手术治疗食管癌的多种方法对比及对患者生存质量的影响

手术治疗食管癌的多种方法对比及对患者生存质量的影响曹生军
【期刊名称】《中国卫生标准管理》
【年(卷),期】2016(7)23
【摘要】目的：探究不同手术方法治疗食管癌的临床疗效及患者术后生存质量比较。

方法选择我院2014年1月～2015年1月收治的86例食管癌患者，根据患者手术治疗方法的不同分为对照组和观察组，比较两组患者手术治疗效果及术后生存质量。

结果观察组患者治疗总有效率为79.07%，手术切除率为93.02%，观察组患者的治疗总有效率和手术切除率高于对照组患者，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；术后3个月和6个月观察组患者的存活率分别为95.35%、86.05%，两组患者术后在一般健康状况、睡眠和躯体功能等方面的生存质量评分差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。

结论微创食管切除术治疗食管癌疗效确切，临床治疗效果高于开放式食管切除术治疗，有效提高患者术后生存质量。

%ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma treated by different surgical methods.Methods 86 patients with esophageal carcinoma admitted in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 were divided into control group and observation group according to the different surgical treatment methods. The therapeutic effect and quality of life in two groups were compared.ResultsIn the observation group,the total effective rate was 79.07%,the operative resection rate was 93.02%. The total effective rate and the surgical resection rate in the observation group were significantly higher than
those in the control group(P<0.05). The survival rates of the patients in the observation group were 95.35% and 86.05%,respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups in terms of general health status,sleep quality and physical function(P<0.05),with statistical significance.ConclusionMinimaly invasive esophagectomy is effective and effective in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. The clinical therapeutic effect is significantly higher than that of open esophagectomy.【总页数】3页(P77-79)
【作者】曹生军
【作者单位】江苏省泰州市第二人民医院胸外科，江苏泰州 225500
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】R735
【相关文献】
1.新辅助化疗联合手术治疗与单纯手术治疗对食管癌患者手术疗效的影响 [J], 朱红军;张双林;朱富国
2.食管癌放疗联合紫杉醇加中药参麦、丹参同步治疗对食管癌患者生存质量的影响[J], 吴华;董迎春;韦祖峰
3.Sextant微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定手术治疗中老年脊柱骨折患者的疗效及对患者生存质量的影响 [J], 张国东;吴志显;罗武
4.胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术与开放食管癌根治术的疗效对比及对患者肺功能的影响[J], 孙钊
5.胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术对食管癌患者术后生存质量的影响 [J], 王留江; 熊健; 罗运成
因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买。