食品微生物外文文献2017.1.19

合集下载

食品微生物菌种名称中英文对照

食品微生物菌种名称中英文对照

菌种中英文对照(全部)Abiotrophia adjacens 毗邻贫养菌Abiotrophia defectiva 软弱贫养菌Achromobacter spp 无色杆菌属某些种Acinetobacter /Pseudomonas spp 不动杆菌/假单胞菌属某些种Acinetobacter baumannii 鲍氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 醋酸钙不动杆菌Acinetobacter haemolyticus 溶血不动杆菌Acinetobacter johnsonii 约氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter junii 琼氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter lwoffii 鲁氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter radioresistens 抗辐射不动杆菌Acinetobacter spp 不动杆菌属某些种Acinetobacter spp/Pseudomonas spp 不动杆菌属某些种/假单胞菌属某些种Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas spp 不动杆菌/假单胞菌属某些种Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans 伴放线放线杆菌Actinomyces israelii 衣氏放线菌Actinomyces meyeri 麦氏放线菌Actinomyces naeslundii 内氏放线菌Actinomyces neuii anitratus 纽氏放线菌无硝亚种Actinomyces neuii neuii 纽氏放线菌纽氏亚种Actinomyces neuii radingae 纽氏放线菌罗亚种Actinomyces neuii turicensis 纽氏放线菌图列茨亚种Actinomyces odontolyticus 龋齿放线菌Actinomyces viscosus 粘放线菌Aerococcus viridans 绿浅气球菌Aeromonas caviae 豚鼠气单胞菌Aeromonas hydrophila 嗜水气单胞菌Aeromonas hydrophila gr. 嗜水气单胞菌群Aeromonas salmonicida achromogenes 杀鲑气单胞菌无色亚种Aeromonas salmonicida masoucida 杀鲑气单胞菌杀日本鲑亚种Aeromonas salmonicida salmonicida 杀鲑气单胞菌杀鲑亚种Aeromonas sobria 温和气单胞菌Agrobacterium radiobacter 放射形土壤杆菌Alcaligenes denitrificans 反硝化产碱菌Alcaligenes faecalis 粪产碱菌Alcaligenes spp 产碱菌属某些种Alcaligenes xylosoxidans 木糖氧化产碱菌Alloiococcus otitis 耳炎差异球菌Anaerobiospirllum succiniproducens 产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌Arachnia propionica 丙酸蛛菌Arcanobacterium bernardiae 伯纳德隐秘杆菌Arcanobacterium haemolyticum 溶血隐秘杆菌Arcanobacterium pyogenes 化脓隐秘杆菌Arcobacter cryaerohoilus 嗜低温弓形杆菌Arthrobacter spp 节杆菌属某些种Bacteroides caccae 粪拟杆菌Bacteroides capillosus 多毛拟杆菌Bacteroides eggerthii 埃氏拟杆菌Bacteroides fragilis 脆弱拟杆菌Bacteroides levii 利氏拟杆菌Bacteroides merdae 屎拟杆菌Bacteroides ovatus 卵形拟杆菌Bacteroides stercoris 粪便拟杆菌Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 多形拟杆菌Bacteroides uniformis 单形拟杆菌Bacteroides ureolyticus 解脲拟杆菌Bacteroides vulgatus 普通拟杆菌Bergeyella zoohelcum 动物溃疡伯格菌Bifidobacterium adolescentis 青春双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium bifidum 双岐双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium breve 短双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium dentium 齿双歧杆菌Bifidobacterium infantis 婴儿双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium spp 双岐杆菌属某些种Bordetella avium 鸟博德特菌Bordetella bronchiseptica 支气管炎博德特菌Bordetella spp 博德特菌属某些种Branhamella catarrhalis 粘膜炎布兰汉球菌Brevendimonas diminuta 缺陷短波单胞菌Brevendimonas vesicularis 泡囊短波单胞菌Brevibacterium casei 乳酪短杆菌Brevibacterium epidermidis 表皮短杆菌Brevibacterium spp 短杆菌属某些种Brucella spp 布鲁菌属某些种Budvicia aquatica 水生布戴约维采菌Burkholderia cepacia 洋葱伯克霍尔德菌Burkholderia diminuta 洋葱伯克霍尔德菌Burkholderia gladioli 唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌Burkholderia pseudomallei 类鼻疽伯克霍尔德菌Buttiauxella agrestis 乡间布丘菌Campylobacter coli 大肠弯曲杆菌Campylobacter fetus fetus 胚胎弯曲杆菌胚胎亚种Campylobacter fetus venerealis 胚胎弯曲杆菌性病亚种Campylobacter hyointestinalis 豚肠弯曲杆菌Campylobacter jejuni doylei 空肠弯曲杆菌德莱亚种Campylobacter jejuni jejuni 空肠弯曲杆菌空肠亚种Campylobacter lari 红嘴鸥弯曲杆菌Campylobacter lari UPTC 红嘴鸥弯曲杆菌UPTC变种Campylobacter mucosalis 粘膜弯曲杆菌Campylobacter sputorrum bubulus 唾液弯曲杆菌牛生物变种Campylobacter sputorrum fecalis 唾液弯曲杆菌粪生物变种Campylobacter upsaliensis 乌普萨拉弯曲杆菌Candida albicans 白假丝酵母Candida boidinii 博伊丁假丝酵母Candida catenulata 链状假丝酵母Candida ciferrii 西弗假丝酵母Candida colliculosa 软假丝酵母Candida curvata 弯假丝酵母Candida dattila dattila假丝酵母Candida drusei 克鲁斯假丝酵母Candida dubliniensis 杜氏假丝酵母Candida famata 无名假丝酵母Candida glabrata 光滑假丝酵母Candida globosa 球形假丝酵母Candida guilliermondii 高里假丝酵母Candida hellenical (=C. steatolytica)Candida holmii 霍氏假丝酵母Candida inconspicua 平常假丝酵母Candida intermedia 中间假丝酵母Candida kefyr 乳酒假丝酵母Candida krusei 克柔假丝酵母Candida lambica 郎比可假丝酵母Candida lipolytica 解脂假丝酵母Candida lusitaniae 葡萄牙假丝酵母Candida magnoliae 木兰假丝酵母Candida melibiosica 口津假丝酵母Candida membranaefaciens 璞膜假丝酵母Candida norvegensis 挪威假丝酵母Candida norvegica norvegica假丝酵母Candida parapsilosis 近平滑假丝酵母Candida pelliculosa 菌膜假丝酵母Candida pulcherrima 铁红假丝酵母Candida rugosa 皱落假丝酵母Candida rugosa 皱褶假丝酵母Candida sake 清酒假丝酵母Candida silvicola 森林假丝酵母Candida sphaerica 园球形假丝酵母Candida tropicalis 热带假丝酵母Candida utilis 产朊假丝酵母Candida valida 粗状假丝酵母Candida zeylanoides 诞沫假丝酵母Capnocytophaga gingivalis 牙龈二氧化碳嗜纤维菌Capnocytophaga ochracea 黄褐二氧化碳嗜纤维菌Capnocytophaga spp 二氧化碳嗜纤维菌属某些种Capnocytophaga sputigena 生痰二氧化碳嗜纤维菌CDC gruop IV C-2 CDC菌群IV C-2Cedecea davisae 戴氏西地西菌Cedecea lapagei 拉氏西地西菌Cedecea neteri 奈氏西地西菌Cedecea spp 西地西菌属某些种Cellulomonas spp 纤维单胞菌属某些种Cellulomonas turbata 特氏纤维单胞菌Ceotruchum candidum 假丝地霉Ceotruchum capitatum 头状地霉Ceotruchum fermenfans 发酵地霉Ceotruchum penicillatum 潘氏地霉Ceotruchum spp 地霉菌属某些种Chromobacterium violaceum 紫色色杆菌Chryseobacterium indologenes 产吲哚金黄杆菌Chryseobacterium meningosepticum 脑膜脓毒性金黄杆菌Chryseomonas luteola 浅黄金色单胞菌Citrobacter amalonaticua 无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter braakii 布氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter farmeri 法氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter freundii 弗氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter freundii group 弗氏柠檬酸杆菌群Citrobacter koseri 柯氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter koseri 克氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter koseri (= C.diversus) 克氏柠檬酸杆菌(=差异柠檬酸杆菌)Citrobacter koseri/amalonaticus 克氏/无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter youngae 杨氏柠檬酸杆菌Clostridium acetobutylicum 丙酮丁醇梭杆菌Clostridium barati 巴氏梭菌Clostridium beijerinckii 拜氏梭菌Clostridium beijerinckii /butyricum 拜氏/丁酸梭菌Clostridium bifermentans 双酶梭菌Clostridium botlinum 肉毒梭菌Clostridium butyricum 丁酸梭菌Clostridium cadaveris 尸毒梭菌Clostridium clostridiiforme 梭状梭菌Clostridium difficile 艰难梭菌Clostridium fallax 谲诈梭菌Clostridium glycolicum 乙二醇梭菌Clostridium hastiforme 矛形梭菌Clostridium histolyticum 溶组织梭菌Clostridium innocuum 无害梭菌Clostridium innocuum 无害芽胞梭菌Clostridium limosum 泥渣梭菌Clostridium paraputrificum 类腐败梭菌Clostridium perfringens 产气荚膜梭菌Clostridium ramosum 多枝梭菌Clostridium septicum 败毒梭菌Clostridium sordellii 索氏梭菌Clostridium sporogenes 生孢梭菌Clostridium spp 梭菌属某些种Clostridium subterminale 近端梭菌Clostridium tertium 第三梭菌Clostridium tetani 破伤风梭菌Clostridium tyrobutyricum 酪丁酸梭菌Comamonas acidovorans 食酸丛毛单胞菌Comamonas spp 丛毛单胞菌属某些种Comonas testosteroni 睾丸酮丛毛单胞菌Corynebacterium accolens 拥挤棒杆菌Corynebacterium afermentans 非发酵棒杆菌Corynebacterium amycolatum 无枝菌酸棒杆菌Corynebacterium aquaticum 水生棒杆菌Corynebacterium argentoratense 银色棒杆菌Corynebacterium auris 耳棒杆菌Corynebacterium bovis 牛棒杆菌Corynebacterium cystitidis 膀胱炎棒杆菌Corynebacterium diphtheriae belfanti Corynebacterium diphtheriae gravis 重白喉棒杆菌Corynebacterium diphtheriae mitis 缓和白喉棒杆菌Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum 解葡萄糖苷Corynebacterium group F- 1 F-1群棒杆菌Corynebacterium group G G群棒杆菌Corynebacterium jeikeium 杰氏棒杆菌Corynebacterium kutscher 库氏棒杆菌Corynebacterium macginleyi 麦氏棒杆菌Corynebacterium minutissimum 极小棒杆菌Corynebacterium pilosum 多毛棒杆菌Corynebacterium propinquum 丙酸棒杆菌Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum 假白喉棒杆菌Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis 假结核棒杆菌Corynebacterium renale 牛肾盂炎棒杆菌Corynebacterium renale group 牛肾盂炎棒杆菌群Corynebacterium seminale 生殖棒杆菌Corynebacterium striatum 纹带棒杆菌Corynebacterium ulcerans 溃疡棒杆菌Corynebacterium urealyticum 解脲棒杆菌Cryptococcus albidus 浅白隐球酵母Cryptococcus humicola 土生隐球菌Cryptococcus humicolus 土生隐球酵母Cryptococcus laurentii 罗伦隐球酵母Cryptococcus neoformans 新型隐球酵母Cryptococcus terreus 地生隐球酵母Cryptococcus uniguttulatus 指甲隐球酵母Cryytococcus neoformans 白地霉Debaryomyces polymorphus 多形德巴利酵母菌Dermabacter hominis 人皮肤杆菌Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis 西宫皮肤球菌Dietzia spp 迪茨菌属某些种Edwardsiella hoshinae 保科爱德华菌Edwardsiella tarda 迟钝爱德华菌Eikenella corrodens 啮蚀艾肯菌Enterobacter aerogenes 产气肠杆菌Enterobacter amnigenus 河生肠杆菌Enterobacter asburiae 阿氏肠杆菌Enterobacter cancerogenus 生癌肠杆菌Enterobacter cloacae 阴沟肠杆菌Enterobacter gergoviae 日沟维肠杆菌Enterobacter intermedius 中间肠杆菌Enterobacter sakazakii 阪崎肠杆菌Enterobacter spp 肠杆菌属某些种Enterococcus avium 鸟肠球菌Enterococcus casselifavus 铅黄肠球菌Enterococcus durans 耐久肠球菌Enterococcus faecalis 粪肠球菌Enterococcus faecium 屎肠球菌Enterococcus gallinarum 鹑鸡肠球菌Enterococcus hirae 海氏肠球菌Enterococcus saccharolyticus 解糖肠球菌Erwinia spp 欧文菌属某些种Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae 猪红斑丹毒丝菌Escherichia coli 大肠埃希菌Escherichia fergusonii 费格森埃希菌Escherichia hermannii 赫氏埃希菌Escherichia vulneris 伤口埃希菌Eubacterium aerofaciens 产气真杆菌Eubacterium lentum 迟缓真杆菌Eubacterium limosum 粘液真杆菌Ewingella americana 美洲爱文菌Flavimonas oryzihabitans 栖稻黄色单胞菌Fusobacterium mortiferum 死亡梭杆菌Fusobacterium necrogenes 坏疽梭杆菌Fusobacterium necrophorum 坏死梭杆菌Fusobacterium nucleatum 具核梭杆菌Fusobacterium varium 可变梭杆菌Gardnerella vaginalis 阴道加德纳氏菌Gemella haemolysans 溶血孪生球菌Gemella mobillorum 麻疹孪生球菌Geotrichum candidum 白地霉Geotrichum capitatum 头状地霉Geotrichum penicillatum 帚状地霉Gordona spp 戈登菌属某些种Haemophilus aphrophilus 嗜沫嗜血杆菌Haemophilus influenzae 流感嗜血杆菌Haemophilus influenzae I 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅰ型Haemophilus influenzae II 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅱ型Haemophilus influenzae III 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅲ型Haemophilus influenzae IV 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅳ型Haemophilus influenzae V 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅴ型Haemophilus influenzae VI 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅵ型Haemophilus influenzae VII 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅶ型Haemophilus influenzae VIII 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅷ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae 副流感嗜血杆菌Haemophilus parainfluenzae I 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅰ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae II 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅱ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae III 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅲ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae IV 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅳ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae V 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅴ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae VI 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅵ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae VII 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅶ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae VIII 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅷ型Haemophilus paraphrophilus 副嗜沫嗜血杆菌Haemophilus somnus 睡眠嗜血杆菌Hafinia alvei 蜂房哈夫尼亚菌Hansenula polymorpha 多形汉逊酵母Hansenula saturnus 土星汉逊酵母Helicobacter cinaedi 同性恋螺杆菌Helicobacter fennelliae 芬纳尔螺杆菌Helicobacter pylori 幽门螺杆菌Klebsiella ornithinolytica 解鸟氨酸克雷伯菌Klebsiella oxytoca 产酸克雷伯菌Klebsiella planticola 植生克雷伯菌Klebsiella pneumonia ozaenae 肺炎克雷伯菌臭鼻亚种Klebsiella pneumonia rhinoscleromatis 肺炎克雷伯菌鼻硬结亚种Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumoniae 肺炎克雷伯菌肺炎亚种Klebsiella terrigena 土生克雷伯菌Kloeckera apiculata 柠檬克勒克酵母Kloeckera apis 蜜蜂克勒克酵母Kloeckera japonica 日本克勒克酵母Kloeckera spp 克勒克酵母某些种Kluyvera ascorbata 抗坏血酸克吕沃尔菌Kluyvera cryocrescens 栖冷克吕沃尔菌Kluyvera spp 克吕沃尔菌属某些种Kluyvera terrigena 土生克雷伯菌Kocuria kristinae 克氏库克菌Kocuria roseus (=Micrococcus roseus) 玫瑰色库克菌(=玫瑰色微球菌)Kocuria varians (=Micrococcus varians) 变异库克菌(=变异微球菌)Koserella trabulsii 特氏科泽菌Kytococcus sedentaruis 不动盖球菌Lactobacillus acidophilus 嗜酸乳杆菌Lactobacillus fermentium 发酵乳杆菌Lactobacillus jensenii 詹氏乳杆菌Lactococcus garvieae 格氏乳球菌Lactococcus lactis cremoris 乳酸乳球菌乳脂亚种Lactococcus lactis lactis 乳酸乳球菌乳亚种Lactococcus raffinolactis 棉子糖乳球菌Leclercia adcarboxglata 非脱羧勒克菌Leptotrichia buccalis 口腔纤毛菌Leuconostoc spp 明串珠菌属某些种Listeria grayi 格氏利斯特菌Listeria innocua 无害利斯特菌Listeria ivanovii 伊氏利斯特菌Listeria ivanovii 依氏利斯特菌Listeria monocytogenes 单核细胞增生利斯特菌Listeria seeligeri 斯氏利斯特菌Listeria spp 利斯特菌属某些种Listeria welshimeri 威氏利斯特菌Listeria welshimeri 魏氏利斯特菌Luconostoc spp 明串珠菌属某些种Microbacterium spp 微小杆菌属某些种Micrococcus luteus 滕黄微球菌Micrococcus lylae 莱拉微球菌Micrococcus lylae 里拉微球菌Micrococcus spp 微球菌属某些种Mobiluncus curtisii 克氏动弯杆菌Mobiluncus mulieris 羞怯动弯杆菌Mobiluncus spp 动弯杆菌属某些种Moellerella spp 米勒菌属某些种Moellerella wisconsensis 威斯康星米勒菌Moraxella lacunata 腔隙莫拉菌Moraxella nonliquefaciens 非液化莫拉菌Moraxella osloensis 奥斯陆莫拉菌Moraxella spp 莫拉菌属某些种Morganella morganii 摩氏摩根菌Neisseria cinerea 灰色奈瑟球菌Neisseria gonorrhoeae 淋病奈瑟球菌Neisseria lactamica 乳糖奈瑟球菌Neisseria meningitidis 脑膜炎奈瑟球菌Neisseria mucosa 粘液奈瑟球菌Neisseria polysaccharea 多糖奈瑟球菌Neisseria sicca 干燥奈瑟球菌Neisseria spp 奈瑟菌属某些种Neisseria subflava 微黄奈瑟球菌Nocardia spp 奴卡菌属某些种Ochrobactrum anthropi 人苍白杆菌Oerskovia spp 厄氏菌属某些种Oerskovia xanthineolytica 溶黄嘌呤厄菌Oligella ureolytica 解脲寡源杆菌Oligella urethralis 尿道寡源杆菌Pantoea spp 泛菌属某些种Pasteurella aerogenes 产气巴斯德菌Pasteurella gr.EF4 巴斯德菌群EF4Pasteurella haemolytica 溶血巴斯德菌Pasteurella multocida 多杀巴斯德菌Pasteurella pneumotropica 侵肺巴斯德菌Pasteurella spp 巴斯德菌属某些种Peptococcus niger 黑色消化球菌Peptostreptococcus anaerobius 厌氧消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus 不解糖消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus indolicus 产吲哚消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus indolicus 吲哚消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus magnus 大消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus micros 微小消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus prevotii 普氏消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus spp 消化链球菌属某些种Photobacterium damsela 美人鱼发光杆菌Pichia carsonii 卡氏毕赤酵母Pichia etchellsii 埃切毕赤酵母Pichia farinosa 粉状毕赤酵母Pichia ohmeri 奥默毕赤酵母Pichia spartinae 斯巴达克毕赤酵母Plesimonas shigelloides 类志贺邻单胞菌Porphyromonas asaccharolytica 不解糖卟啉单胞菌Porphyromonas endodontalis 牙髓卟啉单胞菌Porphyromonas gingivalis 牙龈卟啉单胞菌Prevotella bivia 二路普雷沃尔菌Prevotella buccae 颊普雷沃菌Prevotella buccalis 口颊普雷沃菌Prevotella denticola 栖牙普雷沃菌Prevotella disiens 解糖胨普雷沃菌Prevotella intermedia 中间普雷沃菌Prevotella loescheii 洛氏普雷沃菌Prevotella melaninogenica 产黑色普雷沃菌Prevotella oralis 口腔普雷沃菌Prevotella oris(=Bacteroides oris) 口普雷沃菌(=口拟杆菌) Propionibacterium acnes 疮疱丙酸杆菌Propionibacterium avidum 贪婪丙酸杆菌Propionibacterium granulosum 颗粒丙酸杆菌Propionibacterium propionicum 丙酸丙酸杆菌Proteus mirabilis 奇异变形杆菌Proteus penneri 彭氏变形杆菌Proteus vuigaris 普通变形杆菌Prototheca wickerhamii 魏氏原壁菌Providencia alcalifaciens 产碱普罗威登斯菌Providencia rettgeri 雷氏普罗威登斯菌Providencia rustigianii 拉氏普罗威登斯菌Providencia stuartii 斯氏普罗威登斯菌Providencia stuartii/ alcalifaciens 司氏/产碱普罗威登斯菌Pseudomonas aeruginosa 铜绿假单胞菌Pseudomonas alcaligenes 产碱假单胞菌Pseudomonas fluorescens 荧光假单胞菌Pseudomonas mendocina 门多萨假单胞菌Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes 假产碱假单胞菌Pseudomonas putida 恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonas spp 假单胞菌属某些种Pseudomonas sputita 恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonas stutzeri 施氏假单胞菌Pseudomonsa aeruginosa 铜绿假单胞菌Pseudomonsa fluorescens 荧光假单胞菌Pseudomonsa pseudomallei 类鼻疽假单胞菌Pseudomonsa putida 恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonsa spp 假单胞菌属某些种Rahnella aquatilis 水生拉恩菌Rhodococcus spp 红球菌属某些种Rhodotorula glutinis 红酵母Rhodotorula glutinis 粘红酵母Rhodotorula minuta 小红酵母Rhodotorula mucilaginosa 粘质红酵母Rothia dentocariosa 龋齿罗菌Saccharomyces cerevisiae 酿酒酵母Saccharomyces kluyverii 克鲁费酵母Salmonella arizonae 亚利桑那沙门菌Salmonella choleraesuis 猪霍乱沙门菌Salmonella enteritidis 肠炎沙门菌Salmonella gallinarum 鸡沙门菌Salmonella paratyphi A 甲型副伤寒沙门菌Salmonella paratyphi B 乙型副伤寒沙门菌Salmonella pullorum 鸡白痢沙门菌Salmonella spp 沙门菌属某些种Salmonella typhi 伤寒沙门菌Salmonella typhimurium 鼠伤寒沙门菌Serratia ficaria 无花果沙雷菌Serratia fonticola 居泉沙雷菌Serratia liquefaciens 液化沙雷菌Serratia marcescens 粘质沙雷菌Serratia odorifera 气味沙雷菌Serratia odorifera 1 气味沙雷菌1型Serratia odorifera 2 气味沙雷菌2型Serratia plymuthica 普城沙雷菌Serratia proteamaculans 变形斑沙雷菌Serratia putrefaciens 腐败沙雷菌Serratia rubidaea 深红沙雷菌Shewanella putrefaciens 腐败希瓦菌Shigella bogdii 鲍氏志贺菌Shigella dysenteriae 痢疾志贺菌Shigella flexneri 弗氏志贺菌Shigella sonnei 索氏志贺菌Shigella spp 志贺菌属某些种Sphingobacterium multivorum 多食鞘氨醇杆菌Sphingobacterium Spiritivovum 嗜神鞘氨醇杆菌Sphingobacterium spiritovorum 食神鞘氨醇杆菌Sphingomonas paucimobilis 少动鞘氨醇单胞菌Sporobolomyces salmonicolor 赭色掷孢酵母Staphylococcus arlettae 阿尔莱特葡萄球菌Staphylococcus aureus 金黄色葡萄球菌Staphylococcus auricularis 耳葡萄球菌Staphylococcus capitis 头状葡萄球菌Staphylococcus caprae 山羊葡萄球菌Staphylococcus carnosus 肉葡萄球菌Staphylococcus chromogenes 产色葡萄球菌Staphylococcus cohnii cohnii 科氏葡萄球菌科氏亚种Staphylococcus cohnii urealyticum 科氏葡萄球菌解脲亚种Staphylococcus epidermidis 表皮葡萄球菌Staphylococcus equorum 马胃葡萄球菌Staphylococcus gallinarum 鸡葡萄球菌Staphylococcus haemolyticus 溶血葡萄球菌Staphylococcus hominis 人葡萄球菌Staphylococcus hyicus 猪葡萄球菌Staphylococcus intermedius 中间葡萄球菌Staphylococcus kloosii 克氏葡萄球菌Staphylococcus lentus 缓慢葡萄球菌Staphylococcus lugdunensis 路邓葡萄球菌Staphylococcus saccharolylicus 解糖葡萄球菌Staphylococcus saprophyticus 腐生葡萄球菌Staphylococcus schleiferi 施氏葡萄球菌Staphylococcus sciuri 松鼠葡萄球菌Staphylococcus simulans 模仿葡萄球菌Staphylococcus warneri 沃氏葡萄球菌Staphylococcus xylosus 木糖葡萄球菌Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 嗜麦寡养食单胞菌Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌Stomatococcus mucilaginosus 粘滑口腔球菌Streptococcus acidominimus 少酸链球菌Streptococcus agalactiae 无乳链球菌Streptococcus alactolyticus 非解乳糖链球菌Streptococcus anginosus 咽峡炎链球菌Streptococcus bovis I 牛链球菌Ⅰ型Streptococcus bovis II 牛链球菌Ⅱ型Streptococcus canis 狗链球菌Streptococcus constellatus 星座链球菌Streptococcus downei 汗毛链球菌Streptococcus dysgalactiae 停乳链球菌停乳亚种Streptococcus dysgalactiae equlsimilis 停乳链球菌似马亚种Streptococcus equi equi 马链球菌马亚种Streptococcus equi zooepidemicus 马链球菌兽瘟亚种Streptococcus equinus 马肠链球菌Streptococcus gordonii 格氏链球菌Streptococcus gr L L群链球菌Streptococcus intermadius 中间链球菌Streptococcus mitis 缓症链球菌Streptococcus mutans 变异链球菌Streptococcus oralis 口腔链球菌Streptococcus parasanguis 副血链球菌Streptococcus penumoniae 肺炎链球菌Streptococcus porcinus 豕链球菌Streptococcus pyogenes 化脓链球菌Streptococcus salivarius salivarius 唾液链球菌唾液亚种Streptococcus salivarius thermophilus 唾液链球菌嗜热亚种Streptococcus sanguis 血链球菌Streptococcus sobrinus 表兄链球菌Streptococcus suis I 猪链球菌Ⅰ型Streptococcus suis II 猪链球菌Ⅱ型Streptococcus uberis 乳房链球菌Streptococcus vestibularis 前庭链球菌Tatumella ptyseos 痰塔特姆菌Trichosporon asahii 阿氏丝孢酵母Trichosporon asteroides 星状丝孢酵母Trichosporon inkin 墨汁丝孢酵母Trichosporon mucoides 粘性丝孢酵母Trichosporon ovoides 卵形丝孢酵母Trichosporon spp 丝孢酵母某些种Veillonella parvula 小韦荣球菌Veillonella spp 韦荣氏球菌属某些种Versinia enterocolitica 小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌Versinia pseudotuberculosis 假结核耶尔森菌Vibrio alginolyiicus 解藻朊酸弧菌Vibrio cholerae 霍乱弧菌Vibrio fluvialis 弗氏弧菌Vibrio fluvialis 河流孤菌Vibrio hollisae 霍氏弧菌Vibrio metschnikovi 梅氏弧菌Vibrio mimicus 最小弧菌Vibrio parahaemolyticus 副溶血弧菌Vibrio vulnficus 创伤弧菌Weeksella virosa 有毒威克斯菌Weeksella zoohelcum 动物溃疡威克斯菌Yersinia enterocolitica 小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌Yersinia frederiksenii 弗氏耶尔森菌Yersinia intermedia 中间耶尔森菌Yersinia kristensenii 克氏耶尔森菌Yersinia pestis 鼠疫耶尔森菌Yersinia pseudotuberculosis 假结核耶尔森菌Yersinia ruckeri 鲁氏耶尔森菌Zygosaccharomyces spp 接合酵母属某些种。

