameterized form,in which the time is regarded as a function q M+1of an arbitrary parameterτ:I= τ1τ2dτLτ≡ τ1τ2dτ M+1 i=1p i q′i .Here,q′≡dq/dτ,and the constraint equation p M+1+H(p,q)=0holds.One may equally well replace this constraint by an additional term in the action:I= τ1τ2dτ M+1 i=1p i q′i−NR (2.3)where N(τ)is a Lagrange multiplier.Its variation yields the constraint equation R(p M+1,p,q)=0, which may be any equation with the solution(occurring as a simple root)p M+1=−H.The theory as cast into form(2.3)is now generally covariant with respect to arbitrary coordinate transformations¯τ=¯τ(τ),bearing in mind that N transforms as dq/dτ.The price of achieving this general covariance has been not only the introduction of the(M+1)st degree of freedom,but, more important,the loss of canonical form,due to the appearance of the Lagrange multiplier N in the“Hamiltonian,”H′≡NR.(N occurs in H′but not in M+1i=1p i q′i.)A further striking feature which is due to the general covariance of this formulation is that the“Hamiltonian”H′vanishes by virtue of the constraint equation.This is not surprising,since the motion of any particular variable F(p,q)with respect toτis arbitrary,i.e.,F′may be given any value by suitable recalibration τ→¯τ.2.3.Reduction of parameterized action to Hamiltonian form—intrinsic coordinates.As we shall see,the Lagrangian of general relativity may be written in precisely the form of(2.3).We will,therefore,be faced with the problem of reducing an action of the type(2.3)to canonical form(2.1).The general procedure consists essentially in reversing the steps that led to(2.3).If one simply inserts the solution,p M+1=−H,of the constraint equation into(2.3),one obtainsI= dτ M i=1p i q′i−H(p,q)q′M+1 .(2.4) All reference to the arbitrary parameterτdisappears when I is rewritten asI= dq M+1 M i=1p i(dq i/dq M+1)−H (2.5)which is identical to(2.1)with the notational change q M+1→t.Equation(2.5)exhibits the role of the variable q M+1as an“intrinsic coordinate.”By this is meant the following.The equation of motion for q M+1is q′M+1=N(∂R/∂q M+1)from(2.3).Also,none of the dynamical equations determine N as a function ofτ.Thus N and hence q M+1,are left arbitrary by the dynamics(though, of course,a choice of q M+1as a function ofτfixes N).One is therefore free to choose q M+1(τ) to be any desired function and use this function as the new independent variable(parameter): q i=q i(q M+1),p i=p i(q M+1),i=I...M.The action of(2.5),and hence the relations between q i, p i,and q M+1are now independent ofτ.They are manifestly invariant under the general“coordinate transformation”¯τ=¯τ(τ)(for the simple reason thatτitself no longer appears).The choice of q M+1 as the independent variable thus yields a manifestlyτ-invariant formulation and gives an“intrinsic”specification of the dynamics.This is in contrast to the original one in which the trajectories of q1...q M+1are given in terms of some arbitrary variableτ(which is extraneous to the system).In practice,we shall arrive at the intrinsic form(2.5)from(2.4)in an alternate way.Since the relation between q M+1andτis undetermined,we are free to specify it explicitly,i.e.,impose a “coordinate condition.”If,in particular,this relation is chosen to be q M+1=τ(a condition which also determines N),the action(2.4)then reduces(2.5)with the notational change q M+1→τ; the non-vanishing Hamiltonian only arises as a result of this process.[Of course,other coordinate conditions might have been chosen.These would correspond to using a variable other than q M+1 as the intrinsic coordinate in the previous discussion.]This simple analysis has shown that the way to reduce a parameterized action to canonical form is to insert the solution of the constraint equations and to impose coordinate conditions.Further, the imposition of coordinate conditions is equivalent to the introduction of intrinsic coordinates.Infield theory it will prove more informative to carry out this analysis in the generator.We exhibit here the procedure in the particle case:The generator associated with the action of(2.3)isG=M+1i=1p iδq i−NRδτ(2.6)Upon inserting constraints,the generator reduces toG=Mi=1p iδq i−Hδq M+1.