FINES, LENIENCY, and REWARDS in antitrust
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
RAND Journal of Economics
V ol.43,No.2,Summer2012
pp.368–390
FINES,LENIENCY,and REW ARDS in antitrust
Maria Bigoni∗
Sven-Olof Fridolfsson∗∗
Chlo´e Le Coq∗∗∗
and
Giancarlo Spagnolo∗∗∗∗
This article reports results from an experiment studying how FINES,LENIENCY,and REW ARDS for whistleblowers affect cartel formation and prices.Antitrust without LENIENCY reduces cartel formation but increases cartel prices:subjects use costly FINES as punishments.LENIENCY improves antitrust by strengthening deterrence but stabilizes surviving cartels:subjects appear to anticipate the lower postconviction prices after reports/LENIENCY.With REW ARDS,prices fall at the competitive level.Overall,our results suggest a strong cartel deterrence potential for well-run LENIENCY and REW ARD schemes.Thesefindings may also be relevant for similar white-collar organized crimes, such as corruption and fraud.
1.Introduction
The last decades have brought a major innovation in antitrust law enforcement.In most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries,LENIENCY policies—schemes that reduce sanctions for self-reporting cartel members—are now the main tool for
∗University of Bologna;maria.bigoni@unibo.it.
∗∗Research Institute of Industrial Economics;sven-olof.fridolfsson@ifn.se.
∗∗∗SITE and Stockholm School of Economics;chloe.lecoq@hhs.se.
∗∗∗∗University of Rome Tor Vergata,SITE,EIEF,and CEPR;giancarlo.spagnolo@uniroma2.it.
Many thanks to our editor,Judith Chevalier,and to two anonymous referees as well as to Martin Dufwenberg,Tore Ellingsen,Nisvan Erkal,Magnus Johanneson,Dorothea Kuebler,Joe Harrington,Nathan Miller,Massimo Motta, Hans-Theo Normann,Sander Onderstaal,Charles Plott,Patrick Rey,Maarten Pieter Schinkel,Adriaan Soetevent,Jean Tirole,and Julian Wright for discussions and advice related to this project,and to audiences in Alicante(IMEBE 2008),Amsterdam(ENABLE Conference),Berlin(ESMT and WZB),Boston(IIOC2009),Copenhagen(University of Copenhagen),Crete(CRESSE2009),Frankfurt,Gerzensee(ESSET2007),Gothenburg(NWBEE2008),Mannheim (RNIC2007),Norwich(UEA-CCP),Rome(Tor Vergata and EIEF),Toulouse,San Francisco(IOS-ASSA Meeting2009), Singapore,Stockholm(Ifn,Stockholm School of Economics,and Konkurrensverket),and Naples(Universit`a Federico II)for comments and suggestions.We also gratefully acknowledge research funding from Konkurrensverket(Swedish Competition Authority)that made this research possible.Le Coq thanks Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse for financial support.