微生物英文文献及翻译—原文

微生物英文文献及翻译—原文

微生物英文文献及翻译—原文本期为微生物学的第二讲,主要讨论炭疽和蛔虫病这两种既往常见而当今社会较为罕见的疾病。

炭疽是由炭疽杆菌所致的一种人畜共患的急性传染病。

人因接触病畜及其产品及食用病畜的肉类而发生感染。

临床上主要表现为皮肤坏死、溃疡、焦痂和周围组织广泛水肿及毒血症症状;似蚓蛔线虫简称蛔虫,是人体内最常见的寄生虫之一。

成虫寄生于小肠,可引起蛔虫病。

其幼虫能在人体内移行,引起内脏幼虫移行症。

案例分析Case 1:A local craftsman who makes garments from the hides of goats visits his physician because over the past few days he has developed several black lesions on his hands and arms. The lesions are not painful, but he is alarmed by their appearance. He is afebrile and his physical examination is unremarkable.案例1:一名使用鹿皮做皮衣的当地木匠来就医,主诉过去几天中手掌和手臂上出现几个黑色皮肤损害。

皮损无痛,但是外观较为骇人。

患者无发热,体检无异常发现。

1. What is the most likely diagnosis?Cutaneous anthrax, caused by Bacillus anthracis. The skin lesions are painless and dark or charred ulcerations known as black eschar. It is classically transmitted by contact with thehide of a goat at the site of a minor open wound.皮肤炭疽:由炭疽杆菌引起,皮损通常无痛、黑色或称为焦痂样溃疡。

