Ergo Injury RCA
老人腰椎变形评残流程
老人腰椎变形评残流程英文回答:The process of evaluating disability caused by degenerative changes in the lumbar spine in elderly individuals involves several steps. First, a comprehensive medical examination is conducted to assess the severity of the condition and its impact on the individual's daily life. This may include physical examinations, imaging tests such as X-rays or MRIs, and evaluation of the individual's medical history.Based on the findings from the medical examination, a disability rating is assigned to the individual. Thisrating is determined by considering various factors, including the extent of the degenerative changes in the lumbar spine, the level of pain experienced by the individual, and the functional limitations caused by the condition. The disability rating is usually expressed as a percentage, with a higher percentage indicating a moresevere disability.In addition to the medical evaluation, the individual may also be required to undergo functional capacity assessments. These assessments measure the individual's ability to perform specific tasks or activities, such as lifting objects, bending, or walking. The results of these assessments provide further insight into the individual's functional limitations and help determine the extent of the disability.Once the disability rating and functional capacity assessments are completed, the individual's case is reviewed by a disability evaluation board or committee. This board or committee consists of medical professionals, rehabilitation specialists, and other experts who review the medical evidence and assessments to make a final determination regarding the individual's disability status.It is important to note that the process of evaluating disability caused by degenerative changes in the lumbar spine may vary depending on the country or jurisdiction.Different countries may have different criteria and procedures for assessing disability, and the specific process may also depend on the individual's occupation and the type of disability benefits they are seeking.中文回答:评估老年人腰椎变形引起的残疾的流程包括几个步骤。
跌倒病人RCA分析PPT1
制定宣教执行单(事见附件件),并制作RCA分析课件
(2)发生跌倒及时检查相关文书的书写
(3)隐瞒不报者,扣当月奖金200元
10.检查厕所呼叫铃,发现问题及时维护
患者肌力活动
情况
活动指引
如厕指引
辅助器具 使用指引
跌倒风险
注意事项
0-2级、 3级伴身 体虚弱、 眩晕者
卧床
床上被动运动
跌倒病人RCA分析
前言
跌倒高危科室 RCA分析
主要内容
1 第一阶段个案发生过程 2 第二阶段近端原因分析 3 第三阶段根本原因确认 4 第四阶段发展改善行动
What Why How Action
1 第一阶段个案发生过程 What
• RCA小组成员:护士长,科室护士 • 问题:一名患者在入厕时跌倒 • 资料收集:患者病史,目击者的叙述、观
察的资料,文件的记录
患者的一般资料
• 患者,男性,36岁,诊断:腰2椎体爆裂性骨折并 脊髓损伤术后
• 病史资料:患者有十余年的精神分裂症病史, 性格偏执,目前长期服用“氯氮平”
• 专科情况:
肌力
双上肢肌力正常. 右下肢近端肌力2级远端1级,左下肢近端肌力2+级, 远端肌力2-级
ADL 50分 日常生活部分依赖
分析课件
组长/护长
(2)发生跌倒及时检查相关文书的书写
(3)隐瞒不报者,扣当月奖金200元
10.检查厕所呼叫铃,发现问题及时维护
两周1次 中期班
1.规划固定放置轮椅的区域,贴上相关警示和标签
环 2.凡是有轮椅的,提供铁链锁,要求
防跌倒专项方案
项目
具体内容
1.开会动员,将防跌倒作为本年度护理安全专项,
跌倒病人RCA分析
RCA分析的优势和局限性
人力和时间投入
RCA需要投入大量人力和 时间进行深入调查和分析。
专业知识要求
进行RCA分析需要具备一 定的专业知识和经验,以 确保准确识别根本原因。
文化障碍
在某些文化背景下,公开 讨论不良事件可能存在一 定的困难。
RCA在病人跌倒中
04
的应用
应用范围和目标
应用范围
RCA分析(Root Cause Analysis)在 病人跌倒事件中广泛应用,旨在识别 跌倒的根本原因,并采取有效措施防 止类似事件的再次发生。
程上的不足。
医疗人员的安全意识和培训需要 进一步加强,以减少跌倒事件的
发生。
对医疗机构的建议
医疗机构应加强病人跌倒的预防 措施,包括改善环境、加强监管
和提供必要的辅助器具等。
医疗机构应定期对医疗人员进行 跌倒预防的培训和教育,提高他
