Detection of Organophosphorus Compounds by Covalently Immobilized Organophosphorus Hydrolase
有机磷农药污染与控制
北京农学院研究生课程论文论文题目:有机磷农药污染与控制课程名称: 农产品生产安全评价与控制任课教师: 高凡、王敬贤学生姓名学 号系 别 植物科学技术学院专 业 农业资源利用课程论文提交时间:2015年11月18日有机磷农药污染与控制一、概述随着农业生产的发展,农民在作物种植过程中使用农药的范围不断扩大,数量不断增大,对防治植物病、虫、害起到了相当大的作用,同时对夺取农业新丰收起了很大作用。
但是,由于每种农药都有不同程度的毒性,使用得当,可以防治作物病虫害;如果使用不当,也可能会引起相反效果,甚至使人畜中毒。
有机磷农药以其高效、低残留和使用成本低等特点,成为农业广泛使用的农药类型,在全世界范围内大面积推广[1]。
有机磷农药,是用于防治植物病、虫、害的含有机磷农药的有机化合物。
这一类农药品种多、药效高,用途广,易分解,在人、畜体内一般不积累,在农药中是极为重要的一类化合物。
但仍有不少品种对人、畜的急性毒性很强。
近年来,高效低毒的品种发展很快,逐步取代了一些高毒品种,使有机磷农药的使用更安全有效。
但某些具有高毒性的有机磷农药,如甲胺磷、对硫磷、氧乐果等对动物有致畸性和致癌性[2],在使用时仍特别要注意安全。
我国有机磷农药的产量占全世界总量的1/3,有机磷农药的产量占全国农药总量的一半以上[3]。
有机磷农药是目前应用最为广泛的农药,在各种农作物中得到大范围的应用,继而造成有机磷农药在农产品当中残留总量巨大的现状。
二、有机磷农药的危害2.1 有机磷农药对人的危害有机磷类农药对人的危害作用从剧毒到低毒不等。
早在1930 年,美国发生过一起牙买加姜酒事件,约有2 万人饮用后出现神经麻痹现象,后来经查证导致中毒事件发生的原因是酒中混有有机磷的化合物三甲基苯基磷酸酯(TOCP)[3]。
有机磷农药可从口、呼吸道和皮肤三条途径进入人体内,印制人体内的胆碱酯酶的活性[4],因此胆碱酯酶便不再分解乙酰胆碱,从而致使神经中毒而伤亡。
参考文献——精选推荐
参考⽂献[1] Meng W., Wei J., Luo X., et al. Separation of β-agonists in pork on a weak cation exchange column by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Analytical Methods,2012, 4(4): 1163.[2] 聂建荣, 朱铭⽴, 连槿, 等. ⾼效液相⾊谱-串联质谱法检测动物尿液中的15 种β-受体激动剂. ⾊谱,2010, 28(8): 759-764.[3] Traynor I., Crooks S., Bowers J., et al. Detection of multi-β-agonist residues in liver matrix by use of a surface plasma resonance biosensor. Analytica Chimica Acta,2003, 483(1): 187-191. [4] Kuiper H., Noordam M., van Dooren-Flipsen M., et al. Illegal use of beta-adrenergic agonists: European Community. Journal of Animal Science,1998, 76(1): 195-207.[5] Watkins L., Jones D., Mowrey D., et al. The effect of various levels of ractopamine hydrochloride on the performance and carcass characteristics of finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science,1990, 68(11): 3588-3595.[6] Parr M. K., Opfermann G., Sch?nzer W. Analytical methods for the detection of clenbuterol. Bioanalysis,2009, 1(2): 437-450.[7] López-Mu?oz F., Alamo C., Rubio G., et al. Half a century since the clinical introduction of chlorpromazine and the birth of modern psychopharmacology. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry,2004, 28(1): 205-208.[8] Goodman L., Gilman A. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 7th edn Macmillan. New York,1980: 1054-1105.[9] 王春燕. ⽑细管电泳—电化学发光检测吩噻嗪类药物的研究. 长春理⼯⼤学, 2006.[10] 孙雷, 张骊, 徐倩, et al. 超⾼效液相⾊谱-串联质谱法检测猪⾁和猪肾中残留的10 种镇静剂类药物. ⾊谱,2010, 28(1): 38-42.[11] 顾华兵, 谢洁, 彭涛, et al. 鸡⾁组织中氯丙嗪残留的HPLC-MS/MS 检测⽅法的建⽴. 中国家禽,2014, 36(15): 33-36.[12] Mitchell G., Dunnavan G. Illegal use of beta-adrenergic agonists in the United States. Journal of Animal Science,1998, 76(1): 208-211.[13] Directive C. Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC. Official Journal L125,1996, 23(5): 10-32.[14] 农业部, 卫⽣部. 禁⽌在饲料和动物饮⽤⽔中使⽤的药物品种⽬录[Z] 农业部公告[2002] 176 号. 2002.[15] Damasceno L., Ventura R., Cardoso J., et al. Diagnostic evidence for the presence of β-agonists using two consecutive derivatization procedures and gas chromatography–mass spectrometric analysis. Journal of Chromatography B,2002,780(1): 61-71.[16] 王培龙. β-受体激动剂及其检测技术研究. 农产品质量与安全,2014, 1): 44-52.[17] Wang L.-Q., Zeng Z.-L., Su Y.-J., et al. Matrix effects in analysis of β-agonists with LC-MS/MS: influence of analyte concentration, sample source, and SPE type. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2012, 60(25): 6359-6363.[18] Shao B., Jia X., Zhang J., et al. Multi-residual analysis of 16 β-agonists in pig liver, kidney and muscle by ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry,2009, 114(3): 1115-1121.[19] Josefsson M., Sabanovic A. Sample preparation on polymeric solid phase extraction sorbents for liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analysis of human whole blood--a study on a number of beta-agonists and beta-antagonists. Journal of Chromatography A 2006, 1120(1-2):1-12.[20] Zhang Z., Yan H., Cui F., et al. Analysis of Multiple β-Agonist and β-Blocker Residues in Porcine Muscle Using Improved QuEChERS Method and UHPLC-LTQ Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry. Food Analytical Methods,2015: 1-10. [21] Wang P., Liu X., Su X., et al. Sensitive detection of β-agonists in pork tissue with novel molecularly imprinted polymer extraction followed liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry detection. Food chemistry,2015, 184(72-79.[22] Li T., Cao J., Li Z., et al. Broad screening and identification of beta-agonists in feed and animal body fluid and tissues using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry combined with spectra library search. Food Chem,2016, 192(188-196.[23] Xiong L., Gao Y.-Q., Li W.-H., et al. A method for multiple identification of four β2-Agonists in goat muscle and beefmuscle meats using LC-MS/MS based on deproteinization by adjusting pH and SPE for sample cleanup. Food Science and Biotechnology,2015, 24(5): 1629-1635.[24] Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Sun Y., et al. Development of an Analytical Method for the Determination of β2-Agonist Residues in Animal Tissues by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with On-line Electrogenerated [Cu (HIO6) 2] 5--Luminol Chemiluminescence Detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food chemistry,2007, 55(13): 4949-4956.[25] Liu W., Zhang L., Wei Z., et al. Analysis of beta-agonists and beta-blockers in urine using hollow fibre-protected liquid-phase microextraction with in situ derivatization followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 2009, 1216(28): 5340-5346. [26] Caban M., Mioduszewska K., Stepnowski P., et al. Dimethyl(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)silyldiethylamine--a new silylating agent for the derivatization of beta-blockers and beta-agonists in environmental samples. Analytica Chimica Acta,2013, 782(75-88.[27] Caban M., Stepnowski P., Kwiatkowski M., et al. Comparison of the Usefulness of SPE Cartridges for the Determination of β-Blockers and β-Agonists (Basic Drugs) in Environmental Aqueous Samples. Journal of Chemistry,2015, 2015([28] Zhang Y., Wang F., Fang L., et al. Rapid determination of ractopamine residues in edible animal products by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: development and investigation of matrix effects. J Biomed Biotechnol,2009, 2009(579175.[29] Roda A., Manetta A. C., Piazza F., et al. A rapid and sensitive 384-microtiter wells format chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for clenbuterol. Talanta,2000, 52(2): 311-318.[30] Bacigalupo M., Meroni G., Secundo F., et al. Antibodies conjugated with new highly luminescent Eu 3+ and Tb 3+ chelates as markers for time resolved immunoassays. Application to simultaneous determination of clenbuterol and free cortisol in horse urine. Talanta,2009, 80(2): 954-958.[31] He Y., Li X., Tong P., et al. An online field-amplification sample stacking method for the determination of β 2-agonists in human urine by CE-ESI/MS. Talanta,2013, 104(97-102.[32] Li Y., Niu W., Lu J. Sensitive determination of phenothiazines in pharmaceutical preparation and biological fluid by flow injection chemiluminescence method using luminol–KMnO 4 system. Talanta,2007, 71(3): 1124-1129.[33] Saar E., Beyer J., Gerostamoulos D., et al. The analysis of antipsychotic drugs in humanmatrices using LC‐MS (/MS). Drug testing and analysis,2012, 4(6): 376-394.[34] Mallet E., Bounoure F., Skiba M., et al. Pharmacokinetic study of metopimazine by oral route in children. Pharmacol Res Perspect,2015, 3(3): e00130.[35] Thakkar R., Saravaia H., Shah A. Determination of Antipsychotic Drugs Known for Narcotic Action by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography. Analytical Chemistry Letters,2015, 5(1): 1-11.[36] Kumazawa T., Hasegawa C., Uchigasaki S., et al. Quantitative determination of phenothiazine derivatives in human plasma using monolithic silica solid-phase extraction tips and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A,2011, 1218(18): 2521-2527.[37] Flieger J., Swieboda R. Application of chaotropic effect in reversed-phase liquid chromatography of structurally related phenothiazine and thioxanthene derivatives. J Chromatogr A,2008, 1192(2): 218-224.[38] Tu Y. Y., Hsieh M. M., Chang S. Y. Sensitive detection of piperazinyl phenothiazine drugs by field‐amplified sample stacking in capillary electrophoresis with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Electrophoresis,2015, 36(21-22): 2828-2836.[39] Geiser L., Veuthey J. L. Nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis in pharmaceutical analysis. Electrophoresis,2007, 28(1‐2): 45-57.[40] Lara F. J., García‐Campa?a A. M., Gámiz‐Gracia L., et al. Determination of phenothiazines in pharmaceutical formulations and human urine using capillary electrophoresis with chemiluminescence detection. Electrophoresis,2006,27(12): 2348-2359.[41] Lee H. B., Sarafin K., Peart T. E. Determination of beta-blockers and beta2-agonists in sewage by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A,2007, 1148(2): 158-167.[42] Meng W., Wei J., Luo X., et al. Separation of β-agonists in pork on a weak cation exchange column by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Analytical Methods,2012, 4(4): 1163-1167. [43] Yang F., Liu Z., Lin Y., et al. Development an UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Detection of β-Agonist Residues in Milk. Food Analytical Methods,2011, 5(1): 138-147.[44] Quintana M., Blanco M., Lacal J., et al. Analysis of promazines in bovine livers by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorimetric detection. Talanta,2003, 59(2): 417-422.[45] Tanaka E., Nakamura T., Terada M., et al. Simple and simultaneous determination for 12 phenothiazines in human serum by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci,2007, 854(1-2): 116-120.[46] Kumazawa T., Hasegawa C., Uchigasaki S., et al. Quantitative determination of phenothiazine derivatives in human plasma using monolithic silica solid-phase extraction tips and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J ChromatogrA,2011, 1218(18): 2521-2527.[47] Qian J. X., Chen Z. G. A novel electromagnetic induction detector with a coaxial coil for capillary electrophoresis. Chinese Chemical Letters,2012, 23(2): 201-204.[48] Baciu T., Botello I., Borrull F., et al. Capillary electrophoresis and related techniques in the determination of drugs of abuse and their metabolites. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry,2015, 74(89-108.[49] Sirichai S., Khanatharana P. Rapid analysis of clenbuterol, salbutamol, procaterol, and fenoterol in pharmaceuticals and human urine by capillary electrophoresis. Talanta,2008, 76(5):1194-1198.[50] Toussaint B., Palmer M., Chiap P., et al. On‐line coupling of partial filling‐capillary zone electrophoresis with mass spectrometry for the separation of clenbuterol enantiomers. Electrophoresis,2001, 22(7): 1363-1372.[51] Redman E. A., Mellors J. S., Starkey J. A., et al. Characterization of Intact Antibody Drug Conjugate Variants using Microfluidic CE-MS. Analytical chemistry,2016.[52] Ji X., He Z., Ai X., et al. Determination of clenbuterol by capillary electrophoresis immunoassay with chemiluminescence detection. Talanta,2006, 70(2): 353-357.[53] Li L., Du H., Yu H., et al. Application of ionic liquid as additive in determination of three beta-agonists by capillary electrophoresis with amperometric detection. Electrophoresis,2013, 34(2): 277-283.[54] 张维冰. ⽑细管电⾊谱理论基础. 北京:科学出版社,2006.[55] Anurukvorakun O., Suntornsuk W., Suntornsuk L. Factorial design applied to a non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis method for the separation of beta-agonists. J Chromatogr A,2006, 1134(1-2): 326-332.[56] Shi Y., Huang Y., Duan J., et al. Field-amplified on-line sample stacking for separation and determination of cimaterol, clenbuterol and salbutamol using capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A,2006, 1125(1): 124-128.[57] Chevolleau S., Tulliez J. Optimization of the separation of β-agonists by capillary electrophoresis on untreated and C 18 bonded silica capillaries. Journal of Chromatography A,1995, 715(2): 345-354.