食品微生物菌种名称中英文对照

食品微生物菌种名称中英文对照

菌种中英文对照(全部)Abiotrophia adjacens 毗邻贫养菌Abiotrophia defectiva 软弱贫养菌Achromobacter spp 无色杆菌属某些种Acinetobacter /Pseudomonas spp 不动杆菌/假单胞菌属某些种Acinetobacter baumannii 鲍氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 醋酸钙不动杆菌Acinetobacter haemolyticus 溶血不动杆菌Acinetobacter johnsonii 约氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter junii 琼氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter lwoffii 鲁氏不动杆菌Acinetobacter radioresistens 抗辐射不动杆菌Acinetobacter spp 不动杆菌属某些种Acinetobacter spp/Pseudomonas spp 不动杆菌属某些种/假单胞菌属某些种Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas spp 不动杆菌/假单胞菌属某些种Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans 伴放线放线杆菌Actinomyces israelii 衣氏放线菌Actinomyces meyeri 麦氏放线菌Actinomyces naeslundii 内氏放线菌Actinomyces neuii anitratus 纽氏放线菌无硝亚种Actinomyces neuii neuii 纽氏放线菌纽氏亚种Actinomyces neuii radingae 纽氏放线菌罗亚种Actinomyces neuii turicensis 纽氏放线菌图列茨亚种Actinomyces odontolyticus 龋齿放线菌Actinomyces viscosus 粘放线菌Aerococcus viridans 绿浅气球菌Aeromonas caviae 豚鼠气单胞菌Aeromonas hydrophila 嗜水气单胞菌Aeromonas hydrophila gr. 嗜水气单胞菌群Aeromonas salmonicida achromogenes 杀鲑气单胞菌无色亚种Aeromonas salmonicida masoucida 杀鲑气单胞菌杀日本鲑亚种Aeromonas salmonicida salmonicida 杀鲑气单胞菌杀鲑亚种Aeromonas sobria 温和气单胞菌Agrobacterium radiobacter 放射形土壤杆菌Alcaligenes denitrificans 反硝化产碱菌Alcaligenes faecalis 粪产碱菌Alcaligenes spp 产碱菌属某些种Alcaligenes xylosoxidans 木糖氧化产碱菌Alloiococcus otitis 耳炎差异球菌Anaerobiospirllum succiniproducens 产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌Arachnia propionica 丙酸蛛菌Arcanobacterium bernardiae 伯纳德隐秘杆菌Arcanobacterium haemolyticum 溶血隐秘杆菌Arcanobacterium pyogenes 化脓隐秘杆菌Arcobacter cryaerohoilus 嗜低温弓形杆菌Arthrobacter spp 节杆菌属某些种Bacteroides caccae 粪拟杆菌Bacteroides capillosus 多毛拟杆菌Bacteroides eggerthii 埃氏拟杆菌Bacteroides fragilis 脆弱拟杆菌Bacteroides levii 利氏拟杆菌Bacteroides merdae 屎拟杆菌Bacteroides ovatus 卵形拟杆菌Bacteroides stercoris 粪便拟杆菌Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 多形拟杆菌Bacteroides uniformis 单形拟杆菌Bacteroides ureolyticus 解脲拟杆菌Bacteroides vulgatus 普通拟杆菌Bergeyella zoohelcum 动物溃疡伯格菌Bifidobacterium adolescentis 青春双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium bifidum 双岐双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium breve 短双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium dentium 齿双歧杆菌Bifidobacterium infantis 婴儿双岐杆菌Bifidobacterium spp 双岐杆菌属某些种Bordetella avium 鸟博德特菌Bordetella bronchiseptica 支气管炎博德特菌Bordetella spp 博德特菌属某些种Branhamella catarrhalis 粘膜炎布兰汉球菌Brevendimonas diminuta 缺陷短波单胞菌Brevendimonas vesicularis 泡囊短波单胞菌Brevibacterium casei 乳酪短杆菌Brevibacterium epidermidis 表皮短杆菌Brevibacterium spp 短杆菌属某些种Brucella spp 布鲁菌属某些种Budvicia aquatica 水生布戴约维采菌Burkholderia cepacia 洋葱伯克霍尔德菌Burkholderia diminuta 洋葱伯克霍尔德菌Burkholderia gladioli 唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌Burkholderia pseudomallei 类鼻疽伯克霍尔德菌Buttiauxella agrestis 乡间布丘菌Campylobacter coli 大肠弯曲杆菌Campylobacter fetus fetus 胚胎弯曲杆菌胚胎亚种Campylobacter fetus venerealis 胚胎弯曲杆菌性病亚种Campylobacter hyointestinalis 豚肠弯曲杆菌Campylobacter jejuni doylei 空肠弯曲杆菌德莱亚种Campylobacter jejuni jejuni 空肠弯曲杆菌空肠亚种Campylobacter lari 红嘴鸥弯曲杆菌Campylobacter lari UPTC 红嘴鸥弯曲杆菌UPTC变种Campylobacter mucosalis 粘膜弯曲杆菌Campylobacter sputorrum bubulus 唾液弯曲杆菌牛生物变种Campylobacter sputorrum fecalis 唾液弯曲杆菌粪生物变种Campylobacter upsaliensis 乌普萨拉弯曲杆菌Candida albicans 白假丝酵母Candida boidinii 博伊丁假丝酵母Candida catenulata 链状假丝酵母Candida ciferrii 西弗假丝酵母Candida colliculosa 软假丝酵母Candida curvata 弯假丝酵母Candida dattila dattila假丝酵母Candida drusei 克鲁斯假丝酵母Candida dubliniensis 杜氏假丝酵母Candida famata 无名假丝酵母Candida glabrata 光滑假丝酵母Candida globosa 球形假丝酵母Candida guilliermondii 高里假丝酵母Candida hellenical (=C. steatolytica)Candida holmii 霍氏假丝酵母Candida inconspicua 平常假丝酵母Candida intermedia 中间假丝酵母Candida kefyr 乳酒假丝酵母Candida krusei 克柔假丝酵母Candida lambica 郎比可假丝酵母Candida lipolytica 解脂假丝酵母Candida lusitaniae 葡萄牙假丝酵母Candida magnoliae 木兰假丝酵母Candida melibiosica 口津假丝酵母Candida membranaefaciens 璞膜假丝酵母Candida norvegensis 挪威假丝酵母Candida norvegica norvegica假丝酵母Candida parapsilosis 近平滑假丝酵母Candida pelliculosa 菌膜假丝酵母Candida pulcherrima 铁红假丝酵母Candida rugosa 皱落假丝酵母Candida rugosa 皱褶假丝酵母Candida sake 清酒假丝酵母Candida silvicola 森林假丝酵母Candida sphaerica 园球形假丝酵母Candida tropicalis 热带假丝酵母Candida utilis 产朊假丝酵母Candida valida 粗状假丝酵母Candida zeylanoides 诞沫假丝酵母Capnocytophaga gingivalis 牙龈二氧化碳嗜纤维菌Capnocytophaga ochracea 黄褐二氧化碳嗜纤维菌Capnocytophaga spp 二氧化碳嗜纤维菌属某些种Capnocytophaga sputigena 生痰二氧化碳嗜纤维菌CDC gruop IV C-2 CDC菌群IV C-2Cedecea davisae 戴氏西地西菌Cedecea lapagei 拉氏西地西菌Cedecea neteri 奈氏西地西菌Cedecea spp 西地西菌属某些种Cellulomonas spp 纤维单胞菌属某些种Cellulomonas turbata 特氏纤维单胞菌Ceotruchum candidum 假丝地霉Ceotruchum capitatum 头状地霉Ceotruchum fermenfans 发酵地霉Ceotruchum penicillatum 潘氏地霉Ceotruchum spp 地霉菌属某些种Chromobacterium violaceum 紫色色杆菌Chryseobacterium indologenes 产吲哚金黄杆菌Chryseobacterium meningosepticum 脑膜脓毒性金黄杆菌Chryseomonas luteola 浅黄金色单胞菌Citrobacter amalonaticua 无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter braakii 布氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter farmeri 法氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter freundii 弗氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter freundii group 弗氏柠檬酸杆菌群Citrobacter koseri 柯氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter koseri 克氏柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter koseri (= C.diversus) 克氏柠檬酸杆菌(=差异柠檬酸杆菌)Citrobacter koseri/amalonaticus 克氏/无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter youngae 杨氏柠檬酸杆菌Clostridium acetobutylicum 丙酮丁醇梭杆菌Clostridium barati 巴氏梭菌Clostridium beijerinckii 拜氏梭菌Clostridium beijerinckii /butyricum 拜氏/丁酸梭菌Clostridium bifermentans 双酶梭菌Clostridium botlinum 肉毒梭菌Clostridium butyricum 丁酸梭菌Clostridium cadaveris 尸毒梭菌Clostridium clostridiiforme 梭状梭菌Clostridium difficile 艰难梭菌Clostridium fallax 谲诈梭菌Clostridium glycolicum 乙二醇梭菌Clostridium hastiforme 矛形梭菌Clostridium histolyticum 溶组织梭菌Clostridium innocuum 无害梭菌Clostridium innocuum 无害芽胞梭菌Clostridium limosum 泥渣梭菌Clostridium paraputrificum 类腐败梭菌Clostridium perfringens 产气荚膜梭菌Clostridium ramosum 多枝梭菌Clostridium septicum 败毒梭菌Clostridium sordellii 索氏梭菌Clostridium sporogenes 生孢梭菌Clostridium spp 梭菌属某些种Clostridium subterminale 近端梭菌Clostridium tertium 第三梭菌Clostridium tetani 破伤风梭菌Clostridium tyrobutyricum 酪丁酸梭菌Comamonas acidovorans 食酸丛毛单胞菌Comamonas spp 丛毛单胞菌属某些种Comonas testosteroni 睾丸酮丛毛单胞菌Corynebacterium accolens 拥挤棒杆菌Corynebacterium afermentans 非发酵棒杆菌Corynebacterium amycolatum 无枝菌酸棒杆菌Corynebacterium aquaticum 水生棒杆菌Corynebacterium argentoratense 银色棒杆菌Corynebacterium auris 耳棒杆菌Corynebacterium bovis 牛棒杆菌Corynebacterium cystitidis 膀胱炎棒杆菌Corynebacterium diphtheriae belfanti Corynebacterium diphtheriae gravis 重白喉棒杆菌Corynebacterium diphtheriae mitis 缓和白喉棒杆菌Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum 解葡萄糖苷Corynebacterium group F- 1 F-1群棒杆菌Corynebacterium group G G群棒杆菌Corynebacterium jeikeium 杰氏棒杆菌Corynebacterium kutscher 库氏棒杆菌Corynebacterium macginleyi 麦氏棒杆菌Corynebacterium minutissimum 极小棒杆菌Corynebacterium pilosum 多毛棒杆菌Corynebacterium propinquum 丙酸棒杆菌Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum 假白喉棒杆菌Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis 假结核棒杆菌Corynebacterium renale 牛肾盂炎棒杆菌Corynebacterium renale group 牛肾盂炎棒杆菌群Corynebacterium seminale 生殖棒杆菌Corynebacterium striatum 纹带棒杆菌Corynebacterium ulcerans 溃疡棒杆菌Corynebacterium urealyticum 解脲棒杆菌Cryptococcus albidus 浅白隐球酵母Cryptococcus humicola 土生隐球菌Cryptococcus humicolus 土生隐球酵母Cryptococcus laurentii 罗伦隐球酵母Cryptococcus neoformans 新型隐球酵母Cryptococcus terreus 地生隐球酵母Cryptococcus uniguttulatus 指甲隐球酵母Cryytococcus neoformans 白地霉Debaryomyces polymorphus 多形德巴利酵母菌Dermabacter hominis 人皮肤杆菌Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis 西宫皮肤球菌Dietzia spp 迪茨菌属某些种Edwardsiella hoshinae 保科爱德华菌Edwardsiella tarda 迟钝爱德华菌Eikenella corrodens 啮蚀艾肯菌Enterobacter aerogenes 产气肠杆菌Enterobacter amnigenus 河生肠杆菌Enterobacter asburiae 阿氏肠杆菌Enterobacter cancerogenus 生癌肠杆菌Enterobacter cloacae 阴沟肠杆菌Enterobacter gergoviae 日沟维肠杆菌Enterobacter intermedius 中间肠杆菌Enterobacter sakazakii 阪崎肠杆菌Enterobacter spp 肠杆菌属某些种Enterococcus avium 鸟肠球菌Enterococcus casselifavus 铅黄肠球菌Enterococcus durans 耐久肠球菌Enterococcus faecalis 粪肠球菌Enterococcus faecium 屎肠球菌Enterococcus gallinarum 鹑鸡肠球菌Enterococcus hirae 海氏肠球菌Enterococcus saccharolyticus 解糖肠球菌Erwinia spp 欧文菌属某些种Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae 猪红斑丹毒丝菌Escherichia coli 大肠埃希菌Escherichia fergusonii 费格森埃希菌Escherichia hermannii 赫氏埃希菌Escherichia vulneris 伤口埃希菌Eubacterium aerofaciens 产气真杆菌Eubacterium lentum 迟缓真杆菌Eubacterium limosum 粘液真杆菌Ewingella americana 美洲爱文菌Flavimonas oryzihabitans 栖稻黄色单胞菌Fusobacterium mortiferum 死亡梭杆菌Fusobacterium necrogenes 坏疽梭杆菌Fusobacterium necrophorum 坏死梭杆菌Fusobacterium nucleatum 具核梭杆菌Fusobacterium varium 可变梭杆菌Gardnerella vaginalis 阴道加德纳氏菌Gemella haemolysans 溶血孪生球菌Gemella mobillorum 麻疹孪生球菌Geotrichum candidum 白地霉Geotrichum capitatum 头状地霉Geotrichum penicillatum 帚状地霉Gordona spp 戈登菌属某些种Haemophilus aphrophilus 嗜沫嗜血杆菌Haemophilus influenzae 流感嗜血杆菌Haemophilus influenzae I 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅰ型Haemophilus influenzae II 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅱ型Haemophilus influenzae III 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅲ型Haemophilus influenzae IV 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅳ型Haemophilus influenzae V 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅴ型Haemophilus influenzae VI 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅵ型Haemophilus influenzae VII 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅶ型Haemophilus influenzae VIII 流感嗜血杆菌Ⅷ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae 副流感嗜血杆菌Haemophilus parainfluenzae I 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅰ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae II 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅱ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae III 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅲ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae IV 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅳ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae V 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅴ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae VI 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅵ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae VII 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅶ型Haemophilus parainfluenzae VIII 副流感嗜血杆菌Ⅷ型Haemophilus paraphrophilus 副嗜沫嗜血杆菌Haemophilus somnus 睡眠嗜血杆菌Hafinia alvei 蜂房哈夫尼亚菌Hansenula polymorpha 多形汉逊酵母Hansenula saturnus 土星汉逊酵母Helicobacter cinaedi 同性恋螺杆菌Helicobacter fennelliae 芬纳尔螺杆菌Helicobacter pylori 幽门螺杆菌Klebsiella ornithinolytica 解鸟氨酸克雷伯菌Klebsiella oxytoca 产酸克雷伯菌Klebsiella planticola 植生克雷伯菌Klebsiella pneumonia ozaenae 肺炎克雷伯菌臭鼻亚种Klebsiella pneumonia rhinoscleromatis 肺炎克雷伯菌鼻硬结亚种Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumoniae 肺炎克雷伯菌肺炎亚种Klebsiella terrigena 土生克雷伯菌Kloeckera apiculata 柠檬克勒克酵母Kloeckera apis 蜜蜂克勒克酵母Kloeckera japonica 日本克勒克酵母Kloeckera spp 克勒克酵母某些种Kluyvera ascorbata 抗坏血酸克吕沃尔菌Kluyvera cryocrescens 栖冷克吕沃尔菌Kluyvera spp 克吕沃尔菌属某些种Kluyvera terrigena 土生克雷伯菌Kocuria kristinae 克氏库克菌Kocuria roseus (=Micrococcus roseus) 玫瑰色库克菌(=玫瑰色微球菌)Kocuria varians (=Micrococcus varians) 变异库克菌(=变异微球菌)Koserella trabulsii 特氏科泽菌Kytococcus sedentaruis 不动盖球菌Lactobacillus acidophilus 嗜酸乳杆菌Lactobacillus fermentium 发酵乳杆菌Lactobacillus jensenii 詹氏乳杆菌Lactococcus garvieae 格氏乳球菌Lactococcus lactis cremoris 乳酸乳球菌乳脂亚种Lactococcus lactis lactis 乳酸乳球菌乳亚种Lactococcus raffinolactis 棉子糖乳球菌Leclercia adcarboxglata 非脱羧勒克菌Leptotrichia buccalis 口腔纤毛菌Leuconostoc spp 明串珠菌属某些种Listeria grayi 格氏利斯特菌Listeria innocua 无害利斯特菌Listeria ivanovii 伊氏利斯特菌Listeria ivanovii 依氏利斯特菌Listeria monocytogenes 单核细胞增生利斯特菌Listeria seeligeri 斯氏利斯特菌Listeria spp 利斯特菌属某些种Listeria welshimeri 威氏利斯特菌Listeria welshimeri 魏氏利斯特菌Luconostoc spp 明串珠菌属某些种Microbacterium spp 微小杆菌属某些种Micrococcus luteus 滕黄微球菌Micrococcus lylae 莱拉微球菌Micrococcus lylae 里拉微球菌Micrococcus spp 微球菌属某些种Mobiluncus curtisii 克氏动弯杆菌Mobiluncus mulieris 羞怯动弯杆菌Mobiluncus spp 动弯杆菌属某些种Moellerella spp 米勒菌属某些种Moellerella wisconsensis 威斯康星米勒菌Moraxella lacunata 腔隙莫拉菌Moraxella nonliquefaciens 非液化莫拉菌Moraxella osloensis 奥斯陆莫拉菌Moraxella spp 莫拉菌属某些种Morganella morganii 摩氏摩根菌Neisseria cinerea 灰色奈瑟球菌Neisseria gonorrhoeae 淋病奈瑟球菌Neisseria lactamica 乳糖奈瑟球菌Neisseria meningitidis 脑膜炎奈瑟球菌Neisseria mucosa 粘液奈瑟球菌Neisseria polysaccharea 多糖奈瑟球菌Neisseria sicca 干燥奈瑟球菌Neisseria spp 奈瑟菌属某些种Neisseria subflava 微黄奈瑟球菌Nocardia spp 奴卡菌属某些种Ochrobactrum anthropi 人苍白杆菌Oerskovia spp 厄氏菌属某些种Oerskovia xanthineolytica 溶黄嘌呤厄菌Oligella ureolytica 解脲寡源杆菌Oligella urethralis 尿道寡源杆菌Pantoea spp 泛菌属某些种Pasteurella aerogenes 产气巴斯德菌Pasteurella gr.EF4 巴斯德菌群EF4Pasteurella haemolytica 溶血巴斯德菌Pasteurella multocida 多杀巴斯德菌Pasteurella pneumotropica 侵肺巴斯德菌Pasteurella spp 巴斯德菌属某些种Peptococcus niger 黑色消化球菌Peptostreptococcus anaerobius 厌氧消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus 不解糖消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus indolicus 产吲哚消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus indolicus 吲哚消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus magnus 大消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus micros 微小消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus prevotii 普氏消化链球菌Peptostreptococcus spp 消化链球菌属某些种Photobacterium damsela 美人鱼发光杆菌Pichia carsonii 卡氏毕赤酵母Pichia etchellsii 埃切毕赤酵母Pichia farinosa 粉状毕赤酵母Pichia ohmeri 奥默毕赤酵母Pichia spartinae 斯巴达克毕赤酵母Plesimonas shigelloides 类志贺邻单胞菌Porphyromonas asaccharolytica 不解糖卟啉单胞菌Porphyromonas endodontalis 牙髓卟啉单胞菌Porphyromonas gingivalis 牙龈卟啉单胞菌Prevotella bivia 二路普雷沃尔菌Prevotella buccae 颊普雷沃菌Prevotella buccalis 口颊普雷沃菌Prevotella denticola 栖牙普雷沃菌Prevotella disiens 解糖胨普雷沃菌Prevotella intermedia 中间普雷沃菌Prevotella loescheii 洛氏普雷沃菌Prevotella melaninogenica 产黑色普雷沃菌Prevotella oralis 口腔普雷沃菌Prevotella oris(=Bacteroides oris) 口普雷沃菌(=口拟杆菌) Propionibacterium acnes 疮疱丙酸杆菌Propionibacterium avidum 贪婪丙酸杆菌Propionibacterium granulosum 颗粒丙酸杆菌Propionibacterium propionicum 丙酸丙酸杆菌Proteus mirabilis 奇异变形杆菌Proteus penneri 彭氏变形杆菌Proteus vuigaris 普通变形杆菌Prototheca wickerhamii 魏氏原壁菌Providencia alcalifaciens 产碱普罗威登斯菌Providencia rettgeri 雷氏普罗威登斯菌Providencia rustigianii 拉氏普罗威登斯菌Providencia stuartii 斯氏普罗威登斯菌Providencia stuartii/ alcalifaciens 司氏/产碱普罗威登斯菌Pseudomonas aeruginosa 铜绿假单胞菌Pseudomonas alcaligenes 产碱假单胞菌Pseudomonas fluorescens 荧光假单胞菌Pseudomonas mendocina 门多萨假单胞菌Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes 假产碱假单胞菌Pseudomonas putida 恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonas spp 假单胞菌属某些种Pseudomonas sputita 恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonas stutzeri 施氏假单胞菌Pseudomonsa aeruginosa 铜绿假单胞菌Pseudomonsa fluorescens 荧光假单胞菌Pseudomonsa pseudomallei 类鼻疽假单胞菌Pseudomonsa putida 恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonsa spp 假单胞菌属某些种Rahnella aquatilis 水生拉恩菌Rhodococcus spp 红球菌属某些种Rhodotorula glutinis 红酵母Rhodotorula glutinis 粘红酵母Rhodotorula minuta 小红酵母Rhodotorula mucilaginosa 粘质红酵母Rothia dentocariosa 龋齿罗菌Saccharomyces cerevisiae 酿酒酵母Saccharomyces kluyverii 克鲁费酵母Salmonella arizonae 亚利桑那沙门菌Salmonella choleraesuis 猪霍乱沙门菌Salmonella enteritidis 肠炎沙门菌Salmonella gallinarum 鸡沙门菌Salmonella paratyphi A 甲型副伤寒沙门菌Salmonella paratyphi B 乙型副伤寒沙门菌Salmonella pullorum 鸡白痢沙门菌Salmonella spp 沙门菌属某些种Salmonella typhi 伤寒沙门菌Salmonella typhimurium 鼠伤寒沙门菌Serratia ficaria 无花果沙雷菌Serratia fonticola 居泉沙雷菌Serratia liquefaciens 液化沙雷菌Serratia marcescens 粘质沙雷菌Serratia odorifera 气味沙雷菌Serratia odorifera 1 气味沙雷菌1型Serratia odorifera 2 气味沙雷菌2型Serratia plymuthica 普城沙雷菌Serratia proteamaculans 变形斑沙雷菌Serratia putrefaciens 腐败沙雷菌Serratia rubidaea 深红沙雷菌Shewanella putrefaciens 腐败希瓦菌Shigella bogdii 鲍氏志贺菌Shigella dysenteriae 痢疾志贺菌Shigella flexneri 弗氏志贺菌Shigella sonnei 索氏志贺菌Shigella spp 志贺菌属某些种Sphingobacterium multivorum 多食鞘氨醇杆菌Sphingobacterium Spiritivovum 嗜神鞘氨醇杆菌Sphingobacterium spiritovorum 食神鞘氨醇杆菌Sphingomonas paucimobilis 少动鞘氨醇单胞菌Sporobolomyces salmonicolor 赭色掷孢酵母Staphylococcus arlettae 阿尔莱特葡萄球菌Staphylococcus aureus 金黄色葡萄球菌Staphylococcus auricularis 耳葡萄球菌Staphylococcus capitis 头状葡萄球菌Staphylococcus caprae 山羊葡萄球菌Staphylococcus carnosus 肉葡萄球菌Staphylococcus chromogenes 产色葡萄球菌Staphylococcus cohnii cohnii 科氏葡萄球菌科氏亚种Staphylococcus cohnii urealyticum 科氏葡萄球菌解脲亚种Staphylococcus epidermidis 表皮葡萄球菌Staphylococcus equorum 马胃葡萄球菌Staphylococcus gallinarum 鸡葡萄球菌Staphylococcus haemolyticus 溶血葡萄球菌Staphylococcus hominis 人葡萄球菌Staphylococcus hyicus 猪葡萄球菌Staphylococcus intermedius 中间葡萄球菌Staphylococcus kloosii 克氏葡萄球菌Staphylococcus lentus 缓慢葡萄球菌Staphylococcus lugdunensis 路邓葡萄球菌Staphylococcus saccharolylicus 解糖葡萄球菌Staphylococcus saprophyticus 腐生葡萄球菌Staphylococcus schleiferi 施氏葡萄球菌Staphylococcus sciuri 松鼠葡萄球菌Staphylococcus simulans 模仿葡萄球菌Staphylococcus warneri 沃氏葡萄球菌Staphylococcus xylosus 木糖葡萄球菌Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 嗜麦寡养食单胞菌Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌Stomatococcus mucilaginosus 粘滑口腔球菌Streptococcus acidominimus 少酸链球菌Streptococcus agalactiae 无乳链球菌Streptococcus alactolyticus 非解乳糖链球菌Streptococcus anginosus 咽峡炎链球菌Streptococcus bovis I 牛链球菌Ⅰ型Streptococcus bovis II 牛链球菌Ⅱ型Streptococcus canis 狗链球菌Streptococcus constellatus 星座链球菌Streptococcus downei 汗毛链球菌Streptococcus dysgalactiae 停乳链球菌停乳亚种Streptococcus dysgalactiae equlsimilis 停乳链球菌似马亚种Streptococcus equi equi 马链球菌马亚种Streptococcus equi zooepidemicus 马链球菌兽瘟亚种Streptococcus equinus 马肠链球菌Streptococcus gordonii 格氏链球菌Streptococcus gr L L群链球菌Streptococcus intermadius 中间链球菌Streptococcus mitis 缓症链球菌Streptococcus mutans 变异链球菌Streptococcus oralis 口腔链球菌Streptococcus parasanguis 副血链球菌Streptococcus penumoniae 肺炎链球菌Streptococcus porcinus 豕链球菌Streptococcus pyogenes 化脓链球菌Streptococcus salivarius salivarius 唾液链球菌唾液亚种Streptococcus salivarius thermophilus 唾液链球菌嗜热亚种Streptococcus sanguis 血链球菌Streptococcus sobrinus 表兄链球菌Streptococcus suis I 猪链球菌Ⅰ型Streptococcus suis II 猪链球菌Ⅱ型Streptococcus uberis 乳房链球菌Streptococcus vestibularis 前庭链球菌Tatumella ptyseos 痰塔特姆菌Trichosporon asahii 阿氏丝孢酵母Trichosporon asteroides 星状丝孢酵母Trichosporon inkin 墨汁丝孢酵母Trichosporon mucoides 粘性丝孢酵母Trichosporon ovoides 卵形丝孢酵母Trichosporon spp 丝孢酵母某些种Veillonella parvula 小韦荣球菌Veillonella spp 韦荣氏球菌属某些种Versinia enterocolitica 小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌Versinia pseudotuberculosis 假结核耶尔森菌Vibrio alginolyiicus 解藻朊酸弧菌Vibrio cholerae 霍乱弧菌Vibrio fluvialis 弗氏弧菌Vibrio fluvialis 河流孤菌Vibrio hollisae 霍氏弧菌Vibrio metschnikovi 梅氏弧菌Vibrio mimicus 最小弧菌Vibrio parahaemolyticus 副溶血弧菌Vibrio vulnficus 创伤弧菌Weeksella virosa 有毒威克斯菌Weeksella zoohelcum 动物溃疡威克斯菌Yersinia enterocolitica 小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌Yersinia frederiksenii 弗氏耶尔森菌Yersinia intermedia 中间耶尔森菌Yersinia kristensenii 克氏耶尔森菌Yersinia pestis 鼠疫耶尔森菌Yersinia pseudotuberculosis 假结核耶尔森菌Yersinia ruckeri 鲁氏耶尔森菌Zygosaccharomyces spp 接合酵母属某些种。