们的安全意识和应对能力。
医疗机构应建立完善的跌倒报告 和反馈机制,及时发现和解决跌
跌倒病人rca分析
contents
目录
• 引言 • 病人跌倒原因分析 • RCA分析方法介绍 • RCA在病人跌倒中的应用 • 案例分析 • 结论和建议
引言
01
背景介绍
跌倒是一种常见的意外事件, 对老年人和身体虚弱的人来说 尤其危险。
跌倒可能导致骨折、脑损伤等 严重后果,甚至威胁生命。
RCA分析是一种系统的方法, 用于分析事故的原因,并提出 改进措施,以防止类似事故再 次发生。
倒事件中存在的问题。
对未来研究的展望
未来研究可以进一步探讨病人跌倒的原因和预防措施,为医疗机构提供 更有针对性的建议。
未来研究可以关注医疗人员对跌倒预防的认知和行为,以及如何提高他 们的安全意识和应对能力。
一季度跌倒RCA分析(ppt文档)
诚信、关怀、执行力
Asking Whys:
• 为什么病患可以自行离床? • 为什么病患陪人没有在病人身旁? • 为什么管床护士未对高风险病人进行跌倒/
坠床评估? • 为什么没有约束患者? • 为什么没有有效的使用足够的床栏?
近 端 原 因 诚信、关怀、执行力
1.护士长: (1)风险管理不到位:患者既往有自行拔出胃管,依 从性不佳表现,未提示护士病人可能不遵从卧床休息。
诚信、关怀、执行力
病人背景介绍(一)
患者,女,84岁,因呼吸衰竭于5-1日收入我科后病 情加重转入ICU,6-4转回我科,患者神志清,对答切 题,带入颈静脉置管和尿管,一级护理,告病重,心 电监护,精神差,床上活动无力,嘱卧床休息,有五 个儿女轮流陪护,6月22号早上8点半患者在无家属陪 护的情况下自行下床滑坐在床边。
時間
22/6 8:10
8:30
事件 管床护士为病人雾化时见病人在睡觉,患者 家属示意病人醒后再治疗。
护士进病房时发现患者坐在床边,家属 不在身边,立即扶至病床上,呼叫医生。
8:35 检查患者无疼痛、皮肤损伤及活动障碍,生
命体征正常。
诚信、关怀、执行力
運用工具寻找原因
• Asking “Whys”:寻找原因 • Barrier Analysis:风险评价技术 • Fishbone Diagrams:鱼骨图
1.管床护士护士未做风险评估。 无 2. 对患者依从性评估不足。
3、未进行相关告知。 护士长了解但执行有困难。 无 护士长核心制度执行力欠缺。
诚跌信、关倒怀、要执行力因分析图
制度因素
缺乏规范的坠床防 范管理指引;
管理因素
病人因素
护理核心制度执行不
家属离开病房不知与护士沟通
22110C-4病人康复期二次伤害防护预案英文版
22110C-4病人康复期二次伤害防护预案英文版Document Title: Prevention Plan for Secondary Injuries in the Rehabilitation Period of 22110C-4 PatientsIntroduction:The purpose of this document is to outline a prevention plan for secondary injuries in the rehabilitation period of 22110C-4 patients. This plan aims to reduce the risk of additional harm and complications during the recovery process.Risk Assessment:Before implementing any prevention measures, it is essential to conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify potential hazards and vulnerabilities that could lead to secondary injuries in patients with the 22110C-4 condition. This assessment should consider factors such as mobility limitations, muscle weakness, and cognitive impairments that may increase the risk of accidents and injuries.Prevention Strategies:1. Patient Education: Provide comprehensive education to patients and their caregivers on the importance of safety measures during the rehabilitation period. This includes instructions on proper body mechanics, fall prevention techniques, and the use of assistive devices.2. Environmental Modifications: Ensure that the rehabilitation environment is free of obstacles and hazards that could pose a risk to patients. This includes keeping walkways clear, installing handrails and grab bars, and using non-slip mats in wet areas.3. Regular Monitoring: Conduct regular assessments of patients' physical and cognitive abilities to identify any changes or deterioration that may increase the risk of secondary injuries. Adjust the rehabilitation plan accordingly to address these concerns.4. Staff Training: Provide training to rehabilitation staff on the specific needs and challenges of 22110C-4 patients. This includes properhandling techniques, communication strategies, and emergency response protocols.5. Assistive Devices: Provide patients with appropriate assistive devices such as wheelchairs, walkers, and canes to support their mobility and reduce the risk of falls and injuries.6. Collaboration