功能语法论文
系统功能语法论文转换生成语法论文:系统功能语法与转换生成语法差异浅析
系统功能语法论文转换生成语法论文:系统功能语法与转换生成语法差异浅析摘要:系统功能语法和转换生成语法是当今语言学界著名的两大语法理论。
本文旨在对两种理论进行介绍和比较来分析二者的差异,以期读者能加深对这两大语法流派的理解,对其价值作出客观的判断并为今后的研究提供新的视角。
关键词:系统功能语法;转换生成语法;差异一、引言综观语言学发展历程,各种语法理论层出不穷,流派林立。
在众多语言流派中,最突出的有两大潮流,一是功能主义,二是形式主义。
功能主义以韩礼德的系统功能语法为代表,形式主义则以乔姆斯基的转换生成语法为代表。
这两种语法理论都在世界上产生了巨大的影响,推动了语言学研究的发展。
究其本质,二者在很多方面存在着差异。
下文将从不同角度对比两种语法理论,探寻差异。
二、系统功能语法和转换生成语法简介(一)系统功能语法系统功能语法由系统语法发展而来。
50年代,英国语言学家韩礼德创立了系统语法。
这是一种建立在选择概念上的语法理论,“系统”即为一组可能的意义选择。
60年代后期以来,系统语法发生了一系列变化,主要表现为对系统概念的升格,系统语法学家通常把这一后期的系统语法模式称为系统功能语法。
系统功能语法将语言分为五个层次:语境、意义、措辞、音的结构和语音。
与系统语法相比,系统功能语法更注重语言在实际应用中所发挥的功能。
系统功能语言学家认为语言是一种语用现象,是用于交际目的的符号工具。
只有考虑到语言的实用目的,才能从根本上认识语言的结构。
(二)转换生成语法转换生成语法由美国语言学家乔姆斯基在50年代创立,在西方语言学界长期占据首要地位。
转换生成语法认为转换是语法的必要过程,生成是语法的根本属性,语言学与自然科学一样,可以从假设出发,进行推演并形式化。
为了描写和解释语言现象,转换生成语法把语法关系作为语言结构的中心,以此说明语言的生成性。
此外,转换生成语法借鉴数理逻辑理论,用递归功能原理说明用有限的规则能够生成无限的句子,把语言描写形式化。
汉语功能语法研究
汉语功能语法研究
首先,汉语功能语法的研究对象是汉语句子的结构和功能。
传统的句
法学主要关注句子的结构和形式,而功能语法则强调句子的功能和意义。
功能语法认为句子是为了实现其中一种语言功能而存在的,它着眼于句子
在交际中的作用和功能。
研究对象包括句子的成分、句子结构、句子功能
以及句子整体结构与意义的关系等。
其次,汉语功能语法的研究方法是基于语料库的分析和功能分析。
相
较于传统的句法分析方法,功能语法更加注重真实语言的分析和实际应用。
研究者通过收集大量的语料并进行分析,能够更好地理解汉语句子的结构
和功能。
功能语法的研究方法也包括对句子成分的功能和意义进行分析,
通过揭示句子的功能和语篇结构,帮助人们更好地理解和运用语言。
最后,汉语功能语法的研究具有重要的价值。
一方面,功能语法能够
帮助人们更好地理解汉语的语言规则和结构,提高语言运用能力。
通过分
析句子的结构和功能,人们能够更加准确地使用语言来传达意义,实现有
效的交际。
另一方面,功能语法的研究也有助于推动语言教学和语言技术
的发展。
它不仅能够指导语言教学的实践,提高学习者的语言水平,还有
助于语言技术的发展,如机器翻译、文本自动标注等。
总之,汉语功能语法是对汉语句子结构和功能进行研究的学科,它通
过语料库的分析和功能分析,帮助人们更好地理解和应用汉语。
功能语法
的研究具有重要的价值,不仅对个人的语言运用能力有帮助,也对语言教
学和语言技术的发展做出贡献。
汉语功能语法研究
汉语功能语法研究汉语功能语法是一种对汉语句子结构和语法功能进行描述和研究的语法理论。
它旨在从语用和交际的角度分析和解释句子的语法结构和功能。
本文将对汉语功能语法的定义、特点和研究方法进行论述,并探讨其在汉语句子分析和教学中的应用。
汉语功能语法是在传统的形式语法基础上发展起来的一种语法理论。
它强调句子的使用功能,关注句子的交际目的和语境。
与传统的形式语法不同,功能语法并不将语法结构视为一个抽象的形式系统,而是将其作为句子意义的表达工具。
在功能语法中,句子的语法结构和语义功能是相互依存的,在交际中才能完成有实际意义的信息传达。
汉语功能语法的特点之一是强调话语的动态性。
它认为语法结构和语义功能的分析需要结合具体的话语情境。
比如,在汉语中,主语、谓语和宾语的位置可以灵活变化,这取决于说话者的交际目的和语境要求。
功能语法通过分析句子的话语动态,揭示了句子结构和功能之间的关系。
汉语功能语法的研究方法主要包括句子分析和语料库研究。
句子分析是通过对句子结构和功能关系的分析,揭示句子意义的表达方式和交际目的。
语料库研究通过对大量真实语料的收集和分析,得出语言的真实用法。
语料库研究在功能语法中具有重要作用,可以为语法规则的建立和修订提供实证数据。
在汉语句子分析中,功能语法可以帮助我们理解句子结构和功能的关系。
功能语法通过对句子成分的分析,揭示了句子中不同成分的功能和作用。
比如,在一个汉语句子中,“我”是主语,“去”是谓语,“学校”是宾语。
功能语法帮助我们理解了这些成分在句子中的语法功能和交际目的。
在汉语教学中,功能语法也发挥了重要作用。
它强调学习者在掌握语法规则的同时,还需要理解句子的交际功能和语境要求。
通过功能语法的教学,学习者能够更好地理解和运用汉语句子结构,提高语言交际的能力。
总之,汉语功能语法是一种以交际为导向的语法理论。
它强调句子结构和语义功能的相互关系,通过揭示句子的话语动态,帮助我们更好地理解和运用汉语句子结构。
汉语功能语法研究
汉语功能语法研究汉语是世界上使用人数最多的语言之一,其独特的语法结构是汉语学习者需要深入了解和掌握的重要内容之一。
汉语功能语法研究旨在探索汉语语法结构中的功能性因素,并分析它们在句子构成和语义表达中的作用。
功能语法是一种语法研究方法,它强调语言表达的意义和功能,而不仅仅关注句子的形式。
在汉语功能语法研究中,重点探讨句子中各个成分的功能和语义角色,以及其在句子中的位置和关系。
一个重要的研究领域是汉语句子的动态结构。
在汉语中,动态结构通常由主语、谓语、宾语和状语等成分组成。
研究者们关注这些成分在不同句子类型中的表达方式和功能。
例如,在汉语中,主语在陈述句中通常位于句首,但在疑问句中通常位于句尾。
这种差异反映了句子类型和信息结构的语法化特征。
此外,汉语功能语法研究还关注汉语句子中的话题和焦点结构。
话题是句子中已知的信息,而焦点是句子中新出现的信息。
研究者们探索话题和焦点在汉语句子中的表达方式和位置,以及它们如何影响句子的语义和信息传递。
另一个重要的研究领域是汉语句子中的语义角色和论元结构。
语义角色指的是动词所表示的行为或状态的参与者,而论元则是与动词相关的成分。
通过分析汉语句子中动词和宾语、谓语和主语之间的关系,研究者可以揭示汉语中各种动作和状态的表达方式,并分析其与句子结构、语义和信息传递的关系。
除了以上几个方面,汉语功能语法研究还包括对固定搭配、语序、语言变体和语用规约等问题的研究。
研究者们通过采用实证研究方法,如语料库语言学和实验语言学,来获取真实使用情况下的语言数据,并对其进行分析和归纳。
汉语功能语法研究的意义在于加深我们对汉语语法结构的理解,帮助汉语学习者掌握和运用汉语的正确表达方式。
另外,该研究也为语言教学和翻译工作提供理论基础和实践参考。
总之,汉语功能语法研究是一门重要的研究领域,通过探索汉语语法结构中的功能性因素,我们可以更加全面地理解和分析汉语句子的构成和语义表达。
这对于汉语学习者和语言研究者来说,都具有重要的理论和实践意义。
系统功能语言学论文
A Metafunctional Analysis ofMartin Luther King’s I Have a DreamChapter I IntroductionThis thesis makes a detailed analysis of the great speech I Have a Dream, delivered by Martin Luther King Jr., from systemic functional perspective. it aims to investigate how the author successfully develops it, strengthens the theme and reaches the ideal effects.Such a powerful English political public speech has long been repeatedly studied and excerpted ever since it was first delivered in Washington. Many scholars have also analyzed either the oral or the written speech text from different aspects. However, few of them have ever tried to apply Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) to analyze it. As SFG will become the backbone theoretic support in this paper, it is important to start with the following brief introduction of the history of systemic functional grammar.For their own research purposes, linguists present different methods for analyzing discourses. Here are some examples: Schiffrin in Approaches to Discourse introduces 6 methods for discourse analysis: speech act theory, international sociolinguistics, the ethnography of communication, pragmatics, conventional analysis, variation analysis, socio-cultural analysis, critical analysis and comprehensive analysis. They can be roughly categorized as Structuralism and Functionalism according to their theoretic bases. At the turn of the twentieth century, historical and general linguistics were well established as academic disciplines.With the development of linguistics, some linguists begin to do some research on language from functional prospective. These linguists stress the social attribute of language, emphasize the information transmitting function of lingual forms and interpret lingual phenomena with reference to their contexts. SFG is the representative theory of Functionalism. SFG, mainly developed by M.A.K. Halliday in the 1960s, is “a theory of meaning as choice, by which a language, or any other semiotic system, isinterpreted as networks of interlocking options.”And SFG is more suitable for discourse analysis than other theories because it is a theory of high manipulation and practicability. Some successful studies of separate discourses with this theory have been done.Martin Luther King Jr. became a famous leader of Civil Rights Movements in America in the 1960s, and he was also a powerful speaker. He delivered this greatest speech on the hot afternoon of August 28, 1963. Almost 250,000 people marched on Washington to witness this historic moment of the United States. His speech was the symbol of the demonstration for the civil rights as Washington that was also the turning point and the milestone of the Civil Rights Movement.Now it still has immeasurable influence on American civil right legislation, black people‟s struggle for freedom and democracy and the global struggle of anti-racial segregation and discrimination. It is also one of the well-known speeches in the world which has been translated into many languages, read and studied as a speech model by people for the purpose of appreciating its artistry of literature and improving their writing or speaking competence. Although many studies have offered many insights into the speech, it is still worthy of studying the speech from the prospective because that may offer us new insights into it.This thesis attempts to extend its analysis to different aspects of lexico-grammatical layer of the speech in order to practice and testify that SFG is of notable power of application and manipulation; so it can be effective method of analyzing discourses. It also provides its readers a better understanding and fuller appreciation of the speech.Chapter II Relevant Theories2.1 The Definition of Discourse/ Text in SFGThis thesis is mainly about discourse analysis with SFG; so it is of great value to elaborate the definition of discourse/ text in SFG. The present author will treat the two terms as the same with both referring to any language in use, including written ones and spoken ones.Structural linguistics considers text as a grammatical unit that is larger than a sentence but is related to a sentence in the same way that a sentence is related to a clause. While Halliday believes it is misleading for he holds the view that a text is some kind of super-sentence, “something that is larger than sentence but of the same nature” (Halliday, 2001:135). In terms of the size of text, functional grammar claims that text is “not defined by its size”and it is used in linguistics to refer to “any passage, spoken or written, of whatever length, that does form a unified whole”(Halliday & Hasan, 2001:1).While Halliday and Hasan make the interpretation of a text into a broader sense. From functional prospective, “a text