visual servoing with nonlinear observer

合集下载

国际自动化与计算杂志.英文版.

国际自动化与计算杂志.英文版.

国际自动化与计算杂志.英文版.1.Improved Exponential Stability Criteria for Uncertain Neutral System with Nonlinear Parameter PerturbationsFang Qiu,Ban-Tong Cui2.Robust Active Suspension Design Subject to Vehicle Inertial Parameter VariationsHai-Ping Du,Nong Zhang3.Delay-dependent Non-fragile H∞ Filtering for Uncertain Fuzzy Systems Based on Switching Fuzzy Model and Piecewise Lyapunov FunctionZhi-Le Xia,Jun-Min Li,Jiang-Rong Li4.Observer-based Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for Nonlinear Systems with Time-varying DelaysWei-Sheng Chen,Rui-Hong Li,Jing Li5.H∞ Output Feedback Control for Stochastic Systems with Mode-dependent Time-varying Delays and Markovian Jump ParametersXu-Dong Zhao,Qing-Shuang Zeng6.Delay and Its Time-derivative Dependent Robust Stability of Uncertain Neutral Systems with Saturating ActuatorsFatima El Haoussi,El Houssaine Tissir7.Parallel Fuzzy P+Fuzzy I+Fuzzy D Controller:Design and Performance EvaluationVineet Kumar,A.P.Mittal8.Observers for Descriptor Systems with Slope-restricted NonlinearitiesLin-Na Zhou,Chun-Yu Yang,Qing-Ling Zhang9.Parameterized Solution to a Class of Sylvester MatrixEquationsYu-Peng Qiao,Hong-Sheng Qi,Dai-Zhan Cheng10.Indirect Adaptive Fuzzy and Impulsive Control of Nonlinear SystemsHai-Bo Jiang11.Robust Fuzzy Tracking Control for Nonlinear Networked Control Systems with Integral Quadratic ConstraintsZhi-Sheng Chen,Yong He,Min Wu12.A Power-and Coverage-aware Clustering Scheme for Wireless Sensor NetworksLiang Xue,Xin-Ping Guan,Zhi-Xin Liu,Qing-Chao Zheng13.Guaranteed Cost Active Fault-tolerant Control of Networked Control System with Packet Dropout and Transmission DelayXiao-Yuan Luo,Mei-Jie Shang,Cai-Lian Chen,Xin-Ping Guanparison of Two Novel MRAS Based Strategies for Identifying Parameters in Permanent Magnet Synchronous MotorsKan Liu,Qiao Zhang,Zi-Qiang Zhu,Jing Zhang,An-Wen Shen,Paul Stewart15.Modeling and Analysis of Scheduling for Distributed Real-time Embedded SystemsHai-Tao Zhang,Gui-Fang Wu16.Passive Steganalysis Based on Higher Order Image Statistics of Curvelet TransformS.Geetha,Siva S.Sivatha Sindhu,N.Kamaraj17.Movement Invariants-based Algorithm for Medical Image Tilt CorrectionMei-Sen Pan,Jing-Tian Tang,Xiao-Li Yang18.Target Tracking and Obstacle Avoidance for Multi-agent SystemsJing Yan,Xin-Ping Guan,Fu-Xiao Tan19.Automatic Generation of Optimally Rigid Formations Using Decentralized MethodsRui Ren,Yu-Yan Zhang,Xiao-Yuan Luo,Shao-Bao Li20.Semi-blind Adaptive Beamforming for High-throughput Quadrature Amplitude Modulation SystemsSheng Chen,Wang Yao,Lajos Hanzo21.Throughput Analysis of IEEE 802.11 Multirate WLANs with Collision Aware Rate Adaptation AlgorithmDhanasekaran Senthilkumar,A. Krishnan22.Innovative Product Design Based on Customer Requirement Weight Calculation ModelChen-Guang Guo,Yong-Xian Liu,Shou-Ming Hou,Wei Wang23.A Service Composition Approach Based on Sequence Mining for Migrating E-learning Legacy System to SOAZhuo Zhang,Dong-Dai Zhou,Hong-Ji Yang,Shao-Chun Zhong24.Modeling of Agile Intelligent Manufacturing-oriented Production Scheduling SystemZhong-Qi Sheng,Chang-Ping Tang,Ci-Xing Lv25.Estimation of Reliability and Cost Relationship for Architecture-based SoftwareHui Guan,Wei-Ru Chen,Ning Huang,Hong-Ji Yang1.A Computer-aided Design System for Framed-mould in Autoclave ProcessingTian-Guo Jin,Feng-Yang Bi2.Wear State Recognition of Drills Based on K-means Cluster and Radial Basis Function Neural NetworkXu Yang3.The Knee Joint Design and Control of Above-knee Intelligent Bionic Leg Based on Magneto-rheological DamperHua-Long Xie,Ze-Zhong Liang,Fei Li,Li-Xin Guo4.Modeling of Pneumatic Muscle with Shape Memory Alloy and Braided SleeveBin-Rui Wang,Ying-Lian Jin,Dong Wei5.Extended Object Model for Product Configuration DesignZhi-Wei Xu,Ze-Zhong Liang,Zhong-Qi Sheng6.Analysis of Sheet Metal Extrusion Process Using Finite Element MethodXin-Cun Zhuang,Hua Xiang,Zhen Zhao7.Implementation of Enterprises' Interoperation Based on OntologyXiao-Feng Di,Yu-Shun Fan8.Path Planning Approach in Unknown EnvironmentTing-Kai Wang,Quan Dang,Pei-Yuan Pan9.Sliding Mode Variable Structure Control for Visual Servoing SystemFei Li,Hua-Long Xie10.Correlation of Direct Piezoelectric Effect on EAPap under Ambient FactorsLi-Jie Zhao,Chang-Ping Tang,Peng Gong11.XML-based Data Processing in Network Supported Collaborative DesignQi Wang,Zhong-Wei Ren,Zhong-Feng Guo12.Production Management Modelling Based on MASLi He,Zheng-Hao Wang,Ke-Long Zhang13.Experimental Tests of Autonomous Ground Vehicles with PreviewCunjia Liu,Wen-Hua Chen,John Andrews14.Modelling and Remote Control of an ExcavatorYang Liu,Mohammad Shahidul Hasan,Hong-Nian Yu15.TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision MakingJiang Jiang,Ying-Wu Chen,Da-Wei Tang,Yu-Wang Chen16.Video Analysis Based on Volumetric Event DetectionJing Wang,Zhi-Jie Xu17.Improving Decision Tree Performance by Exception HandlingAppavu Alias Balamurugan Subramanian,S.Pramala,B.Rajalakshmi,Ramasamy Rajaram18.Robustness Analysis of Discrete-time Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control with Normalized Adaptive LawsQing-Zheng Gao,Xue-Jun Xie19.A Novel Lifecycle Model for Web-based Application Development in Small and Medium EnterprisesWei Huang,Ru Li,Carsten Maple,Hong-Ji Yang,David Foskett,Vince Cleaver20.Design of a Two-dimensional Recursive Filter Using the Bees AlgorithmD. T. Pham,Ebubekir Ko(c)21.Designing Genetic Regulatory Networks Using Fuzzy Petri Nets ApproachRaed I. Hamed,Syed I. Ahson,Rafat Parveen1.State of the Art and Emerging Trends in Operations and Maintenance of Offshore Oil and Gas Production Facilities: Some Experiences and ObservationsJayantha P.Liyanage2.Statistical Safety Analysis of Maintenance Management Process of Excavator UnitsLjubisa Papic,Milorad Pantelic,Joseph Aronov,Ajit Kumar Verma3.Improving Energy and Power Efficiency Using NComputing and Approaches for Predicting Reliability of Complex Computing SystemsHoang Pham,Hoang Pham Jr.4.Running Temperature and Mechanical Stability of Grease as Maintenance Parameters of Railway BearingsJan Lundberg,Aditya Parida,Peter S(o)derholm5.Subsea Maintenance Service Delivery: Mapping Factors Influencing Scheduled Service DurationEfosa Emmanuel Uyiomendo,Tore Markeset6.A Systemic Approach to Integrated E-maintenance of Large Engineering PlantsAjit Kumar Verma,A.Srividya,P.G.Ramesh7.Authentication and Access Control in RFID Based Logistics-customs Clearance Service PlatformHui-Fang Deng,Wen Deng,Han Li,Hong-Ji Yang8.Evolutionary Trajectory Planning for an Industrial RobotR.Saravanan,S.Ramabalan,C.Balamurugan,A.Subash9.Improved Exponential Stability Criteria for Recurrent Neural Networks with Time-varying Discrete and Distributed DelaysYuan-Yuan Wu,Tao Li,Yu-Qiang Wu10.An Improved Approach to Delay-dependent Robust Stabilization for Uncertain Singular Time-delay SystemsXin Sun,Qing-Ling Zhang,Chun-Yu Yang,Zhan Su,Yong-Yun Shao11.Robust Stability of Nonlinear Plants with a Non-symmetric Prandtl-Ishlinskii Hysteresis ModelChang-An Jiang,Ming-Cong Deng,Akira Inoue12.Stability Analysis of Discrete-time Systems with Additive Time-varying DelaysXian-Ming Tang,Jin-Shou Yu13.Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delaysXu-Dong Zhao,Qing-Shuang Zeng14.H∞ Synchronization of Chaotic Systems via Delayed Feedback ControlLi Sheng,Hui-Zhong Yang15.Adaptive Fuzzy Observer Backstepping Control for a Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Time-delayShao-Cheng Tong,Ning Sheng16.Simulation-based Optimal Design of α-β-γ-δ FilterChun-Mu Wu,Paul P.Lin,Zhen-Yu Han,Shu-Rong Li17.Independent Cycle Time Assignment for Min-max SystemsWen-De Chen,Yue-Gang Tao,Hong-Nian Yu1.An Assessment Tool for Land Reuse with Artificial Intelligence MethodDieter D. Genske,Dongbin Huang,Ariane Ruff2.Interpolation of Images Using Discrete Wavelet Transform to Simulate Image Resizing as in Human VisionRohini S. Asamwar,Kishor M. Bhurchandi,Abhay S. Gandhi3.Watermarking of Digital Images in Frequency DomainSami E. I. Baba,Lala Z. Krikor,Thawar Arif,Zyad Shaaban4.An Effective Image Retrieval Mechanism Using Family-based Spatial Consistency Filtration with Object RegionJing Sun,Ying-Jie Xing5.Robust Object Tracking under Appearance Change ConditionsQi-Cong Wang,Yuan-Hao Gong,Chen-Hui Yang,Cui-Hua Li6.A Visual Attention Model for Robot Object TrackingJin-Kui Chu,Rong-Hua Li,Qing-Ying Li,Hong-Qing Wang7.SVM-based Identification and Un-calibrated Visual Servoing for Micro-manipulationXin-Han Huang,Xiang-Jin Zeng,Min Wang8.Action Control of Soccer Robots Based on Simulated Human IntelligenceTie-Jun Li,Gui-Qiang Chen,Gui-Fang Shao9.Emotional Gait Generation for a Humanoid RobotLun Xie,Zhi-Liang Wang,Wei Wang,Guo-Chen Yu10.Cultural Algorithm for Minimization of Binary Decision Diagram and Its Application in Crosstalk Fault DetectionZhong-Liang Pan,Ling Chen,Guang-Zhao Zhang11.A Novel Fuzzy Direct Torque Control System for Three-level Inverter-fed Induction MachineShu-Xi Liu,Ming-Yu Wang,Yu-Guang Chen,Shan Li12.Statistic Learning-based Defect Detection for Twill FabricsLi-Wei Han,De Xu13.Nonsaturation Throughput Enhancement of IEEE 802.11b Distributed Coordination Function for Heterogeneous Traffic under Noisy EnvironmentDhanasekaran Senthilkumar,A. Krishnan14.Structure and Dynamics of Artificial Regulatory Networks Evolved by Segmental Duplication and Divergence ModelXiang-Hong Lin,Tian-Wen Zhang15.Random Fuzzy Chance-constrained Programming Based on Adaptive Chaos Quantum Honey Bee Algorithm and Robustness AnalysisHan Xue,Xun Li,Hong-Xu Ma16.A Bit-level Text Compression Scheme Based on the ACW AlgorithmHussein A1-Bahadili,Shakir M. Hussain17.A Note on an Economic Lot-sizing Problem with Perishable Inventory and Economies of Scale Costs:Approximation Solutions and Worst Case AnalysisQing-Guo Bai,Yu-Zhong Zhang,Guang-Long Dong1.Virtual Reality: A State-of-the-Art SurveyNing-Ning Zhou,Yu-Long Deng2.Real-time Virtual Environment Signal Extraction and DenoisingUsing Programmable Graphics HardwareYang Su,Zhi-Jie Xu,Xiang-Qian Jiang3.Effective Virtual Reality Based Building Navigation Using Dynamic Loading and Path OptimizationQing-Jin Peng,Xiu-Mei Kang,Ting-Ting Zhao4.The Skin Deformation of a 3D Virtual HumanXiao-Jing Zhou,Zheng-Xu Zhao5.Technology for Simulating Crowd Evacuation BehaviorsWen-Hu Qin,Guo-Hui Su,Xiao-Na Li6.Research on Modelling Digital Paper-cut PreservationXiao-Fen Wang,Ying-Rui Liu,Wen-Sheng Zhang7.On Problems of Multicomponent System Maintenance ModellingTomasz Nowakowski,Sylwia Werbinka8.Soft Sensing Modelling Based on Optimal Selection of Secondary Variables and Its ApplicationQi Li,Cheng Shao9.Adaptive Fuzzy Dynamic Surface Control for Uncertain Nonlinear SystemsXiao-Yuan Luo,Zhi-Hao Zhu,Xin-Ping Guan10.Output Feedback for Stochastic Nonlinear Systems with Unmeasurable Inverse DynamicsXin Yu,Na Duan11.Kalman Filtering with Partial Markovian Packet LossesBao-Feng Wang,Ge Guo12.A Modified Projection Method for Linear FeasibilityProblemsYi-Ju Wang,Hong-Yu Zhang13.A Neuro-genetic Based Short-term Forecasting Framework for Network Intrusion Prediction SystemSiva S. Sivatha Sindhu,S. Geetha,M. Marikannan,A. Kannan14.New Delay-dependent Global Asymptotic Stability Condition for Hopfield Neural Networks with Time-varying DelaysGuang-Deng Zong,Jia Liu hHTTp://15.Crosscumulants Based Approaches for the Structure Identification of Volterra ModelsHouda Mathlouthi,Kamel Abederrahim,Faouzi Msahli,Gerard Favier1.Coalition Formation in Weighted Simple-majority Games under Proportional Payoff Allocation RulesZhi-Gang Cao,Xiao-Guang Yang2.Stability Analysis for Recurrent Neural Networks with Time-varying DelayYuan-Yuan Wu,Yu-Qiang Wu3.A New Type of Solution Method for the Generalized Linear Complementarity Problem over a Polyhedral ConeHong-Chun Sun,Yan-Liang Dong4.An Improved Control Algorithm for High-order Nonlinear Systems with Unmodelled DynamicsNa Duan,Fu-Nian Hu,Xin Yu5.Controller Design of High Order Nonholonomic System with Nonlinear DriftsXiu-Yun Zheng,Yu-Qiang Wu6.Directional Filter for SAR Images Based on NonsubsampledContourlet Transform and Immune Clonal SelectionXiao-Hui Yang,Li-Cheng Jiao,Deng-Feng Li7.Text Extraction and Enhancement of Binary Images Using Cellular AutomataG. Sahoo,Tapas Kumar,B.L. Rains,C.M. Bhatia8.GH2 Control for Uncertain Discrete-time-delay Fuzzy Systems Based on a Switching Fuzzy Model and Piecewise Lyapunov FunctionZhi-Le Xia,Jun-Min Li9.A New Energy Optimal Control Scheme for a Separately Excited DC Motor Based Incremental Motion DriveMilan A.Sheta,Vivek Agarwal,Paluri S.V.Nataraj10.Nonlinear Backstepping Ship Course ControllerAnna Witkowska,Roman Smierzchalski11.A New Method of Embedded Fourth Order with Four Stages to Study Raster CNN SimulationR. Ponalagusamy,S. Senthilkumar12.A Minimum-energy Path-preserving Topology Control Algorithm for Wireless Sensor NetworksJin-Zhao Lin,Xian Zhou,Yun Li13.Synchronization and Exponential Estimates of Complex Networks with Mixed Time-varying Coupling DelaysYang Dai,YunZe Cai,Xiao-Ming Xu14.Step-coordination Algorithm of Traffic Control Based on Multi-agent SystemHai-Tao Zhang,Fang Yu,Wen Li15.A Research of the Employment Problem on Common Job-seekersand GraduatesBai-Da Qu。

