LSAT分析推理(组题)讲义1
LSAT分析推理篇
LSAT分析推理篇分析推理部分一般分四组，共有24个问题。
每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况。
例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等等。
这部分试题主要测试考生理解有关关系结构并推出结论的能力，于GRE考试逻辑部分极为相象。
【题型概况】1.有关分布的题型Six campers:Alice,Betty,Carmen,Dora,Gina,and Harriet are arranging a dishwashing schedule for the six days of their camping trip so that each of them will wash dishes on only one day.Betty washes either on day 2 or day 6.If Alice washes on day I,Carmen washes on day 4;Carmen does not wash on day 4 unless Alice washes on day I.If Alice washes on day I, Harriet washes on day 5; Harriet does not wash on day 5 unless Alice washes on day 1.If Gina does not wash on day 3, Alice washes on day 3.If Alice washes on day 4, Dora washes on day 5.If Betty washes on day 2, Gina washes on day 5.If Harriet washes on day 6, Dora washes on day 4.Question:*Which one of the following is an acceptable order in which the campers can wash dishes from the first to the last day?(A) Dora, Betty, Alice, Gina, Carmen, Harriet(B) Betty, Alice, Harriet, Carmen, Gina, Dora(C) Harriet, Gina, Betty, Carmen, Dora, Alice(D) Carmen, Betty, Alice, Dora, Gina, Harriet(E) Alice, Betty, Dora, Carmen, Gina, Harriet*If Dora washes on day 6, on which day does Carmen wash?(A) I (B) 2 (C)3 (D) 4 (E) 52.有关排列次序的问题Each of seven travelers—Norris,Oribe,Paulsen,Rosen,Semonelli, Tan, and Underwood—will be assigned to exactly one of nine airplane seats. The seats are numbered from 1 through 9 and arranged in rows as follows:Front row: 1 2 3Middle row: 4 5 6Last row: 7 8 9Only seats in the same row as each other are immediately beside each other. Seat assignments must meet the following conditions: Oribe’s seat is in the last row.Paulsen’s seat is immediately beside Rosen’s seat and also immediately beside an unassigned seat.Rosen’s seat is in the row immediately behind the row in which Norris’seat is located.Neither Semonelli nor Underwood is seated immediately beside Norris.Question:*Which one of the following is a pair of travelers who could be assigned to seats 2 and 8, respectively?(A) Norris, Semonelli(B) Oribe, Underwood(C) Paulsen, Oribe(D) Rosen, Semonelli(E) Underwood, Tan*If Semonelli and Underwood are not assigned to seats in the same row as each other, which one of the following must be false?(A) Norris is assigned to seat 2.(B) Paulsen is assigned to seat 5.(C) Rosen is assigned to seat 4.(D) Tan is assigned to seat 2.(E) Underwood is assigned to seat 1.3.有关编组的问题A jeweler makes a single strand of beads by threading onto a string in a single direction from a clasp a series of solid-colored beads. Each bead is either green, orange, purple, red, or yellow. The resulting strand satisfies the following specifications: If a purple bead is adjacent to a yellow bead, any bead that immediately follows and any bead that immediately precedes that pair must be red.Any pair of beads adjacent to each other that are the same color as each other must be green.No orange bead can be adjacent to any red bead.Any portion of the strand containing eight consecutive beads must include at least one bead of each color.Question:*If the strand has exactly eight beads, which one of the following is an acceptable order,starting from the clasp,for the eight beads?(A) green, red, purple, yellow, red, orange, green,purple(B) orange, yellow, red, red, yellow, purple, red,green(C) purple, yellow, red, green, green, orange,yellow, orange(D) red, orange, red, yellow, purple, green, yellow,green(E) red, yellow, purple, red, green, red, green, green*If an orange bead is the fourth bead from the clasp, which one of the following is a pair that could be the second and third beads, respectively?(A) green, orange(B) green, red(C) purple, purple(D) yellow, green(E) yellow, purple4.有关空间分布的问题At an evening concert, a total of six songs—O, P,T, X, Y, and Z—will be performed by three vocalists—George, Helen, and Leslie. The songs will be sung consecutively as solos, and each will be performed exactly once.The following constraints govern the composition of the concert program:Y must be performed earlier than T and earlier than O.P must be performed earlier than Z and later than O.George can perform only X, Y, and Z.Helen can perform only T, P, and X.Leslie can perform only O, P, and X.The vocalist who performs first must be different from the vocalist who performs last.Question:*Which one of the following is an acceptable schedule for the performance of the songs,in order from the first to last song performed?(A) X, T, Y, O, P, Z(B) X, Z, Y, T, O, P(C) Y, O, P, X, T, Z(D) Y, P, O, Z, T, X(E) Y, X, O, P, Z, T*Which one of the following must be true about the program?(A) George performs X.(B) Helen performs O.(C) Helen performs T.(D) Leslie performs P.(E) Leslie performs X.【解题技巧】1.在解答每一组问题时，将其作为一个单元。
