B2B与供应链整合(pdf91页)中英文
B2B电子商务与供应链管理
B2B电子商务与供应链管理1. 引言B2B电子商务（Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce）是指企业通过互联网平台进行商务交易和合作的一种模式。
它通过在线平台连接买方和卖方，实现商务合作和交易的自动化和数字化。
供应链管理则是对供应链中的各个环节进行协调、优化和控制，以实现高效、低成本的供应链运营。
本文将介绍B2B电子商务与供应链管理的关系及重要性，并深入探讨其对企业的影响和优势。
2. B2B电子商务与供应链管理的关系B2B电子商务与供应链管理密不可分。
传统的供应链管理是基于纸质文档和人工处理的，而B2B电子商务提供了一种全新的方式来管理供应链。
通过B2B电子商务平台，企业可以实现供应链的数字化和自动化，大大提高供应链的效率和可见性。
B2B电子商务平台可以将供应链中的各个环节进行整合，并提供实时的数据和报告，使企业能够更好地监控和管理供应链运营。
对于供应商来说，他们可以通过B2B电子商务平台与买方直接合作，减少中间环节，提高交易效率和利润。
对于买方来说，他们可以通过B2B电子商务平台更好地管理供应商，降低采购成本并提高供应链的可靠性。
因此，B2B电子商务与供应链管理之间存在着紧密的关系，相互促进、相互依赖。
3. B2B电子商务与供应链管理的优势3.1 提高供应链的可见性和透明度B2B电子商务平台可以提供实时的供应链数据和报告，使企业能够更好地了解供应链各个环节的情况。
通过实时数据和报表分析，企业可以更准确地预测需求，制定合理的采购计划，并及时调整供应链中的各个环节，以满足市场需求。
3.2 加快交易速度和减少交易成本B2B电子商务平台可以将供应链中的各个环节进行数字化和自动化，大大减少了人工处理的时间和成本。
通过在线平台，买方可以快速搜索合适的供应商，下单、支付和收货的过程都可以在线完成，大大加快了交易速度。
同时，传统的纸质文档和人工处理也被数字化和自动化，大大减少了交易成本。
供应链英语翻译(译文和原文)
Perspectives in supply chain risk managementChristopher S. TangUCLA Anderson School, 110 Westwood Plaza, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095,USAReceived 3 November 2005; accepted 16 December 2005Available online 2 March 2006AbstractTo gain cost advantage and market share, many firms implemented various initiatives such as outsourced manufacturing and product variety. These initiatives are effective in a stable environment, but they could make a supply chain more vulnerable to various types of disruptions caused by uncertain economic cycles, consumer demands, and natural and manmade disasters. In this paper, we review various quantitative models for managing supply chain risks. We also relate various supply chain risk management (SCRM) strategies examined in the research literature with actual practices. The intent of this paper is three-fold. First, we develop a unified framework for classifying SCRM articles. Second, we hope this review can serve as a practical guide for some researchers to navigate through the sea of research articles in this important area. Third, by highlighting the gap between theory and practice, we hope to motivate researchers to develop new models for mitigating supply chain disruptions.Keywords:Supply chain risk management; Quantitative models; Review1. IntroductionOver the last 10 years, earthquakes, economic crises,SARS, strikes, terrorist attacks have disrupted supply chain operations repeatedly. Supply chain disruptions can have significant impact on a firm’s short-term performance. For example, Ericsson lost 400 million Euros after their supplier’s semiconductor plant caught on fire in 2000, andApple lost many customer orders during a supply shortage of DRAM chips after an earthquake hit Taiwan in 1999. Supply chain disruptions can have long-term negative effects on a firm’s financial performance as well. For instance, Hendricks and Singhal (2005) report that companies suffering from supply chain disruptions experienced 33–40% lower stock returns relative to their industry benchmarks.To mitigate supply chain disruptions associated with various types of risks (uncertain economic cycles,uncertain consumer demands, and unpredictable natural andman-made disasters), many researchers have developed different strategies/models for managing supply chain risks. In this paper, we review primarily quantitative models that deal with supply chain risks. Also, we relate various supply chain risk management (SCRM) strategies examined in the literature with actual practices. The intent of this paper is threefold. First, we develop a unified framework for classifying SCRM articles. Second, we hope this review can serve as a practical guide for some researchers to navigate through the sea of research articles in this important area. Third, by highlighting the gap between theory and practice, we hope to motivate researchers to develop new models for mitigating supply chain disruptions.2. Supply managementTo gain cost advantage, many firms outsourced certain non-core functions so as to maintain a focus on their core competence (cf., Porter (1985)). Since the 1980s, we witnessed a sea change in which firms outsourced their supply chain operations including design, production, logistics, information services, etc. Essentially, supply management deal with five inter-related issues:1. supply network design,2. supplier relationship,3. supplier selection process (criteria and supplierselection),4. supplier order allocation,5. supply contract.3.Demand managementIn Section 2, we describe how manufacturers can use different supply management strategies to mitigate various supply chain operational risks However, these supply management strategies are ineffective when the underlying supply mechanism is inflexible. For instance, in the service industry or in the fashion goods manufacturing industry, the supply mechanism is inflexible because the capacity is usually fixed. When the supply capacity is fixed, many firms have attempted to use different demand management strategies so that they can manipulate uncertain demands dynamically so that the modified demand is better matched with the fixed supply.Due to space limitation, we are unable to review the dynamic pricing or clearance pricing literature. The reader is referred to Elmaghraby and Keskinocak (2003) for an extensive review of dynamic pricing models and clearance pricing models for selling a fixed number of units over a finite horizon. Also, we do not plan to review literature that deal with coordination of pricing and ordering decisions. The reader is referred to Yano and Gilbert (2004),Petruzzi and Dada (1999), Eliashberg and Steinberg (1993) for three comprehensive reviews in this area. Instead, we shall focus on articles that emphasize on the use of demand management strategies to‘‘shape’’ uncertain demand so that a firm can use an inflexible supply to meet the modified demand.4. Product managementTo compete for market share, many manufacturers expand their product lines. As reported in Quelch and Kenny (1984), the number of stock keeping units (SKUs) in consumer packaged goods has been increasing at a rate of 16% every year between 1985 and 1992. Marketing research shows that product variety is an effective strategy to increase increasing market share because it enables a firm to serve heterogeneous market segments and to satisfy consumer’s variety seeking behavior. However, while product variety may help a firm to increase market share and revenue, product variety can increase manufacturing cost due to an increasein manufacturing complexity. Moreover, product variety can increase inventory cost due to an increase in demand uncertainty. These twoconcerns have been illustrated in an empirical study conducted by MacDuffie et al. (1996). They show that the production and inventory costs tend to increase as product variety increases. Therefore, it is critical for a firm to determine an optimal product portfolio that maximizes the firm’s profit. The reader is referred to Ramdas (2003) for a comprehensive review of literature in the area of product variety.5. Information managementAs explained in Fisher (1997), most consumer products can be classified as fashion products or functional products. Basically, fashion products usually have shorter life cycles and higher levels of demand uncertainties than the functional products. Therefore, different information management strategies would be needed to manage for different typesof products especially in the presence of supply chain risks. For this reason, we shall classify the work in this section according to the product types: fashion products and functional products.6.Robust strategies for mitigating operational and disruption risksUpon examining the underlying assumptions of the models reviewed so far, it appears most of the quantitative models are designed for managing operational risks. Even though these quantitative models often provide cost effective solutions for managing operational risks, there do not address the issue of disruption risks in an explicit manner. Before we present some potential research ideas for managing supply chain disruption risk in the next section, we shall examine how disruptions risks are managed in practice and relate these practices to the models reviewed earlier. After reviewing some qualitative analyses presented in various risk management and SCRM articles, we can summarize the key findings as follows:1.Managers’attitude towards risks：Sharpira (1986) and March and Sharpira (1987) study managers’ attitude towards risks and they conclude that:(1)Managers are quite insensitive to estimates of the probabilities of possible outcomes.