ANIMAL RIGHT
动物权利全球宣言
动物权利全球宣言UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF ANIMAL RIGHTS 导言Preamble我们认为：生命是统一的，所有的生命都有一个共同的起源，只是在各个物种的演变过程中出现了差异；Considering that Life is one, all living beings having a common origin and having diversified in the course of the evolution of the species;所有的生命都拥有天赋的权利，而任何有神经系统的动物都各有其权利；Considering that all living beings possess natural rights, and that any animal with a nervous system has specific rights;对这些天赋权利的轻视，甚至是简单的无知都会给大自然造成严重的破坏，导致人类对动物犯下罪行；Considering that the contempt for, and even the simple ignorance of these natural rights cause serious damage to nature and lead man to commit crimes against animals;物种共存意味着人类对其他动物物种的生存权力的认知；Considering that the coexistence of species implies a recognition by the human species of the right of other animal species to live;人与人之间的尊重与人对动物的尊重是不可分割的。
Considering that the respect of humans for animals is inseparable from the respect of man for another man.在此，我们宣告：IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED:第一条所有动物都生来平等，同样享有生存的权利。
动物权利英语作文
动物权利英语作文With the tremendous development of modern society andscience,experimentations become an essential impetus to the scientific advancement. Accordingly, the using of animals in experimentations is raising peoples attention for the number of it has exceeded 8 millions according to figures ,what a huge amount !Which means 8 millions lives disappeared by force. Some people persevere this standpoint that human being is the domination of the world ,who has the domination patent of using animals to the experimentations for the purpose of progress of science.As well as the sacrifice of animals is prerequisite to some extent .Not only agriculture、industry、medical science、hereditism 、militarybut necessities of our daily life ,the using of animals in experimentations plays an significant role to these researches ,The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences data shows that three fourths research achievements depends on the experiment animals every year . However, the others take prohibiting using animals in experimentations forgranted ,especially zoophilists .From a modern perspective,1they understand that equal rights take precedence over scientific interest. Science improvements should not at the expense of animals .How can the animals rights be neglected as the human rights has been upraised toa high position which touch off so many watchful eyes that every country has to do something for their management and legislation. If evolution is survival of the fittest, why should we give them a peaceful and safe environment not force them in death for experimentations butlet them go? My friend, a student in college of medicine posted a card in Internet says that when the using of animals inexperimentations can over, seeing these innocent animals lost their life for a reason to research is so cruel .We can never taste thepainful feeling of experimentalanimals .injection narcosis surgery seaming even struggling against death.Every step they taking stands drastic sufferings .how dear can we leave them in this situation ? It is a vivid life ,not a thing but our company in this world ,who own a longer living history than we human being .All in all， every thing has two sides ,what we should attach importance to is judging and weighing which side is2more meaningful and worthy. If you ask me ,i will provide you a viewpoint that the using animals in experimentations is so ruthless and brutal that should be forbided as soon as possible . Of course the science moving step is necessary for us ,however,which can not be a powerful reason that we can ending a life without permit . And we can use dead humanscell or organs to the experimentations instead of vivid animals ,As the technology of science high developed ,we has no hinder that we can create a now tool or something kinds like appliances can be used in experimentations .Remember we are a member of living lives ,we are equal ,please do not deprive the rights of animals ,just give them a space to be alife.篇二:英语辩论关键句动物权利英语辩论 (动物权利)人类不应该拿动物做实验Humans should not take the animal experiment1.动物权利说1 animal rights动物也有权利Animal also have the right to人类也是动物，如果人有基本的公民权利，动物也应该有。
动物权animals and their rights
Animal rightsThere is much disagreement as to whether non-human animals have rights, and what is meant by animal rights.There is much less disagreement about the consequences of accepting that animals have rights.The consequences of animal rightsAnimal rights teach us that certain things are wrong as a matter of principle, that there are some things that it is morally wrong to do to animals.Human beings must not do those things, no matter what the cost to humanity of not doing them.Human beings must not do those things, even if they do them in a humane way.For example: if animals have a right not to be bred and killed for food then animals must not be bred and killed for food.It makes no difference if the animals are given 5-star treatment throughout their lives and then killed humanely without any fear or pain - it's just plain wrong in principle, and nothing can make it right.Accepting the doctrine of animal rights means:•No experiments on animals•No breeding and killing animals for food or clothes or medicine•No use of animals for hard labour•No selective breeding for any reason other than the benefit of the animal•No hunting•No zoos or use of animals in entertainmentTop The case for animal rightsPhilosophers have usually avoided arguing that all non-human animals have rights because:•the consequences are so limiting for humanity•it would give rights to creatures that are so simple that the idea of them having rights seems to defy common senseThe second problem is dealt with by not arguing that all animals have rights, but only that 'higher' animals have rights.One leading author restricts right to mentally normal mammals at least one year old (called 'adult mammals' from now on).The case for animal rightsThe case for animal rights is usually derived from the case for human rights.The argument (grossly oversimplified) goes like this:•Human animals have rights•There is no morally relevant difference between human animals and adult mammals•Therefore adult mammals must have rights tooHuman beings and adult mammals have rights because they are both'subjects-of-a-life'.This means that:•They have similar levels of biological complexity•They are conscious and aware that they exist•They know what is happening to them•They prefer some things and dislike others•They make conscious choices•They live in such a way as to give themselves the best quality of life•They plan their lives to some extent•The quality and length of their life matters to themIf a being is the subject-of-a-life then it can be said to have 'inherent value'.All beings with inherent value are equally valuable and entitled to the same rights.Their inherent value doesn't depend on how useful they are to the world, and it doesn't diminish if they are a burden to others.Thus adult mammals have rights in just the same way, for the same reasons, and to the same extent that human beings have rights.TopThe case against animal rightsA number of arguments are put forward against the idea that animals have rights.•Animals don't think•Animals are not really conscious•Animals were put on earth to serve human beings•Animals don't have souls•Animals don't behave morally•Animals are not members of the 'moral community'•Animals lack the capacity for free moral judgment•Animals don't thinkSt Thomas Aquinas taught that animals acted purely on instinct while human beings engaged in rational thought.This distinction provided the frontier between human beings and animals, and was regarded as a suitable criterion for assessing a being's moral status.Animals are not really consciousThe French philosopher Rene Descartes, and many others, taught that animals were no more than complicated biological robots.This meant that animals were not the sort of thing that was entitled to have any rights - or indeed any moral consideration at all.Animals were put on earth to serve human beingsThis view comes originally from the Bible, but probably reflects a basic human attitude towards other species.Christian theologians developed this idea - St Augustine taught that "by a most just ordinance of the Creator, both their [animals'] life and their death are subject to our use."St Thomas Aquinas taught that the universe was constructed as a hierarchy in which beings at a lower level were there to serve those above them.As human beings were above animals in this hierarchy they were entitled to use animals in any way they wanted.However, as C.S. Lewis pointed out:Animals don't have soulsChristian theologians used to teach that only beings with souls deserved ethical consideration.Animals did not have souls and therefore did not have any moral rights.This argument is no longer regarded as useful, because the idea of the soul is very controversial and unclear, even among religious people. Furthermore it is not possible to establish the existence of the soul (human or animal) in a valid experimental way.This also makes it difficult to argue, as some theologians have done, that animals should have rights because they do have souls.Top Animals aren't 'moral'Some of the arguments against animal rights centre on whether animals behave morally.Rights are unique to human beings•rights only have meaning within a moral community•only human beings live in a moral community•adult mammals don't understand or practice living according to a moral code•the differences in the way human beings and adult mammals experience the world are morally relevant•therefore rights is a uniquely human concept and only applies to human beings Animals don't behave morallySome argue that since animals don't behave in a moral way they don't deserve moral treatment from other beings.Animals, it's argued, usually behave selfishly, and look after their own interests, while human beings will often help other people, even if doing so is to their own disadvantage.Not all scientists agree: Jane Goodall, an expert on chimpanzees has reported that they sometimes show truly altruistic behaviour.Animals don't have rights against other animalsAnother reason for thinking that animals don't behave morally is that even the most enthusiastic supporters of animal rights only argue that animals have rights against human beings, not against other animals.For example, as Mary Warnock put it:Why this might be relevant to the question of whether animals should have rights becomes clearer if you rephrase it in terms of duties or obligations instead of rights and ask - why should human beings have obligations towards animals, if animals don't have obligations to other animals or to human beings?Top Moral communityThis argument states that animals are not members of the 'moral community'.• A moral community is• a group of beings who live in relationship with each other and use and understand moral concepts and rules•the members of this community can respect each other as moral persons •the members of this community respect each other's autonomy•human beings do display these characteristics and are therefore members of the 'moral community'•animals do not display these characteristics and are therefore not members of the 'moral community'•most people would agree with this: after all we don't regard a dog as having done something morally wrong when it bites someone - if the dog is put to death because of the bite, that is to protect people, not to punish the dog•only members of a 'moral community' can have rights, therefore animals don't have rights•members of the 'moral community' are more 'valuable' than beings that are not members of the moral community•it is not wrong for valuable beings to 'use' less valuable beings•therefore it is not wrong for human beings to use animalsAnimals lack the capacity for free moral judgements•If an individual lacks the capacity for free moral judgment, then they do not have moral rights.