Preference-based
高考观点态度题的常见词汇
高考观点态度题的常见词汇一、高考观点态度题常见词汇示例。
1. 积极类。
- approving(赞成的):表示对某事或某人持认可、赞同的态度。
例如:The author's approving tone towards the new policy can be seen throughout the passage.(在整篇文章中都能看出作者对新政策的赞成态度。
)- positive(积极的):积极乐观的态度。
例如:His positive attitude towards life inspired many people.(他对生活的积极态度激励了很多人。
)- favorable(有利的;赞成的):可以形容对事物有利的情况或者表示赞成的态度。
如:The public has a favorable opinion of this environmental protection project.(公众对这个环保项目持赞成意见。
)2. 消极类。
- negative(消极的;否定的):表达负面的、否定的态度。
例如:The negative comments on the movie showed that it didn't meet the audience's expectations.(对这部电影的负面评论表明它没有达到观众的期望。
)- critical(批评的):强调批评、挑剔的态度。
如:The critical remarks in the report pointed out the problems in the company's management.(报告中的批评性言论指出了公司管理中的问题。
)- disapproving(不赞成的):与approving相反,不认可、不赞同某事或某人。
例如:She gave a disapproving look when she heard his rude words.(当她听到他粗鲁的话时,她露出了不赞成的神情。
AFFINITYPROPAGATION算法介绍
{
(3)
由上面的公式可以看出,当 s(k, k)较大使得 r(k, k)较大时,a(i, k)也较大, 从而类代表 k 作为 最终聚类中心的可能性较大;同样,当越多的 s(k, k)较大时,越多的类代表倾向于成为最终 的聚类中心。因此,增大或减小 s(k, k)可以增加或减少 AP 输出的聚类数目。 Damping factor(阻尼系数):主要是起收敛作用的。AP 聚类算法迭代过程很容易产生震荡, 所以一般每次迭代都加上一个阻尼系数 ( [0.5,1)) :
m e d ia n ( s ) 2
median(s) 2×median(s)
表 1.不同的 preference 得到的聚类数目比较 由表 1,我们可以看出,当 preference 越大时,得到的聚类数目越多。 当取不同的 (阻尼系数)值时,迭代次数和迭代过程中数据的摆动都会有很大的不同,下 面同样是对同一组数据集(200 个数据点)进行计算,取有代表性的两个值(0.5 和 0.9)进行 比较结果如下:
心(该聚类中所有对象的均值) ;不断重复这一过程直到标准测度函
k
i 1 pCi
| pm
i
|2
(1)
其中,E 是数据集中所有对象的平方误差和,p 是空间中的点,表示给定对象,mi 是簇 Ci 的 均值(p 和 mi 都是多维的) 。换句话说,对于每个簇中的每个对象,求对象到其簇中心距离 的平方,然后求和。这个准则试图使生成的 k 个结果簇尽可能的紧凑和独立。 例 1:我们在二维空间中随机的生成 20 个数据点,将聚类数目指定为 5 个,并随机生成一 个聚类中心(用“×”来标注),根据对象与簇中心的距离,每个对象分属于最近的簇。初始 示例图如下:
AP 聚类算法
美国ew3移民申请流程
美国ew3移民申请流程穿越大洋的绿卡之旅:美国EW3移民申请全流程大揭秘在梦想照进现实的旅程中,踏上美国EW3移民之路是一场独特且充满挑战的人生探险。
EW3,全称Employment-Based Third Preference,即美国职业移民第三优先类别,主要是为熟练和非熟练工人群体打开了一扇通向“美国梦”的大门。
本文将深入浅出地解读这场横跨大洋的移民历程,带你一同体验那份既激动又忐忑的心路历程。
首先,启程之前,你需要找准定位。
EW3主要针对那些有美国雇主愿意提供永久性工作机会的非技术工人,也就是说,你得先有个美国雇主愿意做你的“引路人”。
这个阶段的关键就是“敲定雇主”,如同大海捞针般寻找并锁定那个愿意为你担保的雇主,这一步走得扎实与否,直接影响到后续流程的顺利与否。
一旦雇主“上钩”,接下来便是签订合同、提交劳工证书申请(PERM)。
在这个环节,犹如走过独木桥,需小心翼翼地满足各种法定条件,包括但不限于工资标准、招聘广告等要求。
这一过程可能会伴随着焦急等待与反复调整,但请记住,“好事多磨”,每一份坚持都将成为通往成功路上的垫脚石。
待劳工证书获批后,就来到了移民申请的关键一环——递交I-140表格,也即是外籍劳工移民申请表。
此刻的心情或许就如同马拉松选手冲向终点线前的冲刺,紧张而又满怀期待。
填写这份文件时,务必详实准确,任何微小的疏忽都可能导致整个进程陷入僵局。
I-140批准后,就轮到了签证排期的等待。
此时,耐心成了最宝贵的财富。
由于EW3类别的签证名额有限,往往会出现排期倒退的情况,这段时间内,申请人需要保持良好心态,同时关注国务院每月公布的签证公告牌,以便随时了解自己的优先日期进展。
当签证排期快到之际,终于可以提交I-485身份调整申请或通过领事程序办理移民签证了。
这时的你,离梦想中的绿卡仅剩一步之遥,那种即将抵达彼岸的兴奋与紧张交织在一起,仿佛能听见心跳声都在为这一刻加油鼓劲。
最后,经过面试等一系列手续,当你拿到那张象征着新生活的绿卡时,这场历时长久、历经艰辛的EW3移民申请流程才算是圆满落幕。
preference structure定义
preference structure定义Preference Structure•Definition 1:Preference structure refers to the overall organization or arrangement of preferences that individuals possess. It encompasses the set of comparative judgments people make when faced with multiple options. This structure can vary across individuals, and it shapes decision-making processes and outcomes.•Reasoning:Understanding preference structure is crucial in various fields such as psychology, marketing, economics, and decision theory. By examining how preferences are structured, researchers can gain insights into human behavior and tailor products, services, and policies to better meet people’s needs and desires.