is a unit of language in use”, which breaks the limit of the structural interpretation of text being grammatically larger than sentence that treats text and sentence as the same nature.2.2 Discourse AnalysisThe term Discourse Analysis originated from Z. Harris‟ paper Discourse Analysis published in 1952 which is considered as the beginning of modern discourse analysis. But some linguists define discourse analysis the linguistic analysis of spontaneous and coherent spoken or written discourse. And others think it as research or how sentences are used in communications to perform social behaviors, emphasizing the communicational functions of discourses.So a discourse provides many characteristics for analyzing from different perspectives. And these characteristics can not be dealt within a single analysis, so any single analysis cannot cover all of them or cannot be elaborate. What is to be analyzed should be decided by the register of the discourse and the purpose of analysis.2.3 Three MetafunctionsAll the more specific functions can be assigned to one or more functions, and hence we refer to these broad functions as metafunctions. The first is the experiential; the second is the interpersonal; and the third is the textual.Ideational function comprises a set of resources for constructing people‟s theories of experience, and the ways in which people construct reality that seem natural tothem. It is used to understand the environment.Interpersonal function has something to do to with a speaker/writer‟s resources for interacting in dialogue and for expressing hid/ her opinions and attitudes. It is used to “act on the others in it”.The third function is the textural function, having to do with the problem of organizing what a speaker/writer has to say with respect to what they‟ve said and what they‟re going to say, and making what they‟ve said relevant to the context in which they are speaking. So it is a kind of management function which is supposed that a speaker/writer encode into interpersonal and ideational meaning.Chapter III Metafunctional Analysis of I Have a Dream3.1 The Experiential Function3.1.1 TransitivityAs we know that the life of human being is full of varied and colorful experiences, which are composed of the content of “goings-on”—happening, doing, sensing, meaning, and being and becoming. Human beings use language to build a mental picture of reality, to make sense of these experiences and sort out these “goings-on” in the grammar clause. The grammatical system by which achieved is transitivity. The transitivity system construes the world of experience into a set of process types in which the processes consist, in principle, of three components: (i) the process itself; (ii) participants in the process; (iii) circumstances associated with the process, which change their specific terms with the different types of process.In the transitivity system, there are three main kinds of processes: material, mental and relational processes. The processes of doing are those of material processes; and the processes of consciousness are those of mental processes; the processes of classifying and identifying are those of relational processes. (Halliday, 2000: 106-7).3.1.2 Transitivity Analysis of I Have a DreamEvery complete discourse shall have consisted of more than one functional component realized through different processes which combine together to express a speaker/ writer‟s thought for different purposes. The combination of different processes in an English political discourse such as the above-mentioned speech servesvarious functions: to state the truth, to express feelings, to describe happenings, to explain power relationships, to call for actions, and so on.The transitivity analysis of I Have a Dream is as follows:This speech is given on the day in memory of the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation at the step before Abraham Lincoln‟s memorial. Through this speech, he wants to make the following points clear:1.American blacks‟ equal civil rights, liberty and freedom are legitimate, so their struggle for these civil rights is legitimate.2. At current, American black people can not enjoy their legitimate civil rights as American whites do because of racial injustice, discrimination and segregation.3. Peaceful struggle is the right way for American blacks to obtain heir legitimate civil rights and they should keep on struggling until their goal is realized.We know that many processes have two participants. And this speech involves passive voice, subjunctive mood and various tenses. All these prove that King illustrates his points from different angles to make his arguments touching and convincing.Look at the extract from I Have a Dream:(1)In a sense we have come [Material] to our nation‟s capital to cash [Material] acheck. When the architects of our republic wrote [Material] the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing [Material] a promissory note to which every American was to fall [Relational] heir.This note was [Relational] a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed[Material] the "unalienable Rights" of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.In (1), 5 out of 7 processes are material processes, others are relational processes. These five material processes here state firmly the truth about American blacks‟ civil rights that they are bestowed to American blacks as to the rest of American people since the foundation of the Untied States of America.Relational processes describe the relationship of people and things in a discourse. In English political speeches, the relational processes are often used in explainingsome abstract political concepts, elaborating the relationship between political powers or between other entities. In this speech, the relationship processes take up one quarter of all the processes and many serve to state the imbalance of power relationship, or civil rights, between American whites and American blacks and their hope to change the current imbalance of power between them and their faith in their final victory.3.1.3 Lexical Density of I Have a DreamLexical density is closely related to nominalization through which processes and properties are reworded metaphorically as nouns; they function as thing in the nominal group.The style of public political speeches is more formal than that of daily spoken discourses, which makes a public political speech contain characteristics of both spoken discourse and written discourse.As a public political speech made at such a solemn moment, this speech needs characteristics of written discourses to maintain its seriousness. Its characteristics of written discourse are displayed more in the adoption of many figurations such as “a great beacon lights”, “a bad check”and “tranquillizing drug of gradualism”, its repetition of phrases and words, its clausal parallel structures which all add sublimity to its tone, momentum and vividness to the speech as a whole.3.2 Interpersonal FunctionIt is the way in which the communication between speaker/writer and audience/reader is established.3.2.1 The Mood SystemThe mood system of mood and modality is the main ways put forward by Halliday to realize the interpersonal function of a discourse. “Mood expresses the speech function”(Halliday, 2000:363). “Modality refers to the areas of meaning that lies between yes and no—the intermediate ground between positive and negative polarity”.3.2.1.1 Analysis of the Mood System of I Have a DreamInterpersonal function of a discourse is mainly realized through the choice of the mood of it. Halliday points out: “the general principle behind the expression of moodin the clause is as follows. The grammatical category that is characteristically used to exchange information is the indicative; the characteristic expression of a statement is the declarative that of a question is the interrogative.” King uses two modal operators as in (13) and (14).(13) …to which every American was to [obligation] fall heir.