最全LSAT考试详解（2）
最全LSAT考试详解（2）最全LSAT考试详解逻辑推理LSAT的逻辑推理试题共有两个部分，常被称为“辩论题”，考察应试人分析辩题的能力。
每部分有24-26道试题。
一般每道题都有一篇小的短文或对话，然后针对此短文或对话提出问题、选择针对辩论的另一种结论、发现辩题中的谬误、找到相同逻辑的另一种辩题、或找到一个可以强化/弱化辩题的证例。
绝大多数短文都有一道问题，有的则由两道。
短文或对话涉及的范围很广，包括哲学、文学、政治、科技、艺术、历史、体育等等。
逻辑推理试题主要测试考生的以下能力：1.确定中心思想2.找出推理中的假设3.从已知事实或前提得出合理结论4.确定推理的准则并将之应用于新的论证5.确定推理的方法或结构6.找出推理的错误及误解7.确定新的事实或论证对现有论证或结论的加强或削弱8.对论证进行分析分析推理目前的LSAT有一个分析推理部分，一般分四组，共有22–24个问题。
每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况，例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等等，类型包括分组、对比、顺序。
这部分试题主要测试考生理解有关关系结构并推出结论的能力。
考题以划定前提开始(“可能有5人出席下午的会议”)，然后建立彼此之间的关系(“如果Amy出席，那么Bob不出席;如果Cathy出席，那么Dan也出席...”)考生要求从中得到结论(“出席的最大人数是多少?”)。
挑战性在于规则不会只有“独一”的“正确”答案;相反，考生被要求从规则中找到一系列的可能性。
有时，一些问题可能会改变、增加规则，要求考生迅速整理已知信息。
不计分部分目前的考试包含一个实验部分，即法律服务所说的“可变部分”。
它为以后的考试测试新题型。
考生在这部分上的表现不会计入总成绩。
考生不会被告知哪部分是实验题，否则会影响数据收集。
在此之前，这部分考试总是列在前三部分之中，但是在2011年10月以来，LSAT 的实验部分可能会出现在前三部分之外。
LSAT逻辑推理高分手册
LSAT逻辑推理高分手册引言：逻辑推理是LSAT考试中最重要的一部分，对于考生来说，熟练掌握逻辑推理技巧是取得高分的关键。
本手册将为您详细介绍LSAT逻辑推理的各种题型和解题方法，帮助您在考试中取得优秀成绩。
第一章：逻辑推理概述逻辑推理在LSAT考试中占据很大比重，它是测试考生思维能力和逻辑分析能力的重要手段。
在这一章节中，我们将介绍逻辑推理在LSAT中的作用，以及考试中常见的逻辑推理题型。
1.1 LSAT中的逻辑推理在LSAT考试中，逻辑推理主要考察考生对逻辑结构的分析能力。
考生需要通过判断推理的有效性、理解论证结构和逻辑关系等方面来回答问题。
1.2 常见的逻辑推理题型在逻辑推理部分，常见的题型包括假设、推理、推论以及逻辑演绎等。
每种题型需要采用不同的解题方法和技巧，下面将逐一介绍。
第二章：假设题解题方法假设题是LSAT逻辑推理考试中的一种常见题型，它要求考生根据题目给出的信息，做出合理的假设。
在这一章节中，我们将介绍解答假设题的一般原则和具体方法。
2.1 解答假设题的原则解答假设题的关键是在保持逻辑合理性的前提下，利用给出的信息，全面分析问题，并作出合理的假设。
2.2 解答假设题的方法解答假设题的一般方法包括全面分析题目，利用排除法和反证法等。
在具体解题过程中，可以根据题目信息逐步排除错误选项，最终选择最符合题意的答案。
第三章：推理题解题方法推理题是LSAT逻辑推理考试中的另一种常见题型，它要求考生通过推理、分析题目中给出的信息，得出结论。
在这一章节中，我们将介绍解答推理题的一般原则和具体方法。
3.1 解答推理题的原则解答推理题的关键是准确理解题目中的信息，并运用逻辑推理能力进行分析和推理，最终得出合理的结论。
3.2 解答推理题的方法解答推理题的一般方法包括分析题目中的前提条件，确定逻辑关系，找到合适的推理路径等。
在具体解题过程中，可以使用图表或逻辑图等工具来帮助理清思路，准确推导出答案。
第四章：推论题解题方法推论题是LSAT逻辑推理考试中的又一种常见题型，它要求考生根据题目中的信息，进行逻辑推理，从而得出正确的推论。
LSAT逻辑推理原则讲解
LSAT逻辑推理原则讲解LSAT是为测试赴美加地区留学学生的英语能力，其成绩只是作为申请入法学院的评估条件之一，几乎所有的美国法学院和绝大部分加拿大法学院都要求申请人参加LSAT作为J.D.的入学条件。
那么大家知道LSAT逻辑推理原则吗？Focus: Logical Reasoning Logical Reasoning is half of your score on the LSAT - and this is good news. 实际上逻辑推理是你稳拿一半分数的部分...Why?Because you already have most of the Logical Reasoning skills you need for the test. The LSAT* tests your ability to use those skills thoroughly, quickly, andstrategically in the context of a strictly timed, multiple-choice test.On the LSAT, in law school, and in your law career, you will need the ability to see and understand complex reasoning. It's not enough to sense whether an argumentis wrong or weak; you'll need to analyze precisely why it is so. This involves an even more fundamental skill, one that's called on by nearly every Logical Reasoning question--the ability to isolate and identify the various components of any given argument.Logical Reasoning on the LSATEach of the two scored Logical Reasoning sections consists of twenty-four totwenty-six questions based on short passages called "stimuli." Each stimulus takes the form of an argument--i.e., a conclusion based on evidence. You will need to understand the stimulus to answer the questions based on it.2 scored sectionseach 35 minutes longApproximately 50 percent of your scoreUsually 24 to 26 questions eachCommon question-types: weakening, strengthening, assumption, main point, inference,parallel logic·Tests ability to understand, analyze, evaluate, and manipulate argumentsSeven Basic Principles1.Understand the Structure of ArgumentsSuccess on this section hinges on your ability to identify the two basic parts of every argument:* the conclusion: the point that the author is trying to make* the evidence: the support that the author offers for the conclusion2. Preview the Question StemDoing so before reading the stimulus makes you a better, more directed reader. You will know what you're looking for in advance.3. Paraphrase the Author's PointIt's much easier to understand and remember an argument if you restate it simply,in your own words.4. Judge the Author's