英语辩论赛反驳对方
关于谈论班级上周英语辩论赛的英语作文
关于谈论班级上周英语辩论赛的英语作文Reflecting on Our Class's English Debate CompetitionLast week, our class participated in an exciting English debate competition, which was not only a platform for us to showcase our linguistic skills but also a valuable opportunity to enhance our critical thinking and public speaking abilities. The event was organized by our English teacher with the aim of fostering a love for the language and encouraging active participation in classroom discussions.The debate topic was carefully chosen to spark lively discussions among students. It was a timely and relevant issue that resonated with our interests and concerns. As the debate commenced, the atmosphere in the classroom was charged with excitement and anticipation. Each team was eager to present their arguments and counter the opposing views.The opening statements set the tone for the debate, with both teams laying out their main points and framing the discussion. As the debate progressed, the studentsengaged in lively and respectful exchanges, defending their positions with facts, examples, and eloquent arguments. The moderator kept the discussion flowing smoothly, ensuring that each team had an equal opportunity to speak.One of the most striking aspects of the debate was the diversity of perspectives expressed by the students. While some argued strongly for one side, others presented convincing counterarguments, challenging the prevailing views. This diversity not only added depth to the discussion but also demonstrated the maturity and openness of our classmates.The closing statements summed up the main points of the debate and left a lasting impression on the audience. Both teams did an excellent job of summing up their arguments and defending their positions. The judge, who was a senior student with excellent debate skills, provided feedback on the performance of both teams, highlighting their strengths and areas for improvement.Overall, the debate competition was a resounding success. It not only improved our English proficiency but also taught us the importance of critical thinking, publicspeaking, and respectful disagreement. The experience was enriching and eye-opening, and I am confident that it will have a lasting impact on our learning and personal growth.Looking ahead, I hope that our class will continue to organize such debates regularly. These activities not only enhance our language skills but also foster a positive learning environment where we can express our opinions, challenge ideas, and grow intellectually. I am excited to see how our class will continue to develop and grow through such enriching experiences.班级英语辩论赛回顾上周，我们班级参与了一场激动人心的英语辩论赛。
英语作文反驳对方的观点模版
Title: Rebutting a CounterargumentIn recent discussions, I have encountered the viewpoint that technology is detrimental to human relationships. However, I firmly disagree with this notion.Firstly, technology has, in fact, enhanced our ability to conne ct and communicate. Social media platforms, instant messaging apps, and video conferencing tools have broken geographical barriers, allowing u s to stay in touch with friends and family across the globe. We can now share our thoughts, experiences, and emotions in real-time, regardless of distance.Moreover, technology has provided us with new avenues for expressing ourselves and forming communities of interest. Online forums, blogs, and virtual communities bring together people with similar passions and interests, fostering meaningful connections and fostering a sense of belonging.Furthermore, technology has made it easier to access information and knowledge, which can be utilized to improve our interpersonal relationships. We can learn about different cultures, perspectives, and communication styles, making us more empathetic and understanding towards others.In conclusion, while it is true that technology can be misused or abused, it has, on the whole, had a positive impact on human relationships. It has brought us closer together, allowed us to express ourselves more freely, and provided us with tools to improve our interactions with others. Therefore, I stand firmly against the argument that technology is detrimental to human relationships.。
七年级英语辩论赛论点论据与反驳技巧题60题
七年级英语辩论赛论点论据与反驳技巧题60题1. In a debate about school uniforms, which of the following can be a strong argument in favor of wearing school uniforms?A. School uniforms can save students' time in choosing clothes every morningB. School uniforms are too expensive for some familiesC. Students can't show their individuality in school uniformsD. School uniforms are not fashionable答案：A。
解析：A选项提到校服能节省学生每天早上挑选衣服的时间，这是支持穿校服的一个有力论据，因为在校园生活中，早上时间紧张，校服可以让学生快速准备好着装。
而B选项提到校服对一些家庭来说太贵，这是反对穿校服的论据；C选项说学生不能在校服中展现个性，D选项说校服不时尚，这都是反对穿校服的观点，不符合题意。
2. When debating about school club activities, which argument supports the idea that school clubs are beneficial?A. School clubs can help students make more friendsB. School clubs take up too much study timeC. Some school clubs lack professional teachersD. School clubs are often noisy答案：A。
英语作文反驳句子模板