(2.7)Imposing the coordinate condition q M+1=t then yields(2.2)From this form,one can immediately recognize the M pairs of canonical variables and the non-vanishing Hamiltonian of the theory.One can,of course,perform the above analysis for a parameterizedfield theory as well.Here the coordinates appear as four newfield variables q M+µ=xµ(τα),and there are four extra momenta p M+µ(τα)conjugate to them.Four constraint equations are required to relate these momenta to the Hamiltonian density and thefield momentum density,and correspondingly,there are four Lagrange multipliers Nµ(τα)for afield.An example in which the scalar mesonfield is parameterized may be found in III.3.First-Order Form of the Gravitational Field3.1.The Einstein action infirst-order(Palatini)form.The usual action integral for general relativity1I= d4x L= d4x√−g gµν).These Lagrange equations of motion are then second-order differential equations.It is our aim to obtain a canonical form for these equations,that is,to put them in the form˙q=∂H/∂p,˙p=−∂H/∂q.As a preliminary step,we will restate the Lagrangian so that the equations of motion have two of the properties of canonical equations:(1)they arefirst-order equations;and(2)they are solved explicitly for the time derivatives.The second property will be obtained by a3+1dimensional breakup of the original four-dimensional quantities,as will be discussed below.Thefirst property is insured by using a Lagrangian linear infirst derivatives.In relativity,this is called the Palatini Lagrangian,and consists in regarding the Christoffel symbols Γµανas independent quantities in the variational principle(see,for example,Schr¨o dinger,1950). Thus,one may rewrite(3.1)asI= d4x gµνRµν(Γ)(3.2) whereRµν(Γ)≡Γµαν,α−Γµαα,ν+ΓµανΓαββ−ΓµαβΓνβα.(3.3) Note that these covariant components Rµνof the Ricci tensor do not involve the metric but only the affinityΓµαν.Thus,by varying gµν,one obtains directly the Einsteinfield equationsGµν≡Rµν−1gαβ(gµβ,ν+gνβ,µ−gµν,β).2The Palatini formulation of general relativity has a direct analog in Maxwell theory,the affinity corresponding to thefield strength Fµνand the metric to the vector potential Aµ.Here the Lagrangian isL=Aµ,νFµν+11We use units such that16πγc−4=1=c,whereγis the Newtonian gravitational constant;electric charge is in rationalized tin indices run from1to3,Greek from0to3,and x0=t.Derivatives are denoted by a comma or the symbol∂µ.with Aµand Fµνto be independently varied.Thefield equations then becomeFµν,ν=0(3.6a) andAν,µ−Aµ,ν=Fµν(3.6b) which correspond to(3.4a)and(3.4b).The next step in achieving canonical form is to single out time derivatives by introducing three-dimensional notation.For the Maxwellfield,we thus defineE i≡F0i.(3.7a) Since the canonical form requires equations offirst order in time derivatives(but not in space derivatives),we may use the equationF ij=A j,i−A i,j to eliminate F ij.In terms of the abbreviationB i≡1(B i B i+E i E i)−A0E i,i.(3.8)2At this stage,the Maxwell equations are obtained by varying L with respect to the independent quantities E i,A i,and A0.3-2.Three-plus-one dimensional decomposition of the Einsteinfield.The three-dimensional quantities appropriate for the Einsteinfield are(as will be discussed in detail later)g ij≡4g ij,N≡(−4g00)−1/2,N i≡4g0i(3.9a)πij≡−4g=N√−4g4R=−g ij∂tπij−NR0−N i R i−2(πij N j−1g),i(3.13) whereR0≡−√2π2−πijπij)](3.14a)R i≡−2πij|j.(3.14b) The quantity3R is the curvature scalar formed from the spatial metric g ij,|indicates the covariant derivative using this metric,and spatial indices are raised and lowered using g ij and g ij.(Similarly,π≡πi i.)As in the electromagnetic example,we have allowed second-order space derivatives to appear by eliminating such quantities asΓi k j in terms of g ij,k.One may verify directly that thefirst-order Lagrangian(3.13)correctly gives rise to the Einstein equations.One obtains∂t g ij=2Ng−1/2(πij−1g(3R ij−12Ng−1/2g ij(πmnπmn−12ππij)+√2δ0µ4R=0equations,while equations(3.15b)are linear combinations of theseequations and the remaining six Einstein equations(4G ij=0).3.3.Geometrical interpretation of dynamical variables.Before proceeding with the reduction to canonical form,it is enlightening to examine,from a geometrical point of view,our specific choices(3.9)of three-dimensional variables.Geometrically,their form is governed by the requirement thatthe basic variables be three-covariant under all coordinate transformations which leave the t=constsurfaces unchanged.Any quantities which have this property can be defined entirely within thesurface(this is clearly appropriate for the3+1dimensional breakup).One fundamental four-dimensional object which is clearly also three-dimensional is a curve xµ(λ)which lies entirelywithin the3-surface,i.e.,x0(λ)=const.The vector vµ≡dxµ/dλtangent to this curve is therefore also three-dimensional.The restriction that the curve lie in the surface t=const is then v0=0,and conversely any vector Vµ,with V0=0is tangent to some curve in the surface.Three suchindependent vectors are Vµ(i)=δµi.Given any covariant tensor Aµ...