PersuasivenessYou must read actively, not passively. Constantly question whether the author's argument seems valid or dubious. On a section where many of the questions deal with finding flaws in the author's reasoning, it's imperative to read with a critical eye.5. Answer the Question AskedYou read the argument. You see a major weakness in it. You find an answer choice that points out this weakness. You choose that answer. And you miss the point. Why? Because the question stem was asking for a statement that strengthened the argument, not one that weakened it. Don't let this happen to you. Always double-check the question stem.6.Try to Paraphrase the AnswerApproach the answer choices with at least a faint idea of what the answer should look like.7. Keep the Scope of the Argument in MindA remarkable number of wrong answers have scope problems. Always be on the lookout for answer choices that are too extreme, that contain value judgments that are not relevant to the argument, or that don't match the stimulus in tone or subject matter.注意：逻辑推理部分(两个section)：每个section有24～26道试题。
2021年美国法学院入学考试LSAT题库和答案
2021年美国法学院入学考试LSAT题库和答案
2021年美国法学院入学考试（LSAT）题库【真题精选＋章节题库＋模拟试题】
内容简介
本题库包括真题精选、章节题库和模拟试题三部分。
具体如下：
第一部分为真题精选及详解。
根据试卷结构，精选LSAT阅读理解、逻辑推理、分析推理部分典型考试真题，每题均给出答案及解析。
既可以体验真实考试，也可以测试自己的水平。
通过该部分学习，学员可充分了解出题风格，熟知解题思路，从而能够有针对性地备考。
第二部分为章节题库。
按照试卷结构，共分为阅读理解、逻辑推理、分析推理共三种考试题型。
每种题型精选专项练习，帮助学员加深对解题思路的理解和掌握，并在实战中灵活运用。
专项练习是在参考众多相关考试用书、国内外权威杂志以及优秀论文等大量素材的基础上精心设计而成，具有很强的针对性和实用性。
每题均提供答案及解析。
第三部分为模拟试题及详解。
由圣才辅导名师根据历年命题规律及热门考点进行考前预测，可用于考前冲刺或摸底自测。
•
试看部分内容
•第一部分真题精选及详解
•LSAT阅读理解真题精选及详解•LSAT逻辑推理真题精选及详解•LSAT分析推理真题精选及详解•第二部分章节题库
•第1章阅读理解
•第2章逻辑推理（议论）•第3章分析推理（游戏）•第三部分模拟试题
•LSAT模拟试题及详解（一）•LSAT模拟试题及详解（二）。
LSAT考试科目：LSAT分析推理是什么
LSAT考试科目：LSAT分析推理是什么LSAT分析推理是什么呢？分析推理是LSAT考试的一门课程，一般分四组，共有24个问题。
每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况，例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等。
LSAT分析推理是什么，更多知识等你来看！LSAT考试由五个35分钟的section组成，这些section包括1个阅读理解、1个分析推理和2个逻辑推理，以及一个不计入成绩的加试section。
加试有可能是上述任一种题型。
LSAT分析推理每个section围绕一个单独的段落。
以下是LSAC官方关于分析推理的介绍：Analytical Reasoning questions are designed to assess the ability to consider a group of facts and rules, and, given those facts and rules, determine what could or must be true. The specific scenarios associated with these questions are usually unrelated to law, since they are intended to be accessible to a wide range of test takers. However, the skills tested parallel those involved in determining what could or must be the case given a set of regulations, the terms of a contract, or the facts of a legal case in relation to the law. In Analytical Reasoning questions, you are asked to reason deductively from a set of statements and rules or principles that describe relationships among persons, things, or events.Analytical Reasoning questions appear in sets, with each set based on a single passage. The passage used for each set of questions describes common ordering relationships or grouping relationships, or a combination of both types of relationships. Examples include scheduling employees for work shifts, assigning instructors to class sections, ordering tasks according to priority, and distributing grants for projects.Analytical Reasoning questions test a range of deductive reasoning skills. These include:Comprehending the basic structure of a set of relationships by determining a complete solution to the problem posed (for example, an acceptable seating arrangement of all six diplomats around a table)Reasoning with conditional (“if-then”) statements and recognizing logically equiva lent formulations of such statementsInferring what could be true or must be true from given facts and rulesInferring what could be true or must be true from given facts and rules together with new information in the form of an additional or substitute fact or ruleRecognizing when two statements are logically equivalent in context by identifying a condition or rule that could replace one of the original conditions while still resulting in the same possible outcomesAnalytical Reasoning questions reflect the kinds of detailed analyses of relationships and sets of constraints that a law student must perform in legal problem solving. For example, an Analytical Reasoning passage might describe six diplomats being seated around a table, following certain rules of protocol as to who can sit where. You, the