•Book Recommendation:Title: “Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions”Author: Dan ArielyIn this enlightening book, Dan Ariely explores the influence of preference structure on human decision-making. Through a series of engaging experiments and real-life examples, Ariely reveals how our preferences are often inconsistent, illogical, and influenced by external factors.Us ing concepts such as the “decoy effect” and the “power of free,” Ariely demonstrates how companies and marketers exploit our preference structures to manipulate our choices. By understanding the underlying mechanisms of preference formation and the biases that affect our decision-making, readers can gain a better understanding of their own choices and guard against manipulation.With its blend of insightful research and humorous anecdotes, “Predictably Irrational” offers a fresh perspective on preference structure and its impact on our lives. It challenges conventional wisdom and provides practical advice on how individuals and organizations can navigate the complexities of preferences to make more informed decisions.Throughout the book, Ariely emphasizes that although we may believe ourselves to be rational decision-makers, ourpreference structures often lead us astray. By examining the hidden forces that shape our preferences, readers can gain a deeper understanding of themselves and the world around them. ConclusionPreference structure plays a vital role in decision-making, shaping our choices and influencing our behavior. Understanding how preferences are organized can help individuals and organizations make more informed decisions and design effective strategies. The book “Predictably Irrational” offers valuable insights into preference structure and its significance in our lives.。
preference的用法总结大全
preference的用法总结大全1. Preference作为名词,表示偏好、优先选择或个人喜好。
- What is your preference for breakfast, cereal or toast?(早餐你喜欢吃麦片还是吐司?)- I have a strong preference for action movies over romantic comedies. (相较于浪漫喜剧片,我更喜欢动作片。
)2. Preference作为动词,表示偏爱、优先选择或花更多时间在某事物上。
- I prefer spending my weekends at home rather than going out.(与其出去,我更喜欢在家度过周末。
)- She prefers to travel by train rather than by bus.(与其乘坐公交车,她更喜欢乘坐火车旅行。
)3. have a preference for表示对某种事物有偏好。
- She has a preference for Italian cuisine.(她喜欢意大利菜。
)4. show preference表示展现出偏爱或倾向。
- The teacher should not show preference towards any student.(老师不应该对任何学生显示偏爱。
)5. express preference表示表达偏好。
- He expressed his preference for classical music.(他表达了对古典音乐的偏好。
)6. give preference to表示给予优先考虑或优先选择。
- The company gives preference to internal candidates for promotions. (公司优先考虑内部员工晋升。
美国移民方法政策
The fifth employment preference is investment for immigration. It has three conditions: 1. Invest one million or five hundred thousand dollars to a American commercial entity. 2. Create or increase the 10 full-time jobs for American workers. 3. Prove the Investment funds are legal.