英语作文反驳句子模板Refuting the Statement: "Technology is Making People Less Intelligent"In today's society, there is a common belief that technology is making people less intelligent. This statement is often used to criticize the increasing reliance on technology in various aspects of our lives. However, upon closer examination, it becomes clear that this assertion is not entirely accurate. In fact, technology has the potential to enhance intelligence and cognitive abilities in numerous ways.To begin with, technology provides access to a wealth of information and knowledge that was previously unavailable. The internet, for example, allows individuals to easily access a vast array of resources, including educational materials, scholarly articles, and research studies. This wealth of information can greatly contribute to the expansion of one's knowledge and understanding of the world. In addition, technology has enabled the development of online courses and educational platforms, which offer opportunities for continuous learning and skill development. These resources have the potential to enhance intelligence by providing individuals with the tools and information necessary to expand their intellectual capabilities.Furthermore, technology has facilitated advancements in communication and collaboration, which are essential components of intelligence. Through the use of various digital platforms, individuals can engage in meaningful discussions, share ideas, and collaborate on projects with people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. This interconnectedness has the potential to broaden one's understanding of different viewpoints and foster critical thinking skills. Additionally, the ability to communicate and collaborate effectively in the digital age is a valuable skill that can contribute to intellectual growth and development.Moreover, technology has also led to the development of innovative tools and applications that can enhance cognitive abilities. For instance, brain training apps and games have been designed to improve memory, attention, and problem-solving skills. These tools provide a fun and engaging way to exercise the brain and maintain cognitivefunction. Additionally, advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to assist individuals in processing and analyzing complex information, thereby augmenting their intellectual capacities.It is important to recognize that the impact of technology on intelligence is not solely determined by the existence of the technology itself, but rather by how it is utilized. When used mindfully and purposefully, technology has the potential to enhance intelligence and cognitive abilities. However, it is essential for individuals to exercise critical thinking and discernment in their interactions with technology, and to balance its use with other intellectual pursuits.In conclusion, the assertion that technology is making people less intelligent is not entirely accurate. In fact, technology has the potential to enhance intelligence and cognitive abilities through its provision of access to knowledge, facilitation of communication and collaboration, and development of innovative tools and applications. It is crucial to recognize the positive impact of technology on intelligence and to harness its potential for intellectual growth and development.。
英语话题作文的正反辩论
英语话题作文的正反辩论英文回答：In the realm of discourse, the topic of [Prompt] has sparked a fervent debate, pitting proponents against opponents in a battle of words. This essay shall delve into the arguments presented by both sides, examining their validity and implications.Proponents: Advocates for [Position]Proponents of [position] argue that it offers a multitude of benefits. They contend that it promotes [benefit 1], enhances [benefit 2], and facilitates [benefit 3]. By delving into specific examples and citing empirical evidence, they bolster their claims, painting a compelling picture of the positive impact that [position] can have.Opponents: Detractors of [Position]Detractors of [position], on the other hand, raisevalid concerns. They assert that it may lead to [consequence 1], hinder [consequence 2], and exacerbate [consequence 3]. Drawing upon historical precedent and expert analysis, they present a persuasive case against the adoption of [position]. Their arguments invite us to consider the potential drawbacks and to proceed with caution.Discussion: Weighing the Evidence.To reach a well-informed conclusion, it is imperative to carefully weigh the evidence presented by both sides. Proponents offer a compelling case, highlighting the potential benefits of [position]. Yet, opponents raise legitimate concerns that must not be dismissed lightly.Consideration should also be given to the context in which [position] is being proposed. Its implementation may be contingent upon specific circumstances, and its impact may vary depending on the particular context. It is therefore crucial to conduct a thorough analysis of thepotential consequences before making a judgment.Conclusion.The debate surrounding [prompt] is a complex one, with valid arguments presented by both proponents and opponents. To reach a well-reasoned conclusion, it is essential to carefully consider the evidence, weigh the potential benefits against the potential risks, and take into account the specific context in which [position] is being considered. Only then can we make an informed decision about the merits of [position].中文回答：支持方：支持方认为[立场]有许多好处。
英语BP辩论反方二辩辩论稿
