3种抗肿瘤靶向药物的可负担性评价——以湖北省为例

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

3种抗肿瘤靶向药物的可负担性评价——以湖北省为例
田梦媛;崔丹;张欲晓;殷潇;方欣;胡江蔺
【期刊名称】《中国药房》
【年(卷),期】2017(028)020
【摘要】OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the affordability of 3 anti-tumor targeted drugs gefitinib,trastuzumab and sunitinib in ur-ban and rural residents of Hubei province,and to provide reference for medical insurance price admission of anti-malignant tumor targeted drugs in China. METHODS:Referring to the incidence of malignant tumor stated in statistical yearbook of Hubei province and income data of urban and rural residents in Hubei province,based on the policy of reducing the price of imported drugs by 50% mentioned in the national drug price negotiations,and assume the drugs are included in the medical insurance reimbursement list,WHO/HAI standard survey method,catastrophic expenditure evaluation method and poverty effect evaluation method were ad-opted to calculate the affordability of 3 drugs. RESULTS:According to WHO/HAI standard survey method,increment of payment for 3 drugs were 64.00%-74.00% before and after 50% discount and reimbursement. According to catastrophic expenditure evalua-tion method,50% discount of gefitinib and reimbursement gefitinib,trastuzumab and sunitinib in urban area would result in cata-strophic expenditures of 20.00%、59.28% and 35.48% patients;in rural area,would result in catastrophic expenditures
of 50.63%、74.72% and 75.93% patients. According to poverty effect evaluation method,50% discount of 3 drugs and reimbursement caused less than 31.95% urban and rural patients falling to poverty. CONCLUSIONS:Fifty percentage discount of 3 anti-tumor targeted drugs mentioned in the national drug price negotiations cause the economic burden more serious for rural residents than urban resi-dents. In the formulation of policies,the corresponding reimbursement ratio should be adjusted according to urban and rural areas, drug price and disease types for a balance of patients with different economic burden.%目的:评价湖北省城乡居民对吉非替尼、曲妥珠单抗、舒尼替尼3种抗肿瘤靶向药物的可负担性,为我国恶性肿瘤靶向药物的医保准入提供参考.方法:参考湖北省肿瘤登记年报中3种恶性肿瘤的发病率和湖北省城乡居民收入数据,结合国家药价谈判中的"降低50%进口药价格"的政策,假设药物进入医保报销目录,分别采用世界卫生组织/国际健康行动组织(WHO/HAI)标准调查法、灾难性卫生支出评价法和致贫作用评价法计算3种药物的可负担性.结果:按WHO/HAI标准调查法,3种药物降价50%报销前后的可支付性增量为64.00%~74.00%;按灾难性卫生支出评价法,吉非替尼、曲妥珠单抗、舒尼替尼3种药物降价50%再经医保报销,分别会造成20.00%、59.28%、35.48%的城镇用药患者,以及50.63%、74.72%、75.93%的农村用药患者产生灾难性支出;按致贫作用评价法,3种药物降价50%且报销后在城镇与农村造成因病致贫的患者占比均不超过31.95%.结论:国家药价谈判降价50%后3种抗肿瘤靶向药物对农村居民造成的经济负担较城镇居民严重.在制定政策时应根据城乡、药价及病种来调整相应报销比例,平衡不同疾病患者的经济负担.
【总页数】4页(P2746-2749)
【作者】田梦媛;崔丹;张欲晓;殷潇;方欣;胡江蔺
【作者单位】武汉大学健康学院全球健康研究中心,武汉 430071;武汉大学健康学院全球健康研究中心,武汉 430071;武汉大学健康学院全球健康研究中心,武汉430071;武汉大学健康学院全球健康研究中心,武汉 430071;武汉大学健康学院全球健康研究中心,武汉 430071;武汉大学健康学院全球健康研究中心,武汉 430071【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】R956
【相关文献】
1.药品不同准入价格对医保基金及个人可负担性的影响--以部分抗肿瘤靶向药物为例 [J], 方欣;田梦媛;张欲晓;殷潇;胡江蔺;崔丹
2.大学生创业扶持政策有效性评价——以湖北省大学生创业扶持政策为例 [J], 王迪;李帅
3.基于土地资源的市县级多要素国土空间开发适宜性评价研究——以湖北省宜昌市为例 [J], 姜华;唐晓华;杨利亚;刘志雄;王宁涛;刘磊
4.基于GIS的旅居养老目的地适宜性评价——以湖北省为例 [J], 杨玉兰;唐嘉耀
5.基于改进型两步移动搜索法的县域义务教育资源空间可达性评价——以湖北省监利县为例 [J], 杨慧;杨乃;孔凡敏;曾进
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。

相关文档
最新文档