areportonamusingourselvestodeath娱乐至死英文读书报告
《娱乐至死》英文摘抄
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6630/d663005baba785b53466b34199770f3a1b82efcc" alt="《娱乐至死》英文摘抄"
《娱乐至死》英文摘抄1."Am u se m e n t" O r "I gn o r an ce"?--Re re a di n g Am u se O u r s e l ve s To De at h B y N e i l Po t sm a n“娱”还是“愚”?——读《娱乐至死》2.M e di a An d C l a s s ro o m Te a ch i n g: Re ve l a ti o n F ro m Re adi n g Th e Di s ap pe ar an ce O f Ch i l dh o o d A n d Am u si n g O u r s e l ve s To De at h B y Ne i l Po st m a n;媒体与课堂教学——兼读尼尔·波兹曼《童年的消逝》、《娱乐至死》3.On Li Yu’s D r am a U ti l i t a ri an i s ti c O ri e n t a ti o n OfE n te r t ai n m e n t B e i n g Fi r s t;李渔娱乐至上的戏曲功利取向之我见4.Th e St a te Of B e i n g Am u se d, E n te r t ai n e d, O r Pl e a s e d.娱乐被逗乐,得到娱乐和快乐的状态5.As Fo r C ar ri e, S h e Stu di e d Ove r Th e Pro b l e m OfF i n di n g Cl o th e s A n d Am u se m e n t O n F i f t y Ce n t s A We e k.至于嘉莉,她在考虑如何用剩下的这5角钱解决买衣和娱乐的问题。
6.At Le as t 5,000J o b s A We e k A re Va n i s h i n g In Th eC a te ri n g An d Le i s u re In du s t ri e s An d To u r i s m.在服务、娱乐和旅游行业,每周至少有5,000份工作在消失。
老师读书心得 《娱乐至死》读书笔记
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d5cf/5d5cf6aeea4151cf1959003ec3b40900278ac59e" alt="老师读书心得 《娱乐至死》读书笔记"
老师读书心得《娱乐至死》读书笔记英文回答:"Amusing Ourselves to Death" is a thought-provoking book that delves into the impact of television and other forms of entertainment on our society. As a teacher, reading this book has given me a lot of insights into how the media and entertainment industry have shaped ourculture and influenced our way of thinking.One of the key points that resonated with me is Neil Postman's argument that television has transformed our public discourse into a form of entertainment. He compares the serious, rational discourse of the past, which was dominated by the printed word, to the superficial and sensationalized nature of televised communication. This has led to a society where important issues are oftentrivialized and reduced to mere spectacle.For example, think about how political debates and newsprograms are often more focused on entertainment value and ratings rather than meaningful discussions about policies and ideas. This has had a profound impact on how we engage with the world around us, as we have become accustomed to seeking instant gratification and entertainment in all aspects of our lives.Another concept that struck a chord with me is the idea that our reliance on visual media has led to a decline in our ability to engage in critical thinking and sustained argument. Postman argues that the medium of television, with its emphasis on visual imagery and short attention spans, has eroded our capacity for deep, analytical thinking. Instead, we have become passive consumers of information, accepting whatever is presented to us without questioning or analyzing it.I see this in my own students, who often struggle to engage with complex texts and ideas because they are so used to consuming bite-sized, visually stimulating content. They are more interested in quick, entertaining videos than in-depth articles or books. This has made me realize theimportance of teaching them how to critically analyze and evaluate information, and to encourage them to seek out substantive, thought-provoking material.Overall, "Amusing Ourselves to Death" has been a powerful reminder of the profound impact that media and entertainment have on our society. It has made me more conscious of the need to cultivate critical thinking skills in my students and to encourage them to look beyond the surface of things.中文回答:《娱乐至死》是一本发人深省的书,深入探讨了电视和其他形式的娱乐对我们社会的影响。
娱乐至死作文八百字
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c47/f5c47ba6afcd13c967fa49b394928d59473dcc72" alt="娱乐至死作文八百字"
娱乐至死作文八百字英文回答:Entertainment as a Distraction.In "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Neil Postman argues that our society has become obsessed with entertainment to the point where it has become a distraction from important issues. He believes that the rise of television as a medium has led to a decline in critical thinking and a loss of meaningful discourse.Postman's argument resonates with me because I have observed how entertainment has become a dominant force in our lives. We are constantly bombarded with entertainment in various forms, from television shows and movies tosocial media and video games. This constant stream of amusement has made it difficult for us to engage in deeper discussions and reflect on important matters.Television, in particular, has played a significantrole in shaping our culture. It presents information and news in a way that is easily digestible and entertaining, but often lacks depth and substance. As a result, we have become passive consumers of information, accepting whatever is presented to us without questioning or critically analyzing it.Moreover, the rise of reality television and celebrity culture has further contributed to the decline of meaningful discourse. We are more interested in the personal lives of celebrities and fictional stories than in discussing pressing social, political, and environmental issues. This focus on entertainment has led to a shallow and superficial society, where trivial matters take precedence over important ones.中文回答:《娱乐至死》中的娱乐作为一种分散注意力的方式。
amusing ourselves to death摘抄
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a4e/04a4e590bce26933c207cc88c233b10d6e56fa12" alt="amusing ourselves to death摘抄"
amusing ourselves to death摘抄“Amusing Ourselves to Death” 可能指的是美国媒体文化研究者和批评家尼尔·波兹曼(Neil Postman)于 1985 年出版的一本书,中文译名是《娱乐至死》。
以下是一些关于这本书的摘抄:1. “In the age of television, we are entertained to death.”(在电视时代,我们被娱乐至死。
)2. “We are becoming a culture that values entertainment over information, that prefers the image to the word, and that is losing the ability to think deeply and critically.”(我们正在成为一个重视娱乐甚于信息、偏爱图像甚于文字、并且正在失去深入和批判性思考能力的文化。
)3. “Television has changed the way we see the world, and not necessarily for the better.”(电视改变了我们看待世界的方式,但不一定是为了更好。
)4. “The problem with television is that it gives us the illusion of knowing things without actually having to learn anything.”(电视的问题在于它给了我们一种了解事物的错觉,而实际上我们并没有学到任何东西。
)5. “In a world of entertainment, everything is reduced to spectacle and we lose touch with the deeper meaning and value of life.”(在一个娱乐的世界里,一切都被简化为奇观,我们失去了与生活更深层次的意义和价值的联系。
对娱乐至死的态度英语作文
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5796a/5796a85f56a54eb41bde6dc3bf24317f3b136110" alt="对娱乐至死的态度英语作文"
对娱乐至死的态度英语作文Title: Entertainment to Death。
