new-zealand-14-wellington-region_v1_m56577569830517023

合集下载

New Zealand 简介

New Zealand 简介

• Schooling in New Zealand is compulsory for all children aged 6 to 16.The compulsory schooling is divided into primary,intermediate or middle,and secondary schooling.The school year,based on four terms,usually runs from late January to m•
Language
• Both English and Maori are official languages of New Zealand .In April 2006, New Zealand became the first country to declare sign language as an official language,alongside English and Maori . • Maori is only used in New Zealand and nowhere else in the world.Despite its official status,the language continues to struggle for life.It is only recently that the Maori language has gathered widespread support.
• New Zealand is nominally Christian,but there is no official state religion.
People
• New Zealand’s indigenous(土生土长 的)Maori people have aunique and fascinating language and culture. The Maori arts,including traditional and contemporary arts,are still kept alive and flourishing.Excellent examples of weaving and carving can be found in today’s museums and shops.Craftsmanship(手艺) of the Maoris is famous for its varied designs and rich forms.Nowdays,some people,while replicating the techniques used hundreds ot years ago,also adopted innovative techniques and forms to develop this ancient form of Maori arts.

新西兰简介全英文

新西兰简介全英文

1. North Island
The largest lake in New Zealand is Lake Taupo. It is 40 kilometers long and 27 kilometers wide. Formed in the crater of an extinct volcano, Lake Taupo is one with many hot springs and spectacular scenery.
What do you need to know about New Zealand? Where is New Zealand located? What are the geographical features of New Zealand? What are the types of climate in New Zealand? What are the unique plants and animals in New Zealand? How is the population distributed in New Zealand? What are the major ethnic groups and their languages? What are the main religions in New Zealand?
1. North Island
Mount Ruapehu is the highest mountain in the North Island (2,797 m), which is still alive. Closely related to the repeated volcanic activities are the rich resources of geothermal power in the North Island. Here, plenty of hot springs and geysers could be found as a result of the underground heat.

Welcome+to+New+Zealand新西兰英语阅读

Welcome+to+New+Zealand新西兰英语阅读

Welcome to New Zealand! This lively country is made up of two main islands that lie in the South Pacific Ocean. Mountains, glaciers and volcanoes make the islands beautiful to visit and explore.New Zealand ChallengeHow much do you know about New Zealand? Find out by taking our quiz below.1.New Zealand is about the size of which U.S. state?New JerseyFloridaColorado2.Who were New Zealand's first inhabitants?The EnglishThe MaoriThe Dutch3.In 1893, New Zealand became the first country to give women which right? The right to voteThe right to own propertyThe right to run for political office4.What do New Zealanders call their parents?AncientsRelicsOldies5.The Sky Tower in Auckland is 1,076 feet tall. How does the building's height set it apart?It's the tallest building in the southern hemisphereIt's the same height as Mount EverestIt's the tallest building in the northern hemisphere6.What is the name of New Zealand's highest mountain?Mount TasmanMount FujiMount Cook (Aoraki)7.Which is the fastest growing city in New Zealand?AucklandWellingtonHamilton8.How do you say "flip-flops" in Kiwi?JelliesJandalsFlippiesGet to know New Zealand! Here are some facts about its land, products and culture.Official name: New ZealandSize: 103,737 square miles; about the size of ColoradoPopulation: 4,290,347 as of 2011Capital: WellingtonOfficial Language: English, MaoriCurrency: New Zealand Dollar (NZD)Literacy: 99%Climate: Winter is wet and blustery and summer is clear and sunnyAgricultural Products: Wheat, barley, potatoes, grapes, kiwifruit, dairy products, wool, beefMajor industries: Wood and paper, machinery, clothing, mining, tourismAucklandAuckland was first settled by Maori tribes around 1350. By the time European settlers arrived in 1840, it was almost deserted. Today, Auckland is NewZealand's largest and fastest growing city. Snuggled between two coasts, Auckland has many harbors and is said to have the most pleasure boats perperson of any city in the world. The Sky Tower (pictured to the left) is the city's most distinctive landmark. At 1,076 feet tall, the tower is the tallest building in the southern hemisphere!ChristchurchChristchurch is the largest city in New Zealand's South Island. In the past, the city was centered on agriculture. Today it is a refined modern city. The beautiful Christ Church Cathedral (pictured above) can be found in the city's Cathedral Square. The Avon River winds through the city and is one of Christchurch's major attractions. Visitors and locals enjoy walking along the paths and bridges that dot the river. They also can be found floating downstream in boatsWellingtonWellington is New Zealand's capital city. It is home to the Parliament building and many other cultural treasures. The city rests between rolling green hills and a wide waterfront. A highlight of the city's arts, cultural and historical attractions is Te Papa, the national museum. It is one of the largest national museums in the world and holds many Maori pieces, including a carved meetinghouse. It also displays the original Treaty of Waitangi.DunedinThe first settlers to arrive in the area surrounding Dunedin were Scottish. The city's Scottish roots give it a unique character. Dunedin was New Zealand's business center during the gold rush in the 1860s. At that time, leaders built the city center, called the Octagon, to be the central focus. Today it remains a popular gathering spot for picnics, festivals and meetings.Aoraki/Mount CookAt 12,349 feet, Aoraki/Mount Cook is New Zealand's tallest mountain. Legend says that a boy named Aoraki and his three brothers were at sea when their canoe overturned on a reef. When the brothers climbed on top of their canoe, freezing wind turned them to stone. The canoe became the South Island and Aoraki and his brothers became the peaks of the mountains.Aoraki/Mount Cook is where famous New Zealander Sir Edmund Hillary trained before he made his historic trek up Mount Everest.New Zealand’s Hist ory600 A.D. -1300 A.D. The first inhabitants of New Zealand, the Maori, arrive from eastern Polynesia.1642 Dutch sailor Abel Janszoon Tasman becomes the first European to reach New Zealand.1769 English explorer Captain James Cook makes the first of his three voyages to the islands. His journals inspire other Europeans to explore New Zealand.1840 The Maori sign the Treaty of Waitangi giving control to the British in exchange for protection and guaranteed Maori possession of their lands1860 A decade of land wars begins between the Maoris and European settlers.1861 Gold is discovered in Tuapeka. This leads to a gold rush.1893 New Zealand becomes the first country to give women the right to vote. 1907 The country becomes a dominion, or self-governing community, within the British Empire.1947 New Zealand gains independence from Great Britain.1953 New Zealander Sir Edmund Hillary becomes the first person to climb to the top of Mount Everest.1985 New Zealand no longer allows U.S. nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed ships to enter its ports. French secret service agents blow up a Greenpeace ship called Rainbow Warrior in Auckland Harbor.1987 New Zealand hosts and wins the inaugural Rugby World Cup.1997 Jennifer Shipley becomes the country's first female prime minister. 2005 Prime Minister Helen Clark wins her third election.2010 New Zealand sends military forces to Afghanistan for the third time at the request of the U.S.New Zealand: Native LingoNew Zealanders speak English, but it helps to have a translator when it comes to some of their slang words. The examples below will help you talk like a true Kiwi.New ZealanderKiwiToiletDunnyFish and chips GreasiesIce blockIce popCandyLollyFlip-flops Jandals ThanksTaHelloG'day Sausage Snarler Relatives Rellies Sunglasses Sunnies Parents Oldies。

新西兰国家概况PPT

新西兰国家概况PPT

货 币
携入或携出新西兰的外国货币金额并无限制。不过携 入或携出超过10,000新西兰元的现金必需填交“携带 现金报告表。
人文地理之教体(一)
新西兰的教育体制被视为世界上最好的教育体制之一,他 们通过学校、大学、技工学院和其它教育机构提供高质量 教育,新西兰的教育体系源于英国的传统教育体制,全国 实行统一的教育体系,教育经费开支占政府开支第三位。 早期幼儿教育不是义务教育。在新西兰,6至16岁的孩子 都必须接受小学、中学和高中义务教育,新西兰的大多数 孩子5岁开始上学,19岁以前在公立学校上学为免费教育。 上完中学的学生可以继续接受高等教育和培训,这可以在 理工学院、教育学院、大学和私立培训机构进行,学生需 要为他们的高等教育缴纳学费。著名学府:奥克兰大学、 奥克兰理工大学、惠灵顿维多利亚大学、梅西大学、 坎特伯雷大学、林肯大学、奥塔哥大学、怀卡托大学。
新西兰行政区划
北岛
北大地区 奥克兰大区 怀卡托大区 普伦蒂湾大区 吉斯伯恩大区 霍克湾大区 惠灵顿大区 塔拉纳基大区 马纳瓦图-旺 加努伊大区
南岛
塔斯曼大区
马尔堡大区
尼尔逊大区 南地大区
西岸大区
坎特伯雷大区 奥塔哥大区
新西兰位于太平洋西南部,是个岛屿国家。新西兰两大岛屿以 库克海峡分隔,南岛邻近南极洲,北岛与斐济及汤加相望,面 积26.8万平方公里。首都惠灵顿,最大的城市是奥克兰。属于 发达国家。过去二十年,新西兰经济成功地从农业为主,转型 为具有国际竞争力的工业化自由市场经济。鹿茸、羊肉、奶制 品和粗羊毛的出口值皆为世界第一。新西兰气候宜人、环境清 新、风景优美、旅游胜地遍布、森林资源丰富、地表景观富变 化,生活水平也相当高,排名联合国人类发展指数第3位。
教 育
人文地理之教体(二)

