CE240LectW032Soilclassification
一种土壤治理采集装置
专利名称:一种土壤治理采集装置专利类型:实用新型专利
发明人:王超
申请号:CN202121811775.9
申请日:20210804
公开号:CN215726926U
公开日:
20220201
专利内容由知识产权出版社提供
摘要:本实用新型提供一种土壤治理采集装置,涉及土壤治理技术领域。
该土壤治理采集装置,包括电机,所述电机的输出轴固定安装有传动轴,传动轴的底端固定安装有钻头,钻头的圆周面固定安装有若干个导向板,电机的下方设置有放置桶,传动轴贯穿放置桶,电机与放置桶固定连接。
该土壤治理采集装置,通过设置电机、钻头、导向管、连通管、收集桶的毛刷杆,通过握住手持杆可以使电机带动钻头进行钻地,当钻头位于地面以下的时候,钻头带动的土可以经过螺旋叶片旋转排出达到了可以有效的快速收集某一深度土壤的效果,解决了现有技术的土壤治理采集装置,在使用的时候土壤容易混乱,并且在收集土壤的时候,由于土壤的板结,很难进行收集的问题。
申请人:青岛市环境保护科学研究院
地址:266000 山东省青岛市市南区京山路15号
国籍:CN
更多信息请下载全文后查看。
中蓝晨光二乙基次磷酸铝环评
中蓝晨光二乙基次磷酸铝环评1. 介绍二乙基次磷酸铝是一种常见的化工原料,广泛用于阻燃材料、涂料、塑料等领域。
该化合物具有良好的阻燃性能和热稳定性,具备广阔的应用前景。
然而,随着其生产和使用规模的不断扩大,环境和健康风险引起了广泛关注。
因此,进行二乙基次磷酸铝的环境评价势在必行。
2. 环评流程进行中蓝晨光二乙基次磷酸铝的环评需要按照一定的流程进行,以确保评价全面、客观、科学。
一般而言,环评流程包括初步评价、在线调查、实地勘察、风险评估等多个环节。
以下是具体的环评流程:2.1 初步评价初步评价是对项目进行初步梳理和分析,明确项目基本情况和可能引起的环境问题。
主要包括对项目地理位置、生产过程、废水排放、废气回收等方面的初步了解。
2.2 在线调查在线调查是通过网络或其他方式,收集目标项目相关信息和意见。
可以通过问卷调查、专家咨询等方式收集公众和专业人士的意见和建议,充分考虑各方利益和意见。
2.3 实地勘察实地勘察是对项目周边环境进行现场考察和调查,进一步了解项目可能产生的环境影响。
包括对空气、水质、土壤等环境指标进行采样和分析,同时结合项目规划和设计,评估可能的环境风险。
2.4 风险评估风险评估是基于初步评价、在线调查和实地勘察的结果,对项目的环境风险进行全面评估。
主要包括对废水、废气排放的浓度、污染物种类和数量的评估,以及对潜在风险的定量分析和评估。
3. 环境影响分析在对中蓝晨光二乙基次磷酸铝进行环评时,需要对其生产过程和使用过程中的环境影响进行全面分析。
以下是对环境影响的分析:3.1 废水排放二乙基次磷酸铝生产过程中会产生废水,其中可能含有有机物和无机物等污染物。
这些废水如果未经处理直接排放,可能对周边水体和生态系统造成影响。
因此,在环评中需要考虑废水处理的可行性和效果。
3.2 废气排放二乙基次磷酸铝的生产过程中还会产生废气,其中可能含有有机物和气态污染物。
这些废气如果未经处理直接排放,可能对大气环境和人体健康造成影响。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Classification Systems
• Two commonly used systems for soil engineers based on particle distribution and Atterberg limits: • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) System (for state/county highway dept.) • Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (preferred by geotechnical engineers).
Silt and Clay
No.200 No.10 2.0 mm No.40 0.425 mm 0.075 mm
(PI)
(LL)
Das, Figure 4.1
General Guidance
– – –
8 major groups: A1~ A7 (with several subgroups) and organic soils A8 The required tests are sieve analysis and Atterberg limits. The group index, an empirical formula, is used to further evaluate soils within a group (subgroups). A1 ~ A3
Group Index GI
The first term is determined by the LL
GI = ( F200 − 35) [ 0.2 + 0.005( LL − 40)] +0.01( F200 − 15)( PI − 10) (4.1)
The second term is determined by the PI
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials system (AASHTO)
Origin of AASHTO: (For road construction) This system was originally developed by Hogentogler and Terzaghi in 1929 as the Public Roads Classification System. Afterwards, there are several revisions. The present AASHTO (1978) system is primarily based on the version in 1945. (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)
Communicate between engineers
Simple indices GSD, LL, PI
Classification system (Language)
Use the accumulated experience
Estimate engineering properties
Achieve engineering purposes
Definition of Grain Size
No specific grain sizeuse Atterberg limits
Gravel Boulders Cobbles
Coarse 300 mm 75 mm 19 mm Fine Coarse No.4 4.75 mm
Sand
Medium Fine
Definition of Grain Size
No specific grain size-use Atterberg limits
Boulders
Gravel
Coarse 75 mm No.4 4.75 mm
Sand
Fine
Silt-Clay
No.200 No.40 0.425 mm 0.075 mm
Soil particles The description of the grain size distribution of soil particles according to their texture (particle size, shape, and gradation). Major textural classes include, very roughly: gravel (>2 mm); sand (0.1 – 2 mm); silt (0.01 – 0.1 mm); clay (< 0.01 mm). Furthermore, gravel and sand can be roughly classified as coarse textured soils, wile silt and clay can be classified as fine textures soils.
CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2
Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)
Outline of this Lecture
1. Particle distribution and Atterberg Limits 2. Soil classification systems based on particle distribution and Atterberg Limits 3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials System (AASHTO) 4. The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
Using LL and PI separates silty materials from clayey materials (only for A2 group)
– The original purpose of this classification system is used for road construction (subgrade rating).
Some Explanations of Group Index GI
1, if Eq. 4.1 gives a negative value then GI=0; 2, round up the value calculated by Eq. 4.1 to an integer; 3, there is no upper limit for GI; 4, the GIs for soil groups A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, and A-3 are always zero (0).
Objective
Classifying soils into groups with similar behavior, in terms of simple indices, can provide geotechnical engineers a general guidance about engineering properties of the soils through the accumulated experience.
Classification
(Proceeding from left to right against the columns)
Das, Table 4.1, 2006
Classification (Cont.)
Note: The first group from the left to fit the test data is the correct AASHTO classification. Das, Table 4.1, 2006
For Group A-2-6 and A-2-7 GI = 0.01( F200 − 15)( PI − 10)
(4.2) use the second term only
F200: percentage passing through the No.200 sieve In general, the rating for a pavement subgrade is inversely proportional to the group index, GI.
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
Origin of USCS: This system was first developed by Professor A. Casagrande (1948) for the purpose of airfield construction during World War II. Afterwards, it was modified by Professor Casagrande, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to enable the system to be applicable to dams, foundations, and other construction. Four major divisions: (1) Coarse-grained (2) Fine-grained (3) Organic soils (4) Peat
Granular Materials ≤ 35% pass No. 200 sieve