with Healthcare Providers: Work closely with other healthcare providers involved in the care of 22110C-4 patients to ensure a coordinated approach to injury prevention. This includes sharing relevant information and updates on the patient's condition.Conclusion:By implementing the prevention plan outlined in this document, healthcare providers can effectively reduce the risk of secondary injuries in 22110C-4 patients during the rehabilitation period. It is essential to prioritize patient safety and well-being throughout the recovery process.。
RCA2在跌倒患者不良事件中的应用
RCA²在跌倒患者不良事件中的应用徐应玲,张妍,严园[摘要]探讨运用根本原因分析及行动(RCA2)进行跌倒事件分析,找出根因是未对护士进行Morse跌倒评分及MBI评分方法的规范培训、夜间巡视标准化流程不完善、无陪护告知标准化流程等,提出相应的措施为全员培训Morse跌倒评分及MBI 评分方法、修订夜间巡视标准化流程、制定陪护告知标准化流程及管理规定,避免类似事件的再次发生,使得护理工作更加安全、有效,最终患者康复出院。
[关键词]跌倒;根本原因分析;根本原因分析及行动;不良事件[中图分类号]R47[文献标志码]B[文章编号]1672-271X(2019)02-0211-02[DOI]10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2019.02.0240引言跌倒是指突发、不自主、非故意的停顿导致体位改变,倒在地上或比初始位置更低的平面[1-2]。
有研究报道,每例住院患者平均每年发生1.4次跌倒[3]。
美国医疗机构评审联合委员会(JCAHO)和中国医院协会将防范与减少患者跌倒风险列入了患者安全目标中[4]。
癌症患者作为一种特殊的住院群体,由于疾病行化疗导致营养不良,活动无耐力等均为发生跌倒坠床的危险因素[5-6]。
根本原因分析及行动(root cause analysis and actions,RCA2)是美国国家患者安全基金会(NPSF)于2015年首次提出[7],以根本原因分析法(RCA)为基础,对已发生的不良事件进行失误分析,进而找出原因,并采取相应行动的过程[8-10],其目的是避免类似事件再次发生。
本文对我院1例癌症患者发生跌倒不良事件进行RCA2分析,现报道如下。
1病例介绍患者,男,70岁,因“右肺腺癌伴脑转移”于2017年10月15日入住我院呼吸科,既往有高血压、痛风、甲状腺机能减退等病史。
入院时血压150/78 mmHg,跌倒(Morse跌倒)评分25分,自理能力(改良Barthel指数)评分90分。
人体损伤致残程度分级适用指南骨不连
人体损伤致残程度分级适用指南骨不连英文版Guidance on the Classification of Disability Caused by Bone NonunionIntroduction:Bone nonunion, a common complication following fractures, occurs when the fractured bone fails to heal despite appropriate treatment. This condition can lead to significant disability, affecting a person's ability to perform daily activities. This article aims to provide a practical guide for the classification of disability caused by bone nonunion.Classification Criteria:The classification of disability caused by bone nonunion is primarily based on the location, severity, and impact on daily activities. The following criteria are commonly used: Location of Bone Nonunion: The location of the nonunion plays a crucial role in determining the severity of the disability.For example, nonunion in weight-bearing bones, such as the femur or pelvis, may result in more severe disability than nonunion in non-weight-bearing bones.Severity of Bone Nonunion: The severity of the nonunion is determined by factors such as the extent of the fracture, the stability of the nonunion, and the presence of any associated complications. More severe nonunions may lead to more significant disabilities.Impact on Daily Activities: The impact of bone nonunion on daily activities is another important consideration. For instance, nonunion that limits ambulation or the use of hands may significantly affect a person's ability to perform daily tasks.Guidance for Classification:When classifying the disability caused by bone nonunion, it is important to consider all relevant factors. A multidisciplinary team, including orthopedic surgeons, rehabilitation specialists, and other