Agile Project Management

Agile Project Management

Agile Project ManagementRashina Hoda Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand+64 4 463 6778 hodarash@Prof. James NobleVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand+64 4 463 6736kjx@Dr. Stuart MarshallVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand+64 4 463 6730stuart.marshall@ABSTRACTAs agile software development gains awareness and popularity in the software industry, it also continues to capture the interest of the research community. There are several topics within the agile software development area that demand deeper understanding and research. One such topic is 'Agile Project Management' which relates to the management of software projects that are developed using various agile frameworks such as eXtreme Programming (XP) and Scrum.This paper outlines proposed research on agile project management. In particular we hope to explore the role of the project manager, the process and problems of transitioning into an agile framework, and the management of outsourced agile projects.Categories & Subject Descriptors:K.6.1 Project and People Management: Management techniquesK.6.3 Software Management: Software development/process General TermsManagement, Experimentation, Human Factors, Theory. KeywordsAgile Methodologies, Agile Project Management, Outsourcing or Off-shoring, Project Manager, Transitioning.1. INTRODUCTIONAgile development methodologies are becoming popular in the industry [1] and consequently companies and practitioners are faced with the challenge of understanding and embracing this new paradigm. They are eager to know what it is, how it works, and what does it take to make it work. Companies or practitioners interested in adopting agile frameworks are faced with the challenge of making the transition. Traditional roles are challenged and processes are revamped to reflect the new development methodologies. In this new setup, we find three major areas of concern and wish to explore them as the main aims of our research.1.1 Aim of the ResearchThe objective of the research is to investigate 'Agile Project Management' within companies, practitioners, or mentors using agile software methodologies such as XP, Scrum, Crystal etc. The investigation is expected to delve into the following sub-topics, and closely examine:The role of the project manager in an agile project.The process and problems of transitioning into an agile framework.Management of off-shored or outsourced agile software projects.2. MOTIV ATIONLooking specifically at the aims of our research above, we begin to formulate some of the most obvious questions surrounding these issues. For instance, it will be interesting to explore the kinds of pressure the manager faces in trying to bring the agile principles to life. With agile processes promoting the concept of 'self-directed teams' [1], is there room for the conventional project manager or does this role also need to evolve to suit the principles of the new paradigm? How are the agile manager roles different from the traditional manager roles?How do organizations adapt to a radically new framework such as agile? Does it merely take up gradation of technical skills or a complete change in outlook and the way the organization works?Finally, as outsourcing becomes a common practice, we are faced with other challenging questions. How difficult is agile project management for outsourced or off-shored projects? Does communication become a prime concern or does management suffer at the hands of trying to synchronize distributed teams spanning different continents and time zones? Is agility thrust upon the teams that the projects are outsourced to by their parent companies or do they freely choose to follow agile processes?These are the issues we hope to investigate in our case studies. For the rest of the paper, we first explain the concepts of agile methodologies like XP and Scrum and the basics of grounded theory as a qualitative research method. Then we discuss the issues surrounding agile project management. This is followed by planned road map of the research. And finally we present the conclusion.This paper was published in the proceedings of the New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference 2008. Copyright is held by the author/owner(s).NZCSRSC 2008, April 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand.Agile Project Management219 3. BACKGROUNDThe research focuses on agile methods like eXtremeProgramming (XP) and Scrum and use grounded theory as aqualitative research method. Before we describe the details ofthe proposed research, we discuss these concepts in more detail.3.1 Agile MethodsAgile methodologies follow iterative and incremental style ofdevelopment that dynamically adjusts to changing requirementsand enables better risk management. The four basic principlesof agile as defined by the Agile manifesto [2] are:individuals and interactions over process and tools,working software over comprehensivedocumentation,customer collaboration over contract negotiation,responding to change over following a plan.There are differences between the traditional ways of softwaredevelopment and the agile style of working. Some of theprominent ones are highlighted in Table 1.Table 1. Comparative Chart – Traditional vs. AgileCategories Traditional AgileDevelopment Model Traditional IterativeFocus Process PeopleManagement Controlling FacilitatingCustomer involvement Requirementsgathering anddelivery phasesOn-site andconstantly involvedDevelopers Work individuallywithin teams Collaborative or in pairsTechnology Any Mostly ObjectOrientedProduct Features All included Most important firstTesting End ofdevelopment cycle Iterative and/or Drives codeDocumentation Thorough Only when needed In real life development, its common to experience frequent change requests in customer requirements. The traditional forms of development left little scope of refactoring to address this need. They adopt the traditional model of development which unrealistically assumes that the customer requirements remain fixed over the entire length of the project. Agile methodologies on the other hand are focused towards customer satisfaction and therefore allow for changes through iterative style of development where only needed functionalities are focused on. Since only a hand full of tasks are achieved in one iteration, its easier to modify functionalities as needed and manage the associated risks better.There are many versions of agile methodologies such as Crystal, Feature Driven Development (FDD), Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM), and Adaptive Software Development. For our research purposes we concentrate on the more popular XP and Scrum flavours.3.1.1 eXtreme Programming (XP)XP was created by Kent Beck [3], who compiled a collection of good practices and took them to the extreme. Its mostly targeted at small to medium sized projects and has gained rapid acceptance and practice over the world.The five XP values are communication, simplicity, feedback, courage, and respect. Its hallmark principles are planning game, small releases, metaphors, simple design, refactoring, pair programming, testing, collective ownership, 40-hour work week, on-site customer, coding standards, and continuous integration.Customers provide the specification of required functionalities in the form of user stories [4]. They are written concisely in non-technical formats and focus on the needs of the user avoiding any design details. They help the developers to estimate the implementation time and go into the release planning.Each short iteration achieves a handful of tasks and its recommended that a steady project velocity be maintained. Developers work in pairs and perform unit tests and integrate code often. The customer is ideally available on-site and is closely involved in the development through rapid feedback. Refactoring the code to renew obsolete designs and remove redundancy allows for a higher quality product to be produced. Testing is an important part and is undertaken frequently in form of unit tests and acceptance test. Finally lengthy documentation is avoided and optimization is left till last.3.1.2 ScrumScrum is another agile development methodology developed by Jeff Sutherland and formalized by Ken Schwaber.The roles involved in this process are Product Owner, Scrum Master, and the team. The Product Owner is responsible for maintaining the correct business perspective. The Scrum Master works with the Product Owner and facilitates the team. The team should contains seven (plus/minus two) members. Activities include sprint planning, sprint review, and scrum meeting. A sprint is usually 2 to 4 weeks of development time where a set of selected stories are worked on. The sprint review reviews the previous sprint in terms of tasks achieved and the next sprint details are defined. The Scrum Master leads a daily 15 minutes meeting where each member briefly describes their tasks and concerns.The artifacts produced are named Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, and Burndown Chart. The product backlog is a list of product features prioritized by value delivered to the customer [5] and is maintained by the Product Owner. The sprint backlog refers to the development tasks that are needed in order to implement a feature and is a subset of the product backlog. The burndown chart shows the total work remaining in a sprint. 3.2 Research Method – Grounded TheoryWe intend to make use of Grounded Theory – a qualitative research method which was originally developed by Glaser and Strauss [6].220R.Hoda,J.Noble,and S.MarshallThe major components of Qualitative Research [7] are:1.the data, which can be derived from different sources,interviews and observations being the most common.2.the different analytic or interpretive procedures thatare used to arrive at theories.3.written and verbal reportAs Strauss and Corbin note in their book on grounded theory [7], “A grounded theory is one that is inductively derived from the study of the phenomenon it represents. That is, it is discovered, developed, and provisionally verified through systematic data collection and analysis of data pertaining to that phenomenon.”According to grounded theorists, research questions may be derived from suggested or assigned research problems, technical literature, and personal and professional experience. In our case it was a combination of all of these factors that led to the finalization of our research topic.As grounded theory suggested, we must not bind ourselves to any preconceived notions and allow important categories to emerge through the iterations of interviews. Therefore, we plan to proceed by conducting a pilot study to understand the real issues within the agile project management area and then improve our list of questions to focus more on the important categories in succeeding interviews.Researchers adopt different methods of coding to handle the large amounts of raw data extracted from the interviews and observations. They need to exhibit a personal quality called 'theoretical sensitivity' in order to derive meaning from the mountains of data gathered.'Theoretical Sensitivity' is defined as “the ability to recognize what is important in data and to give it meaning. It comes from being well grounded in the technical literature as well as from professional and personal experience.” [7]After the split of ideologies occurred between Glaser and Strauss (founders of the Grounded Theory) different views on 'coding paradigms' emerged. According to Strauss, various methods of data analysis can be employed in order to convert the collected data into theories. Some of these are Open Coding, Axial Coding, and Selective Coding. Glaser maintains “all is data” and requires researchers to treat all information, whether derived from interviews, observations, surveys, or statistical analysis etc to be treated as data. It will take more exploration of the two, Glaserian and Straussian, paradigms before we can decide on which one to follow.Now that we have explained the basic paradigms involved in our research, lets explore the topic 'agile project management' in greater detail.4. AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project management is an integral and indispensable part of any software development process. Managing the teams, customer relationships, cost reduction, risk management, maintaining project time line and budget constitute the crux of project management. Although these basic tasks remain the same, their execution details are slightly different for each agile framework. What is drastically different- is the way of thinking. The role of the project manager has undergone considerable changes with the evolution of agile methodologies. While Scrum has introduced the Product Owner and Scrum Master, XP has invented the roles tracker or coach.Sanjiv Augustine and Susan Woodcock explore the role of the project manager and propose the concept of visionary leader as opposed to an uninspired taskmaster.[1] While traditional management was viewed as governing and commanding, experienced agile project managers are preaching of 'self-directed teams' with 'light touch' leadership[1]. Similar sentiments are resonated by Mary Poppendieck in a panel discussion titled Agile Management – An Oxymoron? [8] where Poppendieck notes “I distinguish management tasks – getting the maximum value from the dollar – from leadership tasks – helping people to excel. Leaders are required. Managers are optional.” It will be interesting to observe the new face of project managers in an agile setting through the course of this research. We plan to interview managers about their perceived roles and how different do they find it from the traditional manager roles.Our research also aims to focus on the process and problems of transitioning into an agile framework. Experienced practitioners suggest having a checklist to assess the company's need and readiness for embracing the agile wave. In a paper by Nerur et al. from the University of Arlington, Texas [9] various issues related to transitioning into an agile environment are mentioned. They are broadly divided into people-related, process-related, and technological issues.Finally, the last item on our research agenda is exploring the management of outsourced or off-shored agile projects. We hope to contact and collaborate with companies in India that deal with off-shored agile projects. We find that previous research on outsourcing in an agile environment suggests that there is a co-relation worth exploring. In a paper titled When XP Met Outsourcing [10], the researchers note that they “saw a strong awareness of the interactions between outsourcing arrangements and the XP process”. Sutherland et al.[11] note in their recent paper that in order to ensure success “o utsourced teams must be highly skilled Agile teams and project implementation must enforce geographic transparency with cross-functional teams at remote sites fully integrated with cross-functional teams at the primary site.” We will aim explore these interesting angles further in our case studies. Having done some initial reading and exploring the literature available on agile project management, we now chart out our research road map.5. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH – Road Map5.1 Finding Agile PractitionersAfter gaining Human Ethics Committee approval, the next important and challenging part of the research process is finding interested parties for interviews and observations. We searched for agile companies, groups, and organizations on the Internet and contacted them with details of our research. We also signed up on agile mailing lists and joined user groups of agile enthusiasts. We also gained some contacts in the New Zealand agile community and will follow them up for possibilities of interviews. Searching through different avenues, we are planning to build a set of practitioners and companies that can be representative of the larger agile community. WeAgile Project Management221must however acknowledge that our representative set of practitioners and companies is confined to those that exhibit their interest in participation.5.2 InterviewsIn order to gather information regarding the topic, we will conduct interviews in New Zealand and India. We plan to follow projects averaging between 6 to 12 months and hold interviews and observations at important milestones of the projects or at regular intervals mutually agreed upon by the interviewees. This is so we can get a complete picture of agile project management through the entire life cycle of different projects.5.3 Data CollectionThe data collected will be analyzed as per the principles of grounded theory.. All materials collected will be stored in a secure and confidential way and will be destroyed at the completion of the research.5.4 Building the TheoryThe research will use qualitative analysis methods named Grounded Theory to gather valuable data regarding various issues in Agile Project Management in New Zealand and India. As we gather more data from our case studies, we'll need to undertake in-depth analysis of all the information and follow the systematic coding procedures to arrive at theories. We will also need to revisit the data time and again in order to validate the emerging theories against the raw information and carefully avoid any biases or misinterpretations.6. CONCLUSION - The Future is Agile There is no lack of interest in the research community and the software industry for agile processes, as is evident from the numerous research being conducted on agile practices and from the growing awareness of agile methodologies in the industry. This gives us the motivation and encouragement to explore another important issue in the agile sphere – Agile Project Management, one that demands greater understanding. Our research hopes to explore three specific issues, namely process and problems of transitioning into an agile framework, role of the agile project manager, and management of outsourced agile projects and derive theory to comment on the successful practices in all of these areas.The agile community in New Zealand is respectable in size but difficult to discover and follow, largely because of the lack of a central organization or banner that could cover the regional interests. We are aware of efforts being directed to rectify this problem.The agile community in India seems to be vast and very proactive. It was also encouraging to see their interest and willingness to participate in our research. Societies such as Agile Software Community of India or ASCI [12] are working to support and propagate agile practices in the India software industry and academia.Finally, growing number of companies are adopting agile ways of development in New Zealand, India, and rest of the world. We must develop deeper knowledge and comprehension of the critical issues such as agile project management, if this interest and growth of the agile methodologies is to be sustained. Our proposed research is a step in that direction. 7. REFERENCES[1]Augustine, S., Payne, B., Sencindiver, F., and Woodcock,S. 2005. Agile project management: steering from theedges. Commun. ACM 48, 12 (Dec. 2005), 85-89.[2]/ (Dec. 2007)[3]Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embracechange, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,Boston, MA, 1999[4]/ (Dec. 2007)[5]/view/scrum_framework (asof Dec. 2007)[6]Strauss, Anselm and Glaser, Barney (1967). The Discoveryof Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Adline.[7]Strauss, Anselm and Corbin, Juliet (1990). Basics ofQualitative Research Grounded Theory Procedures andTechniques. Sage Publications.[8]Anderson, L., Alleman, G. B., Beck, K., Blotner, J.,Cunningham, W., Poppendieck, M., and Wirfs-Brock, R.2003. Agile management - an oxymoron?: who needsmanagers anyway? OOPSLA '03. ACM, New York, NY,275-277.[9]Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., and Mangalaraj, G. 2005.Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Commun.ACM 48, 5 (May. 2005), 72-78.[10]Martin, A., Biddle, R., and Noble, J. (2004), When XPMet Outsourcing, Jutta Eckstein & Hubert Baumeister(Ed.)[11]Sutherland, J., Viktorov, A., Blount, J., and Puntikov, N.2007. Distributed Scrum: Agile Project Management with Outsourced Development Teams (January 03 - 06, 2007).HICSS. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 274a.[12]Agile Software Community of India, ASCI. DOI=/ ( Dec. 2007)。