(2) Managers tend to focus on critical performance targets, which affect the way they manage risk.(3) Managers make a sharp distinction between taking risks and gambling.2.Managers’ attitude towards initiatives for managing supply chaindisruption risks.7. ConclusionsIn this paper, we have reviewed various quantitative models for managing supply chain risks. We found that these quantitative models are designed for managing operational risks primarily, not disruption risks. However, we argue that some of these strategies have been adopted by practitioners because these strategies can make a supply chain become more efficient in terms of handling operational risks and more resilient in terms of managing disruption risks. Since there are few supply chain management models for managing disruption risks, we would like to present six potential ideas for future research.1.Demand and supply process：Virtually, all models reviewed in this paper are based on the assumption that the demand or the supply process is stationary. To model various types of disruptions mathematically, one may need to extend the analysis to deal with non-stationary demand or supply process. For instance, one may consider modeling the demand or the supply process as a ‘‘jump’’ process to capture the characteristics of major disruptions.2.Objective function：The performance measures of the models reviewed in this paper are primarily based on the expected cost or profit. The expected cost or profit is an appropriate measure for evaluating different strategies for managing operational risks. When dealing with disruption risks that rarely happen, one may need to consider alternative objectives besides the expected cost/profit.3.Supply management strategies：When developing supply management strategies for managing disruption risks, both academics and practitioners suggest the idea of ‘‘back-up’’ suppliers.4.Demand management strategies: Among the demand management strategies presented in Section 3, it appears that dynamic pricing/ revenue management has great potential for managing disruption risks because a firm can deploy this strategy quickly after a disruption occurs. In addition, revenue management looks promising especially after successful implementations of different revenue management systems in the airline industry for managing operational risks.5. Product management strategies: When selling products on line, e-tailers can change their product assortments dynamically according to the supply and demand of different products. This idea can be extended to brick and mortar retailers for managing disruption risks.rmation management strategies: Among the information management strategies described in Section 6, we think the CPFR strategy is promising because it fosters a tighter coordination and stronger collaboration among supply chain partners.站在供应链风险管理的角度作者：Christopher S. Tang摘要：为了获得成本优势和抢占市场份额，很多企业采取了各种措施，比如外包生产制造和产品多样化生产。
电子商务供应链管理中英文对照外文翻译文献
电子商务供应链管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)翻译:电子商务对动态供应链管理的影评价摘要最近，互联网及相关信息和通信技术（ICT）使得成本效益的信息能够在供应链的独立各方之间传播．新的供应链战略，如供应商管理库存（VMI业务）协同规划，预测与补货（CPFR），有效消费者反馈（ECR），已开始利用这些新的沟通渠道，特别是在供应链的零售终端．电子商务加强了供应链上的制造商和材料零组件供应商，他们以前不能被很好理解和开发．本文的目的是建立供应链模式的电子商务使信息和通讯技术（ICT）的影响量化，特别是其对动态行为的影响．论文包含简单却充满活力的模型，其对将要实施的供应链动态行为模式下的电子商务提出了相当数量见解．关键词供应链管理动力学；电子商务；EPOS(创新电子支付系统)；供应商管理库存；网上购物1. 总述当ICT型的电子商务提出，让供应链中的企业共享市场信息，使得“1-2-1企业”成为可能时，（Peppers&Rogers，1997）几乎没有分析或可量化的证据证明它真正会在配送顾客所需上提高企业的整体绩效．通常的建议是，通过ICT在供应链中的所有企业传递供应链中的信息会提高企业绩效．事实上，最近的研究（Hong-Minh et al.,2000）已经表明，通过供应链的“啤酒游戏”（Ster man，1989年），企业之间简单的传递信息会有一个不利的影响．这是由于伴随着更多的可用信息，调度程序需要知道如何处理它．有很多种方法能使创新的信息流在供应链里得到应用．Kiely（1998）提供了一个良好的起点，他特别强调用需求数据来达到预测的目的．在这篇文章中我们分析4个能够成立的ICT方案的影响，此项分析使通过调查牛鞭效应（Letal,1997a,b）用两种不同的方法把它们传统的供应链加以比较．第一种办法是根据管理飞行模拟器的结果分析啤酒游戏．第二种方法是基于一个量化Z变换分析，其中的应用工具是Disney和To will（2002）高度提倡的．比较和对比这两种方法的目的是评价电子商务在供应链动态质量评估方面的影响．“牛鞭效应”是一项重要措施，因为它是体现出了一个表现不佳的供应链的症状．（琼斯和西蒙，2000年）．“牛鞭效应”是一个生产适应成本的代理办法（Stalk and Hout，1990年），并表明持有“以防万一”的库存的意义是为了缓和不明因素．牛鞭效应相当多以实验和观察为依据的证据包括最近的例子显示：供应商两级订单的粮食部门上游的数据是电子销售点（EPOS）的数据的10倍（Jones and Simons,2000）．汽车部门收入订单和供应商只有一个单一的梯队供应链的差异比率大概是1：2（Naim et al.,2002）．这5个供应链战略是：传统供应链战略——即在供应链上四个"串联"的梯队．网上购物——即分销网络是单道的，信息和物品 在最终消费者和产品供应商之间直接流动．缩减型供应链——即供应链里的一个梯队被移除．供应商管理库存（VMI）——这是模拟通过对供应链里的双方企业制定议定书，给予必要的库存和销售信息，权力和责任给供应商，以便管理客户的库存．电子销售点（EPOS）——市场资讯在供应链中的所有企业之间互传．尽管各种电子商业的情况，可以由四个组四个硕士课程学生根据自己的学识在这两个学术和实践上进行战略的审查或者执行．正是这些大师的学生在实施啤酒游戏．2. 方法论改进个别制造商和供应链的动态行为的研究已是人所共知．最近期的研究方法，可分为下列四类：管理游戏：例如啤酒的游戏对于说明的不同供应链战略的益处来说是有用的．这是麻省理工学院于五十年代末发明的．（sterman，1989）从游戏本身来说，游戏中大致没有什么可以被严格证明．从这个意义上说，游戏是有限制的．但他们确实提供了有价值的证据，并是一个良好的学习手段．其他作者扩展或用计算机处理了啤酒游戏包括van Ackere et al（1993），Kaminsky和Simchi-Levi（1998），Lambrecht和Dejonckheere（1999）．实证研究:很多位作者调查了ICT的冲击对供应链的影响．包括Holmstromm（1998），Fransoo和Wouters（2000），Kaipia，Holmström和Tanskanen（2000）．然而，此种贡献在已知战略实施以后，量化了改进性能，即不存在预测要素和集，并且研究的焦点就是要找出最佳做法．不幸的是，它并非总是能够比较信息和通信技术的推行策略，其直接原因是由于这些策略在不同性质的环境中实施．统计：这种类型的贡献，通常提供关于需求的特性的影响的统计见解 ，例如标准差和相关性，以及供应链特性，例如首要时间和库存成本中的信息路径和牛鞭效应或需求扩增．统计方法经常被用来量化真实情况的表现．然而，这些方法未能表现出如何减少或消除有害的动态影响，如“牛鞭”，并很少得到从技术上深入探讨影响系统结构性能的原因和结果．这种类型最近的重大贡献包括Lee, So and Tang （2000）,Chen, Ryan and Simchi-Levi （2000），Chen，Drezner，Ryan and Simchi-Levi（2000）．模拟与系统动力：它是由Forrester（1961）提出，是一种在大型非线性系统内调查动态效果方法，且不诉诸复杂的数学控制理论模型（Edghill和Towill，1989年）．仅用模拟方法虽然繁琐，费时，且只提供有限的洞察力（Popplewell和Bonney，1987），但它们确有先发优势，能在模型非线形的同时避免复杂的数学．以前利用模拟所做的工作是非常多产的，其中包括（但绝不仅限于）Forrester（1961），and Coyle（1982）,他研究了传统的供应链结构，Cachon andFisher（1997）和Waller,Johnson和Davis （1999）他们研究过VMI．连续控制理论技术:用于生产和库存控制．首先由1978年诺贝尔经济学奖得主赫伯特西蒙（由于他在工作机构动态上的出色研究）第一次提出．西蒙（1952）描述了如何使用线性确定性控制理论来进行生产和库存控制．Axsäter（1985）陈述了一个有用的对于早期工作的评论性论文，总结了这个领域的优势和和劣势．他的结论是，控制理论“说明了非常好的动态效果和反馈”，但不能解决测序和生产批量的问题．瑞典的Linkoping 大学的生产经济学学院的大量研究已被记入文献．他们已经在运用拉普拉斯变换和经济技术，如MRP系统（Grubbstrom,1967）的净现值．连续控制理论受到这样的困扰，即一些调度和订货情况本来就是离散的，而且离散时间的延误的连续表述在数学上是很复杂的．离散控制理论，能够很有效地对抽样数据系统进行调查．例如：调度和订货系统和本质上离散的计算机系统Vassian（1955）从西蒙在连续领域的工作中得到灵感，采用离散控制理论研究了一个生产调度算法．De Winter （1966），在关于新型的供应链结构可能仅有的两个成果的其中之一里，寻找一种用在海军供应链上的集中控制存货．Deziel和Eilon（1967）描述了一个重大的应用．Burns和Burns and Sivazlian（1978）研究一个拥有四个级别的使用的Z变换的传统供应链．Bonney和Popplewell（1988）研究了MRP系统．Dejonck heeretal.（2003a），一直在用Z变换调查共同控制结构中共同预测机制的牛鞭表现．Disney（2001）一直采用离散控制理论来调查供应商管理库存供应链．离散控制理论的缺点在用到数学的时候往往涉及冗长而乏味代数操控．本文中所涉及的方法都是用来分析结果的．例如啤酒游戏的结果，或是在各种情况的ICT下决定牛鞭效应的范围和程度．将这些分析与以前公布的结果进行直接比较，（Hong-Minhetal.，2000）得到了相违背的结果．啤酒游戏的结果包括结构性问题和人类行为方面的问题．后者特征可能包括游戏玩家对游戏理解不够，不确定性决策和错误以及从顾客到供应商订单传送中出错．这时候分析型的Z变换方法被用来比较目标和结果，并用它来推导出供应链牛鞭效应中确定性的反馈系统结构的影响．如果认为ICT 系统将处理供应链中数量庞大的信息交易，并且管理例外的情况时人为干扰影响是有限的．那分析方法就更为重要了．3. 五种供应链的描述这五种供应链研究的设想由下进行总结．下面是对每种供应链的简短说明．3.1 传统供应链传统供应链的特点是由4个“串联”起来梯队组成一个供应链．每个梯队只接收有关当地库存水平和销售的信息．然后每个梯队按照当地供应商的存货水平，销售情况及以前的未取货订单来制定定单（Sterman,1989）．3.2 缩减型供应链缩减型供应链是指供应链中的梯队减少了．例如对于的供应链来说，这就代表了零售梯队已经融入于信息和物质流．这是一个用ICT 来缩减梯队的供应链．作为提高供应链的动态性的有效机制，梯队缩减已经被Wikner,Towill和Naim（1991）确认．3.3 网上购物网上购物是指生产商直接从最终消费者那里接到订单（可能像戴尔一样通过互联网），并在生产和分销的第一时间将产品直接邮购给最终消费者．这样的供应链策略与传统的仅一个梯队的供应链具有相同的基本结构．3.4 EPOS可用型供应链EPOS可用型供应链是指最终消费者的销售对于供应链中的所有成员都是可见的．例如，在很多杂货供应链中，通过互联网可以获得EPOS数据．这些数据或是直接从零售商那得到的或是通过第三方得到的．供应链成员可用这些数据对未来的情况进行预测．具体来说，在这种策略中，每个梯队可以用最终消费者的销售作为自己的规划建议，但每梯次仍然需要提供（如果可能的话）他的客户所订的货物．Dejinckheere，Disney，Lambrecht 和Towill（2001）从Mason-Jones（1998）的模拟方法中得到启发，利用Z 变换对这项策略已经进行了全面调查．3.5 供应商管理库存（VMI）VMI具体表述如下：在一个有两个梯队的VMI的关系中供应商（分销商）管理，消费者（零售商）的库存．分销商拥有零售商的销售和库存水平的资料．在此情况下零售商并不给分销商下订单，而是零售商相信分销商供给足够数量的库存来保证零售商有足够的（不是太多）库存．VMI策略的支持者有DisneyHolmstrom，Kaipia和Towill（2001），他们支持供应链中的VMI梯队．在这种情况下，其他的梯队（仓库和工厂）按传统的模式运行．4. ICT对供应链动力学的影响4.1 啤酒游戏的结果Hong-Minh et al.（2000）分析了四个不同的团队采用四种不同的供应链策略的结果，其中的一个团队采用的是前面描述果过的EPO S型供应链．虽然研究结果表明信息共享好处多多，（Mason-Jones and Towill,1997）,令人惊讶的是EPOS策略的效果是最差的．当EPOS策略减小了供应链里牛鞭效应的程度是，作为代价的是长时间的存货积压（负的净存货）．得出的结论是虽然市场信息及时的在供应链的各个梯队得以分享，供应链里的各方仍有他们自己的订货规则．这就是说，各方没有共同协作．虽然共享市场信息确实是一件好事，但只有把它作为一个商定的整体供应链的决策策略的一部分时，它才会产生收益．（Mason-Jones,1998）为了测试这一假说，EPOS 策略被加上一些特性后重新运行，这些策略包括所有的参与者参与协同规划，预测与补货,也就是CPFR ．作为一个涉及16名学生的国际运输方向的硕士课程，啤酒游戏也由目前的作者运行两次．第一次的啤酒游戏按传统模式运行．那就是，啤酒严格按Sterman （1989）所定的规则运行 ．第二次的啤酒游戏在学生团结协作下进行．不同的集团重新制定了四个不同的ICT 供应链策略．第一届四阶段时期，需求模式（即所有集团回应）被由一个8面骰子随机抽出，从时间5（两个游戏中指25）需求由一个20片面的骰子产生．为了达到本文的目的，我们对第二组的结果进行了分析．不同的绩效措施被从游戏收集，他们已被总结成方程式1（Chenetal ,2000）．2222//CONS ORATE CONS CONS ORATE ORATE i i i i Bullwhip σσμσμσ==这个等式给了衡量牛鞭效应的方法.除了牛鞭措施的衡量，我们还在啤酒游戏中采用了典型性能指标，那就是库存成本．每得到一件货物的库存罚0.5英镑，每少一件库存花费1英镑．股票出招致费用£1.00．库存成本是一个重要的度量因素，因为它最终决定我们能在何种程度上满足顾客以及确定过期库存的危险型．严重的积压成本是有道理的．因为无论我们将供应链的波动程度控制的多么好，如果我们不能满足最终消费者的话，我们最终会被行业所抛弃．游戏的结果汇总在附录中．库存费用作为一个正常能被达到的相对排名从而在在某一特定的供应链策略的实际梯队数量中独立出来．