healthcare professionals, should be involved. Theycan assess the patient's condition and provide recommendations for appropriate classification.It is also crucial to involve the patient in the classification process. Understanding their specific needs and challenges can help ensure that the classification accurately reflects their disability.Conclusion:Bone nonunion can lead to significant disability, affecting a person's quality of life. A thorough and comprehensive classification system is essential for accurate assessment and appropriate management. By considering the location, severity, and impact on daily activities, healthcare professionals can provide patients with the necessary support and guidance.中文版人体损伤致残程度分级适用指南:骨不连介绍:骨不连是骨折后常见的并发症,发生在经过适当治疗后骨折部位仍未能愈合的情况。
桡骨骨折工伤鉴定等级
桡骨骨折工伤鉴定等级A radius fracture, also known as a broken forearm, is a common injury that can occur as a result of a variety of accidents, including falls, sports injuries, and car accidents. When a radius fracture occurs as a result of a work-related accident, it may be necessary to undergo a work injury assessment to determine the severity of the injury and the level of compensation that may be due to the injured worker. The assessment process involves a thorough examination of the injury, including X-rays and other diagnostic tests, as well as a review of the worker's medical history and the circumstances surrounding the accident. The results of the assessment will determine the level of disability and the worker's ability to return to work, as well as any necessary accommodations or rehabilitation services that may be required.From a medical perspective, a radius fracture can vary in severity, depending on the location and extent of the break. In some cases, the fracture may be relatively minorand heal with conservative treatment, such as immobilization in a cast or splint. However, more severe fractures may require surgical intervention, such as open reduction and internal fixation, to realign the bones and stabilize the injury. The extent of the injury and the type of treatment required will play a significant role in determining the level of disability and the worker'sability to return to work. Additionally, any complications or long-term effects of the injury, such as nerve damage or arthritis, will also be taken into account during the assessment process.From a legal perspective, the assessment of a radius fracture as a work-related injury is governed by workers' compensation laws and regulations. These laws vary by state and may include specific guidelines for determining the level of disability and the corresponding compensation for different types of injuries. The assessment process may involve the use of standardized evaluation tools, such as the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, to determine the level of impairment and the corresponding disability rating. Theresults of the assessment will be used to determine the worker's eligibility for benefits, such as medical treatment, temporary disability payments, and vocational rehabilitation services.From an emotional perspective, a