test taker, must answer questions about the logical implications of given and new information. For example, you may be asked who can sit between diplomats X and Y, or who cannot sit next to X if W sits next to Y. Similarly, if you were a student in law school, you might be asked to analyze a scenario involving a set of particular circumstances and a set of governing rules in the form of constitutional provisions, statutes, administrative codes, or prior rulings that have been upheld. You might then be asked to determine the legal options in the scenario: what is required given the scenario, what is permissible given the scenario, and what is prohibited given the scenario. Or you might be asked to develop a “theory” for the case: when faced with an incomplete set of facts about the case, you must fill in the picture based on what is implied by the facts that are known. The problem could be elaborated by the addition of new information or hypotheticals.No formal training in logic is required to answer these questions correctly. Analytical Reasoning questions are intended to be answered using knowledge, skills, and reasoning ability generally expected of college students and graduates.。
lsattr 题目
lsattr 题目【原创实用版】目录1.LSAT 简介2.LSAT 的结构和内容3.LSAT 的备考策略4.LSAT 对法学院申请的重要性正文1.LSAT 简介LSAT（Law School Admission Test）即法学院入学考试，是美国和加拿大法学院的入学考试，用于评估潜在法学院学生的逻辑和分析能力。
该考试由美国法学院考试委员会（Law School Admission Council，简称LSAC）主办，是申请进入这两个国家法学院的重要标准之一。
2.LSAT 的结构和内容LSAT 分为三个部分：阅读理解、逻辑推理和分析性写作。
此外，考试还包含一个不计入成绩的实验部分。
（1）阅读理解：这部分包括三篇文章，每篇文章后附有五道问题。
主要测试考生的阅读理解、分析和推理能力。
（2）逻辑推理：这部分包括约 20 道题目，要求考生根据给定的信息进行推理和判断，测试考生的逻辑分析能力。
（3）分析性写作：这部分要求考生在 30 分钟内完成一篇短文，对给定的论点进行分析和评价，测试考生的写作和批判性思维能力。
3.LSAT 的备考策略（1）熟悉考试结构和题型：考生需要了解 LSAT 的各个部分和题型，以便更好地应对考试。
（2）提高阅读速度和理解能力：阅读是 LSAT 的重要部分，考生需要通过大量阅读来提高自己的阅读速度和理解能力。
（3）加强逻辑推理训练：逻辑推理部分是 LSAT 的关键，考生需要通过练习逻辑题来提高自己的逻辑分析能力。
（4）锻炼写作能力：分析性写作部分需要考生具备较强的写作和批判性思维能力，考生需要多进行写作练习，提高自己的写作水平。
4.LSAT 对法学院申请的重要性LSAT 成绩是申请法学院的重要依据之一，它直接影响到考生能否被录取以及获得的奖学金数额。
因此，对于有意申请法学院的考生来说，取得优异的 LSAT 成绩至关重要。
lsat infer题目
lsat infer题目LSAT（Logical Reasoning）推理题目是法学院入学考试（Law School Admission Test）中的一部分，主要考察考生的逻辑推理和批判性思维能力。
以下是几个LSAT推理题目的示例：1. A city has two hospitals: the General Hospital and the Children's Hospital. The General Hospital treats adults, while the Children's Hospital treats only children. Each hospital has a waiting room. One day, a family with three children enters the General Hospital's waiting room. Explain how this is possible.2. A police officer pulled over a speeding car and wrote a ticket for the driver. When the officer returned to his patrol car, he found that someone had set fire to it. Explain how this is possible.3. A restaurant owner claims that the best way to prepare a turkey is to roast it in the oven at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for two hours per pound. A customer challenges this claim, saying that a turkey should be cooked at 450 degrees Fahrenheit for one hour per pound. Who is correct? Explain why.4. A group of explorers enters a cave and finds a set of hieroglyphics on the wall. They cannot read them, so they take pictures and leave. Later, an Egyptologist examines the pictures and determines that the hieroglyphics say "Death to all who enter here." How did the Egyptologist know this? Explain why hieroglyphics were used by ancient Egyptians.这些题目都是基于现实生活中的场景或情境，要求考生通过逻辑推理和分析，找出合理的解释或推断出正确的结论。
LSAT考试分析推理题：排除他因
可乐留学网 留学可以很快乐第1页 / 可乐留学网 LSAT 考试分析推理题：排除他因大家都知道想进入美国的法学院就读并不是一件容易的事情，必须参加法学院入学考试LSAT ，而这项考试并不是那么容易，每一门都需要投入时间和精力。
本文整理了LSAT 考试分析推理题，详情如下~LSAT 考试分析推理题：排除他因-1-1-16. Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.answer:C not+weaken典型的排除他因. 原文认为是严格的新规章使得mechanical problem 被更多的检测出来. 言下之意是mechanical problem 本身并没有同幅增长. 而C 就是这个意思, 既不是因为mechanical problem 本身增加了50%造成的. 这类题目的题干为:A-->B, assumption: 不是C-->B推荐阅读--解题技巧1·在解答每一组问题时，将其作为一个单元。
LSAT逻辑推理及真题解析
考试考查能力
考试考查能力
逻辑推理试题共有两个部分，每部分有24~26道试题。一般每道题都有一篇小的短文或对话，然后针对此短 文或对话提出问题。短文或对话涉及的范围很广，包括哲学、文学、政治、科技、艺术、历史、体育等等。逻辑 推理试题主要测试考生的以下能力：
确定中心思想 找出推理中的假设 从已知事实或前提得出合理结论 确定推理的准则并将之应用于新的论证 确定推理的方法或结构 找出推理的错误及误解 确定新的事实或论证对现有论证或结论的加强或削弱 对论证进行分析 LSAT逻辑推理及真题解析 -聚焦LSAT逻辑推理题
LSAT逻辑推理及真题解析
管卫东主编的图书
01 作者简介
目录
02 逻辑推理
03 考试考查能力
04 逻辑推理题
05 考试逻辑题型
基本信息
《LSAT逻辑推理及真题解析》是管卫东主编的图书。
作者简介
作者简介