因此，我们将惩罚有较少梯队的供应链．此外，两种EPOS 的结果都会被显示出来．第一个是在研究中做过并在本文中描述过的，它被定义为EPOS-CPFR ,第二个（叫作EPOS-no CPFR ）是基于被Hong-minhetal.（2000）记录的有确切结果的EPOS．EPOS-CPFR在最少化方面做的很好，而事实上它就是减少供应链的牛鞭效应．但是，对于EPOS- no CPFR,要支付更多的库存成本，这主要是由于供应链中有长期的存货．除了使存货成本正常化，消除一个梯队或许多梯队的策略仍优于其他的选择．如以前所报告的（例如，见Wikner et al.，1991），消除一个梯队就消除了一个决策点，并减少了总成本．比EPOS-CPFR的结果更令人惊讶的是VMI的情况为既有最差的存货持有成本又有最坏的牛鞭效应．很明显，在游戏中可以看出，尽管提供了详尽的记录议定书的规定，游戏成员在贯彻落实这一构想时存有问题．4.2 Z变换评价我们再一次使用式1以确定牛鞭因素在I级，因为它为提供了一个封闭表达式，使牛鞭能够通过一个Z变换方法而确定下来（Disney Towill, 2002），对牛鞭效应进行量化的学者有（Chenetal, 2000）．我们用平方脉冲响应方法来确定每一个供应链策略所产生的牛鞭效应的大小．这种方法是由Disney和Towill（2002）创造的．总的来说，常用的供应链模式可归纳如下：除非对具体战略进行模式化是必要的，生产决策具有有序规则 ，它是基于平均需求的总和，目标商品库存和实际库存中的一小部分的差别，以及目标运输库存与实际运输库存的结构之间的一小部分的区别（John，Naim 和Towill，1994年）．这这个结论是适当的．因为Naim和Towill（1995）已表明，这是相等于sterman的（1989）锚定和调整启发式，这个式子能够在玩啤酒游戏中复制人的行为，这是众所周知的．使用Eziel和 Eilon在定序规则里的设置（Disney和Towill，2001年和2002年）可使复杂的数学操控减少．这是正确的，因为Disney和towill（2002）已证明这是一个具有重要的可取的动态特性的一般apiobpcs模式的子集．数学工作也得到了进一步简化，这是通过设置在订货规则里指数预报的平均年龄相等于在两个反馈回路中的逆增益()ti1/减1，并确定了制作/发行的筹备时间相等于两种秩序的时期．这些是为了尽量避免在牛鞭表达式中的极高阶多项式．VMI 的具体情景蓝本是供应商管理其客户的库存水平，并致力确保该存货水平保持在（经共同商定）最低和最高水平之间．尤其是，最低及最高水平不会随时间而改变时．这种情况导致两个梯队的供应链运行起来就像具有一个梯队的供应链，Disney （2001年）．我们可以从Disney （2001）那获得对供应商管理库存及其变种的更多信息（尤其是当最低及最高水平随着时间变化）．我们的研究结果概述于下．有两个基本牛鞭非公开形式：一为传统，缩减，电子购物和VMI 的供应链模式，另一个为EPOS 供应链模式．我们可以从下得出结论，当订货样式逐渐流向了供应链中的传统供应链，牛鞭将普遍增加．不过我们注意到，通过仔细观察，当接近4i T 时，流向供应链牛鞭效应反而会降低．消除一个梯队，很明显可以除掉牛鞭的根源，因为一套秩序变通是根本无法进行的．有效地消除整个销售网络可使工厂订单率像传统的供应链的第一梯队一样迅速有效．虽然是一个“低科技”的ICT ，移除两梯队的策略在概念上是简单易懂的．由于这些战略不要求调度器的新的行为，所以也许可以解释为何它们在啤酒游戏产生了有利的结果．不过，他们也存在严重的缺点，在实际供应链中消除零售商，分销中心和批发商也就意味着消除了和顾客的近距离接触．所以除非顾客已经准备好接受不呢个近距离接触的弊端，（因为他们可能用书籍或电脑来完成），这个策略就不可能使用．在VMI 的供应链中，我们可以使得两个梯队表现的和一个单一的梯队一样．事实上，我们没有理由不能拥有一个四梯队的VMI 策略，并使得四梯队像一个单一的梯队那样行动． 因此VMI 被用来获得良好的动态订货，并提供与顾客接触的机会．这也许可以解释为何该策略经常被发现用在杂货供应链中．然而EPOS 策略与其他的策略相比，具有一个本质上不同的订货结构，所以我们需要一套新的封闭形式．但是我们可以看到，我们可以从EPOS中得到与VMIJ几乎相同的绩效表现．而且EPOS策略可以与顾客近距离接触，因此将具有更广泛的用途．5. 结论我们依据单一产品或者累计产品类型提出结果．这个结果当评估ICT 对多种产品的影响时一样有效．研究表明，有必要采取适当的分类政策，以便于汇总产品到各类以动态行为为基础的市场（Naimetal.，2002）．不同的产品类型可能需要不同的订货政策（Evansetal.，1998）或信息富集策略（Mason-Jones and Towill,1997）．我们采取了两种不同的做法来了解ICT对供应链动力学的影响．该Z 变换分析表明有可能创新型的ICT将超越其它策略．但啤酒游戏结果显示ICT增加了人的决策复杂程度，即使清楚所提供的界定协议，也是很难的．因为有太多的信息和和计算需要管理．啤酒游戏还表明，如果对ICT协议管理不善，会增加库存成本．我们的结论是，虽然啤酒是在一个模拟和简化的环境中进行的，但像真实世界一样，人们需要决定哪些结果是不能被立即预知的．Sterman（1989）就表示，在这样的一个环境中，人们并不善于决策．虽然ICT为提高供应链的透明度提供了机会，但同时也创造了一个更复杂的环境使得当人们确实要加以干预使，决策变得更为困难．在传统的打啤酒模式和实施电子商务纲要之间可能有一个供游戏的人通过的学习曲线．电子商务实施纲要显示如果确实存在着学习曲线，那么就表明在简单的情况下学习曲线能够让参与者更快的进步．还有一种可能性是实施者在实施他们的电子商务战略时雄心勃勃．同时，这是不同于真实世界的．公司往往可能在执行新技术时超过了自己的能力和资源以至于太先进的满足了他们的需要，或者是由于在本质上属于资源密集型而无法执行和操作．由于很难保证每个人都受过适当训练，以应对ICT议定书的规定，有必要设计强有力的ICT系统以尽量减少人类干扰．反过来说，在需要人类的互动时，需要用哪些具体信息资源来做出那些特别的决定，这些要求是显而易见的．同时，在现有技术条件下，ICT系统很难处理例外情况，例如旷工或工厂停产．因此需要适当简化程序来使人机交互简单化，以管理例外情况．附录A在不同的供应链中量化牛鞭使用Z变换方法，如表2所示．原文:Assessing the impact of e-business on supplychaindynamicsAbstractThe Internet and related information and communication technologies (ICT) have recently enabled the cost-effective dissemination of information between disparate parties in the supply chain. New supply chain strategies, such as vendor managed inventory (VMI), collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) and efficient consumer response (ECR), have begun to exploit these new communication channels, principally at the retail end of the supply chain. The impact of the e-business enabled supply chain on manufacturers and materials/component suppliers is,however, less well understood and exploited. This paper is aimed at establishing e-business enabled supply chain models for quantifying the impact of ICT, in particular its effect on dynamic behaviour. The paper concludes that simple, yet robust, models enable considerable quantitative insights into the impact of e-business on supply chain dynamic behaviour prior to their implementation.Keywords Supplychaindynamics；Lommerce；ullwhipZQS；Vendormanage dinventory；Shopping1. IntroductionWhile information and communication technologies (ICT) in the form of e-business is advocated as an enabler to the 1–2–1 enterprise (Peppers andRogers, 1997) by allowing market place information to be shared by all businesses in the supply chain, there is little analytical or quantifiable evidence that it will actually improve the overall performance of the enterprise in delivering customer wants. It is usually proposed that passing information to all businesses in the supply chain via ICT will improve performance. In fact, recent research (Hong-Minh et al., 2000) has shown, via the supply chain ‘‘Beer Game’’ (Sterman, 1989), that simply passing information on to businesses can have a detrimental effect. This is due to the fact that, as well as having more information available, schedulers need to know what to do with it.There are many ways in which innovative information flows could be used within supply chains. Kiely (1998) provides a good starting point, specifically focusing on using demand data for forecasting purposes. In this paper we analyse the impact of four ICT enabled scenarios by investigating the bullwhip effect (Lee et al.,1997a, b) using two different approaches and comparing them to a traditional supply chain. The first approach is based on an analysis of the results of a management flight simulator, the Beer Game. The second approach is based on a quantitative z-transform analysis using the tools highlighted by Disney and Towill (2002). The aim is to compare and contrast the two approaches qualitatively to assess the implications of their evaluations of e-business scenarios on supply chain dynamics.Bullwhip is an important measure, being symptomatic of a poorly performing supply chain (Jones and Simons, 2000). It is a surrogate measure of production adaptation costs (Stalk and Hout, 1990) and implies the inclusion of ‘‘just-in-case’’ stock holding to buffer against uncertainties. There is considerable empirical evidence of bullwhip including recent examples in the: * food sector where the supplier orders two tiers further upstream varied 10 times more than the electronic point of sales (EPOS) data (Jones and Simons, 2000).* automotive sector where the ratio of the variance between incoming orders and order to suppliers at just a single echelon in the supply chain was 1:2 (Naim et al., 2002).The five supply chain strategies considered are:* Traditional—in which there are four ‘‘serially linked’’ echelons in the supply chain.* e-Shopping—where the distribution network is by-passed and information and materials flow directly between the end consumer and the product suppliers.* Reduced—where an echelon in the supply chain had been removed.* Vendor managed inventory (VMI)—that is simulated by developing a protocol positioned between two businesses in the supply chain that gives the necessary inventory and sales information, authority and responsibility to the supplier in order to manage the customer’s inventory.* EPOS—where information from the market place is transmitted to all enterprises in the supply chain.Although various e-business scenarios are available the above were chosen by four groups of four Masters Programme students based on their review of commonly quoted and/or implemented strategies in both the academic and practitioner literature. It was these Masters students who implemented the scenarios in the Beer Game.2. MethodologyResearch on improving the dynamic behaviour of individual manufacturing businesses and supply chains is well known. Most recent research methodologies may be categorised as:* Management games: Tools such as the Beer Game that was developed at MIT at the end of the 1950s (Sterman, 1989), are useful to illustrate the benefitsof different supply chain strategies. Games are limited in the sense that generally nothing can be rigorously proved from the game in itself, but they do provide a valuable source of anecdotal evidence and are a good learning device. Other authors have extended or computerised the Beer Game including van Ackere et al. (1993), Kaminsky and Simchi-Levi (1998), and Lambrecht and Dejonckheere (1999a, b).* Empirical studies: A number of authors have investigated the impact of ICT on the supply chain including Holmstr .om (1998), Fransoo and Wouters (2000), and Kaipia et al. (2000). However, this type of contribution looks at quantifying the improvement performance of a known strategy after its implementation; that is, there is no predictive element and the focus of the research is to identify best practices. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to compare ICT implementation strategies directly due to the varying nature of the environments they have been implemented in.* Statistical: This type of contribution typically provides statistical insights about the impact of demand properties such as standard deviation and correlation, and supply chain properties such as lead-times and information paths on inventory costs and the bullwhip effect orTdemand amplification. Statistical methods are often used to quantify the performance of real situations. These methods however, fail to show how to reduce or eliminate the detrimental dynamic effects, such as ‘‘bullwhip’’, and insights into the causes and effects of system structure on performance are rarely obtained in depth from the technique. Recent significant contributions of this type include Lee et al. (2000) and Chen et al., (2000).* Simulation and system dynamics: This approach was advocated by Forrester (1961) as a method of investigating the dynamical effects in large non-linear systems without resorting to complicated mathematical control theory based models (Edghill and Towill, 1989). Simulation approaches alone suffer。