•All non-human animals lack the capacity for free moral judgment.•Therefore, non-human animals do not have moral rights.Top Fundamental rightsAnimal and human rights boil down to one fundamental right: the right to be treated with respect as an individual with inherent value.Philosophers have a traditional way of expressing this:From this fundamental right come other rights.Particular species only get relevant and useful rights - so animals don't get all the rights that human beings get. For example: animals don't want or get the right to vote.When rights conflictSometimes a particular situation results in a conflict of rights.Two methods can be used to determine the best course of action when there is no alternative to violating the rights of some individual or group:•The Miniride Principle: Where similar harms are involved, override the fewest individuals' rights.•The Worse-off Principle: Where dissimilar harms are involved, avoid harming the worse-off individual.Harm is defined as the reduction of the capacity to have and fulfil desires.This definition of harm benefits people over animals because human beings have far more desires that they want to satisfy than do non-human animals.This resolves many of the traditional problems of humans versus animals in favour of humanity, because the human being under consideration would suffer far more harm than the non-human animal.But be careful: this method of choosing alternative courses of action is not utilitarian, it doesn't necessarily lead to choosing the course of action that produces the greatest overall happiness.Top The problem of 'marginal people'The phrase 'marginal people' or 'marginal human beings' is unpleasant. We use it here only because if you read the literature of animal rights you will encounter it often, and it's important to know what it means. We do not intend to denigrate the status or worth of any human being by using it here...The problem with the line of thought in the section above that it takes rights away from many human beings as well as from non-human animals.This is because some human beings (babies, senile people, people with some severe mental defects and people in a coma) don't have the capacity for free moral judgement either, and by this argument they wouldn't have any rights.Some philosophers are prepared to argue that in fact such 'marginal human beings' don't have rights, but most people find that conclusion repellent.The argument can be rescued by rewriting it like this:•If an individual is a member of a species that lacks the capacity for free moral judgment, then he or she does not have moral rights.•All non-human animal species lack the capacity for free moral judgment.•Therefore, non-human animals do not have moral rights.But this is not an argument; it's a statement that human beings have rights andnon-human animals don't, which is pure speciesism, and hardly persuasive.It's also vulnerable to the (probably unlikely) arrival of a species of extra-terrestrial creatures who demonstrate the capacity for free moral judgement.。
小学英语过关词汇表
小学英语过关词汇表Aa一（个，件····）afternoon 下午，午后are是arm胳膊，手臂again又；再A.M.（a.m.）早上;上午America美国and和;并且animal动物ant蚂蚁apple苹果at在......all right 好吧，好的aunt 姑姑，婶婶，姨妈a pair of一双art room绘画教室assistant售货员accountant会计actor男演员actress女演员after school放学以后artist画家Australia澳大利亚a little有些angry生气的，愤怒的another另一个active 积极的，活跃的air空气air-conditioner空调any任何；所有的at home在家里able能about关于；大约always总是answer the phone接电话April (缩写Apr)四月August（缩写Aug）八月B bag书包ball球balloon气球bear熊bird 鸟birthday生日black黑色的blue蓝色的boat小船body身体book书bread面包brown棕色的，褐色的bye（口语）再见back回来banana香蕉beautiful美丽的big大的bike自行车box盒子boy男孩brother兄弟bus公共汽车baby婴儿baseball player 棒球运动员bathroom卫生间bed床bedroom 卧室beef牛肉board写字板boots靴子breakfast早餐but但是bank 银行become变成bookstore书店busy忙碌的buy购买by经;乘behind在……后边bridge桥building建筑物because因为best最；极Ccake蛋糕can能；可以car小汽车cat猫chicken鸡肉coffee咖啡Coke可乐crayon蜡笔Canada (CAN) 加拿大certainly当然;可以chair椅子children儿童class同学们;班级come in进来come on鼓励用语cute逗人喜爱的Chinese 中国的;中文；汉语Chinese book中国书chopstick(s)筷子classmate 同学classroom 教室clean 打扫，清洁，檫干净colour颜色come 来computer电脑computer game电脑游戏can 能canteen食堂carrot胡萝卜cheap便宜的Chinese语文close关；关上cloudy多云的cold寒冷的colourful色彩丰富的computer room计算机教室cool顶好的；酷的；凉爽的cow奶牛cucumber黄瓜cinema电影院cleaner清洁工cloud云;云彩collect stamps集邮come from来自…;从…来come out露出;出现comic book漫画书company公司country 国家climb(过去式climbed)爬cm(centimeter)厘米cook(过去式cooked)做饭cousin堂(表)姐妹，兄妹cabbage洋白菜；卷心菜city城市clean the bathroom打扫卧室closet壁橱；衣橱clothes衣服cook the meals做饭curtain窗帘catch butterflies 捉蝴蝶chart图表Children’s Center儿童活动中心clean the room打扫房间climb mountains爬山climber攀登者collect leaves收集树叶cook dinner做饭count insects数昆虫Ddog狗doll玩具娃娃duck 鸭dad爸爸(口语)deer鹿desk课桌don’t = do not 不是;不要draw画画desk 课桌，书桌dinner晚餐，正餐doctor 医生door门driver司机donkey驴子dress连衣裙Dance(过去式danced)跳舞deep深的drink饮料day天；日子do homework 做作业do housework 做家务do the dishes 洗碗碟date日期December(缩写Dec)十二月do an experiment 做实验do morning exercise 晨练draw pictures画画drink water喝水Eear耳朵eat吃eight八elephant大象eraser橡皮eye眼睛egg蛋eighteen十八eleven十一excuse me对不起English book英语书English英语English class英语课expensive昂贵的east东easy简单的else其他;另外engineer工程师England英国enjoy从……获得乐趣every 每个;所有的excited兴奋的;激动的each各自，每个even甚至eggplant茄子empty the trash倒垃圾end table 床头柜eat breakfast 吃早饭eat dinner吃晚饭e-card 电子卡片eighth 第八either也evening夜晚;晚上everyone每个人Fface脸fine好的finger手指five五foot脚for为；给four四French fries炸薯条feed喂养fifteen十五fly放(风筝)fourteen十四fox狐狸from从;从……..起fruit水果funny滑稽可笑的fan扇子，电扇farmer农民fat胖的fifty五十floor地板food食物fork叉子forty四十forty-one四十一fridge冰箱farm农场first第一football足球fresh新鲜的factory工厂fall落下;跌落;降落;掉下far远feel感觉到;感受到fifth第五find寻找;找到fruit stand水果摊fun快乐;乐趣fail不及格；失败feet脚（复数）flu流感fly(过去式flew)飞funnier更滑稽的）favourite 最喜爱的flat 公寓flower花forest森林Friday星期五from从；来自fall秋天February(缩写Feb.)二月fight 打架first 第一fly kites 放风筝fourth 第四Ggift礼物good 好的goodbye 再见great很好的green 绿色的game 游戏giraffe 长颈鹿girl女孩good afternoon 下午好goodbye 再见good morning 早上好goose 鹅grandfather (外)祖父grandma (口语)(外)祖母grandmother (外)祖母grandpa (口语)(外)祖父grape 葡萄guess 猜测Gee用以表示惊讶、赞赏等good idea好主意good job干得好get up起床go home回家go to bed上床睡觉go to school上学go to playground去操场goat山羊green绿色的gym体育馆garden花园get 得到get off 下车get to到达go to school 上学go to the cinema 去看电影game比赛get(过去式got)到达go(过去式went)去go fishing去钓鱼go hiking去郊游go ice-skating去滑冰go swimming去游泳goal(球赛等)得分good好的guess猜测grape葡萄grass 草green beans青豆get up 起床go hiking 去远足go shopping 购物;买东西grandpa 爷爷;外公Hhamburger 汉堡包hand 手happy 快乐的，幸福的have 有head 头hello 喂hi 喂hot dog 热狗how old 几岁has 有here you are 给你hmm 嗯(语气词)how 多么;怎么样how many 多少have/has 有，吃have a look 看一看he他heavy沉重的her她的here 这里here you are 给你hey嘿his 他的home家hungry 饥饿的have to必须；不得不hello喂；你好（打电话用语）help帮助hen母鸡horse马hot炎热的how much多少钱hundred百hurry抓紧；赶快hardly几乎没有;几乎不high高的hobby爱好HongKong香港hospital 医院however 但是happy高兴的have a cold感冒；伤风have a fever发烧have a headache头疼have a sore throat喉咙疼have a toothache牙疼hear听见，听到heavier更重的hurt疼痛have a try 试一试healthy 健康的；helpful 有帮助的；有用的holiday 假期house 房子；住宅Halloween 万圣节前夕have a look 看一看have a picnic 举行野餐have English class上英语课him 他（宾格）honey蜂蜜II我I’m = I am我是is 是it 它I’d like=I would likein在……里面ice冰ice-cream 冰激凌if 加入;如果into进入;到里面I’d like=I would like 我想要I’d like to= I would like to ill 有病的in front of 在……前面interesting 有趣的Jjuice 果汁jeep吉普车jump 跳jacket夹克衫jeans牛仔裤just a minute再多一会儿just do it 就这么干吧January （缩写Jan.）一月July七月June 六月Kkite 风筝key钥匙kitchen 厨房knife 刀kangaroo 袋鼠kid小孩；孩子Kg(kilogram)千克，公斤kick踢killier whale虎鲸know知道kind 和蔼的；亲切的know 知道Lleg 腿let’s= let us让我们like 喜欢look at 看；瞧lamp 台灯lion 狮子lock 锁long 长的look at 看;瞧look out 当心;留神lovely可爱的light灯，管灯living room 起居室long hair长头发look 看上去，看，瞧瞧lamb小羊；羔羊library图书馆lunch午饭left 左边little小的live居住;住look for寻找last上一个；留在最后的laugh at因……而发笑learn(过去式learned)学习leave(过去式left)离开lobster龙虾longer 更长的lady女士；小姐；夫人lake 湖泊look at 看一看love 爱；热爱leaf（复数leaves叶子listen to music 听音乐Mmay 可以；可能me我（宾格）meet 见面milk牛奶monkey猴子morning早晨；早上mouse 老鼠mouth 嘴man 男人meet 遇见;碰见Miss 小姐mom 妈妈(口语)more 更多的mother 母亲;妈妈Mr.先生many许多math book数学书member 成员music 音乐math数学matter事情；麻烦music音乐music class音乐课music room音乐教室magazine 杂志make kites 制作风筝make sure 核实或查明。
动物权利运动 Animal rights movement(英文)
What really is an animal rights movement?Animal rights movement, also called animal liberation movement is a social movement, seeking an end to animals being treated as human beings’ possessions and their use in the research, food, clothing, and entertainment industries. Its purpose not only advocates that animals have rights to be treated mercifully, but also advocates that animals should have certain basic right like human beings. Animals should not be treated as human property or tools, both at the legal level or spiritual level.In some countries, legislation has been enacted to protect animal rights. In 1992, Switzerland legally confirmed that animals were "beings" rather than "items". In 2002, Germany incorporated animal protection provisions into the constitution. Animal rights movement has started placing its influences on political decision making in some countries. The trend continues to increase.Critics argue that, since animals make no moral judgments of social contracts, they cannot be responsible for the rights of others or even have no concept of rights at all, therefore cannot be considered having a spirit. Only human beings have the sense of responsibility, so only they should have rights.Some animal rights advocates argue that, although fundamentally, there is nothing wrong with the use of animals for food, entertainment, or scientific research, people should legislate to protect animals from unnecessary suffering. This view is called animal welfare and is also the view of some veteran animal protection organizations. The liberationist views of animal rights believe animals should have a certain spiritual right. The basic rights of animals should be protected by laws. It is different from the view of animal welfare that just care about animals for not being abused and not trying to protect the animal's spiritual rights.Animal rights activists believe that animal experiments will make animal illness oreven death, and there are many kinds of alternatives. The animal experiments are only for human own interests at the expense of animal right to life.In animal rights movement, activists are often involved in boycotting these cruel treatments upon animal in farmland and slaughter house and live animal exports. Boycotting against companies which have been subjected to a number of animal experiments during product development is also common. They are strongly opposed to the apparent damage to animal rights, including fur trading, hunting, circus, equestrian competition, zoo and pet sale. More and more animal rights activists are engaged in direct fighting, such as rescuing animals from laboratories which occasionally raises violent clashes. There is also an increased "public rescue" behavior.In addition, Animal rightists are also committed to educating the public via various media. Many animal activists pursue vegetarianism and advocate eating less meat. They believe that since the general human beings have always considered themselves high creatures, then they should not make animal predation behavior. Humans are omnivorous and able to choose to eat vegetables.Critics argue that the concept of animal rights movement involves the moral judgment of philosophy, which is to turn mankind into a second-class citizen below the animal. Some critics even believe that animal rights movement is anti-human activities.。
动物与人类平等的英文单词
动物与人类平等的英文单词English:The concept of equality between animals and humans is often referred to as "animal rights". This approach emphasizes the idea that animals deserve the same consideration and respect as humans, and that they should not be exploited or oppressed for the benefit of humans. It advocates for the protection of animals from cruelty and mistreatment, and promotes the idea that they have their own inherent value and rights. This includes the right to live free from harm and suffering, and to not be used for entertainment, experimentation, or other human purposes without their consent. Animal rights also encompass the belief that animals should not be viewed as property, but rather as individual beings with their own interests and needs that should be taken into account in both legal and ethical frameworks.中文翻译:动物与人类平等的概念通常被称为“动物权利”。