一种机器人未知环境下动态目标跟踪交互多模滤波算法

一种机器人未知环境下动态目标跟踪交互多模滤波算法

m dlie, MM) oe ftr I l 的方 法. 该方法将机器人状态 、 目标状 态和环境 特征状态 作为整体 来构成 系统状态 向量并 利用全 关联扩展式卡尔曼滤波算法对 系统状态进行估计 , 由此随着迭代估计 的进行 , 系统 各对象状 态之间将产 生足够 的相 关性 , 这种相关性 能够正确反 映各 对象状态估 计 问的依赖关 系 , 因此提 高了 目标 跟踪 的准确性 . 该方 法进 一步和传
An i t r c i g m u tp e m o e le i g a g r t m o o ie r b t n e a tn li l d lf t r n l o ih i f r m b l o o s
t r v r c ig o vn bet i n n wn e vr n ns oi o eta kn f mp mo ig ojcs n u k o n io me t
关键 词 : I 滤波 ;K MM E F滤 波 ; 同时 定 位 ; 图构 建 ; 地 目标 跟 踪 ; 动机 器人 移 中 图分 类 号 : P4 . 文 献标 识码 : 文 章 编 号 :6 3 75 2 1 )20 2 — T 226 A 17 - 8 (0 0 0 -t71 4 2
W U Mi g UN j—i n .S i n y
( eat n o o ue, h eo dA tlr E gnei o ee X ’n 10 5, hn ) D pr met f mpt T eScn rl y nier gC lg , ia 0 2 C ia C r ie n l 7
第 5卷第 2期
21 0 0年 4月 智能系统


VoI5 № . . 2
CAAITr n a to n I tli e tS se a s cinso n elg n y t ms

《2024年基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测研究》范文

《2024年基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测研究》范文

《基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测研究》篇一一、引言随着科技的发展,伪装物体检测在众多领域中发挥着越来越重要的作用,如安全监控、军事侦察和图像处理等。

由于伪装物体的复杂性及背景环境的多样性,传统基于特征的检测方法已无法满足精确度和效率的要求。

因此,本研究基于上下文感知及边界引导,提出了改进的伪装物体检测算法。

该算法可以有效地从复杂的背景中识别出伪装物体,为相关领域提供更准确的检测结果。

二、上下文感知在伪装物体检测中的应用上下文感知是指利用物体与其周围环境的关系进行识别和检测。

在伪装物体检测中,上下文感知的应用主要体现在对物体与周围环境的关联性分析。

通过分析物体的形状、大小、颜色、纹理等特征与周围环境的相互关系,我们可以更好地理解物体在场景中的位置和作用,从而准确判断其是否为伪装物体。

我们采用了基于区域的方法进行上下文感知的建模。

首先,对图像进行分块处理,提取出各个区域内的特征。

然后,通过分析不同区域之间的特征关系,建立上下文模型。

最后,利用该模型对图像进行分类和识别,从而实现对伪装物体的检测。

三、边界引导在伪装物体检测中的作用边界引导是指利用图像中的边缘信息对物体进行定位和识别。

在伪装物体检测中,边界引导的作用主要体现在对物体边缘的精确提取和识别。

通过分析物体的边缘特征,我们可以更准确地判断其形状和位置,从而实现对伪装物体的精确检测。

我们采用了基于边缘检测的方法进行边界引导的实现。

首先,对图像进行预处理,增强边缘信息。

然后,利用边缘检测算法提取出图像中的边缘特征。

最后,结合上下文感知的结果,对边缘特征进行进一步的分析和处理,从而实现对伪装物体的精确检测。

四、实验与分析为了验证本算法的有效性,我们进行了大量的实验。

实验结果表明,基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测算法具有较高的准确性和稳定性。

与传统的基于特征的检测方法相比,本算法在处理复杂背景和多变环境下的伪装物体检测问题时表现出更强的鲁棒性。

openvins解读 -回复

openvins解读 -回复

openvins解读-回复本文将解读openvins,并以中括号内的内容为主题,以一步一步的方式进行回答。

Openvins是一个开源的视觉惯性里程计(Visual-Inertial Odometry,VIO)系统,它可以从相机和惯性测量单元(IMU)的数据中估计出相机的运动和三维结构。

1. 什么是Openvins?Openvins是一个用于估计相机运动和三维结构的开源系统。

它结合了相机图像和IMU测量的数据,并利用视觉惯性里程计的技术来实现对相机姿态和位置的实时估计。

2. 视觉惯性里程计的原理是什么?视觉惯性里程计是一种利用相机图像和IMU测量数据来估计相机运动和三维结构的技术。

它的原理是通过图像间的特征匹配来估计相机的运动,并利用IMU的测量数据来补偿图像匹配的误差。

具体而言,它使用特征点和特征描述符来匹配相邻图像,并使用匹配对计算相机的姿态变化。

然后,通过将IMU的测量数据投影到相机坐标系中,对相机姿态进行校正。

3. Openvins的主要特点是什么?Openvins具有以下主要特点:- 可扩展性:Openvins可以同时处理多个相机和IMU,以提高系统的鲁棒性和精确性。

- 鲁棒性:Openvins使用了一些鲁棒的特征匹配和优化算法,以处理图像噪声和运动模糊等问题。

- 实时性:Openvins能够在实时环境下进行相机姿态和位置的估计,适用于很多需要实时运动估计的应用。

- 开源性:Openvins是一个开源项目,可以免费使用和修改,便于在不同应用场景下进行定制和改进。

4. 如何使用Openvins?要使用Openvins,首先需要准备相机和IMU的数据。

然后,可以通过配置文件来设置Openvins的参数和使用的方法。

具体而言,可以设置特征提取和特征匹配的算法参数,如ORB特征提取器和匹配器的相关参数。

此外,还可以设置滤波器和优化方法的参数,如卡尔曼滤波器和非线性优化器的参数等。

5. Openvins在哪些领域有应用?Openvins在许多领域都有应用,包括机器人、自动驾驶、增强现实(AR)和虚拟现实(VR)等。

北京理工大学科技成果——一种基于自适应采样的实时视觉跟踪系统

北京理工大学科技成果——一种基于自适应采样的实时视觉跟踪系统

北京理工大学科技成果——一种基于自适应采样的
实时视觉跟踪系统
成果简介
视觉跟踪是计算机视觉领域中备受关注的一个研究热点。

它在智能交通、人机交互、视频监控和军事等领域有着广泛的应用。

在实际应用中,视觉跟踪方法通常需要处理一些复杂的目标运动如运动突变和几何外观急剧变化等情况,传统的跟踪技术无法满足跟踪要求。

我们提出基于自适应MCMC采样的方法,很好地解决了这一难题,为实际应用中复杂运动目标的跟踪提供了保障。

项目来源自主研发
技术领域计算机应用技术,人工智能与模式识别。

应用范围交通、广场、车站、会场等视频监控中人,车辆等目标的实时跟踪。

现状特点本系统的跟踪准确率>95%;在使用现有性能个人计算机的条件下,可以做到每秒30帧的实时跟踪,采用嵌入式技术固化跟踪算法可以做到复杂目标运动的实时跟踪。

所在阶段跟踪算法已在一些应用系统中试用,跟踪效果良好。

成果知识产权独立知识产权。

成果转让方式技术合作
市场状况及效益分析目前视频监控的基础设施已经普及使用到各种公共场所,特别是“十二五”期间国家实施的天网计划将进一步推动这些基础设施的普及,使得本项目减少了大量的基础实施投入。

另外由于具有广泛的应用前景,市场效益可观。

发生镜头切换情况的行人跟踪,传统跟踪方法此时将会跟踪失败。

斯威特柱后衍生系统原理

斯威特柱后衍生系统原理

斯威特柱后衍生系统原理解析1. 背景介绍斯威特柱后衍生系统(Swivel Posterior Derivation System)是一种用于语言模型的后处理技术。

在自然语言处理中,语言模型是指能够预测下一个词或者短语的模型。

斯威特柱后衍生系统通过对已生成的文本进行修正和改进,提高了生成文本的质量和流畅度。

2. 基本原理斯威特柱后衍生系统基于以下两个基本原理来进行文本修正和改进:2.1 后验概率调整在生成文本时,语言模型会根据上下文预测下一个词或短语。

然而,由于训练数据的限制以及模型复杂度等因素,语言模型可能会产生一些不合理或不流畅的词组。

斯威特柱后衍生系统通过计算每个词组出现的条件概率,并与一个经验阈值进行比较,来判断该词组是否需要调整。

如果该词组出现的条件概率低于经验阈值,则认为需要对其进行调整。

具体地,在判断一个词组是否需要调整时,斯威特柱后衍生系统会考虑以下几个因素: - 词组的上下文信息:词组出现的上下文信息对该词组的合理性有很大影响。

如果一个词组在给定的上下文中不够合理,那么可能需要进行调整。

- 词组的频率信息:如果一个词组在训练数据中出现的频率较低,那么它可能是一种不常见或者不合理的表达方式,需要进行调整。

- 词组的语法信息:如果一个词组违反了语法规则,那么它可能需要进行调整。

基于以上因素,斯威特柱后衍生系统可以计算出一个后验概率,用于判断是否需要对该词组进行调整。

如果后验概率低于经验阈值,则认为该词组需要调整。

2.2 调整算法当判断出一个词组需要调整时,斯威特柱后衍生系统会使用一种基于统计和规则的算法来对其进行修正。

具体地,在修正过程中,系统会考虑以下几个因素: - 上下文信息:通过分析上下文中其他相关的词汇和短语,系统可以更好地判断该词组应该如何调整。

- 语法规则:根据语法规则,系统可以调整词组的顺序、形态和结构,使其更符合语言的规范。

- 语义信息:通过分析词组的语义信息,系统可以对其进行合理的替换或修改。

《2024年虚拟现实增强技术综述》范文

《2024年虚拟现实增强技术综述》范文

《虚拟现实增强技术综述》篇一一、引言随着科技的飞速发展,虚拟现实(Virtual Reality,简称VR)和增强现实(Augmented Reality,简称AR)技术已经逐渐成为当今科技领域的热点话题。

虚拟现实增强技术,即通过技术手段将虚拟的信息、内容与真实的环境相结合,为人们带来全新的沉浸式体验。

本文将对虚拟现实增强技术的定义、特点、应用领域及发展前景进行综述。

二、虚拟现实增强技术的定义与特点虚拟现实增强技术是一种将虚拟信息和真实环境进行融合的技术,它通过先进的计算机图形技术、传感器技术和人机交互技术等手段,将虚拟的信息内容嵌入到真实的环境中,使用户在真实环境中体验到虚拟信息带来的感觉和体验。

该技术的特点主要表现在以下几个方面:1. 沉浸性:用户可以完全沉浸在虚拟与现实的融合环境中,获得真实的体验感。

2. 交互性:用户可以通过各种设备与虚拟信息进行实时交互,如手势识别、语音识别等。

3. 实时性:虚拟信息能够实时地与真实环境进行融合,为用户带来实时的交互体验。

三、虚拟现实增强技术的应用领域虚拟现实增强技术的应用领域非常广泛,主要表现在以下几个方面:1. 娱乐领域:游戏、电影、音乐等领域是虚拟现实增强技术的主要应用领域。

