滥用执行异议权行为的法律规制

学校代码 ***** 学号 ************ 分类号密级

硕士学位论文

滥用执行异议权行为的法律规制

学位申请人周志龙

指导教师李喜莲教授

学院名称法学院

学科专业法律硕士

研究方向民事诉讼法学

二〇一七年十一月二十七日

To enforce the legal regulation of the abuse of

the right to dissent

Candidate Zhouzhilong

Supervisor A.P.Lixilian

College Faculty of Law

Program Law

Specialization Law of cicull procedure

Degree Master of Law

University Xigtan University

Date November,27, 2017

摘要

执行异议权作为民事诉权的具体内容，是民事诉讼法贯彻当事人地位平等原则的具体体现。在执行程序中，执行当事人或利害关系人对该权利的滥用，从根本上违背了设计者的初衷和目的，故而需要对该权利滥用行为加以规制，以避免损害结果的发生。典型案例表明，执行异议权被有关主体反复利用，且滥用执行异议权的“滥用”行为难以界定。判定当事人、利害关系人或者案外人滥用执行异议权的具体方法有三：一是应当严格界定滥用异议权的利害关系人、案外人的身份；二是准确认定滥用行为，即必须符合权利滥用的主、客观构成要件；三是执行异议权滥用必须具有相应的社会危害性。规制滥用执行异议权的行为必须多管齐下，以明确滥用执行异议权的归责原则、责任主体和责任承担方式，完善滥用执行异议权的费用负担制度，加大对滥用异议权的惩罚力度。唯有综合运用多种手段预防和惩治当事人、案外人滥用执行异议权的行为，才能有效的预防、减少和消除司法实践中日益增多的执行异议权滥用现象，切实保护权益人的合法权益，实现诉讼秩序、执行秩序和法律秩序的良性运转。

关键词：执行异议权；执行当事人；异议权滥用；法律规制

Abstract

The execution of the right of dissent as the concrete content of the right of civil action，is the embodiment of the principle of equality of the litigants in the Civil Procedure Law. In the executive process, the abuse of this right by the executing party or the interested party fundamentally violates the original intention and purpose of the designers. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the abusing of the right to avoid the harm result. Typical cases show that the right to implement the opposition is repeatedly used by the parties concerned, meanwhile the "abuse" of the right in the abuse of executive objection is hardly defined. There are three specific ways to judge the parties, interested parties or non-respondents in abusing the right to implement the opposition: the first one is the identity of the interested party and the outsider who abuse the right of objection should be strictly defined; the second one is the abuse of the right must be accurately identified, that is, it must conform to the subjective and objective elements of abuse of rights; the third one is the abuse of the right to objection must produce a corresponding social hazard. To regulate the abuse of the right of execution of the objection,it must be handled in a multi-pronged approaches,which is to clearify that the principle of liability attribution,the main body of responsibility and the way of assuming responsibility for abuse of the right of execution,to improve the abusive cost burden system for implementing the right of opposition, and to increase penalties for abuse of the right of opposition. Only by comprehensively using a variety of means, to prevent and punish parties and outsiders abusing the right to perform the objection, can we effectively prevent, reduce and eliminate the abuse of the right to implement the objection in the judicial practices. So that it is able to effectively protect the legitimate rights, interests of the rights and interests of the people and to achieve the benign operation of the litigation order, the execution order and the legal order.Key words: Execution of the right of objection；Executive party；Abuse of objection； Legal regulation