介绍动物园里的动物和动物园的规则英语作文
介绍动物园里的动物和动物园的规则英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1Visiting a zoo is a fun and educational experience for people of all ages. Zoos provide an opportunity to see a wide variety of animals up close and learn about different species from around the world. In this essay, I will introduce some of the animals commonly found in zoos and discuss the rules and regulations that visitors must follow when visiting a zoo.One of the most popular attractions at any zoo is the big cats exhibit. Visitors can see majestic animals such as lions, tigers, and leopards in their natural habitat. These animals are known for their grace, power, and beauty, and watching them up close can be a thrilling experience. Visitors must always follow the guidelines set by the zoo staff when viewing these animals to ensure their safety and the safety of the animals.Another favorite exhibit at the zoo is the primates section. Here, visitors can see chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans in action. These fascinating creatures are closely related to humans and share many behaviors and characteristics with us. Visitorsare often amazed by their intelligence, agility, and social interactions. It is important to keep a safe distance from the primates and refrain from feeding them anything, as their diet is carefully monitored by the zoo staff.In addition to big cats and primates, zoos also feature a wide variety of birds, reptiles, and marine animals. Visitors can see colorful parrots, majestic eagles, slithering snakes, and playful dolphins, among other species. Each exhibit is designed to mimic the natural habitat of the animals and provide them with a comfortable and stimulating environment.When visiting a zoo, there are several rules and regulations that visitors must follow to ensure the safety and well-being of the animals. One of the most important rules is to never feed the animals anything unless specifically permitted by the zoo staff. Many animals have strict dietary requirements, and feeding them the wrong food can make them sick or even endanger their health.Visitors should also refrain from making loud noises or sudden movements that could startle the animals. Loud noises can cause stress and anxiety for the animals, leading to behavioral problems and health issues. It is important to respectthe animals' space and observe them from a safe distance at all times.Another important rule is to never litter or throw objects into the animal enclosures. Plastic bags, bottles, and other debris can be harmful to the animals if they ingest them. Visitors should always dispose of their trash in designated bins and keep the zoo clean and tidy.In conclusion, visiting a zoo is a wonderful way to learn about different species of animals and appreciate the diversity of life on Earth. By following the rules and regulations set by the zoo staff, visitors can ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for themselves and the animals. Zoos play a crucial role in conservation efforts and education, and by supporting them, we can help protect endangered species and preserve our planet's biodiversity.篇2A visit to the zoo is always a fun and educational experience for people of all ages. It is a chance to observe and learn about different types of animals from all around the world. In this essay, I will introduce some of the animals you can find in a typical zooas well as the rules and regulations that visitors must follow during their visit.First and foremost, let's talk about some of the animals that you can expect to see at the zoo. One of the most popular attractions at any zoo is the big cats, such as lions, tigers, and leopards. These majestic animals never fail to impress visitors with their grace and power. In addition to big cats, you can also see a wide variety of other mammals, including elephants, giraffes, and monkeys. For those who are interested in reptiles, there are often exhibits featuring snakes, lizards, and turtles. And let's not forget about the birds - zoos are home to all kinds of exotic and colorful species of birds from around the world.Now, let's talk about the rules and regulations that visitors must follow when visiting a zoo. The most important rule is to respect the animals and their habitats. This means not feeding the animals, trying to touch them, or making loud noises that could stress them out. It is also important to stay on designated paths and not climb or lean on any barriers or fences. These rules are in place to ensure the safety of both visitors and animals, so it is important to follow them at all times.In addition to these basic rules, many zoos also have specific guidelines for behavior when visiting certain exhibits. Forexample, you may be asked to be quiet or move slowly when visiting a nocturnal exhibit so as not to disturb the animals. Some exhibits may also have restrictions on photography or flash photography in order to prevent stress to the animals.Overall, a visit to the zoo can be a fun and enriching experience for people of all ages. By following the rules and regulations set by the zoo, visitors can ensure the safety and well-being of the animals while also having an enjoyable time exploring and learning about the natural world. So next time you plan a trip to the zoo, remember to respect the animals and follow the rules for a memorable and rewarding experience.篇3Zoo is a place where people can visit and observe various animals from all around the world. It is a popular destination for families, students, and animal lovers to learn about different species and conservation efforts. In this essay, we will introduce some of the animals commonly found in zoos and the rules visitors should follow while visiting.First of all, let's talk about the animals. Zoos usually have a diverse collection of animals, ranging from large mammals likeelephants and lions to tiny insects like beetles and butterflies. Some of the most popular animals in zoos include:1. Lions: Known as the "king of the jungle," lions are majestic creatures that draw crowds with their loud roars and regal appearance.2. Elephants: These gentle giants are loved for their intelligence, grace, and strong family bonds. Visitors often enjoy watching them play in the water or interact with their caretakers.3. Giraffes: With their long necks and beautiful spots, giraffes are a favorite among children and adults alike. Visitors can often feed them or watch them gracefully move around their enclosure.4. Penguins: These adorable birds are a must-see for visitors of all ages. Zoos often have special exhibits where guests can watch them swim and interact with each other.5. Tigers: With their striking orange and black stripes, tigers are both beautiful and fearsome. Visitors can observe them lounging in the sun, playing with enrichment toys, or stalking their prey.In addition to these animals, zoos also house a variety of birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Each species has its ownunique behaviors, habitat preferences, and conservation needs, making them fascinating subjects for study and observation.Now, let's discuss the rules visitors should follow while visiting the zoo. These rules are designed to ensure the safety and well-being of both the animals and the guests. Some common rules include:1. Do not feed the animals: While it may be tempting to offer treats to the animals, most zoos have strict guidelines against feeding them. Human food can be harmful to the animals' health and disrupt their natural diet.2. Do not tap on the glass: Many animals are housed in enclosures with glass walls or windows. Visitors should refrain from tapping on the glass or making loud noises, as this can stress out the animals and disturb other guests.3. Stay on designated paths: Zoos often have designated pathways for visitors to follow. These paths are designed to keep guests safe and prevent them from getting too close to the animals. Venturing off the paths can be dangerous and disruptive to the animals' routines.4. Respect the animals' space: While it's exciting to see animals up close, it's important to remember that they are wildcreatures. Visitors should maintain a safe distance from the animals and avoid reaching into their enclosures.5. Follow the zoo's guidelines: Each zoo has its own set of rules and regulations that visitors must follow. These guidelines may include restrictions on photography, prohibited items, or specific opening and closing times. It's important to familiarize yourself with these rules before your visit.By following these rules and guidelines, visitors can enjoy a safe and educational experience at the zoo. Whether you're there to admire the animals, learn about conservation efforts, or simply have a fun day out with your family, the zoo is a wonderful place to connect with nature and gain a greater appreciation for the world's diverse wildlife.。
Animals英语作文（精选22篇）
Animals英语作文（精选22篇）Animals英语作文（精选22篇）Animals英语作文篇1I like animals very much. I have a dog, It’s my favourite animal. It’s white, It looks like a snow ball. It has two big eyes and ears. But its nose and mouth are very small. It’s very naughty.It often stares at my food when I have a meal. When I’m home it follows me all the time.When I do my homework, it often sits beside quietly, but sometimes runs around me and shouts: wom wom.I like my dog very much.Animals英语作文篇2There are many animals in the zoo. The rabbits are lovely.They like jumping and runnimg.They like to eat turnip very much. The tigers are strong and brave .They are the king of the forest. There are a lot of birds in the zoo.They are pretty.They are singing very beautiful. The giraffes are very tall. Their necks are so long . The lions are valour. They have long hair. They like to eat meat. The monkeys are thin. They like climbing trees. They like to eat bananas and peaches very much. I like animals. I like to go to the zoo , too .Animals英语作文篇3My favorite animals is Monkeys.they are very cute and cleven.They like eating bananas very much.I often go to the zoo see monkeys.Today I go to the zoo.I take many bananas go to the zoo.I'm all here,many mankeys in trees.I give them some bananas.They are very happy.And I paly with them.It's six o'clock p.m.I have to go home.I say:"See you next time,I well be gohome.Goodbye!"Animals英语作文篇4Last week, I saw a very impressive documentary about panda.A professor studied panda in the early 1980s went to the wild life and kept trace of wild giant panda for many years. As a result, he found that it was human being that made these lovely animals die out. At that time, many people believed that giant panda became less because of the low rate of newborn babies. But it was not true. People cut trees for making profit at that time. Panda lose homeland and they lacked of food. Thanks to these valuable data, the government took the policy to protect the animals. So today, the number of giant panda is increasing. People realize the importance of protecting the environment and it is the best way to protect wild animals, they are the indispensable part of the nature.Animals英语作文篇5My favorite animals are are can swim very well.I think they look like a beautiful girl in a white have a pair of wings and they can also fly well.I believe they are angles from the bring us love and make us are always friendly to can＇t hurt them,because they are our friend.I love them!I like dogs, are not beautiful,but they are the best keep the thieves have the best listening and can hear in the nosiy,see in the we are in danger,they will help