毕业论文外文翻译-胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究
外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 胜任力模型研究
Research on Competency Model:A Literature Review andEmpirical StudiesAbstractWestern countries have applied competency models to addressing problems existed in their administrative and managerial systems since 1970s,and the findings is positine and promising. However, competency model hasn’t been introduced to China until 1990s and it is still unknown and mysterious to many Chinese managers. This paper aims to uncover the mysterious veil of competency model in order to broaden the horizon of Chinese managers and boost China's human resource development as well as management.Keywords:Competency,Competency Models,Empirical Studies of Competency ModelsIt has been more than 30 years since competency model was utilized to human resource management.In western countries,competency model first displayed its effectiveness in government administration, meanwhile many multinationals and their branch companies applied the competency model to their daily business management and their business was a great success. As the notion of competency is gradually come to light and accepted by people all around the world,more and more enterprises have been trying to build their own competency model under the help of professional consultant firms. As a result,competency model has gradually been a very fashionable phrase in the field of management and quite a few enterprises are thus benefited from it. In recent years, competency model has become a hot spot in the Chinese academia as well as big-,middle- and small-sized enterprises alike,many relevant writings and books have also been translated and published. However, competency and competency model are still mysterious to many Chinese scholars, business managers as well as government administrators.Purpose and Significance of the StudyThe purpose of the study aims to make a critical literature review of the competency model,clarify some confusion related to it and explore its application. The following questions are employed to guide this study:What is competency? What is competency model? What are the theoretical and empirical findings related to competency model?The study illustrates how we could take advantage of competency model in our harmonious society building. On one hand,the study will delineate competency and competency model in order to clarify confusions related to it since it is still strange and mysterious to many Chinese managers and administrators;on the other hand,thestudy would enrich Chinese HRD&HRM in the field of government administration and business management both theoretically and empirically.Research MethodThe present study has utilized qualitative analysis, induction and deduction. Since this research is a literature review in some sense, qualitative analysis will be an indispensable research method; Induction and deduction are applied to both theoretical and empirical studies.In order to enhance the credibility of present research,only the authoritative publications on competency model are reviewed,including books and papers written by foreign and Chinese scholars and HRDHRM practitioners. By searching for the keywords "competency" "competency model" and "competency model building" as well as "empirical studies on competency models",books and papers written by well-known foreign scholars such as McClelland D. C.,Lyle M. Spencer, Anntoinette D. Lucia, Richard Lepsinger etc.,are available; by the same token,books and papers written by Chinese scholars such as Zhi-gong He,Jianfeng Peng, Shaohua Fang, Nengquan Wu,etc.,could be consulted. All the books and papers are published between 1950s and 2007. In addition, many data cited in this paper comes from empirical studies at home and abroad.FindingsIn this part,a literature review of competency is firstly carried out;then competency model as well as its evolution,development and innovation is delineated;finally empirical studies are reviewed. Empirical studies mainly focus on competency model building and its application to human resource development and management.Understanding CompetencyIn 1973,American scholar David C. McClelland published his paper Testing for Competency Rather Than Intelligence which cited a large amount of research findings to illustratethe inappropriateness of assessing personnel qualities by abusing intelligence tests. Dr. McClelland further explained that some factors (personality, intelligence, value,etc.)which people had always taken for granted in determining work performance hadn't displayed their desired result. As a result,he emphasized that people should ignore those theoretical by pothese and subjective judgements which had been proved groundless in reality. He declared that people should tap directly those factors and behaviors which could really impact their performance (McClelland, 1973). These factors and behaviors were named "competency" by McClelland. The publishing of this paper symbolized the debut of competency research. From then on,many scholars started getting involved into the research on competency and they conceptualizedcompetency from different perspectives as shown in the following table: The above ten concepts of competency have a lot in common:①Competency is motive, trait,value,skill,self-image, social role,knowledge;②Competency is a combination;③Competency should be measurable, observable, instructional,phasic and hierarchical;④Competency is a determinant to outstanding performance.Thus competency is an underlying combination of individual characteristics such as motive, inner drive force, quality, attitude,sole role,self-image, knowledge and skill,it is causally related to criterion-referenced effective and/or superior performance in a job or situation and it is measurable,observable and instructional.Besides,many scholars and consultancy firms believe that competency could be explained under the help of three different models:Iceberg Model. This model treats competency as an iceberg, the part above the water represents behavior, knowledge and skills which are easy to measure and observe,while the part under the water symbolizes underlying qualities such as value,attitude,social role, self-image,traits which are hard to assess,and the deepest part under the water represents the most latent qualities such as inner drive force,social motive, etc. which are most difficult to observe and measure.Onion Model. This model treats competency as an onion, the outer layer represents skills and knowledge which are liable to acquire,the inner layer refers to qualities such as self-image,social role,attitude and value which are relatively difficult to appraise, while the core of the onion symbolizes traits and motives which are most difficult to cultivate and develop.Brain Model. This model stems from the brain mechanism. It presupposes that the brain could be divided into four parts. Each part functions differently. The upper-left part is in charge of competency such as analysing capacity, calculation, strong logic ability; the upper-right part is in charge of competency such as innovation and intuition;the bottom left part is in charge of competency such as organizing ability, planning ability; and the bottom-right part is in charge of competency such as communication ability,perception, etc. Different parts will exert corresponding influence on competency development.Conceptualizations of Competency ModelFew foreign scholars have directly put forward conceptualizations of competency model. By contrast,many Chinese scholars have expressed their opinions on it. The present paper only cites those concepts that have been published by authoritative publishing houses.Jianfeng Peng, a professor in Ch;na Renmin University,together with his students, has studied how to build competency models for effective HR management since 2003. He thought competency model was the combination of differentqualities which were necessary for people to successfully finish a job or achieve superior performance,these qualities included different motives,traits, self-images and social roles as well as knowledge and skill (Jianfeng Peng, 2003). Prof. Peng believed that a competency model was composed of 4-6 competencies that were closely related to performance. Competency models could help managers judge and distinguish key factors that led to superior performance or underperformance. As a result,competency model could be treated as a foundation to improve performance.Professor Nengquan Wu from Sun Yat-sen University published his book Competency Model:Design and Application in 2005,according to his understanding, competency model refers to "proficiencies that people define core competencies of different levels, delineate corresponding behaviors,determine key competencies as well as f inish certain work.”