lec 4 heuristic

合集下载

lec评价法四级

lec评价法四级

lec评价法四级摘要:1.LEC 评价法简介2.LEC 评价法四级的适用对象和要求3.LEC 评价法的四大要素4.四级考试对LEC 评价法的应用5.总结正文:【LEC 评价法简介】LEC 评价法,全称为“Learning, Evaluating, and Communicating”,即学习、评价和交流法,是一种综合性的评价方法。

它旨在通过对学习者的学习过程、学习成果和学习环境的评价,以及对学习者之间的交流与合作,来全面衡量学习者的学习能力和水平。

【LEC 评价法四级的适用对象和要求】LEC 评价法四级主要适用于英语作为非母语的学习者,特别是那些准备参加四级考试的学生。

四级考试是我国大学英语教育体系中的一个重要部分,它要求考生具备一定的英语听、说、读、写能力。

因此,LEC 评价法四级的实施,可以帮助学生更好地备考四级考试,提高他们的英语应用能力。

【LEC 评价法的四大要素】LEC 评价法包括四个要素,分别是学习、评价、交流和环境。

这四个要素相互关联,共同构成了LEC 评价法的基本框架。

首先,学习是LEC 评价法的核心。

学习者需要通过自主学习和合作学习,来提高自己的语言能力。

其次,评价是LEC 评价法的重要组成部分。

它通过对学习者的学习成果和学习过程进行评价,来衡量学习者的学习能力。

再次,交流是LEC 评价法的另一个重要要素。

它强调学习者之间的交流与合作,以此来提高学习者的语言应用能力。

最后,环境是LEC 评价法的另一个重要组成部分。

它要求学习者在一个良好的学习环境中进行学习,以此来提高学习者的学习效率。

【四级考试对LEC 评价法的应用】四级考试对LEC 评价法的应用,主要体现在以下几个方面。

首先,四级考试要求学习者具备一定的听、说、读、写能力,这正是LEC 评价法所强调的。

其次,四级考试的评分标准也与LEC 评价法相似。

它不仅注重学习者的语言知识,还注重学习者的语言应用能力。

最后,四级考试也鼓励学习者之间的交流与合作,这与LEC 评价法的理念是一致的。

Comparison of methods for implementing virtual synchronous machine on inverters

Comparison of methods for implementing virtual synchronous machine on inverters

European Association for theDevelopment of Renewable Energies, Environmentand Power Quality (EA4EPQ)International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality(ICREPQ’12)Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 28th to 30th March, 2012Comparison of methods for implementing virtual synchronous machine oninvertersYong Chen 1, Ralf Hesse 2, Dirk Turschner 3 and Hans-Peter Beck 41234Institute of Electrical Power Engineering Clausthal University of TechnologyLeibnizstrasse 28, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld (Germany) 1Phone:+0049-5323-72-3819, e-mail: yong.chen@tu-clausthal.de2Phone:+0049-170-5021628, e-mail: email@iehw.de3Phone:+0049-5323-72-2592, e-mail: dirk.turschner@tu-clausthal.de 4Phone:+0049-5323-72-2570, e-mail: mendt@iee.tu-clausthal.deAbstractVirtual Synchronous Machine also called VISMA [1] is a control algorithm to make an inverter operated as a conventional electromechanical synchronous machine. It is a promising solution to overcome the problems of the grid stability and quality, which have been exacerbated by increasing integration of distributed generation units into the grid. Compared to the conventional power plants, in which the synchronous machine dominate, the distributed generation units have either significantly smaller or no rotating mass and damping effect. These weaknesses can be compensated by using the VISMA concept and thus the power system quality will be improved. Furthermore, the penetration level of the DG sources won’t be restricted any more.Up to now the VISMA was implemented by using a voltage-to-current model on a hysteresis controlled inverter [1][2][3]. This method will be called VISMA-Method 1 here. Since the most products of inverters in the market are PWM controlled, the VISMA-Method 1 cannot be easily applied on these inverters. Therefore, a new method is developed to implement the VISMA by using a current-to-voltage model on the currently widely applied PWM controlled inverter. This new method is called VISMA-Method 2 in this paper and will be compared with the VISMA-Method 1 by simulation results.Key wordsVirtual Synchronous Machine (VISMA), inverter, hysteresis controller, pulse-width modulation (PWM), distributed generation (DG), stand-alone grid, virtual rotating mass, virtual damping1. IntroductionThe diffusing utilization of the renewable energy resources is driven by the limited fossil energy store on the one hand and the exacerbated environmental issues as well as energy politics on the other hand.The diversity of the renewable energies and its strong dependence on the geological location and meteorological situation make the change that the electricity will be generated more and more by small distributed generation (DG) units. Most of these DG technologies only consider supplying maximum power into the grid but taken the stability of the power system not into account. Generally, a few small-size DG units will not influence the safe operation of the power network in the presence of large centralized power stations thus their influences can be neglected. But with a larger numbers of DG units with higher capacities, the overall dynamics of power systems are significantly affected [4]. Therefore the solutions to improve the power system stability and at the same time ensure the increasing integration of the DG units are necessary.The concept of virtual synchronous machine describes a new type of grid feeding inverter, which operates with a storage system entirely as an electromechanical synchronous machine. The basic idea of the VISMA bases on reproducing the static and dynamic properties of a real synchronous machine on a power electronic interface between a DG unit and the grid, in order to inherit the advantages of a synchronous machine in consideration of power system stability such as adjustable active and reactive power, dependence of the grid frequency on the rotor speed and the effect of the rotating mass and damping windings as well as stable operation with a high parallelism level. Fig. 1 illustrates the basic idea of the VISMA.Fig. 1. Basic idea of the VISMA.This paper presents firstly two methods for impelmenting the VISMA on an inverter. Then the static and dynamic properties of both methods are compared by the simulation results in a parallel operation with the stiff grid. Futhermore it is also disscussed that whether both VISMA-Methods are able to be operated in a stand-alone grid. Finally the relavant conclusions are drawed at the end of this paper.2.Implementation Methods of the VISMAIn this section two methods to implement the VISMA on an inverter will be discussed here. They will be called VISMA-Method 1 and 2 in this paper. The VISMA-Method 1 was already presented in [1][2][3] and will be applied as a reference here for the comparison with the VISMA-Method 2.A. VISMA-Method 1: using voltage-to-current modelThe complete VISMA functional chain is shown in Fig. 2. It starts with the real-time measurement of the grid voltage to feed the virtual synchronous machine algorithm on the process computer and delivers the stator currents of the virtual synchronous machine as the results which presented as process variables. The fast hysteresis controlled inverter carries over the current signals to drive these currents at the grid immediately.Fig. 2. Concept of the VISMA-Method 1.The synchronous machine model used in this method is shown in Fig. 3 and was introduced in [5].Fig. 3. Block diagram of the VISMA-Model 1. B.VISMA-Method 2: using current-to-voltage model Compared with the VISMA-Method 1, the currents will be measured in the VISMA-Method 2 and the reference voltage will be calculated in the VISMA-Model 2, and then sent to a pulse-width modulator, which generates switch signals for the inverter. The inductors L f und capacitors C f are used to filter the harmonics of the output voltage of the inverter. Fig. 4 demonstrates the basic concept of the VISMA-Method 2.Fig. 4. Concept of the VISMA-Method 2.The synchronous machine model used in VISMA-Method 2 is a current-to-voltage model as shown in Fig.5. This is an inverse model of VISMA-Model 1, namely the current as input and voltage as output. After the model inversion a differentiator occurs, which could lead to instability of the model. Hence a low-pass filter should be applied to reduce the disturbance of the model input (current i grid) and enable a stable computing process of VISMA-Model 2.Fig. 5. Block diagram of the VISMA-Model 2. 3.Simulation ParametersThe simulations presented in this paper were carried out in Matlab-Simulink. The important parameter setups during the simulations are shown in table I.Table I. – Simulation parameters Voltage of DC site ±350V Nominal frequency 50Hz Nominal phase voltage (rms) 230V Inductor L f4mH Capacitor C5µF Tolerance band of hysteresiscontroller for phase currents±1ASwitching frequency of the IGBT inverter2,8kHz ~ 15kHz forVISMA-Method 115kHz for VISMA-Method 2 using PWM controllerTime step for simulation 1µs4.Parallel Operation with Stiff GridIn this section the two VISMA-Methods are discussed under the parallel operation with a stiff grid. The static and dynamic properties of the VISMA-Method 2 are compared with the reference VISMA-Method 1 by simulation results.A. Synchronisation of the VISMA with the gridThe VISMA must be synchronized with the grid firstly before connecting to the grid, since an adverse switching could lead to large transient currents between the VISMA and the grid, which could damage the equipments. Due to the different control concepts, both VISMA-Methods will be synchronized with the grid in different ways.Since the currents in the VISMA-Method 1 are controlled directly by using a hysteresis controller, the transient currents can be regulated nearly to zero by setting the reference currents closely to zero. After that, the VISMA can be connected to the grid, because the hysteresis controller and IGBT-module track the reference currents very fast.Compared to the VISMA-Method 1 the synchronizing of the VISMA-Method 2 is more complicated, since the currents between VISMA and grid cannot be directly controlled but only indirectly through the voltage controller. In this case the VISMA behaves as a voltage source. Therefore the VISMA can be synchronized with the grid in the same way as a real synchronous generator. Thereby the following parameters should be adjusted according to the grid voltage at PCC: amplitude, phase and frequency. The voltage difference between VISMA and grid should be so small that transient currents values are acceptable.B.Power setting of the VISMAThe power of the VISMA can be set similarly as a real synchronous machine. The following shows separately the active and reactive power setting of both VISMA-Methods with discussions.1). Active power setting of the VISMAThe active power of the VISMA can be easily set by adjusting the model parameter M mech, which is called virtual torque. Fig.6 shows the active power setting of the VISMA for both methods.Fig. 6. Active power setting of the VISMA (left: VISMA-Method 1; right: VISMA-Method 2).The simulation results prove that the VISMA-Method 2 is able to behave the same dynamic property as the VISMA-Method 1. A positive torque means the VISMA supplies an active power into the grid and operates as a generator. For a negative torque the active power will be taken from the grid and then the VISMA operates as a motor.The only difference between both VISMA methods consists in the noise component of the P vsima. In VISMA-Method 1, because of the hysteresis controller, which works at a fixedtoleranceband, the switching frequency of the inverter is not constant but varying within a frequency band. Therefore there are harmonics with different frequency terms in the output currents. However, in Method 2, by using PWM-controller a constant switching frequency can be reached thus the output of the inverter will be more easily and better filtered by selecting a proper filter.2). Reactive Power setting of the VISMAThe reactive power of the VISMA can be regulated by setting the virtual excitation E p in the same way just as a real synchronous machine in a power plant. This will be demonstrated in Fig. 7 through the simulation results. Fig. 7. Reactive power setting of the VISMA (left: VISMA-Method 1; right: VISMA-Method 2).Both VISMA-Methods supply a capacitive reactive power while over excited and an inductive reactive power while under excited. The VISMA-Method 2 has the same dynamic property as the VISMA-Method 1 but the output signal has a lower noise because of the PWM-controller compared to VISMA-Method 1.The power of the VISMA can be regulated dynamically during the changes of the grid frequency and voltage, in case that the frequency and voltage controls are added to the VISMA [6].C.Reaction of the VISMA to a grid frequency dropIn this section the dynamic properties of both VISMA-Methods, the virtual rotating mass and virtual damping, are compared by simulations results.1). Different virtual rotating massFig.8 recorded the simulation results which demonstrated how both VISMA-Methods respond to a grid frequency drop from 50Hz to 49.5Hz with different virtual rotating mass.Fig. 8. Reaction of the VISMA to a frequency drop with different virtual mass J VISMA (left: VISMA-Method 1; right: VISMA-Method 2).It can be clearly seen that both VISMAs provide an active power into the grid immediately as the grid frequency drops. Comparing the power reactions with J VISMA= 0.1kgm2, 0.3kgm2, and 0.5kgm2, it can also be observed in both VISMA methods that the VISMA with a larger virtual mass will provide more active power into the grid and therefore the grid will be more supported.2). Different virtual dampingThe virtual damping of the VISMA can reduce the oscillations in the grid. To prove this effect in VISMA-Method 2, the simulations with two different damping factors k d were carried out and the results are compared with the VISMA-Method 1. It is demonstrated that the virtual damping can also be realized in the VISMA-Method 2 as Method 1, which is observed in Fig. 9 that a larger damping factor has a stronger effect on reducing frequency and power oscillation of both VISMAs.D.Reaction of the VISMA to a voltage dropThe VISMA can support the grid during a voltage drop by supplying a capacitive reactive power. This dynamic property can be achieved in both VISMA methods as shown Fig. 10.Fig. 9. Reaction of the VISMA to a frequency drop with different virtual damping k d (left: VISMA-Method 1; right:VISMA-Method 2).Fig. 10. Reaction of the VISMA to a voltage drop (left: VISMA-Method 1; right: VISMA-Method 2).5.Failure of Stiff Grid – Island ModeIn the following section the island mode of both VISMA-Methods will be investigated by simulation. At the beginning both VISMAs are connected with the grid. After 0.2s the VISMAs will be switched off from the grid and they should build a local stand-alone grid. In all simulations the VISMA didn’t have frequency and voltage control mechanisms.A. Island mode of the VISMA-Method 1For the parallel operation with the stiff grid, the capacitors which are shown in green color in Fig. 11 are not necessary in the VISMA-Method 1, because it presents itself as a current source. If there is no stiff grid in this configuration, then the VISMA cannot operate as a synchronous machine, since no currents flow in the inductors and the hysteresis controller cannot work properly. Therefore, extra capacitors must be installed in the VISMA for the island function, see Fig. 11.Fig. 11. Enable the island function of the VISMA-Method 1 byextending the capacitors.Fig. 12 shows the simulation results under the condition that the VISMA changed from grid connected mode to island mode in cases of without and with a load.Fig. 12. Output voltage of the VISMA-Method 1 by changing to island mode (filter capacators C = 5µF, left: VISMA without load; right: VISMA with a load).It is obviously to see that the VISMA has built the voltage continuously after switching off the public grid. Without a load the voltages have a large distortion, because the switching frequency of the hysteresis controller is varying and the LC-filter could not filter out all frequency parts; whereas the VISMA under island mode with a resistive load, the harmonics could be damped almost completely and rapidly. Another way to reduce the harmonics is to choose larger capacitors and make sure that the corner frequency of the LC-filter is under the minimal switching frequency of the hysteresis controller.B.Island mode of the VISMA-Method 2For VISMA-Method 2 a modification of the hardware configuration is not necessary. The VISMA operates here as a voltage source. Under the same simulation conditions the VISMA-Method 2 provided following results illustrated in Fig.13.Fig. 13. Output voltage of the VISMA-Method 2 by changing to island mode (filter capacators C = 5µF, left: VISMA without load; right: VISMA with a load).Firstly, the VISMA-Method 2 could build the three phase voltages immediately after switching off the public grid. Secondly, the voltages of the VISMA have almost no harmonics compared to the VISMA-Method 1 because of the constant switching frequency of the PWM controller and the proper output filter. In the case of VISMA with a load into island mode, the voltages dropped in short period and then rose quickly to a stabile value. Because of the virtual inertial of the VISMA the voltages cannot collapse suddenly. In order to keep a stable long-term voltage under island mode, the voltage and frequency controller must be applied. parison of both VISMA-MethodsIn table II a comparison of both VISMA-Methods is presented by considering the important properties of the VISMA system.Table II. – Comparison of VISMA-MethodsVISMA-Method 1 VISMA-Method 2VISMA-Modelvoltage-to-currentmodelcurrent-to-voltagemodelControlmechanismHysteresis controller PWM controller Control variable Phase currents Phase voltages MeasurementvariablePhase voltages amPCCPhase currents inoutput inductors Switchingfrequency(assumed: max.f s=15kHz forIGBT)2,8kHz ~ 15kHz insimulation (dependson the setting ofhysteresis controller)15kHz in simulation(depends on thesetting of PWMcontroller)Synchronizingwith the gridVISMA currentsalmost equal to zeroThe same as the realsynchronousgenerator Parameter forpower settingVirtual excitation E pVirtual torque M mechVirtual excitation E pVirtual torque M mech DynamicpropertiesVirtual rotating mass(virtual inertial J VISMA)Virtual damping k dVirtual rotating mass(virtual inertial J VISMA)Virtual damping k d Low-pass filter Not necessaryNecessary for themeasurement of thephase currents Island modePossible withextending filtercapacitorsFrequency and voltagecontroller arenecessary for a stablelong-term island gridPossible withouthardwarereconfigurationFrequency andvoltage controller arenecessary for a stablelong-term island grid7.ConclusionsThis paper presents a new method to implemente the VISMA on the PWM controlled inverter by using a current-to-votage model. A comparison of this new method with VISMA-Method 1 by using a voltage-to-current model on the hysteresis controlled inverter has been performed by simulation results. It has been proved that the VISMA-Method 2 is able to behave almost the same static and dynamic properties such as flexible power setting, energetic reproducing the virtual rotating mass and virtual damping in a parallel operation with the public grid as the VISMA-Method 1.Both VISMA-Methods can be operated under an island mode. The VISMA-Method 2 can achieve a better voltage quality compared to the VISMA-Method 1, which needs larger capacitors in order to having the same voltage quality. For building a stable island grid the frequency and voltage controller should be applied in both VISMA-Methods.Considering the widely applied PWM controlled invertes in the current market, the VISMA-Method 2 is tended to be more easily utilized.References[1] R. Hesse, D. Turschner, H.-P. Beck, Die virtuelleSynchronmaschine, VDE Verlag Berlin, Etz Elektrotechnik + Automation S2/2007, pp. 38-44.[2] R. Hesse, H.-P. Beck: Virtual Synchronous Machine,Proceeding, 9th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation, Barcelona (Spain), 2009.[3] Y. Chen , R. Hesse, D. Turschner, H.-P. Beck, DynamicProperties of the Virtual Synchronous Machine (VISMA), in Proc. ICREPQ’11, Las Palmas (Spain), 2011.[4] J. G. Slootweg, W. L. Kling, “Impacts of distributedgeneration on power system transient stability”, PowerEngineering Society Summer Meeting, 2002 IEEE, Vol.: 2, 21-25 July 2002, Pages:862 - 867 vol.2[5] Y. Chen, R. Hesse, D. Turschner, H-P. Beck, Improving theGrid Quality by Using Virtual Synchronous Machine, inProc. PowerEng 2011, Málaga (Spain), 2011.。