食品微生物论文

食品微生物论文

微生物食品——单细胞蛋白PS湛江师范学院生命科学与技术学院,湛江 524048摘要:微生物都是核酸和蛋白质的实体,大多是单细胞,用发酵法生产这些单细胞微生物就可以得到极为丰富的单细胞蛋白。

微生物的繁殖速度惊人,一头体重500千克的牛,每天只能合成0.5千克的蛋白质。

而500千克的活菌体,只要有合适的条件,在24小时内能够生产1250千克的单细胞蛋白质。

单细胞微生物制造出来的蛋白质可以制造人造肉、人造鱼、人造面粉等食品。

关键词:微生物、食品、单细胞蛋白、营养在日常生活中,我们不论有意无意,经常直接食用微生物或含有微生物的食品。

平常我们吃的蘑菇就是微生物的一种,令人难以置信,细菌和其他微生物含有和牛排一样多的蛋白质。

微生物食品在人类食谱中的比例越来越重。

目前,世界上还有2/3的人营养不良,缺少动物性蛋白,可见人类对蛋白质的需要越来越大。

毕竟地球上的动植物有限,产生的蛋白质更是有限的,因此需要在微生物方面做文章,势在必行。

(一)单细胞蛋白概念1966年,在麻省理工学院召开的会议上,第一次提出单细胞蛋白的概念。

单细胞蛋白又叫微生物蛋白、菌体蛋白。

按生产原料不同,可以分为石油蛋白、甲醇蛋白、甲烷蛋白等;按产生菌的种类不同,又可以分为细菌蛋白、真菌蛋白等。

1967年在第一次全世界单细胞蛋白会议上,将微生物菌体蛋白统称为单细胞蛋白。

(二)单细胞蛋白含丰富营养物质及其原料来源单细胞蛋白所含的营养物质极为丰富。

其中,蛋白质含量高达40%~80%,比大豆高10%~20%,比肉、鱼、奶酪高20%以上;氨基酸的组成较为齐全,含有人体必需的8种氨基酸,尤其是谷物中含量较少的赖氨酸。

一般成年人每天食用10~15 g干酵母,就能满足对氨基酸的需要量。

单细胞蛋白中还含有多种维生素、碳水化合物、脂类、矿物质,以及丰富的酶类和生物活性物质,如辅酶A、辅酶Q、谷胱甘肽、麦角固醇等。

而且单细胞蛋白质里氨基酸的种类比较齐全,有几种在一般食物里缺少的氨基酸,再单细胞蛋白里却大量存在.另外,还含有多种维生素,这也是一般食物所不及.正是由于单细胞蛋白具有这些突出的优点,现在人们用它加上相应的调味品做成鸡、鱼、猪肉的代替品,不仅外形相象,而且味道鲜美,营养也不亚于天然的鱼肉制品;用它掺和在饼干、饮料、奶制品中,则能提高这些产品的营养价值.在畜禽的饲料中,只要添加3-10%的单细胞蛋白,便能大大的提高饲料的营养价值和利用率.用来喂猪可增加瘦肉率;用来养鸡可多产蛋;用来饲养奶牛还可提高产奶量.在井冈霉素、肌苷、抗菌素等发酵它又可代替粮食原料.原料来源广泛:可作为单细胞蛋白生产原料的资源有:矿物(石油、液蜡、甲烷、泥炭等)、纤维资源(秸秆、木屑、糠稗、蔗渣等)、糖类资源(糖蜜、甘薯、木薯等)、工业有机废液(味精废液、淀粉废液、豆制品废液、酒精废液等)等。

微生物世界七大奇迹食品篇听力原文

微生物世界七大奇迹食品篇听力原文

微生物世界七大奇迹食品篇听力原文第1段Microbes, most of them bacteria, have populated this planet since long before animal life developed and they will outlive us. Invisible to the naked eye, they are ubiquitous. They inhabit the soil, air, rocks and water and are present within every form of life, from seaweed and coral to dogs and humans. And, as Yong explains in his utterly absorbing and hugely important book, we mess with them at our peril.微生物,大多数都是细菌,在动物出现很早以前就生活在地球上,而且它们会在我们消失之后继续存在。

虽然裸眼看不到,但它们到处都是。

它们出现在土壤、空气、岩石和水中,也存在于任何形式的生命内部,从海草和珊瑚,到狗和人类。

并且,正如杨在其十分引人入胜又至关重要的书中所说的那样,我们冒着危险操纵它们。

第2段Every species has its own colony of microbes, called a ‘microbiome’, and these microbes vary not only between species but also between individuals and within different parts of each individual. What is amazing is that while the number of human cells in the average person is about 30 trillion, the number of microbial ones is higher – about 39 trillion. At best, Yong informs us, we are only 50 per cent human. Indeed, some scientists even suggest we should think of each species and its microbes as a single unit, dubbed a ‘holobiont’.每个物种都有它们自己的微生物群落,被叫做“微生物群”。

食品微生物论文

食品微生物论文

浅谈食品中酵母菌食品中的酵母菌种类繁多,其不同种类有不同的功能,这使得酵母菌在食品中有着广泛的用途,与人类的生活息息相关,随着科学技术的发展,酵母菌一定可以为人类的生活做出更大的贡献。

酵母菌是子囊菌、担子菌等几科单细胞真菌的通称。

依照荷兰科学家Loddov在1970年提出的分类系统,将有无形成有性孢子作为分类的起点,属上的分类主要依据形态,种的划分主要依据生理的特性,将酵母菌分为三个亚门:1.能形成子囊孢子的酵母属子囊亚门,共4个科22个属139种酵母。

2.能产生冬孢子和担孢子的酵母菌,属于担子菌亚门,冬孢菌纲、黑粉菌目、黑粉菌科共9个科。

3.能产生掷孢子的酵母菌,属于担子菌亚门、冬孢子纲、掷包酵母科、科内有3个属。

4.不能产生有性孢子,尚未发现有性过程的酵母属于半知菌亚门,共12个属170个种。

但就我国目前所常用的分类是将酵母菌分为:鲜酵母、活性干酵母、即发酵母。

酵母菌在生物界中的种类繁多,其在人类的生活中也得到广泛的应用。

据科学家推测,早在史前三千年,人类就已经懂得酵母的发酵技术,虽不知原理,但却已有相当丰富的经验。

据考古学家考证,在史前2500年的埃及Theban法王填墓内找到经发酵的面包实体和证明酒和啤酒酿造的壁画和宝物,以及在公元前2698年中国史记记载了自黄帝开始已有教民烹煮面食的记载,都证明人类在这之前就已懂得种植稻米、小麦以及储存、磨粉和利用酵母调制不同的食物。

由此看来,酵母菌的利用已深入人类的发展史。

1.酵母菌在发酵乳制品中的应用随着科学技术的发展,酵母菌在酿造、奶制品、焙烤食品等有着飞速的发展。

内蒙古农业大学的贺银凤教授探究了国内外传统的发酵乳制品中乳酸菌和酵母菌的相互作用关系,指出了酵母菌在发酵品中与乳酸菌有着同样的作用,菌种间相互促进和相互制约控制产品的风味特点、营养特性、医疗和保健作用。

这为研究酵母菌在奶制品中的应用提供了理论的参考,不同的乳制品中的酵母菌存在着多样性,往往是多种酵母菌的共同作用形成不同的风味,不同的品质,而不同地区也有自己所特有的酵母菌,这是由于酵母菌的多样性所决定的。