2.1 Employment-Based Immigration: First Preference(EB-1) Alien of extraordinary ability and has bigger achievement than ordinary people in their fields, for example, science, art, education, business, sports. This application does not need to provide a work permit. You don’t need the support of the employer, but you should find a job in your professional field. EB-1b: Outstanding professor and researchers in an academic research field. The applicant has at least three years experience in related research, and has support and job offer from employer. EB-1c: Multinational manager or executive The future employer is the applicant, and provide specific job to favoree. EB-1a:
Preference-based catalog browser that utilizes a b
专利名称:Preference-based catalog browser thatutilizes a belief network发明人:David E. Heckerman,Christopher A.Meek,Usama M. Fayad申请号:US09316704申请日:19990521公开号:US06633852B1公开日:20031014专利内容由知识产权出版社提供专利附图:摘要:An electronic shopping aid is provided that assists a user in selecting a product from an electronic catalog of products based on their preferences for various features ofthe products. Since the electronic shopping aid helps a user select a product based on the user's preferences, it is referred to as a preference-based product browser. In using the browser, the user initially inputs an indication of their like or dislike for various features of the products as well as an indication of how strongly they feel about the like or dislike. The browser then utilizes this information to determine a list of products in which the user is most likely interested. As part of this determination, the browser performs collaborative filtering and bases the determination on what other users with similar characteristics (e.g., age and income) have liked. After creating this list, the browser displays the list and also displays a list of features which the user has not indicated either a like or a dislike for and which the browser has identified as being most relevant to the determination of the products that the user may like. Thus, by specifying a like or dislike for one or more of these features, the user helps the browser to more accurately determine the products in which the user will most likely be interested by having the user state a preference for only those features that the browser deems most important to the determination process.申请人:MICROSOFT CORPORATION代理机构:Amin & Turocy, LLP更多信息请下载全文后查看。
resource-based view
Resource-Based ViewResource-Based View was first put forward by Birger Wernerfelt who was a teacher in the Graduate School of Business Adfnitiistration,the University of Michigan in U.S.A. in 1984. The core idea of resource-based view is an economic tool used to determine the strategic resource available to a firm.The fundamental principle of the RBV is that the basis for the compative advantage of a firm lies primarily in the application of the bundle of valuable resource at the firm’disposal.The context of the resource-based view put forward was based on theory of Resources Declining Returns to Scale and the traditional theory of Factor Demand. By virtue of analysing this type of resource,the economic theory of factor demand becomes a special case of the theory.The resource-based view development has experienced several stages.When The resource-based view appeared in 1984, it was ignored. In 1984-1987 the paper had a grand total of three citations. Even Birger Wernerfelt did not cite it, although he did work which was based on it(Wernerfelt and Montgomery,1986).In 1984-1987 the paper had a grand total of three citations.Only sometime in 1988-1989 did the paper start to have an impact on the academic side of the field.This happened after a couple of other papers had clarified the nature of the 'markets' for resources (Barney,1986a;Dierickx and Cool,1989;Wernerfelt,1989).In 1991-1999,contributors to theissue were asked to revisit their earlier articles and consider developments over the intervening decade in short commentary papers. All but one of the original authors was able to provide such an analysis. Second, new full-length papers analyzing the impact of the RBV on specific subject areas were solicited. Survey papers were written (Connor,1991; Mahoney and Pandian,1992), focused issues of The Journal of Manage-ment and the Strategic Management Journal were planned,and specialized conferences were arranged(Sanchez,Heene,and Thomas,1995). The selection of those source documents that make up the core of a theory or discipline is a critical stage in the process. Achieving this balance is not easywhen analyzing such adiverse field as the RBT(Foss,1998).Much of this literature focuses on the role of dynamic capabilities,that is,specific processes firms use to alter their resource base, as sources of competitive advantage (Eisenhardt&Martin,2000). Like Fiol(2001), much of this literature concludes that competitive advantages can exist in dynamic markets only because of the ability of firms to continuously change,and that sustained