(Nengquan Wu,2005). Prof. Wu conceptualized competency model from the perspective of methodology. He believed that competency model was a unique HRM thinking mode, method and operation flow. On the basis of organizational strategy, competency model could be utilized to enhance organizational competitiveness and improve performance.Shaohua Fang, a senior HRM consultant and expert,provided us with the following definition:"Competency model is to conceptualize and describe the necessary knowledge,skills,qualities and abilities which an employee should have in order to finish work (Shaohua Fang, 2007)”.By taking advantage of definitions of different levels and related behavioral descriptions, people could determine the combination of core competencies and required proficiency to finish work. Hc} pointed out these behaviors and skills must be able to measure,observe and instruct and they should exert a great influence upon personal performance and business success.International Human Resource Institute(IHRI) has also defined competency model:"The so-called competency model is the standardized description and explanation of competencies that could actualize superior performance.”(·IHRI, 2005)IHRI declared that a competency model should include 6^-1 2 competencies.In summary, the first concept mentioned above attaches an importance to the composition of competency model and its function, while all of the rest three concepts emphasize cognitive abilities as well as criterion-referred performance. Thus competency, model is a combination of different competencies which could be observed,delineated,explained and calculated on one hand,and could facilitate superior performance on the other hand.Development and Evolution of Competency ModelIn early 1970, top officials in U. S. Department of State believed that theirdiplomats' se- lection based on intelligence test was ineffective. It was an upset situation for them to find that many seemly excellent people fail to live up to their expectations regarding their work performance. Under such circumstances, Dr. McClelland was invited to help Department of State design an effective personnel selection system which could appraise the actual performance of employees. In that program,McClelland and his colleague Charles Dailey adopted the method of Behavioral Event Interview (BEI) to collect information in older to study factors that influenced the diplomats' performance. Through a series of summaries and analyses, McClelland and Dailey found out the differences between an excellent diplomat and a mediocre diplomat as far as their behaviors and modes of thinking were concerned. In this way, competencies that a diplomat should possess were found out. This program is the earliest empirical application of competency model. And the research findings were two papers: Improving Officer Selection for the Foreign Service (McClelland&Dailey,1972) as well as Evaluating New Methods of Measuring the Qualities Needed in Superior Foreign Service Information Officers(McClelland& Dailey,1973).Mcber and American Management Association (A'MA) also started their research on competency model in the same year. They focused on providing the answer to the question:what kind of competencies should be displayed by successful managers rather than unsuccessful ones? AMA spent 5 years observing 1 800 managers. By comparing the performance of excellent managers and mediocre ones, AMA defined their competencies based on their traits. The research results showed that all the successful managers shared the following 5 competencies:professional knowledge,maturity of mentality, maturity of .entrepreneurship,people relations and maturity of the profession. Of which,only professional knowledge were shared by excellent and mediocre managers (Mcber&.AMA, 1970).Then Prof. Bray carried out 8 years research at AT&T based on technique of assessment center. From the aspectives of abilities, attitudes and traits, etc.,he built a competency model composed of 25 competencies such as interpersonal relations, expression ability, social sensitivity, creativity,flexibility,organizational ability,planning ability, decision-making ability, etc(Bray and Grant,1978).In China,however, researches on competency model are relatively much late.Chinese scholars Chongming Wang and Minke Chen published their paper about competency model in Psychological Science in 1992. They studied 220 senior and middle-level managers of 51 enterprises in 5 cities. After examining and testing the competency model for senior managers on the basis of factor analysis and structural equation modelling, they compiled "Key Managerial Behavior Assessment Scale" (Chongming Wang&Minke Chen,2002).Scholars such as Kan Shi, Jicheng Wang and Chaoping Li took advantage of Behaviocal Event Interview to assess the competency model for senior managers in the industry of telecommunication (Kan Shi,Jicheng Wang&Chaoping Li,2002). Jicheng Wang designed 5 universal competency models for technical personnel,sales people, community service personnel,managers as well as entrepreneurs respectively.Jianfeng Peng and his postgraduate student Xiaojuan Xing built 4 universal competency models for business managers,business technical personnel,marketing personnel as well as HR managers (Jianfeng Peng,2003 ).The above domestic studies illustrate that competency models for middle-level and senior managers have been built based on in-depth interview and questionnairing. Most publications only focus on conceptualizing competency model,its development,behavioral event interview as well as competency model building,most of the findings are theoretical rather than empirical. By contrast,foreign studies are much maturer both theoretically and empirically.Empirical StudiesEmpirical studies highlight the application of competency model to enterprises, governments and other institutions.Nowadays,empirical studies on competency models mainly focus on the following 4 aspects:Staffing and Selection. Besides job standards and skills prescription, more and more businesses have carried out their personnel staffing and selection in light of the candidates' competencies which are crucial to their future performance. This competency-based personnel staffing and selection has connected business strategies and targets to business employees themselves. As a result,the quality of staffing and selection is greatly improved.Performance Management. Businesses which have built their competency models are more interested in the competency rather than the result itself in their performance management. As a result, their performance management style has been competency-driven rather than result-driven. Managers haven’t attached an importance to short-term performance, but current and long-term performances. In such a managerial system,outstanding performance has been easily actualized. Each employee has made most of their core competencies and expertise to make a contribution to their business.Compensation Management.After the competency-based compensation management system is set up, businesses have concentrated on their employees’future development and potential value, which has stimulated employees and managers of all ranks to improve themselves both menetuacy and teconologcal. Competency oases compense lion management system has helped enterprises attract and retain moretalents. In a word,competency model has endowed employees with a sense of respect and creativity.Training and Development. Enterprises which have built their competency models tend to determine core competencies in light of business strategies,environments, employee development planning and performance appraisal. Enterprises decide their training and development priorities on the basis of competency model.Future TrendsDespite that there is a growing body of literature on competency model,research on competency model is still in a premature stage and many questions still remain unanswered. Therefore, further research is required to address several important issues.First of all,although there are growing studies on the impacts of the competency model on organizational outcomes,antecedents of competency model need to be identified and academically explored. Future studies are needed to examine the relationships between the features of competency model and its key antecedent variables such as organizational sttracture.leadership and external environment. For example,it can be reasoned that the features of competency model are likely to be positively correlated with the structures of enterprises, governments as well as other institutions. Secondly,the impact of competency model on performance needs to be thoroughly explored. More studies are needed to examine whether the features of competency model or organizational culture,has direct or indirect impacts on organizational performance. While quite a few HRD and HRM researchers and practitioners have demonstrated that the concept of competency model has a positive impact on organizational performance, however,such impact may be mediated by other important organizational variables. Finally, it is also important to consider the relationships of competency model and other important HR variables such as career development, managerial coaching as well as employee training.Conclusions and DiscussionsIn conclusion,competency model has increasingly exerted profound influence on human resource development and management. While this concept has received an increase in both academic and management fields,there are increasing empirical studies designed to examine the nature of the construct and its relationships with other important organizational variables. More studies are needed to enhance the theoretical and empirical foundations of competency model.胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究摘要20世纪70年代以来,西方国家已经利用胜任力模型来解决存在于行政和管理系统中的问题,其结果是积极且有前途的。