us at they don＇t mind their ,I love them.Animals英语作文篇6In our life,have some animals,they are so cult and so ugly,but we must know animals and humans are friends,we should like animals ,so i wnat to be a volunteer to help them. I am so friendly and i love animals very much,i can do more things and i do somegood things,i give the money for save China's tigers and so on.So i want to help animals,because i love them. Let's help animals just help yourself ,let's to be a volunteer to help them now,so come on!Animals英语作文篇7Some people think killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary and some people think it is essential for daily diet. Nowadays, more and more meat was provided for people, therefore many people think that animals are being killed just for food, and this kind of action is cruel for animals.The main reason is that people should not master existent right of animals. More and more wild animals are rapidly disappearing from this globe, it couldn't be divided with that animals were hunted and killed cruelly.Another reason is that if people do not eat meat, their health will not be affected. Moreover, the Chinese Kongfu comes from the Chinese temple that is famous in the world.Last but not the least reason is that people have already made all kinds of man-made meat, so they do not have to eat animal meat. At least, we do not have to kill animals in order to satisfy our appetite. Otherwise we will lose them.Animals英语作文篇8Do you like animals? Maybe you don't like them, maybe you like, but I tell you: I like them very much.I like rabbits, because they are very beautiful,they have big and red eyes,long ears and short tails.they are very cute,I like them very much.I like dogs,too, because they are very kind,they have long noses, long tails ,big eyes and big ears. I like them verymuch.I like more animals:cats ?calves? peacocks……Are they cute?Animals英语作文篇9My favorit animals are swans.Thy ar whit.Thy can swim vry wll.I think thy look lik a bautiful girl in a whit drss.Thy hav a pair of wings and thy can also fly wll.I bliv thy ar angls from th sky.Thy bring us lov and mak us happy.Thy ar always frindly to us.W can't hurt thm,bcaus thy ar our frind.I lov thm!I lik dogs,too.Thy ar not bautiful,but thy ar th bst frinds.Thy kp th thivs away.Dogs hav th bst listning and ys.Thy can har in th nosiy,s in th dark.If w ar in dangr,thy will hlp us at onc.And thy don't mind thir livs.So,I lov themAnimals英语作文篇10As we know, animals are very important to us. I like animals very much, such as dogs, cats and so on. But I like cats best.I think cats are cuter than other animals. I have a pet cat, it is very beautiful. It can make me happy, I often play with my little cat,. Its name is Mary. It’s black and white. I usually go to park with my cat. We share the same world with them.I like cats very much. They are my friends.How to stay happyEveryone has their worries. When you have worries, please try to control your mood, because it can change your life in many ways. So we should try to be happy every day. Try your best to do everything. You can also help others in need or listen to music when you are sad. Playing sports with your friends is a good way to keep happy.In the life, we must believe ourselves and have a nice day. You should have more time to talk with your friends and parents.I believe you will be better.Animals英语作文篇11Since I go to school，the teachers always tell me that animals are our friends. If they disappear from the earth，then we won’t live for long.It is true that men and animals are important part of nature，so we need to live with each other friendly. The one who kills animals should be punished，and there needs more laws to punish these bad people.Animals英语作文篇12Golden monkeys live only in China.Their fur is golden and a bit grey. Their tails are as long as their bodies. Male golden monkeys are big and strong while the female ones are much smaller.Golden monkeys live in forests which are 2000-3000 meters above sea level. They like living in family groups.They eat fruit nuts tree leaves and so on. But now their number is getting smaller and smaller.We hope more and more people will understand the importance of protecting wild animals. We also hope that people will stop hunting golden monkeys.Animals英语作文篇13My favorite animal is a panda . the panda look like a bear and polar bear .Panda is one of the scarcest animals.As the balance of nature was destroyed and the weather was getting warmer and warmerpandas became less.But at present the number of pandas is increasing year by year.Nowadaysthe biggest nature park for panda in China is in Sichuan.Animals英语作文篇14There are many different kinds oof animals in Australia.My favourite animal is koala. It's very pretty.It likes climbing trees.The symbol of the Australia is koala.These animals are lovely and we should live harmony with them.Animals英语作文篇15Among all the animalsI like rabbit very much.When I was a little girlkeep a rabbit by myselfit was very lovely with a pair of long earsand two red round eyesthe hair of it was white.After school I fed it everydayit liked vegetables and carrots.So when I gave them to itthe rabbit always jumpped happilylooked at me by its red eyesseemed to tell me it was very hungry.So I love the rabbit !Animals英语作文篇16Animals are people's friends.But many wild animals are facing the danger of dying outbecause the environment has changed greatly.Their living areas are becoming smaller and smaller because of pollution and the development of cities.They have no room to live in except in the zoo.And many of the wild animals now can't find enough food to eat.At the same timeman is killing off animals just to get their furskinteeth and meat.people should realize how serious the situation is and something should be done to protect the animals.We are supposed to set up some nature reservesso that animals can live freely.Besidespeople should not be allowed to kill endangered animals or eat their meat.We should also do something to make our world cleaner.Fresh airclean waterand grass are all important foranimals because they need them for living.The death of the endangered animals will bring a disaster to human beings.Animals英语作文篇17A snake is a long and thin animal that lives in grass or other dark places. It has no legs or feet but can move very fast on its stomach.Snakes usually have greenyellow or black skins which make it difficult for their enemies to find them.Some kinds of snakes live in water. They can swim as freely as fish.Snakes are cold-blooded animals. They take many things as food such as mice sparrows frogs birdseggs pests and so on.As snakes are dreadful looking people are afraid of them.In fact snakes are not as dreadful as they look. They can help us to kill mice and pests. They can provide us with delicious meat.Their blood is a good drink.Poisonous snakes are especially useful. We can make valuable drugs with them.Animals英语作文篇18Do you know of any endangered animals? Why are they in danger?I think there are many endangered animals in the world such as tigers and pandas. When farmers cut down trees tigers can no longer hide and hunt. Many tigers are killed by people who want to sell their fur for money. And there are few places where pandas can live. We are not alone in the world. We human beings could not live without all the plants and animals around us. So protecting wildlife animals are very important.Animals英语作文篇19More and more animals are being killed.Many animals are dying out.But they are our friends.We should protect them.People need animals.They are a source of food for human beings.Many animals are very beautiful to enjoy and very interesting to play with.Once they are gone,we can't admire the beautify they bring any more.More importantly,every animals has its place in the balance of nature.Destroying one kind of animal can break the balance of the nature so that many problems will appear.In the end,it will cause the extinction of the human being.Therefore,endangered animals should be protected by laws.Protecting animals is protecting ourselves.Animals英语作文篇20Experts say a shortage of fish and other food is threatening many of the world's penguins. They say as many as ten of the seventeen kinds of penguins may be in danger of disappearing.Wildlife Conservation Society researchers have studied these birds for eighteen years. They say the numbers of penguins have decreased by thirty percent since Nineteen-Eighty-Seven.Many scientists blame global warming for the decrease in penguin populations. They believe the heating of the atmosphere has caused ocean waters to become warmer.The scientists say higher water temperatures have reduced the supply of fish and krill. In addition many adult penguins die of hunger.Animals英语作文篇21The earth is a big family which belongs to everyone and all the animals.All the animals are our family members so it's our duty to be friendly to them.Howevermore and more wild animals are forced to perform programs or do dangerous work.What's moresome kinds of animals have already disappeared.It seems that animals are dying out little by little and we will lose lots of happiness and our family members.Thereforewe should protect them and treat them as our relations from now on to prohibit them leaving us.Animals英语作文篇22Animals are our good friends. Among all the animals, I like bears best.Look at this bear, it’s brown and fat. It can climb the trees very well. It can run very fast, too. It has sharp teeth and a fat body. It likes to eat meat, but it doesn’t like to eat noodles.I like bears. Do you like bears?。
英语口语animals动物主题对话5分钟
英语口语animals动物主题对话5分钟第一篇：英语口语animals动物主题对话5分钟赵：Nowadays, we can find an interesting phenomenon among dorms of college students that most of students wish to have a pet indoor to relax themselves, or in another word, to be a company.现如今，我们可以发现在大学生寝室有一个现象：很多学生希望在寝室养宠物来娱乐自己，或者用其他话来说，作为一个陪伴。
章：I think some college students keep small animals as their pets is reasonable.The systems of College are too strict.Why students can”t do things they like? They just small animals 我认为大学生在寝室养小动物作为他们的宠物是合理的。
学校的制度太严格了。
为什么学生不可以做自己喜欢的事？他们仅仅是小动物而已。
周：My friend kept a dog as a pet in the dormitory.It is a stray dog, but he also made the careful preparation He toke it so well that we all think he can play with the dog.But a week after the teacher found it.The teacher asked him to drop the dog.What school do Is right? 我的朋友在寝室里养狗，是一只流浪狗，但是他也为它做了精心的准备, 他对它是如此的精心以至于让我们都以为他可以和这只狗一起玩耍。
保护动物的英语演讲稿（精选24篇）
保护动物的英语演讲稿（精选24篇）保护动物的英语篇1Many animals are in danger of dying out。
As is shown in the chart， we cansee the number of animal species decreases faster and faster and this trend willcontinue。
From 1980 to 20__， at least 1 million animal species have disappeared。
Worse still，more and more wild animals are in great danger。
It is not a pieceof sensational news; it is a fact， a harsh reality。
Unfortunately， we may notsee these animals in the near future。
很多动物频临灭绝的危险。
图表显示，我们能够看到动物物种数量下降的速度越来越快，而且这种趋势将会持续下去。
从1980年到20__年，至少有100万动物物种已经消失。
更糟糕的是，越来越多的野生动物处于巨大的危险中。
这不是一则耸人听闻的新闻，这是一个事实，一个残酷的事实。
不幸的是，将来我们可能看不到这些动物了。
From the second picture， we can find some reasons。
Why is the number ofanimal species declining year by year? Apparently animals have bee victims offashion industry。
Animal skin has been used to make fashionable clothes andthese clothes sell at a high price。
动物权利,英语animals' rights
electrocution poisoning Brain operation fishing persecution poach horse sports
pet stores …. circuses slavery
dog race Trophäen sammeln hunting
Sports
Entertainment
ANIMAL RIGHTS
The following things you must have done.
Eat steak
watch the circus on TV
Kill mosquitoes
See butterfly specimen on sale
So what do you think of these things? Right or wrong?
Angered man stabbed his dog.
This dog suffers from severe malnutrition.
Clorox testing
Cosmetics testing
Unknown cleaning chemicals testing
Scientists are now using animals for experiences that will bring out new drugs.