ooDACEToolboxAFlexibleObject-OrientedKriging…

ooDACEToolboxAFlexibleObject-OrientedKriging…

Journal of Machine Learning Research15(2014)3183-3186Submitted6/12;Revised6/13;Published10/14ooDACE Toolbox:A Flexible Object-Oriented Kriging ImplementationIvo Couckuyt∗********************* Tom Dhaene******************* Piet Demeester*********************** Ghent University-iMindsDepartment of Information Technology(INTEC)Gaston Crommenlaan89050Gent,BelgiumEditor:Mikio BraunAbstractWhen analyzing data from computationally expensive simulation codes,surrogate model-ing methods arefirmly established as facilitators for design space exploration,sensitivity analysis,visualization and optimization.Kriging is a popular surrogate modeling tech-nique used for the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments(DACE).Hence,the past decade Kriging has been the subject of extensive research and many extensions have been proposed,e.g.,co-Kriging,stochastic Kriging,blind Kriging,etc.However,few Krig-ing implementations are publicly available and tailored towards scientists and engineers.Furthermore,no Kriging toolbox exists that unifies several Krigingflavors.This paper addresses this need by presenting an efficient object-oriented Kriging implementation and several Kriging extensions,providing aflexible and easily extendable framework to test and implement new Krigingflavors while reusing as much code as possible.Keywords:Kriging,Gaussian process,co-Kriging,blind Kriging,surrogate modeling, metamodeling,DACE1.IntroductionThis paper is concerned with efficiently solving complex,computational expensive problems using surrogate modeling techniques(Gorissen et al.,2010).Surrogate models,also known as metamodels,are cheap approximation models for computational expensive(black-box) simulations.Surrogate modeling techniques are well-suited to handle,for example,expen-sivefinite element(FE)simulations and computationalfluid dynamic(CFD)simulations.Kriging is a popular surrogate model type to approximate deterministic noise-free data. First conceived by Danie Krige in geostatistics and later introduced for the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments(DACE)by Sacks et al.(1989),these Gaussian pro-cess(Rasmussen and Williams,2006)based surrogate models are compact and cheap to evaluate,and have proven to be very useful for tasks such as optimization,design space exploration,visualization,prototyping,and sensitivity analysis(Viana et al.,2014).Note ∗.Ivo Couckuyt is a post-doctoral research fellow of FWO-Vlaanderen.Couckuyt,Dhaene and Demeesterthat Kriging surrogate models are primarily known as Gaussian processes in the machine learning community.Except for the utilized terminology there is no difference between the terms and associated methodologies.While Kriging is a popular surrogate model type,not many publicly available,easy-to-use Kriging implementations exist.Many Kriging implementations are outdated and often limited to one specific type of Kriging.Perhaps the most well-known Kriging toolbox is the DACE toolbox1of Lophaven et al.(2002),but,unfortunately,the toolbox has not been updated for some time and only the standard Kriging model is provided.Other freely available Kriging codes include:stochastic Kriging(Staum,2009),2DiceKriging,3 Gaussian processes for Machine Learning(Rasmussen and Nickisch,2010)(GPML),4demo code provided with Forrester et al.(2008),5and the Matlab Krigeage toolbox.6 This paper addresses this need by presenting an object-oriented Kriging implementation and several Kriging extensions,providing aflexible and easily extendable framework to test and implement new Krigingflavors while reusing as much code as possible.2.ooDACE ToolboxThe ooDACE toolbox is an object-oriented Matlab toolbox implementing a variety of Krig-ingflavors and extensions.The most important features and Krigingflavors include:•Simple Kriging,ordinary Kriging,universal Kriging,stochastic Kriging(regression Kriging),blind-and co-Kriging.•Derivatives of the prediction and prediction variance.•Flexible hyperparameter optimization.•Useful utilities include:cross-validation,integrated mean squared error,empirical variogram plot,debug plot of the likelihood surface,robustness-criterion value,etc.•Proper object-oriented design(compatible interface with the DACE toolbox1is avail-able).Documentation of the ooDACE toolbox is provided in the form of a getting started guide (for users),a wiki7and doxygen documentation8(for developers and more advanced users). In addition,the code is well-documented,providing references to research papers where appropriate.A quick-start demo script is provided withfive surrogate modeling use cases, as well as script to run a suite of regression tests.A simplified UML class diagram,showing only the most important public operations, of the toolbox is shown in Figure1.The toolbox is designed with efficiency andflexibil-ity in mind.The process of constructing(and predicting)a Kriging model is decomposed in several smaller,logical steps,e.g.,constructing the correlation matrix,constructing the1.The DACE toolbox can be downloaded at http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/~hbn/dace/.2.The stochastic Kriging toolbox can be downloaded at /.3.The DiceKriging toolbox can be downloaded at /web/packages/DiceKriging/index.html.4.The GPML toolbox can be downloaded at /software/view/263/.5.Demo code of Kriging can be downloaded at //legacy/wileychi/forrester/.6.The Krigeage toolbox can be downloaded at /software/kriging/.7.The wiki documentation of the ooDACE toolbox is found at http://sumowiki.intec.ugent.be/index.php/ooDACE:ooDACE_toolbox.8.The doxygen documentation of the ooDACE toolbox is found at http://sumo.intec.ugent.be/buildbot/ooDACE/doc/.Figure1:Class diagram of the ooDACE toolbox.regression matrix,updating the model,optimizing the parameters,etc.These steps are linked together by higher-level steps,e.g.,fitting the Kriging model and making predic-tions.The basic steps needed for Kriging are implemented as(protected)operations in the BasicGaussianProcess superclass.Implementing a new Kriging type,or extending an existing one,is now done by subclassing the Kriging class of your choice and inheriting the(protected)methods that need to be reimplemented.Similarly,to implement a new hyperparameter optimization strategy it suffices to create a new class inherited from the Optimizer class.To assess the performance of the ooDACE toolbox a comparison between the ooDACE toolbox and the DACE toolbox1is performed using the2D Branin function.To that end,20data sets of increasing size are constructed,each drawn from an uniform random distribution.The number of observations ranges from10to200samples with steps of10 samples.For each data set,a DACE toolbox1model,a ooDACE ordinary Kriging and a ooDACE blind Kriging model have been constructed and the accuracy is measured on a dense test set using the Average Euclidean Error(AEE).Moreover,each test is repeated 1000times to remove any random factor,hence the average accuracy of all repetitions is used.Results are shown in Figure2a.Clearly,the ordinary Kriging model of the ooDACE toolbox consistently outperforms the DACE toolbox for any given sample size,mostly due to a better hyperparameter optimization,while the blind Kriging model is able improve the accuracy even more.3.ApplicationsThe ooDACE Toolbox has already been applied successfully to a wide range of problems, e.g.,optimization of a textile antenna(Couckuyt et al.,2010),identification of the elasticity of the middle-ear drum(Aernouts et al.,2010),etc.In sum,the ooDACE toolbox aims to provide a modern,up to date Kriging framework catered to scientists and age instructions,design documentation,and stable releases can be found at http://sumo.intec.ugent.be/?q=ooDACE.ReferencesJ.Aernouts,I.Couckuyt,K.Crombecq,and J.J.J.Dirckx.Elastic characterization of membranes with a complex shape using point indentation measurements and inverseCouckuyt,Dhaene and Demeester(a)(b)Figure2:(a)Evolution of the average AEE versus the number of samples(Branin function).(b)Landscape plot of the Branin function.modelling.International Journal of Engineering Science,48:599–611,2010.I.Couckuyt,F.Declercq,T.Dhaene,and H.Rogier.Surrogate-based infill optimization applied to electromagnetic problems.Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering:Advances in Design Optimization of Microwave/RF Circuits and Systems, 20(5):492–501,2010.A.Forrester,A.Sobester,and A.Keane.Engineering Design Via Surrogate Modelling:A Practical Guide.Wiley,Chichester,2008.D.Gorissen,K.Crombecq,I.Couckuyt,P.Demeester,and T.Dhaene.A surrogate modeling and adaptive sampling toolbox for computer based design.Journal of Machine Learning Research,11:2051–2055,2010.URL http://sumo.intec.ugent.be/.S.N.Lophaven,H.B.Nielsen,and J.Søndergaard.Aspects of the Matlab toolbox DACE. Technical report,Informatics and Mathematical Modelling,Technical University of Den-mark,DTU,Richard Petersens Plads,Building321,DK-2800Kgs.Lyngby,2002.C.E.Rasmussen and H.Nickisch.Gaussian processes for machine learning(GPML)toolbox. Journal of Machine Learning Research,11:3011–3015,2010.C.E.Rasmussen and C.K.I.Williams.Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning.MIT Press,2006.J.Sacks,W.J.Welch,T.J.Mitchell,and H.P.Wynn.Design and analysis of computer experiments.Statistical Science,4(4):409–435,1989.J.Staum.Better simulation metamodeling:The why,what,and how of stochastic Kriging. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference,2009.F.A.C.Viana,T.W.Simpson,V.Balabanov,and V.Toropov.Metamodeling in multi-disciplinary design optimization:How far have we really come?AIAA Journal,52(4): 670–690,2014.。