ν,its projection onto thesurface is then Vµ(i)...Vν(j)Aµ...ν=A i...j.Thus,the covariant spatial components of any four-tensorform a three-tensor which depends only on the surface2(in contrast to the contravariant spatial components which are scalar products with gradients rather than tangents,and hence depend also on the choice of spatial coordinates in the immediate neighborhood of the surface).This accounts for the choice of g ij,rather than4g ij.In contrast,N and N i do not have the desired invariance and,in fact,by choosing coordinates such that the x i=const lines are normal to the surface,one obtains N i=0.(If x0is arranged to measure proper time along these lines,one has also N=1.) By the same argument,one can see that A i and F ij are appropriate three-dimensional quantities in a general relativistic discussion of the Maxwellfield.The quantity which plays the role of a momentum is more difficult to define within the surface, since it refers to motion in time leading out of the original t=const surface.Such a quantityis,however,provided by the second fundamental form K ij(see,for example,Eisenhart,1949), which gives the radii of curvature of the t=const surface as measured in the surrounding four-space.These“extrinsic curvatures”describe how the normals to the surface converge or diverge, and hence determine the geometry of a parallel surface at an infinitesimally later time.Since K ij describes a geometrical property of the t=const surface,as imbedded in four-space,it again does not depend on the choice of coordinates away from the surface.This may also be seen from a standard definition,K ij=−n(i;j),which expresses K ij as the covariant spatial part of the tensor n(µ;ν)(the four-dimensional covariant derivative of the unit normal,nµ=−Nδ0µto the surface).3 For convenience in ultimately reaching canonical form,we have chosen,instead of K ij,the closely related variableπij=−√3Thus one has K ij=−n=−n(i,j)+nµΓiµj=NΓi0j.(i;j)form∂t u a=f a(u)(a=1,2,3,4).These equations govern the motion of a system of two degrees offreedom.This is to be expected,since the linearized gravitationalfield is a massless spin twofield,and the self-interaction of the full theory should not alter such kinematical features as the numberof degrees of freedom.3.5.The gravitationalfield as an already parameterized system.To conclude this section,we point out the characteristic properties of the Einstein Lagrangian of(3.13).We reproduce it herewith a divergence4and a total time derivative5discarded:L=πij∂t g ij−NR0−N i R i,Rµ=Rµ(g ij,πij).(3.17) Equation(3.17)is thus precisely in the form of a parameterized theory’s Lagrangian as in(2.3).This form just expresses the invariance of the theory with respect to transformations of the fourcoordinates xµand hence the xµare parameters in exactly the same sense thatτwas in the particlecase.That the N and N i are truly Lagrange multipliers follows from the fact that they do notappear in the pq′(i.e.,πij∂t g ij)part of L.Their variation yields the four constraint equations Rµ,=0.The“Hamiltonian”H′≡NR0+N i R i vanishes due to the constraints.The true non-vanishing Hamiltonian of the theory will arise only after the constraint variables have been eliminated andcoordinate conditions chosen.The analysis leading to the canonical form is carried out in the nextsection.4.Canonical Form for General Relativity4.1.Analysis of generating functions.We are now in a position to cast the general theory into canonical form.The geometrical considerations of Section3were useful in obtaining the Lagrangian in the form(3.17),which,in the light of Section2,we recognized as the Lagrangian of a parameterizedfield theory corresponding to(2.3).The reduction of(3.17)to the canonical form analogous to(2.1)requires an identification of thefour extra momenta to be eliminated by the constraint equations(3.15c).To this end we considerthe generator arising from(3.17):G= d3x[πijδg ij+T0µ′δxµ].