《LSAT逻辑推理及真题解析》，网上简称GWD，以其名字命名的GWD题几乎被中国GMAT考生奉为“GMAT真题 集”，他创办了专注于GMAT（及LSAT）培训和北美顶尖商学院留学申请咨询服务的博智教育，担任首席 GMAT/LSAT讲师；作为中国第一个透彻研究并主讲GMAT、LSAT、SAT和GRE这四大思维能力类考试的专家，管卫东 探索出一套独特的逻辑思维体系并结合数学与计算机本科背景，研发了一套专门针对这四大考试的FMA教学体系， 集合英语快速阅读能力提升、客观逻辑思维体系建立和计算机自适应性模拟考试机制，帮助考生短期内快速达到 主考方高分要求。作为著名的应试辅导专家，同时担任高等教育出版社、山东教育电视台、北大附中网校特聘高 考辅导教师，多家媒体教育版块的专栏作家。可见，《LSAT逻辑推理及真题解析》这本书具有很大的参考价值。
聚焦LSAT分析推理
聚焦 LSAT 分析推理Focus on Logic Games 不过是逻辑游戏罢了 Nothing inspires more fear in the hearts of LSAT* test takers than Analytical Reasoning affectionately known as Logic Games. Why? Partly, it's because the skills tested on the section seem so unfamiliar. You need to turn a game's information to your advantage by organizing your thinking and spotting key deductions and that's not easy to do. ◆◇Logic Games on the LSAT · minutes 35 · Approximately 25 percent of your score · Usually 24 questions · Usually 4 games · Common question-types: sequencing, grouping, matching · Tests how rules create systems ofsgroupsand limit possible outcomes · Attention to detail is key, as is ability to maintain awareness of multiple facts simultaneously · Basic logic is important: if vs. only if; the logical meaning of or, the contrapositive · Often most intimidating section initially· Often shows rapid improvement with practice ◆◇Four Basic Principles Logic Games require an ability to reason clearly and deductively from a given set of rules or restrictions, all under strictly timed conditions. 1.To Go Faster, Slow Down 欲速则不达This is not only the most important principle for logic games success, it's also the one that's most often ignored. Peopleshavingstiming difficulties tend to speed up, not slow down. But by spending a little extra time thinking through the stimulus, the "action" of the game, and the rules, you will be able to recognize the game's key issues and make important deductions that will actually save you time in the long run. 2. Understand What a Rule Means 了解游戏规则 To fully grasp a rule in Logic Games, you must know more than just what it says. You have to know what the rule means in the context of the game and in combination with other rules. 3. Use Scratchwork and Shorthand 使用速记，需要时可以是画桃符 You're applying to law school, not art school. Don't worry about making elaborate diagrams in Logic Games. There is no "right diagram" for any game. But there is good scratchwork that condenses a lot of informationsintosmanageable visual clues and helps you get points more quickly and more accurately. 4. Try to Set Off Chains of Deductions 演绎时学会减负 When hypothetical information is offered in a question stem, try to use it to set off a chain of deductions. Then follow through until you've taken the new information as far as it can go. Stay out of answer-choice land until you've sufficiently mined the hypothetical.。
最全LSAT考试详解
最全LSAT考试详解最全LSAT考试详解所有法学专业渴望留学的学子都要面对“LAST”这座大山，俗话说知己知彼才能百战不殆，下面就和店铺一起来了解一下这个独具特色的考试吧!LSAT(Law School Admission Test)，即法学院入学考试。
它是由位于美国宾西法尼亚州的法学院入学委员会负责主办的法学院入学资格考试。
几乎所有的美国、加拿大法学院、澳大利亚墨尔本大学都要求申请人参加LSAT考试。
LSAT考试共有五个部分(包含一个不记分的供入学委员会评估用的评测部分)，包括三个方面的内容，每部分时间为35分钟，另加30分钟的写作。
这三个方面的内容分别是阅读理解、逻辑推理及分析推理，主要测试考生下列几方面的能力：1.准确阅读并理解复杂文章的能力2.组织有关信息并得出合理结论的能力3.批判性地推理的能力4.对他人的推理进行分析和评价的能力考试自1948年起就以某种形式出现，它之所以被创立是在学校平均分GPA之外给予法学院考察申请人水平的标准。
目前的考试是1991年版。
考试分六个部分：4个选择题部分，不计分的写作部分，不计分的实验部分。
原始分值被转化为量表分数，最高180、最低120，平均数为150。
在申请法学院时，过去五年内的所有成绩都将被递交。
LSAT考试满分为180分，最低分为120分，其计算方法是根据选择的正确的答案的数目来确定。
选对25个左右，分数大概为130分;选对39个左右，分数大概为140分;选对55个，分数大致为150分;选对72个，分数为160;选对87个，分数为170分;选对98个以上，分数为满分180分。
一般来说，排名前14的法学院要求成绩都在170分以上;排名前25的法学要求成绩在160分以上。
考试成绩一般在考后五周左右由主办机构寄出，LSAT成绩在5年内有效。
LSAT考试每年举办四次，分别在2月、6月、10月及12月，考生不得在两年内参加超过3次LSAT的考试。
中国大陆地区6月和12月在北京大学有固定考试。
LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题
LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题LSAT考试是美国法学院申请入学的参考条件之一,该成绩作为预估申请入学者在法学院是与否有正确且合理的推论与判断能力、分析及评估能力而进行的考试。
本文整理了LSAT考试分析推理题。
快来看看吧~LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题-1-1-14. Either Perry’s faction or Tucker’s faction, but not both, will win control of the government. If Perry’s faction wins, the nation will suffer economically. If Tucker’s faction wins, the nation will suffer militarily.Given the statements in the passage, which one of the following statements must be true?(A) It is possible, but not certain, that the nation will neither suffer economically nor suffer militarily.(B) If the nation suffers economically, it is certain that Perry’s faction has won control of the government.(C) It is certain that the nation will suffer either economically or militarily, and also certain that it will not suffer both.(D) If the nation suffers militarily, it is possible, but not certain, that Tucker’s faction has won control of the government.(E) If the nation suffers both economically and militarily, it is certain that neither Perry’s faction nor Tucker’s has won control of the government.由原文，可得1。