(14)…that all men, yes, black men and white men, would [obligation] be guaranteed the inalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.It first presents what American blacks deserve and what they actually have now. King describes the real and terrible situations at present in which American blacks are. All these are facts that have happened and cannot be changed.3.3 Textual FunctionAs we know mentioned that a text is a semantic unit, but to be exact, a text should also be a semantically coherent unit. A text of this kind has “texture” which integrates different and related parts of the text so that it expresses meaning as a whole. It is “texture” that ensures a text‟s coherence, and thus it is a meaningful text. The concept of texture is entirely appropriate to express the property of …being a text‟. A text has texture, which is what distinguishes it from something that is not a text. It derives this texture from the fact that it functions as a unity with respect to the enviro nment”(Halliday & Hasan, 2001:2). In a text, texture is the semantic relation of the information relationship expressed by the elements of the text.3.3.1 Non-structural CohesionIt can be further divided into componential and organic relations. Cohesion of componential relations refers to the semantic relation between information components, i.e. language elements in cohesive ties are not the holistic information, but the components of information. Cohesion of organic relations means the semantic relation of the holistic information, not that of the components of information.After the brief introduction to the non-structural cohesive devices, we shall analyse some typical ones in this speech.3.3.1.1 Grammatical Cohesive DevicesGrammatical cohesive devices can be divided into two groups: reference includingpronominals, demonstratives, definite articles and comparative, and substitution and ellipsis including nominal substitution/ellipsis, verbal substitution /ellipsis and clausal substitution/ ellipsis.In this speech, exdophoric reference is greatly employed. “We” appears 31 times; “us”, 4 times; “our”, 16 times. They are all together 51 times. These pronominals refer to participants of the communication, the speaker, King and his audience. Of the demonstrative “this” in that speech, there are 5 elements referring to the participants, the place, the time and the political conditions of the speech as in the discourse, “...(16)...this nation...(18)...this hallowed spot...(25) this sweltering summer (50)this situation…(54) this nation…”. “Here” refers to the place of the speech appears 3 times.The great number of “we (us, our)” used in the speech shorten the distance between King and other American blacks and that between American blacks and American whites and imply the fact that all Americans, black people and white people, are the citizens of the USA. “We” can include the speaker and the listener at the same time in English, so the use of “we” mean the speaker and the listener hole the position, so the listener will feel the intimacy between them and would like to support the speaker without any doubt. This would lead them to make the conclusion that they are equal, and thus American blacks deserve the civil rights as American whites do.The words “here”and “this”make the relationship between the speech and its context of situation closer, and also strengthen its audience‟s feeling of being on-the-spot and attract their attention more.3.3.1.2 Lexical Cohesive DevicesCo-reference, co-classification and co-extension are realized through different cohesive devices whose realization is language elements of a discourse. These language elements form different cohesive ties of three or more language elements which are also called, as Halliday puts it, cohesive chains, or referential chains. The reason is that language elements forming the chains can be “anything that can have a participant role in a transitivity structure…circumstantial elements, the process itself…” (Halliday,2000:337).Halliday and Hasan categorize lexical cohesion into 2 groups: reiteration and collocation. Reiteration means that a certain word reappears in a discourse through the repetition of itself, or the use of its synonym, superordinate, hyponymy, general word, and other forms to make the discourse‟s sentences cohesive. In terms of the repetition role in the coherence of a discourse, Hoey says: “…repetition serves to show the relatedness of sentences in much the same way that a bibliographical reference shows the relatedness of academic papers.” Collocation means lexical items‟ co-occurrence tendency. In a discourse centering on a certain subject, some words will appear at the same time and others will have little or no possibility to appear because of “field of discourse”. The semantic relations of collocation are antonym and complementary, etc.First, we will take paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 of the speech as an example to analyze the cohesive chain in I Have a Dream.The second and the third paragraphs focus on the fact that American blacks have not received their civil rights, on the contrary, they are still suffering from the segregation and the discrimination from the American racialists even 100 years after they were entitled to protection under the laws such as the Emancipation Proclamation. So the three cohesive chains are “five score years ago”, “we” and “Negro” which make these two paragraphs a semantically coherent local part of that speech.There are three cohesive chains running through I Have a Dream as follows:Chain one:(1)our...(2) we...(9) we...(11) our...(15)we...(16) we...(17) we...(18) we (22)our...(29) our...(31) our/we...(32) us/our...(33) we...(34) we/our (35)we (36)us/our/our/our….(37)we…(38)we/we/we…(39)we…(41)we…(42)we/our…(43 )we…(44) we/we…(51) we…(54) we…(62) our…Chain two:(1)nation...(8) American society...(10) nation...(11) republic...(13) America (14)America...(16) nation...(18) America...(22) nation...(24) nation (27)nation...(28) America...(29) nation...(54) nation...(57) nation...(65) nation (67)country…Chain three:(1)freedom...(3)injustice....(4) captivity...(5) free...(12) liberty...(15) justice (17)freedom/justice...(20)democracy...(21)justice...(22)injustice/brotherhood (23)justice…(25)freedom/equality…(29)justice…(32)freedom…(36)freedom/freedo m…(77)freedom/freedom/free/free…Chain one is a referential chain formed by the exophoric of “we/our/us” discussed in section 3.3.1.1. This chain, as stated above, integrates his speech and its context of situation, stresses the equality between King and his audience and creates the atmosphere of their liking and sympathizing with each other, thus strengthens their solidarity.Chain two is formed by words of repetition, synonym. We treat “American society” as the synonym of “nation”. Chain three is combined by words of repetition, synonym, and antonym. We treat “democracy”as the synonym of “freedom/ equality” and “sisters and brothers/ brotherhood”.Chain one, two and three all begin at the first sentence of I Have a Dream and end at the last sentence of it. From he beginning to the end, there are many lexical items of chain one, two and three which appear in the same sentence. Words like “we/our/us”, “nation/country/America”and “freedom/justice/equality”are the central tokens that refer to the cohesive items interacting with other cohesive chains. The interaction of cohesive chains usually indicates the topic of a discourse. So does in his speech.The interaction of chain one, two, and three shows that the aim of this speech is to call for all Americans, both American blacks and American whites, to fight for the realization of freedom and equality for all the American people. Another thing is the lexical items of chain two and chain three are all words expressing meanings of seriousness and grandness and thus they make this speech more formal and adequate for its context of situation.3.3.2 ParallelismParallelism refers to a linguistic structure appears