Guidance document on pesticide residue

Guidance document on pesticide residue

EUROPEAN COMMISSION12Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection345SANCO/825/00 rev. 8.1 616/11/2010 78Guidance document on pesticide residue 9analytical methods10111213141516[Revision 8 is the version of this guidance document that is currently valid. It is, however, under1718continuous review and will be updated when necessary. The document is aimed at 19manufacturers seeking pesticides authorisations and parties applying for setting or modification 20of an MRL. It gives requirements for methods that would be used in post-registration 21monitoring and control by the competent authorities in Member States in the event that 22authorisations are granted. For authorities involved in post-registration control and monitoring, the document may be considered as being complementary to the documents: Method Validation2324and Quality Control Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food and Feed (for the valid revision visit http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/resources/publications_en.htm) and the2526OECD document “Guidance Document on pesticide residue analytical methods”, 2007.27(ENV/JM/ ENV/JM/MONO(2007)17).1Preamble (4)28292General (5)302.1Good Laboratory Practice (5)312.2Selection of analytes for which methods are required (5)322.3Description of an analytical method and its validation results (5)332.4Hazardous reagents (6)342.5Acceptable analytical techniques considered commonly available (6)352.6Multi-residue methods (7)362.7Single methods and common moiety methods (7)372.8Single methods using derivatisation (7)382.9Method validation (8)392.9.1Calibration (8)2.9.2Recovery and Repeatability (9)40412.9.3Selectivity (11)422.10Confirmation (11)432.10.1Confirmation simultaneous to primary detection (11)442.10.2Confirmation by an independent analytical technique (12)452.11Independent laboratory validation (ILV) (12)2.12Availability of standards (13)46472.13Extraction Efficiency (13)483Analytical methods for residues in plants, plant products, foodstuff (of plant origin),feedingstuff (of plant origin) (Annex IIA Point 4.2.1 of Directive 91/414/EEC; Annex Point IIA,4950Point 4.3 of OECD) (14)513.1Purpose (14)523.2Selection of analytes (14)533.3Commodities and Matrix Groups (14)543.4Limit of quantification (15)553.5Independent laboratory validation (ILV) (15)564Analytical methods for residues in foodstuff (of animal origin) (Annex IIA Point 4.2.1 of 57Directive 91/414/EEC; Annex Point IIA, Point 4.3 of OECD) (16)584.1Purpose (16)594.2Selection of analytes (16)604.3Commodities (16)614.4Limit of quantification (16)4.5Independent laboratory validation (ILV) (16)62635Analytical methods for residues in soil (Annex IIA, Point 4.2.2 of Directive 91/414/EEC;64Annex Point IIA, Point 4.4 of OECD) (17)655.1Purpose (17)665.2Selection of analytes (17)675.3Samples (17)685.4Limit of quantification (17)696Analytical methods for residues in water (Annex IIA, Point 4.2.3 of Directive 91/414/EEC;70Annex Point IIA; Point 4.5 of OECD) (19)716.1Purpose (19)726.2Selection of analytes (19)736.3Samples (19)746.4Limit of quantification (19)756.5Direct injection (20)767Analytical methods for residues in air (Annex IIA, Point 4.2.4 of Directive 91/414/EEC; 77Annex Point IIA; Point 4.7 of OECD) (21)7.1Purpose (21)78797.2Selection of analytes (21)807.3Samples (21)7.4Limit of quantification (21)81827.5Sorbent characteristics (22)837.6Further validation data (22)7.7Confirmatory methods (22)84858Analytical methods for residues in body fluids and tissues (Annex IIA, Point 4.2.5 of86Directive 91/414/EEC; Annex Point IIA Point 4.8 of OECD) (23)8.1Purpose (23)87888.2Selection of analytes (23)898.3Samples (23)908.4Sample set (23)918.5Limit of quantification (23)929Summary - List of methods required (24)10Abbreviations (25)939411References (27)951Preamble96This document provides guidance to applicants, Member States and EFSA on the data 97requirements and assessment for residue analytical methods for post-registration control and 98monitoring purposes. It is not intended for biological agents such as bacteria or viruses. It 99recommends possible interpretations of the provisions of section 3.5.2 of Annex II of 100Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 [1] and of the provisions of section 4, part A of Annex II and 101section 5, part A of Annex III of Council Directive 91/414/EEC [2]. It also applies to 102applications for setting or modification of an MRL within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 103396/2005 [3]. It has been elaborated in consideration of the ‘Guidance Document on pesticide 104residue analytical methods’ of the OECD [4] and SANCO/10684/2009 “Method validation 105and quality control procedures for pesticide residue analysis in food and feed” [5].106This document has been conceived as an opinion of the Commission Services and elaborated 107in co-operation with the Member States. It does not, however, intend to produce legally 108binding effects and by its nature does not prejudice any measure taken by a Member State nor 109any case law developed with regard to this provision. This document also does not preclude 110the possibility that the European Court of Justice may give one or another provision direct 111effect in Member States.112This guidance document must be amended at the latest if new data requirements as referred to 113in Article 8 (1)(b) and 8 (1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 will have been established 114in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 79 (4).1152General1162.1Good Laboratory Practice117According to Guidance Document 7109/VI/94-Rev. 6.c1 (Applicability of Good Laboratory 118Practice to Data Requirements according to Annexes II, Part A, and III, Part A, of Council 119Directive 91/414/EEC) [6] the development and validation of an analytical method for 120monitoring purposes and post-registration control is not subject to GLP. However, where the 121method is used to generate data for registration purposes, for example residue data, these 122studies must be conducted to GLP.1232.2Selection of analytes for which methods are required124The definition of the residues relevant for monitoring in feed and food as well as in 125environmental matrices and air is not the subject matter of this document. Criteria for the 126selection of analytes in case that no legally binding definition is available are given in the 127respective sections 3 - 8. In addition, sections 5.2, 6.2, 7.2 and 8.2 clarify under which 128circumstances analytical methods for residues may not be necessary.1292.3Description of an analytical method and its validation results130Full descriptions of validated methods shall be provided. The submitted studies must include 131the following points:132•Itemisation of the fortified compounds and the analytes, which are quantified133•Description of the analytical method134•Validation data as described in more detail below135•Description of calibration including calibration data136•Recovery and Repeatability137•Data proving the selectivity of the method138•Confirmatory data, if not presented in a separate study139•References (if needed)140141The following information should be offered in the description of the analytical method:142•An introduction, including the scope of the method143•Outline/summary of method, including validated matrices, limit of quantification (LOQ), 144range of recoveries, fortification levels and number of fortifications per level145•Apparatus and reagents146•instrument parameters used as example if appropriate147•Description of the analytical method, including extraction, clean-up, derivatisation (if148appropriate), chromatographic conditions (if appropriate) and quantification technique149•Hazards or precautions required150•Time required for one sample set151•Schematic diagram of the analytical method152•Stages where an interruption of the method is possible153•Result tables (if results are not presented in separate studies)154•Procedure for the calculation of results from raw data155•Extraction efficiency of solvents used156•Important points and special remarks (e.g. volatility of analyte or its stability with regard 157to pH)158•Information on stability of fortified/incurred samples, extracts and standard solutions (If 159the recoveries in the fortified samples are within the acceptable range of 70-120 %,160stability is sufficiently proven.)161Sometimes it may be necessary for other information to be presented, particularly where 162special methods are considered.1632.4Hazardous reagents164Hazardous reagents (carcinogens category I and II [7]) shall not be used. Among these 165compounds are diazomethane, chromium (VI) salts, chloroform and benzene.1662.5Acceptable analytical techniques considered commonly available167Analytical methods shall use instrumentation regarded as "commonly available":168•GC detectors: FPD, NPD, ECD, FID, MS, MS n (incl. Ion Traps and MS/MS), HRMS169•GC columns: capillary columns170•HPLC detectors: MS, MS/MS, HRMS, FLD, UV, DAD171•HPLC columns: reversed phase, ion-exchange, normal phase172•AAS, ICP-MS, ICP-OES173Other techniques can be powerful tools in residue analysis, therefore the acceptance of 174additional techniques as part of enforcement methods should be discussed at appropriate 175intervals. Whilst it is recognised that analytical methodology is constantly developing, some 176time elapses before new techniques become generally accepted and available.1772.6Multi-residue methods178Multi-residue methods that cover a large number of analytes and that are based on GC-MS 179and/or HPLC-MS/MS are routinely used in enforcement laboratories for the analysis of plant 180matrices. Therefore, validated residue methods submitted for food of plants, plant products 181and foodstuff of plant origin (Section 3) should be multi-residue methods published by an 182international official standardisation body such as the European Committee for 183Standardisation (CEN) (e.g. [8 - 12]) or the AOAC International (e.g. [13]). Single residue 184methods should only be provided if data show and are reported that multi-residue methods 185involving GC as well as HPLC techniques cannot be used.186If validation data for the residue analytical method of an analyte in at least one of the 187commodities of the respective matrix group have been provided by an international official 188standardisation body and if these data have been generated in more than one laboratory with 189the required LOQ and acceptable recovery and RSD data (see Section 2.9.2), no additional 190validation by an independent laboratory is required.1912.7Single methods and common moiety methods192Where a pesticide residue cannot be determined using a multi-residue method, one or where 193appropriate more alternative method(s) must be proposed. The method(s) should be suitable 194for the determination of all compounds included in the residue definition. If this is not 195possible and an excessive number of methods for individual compounds would be needed, a 196common moiety method may be acceptable, provided that it is in compliance with the residue 197definition. However, common moiety methods shall be avoided whenever possible.1982.8Single methods using derivatisation199For the analysis of some compounds by GC, such as those of high polarity or with poor 200chromatographic properties, or for the detection of some compounds in HPLC, derivatisation 201may be required. These derivatives may be prepared prior to chromatographic analysis or as 202part of the chromatographic procedure, either pre- or post-column. Where a derivatisation 203method is used, this must be justified.204If the derivatisation is not part of the chromatographic procedure, the derivative must be 205sufficiently stable and should be formed with high reproducibility and without influence of 206matrix components on yield. The efficiency and precision of the derivatisation step should be 207demonstrated with analyte in sample matrix against pure derivative. The storage stability of 208the derivative should be checked and reported. For details concerning calibration refer to 209Section 2.9.1.210The analytical method is considered to remain specific to the analyte of interest if the 211derivatised species is specific to that analyte. However, where – in case of pre-column 212derivatisation – the derivative formed is a common derivative of two or more active 213substances or their metabolites or is classed as another active substance, the method should be 214considered non-specific and may be deemed unacceptable.2152.9Method validation216Validation data must be submitted for all analytes included in the residue definition for all 217representative sample matrices to be analysed at adequate concentration levels.218Basic validation data are:219•Calibration data220•Concentration of analyte(s) found in blank samples221•Concentration level(s) of fortification experiments222•Concentration and recovery of analyte(s) found in fortified samples223•Number of fortification experiments for each matrix/level combination224•Mean recovery for each matrix/level combination225•Relative standard deviation (RSD) of recovery, separate for each matrix/level combination 226•Limit of quantification (LOQ), corresponding to the lowest validated level227•Representative clearly labelled chromatograms228•Data on matrix effects, e.g. on the response of the analyte in matrix as compared to pure 229standards230.Further data may be required in certain cases, depending on the analytical method used, and 231the residue definition to be covered.2322.9.1Calibration233The calibration of the detection system shall be adequately demonstrated at a minimum of 3 234concentration levels in duplicate or (preferably) 5 concentration levels with single 235determination. Calibration should be generated using standards prepared in blank matrix 236extracts (matrix matched standards) for all sample materials included in the corresponding 237validation study (Sections 3 - 8). Only, if experiments clearly demonstrate that matrix effects 238are not significant (i.e. < 20 %), calibration with standards in solvent may be used. Calibration 239with standards in solvent is also acceptable for methods to detect residues in air (Section 7). 240In case that aqueous samples are analysed by direct injection HPLC-MS/MS calibration shall 241be performed with standards in aqueous solution.242The analytical calibration must extend to at least the range which is suitable for the 243determination of recoveries and for assessment of the level of interferences in control 244samples. For that purpose a concentration range shall be covered from 30 % of the LOQ to 24520 % above the highest level (Section 2.9.2).246All individual calibration data shall be presented together with the equation of the calibration. 247Concentration data should refer to both, the mass fraction in the original sample (e.g. mg/kg) 248and to the concentration in the extract (e.g. µg/L). A calibration plot should be submitted, in 249which the calibration points are clearly visible. A plot showing the response factor1 versus the 250concentration for all calibration points is preferred over a plot of the signal versus the 251concentration.252Linear calibrations are preferred if shown to be acceptable over an appropriate concentration 253range. Other continuous, monotonically increasing functions (e.g. exponential/power, 254logarithmic) may be applied where this can be fully justified based on the detection system 255used.256When quantification is based on the determination of a derivative, the calibration shall be 257conducted using standard solutions of the pure derivative generated by weighing, unless the 258derivatisation step is an integral part of the detection system. If the derivative is not available 259as a reference standard, it should be generated within the analytical set by using the same 260derivatisation procedure as that applied for the samples. Under these circumstances, a full 261justification should be given.2622.9.2Recovery and Repeatability263Recovery and precision data must be reported for the following fortification levels, except for 264body fluids and body tissues (Section 8):265•LOQ 5 samples266•10 times LOQ, or MRL (set or proposed) or other relevant level (≥ 5 x LOQ)2675 samples268Additionally, for unfortified samples residue levels must be reported:269samples•blankmatrix 2270According to the residue definition the LOQ of chiral analytes usually applies to the sum of 271the two enantiomers. In this case it is not necessary to determine the enantiomers separately. 2721 The response factor is calculated by dividing the signal area by the respective analyte concentration.Enantioselective methods would only be required if a single enantiomer is included in the 273residue definition.274In cases of complex residue definitions (e.g. a residue definition which contains more than 275one compound) the validation results shall be reported for the single parts of the full residue 276definition, unless the single elements cannot be analysed separately.277The mean recovery at each fortification level and for each sample matrix should be in the 278range of 70 % - 120 %. In certain justified cases mean recoveries outside of this range will be 279accepted.280For plants, plant products, foodstuff (of plant and animal origin) and in feeding stuff recovery 281may deviate from this rule as specified in Table 1.2282Table 1: Mean recovery and precision criteria for plant matrices and animal matrices [4]283Concentration level Range of mean recovery(%)Precision, RSD(%)> 1 µg/kg ≤ 0.01 mg/kg 60 - 120 30> 0.01 mg/kg ≤ 0.1 mg/kg 70 - 120 20> 0.1 mg/kg ≤ 1.0 mg/kg 70 - 110 15> 1 mg/kg 70 - 110 10284If blank values are unavoidable, recoveries shall be corrected and reported together with the 285uncorrected recoveries.286The precision of a method shall be reported as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 287recovery at each fortification level. For plants, plant products, foodstuff (of plant and animal 288origin) and feeding stuff the RSD should comply with the values specified in Table 1. In other 289cases the RSD should be ≤ 20 % per level. In certain justified cases, e.g. determination of 290residues in soil lower than 0.01 mg/kg, higher variability may be accepted.291When outliers have been identified using appropriate statistical methods (e.g. Grubbs or 292Dixons test), they may be excluded. Their number must not exceed 1/5 of the results at each 293fortification level. The exclusion should be justified and the statistical significance must be 2942 According to Annex IIA 4.2 of Directive 91/414/EEC the mean recovery should normally be 70 % - 110 % andthe RSD should preferably be ≤ 20 %.clearly indicated. In that case all individual recovery data (including those excluded) shall be 295reported.2962.9.3Selectivity297Representative clearly labelled chromatograms of standard(s) at the lowest calibrated level, 298matrix blanks and samples fortified at the lowest fortification level for each analyte/matrix 299combination must be provided to prove selectivity of the method. Labelling should include 300sample description, chromatographic scale and identification of all relevant components in the 301chromatogram.302When mass spectrometry is used for detection, a mass spectrum (in case of MS/MS: product 303ion spectrum) should be provided to justify the selection of ions used for determination.304Blank values (non-fortified samples) must be determined from the matrices used in 305fortification experiments and should not be higher than 30 % of the LOQ. If this is exceeded, 306detailed justification should be provided.3072.10Confirmation308Confirmatory methods are required to demonstrate the selectivity of the primary method for 309all representative sample matrices (Sections 3 – 8). It has to be confirmed that the primary 310method detects the right analyte (analyte identity) and that the analyte signal of the primary 311method is quantitatively correct and not affected by any other compound.3122.10.1Confirmation simultaneous to primary detection313A confirmation simultaneous to the primary detection using one fragment ion in GC-MS and 314HPLC-MS or one transition in HPLC-MS/MS may be accomplished by one of the following 315approaches:316•In GC-MS, HPLC-MS, by monitoring at least 2 additional fragment ions (preferably317m/z > 100)for low resolution system and at least 1 additional fragment ion for high318resolution/accurate mass system319•In GC-MS n (incl. Ion Traps and MS/MS), HPLC-MS/MS, by monitoring at least 1320additional SRM transition321The following validation data are required for the additional fragment ions (MS and HRMS) 322or the additional SRM transition (MS n and MS/MS): calibration data (Section 2.9.1), recovery 323and precision data according to Section 2.9.2 for samples fortified at the respective LOQ (n = 3245) and for 2 blank samples.325For all mass spectrometric techniques a mass spectrum (in case of single MS) or a product ion 326spectrum (in case of MS n) should be provided to justify the selection of the additional ions. 3272.10.2Confirmation by an independent analytical technique328Confirmation can also be achieved by an independent analytical method. The following are 329considered sufficiently independent confirmatory techniques:330•chromatographic principle different from the original method331• e.g. HPLC instead of GC332•different stationary phase and/or mobile phase with significantly different selectivity333•the following are not considered significantly different:334•in GC: stationary phases of 100 % dimethylsiloxane and of 95 % dimethylsiloxane 335+ 5 % phenylpolysiloxane336•in HPLC: C18- and C8-phases337•alternative detector338• e.g. GC-MS vs. GC-ECD, HPLC-MS vs. HPLC-UV/DAD339•derivatisation, if it was not the first choice method340•high resolution/accurate mass MS341•in mass spectrometry an ionisation technique that leads to primary ions with different m/z 342ratio than the primary method (e.g. ESI negative ions vs. positive ions)343It is preferred that confirmation data are generated with the same samples and extracts used 344for validation of the primary method.345The following validation data are required: calibration data (Section 2.9.1), recovery and 346precision data (Section 2.9.2) for samples fortified at the respective LOQ (n ≥ 3) and of a 347blank sample and proof of selectivity (Section 2.9.3).3482.11Independent laboratory validation (ILV)349A validation of the primary method in an independent laboratory (ILV) must be submitted for 350methods used for the determination of residues in plants, plant products, foodstuff (of plant 351and animal origin) and in feeding stuff. The ILV shall confirm the LOQ of the primary 352method, but at least the lowest action level (MRL).353The extent of independent validation required is given in detail in sections 3 and 4.354In order to ensure independence, the laboratory chosen to conduct the ILV trials must not 355have been involved in the method development and in its subsequent use. In case of multi-356residue methods it would be accepted if the ILV is performed in a laboratory that has already 357experience with the respective method.358The laboratory may be in the applicant’s organisation, but should not be in the same location. 359In the exceptional case that the lab chosen to conduct the ILV is in the same location, 360evidence must be provided that different personnel, as well as different instrumentation and 361stocks of chemicals etc have been used.362Any additions or modifications to the original method must be reported and justified. If the 363chosen laboratory requires communication with the developers of the method to carry out the 364analysis, this should be reported.3652.12Availability of standards366All analytical standard materials used in an analytical method must be commonly available. 367This applies to metabolites, derivatives (if preparation of derivatives is not a part of the 368method description), stable isotope labelled compounds or other internal standards.369If a standard is not commercially available the standard should be made generally available by 370the applicant and contact details be provided.3712.13Extraction Efficiency372The extraction procedures used in residue analytical methods for the determination of residues 373in plants, plant products, foodstuff (of plant and animal origin) and in feeding stuff should be 374verified for all matrix groups for which residues ≥ LOQ are expected, using samples with 375incurred residues from radio-labelled analytes.376Data or suitable samples may be available from pre-registration metabolism studies or 377rotational crop studies or from feeding studies. In cases where such samples are no longer 378available to validate an extraction procedure, it is possible to "bridge" between two solvent 379systems (details in [4]). The same applies if new matrices are to be included.3803Analytical methods for residues in plants, plant products, foodstuff (of 381plant origin), feedingstuff (of plant origin)382(Annex IIA Point 4.2.1 of Directive 91/414/EEC; Annex Point IIA, Point 3834.3 of OECD)3843.1Purpose385•Analysis of plants and plant products, and of foodstuff and feeding stuff of plant origin for 386compliance with MRL [3].3873.2Selection of analytes388The selection of analytes for which methods for food and feed are required depends upon the 389definition of the residue for which a maximum residue level (MRL) is set or is applied for 390according to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.3913.3Commodities and Matrix Groups392Methods validated according to Section 2.9 and 2.10 must be submitted for representative 393commodities (also called “matrices” by analytical chemists) of all four matrix groups in 394Table 2.395396Table 2: Matrix groups and typical commoditiesMatrix group Examples for commoditiesbarley, rice, rye, wheat, dry legume vegetables dry commodities (high protein/highstarch content)commodities with high water content apples, bananas, cabbage, cherries, lettuce, peaches,peppers, tomatoescommodities with high oil content avocados, linseed, nuts, olives, rape seedcommodities with high acid content grapefruits, grapes, lemons, oranges397Important Note: This list of commodities is not a comprehensive list of commodities/matrices.398Applicants may consult regulatory authorities for advice on the use of other commodities.If samples with high water content are extracted at a controlled pH a particular method or 399validation for commodities with high acid content is not required.400Where a previously validated method has been adopted to a new matrix group, validation data 401must be submitted for representative matrices of this group.402。

