英文学术报告范例ppt课件
合集下载
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
4
Experimental Program
Table 1. Specimen Information of Each Group
Test series Specimen shape
Specimen size/mm
UHTCC
Prism
40×40×160
Matrix
Prism
40×40×160
Specimen
number 9a 9a
Suffix representation
p40u p40m
5
Results
Comparison of compressive strength
Fig. 1. Comparison of prism compressive strength between UHTCC and matrix
0.2c
8
Comparison of stress-strain curves
The chart shows the comparison between the predictions and the test data of UHTCC
The predicted curves are obtained by using the experimental strain value at peak stress instead of the fixed value of 0.002.
c c3 c2
(c3
0.2c2
Байду номын сангаас
0.8
)
Strain hardening branch: c1 c2
c
Horizontal branch: c3 c
c c3 c2
( c3
0.2c2
0.8 )
Descending branch: c3 c
For serial number from 6 to 9, the water-binder ratio was varied from 28 to 35% with other parameters constant.
For serial number from 10 to 13, the mineral admixturebinder ratio was varied from 50 to 80% with other parameters constant.
12
9
Comparison of compressive strength
10
Conclusions
The prism compressive strength decreases because of the fiber addition.
The strain at peak stress is larger than that of matrix because of the fiber addition
6
Results
Comparison of strain at peak stress
Fig. 3. Comparison of strain at peak stress between UHTCC and matrix
7
Theoretical model
Ascending branch:c1 c2
structural applications are limited
3
Experimental Program
For serial number from 1 to 5, the sand-binder ratio was varied from 30 to 45% with other parameters constant.
2
Background
Numbers of studies carried out
permeability and carbonation properties tensile and bending properties freeze-thaw properties
no uniform test available for the compressive properties
A theoretical model is provide which is needed for modeling its mechanical behavior or for permitting its use in various structural applications.
11
Thank You !
Comparison of compressive strength between UHTCC and matrix
Comparison of strain at peak stress between UHTCC and matrix
A theoretical stress-strain curve model Conclusions
Experimental Study on Compressive Properties of Ultrahigh Toughness Cementitious Composites
1
Layout
Background Experimental Program Experimental Results
Experimental Program
Table 1. Specimen Information of Each Group
Test series Specimen shape
Specimen size/mm
UHTCC
Prism
40×40×160
Matrix
Prism
40×40×160
Specimen
number 9a 9a
Suffix representation
p40u p40m
5
Results
Comparison of compressive strength
Fig. 1. Comparison of prism compressive strength between UHTCC and matrix
0.2c
8
Comparison of stress-strain curves
The chart shows the comparison between the predictions and the test data of UHTCC
The predicted curves are obtained by using the experimental strain value at peak stress instead of the fixed value of 0.002.
c c3 c2
(c3
0.2c2
Байду номын сангаас
0.8
)
Strain hardening branch: c1 c2
c
Horizontal branch: c3 c
c c3 c2
( c3
0.2c2
0.8 )
Descending branch: c3 c
For serial number from 6 to 9, the water-binder ratio was varied from 28 to 35% with other parameters constant.
For serial number from 10 to 13, the mineral admixturebinder ratio was varied from 50 to 80% with other parameters constant.
12
9
Comparison of compressive strength
10
Conclusions
The prism compressive strength decreases because of the fiber addition.
The strain at peak stress is larger than that of matrix because of the fiber addition
6
Results
Comparison of strain at peak stress
Fig. 3. Comparison of strain at peak stress between UHTCC and matrix
7
Theoretical model
Ascending branch:c1 c2
structural applications are limited
3
Experimental Program
For serial number from 1 to 5, the sand-binder ratio was varied from 30 to 45% with other parameters constant.
2
Background
Numbers of studies carried out
permeability and carbonation properties tensile and bending properties freeze-thaw properties
no uniform test available for the compressive properties
A theoretical model is provide which is needed for modeling its mechanical behavior or for permitting its use in various structural applications.
11
Thank You !
Comparison of compressive strength between UHTCC and matrix
Comparison of strain at peak stress between UHTCC and matrix
A theoretical stress-strain curve model Conclusions
Experimental Study on Compressive Properties of Ultrahigh Toughness Cementitious Composites
1
Layout
Background Experimental Program Experimental Results