erp中英文对照字典
ERP中英文对照字典1 ABM Activity-based Management 基于作业活动管理2 AO Application Outsourcing 应用程序外包3 APICS American Production and Inventory Control Society,Inc 美国生产与库存管理协会4 APICS Applied Manufacturing Education Series 实用制造管理系列培训教材5 APO Advanced Planning and Optimization 先进计划与优化技术6 APS Advanced Planning and Scheduling 高级计划与排程技术7 ASP Application Service/Software Provider 应用服务/软件供应商8 ATO Assemble To Order 定货组装9 ATP Available To Promise 可供销售量(可签约量)10 B2B Business to Business 企业对企业(电子商务)11 B2C Business to Consumer 企业对消费者(电子商务)12 B2G Business to Government 企业对政府(电子商务)13 B2R Business to Retailer 企业对经销商(电子商务)14 BIS Business Intelligence System 商业智能系统15 BOM Bill Of Materials 物料清单16 BOR Bill Of Resource 资源清单17 BPR Business Process Reengineering 业务/企业流程重组18 BPM Business Process Management 业务/企业流程管理19 BPS Business Process Standard 业务/企业流程标准20 C/S Client/Server(C/S)\Browser/Server(B/S) 客户机/服务器\浏览器/服务器21 CAD puter-Aided Design 计算机辅助设计22 CAID puter-Aided Industrial Design 计算机辅助工艺设计23 CAM puter-Aided Manufacturing 计算机辅助制造24 CAPP puter-Aided Process Planning 计算机辅助工艺设计25 CASE puter-Aided Software Engineering 计算机辅助软件工程26 CC Collaborative merce 协同商务27 CIMS puter Integrated Manufacturing System 计算机集成制造系统28 CMM Capability Maturity Model 能力成熟度模型29 MS Customer Oriented Manufacturing Management System 面向客户制造管理系统30 CORBA mon Object Request Broker Architecture 通用对象请求代理结构31 CPC Collaborative Product merce 协同产品商务32 CPIM Certified Production and Inventory Management 生产与库存管理认证资格33 CPM Critical Path Method 关键线路法34 CRM Customer Relationship Management 客户关系管理35 CRP capacity requirements planning 能力需求计划36 CTI puter Telephony Integration 电脑集成(呼叫中心)37 CTP Capable to Promise 可承诺的能力38 D Distributed ponent Object Model 分布式组件对象模型39 DCS Distributed Control System 分布式控制系统40 DMRP Distributed MRP 分布式MRP41 DRP Distribution Resource Planning 分销资源计划42 DSS Decision Support System 决策支持系统43 DTF Demand Time Fence 需求时界44 DTP Delivery to Promise 可承诺的交货时间45 EAI Enterprise Application Integration 企业应用集成46 EAM Enterprise Assets Management 企业资产管理47 ECM Enterprise merce Management 企业商务管理48 ECO Engineering Change Order 工程变更订单49 EDI Electronic Data Interchange 电子数据交换50 EDP Electronic Data Processing 电子数据处理51 EEA Extended Enterprise Applications 扩展企业应用系统52 EIP Enterprise Information Portal 企业信息门户53 EIS Executive Information System 高层领导信息系统54 EOI Economic Order Interval 经济定货周期55 EOQ Economic Order Quantity 经济订货批量(经济批量法)56 EPA Enterprise Proficiency Analysis 企业绩效分析57 ERP Enterprise Resource Planning 企业资源计划58 ERM Enterprise Resource Management 企业资源管理59 ETO Engineer To Order 专项设计，按订单设计60 FAS Final Assembly Schedule 最终装配计划61 FCS Finite Capacity Scheduling 有限能力计划62 FMS Flexible Manufacturing System 柔性制造系统63 FOQ Fixed Order Quantity 固定定货批量法64 GL General Ledger 总账65 GUI Graphical User Interface 图形用户界面66 HRM Human Resource Management 人力资源管理67 HRP Human Resource Planning 人力资源计划68 IE Industry Engineering/Internet Exploration 工业工程/浏览器69 ISO International Standard Organization 国际标准化组织70 ISP Internet Service Provider 互联网服务提供商71 ISPE International Society for Productivity Enhancement 国际生产力促进会72 IT/GT Information/Group Technology 信息/成组技术73 JIT Just In Time 准时制造/准时制生产74 KPA Key Process Areas 关键过程域75 KPI Key Performance Indicators 关键业绩指标76 LP Lean Production 精益生产77 MES Manufacturing Executive System 制造执行系统78 MIS Management Information System 管理信息系统79 MPS Master Production Schedule 主生产计划80 MRP Material Requirements Planning 物料需求计划81 MRPII Manufacturing Resource Planning 制造资源计划82 MTO Make To Order 定货(订货)生产83 MTS Make To Stock 现货(备货)生产84 OA Office Automation 办公自动化85 OEM Original Equipment Manufacturing 原始设备制造商86 OPT Optimized Production Technology 最优生产技术87 OPT Optimized Production Timetable 最优生产时刻表88 PADIS Production And Decision Information System 生产和决策管理信息系统89 PDM Product Data Management 产品数据管理90 PERT Program Evaluation Research Technology 计划评审技术91 PLM Production Lifecycle Management 产品生命周期管理92 PM Project Management 项目管理93 POQ Period Order Quantity 周期定量法94 PRM Partner Relationship Management 合作伙伴关系管理95 PTF Planned Time Fence 计划时界96 PTX Private Trade Exchange 自用交易97 RCCP Rough-Cut Capacity Planning 粗能力计划98 RDBM Relational Data Base Management 关系数据库管理99 RPM Rapid Prototype Manufacturing 快速原形制造100 RRP Resource Requirements Planning 资源需求计划101 SCM Supply Chain Management 供应链管理102 SCP Supply Chain Partnership 供应链合作伙伴关系86 OPT Optimized Production Technology 最优生产技术87 OPT Optimized Production Timetable 最优生产时刻表88 PADIS Production And Decision Information System 生产和决策管理信息系统89 PDM Product Data Management 产品数据管理90 PERT Program Evaluation Research Technology 计划评审技术91 PLM Production Lifecycle Management 产品生命周期管理92 PM Project Management 项目管理93 POQ Period Order Quantity 周期定量法94 PRM Partner Relationship Management 合作伙伴关系管理95 PTF Planned Time Fence 计划时界96 PTX Private Trade Exchange 自用交易97 RCCP Rough-Cut Capacity Planning 粗能力计划98 RDBM Relational Data Base Management 关系数据库管理99 RPM Rapid Prototype Manufacturing 快速原形制造100 RRP Resource Requirements Planning 资源需求计划101 SCM Supply Chain Management 供应链管理102 SCP Supply Chain Partnership 供应链合作伙伴关系103 SFA Sales Force Automation 销售自动化104 SMED Single-Minute Exchange Of Dies 快速换模法105 SOP Sales And Operation Planning 销售与运作规划106 SQL Structure Query Language 结构化查询语言107 TCO Total Cost Ownership 总体运营成本108 TEI Total Enterprise Integration 全面企业集成109 TOC Theory Of Constraints/Constraints managemant 约束理论/约束管理110 TPM Total Productive Maintenance 全员生产力维护111 TQC Total Quality Control 全面质量控制112 TQM Total Quality Management 全面质量管理113 WBS Work Breakdown System 工作分解系统114 XML eXtensible Markup Language 可扩展标记语言115 ABC Classification(Activity Based Classification) ABC分类法116 ABC costing 作业成本法117 ABC inventory control ABC 库存控制118 abnormal demand 反常需求119 acquisition cost ,ordering cost 定货费120 action message 行为/活动(措施)信息121 action report flag 活动报告标志122 activity cost pool 作业成本集123 activity-based costing(ABC) 作业基准成本法/业务成本法124 actual capacity 实际能力125 adjust on hand 调整现有库存量126 advanced manufacturing technology 先进制造技术127 advanced pricing 高级定价系统128 AM Agile Manufacturing 敏捷制造129 alternative routing 替代工序(工艺路线)130 Anticipated Delay Report 拖期预报131 anticipation inventory 预期储备132 apportionment code 分摊码133 assembly parts list 装配零件表134 automated storage/retrieval system 自动仓储/检索系统135 Automatic Rescheduling 计划自动重排136 available inventory 可达到库存137 available material 可用物料138 available stock 达到库存139 available work 可利用工时140 average inventory 平均库存141 back order 欠交(脱期)订单142 back scheduling 倒排(序)计划/倒序排产? 143 base currency 本位币144 batch number 批号145 batch process 批流程146 batch production 批量生产147 benchmarking 标杆瞄准(管理)148 bill of labor 工时清单149 bill of lading 提货单150 branch warehouse 分库151 bucketless system 无时段系统152 business framework 业务框架153 business plan 经营规划154 capacity level 能力利用水平155 capacity load 能力负荷156 capacity management 能力管理157 carrying cost 保管费158 carrying cost rate 保管费率159 cellular manufacturing 单元式制造160 change route 修改工序161 change structure 修改产品结构162 check point 检查点163 closed loop MRP 闭环MRP164 mon Route Code(ID) 通用工序标识165 ponent-based development 组件(构件)开发技术166 concurrent engineering 并行(同步)工程167 conference room pilot 会议室模拟168 configuration code 配置代码169 continuous improvement 进取不懈170 continuous process 连续流程171 cost driver 作业成本发生因素172 cost driver rate 作业成本发生因素单位费用173 cost of stockout 短缺损失174 cost roll-up 成本滚动计算法175 crew size 班组规模176 critical part 急需零件177 critical ratio 紧迫系数178 critical work center 关键工作中心179 CLT Cumulative Lead Time 累计提前期180 current run