[58] Wang W., Zhang Y., Wang J., et al. Determination of beta-agonists in pig feed, pig urine and pig liver using capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. Meat Sci,2010, 85(2): 302-305.[59] Lin C. E., Liao W. S., Chen K. H., et al. Influence of pH on electrophoretic behavior of phenothiazines and determination of pKa values by capillary zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis,2003, 24(18): 3154-3159.[60] Muijselaar P., Claessens H., Cramers C. Determination of structurally related phenothiazines by capillary zone electrophoresis and micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A,1996, 735(1): 395-402.[61] Wang R., Lu X., Xin H., et al. Separation of phenothiazines in aqueous and non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis. Chromatographia,2000, 51(1-2): 29-36.[62] Chen K.-H., Lin C.-E., Liao W.-S., et al. Separation and migration behavior of structurally related phenothiazines in cyclodextrin-modified capillary zone electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography A,2002, 979(1): 399-408.[63] Lara F. J., Garcia-Campana A. M., Ales-Barrero F., et al. Development and validation of a capillary electrophoresis method for the determination of phenothiazines in human urine in the low nanogram per milliliter concentration range using field-amplified sample injection. Electrophoresis,2005, 26(12): 2418-2429.[64] Lara F. J., Garcia-Campana A. M., Gamiz-Gracia L., et al. Determination of phenothiazines in pharmaceutical formulations and human urine using capillary electrophoresis with chemiluminescence detection. Electrophoresis,2006,27(12): 2348-2359.[65] Yu P. L., Tu Y. Y., Hsieh M. M. Combination of poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) and hydroxypropyl-gamma-cyclodextrin for high-speed enantioseparation of phenothiazines bycapillary electrophoresis. Talanta,2015, 131(330-334.[66] Kakiuchi T. Mutual solubility of hydrophobic ionic liquids and water in liquid-liquid two-phase systems for analytical chemistry. Analytical Sciences,2008, 24(10): 1221-1230.[67] 陈志涛. 基于离⼦液体相互作⽤⽑细管电泳新⽅法. 万⽅数据资源系统, 2011.[68] Liu J.-f., Jiang G.-b., J?nsson J. ?. Application of ionic liquids in analytical chemistry. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry,2005, 24(1): 20-27.[69] YauáLi S. F. Electrophoresis of DNA in ionic liquid coated capillary. Analyst,2003, 128(1): 37-41.[70] Kaljurand M. Ionic liquids as electrolytes for nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis,2002, 23(426-430.[71] Xu Y., Gao Y., Li T., et al. Highly Efficient Electrochemiluminescence of Functionalized Tris (2, 2′‐bipyridyl) ruthenium (II) and Selective Concentration Enrichment of Its Coreactants. Advanced Functional Materials,2007, 17(6): 1003-1009.[72] Pandey S. Analytical applications of room-temperature ionic liquids: a review of recent efforts. Anal Chim Acta,2006, 556(1): 38-45.[73] Koel M. Ionic Liquids in Chemical Analysis. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry,2005, 35(3): 177-192.[74] Yanes E. G., Gratz S. R., Baldwin M. J., et al. Capillary electrophoretic application of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids. Analytical chemistry,2001, 73(16): 3838-3844.[75] Qi S., Cui S., Chen X., et al. Rapid and sensitive determination of anthraquinones in Chinese herb using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquid with β-cyclodextrin as modifier in capillary zone electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography A,2004, 1059(1-2): 191-198.[76] Jiang T.-F., Gu Y.-L., Liang B., et al. Dynamically coating the capillary with 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids for separation of basic proteins by capillary electrophoresis. Analytica Chimica Acta,2003, 479(2): 249-254.[77] Jiang T. F., Wang Y. H., Lv Z. H. Dynamic coating of a capillary with room-temperature ionic liquids for the separation of amino acids and acid drugs by capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Analytical Chemistry,2006, 61(11): 1108-1112.[78] Qi S., Cui S., Cheng Y., et al. Rapid separation and determination of aconitine alkaloids in traditional Chinese herbs by capillary electrophoresis using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazoium-based ionic liquid as running electrolyte. Biomed Chromatogr,2006, 20(3): 294-300.[79] Wu X., Wei W., Su Q., et al. Simultaneous separation of basic and acidic proteins using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ion liquid as dynamic coating and background electrolyte in capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis,2008, 29(11): 2356-2362.[80] Guo X. F., Chen H. Y., Zhou X. H., et al. N-methyl-2-pyrrolidonium methyl sulfonate acidic ionic liquid as a new dynamic coating for separation of basic proteins by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis,2013, 34(24): 3287-3292.[81] Mo H., Zhu L., Xu W. Use of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids as background electrolytes in capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of inorganic anions. J Sep Sci,2008, 31(13): 2470-2475.[82] Yu L., Qin W., Li S. F. Y. Ionic liquids as additives for separation of benzoic acid and chlorophenoxy acid herbicides by capillary electrophoresis. Analytica Chimica Acta,2005, 547(2): 165-171.[83] Marszall M. P., Markuszewski M. J., Kaliszan R. Separation of nicotinic acid and itsstructural isomers using 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquid as a buffer additive by capillary electrophoresis. J Pharm Biomed Anal,2006, 41(1): 329-332.[84] Gao Y., Xu Y., Han B., et al. Sensitive determination of verticine and verticinone in Bulbus Fritillariae by ionic liquid assisted capillary electrophoresis-electrochemiluminescence system. Talanta,2009, 80(2): 448-453.[85] Li J., Han H., Wang Q., et al. Polymeric ionic liquid as a dynamic coating additive for separation of basic proteins by capillary electrophoresis. Anal Chim Acta,2010, 674(2): 243-248.[86] Su H. L., Kao W. C., Lin K. W., et al. 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids and an anionic surfactant: excellentbackground electrolyte modifiers for the analysis of benzodiazepines through capillary electrophoresis. J ChromatogrA,2010, 1217(17): 2973-2979.[87] Huang L., Lin J. M., Yu L., et al. Improved simultaneous enantioseparation of beta-agonists in CE using beta-CD and ionic liquids. Electrophoresis,2009, 30(6): 1030-1036.[88] Laamanen P. L., Busi S., Lahtinen M., et al. A new ionic liquid dimethyldinonylammonium bromide as a flow modifier for the simultaneous determination of eight carboxylates by capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A,2005, 1095(1-2): 164-171.[89] Yue M.-E., Shi Y.-P. Application of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids in separation of bioactive flavonoids by capillary zone electrophoresis. Journal of Separation Science,2006, 29(2): 272-276.[90] Liu C.-Y., Ho Y.-W., Pai Y.-F. Preparation and evaluation of an imidazole-coated capillary column for the electrophoretic separation of aromatic acids. Journal of Chromatography A,2000, 897(1): 383-392.[91] Qin W., Li S. F. An ionic liquid coating for determination of sildenafil and UK‐103,320 in human serum by capillary zone electrophoresis‐ion trap mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis,2002, 23(24): 4110-4116.[92] Qin W., Li S. F. Y. Determination of ammonium and metal ions by capillary electrophoresis–potential gradient detection using ionic liquid as background electrolyte and covalent coating reagent. Journal of Chromatography A,2004, 1048(2): 253-256.[93] Borissova M., Vaher M., Koel M., et al. Capillary zone electrophoresis on chemically bonded imidazolium based salts. J Chromatogr A,2007, 1160(1-2): 320-325.[94] Vaher M., Koel M., Kaljurand M. Non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis in acetonitrile using lonic-liquid buffer electrolytes. Chromatographia,2000, 53(1): S302-S306.[95] Vaher M., Koel M., Kaljurand M. Ionic liquids as electrolytes for nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis,2002, 23(3): 426.[96] Vaher M., Koel M. Separation of polyphenolic compounds extracted from plant matrices using capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography A,2003, 990(1-2): 225-230.[97] Francois Y., Varenne A., Juillerat E., et al. Nonaqueous capillary electrophoretic behavior of 2-aryl propionic acids in the presence of an achiral ionic liquid. A chemometric approach. J Chromatogr A,2007, 1138(1-2): 268-275.[98] Lamoree M., Reinhoud N., Tjaden U., et al. On‐capillary isotachophoresis for loadability enhancement in capillary zone electrophoresis/mass spectrometry of β‐agonists. Biological mass spectrometry,1994, 23(6): 339-345.[99] Huang P., Jin X., Chen Y., et al. Use of a mixed-mode packing and voltage tuning for peptide mixture separation in pressurized capillary electrochromatography with an ion trap storage/reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer detector. Analytical chemistry,1999, 71(9):1786-1791.[100] Le D. C., Morin C. J., Beljean M., et al. Electrophoretic separations of twelve phenothiazines and N-demethyl derivatives by using capillary zone electrophoresis and micellar electrokinetic chromatography with non ionic surfactant. Journal of Chromatography A,2005, 1063(1-2): 235-240.。
职业卫生与职业医学-常用英语词汇
《职业卫生与职业医学》常用英语词汇occupational health 职业卫生学industrial hygiene 工业卫生工程学Occupational hazard 职业性危害Occupational adverse effect/damage 职业性损害/损伤Occupational tolerance 职业耐受性Occupationalinjury/workinjury 工伤Occupationaldisorders 职业性疾患Occupationaldiseases 职业病Diagnosisofoccupational disease 职业病的诊断Emergencyrescuecenter 应急救援中心healthpromotion 健康促进compensabledisease 需赔偿的疾病work—relateddisease 工作有关疾病occupationalstigma 职业特征hostriskfactor 个体危险因素highriskgroup 高危人群occupationalhealthservice 职业卫生服务threelevelsofprevention 三级预防primary prevention 第一级预防secondaryprevention 第二级预防tertiaryprevention 第三级预防primaryhealthcare 初级卫生保健workphysio1ogy 工作(职业)生理学occupational psychology职业心理学ergonomics 人类工效学humanfactorsengineering 人机因素工程学mentalwork 脑力劳动physicalwork 体力劳动oxygendemand 氧需maximumoxygenuptake 氧上限oxygendebt 氧债steadystate 稳定状态intensity of work 工作强度shift work 轮班制dualclassificationofworkintensity 工作强度双重分级法static work/effort 静力作业isometric contraction 等长性收缩dynamic work 动态作业isotonic contraction 等张性收缩dynamic stereotype 动力定型occupational stress 职业性紧张stressor 紧张因素stress 紧张strainorstressreaction 紧张反应modifier 调节(缓解)因素person—environmentfitmodel 人一环境相适应模式jobdemands—controlmodel 工作需求一控制模式psychosocial stresses 社会心理紧张quantitative overload 超负荷quantitative underload 负荷不足work capacity 作业能力induction period 入门期steady period 稳定期fatigue period 疲劳期terminal motivation 终末激发training 锻炼exercise 练习fatigue 疲劳overstrain 过劳physical stress 体力紧张psychological strain 心理过劳mismatch 失衡micropause 工间小歇break 工间休息active rest 积极休息physicalstrain 体力过劳occupationalcumulativetraumaordisorders 职业蓄积性损伤或疾患flatfoot 扁平脚varicosityoflowerextremity 下肢静脉曲张abdominalhernia 腹疝kyphosis 驼背scoliosis 脊柱侧凸lowbackpain 下背痛lumbarinsufficiency 腰肌劳损lumbago 腰痛sciatica 坐骨神经痛temosynovitis 腱鞘炎occupationalcramp 职业性痉挛occupationalneurosis 职业性神经机能症writer'scramp 书写痉挛styloiditis 茎突炎epicondylitis 上踝炎periarthritis 关节周炎bursitis 滑囊炎Dupuytren’scontracture 掌挛缩病callus 胼胝singer’snodules 歌唱家小结节psychologicalstrain 心里过劳post—traumaticstressdisorder 外伤后紧张性精神病masspsychogenic illness 群体精神病video display terminal,VDT 视屏显示终端occupationalneckandupperextremitydisorder 职业性颈肩腕综合征computeroperatorsyndrome 电脑操作综合征dust 粉尘fume 烟vapor 蒸气gas 气体solid 固体liquid 液体mist 雾productivedust 生产性粉尘productivefume 生产性烟尘aerosol 气溶胶targetorgan 靶器官bloodbrainbarries 血脑屏障placentalbarries 胎盘屏障skinbarries 皮肤屏障absorption 吸收distribution 分布excretion 排泄blood/air partition coefficient 血/气分配系数lipid/water partition coefficient 脂/水分配系数biotransformation 生物转化depot 储存库acute poisoning 急性中毒subacute poisoning 亚急性中毒chronic poisoning 慢性中毒poison’s absorption 毒物的吸收lead 铅coproporphyrin,CP 粪卟啉freeerythrocyteprotoporphyrin,FEP 红细胞游离原卟啉zincprotoporphyrin,ZnPP 锌原卟啉一aminolaevulinic acid,一ALA —氨基一一酮戊酸transmmlganin 转锰素mercury 汞manganese 锰chromium 铬beryllium 铍zinc锌nickel 镍antimony 