In a world dominated by screens and constant stimulation, the concept of "entertainment to death" has become increasingly relevant. Neil Postman's seminal work, "Amusing Ourselves to Death," highlights the dangers of a society where entertainment takes precedence over meaningful discourse and critical thinking. In this essay, we will explore the implications of entertainment-centric cultures and delve into potential solutions to mitigate its negative effects.To begin with, the prevalence of entertainment in modern society is undeniable. From social media scrolling to binge-watching TV series, individuals are inundated with an endless array of entertainment options. While these activities may provide temporary pleasure and distraction, they often come at the expense of more intellectually stimulating pursuits. Instead of engaging in meaningfulconversations or deep reflection, many people opt for passive consumption of content that requires little to no critical thought.Moreover, the rise of entertainment-centric cultures has led to a decline in attention spans and an erosion of critical thinking skills. With the constant barrage of information and entertainment vying for our attention, it has become increasingly difficult to focus on complex issues or engage in nuanced discussions. Instead, society gravitates towards sensationalism and soundbites, favoring entertainment value over substance. This trend is particularly evident in the realm of politics and news media, where sensationalized headlines and clickbait articles dominate the landscape.Furthermore, the commodification of entertainment has led to the prioritization of profit over public good. In pursuit of ratings and advertising revenue, media companies often prioritize sensationalism and spectacle over journalistic integrity and truth. This has resulted in a proliferation of fake news and misinformation, furthereroding trust in traditional media sources. Additionally, the relentless pursuit of profit has fueled an arms racefor attention, with platforms competing to capture and retain users' engagement at any cost.However, all hope is not lost. There are steps that individuals and society as a whole can take to combat the pernicious effects of entertainment-centric cultures. Firstly, we must cultivate a culture of critical thinking and media literacy. By teaching individuals to critically evaluate the information they consume and discern fact from fiction, we can empower them to make informed decisions and resist manipulation by media outlets.Secondly, we must prioritize quality over quantity in our media consumption habits. Instead of mindlessly consuming endless streams of content, we should seek out meaningful and enriching experiences that challenge us intellectually and emotionally. This could involve reading thought-provoking books, engaging in stimulating conversations, or pursuing creative hobbies that stimulate our minds and ignite our passions.Thirdly, we must hold media companies accountable for their role in perpetuating entertainment-centric cultures. This requires demanding greater transparency and accountability from media outlets, as well as supporting independent journalism that prioritizes truth and integrity over sensationalism and profit. Additionally, regulatory measures may be necessary to curb the spread of fake news and misinformation and ensure that media companies act in the public interest.In conclusion, the phenomenon of "entertainment to death" poses significant challenges to individuals and society as a whole. However, by fostering a culture of critical thinking, prioritizing quality over quantity in our media consumption habits, and holding media companies accountable for their actions, we can mitigate its negative effects and build a more informed and engaged society. Ultimately, the choice lies with us – will we continue to amuse ourselves to death, or will we rise to the challenge and reclaim control of our minds and our future?。
amusing ourselves to death英文摘录
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c559/6c559171934053a8a844ba199d0be6ee719674ae" alt="amusing ourselves to death英文摘录"
amusing ourselves to death英文摘录Amusing Ourselves to Death: A Thought-provoking Study on the Impact of EntertainmentIntroduction:In the masterpiece "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Neil Postman delves deep into the detrimental effects of today's entertainment culture on our society. Through a thought-provoking exploration of media, technology, and their impact on our lives, Postman sheds light on the dangerous consequences of prioritizing entertainment over meaningful content. This article aims to summarize and analyze the key ideas presented in Postman's work, emphasizing the urgent need for critical thinking and media literacy in the modern world.The Influence of Television:Postman commences his analysis by emphasizing television's dominance in shaping public discourse. Drawing a stark contrast between the Age of Show Business and the Age of Exposition, he argues that television's relentless pursuit of entertainment has surpassed its capacity to educate and inform. The inherent nature of the medium, with its emphasis on brevity, sensationalism, and visuals, has transformed our culture into one where entertainment takes precedence over serious ideas and substantive content.The Decline of Public Discourse:As television became the primary medium of communication, Postman contends that it has significantly altered the way we receive and processinformation. He asserts that television promotes a form of communication that is fragmented, shallow, and lacking in nuance. In the pursuit of ratings and viewer engagement, important issues are reduced to mere sound bites, trivializing complex topics and hindering meaningful public discourse. Consequently, critical thinking and intelligent discussion have been overshadowed by simplistic entertainment.News as Entertainment:Postman proceeds to critique the transformation of news into a form of entertainment. The merging of news and show business has led to the rise of infotainment, blurring the line between facts and sensationalism. News, once a platform to inform and enlighten individuals, has devolved into a source of amusement. The increasing reliance on visuals, flashy graphics, and captivating headlines reduces news to a spectacle, captivating viewers but failing to provide them with substantial, nuanced information.Implications on Politics and Education:Building