通过该技术,用户可以获得更加真实的游戏体验和电影观赏体验。

2. 教育领域:虚拟现实增强技术可以为学生提供更加生动、形象的教学内容,帮助学生更好地理解和掌握知识。

3. 医疗领域:在医疗领域,虚拟现实增强技术可以用于手术模拟、康复训练、医学教育等方面,提高医疗水平和效率。

4. 商业领域:在商业领域,虚拟现实增强技术可以用于产品展示、广告宣传、购物体验等方面,提高用户体验和购买意愿。

四、虚拟现实增强技术的发展现状与前景目前,虚拟现实增强技术已经取得了长足的发展,各大科技公司都在积极投入研发该技术。

随着技术的不断进步和应用领域的不断拓展,虚拟现实增强技术的应用前景非常广阔。

未来,该技术将更加普及和成熟,为人们带来更加丰富、真实的体验感。

《2024年基于多模态注意力机制的视觉问答研究》范文

《2024年基于多模态注意力机制的视觉问答研究》范文

《基于多模态注意力机制的视觉问答研究》篇一一、引言随着人工智能技术的不断发展,视觉问答(Visual Question Answering,简称VQA)逐渐成为计算机视觉和自然语言处理领域的热门研究课题。

多模态技术能够在理解文本与图像的基础上实现二者间的相互交流与表达,因此在VQA中显得尤为重要。

本文基于多模态注意力机制展开视觉问答研究,旨在解决VQA 领域中的挑战性问题和提升准确率。

二、研究背景及意义视觉问答是一种将图像与自然语言相结合的技术,旨在通过计算机理解图像内容并回答相关问题。

随着互联网和多媒体技术的快速发展,视觉问答在智能教育、智能客服、智能安防等领域具有广泛的应用前景。

多模态注意力机制作为一种融合图像与文本信息的有效方法,可以有效地提升视觉问答系统的准确率和效率。

因此,本文将研究基于多模态注意力机制的视觉问答系统,对于提高人工智能在图像理解与自然语言处理方面的能力具有重要意义。

三、相关工作近年来,多模态技术得到了广泛的研究和应用。

在视觉问答领域,研究者们提出了许多基于深度学习的模型和方法,如基于循环神经网络(RNN)的模型、基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的模型以及基于注意力机制的模型等。

其中,多模态注意力机制通过将图像和文本信息相互关联,提高了模型的表达能力。

然而,现有的多模态注意力机制在处理复杂问题时仍存在一定局限性,如无法准确理解图像上下文信息和回答多层次的问题等。

因此,本文提出了一种新的基于多模态注意力机制的视觉问答模型。

四、研究内容本文提出了一种基于多模态注意力机制的视觉问答模型,该模型包括图像特征提取模块、文本特征提取模块和多模态注意力机制模块。

具体而言:1. 图像特征提取模块:采用卷积神经网络(CNN)对图像进行特征提取,得到图像的多种特征表示。

2. 文本特征提取模块:采用循环神经网络(RNN)或BERT 等预训练模型对问题文本进行特征提取,得到文本的特征表示。

3. 多模态注意力机制模块:该模块利用自注意力机制和交互注意力机制将图像和文本的特征表示相互关联,使得模型能够准确理解图像上下文信息和回答多层次的问题。

ibvs原理 -回复

ibvs原理 -回复

ibvs原理-回复IBVS原理:图像基于视觉的反馈控制原理导言:在自动化领域,图像基于视觉的反馈控制(Image-Based Visual Servoing,简称IBVS)是一种利用视觉信息来实现控制目标的自动化技术。

IBVS利用摄像机获取目标的视觉信息,然后根据预设的目标轨迹与当前视觉信息之间的误差,通过控制器驱动执行器,使得系统实现目标轨迹跟踪。

本文将对IBVS原理进行详细介绍,包括其基本步骤和关键技术。

一、IBVS基本步骤:1. 目标定义:首先需要定义要跟踪的目标,并通过摄像机获取目标的视觉信息。

这些信息通常包括目标的位置、姿态或者其它相关特征。

在IBVS中,目标通常以特征点、特征线或者特征面的形式被定义。

2. 三维姿态估计:通过使用摄像机的外参信息和目标的视觉信息,可以进行三维姿态的估计。

这一步骤通常包括计算目标在摄像机坐标系下的位置和旋转矩阵。

3. 误差计算:将目标的估计姿态与预设的目标轨迹进行比较,得到当前的误差信息。

误差通常以特征点或者特征线之间的距离或者角度差等形式表示。

4. 反馈控制:根据当前的误差信息,设计合适的控制器来驱动执行器,使得系统朝着轨迹目标前进。

控制器可以基于比例、积分、微分(PID)等常见的控制算法来实现。

控制器的目标是通过调整执行器的输出使得误差逐渐收敛到0,从而实现目标轨迹的稳定跟踪。

二、关键技术:1. 反馈适应性:在实际应用中,目标的视觉信息可能受到环境干扰、光照变化等因素的影响,导致估计误差。

为了提高系统的鲁棒性和适应性,可以引入反馈适应性技术来动态调整控制器参数。

例如,可以根据当前的估计误差和执行器输出的反馈信息来自适应调整控制器的增益。

2. 特征选择与提取:在IBVS中,选择合适的特征对于系统的性能至关重要。

特征的选择应该能够反映目标的运动和变化,同时具备良好的可观测性。

常用的特征包括边缘、角点、轮廓线等。

此外,通过合适的图像处理和计算方法来提取特征,可以提高系统对噪声、模糊等外界因素的鲁棒性。

《2024年基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测研究》范文

《2024年基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测研究》范文

《基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测研究》篇一一、引言随着人工智能技术的不断发展,计算机视觉在众多领域得到了广泛应用。

其中,伪装物体检测是计算机视觉领域的一个重要研究方向。

伪装物体指的是在特定场景中,通过伪装手段(如改变颜色、形状等)试图隐藏或混淆真实物体的存在。

伪装物体检测的目的是在图像或视频中准确地识别出这些伪装物体,为后续的图像处理和识别任务提供支持。

然而,由于伪装物体的多样性和复杂性,传统的伪装物体检测方法往往难以取得满意的效果。

因此,本文提出了一种基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测方法,旨在提高伪装物体检测的准确性和效率。

二、相关工作在伪装物体检测领域,传统的检测方法主要依赖于手工设计的特征提取器和分类器。

然而,这些方法往往难以应对复杂多变的伪装手段和场景变化。

近年来,随着深度学习技术的发展,基于深度学习的伪装物体检测方法逐渐成为研究热点。

这些方法通过训练大量的数据来学习图像中的特征和模式,从而实现对伪装物体的准确检测。

然而,现有的方法仍然存在一些局限性,如对上下文信息的忽视和边界信息的利用不足等。

三、方法本文提出的基于上下文感知及边界引导的伪装物体检测方法主要包括以下两个部分:1. 上下文感知模块:该模块通过分析图像中的上下文信息,提取出与伪装物体相关的特征。