反方二辩：Thank you,Mr.（Ms.）speaker. Ladies and gentlemen, good evening!In the first part of my speech, I would like to make my rebuttal.The prop seem to think they're providing extra incentives to scientists from universities and research institutions, therefore increasing innovation. This is wrong. Firstly, many scientists work for pharmaceutical companies directly . Secondly, scientists at universities and research institutions are paid by pharmaceutical companies to undertake research for them. Why is this important? It means that scientists are actually harmed under the proposition's model, not helped. When patents are removed, pharmaceutical companies can no longer earn monopoly profits.Now I’d like to provide my statements. For the first aspect, why we save more lives? Firstly, under our plan you can pay scientists double the bonuses they get paid and still get the job done way below the current cost. This is because we won’t have to pay $6-10 million a year for the CEO of the firm in question or billions in publicity. We’re also providing incentives for the same companies to research novel drugs. Rather than fret over prices remaining high for 20 years to make a profit we're allowing them a generous research and development-linked profit on delivery.Secondly, we have the preposterous claim that university research is funded by corporations! The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry lobby group, estimates that private industry finances only about 43% of drug development! Our plan allows for universities and government institutions to take on more research and even provide them with concrete benefits.Thirdly, more than 69% of those with HIV lack access to the medication to treat it. Rather than pay the current prices for that 69% for as long as they need them what we do is pay for them in a drastically cheaper one-off payment that would allow for generic copies to be made ad infinite. This way we also don't endorse current practice that actively discourages innovation but instead create a new regime that truly rewards it allowing everyone to benefit from genuinely novel drugs.Fourthly, the opp has argued our plan would not encourage cheaper drugs with the same effects to be produced. Of course not! If we create generic drugs, accessible to all why need a “new” drug that does exactly the same? This is what happens under the statusquo;companies creating useless “me-too drugs” one after the other rather than researching into novel drugs that have something to offer. Rather than see this lack of innovation as a problem they are offering its solution as an argument .In addition, if companies with patents charge very high prices, that creates a market for cheaper drugs for that illness, so other companies can move into that market. This means innovation is encouraged, there are more drugs and the price isn't an issue in the long term. Under the prop's model it is necessary that generics are more profitable than new drugs for a company to produce, or else none of them will, instead going for the massive prize for new drugs. If generics are more popular, no new drugs will be produced, only copies.For the second aspect, abolishing patents for life-saving medicines would not decline the price of medicines.The prop have founded their case on the idea that lots of generic producers will be able to produce drugs cheaply if patents are bypassed. However, thereneeds to be a massive incentive to get these drugs developed in the first place. They cost up to $800 million to get to market, and this means huge amounts of investment are required. Not only does this investment need to be payed back, there needs to be a promise of strong profit to pay off the risk of such a huge investment being unsuccessful (most drugs never go to market). As patents provide the ability to charge monopoly pricing, if there was no patent for life-saving drugs there would need to be an even greater incentive to stop companies producing non-life saving drugs instead. What this means is that whatever model the prop propose to provide these incentives, it will always be more expensive than allowing a company to patent a product, which at least makes it as valuable as a non-life saving drug. In conclusion, if we abolish those patents,no one would continue researching and developing new medicines,thus,abolishing patents for life-saving medicines seems to save more lives at the beginning, it would kill more lives in the long run.THANKS !!!致力为企业和个人提供合同协议，策划案计划书，学习课件等等打造全网一站式需求欢迎您的下载，资料仅供参考。
最好的英语口语辩论对话（精选多篇）
最好的英语口语辩论对话（精选多篇）第一篇：最好的英语口语辩论对话英语口语对话（三对三辩论）The topic: Chinese students should not celebrate Western festivals.人物（Character）：主持人（host）正方一辩：P1 正方二辩：P2 正方三辩：P3 反方一辩：C1 反方二辩：C2 反方三辩：C3 HOST：A debate is about to begin, both sides of the debate are momentum rainbow.辩论赛即将开始，辩论双方都气势如虹。
Now, I declare the debate began.现在，我宣布辩论赛开始。
P1: We are the Pro.The opinion of our group is that Chinese student should not celebrate the foreign festivals.我们小组代表正方观点。
我们小组的意见是中国学生不应该庆祝外国节日。
C1: We are the Con.The opinion of our group is that Chinese student should celebrate the foreign festivals.我们小组代表反方观点。
我们小组的意见是中国学生应该庆祝外国节日。
P1:With the introduction of western festivals ,Chinese students are more and more inclined to western festivals ratherthantraditionalChinese holidays.This is not a good phenomenon，which is not conductive to inherit and carry forward the Chinese traditional culture.What’s more, holidays like Christmas aren’t simply festivals.They are religious events随着西方节日引入中国，中国学生越来越倾向于过西方节日而不是中国传统节日。
英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词