upon his critique of television's influence, Postman highlights the profound implications on politics and education. In an entertainment-driven culture, political campaigns have become spectacles, emphasizing image, charisma, and entertainment value over substance and policy. The rise of television-centered politics diminishes the capacity for rational discourse, leaving citizens uninformed and ill-equipped to make informed decisions.Similarly, in the realm of education, the increasing influence of entertainment hinders the development of critical thinking. Postman argues that television's engaging and visually stimulating nature has conditionedindividuals to expect constant entertainment, making it challenging for educational institutions to foster deep, intellectual engagement. This shift jeopardizes the future by producing generations more interested in being entertained than educated.Strategies for Change:Recognizing the alarming consequences of an entertainment-driven society, Postman highlights the urgency to develop media literacy and critical thinking skills. By actively consuming media with a discerning eye, individuals can resist being passively manipulated by the culture of entertainment. Engaging in deep reading, intellectual discussions, and reflective thinking can cultivate the discernment necessary to resist the allure of mindless amusement.Postman concludes by urging society to reevaluate its obsession with entertainment and prioritize meaningful engagement with ideas and critical discourse. Only through conscious efforts to elevate important topics and restore intellectual rigor can we overcome the perils outlined in "Amusing Ourselves to Death" and build a society capable of true understanding and progress.Conclusion:In "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Neil Postman skillfully unveils the detrimental effects of an entertainment-focused culture on our society. By illuminating the pervasive influence of television, the decline of public discourse, the transformation of news, and the implications on politics and education, Postman presents a compelling case for the need to prioritize critical thinking and media literacy. This thought-provoking work serves as acall to action, urging us to reclaim our agency as consumers of media and actively engage in meaningful discourse that transcends the spectacle of entertainment. Only then can we amend the course and create a society that values intellectual growth, understanding, and progress.。
中传MFA考研考点:娱乐至死、泛娱乐化
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f3d5/5f3d53a33c33db991fb887c33be7b395edaf9d0a" alt="中传MFA考研考点:娱乐至死、泛娱乐化"
中传MFA考研考点:娱乐至死、泛娱乐化
内容来源:凯程考研集训营
娱乐至死、泛娱乐化
Neil Postman(1931-2003)《娱乐至死》(Amusing Ourselves to Death)和《童年的消逝》(The Disappearance of Childhood)两本书影响最大。
①媒介即隐喻
在《娱乐至死》中,作者对麦克卢汉所说的“媒介即信息”作了修正,他认为媒介不仅仅是“信息”而是“隐喻”。
如果从科学的角度来理解,“媒介即信息”完全正确,但如果从人文的角度理解则含混不清。
波兹曼认为:“信息是关于这个世界的明确具体的说明,但是我们的媒介,包括那些使会话得以实现的符号,却没有这个功能。
它们更像是一种隐喻,用一种隐蔽但有力的暗示来定义现实世界。
不管我们是通过言语还是印刷的文字或是电视摄影机来感受这个世界,这种媒介一一隐喻的关系为我们将这个世界进行着分类、排序、构建、放大、缩小、着色,并且证明一切存在的理由。
”
②泛娱乐化了的电视
美国的政治、新闻、教育等“都心甘情愿地成为娱乐的附庸,毫无怨言,无声无息,其结果是我们成了一个娱乐至死的物种。
”
美籍奥地利人,传播学四大奠基人之一拉扎斯菲尔德(Paul Lazarsfeld)认为现代大众传播具有明显的负面功能,将现代人淹没在表层信息和通俗娱乐的滔滔洪水中,人们每天在接触没接上花费大量的时间和精力,降低了积极参与社会实践的热情。
他把这种现象称为大众传播的“麻醉作用”。
娱乐至死作文八百字
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a76e/9a76e2f06597f3378364911c450de92f24f7f5d0" alt="娱乐至死作文八百字"
娱乐至死作文八百字英文回答:The advent of mass media and the proliferation of technology have given rise to the phenomenon known as "entertainment to death," a term coined by Neil Postman in his seminal work, "Amusing Ourselves to Death." This concept underscores the idea that society's relentless pursuit of entertainment has led to the erosion of critical thinking, intellectual discourse, and meaningful engagement with the world around us.Postman argues that the relentless stream of trivial and sensationalistic content disseminated through television, social media, and other forms of entertainment has conditioned us to passively accept superficial information without exercising our capacity for critical analysis. As a result, we become less informed, less discerning, and less engaged with the world beyond our immediate sphere of entertainment.Moreover, the blurring of lines between news and entertainment has further exacerbated this issue. News outlets, in an attempt to attract viewers and generate revenue, have increasingly adopted sensationalistic tactics and entertainment-like formats, sacrificing accuracy and depth for ratings and shareability. This has created an environment where it becomes increasingly difficult for individuals to distinguish between credible information and mere entertainment, further undermining their ability to make informed decisions.Furthermore, the proliferation of instant gratification and the demand for constant distraction have stifled our attention spans and diminished our capacity for sustained contemplation. We are bombarded with an endless array of stimuli, each designed to capture our attention for as long as possible. This constant bombardment of distractions erodes our ability to focus on complex issues, engage in meaningful conversations, and develop our intellectual capacities.As a result of these factors, society is becoming increasingly passive, apathetic, and disconnected from the larger world. We are lulled into a state of constant entertainment, where critical thinking, intellectual curiosity, and informed decision-making take a backseat to the pursuit of instant gratification and mindless consumption.中文回答:娱乐至死。
电视时代的娱乐力——解读《娱乐至死》
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23951/23951b93a63066779a5e1920fdec62099e9e28df" alt="电视时代的娱乐力——解读《娱乐至死》"
56一、电视时代的来临1985年,尼尔·波兹曼在电视媒介初现端倪的时刻提出了“娱乐至死”这一概念,并指出电视这一媒介是如何在宗教、政治、商业、教育等领域发挥着作用,控制人们的思想,塑造娱乐化的公众话语,社会正在被重新建构。
《娱乐至死》中,尼尔·波兹曼认为“媒介即隐喻”“媒介即认识论”。
换言之,媒介既是认识世界的一种手段,又是认识世界的基本原则。
作为一种手段,媒介为我们将这个世界进行着分类、排序、构建、放大、缩小、着色,并且证明一切存在的理由。
[1]11而作为一种认识世界的基本原则,它就成为了重要文化对话的载体。
[1]17人类社会至今经历第27卷 第6期 牡丹江大学学报 Vol.27 No.62018年6月 Journal of Mudanjiang University Jun. 2018文章编号:1008-8717(2018)06-0056-03电视时代的娱乐力——解读《娱乐至死》向 玙(湘潭大学外国语学院 ,湖南 湘潭 411105)摘 要: 尼尔·波兹曼的《娱乐至死》发行于1985年,彼时的印刷业只是在电视行业蒸蒸日上的劲头下显出颓靡之势。
时至今日,波兹曼的预言几乎完全实现,“娱乐至死”的时代终于来临。
本文从波兹曼对媒介意义的定义出发,结合社会现实分析电视时代的话语形式和行动模式,揭示在电视媒介影响下出现的“信息碎片化”现象以及被消费主义统治的价值观,从而对当代的主导媒介形式进行反思。