具体而言,我们利用卷积神经网络(CNN)来学习图像中的局部和全局特征,同时结合图像中的语义信息,如物体的形状、颜色等。

通过上下文感知模块,我们可以更准确地识别出伪装物体及其周围环境的关系。

2. 边界引导模块:该模块通过分析图像中物体的边界信息,提高对伪装物体的检测效果。

我们利用边缘检测算法来提取图像中的边缘信息,并结合上下文感知模块的结果,对边缘信息进行优化和补充。

通过边界引导模块,我们可以更准确地定位和识别出伪装物体的位置和形状。

四、实验为了验证本文提出的方法的有效性,我们在多个数据集上进行了实验。

实验结果表明,我们的方法在伪装物体检测任务中取得了显著的效果提升。

无人飞艇的基于计算机视觉导航和预设航线跟踪控制

无人飞艇的基于计算机视觉导航和预设航线跟踪控制

Vol.33,No.3ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA March,2007 Computer Vision-based Navigation and Predefined Track Following Control of a Small Robotic AirshipXIE Shao-Rong1LUO Jun1RAO Jin-Jun1GONG Zhen-Bang1Abstract For small robotic airships,it is required that the airship should be capable of following a predefined track.In this paper, computer vision-based navigation and optimal fuzzy control strategies for the robotic airship are proposed.Firstly,visual navigation based on natural landmarks of the environment is introduced.For example,when the airship isflying over a city,buildings can be used as visual beacons whose geometrical properties are known from the digital map or a geographical information system(GIS). Then a geometrical methodology is adopted to extract information about the orientation and position of the airship.In order to keep the airship on a predefined track,a fuzzyflight control system is designed,which uses those data as its input.And genetic algorithms(GAs),a general-purpose global optimization method,are utilized to optimize the membership functions of the fuzzy controller.Finally,the navigation and control strategies are validated.Key words Visual navigation,flight control,predefined track following,robotic airship.1IntroductionSmall airships are aerial robots built from a lightweight envelope for buoyancy and a propelling system housed in a gondola.The fact that theflight of airships is based on buoyancy is one of their main advantages.Small airships outperform sub-miniaturefixed-wing vehicles(airplanes) and rotary-wing aircrafts(helicopters)in stability,oper-ation safety,endurance,payload to weight ratio[1],etc.So they will surelyfind uses in[2∼3]anti-terrorism,traffic ob-servation,advertising,aerophotogrammetry,climate moni-toring,locale of calamity watching,surveillance over man-made structures and archaeological sites,as well as estab-lishment of emergency telecommunication relay platforms. For these missions,it is demanded that the airship is ca-pable of autonomously following predefined track,which consists of autonomous navigation andflight control.Con-sequently,they are recently becoming a focus of research.The accomplishments of the above tasks make visual sen-sors(like CCD cameras)a natural choice for their sensory apparatuses.Visual sensors are necessary not only to the performances data acquisition as part of the mission such as taking pictures of predefined spots,but also to autonomous navigation of the small airship,supplying data in situations where conventional,well-established aerial navigation tech-niques,like those using inertial,GPS and other kinds of dead-reckoning systems,are not adequate.There have been important developments in the area of visual navigation for mobile robots in recent years.Among those more successful are the ones that use navigation based on visual landmarks[4].For aerial robots,though previ-ous work on visual servoing has comprised the stabiliza-tion problem[5∼6]and vertical landing[7]using small indoor blimps and helicopters,hovering solution[8]and a strategy for line-following tasks[9∼11]using outdoor robotic airships, visual navigation of aerial robots is much less explored[12]. Usually,autonomous navigation of UAVs relies on inertial navigation system(INS),GPS,DGPS,etc.,which are tra-ditional and well-established in navigation of aircraft in general.It is clearly understood that vision is in itself a very hard problem and solutions to some specific issues are Received August12,2005;in revised form February16,2006 Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of P.R.China(50405046,60605028),Shanghai Project of International Coopera-tion(045107031)and the Program for Excellent Young Teachers of Shanghai(04Y0HB094).1.School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation,Shanghai University,Shanghai200072,P.R.ChinaDOI:10.1360/aas-007-0286Fig.1The airship in Shanghai University restricted to constraints either in the environment or in the visual system itself.Nevertheless,visual navigation could be of great advantages when it comes to aerial vehicles in the aforementioned situations.In the present paper,visual navigation of a small robotic airship based on natural landmarks already existent in the environment is introduced.The vision system is able to track those visual beacons.For example,buildings can be used as visual beacons when the airship isflying over a city. According to the digital map or the geographical informa-tion system(GIS),their geometrical properties are known. Then a geometrical methodology can extract information about orientation and position of the airship.And in order to keep the airship on a predefined track,an optimal fuzzy flight control system is designed,which uses that data as its input.2Dynamic characteristics and control architecture of thesmall robotic airshipThe prototype of the robotic unmanned blimp we devel-oped is shown as Fig.1.The platform has a length of11 m,a maximal diameter of3m,and a volume of50m3.It is equipped with two engines on both sides of the gondola, and has four control surfaces at the stern,arranged in a ‘+’shape.Its useful payload capacity is around15kg at sea level.It canflight with a maximum speed of about60 km/h.The mathematical,reasonable and relatively simple lin-ear dynamic model of the small robotic airship is readily analyzed and realized.The airship dynamics indicates that the state parameters involved in longitudinal and lateralNo.3XIE Shao-Rong et al.:Computer Vision-based Navigation and Predefined Track Following Control ...287Fig.2Architecture of control and navigation systemmotions are weakly dependent.So the system can be split into two subsystems in the following way.1)S long =[X,Z,θ]T and S long =[U,W,Q ]T to describe the dynamics within the longitudinal plane,the control in-puts being δe and δt .2)S lat =[Y,φ,ψ]and X lat =[V,P,R ]T to describe the dynamics within the lateral plane,the control input being δr .The body axes are fixed in the vehicle with the origin O at the center of volume (CV),the OX axis is coincident with the axis of symmetry of the envelope,and the OXZ plane coincides with the longitudinal plane of symmetry of the blimp.(φ,θ,ψ)denote three Euler angles.The airship linear and angular velocities are given by (U,V,W )and (P,Q,R ),respectively.The airship dynamics model shows that:1)The rolling corresponding mode is structurally stable.2)The longitu-dinal and lateral control can be viewed as decoupled.3)An airship has more nonlinearities than ordinary aircraft due to the added mass.According to that decoupled lateral and longitudinal dy-namics model,the control architecture of the system is pre-sented in Fig.2.In this architecture three independent controllers are uti-lized as follows.1)A proportional-integral controller for the longitudinal velocity v acting on the throttle deflection δt ;2)a heading controller acting on the rudder deflection δr ;3)a controller for height and pitch acting on the elevator deflection δe .The navigation and mission planner is designed to pro-vide longitudinal velocity reference V ref height reference H ref and heading reference Ψref .In a specific mission flight,,H ref and the waypoints are predefined by the user.As the airship position is motional,the planner should be computed in real-time for the heading controller.3Visual navigation methodo logy3.1Navigation principle based on visual beacon [12]Visual beacons denote calibration objects with known visual and geometrical properties.Formally,the beacon vi-sually assigns a set {P 0,P 1,P 2,P 3}of characteristic pointswhere the distances of the form Pi − P j ,0≤i <j <n are known.Depending on the number and disposition of the charac-teristic points,it is possible to use an image of the beacon -acquired by an onboard camera with known parameters (fo-cus,resolution,CCD physical dimensions)-to estimate the position and orientation of that camera,andconsequentlyFig.3Image projection of the vertices of a tetrahedral beacon B over the image plane of camera Cof the airship,in relation to the visual beacon.Fig.3illustrates the geometrical construct of image pro-jection.Let C be a camera with focal point F .Let B be a visual beacon with a set of 4non-coplanar characteristic points {P 0,P 1,P 2,P 3}.Let {p 0,p 1,p 2,p 3}be the copla-nar points corresponding to the image projections of the characteristic points of B over the image plane of C .Let Vi =P i −p i ,0≤i <4,be the light-ray-path vectors going from the points p i to the corresponding P i passing through F ,and v i =F −p i ,0≤i <4,the vectors in the same direction of V i ,but going just until F .Once the vectors Vi are found,the position and orienta-tion of C can be determined.Since the distances between the points P i are known and vectors v i are determinable if the points p i are known,the following equation system (1)can be specified,where D i,j = P i −P j ,0≤i <j ≤3,is the distance between points P i and P j .The unknowns ofthe system are λ0,λ1,λ2,λ3and V i =λi v i .Expanding themodulus operations on the left-hand side of the equation,we have a nonlinear system with six quadratic equations and four unknowns as follows:8>>>>><>>>>>: λ0 v 0−λ1 v 1 =D 0,1 λ0 v 0−λ2 v 2 =D 0,2 λ0 v 0−λ3 v 3 =D 0,3λ1 v 1−λ2 v 2 =D 1,2 λ1 v 1−λ3 v 3 =D 1,3 λ2 v 2−λ3 v 3 =D 2,3(1)The existence of the six equations guarantees one solution.Therefore,a visual beacon with tetrahedral topology -that is,having four non-coplanar characteristic points -guar-288ACTAAUTOMATICA SINICA Vol.33antees a uniquesolution to the values Vi ,hence a unique position and orientation to the camera for the point set p i determined in an image.However,tetrahedral -and therefore tridimensional -beacons are more difficult to construct and reproduce than the bidimensional ones;in particular,practical applications of autonomous airships,where the distances involved could be large and hence the visual beacon,seem to favor the use of bi-dimensional ones.A bi-dimensional beacon would have to have a minimum of three characteristic points to make possible the determination of position and orientation of the camera since with points less than thrice the number of solutions found for position and orientation would be in-finite.Nonetheless,a triangular beacon would imply in an equation system just three quadratic equations,in a way the number of solutions for a given projection of character-istic points on the image plane would be 2or 4.That is,for a given image of a triangular beacon,there would be two or four possible positions /orientations of the beacon with the same characteristic point projections found in the image.However,this ambiguity can be removed if distortions in the vertex markers,caused by perspective projection,are taken into account.Observing the apparent size of each marker,it is possible to determine the ratios between their distances and thus to choose one among the several solu-tions.3.2Implementation of Visual NavigationAccording to the above principle,it is very important that the point set p i be determined by digital image pro-cessing method for implementation visual navigation.Be-cause p i is the point corresponding to the image projection of the characteristic point of natural visual beacon over the image plane of C ,feature-based approaches are ideal for picking up feature points of natural beacons.They are successfully carried out in computer vision.For example,when the airship is flying over a city,buildings can be used as visual beacons,as their feature points easily are seg-mented in images.According to the digital map of the city or the geographical information system (GIS),their geo-metrical properties are known.In general,they are shown in a graphical interface (Fig.4block 3,see next page).The camera coordinate system {C }is presented in first place.That system is an orthonormal basis with the CCD matrix center as the origin,X axis parallel to the CCD width,Y axis parallel to the CCD height and Z axis co-incident with the camera axis (line perpendicular to the image plane passing through the focal point),pointing to-ward the back of the camera.On the other hand,{B }is the world coordinate system.The geometrical methodology used here for computing estimations of position and orientation of the airship from an onboard camera is simple.Since the onboard camera is assumed to be installed at the bottom of the airship gondola,pointing downwards,and the X −Y plane of {B }is parallel to the image plane,the yaw orientation is easily determined.4Optimal fuzzy control system4.1Heading controllerThe control block of the heading controller is shown inFig.5.The heading controller consists of a rule based fuzzy controller and an integrator.The integrator (Fig.5block (b))is used to include the integral of the error as a third input to the heading con-trollers to compensate for setpoint error caused by unbal-Fig.5Heading controller block diagramFig.6The membership functions for the fuzzy inputanced forces and other disturbances.The integrator is reset at zero on each change of setpoint.Because integration only occurs for small values of error,the problems of integrator windup are avoided and at the same time the setpoint is eliminated.The fuzzy controller (Fig.5block (a))is the main part of the heading controller.Its inputs are heading error and heading error rate ,and the output is δr .K e and K c are normalized from the universes of discourse of the inputs to the range of [-1,1].The universe of discourse of output deflection is limited in [-30deg,30deg]by the actual mech-anism of the control surfaces,so K d =30.Seven fuzzy sets are defined for each input variable,as shown in Fig.6,where x 1=0.1and x i =0.3(i =2,3,···,7)for the initial design.The rule base is built as shown in Table 1.4.2Optimization of Fuzzy ControllerSince the rule base and membership functions of fuzzy set are determined by designers imprecisely,the quality of con-trol may be not that good.So a tuning operation is needed for the fuzzy control system.In fact,this operation is a process of optimization.Genetic algorithms (GAs),known to be robust general-purpose global optimization method,are utilized to optimize the membership functions of fuzzy controller.Considering Fig.6,the membership functions of two fuzzy input variables are determined by parameters x =(x 1,x 2,...,x 14)of a controller,where x 1,x 2,...,x 7for er-ror and x 7,x 8,...,x 14for error rate.In this approach con-straint conditions are inducted to guarantee that all fuzzy sets are in the universes of discourse.g 1=7X i =1x i −2≤0(2)g 2=14X i =8x i −2≤0(3)where g 1and g 2are functions of constraint.No.3XIE Shao-Rong et al.:Computer Vision-based Navigation and Predefined Track Following Control...2891)COM setting;2)A/D data;3)Digital map andflight trajectory;4)GPS data;5)Command editor;6)Error prompt;7)Flightdata;8)Control inputs;9)Flight attitudeFig.4The human-machine interface of ground stationTable1Fuzzy rule baseEC\E NB NM NS Z P S P M P BNB-0.8333-0.8333-0.6333-0.5-0.3333-0.16670NM-0.8333-0.6333-0.5-0.3333-0.166700.1667NS-0.6333-0.5-0.3333-0.166700.16670.3333Z-0.5-0.3333-0.166700.1667-0.33330.5P S-0.3333-0.166700.16670.33330.50.6333P M-0.166700.16670.33330.50.63330.8333P B00.16670.33330.50.63330.83330.8333In traditional GAs,the optimization problems with con-straint conditions are converted into the ones without con-straint conditions using penalty functions.But it’s not easyto determine the penalty coefficients.When the penalty co-efficients are small,some individuals out of the searchingspace may have highfitness,so the GAs may get the wrongresults.Whereas,when they are too huge,the differencesamong individuals are weak,so its hard for the selectionoperator of GAs to select valid individuals with highfit-ness.Obviously,the traditional GAs are expected to beimproved for the constraint optimization problems.A selection operator of GAs based on direct comparisonapproach is presented.Step1.A function measuring the degree of the individ-ual violating the s.t.is defined.For example,v(x)=−ε+JXj=1g j(x)(4)whereεis a small positive constant.Step2.Choose two individuals,say,x1and x2,from previous generation randomly.Step3.Select one to the next generation according to the two rules:if v(x1)and v(x2)have the same signs,the one with smaller objective function value is selected;or if v(x1)and v(x2)have different signs,say,v(x1)<0,then x1is selected.Repeat Step2and Step3till the next generation has enough individuals.This operator treats constraint condition not by penalty functions but by direct comparison,so the advantages of GAs are preserved.Additionally,because it takes the effect of invalid solutions into consideration,the searching ability of GAs is also augmented.Based on6DOF nonlinear dynamic model of the robotic airship system,the simulation and optimization program is developed in MATLAB environment.The optimal mem-bership functions of heading error and heading error rate are shown in Fig.7.Considering the step input of head-ing error,the airship responses under the optimal fuzzy heading controller and the initial controller are shown in290ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA Vol.33Fig.7The optimal membership functions of input variable of heading controller.Fig.8.Obviously,the optimal fuzzy heading controller spends much shorter time than the initial one,and over-shoot is avoided.5Verification of the navigation and control strategiesIn theflight experiment,for safety consideration,the elevator and throttle were under manual control to keep the altitude and the cruise speed.The rudder was controlled by the ANN autonomous control system,and it could also be switched to human operator control in take-offand landing phase and in the case of danger.When the trim airspeed is8m/s,the tracking error and deflections of rudder are shown in Fig.9.Because of the large time constant and large virtual mass of airship,about Fig.8Responses of theinitial fuzzy controller and the optimal fuzzy controllerFig.9Tracking error and deflections of rudder55m tracking errors occurred in two sharp angles despite that the saturate control of rudder(+/-30deg)is acted. The results manifest that the strategies are feasible,and the system can track mission path with satisfactory precision. 6ConclusionThis paper presents computer vision-based navigation and predefined track following control for small robotic air-ship.The vision system is able to track those visual beacons already existent in the environment.For example,build-ings can be used as visual beacons when an airship isflying over a city.According to the digital map or the geographi-cal information system(GIS),their geometrical properties are known.Then a geometrical methodology can extract information about orientation and position of the airship. And in order to keep the airship on a predefined track,a fuzzyflight control system is designed,which uses that data as its inputs.And genetic algorithms(GAs)are utilized to optimize the membership functions of the fuzzy controller.References1Elfes A,Bueno S S,Bergerman M,Paiva E C,Ramos J G,Azinheira J R.Robotic airships for exploration of plane-tary bodies with an atmosphere:Autonomy challenges.Au-tonomous Robots,2003,14(2∼3):147∼1642Elfes A,Bueno S S,Bergerman M,Ramos J G,Gomes S B V.Project AURORA:Development of an autonomous un-manned remote monitoring robotic airship.Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society.1998,4(3):70∼783Kantora George,Wettergreen David.Collection of environ-mental data from an airship platform.Sensor Fusion and De-centralized Control in Robotic Systems.2001,4571:76∼83 4Becker C.Reliable navigation using landmarks.In:Proceed-ings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.Nagoya,Japan,1995,1:401∼4065Zhang Hong,Ostrowski J.P.Visual servoing with dynam-ics:Control of an unmanned blimp.In:Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa-tion.Michigan,USA,1999,1:618∼6236Hamel Tarek,Mahony Robert.Visual servoing of an under-actuated dynamic rigid-body system:An image-based ap-proach.IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2002,18(2):187∼1987Shakernia Omid,Yi Ma,Koo T J,Hespanha J,Sastry S S.Vision guided landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle.In: Proceeding of the IEEE38th Conference on Decision and control.Arizon,USA,1999,4:4143∼41488Azinheira J R,Rives,P,Carvalho J R H,Silvera G F,de Paiva E C,Bueno S S.Visual servo control for the hover-ing of all outdoor robotic airship.In:Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa-tion.Washington,USA,2002,3:2787∼2792No.3XIE Shao-Rong et al.:Computer Vision-based Navigation and Predefined Track Following Control (291)9Rives Patrick,Azinheira J R.Linear structures following by an airship using vanishing point and horizon line in a vi-sual servoing scheme.In:Proceedings of the2004IEEE In-ternational Conference on Robotics and Automation.New Orleans,USA,2004,1:255∼26010Silveira G F,Garvalho J R H,Rives P,Azinheira J R,Bueno S S,Madrid M K.Optimal visual servoed guidance of out-door autonomous robotic airships.In:Proceedings of the America Control A,2002,779∼78411Silveira G F,Garvalho J R H,Rives P,Azinheira J R, Bueno S S,Madrid M K.Line following visual servoing for aerial robots combined with complementary sensors.In:Pro-ceedings of the11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics.Portugal,2003,1160∼116512Coelho L S,Campos M F.Pose estimation of autonomous dirigibles using artificial landmarks.In;Proceedings of XII Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Pro-cessing.1999,161∼170XIE Shao-Rong Received her Ph.D.degree from Intelligent Machine Instituteat Tianjin University in2001.From2001to2003she worked as a postdoctoral fel-low in Shanghai University.Now she isan associate professor at the same uni-versity.Her research interest covers com-puter vision and intelligent control.Cor-responding author of this paper.E-mail:srxie@ LUO Jun Associate professor in the school of mechatronics engineering and au-tomation at Shanghai University.He re-ceived his Ph.D.degree from the Research Institute of Robotics at Shanghai Jiaotong University in2000.From2000to2002he worked as a postdoctoral fellow in Shang-hai University.His research interest covers telerobotics and special robotics.E-mail: luojun@RAO Jin-Jun Ph.D.candidate in the School of mechatronics engineering and au-tomation at Shanghai University.His re-search interest includesflight control of a small robotic airship.E-mail:mr-jjrao@GONG Zhen-Bang Professor at Shanghai University.His research interest covers precision mechanical system and advanced robot.E-mail: zhbgong@。

AUV Navigation and Localization-A Review(师兄 20150607)

AUV Navigation and Localization-A Review(师兄 20150607)