英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词第一篇：英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词OK.Thanks my fellow debater.Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.We are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’.However, I can’t agree with debaters’ opinion.We insist that upon death, each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ transplant.According to this topic, what is“should be given”? Is it a forced obligation?Donation has the firstly basic principle is voluntary.And what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with voluntary.If lack of voluntary,it is not the “donation” but robbery.The followings are the reasons for our opposition.First of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ transplant.Especially for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the transplant operation is so high even more than 30,000.Besides,after operation, medicine also spent a amount of overhead.All of cost goes beyond the ability to pay for a general family.Secondly, both people and the State do not have right to violate the value with another one.Forced corpse donation on the surface is to defend the patient's right to survival, but meanwhile it destroys the right the dead and his families to choose freely.In addition,the deceased's body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s successor.That is a performance of inherited relationship.However enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited system.The reason why the donation is forced is thatthe organ is rare and so many patients need it.Similarly,money is also needurgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO!They are all voluntary donations.Without will of the parties,the donation would become robbery.If we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves frominfringement.But he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donat e their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any comments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or not.Then,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use or organ donation.Thank you.Yes!The value of others lives is quite precious, but personal belief does not have signification? Chinese traditional belief is that "your body is something you receive from your parents”.Even death, leaving the whole body is not just only a formality,but it represents our respect for human rights, and respect for the deceased.第二篇：英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词OK.Thanks my fellow debater.Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.We are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’.However, I can’t agreewith debaters’ opinion.We insist that upon death, each person’s body shou ld not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ transplant.According to this topic, what is“should be given”? Is it a forced obligation? Donation has the firstly basic principle is voluntary.And what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with voluntary.If lack of voluntary,it is not the “donation” but robbery.The followings are the reasons for our opposition.First of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ transplant.Especially for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the transplant operation is so high even more than 30,000.Besides,after operation, medicine also spent a amount of overhead.All of cost goes beyond the ability to pay for a general family.Secondly, both people and the State do not have right to violate the value with another one.Forced corpse donation on the surface is to defend the patient's right to survival, but meanwhile it destroys the right the dead and his families to choose freely.In addition,the deceased's body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s successor.That is a performance of inherited relationship.However enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited system.The reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need it.Similarly,money is also need urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO!They are all voluntary donations.Without will of the parties,the donation would become robbery.If we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what isthe necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from infringement.But he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any comments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or not.Then,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use or organ donation.Thank you.Yes!The value of others lives is quite precious, but personal belief does not have signification? Chinese traditional belief is that "your body is something you receive from your parents”.Even dea th, leaving the whole body is not just only a formality,but it represents our respect for human rights, and respect for the deceased.第三篇：辩论赛一辩开场谢谢主席，大家好。
辩论作文英文反驳词
辩论作文英文反驳词英文：Firstly, I have to disagree with your argument that technology is causing more harm than good. While it is true that technology can have negative effects, such asaddiction to social media or cyberbullying, it also has numerous benefits. For example, technology has made communication and information sharing much easier and faster. We can now communicate with people across the world in real-time and access information on any topic with justa few clicks.Furthermore, technology has greatly improved our daily lives. Smartphones, for instance, have made it possible for us to do so many things on the go, such as online shopping, banking, and even attending virtual meetings. In addition, technology has revolutionized industries such as healthcare, transportation, and entertainment, making them moreefficient and accessible.In conclusion, while there are certainly negative aspects to technology, it is unfair to say that it is causing more harm than good. We should focus on using technology responsibly and harnessing its benefits to improve our lives.中文：首先，我不同意你的观点，认为技术带来的负面影响比正面影响更大。
英语辩论常用句型及话题带翻译
英语辩论常用句型及话题带翻译在英语辩论中，掌握一些常用的句型和热门话题是非常重要的。
这不仅能帮助我们更清晰地表达自己的观点，还能有效地回应对方的论点。
以下是为大家整理的英语辩论常用句型及相关话题，并附上了对应的翻译。
一、表达观点1、“I firmly believe that” （我坚信）例如：“I firmly believe that education is the key to a better future”（我坚信教育是通向美好未来的关键。
）翻译：“我坚信教育是通向美好未来的关键。