If they are right , that means we can continue to do what we are doing now….. If they are wrong, then does it mean that we should be vegetarians?
castration without anaesthesia vivisection overdose gluttony Contergan slaughtering
动物的权利 Animal Right 英语作文
Animal RightIt is the idea that all animals are born free like humans, and we should not subject them to exploitation for our needs. Animal rights aim to give animals the same rights as humans in which they are not killed or tortured at the hands of people.Animal Rights Essay: Animal Rights is the thought or idea that says that some or all animals are entitled to their basic rights such as possession of their life, and other crucial needs to survive.It is the idea that all animals are born free like humans, and we should not subject them to exploitation for our needs. Animal rights aim to give animals the same rights as humans in which they are not killed or tortured at the hands of people.Long and Short Essays on Animal Right for Students and Kids in EnglishWe provide children and students with essay samples on an extended essay of 500 words and a short piece of 150 words on the topic “Animal Rights” for reference.Long Essay on Animal Rights 500 Words in EnglishIs it unjust to kill animals to feed ourselves? If you are a vegetarian or an animal lover, you might find killing animals to feed ourselves as unethical. There are various views on the subject, and continuous debates and articles try to resolve the matter.Animal rights are the thought process that all animals have basic rights like all human beings, and they do not deserve to be killed at our hands or made to suffer. It is best not to viewanimals as our commodities. It is wrong to view them as our resources. If we can accept the fact that animals are not born to be killed or exploited at our hands, we can approach a human view of treating animals and can then genuinely discuss the rights of animals.We wrongly believe that animals are the commodities that we use. If we adopt this thought, our actions towards them will be unethical and regrettable. If we think that animals have no moral status, we will be extremely apathetic, which is diametric to human nature. The wrong thought process can hamper the understanding and reasoning of everything in our life.Animals are living creatures, and so are we. They too feel pain and suffering. Hence, it is not illogical to consider the topic of animals having rights.Believing that animals have rights does not necessarily mean that eating meat is wrong or unethical. People of different backgrounds and religions follow different diets and have different eating habits. Some of them include non-vegetarian diets, and some of them don’t.Eating meat is a lifestyle for some people, and others should respect it. But, eating meat is not the only question that comes to mind when we think about animal rights. Thousands of animals are kept in farms and slaughterhouses. They are brought up in extremely inhospitable environments and are ultimately killed. Many of them are brought and stored in labs, and people perform all sorts of heinous and inexplicable experiments on them.You can now access more Essay Writing on this topic and many more.Humans torture millions of animals every year in labs. They burn, cut or starve animals in the name of research that does not always bear results. Most drugs that work on animals might not work for humans or not have the same efficiency. Hence, it is barbaric to meaninglessly kill animals and think that they do not have any rights.People should never believe that animals are useless, dumb creatures. They too have a soul and can feel. Their emotions might not be as complex as humans, but they deserve to be acknowledged.Humans are different than other animals. We have a moral compass and try to justify the events around us. Hence, when we think about any living creature being hurt, it makes us sad.If you see an abused animal or an injured animal, you could walk past it. You could alsoreport the animal abuse if it is a domestic animal, or take it to the vet for treatment. We should have realized that it is more peaceful to care for animals contently, than kill or capture them. Animals are soulful creatures like us and magnificent creation. We should respect them, and they do have rights.Short Essay on Animal Rights 150 Words in EnglishShort Essay on Animal Rights is usually given to classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.The animal right is the thought that all animals have birthrights like humans. It is the liberal thought process where we consider all animals to have basic rights that would protect them from being subjected to torture, starvation, slaughtering, etc. for our benefits.There are a lot of disagreements regarding animals having rights. Some people argue that animal rights should be protected, while others argue that there is no need for animal rights.People who say that animals have no rights, think it to be true because they view animals as commodities that we can exploit whenever required. Some people think that animals are created for our pleasure and our needs since we are at the top of the food chain. These people are largely mistaken.All animals have souls and are living beings just like us. They have sensations and can feel everything around them just like humans can. Hence, we are morally obliged to acknowledge the rights of animals and not harvest them.10 Lines on Animal Rights Essay in English1. Animal rights are the concept that animals have similar rights as human.2. Many people support animal rights, and many p eople don’t.3. Many believe that animal rights should be established to protect the basic needs of all animals.4. Others believe that animals don’t require any rights, and are present to satisfy the needs of humans.5. It is a wrong thought that animals are commodities for humans, and can be used as objects.6. Animals are projected to cruel treatments in places like animal farms, animal testing labs, etc.7. The animal rights issue is a hotly debated topic.8. All animals are living organisms and can feel like us. Hence, we should treat them as such.9. Humans are superior to other animals in terms of evolutions, but we belong to theanimal kingdom as well.10. Humans have morals, unlike other animals. We should use it to support the cause of animal rights.FAQ’s on Animal Rights EssayQuestion 1.What are animal rights?Answer:Animal right is the idea that animals deserve similar rights like a human. People who are supporters of animal rights believe that all animals have fundamental rights, such as the right to live and not tortured.Question 2.What is animal testing?Answer:Animal testing is the method of using animalsas test-subjects for testing drugs and products on animals.Question 3.Why is animal right relevant?Answer:We use animals as a commodity and use them as we will. As human beings who have morals, we can think about considering the rights of animals too.Question 4.Why should we give rights to animals?Answer:Like human beings, animals also are living being who can feel what goes on around them. Hence, animals should have the basic right to survive.。
英语作文介绍12生肖
英语作文介绍12生肖The 12 Chinese zodiac signs, also known as the 12 animal signs, are a significant part of Chinese culture and astrology. Each sign is associated with certain personality traits, characteristics, and even years. The 12 animal signs are rat, ox, tiger, rabbit, dragon, snake, horse, goat, monkey, rooster, dog, and pig. These signs are deeply rooted in Chinese tradition and are believed to have a profound impact on a person's life, including their career, relationships, and overall fortune.The rat is the first of the 12 animal signs and is known for its intelligence, wit, and resourcefulness. People born in the Year of the Rat are believed to be quick thinkers and problem solvers. They are also considered to be charming and sociable, making them natural leaders.The ox is the second animal sign and is associated with strength, reliability, and determination. Those born in the Year of the Ox are believed to be hardworking, dependable,and steadfast. They are also known for their patience and perseverance, making them well-suited for long-term goals and success.The tiger is the third animal sign and is known for its bravery, confidence, and independence. People born in the Year of the Tiger are believed to be adventurous, passionate, and courageous. They are also considered to be natural leaders with a strong sense of justice and fairness.The rabbit is the fourth animal sign and is associated with gentleness, kindness, and sensitivity. Those born inthe Year of the Rabbit are believed to be compassionate, artistic, and intuitive. They are also known for their diplomacy and ability to create harmony in their relationships.The dragon is the fifth animal sign and is known forits power, energy, and vitality. People born in the Year of the Dragon are believed to be charismatic, ambitious, and confident. They are also considered to be natural risk-takers and innovators, with a strong desire for success andrecognition.The snake is the sixth animal sign and is associated with wisdom, intuition, and mystery. Those born in the Year of the Snake are believed to be insightful, enigmatic, and determined. They are also known for their ability to adapt to different situations and their deep understanding of human nature.The horse is the seventh animal sign and is known for its freedom, passion, and adventure. People born in the Year of the Horse are believed to be energetic, outgoing, and sociable. They are also considered to be independent and strong-willed, with a love for travel and new experiences.The goat is the eighth animal sign and is associated with peace, harmony, and creativity. Those born in the Year of the Goat are believed to be gentle, artistic, and empathetic. They are also known for their strong sense of aesthetics and their ability to create beauty in their surroundings.The monkey is the ninth animal sign and is known forits intelligence, curiosity, and playfulness. People born in the Year of the Monkey are believed to be clever, witty, and adaptable. They are also considered to be quick learners and natural problem solvers, with a love for new challenges and experiences.The rooster is the tenth animal sign and is associated with confidence, diligence, and reliability. Those born in the Year of the Rooster are believed to be hardworking, honest, and detail-oriented. They are also known for their strong sense of responsibility and their ability to lead by example.The dog is the eleventh animal sign and is known forits loyalty, honesty, and integrity. People born in the Year of the Dog are believed to be faithful, reliable, and compassionate. They are also considered to be protective and caring, with a strong sense of justice and fairness.The pig is the twelfth and final animal sign and isassociated with kindness, generosity, and optimism. Those born in the Year of the Pig are believed to be sincere, sociable, and easygoing. They are also known for their love of life's pleasures and their ability to enjoy the present moment.In conclusion, the 12 Chinese zodiac signs play a significant role in Chinese culture and astrology. Each sign is associated with unique personality traits, characteristics, and years, and is believed to have a profound impact on a person's life. Whether you believe in astrology or not, the 12 animal signs offer an interesting insight into the diversity of human nature and the rich tapestry of Chinese traditions.。
每个动物都有自己的优点 故事作文
每个动物都有自己的优点故事作文英文回答：Animals are fascinating creatures, each with their own unique qualities and strengths. From the mighty lion to the graceful dolphin, every animal has something special to offer. In this story, I will share some examples of animals and their advantages.Let's start with the lion, known as the king of the jungle. Lions are powerful and courageous. They have a majestic presence and are natural leaders. In a pride, the lion takes charge and protects the group. This reminds me of the phrase "the lion's share," which means the largest portion or the best part of something. For example, in a group project, if I take the lion's share of the work, it means I am taking the lead and doing the most important tasks.Moving on to another animal, let's talk about the owl.Owls are known for their wisdom and intelligence. They have excellent night vision and can rotate their heads almost 360 degrees. This reminds me of the phrase "wise as an owl," which means someone who is very wise and knowledgeable. For example, if my friend always gives me good advice and makes wise decisions, I can say that she is as wise as an owl.Now let's talk about dolphins. These intelligent creatures are known for their playful and social nature. They are highly adaptable and can communicate with each other using a series of clicks, whistles, and body movements. Dolphins are also known for their teamwork. They work together to hunt for food and protect each other from predators. This reminds me of the phrase "in the same boat," which means being in the same situation or having the same goals. For example, if my classmates and I are all studying for the same exam, we can say that we are in the same boat.Moving on to a different animal, let's talk about ants. Ants are incredibly hardworking and organized. They worktogether in colonies to build intricate tunnels and gather food. Ants never give up and always find a way to overcome obstacles. This reminds me of the phrase "busy as a bee," which means being very busy and active. For example, if I have a lot of tasks to complete in a short amount of time, I can say that I am as busy as a bee.Finally, let's talk about the dog. Dogs are known for their loyalty and companionship. They are often referred to as "man's best friend" because of their close bond with humans. Dogs are protective and will do anything to keep their loved ones safe. This reminds me of the phrase "let sleeping dogs lie," which means to avoid interfering in a situation that could cause trouble. For example, if I hear my parents arguing, I know it's best to let sleeping dogs lie and not get involved.中文回答：动物是迷人的生物，每个动物都有自己独特的品质和优点。