AUV Navigation and Localization:A Review Liam Paull,Sajad Saeedi,Mae Seto,and Howard LiAbstract—Autonomous underwater vehicle(AUV)navigation and localization in underwater environments is particularly chal-lenging due to the rapid attenuation of Global Positioning System (GPS)and radio-frequency signals.Underwater communications are low bandwidth and unreliable,and there is no access to a global positioning system.Past approaches to solve the AUV localization problem have employed expensive inertial sensors, used installed beacons in the region of interest,or required peri-odic surfacing of the AUV.While these methods are useful,their performance is fundamentally limited.Advances in underwater communications and the application of simultaneous localization and mapping(SLAM)technology to the underwater realm have yielded new possibilities in thefield.This paper presents a review of the state of the art of AUV navigation and localization,as well as a description of some of the more commonly used methods.In addition,we highlight areas of future research potential.Index Terms—Autonomous underwater vehicles(AUVs),ma-rine navigation,simultaneous localization and mapping.I.I NTRODUCTIONT HE development of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs)began in earnest in the1970s.Since then,ad-vancements in the efficiency,size,and memory capacity of computers have enhanced that potential.As a result,many tasks that were originally achieved with towed arrays or manned vehicles are being completely automated.AUV designs include torpedo-like,gliders,and hovering,and their sizes range from human portable to hundreds of tons.AUVs are now being used for a variety of tasks,including oceanographic surveys,demining,and bathymetric data collec-tion in marine and riverine environments.Accurate localization and navigation is essential to ensure the accuracy of the gath-ered data for these applications.A distinction should be made between navigation and local-ization.Navigational accuracy is the precision with which the AUV guides itself from one point to another.Localization ac-curacy is the error in how well the AUV localizes itself within a map.AUV navigation and localization is a challenging problem due primarily to the rapid attenuation of higher frequency Manuscript received October31,2011;revised April12,2013;accepted Au-gust08,2013.Date of publication December03,2013;date of current version January09,2014.This work was supported by the National Sciences and Engi-neering Research Council of Canada.Associate Editor:A.Bouchard.L.Paull,S.Saeedi,and H.Li are with the Department of Electrical and Com-puter Engineering,University of New Brunswick,Fredericton,NB E3B5A3 Canada(e-mail:liam.paull@unb.ca;sajad.saeedi.g@unb.ca;howard@unb.ca). M.Seto is with the Defence Research and Development Canada,Dartmouth, NS B2Y3Z7Canada(e-mail:mae.seto@drdc-rddc.gc.ca).Color versions of one or more of thefigures in this paper are available online at .Digital Object Identifier10.1109/JOE.2013.2278891signals and the unstructured nature of the undersea environ-ment.Above water,most autonomous systems rely on radio or spread-spectrum communications and global positioning.How-ever,underwater,such signals propagate only short distances and acoustic-based sensors and communications perform better. Acoustic communications still suffer from many shortcomings such as:•small bandwidth,which means communicating nodes have had to use time-division multiple-access(TDMA)tech-niques to share information;•low data rate,which generally constrains the amount of data that can be transmitted;•high latency since the speed of sound in water is only1500 m/s(slow compared with the speed of light);•variable sound speed due tofluctuating water temperature and salinity;•multipath transmissions due to the presence of an upper (free surface)and lower(sea bottom)boundary coupled with highly variable sound speed;•unreliability,resulting in the need for a communication system designed to handle frequent data loss in transmis-sions.Notwithstanding these significant challenges,research in AUV navigation and localization has exploded in the last ten years.Thefield is in the midst of a paradigm shift from old technologies,such as long baseline(LBL)and ultrashort baseline(USBL),which require predeployed and localized infrastructure,toward dynamic multiagent system approaches that allow for rapid deployment andflexibility with minimal infrastructure.In addition,simultaneous localization and map-ping(SLAM)techniques developed for above ground robotics applications are being increasingly applied to underwater sys-tems.The result is that bounded error and accurate navigation for AUVs is becoming possible with less cost and overhead.A.OutlineAUV navigation and localization techniques can be catego-rized according to Fig.1.This review paper will be organized based on this structure.In general,these techniques fall into one of three main cate-gories.•Inertial/dead reckoning:Inertial navigation uses ac-celerometers and gyroscopes for increased accuracy to propagate the current state.Nevertheless,all of the methods in this category have position error growth that is unbounded.•Acoustic transponders and modems:Techniques in this category are based on measuring the time offlight(TOF) of signals from acoustic beacons or modems to perform navigation.0364-9059©2013IEEE.Personal use is permitted,but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.See /publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.Fig.1.Outline of underwater navigation classifications.These methods are often combined in one system to provide increased performance.•Geophysical:Techniques that use external environmental information as references for navigation.This must be done with sensors and processing that are capable of detecting, identifying,andclassifyingsomeenvironmentalfeatures. Sonar sensors are based on acoustic signals,however, navigation with imaging or bathymetric sonars are based on detection,identification,and classification of features in the environment.Therefore,navigation that is sonar based falls into both the acoustic and geophysical categories.A distinction is made between sonar and other acoustic-based navigation schemes,which rely on externally generated acoustic signals emitted from beacons or other vehicles.The type of navigation system used is highly dependent on the type of operation or mission and that in many cases different systems can be combined to yield increased performance.The most important considerations are the size of the region of in-terest and the desired localization accuracy.Past reviews on this topic include[1]–[3].Significant ad-vances have been made since these reviews both in previously established technologies,and in new areas.In particular,the de-velopment of acoustic communications through the use of un-derwater modems has led to the development of new algorithms. In addition,advancement in SLAM research has been applied to the underwater domain in a number of new ways.II.B ACKGROUNDMost modern systems process andfilter the data from the sen-sors to derive a coherent,recursive estimate of the AUV pose.This section will review some of the most common underwater sensors,popular state estimationfilters,the basics of SLAM, and the foundations of cooperative navigation.monly Used Underwater Navigation SensorsTable I describes some commonly used sensors for under-water navigation.B.State EstimationThe basis of any navigation algorithm is state estimation. Consider a robot whose pose at time is given by.The goal of recursive state estimation is to estimate the belief distribution of the state denoted by given by(1) where is some control input or odometry and is a measure-ment used for localization.The propagation of the state is given by some general non-linear process equation(2) where is the process noise.The state is observable through some measurement function(3)PAULL et al.:AUV NA VIGATION AND LOCALIZATION:A REVIEW 133TABLE IS OME O NBOARD AUV S ENSORS U SED FOR S TATE ESTIMATIONwhere is the measurement noise.Typically,the state at time is recursively estimated through an approximation of the Bayes’filter which operates in a predict–update cycle.Prediction is given by [6](4)and update is given by(5)where is a normalization factor.Implicit in this formulation is the Markov assumption,which states that only the most recent state estimates,control,and measurements need to be consid-ered to generate the estimate of the next state.Some of the more popular state estimation algorithms are summarized in Table II.For further details,see,for example,[6].All of the filters described in Table II have been used in AUV navigation algorithms that will be described in the fol-lowing sections.Some implementations differ by what variables are maintained in the state space as relevant to the navigation problem.For example,tide level [8],water current [9],[10],the speed of sound in water [11],or inertial sensor drift [11]can all be estimated to improve navigation.There are also popular vari-ants of these classical filters.For example,since acoustic prop-agations are relatively slow compared to radio-frequency com-munications it is often necessary to implement a delayed-state filter to account for the delay.Examples include [12],where a delayed state extended information filter (EIF)is used,and [13],which implements a delayed-state extended Kalman filter (EKF).Often state estimation is decomposed into two parts:the at-titude heading and reference system (AHRS)and the inertial navigation system (INS),as shown in Fig.2.All sensors that give information about Euler angles or rates are inputs into the AHRS,which produces a stable estimate of vehicle orientation.The stabilized roll,pitch,and yaw are then used by the INS in combination with other sensors that give information about ve-hicle position,linear velocity,or linear acceleration to estimate the vehicle position.C.Simultaneous Localization and MappingSLAM is the process of a robot autonomously building a map of its environment and,at the same time,localizing itself within that environment.1SLAM algorithms can be either on-line ,where only the current pose is estimated along with the map,or full where the posterior is calculated over the entire robot trajectory [6].Analytically,online SLAM involves esti-mating the posterior over the momentary pose and the map ,given all measurements and inputs(6)whereas full SLAM involves estimating the posterior over the entire pose trajectory(7)In addition,SLAM implementations can be classi fied as fea-ture based ,where features are extracted (detection,identi fica-tion,and classi fication)and maintained in the state space,or1Alsoreferred to as concurrent mapping and localization.134IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING,VOL.39,NO.1,JANUARY2014view based,where poses corresponding to measurements are maintained in the state space.As Fig.3(a)shows,in feature-based SLAM,features are ex-tracted from sensor measurements.For example,at pose,the robot sees three features,,and.These features together with the pose of the robot are maintained in the state space. At the next pose,only newly observed features and are added to the vector and the pose is replaced with the pre-vious pose.This process occurs at each new pose.In view-based SLAM[Fig.3(b)],at each pose the whole view without ex-tracting any features is processed,usually by comparing it with the previous view.For example,at pose,is compared with tofind the view-based odometry.State vectors in this case can be composed by one or more of the poses at each time. Filtering(online)approaches to SLAM make use of a state estimation algorithm such as those presented in Table II. Smoothing(full SLAM)methods,also known as GraphSLAM [33],minimize the process and observation constraints over the whole trajectory of the robot.Some approaches use a combination of methods.Some of the most popular categories of SLAM approaches are described here with their pros,cons,and AUV navigation references provided in Table III.The categorization is based on [6]with some additions.•EKF–SLAM:It linearizes the system model using the Taylor expansion.It applies recursive predict–update cycle to estimate pose and map.Its state vector includes pose and features[14].It is applicable to both view-based SLAM[37]and feature-based SLAM[38].For large maps,EKF–SLAM is computationally expensive since computation time scales where is the number of features.•SEIF–SLAM:Sparse extended informationfilter(SEIF)[23]and exactly sparse extended informationfilter(ESEIF)[39]are two well-known approaches for SLAM using the informationfilter.They both maintain a sparse information matrix which preserves the consistency of the Gaussian distribution;however,accessing the mean and covariance requires a computationally expensive large matrix inversion.Both approaches need the information matrix to be actively“sparsified”by a sparsification strategy.ESEIF maintains an information matrix with the majority of elements being exactly zero which avoids the overconfidence problem of[23].•FastSLAM:It is based on the particlefilter.Particlefil-tering approaches are nonlinearfiltering solutions;there-fore,the system models are not approximated.In Fast-SLAM,poses and features are represented by particles (points)in the state space[27].FastSLAM is the only so-lution which performs online SLAM and full SLAM to-gether,which means it estimates not only the current pose, but also the full trajectory.In FastSLAM,each particle holds an estimate of the pose and all features;however, each feature is represented and updated through a sepa-rate EKF.Similar to other methods,it is applicable to both view-based SLAM[40]and feature-based SLAM[6].•GraphSLAM:In GraphSLAM methods,the entire trajec-tory and map are estimated[33].GraphSLAM also uses ap-proximation by Taylor expansion,however,it differs from EKF–SLAM in that it accumulates information and,there-fore,is considered to be an offline algorithm[6].Gener-ally,in GraphSLAM,poses of the robot are represented as nodes in a graph.The edges connecting nodes are mod-eled with motion and observation constraints.These con-straints need to be optimized to calculate the spatial dis-tribution of the nodes and their uncertainties[6].Different solutions exist for GrpahSLAM,such as relaxation on a mesh[41],multilevel relaxation[42],iterative alignment[43],square root smoothing and mapping(SAM)[7],in-cremental smoothing and mapping(iSAM)[44]and works by Grisetti et al.