食品微生物外文文献2017.1.19

食品微生物外文文献2017.1.19

食品微生物外文文献2017.1.19脉冲强光对诺如病毒和沙门及o157的灭活作用Pulsed light (PL) inactivation of two human norovirus (HuNoV) surrogates, murine norovirus (MNV-1) and Tulane virus (TV), and two bacterial pathogens, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella, were evaluated. The viruses and bacteria were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to final populations of ~6 log PFU/mL and ~6 log CFU/mL, respectively. Both viral and bacterial suspensions were then irradiated by PL for different durations and the reductions of each microorganisms were determined. MNV-1 and TV were significantly (P < 0.05) more resistant to PL treatment than Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in PBS suspension. MNV-1, Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 were also inoculated on strawberries and blueberries and the PL inactivation of each microorganism was determined. Lower inactivation of each microorganism was achieved on berry surfaces than in PBS suspension. This study shows that PL can induce rapid inactivation of MNV-1, TV, Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in clear suspension with viruses more resistant to PL treatment than bacteria. The efficacy of PL treatment is substantially influenced by food surface structure.乳酸菌基因组学和代谢组学的研究进展The Lactobacillus genus represents the largest and most diverse genera of all the lactic acid bacteria (LAB), encompassing species with applications in industrial, biotechnological and medical fields. The increasing number of available Lactobacillus genome sequences has allowed understanding of genetic and metabolic potential of this LAB group. Pangenome and coregenome studies are available for numerous species, demonstrating the plasticity of the Lactobacillus genomes and providing the evidence of niche adaptability. Advancements in the application of lactobacilli in the dairy industry lie in exploring the genetic background of their commercially important characteristics, such as flavour development potential or resistance to the phage attack. The integration of available genomic and metabolomic data through the generation of genome scale metabolic models has enabled the development of computational models that predict the behaviour of organisms under specific conditions and present a route to metabolic engineering. Lactobacilli are recognised as potential cell factories, confirmed by the successful production of many compounds. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of genomics, metabolomics and metabolic engineering of the prevalent Lactobacillus species associated with the production of fermented dairy foods. In-depth understanding of their characteristics opens the possibilities for their future knowledge-based applications.牛肉冷冻状态下的微生物The primary objective of this study was to characterise (microbiology and physical parameters) beef carcasses and primals during chilled storage. A minor aim was to compare observed growth of key spoilage bacteria on carcasses with that predicted by ComBase and the Food Safety Spoilage Predictor (FSSP). Total viable count (TVC), total Enterobacteriacae count (TEC), Pseudomonas spp., lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Brochothrixthermosphacta and Clostridium spp. were monitored on beef carcasses (n = 30) and primals (n = 105) during chilled storage using EC Decision 2001/471/EC and ISOsampling/laboratory procedures. The surface and/or core temperature, pH and water activity (aw) were also recorded. Clostridium (1.89 log10 cfu/cm2) and Pseudomonas spp. (2.12 log10 cfu/cm2) were initially the most prevalent bacteria on carcasses and primals, respectively. The shortest mean generation time (G) was observed on carcasses with Br. thermosphacta (20.3 h) and on primals with LAB (G = 68.8 h) and Clostridium spp. (G = 67 h). Over the course of the experiment the surface temperature dec reased from 37 °Cto 0 °C, pH from 7.07 to 5.65 and aw from 0.97 to 0.93 The observed Pseudomonas spp. and Br. thermosphacta growth was more or less within the range of predictions of Combase. In contrast, the FSSP completely overestimated the growth of LAB. This study contributes to the very limited microbiological data on beef carcasses and primals during chilling.冰箱中牡蛎气调包装的微生物组分变化As filter-feeding bivalves, oysters can accumulate microorganisms into their gills, causing spoilage and potential safety issues. This study aims to investigate the changes in the gill microbiota of oysters packed under air and modified atmospheres (MAs, 50% CO2: 50% N2, 70% CO2: 30% O2, and 50% CO2: 50% O2) during storage at 4 °C. The diversity of bacterial microbiota in oyster gills was profiled through polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis on the 16S rRNA gene V3 region to describe the variation during the entire storage period. The DGGE profile revealed high bacterial diversity in the air- and MA-packaged oyster gills, and the spoilage bacterial microbiota varied in the MA-packaged oyster gills. Results indicated that CO2:O2 (70%:30%) was suitable for oyster MA packaging andthat high bacterial loads in oyster gills need to be considered during storage. In addition, Lactobacillus and Lactococcus species were found to grow dominantly in fresh oyster gills under MA packaging, which supports the potential application of MA packaging for oyster storage.干腌制猪腰猪腿的猪链球菌的生存Dry-cured hams, shoulders and loins of Iberian pigs are highly appreciated in national and international markets. Salting, additive addition and dehydration are the main strategies to produce these ready-to-eat products. Although the dry curing process is known to reduce the load of well-known food borne pathogens, studies evaluating the viability of other microorganisms in contaminated pork have not been performed. In this work, the efficacy of the dry curing process to eliminate three swine pathogens associated with pork carcass condemnation, Streptococcus suis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Trueperellapyogenes, was evaluated. Results of this study highlight that the dry curing process is a suitable method to obtain safe ready-to-eat products free of these microorganisms. Although salting of dry-cured shoulders had a moderate bactericidal effect, results of this study suggest that drying and ripening were the most important stages to obtain dry-cured products free of these microorganisms.使用噬菌体提高贝壳类中大肠杆菌的去除率The present study investigated the potential application of the bacteriophage (or phage) phT4A, ECA2 and the phage cocktail phT4A/ECA2 to decrease the concentration of Escherichia coli during the depuration of natural and artificially contaminated cockles. Depuration in static seawater at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 with single phage suspensionsof phT4A and ECA2 was the best condition, as it decreased by ~2.0 log CFU/g the concentration of E. coli in artificially contaminated cockles after a 4 h of treatment. When naturally contaminated cockles were treated in static seawater with single phage suspensions and the phage cocktail, similar decreases in the concentration of E. coli (~0.7 log CFU/g) were achieved. However, when employing the phage cocktail, a longer treatment time was required to obtain comparable results to those achieved when using single phage suspensions. When naturally contaminated cockles were depurated with phage phT4A in a recirculated seawater system (mimicking industrial depuration conditions), a 0.6 log CFU/g reduction of E. coli was achieved after a 2 h of treatment. When the depuration process was performed without phage addition, a 4 h treatment was necessary toobtain a similar decrease. By combining phage therapy and depuration procedures, a reduction in bivalves depuration period can be achieved for, thus decreasing the cost associated with this procedure and even enhance the quality and safety of depurated bivalves destined for human consumption.乳制品中诺如病毒的三种提取方法比较Noroviruses (NoV) are currently the most common cause of viral foodborne diseases and RT-qPCR is widely used for their detection in food because of its sensitivity, specificity and rapidity. The ISO/TS (15216-1, 15216-2) procedures for detecting NoV and HAV in high-risk food categories such as shellfish, bottled water and vegetables were published in 2013. Milk products are less implicated in foodborne viral outbreaks but they can be contaminated with fruit added to these products or by the food handler. Thus, the development of sensitive and reliabletechniques for the detection of NoV in dairy products is needed to ensure the safety of these products. The aim of this study was to develop a RT-qPCR based method for the detection of NoV in milk products. Three methods were tested to recover NoV from artificially contaminated milk and cottage cheese. The selected method was based on the use of proteinase K and the recovery efficiencies ranged from 54.87% to 98.87% for NoV GI, 61.16%–96.50% for NoV GII. Murine norovirus and mengovirus were used as process controls and their recovery efficiencies were respectively 60.59% and 79.23%. The described method could be applied for detecting NoV in milk products for routine diagnosis needs.溶解氧和培养基对空肠弯曲菌形成生物膜的影响Campylobacter jejuni survival in aerobic environments has been suggested to be mediated by biofilm formation. Biofilm formation by eight C. jejuni strains under both aerobic and microaerobic conditions in different broths (Mueller-Hinton (MH), Bolton and Brucella) was quantified. The dissolved oxygen (DO) content of the broths under both incubation atmospheres was determined. Biofilm formation for all strains was highest in MH broth under both incubation atmospheres. Four strains had lower biofilm formation in MH under aerobic as compared to microaerobic incubation, while biofilm formation by the other four strains did not differ under the 2 atm. Two strains had higher biofilm formation under aerobic as compared to microaerobic atmospheres in Bolton broth. Biofilm formation by all other strains in Bolton, and all strains in Brucella broth, did not differ under the 2 atm. Under aerobic incubation DO levels in MH >Brucella> Bolton broth. Under microaerobic conditions levels in MH = Brucella> Bolton broth. Levels of DO in MH andBrucella broth were lower under microaerobic conditions but those of Bolton did not differ under the 2 atm. Experimental conditions and especially the DO of broth media confound previous conclusions drawn about aerobic biofilm formation by C. jejuni. 热-紫外处理对液体食品的灭菌效果优化The combination of ultraviolet radiation and heat (UV-H treatment) has been demonstrated as a promising strategy to overcome the limited UV germicidal effect in fruit juices. Nonetheless, there are so far no data regarding the efficacy of the combined process for the inactivation of bacterial foodborne pathogens in other liquid foods with different pH and composition. In this investigation, the optimum UV-H processing conditions for the inactivation of Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and S. aureus in chicken and vegetable broth, in addition to juices, were determined. From these data models that accurately predict the most advantageous UV-H treatment temperature and the expected synergistic lethal effect from UV and heat resistance data separately were constructed. Equations demonstrated that the optimumUV-H treatment temperature mostly depended on heat resistance, whereas the maximum synergistic lethal effect also was affected by the UV resistance of the microorganism of concern in a particular food.肠炎沙门鞭毛对侵袭的作用Nontyphoidal Salmonella strains are the main source of pathogenic bacterial contamination in the poultry industry. Recently, Salmonella entericaserovar Kentucky has been recognized as the most prominent serovar on carcasses in poultry-processing plants. Previous studies showed that flagellaare one of the main factors that contribute to bacterial attachment to broiler skin. However, the precise role of flagella and the mechanism of attachment are unknown. There are two different flagellar subunits (fliC and fljB) expressed alternatively in Salmonella entericaserovars using phase variation. Here, by making deletions in genes encoding flagellar structural subunits (flgK, fliC, and fljB), and flagellar motor (motA), we were able to differentiate the role of flagella and their rotary motion in the colonization of broiler skin and cellular attachment. Utilizing a broiler skin assay, we demonstrated that the presence of FliC is necessary for attachment to broiler skin. Expression of the alternative flagellar subunit FljB enables Salmonella motility, but this subunit is unable to mediate tight attachment. Deletion of the flgK gene prevents proper flagellar assembly, making Salmonella significantly less adherent to broiler skin than the wild type. S. Kentucky with deletions in all three structural genes, fliC, fljB, and flgK, as well as a flagellar motor mutant (motA), exhibited less adhesion and invasion of Caco-2 cells, while an fljB mutant was as adherent and invasive as the wild-type strain.IMPORTANCE In this work, we answered clearly the role of flagella in S. Kentucky attachment to the chicken skin and Caco-2 cells. We demonstrated that the presence of FliC is necessary for attachment to broiler skin. Expression of the alternative flagellar subunit FljB enables Salmonella motility, but this subunit is unable to mediate strong attachment. Deletion of the flgK gene prevents proper flagellar assembly, making Salmonella significantly less adherent to broiler skin than the wild type. S. Kentucky with deletions in all three structural genes, fliC, fljB, and flgK, as well as a flagellar motor mutant (motA), exhibited less adhesion and invasion of Caco-2 cells, while an fljB mutant wasas adherent and invasive as the wild-type strain. We expect these results will contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of Salmonella attachment to food products.单增李斯特菌可能是通过胃液和体外细胞侵染的主要细菌Various Listeria monocytogenes strains may contaminate a single food product, potentially resulting in simultaneous exposure of consumers to multiple strains. However, due to bias in strain recovery, L. monocytogenes strains isolated from foods by selective enrichment (SE) might not always represent those that can better survive the immune system of a patient. We investigated the effect of cocultivation in tryptic soy broth with 0.6% yeast extract (TSB-Y) at 10°C for 8 days on (i) the detection of L. monocytogenes strains during SE with the ISO 11290-1:1996/Amd 1:2004 protocol and (ii) the in vitro virulence of strains toward the Caco-2 human colon epithelial cancer cell line following exposure to simulated gastric fluid (SGF; pH 2.0)-HCl (37°C). We determined whether the strains which were favored by SE would be effective competitors under the conditions of challenges related to gastrointestinal passage of the pathogen. Interstrain competition of L. monocytogenes in TSB-Y determined the relative population of each strain at the beginning of SE. This in turn impacted the outcome of SE (i.e., favoring survival of competitors with better fitness) and the levels exposed subsequently to SGF.However, strong growth competitors could be outcompeted after SGF exposure and infection of Caco-2 cells by strains outgrown in TSB-Y and underdetected (or even missed) during enrichment. Our data demonstrate a preferential selection of certain L. monocytogenes strains during enrichments, often not reflecting a selective advantage of strains during infection. Thesefindings highlight a noteworthy scenario associated with the difficulty of matching the source of infection (food) with the L. monocytogenes isolate appearing to be the causative agent during listeriosis outbreak investigations.系统模型的建立来描述动物粪便是果蔬感染致病菌的主要途径The majority of foodborne outbreaks in the United States associated with the consumption of leafy greens contaminated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 have been reported during the period of July to November. A dynamic system model consisting of subsystems and inputs to the system (soil, irrigation, cattle, wild pig, and rainfall) simulating a hypothetical farm was developed. The model assumed two crops of lettuce in a year and simulated planting, irrigation, harvesting, ground preparation for the new crop, contamination of soil and plants, and survival of E. coli O157:H7. As predicted by the baseline model for crops harvested in different months from conventional fields, an estimated 13 out of 257 (5.05%) first crops harvested in July would have at least one plant with at least 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7. Predictions indicate that no first crops would be contaminated with at least 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 for other months (April to June). The maximum E. coli O157:H7 concentration in a plant was higher in the second crop (27.10 CFU) than in the first crop (9.82 CFU). For the second crop, the probabilities of having at least one plant with at least 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 in a crop were predicted as 15/228 (6.6%), 5/333 (1.5%), 14/324 (4.3%), and 6/115 (5.2%) in August, September, October, and November, respectively. For organic fields, the probabilities of having at least one plant with ≥1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 in a crop (3.45%) were predicted to be higher than those for the conventional fields (2.15%).O157迫于环境压力的嗜热和苏醒加速进化The development of resistance in foodborne pathogens to food preservation techniques is an issue of increasing concern, especially in minimally processed foods where safety relies on hurdle technology. In this context, mild heat can be used in combination with so-called nonthermal processes, such as high hydrostatic pressure (HHP), at lower individual intensities to better retain the quality of the food. However, mild stresses may increase the risk of (cross-)resistance development in the surviving population, which in turn might compromise food safety. In this investigation, we examined the evolution of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain ATCC 43888 after recurrent exposure to progressively intensifying mild heat shocks (from 54.0°C to 60.0°C in 0.5°C increments) with intermittent resuscitation and growth of survivors. As such, mutant strains were obtained after 10 cycles of selection with ca. 106-fold higher heat resistance than that for the parental strain at 58.0°C, although this resistance did not extend to temperatures exceeding 60.0°C. Moreover, th ese mutant strains typically displayed cross-resistance against HHP shock and displayed signs of enhanced RpoS and RpoH activity. Interestingly, additional cycles of selection maintaining the intensity of the heat shock constant (58.5°C) selected for mutan t strains in which resuscitation speed, rather than resistance, appeared to be increased. Therefore, it seems that resistance and resuscitation speed are rapidly evolvable traits in E. coli ATCC 43888 that can compromise food safety.肉桂油抑制大肠0157噬菌体的入侵和增殖This study evaluated the inhibitory effect of cinnamon oil against Escherichia coli O157:H7 Shiga toxin (Stx) production andfurther explored the underlying mechanisms. The MIC and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of cinnamon oil against E. coli O157:H7 were 0.025% and 0.05% (vol/vol), respectively. Cinnamon oil significantly reduced Stx2 production and the stx2 mRNA expression that is associated with diminished Vero cell cytotoxicity. Consistently, induction of the Stx-converting phage where the stx2 gene is located, along with the total number of phages, decreased proportionally to cinnamon oil concentration. In line with decreased Stx2 phage induction, cinnamon oil at 0.75× and 1.0× MIC eliminated RecA, a key mediator of SOS response, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), and poly(A) polymerase (PAP I), which positively regulate Stx-converting phages, contributing to reduced Stx-converting phage induction and Stx production. Furthermore, cinnamon oil at 0.75× and 1.0× MIC strongly inhibited the qse BC and luxS expression associated with decreased AI-2 production, a universal quorum sensing signaling molecule. However, the expression of oxidative stress response genes oxyR, soxR, and rpoS was increased in response to cinnamon oil at 0.25× or 0.5× MIC, which may contribute to stunted bacterial growth and reduced Stx2 phage induction and Stx2 production due to the inhibitory effect of OxyR on prophage activation. Collectively, cinnamon oil inhibits Stx2 production and Stx2 phage induction in E. coli O157:H7 in multiple ways.长时间接触导致增加了产气肠杆菌的食品感染Bacterial cross-contamination from surfaces to food can contribute to foodborne disease. The cross-contamination rate of Enterobacteraerogenes on household surfaces was evaluated by using scenarios that differed by surface type, food type, contact time (<1, 5, 30, and 300 s), and inoculum matrix (trypticsoy broth or peptone buffer). The surfaces used were stainless steel, tile, wood, and carpet. The food types were watermelon, bread, bread with butter, and gummy candy. Surfaces (25 cm2) were spot inoculated with 1 ml of inoculum and allowed to dry for 5 h, yielding an approximate concentration of 107 CFU/surface. Foods (with a 16-cm2 contact area) were dropped onto the surfaces from a height of 12.5 cm and left to rest as appropriate. Posttransfer, surfaces and foods were placed in sterile filter bags and homogenized or massaged, diluted, and plated on tryptic soy agar. The transfer rate was quantified as the log percent transfer from the surface to the food. Contact time, food, and surface type all had highly significant effects (P < 0.000001) on the log percent transfer of bacteria. The inoculum matrix (tryptic soy broth or peptone buffer) also had a significant effect on transfer (P = 0.013), and most interaction terms were significant. More bacteria transferred to watermelon (~0.2 to 97%) than to any other food, while the least bacteria transferred to gummy candy (~0.1 to 62%). Transfer of bacteria to bread (~0.02 to 94%) was similar to transfer of bacteria to bread with butter (~0.02 to 82%), and these transfer rates under a given set of conditions were more variable than with watermelon and gummy candy.。

食品微生物法英语

食品微生物法英语

食品微生物法英语Food Microbiology ActThis act is designed to regulate and monitor the microbiological safety of food products. It encompasses a range of measures to ensure that foodborne pathogens and spoilage microorganisms are controlled and minimized during the production, processing, and distribution of food.Key provisions of the Food Microbiology Act include:1. Microbiological criteria: It sets specific limits or guidelines for the presence of certain pathogens or indicators of poor hygiene in food products. These criteria are used to assess the safety and quality of food and determine if it is suitable for consumption.2. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): The act requires food producers to follow established GMPs to prevent microbiological contamination during food processing. This includes maintaining hygienic conditions, implementing proper sanitation measures, and training personnel on safe food handling practices.3. Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems: Food establishments are required to implement HACCP systems to identify and control potential microbiological hazards. This systematic approach involves analyzing each step of the food production process to identify critical control points and establish measures to prevent or eliminate hazards.4. Food testing and monitoring: The act mandates regular testing offood products to monitor their microbiological safety. This may involve microbiological analysis of samples to detect the presence of pathogens or indicator microorganisms. Results of these tests are used to ensure compliance with microbiological criteria and take appropriate actions, such as product recall or improvement of control measures.5. Enforcement and penalties: The act establishes enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with microbiological standards and regulations. Non-compliance may result in penalties, including fines or suspension of operations, depending on the severity of the violation.In summary, the Food Microbiology Act aims to protect public health by regulating the microbiological safety of food products. Through the establishment of criteria, GMPs, HACCP systems, and testing requirements, it ensures that foodborne pathogens and spoilage microorganisms are effectively controlled, minimizing the risk of foodborne illnesses and maintaining the quality of food.。

食品微生物的污染来源与控制研究

食品微生物的污染来源与控制研究

食品微生物的污染来源与控制研究下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成,希望大家下载以后,能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改,请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用,谢谢!本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,如想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by the editor. I hope that after you download them, they can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types of practical materials, such as educational essays, diary appreciation, sentence excerpts, ancient poems, classic articles, topic composition, work summary, word parsing, copy excerpts, other materials and so on, want to know different data formats and writing methods, please pay attention!食品微生物的污染问题一直是食品安全领域的重要研究课题。