in a discourse more than one time.These sentences or phrases with the same or similar structures are closely correlated in contents and meanings. They sound rhythmically and sonorously when read aloud, so they can express the speaker/writer‟s strong feelings and become cohesive device helping to make a discourse a coherent one. In this speech, from sentence 55 to 61, “I have a dream” appears nine times at the beginning of the sentences which coheres with “I still have a dream” in sentence 52 to 53. “it is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream”. Besides, it is also the same as the title of the speech. They together advance gradually the speaker‟s argument.We can find out that many other parallel structures in the speech I Have a Dream, such as, “Now is the time to…” in sentence 20, 21,22 and 23; “we can never be satisfied as long as…” in sentence 41, 42 and 43; “let freedom ring…”in the last paragraph. All the parallel structures consist of a great part of a dream, so parallelism is an important cohesive device in it.Chapter IV ConclusionSystemic functional linguistic approach in discourse analysis is undoubtedly valuable and important. It provides discourse analysis with a scientific and practical standard. The association of the three strata (the three variables of context, the three metafunctions and the lexico-grammatical layer) tremendously enhances the power of evaluation and persuasion of analysis and makes it more scientific.Discourse, or text, is the language that is functional in social context. It is a meaning unit that consists of ideational, interpersonal and textual components. In the theory of SFG, the three semantic components of discourse have a corresponding relationship upwards with the three parameters of context of situation: field, tenor and mode, and downwards with the lexico-grammatical structures: transitivity, lexical density, mood, modality, repetition, non-structural cohesion and structural cohesion, etc. Discourses are produced by the actualization of the meaning choices made from the meaning potentials offered by a register. Through the analysis of this speech‟s lexico-grammatical layer, its register variables are summarized as follows:Field: demonstration for civil rights.Tenor: political leader and his followers. Reflecting the roles between the leaderand follower, King as American black and his audience as American blacks (both are victims of racial discrimination), American blacks and American whites, stressing the equality between all Americans.Mode: well written before spoken delivery. Monologue. To urge devotees of civil rights to fight for equality and freedom for all American through nonviolent resistance. This is to say that the choice of its lexico-grammatical layer meets the requirements of the semantic system and the context of situation and that that dream deserves the honor as a worldwide famous public speech.The analysis also shows that language resources realizing three metafunctions can be studied separately, but they interweave with each other in discourses, and one language element may realize different metafunctions at the same time. For example, the analysis shows the repetition can be used to interpret experiential function (increasing lexical density), interpersonal function (increasing emotional appeal) and textual function (increasing cohesion).The analysis provides its readers a better understanding and a fuller appreciation of the speech. For example, its analysis of cohesive chains enables them to better understand how the parts are closely connected together to form this speech an integrated discourse.The thorough review of this thesis suggests a need for further exploration and study of this speech. Concerning time and the length of the thesis, this thesis narrows its attention on some selective analysis approaches. As a result, the broader and deeper analysis can be done through including more analysis approaches. The following are two suggestions for further analysis.1. To analysis I Have a Dream’s key and information structure as oral speech. This may lead to more findings to explain how King uses his voice to make his speech more acceptable for his audience and help raining speakers to influence their audience with their voices.2. To analyze this speech from the approach of appraisal theory. This may lead to more findings on how it realizes interpersonal function with language resources besides mood and modality.Bibliography1. Bloor,T. & Bloor,M. The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach [M]. 北京:外语教学出版社,2001.2. Brown, G. &Yule G. Discourse Analysis. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2000.3. Halliday,M.A.K. An introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2000.4. Halliday, M.A.K.. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2000.5. 胡壮麟,朱永生,张德禄.系统功能语法概论[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社,1989.6. 胡壮麟.语篇的衔接与连贯[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,1994.7. 杨信彰.英语书面语体中的词汇密度特征[J]. 解放军外语学院学报.第三期,1995.。
第五届全国系统功能语法学术研讨会论文综述
第五届全国系统功能语法学术研讨会论文综述彭宣维提要:以 语言系统和功能及其语用学原则和认知过程 为主题的第五届全国系统功能语法学术研讨会于1997年7月在重庆大学举行。
本文拟从国际系统语言学现状及基本理论探讨、语篇研究、英汉描写和分析应用几个方面对提交本次大会的论文做分类述评,以体现系统功能语言学在中国的发展现状,最后指出了该学科所面临的问题和进一步探索的领域。
关键词:综述,第五届全国系统功能语法学术研讨会,语用学原则,认知过程Abstract:Language Systems and Functions,and their Pr agmatic Pr incip les/Cognitive Pr ocess as the theme,the 5th Chinese SF Wo rkshop was held at Chong qing U niversity.T he present paper attempts to made a g eneral obser-vation of the studies concerned from the following perspectives:curr ent tr ends of the international SF L ing uist ics and some basic issues adv anced,tex t studies,descriptions of particular languag es,and the applicat ions in translat ion and languag e teaching,along with a historical surv ey of the development of the studies of SFG in China since the 80.I t briefly points out,in the end,the issues that r esearchers have to consider in the futur e.Key words:survey,the5th N ational SF Workshop,pragmatic principles,cognitiv e process以 语言系统和功能及其语用学原则和认知过程 为主题的第五届全国系统功能语法学术研讨会,于1997年7月在重庆大学举行。
例谈运用功能语法翻译诗歌论文
例谈运用功能语法翻译诗歌论文例谈运用功能语法翻译诗歌论文一、引言当前,典籍翻译中的诗歌翻译作为一种跨文化交际活动已受到很多学者的关注。
黄国文指出“国内已经有很多人对古诗英译做出了深刻的评论,但是大多数学者是从文学翻译和文学批评的角度出发,在分析时,主观成分比较多,并且有些看法是经验式的、随想式的”.[1]而要对译文进行客观的描述,必须以一定的理论为基础。
韩礼德的系统功能语法为语篇的分析提供了一个理论框架。
功能语法包括概念功能、人际功能与语篇功能三方面。
[2]它注重的是语言的功能即意义。
诗歌翻译属于一种特殊的翻译形式,在翻译诗歌时,不仅要注重意义对等,而且也要注重音律和形式对等。
本文以《越中览古》为例,先从功能语法的角度研究意义对等;再从诗学角度探讨音律与形式对等。
这样对诗歌的翻译分析才较全面。
二、李白诗歌的功能体现《越中览古》是唐代伟大诗人李白的怀古之作。
原文如下:越王勾践破吴归,战士还家尽锦衣。
宫女如花满春殿,只今惟有鹧鸪飞。
本文主要对许渊冲与孙大雨的译本进行分析。
许译:The king of Yue returned,having destroyed thefoe;His loyal men came home,with silken dress aglow.His palace thronged with flower - like ladies fair;Now we see but a frock of partridges flying there.孙译:When Goujian King of Yue,had crushed hisstate foe Wu,His homing warriors were dressed in bro-cade all.Then beauties held captive,lush like flowers,thronged the spring court;Now only partridges are flyingand each and each call.(一)元功能分析1.原诗的元功能分析概念功能涉及“过程”“参与者”与“环境成分”.“过程”又分为物质过程、关系过程、心理过程、言语过程、行为过程、存在过程(表1)。
从功能语法视角看范文对英语写作的意义
2.从 衔 接 连 贯 看 范 文 的语 境 特征
功能 语 法将 衔 接 和连 贯看 做 一 对形 式 和语 义关 系并认 为 形式 上 的 衔接 有助 于 构建 语 义 上的 连贯 。 作 为一 种形 式 语义 关 系 ,当语 篇 中的 某一 语 言成 分需 要 依赖 另 一语 言 成 分来 解 释 时 ,便 产 生衔 接 关 系 。衔 接 在 具 体 语 篇 中 体 现 为 指 称 、替 代 、 省 略 、连 接 等 语 法 手 段 和 搭 配 、重 现 等 词 汇 手 段 (胡 壮 麟 , 1994)。
范 文是 说 明英 语 语篇 衔接 手 段 的最佳语 境 。语 义连 贯是 语篇 的基 本 特征 而使 用 各种 衔 接手 段是 建 立 语 篇连 贯 的主 要途 径 。语 料分 析 表 明 ,由于传 统 的训 练 方法 比较 保 守 和受词 汇 量限 制 ,中 国学 生 一般 避 免使用 指 称 、替 代 、省 略等 衔接 手 段 ,而 连词 或 起 连接 作用 的其 他 词 类 使用 频率 较 高 。 由于教 师 的强 调 和考 试的 考察 ,不少 学生 主观上 还 是想尽 量 使用 衔 接方 式 以加 强语 篇 连贯 的 。但学 生 对衔 接 的理 解 有简
以韩礼 德 为代 表 的系统 功 能语 法 学派 主要 对 系统 网络 中选 择 的项 目及其 所组 成 的系 列在 语 言交 际 中 的 功能进 行 研究 。其整 个语 言 理论 体 系对 作为 交 际系 统 的语 言及 其功 能 进行 了全 面 的描 述 ,其有 关 语 言 元 功能 及其 实 现方 式 的理论 对 于 外 语 写作 具有 多方 面 的指 导意 义 。
功能语法与语篇分析(2)
英语语法
因此,语法为了满足这个要求把“我”当成主语。 “痛”与人是分开的东西,是说话人拥有的东西, “头”是痛的地点: I have an ache in my head. 如果“头”是个分类词,那么痛和痛的地 点就成为一种复合物:I have a headache. I have an ache in my head. → I have a headache.