”2、“In my opinion/view,” （在我看来，）例如：“In my opinion, we should focus more on environmental protection”（在我看来，我们应该更关注环境保护。
）翻译：“在我看来，我们应该更关注环境保护。
”3、“It seems to me that” （在我看来，）例如：“It seems to me that technology has both advantages and disadvantages”（在我看来，技术既有优点也有缺点。
）翻译：“在我看来，技术既有优点也有缺点。
”4、“I’m of the opinion that” （我的观点是）例如：“I’m of the opinion that we need to balance work and life”（我的观点是我们需要平衡工作和生活。
）翻译：“我的观点是我们需要平衡工作和生活。
”二、提出论据1、“First of all, Secondly, Finally,” （首先，其次，最后，）例如：“First of all, we have limited resources Secondly, the demand is increasing rapidly Finally, we need to find new solutions”（首先，我们的资源有限。
英语辩论赛二辩稿模板
英语辩论赛二辩稿模板篇一：英语BP辩论反方二辩辩论稿反方二辩：Thank you,Mr.（Ms.）speaker. Ladies and gentlemen, good evening! providing extra incentives to scientists from universities and research institutions, therefore increasing innovation. This is wrong. Firstly, many scientists work for pharmaceutical companies directly . Secondly, scientists at universities and research institutions are paid by pharmaceutical companies to undertake research for them. Why is this important? It means that scientists are actually harmed under the proposition's model, not helped. When patents are removed,pharmaceutical companies can no longer earn monopoly profits.Now I’why we save more lives? Firstly, under our plan you can pay scientists double the bonuses they get paid and still get the job done way below the current cost. This is because we won’t have to pay $6-10 million a year for the CEO of the firm in question or billions in publicity. We’re also providing incentives for thesame companies to research novel drugs. Rather than fret over prices remaining high for 20 years to make a profit we're allowing them a generous research and development-linked profit on delivery. Secondly, we have the preposterous claim that university research is funded by corporations! The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry lobby group, estimates that private industry finances only about 43% of drug development! Our plan allows for universities and government institutions to take on more research and even provide them with concrete benefits. Thirdly, more than 69% of those with HIV lack access to the medication to treat it. Rather than pay the current prices for that 69% for as long as they need them what we do is pay for them in adrastically cheaper one-off payment that would allow for generic copies to be made ad infinite. This way we also don't endorse current practice that actively discourages innovation but instead create a new regime that truly rewards it allowing everyone to benefit from genuinely novel drugs.Fourthly, the opp has argued our plan would not encourage cheaper drugs with the same effects to be produced. Of course not! If we create generic drugs, accessible to all why need a “new” drug that does exactly the same? This is what happens under the status quo;companies creating useless “me-too drugs” one after the other rather than researching into novel drugs that have something to offer. Rather than see this lack of innovation as a problem they are offering its solution as an argument .In addition, if companies with patents charge very high prices, that creates a market for cheaper drugs for that illness, so other companies can move into that market. This means innovation is encouraged, there are more drugs and the price isn't an issue in the long term. Under the prop's model it is necessary that generics are more profitable than new drugs for a company to produce, or else none of them will, instead going for the massive prize for new drugs. If generics are more popular, no new drugs will be produced, only copies.For the second aspect, abolishing patents for life-saving medicines would not decline the price ofprop have founded their case on the idea that lots of generic producers will be ableto produce drugs cheaply if patents are bypassed. However, there needs to be a massive incentive to get these drugs developed in t(来自: 小龙文档网:英语辩论赛二辩稿模板)he first place. They cost up to $800 million to get to market, and this means huge amounts of investment are required. Not only does this investment need to be payed back, there needs to be a promise of strong profit to pay off the risk of such a hugeinvestment being unsuccessful (most drugs never go to market). As patents provide the ability to charge monopoly pricing, if there was no patent for life-saving drugs there would need to be an even greater incentive to stop companies producing non-life saving drugs instead. What this means is that whatever model the prop propose to provide these incentives, it will always be more expensive than allowing a company to patent a product, which at least makes it as valuable as a non-life saving drug. medicines,thus,abolishing patents for life-saving medicines seems to save morelives at the beginning, it would kill more lives in the long run.篇二：英语辩论范例英语辩论赛话题：当代社会男人压力大还是女人压力大主持：主持词：Good morning everyone, today, we will bring you a small but brilliant debate. I hope all of you would enjoy the time.（介绍来宾）The judges of today's debate are our teacher and everybody here! Welcome! The topic for our debate today is "whether the pressure of men is more than women?" First please let me introduce the contestants of both sides. Those on the pros are Liu Junyi and me. Those on the cons are Gao Tianli and Lei Feiyan. As everybody is ready now, here starts the debate.The first session: Statement of their arguments: ----the For-side, please正方一辩：我方观点是当今社会男人的压力比女人的压力大。
英语辩论赛万能句子反驳
英语辩论赛万能句子反驳
在英语辩论赛中，反驳对手观点是至关重要的。
在进行辩论时，灵活运用一些
万能句子可以帮助我们更有力地反驳对方观点，拉开与对手的差距。
以下是一些常用的英语辩论赛万能句子，可以帮助你在辩论中更加自信和有力地进行反驳：
1.首先，我完全理解你的立场，但是…通过这个句子，你可以表现出
对对手观点的尊重，然后开始引入自己的观点。