关键词:《娱乐至死》;电视;信息碎片化;消费主义中图分类号:I106 文献标识码:AAmusing Power in Television Time——Interpretation of A musing Ourselves to DeathXIANG Yu(Foreign Language Department, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105)Abstract: Neil Postman’s A musing Ourselves to Death was published in 1985 when print industry just showed the trend of depression under the influence of television. Up to now, Postman’s prediction has been almost realized, the time of amusing ourselves to death finally comes. According to Postman’s definition of the meaning of media, this essay analyzes the speech form and action model with social relaity to reveal the phenomenon of information fragmentation and comsumerism controlled value in televison time, thus reflecting on contemporary major media.Key words: A musing Ourselves to Death ; television; information fragmentation; consumerism 收稿日期:作者简介:2017-12-15向玙(1995-),湘潭大学外国语学院英语语言文学专业在读硕士研究生,研究方向:英美文学。
3000字读后感
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3f29/d3f29652f5b24b7be2d344e370b55e634a17708c" alt="3000字读后感"
3000字读后感波兹曼的时代电脑还没有像如今无可替代,但他也对可以预见的电脑时代提出警告,而今日的事实比他猜想的更悲观。
互联网表面上集合了印刷术与电视机,为两者提供了貌似公平的决斗,实际互联网上的文字信息多是电报的升级版,只不过它努力做到“更快、更黄、更无趣”,网络阅读和电子书虽然延缓了人类智力的退化,但它们依然阻止不了娱乐对人类宣判的死刑,只不过是用凌迟代替了枪决,更加缓慢而痛苦,我的观点与波兹曼一致---大学,只有大学这座人类最后的真理堡垒才能帮助不甘自毁的人们发起反攻。
其实,当年的波兹曼完全没有必要担心西方文明会被娱乐轻而易举地攻陷,读过甘阳的《通三统》中对美国现代大学通识教育体制的介绍描述之后,我们会发现西方社会已经建成了一个牢不可催的文明传承机制,在两年的通识教育“核心课程”中,我的同龄人将接受高强度的学术训练和文化熏陶,在第一流教授的指导下,他们回到古希腊古罗马,细读柏拉图、亚里士多德、希罗多德、吉本、索福克勒斯这些圣哲的经典作品,甘阳对经过这样训练的学生有过如下的描述“芝加哥大学大一的学生进来都傻傻的,水平完全不如我国优秀的大一本科生,而四年之后,则完全脱胎换骨,成了一个“enducated person”,这样的人怎么可能不是精英”,一个每年都会培养出几百万熟读《理想国》、《荷马史诗》,有着深厚人文社科素养公民的社会,怎么可能会输给娱乐?思想建筑起来的高墙任一万个好莱坞、一万个《美国偶像》也是击不破的。
不幸的是,在中国,这道防线已经全面失守。
由于中国漫长的历史年代,决定了中国人民的娱乐方式几经变化,从多样性到特殊政治情势下的单一性,再到开放后的多元化。
中国的娱乐文化伴随着社会的变革发生着质的变化。
同美国的“树墩演讲”一样,我们可以拿我们的传统相声作为例子。
这门产生于民间的艺术,诞生初期在市井生活中受到人们的广泛欢迎,就像听演讲的美国人民一样,中国的老百姓在休闲之时,在天桥地场、甬道路旁,热闹的场面以及人们由衷的笑声也许是今天的人们所不能想见的,与美国的“树墩演讲”不同的是,演讲所表达的是普通人对社会问题的深刻见解,而相声则是将人们生活中的问题进行幽默化的讽刺。
娱乐至死英文书评amusing ourselves to death
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/775ce/775ce6c5d453d19650ae9830158e5cd25b9adab3" alt="娱乐至死英文书评amusing ourselves to death"
i. A Brief Introduction of Amusing Ourselves to DeathThere is a subtitle Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business following the title Amusing Ourselves to Death in the original book, the addition of which constitutes the complete title (Chinese version has removed the subtitle).Boltzmann starts with Orwell's and Huxley's predictions, namely the two ways of the destruction of culture. whether culture will become a reality rather than the former. Then he puts forward his basic thought Media are Metaphor, which means that media is a kind of discourse structure, and it is the form decides the content in our real life, not the other way around. Then Boltzmann tells people that American was once a society where print could flow freely in each class and in every field with a great number of examples. In the environment where paper media pervade, people are rational, logical and more serious. But nowadays, American society is occupied by TV sets. The invention of television has the tendency of destroying our culture. With television being the electronic media, the spread content of our society is incoherence and lacking of context, so is simple, short, trivial and entertaining. Ao entertainment is more and more infiltrating into every corner of the American society, including politics, education, religion, etc, thus deconstructing the American public discourse. For all of this, as Boltzmann points out that, it is OK with television and entertainment itself but the problem lies in that those so-called elites are trying to endow TV with earnestness and loftless because the essence of TV is entertainment. People come out of the "Interpretation age" and into the "Entertainment era". Junk information pours in out daily life at an unprecedented speed. Therefore, Boltzmann outs forward his solution-rely on school education at the end of his book.ii. Reflection on Amusing Ourselves to DeathJust as Plato put it, the form of conversation of human has a significant impact on the thought expressed. In many cases, a word's credibility lies in the credibility of the tone it is said. The competition of thoughts (people understandings but the illusory truth) to a certain degree is also the competition of media. At the beginning of human society, it is the movement that conveys the information; before the invention of writing, oral communication is a very important index; when printing came into the word later, words are most reliable; but in a society of telegraph, television and network, in what way will people talk to each other?Since the invention of the TV sets, there was a large-scale activity refusing the use of TV. And most ironically, the biggest medium propagating the activity is the TV itself. In other words, people opposed the use of TV sets via watching TV programs. This kind of propagation is so weak because it is clear that to whom the words tool belongs. It is necessary and valuable for the existence of entertainment, so is TV itself. But if the entertainment and TV have occupied the right of public discourse and culture society, then se really should do something for our survival before suffering from the pain of becoming "not know why I laugh and cease thinking".But, in the percent, television and network have been widely accepted and held the right ofpublic discourse to some extent. Obviously, this two kinds of media have the essence of entertainment. In that case, my personal wisdom can't go beyond Boltzmann's. Perhaps, we can only maintain our alertness in culture through strengthening school "media consciousness" education and listening to Boltzmann's "warning" to keep at the same time.iii. ConclusionNowadays, corruption in the Communist Party of China is a heated topic among all ranks of people. People criticize the communists even at the cost of their lives. Many students declare themselves to be "young cynic" not to obey regulations and make trouble anywhere as they please. But I don't think it is wise.Actually, we are living in an environment full of temptations. We are living in an entertaining world. It is people's instinct to addict himself in feasting and revelry unconsciously. As you can see, some communists are lost in their pursuit of money and status; some teachers leave their real obligations of teaching and researching behind and are only crazy about reputation; to name just a few. This indicates that some people have forgotten their position in our society. They don't know who they are. They are lost. It is of no use criticizing them or parading yourselves as being different. What we have to do is position ourselves correctly and do what we should do. Otherwise, we will only add to the complexity and disorder in our society.。