competitive advantages are not possible in these markets.Some of this work seems to suggest that a“dynamic capabilities” perspective on competitive advantage contradicts the RBV.Revisiting their managerial rents model,Castanias and Helfat(2001)present an expanded,classification of managerial resources and explain how it relates to(1)other classifications of managerial abilities such as those dealing with leadership qualities or functional area experience and(2)the fundamental resource-based characteristics of scarcity,immobility, and inimitability.In 2003, Constance E.Helfat introduces the concept of the capability lifecycle(CLC), which articulates general patterns and paths in the evolution of organizational capabilities over time.The capability lifecycle provides a structure for a more comprehensive approach to dynamic resource-based theory.Jose Acedo analyzes the assumptions underlying the theory from an inductive perspective. Three main trends are shown to coexist within RBT: the resource-based view,the knowledge-based view,and the relational view. (2006)RBV has been applied to a wide range of phenomena, such as information systems(Wade&Hulland,2004), organizational networks(Lavie,2006). The theoretical and empirical development of the RBV has been analyzed in a number of review studies; recent are Acedo, Barroso, &Galan(2006), Armstrong&Shimizu(2007), Lockett, Thompson, &Morgenstern(2009) ,De-Jin &Dong-Won Sohn(2012).Yet the RBV has also been extensively criticized formany weaknesses. Its variables, boundaries,and applicability are not clearly specified.(Jeroen Kraaijenbrink,2009)Now we focused towards descriptive accounts of the development of the RBV or or have provided a summary of empirical approaches and evidence on the RBV. howthe core elements of the theory and its application have developed over time,to explain how we have arrived at the position we have today.The resource-based view(RBV)has become one of the most influential and cited theories in the history of management theorizing.It aspires to explain the internal sources of a firm's sustained competitive advantage(SCA).Its central proposition is that if a firm is to achieve a state of SCA,it must acquire and control valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable(VRIN) resources and capabilities,plus have the organization in place that can absorb and apply them. Given its elegant simplicity and its immediate face validity,the RBV’s core message is appealing,easily grasped and easily taught.。
customized preference
customized preference"Customized preference" refers to an individual's specific and personalized choices, tendencies, or inclinations. It emphasizes the uniqueness and distinctiveness of each person's preferences. Customized preferences are based on an individual's unique combination of factors such as personality, interests, values, experiences, and cultural background.One of the key aspects of customized preferences is the ability to tailor and personalize products, services, or experiences to meet an individual's specific needs and desires. In a customization-driven market, businesses strive to offer personalized solutions that cater to the unique preferences of their customers. This could involve customizing products according to size, color, design, or other specifications, as well as tailoring services to align with an individual's preferences in terms of communication channels, scheduling, and interaction styles.Customized preferences also extend to the realm of digital experiences. For example, websites and applications often utilize personalized recommendations, customized dashboards, and user-configurable settings to enhance the user experience based on their preferences. This level of personalization aims to increase user satisfaction, engagement, and loyalty by providing a more tailored and relevant experience.Furthermore, customized preferences reflect the growing trend towards individualization and the desire for uniqueness. People seek products, services, and experiences that align with their distinct personality, style, and interests. Customization allows individuals to express their individuality and stand out from the crowd.In summary, customized preferences emphasize the importance of personalized choices, tailored experiences, and individualized solutions. They reflect the diverse nature of human preferences and the increasing demand for products and services that cater to each person's unique needs and desires.。
in preference to造句