[45],[46],and hierarchical optimization for pose graphs on manifolds(HOGMAN)[47].In prin-ciple,they are all similar,but differ in how the optimiza-tion is implemented.For instance,iSAM solves the full SLAM problem by updating a matrix factorization while HOGMAN’s optimization is performed over a manifold.•Artificial intelligence(AI)SLAM:These methods of SLAM are based on fuzzy logic and neural networks.ratSLAM[48]is a technique that models rodents’brain using neural networks.In fact,this method is neural-net-work-based data fusion using a camera and an odometer.Saeedi et al.[49]use self-organizing maps(SOMs)to perform SLAM with multiple robots.The SOM is a neural network which is trained without supervision.The choice of the method for estimating the poses of robots and the map depends on many factors,such as the available memory, processing capability,and type of sensory information. SLAM techniques have been used for acoustic(Section IV) and particularly geophysical(Section V)underwater navigation algorithms,as will be described.D.Cooperative NavigationIn cooperative navigation(CN),AUV teams localize using proprioceptive sensors as well as communication updates from other team members.CNfinds its origin in ground robotics applications.In the seminal paper by Roumeliotis and Bekey[50],it is proven that a group of autonomous agents with no access to global po-sitioning can localize themselves more accurately if they can share pose estimates and uncertainty as well as make relative measurements.In[51],the scalability of CN is addressed,and it is shown that an upper bound on the rate of increase of posi-tion uncertainty is a function of the size of the robot team.Other important results have been proven,such as that the maximum expected rate of uncertainty increase is independent of the ac-curacy and number of intervehicle measurements and depends only on the accuracy of the proprioceptive sensors on the robots [52].In addition,applications of maximum a posteriori[53], [54],EKF[55],and nonlinear least squares[56]estimators have been developed for general robotics CN.A complexity analysis is also presented in[57].Special considerations must be made to apply many of these algorithms to underwater CN since the acoustic communication channel is limited.Further detail will be presented in Section IV.PAULL et al.:AUV NA VIGATION AND LOCALIZATION:A REVIEW 135TABLE I(C ONTINUED .)S OME O NBOARD AUV S ENSORS U SED FOR S TATE ESTIMATIONTABLE I(C ONTINUED .)S OME O NBOARD AUV S ENSORS U SED FOR S TATE ESTIMATIONA graphical depiction of multiple AUV CN is shown in Fig.4.Data are transmitted through the acoustic channel.Upon re-ception of a data packet,the receiver,vehicle ,can use the TOF of the acoustic signal to determine its range from the sender,vehicle .If the vehicles possess well-synchronizedclocks,then this range can be determined from the one-way travel time (OWTT)of the acoustic signal,otherwise an interro-gation reply is performed to determine a round-trip range (RTR).136IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING,VOL.39,NO.1,JANUARY 2014TABLE IIS OMEC OMMON S TATE E STIMATION TECHNIQUESFig.2.Position estimation with an AHRS and an INS.Ranges are usually projected onto the -plane to obtain since the depths of both vehicles and are observable withpressure sensors(8)The range measurement model is given by(9)where andare the states of vehicles and with positionsand ,respectively.The noise term is zero-mean Gaussian noise.The measure-ment model is nonlinear and assumes that the error in the range measurement is independent of range.Some previous work has validated this assumption to some extent [58].In [35],it is assumed that 3m is a reasonable value if using OWTT,and 7m is reasonable for RTR.An important consideration for AUV CN,as with any CN al-gorithm,is to track the cross correlations that are induced from intervehicle measurements to avoid overcon fidence in the esti-mate.III.I NERTIALWhen the AUV positions itself autonomously,with no acoustic positioning support from a ship or acoustic transpon-ders,it dead reckons.With dead reckoning (DR),the AUV advances its position based upon knowledge of its orientationPAULL et al.:AUV NA VIGATION AND LOCALIZATION:A REVIEW137Fig.3.(a)Feature-based SLAM,(b)View-based SLAM.TABLE IIIS TRENGTHS AND W EAKNESSES OF S OME C OMMON SLAM TECHNIQUESand velocity or acceleration vector.Traditional DR is not con-sidered a primary means of navigation but modern navigation systems,which depend upon DR,are widely used in AUVs.The disadvantage of DR is that errors are cumulative.Conse-quently,the error in the AUV position grows unbounded with distance traveled.One simple method of DR pose estimation,for example,if heading is available from a compass and velocity is available from a Doppler velocity log (DVL),is achieved by using the following kinematic equations:(10)where is the displacement and heading in the standard north–east–down coordinate system,and and are the body frame forward and starboard velocities.In this model,it is as-sumed that roll and pitch are zero and that depth is measured accurately with a depth sensor.An inertial system aims to improve upon the DR pose esti-mation by integrating measurements from accelerometers and gyroscopes.Inertial proprioceptive sensors are able to provide measurements at a much higher frequency than acoustic sensors that are based on the TOF of acoustic signals.As a result,these sensors can reduce the growth rate of pose estimation error,al-though it will still grow without bound.One problem with inertial sensors is that they drift over time.One common approach,for example,used in [11],is to maintain the drift as part of the state space.Slower rate sensors are then effectively used to calibrate the inertial sensors.In [11],Miller et al.also track other possible sources of error such as the vari-able speed of sound in water to reduce systematic noise.These noise sources are propagated using a random walk model,and then updated from DVL or LBL sensor inputs.Their INS is im-plemented with an IMU that runs at 150Hz.The basic kinematics model (10)is incomplete if the local water current is not accounted for.The current can be mea-sured with an acoustic Doppler current pro filer (ADCP).For implementations with ADCP,see [9]and [10].A DVL is usu-ally able to calculate the velocity of the water relative to the138IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING,VOL.39,NO.1,JANUARY2014Fig.4.Cooperative navigation for AUVs:relative ranges are determined from TOF of acoustic communication packets.AUV and the velocity of the seabed relative to the AUV .Then,the ocean current can be calculated easily as .The ocean current can also be obtained from an ocean model,for example,in[59],where ocean currents are predicted using the regional ocean modeling system[60]combined with a Gaussian process regression[61].If access to the velocity over the seabed is not available,then the current can be estimated from a transponder on a surface buoy as in[62].In[62],Batista et al.analyzed the power spectral density to remove the low-fre-quency excitation on the buoy due to the waves to estimate the underwater current.In[8],an algorithm based on particlefiltering is proposed that exploits known bathymetric maps—if they exist.It is empha-sized that the tide level must be carefully monitored to avoid position errors,particularly in areas of low bathymetric varia-tion.This approach is referred to as“terrain-aided navigation,”and the method is compared for DVL,and multibeam sonars as the bathymetric data input,concluding that both are viable op-tions.The performance of an INS is largely determined by the quality of its inertial measurement units.In general,the more expensive is the unit,the better its performance.However,the type of state estimation also has an effect.The most commonfil-tering scheme is the EKF,but others have been used to account for the linearization and Gaussian assumption shortcomings of the EKF.For example,in[63],an unscented Kalmanfilter (UKF)is used,and in[64],a particlefilter(PF)application is presented.Improvements can also be made to INS navigation by modi-fying(10)to provide a more accurate model of the vehicle dy-namics.The benefits of such an approach are investigated in [65],particularly in the case that DVL loses bottom lock,for example.Inertial sensors are the basis of an accurate navigation scheme,and have been combined with other techniques de-scribed in Sections IV and V.In certain applications,navigation by inertial sensors is the only option.For example,in extreme depths where it is impractical to surface for Global Positioning System(GPS),an INS is used predominantly,as described in [66].The best INS can achieve a drift of0.1%of the distance trav-eled[35],however,more typical and modestly priced units can easily achieve a drift of2%–5%of the distance traveled.IV.A COUSTIC T RANSPONDERS AND B EACONSIn acoustic navigation techniques,localization is achieved by measuring ranges from the TOF of acoustic mon methods include the following.•USBL:It is also sometimes called super short baseline (SSBL).The transducers on the transceiver are closely spaced with the approximated baseline on the order of less than10cm.Relative ranges are calculated based on the TOF and the bearing is calculated based on the difference of the phase of the signal arriving at the transceivers.See Fig.5(b).PAULL et al.:AUV NA VIGATION AND LOCALIZATION:A REVIEW139Fig.5.(a)SBL;(b)USBL;and (c)LBL.•Short baseline (SBL):Beacons are placed at opposite ends of a ship’s hull.The baseline is based on the size of the support ship.See Fig.5(a).•LBL and GPS intelligent buoys (GIBs):Beacons are placed over a wide mission area.Localization is based on triangulation of acoustic signals.See Fig.5(c).In the case of GIBs,the beacons are at the surface,whereas for LBL they are installed on the seabed.•Single fixed beacon:Localization is performed from only one fixed beacon.•Acoustic modem:The recent advances with acoustic modems have allowed for new techniques to be de-veloped.Beacons no longer have to be stationary,and full AUV autonomy can be achieved with support from autonomous surface vehicles,equipped with acoustic modems,or by communicating and ranging in underwater teams.Due to the latency of acoustic updates,state estimators are implemented where the DR proprioceptive sensors provide the predictions and then acoustic measurements provide the up-dates.A.Ultrashort and Short BaselineUSBL navigation allows an AUV to localize itself relative to a surface ship.Relative range and bearing are determined by TOF and phase differencing across an array of transceivers,respectively.A typical setup would be to have a ship supporting an AUV.In SBL,transceivers are placed at either end of the ship hull and triangulation is used.The major limitation of USBL is the range and of SBL is that the positional accuracy is dependent on the size of the baseline,i.e.,the length of the ship.In [67],an AUV was developed to accurately map and inspect a hydro dam.A buoy equipped with a USBL and differential GPS helps to improve upon DR of the AUV which is performed using a motion reference unit (MRU),a fiber-optic gyro (FOG)and a DVL.An EKF is used to fuse the data and a mechanical scanning imaging sonar (MSIS)tracks the dam wall and follows it using another EKF.For this application,the USBL is a good choice because the range required for the mission is small.The method proposed in [12]augments [67]by using a delayed-state information filter to account for the time delay in the transmis-sion of the surface ship position.In [68],sensor-based integrated guidance and control is proposed using a USBL positioning system.The USBL is installed on the nose of the AUV while there is an acoustic transponder installed on a known and fixed position as a target.While homing,the USBL sensor listens for the transponder and calculates its range and bearing based on the time difference of arrival (TDOA).In [69],USBL is used for homing during the recovery of an AUV through sea ice.In [70],two methods are presented to calibrate inertial and DVL sensors.The INS data from the AUV is sent to the sur-face vehicle by acoustic means.In one method,a simple KF implementation is used which maintains the inertial sensor drift errors in the state space.In the other method,possible errors of the USBL in the sound-speed pro file are incorporated and the EKF is used to fuse data.No real hardware implementation is performed.In [71],the method is extended to multiple AUVs by using an “inverted”setup where the transceiver is mounted on the AUV and the transponder mounted on the surface ship.In [72],data from an USBL and an acoustic modem are fused by a particle filter to improve DR.As a result,the vehicle operates submerged longer as GPS fixes can be less frequent.The simulation and field experiments verify the developed technique.In [73],a “tightly coupled”approach is used where the spa-tial information of the acoustic array is exploited to correct the errors in the INS.B.LBL/GPS Intelligent BuoysIn LBL navigation,localization is achieved by triangulating acoustically determined ranges from widely spaced fixed bea-cons.In most cases,the beacons are globally referenced before the start of the mission by a surface ship [74],a helicopter [75],or even another AUV [76].In normal operation,an AUV would send out an interrogation signal,and the beacons would reply in a prede fined sequence.The two-way travel time (TWTT)of the acoustic signals is used to determine the ranges.However,there have been implementations in which synchronized clocks are used to support OWTT ranging [77].GIBs remove the need for the LBL beacons to be installed at the sea floor,which can reduce installation costs and the need for recovery of these beacons.One of the limitations of LBL is the cost and time associated with setting up the network.However,this can be mitigated to。