如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析
如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析文献综述与实证分析是科学研究中十分重要的步骤,它们可以帮助研究者了解前人的研究进展,为自己的研究提供理论支持和实证依据。
本文将探讨如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析。
一、文献综述的概念与重要性在开始正式撰写研究论文之前,进行文献综述是至关重要的。
文献综述是对已有研究或文献的全面评述和总结,旨在了解相关领域的研究进展和研究热点,避免重复研究。
它可以帮助研究者确定自己的研究问题,选择适当的理论框架和研究方法。
文献综述的重要性在于:首先,它可以帮助研究者了解前人的研究动态和研究成果,为自己的研究提供理论基础和切入点;其次,它可以发现研究领域的研究空白和争议,为自己的研究提供创新的思路和研究方向;最后,它可以避免研究者进行无意义的重复研究,提高研究效率和质量。
二、文献综述的步骤与方法进行文献综述需要遵循一定的步骤与方法,以下是一般的文献综述步骤:1.确定研究范围与目的:明确综述的范围和目的是非常重要的,可以避免综述过于笼统或过于狭窄。
2.收集文献:通过检索学术数据库、阅读相关期刊、图书和会议论文,收集与研究主题相关的文献资料。
对于不同学科领域,可以采用不同的检索工具和策略,如使用关键词、作者名、期刊名等进行检索。
3.筛选文献:对收集到的文献进行筛选,根据题目、摘要和关键词等信息进行初步筛选,排除与研究主题不相关或质量不高的文献。
4.阅读和理解文献:对筛选出的文献进行仔细阅读和理解,把握研究问题、研究方法、数据分析等关键点。
5.分类与总结:根据文献的研究主题、研究对象、研究方法、研究结论等特点,对文献进行分类和总结,可以采用表格或图表等形式进行呈现。
6.撰写文献综述:在撰写文献综述时,应注重逻辑性、连贯性和准确性。
可以根据已有文献的研究范围、研究方法、研究结论等方面进行分章节、分小节的论述。
三、实证分析的概念与方法与文献综述相比,实证分析更加注重对已有数据和事实的分析与解释。
论文写作中的文献综述与实证研究
论文写作中的文献综述与实证研究在论文写作中,文献综述和实证研究是两个重要的环节。
文献综述是指对已有研究的梳理和总结,而实证研究则是指通过实证方法对问题进行验证和分析。
本文将分别介绍文献综述和实证研究的基本概念、内容要点及写作技巧。
一、文献综述1.基本概念文献综述是指对特定主题的相关文献进行查阅、分析和总结的过程。
通过文献综述,可以建立对特定主题的了解,从而确定自己的研究问题和研究方向。
文献综述需要注意查阅的文献来源的权威性和有效性,并选择与研究主题密切相关的文献。
2.内容要点在进行文献综述时,可以按照以下要点进行论述:(1)研究背景:介绍研究主题的重要性和研究现状,可以分析不同研究立场和观点的差异。
(2)研究目的:明确自己的研究问题,阐述自己的研究目的和动机。
(3)文献选择:介绍选择的文献来源,解释选择的原因,并指出存在的局限性。
(4)文献分析:对每篇文献进行详细的分析,包括研究对象、研究方法、分析框架和结果等。
(5)文献总结:对文献进行总结,指出研究中存在的问题和不足之处,为后续研究提供指导和建议。
3.写作技巧在进行文献综述的写作时,需要注意以下技巧:(1)逻辑清晰:在写作过程中,要注意将各个要点有机地连接起来,保持论述的逻辑清晰性。
(2)客观评价:对于文献的评价要客观公正,可以采用横向对比和纵向比较的方式,找出文献之间的异同点。
(3)避免重复:在文献综述中,应该避免对同一个观点或结果的重复描述,可以选择性地引用文献中的内容。
二、实证研究1.基本概念实证研究是指通过采集和分析实际数据,验证研究问题或提出假设的研究方法。
实证研究可以运用各种定量或定性的研究方法,包括实验、调查、案例分析等。
2.内容要点进行实证研究时,可以按照以下要点进行论述:(1)研究问题:明确自己的研究问题或提出假设,并具体描述研究的目标和研究的对象。
(2)研究方法:介绍研究所采用的具体方法和研究设计,包括数据采集的方法、样本选择的原则等。
国内外关于胜任力模型的研究综述的论文
写一篇国内外关于胜任力模型的研究综述的论文,600字
胁任力模型一直都是商业领域的热门话题,因为它能够帮助企业更好地管理人员,并有效地提高绩效。
这一概念已被广泛应用于各行各业,以提供更有效的雇员招聘、培训和管理。
因此,许多学者都在国内外认真研究胜任力模型。
本文将就近年来的研究国内外情况进行综述,以探讨胜任力模型的现状和发展趋势。
首先,国内学者一直致力于通过系统分析和调查研究来研究胜任力模型,并将其应用于企业实践中。
譬如,2017年,张洁
等研究者提出了结合系统动力学的人口科学方法,探究和理解胜任力模型的内在机制,并分析了该模型对企业绩效的影响。
此外,2019年,王春革等研究者利用文献资料分析,提出了
一种基于KM框架的胜任力模型,以提升企业的社会责任感
和职业承诺水平。
而在国外,学者们一直忙于探究胜任力模型的实际应用。
比如,2019年,Gábor和Nikoletta等研究者对来自匈牙利大公司的
调查数据进行了分析,发现已建立的胜任力模型在提高员工绩效方面表现出色。
同时,在2018年,卢芹等研究者采用比较
研究、案例研究和文献分析等方法,发现企业通过开展胜任力模型的实践,能够更好地增强核心竞争力,促进组织高效率发展。
综上所述,国内外的学者都在努力探究胜任力模型的有效性和实施方法,并不断提高企业管理水平,推动企业绩效水平的提升。
因此,我们可以得出结论:胜任力模型可以作为企业管理
的重要工具,为管理者提供有效的帮助,从而提高组织的核心竞争力、增强组织的绩效水平,实现企业的良性发展。
学术论文中的文献综述与实证研究结合方法
学术论文中的文献综述与实证研究结合方法在学术研究中,文献综述和实证研究是两个重要的环节。
文献综述是对已有研究成果的梳理和总结,而实证研究则是通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻研究假设。
本文将探讨学术论文中如何将文献综述与实证研究结合,以提高研究的可信度和说服力。
首先,文献综述是研究的基础。
在进行实证研究之前,研究者需要对相关领域的文献进行全面的查阅和分析,了解已有的研究成果和进展。
文献综述可以帮助研究者确定研究的研究问题和目标,并为后续的实证研究提供理论和方法的指导。
此外,文献综述还可以帮助研究者发现已有研究的不足和局限性,为自己的研究提供切入点和研究空白。
其次,文献综述和实证研究应该相互补充和协调。
文献综述提供了已有研究的理论框架和研究方法,而实证研究则通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻这些理论和方法。
在实证研究中,研究者可以根据文献综述的结果选择适当的研究方法和数据收集方式,以保证研究的可信度和有效性。
同时,实证研究的结果也可以为文献综述提供新的证据和观点,进一步完善和发展已有的理论和方法。
此外,文献综述和实证研究的结合还可以促进学术交流和合作。
通过文献综述,研究者可以了解到不同学者的观点和研究成果,从而与其展开深入的学术交流和合作。
而实证研究则可以为文献综述提供新的实证数据和方法,为其他研究者提供更多的研究资源和参考。
通过学术交流和合作,研究者可以共同推动学科的发展和进步。
最后,文献综述和实证研究的结合还可以提高学术论文的质量和影响力。
通过充分的文献综述,研究者可以对已有研究进行全面的评估和分析,从而提出新的研究问题和假设。
而实证研究则可以通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻这些研究问题和假设,为学术论文提供更加可信和可靠的结论。
同时,文献综述和实证研究的结合还可以提高学术论文的可读性和可理解性,使读者更容易理解和接受研究的观点和结论。
综上所述,学术论文中的文献综述和实证研究是相互依存和相互促进的。
文献综述提供了研究的理论和方法基础,而实证研究则通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻这些理论和方法。
大学论文中的文献综述与实证研究
大学论文中的文献综述与实证研究在大学论文中,文献综述与实证研究是非常重要的两个部分。
本文将从这两个方面展开讨论,探讨它们在论文写作中的作用和要求。
一、文献综述文献综述是指在写作论文之前,对相关领域的文献资料进行搜集、阅读和总结,以了解已有研究成果、理论观点和研究进展。
它的主要作用有以下几个方面:1. 提供研究背景和理论基础文献综述可以帮助我们对所研究的领域有一个全面的了解,了解前人在这个领域做过的研究,掌握已有的研究成果和理论观点,为我们的研究提供背景和理论基础。
2. 寻找研究的空白和问题通过对文献的综述和分析,我们可以发现已有研究中的不足和问题,找到研究的空白,从而确定我们的研究目标和研究问题,为后续的实证研究提供指导和依据。
3. 避免重复研究和错误文献综述不仅可以了解前人的研究成果,还可以防止我们犯相同的错误或者对已有成果的误解。
通过仔细研读文献,我们可以避免在后续的研究中重复前人的工作,提高研究效率和质量。
在论文中写文献综述时,我们需要注意以下几点:1. 确定综述的范围和内容根据研究的需求和目标,确定文献综述的范围和内容。
可以从多个角度进行分类和归纳,将相关的文献进行梳理和整合,形成对该领域的全面综述。
2. 准确引用和标注文献资料在文献综述中,我们需要准确引用和标注文献资料,遵循学术规范和要求。
可以使用文献管理工具来帮助整理和管理文献,确保引用和标注的准确性。
3. 分析和总结文献资料在综述文献时,我们需要对文献资料进行分析和总结。
可以从研究方法、理论观点、实证结果等方面进行归纳和总结,提取关键信息和结论,为后续的论文写作提供依据。
二、实证研究实证研究是指通过观察、实验、调查等方法,对现实问题进行研究,获取和验证真实的数据和信息。
实证研究可以帮助我们验证和验证理论观点,探索问题的本质和规律。
实证研究在大学论文中的作用主要有以下几个方面:1. 证明或反驳假设和理论观点实证研究可以通过调查、实验等方法获取真实的数据,进一步验证或反驳我们的假设和理论观点。
胜任力 文献综述
文献综述一、前言胜任力的研究和实践起源于美国,在20世纪70年代开始有学者投入到胜任力特征的探究和模型的构建中来。
我国最早在上世纪90年代引入了胜任力模型,后经我国学者研究努力,在对国外已有研究成果的基础上充分结合我国国情,对该理论在人员招聘领域也有了初步的探究,为进一步的发展奠定了研究基础。
二、国外相关研究成果胜任力,在国外常常又被译为competency。
在20世纪70年代以来,国外对于胜任力以及模型建立和应用日臻成熟。
现今大家认可的胜任力定义,最早起源于戴维·麦克利兰(David McClelland)博士(1973)为美国国务院设计的甄选驻外联络官的项目中的应用。
在该项目中他将心理学和管理学相结合,认为绩效优者拥有某些特有的知识与行为使得他获得更高的工作成就,因此将胜任力定义为与工作绩效或生活中其他重要成果直接相似或相联系的知识、技能、特质和动机。
在研究中他发展了确定胜任力的一些关键的方法和和理论,如“行为事件访谈法”(BEI)。
戴维·杜波依斯(David Dubois)(1993)将胜任力定义为是一个人在其工作岗位上获得出色成绩的潜在特征。
提出了绩优者的胜任力特征,主要包括6个方面:目标和行动管理、领导、人力资源管理、指导下级技能、其他、特殊知识。
莱尔·斯宾塞(Lyle Spencer)(1994)和麦克利兰对胜任力做了全面定义。
能够明确卓越绩效者和平庸者可准确测量的个体特征。
他们创建了冰山模型来形象的说明,包括了五个层次:知识、技能、自我概念、特质和动机,。
冰山上的技巧和知识是显性部分,而冰山下的部分为隐性部分。
而对于胜任力模型的建立和应用,最早始于1970年McBer和美国管理协会(AMA)进行了一次胜任力项目研究,该研究旨在比较一般绩效这和绩优者的行为,以此来找出管理者成功的五个重要能力特征:专业知识、心智成熟度、企业家成熟度、人际间成熟度、在职成熟度这五个关键能力特征,只有专业知识是优秀管理者和一般管理者都有的。
毕业论文文献综述实证研究与数据解读
毕业论文文献综述实证研究与数据解读在撰写毕业论文时,文献综述是一个至关重要的部分,它不仅可以展示研究者对该领域已有研究成果的了解程度,还可以为后续研究提供理论支持和研究思路。
本文将结合实证研究与数据解读,探讨如何撰写一篇扎实的毕业论文文献综述。
一、文献综述的重要性文献综述是毕业论文中不可或缺的一部分,它通过对相关领域已有研究文献的梳理和分析,帮助研究者了解当前研究的热点和难点,为研究提供理论依据和研究思路。
一篇好的文献综述应该具备以下几个特点:1. 全面性:对该领域的相关文献进行全面、系统的梳理,包括历史渊源、研究现状、研究方法、研究成果等方面的内容。
2. 深入性:对文献进行深入的分析和评价,揭示其中的研究亮点和不足之处,为后续研究提供借鉴和启示。
3. 逻辑性:文献综述应该具有清晰的逻辑结构,层次分明,条理清晰,使读者能够快速抓住重点,理解作者的观点和论证过程。
二、文献综述的撰写步骤1. 确定研究范围:在进行文献综述之前,首先需要确定研究的范围和主题,明确研究的目的和意义,以便有针对性地查找和筛选相关文献。
2. 检索文献:通过图书馆、学术数据库、期刊论文等渠道,检索和收集与研究主题相关的文献资料,建立文献数据库,方便后续的整理和分析。
3. 文献筛选:对检索到的文献进行筛选和归纳,筛选出与研究主题相关、权威可靠的文献,剔除与研究无关或质量较差的文献。
4. 文献整理:将筛选出的文献按照时间顺序或主题分类进行整理,建立文献框架,明确每篇文献的主要内容和观点。
5. 文献分析:对整理好的文献进行深入分析和评价,揭示其中的研究亮点和不足之处,为后续研究提供理论支持和研究思路。
6. 撰写文献综述:在撰写文献综述时,应该遵循科学的写作规范,包括清晰的结构安排、准确的引用格式、流畅的表达方式等,确保文献综述的质量和可读性。
三、实证研究与数据解读在文献综述中,实证研究和数据解读是至关重要的内容,它们可以为研究提供实证支持和数据支撑,增强研究的可信度和说服力。
毕业论文文献综述中的理论分析与实证研究
毕业论文文献综述中的理论分析与实证研究
在撰写毕业论文时,文献综述是一个至关重要的部分,其中的理论分析与实证研究是不可或缺的内容。
理论分析是对相关理论进行梳理、比较和评价,为后续研究提供理论支撑;而实证研究则是通过数据、案例等实证材料验证理论的有效性和适用性。
本文将就毕业论文文献综述中的理论分析与实证研究展开讨论。
首先,理论分析在文献综述中扮演着重要角色。
在撰写毕业论文时,我们需要对相关领域的理论进行深入的研究和分析,理清各种理论之间的内在联系和差异。
通过对不同理论的比较和评价,我们可以找到适合自己研究对象的理论框架,为后续的研究提供理论指导。
此外,理论分析还可以帮助我们理解研究领域的发展脉络,把握研究的前沿动态,为自己的研究提供更广阔的视野。
其次,实证研究是文献综述中不可或缺的一环。
理论再好,也要经得起实践的检验。
在文献综述中,我们需要引用相关研究的实证数据和案例,验证理论的有效性和适用性。
通过对实证研究的总结和分析,我们可以了解当前研究领域的研究现状和趋势,找到已有研究的不足之处,为自己的研究提供借鉴和启示。
在进行文献综述时,理论分析和实证研究是相辅相成的。
理论分析为实证研究提供了理论支撑和指导,而实证研究则可以验证和完善理论。
只有理论与实证相结合,我们的文献综述才能更加全面和有说服力。
总之,毕业论文文献综述中的理论分析与实证研究是至关重要的。
通过对相关理论的深入分析和对实证研究的总结和分析,我们可以为
自己的研究提供理论支撑和实证依据,使研究更加有针对性和科学性。
希望本文的讨论能对大家在撰写毕业论文时有所帮助。
文献综述中的方法论和实证研究趋势分析
文献综述中的方法论和实证研究趋势分析近年来,随着学术研究的深入和发展,文献综述在各个学科领域中扮演着重要的角色。
文献综述是对相关文献进行系统、全面、客观的整理和评议,以了解研究领域的现状、发展动态以及存在的问题。
本文将探讨文献综述中的方法论和实证研究趋势,从而揭示它们对学术研究的重要性和影响。
在进行文献综述时,我们需要明确一个合适的方法论。
方法论是研究者根据自身研究需求和目标制定的研究方法和策略。
不同学科领域的研究者采用的方法论各有不同,但其基本要求是科学性、合理性和可操作性。
首先,一个好的方法论应包括确定研究领域和研究目标。
在进行文献综述时,我们需要明确我们关注的领域是什么,研究的目标是什么。
这将有助于我们缩小研究范围,从而更加精确地选择相关文献进行分析和评价。
其次,合适的文献搜索方法也是方法论的一个重要组成部分。
文献综述需要我们广泛地查询和搜集相关的文献资料。
我们可以通过图书馆的数据库、学术搜索引擎、期刊论文、会议论文等途径来获取相关文献。
此外,我们还可以参考在该领域领先的学者的研究成果,并获取其相关引用文献。
在进行文献综述时,对文献进行筛选和评价也是必不可少的步骤。
我们需要根据预先设定的标准来筛选出与研究领域和目标相关的文献,并对这些文献进行评价。
评价的方法可以包括文献内容的理解和分析,以及对文献质量和可信度的评估。
这些评价结果将有助于我们对该领域现状和问题的全面了解和分析。
实证研究趋势分析也是文献综述中的重要内容之一。
实证研究是以实证证据为基础的科学研究方法,旨在通过收集、分析和解释数据,来验证研究假设或回答研究问题。
在文献综述中,我们可以通过对过去研究的回顾和总结,揭示实证研究在某个特定领域的发展趋势。
对于实证研究趋势的分析,我们可以关注以下几个方面。
首先,我们可以关注实证研究的方法和研究设计。
随着科技的进步和方法的不断改进,研究者在实证研究中采用的方法和设计也在不断发展。
我们可以探讨不同方法和设计在特定领域中的应用情况和效果,从而揭示实证研究的发展方向和趋势。
论文写作中的文献综述与实证结果
论文写作中的文献综述与实证结果在论文写作中,文献综述和实证结果起着至关重要的作用。
文献综述是指对相关文献进行系统性的整理、总结和评价,以确定研究领域的研究现状、问题和研究方向。
实证结果是指通过研究方法和数据分析,得出的客观、可信的结论和发现。
本文将探讨文献综述和实证结果在论文写作中的重要性以及如何进行撰写。
一、文献综述的重要性文献综述是研究论文的第一步,它有助于研究者全面了解研究领域的研究现状。
首先,文献综述可以帮助研究者确定研究主题或问题。
通过对已有文献的研究背景、理论框架和研究方法的分析,研究者可以确定自己研究的研究方向和目标。
其次,文献综述可以避免重复研究。
通过对已有文献的系统梳理和分析,研究者可以了解已有研究的不足之处,避免重复研究已有知识。
最后,文献综述可以为研究提供合适的理论和方法支持。
通过对已有文献的理论框架和研究方法的分析,研究者可以选择合适的理论和方法来支撑自己的研究。
二、文献综述的撰写过程1. 搜集文献在撰写文献综述前,研究者需要广泛搜集相关的文献。