2.我们必须记住，事实是…这个句子可以帮助你引入客观事实或数据，
强调自己观点的可靠性。
3.虽然你的观点有一定道理，但是我要指出…这句话可以帮助你委婉
地表达自己对对方观点的不同看法，加强你的反驳力度。
4.根据专家研究表明，…通过引用专家观点或研究成果，可以增强你
的论证力度，让你的反驳更有说服力。
5.请容我反驳一下，事实是…这句话可以显得你在辩论中的自信和果
断，给对手以回击。
6.但是我们不能忽视…通过强调某些对对方观点影响重要性较高的事
实或信息，可以有效地削弱对方的立场。
7.考虑到现实情况，我们不得不承认…通过承认对方一部分观点，再
在此基础上推出自己观点，可以更加有据可依。
8.我想强调的是…通过这个句子，你可以清晰地指出自己观点的重点，
让对方更容易理解你的立场。
9.当然，对于这个问题，我们的立场是…这句话可以帮助你在确定自
己立场的同时，也暗示对对方观点的反驳。
10.总的来说，以上是我们对这个问题的看法，谢谢。
最后以感谢或总
结的方式结束你的反驳，展现自己的礼貌和辩论总结的能力。
以上是一些常用的英语辩论赛万能句子，希望能帮助你更加游刃有余地进行反驳，取得辩论赛的成功！。
英语辩论赛主席发言词
1.开场：good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the debate today,2.介绍正反方：on my left sits the government and right the opposition, today they will debate the issue “辩题”，and the government believes that “正方观点” the opposition believes that “反方观点”3.开始：now we shall start the debateFirst let us welcome the prime minister of the government, you will have 7 mins to speak.正方一辩结束we have heard your opinions Prime Minister ,thank you very much and now let us welcome the leader of the opposition , you are also given 7 mins to speak.这个发言的顺序是正一反一正二反二正一反一正二反二其中正一是Prime Minister 正二是Deputy Prime Minister 反一是leader of the opposition 反二是deputy leader of opposition每人7分钟结束之后大家都要有一个结束语什么谢谢你的辩论、你变现很好之类的，但是语言要简练明了清晰。
4.整场结束：till now we have heard all of your arguments and opinions, thanks for your excellent performance and please wait a second for the judges to announce the result of the debate.大家要讲的大致内容以及程序就是这些，现场大家可以自由发挥，这两天大家可以上网搜一些视频来看，学习一些语言。
英语口语8000句：反驳对方常用口语句子
英语口语8000句：反驳对方常用口语句子反驳对方◎我们不清楚您到底是怎么想的. It is not <quite> clear to us what you had in mind.= It is not clear to us what you meant.= It is not clear to us what you intended.◎使我们担心的一点是…… The one point that concerned us <a little> was...*concern "担心,在意〞.= The one point that troubled us was...◎我们对……感到担心和挂念. We have become concerned with regards to...= We have become concerned with regards to the shipment schedule. <我们对装船的日程感到担心和挂念.> 中立的答复◎我们正在……过程中. We are <now> in the process of...*in the process "正在……,……正在进行中〞.We are in the process of reviewing your suggestion. <我们正在重新研究贵社所提出的方案.>◎我们非常重视…… We value ... highly.We value your suggestion highly. <我们非常重视贵社所提出的建议.>◎我们非常感谢您提出的这件事. We thank you for raising the issue.*内容可能是好,也可能是坏.◎您的建议将由……进行讨论. Your suggestions are being followed up by...Your suggestions are being followed up by our committee. <您的建议将在我们委员会进行讨论.= Your suggestions are being reviewed by...否定回答◎我们希望您能理解我们这次行动的理由. We hope you will understand our reason for this action.*表达不利于对方的事情时,重要的是在表达方式上下工夫.◎我们很难接受…… It would be difficult for us to accept...*还有商量余地的情况下.= It would be difficult for us to accept the revision to our shipping schedule. <就我们的装船日程来说,再作修改会是很困难的.>◎非常遗憾,我们不能…… We regret that we are unable to...*已没有商量的余地.= We regret that we are unable to alter our pricing schedule. <很遗憾,我们不能更改价目表.>◎除……之外,没有选择的余地. We have no alternative but to...*用于最后阶段的信函中.alternative 是指"替代的手段、方法〞.◎因此,我们采取的立场是…… Consequently we are in the position to...*后接否定性的内容.consequently 表示"最终结果地〞.我方的行为和说明◎我非常高兴地向您推荐…… We are pleased to recommend...to you.◎我们与……有非常亲密的关系. We work closely together with...◎我们已经得知…… We are also told that...◎修改后规定…… The amendment provides that...*amendment "改正〞.= The amendment provides that you can no longer ship after the tenth of each month. <更改后的规定是每月10号以后不能装船.>◎以下的条件表明…… The following conditions show that...*用于否定的内容时.The following conditions show that each shipment must arrive before noon. <以下的条件表明各种货物必须在正午以前送到.>◎这种变更意味着将会推迟…… The effect of this change will be to delay...表明谢意和希望◎我们非常感谢本次交易和…… We appreciate your business and...= We appreciate your patronage and...◎……还有对贵方的友好表示感谢. ..., and wish to thank you for your kindness.◎我们非常感谢你们提供的意见. We would appreciate receiving your comments.= We would appreciate it if you could send us your comments.◎我们非常欢迎你们提出宝贵意见. We shall be interested in receiving your comments.= We shall be interested in hearing your comments.显示热情和诚意◎我们确信…… We are confident that...*confident "确信的〞.◎我们就……的可能性表示极大的热忱. We are enthusiastic over the possibilities of...*enthusiastic "热心的,狂热的〞.◎我们非常欢迎此事有所发展. We welcome this development very much.*development "<形势等>进展,发展〞.◎我们将继续做我们所能做的一切. We will continue to do all we can to...We will continue to do all we can to develop a stronger working relationship between our companies. <为了使我们两家公司的商务关系更加紧密,我们将做出我们所能做的一切.>◎我们将竭尽全力地…… We will do our utmost to... utmost "最大限度〞.We will do our utmost to develop new markets. <为开发新市场我们将竭尽全力.>◎为了扩大……,我们将付出最大的努力. We shall do whatever we can to extend...We shall do whatever we can to extend our service. <为了扩大服务,我们将付出最大的努力.>◎我们将一直地努力提供给您我们最优惠价格. We will always endeavor to offer you our most favorable rates.*endeavor "认真地努力〞.◎就……一事,请您尽管放心. You may rest assured that...*rest assured 为短语,"放心〞.You may rest assured that your shipment will arrive on time. <贵公司的货物将按时到达,请放心.>= You may be certain that...通知、希望得到通知◎我们希望就此事今后经常保持联系. We wish to keep you fully informed on this matter.= We wish to keep you fully posted on this matter.◎在本项目实行之际,烦请通知我们一声. Kindly inform us when this is put into effect.*put into effect "实施,实行〞.= Kindly notify us when this is put into effect.= Please let us know when this is put into effect.对否定性回答的补充◎我们相信您能够理解我们的立场. We feel certain you will understand our position in this matter.◎尽管如此,我们将做我们所能做的一切…… Nevert heless, we will do everything we can to...*nevertheless "然而,尽管如此〞.◎对于……,就我们来说,没有异议. There is no objection, as far as we are concerned, in...There is no objection, as far as we are concerned, in raising the prices. <就提高价格一事,我们完全没有异议.> ◎为作为今后的参考,我们已将此事存入了我们的文档. These have been placed into our files for future reference. *for future reference 表示"为了作为今后的参考〞.。
雅思写作：反驳对方观点的句型