(4.1)The T0µ′δxµterm comes from the independent coordinate variations.However,T0µ′vanishes as a consequence of the constraint equations.6For example,T00′=−NR0−N i R i=0.When the constraints are inserted,G reduces toG= d3xπijδg ij(4.2)[corresponding to(2.7)]where four of the twelve(g ij,πij)are understood to have been expressed in terms of the rest by solving Rµ=0for them.This elimination exhausts the content of theconstraint equations.Finally,as in the particle case,coordinate conditions(now four in number) must be chosen and this information inserted into(4.2),leaving one now with only four dynamical variables(πA,φA).If,in fact,the generator at this stage has the formG= d3x 2 A=1πAδφA+T0µ(πA,φA)δxµ (4.3)then the theory is clearly in canonical form withπA andφA as canonical variables and T0µδxµthe generator of translationsδxµ.In(4.3),T0µ[πA,φA]has arisen in the elimination of the extra momenta p M+µ,by solving the constraint equations,and the xµ,now represent the four variables chosen as coordinates q M+µ.For the Maxwellfield,the generator corresponding to(4.2)is,by(3.8),G= d3x[−E iδA i−1(E iT E iT+B i B i)δt+(E T×B)·δr].2Note that A i L has automatically disappeared from the kinetic term(by orthogonality),and never existed in B≡∇×A=∇×A T.Thus,the two canonically conjugate pairs of Maxwellfield variables are−E iT and A i T.4.2.Analysis of constraint equations in linearized theory-orthogonal decomposition of the metric.In order to achieve the form(4.3)for relativity,it is useful to be guided by the linearized theory.Here one must treat the constraint equations to second order since our general formalism shows that the Hamiltonian arises from them.Through quadratic terms,equations(3.15c)may be written in the formg ij,ij−g ii,jj=P20[g ij,πij](4.4a)−2πij,j=P2i[g ij,πij](4.4b) where P20and P2i are purely quadratic functions of g ij andπij.These equations determine one component of g ij and three components ofπij in terms of the rest.The content of equations(4.4) can be seen more easily if one makes the following linear orthogonal decomposition on g ij andπij. For any symmetric array f ij=f ji one hasf ij=f ij T T+f ij T+(f i,j+f j,i)(4.5) where each of the quantities on the right-hand side can be expressed uniquely as a linear functional of f ij.The quantities f ij T T are the two transverse traceless components of f ij(f ij T T,j≡0,f ii T T≡0). The trace of the transverse part of f ij,i.e.,f T,uniquely defines f ij T according tof ij T≡1。
描写班级的现状作文英语
Our class is a vibrant and dynamic community,a microcosm of the larger school environment.It is a place where diverse personalities,interests,and talents come together to create a rich and engaging atmosphere.Here is a detailed description of the current state of our class.1.Diversity of Students:Our class is composed of students from various backgrounds, each bringing their unique perspectives and experiences.This diversity fosters a culture of acceptance and learning from one another.2.Academic Performance:Academically,our class is striving for excellence.The majority of students are dedicated to their studies,with many achieving high grades. However,there are also students who struggle and require additional support,which the class provides through study groups and peer tutoring.3.Participation in Extracurricular Activities:Many of our classmates are actively involved in extracurricular activities,ranging from sports teams to clubs focused on arts, sciences,and community service.This involvement not only enriches their school experience but also contributes to their personal growth.4.Classroom Environment:The classroom environment is generally positive and conducive to learning.Teachers are approachable and supportive,creating a space where students feel comfortable asking questions and expressing their ideas.5.Social Dynamics:Socially,our class has a mix of closeknit groups and individuals who are more independent.While there is a general sense of camaraderie,there are also instances of cliques and occasional misunderstandings.The class is working towards fostering a more inclusive social environment.e of Technology:Technology plays a significant role in our class.Students use laptops and tablets for research,assignments,and presentations.The integration of technology has enhanced our learning experience,though it also presents challenges in terms of digital distractions.7.Coping with Challenges:Like any group,our class faces challenges such as managing workload,dealing with peer pressure,and navigating the complexities of adolescence. However,we have support systems in place,including counselors and mentors,to help us overcome these obstacles.munity Involvement:Our class is not just focused on academic success