五年级英语动物保护措施练习题30题
五年级英语动物保护措施练习题30题1.We should not hunt wild animals. Hunting wild animals is _____.A.rightB.wrongC.goodD.bad答案：B。
解析：我们不应该捕猎野生动物，捕猎野生动物是错误的行为。
选项A“right”（ 正确的）不符合动物保护原则；选项C“good” 好的）也不对，捕猎野生动物不是好的行为；选项D“bad”（ 坏的）比较笼统，“wrong”更能准确表达捕猎野生动物是错误的行为。
涉及动物保护词汇“hunt wild animals” 捕猎野生动物）。
2.We can _____ to protect animals.A.throw rubbishB.cut down treesC.help them find foodD.pollute the water答案：C。
解析：我们可以帮助动物找到食物来保护它们。
选项A“throw rubbish”（ 扔垃圾）会破坏环境，不利于动物保护；选项B“cut down trees”（ 砍伐树木）会破坏动物的栖息地；选项D“pollute the water” 污染水）也会危害动物生存。
涉及动物保护词汇“help them find food” 帮助它们找到食物）。
3.When we see an injured animal, we should _____.A.ignore itB.kick itC.help itD.hurt it答案：C。
解析：当我们看到受伤的动物时，应该帮助它。
选项A“ignore it”（ 忽视它）是不对的；选项B“kick it”（ 踢它）和选项D“hurt it” 伤害它）会对动物造成更大的伤害。
涉及动物保护词汇“injured animal” 受伤的动物）。
4.We should not buy products made from _____ skins.A.animalB.plantC.plasticD.paper答案：A。
小学六年级上册英语刷题卷(答案和解释)90
小学六年级上册英语刷题卷(答案和解释)(共50道题)下面有答案和解题分析一、综合题1.He _______ (eat) breakfast right now.2.Which one is a wild animal?A. LionB. CatC. DogD. Elephantst weekend, we __________ (go) to the park to play football. It __________ (be) sunny and warm, so we __________ (decide) to play outside. My brother __________ (not like) playing football, but he __________ (enjoy) watching us. After the game, we __________ (sit) on the grass and __________ (have) a picnic.4.He _______ (play) basketball at the moment.5.In the morning, I always ______ (eat) breakfast at 7:30 AM. After that, I ______ (brush) my teeth and ______ (get) ready for school. My dad ______ (drive) me to school, and I ______ (arrive) there at 8:00 AM. I ______ (have) three lessons in the morning, and then I ______ (go) to the playground during lunch break. In the afternoon, we ______ (study) science and geography.6.We _______ (not/meet) our friends last week.7.Which of these objects is used to eat soup?A. ForkB. KnifeC. SpoonD. Plate8.Which of the following is the correct way to say "你好" in English?A. GoodbyeB. Thank youC. HelloD. Sorry9.Adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs in English. They describe how, when, where, or to what extent something happens. Choose the sentence that uses the adverb correctly.A. She runs quick.B. She runs quickly.C. She quickly runs.D. She run quickly.10.They _______ (be) in the classroom when I arrived.11.My favorite season ______ (be) autumn because the weather ______ (be) cool and pleasant. I like to ______ (wear) sweaters and scarves. The trees ______ (change) color, and we can see beautiful red and yellow leaves everywhere. Sometimes, I ______ (go) to the park with my family to enjoy the nice weather. We ______ (have) a picnic there. 12.Lily is taking a walk in the park. She sees some __________ in the grass and a__________ flying overhead. She also hears the sound of __________ in the trees. Lily takes a deep breath and feels __________.13.What is the plural form of "child"?A. ChildsB. ChildrenC. ChildesD. Childes14.We _______ (watch) a movie tomorrow.15.My friends and I ______ (go) to the park after school yesterday. We ______ (play) basketball for an hour, and then we ______ (have) a picnic. Afterward, we ______ (walk) home together.16.Which of these is a number?A. DogB. 5C. TableD. Spoon17.What is the opposite of "hot"?A. ColdB. BigC. HappyD. Tall18.Which of the following animals lives in the water?A. DogB. FishC. BirdD. Tiger19.I _______ (take) the bus to school every day.20.In the evening, I __________ (usually) __________ (watch) a movie with my family. We __________ (enjoy) watching comedies because they __________ (make) us laugh. After the movie, we __________ (talk) about it and __________ (eat) some snacks. Sometimes, my brother __________ (fall) asleep during the movie, but he __________ (not mind).21.Which of these is used to drink?A. PlateB. SpoonC. CupD. Knife22.My family ________ (go) to the mountains every summer. We ________ (enjoy) hiking and ________ (pick) wildflowers. This summer, we ________ (plan) to visit a new mountain. I ________ (look) forward to it very much.23.Which one is a color?A. GreenB. DogC. TableD. Carrot24.He _______ (take) a shower in the morning.25.Which of these is a fruit?A. CarrotB. AppleC. OnionD. Potato26.I _______ (study) English every day. I _______ (like) to read English books and_______ (watch) English movies. On weekends, I _______ (practice) speaking English with my friends.27.In the morning, I usually wake up at __. I get out of bed and make my __. After that,I go to the __ to wash my face and brush my __. I then eat a quick __ and put on my __. I leave the house at __ and walk to school. I always feel __ when I start my day.28.We ______ (go) to a birthday party last Sunday. It ______ (be) a fun party. There______ (be) many games, and we ______ (dance) and ______ (sing) together.29.I _______ (is / am / are) happy to see you.30.Which of these is a body part?A. NoseB. SpoonC. ForkD. Chair31.What is the opposite of "slow"?A. FastB. HeavyC. LightD. Tall32.I _______ (am / is / are) not hungry now.33.We _______ (study) for the exam tomorrow.34.What do you use to make a phone call?A. TelevisionB. PhoneC. SpoonD. Plate35.They _______ (be) at school right now.36.What do you use to write on paper?A. SpoonB. ForkC. PencilD. Plate37.How many legs do most spiders have?A. 4B. 6C. 8D. 1038.He _______ (study) math every morning.39.Which one is the correct sentence?A. He can swim very well.B. He swim can very well.C. He well can swim very.D. He can very swim well.40.What do you use to cut paper?A. KnifeB. ScissorsC. ForkD. Spoon41.What is the opposite of "new"?A. OldB. TallC. BigD. Small42.He _______ (not/like) to drink tea.43.What is the plural form of “child”?A. childsB. childrenC. childs’D. childrens44.We _______ (be) very happy today.45.In the winter, I like to go ice skating at the ______. The ice is very ______, and I have to be careful not to fall. I wear a warm ______ and gloves to keep cozy. After skating, we drink hot ______ to warm up. Ice skating is so much fun!46.Which of these is a type of animal?A. TableB. DogC. ChairD. Book47.We _______ (go) to the zoo every year.48.I _______ (have) a cat at home.49.They _______ (is / are / am) at school right now.50.She _______ (eat / eats / ate) breakfast at 7:00 AM.(答案及解释)。
All_Animals_Are_Equal
All Animals Are Equal*P ETER S INGERIn recent years a number of oppressed groups have campaigned vigorously for equality. The classic instance is the Black Liberation movement, which demands an end to the prejudice and discrimination that has made blacks second-class citizens. The immediate appeal of the black liberation movement and its initial, if limited, success made it a model for other oppressed groups to follow. We became familiar with liberation movements for Spanish-Americans, gay people, and a variety of other minorities. When a majority group—women—began their campaign, some thought we had come to the end of the road. Discrimination on the basis of sex, it has been said, is the last universally accepted form of discrimination, practiced without secrecy or pretense even in those liberal circles that have long prided themselves on their freedom from prejudice against racial minorities.One should always be wary of talking of "the last remaining form of discrimination." If we have learnt anything from the liberation movements, we should have learnt how difficult it is to be aware of latent prejudice in our attitudes to particular groups until this prejudice is forcefully pointed out.A liberation movement demands an expansion of our moral horizons and an extension or reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality. Practices that were previously regarded as natural and inevitable come to be seen as the result of an unjustifiable prejudice. Who can say with confidence that all his or her attitudes and practices are beyond criticism? If we wish to avoid being numbered amongst the oppressors, we must be prepared to re-think even our most fundamental attitudes. We need to consider them from the point of view of those most disadvantaged by our attitudes, and the practices that follow from these attitudes. If we can make this unaccustomed mental switch we may discover a pattern in our attitudes and practices that consistently operates so as to benefit one group—usually the one to which we ourselves belong—at the expense of another. In this way we may come to see that there is a case for a new liberation movement. My aim is to advocate that we make this mental switch in respect of our attitudes and practices towards a very large group of beings: members of species other than our own—or, as we popularly though misleadingly call them, animals. In other words, I am urging that we extend to other species the basic principle of equality that most of us recognize should be extended to all members of our own species.All this may sound a little far-fetched, more like a parody of other liberation movements than a serious objective. In fact, in the past the idea of "The Rights of Animals" really has been used to parody the case for women's rights. When Mary Wollstonecraft, a forerunner of later feminists, published her Vindication of the Rights of Women in 1792, her ideas were widely regarded as absurd, and they were satirized in an anonymous publication entitled A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes. The author of this satire (actually Thomas Taylor, a distinguished Cambridge philosopher) tried to refute Wollstonecraft's reasonings by showing that they could be carried one stage further. If sound when applied to women, why should the arguments not be applied to dogs, cats, and horses? They seemed to hold equally well for these "brutes"; yet to hold that brutes had rights was manifestly absurd; therefore the reasoning by which this conclusion had been reached must be unsound, and if unsound when applied to brutes, it must also be unsound when applied to women, since the very same arguments had been used in each case.One way in which we might reply to this argument is by saying that the case for equality between men and women cannot validly be extended to nonhuman animals. Women have a right to vote, for instance, because they are just as capable of making rational decisions as* In T OM R EGAN &P ETER S INGER (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1989, pp. 148-162men are; dogs, on the other hand, are incapable of understanding the significance of voting, sothey cannot have the right to vote. There are many other obvious ways in which men and women resemble each other closely, while humans and other animals differ greatly. So, itmight be said, men and women are similar beings and should have equal rights, while humans and nonhumans are different and should not have equal rights.The thought behind this reply to Taylor's analogy is correct up to a point, but it does not go far enough. There are important differences between humans and other animals, and these differences must give rise to some differences in the rights that each have. Recognizing this obvious fact, however, is no barrier to the case for extending the basic principle of equality to nonhuman animals. The differences that exist between men and women are equally undeniable, and the supporters of Women's Liberation are aware that these differences may give rise to different rights. Many feminists hold that women have the right to an abortion on request. It does not follow that since these same people are campaigning for equality between men and women they must support the right of men to have abortions too. Since a man cannot have an abortion, it is meaningless to talk of his right to have one. Since a pig can't vote, it is meaningless to talk of its right to vote. There is no reason why either Women's Liberation or Animal Liberation should get involved in such nonsense. The extension of the basic principle of equality from one group to another does not imply that we must treat both groups in exactly the same way, or grant exactly the same rights to both groups. Whether we should do so will depend on the nature of the members of the two groups. The basic principle of equality, I shall argue, is equality of consideration; and equal consideration for different beings may lead to different treatment and different rights.So there is a different way of replying to Taylor's attempt to parody Wollstonecraft's arguments, a way which does not deny the differences between humans and nonhumans, but goes more deeply into the question of equality and concludes by finding nothing absurd in the idea that the basic principle of equality applies to so-called "brutes." I believe that we reach this conclusion if we examine the basis on which our opposition to discrimination on grounds of race or sex ultimately rests. We will then see that we would be on shaky ground if we were to demand equality for blacks, women, and other groups of oppressed humans while denying equal consideration to nonhumans.When we say that all human beings, whatever their race, creed, or sex, are equal, what is it that we are asserting? Those who wish to defend a hierarchical, inegalitarian society have often pointed out that by whatever test we choose, it simply is not true that all humans are equal. Like it or not, we must face the fact that humans come in different shapes and sizes; they come with differing moral capacities, differing intellectual abilities, differing amounts of benevolent feeling and sensitivity to the needs of others, differing abilities to communicate effectively, and differing capacities to experience pleasure and pain. In short, if the demand for equality were based on the actual equality of all human beings, we would have to stop demanding equality. It would be an unjustifiable demand.Still, one might cling to the view that the demand for equality among human beings is based onthe actual equality of the different races and sexes. Although humans differ as individuals in various ways, there are no differences between the races and sexes as such. From the mere fact that a person is black, or a woman, we cannot infer anything