in preference to造句1、She was chosen in preference to her sister.2、Most Americans drink coffee in preference to tea.3、She choose to learn the violin in preference to the piano4、Pamela uses the True Moon Nodes in preference to the Mean Moon Nodes in her calculations.5、Promoting the use of aluminum containers in preference to others might actually conserve resources.6、Threads with higher priority are executed in preference to threads with lower priority.7、Rule of Economy:Programmer time is expensive; conserve it in preference to machine time.8、Application designers: create entertainment UIs that providea pleasant experience in preference to an efficient one.9、I would usually choose living in a small town in preference to living in a big city.10、You can also employ tables to add color to a page in preference to slow loading graphics.11、The inhabitants, apparently Neanderthals, selectively used pine for heating in preference to more available types of wood.12、You should certainly use these in preference to the more verbose traditional means of accomplishing the same thing.13、Every thread has a priority. Threads with higher priority are executed in preference to threads with lower priority.14、Its importance was bound to diminish in proportion as the artistic genius began to emphasize the subjective conception of the object in preference to the object itself.15、But the circumstance was sufficient to lead him to select Tess in preference to the other pretty milkmaids when he wished to contemplate contiguous womankind.16、Multiplication and division have higher precedence than addition. Their operands are bound to the operator in preference to the operands to addition.17、This is probably because a fetus starved of oxygen will send oxygenated blood to the brain in preference to rest of the body.18、Cached data should never be used in preference to authoritative data, so if caching would cause this to happen the data should not be cached.19、Even then, you should be mixing up your routines regularly, in preference to sticking to the one routine month after month.20、If it's a friend or a relative, always use hand-written letters in preference to typing because they're more personal and represent your sincerity.21、The net effect is that P2 priority threads run in preference to the P1 thread which is not what the specification requires.22、But plant species do move, as seeds that are spread tend to grow better in one place than another — in this case at higher elevations in preference to lower ones.23、Given that CRRT has now been in clinical use for three decades, it is fair to ask whether research-based evidence supports the use of this more complex and expensive technology in preference to IHD.24、It may be watched and guarded, so that the enemy shall not force his way again into the citadel, and might even in his subsequent assaults, select some other avenue, in preference to that where he had formerly succeeded.25、In general, NFS v4 should be used in preference to previous versions, since it is more efficient and generally handles the performance of large loads and busy network environments.26、Some music elements such as tempo and timbre, as well asthe personal variables such as gender, personality, and experience of musical education also play important roles in preference to music.。
性别偏好英语作文研究生
性别偏好英语作文研究生In recent years, gender preference has become a hot topic of discussion, especially when it comes to hiring practices in various industries. While some argue that gender preference should not play a role in employment decisions, others believe that it is essential to consider gender as a means of promoting diversity and equal opportunity. This essay will explore both perspectives and offer a balanced critique.To begin with, those who oppose gender preference argue that hiring decisions should be based solely on merit and qualifications. They contend that choosing one candidate over another based on gender is discriminatory and goes against the principles of equal opportunity. They believe that individuals should be evaluated on their skills, experience, and expertise rather than on their gender. Moreover, they argue that focusing on meritocracy will ultimately lead to better performance and results within an organization.On the other hand, proponents of gender preference argue that it is necessary to consider gender as a means of achieving diversity in the workplace. They believe that having a diverse workforce brings various viewpoints and experiences to the table, ultimately leading to innovative solutions and better decision-making. They argue that gender diversity promotes creativity and fosters a more inclusive and equitable work environment. Additionally, they contend that gender preference can help address historical and structural inequalities that have long disadvantaged certain groups. However, it is important to critically analyze both perspectives and find a balanced solution. Implementing gender preferenceindiscriminately can reinforce stereotypes and biases, such as the assumption that women are better suited for certain roles while men are better suited for others. This type of thinking perpetuates gender-based discrimination and limits opportunities for individuals to pursue their desired careers.Instead, it is crucial to focus on creating a fair and transparent hiring process that considers merit as well as the value of diversity. This can be achieved by implementing policies that promote equal opportunity, such as blind hiring or targeted outreach campaigns to underrepresented groups. By acknowledging the importance of merit while actively working towards promoting diversity, organizations can ensure a more inclusive and equitable workplace. In conclusion, the issue of gender preference in hiring is a complex one that requires thoughtful consideration. While some argue for pure meritocracy, others believe that gender preference can contribute to diversity and equality. Finding a balance between these perspectives is crucial to creating a fair and inclusive work environment. By focusing on merit and actively working towards promoting diversity, organizations can forge a path towards a more equitable future.。