Eaton 2.2 Molded Case Circuit Breakers Series G 产品

Eaton 2.2 Molded Case Circuit Breakers Series G 产品

2Catalog Number SelectionThis information is presented only as an aid to understanding catalog numbers. It is not to be used to build catalog numbers for circuit breakers or trip units.Circuit Breaker/Frame Catalog Number SystemNotes1800A only.2Neutral inn left pole on GN; right pole on NG.3Breakers do not ship with lugs.Trip units are factory installable only.NG H 308039ZG E CAmperes080= 800120 = 1200Frame NGPerformance at 480 Vac S = 50 kAIC H = 65 kAIC C = 100 kAIC U = 150 kAIC 1Poles3 = Three4 = Four; neutral 20% protected 7 = Four; neutral 2100% protected 9 = Four; neutral 20/60/100% adjustable protectionTrip Unit33=310+ Electronic LS 32=310+ Electronic LSI 35=310+ Electronic LSG35B22=310+ Electronic LS(A), GFA, no trip 36=310+ Electronic LSIG36B22=310+ Electronic LSI(A), GFA, no trip 38=310+ Electronic ALSI w/ Maintenance Mode39=310+ Electronic ALSIGw/ Maintenance Mode39B22=310+ Electronic ALSI(A)w/ Maintenance Mode and GFA, no tripRatingBlank =80% rated C =100% ratedTerminations 3M =Metric tapped line/loadconductorsE =Imperial tapped line/loadconductorsFeatureBlank =No feature B20=High load alarm B21=Ground faultZG=Zone selective interlockinge s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w2Product Selection Guide and Ordering InformationT ype NGS Standard Interrupting Capacity—U e Max. 690 Vac, 50 kA l cu at 480 Vac or 415 VacT ype NGS Standard Interrupting Capacity—U e Max. 690 Vac, 50 kA I cu at 415 VacMolded Case Switches 78Notes1For AC use only.2NG MCCBs are suitable for 40°C or 50°C applications. Order suffix V3 to eliminate standard 40°C labeling.3Non-UL listed NG 1250 with 1250 ampere trip unit is also available.4Neutral 0% protected. NG, neutral in right pocket; GN, neutral in left pocket.5Neutral 100% protected (denoted by 7 in digit four).6Neutral 0%/60%/100% adjustable protection (denoted by 9 in digit four).7For AC use only. Molded case switch will trip above 14,000 amperes.8For two-pole applications, use outer poles of three-pole molded case switch.Maximum Continuous AmpereRatingat 40°C 12Number of Poles Circuit Breaker Frame Including Digitrip RMS 310+ Electronic Trip Unit with Imperial Tapped ConductorsL – Adjustable Long Delay PickupS–Adjustable Short Delay Pickup with Fixed Short Delay Time(I 2t Response) or Adjustable Short Delay Time (Flat Response)I – Adjustable Instantaneous Pickup by Setting Short Delay Time to InstantaneousG –Adjustable Ground Fault Pickup with Adjustable Ground Fault Delay (Flat Response)Neutral CTfor LSG and LSIG LS LSI LSG LSIG ALSI ALSIG Short Time Range Short Time Delay Ground Fault Pickup Ground Fault Delay 2–8 x I n ———2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n —200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 8003NGS308033E NGS308032E NGS308035E NGS308036E NGS308038E NGS308039E NGFCT1204 4NGS408033E NGS408032E NGS408035E NGS408036E NGS408038E NGS408039E —4 5NGS708033E NGS708032E ——NGS708038E ——4 6NGS908033E NGS908032E ——NGS908038E ——1200 33NGS312033E NGS312032E NGS312035E NGS312036E NGS312038E NGS312039E NGFCT1204 4NGS412033E NGS412032E NGS412035E NGS412036E —NGS412039E —4 5NGS712033E NGS712032E ——NGS712038E ——4 6NGS912033ENGS912032E——NGS912038E——Maximum Continuous Ampere Rating at 40°C 12Number of PolesCircuit Breaker Frame Including Digitrip RMS 310+ Electronic Trip Unit with Metric Tapped ConductorsL – Adjustable Long Delay Pickup (By Adjustable Rating Plug)S–Adjustable Short Delay Pickup with Fixed Short Delay Time(I 2t Response) or Adjustable Short Delay Time (Flat Response)I – Adjustable Instantaneous Pickup by Setting Short Delay Time to InstantaneousG –Adjustable Ground Fault Pickup with Adjustable Ground Fault Delay (Flat Response)LS LSI LSG LSIG ALSI ALSIG Short Time Range Short Time Delay Ground Fault Pickup Ground Fault Delay 2–8 x I n ———2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n —200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 1600 33NGS316033M NGS316032M NGS316035M NGS316036M NGS316038M NGS316039M 4 4NGS416033M NGS416032M NGS416035M NGS416036M NGS416038M NGS416039M 4 5NGS716033M NGS716032M ——NGS716038M —4 6NGS916033MNGS916032M——NGS916038M—Ampere Rating U e Maximum 690 VacThree-PoleCatalog Number Four-PoleCatalog Number 800MCS with Imperial line and load terminals NGK3080KSE MCS with Imperial line and load terminals NGK4080KSE 1200MCS with Imperial line and load terminals NGK3120KSE MCS with Imperial line and load terminals NGK4120KSE 1250MCS with Imperial line and load terminalsNGK3125KSEMCS with Imperial line and load terminalsNGK43125KSEe s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w2T ype NGH High Interrupting Capacity—U e Max. 690 Vac, 65 kA l cu at 480 Vac or 415 VacT ype NGC Very High Capacity—U e Max. 690 Vac, 100 kA l cu at 480 Vac or 415 VacNotes1For AC use only.2NG MCCBs are suitable for 40°C or 50°C applications. Order suffix V3 to eliminate standard 40°C labeling.3Neutral 0% protected. NG, neutral in right pocket; GN, neutral in left pocket.4Neutral 100% protected (denoted by 7 in digit four).5Neutral 0%/60%/100% adjustable protection (denoted by 9 in digit four).Maximum Continuous AmpereRatingat 40°C 12Number of Poles Circuit Breaker Frame Including Digitrip Electronic Trip UnitL – Adjustable Long Delay PickupS–Adjustable Short Delay Pickup with Fixed Short Delay Time (I 2t Response) or Adjustable Short Delay Time (Flat Response)I – Adjustable Instantaneous Pickup by Setting Short Delay Time to InstantaneousG –Adjustable Ground Fault Pickup with Adjustable Ground Fault Delay (Flat Response)Neutral CTfor LSG and LSIG LS LSI LSG LSIG ALSI ALSIG Short Time Range Short Time Delay Ground Fault Pickup Ground Fault Delay 2–8 x I n ———2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n —200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 8003NGH308033E NGH308032E NGH308035E NGH308036E NGH308038E NGH308039E NGFCT1204 3NGH408033E NGH408032E NGH408035E NGH408036E NGH408038E NGH408039E —4 4NGH708033E NGH708032E ——NGH708038E ——4 5NGH908033E NGH908032E ——NGH908038E ——12003NGH312033E NGH312032E NGH312035E NGH312036E NGH312038E NGH312039E NGFCT1204 3NGH412033E NGH412032E NGH412035E NGH412036E —NGH412039E —4 4NGH712033E NGH712032E ——NGH712038E ——4 5NGH912033ENGH912032E——NGH912038E——Maximum Continuous AmpereRatingat 40°C 12Number of Poles Circuit Breaker Frame Including Digitrip RMS 310+ Electronic Trip Unit with Imperial Tapped ConductorsL – Adjustable Long Delay PickupS–Adjustable Short Delay Pickup with Fixed Short Delay Time (I 2t Response) or Adjustable Short Delay Time (Flat Response)I – Adjustable Instantaneous Pickup by Setting Short Delay Time to InstantaneousG –Adjustable Ground Fault Pickup with Adjustable Ground Fault Delay (Flat Response)Neutral CTfor LSG and LSIG LS LSI LSG LSIG ALSI ALSIG Short Time Range Short Time Delay Ground Fault Pickup Ground Fault Delay 2–8 x I n ———2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n —200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 2–8 x I n I–300 ms ——2–8 x I n I–300 ms 200–1200A I–500 ms 8003NGC308033E NGC308032E NGC308035E NGC308036E NGC308038E NGC308039E NGFCT1204 3NGC408033E NGC408032E NGC408035E NGC408036E NGC408038E NGC408039E —4 4NGC708033E NGC708032E ——NGC708038E ——4 5NGC908033E NGC908032E ——NGC908038E ——1200 33NGC312033E NGC312032E NGC312035E NGC312036E NGC312038E NGC312039E NGFCT1204 3NGC412033E NGC412032E NGC412035E NGC412036E —NGC412039E —4 4NGC712033E NGC712032E ——NGC712038E ——4 5NGC912033ENGC912032E——NGC912038E——e s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w2Accessories Selection Guide and Ordering InformationLine and Load TerminalsN-Frame circuit breakers do not include terminals as standard. When copper or Cu/Al terminals are required, order by catalog number.Line and Load T erminalsBase Mounting HardwareBase mounting hardware is included with a circuit breaker or molded case switch.Base Mounting Hardware 2Terminal Shield T erminal ShieldConductor Extension Kit Conductor Extension Kit 3Keeper NutNot required on NG-Frame. Terminals are threaded.Handle ExtensionIncluded with breaker. Additional handle extensions are available.Handle ExtensionInterphase BarriersThe interphase barriers provide additional electrical clearance between circuit breaker poles for special terminationapplications. Barriers are high dielectric insulating plates that are installed in the molded slots between the terminals. (Field installation only.)Interphase BarriersNotes1Single terminals individually packed.2Metric hardware included with breaker.3Included as standard on 100% rated 800/1200A breakers.MaximumBreaker AmperesTerminalBody MaterialWire TypeAWG Wire (Number of Conductors)AWG Wire Catalog Number 1Metric Wire Range mm 2Metric Catalog Number 1Standard Cu/Al Pressure T erminals 700Aluminum Cu/Al 1–500 (2)TA700NB150–240TA700NB1M 1000Aluminum Cu/Al 3/0–400 (3)TA1000NB195–185TA1000NB1M 1200Aluminum Cu/Al 4/0–500 (4)TA1200NB1120–240TA1200NB1M 1200AluminumCu/Al500–750 (3)TA1201NB1300–400TA1201NB1MOptional Copper and Cu/Al Pressure T ype T erminals 700Copper Cu 2/0–500 (2)T700NB170–240T700NB1M 1000Copper Cu 3/0–500 (3)T1000NB195–240T1000NB1M 1200CopperCu3/0–400 (4)T1200NB395–185T1200NB3MNumber of PolesDescriptionCatalog Number Three- and four-poleImperial hardware: 0.3125–18 x 1.25pan-head steel screws and lock washersBMH5Three- and four-poleMetric hardware: M8 pan-head steel screws and lock washersBMH5M DescriptionCatalog Number Three-pole terminal shieldNTS3KDescriptionCatalog Number Three-pole both ends Metric 5104A24G04Three-pole both ends English5104A24G02Description Catalog Number Single handle extensionHEX5DescriptionCatalog Number Interphase barriersIPB5e s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w2AccessoriesAllowable Accessory CombinationsDifferent combinations of accessories can be supplied, depending on the types of accessories and the number of poles in the circuit breaker.NG-Frame AccessoriesLegend■Applicable in indicated pole position❏May be mounted on left or right pole—not both ●Accessory available/modification availableNote1Contact Eaton.DescriptionReference PageThree-Pole Four-Pole LeftCenterRightLeftCenterRightNeu.Internal Accessories (Only One Internal Accessory Per Pole)Alarm lockout (Make/Break)V4-T2-104●■●■Auxiliary switch (1A, 1B)V4-T2-104●■●■Auxiliary switch (2A, 2B)V4-T2-104●■●■Auxiliary switch and alarm switch combination V4-T2-104●■●■Shunt trip—standardV4-T2-104■■Undervoltage release mechanism V4-T2-105■■External Accessories Base mounting hardware V4-T2-65●●●●●●●Interphase barriersV4-T2-65●●●●●●●Non-padlockable handle block V4-T2-102■■Padlockable handle lock hasp V4-T2-102❏❏❏❏Key interlock kitV4-T2-102❏❏❏❏Sliding bar interlock—requires two breakers V4-T2-102●●●Electrical operator V4-T2-102●●●●●●●Plug-in adapters V4-T2-108●●●●●●●Rear connecting studs V4-T2-102●●●●●●●Handle mechanisms V4-T2-407●●●●●●●Drawout cassette V4-T2-109●●●●●●●Handle extensionV4-T2-65●●●●●●●Ammeter/cause of trip display V4-T2-101●●●●●●●Cause of trip LED module V4-T2-101●●●●●●●Digitrip 310 test kitV4-T2-102●●●●●●●Modifications (Refer to Eaton)Moisture fungus treatment V4-T2-100●●●●●●●Freeze-tested circuit breakers—●●●●●●●Marine/Naval application, UL 489 Supplement SA and SB 1●●●●●●●e s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w22.2Molded Case Circuit BreakersSeries GTechnical Data and SpecificationsInterrupting Capacity RatingsUL 489/IEC 60947-2 Interrupting Capacity Ratings 1NG-Frame Digitrip Specifications SpecificationLegendBIM = Breaker Interface Module (A)= GF Alarm I s = Sensor Rating I n = Rating PlugI r= Long Delay Pickup Setting Note11600 amperes is not a UL or CSA listed rating. 1200 amperes is the maximum UL and CSA rating for NG.Circuit Breaker Type Number of Poles 240 (UL)Interrupting Capacity (kA Symmetrical Amperes)Volts AC (50/60 Hz)220–240380–415480600690I cu I cs I cu I cs I cu I cs NGS 12, 3, 4658585505050252010NGH 2, 3, 4100100100705065352513NGC2, 3, 420020010010050100653518Trip Unit Type Digitrip RMS 310+rms sensing YesBreaker T ype Frame N Ampere range320–1200A Interrupting rating at 480 volts 50, 65, 100 (kA)Protection Ordering options LS, LSG LSI, LSIG Fixed rated plug (I n )No No Overtemperature tripYesYesLong Delay Protection (L)Adjustable trip setting (I n )YesYesLong delay pickup 0.5–1.0 (I n ) 0.5–1.0 (I n ) Long delay time I 2t 12 seconds 12 seconds Long delay time I 4t No No Long delay thermal memory Yes Yes High load alarmNoNoShort Delay Protection (S)Short delay pickup 200–800% x (I n )200–800% x (I n )Short delay time I 2t 100 ms No Short delay time flatNo Inst–300 ms Short delay time zone selective interlocking YesYesInstantaneous Protection (I)Instantaneous pickup No 200–800% x (I n )Discriminator No No Instantaneous overrideYesYese s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w w .c m a f h .c o m2 2.2Molded Case Circuit BreakersSeries GSpecifications, continuedLegendBIM = Breaker Interface Module (A)= GF Alarm I s = Sensor Rating I n = Rating PlugI r= Long Delay Pickup Setting Notes1With cause of trip LED module (Trip-LED)2With separate ground fault alarm unit (GFAU).3With cause of trip display (DIGIVIEW or DIGIVIEWR06)Trip Unit Type Digitrip RMS 310+LS, LSGLSI, LSIGGround Fault Protection (G)Ground fault alarm NoNoGround fault pickup 1–5 x Ig (160A)1–5 x Ig (160A)Ground fault delay I 2t No No Ground fault delay flatInst–500 ms Inst–500 ms Ground fault zone selective interlocking Yes Yes Ground fault thermal memory YesYesSystem Diagnostics Status LEDs Yes Yes Cause of trip LEDsYes 1Yes 1Magnitude of trip information No No Remote signal contact—ground alarm Yes 2Yes 2Local auxiliary and bell alarm contact Optional Optional System Monitoring Digital display Yes 3Yes 3Current Yes 3Yes 3Power and energy No No Power quality—harmonics No No Power factor NoNoCommunications Eaton PowerNet No NoT esting Testing methodTest set Test sete s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w w .c m a f h .c o m22.2Molded Case Circuit BreakersSeries GDimensions and WeightsApproximate Dimensions in Inches (mm)NG-FrameNG-FrameApproximate Shipping Weight in Lbs (kg)NG-FrameNumber of Poles Width Height Depth 38.25 (209.6)16.00 (406.4) 5.50 (139.7)411.13 (282.6)16.00 (406.4)5.50 (139.7)Front View Three-PoleFront Cover CutoutSide View5.508.25Complete BreakerBreaker Type Three-Pole Four-Pole NGS, NGH, NGC45 (20.4)58 (26.3)e s y of C M A /F l o d y n e /H y d r a d y n e ŀ M o t i o n C o n t r o l ŀ H y d r a u l i c ŀ P n e u m a t i c ŀ E l e c t r i c a l ŀ M e c h a n i c a l ŀ (800) 426-5480 ŀ w w w .c m a f h .c o m。