but also on giving back to the community.We regularly participate in charity events,environmental initiatives,and volunteer work,which helps us develop a sense of social responsibility.9.Class Spirit:There is a strong sense of class spirit,evident during school events,sports meets,and cultural festivals.This spirit is a testament to our unity and collective pride.10.Future Aspirations:Looking ahead,our class is filled with aspirations and dreams. Students are encouraged to set goals and work towards them,with the class providing a supportive network to help achieve these ambitions.In conclusion,our class is a blend of academic rigor,social interaction,and personal growth.It is a place where we learn not just from books but from each other,and where we are preparing to step into the world as responsible and wellrounded individuals.。
Canonicalandnon-canonicalclauses规范和非规范的条款
Canonical and non-canonical clauses
Describing English is easier if we first describe a set of clauses of rather basic form and then describe what elaborations are possible. So, purely for descriptive convenience, we designate a class of clauses as canonical clauses: those that are
Canonical and non-canonical clauses
Canonical clauses come in various types:
Simple intransitive: Bears hibernate.
Su
V
Simple transitive: Bears love honey.
We simply stipulate that only clauses with those properties will be called canonical.
The idea is not of theoretical import. It is just that later on it turns out to be easier to explain what negated or interrogative clauses are like if we can make reference to a prior account of what non-negated and non-interrogative clauses are like.
Unit One An Image or a Mirage III《2》
Unit One An Image or a Mirage III. A.从更大的范围上讲,选民们往往仅因为某个政客的外表整洁清秀而对他做出有利的反应。
他的对手则因为没有生就一副令人信任的外表而常常遭到否定的评价。
这种判断是错误的,其后果可能是灾难性的。
就算许多选民投一位候选人的票完全是出于政治原因,但本不该当选的人,如果他有整洁清秀的形象,就会使他在势均力敌的选举中占有优势。
我们常常根据一个人的表达能力而做出轻率的判断。
再回到政治这一话题上来,许多选民仅仅根据候选人公开演讲的方式就对他的能力做出判断。
然而,一个候选人可能非常善于演说,但并不一定能胜任他所竞选的职位。
我认识许多才能杰出的人物,他们只是没有培养自己在公开场合演讲的能力,但在与别人一对一的交流中却表现极为出色。
这种能充分表达自己见解的能力,固然十分重要,但我们对于那些让人感觉善于辞令的人,往往产生错误的印象,因为很多情况下这种优点仅仅只是“表面现象”。
不难想象,一位外表整洁清秀、讲话娓娓动听的政治家会轻而易举地战胜一位不事张扬但更为合格的对手。
他之所以取胜仅仅是因为他的形象令人信服。
If you want a winning image with others, your first concern must be a winning self-image. The individual who has a losing self-image will never be able to project a winning image to others. He may be able to fool some people for a while, but his poor self-image will eventually make it impossible for him to relate favorably to others. Throughout the ages, great philosophers have stated, “You are what you think you are.”It is imperative for you to have good image of yourself if you want to create the same impression in others.No matter who you are, everything worthwhile will depend on your own self-image. Your happiness will be based on it. You will live only one life, and in order to enjoy it, you must have a winning self-image. Since we can all choose how we want to think ourselves, we should try to have positive, winning thoughts. In your own attempt to build a winning image you must begin with the self —otherwise, the image you strive for will be supported by nothing but a sand foundation.Any athlete will tell you that you must know you’re a winner in order to be one. To many, this kind of message will sound like double-talk, but it contains an essential truth. Although you can apply this same message to anything in life, I will use athletics as the basis for illustrating my thoughts about self-images because sports involve physical exertion by which desired results can be achieved.Unit 2 Is Love An Art?A.学习艺术的过程可以很方便地分为两个部分:一是精通理论;二是善于实践。
Cauchyscriterionforconvergence
5. Cauchy’s criterion
The definition of convergence refers to the number X to which the sequence converges. But it is rare to know explicitly what a series converges to. In fact, the whole point of series is often that they converge to something interesting which you might not know how to describe otherwise. For example, it is essentially the definition of e that it is the number to which the series
xn 1−x
<
or xn < (1 − x)
if n > K. But we can practically take as given in this course that this is so, or in other words that if |x| < 1 then the sequence xn converges to 0. Explicitly, we can solve
6. Convergence by comparison
Theorem. If the series of non-negative terms
x0 + x1 + x2 + · · · converges and |yi| ≤ xi for each i, then the series
The canonical forms of a lattice rule
Abstract.