1TheWeakAxiomofRevealedPreference1显示偏好弱公理
ECON3712003SUMMARY#5REVEALED PREFERENCE:AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACHTO CONSUMER DEMANDThe model we have studied uses the preference-based approach to choice be-haviour.It assumes that the consumer has preferences satisfying certain properties and that they choose what they prefer most.Preferences are, of course,something we cannot observe.So,we have begun by assuming something about things we cannot observe to ultimately make predictions about something we can observe–consumer demand behaviour.What would have happened if we started with something we can observe?(Choice-based approach.)So,let’s forget about preferences and focus directly on the behaviour of the consumer.Consider two consumption bundles,x and y.Suppose that both of these bundles are affordable at some prices and income level.If the consumer buys one bundle instead of the other,then the bundle bought (chosen)is considered to be revealed preferred(RP)to the other.The presumption is that by actually choosing one bundle over another,the con-sumer conveys important information about their tastes.1The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference It is desirable that the behaviour of the consumer is consistent in the sense that they would not choose a bundle A over a bundle B one time and then choose B over A at some other time.This can be achieved by making the following assumption about the consumer’s behaviour.ASSUMPTION1.1Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference(W ARP): A consumer’s behaviour satisfies WARP if whenever x0is revealed preferred to x1,x1is never revealed preferred to x0.Note that x0is revealed preferred to x1means that x0is chosen when both x0and x1are affordable.And for x1never to be revealed preferred to x0we must have x0not affordable whenever x1is chosen;that is,the cost of x0 must be more than the cost of x1at all prices x1is chosen.Suppose that x0 is revealed preferred to x1at prices p0,and that x is chosen at some other prices p1.Then WARP can formally be expressed as1:p0·x1≤p0·x0=⇒p1·x0>p1·x1(1) 1We adopted the notational convention that the consumption bundle chosen is the one whose superscript is the same as that on the price vector.1The weak axiom does not say that x1will never be chosen under any cir-cumstances.The bundle x1may very well be chosen at some price vector p1.What the weak axiom indicates is that if x1is chosen at some price p1, then x0will be more expensive than x1at prices p1.1.1The Implications of W ARPSuppose that a consumer’s behaviour satisfies WARP.Let x i(p,I)denote how much the consumer consumes of good i at prices p and income I.Strictly speaking,this is not a demand function because we have not mentioned utility or utility maximisation–it just denotes the quantity the consumer chooses facing prices p and income I.So,let’s call it a choice function.In addition to WARP,let’s assume that all income is spent.The implications of these two apparently mild requirements on the consumer’s choice behaviour are rather remarkable.Thefirst implication of these two assumptions is that the choice function x i(p,I)must be homogeneous of degree zero in prices and income for any good i.To see this,suppose that bundle x0is chosen when prices are p0 and income is I0,and that bundle x is chosen when prices are p =t p0and income is I =tI0for any t>0.Because I =tI0,when all income is spent, we must have p ·x =I =tI0=t p0·x0.First,substitute t p0for p in this and divide by t to obtainp0·x =p0·x0.Then substitute p for t p0in the same equation to obtainp ·x =p ·x0.If x0and x are distinct bundles for which thefirst equation holds,then WARP implies that the left-hand side in the second equation must be strictly less than the right-hand side–a contradiction.Thus,these two bundles cannot be distinct,and the consumer’s choice function therefore must be homoge-neous of degree zero in prices and income.2Another and a more important implication of WARP is that the substi-tution effects of own price changes cannot be positive.This can easily be observed by drawing a simple diagram for the case of two goods.It is,in 2Intuitively,what has been shown here is based on the fact that when all prices and income are multiplied by the same constant the budget set remains the same.If x0is