else about that person. This, it may be said, is what is wrong with racism and sexism. The white racist claims that whites are superior to blacks, but this is false—although there are differences between individuals, some blacks are superior to some whites in all of the capacities and abilities that could conceivably be relevant. The opponent of sexism would say the same: a person's sex is no guide to his or her abilities, and this is why it is unjustifiable to discriminate on the basis of sex.This is a possible line of objection to racial and sexual discrimination. It is not, however, the way that someone really concerned about equality would choose, because taking this line could, in some circumstances, force one to accept a most inegalitarian society. The fact thathumans differ as individuals, rather than as races or sexes, is a valid reply to someone whodefends a hierarchical society like, say, South Africa, in which all whites are superior in status to all blacks. The existence of individual variations that cut across the lines of race or sex,however, provides us with no defense at all against a more sophisticated opponent of equality, one who proposes that, say, the interests of those with I.Q. ratings above 100 be preferred to the interests of those with I.Q.s below 100. Would a hierarchical society of this sort really be so much better than one based on race or sex? I think not. But if we tie the moral principle of equality to the factual equality of the different races or sexes, taken as a whole, our opposition to racism and sexism does not provide us with any basis for objecting to this kind of inegalitarianism.There is a second important reason why we ought not to base our opposition to racism and sexism on any kind of factual equality, even the limited kind which asserts that variations in capacities and abilities are spread evenly between the different races and sexes: we can have no absolute guarantee that these abilities and capacities really are distributed evenly, without regard to race or sex, among human beings. So far as actual abilities are concerned, there do seem to be certain measurable differences between both races and sexes. These differences do not, of course, appear in each case, but only when averages are taken. More important still, we do not yet know how much of these differences is really due to the different genetic endowments of the various races and sexes, and how much is due to environmental differences that are the result of past and continuing discrimination. Perhaps all of the important differences will eventually prove to be environmental rather than genetic. Anyone opposed to racism and sexism will certainly hope that this will be so, for it will make the task of ending discrimination a lot easier; nevertheless it would be dangerous to rest the case against racism and sexism on the belief that all significant differences are environmental in origin. The opponent of, say, racism who takes this line will be unable to avoid conceding that if differences in ability did after all prove to have some genetic connection with race, racism would in some way be defensible.It would be folly for the opponent of racism to stake his whole case on a dogmatic commitment to one particular outcome of a difficult scientific issue which is still a long way from being settled. While attempts to prove that differences in certain selected abilities between races and sexes are primarily genetic in origin have certainly not been conclusive, the same must be said of attempts to prove that these differences are largely the result of environment. At this stage of the investigation we cannot be certain which view is correct, however much we may hope it is the latter.Fortunately, there is no need to pin the case for equality to one particular outcome of this scientific investigation. The appropriate response to those who claim to have found evidence of genetically-based differences in ability between the races or sexes is not to stick to the belief that the genetic explanation must be wrong, whatever evidence to the contrary may turn up: instead we should make it quite clear that the claim to equality does not depend on intelligence, moral capacity, physical strength, or similar matters of fact. Equality is a moral ideal, not a simple assertion of fact. There is no logically compelling reason for assuming that a factual difference in ability between two people justifies any difference in the amount of consideration we give to satisfying their needs and interests. The principle of the equality of human beings is not a description of an alleged actual equality among humans: it is a prescription of how we should treat humans.Jeremy Bentham incorporated the essential basis of moral equality into his utilitarian system of ethics in the formula: "Each to count for one and none for more than one." In other words, the interests of every being affected by an action are to be taken into account and given the same weight as the like interests of any other being. A later utilitarian, Henry Sidgwick, put the point in this way: "The good of any one individual is of no more importance, from the point ofview (if I may say so) of the Universe, than the good of any other.''1 More recently, the leadingfigures in contemporary moral philosophy have shown a great deal of agreement in specifying as a fundamental presupposition of their moral theories some similar requirement whichoperates so as to give everyone's interests equal consideration—although they cannot agree on how this requirement is best formulated.2It is an implication of this principle of equality that our concern for others ought not to dependon what they are like, or what abilities they possess—although precisely what this concern requires us to do may vary according to the characteristics of those affected by what we do. It is on this basis that the case against racism and the case against sexism must both ultimately rest; and it is in accordance with this principle that speciesism is also to be condemned. If possessing a higher degree of intelligence does not entitle one human to use another for his own ends, how can it entitle humans to exploit nonhumans?Many philosophers have proposed the principle of equal consideration of interests, in some form or other, as a basic moral principle; but, as we shall see in more detail shortly, not many of them have recognized that this principle applies to members of other species as well as to our own. Bentham was one of the few who did realize this. In a forward-looking passage, written at a time when black slaves in the British dominions were still being treated much as we now treat nonhuman animals, Bentham wrote:The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been witholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of the legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day, or a week, or even a month, old. But suppose they were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?3In this passage Bentham points to the capacity for suffering as the vital characteristic that gives a being the right to equal consideration. The capacity for suffering—or more strictly, for suffering and/or enjoyment or happiness—is not just another characteristic like the capacity for language, or for higher mathematics. Bentham is not saying that those who try to mark "the insuperable line" that determines whether the interests of a being should be considered happen to have selected the wrong characteristic. The capacity for suffering and enjoying things is a prerequisite for having interests at all, a condition that must be satisfied before we can speak of interests in any meaningful way. It would be nonsense to say that it was not in the interests of a stone to be kicked along the road by a schoolboy. A stone does not have interests because it cannot suffer. Nothing that we can do to it could possibly make any difference to its welfare.A mouse, on the other hand, does have an interest in not being tormented, because it willsuffer if it is.If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering intoconsideration. No matter what the nature of the being, the principle of equality requires that its suffering be counted equally with the like suffering—in so far as rough comparisons can be made—of any other being. If a being is not capable of suffering, or of experiencing enjoyment or happiness, there is nothing to be taken into account. This is why the limit of sentience1The Methods of Ethics (7th Ed.), p. 382.2 For example, R. M. Hare, Freedom and Reason (Oxford, 1963) and J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Harvard, 1972); for a brief account of the essential agreement on this issue between these and other positions, see R. M. Hare, "Rules of War and Moral Reasoning," Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 2 (1972).3Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ch. XVII.(using the term as a convenient, if not strictly accurate, shorthand for the capacity to suffer orexperience enjoyment or happiness) is the only defensible boundary of concern for the interests of others. To mark this boundary by some characteristic like intelligence or rationalitywould be to mark it in an arbitrary way. Why not choose some other characteristic, like skin color?The racist violates the principle of equality by giving greater weight to the interests of members of his own race, when there is a clash between their interests and the interests of those of another race. Similarly the speciesist allows the interests of his own species to override the greater interests of members of other species.4 The pattern is the same in each case. Most human beings are speciesists. l shall now very briefly describe some of the practices that show this.For the great majority of human beings, especially in urban, industrialized societies, the most direct form of contact with members of other species is at mealtimes: we eat them. In doing so we treat them purely as means to our ends. We regard their life and well-being as subordinate to our taste for a particular kind of dish. l say "taste" deliberately—this is purely a matter of pleasing our palate. There can be no defense of eating flesh in terms of satisfying nutritional needs, since it has been established beyond doubt that we could satisfy our need for protein and other essential nutrients far more efficiently with a diet that replaced animal flesh by soy beans, or products derived from soy beans, and other high-protein vegetable products.5It is not merely the act of killing that indicates what we are ready to do to other species in order to gratify our tastes. The suffering we inflict on the animals while they are alive is perhaps an even clearer indication of our speciesism than the fact that we are prepared to kill them.6 In order to have meat on the table at a price that people can afford, our society tolerates methods of meat production that confine sentient animals in cramped, unsuitable conditions for the entire durations of their lives. Animals are treated like machines that convert fodder into flesh, and any innovation that results in a higher "conversion ratio" is liable to be adopted. As one authority on the subject has said, "cruelty is acknowledged only when profitability ceases."7. . .Since, as l have said, none of these practices cater for anything more than our pleasures of taste, our practice of rearing and killing other animals in order to eat them is a clear instance of the sacrifice of the most important interests of other beings in order to satisfy trivial interests of our own. To avoid speciesism we must stop this practice, and each of us has a moral obligation to cease supporting the practice. Our custom is all the support that the meat-industry needs. The decision to cease giving it that support may be difficult, but it is no more difficult than it would have been for a white Southerner to go against the traditions of his society and free his slaves: if we do not change our dietary habits, how can we censure those slaveholders who would not change their own way of living?4 I owe the term speciesism to Richard Ryder.5 In order to produce 1 lb. of protein in the form of beef or veal, we must feed 21 Ibs. of protein to the animal. Other forms of livestock are slightly less inefficient, but the average ratio in the United States is still 1:8. It has been estimated that the amount of protein lost to humans in this way is equivalent to 90 percent of the annual world protein deficit. For a brief account, see Frances Moore Lappe, Diet for a Small Planet (Friends of The Earth/Ballantine, New York 1971), pp. 4—11.6 Although one might think that killing a being is obviously the ultimate wrong one can do to it, l think that the infliction of suffering is a clearer indication of speciesism because it might be argued that at least part of what is wrong with killing a human is that most humans are conscious of their existence over time and have desires and purposes that extend into the future see, for instance, M. Tooley, "Abortion and Infanticide," Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol . 2, no. I (1972). Of course, if one took this view one would have to hold—as Tooley does—that killing a human infant or mental defective is not in itself wrong and is less serious than killing certain higher mammals that probably do have a sense of their own existence over time.7 Ruth Harrison, Animal Machines (Stuart, London, 1964). For an account of farming conditions, see my Animal Liberation (New York Review Company, 1975) from which "Down on the Factory Farm," is reprinted in this volume [Animal Rights and Human Obligations].The same form of discrimination may be observed in the widespread practice of experimentingon other species in order to see if certain substances are safe for human beings, or to test some psychological theory about the effect of severe punishment on learning, or to try outvarious new compounds just in case something turns up....In the past, argument about vivisection has often missed the point, because it has been put in absolutist terms: Would the abolitionist be prepared to let thousands die if they could be saved by experimenting on a single animal? The way to reply to this purely hypothetical question is to pose another: Would the experimenter be prepared to perform his experiment on an orphaned human infant, if that were the only way to save many lives? (I say "orphan" to avoid the complication of parental feelings, although in doing so l am being overfair to the experimenter, since the nonhuman subjects of experiments are not orphans.) If the experimenter is not prepared to use an orphaned human infant, then his readiness to use nonhumans is simple discrimination, since adult apes, cats, mice, and other mammals are more aware of what is happening to them, more self-directing and, so far as we can tell, at least as sensitive to pain, as any human infant. There seems to be no relevant characteristic that human infants possess that adult mammals do not have to the same or a higher degree. (Someone might try to argue that what makes it wrong to experiment on a human infant is that the infant will, in time and if left alone, develop into more than the nonhuman, but one would then, to be consistent, have to oppose abortion, since the fetus has the same potential as the infant—indeed, even contraception and abstinence might be wrong on this ground, since the egg and sperm, considered jointly, also have the same potential. In any case, this argument still gives us no reason for selecting a nonhuman, rather than a human with severe and irreversible brain damage, as the subject for our experiments).The experimenter, then, shows a bias in favor of his own species whenever he carries out an experiment on a nonhuman for a purpose that he would not think justified him in using a human being at an equal or lower level of sentience, awareness, ability to be self-directing, etc. No one familiar with the kind of results yielded by most experiments on animals can have the slightest doubt that if this bias were eliminated the number of experiments performed would be a minute fraction of the number performed today.Experimenting on animals, and eating their flesh, are perhaps the two major forms of speciesism in our society. By comparison, the third and last form of speciesism is so minor as to be insignificant, but it is perhaps of some special interest to those for whom this article was written. I am referring to speciesism in contemporary philosophy.Philosophy ought to question the basic assumptions of the age. Thinking through, critically and carefully, what most people take for granted is, I believe, the chief task of philosophy, and it is this task that makes philosophy a worthwhile activity. Regrettably, philosophy does not always live up to its historic role. Philosophers are human beings, and they are subject to all the preconceptions of the society to which they belong. Sometimes they succeed in breaking free of the prevailing ideology: more often they become its most sophisticated defenders. So, in this case, philosophy as practiced in the universities today does not challenge anyone's preconceptions about our relations with other species. By their writings, those philosophers who tackle problems that touch upon the issue reveal that they make the same unquestioned assumptions as most other humans, and what they say tends to confirm the reader in his or her comfortable speciesist habits.I could illustrate this claim by referring to the writings of philosophers in various fields—for instance, the attempts that have been made by those interested in rights to draw the boundary of the sphere of rights so that it runs parallel to the biological boundaries of the species homo sapiens, including infants and even mental defectives, but excluding those other beings of equal or greater capacity who are so useful to us at mealtimes and in our laboratories. l think it would be a more appropriate conclusion to this article, however, if I concentrated on the problem with which we have been centrally concerned, the problem of equality.It is significant that the problem of equality, in moral and political philosophy, is invariablyformulated in terms of human equality. The effect of this is that the question of the equality of other animals does not confront the philosopher, or student, as an issue itself—and this isalready an indication of the failure of philosophy to challenge accepted beliefs. Still, philosophers have found it difficult to discuss the issue of human equality without raising, in a paragraph or two, the question of the status of other animals. The reason for this, which should be apparent from what I have said already, is that if humans are to be regarded as equal to one another, we need some sense of "equal" that does not require any actual, descriptive equality of capacities, talents or other qualities. If equality is to be related to any actual characteristics of humans, these characteristics must be some lowest common denominator, pitched so low that no human lacks them—but then the philosopher comes up against the catch that any such set of characteristics which covers all humans will not be possessed only by humans. In other words, it turns out that in the only sense in which we can truly say, as an assertion of fact, that all humans are equal, at least some members of other species are also equal—equal, that is, to each other and to humans. If, on the other hand, we regard the statement "All humans are equal" in some non-factual way, perhaps as a prescription, then, as I have already argued, it is even more difficult to exclude non-humans from the sphere of equality.This result is not what the egalitarian philosopher originally intended to assert. Instead of accepting the radical outcome to which their own reasonings naturally point, however, most philosophers try to reconcile their beliefs in human equality and animal inequality by arguments that can only be described as devious.As a first example, I take William Frankena's well-known article "The Concept of Social Justice." Frankena opposes the idea of basing justice on merit, because he sees that this could lead to highly inegalitarian results. Instead he proposes the principle thatall men are to be treated as equals, not because they are equal, in any respect, but simply because they are human. They are human because they have emotions and desires, and are able to think, and hence are capable of enjoying a good life in a sense in which other animals are not.8But what is this capacity to enjoy the good life which all humans have, but no other animals?Other animals have emotions and desires and appear to be capable of enjoying a good life. We may doubt that they can think—although the behavior of some apes, dolphins, and even dogs suggests that some of them can—but what is the relevance of thinking? Frankena goes on to admit that by "the good life" he means "not so much the morally good life as the happy or satisfactory life," so thought would appear to be unnecessary for enjoying the good life; in fact to emphasize the need for thought would make difficulties for the egalitarian since only some people are capable of leading intellectually satisfying lives, or morally good lives. This makes it difficult to see what Frankena's principle of equality has to do with simply being human. Surely every sentient being is capable of leading a life that is happier or less miserable than some alternative life, and hence has a claim to be taken into account. In this respect the distinction between humans and nonhumans is not a sharp division, but rather a continuum along which we move gradually, and with overlaps between the species, from simple capacities for enjoyment and satisfaction, or pain and suffering, to more complex ones.Faced with a situation in which they see a need for some basis for the moral gulf that iscommonly thought to separate humans and animals, but can find no concrete difference that will do the job without undermining the equality of humans, philosophers tend to waffle. They resort to highs sounding phrases like "the intrinsic dignity of the human individual";9 they talk of the "intrinsic worth of all men" as if men (humans?) had some worth that other beings did8 In R. Brandt (ed.), Social Justice (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1962), p. 19.9 Frankena, op. cit. p. 23.。
英语作文human right or animal righ
英语作文human right or animal righI attach equal importance to human rights and animal rights, which should be the consensus of ——Lincoln.Tolstoy and Schopenhauer also once said famous quotes about protecting animals.Everyone has the responsibility to protect animals, but many people can't do, we say giant panda, go to the cat to eat fruit, insects, bees, bamboo and animals, general panda weight less than 60 kg, mainly distributed in shaanxi, Sichuan, Gansu and other regions, China's earliest giant panda is found in Yunnan, 120~180cm, captive panda life survival average 30 years or longer, I think vulnerable animals is the most lonely animals, like we have no relatives, only frighten yourself, don't you feel lonely?None of us should destroy the ecological environment of the animals. Before that, a man had built a villa in the panda base in Sichuan province, which is clearly destroying the ecological environment of the giant pandas.For example, the white-headed eagle is 85 to 110 c m long, and like most birds of prey, the stone carving is slightly larger than abear. The adult white-headed eagle has pale yellow eyes and feet, and the head and tail feathers are white. The white-headed eagle smell because pesticides cause them unable to lay eggs.Through the cognition of these two animals, I will tell you that to protect animals, we should know about the common sense of protecting animals since childhood, protecting animals is to protect the environment, we should call on the people around us to protect the animals.。
animals初中英语作文带翻译
animals初中英语作文带翻译动物是人类的朋友，我们应该保护动物，爱护动物。
那么关于animals的初中英语作文怎么写呢?下面是店铺推荐给大家的带翻译的animals初中英语作文，供大家参考。
animals初中英语作文篇一There are many different kinds oof animals in Australia.My favourite animal is koala. It's very pretty.It likes climbing trees.The symbol of the Australia is koala.These animals are lovely and we should live harmony with them.翻译：在澳大利亚有很多不同力量的动物。
我最喜欢的动物是考拉。
它很漂亮。
它喜欢爬树。
澳大利亚考拉的象征。
这些动物是可爱的我们应该与他们和谐生活。
animals初中英语作文篇二Golden monkeys live only in China.Their fur is golden and a bit grey. Their tails are as long as their bodies. Male golden monkeys are big and strong while the female ones are much smaller.Golden monkeys live in forests which are 2000-3000 meters above sea level. They like living in family groups.They eat fruit nuts tree leaves and so on. But now their number is getting smaller and smaller.We hope more and more people will understand the importance of protecting wild animals. We also hope that people will stop hunting golden monkeys.翻译：金丝猴生活在中国。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Philip Kotler: Marketing
Yichen Chen
Marketing has affected our lifestyles has created. We should be from a point of view of popular interested in that how did marketing get its start marketing. God had start in sales department, every company has a sales group and the sales people really want to be in the office of customer because that is the only way something happens, so they do not want to a lot of homework. For example, three things they do not want to do, customer research in systematic way, because that is taking their time away from selling to customer. Second, they would have liked someone else to find leads. Third, someone had to prepare brochures. A
chief marketing officer some of you maybe brand managers may have been in your past experience, category managers market segments, managers managing distribution. A pricing manager communication manager database man direct marketer internet is well –established. The character of the marketing department depends on what the CEO thinks of marketing. 1P’s CEO took over a company, he says I just want someone to broadcast and promote us, so he missing a lot of things. 4P’s CEO know he need marketing plan and that
has to mention product, what are the features price, where should it be made accessible, and finally promotion. We take with each segment and hoe can satisfy their needs, AG Lafley said everything starts with customer, no customers no business. There is a lot of things that a
chief marketing officer does and a lot of tasks, if advertising spent the same amount of
money that they on improving the product as they do on advertising. That is a profound observation because within the age of the internet, it is easier to talk a product you like or do not, in a sense if this goes far enough, it would be not possible for a company to be a bad company because the word of mouth will sink it. Every company should define its mission
and vision for the future and its values. If you are a 1.0 marketer, it is a good job doing. You are trying to deliver satisfaction make a profit and good product. If you are 2.0, you want to help people realize their aspirations, they will return frequently to buy more. What spirit it’s That small set of companies say we have compassion, we want to get involved and want to
improving the lives of people. Some charity works they are doing or it could be a real fundamental strain in the way. Firms of endearment and the subtitle how world – class,
companies profit from passion purpose. The main thing is some firms of endearment are so
much more profitable than the ones that have not been dear to us, one of the thing is that they are 9 or 10 times as profitable. The last one, these are attributes of that set of companies and the last attribute is they spend less on marketing than rather more, because
the companies that were going to be in dear to us who are advertising all the time, they are
so familiar. This presentation is telling us, what is marketing, and many principles, as those
examples teaching us that people who use and follow the principles of marketing will succeed, and what would happen to people who don't follow the rules. It also made everyone realizes how important these principles are in marketing.。