名词化与语体
名词化的选用与语体有着不可分割的联系。 Halliday (1985:91)认为书面语之所以出现名词 化倾向是因为书面语在呈现现实世界的经验和现象 时把它们作为物体来看待,因而多使用名词。而非 正式的语体,特别是口语体,说话人在呈现经验和 现象时是在说话,在用语言讲述所发生的事情或所 做的事情,把经验和现象当作动作来描述,因此多 采用动词。
英语语法
这种变化使被动语态得到广泛的使用。人 们更多地考虑什么是主位,什么是新信息。 因此,我们可以说,词汇语法在构建人类 经验时不是任意的。人类与环境的关系是 复杂的,多方面的。语言构建经验的方式 也是多种多样的。语法无法用一种结构来 表示两种不同的视角。
名词化在语体中的作用
英语通常被看成是一种“名词化”语言。名词化 成为讲英语的人使用的最灵活、最有创造性的语 言手段。从结构上说,名词化指的是把动词或形 容词通过一定的方式如加缀、转化等转换为名词 的语法过程。例如 “This paper analyzes the problem and solves it.”中的动词analyzes和 solves可转换为名词,整个句子相应变成 “This paper gives an analysis of the problem and offers a solution.”。
功能语法与语篇分析(2)
发表论文著作情况
2000年出现130篇,2001年出现164篇,2002 年出现205篇,2003年出现249篇,2004年349 篇,2005年448篇,2006年601篇。如下图所示:
语篇分析
许多学者为了捕捉各类语篇的词汇语法特征,语篇分析的 方法上出现量化分析的趋势。Halliday(1994)认为不 基于语法的语篇分析根本不能说是分析。功能语言学的最 大运用是语篇分析,在对中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI) “汉语与语言学、外语研究与教学”项目进行全文检索, 检索词为“语篇分析”的论文的也越来越多。
功能语言学与语篇分析
厦门大学 杨信彰
2019/12/29
发表论文著作情况
语言功能越来越受到学者们的关注,笔者在“汉语 与语言学、外语研究与教学”的范围内,对中国期 刊全文数据库(CNKI)进行全文检索,发现检索 词为“功能语言学”的论文的出现频率正在不断上 升,已成为新世ห้องสมุดไป่ตู้我国汉语和外语研究的一个重要 主题。1990年出现“功能语言学”为主题词的论 文仅有6篇,但是到了新世纪之初的2000年至 2006年,出现频率却逐年增长。
综合性语言:语言结构不可分,词与词的语法关系 考词本身的形态变化来表示。词的变化是固定的, 不是随意的。
分析性语言:语言结构可分,通过词序和使用助动 词、功能结构词以及其他辅助词来表示。
英语在语言发展过程中逐渐扬弃绝大多数词的性、 数、格等的变化,把词形将少到最低的限度。句子 结构相对稳定。
功能语法与语篇分析
Her hair is long. She has long hair. I have a headache. My head aches. 屋里坐着两个人。 两个人坐在屋里。
语篇中人际意义于功能语法框架内有效体现论文
语篇分析中的人际意义于功能语法框架内的有效体现摘要:人际意义使语篇分析具有情感和色彩。
本文在功能语法框架内以语气、情态以及隐喻式为视角分析了人际意义于语篇内部的有效体现,挖掘了“意义潜势”是语言的参与功能即交际者在交际事件中担当的言语角色以及对命题和提议所做的推断和表达的态度。
关键词:人际意义语气情态隐喻式中图分类号:h059 文献标识码:a一人际意义相关的理论背景语篇分析是有关语言与其使用中的语境之间的关系之研究,是研究使用中的语言。
z.harris(1952)着力研究语篇中语言成分的分布及语篇与社会语境之间的关联。
他的结构分析法开了现代语篇分析之先河。
20纪六七十年代的d.hymes(1964),j.l.austin (1962),searle(1969)和grace(1975)在言语及言语行为方面作了有力的探索。
这些研究完全摆脱了传统语法所注重的在一个句子框架内对构词、词义及各种成分分析的研究,把语言置于社会文化语境中进行审视、理解。
语言学家j.r.firth和他的弟子m.a.k.hallidy发展并建立了系统功能语言学体系。
以hallidy的“元功能”(metafunctions)为代表,他系统地阐述了语言的运作机制及功能。
该原理认为语言本身是一个系统(a system),是一个“意义潜势”(a meaning potential),是一种选择(a choice)。
语言作为系统内部底层关系是与意义相关联,并可供人们不断选择的若干个子系统组成的系统网络(system network)。
人们交际时总是根据所需和具体的场景选择语言形式。
例如:索取信息时,人们运用疑问句;当给予信息时,陈述句完成此功能;与亲朋好友交谈时,语言是轻松的、随意的;在正式场合时,语言的表达是庄重正规,可见语言内容决定形式,形式由语言实体来体现。
交际中的语言被hallidy归纳为三个元功能:(1)概念功能;(2)人际功能;(3)语篇功能。
从系统功能语法看英文产品推销信的句法特征[论文]
从系统功能语法看英文产品推销信的句法特征摘要随着经济全球化和国际跨国公司的迅速发展,商业交易日趋频繁和重要。
作为商务促销类语篇的一种,产品推销信函是公司和潜在客户之间最直接、最基本的联系。
因此产品推销信的好坏直接影响着商品交易的成功与否。
本文从系统功能语法角度分析了产品推销信的句法特征,以期为产品推销信函的理解提供一些帮助,并且为写好产品推销信函提出一些启示。
关键词句法语言系统功能语法产品推销信函中图分类号:h315 文献标识码:a0引言随着经济全球化和国际跨国公司的迅速发展,商业交易日趋频繁和重要。
作为公司交易的一种渠道,适当、得体的商务信函对建立和维持公司与潜在客户之间的关系至关重要。
英文产品推销语篇是商务信函的一种特殊形式,其目的是为了刺激潜在客户的购买欲望。
由于英文商务推销信函是提升公司销售的强有力的因素之一,所以英文推销信函激起了语言学家研究的兴趣。
他们从不同的角度对英文推销信作了研究。
为了使商业世界的交际更加有效,商务人员不仅要了解不同文化背景下商务信函书写的差异,而且要学会如何写商务信函。
本篇论文从韩礼德提出的系统功能句法角度分析了英文推销信函写作的句法特征,以期为产品促销信函的理解提供一些帮助,并且为写好产品促销信函提出一些建议。
1产品推销信的界定和系统功能语法1.1 产品推销信的界定语言,不论是口头语还是书面语,在商务交易和交际中对建立和维持商务关系都至关重要。
因为没有交际,商务交易就无法完成。
因此,使用简单、有效的商务语言可以促进商务交易。
作为商务信函的一种,产品推销信是商务交易成功的第一步。
产品推销信是广告的一种,它的最终目标是劝说潜在客户购买产品或者使用某种服务。
bhatia将产品推销信定义为,“an unsolicited letter addressed to a selected group of perspective customs (they may be individuals or companies)in order to persuade them to buy product or service.”(bhatia,1993:45)。
能愿动词语法功能归属论文
能愿动词的语法功能与归属研究摘要本文综述了近年来能愿动词争论的热点问题,并给出了一些自己的看法,通过语法功能标准确定了能愿动词的归属问题。
关键词能愿动词语法功能归属能愿动词,又叫助动词。
由于在我们的日常生活中使用频率较高,近几十年来,已有不少专家学者对其进行过研究与讨论。
但对于能愿动词的功能、归属问题至今各家仍未能达成共识。
吕叔湘先生也曾说“助动词是个有问题的类。
”本文先将综述这几个方面的研究现状,并在前人研究的基础上对这些问题提出一些浅薄的看法。
语法学界普遍认为能愿动词是个封闭的类,可以一一列举出来,但各家例举出来的能愿动词也是仁者见仁,数量从十几个到几十个不等。
各家划分的能愿动词的范围不同,主要是因为确立的标准不同。
即便都是依据语法功能标准来分类的,确定的能愿动词仍然不一致,因为语法功能标准本身就是不确定的,也并不是每一条标准对每一个具体的能愿动词来说都是实用的。
综合前人的观点我们发现能愿动词有如下公认的语法特性:(1)只能与谓词性成分组合,不与体词性成分组合;如:他们愿意来吗?/天气应该冷了。
这里需要注意的是我们常说:“会英语,想要糖”,其中的“会”“要”只是一般动词并非能愿动词。
(2)不能重叠;一般动词可以重叠,如“试试,看看”等等;但没有“能能,会会,敢敢”的说法。
(3)不能带“着”,一般也不能带动态助词“了、过”;一般动词大多可以加“着、了、过”表示进行、完成等意思。
如“讲着故事,唱了歌,看过电视”等;但能愿动词一般没有这种用法,只有处于句末时,有时候才可以带“了,过”,如“过去的话是不可能的,现在可能了。
”(4)具有“~不~”的提问形式;如:他能不能做班主任?/你会不会去呢?(5)可用“不”来否定,一般不用“没”来否定;如:“不愿意,不可能,不应该”等等,注意“没有可能”中的“可能”是名词,“没有”是动词。
(6)可以单独作谓语;如:我愿意。
/你敢吗?(7)可以单独回答问题;如:你愿意吗?——愿意。
系统功能语法及其在英语教学中的应用
系统功能语法及其在英语教学中的应用System Function Grammar and Its Application in English TeachingAbstract: English grammar plays a very important role in learning English. System function grammar, as a new type of grammar, takes its own special position in both theory and practice. In this paper, the characteristic and application of system function grammar in English teaching are discussed. Keywords: English teaching; system function grammar; application1. IntroductionSystem function grammar (SFG) is a new type of grammar, which is mainly used to describe and explain the generation and realization of meaning in language. SFG theory is based on the idea that language is organized as a system of functions, which can be used to express meanings according to the overall structure of the language and the utterance context. System function grammar is a comprehensive theory of language that takes into account both the macro-level of language (the overall structure of a language) and the micro-level of language (the meaning of individual words and grammar forms). It is of great significance for English teaching.2. Characteristics of System Function GrammarThe most important characteristic of system function grammar is its emphasis on the functional nature of language. It is based on the idea that the purpose of language is to express meaning, and that the form of the language is constructed in such a way as to achieve this purpose. The basic structure of language is a set of functions, which are used to express meanings according to the overall structure of the language and the context in which it is used. The structure of system function grammar is based on the idea that language is organized as a system of functions, which can be used to express meanings according to the overall structure of the language and the context in which it is used.Moreover, system function grammar is concerned with the real use of language in communicative contexts. This means that the focus is on how language functions in real life, rather than on the abstract structures of language. The meaning of an utterance is seen as a product of the interaction between the speaker and the hearer, rather than as simply the product of the structure of the language.Finally, system function grammar is based on the idea that language is a creative and dynamic process. Meaning is seen asbeing generated by the speaker and hearer in the context of a particular conversation, rather than as