IRIS4

IRIS4

IRIS4IntroductionIRIS4 is a revolutionary software platform designed to optimize business operations and enhance productivity. With its advanced features and intuitive user interface, IRIS4 offers a comprehensive solution for businesses of all sizes and industries.Features1. Workflow AutomationIRIS4 provides a powerful workflow automation tool that allows businesses to streamline their processes and eliminate manual tasks. With this feature, users can design custom workflows to automate repetitive tasks, reducing errors and improving efficiency. The workflow automation feature also includes integration with other systems, such as CRM or ERP, allowing for seamless data exchange and real-time updates.2. Collaboration ToolsEffective collaboration is vital for the success of any business. IRIS4 offers a range of collaboration tools, including document sharing, task management, and team messaging, to facilitate efficient communication and teamwork. These tools enable teams to work together seamlessly, regardless of location or time zone, leading to improved productivity and faster decision-making.3. Data AnalyticsIRIS4 integrates powerful data analytics capabilities that enable businesses to gain valuable insights from their data. Users can create custom reports and dashboards to track key performance indicators, identify trends, and make data-driven decisions. The data analytics feature also includes predictive analytics algorithms, helping businesses forecast future trends and make proactive decisions to stay ahead of the competition.4. Security and ComplianceData security and compliance are crucial considerations for businesses in today’s digital age. IRIS4 prioritizes the security of your data and ensures compliance with industry regulations. The platform uses advanced encryption methods to protect sensitive data and provides access controls to restrict unauthorized access. Additionally, IRIS4 offers audit logs and compliance reporting features to help businesses meet regulatory requirements.Benefits1. Improved EfficiencyBy automating repetitive tasks and streamlining business processes, IRIS4 helps businesses save time and resources. Users can focus on more critical tasks, leading to increased productivity and improved efficiency overall.2. Enhanced CollaborationThe collaboration tools offered by IRIS4 enable teams to work together seamlessly, regardless of their location. This promotes effective communication and facilitates better decision-making, resulting in improved teamwork and collaboration.3. Data-Driven Decision MakingWith IRIS4’s data analytics capabilities, businesses can uncover valuable insights from their data. This enables them to make more informed decisions and identify areas for improvement. By leveraging these insights, businesses can drive growth and stay ahead in today’s competitive marketplace.4. Enhanced SecurityIRIS4 understands the importance of data security and compliance. By implementing robust security measures and providing access controls, businesses can protect their sensitive data and ensure compliance with industry regulations. This gives them peace of mind knowing their data is secure and protected.ConclusionIn conclusion, IRIS4 is an innovative software platform that offers businesses a comprehensive solution for optimizing operations and enhancing productivity. With its workflow automation, collaboration tools, data analytics, and security features, IRIS4 empowers businesses to work more efficiently,collaborate effectively, make data-driven decisions, and protect their valuable data. Embracing IRIS4 can help businesses stay competitive and thrive in today’s fast-paced business environment.。

LECD半定量评价法

LECD半定量评价法

危险源辨识、评价半定量分析LEC评价法(L ikelihood E xposure C onsequence)这是一种评价具有潜在危险性环境中作业的危险性半定量评价方法。

它是用与系统风险率有关的3种因素指标值之积来评价系统人员伤亡风险大小,这3种因素是:L(L ikelihood)为发生事故的可能性大小;E(E xposure)为人体暴露在这种危险环境中的频繁程度;C(C onsequence)为一旦发生事故会造成的损失后果。

取得这3种因素的科学准确的数据是相当繁琐的过程,为了简化评价过程,采取半定量计值法,给3种因素的不同等级分别确定不同的分值,再以3个分值的乘积D来评价危险性的大小;即D=LEC。

D值越大,说明该系统危险性大,需要增加安全措施,或改变发生事故的可能性,或减少人体暴露于危险环境中的频繁程度,或减轻事故损失,直至调整到允许范围内。

表1L为发生事故的可能性大小分数值完全可以预料 10相当可能 6可能,但不经常 3可能性小,完全意外 1很不可能,可以设想 0.5极不可能 0.2实际不可能 0.1表2E暴露于危险环境的频繁程度分数值连续暴露 10每天工作时间内暴露 6每周一次或偶然暴露 3每月一次暴露 2每年几次暴露 1 非常罕见暴露 0.5表3C为发生事故产生的后果分数值大灾难,10人以上死亡 100或造成重大财产损失灾难,3~9人死亡或 40造成很大财产损失严重,1~2人死亡或多人重伤 15 或造成一定财产损失较重,一人重伤致残或 7造成较小财产损失几人轻伤或造成较小财产损失 3轻伤,需要治疗救护, 1不造成财产损失。

D(D anger)——危险性分值。

根据公式就可以计算作业的危险程度,但关键是如何确定各个分值和总分的评价。

根据经验,总分在20以下是被认为低危险的,这样的危险比日常生活中骑自行车去上班还要安全些;如果危险分值到达70~160之间,那就有显著的危险性,需要及时整改;如果危险分值在160~320之间,那么这是一种必须立即采取措施进行整改的高度危险环境;分值在320以上的高分值表示环境非常危险,应立即停止生产直到环境得到改善为止。

lec判别法

lec判别法

LEC判别法什么是LEC判别法?LEC判别法(Label Enhancement Classifier)是一种用于文本分类的机器学习算法。

它通过对文本进行特征提取和标签增强的方式,提高文本分类的准确性和效果。

在传统的文本分类任务中,通常使用词袋模型或者TF-IDF模型来提取文本的特征,并使用分类器对提取的特征进行分类。

然而,这种方法往往无法充分利用文本中的上下文信息,导致分类效果不佳。

LEC判别法的提出就是为了解决这个问题。

LEC判别法首先使用深度学习模型(如卷积神经网络或循环神经网络)对文本进行特征提取。

这样可以捕捉到文本中的局部和全局上下文信息。

然后,LEC判别法使用标签增强的方法来进一步提高分类的准确性。

LEC判别法的流程LEC判别法的流程主要包括以下几个步骤:1.数据预处理:对文本数据进行清洗和预处理,包括去除停用词、标点符号等。

2.特征提取:使用深度学习模型(如卷积神经网络或循环神经网络)提取文本的特征。

这些特征可以捕捉到文本中的上下文信息。

3.标签增强:使用标签增强的方法来提高分类的准确性。

标签增强可以通过多种方式实现,如标签平滑、标签噪声等。

4.分类器训练:使用提取的特征和增强的标签来训练分类器。

常用的分类器包括支持向量机、决策树、随机森林等。

5.模型评估:使用测试数据集对分类器进行评估,计算分类的准确率、精确率、召回率等指标。

6.模型优化:根据评估结果对模型进行优化,调整参数、改进特征提取等,提高分类的准确性和效果。

LEC判别法的优势LEC判别法相比传统的文本分类方法具有以下优势:1.上下文信息的利用:LEC判别法使用深度学习模型对文本进行特征提取,可以捕捉到文本中的上下文信息,提高分类的准确性。