hour 现有运转工时181 current run quantity 现有运转数量182 customer care 客户关怀183 customer deliver lead time 客户交货提前期184 customer loyalty 客户忠诚度185 customer order number 客户订单号186 customer satisfaction 客户满意度187 customer status 客户状况188 cycle counting 周期盘点189 DM Data Mining 数据挖掘190 Data Warehouse 数据仓库191 days offset 偏置天数192 dead load 空负荷193 demand cycle 需求周期194 demand forecasting 需求预测195 demand management 需求管理196 Deming circle 戴明环197 demonstrated capacity 实际能力198 discrete manufacturing 离散型生产199 dispatch to 调度200 DRP Distribution Requirements Planning 分销需求计划201 drop shipment 直运202 dunning letter 催款信203 ECO workbench ECO工作台204 employee enrolled 在册员工205 employee tax id 员工税号206 end item 最终产品207 engineering change mode flag 工程变更方式标志208 engineering change notice 工程变更通知209 equipment distribution 设备分配210 equipment management 设备管理211 exception control 例外控制212 excess material analysis 呆滞物料分析213 expedite code 急送代码214 external integration 外部集成215 fabrication order 加工订单216 factory order 工厂订单217 fast path method 快速路径法218 fill backorder 补足欠交219 final assembly lead time 总装提前期220 final goods 成品221 finite forward scheduling 有限顺排计划222 finite loading 有限排负荷223 firm planned order 确认的计划订单224 firm planned time fence 确认计划需求时界225 FPR Fixed Period Requirements 定期用量法226 fixed quantity 固定数量法227 fixed time 固定时间法228 floor stock 作业现场库存229 flow shop 流水车间230 focus forecasting 调焦预测231 forward scheduling 顺排计划232 freeze code 冻结码233 freeze space 冷冻区234 frozen order 冻结订单235 gross requirements 毛需求236 hedge inventory 囤积库存237 in process inventory 在制品库存238 in stock 在库239 incrementing 增值240 indirect cost 间接成本241 indirect labor 间接人工242 infinite loading 无限排负荷243 input/output control 投入/产出控制244 inspection ID 检验标识245 integrity 完整性246 inter panies 公司内部间247 interplant demands 厂际需求量248 inventory carry rate 库存周转率249 inventory cycle time 库存周期250 inventory issue 库存发放251 inventory location type 仓库库位类型252 inventory scrap 库存报废量253 inventory transfers 库存转移254 inventory turns/turnover 库存(资金)周转次数255 invoice address 发票地址256 invoice amount gross 发票金额257 invoice schedule 发票清单258 issue cycle 发放周期259 issue order 发送订单260 issue parts 发放零件261 issue policy 发放策略262 item availability 项目可供量263 item description 项目说明264 item number 项目编号265 item record 项目记录266 item remark 项目备注267 item status 项目状态268 job shop 加工车间269 job step 作业步骤270 kit item 配套件项目271 labor hour 人工工时272 late days 延迟天数273 lead time 提前期274 lead time level 提前期水平275 lead time offset days 提前期偏置(补偿)天数276 least slack per operation 最小单个工序平均时差277 line item 单项产品278 live pilot 应用模拟279 load leveling 负荷量280 load report 负荷报告281 location code 仓位代码282 location remarks 仓位备注283 location status 仓位状况284 lot for lot 按需定货(因需定量法/缺补法)285 lot ID 批量标识286 lot number 批量编号287 lot number traceability 批号跟踪288 lot size 批量289 lot size inventory 批量库存290 lot sizing 批量规划291 low level code 低层(位)码292 machine capacity 机器能力293 machine hours 机时294 machine loading 机器加载295 maintenance ,repair,and operating supplies 维护修理操作物料296 make or buy decision 外购或自制决策297 management by exception 例外管理法298 manufacturing cycle time 制造周期时间299 manufacturing lead time 制造提前期300 manufacturing standards 制造标准301 master scheduler 主生产计划员302 material 物料303 material available 物料可用量304 material cost 物料成本305 material issues and receipts 物料发放和接收306 material management 物料管理307 material manager 物料经理308 material master,item master 物料主文件309 material review board 物料核定机构310 measure of velocity 生产速率水平311 memory-based processing speed 基于存储的处理速度312 minimum balance 最小库存余量313 Modern Materials Handling 现代物料搬运314 month to date 月累计315 move time , transit time 传递时间316 MSP book flag MPS登录标志317 multi-currency 多币制318 multi-facility 多场所319 multi-level 多级320 multi-plant management 多工厂管理321 multiple location 多重仓位322 net change 净改变法323 net change MRP 净改变式MRP324 net requirements 净需求325 new location 新仓位326 new parent 新组件327 new warehouse 新仓库328 next code 后续编码329 next number 后续编号330 No action report 不活动报告331 non-nettable 不可动用量332 on demand 急需的333 on-hand balance 现有库存量334 on hold 挂起335 on time 准时336 open amount 未清金额337 open order 未结订单/开放订单338 order activity rules 订单活动规则339 order address 订单地址340 order entry 订单输入341 order point 定货点342 order point system 定货点法343 order policy 定货策略344 order promising 定货承诺345 order remarks 定货备注346 ordered by 定货者347 overflow location 超量库位348 overhead apportionment/allocation 间接费分配349 overhead rate,burden factor,absorption rate 间接费率350 owner's equity 所有者权益351 parent item 母件352 part bills 零件清单353 part lot 零件批次354 part number 零件编号355 people involvement 全员参治356 performance measurement 业绩评价357 physical inventory 实际库存358 picking 领料/提货359 planned capacity 计划能力360 planned order 计划订单361 planned order receipts 计划产出量362 planned order releases 计划投入量363 planning horizon 计划期/计划展望期364 point of use 使用点365 Policy and procedure 工作准则与工作规程366 price adjustments 价格调整367 price invoice 发票价格368 price level 物价水平369 price purchase order 采购订单价格370 priority planning 优先计划371 processing manufacturing 流程制造372 product control 产品控制373 product family 产品系列374 product mix 产品搭配组合375 production activity control 生产作业控制376 production cycle 生产周期377 production line 产品线378 production rate 产品率379 production tree 产品结构树380 PAB Projected Available Balance 预计可用库存(量) 381 purchase order tracking 采购订单跟踪382 quantity allocation 已分配量383 quantity at location 仓位数量384 quantity backorder 欠交数量385 quantity pletion 完成数量386 quantity demand 需求量387 quantity gross 毛需求量388 quantity in 进货数量389 quantity on hand 现有数量390 quantity scrapped 废品数量391 quantity shipped 发货数量392 queue time 排队时间393 rated capacity 额定能力394 receipt document 收款单据395 reference number 参考号396 regenerated MRP 重生成式MRP397 released order 下达订单398 reorder point 再订购点399 repetitive manufacturing 重复式生产(制造) 400 replacement parts 替换零件401 required capacity 需求能力402 requisition orders 请购单403 rescheduling assumption 重排假设404 resupply order 补库单405 rework bill 返工单406 roll up 上滚407 rough cut resource planning 粗资源计划408 rounding amount 舍入金额409 run time 加工(运行)时间410 safety lead time 安全提前期411 safety stock 安全库存412 safety time 保险期413 sales order 销售订单414 scheduled receipts 计划接收量(预计入库量/预期到货量) 415 seasonal stock 季节储备416 send part 发送零件417 service and support 服务和支持418 service parts 维修件419 set up time 准备时间420 ship address 发运地址421 ship contact 发运单联系人422 ship order 发货单423 shop calendar 工厂日历(车间日历)424 shop floor control 车间作业管理(控制) 425 shop order , work order 车间订单426 shrink factor 损耗因子(系数)427 single level where used 单层物料反查表428 standard cost system 标准成本体系429 standard hours 标准工时430 standard product cost 标准产品成本431 standard set up hour 标准机器设置工时432 standard unit run hour 标准单位运转工时433 standard wage rate 标准工资率434 status code 状态代码435 stores control 库存控制436 suggested work order 建议工作单437 supply chain 供应链438 synchronous manufacturing 同步制造/同期生产439 time bucket 时段(时间段)440 time fence 时界441 time zone 时区442 top management mitment 领导承诺443 total lead time 总提前期444 transportation inventory 在途库存445 unfavorable variance, adverse 不利差异446 unit cost 单位成本447 unit of measure 计量单位448 value chain 价值链449 value-added chain 增值链450 variance in quantity 量差451 vendor scheduler,supplier scheduler 采购计划员/供方计划员452 vendor scheduling 采购计划法453 Virtual Enterprise(VE)/ Organization 虚拟企业/公司454 volume variance 产量差异455 wait time 等待时间456 where-used list 反查用物料单457 work center capacity 工作中心能力458 workflow 工作流459 work order 工作令460 work order tracking 工作令跟踪461 work scheduling 工作进度安排462 world class manufacturing excellence 国际优秀制造业463 zero inventories 零库存464465 Call/Contact/Work/Cost center 呼叫/联络/工作/成本中心466 Co/By-product 联/副产品467 E-merce/E-Business/E-Marketing 电子商务/电子商务/电子集市468 E-sales/E-procuement/E-partner 电子销售/电子采购/电子伙伴469 independent/dependent demand 独立需求/相关需求件470 informal/formal system 非/规X化管理系统471 Internet/Intranet/Extranet 互联网/企业内部网/企业外联网472 middle/hard/soft/share/firm/group ware 中间/硬/软/共享/固/群件473 pegging/kitting/netting/nettable 追溯(反查)/配套出售件/净需求计算474 picking/dispatch/disbursement list 领料单(或提货单)/派工单/发料单475 preflush/backflush/super backflush 预冲/倒冲法/完全反冲476 yield/scrap/shrinkage (rate) 成品率/废品率/缩减率477 scrap/shrinkage factor 残料率(废品系数)/损耗系数478479 costed BOM 成本物料清单480 engineering BOM 设计物料清单481 indented BOM 缩排式物料清单482 manufacturing BOM 制造物料清单483 modular BOM 模块化物料清单484 planning BOM 计划物料清单485 single level BOM 单层物料清单486 summarized BOM 汇总物料清单487488 account balance 账户余额489 account code 账户代码490 account ledger 分类账491 account period 会计期间492 accounts payable 应付账款493 accounts receivable 应收账款494 actual cost 实际成本495 aging 账龄496 balance due 到期余额497 balance in hand 现有余额498 balance sheet 资产负债表499 beginning balance 期初余额500 cash basis 现金收付制501 cash on bank 银行存款502 cash on hand 现金503 cash out to 支付给504 catalog 目录505 category code 分类码506 check out 结帐507 collection 催款508 cost simulation 成本模拟509 costing 成本核算510 current assets 流动资产511 current liabilities 流动负债512 current standard cost 现行标准成本513 detail 明细514 draft remittance 汇票汇出515 end of year 年末516 ending availables 期末可供量517 ending balance 期末余额518 exchange rate 汇率519 expense 费用520 financial accounting 财务会计521 financial entity 财务实体522 financial reports 财务报告523 financial statements 财务报表524 fiscal period 财务期间525 fiscal year 财政年度526 fixed assets 固定资产。