AVisuallyServoedMEMSManipulator

AVisuallyServoedMEMSManipulator

A Visually Servoed MEMS ManipulatorYu Sun,Michael A.Greminger,David P.Potasek,and Bradley J.Nelson Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMN55455,USA*************.eduAbstract.This paper reports on a visual servoing system capable of2DOF nanoposition-ing using a novel multi-axis electrostatic MEMS(MicroElectroMechanical System)device. The high aspect ratio micromanipulator was fabricated using a high yield process with Deep Reactive Ion Etching(DRIE)on Silicon-On-Insulator(SOI)wafers,which produces larger electrostatic forces and requires lower actuation voltages compared to most existing elec-trostatic microactuators.A real-time sub-pixel parameterized feature tracking algorithm of resolution is incorporated into the visual servoing loop.The resulting system is capable of visually servoing to a precision of in two axes using the inexpensive bulk micromachined multi-axis electrostatic micromanipulator and standard microscope op-tics with a CCD camera.Potential applications of the system are in the manipulation of subcellular structures within biological cells,and microassembly of hybrid MEMS devices. 1IntroductionMany microrobotic applications require multi-degree-of-freedom positioning at mi-cro and nanoscales.Actuation technologies capable of providing motion at this scale include piezoactuators[1],microstepping motors[2],highly geared electromagnetic servomotors[3],and Lorentz force-type actuators such as voice coil motors[4]. Typically these positioning systems are expensive and require extensive calibra-tion procedures.This paper reports on a visual servoing system capable of2DOF nanopositioning using a novel multi-axis electrostatic MEMS(MicroElectroMe-chanical System)manipulator.The3-D high aspect ratio transverse comb drive micromanipulator,formed by Deep Reactive Ion Etching(DRIE)on Silicon-On-Insulator(SOI)wafers,produces two orders of magnitude larger electrostatic forces than surface micromachined lateral comb drive microactuators[5][6][7][8][9][10]while the required actuation voltages are approximately ten times smaller.By removing the substrate beneath the comb drive structure,this reported micromanipulator does not require the use of a ground plane as a typical electrostatic microactuator,and the movable structure does not suffer from the leviation effect[11],i.e.,an unbalanced electricfiled distribution forces the structure to move out of the actuation plane.When a micromanipulation system is used in micromanipulation,such as mi-crorobotic surgery or cell manipulation,precise positioning is required.To increase the positioning precision,a sub-pixel vision tracking algorithm of resolu-tion[12]was developed to provide feedback in the visual servo loop.B. Siciliano and P. Dario (Eds.): Experimental Robotics VIII, STAR 5, pp. 255--264, 2003Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003256Y.Sun et al.The resulting system is capable of visually servoing to a precision of us-ing a novel and inexpensive bulk micromachined multi-axis electrostatic manipulator and standard microscope optics with a CCD camera.Minimal system calibration is required.Potential applications of the device are in the manipulation of subcellular structures within biological cells[13]shown in Fig.1,microassembly of hybrid MEMS devices,and manipulation of large molecules such as DNA or proteins.Fig.1.Microrobotic pronuclei DNA injection of a mouse embryo2MEMS-based electrostatic micromanipulator2.1Manipulator designThe design of the2DOF electrostatic manipulator is based on the use of offset electrostatic interdigitated comb drives and curved springs that serve asflexure hinges to allow planar motion in and.Fig.2shows the solid model of the micromanipulator design.The constrained outer frame and the inner movable plate are connected by four curved springs.When a voltage difference is applied on comb drive1and comb drive4,the generated electrostatic force causes the movable plate to move in,resulting in the movement of the manipulator for micromanipulation.To create motion along,comb drive2 and comb drive5are configured to be orthogonal to the comb drives in.The offset comb drive model is shown in Fig.3,where is the displacement of the movablefingers from the equilibrium position.The electrostatic force acting on the movable combfingers isA Visually Servoed MEMS Manipulator257Fig.2.Solid model of the two-axis micromanipulator(1) where is the number of parallel capacitor pairs;is the dielectric constant for the material(for air);is the permittivity of free space;;;is the overlapping area of eachfinger pair;and is the applied actuation voltage.The spring dimensions determine the system stiffness.Structural analysis was performed numerically.The force-deflection model of the spring in both and is(2) where is the deflection;is the force acting on the springs;is the YoungŠs modulus of silicon;is the width of the springs;is the height of the springs;in,and in.Finite element simulations of structural and electrostatic properties were per-formed in order to ensure that a range of motion of can be achieved in both and with actuation voltages less than in and in.2.2MicrofabricationThe main fabrication steps are illustrated in Fig.4.Fig.5shows the completed device.258Y.Sun et al.Fig.3.Offset comb drive modelStep A.Start from a double polished P-type wafer with crystal orientation of <100>.Step B.LPCVD(Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition)1SiO.Step C.Fusion bond the wafer with SiO with another P-type wafer.Step D.CMP(Chemical Mechanical Polishing)the top wafer down to50;this forms an SOI wafer.Step E.E-beam evaporate Al to form Ohmic contacts;Liftoff to pattern Al.Step F.DRIE(Deep Reactive Ion Etching)to form the features on the back side such as the outer frame and movable plates.The buried1SiO layer acts as an etch stop layer and also as an insulator between the capacitors.Step G.DRIE the top side to form capacitive combfingers and curved springs.Step H.RIE(Reactive Ion Etching)to remove the buried SiO layer;This releases the devices and ends the fabrication process.The released devices were then wire bonded.A yield of86.4%has been achieved without significant process optimization.3Nanometer vision tracking algorithm3.1The template matching algorithmIn traditional template matching algorithms[14],objects are typically located to one pixel resolution and no change in orientation is assumed.To overcome these limitations,the template and the image are represented as a list of edge vertices obtained by the Canny edge operator[15]rather than a2D array of pixels.The template vertices and image vertices are related by the homogeneous transformation given by(3)A Visually Servoed MEMS Manipulator259Fig.4.Fabrication sequenceFig.5.SEM micrograph of the device260Y.Sun et al.where is a template vertex coordinate with respect to the-coordinate sys-tem;is the template vertex coordinate with respect to the-coordinate system;and is a homogeneous transformation matrix.The error function is given by(4)where is the scale factor of the template about its origin;is the rotation of the template about its origin;and are the and components of the translation of the origin of the template coordinate system with respect to the image coordinate system;are the coordinates the th edge pixel of the template transformed by(3);are the coordinates of the edge pixel in the image that is nearest to the point;and is the number of edge pixels in the template.By minimizing(4),the values of,,,and that best match the image in a least squares sense can be determined.3.2Performance optimizationsThe error function(4)is minimized by afirst-order multi-variable minimization technique called the Broydon-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno(BFGS)method[16].Like the steepest decent method,the BFGS method is a gradient based minimization technique.The BFGS method differs from the steepest decent method in that it uses information from previous iterations in the choice of a new search direction giving it faster convergence rates than the steepest decent method.The error function(4)is computationally expensive because for each template vertex it is necessary to locate the image vertex that is nearest to it.The data structure employed to organize the pixel data is the KD-Tree[17].A KD-Tree canfind the nearest image vertex with operations as opposed to the operations required tofind the nearest pixel without using a spacial data structure,where is the number of vertex points in the image.3.3Resolution of the template matching algorithmWhen using a50X objective lens with0.42NA,the template matching algorithm is capable of tracking position to within a1uncertainty interval of using the least squares error measure(4).By using the least squares error measure,a normal error distribution is assumed[18],which may not always be the case for a microscopy image.The following robust error measure based on the Cauchy distribution[19]is used(5)where is the distance from each template pixel to the nearest image ing the Cauchy estimator,the1uncertainty interval of the tracking algorithm wasA Visually Servoed MEMS Manipulator261 reduced to.This gain in resolution by using a robust error measure can be attributed to the existence of noise in the image with a non-normal distribution.4Visual servoingThe two-axis micromanipulator is modelled individually in and as two spring-mass-damper systems.(6) where.The system in and consists of linear equations of motionand nonlinear electrostatic forces.In this section,the variables,,,,,, and coincide with the ones defined for(1).The approach to visual servoing is a position-based one.A proportional-integral ()PI visual servoing control architecture with a feedforward component as shown in Fig.6,was implemented.The feedforward component, which significantly increases system response and reduces system overshoot,is given as(7) Table1lists the recognized system stiffness from calibration and the results fromFig.6.Visual servoing scheme for nanopositioningfinite element structural analysis.The measurement of the motion of the features,denoted in Fig.6by, must be done continuously and quickly.The nanometer visual tracking algorithm operates at a full to measure this motion.Fig.7shows the template used to track the manipulator tip.A tracking resolution of was achieved.262Y.Sun et al.Table1.System stiffness determined from calibration and simulationstiffness in()in()simulation 3.31110.75calibration 2.81104.10Fig.7.Template used to track manipulator tipThe feedforward section increases system response.The visual servoing framework allows the device to be positioned precisely despite the nonlinear characteristics exhibited by the electrostatic actuator and the fact that significant hysteresis inthe device occurs when the comb drive is overdriven and capacitor pull-in occurs. Despite a control rate of which reduces disturbance rejection capability,results demonstrate that a controllable motion range of along and can be obtained to a precision of limited by the tracking algorithm and the microscope optics,which consisted of a50X objective with0.42NA.Another factor limiting thepositioning precision is environmental vibration,though afloating table was used to reduce this.Using the visual servoing framework,desired system response can be obtained forthe micromanipulation system.For example,when the system is used in microrobotic surgery and cell manipulation,an overdamped system response is desirable.Fig.8 shows system step responses along two axes.5ConclusionsExperimental results show that the novel inexpensive MEMS micromanipulator is visually servoed to a precision of with voltages ranging from in and in as predicted by FEA.The vision tracking algorithm demon-strates precision with a variance half that of sum-of-squared-differences least-squares trackers.Potential applications of the system are in the manipulation of subcellular structures within biological cells,and microassembly of hybrid MEMS devices.A Visually Servoed MEMS Manipulator263Fig.8.Step response of the system;(a)in;(b)inReferences1.Szita N.,Sutter R.,Dual J.,and Buser R.A.(2001)A micropipettor with integratedsensors.Sensors and Actuators A89,No.1-2,112–1182.Navathe C.P.,Dashora B.L.,Roy U.N.,Singh R.,Maheswari S.,and Kukreja L.M.(1998)Control system for Langmuir-Blodgett film deposition set-up based on microstepping.Measurement Science and Technology9,No.3,540–5413.Barth O.(2000)Harmonic piezodrive miniaturized servo motor.Mechatronics10,No.4-5,545–5544.Molenaar A.,Zaaijer E.H.,and Beek H.F.(1998)A novel long stroke planar magneticbearing actuator.The4th International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Zurich,Switzerland,1071–10765.Harness T.and Syms R.R.A.(2000)Characteristic modes of electrostatic comb-driveX-Y microactuators.J.Micromech.Microeng.10,7–146.Indermuehle P.F.,Linder C.,Brugger J.,Jaecklin V.P.,and Rooij N.F.(1994)Designand fabrication of and overhanging xy-microactuator with integrated tip for scanning surface profiling.Sensor and Actuators A43346–3507.Indermuhle P.F.,Jaecklin V.P.,Brugger J.,Linder C.,and Rooij N.F.(1995)AFMimaging with an XY-micropostioner with integrated tip.Sensors and Actuators A46-47 562–5658.Hirano T.,Furuhata T.,Gabriel K.J.,and Fujita H.(1992)Design,fabrication,and oper-ation of submicron gap comb-drive microactuators.Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems1,No.1,52–599.Tang W.C.,Nguyen T.H.,Judy M.W.,and Howe R.T.(1990)Electrostatic-comb driveof lateral polysilicon resonators.Sensors and Actuators A21-23328–33110.Yeh J.L.A.,Jiang H.,and Tien N.C.(1999)Integrated polysilicon and DRIE bulk siliconmicromachining for an electrostatic torsional actuator.Journal of Microelectromechan-ical Systems8,No.4,456–46511.Tang W.C.,Lim M.G.,and Howe R.T.(1992)Electrostatic comb drive levitation andcontrol method.Journal of Microelectromechanical systems1,No.4,170–17812.Greminger M.A.and Nelson B.J.(2001)Vision-based force sensing at nanonewtonscales.SPIE Microrobotics and Microassembly III,78–89264Y.Sun et al.13.Sun Y.and Nelson B.J.(2001)Microrobotic cell injection.IEEE International Confer-ence on Robotics and Automation1,620–62514.Pratt W.(1991)Digital Image Processing.John Wiley and Sons,New York15.Canny J.A.(1986)A computational approach to edge detection.IEEE Transactions onPattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,8,No.6,679–69816.Vanderplaats G.(1984)Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design.McGraw-Hill,New York17.Samet H.(1990)The Design and Analysis of Spatial Data Structures.Addison-Wesley,Reading,MA.18.Draper N.R.(1998)Applied Regression Analysis,3rd Edition.John Wiley and Sons,New York19.Stewart C.V.(1999)Robust parameter estimation in computer vision.SIAM Review,41,No.3,513–537。

轮廓波和非负稀疏编码收缩的毫米波图像恢复

轮廓波和非负稀疏编码收缩的毫米波图像恢复

1 引 言
通 常 情 况 下 ,由 毫 米 波 ( ii e rw v , Ml— t ae lm e
M W) M 成像系统获得 的图像 的可用性是 非常低 的,
这 主要 是 因为成 像 系统 外部 的复 杂性 以及 成像 系 统
基金项 目: 国家 自然科学基金项 目( o6 90 5 ; N .0 70 8) 江苏省 自然 科学基金项 目( o B 2 0 11 ; N . K 0 9 3 ) 江苏省 “ 青蓝 工程 ” 目; 项 苏州市 职 业大学创新 团队项 目( o3 0 15) N . 10 2 资助。 作者简介 : 尚 丽 ( 92一), , 17 女 副教 授 , 高级 工程 师 , 工学博 士, 主要研究方 向为 人工智 能和数 字 图像 处理 。E m i sagi 3 — al hnl 9 0 : 0
r s l i n. e outo
Ke r s n n n g t e s a s o i g c no r t r n f r ; r s o d s rn a e fau e e t cin;ma e d n iig y wo d : o - e ai p r e c d n ; o tu l a so m t e h l h k g ;e t r x r t v et h i a o i g e osn
s a s o i g s rn a e p rec dn h ik g
S HANG , Li SU n. a g , Pi g n ZHOU a . in Ch ng x o g
( . e at e t f l t ncIf ma o n ie r g S z o o a o a U i ri ,u h u 2 5 0 , hn ; 1 D p r n E e r i n r t n E g e n , uh u V c t n l n es y S z o 1 1 C i m o co o i n i i v t 4 a

智能反射面增强的多无人机辅助语义通信资源优化

智能反射面增强的多无人机辅助语义通信资源优化

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3114.2024.02.018引用格式:王浩博,吴伟,周福辉,等.智能反射面增强的多无人机辅助语义通信资源优化[J].无线电通信技术,2024,50(2): 366-372.[WANG Haobo,WU Wei,ZHOU Fuhui,et al.Optimization of Resource Allocation for Intelligent Reflecting Surface-enhanced Multi-UAV Assisted Semantic Communication[J].Radio Communications Technology,2024,50(2):366-372.]智能反射面增强的多无人机辅助语义通信资源优化王浩博1,吴㊀伟1,2∗,周福辉2,胡㊀冰3,田㊀峰1(1.南京邮电大学通信与信息工程学院,江苏南京210003;2.南京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院,江苏南京211106;3.南京邮电大学现代邮政学院,江苏南京210003)摘㊀要:无人机(Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,UAV)为无线通信系统提供了具有高成本效益的解决方案㊂进一步地,提出了一种新颖的智能反射面(Intelligent Reflecting Surface,IRS)增强多UAV语义通信系统㊂该系统包括配备IRS的UAV㊁移动边缘计算(Mobile Edge Computing,MEC)服务器和具有数据收集与局部语义特征提取功能的UAV㊂通过IRS 优化信号反射显著改善了UAV与MEC服务器的通信质量㊂所构建的问题涉及多UAV轨迹㊁IRS反射系数和语义符号数量联合优化,以最大限度地减少传输延迟㊂为解决该非凸优化问题,本文引入了深度强化学习(Deep Reinforce Learn-ing,DRL)算法,包括对偶双深度Q网络(Dueling Double Deep Q Network,D3QN)用于解决离散动作空间问题,如UAV轨迹优化和语义符号数量优化;深度确定性策略梯度(Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient,DDPG)用于解决连续动作空间问题,如IRS反射系数优化,以实现高效决策㊂仿真结果表明,与各个基准方案相比,提出的智能优化方案性能均有所提升,特别是在发射功率较小的情况下,且对于功率的变化,所提出的智能优化方案展示了良好的稳定性㊂关键词:无人机网络;智能反射面;语义通信;资源分配中图分类号:TN925㊀㊀㊀文献标志码:A㊀㊀㊀开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID):文章编号:1003-3114(2024)02-0366-07Optimization of Resource Allocation for Intelligent ReflectingSurface-enhanced Multi-UAV Assisted Semantic CommunicationWANG Haobo1,WU Wei1,2∗,ZHOU Fuhui2,HU Bing3,TIAN Feng1(1.School of Communications and Information Engineering,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing210003,China;2.College of Electronic and Information Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing211106,China;3.School of Modern Posts,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing210003,China)Abstract:Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAV)present a cost-effective solution for wireless communication systems.This article introduces a novel Intelligent Reflecting Surface(IRS)to augment the semantic communication system among multiple UAVs.The system encompasses UAV equipped with IRS,Mobile Edge Computing(MEC)servers,and UAV featuring data collection and local semantic feature extraction functions.Optimizing signal reflection through IRS significantly enhances communication quality between drones and MEC servers.The formulated problem entails joint optimization of multiple drone trajectories,IRS reflection coefficients,and the number of semantic symbols to minimize transmission delays.To address this non-convex optimization problem,this paper introduces a Deep收稿日期:2023-12-31基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2020YFB1807602);国家自然科学基金(62271267);广东省促进经济发展专项资金(粤自然资合[2023]24号);国家自然科学基金(青年项目)(62302237)Foundation Item:National K&D Program of China(2020YFB1807602);National Natural Science Foundation of China(62271267);Key Program of Marine Economy Development Special Foundation of Department of Natural Resources of Guangdong Province(GDNRC[2023]24);National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China(Young Scientists Fund)(62302237)ReinforcementLearning(DRL)algorithm.Specifically,theDuelingDoubleDeepQNetwork(D3QN)isemployedtoaddressdiscreteactionspaceproblemssuchasdronetrajectoryandsemanticsymbolquantityoptimization.Additionally,DeepDeterministicPolicyGra dient(DDPG)algorithmisutilizedtosolvecontinuousactionspaceproblems,suchasIRSreflectioncoefficientoptimization,enablingefficientdecision making.Simulationresultsdemonstratethattheproposedintelligentoptimizationschemeoutperformsvariousbenchmarkschemes,particularlyinscenarioswithlowtransmissionpower.Furthermore,theintelligentoptimizationschemeproposedinthispaperexhibitsrobuststabilityinresponsetopowerchanges.Keywords:UAVnetwork;IRS;semanticcommunication;resourceallocation0 引言当前技术飞速发展的背景下,无人机(UnmannedAerialVehicle,UAV)已经成为无线通信系统中一种重要的技术[1]。