the bundle chosen at the initial prices,it is revealed preferred to any other bundle affordable at those prices.When the budget set remains the same,then all the bundles affordable before are still affordable.Therefore,choosing a different bundle at the new prices would violate the weak axiom of revealed preference.2fact,possible to show that the substitution matrix in the general case of n commodities is negative semidefinite.3Furthermore,it can be shown that the substitution matrix also satisfies the property that Sp=0.Thus,we get just about every implication we would get from the preference-based approach to demand behaviour.The only thing we do not have is the symmetry of the substitution matrix.2W ARP and Preference MaximisationIt is very important to point out that if demand behaviour is generated by maximising preferences then it must satisfy WARP.To see this,suppose a preference-maximising consumer has monotone and strictly convex prefer-ences.Then we know that there will be a unique bundle demanded at every set of prices,and that bundle will always exhaust the consumer’s income.So let x0maximise utility facing prices p0,and let x maximise utility facing p ,and suppose p0·x ≤p0·x0.Because x ,though affordable,is not cho-sen,it must be because U(x0)>U(x ).Therefore,when x is chosen facing prices p ,it must be that x0is not available or that p ·x0>p ·x .Thus, p0·x ≤p0·x0implies p ·x0>p ·x ,so WARP is satisfied.This gives us a way testing preference-maximising behaviour.If the ob-served choices of a consumer violate WARP,then we know that that consumer cannot possibly be a preference-maximising consumer.But what about the other way around?What if a consumer’s choices satisfy WARP?Must that behaviour been generated by utility maximisation? If the answer is yes,we say that there exists a utility function that rationalises the observed behaviour.The answer to this question is yes if there are only two goods.If,however, there are more than two goods,the answer is no.To see this,suppose that x is chosen when x and y are affordable,y is chosen from y and z,and z is chosen from x and z.This behaviour is consistent with WARP(since y or z is never revealed preferred x).However,this behaviour cannot be the result of preference maximising.If the consumer is a preference maximiser,then x is preferred to y and y is preferred to z,which would imply,by transitivity of preferences,that x is preferred to z,contradicting the third observation.3See,for example,pages88-89in Jehle and Reny(2001)or pages28-36in Mas-Colell et.all.Note that the compensated demand here is based on Slutsky compensation where the consumer is compensated to make the initial bundle affordable rather than to keep the consumer on the same indifference curve.However,when speaking in terms of derivatives of compensated demand functions,these two different kinds of compensated demand func-tions will have the same derivatives.The distinction between the kinds of compensated demand functions can be ignored for small enough changes.3So,satisfaction of the weak axiom of revealed preference is not sufficient for that behaviour to have been generated by maximising preferences.How-ever,WARP can be strengthen to obtain a theory of revealed preference that is equivalent to the theory of preference maximisation.We say that x is in-directly revealed preferred to z if x is revealed preferred to y and y is revealed preferred to z.The following is a stronger version of WARP and is called the strong axiom of revealed preference(SARP):ASSUMPTION2.1Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference(W ARP): A consumer’s behaviour satisfies SARP if,for every sequence of distinct bun-dles x0,x1,...,x k,where x0is revealed preferred to x1,and x1is revealed preferred to x2,...,and x k−1is revealed preferred to x k,it is not the case that x k is revealed preferred to x0.In short,SARP holds if whenever x is directly or indirectly revealed preferred to y,y is never revealed preferred to x.It has been shown that SARP implies the existence of a rationalising util-ity function.It is also true that utility maximisation implies SARP.We can, therefore,state that choice behaviour can be rationalised by a utility func-tion if and only if that behaviour is consistent with SARP.Thus,a theory of demand built only on SARP,a restriction on observable choice,is essentially equivalent to the theory of demand built on preference maximisation.Under both SARP and the utility maximisation hypothesis,consumer demand will be homogeneous and the substitution matrix will be negative semidefinite and symmetric.4。
eb1a 标准
EB1A标准指的是杰出人才移民(Employment-Based Immigration: First Preference EB-1A)的申请标准,适用于在商业、科学、艺术、教育或体育领域中具有杰出才能和贡献的申请人。
以下是EB1A标准的详细说明:
1.申请人需要在上述领域内具有卓越的专业技能,并且在其领域内属于优秀人才。
2.申请人需要在获得永久性工作的过程中展现出极高的能力,例如获得国家级或国际认可的奖励或奖章,或者在同行评审的刊物上发表过文章。
3.申请人需要对其所在领域做出重要的原创性贡献,例如在科学、艺术、教育、商业或体育领域内获得专利或其他知识产权。
4.申请人需要在其领域内获得广泛的认可,例如被邀请审阅他人的作品或文章,或者在重要的新闻媒体上被专门评论报道。
5.申请人需要证明其有能力在其领域内继续做出贡献,例如拥有高于平均水平的薪酬或其他经济利益。