管卫东LSAT高分指导演讲笔记
GWD LSAT 高分指导满分180分，高于170分，共100-101道题，错误率在8-12个之内，时间因素+ 逻辑最重要！一、难点1.时间紧2.记忆难——看懂题目后，记不住信息3.思维难——理解答案难二、应对难点——摆脱思维惯性1.思维惯性：逻辑：35分钟25道逻辑题每题<1.5分钟错：全部的逻辑推理过程——各种严密的推理过程有A推B,B推A全部过程，把各类型题目分开做，用不同类型去做全部过程，把考点都复习到，然后做大量题目对：从对方角度看问题。
法律的目的，法庭辩论，逻辑并非逻辑过程，而是找到对方辩论题目的漏洞，即找思维漏洞点——思维跳跃A．思维的严密度——相关性如何，即到底有无关（支持、驳斥、评价、假设、解释、两人对话、指出原文错误），对有关无关题目的相关做法B．逻辑本身就是概率上的变化——特殊题目类型：Parallel平行结构两个律师之间本身就是用案例来驳斥对方的案例，即用大概率事件来降低对方的可信度，仅仅是引起概率的变化Parallel：正确选项与原文的大概关系，比其他选项更高而已指出原文错误：从A B的思维跳跃，指出来就可以逻辑总共只有三种类型：1．支持、驳斥、评价、假设、解释、两人对话、指出原文错误2．归纳题3．Parallel平行结构逻辑题目顶多用前一半按照推理过程推理，后面的全部按照上述方法以保证时间。
阅读：35分钟，4篇长阅读，每文章6-7道题，25道题，每道题做题<1分钟，每篇文章顶多有2.5分钟看A．有效信息1. 原文的有效信息2.3.B．相似点决策能力区别两个类似选项，如果A B，但是B ，即选了A就可以推出B也正确，那么不可以选A，因为此时将有两个都正确的选项，则应选BC．Scanning 搜索美国高中水平：2500-4000 词汇内搜索1个单词，在1分钟之内1.找什么2.怎么快速找到3.二次精确定位——逻辑思维精确定位Eg: 在题目完全不变的情况下，文章内容不同，查找方式不同○1如果题目Key Word所问为文中某段细节则找与Key Word附近的观点句如没有，找本段的观点句如没有，整段为细节，找段首句，判断是否有明显与前后段联系，如前，则找前段观点，如后，找后端观点如没有与前后段逻辑联系，则为全文中心观点句○2如果题目Key Word在全文中多次出现，则此Key Word不为细节，目的为引出全文观点4.如何快速读GAME：35分钟，24道题，只有can be此种题目比较难，类似于算法，当有N种类似考题，平均速度而言，那种思想所用时间最少，can be 题目时间问题对原文题目，是其题目每个条件限制度的高低，越是低限制的，可能性越大2.英文能力：句子：A.一遍拿下句子的方法（练习1个月即可）1.断点——断点是按照顺序，断点的，不是分析2.加词——在断点处加词3.语序理解——修饰语与被修饰语隔的很远，通过对语序的理解，获得整体接受句子句子决定单词意思信息记忆：用中文记，但是不记中文翻译，用对方思想了解全部英文过程信息关联的记忆能力：原文+选项条件+问题三、复习1.资料：只用真题95年——2011年2.A.第一阶段学所有能力+ 思维95——99年考题B.第二阶段原理熟练○100——04年考题○2网课，解答问题C.第三阶段理性感性○1正确选项的感觉点05——11年考题○2考试情商第三阶段将LSAT融入生活中，全部去理解，整个考试的重点逻辑=语言逻辑+思维逻辑3-4 个月整体阶段170+提前准备过程：绝大多数阅读能力不够1.难句的学习——练习一遍读句子2.快速读文章——读文章后知道大多数信息。
美国法学院入学考试LSAT分析推理真题精选及详解【圣才出品】
LSAT分析推理真题精选及详解Directions:Each group of questions in this section is based on a set of conditions. In answering some of the questions, it may be useful to draw a rough diagram. Choose the response that most accurately and completely answers each question and blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.A company employee generates a series of five-digit product codes in accordance with the following rules:the codes use the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, and no others.Each digit occurs exactly once in any code.the second digit has a value exactly twice that of the first digit.the value of the third digit is less than the value of the fifth digit.1. If the last digit of an acceptable product code is 1, it must be true that the(A) first digit is 2(B) second digit is 0(C) third digit is 3(D) fourth digit is 4(E) fourth digit is 0答案：A解析：如果1在最后一位，第三位比1还小只能是0，而由于前两位必须是倍数关系，那么前两位必然是2和4。
美国法学院入学考试LSAT逻辑推理真题精选及详解【圣才出品】
LSAT逻辑推理真题精选及详解Directions: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer, that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by commonsense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. After you have chosen the best answer, blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.1. Economist: Every business strives to increase its productivity, for this increases profits for the owners and the likelihood that the business will survive. But not all efforts to increase productivity are beneficial to the business as a whole. Often, attempts to increase productivity decrease the number of employees, which clearly harms the dismissed employees as well as the sense of security of the retained employees.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the economist’s argument?(A) If an action taken to secure the survival of a business fails to enhance the welfare of the business’s employees, that acti on cannot be good for the business as a whole.(B) Some measures taken by a business to increase productivity fail to be beneficial to the business as a whole.(C) Only if the employees of a business are also its owners will the interests of the employees and owners coincide, enabling measures that will be beneficial to the business as a whole.(D) There is no business that does not make efforts to increase its productivity.(E) Decreasing the number of employees in a business undermines the sense of security of retained employees.答案：B解析：选项B译为：商家为提高生产力而采取的有些措施并没有带来企业整体利益。
如何准备LSAT分析推理题