食品微生物SCI

食品微生物SCI

452Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2014; 4(6): 452-456Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Diseasejournal homepage: /locate/apjtd*C orresponding author: D r. R ashed N oor, A ssociate P rofessor & C hairman, D epartment of M icrobiology, S tamford U niversity B angladesh, 51 S iddeswari R oad, D haka-1217.T el: +880 2 8355626 ext. 472 F ax: +880 2 9143531E -mail: noor.rashed@F oundation P roject: S upported by S tamford U niversity B angladesh.1. IntroductionE mergence of food borne infectious diseases is a principal public health concern as well as an imperative economic hitch for many countries [1-4]. A ssociation of harmful microorganisms in cosmetics and pharmaceutical drugs are also not unlikely [5,6]. P reservatives, which are commonly known as natural or synthetic substances, are principally affixed to food items including fruits and fruit juices, vegetables, processed foods, and additionally to the cosmetics and pharmaceutical products to enhance their quality as well as shelf life [7,8]. T he mode of actionfrequently lies on their anti-oxidative, antimicrobial and anti-enzymatic properties which in turn hinder the chemical decomposition, fermentation, acidification, and microbiological proliferation within the product [7,9-11].A side from their advantages, some of the artificial preservatives including nitrates, benzoates, sulfites, sorbates, formaldehyde and several others may possess life-threatening side effects [7,9,12]. A mong the earliest preservatives, high concentrations of sugar (mainly used for jams and jellies ) and salt (for meat and fish ), pickling with salt, vinegar, lemon juice or mustard oil (for vegetables ) are well known. O ther advancement in preservation efficiencyContents lists available at ScienceDirectA rticle history:R eceived 20 O ct 2014R eceived in revised form 27 O ct, 2nd revised form 3 N ov, 3rd revised form 10 N ov 2014A ccepted 23 N ov 2014A vailable online 28 D ec 2014Tohora Sultana et al./Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2014; 4(6): 452-456453arose through canning, pasteurization, irradiation, filtration, addition of natural or synthetic preservatives [13-16].W hile the microbiological spoilage in food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics items are globally common, the use of preservatives used in those products against microbial contamination is also expected [17-20]. I n context of B angladesh the microbial prevalence in food and consumer items is too frequent, resulting in disease outbreaks [21-27]. H owever, the knowledge on the extent of microbiological contamination of the associated preservatives have not been provided. M oreover, the microbial content in the preservatives as well as the demonstration of antimicrobial activity would imply the efficiency of the preservatives. B ased on these facts, current study attempted to isolate and enumerate the microorganisms accessing the preservatives and to detect their anti-bacterial traits.2. Materials and methods2.1. Sampling, sample processing and microbiological analysisA total of 9 samples of different categories of natural and synthetic preservatives (with appropriate dates of manufacturing and expiry on the packs ) were collected from different super shops in D haka city during S eptember 2013 to D ecember 2013. S amples included salts, sugars, sodium sulfite, sodium benzoate, acetic acid, citric acid, vinegar, honey and turmeric preservatives. A ll samples were transported to the M icrobiology L aboratory in order to assess their microbiological quality. A total of 10 g of samples were homogeneously mixed with 90 m L of buffer peptone water, and serial dilutions were prepared up to 10-4 following the standard protocols [5-6]. A n aliquot of 0.1 m L of each suspension from the dilution 10-2 and 10-4 was spread onto nutrient agar plate to enumerate the total bacteria and on S abouraud dextrose agar plate for the estimation of fungal load. T hen the nutrient agar plate and S abouraud dextrose agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 to 24 h and at 25 °C for 48 to 72 h, respectively.F or the enumeration of specific pathogens, 0.1 m L from the dilution of 10-2 and 10-4 of each sample was spread onto membrane fecal coliform, M ac C onkey agar, mannitol salt agar, and cetrimide agar for the enumeration of total fecal coliform, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus spp., and Pseudomonas spp., consecutively. A ll the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h except membrane fecal coliform agar which was incubated at 44.5 °C for 18-24 h. P resence of E. coli was further confirmed by the appearance of bluish-black colonies with the production of green metallic sheen on the eosin-methylene blue agar [6]. C onfirmative biochemical tests revealed the identity of the specific pathogens [28].2.2. Determination of anti-bacterial activity of the preservativesT he anti-bacterial activity of the preservative sampleswas performed by using agar well diffusion method as described previously [21]. L awns of bacterial pathogens (E. coli , Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., Vibrio spp., Listeria spp. and Bacillus spp.) were prepared over the M ueller H inton agar plates and holes were made in the M ueller H inton agar by cork borer. E ach of the homogenized preservative blends (around 10 μg/m L ) was then introduced separately in the specified hole with a positive control (streptomycin, 10 μg/m L ) and negative control (normal saline ). P resence of clear zone around the sample suspension indicated the presence of anti-bacterial activity.3. ResultsA ll samples studied were found to be populated with bacteria within a range of 102-105 CFU /g with the presence of specific pathogenic microorganisms, i.e ., E. coli , Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococuus spp. in most of the samples (T ables 1 and 2). S odium benzoate, vinegar and honey samples were found to harbor the highest number of spoiling bacteria (~105 CFU /g ). N ext prevalence was noticed in case of sugar and turmeric samples (104 CFU /g ) while salt and acetic acid samples were populated by a lesser extent of bacteria (103 CFU /g ). T he least microbial spoilage was in the citric acid and sodium sulfite samples (102 CFU /g ). E xcept sugar and vinegar, the other 7 samples exhibited the proliferation of fungal population.Table1A cceptable microbial limits[49]: T otal aerobic bacteria: 103CFU /g; total fungalload: 102 CFU /g; absence of fecal coliforms, E. coli , S. aureus and Pseudomonas spp. per 1 g of the preservative; absence of Salmonella spp. per 10 g of the preservative.Table 2methyl red; VP : V oges-P roskauer.S odium sulfite and citric acid were found to be free from any contaminating specific pathogenic bacteria whileTohora Sultana et al./Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2014; 4(6): 452-456454vinegar and honey samples were found to be contaminated with E. coli, Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus spp. S alt and acetic acid samples harbored only Pseudomonas spp. (~102CFU/g), sodium benzoate was found to be contaminated with E. coli and Staphylococcus spp., and the turmeric samples were contaminated with Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus spp.3.2. Anti-bacterial traits of the preservative samplesA mong the samples studied in our study, sodium sulfite showed the highest activity against all of the test bacteria (T able 3). A cetic acid was found to exhibit the anti-bacterial activity against 6out of 8test bacteria while vinegar exhibited the activity against 4 bacteria. A nti-bacterial activity of both of these preservatives was most prominent against Pseudomonas spp. (T able 3). A nother organic acid, the citric acid in our study also exhibited the activity against all bacteria; however, to a lesser extent compared to that of sodium sulfite. C ompared to sodium sulfite, acetic acid, citric acid and vinegar, other samples in our study were found to pose the anti-bacterial activity to a lesser extent.Table 3μg/m L.A ctivity of salt was scored only against Listeria spp. and Bacillus spp., while activity of sugar and honey was found only against E. coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively. N o activity was found in case of turmeric samples. S ince this preservative was found to be populated with the ubiquitous Pseudomonas spp. and the easily transmittable staphylococcal species, absence of anti-bacterial trait was not unlikely.4. DiscussionF ood preparations or pharmaceutical/cosmetics solutions often tend to provide suitable media for the growth of microorganisms and hence require the incorporation of a preservative[5,6,22,24]. W hile bacteria and fungi spoiled food are well known, reports on the food associated preservative spoiling microorganisms are rare. A ccording to our study, the huge proliferation of microorganisms within the samples tested may reveal a possibility of food and pharmaceutical contamination apart from exogenous sources. A limited report on the preservative spoilage by microorganisms exists so far, and hence the reasoning of the microbial prevalence appears a bit difficult; however, considering the pharmaceutical bio-burden cases, we assume that the microbial access into the preservatives tested in our study might be due to the relatively low concentrations of these food grade products as well as due to the common cause of unhygienic preparation of the preservatives[7,9,11,14,18].N evertheless, to our knowledge, the abundance of microorganisms in common preservatives used in B angladesh has been first time reported in our study.A dditionally, the microbial load among the preservatives tested further poses the extended spoilage of the intended food or pharmaceutical products to be used and hence raises the application risk.I t is indeed well reported that the natural substances including salt, sugar and vinegar are also used as traditional preservatives[29].B esides non-toxicity with acceptability in taste and odour, a preservative should be effective against a wide spectrum of microorganisms. A lmost all of the preservatives, either natural or synthetic, act as either antimicrobials or antioxidants or both and hence are known to prevent the growth of molds, yeasts and bacteria[13,29-33].T he history of sodium sulfite’s anti-bacterial trait has long been known and this preservative has been shown to pose the therapeutic efficacy[7,34-36].C onsistently, our study also demonstrated the highest anti-bacterial activity of this preservative, which is interestingly in consistent to the least microbial prevalence as observed through microbiological enumeration assay.O rganic acids are popular preservatives with marked anti-bacterial traits[37-40].I n our study, both acetic acid and vinegar exhibited the anti-bacterial activity against Pseudomonas spp.; however, both were initially found to harbor Pseudomonas spp., with a relatively higher bacterial load especially in the vinegar samples. T he reason behind this discrepancy might be the higher concentration of the preservatives used for the study of the anti-bacterial activity. S uch a baffling result is suggestive of the further determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of acetic acid and vinegar. T he notable anti-bacterial activity of citric acid in our study is totally consistent with the microbial prevalence data since no pathogen was found to prevail within this preservative.A recent report has shown sodium benzoate to be effective to extend the shelf life of fruit juice; however, in our study this preservative has been found to exhibit the anti-bacterial activity only against Listeria spp. to a minor extent[41].B esides the vinegar and honey samples, sodium benzoate was also found to be largely propagated with microbial population which in turn could be explanatory behind the anti-bacterial inefficiency of this preservative.S alting, salt curing, corning or sugar curing of foods by sodium chloride, brine (for bacon, salt pork, etc.) and sucrose (sugar-cured ham, fruit preserves, jams and jellies, etc.) has long been employed to protect food from microbiological spoilage. S alts have long been used for food preservation and have been found to be effective for bacterial killing[31,42-46].N evertheless, in the present investigation, the activity was limited. T he bacterial prevalence of 103-104CFU/g in salt and sugar samples in our study was also in line with such a weak anti-bacterial activity of these preservatives. S everal reports proved honey to possess significant anti-bacterial activity; however, according to the present study, the activity was not notable probably due to the difference in source, or processing deficiency, or might be due to different experimental conditions[10,12].F urthermore, presence of allTohora Sultana et al./Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2014; 4(6): 452-456455pathogenic bacteria in honey samples was also suggestive of the weak anti-bacterial activity of this preservative.W hile the aspects of anti-bacterial traits of the preservatives could be well discussed in cohort with an array of reports, the scarcity of microbial bio-burden indeed limits the focus on acceptable criteria of the preservatives. H owever, considering the preservatives used in the current investigation as non-sterile pharmaceutical products, the acceptance criteria of microbial limits should be set for the total aerobic bacteria, total fungal load, and the complete absence of specific pathogens including fecal coliforms, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus ), E. coli , Pseudomonas spp. and Salmonella spp., as specified by the pharmacopoeia standards [47,48]. I n this context, the overall microbiological quality of the preservatives citric acid and sodium sulfite was found to be within the limit which is also in consistent to their anti-bacterial activity against the test bacteria.O verall, according to our study, sodium sulfite and citric acid samples were found to be satisfactory preservatives both in terms of microbiological criteria and their anti-bacterial traits. T he results of anti-bacterial activity of the preservatives presented in this study are in line with their microbiological load, which indeed mark a complete bacteriological profile of the samples tested. T hus, in relation to the microbial proliferation in food samples, the study of anti-bacterial activity of all the common preservatives may further raise the public health concern regarding food safety.Conflict of interest statementWe declare that we have no conflict of interest.AcknowledgementsT he work has been supported by S tamford U niversity B mentsBackgroundF ood borne infectious diseases is a principal public health concern, and it has negatively effect on economic growth in many countries. F ood preservatives help to protect health by decreasing the risk of food-borne illness caused by microorganisms in food, and by lowering oxidation in the body, which may occur as a result of ingredients in foods that become oxidized. F ood spoiling bacteria and fungi are well known, but the knowledge on the extent of microbiological contamination of the associated preservatives has not been reported extensively.Research frontiersI n this article authors performed to quantify the microorganisms in some common food preservatives as well as to detect their in vitro anti-bacterial traits.Related reportsI t is indeed well reported that the natural substances including salt, sugar and vinegar are also used as traditional preservatives. I n addition, a recent report has shown sodium benzoate to be effective to extend the shelf life of fruit juice.Innovations & breakthroughsT he present research shown that sodium sulfite and citric acid samples were satisfactory preservatives both in terms of microbiological criteria and their anti-bacterial traits.ApplicationsT his study significantly contributes to understand microbial load in some common food preservatives as well as anti-bacterial activity of the same food preservatives.Peer reviewT his is a good study in which the authors evaluated the distribution of microbial loads in common food preservatives. T he results are interesting and suggested that sodium sulfite and citric acid samples were satisfactory preservatives both in terms of microbiological criteria and their anti-bacterial traits.References[1] D jenane D , Y ang üela J , R oncal és P , A ider M . U se of essentialoils as natural food preservatives: effect on the growth of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid whole eggs stored under abuse refrigerated conditions. J Food Res 2013; 2(3): 65-78.[2] M rityunjoy A , K aniz F , F ahmida J , S hanzida JS , U ddin MA , N oor R . P revalence of Vibrio cholerae in different food samples in the city of D haka, B angladesh. Int Food Res J 2013; 20(2): 1017-1022.[3] S arker N , I slam S , H asan M , K abir F , U ddin MA , N oor R . U se of multiplex PCR assay for detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in street vended food items. Am J Life Sci 2013; 1(6): 267-272.[4] R ahman F , N oor R . P revalence of pathogenic bacteria in common salad vegetables of D haka M etropolis. Bangladesh J Bot 2012; 41(2): 159-162.[5] D as KK , F atema KK , N ur IT , N oor R . P revalence of microorganisms in commonly used cosmetics samples in D haka M etropolis. J Pharm Sci Innov 2013; 2(6): 7-9.[6] K hanom S , D as KK , B anik S , N oor R . M icrobiological analysis of liquid oral drugs available in B angladesh. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2013; 5(4): 479-482.[7] A nand SP , S ati N . A rtificial preservatives and their harmful effects: looking toward nature for safer alternatives. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013; 4(7): 2496-2501.[8] R owe RC , S heskey PJ , C ook WG , F enton ME . Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients . L ondon: P harmaceutical P ress; 2012.[9] S eetaramaiah K , S mith A , M urali R , M anavalan R . P reservatives in food products-review. Int J Pharm Biol Arch 2011; 2: 583-599.[10] L usby PE , C oombes AL , W ilkinson JM . B actericidal activity ofdifferent honeys against pathogenic bacteria. Arch Med Res 2005; 36: 464-467.[11] P harmaceutical microbiology . I n: D enyer SP , H odges NA , G ormanSP . M assachusetts, USA : B lackwell S cientific P ublications; 2004.[12] M andal MD , M andal S . H oney: its medicinal property and anti-bacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2011; 1(2): 154-160.[13] M iti ć-Ćulafi ć DS , P avlovi ć M , O stoji ć S , K nezevi ć-V uk čevi ć J .Tohora Sultana et al./Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2014; 4(6): 452-456456A ntimicrobial effect of natural food preservatives in fresh basil-based pesto spreads.J Food Process Preserv 2013; doi: 10.1111/ jfpp.12091.[14] O regon S tate U niversity 2013. Food safety & preservation:preserving for special diets. C orvallis: O regon S tate U niversityE xtension S ervice; 1980.[15] B ahtiti NH. S tudy of preservative effect of “propolis” on the storage quality of mashed potatoes. Food Sci Technol 2013; 1(2): 17-20.[16] P awar HA, S henoy AV, N arawade PD, S oni PY, S hanbhag PP, R ajal VA. P reservatives from nature: a review. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res 2011; 1: 78-88.[17] B aydar H, K uleasan H, K ara N, S ecilmis-C anbay H, K ineci S. T he effects of pasteurization, ultraviolet radiation and chemical preservatives on microbial spoilage and scent composition of rose water. J Essent Oil Bear Plants2013; 16: 151-160. [18] S tratford M, S teels H, N ebe-von-C aron G, N ovodvorska M, H ayer K, A rcher DB. E xtreme resistance to weak-acid preservatives in the spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Int J Food Microbiol 2013; 166(1): 126–134.[19] S harma N, G archa S, S ingh S. P otential of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MTCC3041as a biopreservative. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2013;3(2): 168-171.[20] S iegert W. C omparison of microbial challenge testing methods for cosmetics. Household and Personal Care Today 2013; 8: 32-39.[21] A hmed T, B aidya S, S harma BC, M alek M, D as KK, A charjee M, et al. I dentification of drug-resistant bacteria among export quality shrimp samples in B angladesh. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci2013;15(4): 655-660.[22] F eroz F, S enjuti JD, N oor R. D etermination of microbial growth and survival in salad vegetables through in vitro challenge test.International J Nutr Food Sci2013; 2(6): 312-319. [23] N oor R, A charjee M, A hmed T, D as KK, P aul L, M unshi SK, et al. M icrobiological analysis of major sea fish availavle in local markets of D haka city, B angladesh. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2013; 2(4): 2420-2430.[24] N oor R, U ddin MA, H aq MA, M unshi SK, A charjee M, R ahman MM. M icrobiological study of vendor and packed fruit juices locally available in D haka city, B angladesh. Int Food Res J 2013;20(2): 1011-1015.[25] H assan MR, A charjee M, D as E, D as KK, A hmed T, A kond MA, et al. M icrobiological study of sea fish samples collected from local markets in D haka city. Int Food Res J 2013;2(3): 1491-1495. [26] R abbi FA, R abbi F, R unun TA, Z aman K, R ahman MM, N oor R. M icrobiological quality assessments of foods collected from different hospitals within D haka city. Stamford J Microbiol 2011;1(1): 31-36.[27] R ahman T, H asan S, N oor R. A n assessment of microbiological quality of some commercially packed and fresh fruit juice available in D haka city: a comparative study. Stamford J Microbiol 2011; 1(1): 13-18.[28] C appuccino J, S herman N. Microbiology-a laboratory manual. 4th ed. M enlo P ark, C alifornia: B enjamin/C ummings P ublishingC o., I nc.; 1996, p. 13-182.[29] S hee AK, R aja RB, S ethi D, K unhambu A, A runachalam KD. S tudies on the anti-bacterial activity potential of commonly used food preservatives. Int J Eng Sci Technol2010; 2(3): 264-269. [30] C hand B. A nti-bacterial effect of garlic (Allium sativum) and ginger (Zingiber officinale)against Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2013;2(4): 2481-2491. [31] O nyuka JHO, K akai R, A rama PF, O fulla AVO. C omparison of antimicrobial activities of brine salting, chlorinated solution andMoringa oleifera plant extracts in fish from L ake V ictoria B asin of K enya. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 2013; 13(3): 7772-7788. [32] S hahnawaz M, S heikh SA, M inhas S. R ole of sodium benzoate as a chemical preservative in extending the shelf life of orange juice. Global Adv Res J Food Sci Technol2013; 2(1): 7-18. [33] C hatkaew A, S u’udi M, L im S, H wang BH, K im J. Pectobacteriumcarotovorum inhibition by preservative agents in sprouting radish seeds. Int Res J Biol Sci 2013;2(9): 22-28.[34] K ropec A, H uebner J, F rank U, L emmen S, H irt U, D aschner FD. In vitro activity of sodium bisulfite and heparin against staphylococci: new strategies in the treatment of catheter-related infection. J Infect Dis1993; 168(1): 235-237.[35] Y amazaki H, T oda M, M iyaji K, Y amaguchi T, F ukutome I.[A nti-bacterial activity of sodium sulfite on the mucoid variant of enteric bacteria]. Showa Igakkai Zasshi1966; 26(2): 93-101. J apanese.[36] I n YW, K imi JJ, K im HJ, O h SW. A ntimicrobial activities of acetic acid, citric acid and lactic acid against Shigella species. J Food Saf 2013;33: 79–85.[37] M ani-López E, G arcía HS, López-M alo A. O rganic acids as antimicrobials to control Salmonella in meat and poultry products. Food Res Int 2012; 45: 713-721.[38] P ark SH, C hoi MR, P ark JW, P ark KH, C hung MS, R yu S, et al. U se of organic acids to inactivate Escherchia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes on organic fresh apples and lettuce. J Food Sci2011; 76: M293–M298. [39] J ang JS, L ee HJ, O h BY, L ee JM, G o JM, K im YH. I nactivation ofEscherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes by organic acid. Korean J Environ Health Sci 2007; 33: 403–407.[40] N wachukwu E, E zeigbo CG. C hanges in the microbial population of pasteurized soursop juice treated with benzoate and lime during storage. Afr J Microbiol Res 2013; 7(31): 3992-3995. [41] B ellagha S, S ahli A, F arhat A, K echaou N, G lenza A. S tudies on salting and drying of sardine (Sardinella aurita): experimental kinetics and modeling. J Food Eng 2007; 78: 947-952. [42] K han MAA, K han YSA. I nsect infestation and preventive measures in dry fish storage of C hittagong, B angladesh. J Biol Sci 2001; 1(10): 963-965.[43] L eroi F, J offraud JJ. S alt and smoke simultaneously affect chemical and sensory quality of cold-smoked salmon during 5 degrees C storage predicted using factorial design. J Food Prot 2000;63(9): 1222-1227.[44] L eroi F, J offraud JJ, C hevalier F. E ffect of salt and smoke on the microbiological quality of cold-smoked salmon during storage at 5 degrees C as estimated by the factorial design method. J FoodProt2000; 63(4): 502-508.[45] W ei CI, H uang TS, K im JM, L in WF, T amplin ML, B artz JA.G rowing and survival of Salmonella M ontevideo on tomatoes and disinfection with chlorinated water. J Food Prot1996; 58(8): 829-836.[46] P ark DL, R ua SM J r., A cker RF. D irect application of new hypochlorite sanitizer for reducing bacterial contamination on foods. J Food Prot 1991; 54: 960-964.[47] F ood and D rug A dministration. S pecifications: test procedures and acceptance criteria for new drug substances and new products: chemical substances. S ilver S pring: F ood and D rug A dministration; 2006. [O nline] A vailable from: /downloads/A nimal V eterinary/ G uidance C ompliance E nforcement/G uidancefor I ndustry/ UCM052487.pdf. [A ccessed on 14th J anuary 2014] [48] E uropean P harmacopoeia C ommission. European Pharmacopeia,Vol 5.6 supplement. 5th ed. I llinois, USA: B alogh S cientific B ooks; 2006, p. 4451-4452.。

食品微生物检验的方法及质量控制

食品微生物检验的方法及质量控制

工程技术 Modern Food
计算出样品中的细菌含量。例如,英国推出了用于检 测肉制品、乳制品和海鲜品的 Mathus 系统;美国 Vitek 公司开发出了用于检测肉制品和乳制品中含菌量的电 阻电导检测器 B免疫学技术法在检测食品中的微生物时,主要利 用抗原、抗体特异性结合的反应,辅助以免疫放大技术, 用病原体来刺激其生成免疫球蛋白。免疫学技术法的 优点是细菌增加之后不用再选择性分离样品,能够直 接进行筛选,并且灵敏度极高。免疫学技术法根据检 验方法的差异,还可以分为凝集反应法、免疫扩散反 应法和免疫荧光反应法等。
1.5 代谢学检验
2.2 检验环境的控制
代谢学检验方法常用的有 2 种,即放射测量法和 电阻抗法。放射测量法是指借助 14C 标记的碳水化合 物,使微生物在代谢过程中因分解 14C 标记的碳水化 合物,而释放出含 14C02,并通过放射测量仪来测量被 释放出的 14C02,然后便可据此计算出样品中微生物的 数量。
事先准备好的聚苯乙烯孔经人为地用抗体包裹好,来 获得所需抗原,然后通过其与一个结合了酶的抗体相 结合,形成抗原抗体复合物,然后通过比色法来分析 与记录结果。该方法可以准确地检测出样品中金黄色 葡萄球菌的数量,因而在检测金黄色葡萄球菌上应用 较为广泛。
1 食品中微生物检验工作中的常用技术 1.2 电阻电导测定法
Key words:Food; Microorganism; Examination method; Quality control
中图分类号:R155.5
食品安全问题越来越受到人们的重视,因为食品 安全关乎着人们的生命健康,因此要特别重视食品微生 物的检测。随着科学技术的不断进步,食品微生物检测 技术也取得了很大的进步,在技术的支持下,更应注意 控制食品微生物检测过程的质量,不断提高食品微生物 检测结果的准确度,从而使食品安全卫生得到保障。