需要注意的是,EB1A标准的满足并不容易,需要申请人具有极高的专业能力和杰出贡献。
此外,还需要注意申请材料的质量和完整性,确保能够提供充分的证据来支持申请人的申请。
dtopsis法
dtopsis法D-TOPSIS(Distance-based Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)是一种常用的多属性决策方法,用于评估和排序多个候选方案或对象。
它基于属性间的距离分析,将每个方案与理想解进行比较,并计算出每个方案的相对优劣程度,最终得出一个综合排序。
在D-TOPSIS中,首先需要确定一个评价指标矩阵,其中每行代表一个方案或对象,每列代表一个评价指标。
这些评价指标可以是定性的,也可以是定量的,可以是利益指标,也可以是成本指标。
接下来,需要将评价指标进行标准化处理,以确保各个指标之间具有可比性。
在D-TOPSIS中,有两个关键的概念:理想解和负理想解。
理想解是指在所有评价指标上取得最大值的解,而负理想解则是指在所有评价指标上取得最小值的解。
通过计算每个方案与理想解之间的距离,可以评估每个方案在不同指标上的相对优劣程度。
在计算距离之前,需要确定方案与理想解之间的权重。
权重可以根据实际情况和决策者的偏好来确定,可以是均匀分配的,也可以是根据主观判断来确定的。
然后,可以使用欧氏距离或曼哈顿距离等方法来计算方案与理想解之间的距离。
计算得到每个方案与理想解之间的距离后,可以通过计算得到每个方案的相对接近度。
相对接近度越大,表示方案越接近理想解,从而具有较高的排名。
根据相对接近度对方案进行排序,可以得到一个综合的排名结果。
D-TOPSIS方法的优点是能够考虑多个评价指标之间的相互关系,不仅可以得出每个方案的相对优劣程度,还可以提供一个综合的排名结果。
它还可以通过调整权重来灵活地适应不同的决策环境和决策者的偏好。
此外,D-TOPSIS方法也具有较好的执行性能和计算效率。
然而,D-TOPSIS方法也存在一些局限性。
首先,它假设评价指标之间的距离具有线性关系,对非线性关系的处理能力有限。
其次,在计算距离时,需要对每个评价指标进行标准化处理,对于某些评价指标可能存在量纲不一致的问题。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
x2=c2: n1 > c1 x2=n2: n1 > c1 X1=c1: n2 > c2 X1=n1: n2 > c2
x2 depends on x1
Reduced CP-nets
If y is a parent of x, but the preference over the domain of x does not depend on y, then we can remove y from the parents of x eliminate rows From a CP net N to its reduced version r(N)
C2 C1 N1 3, 3 4, 0
N2 0, 4 1, 1
(N1,N2): unique Nash equilibrium All other joint strategies are Pareto efficient (PE)
Dominance between strategies
A strategy si is never a best response for i if it is not a best response to any joint strategy s-i In the example: for each player i, Ci is never a best response
In the example, one Nash equilibria (NE): (N1,N2)
Pareto efficient joint strategies
No other joint strategy is better or equal for all agents, and better for at least one Example:
Also: for all i, for all s’i in Si, si ≥i s’i No player has regrets on the strategy he chose But there could be better joint strategies if more than one player changed its strategy
From game G to n(G) From n(G) to r(n(G)) Hard constraints for r(n(G)) Optimals of r(n(G)) = Nash equilibria of G
G n n(G) r Nash equilibria of G = optimals of r(n(G)) r(n(G))
Main course
Fish, red, peaches
Fish, white, berries
Wine
Fish, red, berries
white > red
red > white
Wine
meat, red, peaches
peaches > strawberries
Fruit
meat, white, peaches
N2
3, 3 0, 4 4, 0 1, 1
Pure Nash equilibria
C1 N1
C2 3, 3
4, 0
N2 0, 4
1, 1
A strategy si is a best response for i to s-i if si ≥i s’i for all s’i in Si A joint strategy s is a pure Nash equilibrium if each si is a best response to s-i
Two features: x1, x2 D(x1)={c1, n1} D(x2)={c2, n2} x1 and x2 independent For x1: n1 > c1 For x2: n2 > c2
x2 depends on x1
CP-net techniques in games
Hard constraints: fish, peaches, fish white, meat red Meat is nbr for main course Strawberries is nbr for fruit Once meat is eliminated, red is nbr for wine Nash equilibrium: fish, white, peaches
C2
C1 3, 3
N2
0, 4
N1
4, 0
1, 1
Elimination of dominated strategies
G NBR G’
G’ subgame of G For all i, each si in Si-S’i is never a best response for i in G
Example: reduced CP-net
Two features: x1, x2 D(x1)={c1, n1} D(x2)={c2, n2} x1 depends on x2
x2=c2: n1 > c1 x2=n2: n1 > c1 X1=c1: n2 > c2 X1=n1: n2 > c2
For the game:
From games to CP-nets
Given a game G, we build a CP-net n(G):
Feature xi: player i Domain of xi: strategies for player i Parents of xi: all the other features CP table of xi: s-i: si > s’i if si >i s’i given s-i
Main course fish meat
Wine
white > red
red > white
Wine
peaches > strawberries
Fruit
Example: optimals and Nash equilibria
Unique optimal for CP-net: (fish, white, peaches)
Outline
1. 2.
3.
Strategic games Relation between CP nets and games Relation between soft constraints and games
Parametrized Strategic games
A set of players 1,.., n For each player i:
Eliminate from the strategies of each players those that are never a best response
Nash equilibria and strategy elimination
If G NBR G’, then s Nash equilibrium of G iff Nash equilibrium of G’ In the example: Ci is nbr, thus G’ has one row and one column, which is the unique Nash equilibrium 1,1
Given s-i, s’i >i si iff s-i|par(xi) : s’i >i si in the cp table for variable i
Thm: opt(N) = NE(g(N))
Example – CP net
Fish, white, peaches
fish>meat
Main course fish meat
Optimality in strategic games, CP nets and soft constraints
Main aim
To compare the notion of optimality used in many formalisms To throw the basis for exploiting results in one field and reuse them in the other field Strategic games Agent interaction while pursuing their own interest (payoff function) CP nets Agent’s qualitative and conditional preferences Soft constraints Agent’s quantitative preferences
meat, red, berries
meat, white, berries
CP net Param. Strategic Game
fish>meat Main course
Three players: 1 = main course, 2 = wine, 3 = fruit Two strategies for each player: S1= {meat, fish} S2={red, white} S3={peaches, strawberries} Payoff functions For 1 main course: fish > meat, always For 2 wine: fish, -- white > red meat, -- red > white For 3 fruit: peaches > strawberries, always