雅思写作：反驳对方观点的句型2014雅思写作：反驳对方观点的句型1.Two sides of an argument2.Give the other side's opinion, and then give YOUR opinion3.Give the other side4.Some people think that…5.Although many people feel that…6.It is claimed that…7.Some people feel that…8.One sentence (While, although)9.While it is true that… … I believe…10.Despite the fact that millions of people die every year from lung cancer, many people think it is cool to smoke.11.A lthough many people think that…., I feel that12.Although it is often said that…, in fact the opposite is true13.Two sentences14.It is undoubtedly true that… …However…15.It is often argued that… However, it is16.Some people say that… They claim… However, I feel…17.Supporters of this viewpoint say that… However, it is18.One sentence (While, although)19.While it is true that… … I believe…20.Despite the fact that millions of people die every year from lung cancer, many people think it is cool to smoke.21.Although many people think that…., I feel that22.Although it is often said that…, in fact the opposite is true。
英语作文反驳论点
英语作文反驳论点As a language learner, I understand the challenges and frustrations that come with writing in a second language. However, I believe that with dedication and practice, anyone can improve their English writing skills.作为一名语言学习者，我深知在第二语言写作中所面临的挑战和挫折。
然而，我相信只要有足够的投入和练习，任何人都能提高自己的英语写作水平。
One common argument against this belief is that some people simply lack the natural talent for language learning, and no amountof effort will help them overcome this limitation. While it is true that some individuals may have a harder time picking up a new language, it is not impossible for them to improve with persistence and the right resources.反驳这一观点的一个常见论点是，一些人天生缺乏语言学习的天赋，无论付出多少努力都无法克服这一局限性。
虽然一些人学习新语言可能会更加困难，但只要他们有足够的毅力和合适的资源，提高自己的语言能力并非不可能。
Another argument often made is that writing in a second language will never be as good as writing in one's native language. While it is true that expressing oneself in a second language may present some challenges, it does not mean that one cannot achieve proficiency and fluency in that language over time.另一个常见的论点是，用第二语言写作永远无法和用母语写作一样好。
refuting an argument(英语辩论学习材料：如何驳斥对方论点)
Refuting an ArgumentRead the following argument:Life was better before industrialization. To begin with, in the past, people lived in the countryside. They breathed clean air and so they were healthier. These days, people get cancer and other diseases from the pollution of factories and cars. Furthermore, people suffer from stress and depression. Everybody is so busy that they don’t have time to relax. The suicide rate has increased within the last century and many people take drugs for depression. But above all else, people have lost their freedom in the last two hundred years. Governments have created numerous laws to control people. People need I.D. cards and licenses to do anything. In conclusion, TVs and cars are being paid for with our health, our sanity, and our freedom, and therefore, we are better off without them.What is the thesis statement? ________________________What are the main supporting points and examples?(1)(2)(3)Look at the three main points and decide if they are strong arguments or weak arguments.(1)(2)(3)Examine the three arguments and make counter arguments:(Fill in the blanks with more, fewer, less, higher, lower . . . ) Argument (1):People were healthier in the past.More pollution? True/FalseMore cases of cancer? True/FalseCounter Arguments:In the past, the infant mortality rate was _____________________. These days, the average lifespan is ________________________. These days, medicine is ______________ advanced.______________ diseases can be cured.______________ people have Medicare.Argument (2):People suffer from stress.More stress? True/FalseMore depression? True/FalseCounter Arguments:There are ______________ holidays and vacations now.The average workday is ______________._____________ people travel abroad.Argument (3):People have lost freedom.More laws to control people? True/FalseCounter Arguments:_____________ people have the right to vote these days.People have _________ opportunity to get an education._____________ people have freedom of speech.Racial and sexual discrimination is _________________.The Three Steps to Refuting an Argument(1) Introduce your opponent’s argument.(2) Decide whether it is strong, weak, true or false.(3) Provide counter arguments and counter evidence. Example:Some people argue that our quality of life is decreasing. They feel that life was better before industrialization. They claim that people were healthier, happier, and freer in the past. However, their argument is weak because they do not examine all the facts.People who think life was better before industrialization argue that pollution has caused more cancer and other diseases. While it is true that cancer is increasing, modern medicine has improved our health in general. Over the past two hundred years, the infant mortality rate has declined. As well, people live longer now and doctors can cure more diseases. Also, more people have Medicare and so more people can receive medical treatment.People who think the standard of living has declined, also argue that people have more stress and depression than in the past. This maybe true, but people also have longer vacations, shorter workdays, and more opportunity to travel within their country and abroad.Finally, those who think the past was better argue that people were freer in the past. They claim that the governments of the world have created too many laws to control people, but in fact people are much freer now. More people have the right to vote, freedom of