关于娱乐至死的英语作文
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b554f/b554f65a2eddc8dccb0b9007252314b0895801b0" alt="关于娱乐至死的英语作文"
关于娱乐至死的英语作文Title: The Perils of Entertainment: A Modern Paradox。
In Neil Postman's seminal work, "Amusing Ourselves to Death," he eloquently dissected the insidious impact of the entertainment industry on our culture and society.Postman's insights, though penned in the 1980s, ring truer than ever in today's hyper-connected world, where screens dominate our attention and triviality often triumphs over substance.The ubiquity of entertainment in contemporary society is undeniable. From television shows to social media platforms, we are bombarded with a constant stream of distractions designed to captivate our minds and numb our critical faculties. However, as Postman argued, this relentless onslaught of amusement comes at a grave cost.One of the most profound consequences of our entertainment-saturated culture is the erosion ofmeaningful discourse. In an age where soundbites and memes reign supreme, complex ideas are reduced to simplistic slogans, and genuine dialogue gives way to sensationalism and spectacle. The rise of reality television and clickbait journalism exemplifies this trend, as sensationalism and superficiality become the norm, while substance isrelegated to the sidelines.Moreover, the emphasis on entertainment has also had a profound impact on our political landscape. Politicians are increasingly viewed through the lens of entertainment, valued more for their charisma and entertainment value than their policies or principles. This phenomenon, oftenreferred to as the "celebrification" of politics, has serious implications for the functioning of democracy, as substantive debate and informed decision-making are supplanted by personality cults and theatrical performances.Furthermore, the pervasive influence of entertainment extends beyond the realm of politics and into our everyday lives, shaping our values, beliefs, and behaviors in subtle yet significant ways. From the images we see on screen tothe products we consume, entertainment exerts a powerful influence on our perceptions of the world and ourselves. This can lead to a superficial understanding of complex issues, as well as a preoccupation with instantgratification and hedonistic pursuits at the expense of long-term goals and genuine fulfillment.However, while Postman's critique of entertainment culture is undoubtedly incisive, it is important to recognize that not all forms of entertainment areinherently detrimental. Indeed, when wielded thoughtfully, entertainment has the potential to educate, inspire, and unite. From thought-provoking films that challenge our assumptions to immersive video games that foster empathy and collaboration, entertainment can serve as a powerful medium for social change and personal growth.Ultimately, the challenge lies in striking a balance between the pleasures of entertainment and the demands of a meaningful life. By cultivating discernment and critical thinking skills, we can resist the seductive allure of mindless amusement and instead seek out forms ofentertainment that enrich our lives and expand our horizons. In doing so, we can reclaim control over our attention and our destiny, ensuring that we do not succumb to the perilsof entertainment, but rather harness its potential for positive transformation.。
老师读书心得 《娱乐至死》读书笔记
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d247d/d247da9f133458664d5c5f6cbacee7034c0bd6e3" alt="老师读书心得 《娱乐至死》读书笔记"
老师读书心得《娱乐至死》读书笔记英文回答:Amusing Ourselves to Death: A Book Review。
Neil Postman's "Amusing Ourselves to Death" is aseminal work that explores the profound impact oftelevision on our culture and discourse. Postman arguesthat the rise of television as the dominant form of mass communication has led to a decline in public discourse, critical thinking, and civic engagement.Postman begins by tracing the evolution of communication technologies from the printing press to television. He notes that each new technology hasinfluenced the way we think and communicate. For example, the printing press led to the spread of literacy and the development of new forms of literature. Television, however, has a unique set of characteristics that make itparticularly suited for entertainment and distraction.Postman argues that television's emphasis on entertainment has led to a decline in serious discourse.The constant bombardment of images and sound bites makes it difficult to concentrate on complex issues. People are more likely to be swayed by emotions and personal anecdotes than by facts and reason.This decline in discourse has had a negative impact on our civic life. People are less likely to engage in public debate or to participate in political processes. They are more likely to be passive consumers of information than active citizens.Postman concludes by warning that the continued dominance of television as a form of mass communicationwill lead to a further decline in our culture and discourse. He calls for a return to a more balanced approach to media consumption, one that includes reading, writing, andcritical thinking.中文回答:娱乐至死,读后感。
娱乐至死
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af860/af8600d0e9498bfa7ebaa8163bd76159d8939dd7" alt="娱乐至死"
Neil Postman was a world famous media theorist and cultural critic. His pedagogical and scholarly interests included media and education, as can be seen in many of his seventeen books, including Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985), The Disappearance of Childhood (1982).Postman's best known book is Amusing Ourselves to Death.The book opens with a Foreword that examines two literary dystopic visions – that of George Orwell, who in 1984 warned about a tyrannical state that would ban information to keep the public powerless, and that of Aldous Huxley, who in Brave New World depicted a population too amused by distractions to realize that they had been made powerless. Postman wishes to reveal how discourse inspired by television has turned our world into a more Huxleyan one.At the begining,Postman introduces the concept of the "media-metaphor." Simply put, he posits that every civilization's discourse is limited by the biases of the media it employs. He suggests, for instance, that an oral culture