契尔氏产品报价

契尔氏产品报价

天然泥土面膜Rare-Earth Face Masque(Oily/Acne) HK$155(4.2oz)
暗疮修护系列BLEMISH TREATMENT
草本去痘啫喱Blue Herbal Spot treatment HK$145(0.5oz)
暗疮修护膏Drawing Paste with Azulene HK$150(1oz)
茶树油修护化妆水(中偏油及油有暗疮)Tea Tree Oil Toner HK$265(8.4oz)
玫瑰清新化妆水(中偏油)Rosewater Facial Freshener and Toner HK$140(8.4oz)
蓝色草本爽肤水(油性及暗疮局部)Blue Astringent HK$100(4.2oz) HK$145(8.4oz)
Kiehl's契尔氏契尔氏浓缩蛋白素洗发水 Protein Concentrate Shampoo for Oil Hair 500ml HK¥240
"Kiehl's契尔氏全方位运动每天洗发水 All-Sport Everyday Shampoo 250ml HKD130
彩色润唇膏SPF15 Hue30G(黄金莓) Lip Balm SPF15 Hue30G(Golden Berry) HK$90 (0.5oz)
彩色润唇膏SPF15 Hue58B(黑莓) Lip Balm SPF15 Hue58B(Black Raspberry) HK$90 (0.5oz)
特效保湿霜Ultra Facial Cream HK$240 (1.7oz)
特效保湿乳液(中偏干至中偏油)Ultra Facial Moisturizer HK$130(2.5oz) HK$210(4.2oz)

美国亚马逊FBA头程仓库代码

美国亚马逊FBA头程仓库代码

(聚嘉国际)美国亚马逊Code Location State CityPHX3美西-安大略AZ PhoenixPHX5美西-安大略AZ GoodyearPHX6美西-安大略AZ PhoenixPHX7美西-安大略AZ PhoenixTFC1美西-安大略AZ PhoenixONT2美西-安大略CA San BernardinoONT6美西-安大略CA Moreno ValleyONT8美西-安大略CA Moreno ValleyOAK4美西-安大略CA TracyONT9美西-安大略CA RedlandsOAK3美西-安大略CA PattersonOAK5美西-安大略CA NewarkONT5美西-安大略CA San BernardinoSNA4美西-安大略CA RialtoSJC7美西-安大略CA TracyPHL1美东DE New CastlePHL3美东DE New CastlePHL7美东DE MiddletownTPA1美东FL RuskinTPA2美东FL LakelandLAL1美东FL LakelandMCO5美东FL DavenportMIA5美东FL Doral(Miami)ATL6美东GA East PointATL8美东GA Lithia SpringsIND1美东IN WhitestownIND2美东IN PlainfieldIND3美东IN PlainfieldIND4美东IN IndianapolisIND5美东IN PlainfieldSDF8美东IN JeffersonvilleXUSE美东IN WhitestownCMH2美东OH GroveportTUL1美西-安大略KS CoffeyvilleMCI5美西-安大略KS LenexaMKC4美西-安大略KS EdgertonCVG1美东KY HebronCVG2美东KY HebronCVG3美东KY HebronLEX1美东KY LexingtonLEX2美东KY LexingtonSDF1美东KY CampbellsvilleSDF2美东KY LouisvilleSDF4美东KY ShepherdsvilleSDF6美东KY ShepherdsvilleCVG8美东KY FlorenceCVG5美东KY HebronCVG7美东KY HebronSDF7美东KY ShepherdsvilleSDF9美东KY Shepherdsville IVSA美东KY ErlangerBOS5美东MA StoughtonBOS7美东MA Fall RiverBWI2美东MD BaltimoreBWI1美东MD BaltimoreBWI5美东MD BaltimoreCLT5美东NC ConcordRNO2美西-安大略NE RenoBOS1美东NH NashuaEWR4美东NJ RobbinsvilleEWR5美东NJ Woodbridge (Avenel) EWR7美东NJ Woodbridge (Avenel) EWR6美东NJ SwedesboroEWR9美东NJ CarteretABE8美东NJ FlorenceLAS2美西-安大略NV Las VegasRNO1美西-安大略NV FernleyRNO4美西-安大略NV RenoABE2美东PA BreinigsvilleABE3美东PA BreinigsvilleAVP1美东PA HazletonPHL4美东PA CarlislePHL5美东PA LewisberryPHL6美东PA CarlisleMDT1美东PA CarlisleABE5美东PA HarrisburgPHL9美东PA CarlislePIT5美东PA PittsburghXUSC美东PA CarlisleAVP3美东PA GOULDSBOROABE4美东PA EastonCAE1美东SC West Columbia GSP1美东SC SpartanburgBNA1美东TN LebanonBNA2美东TN LebanonBNA3美东TN MurfreesboroCHA1美东TN ChattanoogaCHA2美东TN CharlestonBNA5美东TN NashvilleSAT1美西-安大略TX SchertzDFW6美西-安大略TX CoppellDFW7美西-安大略TX Fort WorthDFW8美西-安大略TX DallasHOU1美西-安大略TX Humble FTW1美西-安大略TX DallasFTW2美西-安大略TX Grapevine RIC1美东VA Petersburg RIC2美东VA ChesterBFI1美西-安大略WA SumnerBFI3美西-安大略WA DuPont SEA6美西-安大略WA Bellevue SEA8美西-安大略WA Bellevue BFI4美西-安大略WA KentMKE1美东WI Kenosha MKE5美东WI Kenosha RIC3美东WV Chesterfield MDW2美东IL JolietSTL4美东IL Edwardsville MDW6美东IL ROMEOVILLE亚马逊FBA仓库分区表Address Zip 6835 West Buckeye Road 85043 16920 W Commerce Drive 85338 4750 West Mohave St85043 800 N 75th Ave85043 5050 West Mohave Street85043 1910 E Central Ave92408 24208 San Michele Rd92551 24300 Nandina Ave92551 Golden State FC LLC 1555 N. Chrisman Rd95304-9370 2125 W. San Bernardino Ave.92374 255 Park Center Drive 95363-8876 3811 Cherry Street94560 2020 E. Central Ave. Southgate Building 4 92408-2606 Golden State FC LLC2496 W Walnut AveRialto92376-3009 188 Mountain House Parkway953911 Centerpoint Blvd. 197201600 Johnson Way19720 560 Merrimac Ave19709 .DEDC LLC 3350 Laurel Ridge Ave.33570 .DEDC LLC 1760 County Line Rd33811 1760 County Line Rd. 33811 205 Deen Still Road 33897 1900 NW 132nd Place33182 4200 North Commerce30344 .dedc LLC,2201 Thornton Road30122-3895 4255 Anson Blvd 46075 715 Airtech Pkwy46168 715 Airtech Pkwy Suite 195 46168 710 S. Girls School Rd46231 800 Perry Road46168 900 Patrol Rd 47130 5100 S. Indianapolis Road46075 6050 Gateway Court Groveport43125-9016 2654 North Highway 16967337 16851 W 113th St66219 .ksdc LLC 19645 Waverly Rd66021-9588 Bldg. F Park W Int’l41048 1600 Worldwide Blvd 41048 3680 Langley Dr. 41048 1850 Mercer Drive 40511 172 Trade St. 40511 1050 South Columbia 42718 4360 Robards Ln 40218 376 Blvd40165 271 Omega Pkwy401657968 Kentucky Drive Suite 2 & 341042Hebron Building 2 ,2285 Litton Lane 41048-8435 Hebron Building 2 ,2285 Litton Lane 41048-8435300 Omicron Court40165100 W. Thomas P. Echols Lane401654620 Olympic Blvd410181000 Tech Center Drive 02072-4744 .dedc LLC,1180 Innovation Way027222010 Broening Hwy212242010 Broening Highway212245001 Holabird Ave.212247035 Northwinds Drive280278000 North Virginia Street8590610 State Street3063 .dedc LLC 50 New Canton Way08691-2350301 Blair Road #10007001301 Blair Road #100070012277 Center Square Rd08085 .dedc LLC 8003 Industrial Parkway07008-3529 .dedc LLC 309 Cedar Lane085183837 Bay Lake Trail, Suite 111 North890301600 East Newlands Drive 894088000 North Virginia Street89506705 Boulder Drive18031650 Boulder Drive18031550 Oak Ridge Road 1820221 Roadway Dr17015500 McCarthy Dr. Fairview Business Park 17339675 Allen Rd.17015 .dedc LLC, 2 Ames Drive,170156455 Allentown Boulevard171122 Ames Drive. Building #2170152250 Roswell Drive1520540 Logistics Drive17013 .dedc LLC 298 1ST AVE GOULDSBORO18424-9492 .dedc LLC,1610 Van Buren Road180454400 12 Street Extension29172402 John Dodd Rd2930314840 Central Pike Suite 19037090500 Duke DR37090Joe B Jackson Pkwy371277200 Discovery Drive37416-1757225 Infinity Dr NW37310偏远50 Airways Blvd. 372176000 Enterprise Avenue78154-1461 .KYDC LLC 940 W Bethel Road75019-4424700 Westport Parkway 76177-45132700 Regent Blvd75261 8120 Humble Westfield Rd77338 .kydc LLC 33333 LBJ FWY Dallas75241-7203 .kydc LLC2701 West Bethel Road76051 5000 Commerce Way23803 1901 Meadowville Technology Pkwy23836 1800 140th Avenue E.98390 2700 Center Drive98327 1227 124th Avenue Northeast98004 1227 124th Avenue Northeast98004 .DEDC LLC 20529 59th Place South98032 Kenosha Enterprise Park, 38th Street (near I-94)53144 11211 Burlington Road53144 Across the Street from 1901 Meadowville Technology Pa23836 250 Emerald Drive60433 .dedc LLC,3050 GATEWAY COMMERCE CE62025-2815 .dedc LLC,1125 W REMINGTON BLVD60446-6529。