可以通过图书馆的数据库、学术搜索引擎、期刊论文等途径来搜集。
在搜集过程中,可以使用关键词搜索、分类检索等方法,以便快速找到合适的文献。
2.筛选文献搜集到大量文献后,研究者需要进行筛选,选择与自己研究主题和目标最相关的文献。
在筛选过程中,可以依据文献的标题、摘要、关键词等信息进行初步筛选,然后阅读全文,进一步确定是否符合要求。
3.阅读并整理文献在阅读文献时,研究者需要仔细阅读,并对文献进行笔记、标引等整理工作。
可以使用笔记本或文献管理工具来管理整理文献,以便后续撰写文献综述时的查找和引用。
4.综述文献在综述文献时,研究者需要将相关文献进行分类和归纳,以便清晰地呈现研究现状和问题。
可以按照时间顺序、主题特点、理论框架等方式进行分类综述。
同时,在综述文献时,研究者需要对文献进行简单的评价和比较,以便准确地把握已有研究的不足和研究空白。
三、实证结果的重要性实证结果是论文研究的核心部分,它是研究者通过实际数据的收集和分析得出的客观结论和发现。
外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 胜任力模型研究
Research on Competency Model:A Literature Review andEmpirical StudiesAbstractWestern countries have applied competency models to addressing problems existed in their administrative and managerial systems since 1970s,and the findings is positine and promising. However, competency model hasn’t been introduced to China until 1990s and it is still unknown and mysterious to many Chinese managers. This paper aims to uncover the mysterious veil of competency model in order to broaden the horizon of Chinese managers and boost China's human resource development as well as management.Keywords:Competency,Competency Models,Empirical Studies of Competency ModelsIt has been more than 30 years since competency model was utilized to human resource management.In western countries,competency model first displayed its effectiveness in government administration, meanwhile many multinationals and their branch companies applied the competency model to their daily business management and their business was a great success. As the notion of competency is gradually come to light and accepted by people all around the world,more and more enterprises have been trying to build their own competency model under the help of professional consultant firms. As a result,competency model has gradually been a very fashionable phrase in the field of management and quite a few enterprises are thus benefited from it. In recent years, competency model has become a hot spot in the Chinese academia as well as big-,middle- and small-sized enterprises alike,many relevant writings and books have also been translated and published. However, competency and competency model are still mysterious to many Chinese scholars, business managers as well as government administrators.Purpose and Significance of the StudyThe purpose of the study aims to make a critical literature review of the competency model,clarify some confusion related to it and explore its application. The following questions are employed to guide this study:What is competency? What is competency model? What are the theoretical and empirical findings related to competency model?The study illustrates how we could take advantage of competency model in our harmonious society building. On one hand,the study will delineate competency and competency model in order to clarify confusions related to it since it is still strange and mysterious to many Chinese managers and administrators;on the other hand,thestudy would enrich Chinese HRD&HRM in the field of government administration and business management both theoretically and empirically.Research MethodThe present study has utilized qualitative analysis, induction and deduction. Since this research is a literature review in some sense, qualitative analysis will be an indispensable research method; Induction and deduction are applied to both theoretical and empirical studies.In order to enhance the credibility of present research,only the authoritative publications on competency model are reviewed,including books and papers written by foreign and Chinese scholars and HRDHRM practitioners. By searching for the keywords "competency" "competency model" and "competency model building" as well as "empirical studies on competency models",books and papers written by well-known foreign scholars such as McClelland D. C.,Lyle M. Spencer, Anntoinette D. Lucia, Richard Lepsinger etc.,are available; by the same token,books and papers written by Chinese scholars such as Zhi-gong He,Jianfeng Peng, Shaohua Fang, Nengquan Wu,etc.,could be consulted. All the books and papers are published between 1950s and 2007. In addition, many data cited in this paper comes from empirical studies at home and abroad.FindingsIn this part,a literature review of competency is firstly carried out;then competency model as well as its evolution,development and innovation is delineated;finally empirical studies are reviewed. Empirical studies mainly focus on competency model building and its application to human resource development and management.Understanding CompetencyIn 1973,American scholar David C. McClelland published his paper Testing for Competency Rather Than Intelligence which cited a large amount of research findings to illustratethe inappropriateness of assessing personnel qualities by abusing intelligence tests. Dr. McClelland further explained that some factors (personality, intelligence, value,etc.)which people had always taken for granted in determining work performance hadn't displayed their desired result. As a result,he emphasized that people should ignore those theoretical by pothese and subjective judgements which had been proved groundless in reality. He declared that people should tap directly those factors and behaviors which could really impact their performance (McClelland, 1973). These factors and behaviors were named "competency" by McClelland. The publishing of this paper symbolized the debut of competency research. From then on,many scholars started getting involved into the research on competency and they conceptualizedcompetency from different perspectives as shown in the following table: The above ten concepts of competency have a lot in common:①Competency is motive, trait,value,skill,self-image, social role,knowledge;②Competency is a combination;③Competency should be measurable, observable, instructional,phasic and hierarchical;④Competency is a determinant to outstanding performance.Thus competency is an underlying combination of individual characteristics such as motive, inner drive force, quality, attitude,sole role,self-image, knowledge and skill,it is causally related to criterion-referenced effective and/or superior performance in a job or situation and it is measurable,observable and instructional.Besides,many scholars and consultancy firms believe that competency could be explained under the help of three different models:Iceberg Model. This model treats competency as an iceberg, the part above the water represents behavior, knowledge and skills which are easy to measure and observe,while the part under the water symbolizes underlying qualities such as value,attitude,social role, self-image,traits which are hard to assess,and the deepest part under the water represents the most latent qualities such as inner drive force,social motive, etc. which are most difficult to observe and measure.Onion Model. This model treats competency as an onion, the outer layer represents skills and knowledge which are liable to acquire,the inner layer refers to qualities such as self-image,social role,attitude and value which are relatively difficult to appraise, while the core of the onion symbolizes traits and motives which are most difficult to cultivate and develop.Brain Model. This model stems from the brain mechanism. It presupposes that the brain could be divided into four parts. Each part functions differently. The upper-left part is in charge of competency such as analysing capacity, calculation, strong logic ability; the upper-right part is in charge of competency such as innovation and intuition;the bottom left part is in charge of competency such as organizing ability, planning ability; and the bottom-right part is in charge of competency such as communication ability,perception, etc. Different parts will exert corresponding influence on competency development.Conceptualizations of Competency ModelFew foreign scholars have directly put forward conceptualizations of competency model. By contrast,many Chinese scholars have expressed their opinions on it. The present paper only cites those concepts that have been published by authoritative publishing houses.Jianfeng Peng, a professor in Ch;na Renmin University,together with his students, has studied how to build competency models for effective HR management since 2003. He thought competency model was the combination of differentqualities which were necessary for people to successfully finish a job or achieve superior performance,these qualities included different motives,traits, self-images and social roles as well as knowledge and skill (Jianfeng Peng, 2003). Prof. Peng believed that a competency model was composed of 4-6 competencies that were closely related to performance. Competency models could help managers judge and distinguish key factors that led to superior performance or underperformance. As a result,competency model could be treated as a foundation to improve performance.Professor Nengquan Wu from Sun Yat-sen University published his book Competency Model:Design and Application in 2005,according to his understanding, competency model refers to "proficiencies that people define core competencies of different levels, delineate corresponding behaviors,determine key competencies as well as f inish certain work.”