will speak of the world differently than one that has printed language. It is all an introduction for his basic examination, which aims to show how the television age is undergoing a rapid transformation in the wake of the relatively new media of television.In addition,Postman examines how any civilization's media will determine the way in which it defines truth. He believes that there is no universal way to know truth, but rather that a civilization will identify truth largely based on its forms of communication. A primitive oral culture will put great stock in a man who remembers proverbs, since truth is passed on through such stories, whereas a culture of the written word will find oral proverbs quaint and the permanence of written precedent far more important. What concerns Postman about the television is not that it provides non-stop entertainment; in fact, he enjoys this aspect of it. What concerns him is that it has limited our discourse to where all of our serious forms of discussion have turned into entertainment. Television has influenced the way we live off the screen.Equally important,Postman introduces another concept,"The Peek-a-Boo World",with the invention of the telegraph and the widespread reproduction of photographs in the first half of the 1800s. "We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate ....We are eager to tunnel under the Atlantic and bring the old world some weeks nearer to the new; but perchance the first news that will leak through into the broad flapping American ear will be that Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough."() With a sudden access to instantaneous information no longer limited by geographic distance, and the influx of images to accompany information, society slowly became less driven by understanding the context of information, and more involved with collectedirrelevant information divorced from its particular context. The more deliberate process of rational discourse began to break down.Moreover,he discusses how "The Age of Exposition" that defined Typographic America has been replaced by a spectacle that prizes flash and entertainment over substance. Entertainment has become the content of all of our discourse, so that the message itself is less important than the entertainment value of its delivery. He examines the inherent biases that television has as a medium –it demands rapid-fire editing, non-stop stimulation, and quick decisions rather than rational deliberation –and worries that our world has yet to truly consider these inherent biases in discussing television.Postman worried that television was providing us with rapid and ramped disinformation –“misplaced, irrelevant, fragmented, or superficial information —information that creates the illusion of knowing something but which in fact leads one away from knowing”(Postman, 107). Television has recreated and degraded our concept of thinking and knowing. For example, what is more ludicrous than two people on screen rapidly juxtaposing the following stories, all the while smiling or keeping neutral faces: the mayor died; the humane society had a successful open house; a brutal rape on the East side indicates a serial rapist is loose; snow in the mountains; the King of Zimbabwe was released from house arrest; a kitten was saved by seven firemen after it got caught in a drain pipe and local teachers march on the state capital to protest class sizes. Commercial break. Five minutes later the stories roll out once again. This is indeed a news ‘show.’Television has come to be not only the source of what people think they know; it actually is what they know. And what they know are images, crafted and marketed to appeal to viewers to keep them entertained. Currently, the war in Iraq, Operation Iraqi Freedom, appears to be the most important event in the world, in our lives and in our living rooms. Why? Because television says it is. This is the degradation of coherent and relevant information in the hands of television. Of course, television has no hands and it isn’t an ‘it.’Television is a phenomenon of influences, the most important of which are people, money and power.Furthermore,Postman uses the "news of the day" to provide a metaphor for how we now receive all information. He suggests that the chapter's title - taken from a common phrase used in television news reports - assumes disconnectedness between all information. The most horrific story only gets a short bit of attention, and then is separated from the next story. There is no time for gravity or consideration, and the entertaining aspects of news –unemotive, attractive newscasters, pleasant music, clever transitions - only reinforce the idea that the information we receive is not to be considered in thecontext of our lives. As such, we are no longer inspired to action by the news we receive; we are only driven to develop opinions on it.We watch not to act upon —but ultimately to be entertained under the guise of staying “informed”. As Postman wrote way back in 1985, we have a glut of information about “a sea of facts from unknown places about strangers with unknown faces.”We lay on the couch and consume –Anderson Cooper and John Stewart our potato chips and M & M’s.Postman ends his work with "The Huxleyan Warning," in which he returns to the basic premise that Aldous Huxley was right. He restates his thesis and then offers some suggestions to battle the problems he details, though he admits they are unlikely to work because we are so saturated with television, and because culture does not tend to turn against its technologies. However, the most important thing he suggests is that we become aware of what television is, of its inherent biases, so that we can control it rather than let it control us.。
娱乐至死英文书评amusingourselvestodeath
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc95e/fc95e69df6bc052253a2d462a740af9a60d4caad" alt="娱乐至死英文书评amusingourselvestodeath"
i。
A Brief Introduction of Amusing Ourselves to DeathThere is a subtitle Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business following the title Amusing Ourselves to Death in the original book, the addition of which constitutes the complete title (Chinese version has removed the subtitle).Boltzmann starts with Orwell’s and Huxley’s predictions, namely the two ways of the destruction of culture. whether culture will become a reality rather than the former。