radius fracture can have a significant impact on an individual's life, both physically and emotionally. The pain and discomfort associated with the injury can be debilitating, making it difficult to perform everyday tasks and activities. The uncertainty of the injury's long-term effects and the potential for permanent disability can also take a toll on the injured worker's mental well-being. Additionally, the financial strain of medical bills and lost wages can add to the emotional burden of the injury, causing stress and anxiety for the injured worker and their family. The work injury assessment process can be a source of additional stress, as the injured worker may be concerned about the outcome of the assessment and the impact it will have on their ability to support themselves and their loved ones.From a vocational perspective, a radius fracture canimpact an individual's ability to perform their job duties, depending on the nature of their work and the physical demands of their job. For example, a worker in a physically demanding job, such as construction or manufacturing, may be unable to return to work until they have fully recovered from the injury and regained their strength and mobility. In some cases, the worker may be unable to return to their previous job and may require vocational rehabilitation services to help them transition to a new line of work. The work injury assessment will play a crucial role in determining the worker's ability to return to work and the accommodations or retraining that may be necessary for them to resume gainful employment.In conclusion, a radius fracture as a result of a work-related injury can have far-reaching implications for the injured worker, including medical, legal, emotional, and vocational considerations. The work injury assessment process plays a crucial role in determining the severity of the injury, the level of disability, and the corresponding compensation and support services that may be due to the injured worker. It is important for the assessment to takeinto account the medical, legal, emotional, and vocational aspects of the injury to ensure that the injured worker receives the care and support they need to recover and return to work.。
RCA及“5E”措施在预防住院患者跌倒的临床应用分析
RCA及“5E”措施在预防住院患者跌倒的临床应用分析发表时间:2018-05-07T14:36:43.230Z 来源:《医师在线》2018年1月上第1期作者:千春花李晶、马倩、张健、王业宏[导读] 根本原因分析法(RCA)是回溯医疗不良事件的一种有效的分析工具。
摘要:目的探讨根本原因分析法(RCA)及“5E”措施在预防住院患者跌倒中的应用效果。
方法应用RCA对住院患者跌倒原因进行调查分析,确定发生跌倒的因素,制定“5E”措施,跌倒的发生率明显下降。
结果应用RCA对跌倒不良事件进行分析及“5E”预防措施,减少了住院患者的跌倒发生率,改善值为73%。
结论:结合 RCA 和“5E”伤害预防策略改进的跌倒预防管理措施的实施有助于降低住院患者跌倒风险,为解决风险因素、有效降低跌倒发生率提供管理借鉴。
关键词:RCA及“5E”措施;住院患者;预防跌倒引言:根本原因分析法(RCA)是回溯医疗不良事件的一种有效的分析工具,该方法的分析重点在于整个系统及过程的改善,是提升患者安全的重要方法之一,得到国际医疗界的广泛认同,同时引起国内医疗界的广泛重视[1]。
5E原则护理方法即一种预防老年人跌倒的有效方法,它是从教育预防,环境改变,工程策略,强化执行和评估策略几个方面进行积极有效的干预护理[2]。
跌倒已成为老年人群的主要伤害原因,也是造成老年人伤残和死亡的重要原因,严重影响了老年人的生存质量。
对住院患者发生跌倒的因素进行分析,并应用“5E”措施进行预防,可以降低住院患者跌倒的发生率。
我院自 2016年7月以来,应用RCA及“5E”措施,对住院患者跌倒事件进行回顾性分析,找出根本原因,制定改进措施,收到良好效果,现报告如下。
1.资料与方法1.1 一般资料我院2016年7月至2016年12月份全院不良事件网报系统中跌倒患者的详细资料,跌倒患者共24例,其中无损伤7例,轻度损伤9例,中度损伤4例,重度损伤4例;跌倒发生在白班5例,发生在夜班19例;跌倒发生在卫生间19例。
不良事件调查与RCA(定稿2)
谢谢!