2.标签增强的效果:LEC判别法使用标签增强的方法来提高分类的准确性。

标签增强可以通过引入噪声、平滑标签等方式来增加分类器的鲁棒性和泛化能力。

3.可解释性和可拓展性:LEC判别法使用深度学习模型进行特征提取,这些模型具有较好的可解释性和可拓展性,可以应用于不同的文本分类任务。

lec判别法

lec判别法

lec判别法
(实用版)
目录
1.Lec 判别法简介
2.Lec 判别法的基本原理
3.Lec 判别法的应用领域
4.Lec 判别法的优缺点
正文
Lec 判别法,全称 Lecun 支持向量机判别法,是一种基于支持向量机(SVM)的机器学习算法,主要用于图像分类和数据挖掘领域。

Lec 判别法以其较高的准确性和较强的泛化能力,在众多分类算法中脱颖而出,成为当前应用最为广泛的分类方法之一。

Lec 判别法的基本原理是基于最大间隔分类的思想,通过找到一个最优的超平面,将不同类别的数据分隔开来。

在训练过程中,Lec 判别法使用核函数将原始数据映射到高维空间,从而提高分类的准确性。

此外,Lec 判别法还采用了正则化技术,以防止过拟合现象的发生。

Lec 判别法的应用领域非常广泛,包括计算机视觉、语音识别、文本分类、生物信息学等。

特别是在图像分类领域,Lec 判别法凭借其优越的性能,成为了许多图像识别任务的首选算法。

Lec 判别法具有许多优点,例如较高的分类准确性、较强的泛化能力和较好的鲁棒性。

然而,它也存在一些缺点,如计算复杂度较高、对噪声敏感以及需要选择合适的核函数等。

为了克服这些缺点,研究者们在 Lec 判别法的基础上,提出了许多改进算法,如多项式核、径向基核、支持向量回归等。

总之,Lec 判别法作为一种经典的机器学习算法,在许多应用领域都
取得了显著的成果。

WSET模拟题库

WSET模拟题库
d
17
Blanco tequila布兰克特基拉的颜色是?a)Clear无色;b)Golden金色;c)Tawny茶色;d)Mahogany红褐色
a
18
Botrytis是?a)一种病毒;b)一种培形方法;c)一种霉;d)一种葡萄品种
c
19
Cote Or科多尔位于?a)Bordeaux波尔多;b)Burgundy勃艮第;c)Loire卢瓦尔;d)Provence普罗旺斯
d
23
Mildew是一种?a)影响葡萄根部的细菌;b)真菌疾病;c)葡萄园害虫;d)阻碍葡萄生长的病毒
b
24
Pomerol AC的主要葡萄品种是: a)赤霞珠(Cabernet Sauvignon);b)梅洛(Merlot);c)西拉(Syrah);d)黑皮诺(Pinot Noir)
b
25
Recioto是?a)一款来自意大利的起泡酒;b)一款来自西班牙的经橡木桶熟化的葡萄酒;c)一款来自意大利的甜型葡萄酒;d)一款来自西班牙的加强型葡萄酒
c
45
波本(Bourbon)独特的风味特征是?a)泥煤;b)烧焦的橡木桶;c)焦糖;d)木炭
b
46
波本是: a)来自苏格兰的威士忌;b)来自法国的白兰地;c)来自美国的威士忌;d)来自加勒比海的朗姆酒
c
47
波尔多被认为是什么气候类型?a)Cool凉爽;b)Moderate温和;c)Hot炎热;d)Tropical热带
b
50
波特通过什么方法加强?a)在发酵过程中加入葡萄蒸馏酒;b)在发酵结束后加入葡萄蒸馏酒;c)加糖以促进二次发酵;d)在特制的大桶中加热
a
51
勃艮第红葡萄酒的典型水果特征是: a)热带水果;b)草莓;c)黑加仑;d)桃子