being fixed by the structure of the language. The structure of system function grammar is based on the idea that language is constantly changing and developing.3. Application of System Function Grammar in English TeachingSystem function grammar can be used in English teaching in a number of ways.First, teachers can use system function grammar to help students understand English grammar better. By looking at the system of functions that make up a language, students can see how the individual parts of a language, such as verbs, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and adverbs, are related to each other and how they function to create meaning.Second, system function grammar can be used to help students understand how language works in real life. By exploring the function of each part of speech, students can gain a better understanding of how language is used in conversation and how meaning is generated by the interaction between the speaker and the hearer.Third, system function grammar can be used to help studentsbecome more accurate and creative in their language use. By looking at how different parts of speech can be used in different ways to express meaning, students can gain an understanding of the creative possibilities of language.Finally, system function grammar can be used to help students understand more complex grammar structures and how they function to create meaning. By looking at the overall structure of a language, students can gain a better understanding of how certain grammar structures are used to create meaning.4. ConclusionSystem function grammar is a new type of grammar that takes into account both the macro-level of language (the overall structure of a language) and the micro-level of language (the meaning of individual words and grammar forms). It is used to describe and explain the generation and realization of meaning in language. Its application in English teaching can help students understand how language works, how meaning is generated, and how to use language more accurately and creatively.。
你如何看待语法在英语学习中的作用英语作文
你如何看待语法在英语学习中的作用英语作文The Importance of Grammar in English Language LearningGrammar is an essential component of learning any language, and it plays a crucial role in English language learning. In this article, we will explore the significance of grammar in the process of acquiring English proficiency.First and foremost, grammar serves as the foundation of language learning. Just like a building needs a solid foundation to stand tall and strong, a language learner needs to understand the rules and structure of grammar in order to communicate effectively. Without proper grammar knowledge, it would be difficult for learners to express their thoughts and ideas accurately in English.Secondly, grammar provides learners with the tools to construct correct sentences and convey their messages clearly. By understanding the rules of grammar, learners can avoid common mistakes such as subject-verb agreement errors, misplaced modifiers, and punctuation misuse. This not only enhances their writing skills but also improves their overall communication skills in English.Furthermore, grammar helps learners understand the nuances of the English language. For example, the use of tenses, modal verbs, and phrasal verbs can greatly impact the meaning of a sentence. By mastering grammar rules, learners can accurately convey their intended message and avoid misunderstandings with native speakers.In addition, grammar plays a crucial role in language comprehension. When reading or listening to English texts, learners need to understand the grammar rules used by the author or speaker to interpret the meaning of the text. Without a solid grasp of grammar, learners may struggle to comprehend the content and context of the text.Moreover, grammar is essential for academic and professional success. In academic writing, proper grammar is required to convey ideas effectively and meet the standards of scholarly communication. In the professional world, good grammar is essential for creating professional documents, emails, and reports that convey professionalism and credibility.In conclusion, grammar is a fundamental aspect of English language learning that cannot be overlooked. It provides learners with the foundation, tools, and understanding needed to communicate effectively, comprehend text, and succeedacademically and professionally. Therefore, teachers and learners alike should prioritize the study of grammar in their language learning journey.。
论功能语法的语义逻辑框架
论功能语法的语义逻辑框架语言功能语法框架(LFG)是一种形式主义的科学框架,用于描述语言结构元素之间的相互作用。
它不是语法学的构造框架,也不是特定的社会语言学理论,而是一个可用于描述词法,句法和语义特征的通用模型。
语言功能语法可以被用来理解有用于描述语言功能的不同种类,例如语义以及概念理解,但焦点在于检查和描述端到端句子语言功能之间发生的关联。
在更一般的情况下,语言功能语法表明,从宏观上看,语言资源总是和功能资源紧密相联,其中后者的结构取决于文本或其他上下文,或句子所处的话语情境。
语言功能语法是一种多功能的语言学模型,它结合了句法,语义和定义、交互和认知三个功能领域,给出了一套更坚实的方法来理解自然语言的机制以及文本交互和语用分析。
它依赖于句法标记识别和语义分析的结果,也包括语用与话语分析的实践,例如理解和挖掘隐含的意象及信息。
语言功能语法框架建立了一种全新的语言学范式,并将多个功能领域的研究内容一体化。
框架的核心部分包括句法分析,语义分析,定义分析,理解和推理,交互和话语分析。
通过将句法,语义,定义和它们之间的关联联系,LFG可以构建一个综合而完整的自然语言图景,从而实现自然语言处理和理解的正确和连贯的表达。
LFG的运用,除了偏见和文化的影响之外,可以让我们了解和解析看似晦涩难懂的句子结构,同时还了解它们在话语中所扮演的角色,以及它们在语义理解中所起的作用。
它也使我们能够分析潜在的句式结构,从而形成话语以及功能概念之间的联系。
这些都有助于获取完整的文本与话语,从而更深入地了解每个句子和整个上下文的含义,进而对其进行更精准地语义分析和概念理解。
功能语法在励志演讲辞中的应用研究
功能语法在励志演讲辞中的应用研究在竞争激烈的社会大背景下,人们的说话技巧越来越受到重视。
而作为一种讲究语言艺术的文体形式--演讲,其语言技巧与艺术被授予越来越多的关注。
本篇论文也不例外。
观察发现,众多的演讲按功能来分大致分为两种类型:知识型和励志型。
知识型,顾名思义,以传授知识为主,多以工科知识为主;励志型演讲,就是鼓励人们积极面对生活,面对人生,遇到问题要积极应对与解决。
而励志型演讲引起了笔者的兴趣。
励志型演讲之所以能发挥其激励的目的,其语言特点一定是值得探究的。
正是其演讲语言,即演讲辞,尤其特殊的功能。
为了探究励志演讲辞的语言功能,作者利用了语言学家韩礼德所创的关于语言功能分析的功能语法理论。
本论文旨在基于韩礼德的功能语法理论对励志型演讲辞的特点及功能进行探究。
其理论意义就是从前人理论研究的基础上,进一步分析韩礼德功能语法理论在功能性语篇中的应用,并加深对演讲辞的认识和了解;对系统功能语法理论下的功能语法理论做出进一步的阐释,并通过具体语篇的增强该理论的对功能性语篇的解释力;本文利用功能语法理论分析演讲辞的语言特点和功能,既加深了对演讲语言的研究,又拓宽了系统功能语法理论的研究范围。
实践上,通过对该课题的研究,本文将揭示励志演讲中的语言特点及作用。
这将帮助人们更好地认识和了解演讲辞的特点和演讲活动的目的;另一方面,也可以帮助人们准确把握演讲语言的特点,学习其运用语言的技巧和方法,以便人们在生活、学习和工作中做出更有效的交际活动,提高效率,适应社会,服务社会。
本研究是基于韩礼德的功能语法理论下的三大元功能理论为主要理论支撑。
另外,演讲的背景与所处情景对演讲的励志作用也产生了一定的影响,故本文亦利用了韩礼德语境理论下的情景语境理论来分析演讲语篇,并将此理论作为本研究的理论基础之一。
本文运用定量和定性分析相结合的方法进行研究。
从众多演讲中,依据对励志的理解选出30篇励志型演讲,在WORD搜索功能的帮助下,对语篇语言的共性进行统计;再对演讲语言的各自特色进行查找;并进行归纳,分类,分析,生成图表,实现定量分析;继而,抽取具有典型的语句进行分析论证,实现定性分析。
功能语篇分析纵横谈
功能语篇分析纵横谈功能语篇分析纵横谈是语言学领域中的一个重要分支,它的是语言如何在社会交往中实现意义传递和人际互动。
本文将探讨功能语篇分析的理论背景、优点、缺点以及在实际生活和工作中的应用,以便读者更深入地了解该领域的相关知识。
功能语篇分析以韩礼德(Halliday)的系统功能语法为理论基础,强调语言的社会属性以及语言与社会的互动关系。
它的是语言使用中的变异现象,即不同的语言形式和结构如何在不同语境下表达意义。
功能语篇分析的主要优点在于其强调语言的动态性,将语言视为一种社会实践,并尝试从社会文化角度解释语言现象。
然而,它也存在一些缺点,例如过于强调语言的社会属性而忽略了语言的心理属性,有时难以解释某些复杂的语言现象。