食品安全专业中英文对照外文翻译文献

食品安全专业中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)附件1:翻译译文热处理对豆奶(豆腥味)过氧化脂质含量的影响豆腥味是导致豆奶风味不理想的重要因素,为了以最大限度的降低豆奶的豆腥味,我们研究了热处理对过氧化脂质的影响,是影响豆腥味的一个重要因素。

我们还以豆奶为原料并在制作过程中使用加热工序制备了各种甜点,从而通过感官实验来评价加热对其的影响。

经过浸泡和在75℃热处理的肿涨的大豆在相对湿度80-90%处理十分钟的过氧化脂质的含量比大豆中缺乏脂氧合酶和14%或更少的热处理的大豆制备出的豆奶的过氧化脂质含量要大大降低。

此外,设计热烫浸泡和肿胀的大豆在沸水中处理了30秒的豆奶的过氧化脂质含量可以与缺失脂肪氧合酶的大豆制作出的豆奶过氧化脂质含量相媲美。

蛋奶布丁,巴伐利亚奶油以及经过热处理的大豆制作出的豆腐其中的豆腥味都得到了显著的改善。

关键词:大豆豆奶过氧化脂质豆腥味大豆长期以来都是作为高营养食品代名词在日本人的饮食文化中具有具足轻重的作用。

最近的研究表明,大豆蛋白具有降低胆固醇的作用(爱德森等人,1995),大豆皂苷具有抗癌活性(肯尼迪,1995),以及大豆异黄酮对乳腺癌和前列腺癌具有一定的抑制作用(彼得森&贝尔内斯,1991;彼得森G&贝尔内斯S,1993),以及对于骨质疏松症(土田等人,1999)具有一定的预防作用。

根据以上情况可知,由大豆制成的加工食品的价值就是作为人体异黄酮的来源。

大豆被用于很多的食品中,包括豆腐,纳豆,味精,酱油,豆浆。

豆奶作为一种可利用的饮料,可以广泛应用于果冻,蛋奶布丁等甜品的制作原料。

然而,脂肪氧合酶产生的独特的豆腥味对消费者的喜好产生了重大的影响。

因此尽可能的减少豆腥味是能够使豆浆脱颖而出并广泛推广的关键性的挑战。

有几种用于激活脂肪氧合酶的方法已经被提出:温水处理研磨的方法(越后等,1991),其中,大豆在70℃热水中浸泡,然后用95℃的热水进行匀浆;热烫(赛斯&纳特,1988)的方法,用99.3℃的热水进行处理,以及微波加热的方法(王&托莱多,1987)。

国内外食品微生物检测方法

国内外食品微生物检测方法
2017/10/15
第二部分 微生物快速检测系统
2017/10/15
第一节 主要微生物检验快速检测系统
一、以免疫学为基础的检验法
2017/10/15
免疫磁珠 检验法的 优点: 特异性好 灵敏度高 ≤1CFU 所捕获的 菌是活菌 快速、操 作步骤简 便 可快速处 理较大量 样品
2017/10/15
方 法
定性方法
2017/10/15
大肠菌群* 、粪大肠菌群* 、大肠杆菌* 、肠球菌 * 、金黄色葡萄球菌* 、蜡样芽孢杆菌、单核增生 李斯特氏菌、肠杆菌科* 、 副溶血性弧菌、亚硫 酸盐还原梭菌等
致病菌:单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌、沙门氏菌、
空肠弯曲菌、O157、霍乱弧菌、副溶血性弧菌、 溶藻弧菌、创伤弧菌、肉毒梭菌、小肠结肠炎耶 尔森氏菌、产毒霉菌等
国内外食品微生物检测方法
山东检验检疫局技术中心 雷质文
2017/10/15
微生物检验标准方法的必要性和重要性
食品安全食品政治
对食品中的致病微生 物进行监测是国家意 志的体现
有法可依 有法必依 执法必严 违法必究
2017/10/15
国 家

执 行 部 门
有法可依 有章可循 有据可查 有错必纠 有洞必补
2017/10/15
VITEK 2 COMPACT
BD PHOENIX™ 全自动微生物鉴定系统
乳酸菌( G+ )
四、根据酶触反应及代谢产物快速检测细菌
2017/10/15
2017/10/15
2017/10/15
五、其他部分自动化系统
2017/10/15
BIOLOG自动微生物鉴定系统
BIOLOG
准确、可靠的检验结果是正确评价和保 证食品安全性的先决条件,也是国际贸易上 公平交易的有力科学依据。在食品微生物检 验领域中,检验规程规范化和分析方法标准 化是检验结果可信性的重要保证。

微生物专题英文文献

微生物专题英文文献
Mutation-Screening in Xylanase-Producing Strains by Ion Implantation
班级:生物工程 学生:马春玲 2013年12月13日

LOGO
试验内容
1. Purpose and meaning 2. Introduction 3. Materials and methods
3、Materials and methods
供试菌种 黑曲霉A3(褐黑色)
培养基 孢子培养基:马铃薯、葡萄糖、琼脂、去离子水 菌种培养基:PDA培养基 摇瓶发酵培养基:玉米穗、麸皮、(NH4)2SO4、NaNO3 分离培养基:蛋白胨、琼脂、麸皮
矿质元素、生长因子:KH2PO4、MgSO4、FeSO4、CoCl2

通过对出发菌株注入不同剂量的氮离子,低能氮离子 束对菌体细胞均有一定程度的致死和损伤作用,细胞及其 损伤DNA又在其修复系统的作用下得到不同程度的修复, 从而导致黑曲霉孢子的存活率先下降,后上升,然后又下 降,并且菌种的修复出错会使其突变率大大提高,从而提 高了菌株的正突变率,从而确定了氮离子最佳注入参数。 以上试验可以得出最优培养基的组成(即各组分的最 适浓度),而且在以上培养得到了黑曲霉N212(表2),当 它发酵60个小时后酶活达到600IU/ml,比之前未优化的菌 株减少了12个小时,而且相对于原出发菌株酶活增加了100 %。 试验证明离子注入对微生物进行诱变改良是一种行之 有效的诱变技术。
4.6 Analysis 根据表5中的极差值,四个因素对木聚糖酶的影 响强度顺序是A>B>C>D, 根据表2,黑曲霉发酵产木聚 糖酶其碳源玉米芯的浓度对产酶量有着直接的影响. 在合适的玉米芯浓度范围内,随着浓度的升高酶活 也相应升高,与此同时发酵液的黏度升高,溶氧性 能降低,因此产酶能力也降低。

食品微生物参考文献

食品微生物参考文献

食品微生物参考文献毕业论文中的参考文献在一般状况下需要笔者将论文之中的学术资料、论文研究文献、注释文献等等诸多资料进行集中展示与整合,进而集中地展现在论文形态之中,下面是店铺整理推荐的一篇关于食品微生物参考文献,欢迎阅读参考。

关于食品微生物文献1 黄丹,殷文政.呼和浩特地区乳中金黄色葡萄球菌的分离鉴定及药敏性试验研究[J].农产品加工,2007 , (12) : 72 - 742 刘冬香.动物性食品源金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药分析及blaZ、mecA和nuc基因的多重PCR [D].内蒙古农业大学,20093 东秀珠,.蔡妙英?常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2001: 246-2554 何庆国,贾英民.食品微生物学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002: 381-3825 刘秀梅.试论国内外食品安全保障体系[C].6 双金,嘎尔迪等.奶牛隐性乳腺炎的发生规律及其致病菌的分离鉴别与药物敏感性试验[门.内蒙古农业大学学报,2001,22(1): 18-237 张中文.北京地区奶牛乳腺炎病原菌的分离鉴定与药敏试验[J].北京农学院学2002,17(4): 44-478 史冬艳.奶牛乳房炎金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性及以黏附素为靶位的疫苗的基础研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,20109 张善瑞.奶牛乳腺炎主要病原茵快速诊断及金葡菌a-溶血素的原核表达[D].山东农业大学,2007’ 233-23510 Walev I,Weller U,Strauch S,et al. Selective killing of human monocytes and cytokine release provoked by sphingomyelinase(beta-toxin)of Staphylococcus aurous[J]. Infect Immune, 1996,64(8): 2974-297911王蟲.金黄色葡萄球菌Panton-Valentine杀白细胞素的研究进展[J].国外医药抗生素分册,2006,27 ( 6 ): 269-27112 Litton M J,Dohlsten M ,Hansson J,et.al. Tumor the ropy with an antibody-targeted superantigen generate a dichotomy between local an systemic immune responses [J]. American Journal of Pathology, 1997, 150(5): 1670-161713 Brakstad O.QAasbakk K”Maeland J.A.,1992, Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc geneJ.Clin,Microbiol.30 :1654-166014 Chesneau,0.,Allignet,J .and el Solh,N.1993,Thermonuclease gene as a target nucleotide sequence for specific recognition of Staphylococcus aureus.Mol.Cell Probes.7(4) :301-31015 Levy S B. The antibiotic paradox : how miracle drugs are destroying the miracle[M].New York, Plenum, 1992,ISBN 0-306-44331-7 37:32-3816 Jevons M P. “ Cellbenin \"-resistant staphylococci [J] .BMJ, 1961,1:124-12517 Van Duijkeren,Wolfhagen E,Boxe M J,et al.Human-to-dog transmission of methicillin 一resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J].Ermerg Infect,2004,10,2235-223718 Leonard F C,Markey B K. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals: a review[J].Vet, 2008,175:27-3619 Farmer T H, Gilbart J, Elson S W. Biochermical basis of mupirocin resistance in strains of Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Antimicrob Chermother, 1992,30:587-59620 丁兆凤.奶牛乳房炎金黄色葡萄球菌红霉素耐药机制分析[D].黑龙江八一农垦大学,2010, 1-221 Higgins C F, Hyde S C, Mimmack M M, et al. Binding protein-dependent transport systems [J]. Bioenerg Biomennbr,1990,22:571-59222 Rose S D. Application of a novel microarraying system in genomics research and drug discovery[J]. Association Laboratory Automation,1998,3:53—5623 Allignet J, Aubert S, Morvan A, et al. Distribution of genes encoding resistance to streptogramin A and related compounds among staphylococci resistant to these antibiotics[J].Antimicrob Agents Chermother, 1996, 40:2523-252824 Eltringham I. Mupirocin resistance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) [J],Hosp. Infect, 1997,35:1-825牛志强,郑敏.P-内酰胺类抗生素应用知识[J].中国动物保健,2009,6: 63-66食品微生物参考文献毕业论文中的参考文献在一般状况下需要笔者将论文之中的学术资料、论文研究文献、注释文献等等诸多资料进行集中展示与整合,进而集中地展现在论文形态之中,下面是店铺整理推荐的一篇关于食品微生物参考文献,欢迎阅读参考。

食品微生物检验英文参考文献

食品微生物检验英文参考文献

食品微生物检验英文参考文献1.贾英民主编,食品微生物学.高等职业教育教材,北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.91. jiayingmin, food microbiology Textbooks for higher vocational education, Beijing: China Light Industry Press, September 20042.万萍主编,食品微生物基础与实验技术.高职高专食品类教材系列,北京:科学出版社,2. edited by Wan Ping, fundamentals and experimental techniques of food microbiology Food textbook series for higher vocational colleges, Beijing: Science Press,2004two thousand and four3.翁连海主编﹐食品微生物基础高职教材,北京:高等教育出版社,2005.43. Weng Lianhai, editor in chief, higher vocational textbook of food microbiology, Beijing: Higher Education Press, April 20054.苏世彦.食品微生物检验手册.北京:中国轻工业出版社,1998.104. sushiyan. Manual for microbiological examination of food. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 1998.105.牛天贵.食品微生物学实验技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002.85. Niu Tiangui. Experimental technology of food microbiology Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, August 20026.高鼎主编,食品微生物学,北京:中国商业出版社,1996.56. Gao Ding, chief editor, food microbiology, Beijing: China business press, 1996.5 7.谢梅英主编,食品微生物学,北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.57. Xie Meiying, food microbiology, Beijing: China Light Industry Press, May 20048.中华人民共和国国家标准.食品卫生检验方法(微生物部分).北京:中国标准出版社,8. national standards of the people's Republic of China Methods for hygienic inspection of food (microbiological part) Beijing: China Standards Press,2003two thousand and three9.杨洁彬.食品微生物学.北京:北京农业大学出版社,19959. yangjiebin. Food microbiology Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 199510.沈萍主编﹒微生物学北京:高等教育出版社,200011.高东主编﹒微生物遗传学济南:山东大学出版社,199610. microbiology, edited by Shenping, Beijing: Higher Education Press, 200011 Gao Dong. Microbial genetics. Jinan: Shandong University Press, 1996。

我的实验论文(食品微生物检验)

我的实验论文(食品微生物检验)

我的实验论文(食品微生物检验)学号 20105494029本科学术论文系别生物技术专业生物技术(微生物应用技术)年级 2010 级姓名唐贵林论文题目牛乳在自然发酵与酸败过程中细菌的生态学演变指导教师张娅婷职称副教授2012年05月20日2目录摘要 (3)关键词 (3)Abstract (3)Key Words .................................................................................3 引言..........................................................................................4 1.实验部分 (5)1.1 实验器材 (5)1.2 实验方法...........................................................................5 1.3 实验记录..............................................................................6 1.4 实验结果..............................................................................7 1.5 结果分析 (7)2.实验结论..............................................................................7 参考文献 (8)摘要:生牛乳的ph为中性,在牛奶放置过程中,温度,湿度,牛奶中的营养物质的多少等会导致其中细菌的生长以及各细菌的数量发生变化,因此牛乳中的ph也发生着变化。

本次实验研究在牛奶放置过程中的细菌的生长和各细菌数量的变化,故实验中将牛奶拆袋后在培养箱中(温度30℃)放置。

微生物文献综述附参考文献

微生物文献综述附参考文献

乳酸菌在生产中的应用及其鉴定方法摘要:乳酸菌指发酵糖类主要产物为乳酸的一类无芽孢、革兰氏染色阳性细菌的总称。

其在食品工业的应用具有悠久的历史,也是一种宝贵的微生物资源, 和我们的健康息息相关。

本文介绍了乳酸菌在实际生产中的应用,以及目前研究中发现适用于乳酸菌的鉴定技术。

关键词:乳酸菌应用鉴定Abstract:Lactic acid bacteria refer to a class of non - spore,gram positive bacteria,which is the main product of lactic acid. It have been applied in food industry for a long time and are valuable resource of microorganisms,which closely related to our health。

The application of lactic acid bacteria in the practical production and the identification technology of the present research were introduced。

Keywords: Lactic acid bacteria Application identification1。

前言乳酸菌指发酵糖类主要产物为乳酸的一类无芽孢、革兰氏染色阳性细菌的总称,是一个广义范畴的概念而非正式的细菌分类学名称。

乳酸菌可以分成18个属, 共有200多种.乳酸菌的功能主要有: 改善人体肠道功能, 恢复人体肠道内菌群平衡,增强人体免疫能力,抑制腐败菌的生长, 降低胆固醇, 抗氧化,抗高血压, 抗肿瘤, 保藏食品,改善食品风味等。

人们要利用乳酸菌,就需要了解它们的生物学特性,因此对乳酸菌进行快速、准确的分类与鉴定在微生物学和食品科学的研究中是必需的。

微生物发酵中英文对照外文翻译文献

微生物发酵中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文对照外文翻译文献葡萄栽培过程中产生废弃物的侧耳属菇类生物降解:一种微生物和人类食物的来源及其在动物养殖中的潜在用途在通过侧耳属菌(平菇)程序进行葡萄园剪枝和葡萄皮渣的生物转化过程中,使用固态发酵技术受到了高度评价。

我们对水果实体的生产和收获之后被酶作用物的化学变化进行了测量计算,发现生物学效率和生物转化率各自都发生了变化,分别从37.2% 上升至78.7%和16.7%上升至 38.8%。

对于菌丝生长和蘑菇产量提高最有益的基质是与葡萄园剪枝项目相混合操作。

葡萄园修剪产生的枝条与葡萄皮渣相比具有较高的酚类成分、总糖、更好的c/n比值、天然脂肪和总氨。

与之相反,在纯葡萄皮渣的实验中,菌丝生长得非常缓慢甚至是不会生长。

葡萄皮渣比例较高的混合物中水分、蛋白质、脂肪和木质素含量一般较高,然而修剪产生的葡萄枝中,中性洗涤剂纤维、半纤维素、纤维素含量较高。

侧耳菌株的生长可能依赖于基质中纤维成分的可获取情况,而且其消化过程中发生的动态变化可能随着这些纤维在真菌生长过程中的改变而发生。

通过以侧耳属菌为媒介的SSF技术对葡萄栽培残基进行回收利用的潜力巨大,可以生产出人类所需的食物以及在反刍动物饲养中还有限使用的高纤维饲料。

关键词:生物转化酶作用;侧耳属菌;回收利用;固态发酵;葡萄栽培过程的副产品引言:葡萄种植是墨西哥西北部一项重要的生产活动,在墨西哥西北部有33500公顷的土地栽培了数类不同品种的葡萄。

这么大规模的生产活动每年大约产生了大约27万吨的工农业废料,而这其中有大约93%是葡萄园修剪掉的枝条。

这些废料一般直接在田间进行焚烧处理,以防止种植物病原菌的扩散,从而引起环境和生态问题以及危害人类健康的风险。

木质素是工农业废料中所有碳含量的主要组成部分,当它在遇热降解过程中会产生多环芳香烃成分,如苯并芘、邻苯二酚、对苯二酚菲和萘。

所有这些化合物可以抑制DNA 合成,并可能诱发动物和人类的肝脏、肺、喉和子宫颈产生癌变肿瘤。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