(Nengquan Wu,2005). Prof. Wu conceptualized competency model from the perspective of methodology. He believed that competency model was a unique HRM thinking mode, method and operation flow. On the basis of organizational strategy, competency model could be utilized to enhance organizational competitiveness and improve performance.Shaohua Fang, a senior HRM consultant and expert,provided us with the following definition:"Competency model is to conceptualize and describe the necessary knowledge,skills,qualities and abilities which an employee should have in order to finish work (Shaohua Fang, 2007)”.By taking advantage of definitions of different levels and related behavioral descriptions, people could determine the combination of core competencies and required proficiency to finish work. Hc} pointed out these behaviors and skills must be able to measure,observe and instruct and they should exert a great influence upon personal performance and business success.International Human Resource Institute(IHRI) has also defined competency model:"The so-called competency model is the standardized description and explanation of competencies that could actualize superior performance.”(·IHRI, 2005)IHRI declared that a competency model should include 6^-1 2 competencies.In summary, the first concept mentioned above attaches an importance to the composition of competency model and its function, while all of the rest three concepts emphasize cognitive abilities as well as criterion-referred performance. Thus competency, model is a combination of different competencies which could be observed,delineated,explained and calculated on one hand,and could facilitate superior performance on the other hand.Development and Evolution of Competency ModelIn early 1970, top officials in U. S. Department of State believed that theirdiplomats' se- lection based on intelligence test was ineffective. It was an upset situation for them to find that many seemly excellent people fail to live up to their expectations regarding their work performance. Under such circumstances, Dr. McClelland was invited to help Department of State design an effective personnel selection system which could appraise the actual performance of employees. In that program,McClelland and his colleague Charles Dailey adopted the method of Behavioral Event Interview (BEI) to collect information in older to study factors that influenced the diplomats' performance. Through a series of summaries and analyses, McClelland and Dailey found out the differences between an excellent diplomat and a mediocre diplomat as far as their behaviors and modes of thinking were concerned. In this way, competencies that a diplomat should possess were found out. This program is the earliest empirical application of competency model. And the research findings were two papers: Improving Officer Selection for the Foreign Service (McClelland&Dailey,1972) as well as Evaluating New Methods of Measuring the Qualities Needed in Superior Foreign Service Information Officers(McClelland& Dailey,1973).Mcber and American Management Association (A'MA) also started their research on competency model in the same year. They focused on providing the answer to the question:what kind of competencies should be displayed by successful managers rather than unsuccessful ones? AMA spent 5 years observing 1 800 managers. By comparing the performance of excellent managers and mediocre ones, AMA defined their competencies based on their traits. The research results showed that all the successful managers shared the following 5 competencies:professional knowledge,maturity of mentality, maturity of .entrepreneurship,people relations and maturity of the profession. Of which,only professional knowledge were shared by excellent and mediocre managers (Mcber&.AMA, 1970).Then Prof. Bray carried out 8 years research at AT&T based on technique of assessment center. From the aspectives of abilities, attitudes and traits, etc.,he built a competency model composed of 25 competencies such as interpersonal relations, expression ability, social sensitivity, creativity,flexibility,organizational ability,planning ability, decision-making ability, etc(Bray and Grant,1978).In China,however, researches on competency model are relatively much late.Chinese scholars Chongming Wang and Minke Chen published their paper about competency model in Psychological Science in 1992. They studied 220 senior and middle-level managers of 51 enterprises in 5 cities. After examining and testing the competency model for senior managers on the basis of factor analysis and structural equation modelling, they compiled "Key Managerial Behavior Assessment Scale" (Chongming Wang&Minke Chen,2002).Scholars such as Kan Shi, Jicheng Wang and Chaoping Li took advantage of Behaviocal Event Interview to assess the competency model for senior managers in the industry of telecommunication (Kan Shi,Jicheng Wang&Chaoping Li,2002). Jicheng Wang designed 5 universal competency models for technical personnel,sales people, community service personnel,managers as well as entrepreneurs respectively.Jianfeng Peng and his postgraduate student Xiaojuan Xing built 4 universal competency models for business managers,business technical personnel,marketing personnel as well as HR managers (Jianfeng Peng,2003 ).The above domestic studies illustrate that competency models for middle-level and senior managers have been built based on in-depth interview and questionnairing. Most publications only focus on conceptualizing competency model,its development,behavioral event interview as well as competency model building,most of the findings are theoretical rather than empirical. By contrast,foreign studies are much maturer both theoretically and empirically.Empirical StudiesEmpirical studies highlight the application of competency model to enterprises, governments and other institutions.Nowadays,empirical studies on competency models mainly focus on the following 4 aspects:Staffing and Selection. Besides job standards and skills prescription, more and more businesses have carried out their personnel staffing and selection in light of the candidates' competencies which are crucial to their future performance. This competency-based personnel staffing and selection has connected business strategies and targets to business employees themselves. As a result,the quality of staffing and selection is greatly improved.Performance Management. Businesses which have built their competency models are more interested in the competency rather than the result itself in their performance management. As a result, their performance management style has been competency-driven rather than result-driven. Managers haven’t attached an importance to short-term performance, but current and long-term performances. In such a managerial system,outstanding performance has been easily actualized. Each employee has made most of their core competencies and expertise to make a contribution to their business.Compensation Management.After the competency-based compensation management system is set up, businesses have concentrated on their employees’future development and potential value, which has stimulated employees and managers of all ranks to improve themselves both menetuacy and teconologcal. Competency oases compense lion management system has helped enterprises attract and retain moretalents. In a word,competency model has endowed employees with a sense of respect and creativity.Training and Development. Enterprises which have built their competency models tend to determine core competencies in light of business strategies,environments, employee development planning and performance appraisal. Enterprises decide their training and development priorities on the basis of competency model.Future TrendsDespite that there is a growing body of literature on competency model,research on competency model is still in a premature stage and many questions still remain unanswered. Therefore, further research is required to address several important issues.First of all,although there are growing studies on the impacts of the competency model on organizational outcomes,antecedents of competency model need to be identified and academically explored. Future studies are needed to examine the relationships between the features of competency model and its key antecedent variables such as organizational sttracture.leadership and external environment. For example,it can be reasoned that the features of competency model are likely to be positively correlated with the structures of enterprises, governments as well as other institutions. Secondly,the impact of competency model on performance needs to be thoroughly explored. More studies are needed to examine whether the features of competency model or organizational culture,has direct or indirect impacts on organizational performance. While quite a few HRD and HRM researchers and practitioners have demonstrated that the concept of competency model has a positive impact on organizational performance, however,such impact may be mediated by other important organizational variables. Finally, it is also important to consider the relationships of competency model and other important HR variables such as career development, managerial coaching as well as employee training.Conclusions and DiscussionsIn conclusion,competency model has increasingly exerted profound influence on human resource development and management. While this concept has received an increase in both academic and management fields,there are increasing empirical studies designed to examine the nature of the construct and its relationships with other important organizational variables. More studies are needed to enhance the theoretical and empirical foundations of competency model.胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究摘要20世纪70年代以来,西方国家已经利用胜任力模型来解决存在于行政和管理系统中的问题,其结果是积极且有前途的。