新西兰英语国家概况(课堂PPT)

新西兰英语国家概况(课堂PPT)

39
Government and Politics
Form of government
Parliamentary democracy
Head of state
Governor-general, representing the British monarch
Head of government
Prime minister
a blonde of European ancestry
Crux: southern hemisphere
wheat sheaf: agriculture
2 silver fern leaves
golden fleece: farming industry
crown: a commonwealth country
Constitution
No written constitution; political system closely modeled on UK
Political Parties
Two-party system: the National Party and the Labor Party
41
34
Kiwi Fruit
35
History
◆ Maori, 1,000- 3,000 years ago ◆ Europeans, 17th century ◆ the Treaty of Waitangi, 1840
36
The Treaty of Waitangi 1840
◆ signed on 6th February, 1840 by Governor William Hobson and 50 Maori chiefs ◆ Great Britain formally proclaimed sovereignty over the island and agreed to respect the landownership rights of the Maori ◆ February 6th, now New Zealand’s National Day—Waitangi Day

美国消费者法案2024年度认证指南

美国消费者法案2024年度认证指南

美国消费者法案2024年度认证指南下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成,希望大家下载以后,能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改,请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,如想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by the editor. I hope that after you download them, they can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types of practical materials, suchas educational essays, diary appreciation, sentence excerpts, ancient poems, classic articles, topic composition, work summary, word parsing, copy excerpts, other materials and so on, want to know different data formats and writing methods, please pay attention!美国消费者法案2024年度认证指南是未来一年内美国消费者需遵循的法规和标准。