供应链中英对译
供应链supply chain供应链管理supply chain management纵向一体化vertical integration横向一体化horizontal integration供应链管理战略supply chain management strategy供应链协调与写作supply chain coordination and cooperation供应链风险管理supply chain risk management效率型供应链efficient supply chain响应型供应链responsive supply chain敏捷供应链agile supply chain扩展企业extended corporation集成化供应链管理integrated supply chain management业务外包outsourcing推动式push牵引式pull供应链管理战略supply chain management strategy供应链构建supply chain configuration供应链构建的设计原则the principles of supply chain configuration核心企业core company非核心企业non-core company基于产品的供应链设计策略product-based supply chain design为供应链管理设计产品design for supply chain management供应链重构supply chain reengineering供应链合作关系supply chain partnership战略联盟strategic alliance供应商选择supplier selection客户关系管理customer relationship management供应商关系管理supplier relationship management采购管理purchasing management传统采购模式traditional purchasing mode 基于供应链的采购管理模式purchasing mode under the supply chain management mode准时化采购JIT purchasing全球采购global purchase同步化synchronization能力平衡capacity balancing库存控制inventory control协调coordination生产计划与控制production planning and control订单刘order flow合作计划、预测与补货collaborative planning ，forecasting and replenishment准时生产制just in time零库存zero inventories快速响应quick response产品到达市场的时间time-to-market基于时间的竞争time based competition同步性synchronization民机供应链agile supply chain物流logistics物流管理logistics management物流网络logistics network第三方物流third party logistics一体化物流integrated logistics全球物流global logistics流入物流inbound logistics流出物流outbound logistics逆向物流reverse logistics外包outsourcing库存inventory补给策略replenishment policy周期性检查模型periodic review model连续性检查模型continuous review model供应商管理库存vender managed inventory 联合管理库存joint managed inventory多级库存友华multi-stage inventory optimization连续补给continuous replenishment。
Supply Chain Integration (供应链整合)
7
A new Supply Chain Paradigm ― Push-Pull Supply Chain (新的供应链范式—推拉式供应链)
The initial stages, are operated in a push-based manner while the remaining stages employ a pullbased strategy. (供应链上游采用推式策略而下游则采用 拉式策略) The interface between the push-based stages and the pull-based stages is the push-pull boundary. (推拉式策 略的接口称作推拉边界)
A Newer Paradigm: Pull Strategies (新范式:推式策略)
Production is demand driven (生产是需求驱动的) Production and distribution coordinated with true customer demand (生产与配送按照真实的顾客需求协调) Firms respond to specific orders (公司应对具体的订单) Pull Strategies result in (推式策略导致): Reduced lead times (better anticipation) (提前期的减少) Decreased inventory levels at retailers and manufacturers (零售 商与制造商库存水平的减少) Decreased system variability (系统变动性的减少) Better response to changing markets (更好应对变化的市场) But: Harder to leverage economies of scale (规模效应小) 6 Doesn’t work in all cases (不是总有效，买车的例子 )
B2B电子商务与企业供应链管理
B2B电子商务与企业供应链管理B2B电子商务与企业供应链管理电子商务发展的真正突破是B2B的电子商务，即企业对企业的电子商务，是在上下游企业之间从事的网络商务活动，是网络经济的基础。
从参与企业的数量、涉及的金额、交互信息的规模上来说，B2B 都将成为电子商务的主体。
在这种环境下，企业不仅要协调企业内计划、采购、制造、销售的各个环节，还要与包括供应商、承销商等在内的上下游企业紧密配合。
B2B模式的电子商务面向企业整个供应链管理，并带来了供应链的变革，使企业降低交易成本、缩短订货周期、改善信息管理和提高决策水平，从质量、成本和响应速度三方面改进企业经营，增强企业竞争能力。
B2B电子商务模式带来了企业价值链的变革供应链（Supply Chain）由波特的价值链理论（Value Chain）发展而来.波特指出，任何一个组织均可看作是由一系列相关的基本行为组成，这些行为对应于从供应商到消费者的物流、信息流和资金流的流动。
波特的企业价值链是面向职能部门的，资源在企业流动的过程就是企业的各个部门不断对其增加价值的过程。
但随着全球性竞争的日益剧烈、顾客需求的快速变化，采用劳动分工、专业化协作作为基础的面向职能的管理模式正面临着严峻的挑战，它将企业业务流程割裂成相互独立的环节，关注的焦点是单个任务或工作，但单个任务并没有给顾客创造价值，只有整个过程，即当所有活动有序地集合在一起时，才能给顾客创造价值。
哈佛大学的哈默博士于1990年提出的企业流程再造（BPR，Business Process Reengineering）指出：企业的使命是为顾客创造价值，能够为顾客带来价值的是企业流程；企业的成功来自于优异的过程业绩，优异的过程业绩需要有优异的过程管理。
B2B的电子商务模式采用了以顾客为中心、面向过程的管理方法，提高了对顾客、市场的响应速度，注重整个流程最优的系统思想，消除了企业内部环节的重复、无效的劳动，让资源在每一个过程中流动时都实现增值，以达到成本最低、效率最高。
供应链管理毕业论文文献翻译中英文对照
供应链管理毕业论文文献翻译中英文对照附件1：外文资料翻译译文供应链管理ABC1．什么是供应链管理供应链是一种关于整合的科学和艺术，它主要探究提高企业采购生产商品所需的原材料、生产商品，并把它供应给最终顾客的效率的途径。
以下是供应链管理的五个基本组成模块：计划--它是供应链的战略层面。
企业需要有一个控制所有资源的战略以满足客户对产品或服务的需求。
计划的核心是建立一套机制去监控整条供应链以便使它能有效运作：低成本、高品质配送和增值客户服务。
该模块连结着供应链的作业与营运目标，主要包括需求/供给规划（Demand/Supply Planning）与规划基础建设（infrastructure）两项活动，对所有采购运筹流程、制造运筹流程与配送运筹流程进行规划与控制。
需求/供给规划活动包含了评估企业整体产能与资源、总体需求规划以及针对产品与配销管道，进行存货规划、配送规划、制造规划、物料及产能的规划。
规划基础建设管理包含了自制或外包决策的制定、供应链的架构设计、长期产能与资源规划、企业规划、产品生命周期的决定、新旧产品线规划与产品线的管理等。
采购—选择供给你提供用来生产产品或服务的原材料或服务的供应商。
和供应商建立一套价格、供应、支付过程的体系，创造一种机制以监控此过程、改善供应商关系。
理顺此过程以管理供应商交付的原材料库存或服务，其中包括收货、出货、检验、中转和批准支付。
此模块有采购作业与采购基础建设两项管理活动，其目的是描述一般的采购作业与采购管理流程。
采购作业包含了寻找供货商、收料、进料品检、拒收与发料作业。
采购基础建设的管理包含了供货商评估、采购、运输管理、采购品质管理、采购合约管理、付款条件管理、采购零组件的规格制定。
制造—这是制造步骤。
计划这些必需的活动：生产、测试、包装、预出货。
作为供应链的核心机制，它意味着质量水平、产品输出和工厂产能的有效控制。
此模块具有制造执行作业与制造基础建设两项管理活动，其目的是描述制造生产作业与生产的管理流程。
B2B电子商务与供应链管理
5．1 B2B电子商务及其价值
5．1．1 B2B电子商务含义与模式
B2B电子商务包括两种基本模式： 一种是企业之间直接进行的电子商
务，如制造商的在线采购和在线供货等；
另一种是通过第三方电子商务网站平 台进行的商务活动。
海尔的B2B电子商务（企业类）
B2B电子商务（平台类）
阿里巴巴董事会主席 - 马云
5．2 供应链与供应链管理
5．2．3 电子商务环境下的供应链管理创新 在电子商务环境下，可以从以下几个方面
去对供应链管理进行创新： 1．消除供应链上不必要的环节； 2．实施网上销售以期降低成本； 3．培育大量网络企业； 4．推动企业供应链向全球网络化方向发展； 5．促进供应链中信息流的改善； 6．加强贸易伙伴的协调合作关系以增进信任。
作业:（第三次）第三、四章：
1. 网络营销策略包括哪些内容，你是如何理解的？ 2. 网络广告的特点有哪些？ 3. 网上市场调研的优势有哪些？有哪些方法？ 4. 网上购物者的类型有哪些？针对不同的消费者
应该采取的策略是什么？
5. 电子商店经营管理主要包括哪些内容？
6. 适合在网上销售的商品有哪些特点？
1．消除供应链上不必要的环节
2．实施网上销售以期降低成本
3．培育大量网络企业
4．推动企业供应链向全球网络化方向发展
5 ．促进供应链中信息流的改善
6 ．加强贸易伙伴的协调合作关系以增进信任
不同企业在实施电子商务过程中会对公 司定位、利润来源以及对公司发展的战略有 不同的思考，加之信息的不对称，造成供应 链的效率丧失。企业应该协调贸易伙伴间的 协作以达到供应链整体利益的最大化，实现 贸易伙伴之间的信息共享。
5．3 电子供应链管理
5．3 电子供应链管理 5．3．1 电子供应链及其优势 1．电子供应链 电子供应链的定义为：围绕核心企业， 以Internet为平台，以电子商务为手段，通过 对物流、资金流与信息流的整合和控制，从 采购原材料开始，到制成中间产品以及最终 产品，最后由销售网络把产品送到消费者手 中的将供应商、生产商、分销商、零售商、 直到最终客户连成一个整体的网链结构和模 式。
跨境电子商务中英文对照外文翻译文献
跨境电子商务中英文对照外文翻译文献中英文对照外文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)译文:本地化跨境电子商务的模型摘要通过对国际供应链的B2B电子商务交易量的快速增长和伊朗快速增加的跨境交易业务，跨境电商过程的有效管理对B2B电子商务系统十分重要。
本文对局部模型的结构是基于B2B电子商务的基础设施三大层，消息层、业务流程层和内容层。
由于伊朗的电子商务的要求，每一层的需要适当的标准和合适的方案的选择。
当电子文件需要移动顺利向伊朗，建议文件的标准为文件内容支持纸质和电子文件阅读。
验证提出的模型是通过案例研究方法呈现一到四阶段的情景。
本文试图通过交换商业文件在贸易过程中这一局部模型，实现在全球电子贸易供应链更接近区域单一窗口建设的关键目标。
关键词：电子商务;跨境贸易;电子文档管理;国际供应链1.简介电子商务是关于在互联网或其他网络电子系统购买和销售产品或服务。
术语B2B（企业对企业），描述了企业间的电子商务交易，如制造商和批发商，或批发商和零售商之间。
本文的研究目标是上两个不同国家贸易商之间的通信。
今天的世界贸易组织的主要目标之一是建立区域单一窗口，可以提高世界各地的贸易便利化。
建立区域单一窗口需要跨境海关，可以有效地交换贸易文件。
因此，首先，简化跨境贸易文件的关键在于朝着国家单一窗口移动。
然后，区域单一窗口可以授权国家之间的通信。
电子商务模型是基于三个主要逻辑层的研究。
这三个层消息传输层，业务处理层和内容层。
本文的局部模型是一种能够自动交换读取文件的过程。
通过与东亚和中东国家的建立区域单一窗口可以在将来得到改善的更多的互操作性，从而建立伊朗国家单一窗口在本文的第二部分讨论引进国际供应链中的跨境B2B模式所需的基本概念和标准。
第三部分介绍在大的模型中引入的组件功能和范围。
第四部分讨论了B2B交易层模型的定位，最后结束本文。
2.背景在本节中，除了了解B2B电子商务在伊朗的情况，还有参考模型的背景等概念以及讨论B2B电子商务跨境模式的本土化。
供应链管理(中英对照)
Supply Chain Management供应链管理The so-called supply chain, in fact, from suppliers, manufacturers, warehouses, distribution centers and channels, and so constitute a logistics network. The same enterprise may constitute the different components of this network node, but the situation is different from a corporate network in different nodes. For example, in a supply chain, companies may not only in the same manufacturers, storage nodes, and in distribution centers, such as possession node location. In the more detailed division of labor, the higher the professional requirements of the supply chain, different nodes are basically composed by different enterprises. In the supply chain flows between the member units of raw materials, finished products, such as inventory and production constitutes the supply chain of goods flow.所谓供应链，其实就是由供应商、制造商、仓库、配送中心和渠道商等构成的物流网络。
Supply Chain Integration (供应链整合)
4
The Old Paradigm: Push Strategies (老范式:推式策略)
Production decisions based on long-term forecasts (产品决 策基于长期的预测) Ordering decisions based on inventory & forecasts (订货决策 基于库存与预测) What are the problems with push strategies? (存在的问题) Inability to meet changing demand patterns (需求模式变 动时没有办法满足需求) Obsolescence (过时的策略) The bullwhip effect (牛鞭效应): • Excessive inventory (库存过多) • Excessive production variability (生产变动太大) • Poor service levels (服务水平差 ) 5
14
Selecting the Best SC Strategy2 (选择最好的供应链战略)
Low uncertainty but low value of economies of scale (Box IV)(high volume books and cd’s) (需求不确定性小以及低规 模效应) Either push strategies or push/pull strategies might be most appropriate (推式策略或者推拉式策略) High uncertainty and high value of economies of scale (Box II) (需求不确定性大以及高规模效应) For example, the furniture industry (家具行业) How can production be pull but delivery push? (生产过程 采用拉式策略而配送过程采用推式策略) Is this a “pull-push” system? (是否存在推拉式系统?)