文献综述毕业论文中的实证研究案例分析
文献综述毕业论文中的实证研究案例分析在撰写毕业论文时,文献综述是一个至关重要的部分,它旨在对已有研究进行梳理、总结和评价,为后续研究提供理论支持和研究方向。
而在文献综述中,实证研究是一种重要的研究方法,通过对实证研究案例的分析,可以更好地理解研究方法和结论。
本文将以实证研究案例为切入点,探讨文献综述毕业论文中的实证研究案例分析。
一、案例一:《影响员工工作满意度的因素分析》在某毕业论文的文献综述部分,作者对员工工作满意度的影响因素进行了实证研究。
作者首先梳理了国内外相关研究,发现员工工作满意度受到领导行为、工作环境、薪酬福利等因素的影响。
在实证研究中,作者选择了某公司员工作为研究对象,通过问卷调查和统计分析的方法,探讨了不同因素对员工工作满意度的影响程度。
通过对该案例的分析,我们可以看到作者在文献综述中充分总结了前人研究成果,找到了研究的空白点,并通过实证研究填补了这一空白。
这种方法不仅可以提高论文的可信度,还可以为实际管理提供参考建议。
二、案例二:《消费者购买决策的影响因素研究》另一篇毕业论文的文献综述部分涉及到消费者购买决策的影响因素研究。
作者在文献综述中发现,消费者购买决策受到产品质量、价格、品牌声誉等因素的影响。
为了进一步验证这些因素的影响程度,作者选择了某超市的消费者作为研究对象,通过实地观察和访谈的方式,深入了解消费者的购买决策过程。
通过对该案例的分析,我们可以看到作者在文献综述中对消费者购买决策的影响因素进行了系统梳理,并通过实证研究验证了这些因素的重要性。
这种研究方法不仅可以为市场营销提供决策支持,还可以为企业提供产品改进和营销策略优化的建议。
三、案例三:《教师教学效果评价的实证研究》在另一篇毕业论文中,作者对教师教学效果评价进行了实证研究。
在文献综述中,作者发现教师教学效果评价受到学生评价、同行评价、学校评价等因素的影响。
为了更全面地了解教师的教学效果,作者选择了某中学的教师作为研究对象,通过课堂观察、学生问卷调查等方法,对教师的教学效果进行评估。
胜任力研究综述
胜任力研究综述胜任力是指个人在特定工作场景下,具备完成工作任务所需的知识、技能、能力和特质,同时能够与工作环境相匹配,胜任工作任务并产生显著业绩的能力。
(Spencer & Spencer, 1993) 。
胜任力的研究不断深入,以体现人力资源的重要性以及企业管理的重要性,本文将简要介绍相关研究进展,并探讨其对人力资源管理实践的影响。
1.胜任力的理论发展与实证研究早期的胜任力研究主要关注个人的工作表现以及个人素质和能力因素与工作表现之间的关系。
Spencer和Spencer(1993)提出了一个广泛接受的模型来定义胜任力,其中包括个人能力、个性特质、价值观和利他情感等方面。
Lloyd and Sharma(2002)研究认为,工作表现与胜任力之间存在积极的相关性,表现好的员工通常会更加具备胜任力。
2.胜任力框架的建立和应用随着对胜任力概念更深入的研究,研究者开始将其应用到实际的企业管理和人力资源管理实践中。
例如,Mansfield(1996) 将胜任力视为对特定岗位的成功招聘和雇佣的关键要素,并且在雇佣员工时考虑到胜任力因素。
Schneider和Konrad(1997)通过胜任力框架和自然语言分析技术,可以更好地预测面试中胜任力的得分。
3.胜任力的评估和发展胜任力的发展和评估也是企业的一个重要任务。
Zibarras和Wood(2010)建立了一套评估工具来评估应聘者及员工胜任力的水平。
评估结果可以用于制定发展计划和解决员工表现问题。
Lopez和Pou(2005)则关注了企业对员工的胜任力发展的投资,认为员工在胜任力意识和胜任力技能方面能够得到有针对性的培训和发展,将有利于提高员工个人和团体表现。
4.胜任力与组织绩效胜任力通常被认为是支持组织绩效和成功的关键因素。
Chen和Fang(2007)认为,在高胜任力环境中工作的员工,其工作绩效要显著好于低胜任力环境中的员工。
Keshtidar(2010)研究发现,胜任力评价评估过程可以帮助企业制定更有效的业务规划和绩效评价制度。
报告中的实证研究方法与文献综述
报告中的实证研究方法与文献综述设计和撰写报告是研究工作中不可或缺的一环。
为了使报告具备科学性和可信度,采取适当的实证研究方法和综述相关文献显得尤为重要。
本文将分为以下六个部分进行详细论述。
一、实证研究方法的选择实证研究方法是依据事实和数据来验证假设或回答研究问题的一种研究方法。
在设计报告时,需要根据研究目的和问题确定合适的实证研究方法。
常见的实证研究方法包括实验研究、调查研究、案例研究等。
在选择方法时,需要考虑可行性、可靠性和可重复性等因素。
二、实证研究方法的具体操作在具体操作实证研究方法时,需要明确研究对象、收集相关数据、分析数据并得出结论。
例如,在实验研究中,需要设置实验组和对照组,比较两组的差异;在调查研究中,需要设计问卷或面谈提问问题,并对收集到的数据进行统计分析。
通过合理的实证研究方法的操作,能够得出科学的结论。
三、文献综述的重要性文献综述是对已有研究成果进行全面梳理和归纳总结的过程。
通过综述相关文献,可以了解研究领域的研究现状,找到未解决的问题和研究空白,并为接下来的研究工作提供依据和启示。
文献综述还能够发现和引用先前研究的成果,提高研究的可信度和学术价值。
四、文献综述的具体步骤进行文献综述时,需要明确研究领域和目标,收集相关研究文献,筛选和归纳文献,分析文献中的观点和方法,并撰写综述报告。
在收集文献时,可以通过图书馆检索数据库、学术期刊、会议论文等途径获取文献资料。
在筛选文献时,应根据研究问题和目标,选择具有权威性和可信度的文献进行综述。
五、实证研究方法与文献综述的结合实证研究方法和文献综述可以相互补充和支持。
实证研究方法可以验证和实现文献综述中的观点和结论,而文献综述则可以为实证研究方法提供理论依据和启示。
通过综合运用两者,能够增强报告的学术价值和可信度,使研究工作更加系统和深入。
六、完善报告的不足之处及改进方法在报告撰写过程中,可能存在一些不足之处,如数据收集的不完全、文献综述的局限性等。
我国胜任力模型研究综述对间学术论文的文献综述
本次演示采用文献综述的方法,检索了国内外相关数据库和学术期刊,收集 了关于我国青少年学生主观幸福感的研究文献。
三、研究结果与讨论
1、主观幸福感的现状
我国青少年学生主观幸福感总体水平较高,但仍有部分学生感到不幸福或不 确定是否幸福。研究显示,影响青少年学生主观幸福感的主要因素包括家庭、学 业、人际交往和社会支持等。
未来研究需要更加深入地探讨胜任力模型在企业实践中的应用效果,以及如 何根据组织环境和任务需求的变化对胜任力模型进行动态更新和优化等问题。还 需要加强对于不同行业、不同规模企业中胜任力模型应用的对比研究,以便为企 业的实际操作提供更加丰富和有效的指导。
一、引言
青少年时期是个体发展的重要阶段,也是形成和发展健康人格和价值观的关 键时期。主观幸福感作为个体对自身生活满意程度的心理体验,对于青少年的心 理健康和个体发展具有重要意义。因此,针对我国青少年学生主观幸福感的研究 一直受到广泛。特别是在当前社会背景下,研究我国青少年学生主观幸福感现状 及影响因素,对于提高青少年学生的生活质量、促进其全面发展具有十分重要的 意义。
引言:随着经济的发展和社会的进步,人力资源在组织中的地位越来越重要。 胜任力模型作为人力资源管理的重要工具,已经在全球范围内得到了广泛的应用。 我国自20世纪90年代引入胜任力模型以来,越来越多的学者和企业开始和研究这 一领域。本次演示将重点我国胜任力模型研究的发展现状和存在的问题,通过分 析文献资料,总结最新研究成果和发现。
参考内容
我国胜任力模型研究综述:间隔 学术论文的文献综述
摘要:本次演示旨在综述我国胜任力模型研究的发展现状和存在的问题,通 过对文献资料的分析,总结最新研究成果和发现。本次演示首先介绍了研究的背 景和意义,明确了本次演示的研究范围和目的,然后从发展历程和现状、分类以 及不足和争论焦点等方面对文献进行了综述,最后总结了我国胜任力模型研究的 主要成果和不足,并指出了研究的空白和需要进一步探讨的问题。
学术论文中的文献综述和研究现状如何分析
学术论文中的文献综述和研究现状如何分析在学术研究的领域中,撰写一篇高质量的学术论文是每位研究者的重要任务。
而文献综述和对研究现状的准确分析,无疑是学术论文中至关重要的组成部分。
它们不仅能够展现研究者对该领域的深入了解,还为后续的研究提供坚实的基础和方向。
那么,如何有效地进行文献综述和研究现状的分析呢?首先,我们要明确文献综述和研究现状分析的目的。
文献综述的主要目的是对已有的相关研究进行系统的梳理和总结,从而找出研究的空白点和不足之处,为自己的研究提供理论支持和创新思路。
研究现状分析则是在文献综述的基础上,对当前研究的热点、趋势以及存在的问题进行深入剖析,以确定自己研究的切入点和价值。
在进行文献综述时,第一步是广泛收集相关文献。
这包括学术期刊、会议论文、学位论文、研究报告等。
可以通过图书馆的数据库、学术搜索引擎等途径来获取。
在收集文献的过程中,要注意筛选出与研究主题高度相关、质量较高的文献。
对于一些质量不高或者相关性不强的文献,可以适当舍弃。
接下来,要对收集到的文献进行仔细阅读和整理。
在阅读过程中,可以做一些笔记,记录下文献的主要观点、研究方法、研究结论等重要信息。
同时,要对文献进行分类,可以按照研究主题、研究方法、研究时间等维度进行分类,以便后续的分析和总结。
在整理文献的基础上,就可以开始撰写文献综述了。
文献综述的结构一般包括引言、主体和结论三个部分。
引言部分主要介绍研究的背景和意义,引出文献综述的主题。
主体部分是文献综述的核心,要对已有的相关研究进行详细的阐述和分析,可以采用分类综述、时间顺序综述等方法。
在阐述和分析时,要注意客观公正,既要肯定前人研究的成果,也要指出其不足之处。
结论部分则要对文献综述进行总结,强调研究的空白点和有待进一步研究的问题。
在进行研究现状分析时,要关注当前研究的热点和趋势。
可以通过分析相关文献的发表数量、引用次数等指标来判断研究的热点。
同时,要关注学术会议、学术论坛等平台上的讨论,了解当前研究的前沿动态。
如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析
如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析文献综述与实证分析是进行科学研究和学术论文撰写过程中重要的步骤。
通过对已有文献进行综合梳理和分析研究,可以帮助研究者深入了解研究领域的现状、问题和研究进展,为自己的研究提供理论依据和方法支持。
然而,如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析,确实是一个需要掌握的技能。
本文将从以下几个方面介绍如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析。
一、确定研究领域和研究问题在进行文献综述与实证分析之前,首先需要明确自己的研究领域和研究问题。
研究领域即研究的学科范围,而研究问题是在该领域内具体的研究课题。
明确研究领域和研究问题有利于我们在进行文献综述和实证分析时,更有针对性地查找和筛选合适的文献。
二、制定文献综述和实证分析的目标和方法在开展文献综述和实证分析之前,我们需要明确其目标和方法。
目标是指我们进行文献综述和实证分析的目的和要达到的结果。
常见的目标包括了解研究领域现状、总结问题与争议、揭示研究现状与前沿、发掘研究的不足等。
方法则是指我们进行文献综述和实证分析的具体步骤和操作方法,比如采取什么样的文献检索和筛选方法、如何对选定的文献进行综合梳理和归纳等。
三、文献检索与筛选文献综述和实证分析的第一步是进行文献检索与筛选。
文献检索是为了从大量的文献数据库中查找出与研究领域和问题相关的文献。
在进行文献检索时,我们可以利用各种学术搜索引擎和数据库,如Google学术、Web of Science、CNKI等。
在检索时可以根据关键词、作者、出版年份等进行适当的组合和筛选,以获取相关度较高的文献。
四、文献梳理与归纳文献检索与筛选后,我们获得了一系列与研究领域和问题相关的文献。
接下来,我们需要对这些文献进行梳理和归纳。
这一步可以采取阅读摘要、目录和全文等方式,对每篇文献进行初步了解并提取出其中的关键信息。
对于有较高相关度的文献,可以进一步进行阅读、标注和整理,将其中的重要观点、研究方法和结论等进行归纳总结。
五、文献评论与分析在文献综述和实证分析的过程中,我们不仅需要对选定的文献进行归纳总结,还需要对这些文献进行评论和分析。
如何写好毕业论文的文献综述和文献研究
如何写好毕业论文的文献综述和文献研究毕业论文的文献综述和文献研究在整个论文写作过程中起着至关重要的作用。
文献综述是对已有研究成果和观点的梳理和总结,是对研究领域相关文献的回顾和分析;而文献研究则是在文献综述的基础上,对文献中的观点、方法、结论等进行深入的研究和探讨。
下面将从如何撰写文献综述和文献研究两个方面进行详细介绍。
一、文献综述的撰写1.明确研究目的和范围:在撰写文献综述之前,首先要明确自己的研究目的和范围,确定要综述的文献类型和数量,明确研究的重点和方向。
2.查找文献并筛选:通过图书馆、学术数据库等途径查找相关文献,根据研究目的和范围筛选出符合要求的文献,建立文献数据库。
3.文献分类和整理:将筛选出的文献按照主题、时间、方法等进行分类整理,建立文献综述的框架和结构,明确每个部分的内容和重点。
4.撰写文献综述:在撰写文献综述时,要注意文笔流畅、逻辑清晰,避免简单罗列文献内容,要对文献进行分析和比较,突出研究的亮点和不足,提出自己的看法和观点。
5.引用规范:在文献综述中要准确引用文献来源,标注作者、年份、文献名称等信息,避免抄袭和侵权行为,保持学术诚信。
二、文献研究的展开1.深入研究文献观点:在文献综述的基础上,选择其中的重要文献进行深入研究,分析文献中的观点、方法和结论,探讨其在研究领域中的意义和影响。
2.批判性思考和评价:对文献中的观点和结论进行批判性思考和评价,提出自己的看法和观点,指出文献的优点和不足,为后续研究提供参考和启示。
3.横向比较和纵向延伸:在文献研究中可以进行横向比较和纵向延伸,与其他文献进行对比分析,拓展研究视野,发现新的研究问题和方向。
4.提出研究假设和问题:在文献研究的过程中,可以根据文献中的研究成果和观点提出自己的研究假设和问题,为后续研究提供思路和方向。
5.撰写文献研究报告:将文献研究的成果整理撰写成文献研究报告,包括研究背景、目的、方法、结果和结论等内容,保持逻辑严谨和表达清晰。
国内外关于胜任力模型的研究综述
国内外关于胜任力模型的研究综述一、本文概述胜任力模型作为一种人力资源管理工具,近年来在国内外学术界和企业界均受到了广泛关注。
本文旨在系统综述国内外关于胜任力模型的研究现状和发展趋势,以期为相关领域的理论研究和实践应用提供参考。
本文将回顾胜任力模型的起源和发展,阐述其基本概念和理论基础。
胜任力模型是指通过一系列的标准和要求,描述某一职位或角色所需的关键能力、知识、技能和特质的综合框架。
它能够帮助组织和个人明确目标,提高绩效,实现可持续发展。
本文将分别梳理国内外关于胜任力模型的研究进展。
国内研究方面,将重点关注胜任力模型在不同行业、不同职位中的应用及其效果评估;国外研究方面,将关注胜任力模型的最新理论发展和实践案例,以及跨文化背景下的应用。
本文将对国内外胜任力模型研究的成果进行归纳和评价,分析当前研究的不足和未来的发展方向。
结合国内外研究的异同点,提出对胜任力模型研究的展望和建议,以期推动该领域的研究和实践向更高层次发展。
二、胜任力模型的理论基础胜任力模型的理论基础主要源自心理学、人力资源管理学和组织行为学等多个学科领域。
其核心概念最早由哈佛大学教授David McClelland于1973年提出,他强调胜任力是指能区分在特定工作岗位和组织环境中绩效水平的个人特征。
这一观点为后来的胜任力模型研究奠定了理论基础。
特征论:特征论认为,胜任力是个体潜在的、深层的特征,这些特征可以是动机、特质、自我概念、态度或价值观等,它们能预测个体在特定情境下的行为表现。
这一理论为胜任力模型的构建提供了基本的框架。
冰山模型:McClelland的冰山模型是胜任力模型中最具代表性的理论之一。
它将胜任力分为表面的“冰山以上部分”和深层的“冰山以下部分”。
前者包括知识、技能等容易观察和评价的部分,后者则包括动机、特质、态度等难以观察和评价的部分,但后者对个体的工作绩效具有决定性影响。