AS-NZS1660-2-2-1998

AS-NZS1660-2-2-1998

AS/NZS 1660.2.2:1998(Incorporating Amendment No. 1)Australian/New Zealand Standard ™Test methods for electric cables,cords and conductorsMethod 2.2: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens and non-metallic sheaths—Methods specific to elastomeric, XLPE and XLPVC materialsAS/NZS 1660.2.2s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:1998This Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard was prepared by Joint Technical Committee EL-003, Electric Wires and Cables. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on 19 December 1997 and on behalf of the Council of Standards New Zealand on 5 December 1997. It was published on 5 March 1998.The following interests are represented on Committee EL-003:Australasian Railway Association Australian Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers Association Department of Defence, Australia Electrical regulatory authorities Electricity Supply Association of Australia Institution of Engineers, Australia Ministry of Commerce, New Zealand New Zealand Electrical Contractors Association New Zealand Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers Federation Office of Energy, N.S.W.Testing interestsKeeping Standards up-to-dateStandards are living documents which reflect progress in science, technology and systems. To maintain their currency, all Standards are periodically reviewed, and new editions are published. Between editions, amendments may be issued.Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are using a current Standard, which should include any amendments which may have been published since the Standard was purchased.Detailed information about joint Australian/New Zealand Standards can be found by visiting the Standards Australia web site at .au or StandardsNew Zealand web site at and looking up the relevant Standard in the on-line catalogue.Alternatively, both organizations publish an annual printed Catalogue with full details of all current Standards. For more frequent listings or notification of revisions, amendments and withdrawals, Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand offer a number of update options. For information about these services,users should contact their respective national Standards organization.We also welcome suggestions for improvement in our Standards, and especially encourage readers to notify us immediately of any apparent inaccuracies or ambiguities. Please address your comments to the Chief Executive of either Standards Australia International or Standards New Zealand at the address shown on the back cover.This Standard was issued in draft form for comment as DR 97070.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:1998(Incorporating Amendment No. 1)Australian/New Zealand Standard ™Test methods for electric cables,cords and conductorsMethod 2.2: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens and non-metallic sheaths—Methods specific to elastomeric, XLPE and XLPVC materialsOriginated in Australia as part of AS 1660.2—1974.Previous Australian edition AS 1660.2.2—1993.Jointly revised and designated AS/NZS 1660.2.2:1998.Reissued incorporating Amendment No. 1 (July 2001).COPYRIGHT© Standards Australia/Standards New ZealandAll rights are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by anys e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:19982PREFACEThis Standard was prepared by the Joint Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand Committee EL-003, Electric Wires and Cables, to supersede AS 1660.2.2—1993,Test methods for electric cables, Method 2.2:Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens and non-metallic sheaths—Methods specific to elastomeric and XLPE compounds . It is one of a set of tests for electric cables included in the AS/NZS 1660 series. Details of the series are given in Appendix A.This Stand ard incorporates Amend ment No. 1 (July 2001). The changes required by the Amendment are indicated in the text by a marginal bar and amendment number against the clause, note, table, figure or part thereof affected.The objective of this Standard is to provide manufacturers and testers with appropriate test methods for elastomeric, XLPE and XLPVC insulation, screens and sheaths of electric cables and cords.This edition of the Standard differs from the 1993 edition as follows:(a)The title has been modified to include reference to XLPVC materials.(b)The indirect method of measuring air flow in ovens has been changed to therequirements of IEC 811-1-2, Common test method s for insulating and sheathing materials of electric cables , Part 1: Methods for general application , Section Two—Thermal ageing methods .(c)The reference to ASTM D 471, Stand ard test method for rubber property—Effect of liquids No. 2 oil has been changed to IRM 902 (Calumet No. 2) oil.(d)This edition is published as a Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard.(e)A compatibility test has been added.In the preparation of the Standard, consideration was given to IEC 811:1985, Common test methods for insulating and sheathing materials of electric cables , Part 2: Methods specific to elastomeric compound s . Acknowledgment is made of the assistance received from this source.The term 'informative' has been used in this Standard to define the application of the appendix to which it applies. An 'informative' appendix is only for information and guidance.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:19983CONTENTSPageSECTION 1SCOPE AND GENERAL1.1SCOPE (4)1.2REFERENCED DOCUMENTS (4)1.3DEFINITIONS (4)1.4TESTING TEMPERATURE (4)1.5SELECTION OF SPECIMENS...................................................................................4SECTION 2METHODS OF TEST FOR INSULATION, EXTRUDED SEMI-CONDUCTIVE SCREENS AND NON-METALLIC SHEATHS2.1HOT SET TEST (5)2.2THERMAL AGEING (5)2.3MINERAL OIL IMMERSION TEST..........................................................................9APPENDIX A LIST OF METHODS OF TEST IN THE AS/NZS 1660 SERIES 12s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:19984STANDARDS AUSTRALIA/STANDARDS NEW ZEALANDAustralian/New Zealand Standard Test methods for electric cables, cords and conductorsMethod 2.2: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screensand non-metallic sheaths—Methods specific to elastomeric, XLPE and XLPVC materialsS E C T I O N 1 S C O P E A N D G E N E R A L1.1 SCOPEThis Standard sets out the methods of testing insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens and non-metallic sheaths of elastomeric, XLPE and XLPVC insulated electric cables.NOTE: Refer to individual cable Standards for test results criteria. Details of the AS/NZS series of Standards are given in Appendix A.1.2 REFERENCED DOCUMENTSThe following documents are referred to in this Standard:AS/NZS1660Test methods for electric cables, cords and conductors 1660.2.1M ethod 2.1: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens and non-metallic sheaths—Methods for general application ASTMD 471Standard test method for rubber property—Effect of liquids1.3 DEFINITIONSFor the purpose of this Standard, the definitions given in the relevant cable Standard and that below apply.1.3.1 Median value Value obtained from a succession of test results as follows:(a)Even number of results...................average value of the two middle results.(b)Odd number of results....................value of middle result.1.4 TESTING TEMPERATURE Unless otherwise specified, all tests shall be carried out in an ambient temperature of 23±5°C.1.5 SELECTION OF SPECIMENS All specimens used for testing shall be taken at least 300 mm from the end of a factory length of finished cable, flexible cable or flexible cord.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:19985S E C T I O N 2 M E T H O D S O F T E S T F O RI N S U L A T I O N , E X T R U D E D S E M I -C O N D U C T I V ES C R E E N S A N D N O N -M E T A L L I C S H E A T H S2.1 HOT SET TEST2.1.1 Sampling and preparation of test pieces, and determination of their cross-sectional area2.1.1.1 GeneralTwo test pieces from each core or sheath to be tested, after they have been prepared and their cross-sectional areas measured, as specified in the test methods of AS/NZS 1660.2.1for insulation or for sheath, shall be used for the test. For insulation of cables above 1 kV,the dumb-bells shall be prepared from the inner part of the insulating wall after any ridges or semi-conducting layer, or both, have been removed.2.1.1.2 ApparatusThe test shall be carried out in an oven, as specified in Clause 2.2.1.2, maintained at the temperature specified for the material in the relevant cable Standard. The oven shall be fitted with a viewing window. The requirement of Clause 2.2.1.2 for air changing is not applicable to this Clause (2.1).Grips shall be provided, such that each test piece can be suspended from an upper grip in the oven and weights attached to a lower grip attached to the test piece.2.1.1.3 ProcedureThe test pieces shall be suspended in the oven and weights attached to the bottom jaws to exert a force of the value specified for the material in the relevant cable Standard.After 15 min in the oven at the temperature specified for the material in the relevant cable Standard, the distance between the marker lines shall be measured without opening the oven door and the percentage elongation calculated to the nearest 5 percent.The tensile force shall then be removed from the test piece, e.g. by cutting the test piece at the lower grip, and the test piece left to recover for 5 min at the specified temperature.The test pieces shall then be removed from the oven and allowed to cool slowly to ambient temperature, after which the distance between the marker lines shall be measured again to the nearest 0.5 mm and the percentage elongation calculated.2.1.1.4 Report The average of the two values shall be reported for both the elongation under load and the elongation after cooling.2.2 THERMAL AGEING 2.2.1 Ageing in an air oven 2.2.1.1 General An ageing treatment in an air oven may be required by the relevant cable Standard as follows:(a)For prepared test pieces, Clause 2.2.1.3 shall apply.(b)For pieces of completed cable, Clause 2.2.1.4 shall apply.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:199862.2.1.2 Test equipmentAn oven with natural air flow or air flow by pressure shall be used. The air shall enter the oven in such a way that it flows over the surface of the test pieces and leaves near the top of the oven. The oven shall have not less than 8 and not more than 20 complete air changes per hour at the specified ageing temperature.Two methods of measuring the rate of air flow through an oven are given in Clause 2.2.2.2.2.1.3 Procedure for prepared test piecesThe ageing shall be carried out in an atmosphere having the composition and pressure of the ambient air.The test pieces, as specified in AS/NZS 1660.2.1, shall be suspended vertically and substantially in the middle of the oven so that each piece is at least 20 mm from any other piece.The test pieces shall be kept in the oven at the temperature and for the time specified for the material in the Standard for the type of cable.Materials of substantially different compositions shall not be tested in the same oven at the same time.As soon as the ageing period is completed, the test pieces shall be removed from the oven and left at ambient temperature, avoiding direct sunlight, for at least 16 h. The tensile test shall then be carried out in accordance with AS/NZS 1660.2.1.2.2.1.4 Procedure for pieces of complete cableThree pieces of complete cable about 200 mm long shall be taken, preferably from a position close to those where the samples for the tensile test without ageing (see AS/NZS 1660.2.1) are taken.The pieces of cable shall be suspended substantially in the middle of the oven at least 20 mm away from each other and shall occupy not more than 2 percent of the volume of the oven.The pieces of cable shall be kept in the oven at the temperature and for the time specified in the relevant cable Standard.As soon as the specified heating period is completed, the pieces of cable shall be removed from the oven and left at ambient temperature, avoiding direct sunlight, for at least 16 h.The three pieces of cable shall then be dismantled. Two test pieces shall be prepared from the insulation of each core (up to a maximum of three cores) and from the sheath of each piece of cable, as specified in AS/NZS 1660.2.1, so that there are six test pieces from each core and from the sheath.If the test pieces need to be cut or ground to reduce their thickness to not more than 2 mm,this operation shall be effected, so far as possible, on the side which was not facing a material of different type in the complete cable. If ridges must be cut or ground on the side which was facing the different type of material, the material removed on that side shall be minimum compatible with adequate smoothing.After measurement of their cross-sectional areas and after conditioning has been carried out, the test pieces shall be subjected to the tensile test, all in accordance with AS/NZS 1660.2.1.2.2.1.5 CompatibilityThree pieces of complete cable about 200 mm long shall be taken, preferably from a position close to where the samples without ageing (see AS 1660.2.1) were taken.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:19987The pieces of cable shall be suspended substantially in the middle of an oven, complying with Clause 2.2.1.2, at least 20 mm away from each other, and shall not occupy more than 2 percent of the volume of the oven.The pieces shall be kept in the oven at the temperature and for the time specified in the relevant cable Standard.As soon as the specified heating period is completed, the pieces of cable shall be removed from the oven and left at ambient temperature, avoiding direct sunlight for at least 16 hours.The three pieces of cable shall then be dismantled. Where dissimilar materials are in direct contact with each other, then test pieces for the tensile test, in accordance with AS 1660.2.1, shall be prepared from each material in each cable sample. Fillers, barrier tapes and binders shall not be tested, only the material with which they come in contact.If the pieces need to be cut or ground to reduce their thickness to not more than 2 mm, this operation shall be effected, so far as possible, on the side which was not in contact with a dissimilar material. If ridges must be cut or ground on the side in contact with a dissimilar material, the material removed on that side shall be minimum compatible with adequate smoothing.After conditioning, and measurement of their cross-sectional areas, the test pieces shall be subjected to the tensile test, all in accordance with AS 1660.2.1.2.2.2 Methods of measuring air flow in ovens2.2.2.1 Method 1—Indirect or power consumption methodThe method shall be as follows:(a)The additional power required to maintain the oven at a given temperature with itsports open, over that required to maintain the oven at the same temperature with its ports closed, shall be used as a measure of the quantity of air passing through the oven when the ports are open. The average power (P 1 watts) required to maintain the oven temperature at the specified ageing temperature when the ports are open shall be determined over a period of 30 min or longer. The ventilation ports (and, if necessary,the thermometer aperture) shall then be closed and the average power (P 2 watts) to maintain the same temperature over a similar period shall be determined. The difference between the oven temperature and the room temperature shall be the same for the two tests to within 0.2°C. The room temperature shall be measured at a point about 2 m from the oven, approximately level with its base, and at least 0.6 m from any solid objects.(b)The amount of air passing through the oven when the ports are open shall becalculated from the following equations:(a))(12p 21t t C P P m −−=(b)dmV 6003=where:m =mass of air, in grams per second P 1−P 2=difference in power consumption, as defined in Item (a)C p =specific heat of air at constant pressure (1.003 J/g)t 2=oven temperature, in degrees Celsius t 1=room temperature, in degrees Celsius V =volume of air, in litres per hour d =density of air in the laboratory at the time of test, in grams per litre.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:19988Hence: V =()()12003.1216003t t d P P −−or V =()()12215903t t d P P −−This method assumes that, when the ports are closed, no air passes through the oven.Therefore, there shall be no leakages. The air-tight door joints should be sealed with adhesive tape and all apertures, including the inlet port, should be effectively closed.(c)If the power consumption is measured with a wattmeter, the total length of time, inseconds, for which the oven heaters are 'on' shall be measured with a stop-watch and the reading of the wattmeter shall be taken once during each 'on' period.The average of the wattage readings multiplied by the total time registered by the stop-watch and divided by the duration of the test, in seconds, shall be taken as the power, in watts, required to maintain a constant temperature.(d)If a watt-hour or kilowatt-hour meter is used, the reading of the total energyconsumption registered by the meter shall be divided by the duration of the test,measured as a fraction of an hour. If a household kilowatt-hour meter is used, the dial units are too large to enable a sufficient accuracy to be obtained over a reasonably short test, and the rotating disc with which these meters are provided shall be used therefore as the power consumption indicator. The meter shall be put into operation until the index mark on the disc is opposite the centre of the window; it shall then be disconnected until the start of the test.To reduce the possible error, the period of test shall be long enough to permit 100revolutions of the disc and the test shall preferably be ended when the mark on the disc is visible. However, if the mark is out of sight at the end of the test, an estimated fraction of a revolution shall be added. The test shall be started and stopped at corresponding points on the 'on-off' heating cycle (e.g. at the moment when heaters are switched on by the thermostat).2.2.2.2 Method 2—Direct and continuous methodThe equipment for Method 2 shall comprise the following items:(a)Air pressure regulator —a device to reduce the air pressure from that of the supplymains to the low-pressure needed for feeding the oven. It is equipped with an adjustable valve which permits a constant pressure downstream.(b)Flowmeter —an instrument with which the rate of air flow can be measured. It is illustrated in Figure 2.1, and operates on a manometric principle, with—(a)capillary tube, of precision bore of about 2 mm, and a length of about 70 mm;Figure 2.2 shows a typical calibration diagram for airflows up to 500 L/h or600 L/h; and(b)manometric tube with a double graduation of pressure difference rangingbetween 0 mm and ±300 mm of water; distilled water is the manometric liquid.(c)Air oven —an ordinary air oven to be operated when carefully sealed, including sealing round the inlet tube, which should preferably enter the oven through the bottom. The outflow hole, which should be at the top of the oven, is the only port to be open.NOTE: The following two features facilitate the reliability of the method and the equipment:(a)The flowmeter described above can be considered as fully reliable, easy to manufacture and to calibrate, as well as suitable for the range of air rates involved.(b)As shown by tests, the adoption of a slightly 'forced' ventilation does not alter, in practice, the uniformity of the temperature at the various points in the ovens.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:199892.3 MINERAL OIL IMMERSION TEST 2.3.1 Sampling and preparation of the test pieces Five test pieces shall be prepared in accordance with the procedure described in AS/NZS 1660.2.1.2.3.2 Determination of the cross-sectional areas of the test piece The test method in AS/NZS 1660.2.1 shall apply.2.3.3 Oil to be usedUnless otherwise specified in the relevant cable Standard, the mineral oil shall be IRM 902,as specified in ASTM D471.2.3.4 ProcedureThe test pieces shall be immersed in the oil previously heated at the specified test temperature and shall be maintained in the oil at that temperature for the specified time (see relevant cable Standard).At the end of the specified duration, the test pieces shall be removed from the oil, blotted lightly to remove excess oil and suspended in air at ambient temperature for at least 16 h but not more than 24 h, unless otherwise specified in the relevant cable Standard. At the end of this period any further excess oil shall be removed by lightly blotting the test pieces.2.3.5 Determination of the mechanical characteristicsThe test method in AS/NZS 1660.2.1 shall apply.2.3.6 Expression of results and requirementsThe calculation for tensile strength shall be based on the area of the test piece measured before immersion (see AS/NZS 1660.2.1).The median value obtained on the five test pieces immersed in oil shall be expressed as a percentage of the median value of the five values obtained on the untreated test pieces.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:199810s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:199811FIGURE 2.2 CALIBRATION DIAGRAM OF THE CAPILLARY TUBE (d = 2.0 mm,l = 70 mm) OF THE FLOWMETER FOR AIR-FLOW CONTROL IN AIR OVENSs e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008AS/NZS 1660.2.2:199812APPENDIX ALIST OF METHODS OF TEST IN THE AS/NZS 1660 SERIES(Informative)The Standards in the AS/NZS 1660 series are as follows:Number Title AS/NZS 1660Test methods for electric cables, cords and conductors AS/NZS 1660.1Method 1: Conductors and metallic components AS/NZS 1660.2.1Method 2.1: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens and non-metallic sheaths—Methods for general application AS/NZS 1660.2.2Method 2.2: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens andnon-metallic sheaths—M ethods specific to elastomeric, XLPEand XLPVC materialsAS/NZS 1660.2.3Method 2.3: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens andnon-metallic sheaths—Methods specific to PVC and halogen freethermoplastic materialsAS/NZS 1660.2.4Method 2.4: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens andnon-metallic sheaths—M ethods specific to polyethylene andpolypropylene materialsAS/NZS 1660.2.5Method 2.5: Insulation, extruded semi-conductive screens andnon-metallic sheaths—Methods specific to cables above 1 kVAS/NZS 1660.3Method 3: Electrical testsAS/NZS 1660.4Method 4: Complete cable and flexible cordAS/NZS 1660.5.1Method 5.1: Fire tests—Tests on bunched cablesAS/NZS 1660.5.2Method 5.2: Fire tests—Smoke densityAS/NZS 1660.5.3Method 5.3: Fire tests—Determination of the amount of halogenacid gas evolved during the combustion of polymeric materialstaken from cablesAS/NZS 1660.5.4M ethod 5.4: Fire tests—Determination of degree of acidity ofgases evolved during the combustion of materials taken fromelectric cables by measuring pH and conductivityAS/NZS 1660.5.5Method 5.5: Fire tests—Circuit integrity under fire conditionsAS/NZS 1660.5.6Method 5.6: Fire tests—Test for combustion propagation s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008Standards AustraliaStandards Australia is an independent company, limited by guarantee, which prepares and publishes most of the voluntary technical and commercial standards used in Australia. These standards aredeveloped through an open process of consultation and consensus, in which all interested parties are invited to participate. Through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Commonwealthgovernment, Standards Australia is recognized as Australia’s peak national standards body.Standards New ZealandThe first national Standards organization was created in New Zealand in 1932. The Standards Council of New Zealand is the national authority responsible for the production of Standards.Standards New Zealand is the trading arm of the Standards Council established under the Standards Act 1988.Australian/New Zealand StandardsUnder an Active Co-operation Agreement between Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand,Australian/New Zealand Standards are prepared by committees of experts from industry,governments, consumers and other sectors. The requirements or recommendations contained in published Standards are a consensus of the views of representative interests and also take account of comments received from other sources. They reflect the latest scientific and industry experience. Australian/New Zealand Standards are kept under continuous review after publicationand are updated regularly to take account of changing technology.International Involvement Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand are responsible for ensuring that the Australian and New Zealand viewpoints are considered in the formulation of international Standards and that the latest international experience is incorporated in national and Joint Standards. This role is vital in assisting local industry to compete in international markets. Both organizations are the national members of ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission).Visit our Web sites .au s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008GPO Box 5420 Sydney NSW 2001AdministrationPhone (02) 8206 6000Fax (02) 8206 6001Email mail@.auCustomer ServicePhone 1300 65 46 46Fax 1300 65 49 49Email sales@.auInternet .auLevel 10 Radio New Zealand House 155 The Terrace Wellington 6001(Private Bag 2439 Wellington 6020)Phone (04) 498 5990Fax (04) 498 5994Customer Services (04) 498 5991Information Service (04) 498 5992Email snz@ Internet s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008This page has been left intentionally blank.s e d b y U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H A U S T R A L I A o n 02 J u n 2008。