如何准备LSAT分析推理题如何准备LSAT分析推理题LSAT考试中的分析推理题部分一直被同学认为是小菜一碟，但考试中考生往往卡壳的也是分析推理题。
的确这一部分对考生尤其是中国学生来说对阅读能力的要求不是太高，考生平时在练习时做得最爽的就是分析推理题。
而逻辑分析题相对要求更高的阅读能力，因此考生在复习开始阶段也是分析推理题错得少，而逻辑推理题错得多。
但ETS看到逻辑推理题变难并没有难倒中国考生，于是又从另一个角度即分析推理题来为难中国考生。
当然再难也难不倒咱中国人，我这里只是想提醒将要参加考试或正在复习的同学们不要轻视了分析推理题。
分析推理题大多针对若干元素被分组或被安排前后顺序等一些基本问题。
它和逻辑推理题不同，它没有较为详细的背景段落信息而只有一些貌似凌乱的涉及到时间、位置等属性的分组条件，排列条件，挑选条件。
解题的关键就是在尽可能短的时间里从这些条件中理出头绪。
因此分析推理题讲究的是解题方法和解题速度。
而速度一是靠方法来提高，另一个则是靠练习。
要将原文条件熟记在心应用自如而不需要在解题过程中总是回过头来看原文条件，这就需要一定时间的练习来达到。
元素之间的关系是由条件来描述的。
逻辑题中的条件分两种，一种是原文条件，一种是题干条件或选项条件。
做分析推理题首先要读的是原文条件，即题目之前所给出的所有条件。
这部分条件包括背景段落和条件。
因此解分析推理题第一步是读懂背景段落，从背景段落中你必须清楚这道题涉及几个元素，这些元素分成几类，这些元素有什么属性比如时间，位置等。
因此第一步要高度注意的条件就是数字限制。
下一步则是读懂条件。
这部分条件主要是给定一部分或所有元素被处理的构架。
这部分条件分成限制性条件和确定性条件。
限制性条件就是没有涉及具体元素而是给定处理所有元素的要求。
确定性条件则是针对具体元素的条件。
根据对解题的作用又将分析推理题条件分成显性条件和隐含条件，固定条件和不固定条件，充分条件和必要条件。
LSAT逻辑推理解题方法：不要脱离原文的逻辑
可乐留学网 留学可以很快乐第1页 / 可乐留学网 LSAT 逻辑推理解题方法：不要脱离原文的逻辑LSAT 逻辑推理解题方法一文主要是教考生如何进行解题，大家在答题时，不要脱离原文的逻辑。
详情解题方法如下：Emperor: The enemy empire across the sea has harassed us for centuries. I want to conquer it and stop it once and for all. What advice can you give me?皇帝：帝国的敌人是你harassed across the US 几个世纪。
我想征服它，阻止它Once and for all 。
你能给我的建议是什么？Admiral: If you cross the sea, a mighty empire will fall.海军上将：如果你穿越大海，一个强大的帝国将会倒下。
Emperor: In that case, prepare the troops. We set sail tonight.皇帝：在这种情况下，让军队做好准备。
我们今晚启航。
Of the following, the strongest cr iticism of the Emperor‘s decision to invade would be that it. 下面，对皇帝入侵的最强烈的批评是。
(A) Is certain to lead to the emperor‘s defeat(B) Is based on opinion rather than objective facts about troop strength(C) Contradicts the Admiral‘s statement(D) Fails to con sider fully the possible meanings of the Admiral‘s advice(E) Is a futile strategy for solving the problem at hand答案：D ，解析：不要脱离原文的逻辑. B is out of scope. 比如说原文讲根据一个survey 做了一个结论, 首选答案应该是和survey 有关, 例如survey 不够representative. 这道题D 和原文的逻辑有直接的关系, 首选.。
LSAT逻辑推理必考题型解析
LSAT逻辑推理必考题型解析大家知道LSAT逻辑推理必考题型吗?一个想拥有高效逻辑思维的人可能会认为：熟悉错误推理的方式是没有积极意义的，甚至会产生背道而驰的结论。
其实这种观点是错误的。
正确推理无疑是第一位的，然而学习推理中，只有知道什么是错的，才能不犯相同的错误，并找到别人的逻辑漏洞。
一、假设（assumption）这类考题主要考查我们识别根据什么前提得出论点的能力，这类题目往往用以下方式：二、支持（support）这类考题主要考查我们识别一种附加事实信息支持论点的能力，这类题往往用如下措词：which of the following, if true, would constitute the strongest evidence in support of the claim made above?which of the following, if true, does not support the claim that…三、反对（weaken）这类考题主要考查我们识别一种附加事实信息反对论点的能力,这类题主要用以下措词:which of the following, if true, would additionally weaken the traditional opinion that…the persuasiveness of the claim made above is most weakened by…四、评价（evaluation）这类考题主要考查我们评价论点的能力这类题往往用以下方式：which of the following would be most important to know in evaluating the accuracy of the argument above？knowledge of which of the following would be least useful in evaluating the claims made in the passage above？五、推断（inference）这类考题主要考查我们评价论点的能力，这类题往往用以下方式：it can be inferred from the passage above that the author believes that…which of the following is implied by the passage above?from the information above, which of the following can be most reasonably inferred about…六、结论（conclusion）这类考题主要考查我们根据文章中的论据能提出什么合乎逻辑的主张的能力，这类题往往腻和这些方式：if the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn?choose the most logical completion for the following paragraph.小技巧：不要在任何一部分上纠缠，也许每一部分的最后是最容易的，先去做它们。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
分析推理（组题）讲义 1我在逻辑方面的入门书是钱永强老师的那本书， 看完了前几部分部分后对分析推理有了一个 全面的了解， 但对那些有点难度的题目却经常感觉自己缺乏一种洞察力， 也就是不知其重点 考察哪个条件，矛盾将以何种形式出现在哪里。
造成的后果就是作题速度慢， 一开始想多 作些题、多总结总结就可以解决这个问题，但作了很多题之后虽有改善却并不显著。
这时我正好得到了一张管卫东老师的讲课录音， 花了几十个小时仔细聆听之后， 有顿开茅塞 之感，接着作了大量练习，终感水平有了质的提高。
现我已顺利完成了考试，管老师的一套 方法在实践中得到了很好的验证，为使其造福于更多的 G 友，特将我所做的听课笔记贡献 出来。
由于录音效果时好时坏，有些地方记录得大概不是很确切，不过总体上应该没什么大 问题。
另外要说的就是在管老师的分析方法里，两个根本点是“数目”和“固定”，在对具体题型，分 组和排列，的讲解中，也主要是将两个根本点具体化。
大家在作题中应仔细体会，最后达到 以不变应万变的状态。
最后向管卫东老师致以诚挚的谢意！一、问题分类与相应的解决方法 组题中的问题大致可分为 3 类： 1. 问题中有附加条件； 2. 问题中没有附加条件，但有明确的指向。
例如某元素不能放在什么位置，某位置不能放 何种颜色/形状的元素等。
3. 问题中什么都没给，直接就问下面哪一个是 coule be 或 must be. 第一类问题的解法先看题干所给的直接条件，再看间接条件，若前两种条件都没有，则要转换对条件的理解方 式（角度）。
直接条件：题干中给出的比较明确条件，如：某元素在某些位置，某位置放某些元素，若什 么则什么等。
间接限制（条件）： a 数目限制；比如分组时每组的元素数。
第一组要放三个元素，现已放两个，那么必须合在 一起放的元素就不能放在第一组了。
b 隐式条件，或曰总体条件，它并不特指某个元素，但对全体或多个元素都有约束作用。
转换题目中所给条件的理解方式，例如 5 个元素排 9 个位置，现 A 放 1、3，B 放 5、7，问 什 么必然成立？而条件中没有与元素 A、B 或位置 1、3、5、7 相关的，似让人感觉无从下 手， 但我们可以改变条件的理解方式， 对上述条件的理解可以改变为 9 个位置只剩下两个连 续的位置（8、9），若题干中有某两个元素应连续出现的条件，则题目就可获得突破。
第二类问题从下面的例子体会如何通过问题的指向解题。