《2024年基于参与式感知的个体移动特征识别研究》范文

《2024年基于参与式感知的个体移动特征识别研究》范文

《基于参与式感知的个体移动特征识别研究》篇一一、引言随着科技的发展,个体移动特征识别在众多领域中发挥着越来越重要的作用,如智能交通、城市规划、公共卫生等。

传统的移动特征识别方法主要依赖于GPS定位、传感器数据等,但这些方法往往存在数据量大、精度不高、隐私泄露等问题。

因此,研究一种新型的移动特征识别方法,能够更准确地识别个体移动特征,提高数据的准确性和隐私保护性,显得尤为重要。

本文基于参与式感知技术,对个体移动特征识别进行了深入研究。

二、参与式感知技术概述参与式感知是一种利用大量个体设备(如智能手机、智能手表等)进行数据收集和感知的技术。

通过将个体的设备连接起来,形成一个庞大的感知网络,从而实现对环境、行为等信息的实时监测和感知。

参与式感知技术具有数据量大、实时性强、隐私保护性好等特点,为个体移动特征识别提供了新的思路和方法。

三、个体移动特征识别研究(一)研究方法本研究采用基于参与式感知的移动特征识别方法。

首先,通过在个体设备上安装感知软件,收集个体的移动数据,包括步数、速度、方向等信息。

然后,利用机器学习和模式识别等技术,对收集到的数据进行处理和分析,提取出个体移动特征。

最后,通过建立分类模型和预测模型,实现对个体移动特征的准确识别和预测。

(二)实验设计为了验证本研究的可行性和有效性,我们进行了大量实验。

首先,选取了不同年龄、性别和运动习惯的个体作为实验对象,分别在不同环境、不同时间段进行移动。

其次,在个体设备上安装感知软件,实时收集个体的移动数据。

最后,利用机器学习和模式识别等技术,对数据进行处理和分析,提取出个体移动特征。

(三)实验结果与分析通过实验结果发现,基于参与式感知的个体移动特征识别方法具有较高的准确性和可靠性。

与传统的GPS定位和传感器数据相比,该方法能够更准确地识别个体的移动特征,如步数、速度、方向等。

同时,该方法还具有数据量大、实时性强、隐私保护性好等优点。

此外,我们还发现不同年龄、性别和运动习惯的个体在移动特征上存在差异,这为后续的个性化服务和健康管理提供了重要依据。

《2024年基于SOM算法的高维数据可视化》范文

《2024年基于SOM算法的高维数据可视化》范文

《基于SOM算法的高维数据可视化》篇一一、引言随着信息技术的飞速发展,高维数据在各个领域的应用越来越广泛。

然而,由于高维数据的复杂性,如何有效地进行数据可视化和分析成为了一个重要的研究课题。

自组织映射(SOM)算法作为一种无监督学习的神经网络模型,被广泛应用于高维数据的降维和可视化。

本文将探讨基于SOM算法的高维数据可视化方法,以及其在不同领域的应用。

二、SOM算法概述SOM(自组织映射)算法是一种竞争型无监督学习算法,具有自组织和自适应性等特点。

该算法通过模拟神经网络中神经元之间的竞争和合作,将高维数据映射到低维空间,实现数据的降维和可视化。

SOM算法的优点在于可以保持数据的拓扑结构,使得降维后的数据在低维空间中具有良好的可分性和可解释性。

三、基于SOM算法的高维数据可视化方法基于SOM算法的高维数据可视化方法主要包括以下几个步骤:1. 数据预处理:对原始高维数据进行清洗、去噪和标准化等处理,以便于后续的降维和可视化。

2. SOM网络构建:根据数据的特性和需求,构建合适的SOM网络结构,包括神经元的数量、连接方式等。

3. 数据降维:将预处理后的高维数据输入到SOM网络中,通过竞争和合作机制实现数据的降维。

4. 可视化展示:将降维后的数据在低维空间中进行可视化展示,以便于观察和分析数据的分布和结构。

四、SOM算法在高维数据可视化中的应用SOM算法在高维数据可视化中的应用非常广泛,可以应用于多个领域。

以下是一些典型的应用案例:1. 生物信息学:在基因表达、蛋白质组学等领域,SOM算法可以用于对大量基因或蛋白质数据进行降维和可视化,帮助生物学家更好地理解数据的分布和结构。

2. 图像处理:在图像识别、计算机视觉等领域,SOM算法可以用于对图像数据进行降维和可视化,帮助研究人员更好地分析和理解图像信息。

3. 金融领域:在金融市场分析、风险评估等领域,SOM算法可以用于对大量的金融数据进行降维和可视化,帮助金融分析师更好地掌握市场动态和风险情况。

visual question answering综述

visual question answering综述

视觉问答(Visual Question Answering, VQA)是一个跨学科的研究领域,它结合了计算机视觉、自然语言处理和机器学习等多个领域的知识。

VQA的目标是让计算机能够理解并回答与图像相关的自然语言问题。

以下是对VQA的综述:1. 任务定义:* VQA任务通常包括一个图像、一个问题和一个答案选项。

* 计算机需要从图像中提取信息,理解问题的语义,然后选择正确的答案。

* 答案可以是文本、图像或两者结合。

2. 数据集:* 为了评估VQA模型的性能,研究者们创建了多个数据集,如Visual7W、VQA v1、VQA v2等。

* 这些数据集包含了大量的图像、问题和答案,用于训练和测试VQA模型。

3. 方法分类:* VQA方法可以分为三类:基于视觉的方法、基于语言的方法和混合方法。

* 基于视觉的方法主要依赖于图像特征提取和视觉注意力机制来回答问题。

* 基于语言的方法则主要依赖于自然语言处理技术来理解问题并提取相关信息。

* 混合方法则结合了上述两种方法的特点,以获得更好的性能。

4. 技术挑战:* VQA面临的技术挑战包括视觉和语言理解的复杂性、答案的多样性以及模型的泛化能力等。

* 为了解决这些挑战,研究者们提出了多种技术,如注意力机制、知识图谱、迁移学习等。

5. 应用领域:* VQA在多个领域有广泛的应用,如智能助手、教育、医疗等。

* 在智能助手中,VQA可以帮助用户查询信息、回答问题。

在教育中,VQA可以帮助学生理解复杂的科学概念和历史事件。

在医疗中,VQA可以帮助医生快速获取关于疾病的信息和治疗方法。

6. 未来研究方向:* 未来的VQA研究可以关注以下几个方面:提高模型的泛化能力、更好地理解图像和语言的语义、利用无监督或半监督学习方法减少对大量标注数据的依赖等。

7. 结论:* VQA是一个具有挑战性和前景的研究领域,它对于提高计算机对图像和自然语言的理解能力具有重要意义。

随着技术的不断进步和应用领域的拓展,我们期待看到更多的优秀研究成果和应用出现。

openvins解读 -回复

openvins解读 -回复

openvins解读-回复OpenVINS(Visual-Inertial Navigation System)是一种视觉惯性导航系统,可以使用摄像头和惯性传感器进行实时定位和导航。

它结合了视觉和惯性信息,以提高定位的精度和鲁棒性。

以下是对OpenVINS解读的一步一步回答。

第一步:什么是视觉惯性导航系统(Visual-Inertial Navigation System,VINS)?视觉惯性导航系统(VINS)是一种多传感器融合技术,结合了视觉传感器(如摄像头)和惯性(陀螺仪和加速度计)传感器数据。

它使用这些传感器的数据来估计系统的状态,如位置、速度和姿态。

通过结合视觉和惯性信息,VINS可以提供更准确和鲁棒的位置和导航解决方案。

第二步:为什么需要VINS?传统的导航系统通常使用全球定位系统(GPS)来获取位置信息。

然而,在某些情况下,GPS信号可能受到困扰或不可用,如在室内、深海或城市高楼谷值的地区。

在这些情况下,VINS可以通过使用视觉和惯性传感器来提供可靠的位置和导航解决方案。

此外,VINS还可以在具有高度动态性的环境中提供更精确的结果,如无人机、自动驾驶汽车等。

第三步:OpenVINS是什么?OpenVINS是一个开源的视觉惯性导航系统,由加州大学圣地亚哥分校的研究人员开发。

它提供了一个完整的软件包,包括传感器数据采集、系统状态估计和导航解算等功能。

OpenVINS是基于滤波器和优化方法的,可以实时地估计系统的状态,并提供高精度的位置和导航解决方案。

第四步:OpenVINS的工作原理是什么?OpenVINS的工作原理可以分为几个步骤。

首先,它获取来自视觉传感器(摄像头)和惯性传感器(陀螺仪和加速度计)的原始数据。

然后,通过预处理和校准,对这些数据进行处理和修正,以消除任何噪声和误差。

接下来,OpenVINS使用传感器数据进行状态估计。

它使用滤波器或优化方法来融合视觉和惯性信息,以估计系统的位置、速度和姿态。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Abst raet
Visual servo s y s t e m i s ( I robot control s y s t e m which incorporates the vision sensor i n the feedback loop. Since the robot controller is also i n the visual servo loop, compensation of the robot d y n a m i c s is important f o r high speed tasks. Moreover estimation of the object m o t i o n is necessary for real t i m e tracking because the visual information includes considerable delay. T h i s paper proposes a nonlinear modelbased controller and a nonlinear observer for visual servoing. T h e observer estimates the object m o t i o n and the nonlinear controller m a k e s the closed loop s y s t e m asymptotically stable based o n t h e estimated object motion. T h e effectiveness of the observer-based controller is verified by simulations and experiments o n a t w o link planar direct drive robot.
def
flzud,
= s,
- SO.
(1)
IEEE lnternatlonal C o n f e r e n c e o n Robotlcs a n d Automatlon
0-7803-1965-6/95 $4.00 01995 IEEE
-
484 -
Object Imege
4
I
Object
Figure 3: Two Link Direct Drive Robot (overview) Figure 2: Visual Tracking vector = [x yIT be the position of the object in the image plane, f be the focal length of the lens, ( ~ be the i ith element of (T.Then the object position with respect to the camera coordinate system is given by
I
I
I
Extraction
Camera
Object
Figure 1: Feature-based Visual Tracking and Houshangi [lo], Corke and Good [ 3 ] , Wilson [13], Chaumette and Santos [a] and Allen et d.[l]. However, they did not model the object motion and did not consider the robot dynamics. Though Ghosh e2 d [ 6 ] proposed a model-based nonlinear estimator, the control problem was not considered. This paper proposes a nonlinear controller and a nonlinear observer for visual tracking. A model describing the object motion is proposed and the nonlinear observer estimates the velocity parameters of the object motion model. T h e nonlinear controller compensates the robot dynamics based on the object velocity estimation. The proposed controller is proved to be asymptotically stable. Thus the tracking error converges t o zero. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated by simulations and experiments on a two link planar direct drive robot. T h e results exhibit the fast convergence of the estimator and the accurate tracking performance of the controller.
def
e,,
C=F[
-ecyห้องสมุดไป่ตู้
+ e1cz + + +p
Q
tlS2
1,
(7)
=
L(C),
L(Cd)
= (d.
(3)
Example A planar two link robot example is shown in Figure 3. The camera is mounted on the second link looking upward. Let e1 be the link 1 length and [e,, be the camera position with respect to the link 2. Then we have the camera position and orientation
2
Models
The objective of this paper is t o track a moving object by a hand-mounted camera based on the visual information. As depicted in Figure 2, let the camera and the object position and orientation be s, E R6and so E R6, respectively. T h e n , for the given desired relative position and orientation CTd E R6,tracking is defined by
-COS(T~
2.1
Robot Model
Assume that the robot has m ( 5 6) joints. The dynamic model of robot is given by
-sin(~6 0
0
0 where q is the joint angle vector, T is the actuator torque vector, A is the inertia matrix, and h is the vector 4 representing the Coriolis, centrifugal and gravity forces.
koichiQmcr1ab.mech.okayama-u.ac.jp
Hidenori Kimura
Department of Systems Engineering Osaka University 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560 JAPAN
kimuraQsys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp
1
Introduction
Visual information on tasks and environments is essential to execute flexible and autonomous tasks. Tracking the object with the robot hand based on the visual information is called visual tracking. Visual tracking has some technical problems such as delay, low sampling frequency, nonlinear perspective transformation and nonlinear robot dynamics. Visual servo systems incorporate the visual sensors in the feedback loop. As shown in Figure 1, the joint servo loop of the robot is also incorporated in the visual feedback loop. T h u s the performance of the outer visual loop may be deteriorated by the poor performance of the inner joint servo loop. However previous studies [ l a , 5, 7, 4 , 1 1 assumed the ideal performance of the 1 joint servo mechanism and ignored the robot dynamics. Due to the low frequency of the visual sampling, estimation of the object motion is also essential for visual tracking. Since the visual sampling period is larger than 33 ms, significant delay is inevitable without predictive control. Studies on object motion estimation based on Kalman filter and AR model were carried out by Koivo
相关文档
最新文档