锑tin 锡phosphorus 磷arsenic 砷selenium 硒boron 硼irritant gas 刺激性气体chlorine 氯phosgene 光气ammonia 氨asphyxiating gas 窒息性气体organic solvents 有机溶剂benzene 苯toluene 甲苯xylene 二甲苯aniline 苯胺nitrobenzene 硝基苯carbon tetrachloride 四氯化碳vinyl chloride 氯乙烯acrylonitrile 丙烯腈styrene 苯乙烯butadiene 丁二烯carbon disulfide 二硫化碳phenols compound 酚类化物hippuric acid 马尿酸methyl hippuric acid 甲基马尿酸Heinz body 赫恩滋小体trinitrotoluene 三硝基甲苯aniline 阿尼林(苯胺)plastics 塑料synthetic fiber 合成纤维synthetic rubber 合成橡胶polymer 聚合物monomer 单体pesticide 农药insecticide 杀虫剂acaricide 杀螨剂nematocide 杀线虫剂molluscacide 杀软体动物剂rodenticide 杀鼠剂fungicide 杀菌剂herbicide 除草剂defoliant 脱叶剂plant growth regulator 植物生长调节剂organophosphorus pesticide 有机磷农药organophosphates 有机磷酸酯类thio--organophosphates 硫代有机磷酸酯类cholinesterase,ChE 胆碱酯酶acetylcholine,Ach 乙酰胆碱neurotoxic esterase,NTE 神经毒酯酶carbamates 氨基甲酸酯类carbaryl 西维因(胺甲奈)pneumoconiosis 尘肺inorganic dust 无机粉尘organic dust 有机粉尘mixed dust 混合性粉尘aerodynamic equivalent diameter,AED 空气动力学直径non—inhalable dust 非吸入性粉尘inhalable dust 可吸人性粉尘respirable dust 呼吸性粉尘impaction 撞击sedimentation 沉降diffusion 弥散interception 截留silicosis 矽肺silicatosis 硅酸盐肺carbon black pneumoconiosis 碳黑尘肺mixed dust pneumoconiosis 混合性尘肺metallic pneumoconiosis 金属尘肺byssinosis 棉尘症occupational allergic alveolitis 职业性变应性肺泡炎chronic obstructive pulmonary 非特异性慢性阻塞性肺病quartz 石英acute silicosis 速发型矽肺delayed silicosis 晚发型矽肺silanol group 硅烷醇基团hydrogen bond 氢键asbestos dust and asbestosis 石棉粉尘和石棉肺chrysotile 温石棉amphibole group 闪石类crocidolite 青石棉amosite 铁石棉anthophyllite 直闪石themolite 透闪石actinolite 阳闪石hornblende 角闪石ferruginous body 含铁小体coal worker's pneumoconiosis 煤工尘肺progressive massive fibrosis,PMF 进行性大块纤维化farmer’s lung 农民肺heat stress 热应激heat load 热负荷physiological heat strain 生理性热应激反应hyperthermia 过热heat acclimatization 热适应heat stress protein,HSP 热应激蛋白heat stroke 热射病sun stroke 日射病heat cramp 热痉挛heat exhaustion 热衰竭evaporation 蒸发radiation 辐射natural ventilation 自然通风mechanical ventilation 机械通风bends 屈肢症acclimatization 习服noise 噪声sound pressure 声压threshold of hearing 听阈threshold of paining 痛阈sound intensity 声强sound level 声级decibel,dB 分贝sound frequency 声频infrasonics 次声ultrasonics 超声octave band 频带loudness 响度loudness level 响度级equal loudness contours 等响曲线weighted sound level 计权声级speech interference level 语言干扰级impulsive noise 脉冲噪声steady state noise 稳态噪声auditory adaptation 听觉适应auditory fatigue 听觉疲劳temporary hearing threshold shift,TTS 暂时性听闻位移permanent hearing threshold shift,PTS 永久性听同位移hearing impairment 听力损伤noise—induced deafness 噪声性耳聋explosive deafness 暴震性耳聋vibration 振动vibrational frequency 振动频率displacement 位移amplitude 振幅velocity 速度acceleration 加速度peak value 峰值peak--to—peak value 峰一峰值average value 平均值natural frequency 固有频率resonance 共振resonant frequency 共振频率frequency weighted acceleration 频率计权加速度whole—body vibration 全身振动segmental vibration 局部振动hand—transmitted vibration 手传振动hand—arm vibration 手臂振动motion sickness 运动病Raynaud's phenomenon 雷诺氏现象Segmental vibrational disease 局部振动病Raynaud's phenomenon of occupational origin 职业性雷诺氏现象Vibrational white finger,VWF 振动性白指hand—arm vibrational syndrome,HA V 手臂振动综合征vibrationa disease 振动性疾病reduced comfort boundary 舒适界限降低fatigue—decreased proficiency 疲劳减效界限boundary exposure limit 承受极限nonionizing radiation 非电离辐射electromagnetic radiation 电磁辐射electromagnetic radiation spectrum 电磁辐射谱high frequency electromagnetic field 高频电磁场microwave 微波infrared radiation 红外辐射ultraviolet radiation 紫外辐射electro--ophthalmitis 电光性眼炎laser 激光ionizing radiation 电离辐射decompress 减压病al sickness 高空病mountain sickness 高山病occupational tumors 职业肿瘤occupationally carcinogenic factors 职业致癌因素chloro--methyl--methyl--ether 氯甲甲醚environmental monitoring 环境监测biological monitoring 生物学监测external exposure 外接触internal exposure 内接触health surveillance 健康监护pre—employment examination 就业前检查periodical examination 定期检查screening 筛检occupational epidemiology 职业流行病学association 联系causal relationship 因果关系exposure—response relationship 接触一反应关系exposure—effect relationship 接触一效应关系analytic epidemiologic study 分析性流行病学调查cross—sectional study 断面调查cohort study 队列调查prospective study 前瞻性调查historical prospective study 历史性前瞻调查retrospective cohort study 回顾性队列调查follow—up study/longitudinal study 纵向性随访研究case—control study 病例一对照调查retrospective study 回顾性调查relative risk,RR 相对危险度attributable risk,AR 归因危险度odds ratio,OR 比数比standardized mortality ratio,SMR 标化死亡比standardized incidence ratio,SIR 标化发病比proportional mortality ratio,PMR 比例死亡比toxicity 毒性risk 危险性risk assessment 危险度评定acceptable risk 可接受的危险度hazard identification 危害识别qualitative risk assessment 危险度的定性评定dose—response assessment 剂量一反应评定quantitative risk assessment 危险度的定量评定response 反应effect 效应uncertainty factor 不肯定因素exposure assessment 接触评定exposure estimation 接触估测risk characterization 危险度特征分析risk management 危险度管理generally regarded as safe level 一般认为安全的水平virtually safe dose,VSD 实际上安全剂量health standard 卫生标准exposure limit 接触限量maximum allowable concentration,MAC 最高容许浓度threshold limit value,TLV 阈限值threshold limit value--timeweighted average, TLV-TWA时间加权干均阈限值threshold limit value—shortterm exposurelimit, TLV-STEL 短时间接触阈限值thresholdlimit valueceiling,TLV--C 上限值permissibleexposurelimit,PEL 容许接触限值health—basedoccupationalexposurelimit 保证健康的职业接触限值maximumallowablebiologicalconcentration,MABC 最高容许生物浓度biologicalexposurelimit 生物学接触限值biologicalexposureindex,BEI 生物接触指数adverseeffect 有害效应technologicalfeasibility 技术上可行性economicfeasibility 经济上可行性industrialventilation 工业通风heat pressure 热压air dynamic pressure 风压fan 普通风扇spraying fan 喷雾风扇lighting 采光illumination 照明luminous flux 光通量brightness 亮度lighting coefficient,C 采光系数protective clothing 防护服regulation for occupational health 劳动卫生法规preventive health inspection 预防性卫生监督routine health inspection 经常性卫生监督occupational health of working women 妇女劳动卫生extrinsic allergic alveolitis 外源性变压性肺泡炎small scale industry 小工业confounding effects 混杂效应maximum oxygen intake 最大摄氧量heart rate,HR 心率stepping test 阶梯试验maximum permissible limit 最大容许限值pneumonometer 肺通气量仪validation 验证discriminant analysis 判别分析stepwise regression analysis 逐步回归分析方法Average Batch CV,ABCV 平均批变异系数Reference value 参考值Critical Value 临界值Equivalent continuous A—weighted sound pressure level 等效连续A声级。
敌百虫在鲫体内残留规律及其细胞毒性的初步研究
上海海洋大学硕士学位论文上海海洋大学硕士学位论文二O 一八年四月五日学校代码:10264研究生学号:M 150104137题目:敌百虫在鲫体内残留规律及其细胞毒性的初步研究英文题目:Preliminary Research on Residues Regularity and Cytotoxicity of Trichlorfon on Crucian carp 专业:临床兽医学研究方向:水产动物病害学姓名:张敏利指导教师:吕利群上海海洋大学硕士学位论文答辩委员会成员名单姓名工作单位职称备注刘万红武汉大学教授黄赞武汉大学教授徐鸿绪中山大学教授张俊彬深圳大学教授姜有声上海海洋大学副教授答辩地点生命学院D楼答辩日期2018.05.19摘要敌百虫是一种有机磷化合物,常作为杀虫剂,具有低毒和低残留的特点。
敌百虫在中性及弱酸性溶液中较稳定,在碱性溶液中易形成毒性更大的敌敌畏。
高浓度敌百虫影响水生生物的生长和繁殖,通过食物链进入人体,危害人体健康。
不仅影响生物体的生长、发育和生殖,还在细胞和分子水平导致氧化应激、促使自由基的产生,影响相关基因的表达,甚至引起细胞死亡。
(1)研究不同给药方式对敌百虫在鲫肌肉中残留规律,本文首先比较了高效液相色谱仪、气质联用仪和液质联用仪三种检测方法,结果显示液质联用仪方法灵敏度最高(0.2ng/g),因此选择液质联用仪检测鲫肌肉中敌百虫。
在20±2℃条件下,将鲫分别浸泡于敌百虫浓度为0、0.2mg/L和0.5mg/L的水溶液中,结果显示鲫肌肉的药时曲线符合一吸收一室模型,药物达峰时间分别是5.74d和5.650d,达到峰浓度0.163μg/g和0.502μg/g,根据鲫肌肉中敌百虫的药动学方程,药残达到国家限量标准所需时间约为5d;分别以0.5g/kg、1g/kg和2g/kg的剂量给鲫口灌敌百虫,结果显示鲫肌肉的药时曲线符合一吸收一室模型,药物达峰时间分别为5.188h、5.038h和5.997h,达到峰浓度分别为0.199μg/g、0.261μg/g 和0.422μg/g,根据鲫肌肉中敌百虫的药动学方程,药残达到国家限量标准所需时间约为4d。
土壤中有机磷农药的测定
第8章土壤中有机磷农药的测定8.1概述长期以来,大面积使用化学农药严重破坏环境和生态,而我国化学农药的使用量是世界平均用量的2.5倍,高毒农药使用量占我国农药使用量的30%[1]。
有机磷农药是上世纪三十年代德国G.Schradev首先发现的,有机磷农药是作为取代有机氯农药而发展起来的新型农药,这种农药较有机氯农药容易降解,对自然环境的污染和生态系统的危害、残留没有有机氯农药普遍和持久。
但事实上,有机磷农药并不是理想高效、低毒、低残留农药,其在环境中的残留也不容忽视[2],并在动物体内富集[3]。
有机磷农药一般为硫代磷酸酯类或磷酸酯类化合物,大多呈结晶状或油状,工业品呈棕色或淡黄色,除敌敌畏和敌百虫之外,大多有蒜臭味。
这类农药除敌百虫、磷胺、甲胺磷、乙酰甲胺磷等易溶于水,其它不溶于水,易溶于有机溶剂如苯、丙酮、乙醚、三氯甲烷及油类。
有机磷农药分子结构一般具有容易断裂的化学键,在酸性和中性溶液中较稳定,遇碱易分解破坏,对光、热、氧均较稳定,略具挥发性,遇高热可异构化,加热遇碱可以加速分解。
有机磷农药是一种神经毒物,作用机制是抑制生物体内的乙酰胆碱酯酶,引起神经系统紊乱,并造成中毒。
另外,有机磷农药迟发性毒性还会对生殖系统造成损害。
印度北部Kanpur市,地表水中马拉硫磷含量达 2.618mg/L,地下水含量高达29.835mg/L[4]。
近年来,我国农药工业迅速发展,农药年产量居世界第二位。
其中,有机磷农药产量占全世界总量的1/3,占全国农药总量的50%以上[5]。
我国近年来用量最大的农药主要是甲拌磷、特丁硫磷、甲胺膦、氧乐果、丙溴磷、乐果、水胺硫磷、杀螟硫磷、辛硫磷、异稻瘟净、马拉硫磷、乙酰甲胺磷、甲基毒死蜱、毒死蜱、三唑磷、敌百虫、敌敌畏、草甘膦等有机磷农药产品年产量约占我国有机磷类农药总产量的90%以上[6]。
8.2相关环保标准和工作需要8.2.1 国内相关标准目前我国的各类环境质量标准和污染物排放标准中,除了危险废物毒性标准中有四种有机磷的排放限值,还没有土壤和沉积物中有机磷的相关质量和排放标准,详见表1。
水胺硫磷半抗原分子的设计及其免疫效果
水胺硫磷半抗原分子的设计及其免疫效果刘波;袁利鹏;林丹琼;熊波;高秀杰【摘要】以水胺硫磷的特征部分为基础,设计合成半抗原O-甲基-O-2-水杨酸异丙酯硫代磷酰-6-氨基己酸(H-ICP),并通过活泼酯法将其与载体蛋白BSA、OVA分别偶联制备了免疫抗原H-ICP-BSA和包被抗原H-ICP-OVA,再经过动物免疫获得多克隆抗体.采用间接竞争ELISA法建立标准曲线,测得其IC50为5.3 ng/mL,定量检测线性为1.77~10.06 ng/mL,与其他结构类似物无交叉反应.研究所获得的抗水胺硫磷多克隆抗体,可实现果蔬中水胺硫磷农药残留快速检测.%Preparation and identification of polyclonal antibody against Isocarbophos (ICP) was studied.The hapten H-ICP was designed and synthesized on characteristics of ICP pesticide,and artificial antigens H-ICP-BSA (immmue antigen) andH-ICP-OVA (coating antigen) were prepared by coupling with the carrier proteins using active ester method.The polyclonal antibody (PAb) against ICP pesticide was produced by animal immunity.Indirect ELISA experiments showed that IC50 was 5.3 ng/mL,linearity range was from 1.77 to 10.06ng/mL.There is no cross reaction against other structure analogous.The cloning of PAb against ICP was successfully obtained which could be used in pesticide residue detection in fruits and vegetables.【期刊名称】《食品与发酵工业》【年(卷),期】2015(041)008【总页数】4页(P75-78)【关键词】水胺硫磷;半抗原;多克隆抗体;间接ELISA【作者】刘波;袁利鹏;林丹琼;熊波;高秀杰【作者单位】广东农工商职业技术学院热作系,广东广州,510507;广东农工商职业技术学院热作系,广东广州,510507;广东农工商职业技术学院热作系,广东广州,510507;广东产品质量监督检验研究院,广东顺德,528300;中山大学达安基因股份有限公司,广东广州,510665【正文语种】中文水胺硫磷(isocarbophos,ICP),手性有机磷农药(organophosphorus pesticides,OPs)的一种,由于具有杀虫效率高,碱性条件下易分解等优点,一度成为农业生产中的主要杀虫剂之一。
羟基乙叉二膦酸MSDS
PackingGroup? II
毒害物质数据 2809-21-4(Hazardous Substances Data)
生产的这类产品还有基他一些品种,例如氨基三亚甲基膦酸(ATMP): [CH2PO(OH)2]3N 以及乙二胺四亚甲基磷酸(EDTMP)等等。有机多 元膦酸是 60 年代后期开发、70 年代前后被确认的一类水处理剂,这 类处理剂的出现使水片理技术向前迈进了一大步。与机聚磷酸盐相 比,有机多无膦酸具有良药姨的化学稳定性、不易水解、能耐较高温 度和药剂量小且兼具缓和蚀垢 性能等特点。是一类阴极型缓蚀剂, 又是一类非化学当量阻垢剂。和其他水处理剂复合使用时,表现出理 想的协同效应。对许多金属离子如钙、镁、铜、锌等具有优异的螯合 能务,甚至对这些金属的无机盐类如 CaSO4、CaCO3、MgSiO3 等也有
关 剂;电镀化学品;Industrial/Fine Chemicals;INORGANIC & ORGANIC 类 CHEMICALS;Analytical Chemistry;Ligands for Pharmaceutical 别 Research;Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry (Chelating : Reagents);Phosphonate antiscalant;organophosphorus compound Mo l 文 件 :
较好的去活化作用,因此大量应用于水处理技术。该品低毒,小白鼠 皮下注射 LD50 为 kg。
用 是锅炉和换热器的阻垢剂和缓蚀剂、无氰电镀的络合剂、皂用螯合剂、 途? 金属和非金属的清洗剂
用 磷酸化试剂,用于被保护的丝氨酸和吡喃糖。
途?
生产 由三氯化磷与冰醋酸混合后,加热、蒸馏,得乙酰氯(见 00510), 方 再与亚磷酸反应制得。市售品为以水稀释为含量 50%的粘稠液体。每 法? 吨产品消耗三氯化磷(95%)931kg,冰醋酸 591kg。
6.NTE娲绘
神经病靶酯酶与有机磷迟发性神经毒性伍一军(中国科学院动物研究所分子毒理学实验室北京100101)有机磷化合物(organophosphorus compound,OP)种类多,用途广。
大多数OP毒性较大,其持续广泛使用给生态环境和人类健康带来严重威胁,环保机构和毒理学家对此都非常关注。
除了引起急性中毒外,OP还可引发迟发性神经毒性(organophosphate-induced delayed neurotoxicity,OPIDN)。
OPIDN的主要特征是在接触OP后7-14d或更长时间出现感觉异常、肌肉疼痛、衰弱、无力、麻痹,甚至瘫痪的症状,脊髓和外周神经的长轴突出现病理损伤(Lotti,1992;Johnson,1993)。
OPIDN常呈群体性或散在性发生,在南美、埃及、摩洛哥及中国等地都先后发生过规模性OPIDN群体中毒事件,我国广大农村则不断见到由于使用有机磷农药防护不当而发生OPIDN的报道(张基美等,1997;雷念东等,1998)。
OPIDN的发生机理至今尚不完全清楚。
1.神经病靶酯酶(NTE)的发现NTE是在研究OPIDN发生机理过程中发现的。
自从Aldridge (1954)提出酯酶的磷酸化是OPIDN发生的起始事件后,研究者们便纷纷寻找OPIDN发生的靶标位置。
直到1969年,Johnson在鸡脑匀浆中发现神经毒性酯酶(neurotoxic esterase,NTE),后被称为神经病靶酯酶(neuropathy target esterase,NTE)(Johnson,1969;1974)。
该酶是具有酯酶活性的蛋白,本质上属于丝氨酸酯酶家族,它区别于其它丝氨酸酯酶的特点是可以被能诱发迟发性神经毒性的OP所抑制,而不被其它丝氨酸酯酶类抑制剂抑制(Johnson,1977)。
2.NTE 的分离纯化及其基因的克隆由于NTE蛋白是一种不同于一般丝氨酸酯酶活性的跨膜大分子蛋白,分离纯化并保持其酶活性极为困难。
麦氏重排在质谱法检测有机磷类农药残留中的运用
doi:10.16736/41-1434/ts.2022.14.040麦氏重排在质谱法检测有机磷类农药残留中的运用Application of Mclafferty Rearrangement in the Determination of OrganophosphorousPesticide Residues by Mass Spectrometry◎ 肖传勇(德州市农产品质量检测中心,山东 德州 253015)XIAO Chuanyong(Dezhou Agri-products Quality Testing Center, Dezhou 253015, China)摘 要:多数有机磷类农药属于磷酸酯类或硫代磷酸酯类化合物,当结构式含有不饱和基团、可离去的氢(γ-H)、可离去的氢与不饱和基团呈六元环时,经EI源轰击后,可发生麦氏重排反应。
麦氏重排产生的特征离子更能表征化合物的“指纹”信息,利用质谱法检测植物源性食品中有机磷类农药残留量时,将其作为待测组分的定性或定量因子,有助于加重识别点的权重。
关键词:有机磷类农药;麦氏重排;特征离子;农药残留;质谱法Abstract:Many organophosphorus pesticides are phosphate or thiphosphate compounds, when the structural formula contains unsaturated group, departable hydrogen and departable hydrogen forming six-membered ring with unsaturated group, the compound can undergo Mclafferty rearrangement under the condition of EI ionization. The characteristic ion produced by Mclafferty rearrangement can better characterize the fingerprint information of compounds. When we detect the organophosphorous pesticide residues in plant-derived foods by mass spectrometry, we take the characteristic ion produced by Mclafferty rearrangement as the qualitative or quantitative factors of the components, which helps to increase the weight of the identification point.Keywords:organophosphorus pesticide; mclafferty rearrangement; characteristic ion; pesticide residue; mass spectrometry中图分类号:O657.63农产品安全包括数量、质量及数据安全,特别是农产品质量安全备受社会关注。