例一：A gardener has to plant exactly four varieties of flowers in a flower bed, one variety in each of four rows in an ascending order of height from the first row to the fourth row. The seven varieties available to the gardener are, in ascending order of height, red begonias, pink petunias, orange marigolds, red geraniums, white snapdragons, yellow zinnias, and pink cosmos. The following restrictions on color arrangements apply:No two varieties of the same color can be planted. Orange flowers cannot be planted in a row immediately adjacent to a row of yellow flowers.Flowers of which of the following colors CANNOT be planted in the third row? Orange Pink Red White Yellow例二：Exactly seven people—Q, R, S, T, X, Y, and Z—serve on an advisory board. Q, R, S, and T have been elected to the board, and X, Y, and Z have been appointed to the board. Three-person or four-person panels are sometimes drawn from the board to study proposals. Each panel must include at least one elected and at least one appointed board member, but no panel can consist of equal numbers of elected and appointed members. Each panel is chaired by a person who is a member of the group of board members (elected or appointed) whose representatives are in theminority on that panel. Any panel must also conFORM to the following conditions:If Q serves on a panel, T cannot serve on that panel. If R serves on a panel, X cannot serve on that panel. T and Y cannot serve on a panel unless they serve together. If Z serves on a panel, X must also serve on that panel.Each of the following could chair a panel EXCEPT S T X Y Z第三类问题：解第 3 类问题的步骤：（问题中什么都没给，直接就问下面哪一个是 coule be，can not be 或 must be） 1. 迅速看一眼选项，知道选项针对的是什么性质； 2. 看涉及此种性质的条件。
问题若是 coule be，则找最不固定化的元素；若是 can not be 或 must be，则找最固定化的元素。
固定化条件 优先看； 3. 找涉及此元素的选项； 4. 对选项加以验证。
（若时间紧，也可以不验证） 若选项未提供有用信息，则立刻从数目和隐式条件着手。
例： Six musicians—Ann, Betsy, Gordon, Juan, Marian, and Ted—are planning to perFORM a program consisting entirely of three quartets. Each quartet requires two violins, one cello, and a piano. Each person must play in at least one quartet, and each person can play, at most, one instrument in a quartet. No person can play the same type of instrument (violin, cello, or piano) in two successive quartets. 来源:考试大-LSAT Ann plays violin only and must play in the first quartet. Betsy plays violin or piano. Gordon plays violin or cello.Juan plays cello only. Marian plays violin or piano. Ted plays piano only.Unavailability of which of the following musicians would still permit scheduling the five remaining players so that the proposed program could be perFORMed? Betsy Gordon Juan Marian Ted 分析：从题目和选项中都得不到有用信息，那我们立刻从数目和隐式条件着手。
题干对 数 目的规定为： Each quartet requires two violins, one cello, and a piano. 提干的隐式条件为： Each person must play in at least one quartet, and each person can play, at most, one instrument in a quartet. No person can play the same type of instrument (violin, cello, or piano) in two successive quartets. 由隐式条件和数目限制我们可以得到，至少需要 4 个 violin, 2 个 cello 和 2 个 piano 才能 完成 3 轮 4 重奏。
以此条件去看谁能被去掉。
隐式条件的理解隐式条件可以分两类，一种只需换一种角度（对题目产生限制的角度）去理解就行了； 另一种则需要和显式条件合起来推出点东西。
A certain dance involves three couples: L1 and P1, L2 and P2, L3 and P3. Each couple consists of a leader (the L’s) and a partner (the P’s). The dance begins with the following original configuration: The L’s are in a line: L1 L2 L3 The P’s are facing their Respective L’s P1 P2 P3 The dance consists of any one of a variety of sequences of moves. The four possible moves—two of them exchanges and two of them findings—are listed below. No dances except those listed in a move description change position during that move. Exchanges:There is an immediate exchange (IE), in which L1 takes whatever place L2 currently occupies; L2 takes whatever place L3currently occupies; L3 takes whatever place L1 currently occupies. There is a remote exchange (RE), in which L1 and L3 exchange their current places. Findings: There is "find your leader" (FL), in which P’s move so as to be opposite to the L’s they faced at the beginning of the dance. There is "find your partner" (FP), in which L’s move so as to be opposite to the P’s they faced at the beginning of the dance. Two consecutive exchanges cannot be immediately followed by a third exchange. If, in a configuration, each leader faces his or her original partner, the next move cannot be a finding. 最后一个条件应理解/转换为第一次变换不能是 Finding，而且 Finding 不能连续出现。