829-1998_IEEE Standard for Software Test Documentation

829-1998_IEEE Standard for Software Test Documentation

IEEE Std 829-1998(Revision ofIEEE Std 829-1983) IEEE Standard for Software Test DocumentationSponsorSoftware Engineering Technical Committeeof theIEEE Computer SocietyApproved 16 September 1998IEEE-SA Standards BoardAbstract: A set of basic software test documents is described. This standard speciÞes the form and content of individual test documents. It does not specify the required set of test documents. Keywords: test case specification, test design specification, test incident report, test item transmit-tal report, test log, test plan, test procedure specification, test summary reportIEEE Standards documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinat-ing Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. Members of the committees serve voluntarily and without compensation. They are not necessarily members of the Institute. The standards developed within IEEE represent a consensus of the broad expertise on the subject within the Institute as well as those activities outside of IEEE that have expressed an inter-est in participating in the development of the standard.Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market, or provide other goods and services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the time a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in the state of the art and comments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is sub-jected to review at least every Þve years for revision or reafÞrmation. When a document is more than Þve years old and has not been reafÞrmed, it is reasonable to conclude that its contents, although still of some value, do not wholly reßect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to check to determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome from any interested party, regardless of membership afÞliation with IEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a proposed change of text, together with appropriate supporting comments.Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meaning of portions of standards as they relate to speciÞc applications. When the need for interpretations is brought to the attention of IEEE, the Institute will initiate action to prepare appropriate responses. Since IEEE Standards rep-resent a consensus of all concerned interests, it is important to ensure that any interpretation has also received the concurrence of a balance of interests. For this reason, IEEE and the members of its societies and Standards Coordinating Committees are not able to provide an instant response to interpretation requests except in those cases where the matter has previously received formal consideration.Comments on standards and requests for interpretations should be addressed to:Secretary, IEEE-SA Standards Board445 Hoes LaneP.O. Box 1331Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331USAAuthorization to photocopy portions of any individual standard for internal or personal use is granted by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., provided that the appropriate fee is paid to Copyright Clearance Center. To arrange for payment of licensing fee, please contact Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 USA; (978) 750-8400. Permission to photocopy portions of any individual standard for educational class-room use can also be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center.Introduction(This introduction is not part of IEEE Std 829-1998, IEEE Standard for Software Test Documentation.)PurposeThe purpose of this standard is to describe a set of basic software test documents. A standardized test docu-ment can facilitate communication by providing a common frame of reference (e.g., a customer and a supplier have the same deÞnition for a test plan). The content deÞnition of a standardized test document can serve as a completeness checklist for the associated testing process. A standardized set can also provide a baseline for the evaluation of current test documentation practices. In many organizations, the use of these documents signiÞcantly increases the manageability of testing. Increased manageability results from the greatly increased visibility of each phase of the testing process.This standard speciÞes the form and content of individual test documents. It does not specify the required set of test documents. It is assumed that the required set of test documents will be speciÞed when the standard is applied. Annex B contains an example of such a set speciÞcation.The readers of this standard are referred to Annex C for guidelines for using this standard to meet the requirements of IEEE/EIA 12207.1-1997, IEEE/EIA Guide for Information TechnologyÑSoftware life cycle processesÑLife cycle data.OverviewThe documents outlined in this standard cover test planning, test speciÞcation, and test reporting.The test plan prescribes the scope, approach, resources, and schedule of the testing activities. It identiÞes the items to be tested, the features to be tested, the testing tasks to be performed, the personnel responsible for each task, and the risks associated with the plan.Test speciÞcation is covered by three document types:Ñ A test design speciÞcation reÞnes the test approach and identiÞes the features to be covered by the design and its associated tests. It also identiÞes the test cases and test procedures, if any, required to accomplish the testing and speciÞes the feature pass/fail criteria.Ñ A test case speciÞcation documents the actual values used for input along with the anticipated out-puts. A test case also identiÞes constraints on the test procedures resulting from use of that speciÞc test case. Test cases are separated from test designs to allow for use in more than one design and to allow for reuse in other situations.Ñ A test procedure speciÞcation identiÞes all steps required to operate the system and exercise the speciÞed test cases in order to implement the associated test design. Test procedures are separated from test design speciÞcations as they are intended to be followed step by step and should not have extraneous detail.Test reporting is covered by four document types:Ñ A test item transmittal report identiÞes the test items being transmitted for testing in the event that separate development and test groups are involved or in the event that a formal beginning of test exe-cution is desired.Ñ A test log is used by the test team to record what occurred during test execution.Ñ A test incident report describes any event that occurs during the test execution which requires further investigation.Ñ A test summary report summarizes the testing activities associated with one or more test design spec-iÞcations.Figure 1 shows the relationships of these documents to one another as they are developed and to the testing process they document.Figure 1ÑRelationship of test documents to testing processTerminologyThe words shall, must, and the imperative form identify the mandatory material within this standard. The words should and may identify optional material.AnnexesThe examples found in Annex A are meant to clarify the intent of the document descriptions found in the standard. Some suggestions about implementing and using the standard are in Annex B. Guidelines for compliance with IEEE/EIA 12207.1-1997 are provided in Annex C.AudienceThis standard should be of interest to software users and software procurement personnel; to development,test, and maintenance personnel; to operations and acquisition support managers; to software quality assur-ance personnel and auditors; and to participants in the legal system.ParticipantsThis revision was prepared by the Life Cycle Data Harmonization Working Group of the Software Engineer-ing Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. At the time this standard was approved, the work-ing group consisted of the following members:Leonard L. Tripp, ChairThe following persons were on the balloting committee:Edward ByrnePaul R. CrollPerry DeWeeseRobin FralickMarilyn Ginsberg-FinnerJohn HarauzMark Henley Dennis Lawrence David Maibor Ray Milovanovic James Moore Timothy Niesen Dennis Rilling Terry Rout Richard Schmidt Norman F. Schneidewind David Schultz Basil Sherlund Peter V oldner Ronald WadeSyed AliH. Ronald BerlackRichard E. BiehlSandro BolognaJuris BorzovsAudrey C BrewerKathleen L. BriggsM. Scott BuckMichael CaldwellJames E. CardowJaya R. CarlEnrico A. CarraraLawrence CatchpoleKeith ChanAntonio M. CicuTheo ClarkeSylvain ClermontRosemary ColemanVirgil Lee CooperW. W. Geoff CozensPaul R. CrollPatricia W. DaggettGregory T. Daich Geoffrey Darnton Taz Daughtrey Bostjan K. Derganc Perry R. DeWeese Evelyn S. Dow Carl Einar Dragstedt Charles Droz Sherman Eagles Leo Egan Richard L. Evans William Eventoff Richard E. Fairley John W. Fendrich Jay Forster Kirby Fortenberry Eva Freund Richard C. Fries Roger U. Fujii David Gelperin Adel N. Ghannam Marilyn Ginsberg-Finner John Garth Glynn Julio Gonzalez-Sanz L. M. Gunther David A. Gustafson Jon D. Hagar John Harauz Herbert Hecht Debra Herrmann Umesh P. Hiriyannaiah John W. Horch Jerry Huller Peter L. Hung George Jackelen Frank V . Jorgensen Vladan V . Jovanovic William S. Junk George X. Kambic Ron S. Kenett Judith S. Kerner Robert J. Kierzyk Shaye Koenig Thomas M. Kurihara John B. Lane J. Dennis Lawrence Randal LeavittWhen the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved this standard on 16 September 1998, it had the following membership:Richard J. Holleman, Chair Donald N. Heirman, Vice ChairJudith Gorman, Secretary*Member EmeritusValerie E. ZelentyIEEE Standards Project EditorFang Ching LimWilliam M. LivelyJohn LordStan MageeDavid MaiborHarold MainsRobert A. MartinMike McAndrewPatrick D. McCraySue McGrathJacques MeekelJames Bret MichaelAlan MillerCelia H. ModellJames W. MoorePavol NavratMyrna L. OlsonIndradeb P. PalAlex PolackPeter T. PoonLawrence S. Przybylski Kenneth R. Ptack Ann E. Reedy Annette D. Reilly Terence P. Rout Andrew P. Sage Helmut Sandmayr Stephen R. Schach Hans Schaefer Norman Schneidewind David J. Schultz Lisa A. Selmon Robert W. Shillato David M. Siefert Carl A. Singer Nancy M. Smith Alfred R. Sorkowitz Donald W. Sova Luca Spotorno Julia Stesney Fred J. Strauss Christine Brown Strysik Sandra Swearingen Toru Takeshita Richard H. Thayer Booker Thomas Patricia Trellue Leonard L. Tripp Theodore J. Urbanowicz Glenn D. Venables Andre Villas-Boas Udo V oges Delores Wallace William M. Walsh John W. Walz Camille S. White-Partain Scott A. Whitmire P. A. Wolfgang Paul R. Work Natalie C. Yopconka Janusz Zalewski Geraldine Zimmerman Peter F. ZollSatish K. Aggarwal Clyde R. Camp James T. Carlo Gary R. Engmann Harold E. Epstein Jay Forster*Thomas F. Garrity Ruben D. GarzonJames H. GurneyJim D. IsaakLowell G. JohnsonRobert KennellyE. G. ÒAlÓ KienerJoseph L. KoepÞnger*Stephen R. LambertJim LogothetisDonald C. Loughry L. Bruce McClung Louis-Fran•ois Pau Ronald C. Petersen Gerald H. Peterson John B. Posey Gary S. Robinson Hans E. Weinrich Donald W. ZipseContents1.Scope (1)2.References (2)3.Definitions (2)4.Test plan (3)4.1Purpose (3)4.2Outline (3)5.Test design specification (6)5.1Purpose (6)5.2Outline (6)6.Test case specification (7)6.1Purpose (7)6.2Outline (7)7.Test procedure specification (9)7.1Purpose (9)7.2Outline (9)8.Test item transmittal report (10)8.1Purpose (10)8.2Outline (11)9.Test log (11)9.1Purpose (11)9.2Outline (12)10.Test incident report (13)10.1Purpose (13)10.2Outline (13)11.Test summary report (14)11.1 Purpose (14)11.2 Outline (14)Annex A (informative) Examples (16)Annex B(informative) Implementation and usage guidelines (40)Annex C(informative) Guidelines for compliance with IEEE/EIA 12207.1-1997 (41)IEEE Standard for Software Test Documentation1. ScopeThis standard describes a set of basic test documents that are associated with the dynamic aspects of soft-ware testing (i.e, the execution of procedures and code). The standard deÞnes the purpose, outline, and content of each basic document. While the documents described in the standard focus on dynamic testing, several of them may be applicable to other testing activities (e.g., the test plan and test incident report may be used for design and code reviews).This standard may be applied to commercial, scientiÞc, or military software that runs on any digital computer. Applicability is not restricted by the size, complexity, or criticality of the software. However, the standard does not specify any class of software to which it must be applied. The standard addresses the documentation of both initial development testing and the testing of subsequent software releases. For a particular software release, it may be applied to all phases of testing from module testing through user acceptance. However, since all of the basic test documents may not be useful in each test phase, the particu-lar documents to be used in a phase are not speciÞed. Each organization using the standard will need to spec-ify the classes of software to which it applies and the speciÞc documents required for a particular test phase. The standard does not call for speciÞc testing methodologies, approaches, techniques, facilities, or tools, and does not specify the documentation of their use. Additional test documentation may be required (e.g., code inspection checklists and reports). The standard also does not imply or impose speciÞc methodologies for documentation control, conÞguration management, or quality assurance. Additional documentation (e.g., a quality assurance plan) may be needed depending on the particular methodologies used.Within each standard document, the content of each section (i.e., the text that covers the designated topics) may be tailored to the particular application and the particular testing phase. In addition to tailoring content, additional documents may be added to the basic set, additional sections may be added to any document, and additional content may be added to any section. It may be useful to organize some of the sections into subsections. Some or all of the contents of a section may be contained in another document which is then referenced. Each organization using the standard should specify additional content requirements and conventions in order to reßect their own particular methodologies, approaches, facilities, and tools for test-ing, documentation control, conÞguration management, and quality assurance.This standard applies to documentation on electronic media as well as paper. Paper must be used for docu-ments requiring approval signatures, unless the electronic documentation system has a secure approval anno-tation mechanism and that mechanism is used.IEEEStd 829-1998IEEE ST ANDARD FOR 2. ReferencesThis standard shall be used in conjunction with the following publication.IEEE Std 610.12-1990, IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology.13. DeÞnitionsThis clause contains key terms as they are used in this standard.3.1 design level: The design decomposition of the software item (e.g., system, subsystem, program, or module).3.2 pass/fail criteria: Decision rules used to determine whether a software item or a software feature passes or fails a test.3.3 software feature: A distinguishing characteristic of a software item (e.g., performance, portability, or functionality).3.4 software item: Source code, object code, job control code, control data, or a collection of these items.3.5 test:(A) A set of one or more test cases, or (B) A set of one or more test procedures, or (C) A set of one or more test cases and procedures.3.6 test case speciÞcation: A document specifying inputs, predicted results, and a set of execution condi-tions for a test item.3.7 test design speciÞcation: A document specifying the details of the test approach for a software feature or combination of software features and identifying the associated tests.3.8 test incident report: A document reporting on any event that occurs during the testing process which requires investigation.3.9 testing: The process of analyzing a software item to detect the differences between existing and required conditions (that is, bugs) and to evaluate the features of the software item.3.10 test item: A software item which is an object of testing.3.11 test item transmittal report: A document identifying test items. It contains current status and location information.3.12 test log: A chronological record of relevant details about the execution of tests.3.13 test plan: A document describing the scope, approach, resources, and schedule of intended testing activities. It identiÞes test items, the features to be tested, the testing tasks, who will do each task, and any risks requiring contingency planning.3.14 test procedure speciÞcation: A document specifying a sequence of actions for the execution of a test.3.15 test summary report: A document summarizing testing activities and results. It also contains an evalu-ation of the corresponding test items.1IEEE publications are available from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 445 Hoes Lane, P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331, USA (/).IEEE SOFTWARE TEST DOCUMENT A TION Std 829-1998 4. Test plan4.1 PurposeTo prescribe the scope, approach, resources, and schedule of the testing activities. To identify the items being tested, the features to be tested, the testing tasks to be performed, the personnel responsible for each task, and the risks associated with this plan.4.2 OutlineA test plan shall have the following structure:a)Test plan identiÞer;b)Introduction;c)Test items;d)Features to be tested;e)Features not to be tested;f)Approach;g)Item pass/fail criteria;h)Suspension criteria and resumption requirements;i)Test deliverables;j)Testing tasks;k)Environmental needs;l)Responsibilities;m)StafÞng and training needs;n)Schedule;o)Risks and contingencies;p)Approvals.The sections shall be ordered in the speciÞed sequence. Additional sections may be included immediately prior to Approvals. If some or all of the content of a section is in another document, then a reference to that material may be listed in place of the corresponding content. The referenced material must be attached to the test plan or available to users of the plan.Details on the content of each section are contained in the following subclauses.4.2.1 Test plan identiÞerSpecify the unique identiÞer assigned to this test plan.4.2.2 IntroductionSummarize the software items and software features to be tested. The need for each item and its history may be included.References to the following documents, when they exist, are required in the highest level test plan:a)Project authorization;b)Project plan;c)Quality assurance plan;d)ConÞguration management plan;e)Relevant policies;f)Relevant standards.IEEEStd 829-1998IEEE ST ANDARD FOR In multilevel test plans, each lower-level plan must reference the next higher-level plan.4.2.3 Test itemsIdentify the test items including their version/revision level. Also specify characteristics of their transmittal media that impact hardware requirements or indicate the need for logical or physical transformations before testing can begin (e.g., programs must be transferred from tape to disk).Supply references to the following test item documentation, if it exists:a)Requirements speciÞcation;b)Design speciÞcation;c)Users guide;d)Operations guide;e)Installation guide.Reference any incident reports relating to the test items.Items that are to be speciÞcally excluded from testing may be identiÞed.4.2.4 Features to be testedIdentify all software features and combinations of software features to be tested. Identify the test design speciÞcation associated with each feature and each combination of features.4.2.5 Features not to be testedIdentify all features and signiÞcant combinations of features that will not be tested and the reasons.4.2.6 ApproachDescribe the overall approach to testing. For each major group of features or feature combinations, specify the approach that will ensure that these feature groups are adequately tested. Specify the major activities, techniques, and tools that are used to test the designated groups of features.The approach should be described in sufÞcient detail to permit identiÞcation of the major testing tasks and estimation of the time required to do each one.Specify the minimum degree of comprehensiveness desired. Identify the techniques that will be used to judge the comprehensiveness of the testing effort (e.g., determining which statements have been executed at least once). Specify any additional completion criteria (e.g., error frequency). The techniques to be used to trace requirements should be speciÞed.Identify signiÞcant constraints on testing such as test item availability, testing resource availability, and deadlines.4.2.7 Item pass/fail criteriaSpecify the criteria to be used to determine whether each test item has passed or failed testing.4.2.8 Suspension criteria and resumption requirementsSpecify the criteria used to suspend all or a portion of the testing activity on the test items associated with this plan. Specify the testing activities that must be repeated, when testing is resumed.IEEE SOFTWARE TEST DOCUMENT A TION Std 829-1998 4.2.9 Test deliverablesIdentify the deliverable documents. The following documents should be included:a)Test plan;b)Test design speciÞcations;c)Test case speciÞcations;d)Test procedure speciÞcations;e)Test item transmittal reports;f)Test logs;g)Test incident reports;h)Test summary reports.Test input data and test output data should be identiÞed as deliverables.Test tools (e.g., module drivers and stubs) may also be included.4.2.10 Testing tasksIdentify the set of tasks necessary to prepare for and perform testing. Identify all intertask dependencies and any special skills required.4.2.11 Environmental needsSpecify both the necessary and desired properties of the test environment. This speciÞcation should contain the physical characteristics of the facilities including the hardware, the communications and system soft-ware, the mode of usage (e.g., stand-alone), and any other software or supplies needed to support the test. Also specify the level of security that must be provided for the test facilities, system software, and propri-etary components such as software, data, and hardware.Identify special test tools needed. Identify any other testing needs (e.g., publications or ofÞce space). Iden-tify the source for all needs that are not currently available to the test group.4.2.12 ResponsibilitiesIdentify the groups responsible for managing, designing, preparing, executing, witnessing, checking, and resolving. In addition, identify the groups responsible for providing the test items identiÞed in 4.2.3 and the environmental needs identiÞed in 4.2.11.These groups may include the developers, testers, operations staff, user representatives, technical support staff, data administration staff, and quality support staff.4.2.13 StafÞng and training needsSpecify test stafÞng needs by skill level. Identify training options for providing necessary skills.4.2.14 ScheduleInclude test milestones identiÞed in the software project schedule as well as all item transmittal events.DeÞne any additional test milestones needed. Estimate the time required to do each testing task. Specify the schedule for each testing task and test milestone. For each testing resource (i.e., facilities, tools, and staff), specify its periods of use.IEEEStd 829-1998IEEE ST ANDARD FOR 4.2.15 Risks and contingenciesIdentify the high-risk assumptions of the test plan. Specify contingency plans for each (e.g., delayed delivery of test items might require increased night shift scheduling to meet the delivery date).4.2.16 ApprovalsSpecify the names and titles of all persons who must approve this plan. Provide space for the signatures and dates.5. Test design speciÞcation5.1 PurposeTo specify reÞnements of the test approach and to identify the features to be tested by this design and its associated tests.5.2 OutlineA test design speciÞcation shall have the following structure:a)Test design speciÞcation identiÞer;b)Features to be tested;c)Approach reÞnements;d)Test identiÞcation;e)Feature pass/fail criteria.The sections shall be ordered in the speciÞed sequence. Additional sections may be included at the end. If some or all of the content of a section is in another document, then a reference to that material may be listed in place of the corresponding content. The referenced material must be attached to the test design speciÞca-tion or available to users of the design speciÞcation.Details on the content of each section are contained in the following subclauses.5.2.1 Test design speciÞcation identiÞerSpecify the unique identiÞer assigned to this test design speciÞcation. Supply a reference to the associated test plan, if it exists.5.2.2 Features to be testedIdentify the test items and describe the features and combinations of features that are the object of this design speciÞcation. Other features may be exercised, but need not be identiÞed.For each feature or feature combination, a reference to its associated requirements in the item requirement speciÞcation or design description should be included.5.2.3 Approach reÞnementsSpecify reÞnements to the approach described in the test plan. Include speciÞc test techniques to be used. The method of analyzing test results should be identiÞed (e.g., comparator programs or visual inspection).IEEE SOFTWARE TEST DOCUMENT A TION Std 829-1998 Specify the results of any analysis that provides a rationale for test case selection. For example, one might specify conditions that permit a determination of error tolerance (e.g., those conditions that distinguish valid inputs from invalid inputs).Summarize the common attributes of any test cases. This may include input constraints that must be true for every input in the set of associated test cases, any shared environmental needs, any shared special procedural requirements, and any shared case dependencies.5.2.4 Test identiÞcationList the identiÞer and a brief description of each test case associated with this design. A particular test case may be identiÞed in more than one test design speciÞcation. List the identiÞer and a brief description of each procedure associated with this test design speciÞcation.5.2.5 Feature pass/fail criteriaSpecify the criteria to be used to determine whether the feature or feature combination has passed or failed.6. Test case speciÞcation6.1 PurposeTo deÞne a test case identiÞed by a test design speciÞcation.6.2 OutlineA test case speciÞcation shall have the following structure:a)Test case speciÞcation identiÞer;b)Test items;c)Input speciÞcations;d)Output speciÞcations;e)Environmental needs;f)Special procedural requirements;g)Intercase dependencies.The sections shall be ordered in the speciÞed sequence. Additional sections may be included at the end. If some or all of the content of a section is in another document, then a reference to that material may be listed in place of the corresponding content. The referenced material must be attached to the test case speciÞcation or available to users of the case speciÞcation.Since a test case may be referenced by several test design speciÞcations used by different groups over a long time period, enough speciÞc information must be included in the test case speciÞcation to permit reuse. Details on the content of each section are contained in the following subclauses.6.2.1 Test case speciÞcation identiÞerSpecify the unique identiÞer assigned to this test case speciÞcation.。

lec4

lec4

OEP Commitments:
Traffic Manaaement Advisor Analyzes all arrival aircraft flight plans, weather data and local airport operating procedures and recommends the most efficient arrival sequence. Allows time-based metering.
Mandate RNAV above FL180 and far arriuingldeparting at OEP Airports
I
tasks
j Appraach
*Cmpheb SltslrdMs far
Pemmce-based
Approaches
4nlllsl sibs for Basic RNB
Five RNP SAAAR Approaches
Special Aircraft and Aircrew Requirements
Benefits: Since January 2005, the approach allowed Alaska Airlines to complete 27 fights that would otherwise have been diverted to an airport 70 miles away. Each save is worth
SEA MSP PDX SFO LAX SAN HNL LAS SLC PHX DFW IAH ORD DEN STL DTW CLE PHL PIT BOS JFX EWR BWI DCA IAD TPA FLL MCO MIA

Lec+4

Lec+4

Write a Topic Sentence
. At Halloween, children wear masks for fun; they may, of course, also think they are disguising themselves, but chiefly their motive is to experience the joy of saying “boo” to someone. Soldiers wore masks for protection, in ancient times against swords and battle-axes, in more recent times against poison gas. Bank robbers wear masks to disguise themselves, and though of course this disguise is a sort of protection, a robber’s reason for wearing a mask is fairly distinctive from a soldier’s. All of these reasons so far are easily understood, but we may have more trouble grasping the reason that primitive people use masks in religious rituals. Some ritual masks seems merely to be attempts to frighten away evil spirits, and some seem merely to be disguises so that the evil spirits will not know who the wearer is. But most religious masks are worn with the idea that the wearer achieves a new identity, a union with supernatural powers, and thus in effect the wearer becomes – really becomes, not merely pretends to be - a new person.

Lec 4

Lec 4

2010 秋学期 Autumn Semesroeconomics WU JIANFENG
Expenditure minimization problem (EMP)

The expenditure minimization problem (EMP) can be stated as follows:
Expenditure minimization problem (EMP) (Cont’d)

Proposition (comparison between UMP and EMP):
--- If x* is optimal in the UMP when wealth is w>0, then x* is optimal in the EMP when the required level is u(x*) . Moreover, the minimized expenditure level in this EMP is exactly w. --- If h* is optimal in the EMP when utility ū>u(0), then h* is optimal in the UMP when the wealth is p· h*. Moreover, the maximized utility level in this UMP is exactly ū.
• Min p· x subject to: u(x)≥ū.