arbuzov反应 催化剂
arbuzov反应催化剂英文回答:Arbuzov reaction is a chemical reaction that involves the conversion of an organic ester into an organophosphorus compound known as phosphite ester. This reaction is catalyzed by a transition metal catalyst, typically a palladium or platinum complex. The reaction proceedsthrough a nucleophilic substitution mechanism, where a phosphorus atom replaces an oxygen atom in the ester molecule.The Arbuzov reaction is widely used in organicsynthesis to prepare phosphite esters, which are important intermediates in the synthesis of various organic compounds, such as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and fine chemicals. The reaction offers a convenient and efficient method for the introduction of phosphorus-containing groups into organic molecules.One example of the Arbuzov reaction is the conversion of ethyl chloroformate to diethyl phosphite in the presence of a palladium catalyst. The reaction can be represented by the following equation:CH3CH2OCOCl + P(OR)3 → CH3CH2OP(OR)2 + P(OR)2Cl.In this reaction, the palladium catalyst facilitates the nucleophilic attack of the phosphorus atom on the carbon atom of the chloroformate group, leading to the formation of the phosphite ester. The chloride byproduct is then displaced by another molecule of phosphite ester, resulting in the formation of a diphosphite ester.The Arbuzov reaction is a versatile tool in organic synthesis due to its ability to introduce phosphorus-containing groups into organic molecules. It offers a wide range of possibilities for the design and synthesis of new compounds with desired properties. Additionally, the reaction can be easily scaled up for industrial production, making it suitable for large-scale synthesis.中文回答:Arbuzov反应是一种化学反应,涉及将有机酯转化为有机磷化合物,即磷酸酯。
美国环保局 EPA 试验 方法 3500b
METHOD 3500BORGANIC EXTRACTION AND SAMPLE PREPARATION1.0SCOPE AND APPLICATION1.1Method 3500 provides general guidance on the selection of methods used in the quantitative extraction (or dilution) of samples for analysis by one of the semivolatile or nonvolatile determinative methods. Cleanup and/or analysis of the resultant extracts are described in Chapter Two as well as in Method 3600 (Cleanup) and Method 8000 (Analysis).1.2The following table lists the extraction methods, the matrix and the analyte category.SAMPLE EXTRACTION METHODS FOR SEMIVOLATILES AND NONVOLATILESMethod #Matrix Extraction Type Analytes3510Aqueous Separatory Funnel Semivolatile & NonvolatileLiquid-Liquid Extraction Organics3520Aqueous Continuous Liquid-Semivolatile & NonvolatileLiquid Extraction Organics3535Aqueous Solid-Phase Extraction Semivolatile & Nonvolatile(SPE)Organics3540Solids Soxhlet Extraction Semivolatile & NonvolatileOrganics3541Solids Automated Soxhlet Semivolatiles & NonvolatileExtraction Organics3542Air Sampling Train Separatory Funnel &Semivolatile OrganicsSoxhlet Extraction3545Solids Pressurized Fluid Semivolatile & NonvolatileExtraction (ASE) (Heat Organics& Pressure)3550Solids Ultrasonic Extraction Semivolatile & NonvolatileOrganics3560/Solids Supercritical Fluid Semivolatile Petroleum3561Extraction (SFE)Hydrocarbons & PolynuclearAromatic Hydrocarbons 3580Non-aqueous Solvent Solvent Dilution Semivolatile & Nonvolatile Soluble Waste Organics1.3Method 3580 may be used for the solvent dilution of non-aqueous semivolatile and nonvolatile organic samples prior to cleanup and/or analysis.CD-ROM3500B - 1Revision 2December 19961.4Methods 3545, 3560, and 3561 are techniques that utilize pressurized solvent extraction to reduce the amount of solvent needed to extract target analytes and reduce the extraction time when compared to more traditional techniques such as Soxhlet extraction.1.5Prior to employing this method, analysts are advised to consult the disclaimer statement at the front of the manual and the information in Chapter Two for guidance on the allowed flexibility in the choice of apparatus, reagents, and supplies. In addition, unless specified in a regulation, the use of SW-846 methods is not mandatory in response to Federal testing requirements. The information contained in this procedure is provided by EPA as guidance to be used by the analyst and the regulated community in making judgments necessary to meet the data quality objectives or needs for the intended use of the data.2.0SUMMARY OF METHOD2.1 A sample of a known volume or weight is extracted with solvent or diluted with solvent. Method choices for aqueous samples include liquid-liquid extraction by separatory funnel or by continuous extractor and solid-phase extraction (SPE). Method choices for soil/sediment and solid waste samples include standard solvent extraction methods utilizing either Soxhlet, automated Soxhlet, or ultrasonic extraction. Solids may also be extracted using pressurized extraction techniques such as supercritical fluid extraction or heated pressurized fluid extraction.2.2The resultant extract is dried and concentrated in a Kuderna-Danish (K-D) apparatus. Other concentration devices or techniques may be used in place of the Kuderna-Danish concentrator if the quality control requirements of the determinative methods are met (Method 8000, Sec. 8.0).NOTE:Solvent recovery apparatus is recommended for use in methods that require the use of Kuderna-Danish evaporative concentrators. EPA recommends theincorporation of this type of reclamation system as a method to implement anemissions reduction program.2.3See Sec. 7.0 for additional guidance to assist in selection of the appropriate method.3.0INTERFERENCES3.1Solvents, reagents, glassware, and other sample processing hardware may yield artifacts and/or interferences to sample analysis. All these materials must be demonstrated to be free from interferences under the conditions of the analysis by analyzing method blanks. Specific selection of reagents and purification of solvents by distillation in all-glass systems may be necessary. Refer to each method for specific guidance on quality control procedures and to Chapter Four for guidance on the cleaning of glassware.3.2Interferences coextracted from the samples will vary considerably from source to source. If analysis of an extracted sample is prevented due to interferences, further cleanup of the sample extract may be necessary. Refer to Method 3600 for guidance on cleanup procedures.3.3Phthalate esters contaminate many types of products commonly found in the laboratory. Plastics, in particular, must be avoided because phthalates are commonly used as plasticizers and are easily extracted from plastic materials. Serious phthalate contamination may result at any time if consistent quality control is not practiced.CD-ROM3500B - 2Revision 2December 19963.4Soap residue (e.g. sodium dodecyl sulfate), which results in a basic pH on glassware surfaces, may cause degradation of certain analytes. Specifically, Aldrin, Heptachlor, and most organophosphorus pesticides will degrade in this situation. This problem is especially pronounced with glassware that may be difficult to rinse (e.g., 500-mL K-D flask). These items should be hand-rinsed very carefully to avoid this problem.4.0APPARATUS AND MATERIALS4.1Refer to the specific method of interest for a description of the apparatus and materials needed.4.2Solvent recovery apparatus is recommended for use in methods that require the use of Kuderna-Danish evaporative concentrators. Incorporation of this apparatus may be required by State or local municipality regulations that govern air emissions of volatile organics. EPA recommends the incorporation of this type of reclamation system as a method to implement an emissions reduction program. Solvent recovery is a means to conform with waste minimization and pollution prevention initiatives.5.0REAGENTS5.1Refer to the specific method of interest for a description of the solvents needed.5.2Organic-free reagent water. All references to water in this method refer to organic-free reagent water as defined in Chapter One.5.3Stock standards for spiking solutions - Stock solutions may be prepared from pure standard materials or purchased as certified solutions. The stock solutions used for the calibration standards are acceptable (dilutions must be made in a water miscible solvent) except for the quality control check sample stock concentrate which must be prepared independently to serve as a check on the accuracy of the calibration solution.5.3.1Prepare stock standard solutions by accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of purecompound. Dissolve the compound in a water miscible solvent (i.e., methanol, acetone, 2-propanol, etc.) and dilute to volume in a 10-mL volumetric flask. If compound purity is 96 percent or greater, the weight can be used without correction to calculate the concentration of the stock standard solution. Commercially-prepared stock standard solutions can be used at any concentration if they are certified by the manufacturer or by an independent source.5.3.2Stock standard solutions should be stored in polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE)-sealed containers at 4E C or below. The solutions should be checked frequently for stability. Refer to the determinative method for holding times of the stock solutions.5.4Surrogate standards - A surrogate (i.e., a compound that is chemically similar to the analyte group but is not expected to occur in an environmental sample) should be added to each sample, blank, laboratory control sample (LCS), and matrix spike sample just prior to extraction or processing. The recovery of the surrogate standard is used to monitor for unusual matrix effects, gross sample processing errors, etc. Surrogate recovery is evaluated for acceptance by determining whether the measured concentration falls within the acceptance limits.CD-ROM3500B - 3Revision 2December 19965.4.1Recommended surrogates for certain analyte groups are listed in Table 1. Formethods where no recommended surrogates are listed, the lab is free to select compounds that fall within the definition provided above. Even compounds that are on the method target analyte list may be used as a surrogate as long as historical data are available to ensure their absence at a given site. Normally one or more standards are added for each analyte group.5.4.2Prepare a surrogate spiking concentrate by mixing stock standards preparedabove and diluting with a water miscible solvent. Commercially prepared spiking solutions are acceptable. The concentration for semivolatile/nonvolatile organic and pesticide analyses should be such that a 1-mL aliquot into 1000 mL of a sample provides a concentration of 10 times the quantitation limit or near the mid-point of the calibration curve. Where volumes of less than 1000 mL are extracted, adjust the volume of surrogate standard proportionately. For matrices other than water, 1 mL of surrogate standard is still the normal spiking volume.However, if gel permeation chromatography will be used for sample cleanup, 2 mL should be added to the sample. See Table 1 for recommended surrogates. The spiking volumes are normally listed in each extraction method. Where concentrations are not listed in a method,a concentration of 10 times the quantitation limit is recommended. If the surrogate quantitationlimit is unknown, the average quantitation limit of method target analytes may be utilized to estimate a surrogate quantitation limit. As necessary or appropriate to meet project objectives, the surrogates listed in Table 1 may be modified by the laboratory. The concentration of the surrogate in the sample (or sample extract) should either be near the middle of the calibration range or approximately ten times the quantitation limit.5.5Matrix spike standards - The following are recommended matrix spike standard mixtures for a few analyte groups. Prepare a matrix spike concentrate by mixing