•
从人力资源、信息管理 系统、组织领导及沟通系统 等系统中确定根本原因。由 于跌倒的相关因素较多,根 本原因的确定有些困难,但 重要的是在分析的过程中逐 步建立起临床思维,在针对 近端原因的分析中找出问题 之所在,并针对近端原因制 定有效的整改措施,达到分 析的最终目的,预防类似事 件的发生。
整理一下:
第二阶段 找出近端原因
பைடு நூலகம் 步骤四:确定事件发生的顺序
•用时间线法填写时序表.doc
汇集并重组资讯,以更细 节具体的方式叙述事件的 发生始末(包括人、时、 地、如何发生)。
步骤五:列出可能造成事件的护理程序 及比对执行过程是否符合规范
*医院也许有制定与此事件相关的护理流程和指引。
个人头脑风暴
头脑风暴
17/4
19/4
7.235
7.370
78.3
65.7
86.1
57.5
32.4
37.10
5.0
11.8
34.8
39.1
94.4
88.2
126.7
133.2
90.0
98
1.01
1.06
• 3、陪护:熟睡。睡前已协助病人小便,但不记得将尿壶放在病人手边。 • 4、当班护士:夜间繁忙,一人值班要照顾63个病人,其中一级护理42 人,病重4人;40分钟前才巡视过病人,病人已经入睡,呼吸较平稳, 没有提出任何需求和不适;最近家庭事务杂多,情绪有波动。 • 5、白班护士:病人跌倒评分60分,入院时已立即实施跌倒护理,已挂 “预防跌倒”标示,并在每次交接班时强调。病人白天精神较差,气促, 活动后明显,已多次强调病人不要擅自下床活动,以卧床休息为主,并 提供了床边尿壶,上床栏;嘱陪人不可擅自离开,若要离开要和护士做 好交接班。 • 6、护士长:当班护士已从事护理工作15年,平时工作较积极认真,偶 尔也会粗心大意,对预防跌倒的流程指引熟悉。 • 7、管床医生:该病人慢性病急性发作,已患病20余年,酸中毒明显, 有肺性脑病的前期症状,白天嗜睡,夜间兴奋。
车祸骨折理赔流程及技巧
车祸骨折理赔流程及技巧Dealing with the aftermath of a car accident can be a daunting and stressful experience for anyone who has suffered a bone fracture. 车祸骨折是一种令人困扰和紧张的经历,对于受伤者来说,这种经历可能是非常痛苦的。
The first step in the process of filing a claim for compensation for a bone fracture sustained in a car accident is to seek medical treatment immediately. 在车祸骨折理赔流程中的第一步是立即寻求医疗治疗。
It is crucial to have a doctor assess the severity of the fracture and provide necessary treatment to ensure proper healing.After receiving medical treatment, the next step is to gather all relevant documentation related to the car accident and the resulting bone fracture. 在接受医疗治疗后,下一步是收集与车祸和骨折有关的所有相关文件。
This may include medical records, accident reports, photographs, and any other evidence that can support your claim for compensation.Once you have gathered all the necessary documentation, it is important to notify your insurance company about the car accident and the resulting bone fracture. 一旦您收集到所有必要的文件,通知您的保险公司有关车祸和骨折的信息就变得至关重要。
患者跌倒事件RCA分析
患者跌倒事件RCA分析
一、RCA前准备
1、小组成员:护士长、张一、李二、王五、赵六……
2、问题定义:2016年4月20日8:30,患者自行下床时滑落床边,未见明显损伤,尿管与其引流管分离。
3、资料收集:
(1)访谈目击者:护士XX、护士XX、患者XX、家属XX、清洁工XX 、保安XX……
(2)查阅书面资料:病历、不良事件报告单、护理记录单、跌倒评估记录、安全告知书……
(3)现场查看物证:跌倒警示牌、床栏、轮椅、拐杖、卫生间…..