新西兰PPT课件

新西兰PPT课件
*the Southern Cross, the constellation of Crux (南十字座)
National Anthem
God Defend New Zealand
God of nations at Thy feet, In the bonds of love we meet, Hear our voices, we entreat, God defend our free land. Guard Pacific's triple star, From the shafts of strife and war, Make her praises heard afar, God defend New Zealand.
official language: English
capital: Wellington
The national flag of New Zealand
*a defaced Blue Ensign(英国海军预备舰舰旗) with the Union Jack in the canton (徽章或旗 子的右上角的小方块部分) and four red stars with white borders to the right.
1. Features of Land Area and Geography
Location:
an island country in the south-western Pacific Ocean
two main landmasses: the North Island and the South Island
Taupo Volcanic Zone.
A fault line(断层线)--frequent earthquakes Geysers (间歇喷泉) and mineral hot springs

Unit19NewZealand(新西兰)

Unit19NewZealand(新西兰)

Unit19NewZealand(新西兰)【同步教育信息】⼀. Unit 19 New Zealand背景资料:新西兰是太平洋西南部的岛国, 由两个⼤岛和许多⼩岛组成, ⾯积约27万平⽅公⾥,⾸都惠灵顿。

新西兰⼈⼝约340万,其中82%是英国移民的后裔,主要语⾔为英语。

新西兰原来的居民是⽑利⼈。

⽑利⼈是波利尼西亚⼈的⼀部分,约于公元10—14 世纪来到新西兰定居,现为新西兰的少数民族,约占全国总⼈⼝的13%。

⽑利⼈现已同欧洲⼈混⾎,有四分之三的⽑利⼈都已城市化。

⼆. 本周学习重点难点:Unit 19 New Zealand 新西兰(⼀) 有⽤短语:1. handed down from generation to generation ⼀代⼀代流传下去2. sign an agreement with 与……签订协议3. make up 构成;组成4. relate to 与……有关5. marked with 标有6. out of work 失业7. at festivals 过节8. apart from 除……外(⼆) 重点语法:本单元语法复习为宾语。

担任宾语的可以是名词、代词、疑问词、数词、形容词、动词ing形式、不定式、从句等。

如:They raise pings on the farm. (名词)How do you like the color ? (名词)The boy has a lot of friends and he is going to invite all of them to his birthday party. (代词)The young should show respect to the old. (形容词)How many books have you read this month ? (疑问词) About ten. (数词)Do you like swimming ? (动词ing形式)Have you decided where to spend your holiday ? (不定式)I don’t think it righ t that they separate people by the color of their skin. (从句)(三) 重点词汇及句型:1. The language which the Maori speak is related to the languages of Tahiti and Hawaii.⽑利⼈所说的语⾔同塔希提岛和夏威夷的语⾔是有关的。

NewZealand

NewZealand

Prime Minister of New Zealand: John Key
Major Cities of New Zealand
Wellington Auckland Christchurch Dunedin Queenstown Rotorua
Major Cities of New Zealand
Government of New Zealand
► The Queen of England is Head of State ► New Zealander Governor General represents the interests of the UK. ► The Prime Minister is the head of government. ► Focus is on a central government. ►Very little local government (regional or provincial government)
Unique Kiwi Wildlife
► Silver Fern: National Symbol of New Zealand ► The Tuatara: only reptile with a beak ► Birds in New Zealand don‟t fly. ► National bird: Kiwi ► Kakapo: the rarest and largest parrot
The South Island
► “Te Wai Pounamu” (Water of Greenstone) ► Landforms: › Mount Cook ( 3,754 m): the highest peak › Franz Josef Glacier The Southern Alps ► Roughly 970,000 people ► Seven districts ► The largest city: Christchurch (Garden City)

New Zealand

New Zealand


Maoris believe their ancesters and all living things in the world were descended from the gods.
The river
• The North Wairoa (the northern Auckland Peninsula) • Waikato (the longest river,425km) • Lake Taupo (the largest lake, 40km long and 27km wide)
新西兰气候 及动植物
The Climate of New Zealand
New Zealand is surrounded by water, mountainous. All belong to maritime climate temperate forest. Due to the western influence, the average annual rainfall of west coast for 1000 a 3000 millimeter, south island in the southwest coast can reach 5000 millimeter above, East coast only 500 mm. No nearby vast land in climate change, so winter summer temperatures differs very little, only 10 degrees or so. In the north of the annual mean temperature is about 15 ℃, south island's annual average temperature is about 10 ℃.

七年级英语城市名称单选题50题

七年级英语城市名称单选题50题

七年级英语城市名称单选题50题1. Big Ben is in the city of ____. A. Paris B. London C. Sydney答案:B。

解析:Big Ben(大本钟)是伦敦的标志性建筑,巴黎是法国的城市,有埃菲尔铁塔等著名景点,悉尼是澳大利亚的城市,大本钟不在巴黎和悉尼,所以答案是伦敦。

2. The city known for the Louvre Museum is ____. A. Tokyo B. ParisC. Rome答案:B。

解析:卢浮宫博物馆位于巴黎,东京是日本的城市,有自己独特的文化和景点如东京塔,罗马是意大利的城市,有斗兽场等景点,与卢浮宫无关,所以答案是巴黎。

3. The Statue of Liberty is in ____. A. Washington D.C. B. New YorkC. Los Angeles答案:B。

解析:自由女神像位于纽约,华盛顿特区有白宫等标志性建筑,洛杉矶有好莱坞等,自由女神像不在华盛顿特区和洛杉矶,所以答案是纽约。

4. The city where you can see the Colosseum is ____. A. Athens B. Rome C. Berlin答案:B。

解析:罗马斗兽场位于罗马,雅典是希腊的城市,有帕特农神庙等景点,柏林是德国的城市,斗兽场不在雅典和柏林,所以答案是罗马。

5. The Forbidden City is in the city of ____. A. Shanghai B. BeijingC. Guangzhou答案:B。

解析:故宫( 紫禁城)位于北京,上海有外滩等景点,广州有陈家祠等景点,故宫不在上海和广州,所以答案是北京。

6. Which city is known as the capital city of China? A. Shanghai B. Beijing C. Shenzhen答案:B。

New Zealand

New Zealand

structure
Geography History Culture Economic
economic
• The economy of New Zealand largely relies on overseas trade because it lacks many mineral resources and has only discovered small reserves of oil. It needs to import minerals to keep its economy running. Other imports include manufactured goods, heavy machinery, petroleum, chemicals, iron and steel, plastic materials and textiles.
economic indicator
• GDP( purchasing power parity ) 2011, US dollars • 122,193 million(ranking 64) • 281,776 (Ireland 33) • GDP(International Exchange) 2011 (US million dollars) • 161,851 million(ranking 56) • 36,648 (Ireland 23)
structure
Geography History Culture Economic
structure
Geography History Culture Economic
First part
culture
• New Zealand's culture is rich and diverse due to the European ,The Maori.Pacific Island, European and Asian cultures makes New Zealand a colourful place with many different customs and food to enjoy.