stock standards prepared above and diluting with a water miscible solvent. Commercially-prepared spiking solutions are acceptable. The matrix spike standards should be independent of the calibration standard. A few methods provide guidance on concentrations and the selection of compounds for matrix spikes (see Table 2).5.5.1Base/neutral and acid matrix spiking solution - Prepare a spiking solution inmethanol that contains each of the following base/neutral compounds at 100 mg/L and the acid compounds at 200 mg/L for water and sediment/soil samples. The concentration of these compounds should be five times higher for waste samples.Base/neutrals Acids1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene PentachlorophenolAcenaphthene Phenol2,4-Dinitrotoluene2-ChlorophenolPyrene4-Chloro-3-methylphenolN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine4-Nitrophenol1,4-Dichlorobenzene5.5.2Organochlorine pesticide matrix spiking solution - Prepare a spiking solution inacetone or methanol that contains the following pesticides in the concentrations listed for water and sediment/soil. The concentration should be five times higher for waste samples.CD-ROM3500B - 4Revision 2December 1996Pesticide Concentration (mg/L)Lindane0.2Heptachlor0.2Aldrin0.2Dieldrin0.5Endrin0.54,4'-DDT0.55.5.3For methods with no guidance, select five or more analytes (select all analytesfor methods with five or less) from each analyte group for use in a spiking solution. Where matrix spike concentrations in the sample are not listed it should be at or below the regulatory concentration or action level, or 1 to 5 times higher than the background concentration, whichever, concentration would be larger.5.5.4Sec. 8.3.3 provides guidance on determining the concentration of the matrix spikecompounds in the sample. As necessary or appropriate to meet project objectives, the matrix spiking compounds listed in Secs. 5.5.1, 5.5.2, and/or the concentrations listed in the spiking solutions may be modified by the laboratory. When the concentration of an analyte is not being checked against a regulatory limit or action level (see Sec. 8.3.3.3) the concentration of the matrix spike compound in the sample (or sample extract) should be near the middle of the calibration range or approximately ten times the quantitation limit.5.6Laboratory control spike standard - Use the matrix spike standard prepared in Sec. 5.5 as the spike standard for the laboratory control sample (LCS). The LCS should be spiked at the same concentration as the matrix spike.6.0SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND HANDLINGSee Chapters Two and Four for guidance on sample collection.7.0PROCEDURE7.1Water, soil/sediment, sludge, and waste samples requiring analysis for semivolatile and nonvolatile organic compounds (within this broad category are special subsets of analytes, i.e., the different groups of pesticides, explosives, PCBs etc.), must undergo solvent extraction prior to analysis. This manual contains method choices that are dependent on the matrix, the physical properties of the analytes, the sophistication and cost of equipment available to a given laboratory, and the turn-around time required for sample preparation.7.1.1The laboratory should be responsible for ensuring that the method chosen forsample extraction will provide acceptable extraction efficiency for the target analytes in a given matrix. There are several approaches that may be employed to ensure the appropriateness of the extraction method.7.1.1.1Prior to employing any extraction procedure on samples submitted forregulatory compliance monitoring purposes, the laboratory should complete the initialdemonstration of proficiency described in Sec. 8.2. This demonstration applies to allSW-846 extraction methods, including those for which specific performance data areprovided in a determinative method.CD-ROM3500B - 5Revision 2December 19967.1.1.2In addition, when a new or different extraction technique is to be appliedto samples, the laboratory should also demonstrate that their application of the techniqueprovides acceptable performance in the matrix of interest for the analytes of interest.One approach to demonstrating extraction method performance is to make a directcomparison between the chosen method and either Method 3520 (continuous liquid-liquidextraction of aqueous samples) or Method 3540 (Soxhlet extraction of solid samples),as these methods have the broadest applicability to environmental matrices.When direct comparisons are performed, they should be conducted using either standardreference materials derived from real-world matrices or samples from a given site thatcan be reasonably expected to contain the analytes of interest. Because of concerns withthe incorporation of spiking materials into samples, the use of samples spiked by thelaboratory is generally a less useful comparison relative to either real-world contaminatedsamples or standard reference materials, and thus should generally only be employedwhen neither of these latter materials are available. Analyze at least four portions of awell homogenized sample by the extraction method of interest and either Method 3520or Method 3540, depending on the matrix.7.1.1.3When direct comparisons between methods are conducted, thelaboratory may use statistical tests such as an F-test to determine if the results arecomparable between the methods. The laboratory may employ the method of interestprovided that the demonstrated performance can be shown to be either as good or betterthan that of the "reference" method, or adequate for project needs, that is, meeting therequirements of the QA Project Plan for a specific project.7.1.1.4Whatever approaches are taken to ensure the adequacy of theextraction procedure for the matrix of interest, it is the responsibility of the laboratory todocument the results and maintain records of such demonstrations.7.1.2Each method has QC requirements that normally include the addition ofsurrogates to each analytical sample and QC sample as well as the inclusion of a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (or matrix spike and duplicate sample), a laboratory control sample, and a method blank in each sample extraction batch. As defined in Chapter One, a "batch" consists of up to 20 environmental samples processed as a unit. In the case of samples that must undergo extraction prior to analysis, each group of 20 samples extracted together by the same method constitutes an extraction batch.The decision of whether to prepare and analyze a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate pair ora matrix spike and a duplicate sample should be based on knowledge of the samples in theextraction batch. If the samples are expected to contain the analytes of interest, then the analysis of a duplicate sample may yield data on the precision of the analytical process and the analysis of the matrix spike will yield data on the accuracy of the process. In contrast, when the samples are not known or expected to contain the analytes of interest, then the batch should include a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate pair to ensure that both accuracy and precision data will be generated within the extraction batch.7.2Method 3510 - Applicable to the extraction and concentration of water-insoluble and slightly water-soluble organics from aqueous samples. A measured volume of sample is solvent extracted using a separatory funnel. The extract is dried, concentrated and, if necessary, exchanged into a solvent compatible with further analysis. Separatory funnel extraction utilizes relatively inexpensive glassware and is fairly rapid (three, 2-minute extractions followed by filtration) but is labor intensive, uses fairly large volumes of solvent and is subject to emulsion problems. Method CD-ROM3500B - 6Revision 2December 19963520 should be used if an emulsion forms between the solvent-sample phases, which cannot be broken by mechanical techniques.7.3Method 3520 - Applicable to the extraction and concentration of water-insoluble and slightly water-soluble organics from aqueous samples. A measured volume of sample is extracted with an organic solvent in a continuous liquid-liquid extractor. The solvent must have a density greater than that of the sample. The extract is dried, concentrated and, if necessary, exchanged into a solvent compatible with further analysis. Continuous extractors are excellent for samples with particulates (of up to 1% solids) that cause emulsions, provide more efficient extraction of analytes that are more difficult to extract and once loaded, require no hands-on manipulation. However, they require more expensive glassware, use fairly large volumes of solvent and extraction time is rather lengthy (6 to 24 hours).7.4Method 3535 - Applicable to the extraction and concentration of water-insoluble and slightly water-soluble organics from aqueous samples. A measured volume of water is pumped through an appropriate medium (e.g., disk or cartridge) containing a solid phase that effects the extraction of organics from water. A small volume of extraction solvent is passed through the medium to elute the compounds of interest. The eluant is dried, concentrated and, if necessary, exchanged into a solvent compatible with further analysis. Appropriate solid-phase extraction media allow extraction of water containing particulates, are relatively fast and use small volumes of solvent. However, they do require some specialized pieces of equipment.7.5Method 3540 - This method is applicable to the extraction of nonvolatile and semivolatile organic compounds from solids such as soils, relatively dry sludges, and solid wastes. A solid sample is mixed with anhydrous sodium sulfate, placed into an extraction thimble or between two plugs of glass wool, and extracted using an appropriate solvent in a Soxhlet extractor. The extract is concentrated and, if necessary, exchanged into a solvent compatible with further analysis. Soxhlet extraction uses relatively inexpensive glassware, once loaded requires no hands-on manipulation, provides efficient extraction, but is rather lengthy (16 to 24 hours) and uses fairly large volumes of solvent. It is considered a rugged extraction method because there are very few variables that can adversely affect extraction efficiency.7.6Method 3541 - This method utilizes a modified Soxhlet extractor and is applicable to the extraction of semivolatile/nonvolatile organic compounds from solids such as soils, relatively dry sludges, and solid wastes. A solid sample is mixed with anhydrous sodium sulfate, placed into an extraction thimble or between two plugs of glass wool, and extracted using an appropriate solvent in an automated Soxhlet extractor. This device allows the extraction thimble to be lowered into the boiling liquid for the first hour and then extracted in the normal thimble position for one additional hour. The automated Soxhlet allows equivalent extraction efficiency in 2 hours, combines the concentration step within the same device but requires a rather expensive device.7.7Method 3542 - This method is applicable to the extraction of semivolatile organic compounds from the Method 0010 air sampling train. The solid trapping material (i.e., glass or quartz fiber filter and porous polymeric adsorbent resin) are extracted using Soxhlet extraction and the condensate and impinger fluid are extracted using separatory funnel extraction.7.8Method 3545 - This method is applicable to the extraction of nonvolatile/semivolatile organic compounds from solids such as soils, relatively dry sludges, and solid wastes. A solid sample is mixed with anhydrous sodium sulfate, placed into an extraction cell and extracted under pressure with small volumes of solvent. The extract is concentrated and, if necessary, exchanged into a solvent compatible with further analysis. The method is rapid and efficient, in that it uses small volumes of solvent, but does require the use of an expensive extraction device.CD-ROM3500B - 7Revision 2December 1996CD-ROM 3500B - 8Revision 2December 