洋葱模型:洋葱模型是另一个经典的胜任力模型理论,由Boyatzis提出。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Research on Competency Model:A Literature Review andEmpirical StudiesAbstractWestern countries have applied competency models to addressing problems existed in their administrative and managerial systems since 1970s,and the findings is positine and promising. However, competency model hasn’t been introduced to China until 1990s and it is still unknown and mysterious to many Chinese managers. This paper aims to uncover the mysterious veil of competency model in order to broaden the horizon of Chinese managers and boost China's human resource development as well as management.Keywords:Competency,Competency Models,Empirical Studies of Competency ModelsIt has been more than 30 years since competency model was utilized to human resource management.In western countries,competency model first displayed its effectiveness in government administration, meanwhile many multinationals and their branch companies applied the competency model to their daily business management and their business was a great success. As the notion of competency is gradually come to light and accepted by people all around the world,more and more enterprises have been trying to build their own competency model under the help of professional consultant firms. As a result,competency model has gradually been a very fashionable phrase in the field of management and quite a few enterprises are thus benefited from it. In recent years, competency model has become a hot spot in the Chinese academia as well as big-,middle- and small-sized enterprises alike,many relevant writings and books have also been translated and published. However, competency and competency model are still mysterious to many Chinese scholars, business managers as well as government administrators.Purpose and Significance of the StudyThe purpose of the study aims to make a critical literature review of the competency model,clarify some confusion related to it and explore its application. The following questions are employed to guide this study:What is competency? What is competency model? What are the theoretical and empirical findings related to competency model?The study illustrates how we could take advantage of competency model in our harmonious society building. On one hand,the study will delineate competency and competency model in order to clarify confusions related to it since it is still strange and mysterious to many Chinese managers and administrators;on the other hand,the study would enrich Chinese HRD&HRM in the field of government administration and business management both theoretically and empirically.Research MethodThe present study has utilized qualitative analysis, induction and deduction. Since this research is a literature review in some sense, qualitative analysis will be an indispensable research method; Induction and deduction are applied to both theoretical and empirical studies.In order to enhance the credibility of present research,only the authoritative publications on competency model are reviewed,including books and papers written by foreign and Chinese scholars and HRDHRM practitioners. By searching for the keywords "competency" "competency model" and "competency model building" as well as "empirical studies on competency models",books and papers written by well-known foreign scholars such as McClelland D. C.,Lyle M. Spencer, Anntoinette D. Lucia, Richard Lepsinger etc.,are available; by the same token,books and papers written by Chinese scholars such as Zhi-gong He,Jianfeng Peng, Shaohua Fang, Nengquan Wu,etc.,could be consulted. All the books and papers are published between 1950s and 2007. In addition, many data cited in this paper comes from empirical studies at home and abroad.FindingsIn this part,a literature review of competency is firstly carried out;then competency model as well as its evolution,development and innovation is delineated;finally empirical studies are reviewed. Empirical studies mainly focus on competency model building and its application to human resource development and management.Understanding CompetencyIn 1973,American scholar David C. McClelland published his paper Testing for Competency Rather Than Intelligence which cited a large amount of research findings to illustratethe inappropriateness of assessing personnel qualities by abusing intelligence tests. Dr. McClelland further explained that some factors (personality, intelligence, value,etc.)which people had always taken for granted in determining work performance hadn't displayed their desired result. As a result,he emphasized that people should ignore those theoretical by pothese and subjective judgements which had been proved groundless in reality. He declared that people should tap directly those factors andbehaviors which could really impact their performance (McClelland, 1973). These factors and behaviors were named "competency" by McClelland. The publishing of this paper symbolized the debut of competency research. From then on,many scholars started getting involved into the research on competency and they conceptualized competency from different perspectives as shown in the following table: The above ten concepts of competency have a lot in common:①Competency is motive, trait,value,skill,self-image, social role,knowledge;②Competency is a combination;③Competency should be measurable, observable, instructional,phasic and hierarchical;④Competency is a determinant to outstanding performance.Thus competency is an underlying combination of individual characteristics such as motive, inner drive force, quality, attitude,sole role,self-image, knowledge and skill,it is causally related to criterion-referenced effective and/or superior performance in a job or situation and it is measurable,observable and instructional.Besides,many scholars and consultancy firms believe that competency could be explained under the help of three different models:Iceberg Model. This model treats competency as an iceberg, the part above the water represents behavior, knowledge and skills which are easy to measure and observe,while the part under the water symbolizes underlying qualities such as value,attitude,social role, self-image,traits which are hard to assess,and the deepest part under the water represents the most latent qualities such as inner drive force,social motive, etc. which are most difficult to observe and measure.Onion Model. This model treats competency as an onion, the outer layer represents skills and knowledge which are liable to acquire,the inner layer refers to qualities such as self-image,social role,attitude and value which are relatively difficult to appraise, while the core of the onion symbolizes traits and motives which are most difficult to cultivate and develop.Brain Model. This model stems from the brain mechanism. It presupposes that the brain could be divided into four parts. Each part functions differently. The upper-left part is in charge of competency such as analysing capacity, calculation, strong logic ability; the upper-right part is in charge of competency such as innovation and intuition;the bottom left part is in charge of competency such as organizing ability, planning ability; and the bottom-right part is in charge of competency such as communication ability,perception, etc. Different parts will exert corresponding influence on competency development.Conceptualizations of Competency ModelFew foreign scholars have directly put forward conceptualizations of competency model. By contrast,many Chinese scholars have expressed their opinions on it. The present paper only cites those concepts that have been published byauthoritative publishing houses.Jianfeng Peng, a professor in Ch;na Renmin University,together with his students, has studied how to build competency models for effective HR management since 2003. He thought competency model was the combination of different qualities which were necessary for people to successfully finish a job or achieve superior performance,these qualities included different motives,traits, self-images and social roles as well as knowledge and skill (Jianfeng Peng, 2003). Prof. Peng believed that a competency model was composed of 4-6 competencies that were closely related to performance. Competency models could help managers judge and distinguish key factors that led to superior performance or underperformance. As a result,competency model could be treated as a foundation to improve performance.Professor Nengquan Wu from Sun Yat-sen University published his book Competency Model:Design and Application in 2005,according to his understanding, competency model refers to "proficiencies that people define core competencies of different levels, delineate corresponding behaviors,determine key competencies as well as f inish certain work.‖(Nengquan Wu,2005). Prof. Wu conceptualized competency model from the perspective of methodology. He believed that competency model was a unique HRM thinking mode, method and operation flow. On the basis of organizational strategy, competency model could be utilized to enhance organizational competitiveness and improve performance.Shaohua Fang, a senior HRM consultant and expert,provided us with the following definition:"Competency model is to conceptualize and describe the necessary knowledge,skills,qualities and abilities which an employee should have in order to finish work (Shaohua Fang, 2007)‖.By taking advantage of definitions of different levels and related behavioral descriptions, people could determine the combination of core competencies and required proficiency to finish work. Hc} pointed out these behaviors and skills must be able to measure,observe and instruct and they should exert a great influence upon personal performance and business success.International Human Resource Institute(IHRI) has also defined competency model:"The so-called competency model is the standardized description and explanation of competencies that could actualize superior performance.