供应链信息共享中英文外文文献翻译2017
本科毕业设计（论文）中英文对照翻译(此文档为word格式,下载后您可任意修改编辑!)文献出处：Pack Hagen. The most important aspect in supply chain management: information sharing [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 2(12): 397-407.原文The most important aspect in supply chain management:informationsharingPack Hagen.1 IntroductionAdvances in information technology enable information availability, which facilitates communication, coordination, and collaboration among supply chain partners through information sharing. Supply chain management literature reveals that through better information linkages among business partners, various deficiencies, which include long lead times, large batch sizes, high inventory levels, slow new product design and development, and long order fulfillment cycles, can be mitigated or reduced.Even though information sharing can be extremely beneficial, it is not sufficient to fully reduce the impact of uncertainty inherent to supply chain dynamics. For instance, since Forrester’s work on the bullwhip effect (1961), there has been a long debate and unsettled dispute on whether or not sharing information is always beneficial to avoid it. In addition, researchers have also noted that the benefits of information sharing depend on the type of information, as well as the demand patterns and capacity constraints.In this study, the effect of information sharing among business partners on on-time delivery rate and total cost is investigated via simulation of a generic, hypothetical supply chain model. While information sharing in the supply chain has been researched extensively, the effect of sharing of resource reliability information (i.e., occurrence of various failures and equipment breakdowns) on supply chain performancehas not. The experimental factors are (1) capacity tightness (three levels), (2) reliability (three levels), and (3) information sharing modes, which are sharing of reliability information, customer demand, and inventory level. This paper is organized as follows: A literature survey on supply chain dynamics is presented in Section 2. Experimental factors, along with a brief literature on information sharing, are outlined in Section 3. Development of the model is explained in Section 4. Experimental results are discussed in Sections 5 and 6. Conclusions are presented in Section 7.2 Supply chain dynamicsSupply chain management has been studied by many researchers. In addition to traditional supply chain management topics, such as operational planning, strategic planning, and logistics, the literature includes a variety of studies that investigate supply chain management from different perspectives: supply networks, chaos perspective, risk management, supply chain dynamics, uncertainty, classification and taxonomy issues, and e-commerce.For an extensive review of the relevant literature, please refer to Min and Zhou, Huang et al., Goknur and Turan, and Chan and Chan.Making decisions in a supply chain involves a feedback process triggering interaction between system entities; a time delay is observed when there is a lag between when a decision is made and when its effect is felt, which often further complicates the interaction between entities.As studied by Forrester, who discovered the fluctuation and amplification of demand from downstream to upstream of the supply chain, ―feedback–interaction–delay‖ are inherent to many processes in a supply chain, inducing variability, uncertainty, and instability that make supply chain a complex, dynamic system.In the context of ―system dynamics,‖ a supply chain can be defined as a chain of consecutive, sequentially interdependent local transaction systems. The interdependency in supply chains leads to conflicting, local objectives, and thus, trade-offs must be managed properly through cooperation and collaboration. As one of the pioneers in this area, Forrester lists oscillation in order and demand, amplification in order and inventory, and time lag in order and material flow as the three aggregate behaviors that affect supply chain dynamics. De Souza et al. define supply chain dynamics in two parts: (1) dynamics of orders as the difference between a firm’s response and the demand and (2) dynamics of inventory as the difference between the firm’s expected inventory level and actual inventory level. They expand on Forrester’s conclusion and define seven causes of the supply chain dynamics: Rationing and short gaming；Capacity constraints；Information delay；Poor coordination；Material delay；Demand signaling；Order batching.The above-mentioned factors introduce uncertainty that propagates through the supply chain. Davis classifies uncertainty under supply, manufacturing process and demand sides of the supply chain. Mason-Jones and Towill add control systems uncertainty to Davis’s classification. V an der V orst and Beulens define supply chain uncertainty as follows:Supply chain uncertainty refers to decision making situations in the supply chain in which the decision maker does not know definitely what to decide as he is indistinct about the objectives; lacks information about (or understanding of) the supply chain or its environment; lacks information processing capacities; is unable to accurately predict the impact of possible control actions on supply chain behavior; or, lacks effective control actions (noncontrollability). The sources of supply uncertainty are globalization, specialization, and outsourcing. Globalization and specialization combine to make a potentially volatile situation. Globalization of manufacturing processes is often due to some competitive advantage to be gained by globalizing. Specialization of production facilities leads to economies of scale. To gain economies of scale and competitive advantage, these two are often done in tandem. Specialization and globalization also both have a tendency to increase travel distance for products and transportation time, which in turn increases inventories in transit. Specialization comes at great risk becauseco-located production increases uncertainty about supply in politically unstable environments or impending natural disasters. Outsourcing of processes is known to reduce the control of the overall process to a manufacturing firm. Supply uncertainty is described as being supply risk. Supply risk as well as uncertainty characteristics can have an empirical representation. Qualitative analysis is the preferred method because of the difficulties in quantifying the risk characteristics. Qualitative evaluation of supply uncer-tainty, strategy, and risk mitigation are the suggested methods to handle supply uncertainty. Manufacturing (i.e., process) uncertainty has been extensively studied in the literature and sources of internal uncertainty are well-known and typically managed within a manufacturing environment. The primary source of internal uncertainty is equipment failure, which causes downtime. Preventative maintenance and condition based maintenance techniques have become standard practice. Maintenance affects the mean time to failure (MTTF); thus, availability is affected by maintenance. Prognostic systems are being investigated to better predict failures before they happen. In addition to mechanical type of failures, other causes of irregular failures include labor strikes, political unrest, and natural disasters, which may affect the performance of a facility and the overall performance in a supply chain. Demand uncertainty has been widely addressed in the literature. Customer demand is driven by customer consumption habits, customer expectations, andproduct knowledge. Thus, future customer demand is difficult to accurately predict. Uncertain demand can be managed by make-to-order systems, which depend on high level of customization capability and shorter lead times, while a stable demand environment can be managed by make-to-forecast systems, which rely on relatively large inventories created based upon forecast to provide standardized products. Most supply chains operate in between these two extremes; the difference is the amount of product customization or postponement of the product assembly that occurs in the supply chain. Uncertainty and information scarcity describe the typical supply chain environment. Lack of information or insufficient level of information availability leads to incomplete information. Not sharing the information that is available with other entities in the supply chain also creates the same effect. With advanced information technology (IT) tools, such as radiofrequency identification (RFID) systems, information can be first made available, which improves operational visibility, and then can be shared at various levels.The information sharing in supply chains literature includes various studies that range from demand information sharing to product information sharing to inventory information sharing. The literature review shows that true information sharing capability facilitated by advanced IT tools is limited by the willingness of the decision makers toshare information. However, there is no consensus among the researchers on the actual benefits provided by information sharing. The reasons for the disagreement are due to the differences in supply chain configurations including different manufacturing strategies—such as make to order, make to stock, assembly to order [9], levels and modes of information sharing, information sharing process itself as in the case of auction-based models ,and timeliness of information shared (i.e., time delay). This paper investigates via simulation the impact of different information sharing modes, subject to capacity constraints in the presence of resource failures, on on-time delivery rate, and total cost in a supply chain. 3 Experimental factorsIn this study, the effect of information sharing among business partners on the performance of a supply chain is investigated via simulation using three experimental factors: (1) capacity tightness (three levels), (2) reliability (three levels), and (3) information sharing modes (sharing of reliability information, customer demand, and inventory level).The capacity tightness factor provides a level of internal flexibility for a manufacturing enterprise in order to adjust and respond to requirements in supply and demand sides, as studied by Gavirneni et al. and Chan and Chan.The reliability factor introduces uncertainty due to manufacturing-level (i.e., process) breakdowns, which in turn affectcapacity and on-time delivery, as emphasized by Cachon and Fisher and Y u et al.3.1 Capacity tightnessCapacity tightness is defined as follows: When Ctightness is greater than 1, then the total capacity is adequate to meet the total demand. Conversely, if Ctightness is less than 1, then there is insufficient capacity to meet the demand. Capacity tightness has been studied in the context of information sharing in a supply chain. Studies of capacity tightness with various information sharing modes and find that when capacity tightness is large or small, information sharing does not add any value. Examinations of capacity tightness with real-time order revision over a single production period with a variety of product mix report capacity buffers are not significant under demand uncertainty, when real-time order revision is employed.3.2 ReliabilityThe reliability on the logistics portion of a supply chain has been sparsely researched. Logistics reliability is synonymous with on-time delivery rate. Originally, mixed integer programming was used to determine cost given supplier reliability on logistics in a pure probabilistic manner between supplier and manufacturer. An extension of this examination including the reliability of logistics between suppliers,manufacturers, and distributors overall on-time delivery rate was determined. A review of global logistics systems concludes that supplier reliability has been scarcely explored as a factor of uncertainty. Logistics reliability for contingency planning, where supply and demand are random with deterministic logistics failure rates, concludes that network configuration, information sharing, and network rules effect on-time delivery rate.Supplier reliability has been modeled using two methods: the machine breakdown method and the availability of supplier method. The machine breakdown method focuses on the production and inventory methods of the supplier. The availability of supplier method examines longer-term effects of unavailability on the immediate upstream purchaser. Nonetheless, the focus of these studies is on a single entity only and not the whole supply chain.3.3 Information sharing modesA study using order, inventory, and customer demand information sharing in a capacitated two-echelon supply chain with a manufacturer and a retailer found information sharing is significant under all condition. Similarly, across all conditions, capacity is shown to be significant on the reduction of holding costs. Although both capacity and information sharing are significant under every condition, the interaction effects arenot studied.Similarly, an analysis comparing customer demand and inventory information sharing versus no information sharing between a retailer and supplier finds that there is a significant improvement when sharing customer demand and inventory information versus no information sharing. However, the improvement is not from information sharing but instead from information technologies that force lead time and batch size reductions. An analytical comparison of a two-echelon supply chain with no stationary demand comparing no information sharing against customer demand information sharing finds that customer demand information is significantly superior on cost compared to no information sharin. Additionally, customer demand information’s superiority is made more evident when lead time is long, customer demand variability is high, or customer demand is auto-correlated over time. A comparison of production schedule combined with customer demand versus no information sharing finds that with customer demand and production schedule information, production is on a make-to-order basis, whereas with no information sharing production is on a make-to-stock basis. Operational and inventory costs are shown to be lower, when production schedule and customer demand information are shared compared to no information sharing.A comparison of order, inventory, and customer demand informationsharing when order intervals and quantities vary finds customer demand information, across all order quantities and intervals, outperforms inventory information and order information on cost and order fulfillment .Similarly, inventory information is significantly better than order information sharing. In a divergent two-echelon supply chain, a study of three modes of information sharing—no information sharing, demand information sharing, and order information sharing—concludes that the information sharing modes performance increases with additional visibility .译文供应链管理的重中之重：信息共享培根·哈根1引言当今，信息技术飞速发展，这使得更容易了解信息、促进了沟通与协调，并通过信息共享来促进供应链合作伙伴之间的协作。
《供应链整合》
協同商務的類型（續）
採購協同商務
這是指透過網際網路對同一產品感興趣的買主可以結 合起來，形成較高的議價能力，得到較優厚的折扣。
規劃 / 預測協同商務
CPFR的目的主要是要透過整個供應鏈的上、下游廠商 的協定、合作、資訊分享，來降低產品間供需的失衡， 或資訊不分享所造成的長鞭效應(Bullwhip Effect)， 而其主要的協同工作則包括了協同規劃、協同預測與 協同補貨。
OEM
生產條件的設計：模具、製程
ODM
低階產品 從產品構思到製造，由CM負責
CDM
中高階產品 從產品構思開始合作
精品ppt
供應鏈中的協同作業-協同設計
Collaborative Design and Manufacturing
雙方的提早涉入
增加雙方的特用性投資和鎖定效應
零組件的sourcing
Early Involvement
產品研發特性
OEM
協？同 設Wh計y
ODM
業務成長
共識 決心
加 值 業務成長
未來二年業務 快速的成精品長ppt
組織再造
Time-toMarket
專案透明度
Sharp/ViewSonic
•產品生命週期 縮短 •已使用WEB作部 份產品資料傳輸
流程再造
供應鏈中的協同作業-協同設計
依實際需求進行零件製造與採購（拉式） 依實際顧客訂單進行組裝與配送（拉式） 預測生產、陸空聯運、配送倉庫（推＋拉）
精品ppt
四大象限分析 – 書籍、CD
需求穩定 經濟規模不明顯 Amazon
區域需求匯總、預測與倉庫存貨（推式） 依實際顧客訂單進行組裝與配送（拉式）
精品ppt
供应链整合
Demand uncertainty
(需求不确定性) (C.V.)