功能语篇分析在生活和工作中的应用广泛。
首先,在语言教育领域,功能语篇分析可以帮助教师更好地理解学生语言使用中的变异现象,从而为其提供更具针对性的教学策略。
其次,在跨文化交际领域,功能语篇分析可以帮助人们更好地理解不同文化背景下的交际规则和语言使用策略,从而促进跨文化交流的顺利进行。
此外,在商务谈判、法庭辩论等情境下,功能语篇分析也可以帮助人们更好地理解对方的语言意图和交际策略,从而提高沟通效率。
总之,功能语篇分析纵横谈作为语言学领域的一个重要分支,对于深入了解语言的社会属性和交际功能具有重要意义。
虽然它存在一些缺点,但其优点和实用性不容忽视。
通过在生活和工作中的应用,我们可以更好地理解语言现象的本质,提高人际交往和跨文化交流的能力。
在日常交流和工作中,我们经常需要撰写和理解各种类型的文本,包括广告、新闻、报告、电子邮件等等。
这些文本的目的各不相同,有的是为了提供信息,有的是为了说服,有的是为了指示。
为了更好地理解和撰写这些文本,我们可以采用功能语篇分析的方法。
功能语篇分析是一种语言学方法,它可以帮助我们理解文本在特定语境中的目的和意义。
这种方法认为,每个文本都有其特定的功能,例如提供信息、说服或指示,而这些功能是由文本的语言特征体现出来的。
系统功能语言学论文全英
郑州航空工业管理学院毕业论文(设计)2015 届英语专业 1107068 班级题目系统功能语法视角下英语新闻语篇中的名词化研究姓名张丽平学号 110706821指导教师李红新职称副教授二О一五年五月三十一日A Study of Nominalization in English Journalistic Discourses under the Perspective of Systemic-functionalGrammarByZhang lipingSupervisor: Li HongxinDepartment of Foreign LanguagesZhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry ManagementMay 2015内容摘要名词化是英语中非常普遍的语言现象,在人们的语言活动中起着重要作用,尤其是在英语书面语中。
许多研究表明,语体越正式,其名词化程度越高,反之亦然。
新闻英语语篇作为一种较为正式的语体,亦是人们日常生活中经常接触的一种语体,其名词化使用频率较高。
根据Matthews (1997)有关名词化的定义:它是在任何过程中,由任何种类的单元如一个动词或者一个形容词转化成一个名词或者起名词短语作用的一个句法单元。
但是不同的语言学流派对名词化有不同的认知,本文从以韩礼德为代表的系统功能语言学角度出发,在语法隐喻及语言的元功能理论的基础上,调查在新闻语篇中政治、经济、科技和文化四种子语类的名词化使用频率,探讨名词化在新闻语篇中的特征及功能。
本研究从美国和英国的四家知名报纸中随机选取了四种语类的报道各十篇,共四十篇, 统计了四个子语类文本中的名词化的使用频率,剖析每一种新闻子语类中的名词化的特征;讨论名词化在新闻语篇中的概念功能、人际功能和语篇功能。
本论文创新点是从系统功能语法角度探讨了英语新闻语篇中的名词化现象,不仅促进了我们对英语新闻语篇中的名词化现象的全面认识,而且在一定程度上对提高学习者的新闻英语阅读与写作能力提供了帮助。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Functional Analysis of Interpersonal Grammatical Metaphor under Different Social ContextsMa Xiaoyuan(Liaoning Normal University, Department of foreign languages, Dalian) Abstract:interpersonal metaphor is one of the important parts of Halliday’s grammatical theory, which includes two parts:metaphor of mood and metaphor of modality. This essay makes an analysis of the functions of interpersonal metaphor from various social contexts.Key words: interpersonal grammatical metaphor; functions; social contextsⅠ. IntroductionHalliday points out that language possess three main meta-functions: ideational metafunction, interpersonal metafunction and the textual metafunction, and also divided the grammatical metaphor into interpersonal grammatical metaphor and experiential grammatical metaphor. And interpersonal grammatical metaphor just refers to the metaphorical phenomenon that occurs during the interpersonal communication event. It is widely used as a way of language using to establish and maintain better relations with other people involving non-congruent ways of enacting interaction. So it can brings many different functions and benefits when used in various social situationsⅡ. Interpersonal metaphorInterpersonal metaphor has metaphor of mood and metaphor of modality.The metaphor of mood may explain a phenomenon that why sometimes mood choices and speech roles don’t always coincide. For example: could you get me a drink? a words which you said to a person is a kind of indirect speech act shifting a demand for goods-and-services to a question about the other person’s ability, the effect is therefore soften the demand. One more example:What is the use of the rules if no one obeys it? This superficial question realized in the interrogative mood is actually a statement, which is typically realized in the declarative mood. With this metaphorical step an exchange of goods or services is constituted as an exchange of information.And in some contexts, the using of metaphor of mood will show more politeness and consultation than any other normal mood, so, it broadens the function of language from the semantic perspective.And then is the metaphor of modality. Modality is the expression of the speaker’s attitude towards the likelihood or necessity of the proposition, and is congruently realized by modal verbs, and modal metaphor just refers to the modal meaning reflected by the clause which is originally embodied by the modal verbs, modal adverbs or the extended part of the predicate. For example: A: You are supposed to come heretomorrow.B: It is expected that you come here tomorrow. Sentence B is a modal metaphor because the modal meaning of extended part of predicate “supposed to”is showed by the clause “it is expected”. And the basic distinction that determines how each type of modality will be realized is “orientation”. Orientation is the distinction between subjective and objective modality,and the explicit and implicit variants. Halliday states,The explicitly subjective and explicitly objective forms of modality are all strictly speaking metaphorical.Ⅲ.Interpersonal metaphor in different social contexts and it’s functions(1) In advertisementsAdvertising English is a very useful variant of modern English for a particular function with high commercial value. In order to getting the strong effect of guidance and persuasion, the designers of the advertisement always use a special method in language to show the interpersonal relations and get the trust of the customers. So, interpersonal metaphors are widely used in advertising language. here are the examples:A.Are guide books the only way to a city’s soul?Have you driven a Ford lately?Advertising is an adjunct to modern business. Its purpose is to provide consumers with product information; therefore, the advertisinglanguage should be normally declarative sentences, but in fact we can usually see a lot of imperative sentences or questions in ads. This is just an example of metaphor of mood in it. The questions in the ads can be only answered by the readers themselves, and it’s a useful way to arouse the curiosity of them.Sometimes advertisements just show their opinions through some suggestions or hide the subjective traces, like this air services ad:B. It seems that giving to a wide selection of first run movies music videos,news,games and sports will make your trip relaxing and enjoyable.This explicitly objective form of modality totally hides the subjective will and can bring the attention and trust of the customers. Various kinds of expressions through interpersonal metaphor broaden the potential of and attract more customers, which are just the purpose of advertising English, and analysis of the interpersonal metaphor in advertising language can also deepen our understanding and improve our writing skill about it.