脉冲强光对诺如病毒和沙门及o157的灭活作用Pulsed light (PL) inactivation of two human norovirus (HuNoV) surrogates, murine norovirus (MNV-1) and Tulane virus (TV), and two bacterial pathogens, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella, were evaluated. The viruses and bacteria were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to final populations of ∼6 log PFU/mL and ∼6 log CFU/mL, respectively. Both viral and bacterial suspensions were then irradiated by PL for different durations and the reductions of each microorganisms were determined. MNV-1 and TV were significantly (P < 0.05) more resistant to PL treatment than Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in PBS suspension. MNV-1, Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 were also inoculated on strawberries and blueberries and the PL inactivation of each microorganism was determined. Lower inactivation of each microorganism was achieved on berry surfaces than in PBS suspension. This study shows that PL can induce rapid inactivation of MNV-1, TV, Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in clear suspension with viruses more resistant to PL treatment than bacteria. The efficacy of PL treatment is substantially influenced by food surface structure.乳酸菌基因组学和代谢组学的研究进展The Lactobacillus genus represents the largest and most diverse genera of all the lactic acid bacteria (LAB), encompassing species with applications in industrial, biotechnological and medical fields. The increasing number of available Lactobacillus genome sequences has allowed understanding of genetic and metabolic potential of this LAB group. Pangenome and core genome studies are available for numerous species, demonstrating the plasticity of the Lactobacillus genomes and providing the evidence of niche adaptability. Advancements in the application of lactobacilli in the dairy industry lie in exploring the genetic background of their commercially important characteristics, such as flavour development potential or resistance to the phage attack. The integration of available genomic and metabolomic data through the generation of genome scale metabolic models has enabled the development of computational models that predict the behaviour of organisms under specific conditions and present a route to metabolic engineering. Lactobacilli are recognised as potential cell factories, confirmed by the successful production of many compounds. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of genomics, metabolomics and metabolic engineering of the prevalent Lactobacillus species associated with the production of fermented dairy foods. In-depth understanding of their characteristics opens the possibilities for their future knowledge-based applications.牛肉冷冻状态下的微生物The primary objective of this study was to characterise (microbiology and physical parameters) beef carcasses and primals during chilled storage. A minor aim was to compare observed growth of key spoilage bacteria on carcasses with that predicted by ComBase and the Food Safety Spoilage Predictor (FSSP). Total viable count (TVC), total Enterobacteriacae count (TEC), Pseudomonas spp., lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Brochothrix thermosphacta and Clostridium spp. were monitored on beef carcasses (n = 30) and primals (n = 105) during chilled storage using EC Decision 2001/471/EC and ISO sampling/laboratory procedures. The surface and/or core temperature, pH and water activity (aw) were also recorded. Clostridium (1.89 log10 cfu/cm2) and Pseudomonas spp. (2.12 log10 cfu/cm2) were initially the most prevalent bacteria on carcasses and primals, respectively. The shortest mean generation time (G) was observed on carcasses with Br. thermosphacta (20.3 h) and on primals with LAB (G = 68.8 h) and Clostridium spp. (G = 67 h). Over the course of the experiment the surface temperature decreased from 37 °Cto 0 °C, pH from 7.07 to 5.65 and aw from 0.97 to 0.93 The observed Pseudomonas spp. and Br. thermosphacta growth was more or less within the range of predictions of Combase. In contrast, the FSSP completely overestimated the growth of LAB. This study contributes to the very limited microbiological data on beef carcasses and primals during chilling.冰箱中牡蛎气调包装的微生物组分变化As filter-feeding bivalves, oysters can accumulate microorganisms into their gills, causing spoilage and potential safety issues. This study aims to investigate the changes in the gill microbiota of oysters packed under air and modified atmospheres (MAs, 50% CO2: 50% N2, 70% CO2: 30% O2, and 50% CO2: 50% O2) during storage at 4 °C. The diversity of bacterial microbiota in oyster gills was profiled through polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis on the 16S rRNA gene V3 region to describe the variation during the entire storage period. The DGGE profile revealed high bacterial diversity in the air- and MA-packaged oyster gills, and the spoilage bacterial microbiota varied in the MA-packaged oyster gills. Results indicated that CO2:O2 (70%:30%) was suitable for oyster MA packaging and that high bacterial loads in oyster gills need to be considered during storage. In addition, Lactobacillus and Lactococcus species were found to grow dominantly in fresh oyster gills under MA packaging, which supports the potential application of MA packaging for oyster storage.干腌制猪腰猪腿的猪链球菌的生存Dry-cured hams, shoulders and loins of Iberian pigs are highly appreciated in national and international markets. Salting, additive addition and dehydration are the main strategies to produce these ready-to-eat products. Although the dry curing process is known to reduce the load of well-known food borne pathogens, studies evaluating the viability of other microorganisms in contaminated pork have not been performed. In this work, the efficacy of the dry curing process to eliminate three swine pathogens associated with pork carcass condemnation, Streptococcus suis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Trueperella pyogenes, was evaluated. Results of this study highlight that the dry curing process is a suitable method to obtain safe ready-to-eat products free of these microorganisms. Although salting of dry-cured shoulders had a moderate bactericidal effect, results of this study suggest that drying and ripening were the most important stages to obtain dry-cured products free of these microorganisms.使用噬菌体提高贝壳类中大肠杆菌的去除率The present study investigated the potential application of the bacteriophage (or phage) phT4A, ECA2 and the phage cocktail phT4A/ECA2 to decrease the concentration of Escherichia coli during the depuration of natural and artificially contaminated cockles. Depuration in static seawater at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 with single phage suspensions of phT4A and ECA2 was the best condition, as it decreased by ∼2.0 log CFU/g the concentration of E. coli in artificially contaminated cockles after a 4 h of treatment. When naturally contaminated cockles were treated in static seawater with single phage suspensions and the phage cocktail, similar decreases in the concentration of E. coli (∼0.7 log CFU/g) were achieved. However, when employing the phage cocktail, a longer treatment time was required to obtain comparable results to those achieved when using single phage suspensions. When naturally contaminated cockles were depurated with phage phT4A in a recirculated seawater system (mimicking industrial depuration conditions), a 0.6 log CFU/g reduction of E. coli was achieved after a 2 h of treatment. When the depuration process was performed without phage addition, a 4 h treatment was necessary toobtain a similar decrease. By combining phage therapy and depuration procedures, a reduction in bivalves depuration period can be achieved for, thus decreasing the cost associated with this procedure and even enhance the quality and safety of depurated bivalves destined for human consumption.乳制品中诺如病毒的三种提取方法比较Noroviruses (NoV) are currently the most common cause of viral foodborne diseases and RT-qPCR is widely used for their detection in food because of its sensitivity, specificity and rapidity. The ISO/TS (15216-1, 15216-2) procedures for detecting NoV and HAV in high-risk food categories such as shellfish, bottled water and vegetables were published in 2013. Milk products are less implicated in foodborne viral outbreaks but they can be contaminated with fruit added to these products or by the food handler. Thus, the development of sensitive and reliable techniques for the detection of NoV in dairy products is needed to ensure the safety of these products. The aim of this study was to develop a RT-qPCR based method for the detection of NoV in milk products. Three methods were tested to recover NoV from artificially contaminated milk and cottage cheese. The selected method was based on the use of proteinase K and the recovery efficiencies ranged from 54.87% to 98.87% for NoV GI, 61.16%–96.50% for NoV GII. Murine norovirus and mengovirus were used as process controls and their recovery efficiencies were respectively 60.59% and 79.23%. The described method could be applied for detecting NoV in milk products for routine diagnosis needs.溶解氧和培养基对空肠弯曲菌形成生物膜的影响Campylobacter jejuni survival in aerobic environments has been suggested to be mediated by biofilm formation. Biofilm formation by eight C. jejuni strains under both aerobic and microaerobic conditions in different broths (Mueller-Hinton (MH), Bolton and Brucella) was quantified. The dissolved oxygen (DO) content of the broths under both incubation atmospheres was determined. Biofilm formation for all strains was highest in MH broth under both incubation atmospheres. Four strains had lower biofilm formation in MH under aerobic as compared to microaerobic incubation, while biofilm formation by the other four strains did not differ under the 2 atm. Two strains had higher biofilm formation under aerobic as compared to microaerobic atmospheres in Bolton broth. Biofilm formation by all other strains in Bolton, and all strains in Brucella broth, did not differ under the 2 atm. Under aerobic incubation DO levels in MH > Brucella > Bolton broth. Under microaerobic conditions levels in MH = Brucella > Bolton broth. Levels of DO in MH and Brucella broth were lower under microaerobic conditions but those of Bolton did not differ under the 2 atm. Experimental conditions and especially the DO of broth media confound previous conclusions drawn about aerobic biofilm formation by C. jejuni.热-紫外处理对液体食品的灭菌效果优化The combination of ultraviolet radiation and heat (UV-H treatment) has been demonstrated as a promising strategy to overcome the limited UV germicidal effect in fruit juices. Nonetheless, there are so far no data regarding the efficacy of the combined process for the inactivation of bacterial foodborne pathogens in other liquid foods with different pH and composition. In this investigation, the optimum UV-H processing conditions for the inactivation of Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and S. aureus in chicken and vegetable broth, in addition to juices, were determined. From these data models that accurately predict the most advantageous UV-H treatment temperature and the expected synergistic lethal effect from UV and heat resistance data separately were constructed. Equations demonstrated that the optimumUV-H treatment temperature mostly depended on heat resistance, whereas the maximum synergistic lethal effect also was affected by the UV resistance of the microorganism of concern in a particular food.肠炎沙门鞭毛对侵袭的作用Nontyphoidal Salmonella strains are the main source of pathogenic bacterial contamination in the poultry industry. Recently, Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky has been recognized as the most prominent serovar on carcasses in poultry-processing plants. Previous studies showed that flagella are one of the main factors that contribute to bacterial attachment to broiler skin. However, the precise role of flagella and the mechanism of attachment are unknown. There are two different flagellar subunits (fliC and fljB) expressed alternatively in Salmonella enterica serovars using phase variation. Here, by making deletions in genes encoding flagellar structural subunits (flgK, fliC, and fljB), and flagellar motor (motA), we were able to differentiate the role of flagella and their rotary motion in the colonization of broiler skin and cellular attachment. Utilizing a broiler skin assay, we demonstrated that the presence of FliC is necessary for attachment to broiler skin. Expression of the alternative flagellar subunit FljB enables Salmonella motility, but this subunit is unable to mediate tight attachment. Deletion of the flgK gene prevents proper flagellar assembly, making Salmonella significantly less adherent to broiler skin than the wild type. S. Kentucky with deletions in all three structural genes, fliC, fljB, and flgK, as well as a flagellar motor mutant (motA), exhibited less adhesion and invasion of Caco-2 cells, while an fljB mutant was as adherent and invasive as the wild-type strain.IMPORTANCE In this work, we answered clearly the role of flagella in S. Kentucky attachment to the chicken skin and Caco-2 cells. We demonstrated that the presence of FliC is necessary for attachment to broiler skin. Expression of the alternative flagellar subunit FljB enables Salmonella motility, but this subunit is unable to mediate strong attachment. Deletion of the flgK gene prevents proper flagellar assembly, making Salmonella significantly less adherent to broiler skin than the wild type. S. Kentucky with deletions in all three structural genes, fliC, fljB, and flgK, as well as a flagellar motor mutant (motA), exhibited less adhesion and invasion of Caco-2 cells, while an fljB mutant was as adherent and invasive as the wild-type strain. We expect these results will contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of Salmonella attachment to food products.单增李斯特菌可能是通过胃液和体外细胞侵染的主要细菌Various Listeria monocytogenes strains may contaminate a single food product, potentially resulting in simultaneous exposure of consumers to multiple strains. However, due to bias in strain recovery, L. monocytogenes strains isolated from foods by selective enrichment (SE) might not always represent those that can better survive the immune system of a patient. We investigated the effect of cocultivation in tryptic soy broth with 0.6% yeast extract (TSB-Y) at 10°C for 8 days on (i) the detection of L. monocytogenes strains during SE with the ISO 11290-1:1996/Amd 1:2004 protocol and (ii) the in vitro virulence of strains toward the Caco-2 human colon epithelial cancer cell line following exposure to simulated gastric fluid (SGF; pH 2.0)-HCl (37°C). We determined whether the strains which were favored by SE would be effective competitors under the conditions of challenges related to gastrointestinal passage of the pathogen. Interstrain competition of L. monocytogenes in TSB-Y determined the relative population of each strain at the beginning of SE. This in turn impacted the outcome of SE (i.e., favoring survival of competitors with better fitness) and the levels exposed subsequently to SGF.However, strong growth competitors could be outcompeted after SGF exposure and infection of Caco-2 cells by strains outgrown in TSB-Y and underdetected (or even missed) during enrichment. Our data demonstrate a preferential selection of certain L. monocytogenes strains during enrichments, often not reflecting a selective advantage of strains during infection. These findings highlight a noteworthy scenario associated with the difficulty of matching the source of infection (food) with the L. monocytogenes isolate appearing to be the causative agent during listeriosis outbreak investigations.系统模型的建立来描述动物粪便是果蔬感染致病菌的主要途径The majority of foodborne outbreaks in the United States associated with the consumption of leafy greens contaminated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 have been reported during the period of July to November. A dynamic system model consisting of subsystems and inputs to the system (soil, irrigation, cattle, wild pig, and rainfall) simulating a hypothetical farm was developed. The model assumed two crops of lettuce in a year and simulated planting, irrigation, harvesting, ground preparation for the new crop, contamination of soil and plants, and survival of E. coli O157:H7. As predicted by the baseline model for crops harvested in different months from conventional fields, an estimated 13 out of 257 (5.05%) first crops harvested in July would have at least one plant with at least 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7. Predictions indicate that no first crops would be contaminated with at least 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 for other months (April to June). The maximum E. coli O157:H7 concentration in a plant was higher in the second crop (27.10 CFU) than in the first crop (9.82 CFU). For the second crop, the probabilities of having at least one plant with at least 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 in a crop were predicted as 15/228 (6.6%), 5/333 (1.5%), 14/324 (4.3%), and 6/115 (5.2%) in August, September, October, and November, respectively. For organic fields, the probabilities of having at least one plant with ≥1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 in a crop (3.45%) were predicted to be higher than those for the conventional fields (2.15%).O157迫于环境压力的嗜热和苏醒加速进化The development of resistance in foodborne pathogens to food preservation techniques is an issue of increasing concern, especially in minimally processed foods where safety relies on hurdle technology. In this context, mild heat can be used in combination with so-called nonthermal processes, such as high hydrostatic pressure (HHP), at lower individual intensities to better retain the quality of the food. However, mild stresses may increase the risk of (cross-)resistance development in the surviving population, which in turn might compromise food safety. In this investigation, we examined the evolution of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain ATCC 43888 after recurrent exposure to progressively intensifying mild heat shocks (from 54.0°C to 60.0°C in 0.5°C increments) with intermittent resuscitation and growth of survivors. As such, mutant strains were obtained after 10 cycles of selection with ca. 106-fold higher heat resistance than that for the parental strain at 58.0°C, although this resistance did not extend to temperatures exceeding 60.0°C. Moreover, these mutant strains typically displayed cross-resistance against HHP shock and displayed signs of enhanced RpoS and RpoH activity. Interestingly, additional cycles of selection maintaining the intensity of the heat shock constant (58.5°C) selected for mutant strains in which resuscitation speed, rather than resistance, appeared to be increased. Therefore, it seems that resistance and resuscitation speed are rapidly evolvable traits in E. coli ATCC 43888 that can compromise food safety.肉桂油抑制大肠0157噬菌体的入侵和增殖This study evaluated the inhibitory effect of cinnamon oil against Escherichia coli O157:H7 Shiga toxin (Stx) production and further explored the underlying mechanisms. The MIC and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of cinnamon oil against E. coli O157:H7 were 0.025% and 0.05% (vol/vol), respectively. Cinnamon oil significantly reduced Stx2 production and the stx2 mRNA expression that is associated with diminished Vero cell cytotoxicity. Consistently, induction of the Stx-converting phage where the stx2 gene is located, along with the total number of phages, decreased proportionally to cinnamon oil concentration. In line with decreased Stx2 phage induction, cinnamon oil at 0.75× and 1.0× MIC eliminated RecA, a key mediator of SOS response, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), and poly(A) polymerase (PAP I), which positively regulate Stx-converting phages, contributing to reduced Stx-converting phage induction and Stx production. Furthermore, cinnamon oil at 0.75× and 1.0× MIC strongly inhibited the qseBC and luxS expression associated with decreased AI-2 production, a universal quorum sensing signaling molecule. However, the expression of oxidative stress response genes oxyR, soxR, and rpoS was increased in response to cinnamon oil at 0.25× or 0.5× MIC, which may contribute to stunted bacterial growth and reduced Stx2 phage induction and Stx2 production due to the inhibitory effect of OxyR on prophage activation. Collectively, cinnamon oil inhibits Stx2 production and Stx2 phage induction in E. coli O157:H7 in multiple ways.长时间接触导致增加了产气肠杆菌的食品感染Bacterial cross-contamination from surfaces to food can contribute to foodborne disease. The cross-contamination rate of Enterobacter aerogenes on household surfaces was evaluated by using scenarios that differed by surface type, food type, contact time (<1, 5, 30, and 300 s), and inoculum matrix (tryptic soy broth or peptone buffer). The surfaces used were stainless steel, tile, wood, and carpet. The food types were watermelon, bread, bread with butter, and gummy candy. Surfaces (25 cm2) were spot inoculated with 1 ml of inoculum and allowed to dry for 5 h, yielding an approximate concentration of 107 CFU/surface. Foods (with a 16-cm2 contact area) were dropped onto the surfaces from a height of 12.5 cm and left to rest as appropriate. Posttransfer, surfaces and foods were placed in sterile filter bags and homogenized or massaged, diluted, and plated on tryptic soy agar. The transfer rate was quantified as the log percent transfer from the surface to the food. Contact time, food, and surface type all had highly significant effects (P < 0.000001) on the log percent transfer of bacteria. The inoculum matrix (tryptic soy broth or peptone buffer) also had a significant effect on transfer (P = 0.013), and most interaction terms were significant. More bacteria transferred to watermelon (∼0.2 to 97%) than to any other food, while the least bacteria transferred to gummy candy (∼0.1 to 62%). Transfer of bacteria to bread (∼0.02 to 94%) was similar to transfer of bacteria to bread with butter (∼0.02 to 82%), and these transfer rates under a given set of conditions were more variable than with watermelon and gummy candy.。

相关文档
最新文档