Hicksian demand function: h(p, ū)
The minimized expenditure function e(p, ū)=p· h(p, ū)
2010 秋学期 Autumn Semester 2010

分子机器:世界上最小的机器

分子机器:世界上最小的机器

【2016年诺贝尔化学奖解读】分子机器:世界上最小的机器湖北省石首市文峰中学刘涛434400瑞典皇家科学院2016年10月5日宣布:2016年诺贝尔化学奖由法国让-皮埃尔·索维奇、美国詹姆斯·弗雷泽·斯托达特爵士和荷兰伯纳德·L·费林加共同分享,因他们在“发明了行动可控、在给予能源后可执行任务的分子机器”方面所做出的卓越贡献。

(索维奇)(斯托达特)(费林加)半个多世纪以来,科学家就梦想将机器缩小到纳米尺度。

“分子机器”是指在分子层面的微观尺度上设计开发出来的机器,在向其提供能量时可移动执行特定任务。

1983年,索维奇迈出了通往分子机器的第一步,他和团队借助普通的铜离子,成功将两个环状分子连成特殊的链状即双环化合物,并将其命名为“索烃”,这是非生物分子机器的最初雏形。

通常,分子是由原子间通过共享电子对构成的共价键形成的,而在索烃中,分子间形成了更加自由的机械结合,这样就可以像机器一样拥有可以彼此相对运动移动执行任务的部件。

1991年,分子艺术家斯托达特发明了大环分子“轮烷”,将一个分子环穿到一个哑铃状的线性分子轴上,并且发现环能够沿着轴移动,形成的内锁型超分子体系,这是第一个分子级的短程穿梭装置。

1994年,已能做到对分子环运动状态的完全控制,从而打破化学体系中原先占据主导的随机性。

其研究团队从1994年开始利用各种轮烷开发出了一个分子电梯,一种分子的肌肉和基于分子的计算机芯片。

1999年,费林加合成了第一台分子发动机,利用一些巧妙的技巧,只要提供合适的光能和热能,就能持续朝一个方向持续转动,用它转动了比它大一万倍的玻璃量筒,该研究小组已对分子机器进行了优化,现在的旋转速度可达到1200万转/秒。

2011年,还利用类似的分子发动机制造出一款四轮驱动的纳米小车,这样将分子由稳态变为能够运动的状态,并初步实现控制。

这三位分子建造师接力设计并合成仅有头发丝的千分之一大小的全世界最小机器,开创了利用超分子自组装的领域,将分子体系带出了平衡的僵局,带进了充满能量的状态,在这个状态中分子的运动可以被控制。

在下一代通信系统中分配PTRS的方法和装置[发明专利]

在下一代通信系统中分配PTRS的方法和装置[发明专利]

专利名称:在下一代通信系统中分配PTRS的方法和装置专利类型:发明专利
发明人:柳铉逸,缪斯·胡努库姆布尔,亓祎男,南亨周
申请号:CN201880040108.X
申请日:20180611
公开号:CN110771084A
公开日:
20200207
专利内容由知识产权出版社提供
摘要:本公开涉及一种用于将支持比第四代(4G)系统更高数据速率的第五代(5G)通信系统与物联网(IoT)技术融合的通信方法和系统。

本公开可以应用于基于5G通信技术和与IoT相关的技术的智能服务,例如,智能家居、智能建筑、智能城市、智能汽车、联网汽车、医疗保健、数字教育、零售业、安全和安保服务。

本公开公开了一种用于在下一代通信系统中分配PTRS的方法和设备。

申请人:三星电子株式会社
地址:韩国京畿道
国籍:KR
代理机构:北京市立方律师事务所
更多信息请下载全文后查看。

LEC评价法范文

LEC评价法范文

LEC评价法范文LEC(Language Experience Approach)是一种基于学生的语言经验和实践的教学方法,通过学生自身的语言交流和体验来促进语言的学习。

在这种教学方法中,学生可以通过自己的真实经验来学习语言,使学习更加具体生动。

下面就来探讨一下LEC评价法的优点和特点。

首先,LEC评价法能够有效评估学生的实际语言运用能力。

通过观察学生在交流活动中的表现、听说读写等多方面的能力,教师可以全面了解学生的语言水平。

这种评价方式更加贴近学生的实际语言运用能力,避免了传统评价方式中过分注重书面或考试成绩的弊端。

同时,学生在实际的语言交流中能够更好地展现自己的能力,为教师提供更为客观的评价依据。

其次,LEC评价法可以激发学生的学习动力和兴趣。

在这种评价方式中,学生不仅仅是被动接受知识,而是能够主动参与到语言交流和实践中。

通过自己的实际经验和体验来学习语言,学生更容易理解和掌握语言,从而增强学习兴趣和动力。

而且,学生在交流中能够获得及时的正反馈,激励他们更加努力地学习,形成积极向上的学习态度。

另外,LEC评价法能够促进学生的综合语言能力发展。

在这种评价方式中,学生不仅仅需要掌握语法、词汇等基础知识,还需要运用这些知识进行实际交流和表达。

通过综合性的语言实践,学生可以更好地提高听说读写等方面的语言能力,从而全面发展自己的语言水平。

这种综合性的评价方式有助于培养学生的语言能力,使其在各个方面都能够得到全面的提升。

此外,LEC评价法还可以培养学生的合作精神和团队意识。

在这种评价方式中,学生需要通过合作来完成各种语言任务和活动,需要相互协作、共同努力。

通过合作实践,学生可以学会倾听他人,尊重他人意见,学会彼此合作,从而培养出团队合作能力。

这种评价方式有助于培养学生的合作精神,使他们在学习和生活中都能够更好地与他人合作。

总的来说,LEC评价法是一种非常有效的评价方式,能够全面评估学生的语言能力,激发学生学习兴趣,促进学生综合语言能力的发展,培养学生的合作精神和团队意识。

lec判别法

lec判别法

lec判别法(最新版)目录1.Lec 判别法简介2.Lec 判别法的原理3.Lec 判别法的应用实例4.Lec 判别法的优缺点正文一、Lec 判别法简介Lec 判别法,全称 Lecun 支持向量机判别法,是由 Yann LeCun 教授提出的一种机器学习中常用的分类方法。

该方法基于支持向量机(SVM)理论,通过构建一个最优决策边界,将不同类别的数据点进行有效区分。

Lec 判别法广泛应用于手写数字识别、图像分类等任务,取得了显著的成果。

二、Lec 判别法的原理Lec 判别法的核心思想是寻找一个最优决策边界,使得该边界两侧的数据点分别属于不同类别,且边界到各类数据点的距离最大化。

具体操作分为以下三个步骤:1.构建样本空间:将所有样本点按照其类别划分到不同的子空间中。

2.定义决策边界:在样本空间中选择一个决策边界,使得该边界将不同类别的样本点分开。

3.寻找最优决策边界:通过优化算法,如拉格朗日乘子法、序列最小化法等,寻找一个使得边界到各类数据点距离最大化的决策边界。

三、Lec 判别法的应用实例Lec 判别法在许多领域都有广泛应用,以下以手写数字识别为例,介绍 Lec 判别法的应用过程:1.数据预处理:将手写数字图片转换为适合输入的数值形式,如灰度图像、特征提取等。

2.构建样本空间:将处理后的数据划分为训练集和测试集,以便进行模型训练和性能评估。

3.定义决策边界:通过训练集数据,使用 Lec 判别法构建支持向量机模型,得到最优决策边界。

4.识别测试集:将测试集数据输入到已构建好的支持向量机模型中,得到预测结果。

四、Lec 判别法的优缺点Lec 判别法具有以下优点:1.具有良好的分类性能,对于线性可分的数据集表现尤为出色。

2.具有较强的泛化能力,可以有效处理高维数据。

3.算法稳定性较高,鲁棒性好。

然而,Lec 判别法也存在以下缺点:1.训练时间较长,尤其是当数据量较大时。

2.对噪声敏感,容易受到数据中的噪声影响。

LECD格雷厄姆评价法

LECD格雷厄姆评价法

LECD格雷厄姆评价法格雷厄姆评价法(LECD法)格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham,1894-1976)评价法是⼀种简单易⾏的评价操作⼈员在具有潜在危险性环境中作业时的危险性、危害性的半定量评价⽅法。

格雷厄姆评价法,是⽤与系统风险有关的三种因素指标值的乘积来评价操作⼈员伤亡风险⼤⼩,这三种因素分别是:L(事故发⽣的可能性)、E(⼈员暴露于危险环境中的频繁程度)和C(⼀旦发⽣事故可能造成的后果)。

给三种因素的不同等级分别确定不同的分值,再以三个分值的乘积D来评价作业条件危险性的⼤⼩,即:D=L×E×C具体赋分标准如下:(1)事故发⽣的可能性L Likelihood)事故发⽣的可能性⽤概率来表⽰时,绝对不可能发⽣的事故概率为0;⽽必然发⽣的事故概率为1。

然⽽,从系统安全的⾓度考虑,绝对不发⽣事故是不可能的,所以⼈为地将发⽣事故可能性极⼩的分数定为0.1,⽽必然要发⽣的事故的分数定为10,以此为基础,介于这两种情况之间的情况指定为若⼲个中间值,如表1所⽰。

表1 事故发⽣可能性分值L(2)⼈员暴露于危险环境的频繁程度E (Exposure)⼈员暴露于危险环境中的时间越多,受到伤害的可能性越⼤,相应的危险性也越⼤。

规定⼈员连续出现在危险环境的情况定为10,⽽⾮常罕见地出现在危险环境中定为0.5,介于两者之间的各种情况规定若⼲个中间值,如表2。

表2 暴露于危险环境的频繁程度分值L(3)发⽣事故可能造成的后果C (Consequence)事故造成的⼈员伤害和财产损失的范围变化很⼤,所以规定分数值为1~100。

把需要治疗的轻微伤害或较⼩财产损失的分数规定为1,把造成多⼈死亡或重⼤财产损失的分数规定为100,其他情况的数值在1~100之间,如表3表3 发⽣事故可能造成的后果分值C(4)危险性等级划分标准 D (Danger)根据经验,危险性分值在20分以下为低危险性;危险性分值在20~70之间,则需要加以注意;危险性分值在70~160之间,有显著的危险,需要采取措施整改;危险性分值在160~320之间,有⾼度危险,必须⽴即整改;危险性分值⼤于320,极度危险,应⽴即停⽌作业,彻底整改。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

1
Recall that the ordering of FRINGE defines the search strategy
Search Algorithm #2
SEARCH#2 1. INSERT(initial-node,FRINGE) 2. Repeat: a. If empty(FRINGE) then return failure b. N REMOVE(FRINGE) c. s STATE(N) d. If GOAL?(s) then return path or goal state e. For every state s’ in SUCCESSORS(s) i. Create a node N’ as a successor of N ii. INSERT(N’,FRINGE)
3+3 1+5 2+3 3+4 5+2 0+4 1+3 2+3 3+4 1+5 2+4
10
3+2
4+1 5+0
8-Puzzle
f(N) = h(N) =
Σ distances of numbered tiles to their goals
6
5
2 5 4 3 4 6 5
11
2
1 0
Can we prove anything?
2
Best-First Search
It exploits state description to estimate how “good” each search node is An evaluation function f maps each node N of the search tree to a real number f(N) ≥ 0 Best-first search sorts the FRINGE in increasing f
Heuristic (Informed) Search
(Where we try to choose smartly)
R&N: Chap. 4, Sect. 4.1–3
Slides from Jean-Claude Latombe, Kai Yu, Sebastian Thrun, Peter Norvig, and etc.
4
How to construct f?
Typically, f(N) estimates:

either the cost of a solution path through N
Then f(N) = g(N) + h(N), where
– –
g(N) is the cost of the path from the initial node to N h(N) is an estimate of the cost of a path from N to a goal node
5
How to construct f?
Typically, f(N) estimates:

either the cost of a solution path through N
Then f(N) = g(N) + h(N), where
– –
g(N) is the cost of the path from the initial node to N h(N) is an estimate of the cost of a path from N to a goal node

or the cost of a path from N to a goal node
Then f(N) = h(N)
Heuristic function
But there are no limitations on f. Any function of your choice is acceptable. But will it help the search algorithm?
If the state space is infinite, in general the search is not complete If the state space is finite and we do not discard nodes that revisit states, in general the search is not complete If the state space is finite and we discard nodes that revisit states, the search is complete, but in general is not optimal
13
Admissible Heuristic
Let h*(N) be the cost of the optimal path from N to a goal node The heuristic function h(N) is admissible if:
0 ≤ h(N) ≤ h*(N)
An admissible heuristic function is always optimistic !
[Traditionally, f(N)of the generated pathso, the smaller is an estimated cost; f(N), the more promising N] search does not generate Best-first optimal paths in general [Arbitrary order is assumed among nodes with equal f]
5 4 7 2 3 8 1 6 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6
STATE(N)
Goal state
h1(N) = number of misplaced numbered tiles = 6 h2(N) = sum of the (Manhattan) distance of every numbered tile to its goal position = 2 + 3 + 0 + 1 + 3 + 0 + 3 + 1 = 13 h3(N) = sum of permutation inversions = n5 + n8 + n4 + n2 + n1 + n7 + n3 + n6 =4 +6 +3 +1 +0 +2 +0 +0 = 16
5 4 7 2 3 8 1 6TE(N)
Goal state
h1(N) = number of misplaced numbered tiles = 6
[Why is it an estimate of the distance to the goal?]
7
Other Examples
15
8-Puzzle Heuristics
5 4 7 2 3 8 1 6 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6
STATE(N)
Goal state
h1(N) = number of misplaced tiles = 6 is admissible h2(N) = sum of the (Manhattan) distances of every tile to its goal position = 2 + 3 + 0 + 1 + 3 + 0 + 3 + 1 = 13 is ??? h3(N) = sum of permutation inversions = 4 + 6 + 3 + 1 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 0 = 16 is not admissible

or the cost of a path from N to a goal node
Then f(N) = h(N) Greedy best-search
But there are no limitations on f. Any function of your choice is acceptable. But will it help the search algorithm?
It exploits state description to estimate how “good” each search node is An evaluation function f maps each node N of the search tree to a real number “Best” does not refer to the quality f(N) ≥ 0 Best-first search sorts the FRINGE in increasing f
G is a goal node
h(G) = 0
14
8-Puzzle Heuristics
5 4 7 2 3 8 1 6 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6
STATE(N)
Goal state
h1(N) = number of misplaced tiles = 6 is ??? h2(N) = sum of the (Manhattan) distances of every tile to its goal position = 2 + 3 + 0 + 1 + 3 + 0 + 3 + 1 = 13 is admissible h3(N) = sum of permutation inversions = 4 + 6 + 3 + 1 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 0 = 16 is not admissible
相关文档
最新文档