19967.9Method 3550 - This method is applicable to the extraction of nonvolatile and semivolatile organic compounds from solids such as soils, sludges, and wastes using the technique of ultrasonic extraction. Two procedures are detailed depending upon the expected concentration of organics in the sample; a low concentration and a high concentration method. In both, a known weight of sample is mixed with anhydrous sodium sulfate and solvent extracted using ultrasonic extraction.The extract is dried, concentrated and, if necessary, exchanged into a solvent compatible with further analysis. Ultrasonic extraction is fairly rapid (three, 3-minute extractions followed by filtration) but uses relatively large volumes of solvent, requires a somewhat expensive device and requires following the details of the method very closely to achieve acceptable extraction efficiency (proper tuning of the ultrasonic device is very critical). This technique is much less efficient than the other extraction techniques described in this section. This is most evident with very non-polar organic compounds (e.g., PCBs, etc.) that are normally strongly adsorbed to the soil matrix. EPA has not validated Method 3550 for the extraction of organophosphorus compounds from solid matrices. In addition, there are concerns that the ultrasonic energy may lead to breakdown of some organophosphorus compounds (see Reference 1). As a result, this extraction technique should not be used for organophosphorous compounds without extensive validation on real-world samples.Such studies should assess the precision, accuracy, ruggedness, and sensitivity of the technique relative to the appropriate regulatory limits or project-specific concentrations of interest.7.10Methods 3560 and 3561 - These methods are applicable to the extraction of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons and PAHs from solids such as soils, sludges, and wastes using the technique of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). SFE normally uses CO (which may contain very 2small volumes of solvent modifiers). Therefore, there is no solvent waste for disposal, may be automated, provides relatively rapid extraction, but, is currently limited to total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons and PAHs. It also requires a rather expensive device and sample size is more limited.Research on SFE is currently focusing on optimizing supercritical fluid conditions to allow efficient extraction of a broader range of RCRA analytes in a broad range of environmental matrices.7.11Method 3580 - This method describes the technique of solvent dilution of non-aqueous waste samples. It is designed for wastes that may contain organic chemicals at a level greater than 20,000 mg/kg and that are soluble in the dilution solvent. When using this method, the analyst must use caution in the addition of surrogate compounds, so as not to dilute out the surrogate response when diluting the sample.7.12Sample analysis - Following preparation of a sample by one of the methods described above, the sample is ready for further analysis. Samples prepared for semivolatile/nonvolatile analysis may, if necessary, undergo cleanup (See Method 3600) prior to application of a specific determinative method.8.0QUALITY CONTROL8.1Refer to Chapter One for specific guidance on quality control procedures. Each laboratory using SW-846 methods should maintain a formal quality assurance program. Each extraction batch of 20 or less samples should contain: a method blank; either a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate or a matrix spike and duplicate samples; and a laboratory control sample, unless the determinative method provides other guidance.8.2Initial Demonstration of Proficiency - Each laboratory must demonstrate initial proficiency with each sample preparation and determinative method combination it utilizes, by generating data of acceptable accuracy and precision for target analytes in a clean reference matrix. This will include a combination of the sample extraction method (usually a 3500 series method for extractableorganics) and the determinative method (an 8000 series method). The laboratory should also repeat the following operations whenever new staff are trained or significant changes in instrumentation are made.8.2.1The reference samples are prepared from a spiking solution containing eachanalyte of interest. The reference sample concentrate (spiking solution) may be prepared from pure standard materials, or purchased as certified solutions. If prepared by the laboratory, the reference sample concentrate should be made using stock standards prepared independently from those used for calibration.8.2.2The procedure for preparation of the reference sample concentrate is dependentupon the method being evaluated. Guidance for reference sample concentrations for certain methods are listed below. In other cases, the determinative methods contain guidance on preparing the reference sample concentrate and the reference sample. If no guidance is provided, prepare a reference sample concentrate in methanol (or other water miscible solvent). Spike the reference sample at the concentration on which the method performance data are based. The spiking volume added to water should not exceed 1 mL/L so that the spiking solvent will not decrease extraction efficiency. If the method lacks performance data, prepare a reference standard concentrate at such a concentration that the spike will providea concentration in the clean matrix that is 10 - 50 times the MDL for each analyte in that matrix.The concentration of target analytes in the reference sample may be adjusted to more accurately reflect the concentrations that will be analyzed by the laboratory. If the concentration of an analyte is being evaluated relative to a regulatory limit or action level, see Sec. 8.3.1 for information on selecting an appropriate spiking level.8.2.3To evaluate the performance of the total analytical process, the referencesamples must be handled in exactly the same manner as actual samples. Therefore, 1 mL (unless the method specifies a different volume) of the reference sample concentrate is spiked into each of four (minimum number of replicates) 1-L aliquots of organic-free reagent water (now called the reference sample), extracted as per the method. For matrices other than water or for determinative methods that specify a different volume of water, add 1.0 mL of the reference sample concentrate to at least four replicates of the volume or weight of sample specified in the method. Use a clean matrix for spiking purposes (one that does not have any target or interference compounds) e.g., organic-free reagent water for the water matrix or sand or soil (free of organic interferences) for the solid matrix.8.2.4Preparation of reference samplesThe following sections provide guidance on the QC reference sample concentrates for many SW-846 determinative methods. The concentration of the target analytes in the QC reference sample for the methods listed below may need to be adjusted to more accurately reflect the concentrations of interest in different samples or projects. If the concentration of an analyte is being evaluated relative to a regulatory limit or action level, see Sec. 8.3.3 for information on selecting an appropriate spiking level. In addition, the analyst may vary the concentration of the spiking solution and the volume of solution spiked into the sample.However, because of concerns about the effects of the spiking solution solvent on the sample, the total volume spiked into a sample should generally be held to no more than 1 mL.8.2.4.1Method 8041 - Phenols: The QC reference sample concentrate shouldcontain each analyte at 100 mg/L in 2-propanol.CD-ROM3500B - 9Revision 2December 1996。
8081b-有机氯气相色谱法
METHOD 8081BORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SW-846 is not intended to be an analytical training manual. Therefore, method procedures are written based on the assumption that they will be performed by analysts who are formally trained in at least the basic principles of chemical analysis and in the use of the subject technology.In addition, SW-846 methods, with the exception of required method use for the analysis of method-defined parameters, are intended to be methods which contain general information on how to perform an analytical procedure or technique, which a laboratory can use as a basic starting point for generating its own detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), either for its own general use or for a specific project application. The performance data included in this method are for guidance purposes only, and are not intended to be and must not be used as absolute QC acceptance criteria for purposes of laboratory accreditation.1.0SCOPE AND APPLICATION1.1This method may be used to determine the concentrations of various organochlorine pesticides in extracts from solid and liquid matrices, using fused-silica, open-tubular, capillary columns with electron capture detectors (ECD) or electrolytic conductivity detectors (ELCD). The following RCRA compounds have been determined by this method using either a single- or dual-column analysis system:Compound CAS Registry No.Aldrin309-00-2α-BHC319-84-6β-BHC319-85-7γ-BHC (Lindane)58-89-9δ-BHC319-86-8cis-Chlordane5103-71-9trans-Chlordane5103-74-2Chlordane -- not otherwise specified (n.o.s.)57-74-9Chlorobenzilate510-15-61,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)96-12-84,4'-DDD72-54-84,4'-DDE72-55-94,4'-DDT50-29-3Diallate2303-16-4Dieldrin60-57-1Endosulfan I959-98-8Endosulfan II33213-65-9Endosulfan sulfate1031-07-8Endrin72-20-8Endrin aldehyde7421-93-4Compound CAS Registry No.aEndrin ketone53494-70-5Heptachlor76-44-8Heptachlor epoxide1024-57-3Hexachlorobenzene118-74-1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene77-47-4Isodrin465-73-6Methoxychlor72-43-5Toxaphene8001-35-2a Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number1.2This method no longer includes PCBs as Aroclors in the list of target analytes. The analysis of PCBs should be undertaken using Method 8082, which includes specific cleanup and quantitation procedures designed for PCB analysis. This change was made to obtain PCB data of better quality and to eliminate the complications inherent in a combined organochlorine pesticide and PCB method. Therefore, if the presence of PCBs is suspected, use Method 8082 for PCB analyses, and this method (Method 8081) for organochlorine pesticide analyses. If there is no information on the likely presence of PCBs, either employ a PCB-specific screening procedure such as an immunoassay (e.g., Method 4020), or split the sample extract prior to any cleanup steps, and process part of the extract for organochlorine pesticide analysis and the other portion for PCB analysis using Method 8082.1.3The analyst must select columns, detectors and calibration procedures most appropriate for the specific analytes of interest in a study. Matrix-specific performance data must be established and the stability of the analytical system and instrument calibration must be established for each analytical matrix (e.g., hexane solutions from sample extractions, diluted oil samples, etc.). Example chromatograms and GC conditions are provided as guidance.1.4Although performance data are presented for many of the target analytes, it is unlikely that all of them could be determined in a single analysis. The chemical and chromatographic behaviors of many of these chemicals can result in coelution of some target analytes. Several cleanup/fractionation schemes are provided in this method and in Method 3600.1.5Several multi-component mixtures (i.e., chlordane and toxaphene) are listed as target analytes. When samples contain more than one multi-component analyte, a higher level of analyst expertise is necessary to attain acceptable levels of qualitative and quantitative analysis. The same is true of multi-component analytes that have been subjected to environmental degradation or degradation by treatment technologies. These