‖(·IHRI, 2005)IHRI declared that a competency model should include 6^-1 2 competencies.In summary, the first concept mentioned above attaches an importance to the composition of competency model and its function, while all of the rest three concepts emphasize cognitive abilities as well as criterion-referred performance. Thus competency, model is a combination of different competencies which could beobserved,delineated,explained and calculated on one hand,and could facilitate superior performance on the other hand.Development and Evolution of Competency ModelIn early 1970, top officials in U. S. Department of State believed that their diplomats' se- lection based on intelligence test was ineffective. It was an upset situation for them to find that many seemly excellent people fail to live up to their expectations regarding their work performance. Under such circumstances, Dr. McClelland was invited to help Department of State design an effective personnel selection system which could appraise the actual performance of employees. In that program,McClelland and his colleague Charles Dailey adopted the method of Behavioral Event Interview (BEI) to collect information in older to study factors that influenced the diplomats' performance. Through a series of summaries and analyses, McClelland and Dailey found out the differences between an excellent diplomat and a mediocre diplomat as far as their behaviors and modes of thinking were concerned. In this way, competencies that a diplomat should possess were found out. This program is the earliest empirical application of competency model. And the research findings were two papers: Improving Officer Selection for the Foreign Service (McClelland&Dailey,1972) as well as Evaluating New Methods of Measuring the Qualities Needed in Superior Foreign Service Information Officers(McClelland& Dailey,1973).Mcber and American Management Association (A'MA) also started their research on competency model in the same year. They focused on providing the answer to the question:what kind of competencies should be displayed by successful managers rather than unsuccessful ones? AMA spent 5 years observing 1 800 managers. By comparing the performance of excellent managers and mediocre ones, AMA defined their competencies based on their traits. The research results showed that all the successful managers shared the following 5 competencies:professional knowledge,maturity of mentality, maturity of .entrepreneurship,people relations and maturity of the profession. Of which,only professional knowledge were shared by excellent and mediocre managers (Mcber&.AMA, 1970).Then Prof. Bray carried out 8 years research at AT&T based on technique of assessment center. From the aspectives of abilities, attitudes and traits, etc.,he built a competency model composed of 25 competencies such as interpersonal relations, expression ability, social sensitivity, creativity,flexibility,organizational ability,planning ability, decision-making ability, etc(Bray and Grant,1978).In China,however, researches on competency model are relatively much late.Chinese scholars Chongming Wang and Minke Chen published their paper about competency model in Psychological Science in 1992. They studied 220 senior andmiddle-level managers of 51 enterprises in 5 cities. After examining and testing the competency model for senior managers on the basis of factor analysis and structural equation modelling, they compiled "Key Managerial Behavior Assessment Scale" (Chongming Wang&Minke Chen,2002).Scholars such as Kan Shi, Jicheng Wang and Chaoping Li took advantage of Behaviocal Event Interview to assess the competency model for senior managers in the industry of telecommunication (Kan Shi,Jicheng Wang&Chaoping Li,2002). Jicheng Wang designed 5 universal competency models for technical personnel,sales people, community service personnel,managers as well as entrepreneurs respectively.Jianfeng Peng and his postgraduate student Xiaojuan Xing built 4 universal competency models for business managers,business technical personnel,marketing personnel as well as HR managers (Jianfeng Peng,2003 ).The above domestic studies illustrate that competency models for middle-level and senior managers have been built based on in-depth interview and questionnairing. Most publications only focus on conceptualizing competency model,its development,behavioral event interview as well as competency model building,most of the findings are theoretical rather than empirical. By contrast,foreign studies are much maturer both theoretically and empirically.Empirical StudiesEmpirical studies highlight the application of competency model to enterprises, governments and other institutions.Nowadays,empirical studies on competency models mainly focus on the following 4 aspects:Staffing and Selection. Besides job standards and skills prescription, more and more businesses have carried out their personnel staffing and selection in light of the candidates' competencies which are crucial to their future performance. This competency-based personnel staffing and selection has connected business strategies and targets to business employees themselves. As a result,the quality of staffing and selection is greatly improved.Performance Management. Businesses which have built their competency models are more interested in the competency rather than the result itself in their performance management. As a result, their performance management style has been competency-driven rather than result-driven. Managers haven’t attached an importance to short-term performance, but current and long-term performances. In such a managerial system,outstanding performance has been easily actualized. Each employee has made most of their core competencies and expertise to make a contribution to their business.Compensation Management.After the competency-based compensationmanagement system is set up, businesses have concentrated on their employees’future development and potential value, which has stimulated employees and managers of all ranks to improve themselves both menetuacy and teconologcal. Competency oases compense lion management system has helped enterprises attract and retain more talents. In a word,competency model has endowed employees with a sense of respect and creativity.Training and Development. Enterprises which have built their competency models tend to determine core competencies in light of business strategies,environments, employee development planning and performance appraisal. Enterprises decide their training and development priorities on the basis of competency model.Future TrendsDespite that there is a growing body of literature on competency model,research on competency model is still in a premature stage and many questions still remain unanswered. Therefore, further research is required to address several important issues.First of all,although there are growing studies on the impacts of the competency model on organizational outcomes,antecedents of competency model need to be identified and academically explored. Future studies are needed to examine the relationships between the features of competency model and its key antecedent variables such as organizational sttracture.leadership and external environment. For example,it can be reasoned that the features of competency model are likely to be positively correlated with the structures of enterprises, governments as well as other institutions. Secondly,the impact of competency model on performance needs to be thoroughly explored. More studies are needed to examine whether the features of competency model or organizational culture,has direct or indirect impacts on organizational performance. While quite a few HRD and HRM researchers and practitioners have demonstrated that the concept of competency model has a positive impact on organizational performance, however,such impact may be mediated by other important organizational variables. Finally, it is also important to consider the relationships of competency model and other important HR variables such as career development, managerial coaching as well as employee training.Conclusions and DiscussionsIn conclusion,competency model has increasingly exerted profound influence on human resource development and management. While this concept has received an increase in both academic and management fields,there are increasing empirical studies designed to examine the nature of the construct and its relationships with other important organizational variables. More studies are needed to enhance the theoreticaland empirical foundations of competency model.胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究摘要20世纪70年代以来,西方国家已经利用胜任力模型来解决存在于行政和管理系统中的问题,其结果是积极且有前途的。