Then he puts forward his basic thought Media are Metaphor, which means that media is a kind of discourse structure,and it is the form decides the content in our real life, not the other way around。
Then Boltzmann tells people that American was once a society where print could flow freely in each class and in every field with a great number of examples。
In the environment where paper media pervade, people are rational, logical and more serious。
娱乐至死反思作文题目
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02604/02604ac2c24c118ad3095fee82b2fe0d5a0198fd" alt="娱乐至死反思作文题目"
娱乐至死反思作文题目英文回答:The title of the essay is "Reflection on Amusing Ourselves to Death." In this essay, I will discuss my thoughts and reflections on Neil Postman's book "Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business." This book explores the impact of television and media on our society and raises important questions about the role of entertainment in our lives.Postman argues that our culture has become obsessed with entertainment and that this obsession has had detrimental effects on our ability to engage in meaningful public discourse. He compares the dystopian world depicted in George Orwell's "1984" with the one portrayed in Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World," suggesting that Huxley's vision is more relevant to our current reality.I agree with Postman's argument that the rise oftelevision and media has led to a decline in critical thinking and intellectual engagement. In today's society, we are bombarded with an endless stream of entertainment and distractions, which leaves little room for thoughtful reflection and analysis. Our attention spans have become shorter, and we have become accustomed to instant gratification.Furthermore, the emphasis on entertainment has also affected the way information is presented and consumed. News and important issues are often packaged as entertainment, with flashy graphics and sensationalized headlines. This not only trivializes important topics but also makes it difficult for the audience to distinguish between fact and fiction.中文回答:这篇文章的题目是《娱乐至死》反思。
《娱乐至死》读后感
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e22c8/e22c8ded2ac10acc2148cdc718931aca429cabd3" alt="《娱乐至死》读后感"
《娱乐至死》读后感《娱乐至死》读后感1令人们感到痛苦的不是他们用笑声代替了思考,而是他们不知道自己为什么笑以及为什么不再思考。
——尼尔·波兹曼《娱乐至死》这是一本写给电视时代的图书,但是其所蕴含的道理与关怀在络时代也毫不过时。
每天,我们打开电视机,打开电脑,那些花边新闻如洪水般涌入,即使是严肃的新闻,也多配以噱头的标题和血腥的图片,或干脆用戏说的形式。
久而久之,我们习惯了用眼睛来消化所得,我们的感官感受更甚于我们头脑的追求,而电视这些媒体终将通过控制人们的时间、注意力和认知习惯而使人们失去印刷时代时所具有的品质。
我们的文化终将因为大笑过度而体力衰竭。
这是我们大家不想看到的,作者为了把这种不易察觉的文化伤害以及对人自我意识的彻底剥夺表达出来,在本书中一步步地向我们解释、举例、引用。
作者一直强调一个观点“媒介即信息”。
他认为,深入一种文化的最有效途径是了解这种文化中用于会话的工具。
把握了传播的把柄,就会把握传播信息的主动权。
在书里,波兹曼又有一种更为深入的认识——媒介即隐喻,用一种隐蔽但有力的暗示来定义现实世界。
而媒介的独特之处在于,虽然它指导着我们看待和了解事物的方式,但它的这种介入却往往不为人所注意。
因此,媒介就好比是一剂精神,它让你在不知不觉中对其产生依赖,当完全上瘾后,你明知痛苦与自由的丧失,但却无法采取任何措施进行补救,因为这剂毒药已经深入你的灵魂和骨髓了。
波兹曼举了一个很有趣的例子,他说“我们并不一定是为了看时间而去看表”因为“有部分人只是好奇于表示时间的方式”。
当传媒的作用不仅仅是实用,而只是满足当代人浮躁的社会心理与挑剔的口味,那么娱乐业就应运而生了。
在印刷时代,印刷品的出版与读者意见的反馈是有时间差的。
因此,当我们发现只有报纸与杂志才能达到承载海量信息的功能时,一定程度上变成了读者去适应印刷品的品味乃至排版要求。
这时就需要人们思考,选择汲取知识,所以在纯印刷年代,娱乐对于传媒的影响很小。
老师读书心得 《娱乐至死》读书笔记
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c914/9c9144e50b8ee5ff77389e9526f4fd2ca4deadc6" alt="老师读书心得 《娱乐至死》读书笔记"
老师读书心得《娱乐至死》读书笔记英文回答:I was initially hesitant to pick up "Amusing Ourselves to Death" by Neil Postman. Its title seemed to imply a dismissive tone towards entertainment, something I hold dear to my heart. However, upon further contemplation, I realized that Postman's critique was not aimed at entertainment itself but at the way our society has become increasingly defined by it.Postman argues that we have entered an age where entertainment has replaced serious discourse. We are no longer interested in discussing complex issues or engaging in critical thinking. Instead, we prefer to be entertained, to be spoon-fed information in a way that is easy to digest and doesn't challenge our beliefs.As a result, our ability to think critically and reason has diminished. We are more likely to believe what we seeon TV or read on social media without questioning its validity. We are less likely to engage in meaningful conversations or to seek out information that might challenge our views.This has serious implications for our society. When we are no longer able to think critically, we become more susceptible to manipulation and propaganda. We are more likely to make decisions based on emotion rather than reason. We are less likely to hold our leaders accountable or to make informed choices about our future.Postman's book is a wake-up call. It is a reminder that entertainment is not inherently bad, but that we need to be mindful of its effects on our society. We need to make sure that we are not allowing it to replace serious discourse and critical thinking.We need to find ways to encourage people to engage in more meaningful conversations, to read more books, and to watch less TV. We need to support institutions that promote critical thinking and reason. And we need to hold ourleaders accountable for the decisions they make.If we do not take these steps, we risk becoming asociety that is amused to death, a society that is unableto think for itself and is easily manipulated.中文回答:初次见到尼尔·波兹曼的《娱乐至死》这本书时,我犹豫要不要拿起来读。
尼采的名言英文原句及翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1b5a/d1b5ae63537730f49e827ac3edad4eab7d8d7e0f" alt="尼采的名言英文原句及翻译"
尼采的名言英文原句及翻译1.尼采的名言要英文的“如果你想走到高处,就要使用自己的两条腿!不要让别人把你抬到高处;更不要坐在别人的背上和头上。
”-(德国哲学家尼采. F. W.)(F. W. Nietzsche, German Philosopher)If you would go up high, then use your own legs ! Do not let yourselves carried aloft; do not seat yourselves on other people's backs and heads.上帝死了God died!2.尼采的名言要英文的The vain.-- We are like shop windows in which we are continually arranging, concealing or illuminating the supposed qualities other ascribe to us - in order to deceive ourselves.from Nietzsche's DaybreakWill and willingness.-- Someone took a youth to a sage and said: "Look, he is being corrupted by women." The sage shook his head and smiled. "It is men," said he, "that corrupt women; and all the failings of women should be atoned by and improved in men. For it is man who creates for himself the image of woman, and woman forms herself according to this image.""You are too kind-hearted about women," said one of those present; "you do not know them." The sage replied: "Will is the manner of men; willingness that of women. That is the law of the sexes - truly, a hard law for women. All of humanity is innocent of its existence; but women are doubly innocent. Who could have oil and kindness enough for them?""Damn oil! Damn kindness!" someone shouted out of the crowd; "Women need to be educated better!" - "Men need to beeducated better," said the sage and beckoned to the youth to follow him. - The youth, however, did not follow him.from Nietzsche's The Gay ScienceAnti-theses.