Bertram

Bertram

'Light-Handed' Disciplines on the Market Power of Network Owners: New Zealand's Pipeline Access Code and Gas IndustryInformation Disclosure Regulations Geoff Bertram, Victoria University of Wellington 11. IntroductionNew Zealand's major utility industries - electricity, gas, telecommunications, water, rail, ports, and potentially the road network - are now several years down the track of so-called "light-handed regulation". A first generation of novel institutional arrange-ments have been conceived, designed and, in some cases, implemented to fill the void left by the New Zealand Government's decision to walk away from a large part of the regulatory responsibilities traditionally performed by the state in western capitalist economies.Some preliminary assessment of these institutional innovations is now possible, although it is still very early days and all judgements have to be qualified by the recognition that new economic institutions, and the associated customary practices and implicit understandings among market players, take many years to evolve, so that New Zealand is still far from reaching a settled new equilibrium in the market structure of its key infrastructure sectors. In this paper I shall be focusing on two specific examples of the new institution-building process. The first is the development of a voluntary (self-regula-tory) code of conduct governing the terms of third-party access to gas pipelines, through the agency of an informal coalition of key industry players known as Gas House. The second is the application to the gas industry, from 1997 on, of information disclosure requirements enshrined in theGas (Information Disclosure) Regulations 1997.In each of these cases, through my involvement with Simon Terry Associates, I have been directly involved in the process over a period of several years. STA have been the principal consultants to Gas House from its inception at the beginning of 19952; we were closely involved in debates over the drafting of regulatory provisions for disclosure of pipeline capacity3, and earlier this year we carried out for a group of clients a detailed review and analysis of the information disclosed by gas industry participants pursuant to the 1997 regula-tions.42. The Pipeline Access Code Development of a voluntary industry code for access and interconnection to gas pipeline networks began in New Zealand in 1995, following a series of earlier initiatives in Australia.5 The code passed through a long series of drafts and was exhaustively discussed by various committees of Gas House before being finally released in mid-1998.6Victoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999 9The Commerce Act 1986 prevents a dominant firm from "restricting supply of a product or service which cannot be viably duplicated, where this prevents competition with another part of the dominant firm's business".7 Owners of gas pipelines are generally in a dominant (natural monopoly) position with regard to the transport of gas in their geographic regions. The Commerce Act therefore mandates open third-party access in a general sense and requires that the terms and conditions of access not be such as to block other parties from competing with a pipeline owner's retail affiliate in the downstream market for natural gas.Neither the Commerce Act nor any other statute or body of regulations, however, specify how this restraint is to be interpreted when pipeline owners come to set the terms and conditions for access to their systems. Would-be users of gas pipelines in New Zealand found themselves presented with access terms on a "take it or leave it" basis, with recourse to the courts their only effective means of counteracting the market power of system owners.The Gas House organisation arose out of dissatisfaction with this state of affairs. It was formed on the initiative of Enerco, which during 1993 and 1994 had been negotiating unsuccessfully with NGC over issues of capacity allocation and pricing on the transmission pipeline systems serving Auckland, Wellington, Manawatu and Hawkes Bay. In February 1995 Enerco organised a meeting in Auckland attended by several of the other utilities and a number of major gas users, with the declared objective of trying to promote "competition from wellhead to burnertip" by some means other than litigation under the Commerce Act.Conspicuously absent was the Natural Gas Corporation, which joined Gas House only in the middle of 1995 once the organisation had gained sufficient momentum and credibility to present a potential threat to NGC's market position. Thereafter NGC made a major commitment of resources and time to Gas House, winning thereby the ability to restrict the scope and speed of Gas House's work and to control the content of the eventually-published Access Code.Maui Development Ltd never joined in its own right, although it maintained a watching brief through Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd. The Access Code does not represent any significant progress towards open access to the Maui pipeline for parties other than the existing contract holders.8 Officials from the Ministry of Commerce were invited to the initial meeting and attended as observers, but made it clear that they had no mandate to play any constructive role in the development of a self-regulatory framework. Thereafter, despite repeated invitations, the Ministry of Commerce distanced itself completely from the process, declining even to send observers to Gas House meetings.The existence of a pro-competitive industry initiative potentially provided the Government with an opportunity to refine and develop its light-handed regulatory regime on a constructive basis of interaction with the key gas industry players. In practice, however, the existence of Gas House simply provided officials and ministers with an alibi for inaction. Government spokespersons were always happy to refer in complimentary fashion to the progress being made by Gas House, as evidence that no intervention in the industry by Government itself was required. There was, however, no apparent interest in helping the process along, even when major obstacles to effective self-regulation became obvious in Gas House.10 Victoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999The document which eventually emerged at the end of three and a half years carries an "Introduction" and an Appendix entitled "Development of the Access Code and Supporting Information" which between them accurately summarise several of the central problems confronted in the attempt to achieve voluntary self-regulation, in an industry characterised by strong natural monopoly features, and in the absence of a credible commitment by Government to resolve the imbalances of market power that were inevitably reproduced within Gas House. Some extracts follow:"... the Code is not in any way a legally binding document... There is no legal compulsion for any person or body in the gas industry to formally support the Code nor to abide by its provisions."9"The Code does not purport to be a comprehensive prescription for the quasi-regulation of pipeline access. The Code is a voluntary document and as such the standards and undertakings represent the furthest extent to which a process of self-regulation could be developed at this time."10"... The compromise reached within the membership of Gas House, was to publish the Code at this stage of its development so that market practice could assist the Code to evolve. Such a view does not imply ... that the Code provides a complete resolution to many of the complex issues involved in market-led reforms for pipeline access.For example, some members consider that to promote industry change and a competitive gas market, provisions in the Code relating to the following issues will need to be expanded upon or fresh concepts developed:- Tradeability of pipeline capacity- Minimum transport services- Prices and pricing mechanisms- Ring fencing- Spot markets for gas andtransmission."11"The absence of specific ring fencing requirements reflects the fact that there are currently no legal requirements on owners to separate contestable and non-contestable services and that the Code is a voluntary undertaking.Further, there is no independent party to audit ring-fencing requirements."12"... Access to all comers on neutral terms has been the prime objective.However, no owner was willing to embark on the development of a Code which restrained price levels or the scope for setting pricing methodologies, so this issue was set aside."13"During development of the Code it became apparent that it was unlikely that an owner would voluntarily agree to accept a constraint on prices in an environment where there are no controls over prices except the provisions of the Commerce Act which allow the Minister of Commerce to recommend price control."14"The Code does not restrain owners from treating similar gas consumers differently in respect of negotiated prices."15In discussing the actual content of the Access Code, therefore, it is important to start with very modest expectations. The hard reality is that natural monopolies do not voluntarily surrender market power in the absence of credible threats. The central achievement of Gas House was not to mitigate in any way the market power of network owners, but simply to foster the exercise of that power in a somewhat more civilised way and to develop an industry culture of (relatively) good-humouredVictoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999 11agreement to disagree. Gas House also provided an institutional environment where major players could work their way toward shared understandings on a number of operational and contract issues which might otherwise have imposed much greater transaction costs on the evolving gas industry (metering and reconciliation arrangements were the most striking examples).The exercise certainly enabled participants to evaluate for themselves the very limited legal restraints currently imposed on monopoly power in New Zealand. By the time the Code was moving into its final drafting (roughly the last year) it was clear that it could provide only a charter of those user rights and supplier duties which pipeline owners regarded as legally inescapable. Gas House debates enabled gas industry participants to codify some of those rights and duties without resort to lengthy and expensive litigation, but in no major area was the competition frontier pushed forward in a pro-active manner beyond the restraints contained in the letter of the law. Insofar as the law in its present form embodies sufficient conditions for competition to emerge, the Access Code provides a helpful gloss. Insofar as the law fails to set sufficient conditions for competition to emerge, the Code leaves pipeline owners unrestrained.Having thus far accentuated the negative, I must be careful not to eliminate the positive. I turn therefore to a summary of the content of the Code. There are twelve sections:1) Objective, Scope and Definitions. The stated objective is "to promote development of competitive gas markets by publishing minimum standards of dis-closure and conduct for Owners and by facilitating Neutral and Non-Discriminatory access to Transport Systems by Users".16 Key elements of this negotiated wording are the absence of any reference to minimum standards of service as distinct from conduct, and the fact that neutral and non-discriminatory access is only "facilitated", not required. The original intent of those promoting the concept of an access code was that it would be legally binding on signatories up to the point where actual transportation contracts came into force, and that those contracts could not be contrary to the Code. Under those circumstances, words such as "facilitating non-discriminatory access" could have had real teeth. Because the present version of the Code is not legally binding and contains no effective sanctions, the objectives and detailed provisions rest solely on moral suasion for their effectiveness.2) Behavioural Standards.Owners of pipelines are to•provide access to all parties in good financial standing;•accept for carriage all gas which meets specification;•act in a non-discriminatory fashion; •provide service under published terms and conditions;•facilitate access to developable17 as well as actually installed capacity; and •negotiate in good faith.Users are to act reasonably, negotiate in good faith, and not hoard capacity reservations on any pipeline.18Even though embedded in a non-binding document, some of these provisions effectively outlaw certain negotiating tactics which could easily be used as barriers to entry.12 Victoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999Of special significance is the Code's recognition that the open access obligation is to be interpreted as applying to developable capacity as well as actually installed capacity. This finesses the possibility of a pipeline owner declining access on grounds of capacity constraints, which had been a real concern up to the mid-1990s.3) Confidentiality and Ring Fencing.The consultants' recommendations, and early drafts of the Code, contained stringent ring-fencing requirements to apply to vertically-integrated monopolies.19 The draft proposals were based on those imposed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the USA, as a means of blocking a vertically-integrated pipeline operator from giving its own retail affiliate a competitive edge relative to other competing users, whether by giving favourable terms for transport, or by passing on commercially sensitive information at the expense of its competitors.In Gas House, that prescriptive approach was successfully blocked by the pipeline owners, leaving only a brief section in the Code20 laying down expected standards of conduct by owners in respect of con-fidential information and access terms, and leaving it the responsibility of each pipeline owner to publish its own, unilaterally designed, arrangements for protecting information and ensuring nondisrimination. Again the original intent of binding obligations was replaced by general moral suasion.4) ServicesThis section of the Code sets out four general principles and some minimum requirements for the Information Memo-randum which each pipeline owner is to publish containing their access terms and conditions. The principles, in summary, are:•posted-price services are to be available for all capacity, and arrangements should be made for excess capacity to be accessed by Users21 on a short-run (day to day) basis•where capacity entitlements are issued they should be structured to facilitate secondary trading•services should be unbundled "where reasonable and practicable" •pipeline owners may negotiate separate prices, terms and conditions with individual users and these may differ from the posted terms and conditions available to all comers.This section would be the core of a really serious Access Code because the issues addressed are the strategic keys to freedom of entry and exit by users, efficient market allocation of capacity to its highest-valued uses, flexible access to unutilised capacity on a spot or interruptible basis, and non-discrimination among users in terms and conditions. The actual mechanisms by which market power is exercised by pipeline owners in practice are clustered in the areas identified.The consultants' recommendations, and early Code drafts based on them, contained a substantial amount of prescriptive material designed to identify precisely the sorts of exercise of market power which ought to be treated as abuse, and to prevent such abuse. The final Code is almost completely non-prescriptive in these areas and the principles are framed in vague and general form, leaving to pipeline owners very wide freedom to design the detail of their terms and conditions in ways which protect and exploit their market power.Two examples will illustrate this. First, the Code gives licence to owners to departVictoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999 13from their posted terms and conditions in offering "Negotiated Price Services" to individual users, subject only to two general checks: the expectation that owners will act in a "neutral and nondiscriminatory" manner22 which means that no single user should be favoured over others; and the Code requirement for each owner to publish "a policy and criteria for Negotiated Price Services" together with "the material terms of an agreed Negotiated Price Service".23 As I shall point out later, the 1997 experience with regulated information disclosure warrants substantial cynicism regarding the ability of system owners to conceal contract information under the cloak of disclosure, simply by exploiting the letter of the law. There is no reason to expect that owners will be more forthcoming in their compliance with the non-binding Code. The concept of "neutral and non-discriminatory behaviour" is similarly vulnerable to semantic manipulation by owners24 and the Cod provides perilously few and weak safeguards against this.Second, the terms and conditions under which short-term access to excess capacity is to be made available constitute at present the key line of defence of market power for those pipeline owners operating under contract carriage regimes.25 On-demand ("spot") transport service is an essential requirement for economic efficiency and competitive flexibility in the utilisation of gas pipelines, but spot markets directly threaten the sustainability of fixed-price contracts on systems with excess capacity.26A key objective successfully pursued by pipeline owners in Gas House was to prevent insertion into the Code of any clear requirement to provide on-demand service on competitive terms. Although the spirit of section 4.1(ii) of the Access Code can be interpreted as favouring such on-demand service, the strict letter of the Code can be met by arrangements such as the overrun provision currently embodied in NGC's standard Transmission Services Agreement. Under this arrangement, would-be pipeline customers are denied access to on-demand service unless they have first entered into a full-blown transmission contract for a term of not less than one year (NGC simply refuses to enter into short-period - weekly or daily - contracts for transmission service). Users are then subject to punitive charges (twenty times the daily reservation fee) for on-demand service in excess of their annual reservation.27 NGC has thus effectively protected the value of its primary contract instruments against the threat of a spot market, without breaching the letter of the Code.5) Developable CapacityThis section of the Code confirms that developable capacity is to be available to users if required, and lays down several principles designed to protect the position of pipeline owners: owners have the priority right to choose expansion options and to commission the work; the right to own the resulting installations, and a broad right to refuse to install developable capacity if the owner "cannot identify a Developable Capacity option that is technically and economically feasible". Conspicuously missing are the counter-vailing rights for pipeline users proposed in the consultants' recommendations.28 The Code takes a welcome forward step by confirming a general right of access to developable capacity, but gives users no clearly-defined right to participate in the evaluation, design, selection, funding or pricing of capacity increments. Instead, users are to be informed by owners of the reasons for any denial of access, and may then have recourse to the Code's dispute resolution procedures. The resulting14 Victoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999balance between owners and users is not entirely one-sided but is significantly weighted in owners' favour.6) Receipt and Delivery PointsThis section is a substitute for earlier proposals that the Code, or a separate document, should deal extensively with the issue of system interconnection. Inter-connection pricing issues - the core of the Telecom-Clear dispute - were completely sidestepped by Gas House, ostensibly because of fears that any codified pricing arrangements would be in breach of the Commerce Act.29 This left only the technical aspects of interconnection, which the Code reduces to the matter of establishing receipt and delivery points for gas.The Code allows interconnection to be refused outright only on the basis of "Good Industry Practice",30 but provides for a potentially crucial barrier to entry by allowing the owner of a system to which interconnection is sought to "set standards consistent with Good Industry Practice for the construction and operation of facilities owned by others and connected to the Owner's facilities".31 This provisio mimics, with no countervailing restriction on abuse by Owners, the familiar non-tariff-barriers which are routinely used around the world to subvert free trade arrangements - the Dairy Board's recent experience with spreadable butter in Europe is an obvious example.The power to dictate the construction and operating standards to be met by interconnecting competitors is an entirely one-sided weapon in the hands of dominant incumbents, with new entrants given only the right to take the dominant to the disputes procedures. Substantial deadweight costs are the likely result, since efficient interconnected looping around a dominant system's bottleneck will be discouraged and total bypass encouraged. This provision of the Code would be more defensible if it were restricted to upstream interconnected facilities only, since it is reasonable to argue that undesirable gas quality, pressure fluctuations and so on may originate from them. Extending it to downstream connected facilities has the primary effect of enabling a vertically-integrated pipeline owner to handicap competitors of its downstream affiliate by refusing to connect service pipes, meters, or entire pipeline segments installed by those competitors in order to reach customers.7) Access Request ProcessThis section lays down procedural arrangements for making and processing applications for access, and imposes a ten-day deadline for pipeline owners to respond to conforming requests.8) Measurement and ReconciliationThis section makes sensible arrangements for the protection of information and auditing arrangements. As already noted, metering and reconciliation represented one of the areas of greatest progress since 1995, with the key technical work being coordinated by the Gas Association of New Zealand alongside the ongoing Gas House forum.9) PricingAs already noted, Gas House decided not to grasp the pricing nettle on the insistence of pipeline owners, backed by section 29 of the Commerce Act. The single page of the Code dealing with pricing issues is restricted to:- price disclosure,Victoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999 15- a vague reference to "equity and economic efficiency" in pricing,- support for unbundling "where reason-able and practicable",and two principles of more potential substance: a most-favoured nation requirement that any Service be available to all Users on request,32 anda rejection of (one interpretation of) theBaumol-Willig Rule in the form of a provision that owners "shall not recover costs, expenses or revenue losses incurred by Affiliates operating in upstream or downstream markets through increased charges for Services".3310) Information MemorandumThis section prescribes the content of the document in which pipeline owners are to publish details of their systems, the services offered, and the terms and conditions for service, including prices and pricing methodologies.11) AdministrationThe Code is to be administered by a Committee of six to eight members, of which "at least half" are to be pipeline owners with Information Memoranda in the public domain. This provision is explained on the basis that "a representative balance of owner and user interests on the Code Committee" was sought and that "there is a greater potential for users to outnumber owners than vice versa".34 This potential exists, however, only so long as users find it worth their while to join and participate in Gas House and the Code administration. If users become disenchanted with Gas House, or do not see value for the money required to participate in the administration, then the committee could consist entirely of owners. Since the Committee must approve any amendments to the Code, and oversee the dispute resolution procedures, it is surprising that the requirement for at least half the committee members to be owners is not counterbalanced by a matching ceiling on owner representation. In effect, the constitutional arrangement guarantees a blocking coalition of owners on the committee, while leaving it entirely up to users to establish a countervailing position for themselves.12) Dispute ResolutionThe dispute procedures are available only to Code signatories, which provides users with an incentive to join to the extent that the procedures seem likely to be more cost-effective than litigation. Here more than anywhere else, the Code can be meaningful only to the extent that parties bring a large measure of good faith to their dealings with one another. Disputes are to go to the Code Committee, which may appoint an independent arbiter. Rulings must be by a 75% vote of the Committee (which gives pipeline owners an automatic group veto power), and the maximum punishment for a party which refuses to accept the Committee's decision is removal from the public register of code signatories.35 Summing up on the Access Code exercise, the Code itself has really only symbolic significance as the outward and visible sign that the natural gas industry has spent a substantial amount of time and money on a process of self-analysis and self-education. To the extent that the Gas House forum, and the focusing of minds on detailed code drafting, have helped to move the industry towards a new culture of transparency and competition, and away from the old order of regulated franchised monopoly, there are real gains to record.Much of the report card on Gas House, however, is fair at best and negative at worst. The industry's dominant players exercised their dominance within Gas House in the same way as they are able to16 Victoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999do in the marketplace, and the Code embodies only mild restraints on market power, the effectiveness of which depend to a large extent on the good faith of Code signatories in resolving disputes and abiding by the spirit of the Code in a generous fashion.In an industry which had nurtured a culture of good citizenship, or in which peer pressure for good behaviour was powerful, a document such as the Code would be especially valuable, and would be expected to evolve over time in a pro-competitive, power-sharing direction. This would be a corporatist solution to the problem of natural monopoly in infrastructure. The gas industry, however, does not (yet?) have such a culture, and the Code is therefore likely to prove largely a dead letter, however valuable the three-year consultation and debating process was. Real change in the industry is being driven by processes of conflict rather than consensus, and it has become increasingly clear that Government has a preference for these conflict processes and little real interest in the consensual-corporatist alternative. The success of Shell and Todd in regaining control of half the Kapuni reserves by litigation, the actual construction of bypass pipelines such as Kapuni-Hawera and Tawa-Ngauranga, the emergence of new gas sources owned independently of Fletcher Challenge, the capture by new entrant gas sellers of major customers from incumbent suppliers, the downward price pressures resulting from distress sales of take-or-pay gas, and the flow-through from excess capacity in electricity generation, are the forces that are really shaping the landscape of the gas industry.In the long run, the marketplace may prove an effective (though not conspicuously efficient) slaughterhouse for erstwhile monopolists. Even the natural-monopoly status of pipelines can be diluted and eventually destroyed by bypass and stranding - which, given the small size of the New Zealand market, is the local counterpart of the North American com-petitive process of duplication, inter-connection and hubs. New Zealand's weak competition law and high litigation costs provide strong incentives favouring the wasteful use of scarce resources in bypass investment programmes which add nothing to the nation's total stock of economically-useful capital but simply build up increasing amounts of excess capacity.It is ironic that one of the arguments originally used to promote the post-1984 industry restructuring policies was the inefficiency of infrastructural investment under a corporatist model (in that case, Think Big and the associated drive towards excess investment in electricity generation). Over-investment in the energy sectors has turned out no less wasteful, and considerably more disruptive to other sectors of the economy, under deregulated market forces.To sum up, the interventionist argument for pursuing industry reform by regulation (or by consensual self-regulation driven by credible regulatory threats), rather than through a free-for-all Darwinian struggle in the marketplace and the courts, has always been that the market process can be wasteful and distortionary in circumstances where the requirements for perfect competition are not met. The infrastructure of a nation's economy is an arena for strategic long-term decision making under conditions of very imperfect competition. Gas House started from the premise that it was in the interest of the gas industry as a whole to develop its own institutional arrangements to promote efficiency and reduce bloodshed. This view was based on a further premise, that the New Zealand Government expected the gas industry to self-regulate sufficiently toVictoria Economic Commentaries / March 1999 17。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Climate
When Wellington’s weather turns bad, it can be truly foul: lacerating winds and sheets of freezing rain coming in sideways. Bus shelters look more like houses – it ain’t called ‘Windy Wellington’ for nothing... November to April are the warmer months and the best time to visit, with average maximums hovering around 20°C. From May to August it’s colder and wetter – daily temperatures lurk around 12°C.
HIGHLIGHTS
Getting acquainted with NZ’s finest museum, Te Papa (p405) Scaling the lighthouse steps on the wild and remote Cape Palliser (p429) Sampling the good coffee and quality beer that Wellingtonians demand at the city’s slick bars (p416) and bohemian cafés (p415) Lassoing Wellington’s wind with a lesson in sailboarding or kiteboarbing (p409) Waxing-on about toasty noses and berry hints while sampling fine Pinot Noir in Martinborough (p427) Riding the ratchety Cable Car (p405) from Lambton Quay to the manicured Wellington Botanic Gardens (p405) Ripping up the trails at Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park (p408) TELEPHONE CODE: 04
WELLINGTON REGION FACTS
Eat A Maori-fusion meal at Kai in the City (p414);
Getting There & Around
Wellington is a major transport hub: anyone going from one NZ island to the other (by sea) passes through here. Wellington airport is serviced by international and domestic airlines. Easy train and bus connections make commuting into Wellington a viable option – many people travel to work (or to party) in Wellington from the hinterland. Approaching the city from the north, you’ll pass through either the Kapiti Coast to the west via State Highway 1 (SH1), or the Wairarapa to the east via State Highway 2 (SH2), before entering the heavily populated Hutt Valley and Wellington itself. InterCity () is the main North Island bus company, travelling just about everywhere. Commuter trains run from Wellington to the Kapiti Coast and The Wairarapa; long-distance Tranz Scenic (www. ) trains run from Wellington to Auckland via Palmerston North. See p420 for details on getting to/from Wellington.
lime-chilli chocolate at Greytown’s Schoc Chocolate (p429) Drink Too much caffeine at Welly’s cool cafés (p415); Pinot Noir from Martinborough (p427) in The Wairarapa Read Katherine Mansfield’s Collected Stories of Katherine Mansfield Listen to The General Electric by Wellington’s rock legends Shihad Watch Any film directed by revered local boy Peter Jackson Swim at The beaches along the Kapiti Coast (p423) Festival Fringe NZ (p411) – offbeat Wellington at its most theatrical, musical and visual Tackiest tourist attraction The faux Stonehenge in the Wairarapa (p429) Go Green Check out rare and endangered NZ wildlife at Wellington’s Karori Wildlife Sanctuary (p406)
HISTORY
Maori legend has it that the explorer Kupe was the first person to discover Wellington harbour. Wellington’s original Maori name was Te Whanga Nui a Tara, Tara being the son of a Maori chief named Whatonga who had settled on the Hawkes Bay coast. Whatonga sent Tara and his half-brother to explore the southern part of the North Island. When they returned over a year later, their reports were so favourable that Whatonga’s followers moved there, founding the Ngati Tara tribe. The first European settlers arrived in the New Zealand Company’s ship Aurora on 22 January 1840, not long after Colonel William Wakefield arrived to buy land from the Maori. The idea was to build two cities: one would be a commercial centre by the harbour (Port Nicholson) and the other, further north, would be the agricultural hub.
© Lonely Planet Publications 398