result in "weathered" multi-component mixtures that may have significant differences in peak patterns to those of standards.1.6Compound identification based on single-column analysis should be confirmed ona second column, or should be supported by at least one other qualitative technique. This method describes analytical conditions for a second gas chromatographic column that can be used to confirm the measurements made with the primary column. GC/MS (e.g., Method 8270) is also recommended as a confirmation technique, if sensitivity permits (also see Sec. 11.7 of this method). GC/AED may also be used as a confirmation technique, if sensitivity permits (see Method 8085).1.7This method includes a dual-column option that describes a hardware configuration in which two GC columns are connected to a single injection port and to two separate detectors. The option allows one injection to be used for dual-column simultaneous analysis.1.8The following compounds may also be determined using this method. They have been grouped separately from the compounds in Sec. 1.1 because they have not been as extensively validated by EPA. If these compounds are to be determined using this procedure, the analyst is advised that additional efforts may be necessary in order to optimize the instrument operating conditions and to demonstrate acceptable method performance.Compound CAS Registry No.Alachlor15972-60-8Captafol2425-06-1Carbophenothion786-19-6Chloroneb2675-77-6Chloropropylate5836-10-2Chlorothalonil1897-45-6Dacthal (DCPA)1861-32-1Dichlone117-80-6Dichloran99-30-9Dicofol115-32-2Etridiazole2593-15-9Halowax-100058718-66-4Halowax-100158718-67-5Halowax-101312616-35-2Halowax-101412616-36-3Halowax-1051 2234-13-1Halowax-109939450-05-0Mirex2385-85-5Nitrofen1836-75-5trans-Nonachlor39765-80-5Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)82-68-8Permethrin (cis + trans)52645-53-1Perthane72-56-0Propachlor1918-16-7Strobane8001-50-1Trifluralin1582-09-81.9Kepone extracted from samples or in standards exposed to water or methanol may produce peaks with broad tails that elute later than the standard by up to 1 min. This shift is presumably the result of the formation of a hemi-acetal from the ketone functionality and may seriously affect the ability to identify this compound on the basis of its retention time. As a result, this method is not recommended for determining Kepone. Method 8270 may be more appropriate for the analysis of Kepone.1.10Extracts suitable for analysis by this method may also be analyzed for organophosphorus pesticides (Method 8141). Some extracts may also be suitable for triazine herbicide analysis, if low recoveries (normally samples taken for triazine analysis must be preserved) are not a problem.1.11Prior to employing this method, analysts are advised to consult the base method for each type of procedure that may be employed in the overall analysis (e.g., Methods 3500, 3600, and 8000) for additional information on quality control procedures, development of QC acceptance criteria, calculations, and general guidance. Analysts also should consult the disclaimer statement at the front of the manual and the information in Chapter Two for guidance on the intended flexibility in the choice of methods, apparatus, materials, reagents, and supplies, and on the responsibilities of the analyst for demonstrating that the techniques employed are appropriate for the analytes of interest, in the matrix of interest, and at the levels of concern.In addition, analysts and data users are advised that, except where explicitly specified in a regulation, the use of SW-846 methods is not mandatory in response to Federal testing requirements. The information contained in this method is provided by EPA as guidance to be used by the analyst and the regulated community in making judgments necessary to generate results that meet the data quality objectives for the intended application.1.12Use of this method is restricted to use by, or under the supervision of, personnel appropriately experienced and trained in the use of gas chromatographs (GCs) and skilled in the interpretation of gas chromatograms. Each analyst must demonstrate the ability to generate acceptable results with this method.2.0SUMMARY OF METHOD2.1 A measured volume or weight of liquid or solid sample is extracted using the appropriate matrix-specific sample extraction technique.2.1.1Aqueous samples may be extracted at neutral pH with methylene chlorideusing either Method 3510 (separatory funnel), Method 3520 (continuous liquid-liquidextractor), Method 3535 (solid-phase extraction), or other appropriate technique.2.1.2Solid samples may be extracted with hexane-acetone (1:1) or methylenechloride-acetone (1:1) using Method 3540 (Soxhlet), Method 3541 (automated Soxhlet), Method 3545 (pressurized fluid extraction), Method 3546 (microwave extraction), Method 3550 (ultrasonic extraction), Method 3562 (supercritical fluid extraction), or otherappropriate technique or solvents.2.2 A variety of cleanup steps may be applied to the extract, depending on the nature of the matrix interferences and the target analytes. Suggested cleanups include alumina (Method 3610), Florisil (Method 3620), silica gel (Method 3630), gel permeation chromatography (Method 3640), and sulfur (Method 3660).2.3After cleanup, the extract is analyzed by injecting a measured aliquot into a gas chromatograph equipped with either a narrow-bore or wide-bore fused-silica capillary column, and either an electron capture detector (GC/ECD) or an electrolytic conductivity detector(GC/ELCD).3.0DEFINITIONSRefer to Chapter One and the manufacturer's instructions for definitions that may be relevant to this procedure.4.0INTERFERENCES4.1Solvents, reagents, glassware, and other sample processing hardware may yield artifacts and/or interferences to sample analysis. All of these materials must be demonstrated to be free from interferences under the conditions of the analysis by analyzing method blanks. Specific selection of reagents and purification of solvents by distillation in all-glass systems may be necessary. Refer to each method to be used for specific guidance on quality control procedures and to the chapter text for general guidance on the cleaning of glassware. Also refer to Methods 3500, 3600, and 8000 for a discussion of interferences.4.2Interferences co-extracted from the samples will vary considerably from waste to waste. While general cleanup techniques are referenced or provided as part of this method, unique samples may require additional cleanup approaches to achieve desired degrees of discrimination and quantitation. Sources of interference in this method can be grouped into three broad categories, as follows.4.2.1Contaminated solvents, reagents, or sample processing hardware.4.2.2Contaminated GC carrier gas, parts, column surfaces, or detectorsurfaces.4.2.3Compounds extracted from the sample matrix to which the detector willrespond.4.3Interferences by phthalate esters introduced during sample preparation can pose a major problem in pesticide determinations. Interferences from phthalate esters can best be minimized by avoiding contact with any plastic materials and checking all solvents and reagents for phthalate contamination.4.3.1Common flexible plastics contain varying amounts of phthalate esterswhich are easily extracted or leached from such materials during laboratory operations.4.3.2 Exhaustive cleanup of solvents, reagents and glassware may benecessary to eliminate background phthalate ester contamination.4.3.3These materials may be removed prior to analysis using Method 3640(Gel Permeation Cleanup) or Method 3630 (Silica Gel Cleanup).4.4Cross-contamination of clean glassware routinely occurs when plastics are handled during extraction steps, especially when solvent-wetted surfaces are handled. Glassware must be scrupulously cleaned.Clean all glassware as soon as possible after use by rinsing with the last solvent used. This should be followed by detergent washing with hot water, and rinses with tap water and organic-free reagent water. Drain the glassware and dry it in an oven at 130 E C for several hours, or rinse with methanol and drain. Store dry glassware in a clean environment. (Other appropriate glassware cleaning procedures may be employed.)4.5The presence of sulfur will result in broad peaks that interfere with the detection of early-eluting organochlorine pesticides. Sulfur contamination should be expected with sediment samples. Method 3660 is suggested for removal of sulfur. Since the recovery of endrin aldehyde is drastically reduced when using the TBA procedure in Method 3660, this compound must be determined prior to sulfur cleanup when it is an analyte of interest and the TBA procedure is to be used for cleanup. Endrin aldehyde is not affected by the copper powder, so endrin aldehyde can be determined after the removal of sulfur using the copper powder technique in Method 3660. However, as indicated in Method 3660, the use of copper powder may adversely affect the recoveries of other potential analytes of interest, including some organochlorine compounds and many organophosphorous compounds.4.6Waxes, lipids, and other high molecular weight materials can be removed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) cleanup (Method 3640).4.7Other halogenated pesticides or industrial chemicals may interfere with the analysis of pesticides. Certain coeluting organophosphorus pesticides may be eliminated using Method 3640 (GPC -- pesticide option). Coeluting chlorophenols may be eliminated by using Method 3630 (silica gel), Method 3620 (Florisil), or Method 3610 (alumina). Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) also may interfere with the analysis of the organochlorine pesticides. The problem may be most severe for the analysis of multicomponent analytes such as chlordane, toxaphene, and Strobane. If PCBs are known or expected to occur in samples, the analyst should consult Methods 3620 and 3630 for techniques that may be used to separate the pesticides from the PCBs.4.8Coelution among the many target analytes in this method can cause interference problems. The following target analytes may coelute on the GC columns listed, when using the single-column analysis scheme:DB 608Trifluralin/diallate isomersPCNB/dichlone/IsodrinDB 1701Captafol/mirexMethoxychlor/endosulfan sulfate4.9The following compounds may coelute using the dual-column analysis scheme. In general, the DB-5 column resolves fewer compounds than the DB-1701.DB-5Permethrin/heptachlor epoxideEndosulfan I/cis-chlordanePerthane/endrinEndosulfan II/chloropropylate/chlorobenzilate4,4'-DDT/endosulfan sulfateMethoxychlor/dicofolDB-1701Chlorothalonil/β-BHCδ-BHC/DCPA/permethrincis-Chlordane/trans-nonachlorNitrofen, dichlone, carbophenothion, and dichloran exhibit extensive peak tailing on both columns. Simazine and atrazine give poor responses on the ECD detector. Triazinecompounds should be analyzed using Method 8141 (nitrogen-phosphorus detector, or NPD, option).5.0SAFETYThis method does not address all safety issues associated with its use. The laboratory is responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe handling of the chemicals listed in this method. A reference file of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) should be available to all personnel involved in these analyses.6.0EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIESThe mention of trade names or commercial products in this manual is for illustrative purposes only, and does not constitute an EPA endorsement or exclusive recommendation for use. The products and instrument settings cited in SW-846 methods represent those products and settings used during method development or subsequently evaluated by the Agency. Glassware, reagents, supplies, equipment, and settings other than those listed in this manual may be employed provided that method performance appropriate for the intended application has been demonstrated and documented.This section does not list common laboratory glassware (e.g., beakers and flasks).6.1Gas