speech, and an opportunity to get an education. As well, racial and sexual discrimination are decreasing.In conclusion, while it is true that industrialization has some drawbacks, it is not true that our quality of life has decreased. In fact, in many ways, we are healthier and have more opportunity and freedom. Now, look at each sentence and decide if it is step 1, 2, or 3.Phrases for Given a Counter ArgumentWhen your opponent’s argument is true but yours is better:While it’s true that . . . butThere is some truth to the argument that . . . HoweverIt is true that . . . However,When your opponent’s argument might be true but you are not sure:It may be true that . . . butEven if . . .Even if it’s true that . . .When your opponent’s argument is false:It’s not true that . . .They claim that . . . but in fact . . .Now, reread the counter argument and underline any of these phrases that you find.Refuting an ArgumentCutting down rainforests is a necessary evil. In many of the countries where rainforests are disappearing, the people are very poor. Logging the rainforests provides many jobs, which help these poor people. The loggers, the truck drivers, and the shippers all receive work because of the logging industry. As well, once the land is cleared it can be used for more productive things. Farmers can grow crops on the land and ranchers can raise cattle. Finally, the wood itself is very useful. People use the wood for housing, fuel, furniture, and many other everyday items.Argument (1):Counter Argument:Argument (2)Counter Argument:Argument (3)Counter ArgumentFor the TeacherSome possible counter arguments:Argument 1: JobsThe jobs aren’t sustainable. Once the forest is gone, there will be no more logging jobs. Tourism could provide alternative jobs. Jobs from tourism could be sustainable. Also, often the loggers are paid only a very small amount.Argument 2: More Productive uses:The soil under rain forests is poor for farming, and also not very suitable for raising cattle for any long period of time. Within a few years, it becomes difficult to farm or raise cattle.Argument 3: UsefulWood is useful, but the rainforests have many species of plants and animals. Some of these species could provide us with cures for diseases etc. That is also useful. As well, rainforests help keep the air clean and the environment healthy.How you introduce the counter arguments is up to you. You may wish to do an internet search for resources. The above are just the tip of the iceberg.。
英语口语辩论反方辩词
Hello,my English name is Michael.My partners and I hold the point of view that after graduation,we’d better look for job instead of having a further study.First of all,as the old saying goes,practice is the sole criterion of truth,we can easily choose whether we should hunt for job or have further study.We have accumulated mountains of knowledge from university.And I think that after graduation,it’s time to show the world what we got in our hand.I have seen many talented people who are eager to graduate just because they want to put what they have learned into real work.With so much knowledge in your mind but finding no place to practice it is totally a tragedy.Some of the students even can’t wait to graduate.Take Bill Gates as an example,he chose to drop off his classes before graduation and focused on what he really good at,and finally started Microsoft,which is now the biggest computer software company around the world.If we choose further education,the only thing you can gain is just the same as the things you have got in the past four years,which is,knowledge.However,people who choose to work have already gained the experience and practice that cannot be found in university.They are 10,000 miles ahead of you.Secondly,choosing to hunt for job doesn’t mean that we won’t study any more.We will still study from books,from Internet,especially from work and colleagues.Learning from the work you do and the colleagues youwork with is important.During work,you can learn about the most advanced information in your career from your colleagues.After receiving those information,your study after work will have a clear way because you know what kind of knowledge,what kind of books can really help you in work.And I am pretty sure that you can never learn this in your further study.And we can also broaden our horizons during work.Last but not least,if we choose to hunt for job instead of having further study,we will set up and enlarge our circles of friends promptly.As we know,in China,sometimes relationship can be the most important role to determine the outcome.As a consequence,circle of friends is becoming more and more significant.From my point of vies,the earlier we enlarge our circles of friends,especially the friends in our career,the earlier we will benefit from it.That’s all I want to say,thank you for listening.马一方。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
1．广告浪费电视观众的时间，
（1）：如果（unless）没有电视剧之间(between)的广告插曲，那么如何知道你有多么的喜欢这个电视剧。
(How do you know )
（2）：能极大的激发你的好奇心，(arose your curiosity)
（3）：充分体味电视剧的魅力。
(enjoy the series fully grade)
（4）：广告的时间，给你时间去休息，去放松眼部，给你时间去喝水，去厕所，去打电话。
2.广告要花更多的钱。
(more time to relax ,more time to dring water to WC and so on ) （1）：花钱带动经济的发展。
促进消费。
(promoting the encnomic develepment)
3.提高了商品的价格。
（1）：如果没有广告的宣传(publicity)，也许你很需要哪种商品，你就算花再多的时间，你都不知道往哪里花。
()
4, 误导消费者，特别是儿童。
（1），那么请你先举出一个例子，广告怎么样误导未成年儿童了？（exampal）
（2），就算误导未成年，那么也跟家长有关系，
5，越来越多的人不愿看电视了，
（1）：那指的是越来越多的人都喜欢看电脑了吗？那么电脑上就没有广告了吗？说是因为广告的原因就是借口，(use as an excuse)
（2）：这世界还是存在喜欢看广告的人的，比如我，(like ads)
6.有些广告是在撒谎，夸大了产品的作用，
（1）：请问对方，比如呢？你怎么知道他夸大了？适当的夸大其效果，更能引起消费者购买的欲望，才给了你使用这产品的可能才有了解决你问题的希望,(hope)
(exampal)。