1. Notation Used to Describe and Classify Lattice Rules
An s-dimensional lattice, , is a set of points having the property that, when p and q are members of , so are p + q and p ? q. It may be de ned by this property, together with a restriction that there are no points of accumulation. A very familiar lattice is the unit lattice 0, which comprises all points p = (p1 ; p2; : : :; ps ), all of whose components pi are integers. An integration lattice is a lattice that contains the unit lattice 0 as a sublattice. A lattice rule Q( ) is a quadrature rule for 0; 1)s that employs the points of \ 0; 1)s as an abscissa set A(Q) and assigns an equal weight to each. Some lattice rules are useful for integrating naturally periodic functions. Other lattice rules may be very ine cient. A representative selection of the literature on lattice rules may be found in Sloan (1992) and Niederreiter (1992). The investigation of lattice rules is hampered by two features: rst, the large numbers of di erent rules that are available, and second, a bewildering lack of uniqueness in the various convenient representations for investigating rules and for classifying them. A classical approach to lattices is based on the generator matrix. It is readily shown that, given any s-dimensional lattice , there exists a set of s generators a1; a2; : : :; as such that all points s X p = i ai i integer lie in the lattice, and all lattice points are of this form. The s s matrix A whose j -th row is aj (j = 1; 2; : : : ; s) is referred to as a generator matrix of the lattice. When 1
北京化工大学自动控制原理期末复习
Observer (duality)
correction term L(yC~ x), close-loop observer:
~ x A ~ x B L ( u y C ~ x ) ( A L ) ~ x C B L uy
weight matrix L
Observer equation:
1
A
P
0
0
P
1
n
e1t
eAt
P
0
0
P1
ent
1 1
1 1
AQ
1 2
Q 1 1
2
e1t
te1t
t 2 e1t 2
e At
Q
e1t te1t e1t
10
F H
G
J
Nx Nu
0 1
NNuxHF
G10 J 1
r
Nu
uNurK(xNxr)
Kx(Nu KNx)r
Nx
-K
u
y
Plant
x
uKxNr
r
N
u
y
Plant
x
-K Full state feedback with reference inp11ut
contained in f(t)
s 2max
16
u (t ) u (t) ZOH u (t )
0
u (t )
k k 1
t
u (t) u (k)T k , T t (k 1 ) T
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Roger A. Horn∗ and Vladimir V. Sergeichuk†
Abstract We use methods of the general theory of congruence and *congruence for complex matrices—regularization and cosquares—to determine a unitary congruence canonical form (respectively, a unitary *congruence ¯ (respectively, A2 ) canonical form) for complex matrices A such that AA is normal. As special cases of our canonical forms, we obtain—in a coherent and systematic way—known canonical forms for conjugate normal, congruence normal, coninvolutory, involutory, projection, λ-projection, and unitary matrices. But we also obtain canonical forms for matrices whose squares are Hermitian or normal, and other cases that do not seem to have been investigated previously. We show that the classification problems under (a) unitary *congru¯ is normal, ence when A3 is normal, and (b) unitary congruence when AAA are both unitarily wild, so there is no reasonable hope that a simple solution to them can be found.