W E L L I N G T O N • • H i s t o r y 399
Wellington Region
If your New Zealand travels thus far have been all about wilderness and lonesome, one-horse towns, rock into Wellington for a big-city hit. Art-house cinema, hip bars, designer boutiques, live music rooms and late-night coffee shops – it’s all in ‘Windy Welly’. Wellingtonians are geographically isolated and look inwards for inspiration, a habit that fosters a red-hot arts scene. Everyone here seems to be in a band and looks a tad depleted, like they smoke and drink too much and spend their time molesting canvasses and scribbling poetry....except for the politicians of course. NZ’s capital city manages to strike a balance between creative exuberance and an institutional mindset crucial to the day-to-day running of the country. The city is neither altogether bohemian, nor overloaded with bureaucratic stuffed shirts. Wellington is also the major travel crossroads between the North and South Islands. Travellers file through the city, giving it a free-moving, energetic vibe. Steep hills lined with gingerbread-pretty Victorian houses ascend from the harbour to spectacular view points. Wellington punches well above its weight – plan on spending a few days in the ring. If city trappings are something you’re trying to forget, there are great outdoor destinations less than an hour away. Cruise the Kapiti Coast, with it’s low-key beachy towns and mystical Kapiti Island; or head over the Rimutaka Range into the Wairarapa, where the delicate flavours of Pinot Noir (the local grape) are apt reward for a day spent exploring the wild coast.
相关文档
最新文档