4、基本情况:
患者,女,84岁,因患AECOPD于2016年4月18日收入我科治疗,神志清楚,对答切题。
院外带入颈静脉置管和尿管,医嘱一级护理,病重,精神差,床上活动无力,由5个儿女轮流陪护。
2016年4月20日8:00,患者在五家属陪护的情况下自行下床上厕所滑落床边,。
时间序列表
二、找出近端原因
以上分析显示,导致患者跌倒的主要近端原因为:
1、患者当时没有家属陪护
2、没有进行跌倒风险评估
3、没有加用床档
4、……
5、……
6、……
三、确认根本原因
(以近端原因1为例,其余近端原因均要逐一用5WHY法进行分析)
四、设计和执行改进计划
PDCA改进记录表。
RCA分析在脑卒中患者跌倒坠床中的应用
医学信息 2012 年 12 月第 25 卷第 8 期Medical Information. Dec. 2012. Vol. 25. No. 8临床医学RCA 分析在卒中患者跌倒床中的用程蕊,梁喜芳(广省阳江市人民医院神内科,广阳江 529500)摘要:目的运用 RCA 分析法,找出卒中住院患者生跌倒床的根本原因,制定整改措施。
方法对 4 例患者跌倒床的床料采用RCA 分析,找根本原因。
果造成患者跌倒床的根本原因有理人配置不足、健康教育知率低、高危病患无管理意、病房安全管理施不完善。
结论采用RCA 分析法是防患者跌倒床的一种有效方法。
关:卒中; 跌倒床; RCA 分析根本原因分析法(root cause analysis RCA)是一种量构探 3.1.1 年因素年是神内科住院患者跌倒床的著因素,程序[1],是一种流程分析方法学,是一种回溯性医不良事件分析生跌倒床的 4 例患者平均年 73.3 ,年偏大是一个重要特工具,方法将分析重点放在整个系及程的改善方面,而不是征。
由于老年人生理功能随着年增而逐步衰退。
如力下降、认限于个人行上的[2],是管理工具,可用在仸何管知功能减退、感反能力下降等,均易致跌倒床事件的生。
控系上,它可以助找到高事件的根源,理清事件的本 3.1.2 疾病因素卒中可致知功能减退以及感反能力不,何会生,并找到防事件再度生的方案。
卒中患者因运佳,肢体肌力下降,肢体协调功能减弱,平衡功能受损等易致患者、感、平衡功能障碍。
跌倒床事件常有生。
将 2011 年 6 跌倒床等安全事件生。
月~2012 年 4 月在我院神内科病房生意外跌倒床的 4 例患 3.1.3 药物因素卒中患者多伴有多种慢性疾病。
如高血压患者使者行 RCA 分析,旨在加理人的安全理防范意及探有用降血压药物,使体位改致低血压;糖尿病患者使用降糖物效的防方案,道如下:使血糖降低;以及使用静催眠物、抗焦物、利尿、血管扩1 料与方法张剂、肌肉松物等均可引起跌倒床。
大腿动脉割伤急救处理流程
大腿动脉割伤急救处理流程英文回答:Arterial Bleeding from the Femoral Artery: Emergency First Aid Treatment.1. Assess the Situation.Call for emergency medical services (EMTs) immediately.Determine the extent of the wound and the severity of the bleeding.Control the injured person's movements to minimize further damage.2. Apply Direct Pressure to the Wound.Use a clean cloth or bandage to apply direct pressureto the wound.Press firmly and hold for at least 5 minutes, or until bleeding stops.If the bleeding continues, elevate the injured leg and maintain pressure.3. Use a Tourniquet Only as a Last Resort.A tourniquet should only be used if direct pressure is ineffective and the bleeding is life-threatening.Place the tourniquet approximately 2-3 inches above the wound.Tighten the tourniquet enough to stop the bleeding, but not so tight that it cuts off circulation.Note the time of tourniquet application and loosen it every 15-20 minutes to check for circulation.4. Immobilize the Injured Leg.Use a splint or other rigid object to immobilize the injured leg.This will help prevent further injury to the artery.5. Monitor the Patient.Monitor the injured person's vital signs, including pulse, breathing, and level of consciousness.Check the wound for signs of infection, such as redness, swelling, or discharge.Keep the injured person warm and comfortable until medical help arrives.中文回答:股动脉割伤急救处理流程。
根源分析法(RCA)在防止患者跌倒事件中的应用
根源分析法(RCA)在防止患者跌倒事件中的应用作者:张梅芬来源:《医学信息》2014年第05期摘要:目的通过采用RCA法对跌倒事件进行原因分析,找出解决问题的方法和措施,及时加以改进,可以有效防止类似事件的再次发生。
方法通过对全院2012年8月~2013年8月2219例存在跌倒风险的住院患者中发生跌倒患者的原因采用RCA法进行分析总结,找出存在的原因并及时进行分析、制定整改措施。
结果住院患者跌倒事件明显得到控制,护理人员的安全意识提高,保证了患者的安全。
结论护理人员在实际工作中应加强工作责任心,充分利用质量管理工具进行护理质量分析及持续改进,预防不安全隐患,提高护理质量,减少护患纠纷,真正为患者提供一个安全、舒适的住院环境。
关键词:护理安全;跌倒;护理质量跌倒是指患者突然或者非故意性停顿,倒于地面或者倒于比初始位置更低的地方。