1
As special cases of our canonical forms, we obtain—in a coherent and systematic way—known canonical forms for conjugate normal, congruence normal, coninvolutory, involutory, projection, and unitary matrices. But we also obtain canonical forms for matrices whose squares are Hermitian or normal, λ-projections, and other cases that do not seem to have been investigated previously. Moreover, the meaning of the parameters in the various canonical forms is revealed, along with an understanding of when two matrices in a given type are in the same equivalence class. Finally, we show that the classification problems under (a) unitary *congru¯ is normal, are ence when A3 is normal, and (b) unitary congruence when AAA both unitarily wild, so there is no reasonable hope that a simple solution to them can be found.
∗ Mathematics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA 84103, rhorn@ † Institute of Mathematics, Tereshchenkivska 3, Kiev, Ukraine, sergeich@imath.kiev.ua. Partially supported by FAPESP (S˜ ao Paulo), processo 05/59407-6.
2
Notation and definitions
All the matrices that we consider are complex. We denote the set of n-by-n complex matrices by Mn . The transpose of A = [aij ] ∈ Mn is AT = [aji ] and the ¯T = [¯ conjugate transpose is A∗ = A aji ]; the trace of A is tr A = a11 + · · · + ann . ¯ = I; We say that A ∈ Mn is: unitary if A∗ A = I ; coninvolutory if AA 2 a λ-projection if A = λA for some λ ∈ C (involutory if λ = 1); normal if A∗ A = AA∗ ; conjugate normal if A∗ A = AA∗ ; squared normal if A2 is normal; ¯ is normal. For example, a unitary matrix is both and congruence normal if AA normal and conjugate normal; a Hermitian matrix is normal but need not be conjugate normal; a symmetric matrix is conjugate normal but need not be normal. If A is nonsingular, it is convenient to write A−T = (A−1 )T and A−∗ = −1 ∗ (A ) ; the cosquare of A is A−T A and the *cosquare is A−∗ A. We consider the congruence equivalence relation (A = SBS T for some nonsingular S ) and the finer equivalence relation unitary congruence (A = U BU T for some unitary U ). We also consider the *congruence equivalence relation (A = SBS ∗ for some nonsingular S ) and the finer equivalence relation unitary *congruence (A = U BU ∗ for some unitary U ). Two pairs of square matrices of the same size (A, B ) and (C, D) are said to be congruent, and we write (A, B ) = S (C, D)S T , if there is a nonsingular S such that A = SBS T and C = SDS T ; unitary congruence, * congruence, and unitary * congruence of two pairs of matrices are defined analogously. Our consistent point of view is that unitary *congruence is a special kind of *congruence (rather than a special kind of similarity) that is to be analyzed with methods from the general theory of *congruence. In a parallel development, we treat unitary congruence as a special kind of congruence, rather than as a special kind of consimilarity. [8, Section 4.6] The null space of a matrix A is denoted by N (A) = {x ∈ Cn : Ax = 0}; dim N (A), the dimension of N (A), is the nullity of A. The quantities dim N (A), dim N (AT ), dim N (A) ∩ N (AT ) , dim N (A∗ ), and dim (N (A) ∩ N (A∗ )) play an important role because of their invariance properties: dim N (A), dim N (AT ),
1
Introduction
We use methods of the general theory of congruence and *congruence for complex matrices—regularization and cosquares—to determine a unitary congruence canonical form (respectively, a unitary *congruence canonical form) for ¯ (respectively, A2 ) is normal. complex matrices A such that AA We prove a regularization algorithm that reduces any singular matrix by unitary congruence or unitary *congruence to a special block form. For matrices of the two special types under consideration, this special block form is a direct sum of a nonsingular matrix and a singular matrix; the singular summand is a direct sum of a zero matrix and some canonical singular 2-by-2 blocks. Analysis of the cosquare and *cosquare of the nonsingular direct summand reveals 1-by-1 and 2-by-2 nonsingular canonical blocks.