-- The most senile thing ever thought about man is contained in the celebrated saying 'the ego is always hateful'; the most childish is the even more celebrated 'love thy neighbor as thyself'. -- In the former, knowledge of human nature has ceased, in the latter it has not yet even begun.from Nietzsche's Assorted Opinions and MaximsIn the stream.-- Mighty waters draw much stone and rubble along with them; mighty spirits many stupid and bewildered heads.from Nietzsche's Human, all too Human3.尼采的名言:“任何不能杀死你的,都会使你更强大尼采的名言:“任何不能杀死你的,都会使你更强大。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Introduction: In recent years, ” Amusing ourselves to death” seem s to turn to a given phrase, shouldering the task of catching the eyes of the republic as headlines in media. People use this word as a powerful weapon to attack the increasing tendency of entertainment in today’s culture, politics, religion, education, etc. Now I’ve finished reading Neil Boltzmann's Amusing Ourselves to Death and found that this is indeed a splendid and powerful book.Key words: culture; press; TV sets; entertainment; alertnessI. A brief introduction of Amusing Ourselves to DeathThere is a subtitle Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business following the title Amusing Ourselves to Death in the original book, the addition of which constitutes the complete title (Chinese version has removed the subtitle).Boltzmann starts with Orwell’s and Huxley’s predictions, namely the two ways of the destruction of culture——whether culture will become a prison or a farce, and points out that it is the latter that will become a reality rather than the former. Then he puts forward his basic thought Media are Metaphor, which means that media is a kind of discourse structure, and it is the form decides the content in our real life, not the other way around. Then Boltzmann tells people that American was once a society where print could flow freely in each class and in every field with a great number of examples. In the environment where paper media pervade, people are rational, logical and more serious. But nowadays, American society is occupied by TV sets. The invention of television has the tendency of destroying our culture. With television being the electronic media, the spread content of our society is incoherence and lacking of context, so is simple, short, trivial and entertaining. So entertainment is more and more infiltrating into every corner of the American society, including politics, education, religion, etc, thus deconstructing the American public discourse. For all of this, as Boltzmann points out, it is OK with television and entertainment itself but the problem lies in that those so-called elites are trying to endow TVwith earnestness and loftiness because the essence of TV is entertainment. People come out of the "Interpretation age" and into the "Entertainment era". Junk information pours in our daily life at an unprecedented speed. Therefore, Boltzmann puts forward his solution - rely on school education at the end of his book.II. Reflection on Amusing Ourselves to DeathJust as Plato put it, the form of conversation of human has a significant impact on the thought expressed. In many cases, a word’s credibility lies in the credibility of the tone it is said. The competition of thoughts (people’s understandings but the illusory truth) to a certain degree is also the competition of media. At the beginning of human society, it is the movement that conveys the information; before the invention of writing, oral communication is a very important index; when printing came into the world later, words are mostly reliable; but in a society of telegraph, television and network, in what way will people talk to each other?Since the invention of the TV sets, there was a large-scale activity refusing the use of TV. And most ironically, the biggest medium propagating the activity is the TV itself. In other words, people opposed the use of TV sets via watching TV programs. This kind of propagation is so weak because it is clear that to whom the words tool belongs. It is necessary and valuable for the existence of entertainment, so is TV itself. But if the entertainment and TV have occupied the right of public discourse and the culture society, then we really should do something for our survival before suffering from the pain of becoming ”not know why I laugh and cease thinking”.But, in the present, television and network have been widely accepted and held the right of public discourse to some extent. Obviously, this two kinds of media have the essence of entertainment. In that case, my personal wisdom can’t go beyond Boltzmann’s. Perhaps, we can only maintain our alertness in culture through strengthening school "media consciousness" education andlistening to Boltzmann’s "warning" to keep at the same time.III. ConclusionNowadays, corruption in the Communist Party of China is a heated topic among all ranks of people. People criticize the communists even at the cost of their lives. Many students declare themselves to be” young cynic” not to obey regulations and make trouble anywhere as they please. But I don’t think it is wise.Actually, we are living in an environment full of temptations. We are living in an entertaining world. It is people’s instinct to addict himself in feasting and revelry unconsciously. As you can see, some communists are lost in their pursuit of money and status; some teachers leave their real obligations of teaching and researching behind and are only crazy about reputation; to name just a few. This indicates that some people have forgotten their position in our society. They don’t know who they are. They are lost. It is of no use criticizing them or parading yourselves as being different. What we have to do is position ourselves correctly and do what we should do. Otherwise, we will only add to the complexity and disorder in our society.As a student, our main duty is to study. So just remember who you are and what you should do——launching yourselves into studying. Forget about the unfairness and dark side of our society. Because while lost in the meditation of other roles in society and ceasing your task of studying, you will be one element of that unfairness and darkness.。