住院患者中发生跌倒的事件并不少见,跌倒增加了患者的痛苦与负担,特别是老年人因跌倒发生骨折的事件屡见不鲜。
而且许多老年人因此导致生活不能自理。
此外,在住院期间发生跌倒还是导致护患纠纷的一个重要原因,因此,做好护理安全管理,防止跌倒事件发生应该作为医院管理的一项重要内容。
应用质量管理工具进行护理质量与安全管理,有助于工作过程的漏洞填塞,流程优化,以及风险管理机制的完善,对构建患者安全管理体系具有重要意义。
根本原因分析法(RCA),是一种回顾性不良事件分析工具,主要针对事件以一套逻辑的程序找出造成事件发生的根本原因,并执行改进措施,避免类似事件的重复发生的方法。
下面就我院1年中发生的10例跌倒事件进行汇总分析。
1 资料与方法1.1一般资料 2219例风险评估患者中,发生患者跌倒事件10例。
2012年8月~2013年2月846例中发生跌倒8例,2013年3月~8月1373例中发生跌倒2例。
10例中男性6例,女性4例,年龄54~87岁。
根据住院科室不同,外科患者6例,其中上消化道出血2例、各种手术后患者4例;内科患者4例,其中高血压3例,脑梗塞1例。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
WHY?
Work flow and multiple job duties
Hierarchy of controls not applied to work station design
WHY?
Ergonomic risk not identified by S&C
Corrective Actions
Work Environment Behavioral Systems:
• Conduct refresher training on body mechanics for manual lifting
Winning With One Global Network
20% of all lost time injuries/ illnesses in 2010 occurred while lifting or manually moving materials
Winning With One Global Network
Back Injury Due to Manual Material Handling
Learning from Lost Time Accidents
Winning With One Global Network
Situation
Job Task: Changing a laminate roll on Arpeco printing equipment Immediate Cause: Manual handling of heavy roll (i.e., 25-28 kg every 15 min) Description of the Injury: Slipped Disc
Why was there a back injury?
Management System WHY? MOC not conducted when tube making brought in-house from contractor to CP MOC Checklist completed but indicated no Ergonomics risk Complex operation; all job tasks not fully evaluated for ergonomics risk Behavioral System Employee did not follow proper body mechanics rules Training and enforcement inadequate Work Environment Large rolls must be handled quickly at high frequency Technical Systems Work station designed for manual changeover
Back Injury
Heavy rolls lifted ergonomics
Work Environment
Management Systems (methods)
Winning With One Global Network
Management Systems
• • • • • • Complete Ergonomic Hazard Identification training (available MY 2011) Conduct JHA for lifting activities in print work areas and labeling operations Conduct site wide review to identify high risk ergonomic activities and conduct JHAs - implement hierarchy of controls, as necessary Review MOC process triggers to ensure it consistently applied when new work tasks are introduced in the plant Update MOC process to include ergonomics Equip Tube making lines with lifting devices
Winning With One Global Network
Fishbone Analysis
Technical Systems (materials People & machines) Behavior Systems (people)
Incorrect lifting posture No Mechanical Lift assist
Winning With One Global Network
Safety Committee Discussion Questions
Do we have similar exposures at our plant? if yes, identify and develop corrective action plan Does our MOC process include Ergonomics? If not, update Do we apply MOC/JHA when a new work task is introduced into the facility? if not, discuss process Does our team practice proper manual handling body mechanics? if not, plan training