What is the Best Strategy about Push – Pull Strategy? (最好的推拉策略是什么？)
Pull
H
I Computer (PC)
IV Books & CDs (书籍音像制品)
L
Push
L
II Furniture (家具) III Grocery (杂货)
H
Delivery cost Unit price
Pull
13
Push
Economies of Scale (规模效应)
Selecting the Best SC Strategy1 (选 择最好的供应链战略)
Higher demand uncertainty suggests pull (需求不确定性越 大选择拉式策略) Higher importance of economies of scale suggests push (规 模效应越重要选择推式策略) High uncertainty/ EOS not important (Box I) such as the computer industry implies pull (需求不确定性大/规模效应不 重要选择拉式策略) Low uncertainty/ EOS important (Box III) such as groceries implies push (需求不确定性小/规模效应重要选择推式策略) Demand is stable (需求稳定) Transportation cost reduction is critical (运输成本减少很 关键) Pull would not be appropriate here. (不Manufacturers (两种生产模式的PC制造商):
供应链管理外文翻译——Supplychain
1 供应链管理理论、实践及未来的挑战供应链相关理论很明显大部分大部头文章的注意力日益增多的集中在供应策略、业务策略和供应链管理含义的确定上即通常集中在断言他们是什么这样的问题上。
当前所描绘的SCM规范是三个要素的结合体现象、惯例和未来的发展趋势。
现象争议来源于研究范围和侧重点的不同。
一些学者公开宣布他们使用的是供应链管理和采购术语的“同义词”Stuart1997其务实的态度可能会受到很大的赞扬但是与一个作用和一个过程的证明类似似乎某些时候会错过许多供应链或网络管理思路。
另一些人显然有更宽泛的理解举例来说精益供应的做法侧重于“汽车装配的采购活动及组成部分和组件系统制造商的供应活动”Lamming1996年183页。
因此莱明倾向于更广泛的“供应管理”概念。
一些采购供应链管理专家将SCM看作是与供应商的一种发展关系GiuniperoBrand1996年另一人则认为良好的供应管理还不够还要有一个额外的、更广泛、更综合、涵盖一切的系统这个系统包括采购、运输以及销售的最终用户Davis1993年。
在关于定义和描述的争论中我们最终还是返回重新定位专业和职能例如运行管理和物流学。
我们认同采用建构主义的价值探讨行动者本身如何从事有意义的决策而不是试着重新构建。
通过后面这种方法我们便有机会探讨理想的实践主义者和推动者之间的界限以及他们如何有关方面在诠释他们的首要目标、活动范围和职责分配。
这种做法的价值在于并不否认理论和模型在常规供应管理中的贡献。
惯例当从理论向解决办法转化时问题就出现了有利的属性经常归因于某些特点。
例如一个定义表明如果通过电子手段或网络连接的所有供应链能够促进物流和信息流有效和高效的流动那么都可以被认为是真正的时尚ChandrashekarSchary1999年27页 2 有些惯例特别是源于实践的方法具有优越性。
源于丰田公司及其供应商的IMVP引领的精益的生产方式可以说就是这种类型。
另一个例子也许是许多定制和敏捷性的例子Pine 1993年Goldman等1995年 Meier和Humphreys 1998。
零售业供应链英文文献及译文毕业设计论文外文文献翻译
零售业供应链英文文献及译文20 Since the 1990s, China's rapid development of the retail impressive, but compared with developed countries, China's retail business is still an enormous gap exists. China's accession to the WTO, foreign retail giants have entered the Chinese market, China's retail industry to directly face the international market amid fierce competition. And the globalization of the economy, market conditions, Business and competition among enterprises has evolved into the supply chain and the an integrated management ideas and methods, supply chain management around the core business, through the flow of materials, funds, information flow, will be suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retail customers until the final composition of the supply chain together into an overall management model. At present, China's large retail enterprises in the supply chain management awareness has remained only at the operational level, not to treat it as a corporate strategy to implement an important component of the it is only through the supply chain management of strategic thinking, with the types of goods used to build the supply chain to acquire strategic match, can we make our retail enterprise supply chain management to implement a qualitative leap.1.An efficient supply-chain and supply-chain reactionSupply chain there are two main functions : to the logistics function and flow function. Supply chain logistics functions refer to the minimum cost of the raw materials processed into components, semi-finished products, products and their supply chain from a node to another node; supply chain to flow function refers to the market demand to make rapid response, to ensure an appropriate product in the appropriate place and time to meet the needs of customers. Logistics functions to flow and function needs some costs, which together constitute the total supply chain costs, with the main logistics costs including transport, storage, packaging, handling, distribution processing, distribution costs, flow to the cost of including an oversupply of commodities price losses, and supply of stock losses and the resulting loss of potential income customers The general sense is the supply chain and logistics business flow between these two functions of the balance, responsiveness and efficiency cost trade-off between the level. Supply chain management is an integrated management ideas and methods, in the increasingly fierce market competition, the rapid development of information technology today, the supply chain tends to shorten the response time to meet the evolving needs of users. In this time based on the competition, supply chain operations with the needs of the market simultaneously, not only faster response speed, and a flexible response to the magic. Supply chain reaction capacity available supply chain following tasks ability to measure : Is able to demand significant changes to respond; whether it can satisfy customers in a shorter period of Availability; whether it will provide customers with more varieties of products; the possibility of providing innovative products; ability to provide a high level of customer service. Supply chain has more of the above capacity, the supply chain reaction capability will be. However reaction of the increase must also pay the cost of the price increase. For example, to meet the demand for the drastic change in, it needs higher inventory levels, leading to a declining level of efficiency. Therefore, each raising a strategic response capability will have to pay additional costs, thereby reducing efficiency levels, and vice versa.Supply chain efficiency is to achieve a supply chain logistics functions as a major objective, that is, at a minimum cost of raw materials into parts, and finished products, and eventually sent to the hands ofconsumers. Efficient supply-chain needs of the market, the characteristics of the product and related technologies are relatively stable, thus the supply chain nodes of the enterprise can focus on access to the benefits of economies of scale, improve equipment utilization, lower production, transportation, warehousing and other aspects of the associated costs, so as to minimize product costs. Supply chain reaction was achieved in the supply chain to flow function as a major objective, that the right to make changes in market demand, rapid response, such as supply chain for products, the market demand is very great uncertainty, or a shorter product life cycle, product or technology developed rapidly, products or seasonal fluctuations in demand strong. Supply Chain Reaction need to maintain a higher adaptability to the market and achieve flexible production, thereby reducing product obsolescence and the risks of failure. Supply chain strategy is in the supply chain-reaction capability and efficiency levels between the balance Once the retail enterprise supply chain strategy, stress reaction of the supply chain must be all the functions strategy designed to enhance its response capabilities, emphasizing efficiency and the level of the supply chain, it must allow all the functions of the strategies used to improve efficiency and make contribution.2. Retail enterprise sales of household items, refrigerated food, food processing temperature. Functional value of the life cycle length, needs stability can accurately forecast, so that supply and demand can achieve almost perfect balance, This makes it easy to adjust the market, the business flow costs can be omitted. Retail enterprises can concentrate almost all his energy to reduce logistics costs, with the upstream suppliers, in close cooperation accelerate inventory turnover, timely inventory and to adopt high-efficiency low-cost procurement and the right to choose suppliers on cost and quality, According to market forecasts to ensure balanced effectively meet the needs of its customers bring the whole of the supply chain to minimize inventory and maximize efficiency. Clearly, the functional efficiency of the process of commodity requirements, operators such goods retail enterprises should adopt efficient supply chain.Innovative products refers to the design or services, and so on innovative products, such as fashion, high-end appliances Fashion and luxury goods such. These commodities can bring higher profits, but because of its short life cycle and commodity diversification, demand is difficult to predict accurately, a large number of fake products and the emergence of innovative products will weaken the competitive edge, Enterprises had to undergo a series of more new innovations, so that the demand for more unpredictability. Innovative products with a high degree of market uncertainty, increased the risk of an imbalance in supply and demand, Therefore the main cost is not the cost of business flow logistics costs, Retail enterprises need to market changes fast and flexible response to customer demand. Choice of suppliers to not consider the low-cost, but access speed and flexibility; inventory and production capacity in key decision-making is not to minimize the cost, but the speed and flexibility of response. to minimize the market demand for the uncertainty caused by the loss. Clearly, innovative products to respond quickly to the request process, the operation of such goods retail enterprises should adopt reactive supply chain. If the retail business is a function of the value of goods they used reactive supply chain, Or maybe the operators are innovative products that have adopted efficient supply chain, supply chain strategy will be a fundamental error, it is necessary to redesign the supply chain. Retail enterprise supply chain management strategy implementation1. Recognition of the value of retail enterprises demand characteristics, we can commodity production cycle, demand predictability, and the market value of diversity into view with the standard of service and so on to identify the characteristics of the demand for commodities. In general, the functional value of the longer life cycle (more than two years), innovative products and the life cycle is short (3 months to 1 year);functional value less variety (10-20 kinds of deformation), innovative products more varieties (usually up to 10 million species of deformation); functional commodity demand forecast error is less (10%), innovative products forecast larger deviations (40%~100%); Functional value of the average stock lower rate (1% ~ 2%), innovative commodity stock average rate higher (10 to 40%); functional commodity market into a longer term (6 months to 1 year), innovative products into the market for a shorter period (1 day to 2 weeks); Functional commodities lower profit contribution rate (is 5% -20%), innovative products higher profit contribution rate (20% ~ 60%). Criterion use these can be effective in identifying characteristics of the demand for commodities.2. Implementation of retail merchandise categories manage retail commodity categories management refers to a retail commodity groups as a strategic business unit management, to concentrate on transmission and consumers realize the value, in order to obtain better operating performance. Specifically, the retail enterprises operating on all goods by category classification, identification and measurement of each functional category of commodities, income, growth and other indicators, and the types of goods divided into functional goods and innovative products. On this basis, consider combining various types of commodity inventory levels and display shelves, and other factors, the development of commodity varieties, the entire merchandise category management, enhance customer service levels and achieve overall commodity categories of overall revenue maximization.3. According to the types of goods respectively corresponding supply chain strategy for functional products should focus on lowering the cost of logistics. using efficient supply chain, the implementation of effective customer response (ECR) system. From the enhancement of the efficiency of the supply of goods start. and upstream suppliers and manufacturers between the use of modern information technology to establish mutual coordination modes of supply, Retailers use POS systems, the sales and distribution of synchronous operation and sharing of logistics facilities and storage resources, lower distribution costs, minimizing production and distribution processes may produce the waste. For innovative products should focus on lowering costs to flow, using reactive supply chain, the implementation of rapid response (QR) system. Raising the speed of response to customers, and supply chain parties to establish strategic partnership and cooperation mechanism EDI use of EDI technology nodes of the supply chain division of the enterprise collaboration and information sharing, reduce the volume of the design and production cycle, the implementation of JIT production, multiple varieties of small batch production and the high frequency of small batch delivery, and lower supply chain inventory levels, quickly meet customers personalized and customized demand, improve the entire supply chain response capability.20世纪90年代以来，我国零售业的迅速发展令人瞩目，然而与发达国家相比，我国零售业仍然存在着巨大差距。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
来自中国最大的资料库下载
Three Key Words
Electronic Business (EB) Supply Chain Integration Extended Enterprise Solution (EES)
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
来自中国最大的资料库下载
What Is SC What Is SCM
Evolution of Inf. Sys.
Start
SCM&EB
B2B Solution Application
Of DestinationRosettaNet
来自中国最大的资料库下载
Sampled SCM Structure of PC/EE Industry
Supplier Local Vendor
Consignment Local Vendor Local Vendor
PCB Manufacturer
PC Assembly
Strategy
来自中国最大的资料库下载
B2B
Li-Chih Wang, Ph.D. 12/8/2000
来自中国最大的资料库下载Байду номын сангаас
Trends for High Tech Industry
(source: Gartner Group/DataQuest, 1/10/2000)
Inbound Trans
Manufacture
Finished Goods
Outbound Trans
Regional Storage
Custom Pkg
Retailer Trans
Retailer DC
Cross Docking
Store Trans
Retail Store
Consu mer
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
来自中国最大的资料库下载
What is Supply Chain Management?
(source: SCC)
Supply Chain Management is the process of managing the flow of material, service and information across distributed business processes for the purpose of responding to and satisfying market demand.
B2B&SCI RosettaNet
Copyright 1999 Professor Li-Chih Wang
来自中国最大的资料库下载
Outline
1. Concept of Supply Chain Management 2. SCM Strategic Planning, Process and System 3. Evolution of Information Application System 4. SCM and Electronic Business (EB) 5. B2B and Supply Chain Integration 6. Application of RosettaNet 7. Development of an Effective B2B Solutions
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
来自中国最大的资料库下载
1.
(Concept of Supply Chain
Management)
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
来自中国最大的资料库下载
What is a Supply-Chain ? What is the scope of your enterprise?
focus of this
presentation
Suppliers Manufacturers Distributors
Retailers Consumers
Copyright 2000 Professor Li-Chih Wang
Alliance /
-I
Merge
Hub
-I -II -I -III -I -II -III
Distribution Center
-I
-I -II -I -II -I -II -V
-I -II
3rd Parties
JIT (Ship every 2 hrs) 3
TDS (Taiwan Direct Ship)
来自中国最大的资料库下载
Objective of An Effective SupplyChain Management
Provide our customers with the highest degree of customer service level under
the minimum cost
1. Focus on supply-chain and Internet solutions • Extend their internal processes to their trading partners
through extended enterprise solutions (EES). 2. Redesign business models and network infrastructure • A lean model of manufacturing that relies heavily on