(2) In the military newsIn the analysis of military news discourse, it is found that interpersonal metaphors are mainly expressed through the metaphor of modality, the use of metaphor of mood is very rare, which may because the feature of military news discourse is to report the truth, and by usingmuch more declarative sentences can play better the function of transmitting information of news. And the two forms of metaphor of modality: both the explicitly subjective and the explicitly objective forms of it enhance the objectivity and credibility of military news. Here are the examples of metaphor of modalities:A. Major-General Barney White-Spanner said, “I think we’re getting close to what we intend to do in southern Iraq.”Mr. Khan told an audience at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, “... I’m afraid that the longer the war goes on, the more people will be radicalized.”B. It would be wrong to assume that Zardari will go easy on militants just because of that one deal, however repellent.It is unclear, however, whether MPs will give the status-of-forces agreement the green light, with some politicians demanding that the text be put to a public referendum.The former is usually realized in direct speech, expressing the views of some authorities, and also to some extent represents the modal directions of the reporters, because the words are quoted or not is in their control. But the latter makes the opinion of the reporters an unquestioned fact, because the source of modality is concealed and the objective evaluation is emphasized.(3) In business negotiationIn business negotiations, the interaction between negotiators lies in the words and attitudes. A single word or a tone can affect the responses of both sides; it’s subtle and influential, therefore, the tone use in the negotiation deserves your careful attention, it should be courteous, tactful and in a reasonable manner. Compare the following two sentences:A.(a) We cannot make a profit with those numbers.(b) How we can make a profit with those numbers.Sentence (b) here uses the metaphor of mood by asking a question to replace the fact that “we can not make a profit with those numbers”, it’s mild and non-threatening, turning the censure into soft complaints subtly without any harsh feelings. It helps you to adhere to your principle and also avoid the sturdy. Another example;B. (a) you are wrong/I don’t agree with you.(b) Let’s look at this another way.Here the sentence (b) avoids the use of direct rebuttal words but in a suggestive tone; induce the negotiator to rethink about the question in a different attitude. So, using this metaphor of mood can help you achieve your goal without offending the other part.There are also many metaphor of modalities in negotiation English:C .If you can, I think we can discuss this further.You can use this sentence if you want to make a compromise to break the current situation when the negotiation falls into an impasse.Using the explicitly subjective modality “I think......” is to tell the other part “we can continue to negotiate if we agree to this condition”, Point out that there are some possibilities and also out of the shackles of commitment. Another metaphor of modality:D. It seems to me we’re giving up too much in this case.This sentence replace the words that “you’re giving us the short end here”.Use a calm and easy tone to point out the fact; it avoids the embarrassment of the condition like cursing each other when both parts know well about the truth, it helps to reduce the blame and ease the confrontation.(4) In the technological textsIn the technological texts, the information is usually illustrated through the writing material but not face to face interactions between the writer and the reader. But we can always find some questions in the text, and it is obviously that it’s the ideal readers who are created by the writer ask the questions but not the writer him/herself. And it is a metaphor of mood but not a real question, for example:A. Is not ωsuch an element of reality and do we not assume then its existence to start with? The answer is that theω’S represent only a necessary tool to count and average all measurements correctly.In this case, the writer is more an information provider than a person who really needs it; the interrogative mood reflects the statement functionhere, having an interaction with the readers through the metaphorical expressions, like the example above, can make it easier for the reader to accept the theories that have presented by the writer.It is always thought that modality shows the subjectivity, but in fact it shows the efforts that the speakers have made for the truth value of their speech. Their speech can be seen as a direct reflection of the fact and to some extent reflects the cognitive view of non-modal. So, the modality in the technological texts can be seen as the efforts that the writer has made to show the truth level and objectivity in his/her discourse. For example:B. it is likely that hard,inorganic coatings or as structural layers can improve the wear performance of micro machines.This is a metaphor of modality of the explicitly objective form. And there are many kind of metaphors of modality in technological discourses like: It is likely/probable/possible/usual/certain/obvious that...These help to put the information in a position of objectivity, to make it flawless and avoid the criticism and doubts about the reality and the feasibility from the readers, and hide the subjectivity behind.Ⅳ.ConclusionWe can easily see from the above that interpersonal metaphor is so important in our life; it is widely applied in various social conditions for different purposes, it can promote a successfulcooperation in business, enhance the truth and objectivity of the news report or the new technological discoveries, or bring more customers to buy the product that has advertised......Therefore, this essay makes an analysis of the interpersonal metaphor from different social contexts, aiming to enrich the use of interpersonal metaphor and expand the study field of it.Functional Analysis of Interpersonal Grammatical Metaphor under Different Social Contexts马晓媛学号:201010648References【1】Thompson. Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd edition) [M]. Hodder Arnold, 2008.【2】李葆卫. 人际隐喻[J]. 西藏民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009 (5).【3】谭小凤.商务谈判英语中的人际语法隐喻功能浅析[J].四川教育学院学报, 2008(11).【4】冯德正. 广告语中的语法隐喻及其功能[J]. 潍坊教育学院学报, 2007(3)【5】张岩.科技语篇中人际语法隐喻的功能研究[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报, 2009(5).【6】杨林.人际隐喻与新闻英语语篇分析[J]. 西北第二民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(1).。