chromatograph (GC) -- An analytical system complete with gas chromatograph suitable for on-column and split-splitless injection and all necessary accessories including syringes, analytical columns, gases, electron capture detectors (ECD), andrecorder/integrator or data system. Electrolytic conductivity detectors (ELCD) may also be employed if appropriate for project needs. If the dual-column option is employed, the gas chromatograph must be equipped with two detectors.6.2GC columnsThis method describes procedures for both single-column and dual-column analyses. The single-column approach involves one analysis to determine that a compound is present, followed by a second analysis to confirm the identity of the compound (Sec. 11.7 describes how GC/MS confirmation techniques may be employed). The single-column approach may employ either narrow-bore (#0.32-mm ID) columns or wide-bore (0.53-mm ID) columns. The dual-column approach generally employs a single injection that is split between two columns that are mounted in a single gas chromatograph. The dual-column approach generally employs wide-bore (0.53-mm ID) columns, but columns of other diameters may be employed if the analyst can demonstrate and document acceptable performance for the intended application. A third alternative is to employ dual columns mounted in a single GC, but with each column connected to a separate injector and a separate detector.The columns listed in this section were the columns used in developing the method. The listing of these columns in this method is not intended to exclude the use of other columns that are available or that may be developed. Laboratories may use these columns or other columns provided that the laboratories document method performance data (e.g., chromatographic resolution, analyte breakdown, and sensitivity) that are appropriate for the intended application.6.2.1Narrow-bore columns for single-column analysis (use both columns toconfirm compound identifications unless another confirmation technique such as GC/MS isemployed). Narrow-bore columns should be installed in split/splitless (Grob-type) injectors.6.2.1.130-m x 0.25-mm or 0.32-mm ID fused-silica capillary columnchemically bonded with SE-54 (DB-5 or equivalent), 1-µm film thickness.6.2.1.230-m x 0.25-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemicallybonded with 35 percent phenyl methylpolysiloxane (DB-608, SPB-608, orequivalent), 2.5 µm coating thickness, 1-µm film thickness.6.2.2Wide-bore columns for single-column analysis (use two of the three columns listed to confirm compound identifications unless another confirmation technique such as GC/MS is employed). Wide-bore columns should be installed in 1/4-inch injectors, with deactivated liners designed specifically for use with these columns.6.2.2.130-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemicallybonded with 35 percent phenyl methylpolysiloxane (DB-608, SPB-608, RTx-35, or equivalent), 0.5-µm or 0.83-µm film thickness.6.2.2.230-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemicallybonded with 50 percent phenyl methylpolysiloxane (DB-1701, or equivalent), 1.0-µm film thickness.6.2.2.330-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemicallybonded with 95 percent dimethyl - 5 percent diphenyl polysiloxane (DB-5, SPB-5,RTx-5, or equivalent), 1.5-µm film thickness.6.2.3Wide-bore columns for dual-column analysis -- The two pairs of recommended columns are listed below.6.2.3.1Column pair 130-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemically bonded with SE-54 (DB-5, SPB-5, RTx-5, or equivalent), 1.5-µm film thickness.30-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemically bonded with50 percent phenyl methylpolysiloxane (DB-1701, or equivalent), 1.0-µm filmthickness.Column pair 1 is mounted in a press-fit Y-shaped glass 3-way union splitter (J&W Scientific, Catalog No. 705-0733) or a Y-shaped fused-silicaconnector (Restek, Catalog No. 20405), or equivalent.NOTE:When connecting columns to a press-fit Y-shaped connector, a better seal may be achieved by first soaking the ends of the capillary columns inalcohol for about 10 sec to soften the polyimide coating.6.2.3.2Column pair 230-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemically bonded with SE-54 (DB-5, SPB-5, RTx-5, or equivalent), 0.83-µm film thickness.30-m x 0.53-mm ID fused-silica capillary column chemically bonded with50 percent phenyl methylpolysiloxane (DB-1701, or equivalent), 1.0-µm filmthickness.Column pair 2 is mounted in an 8-inch deactivated glass injection tee(Supelco, Catalog No. 2-3665M, or equivalent).6.3Column rinsing kit -- Bonded-phase column rinse kit (J&W Scientific, Catalog No.430-3000), or equivalent.6.4Volumetric flasks, 10-mL and 25-mL, for preparation of standards.6.5Analytical balance, capable of weighing to 0.0100 g.7.0REAGENTS AND STANDARDS7.1Reagent-grade or pesticide-grade chemicals must be used in all tests. Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents conform to specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society, where such specifications are available. Other grades may be used, provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity to permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determination. Reagents should be stored in glass to prevent the leaching of contaminants from plastic containers.NOTE:Store the standard solutions (stock, composite, calibration, internal, and surrogate) at#6 E C in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-sealed containers, in the dark. When a lot of standards is prepared, aliquots of that lot should be stored in individual small vials. All stock standard solutions must be replaced after one year, or sooner if routine QC (see Sec. 9.0) indicates a problem. All other standard solutions must be replaced after six months, or sooner if routine QC (see Sec. 9.0) indicates a problem.7.2Solvents used in the extraction and cleanup procedures (see appropriate 3500 and 3600 series methods) include n -hexane, diethyl ether, methylene chloride, acetone, ethyl acetate, and isooctane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane) and the solvents must be exchanged to n -hexane or isooctane prior to analysis. Therefore, the use of n -hexane and isooctane will be required in this procedure. All solvents should be pesticide grade in quality or equivalent, and each lot of solvent should be determined to be free of phthalates.7.3The following solvents may be necessary for the preparation of standards. Allsolvent lots must be pesticide grade in quality or equivalent and should be determined to be free of phthalates.7.3.1Acetone, (CH 3)2CO 7.3.2Toluene, C 6H 5CH 37.4Organic-free reagent water -- All references to water in this method refer toorganic-free reagent water as defined in Chapter One.7.5Standard solutionsThe following sections describe the preparation of stock, intermediate, and workingstandards for the compounds of interest. This discussion is provided as an example, and otherapproaches and concentrations of the target compounds may be used, as appropriate for the intended application. See Method 8000 for additional information on the preparation of calibration standards.7.6Stock standard solutions (1000 mg/L) -- May be prepared from pure standard materials or can be purchased as certified solutions.7.6.1Prepare stock standard solutions by accurately weighing 0.0100 g of purecompound. Dissolve the compound in isooctane or hexane and dilute to volume in a 10-mL volumetric flask. If compound purity is 96 percent or greater, the weight can be used without correction to calculate the concentration of the stock standard solution.Commercially prepared stock standard solutions can be used at any concentration if they are certified by the manufacturer or by an independent source.7.6.2β-BHC, dieldrin, and some other standards may not be adequatelysoluble in isooctane. A small amount of acetone or toluene should be used to dissolve these compounds during the preparation of the stock standard solutions.7.7Composite stock standard -- May be prepared from individual stock solutions.7.7.1For composite stock standards containing less than 25 components, takeexactly 1 mL of each individual stock solution at a concentration of 1000 mg/L, addsolvent, and mix the solutions in a 25-mL volumetric flask. For example, for a composite containing 20 individual standards, the resulting concentration of each component in the mixture, after the volume is adjusted to 25 mL, will be 1 mg/25 mL. This compositesolution can be further diluted to obtain the desired concentrations.7.7.2For composite stock standards containing more than 25 components, usevolumetric flasks of the appropriate volume (e.g., 50-mL, 100-mL), and follow theprocedure described above.7.8Calibration standards -- Should be prepared at a minimum of five different concentrations by dilution of the composite stock standard with isooctane or hexane. The concentrations should correspond to the expected range of concentrations found in real samples and should bracket the linear range of the detector. See Method 8000 for additional information on the preparation of calibration standards.7.8.1Although all single component analytes can be resolved on a new 35percent phenyl methyl silicone column (e.g., DB-608), two calibration mixtures should be prepared for the single component analytes of this method. This procedure is established to minimize potential resolution and quantitation problems on confirmation columns or on older 35 percent phenyl methyl silicone (e.g. DB-608) columns and to allow determination of endrin and DDT breakdown for instrument quality control (Sec. 9.0).7.8.2Separate calibration standards are necessary for each multi-componenttarget analyte (e.g., toxaphene and chlordane). Analysts should evaluate the specifictoxaphene standard carefully. Some toxaphene components, particularly the more heavily chlorinated components, are subject to dechlorination reactions. As a result, standards from different vendors may exhibit marked differences which could lead to possible false negative results or to large differences in quantitative results.7.9Internal standard (optional)7.9.1Pentachloronitrobenzene is suggested as an internal standard for thesingle-column analysis, when it is not considered to be a target analyte. 1-Bromo-2-nitrobenzene may also be used. Prepare a solution of 5000 mg/L (5000 ng/µL) ofpentachloronitrobenzene or 1-bromo-2-nitrobenzene. Spike 10 µL of this solution intoeach 1 mL of sample extract.7.9.21-Bromo-2-nitrobenzene is suggested as an internal standard for thedual-column analysis. Prepare a solution of 5000 mg/L (5000 ng/µL) of 1-bromo-2-nitrobenzene. Spike 10 µL of this solution into each 1 mL of sample extract.7.10Surrogate standardsThe performance of the method should be monitored using surrogate compounds.Surrogate standards are added to all samples, method blanks, matrix spikes, andcalibration standards. The following compounds are recommended as possiblesurrogates. Other surrogates may be used, provided that the analyst can demonstrateand document performance appropriate for the data quality needs of the particularapplication.7.10.1Decachlorobiphenyl and tetrachloro-m-xylene have been found to be auseful pair of surrogates for both the single-column and dual-column configurations.Method 3500 describes the procedures for preparing these surrogates.7.10.2 4-Chloro-3-nitrobenzotrifluoride may also be useful as a surrogate if thechromatographic conditions of the dual-column configuration cannot be adjusted topreclude coelution of a target analyte with either of the surrogates in Sec. 7.9.1. However, this compound elutes early in the chromatographic run and may be subject to otherinterference problems. A recommended concentration for this surrogate is 500 ng/µL.Use a spiking volume of 100 µL for a 1-L aqueous sample. (Other surrogateconcentrations may be used, as appropriate for the intended application.)7.10.3Store surrogate spiking solutions at #6 E C in PTFE-sealed containers inthe dark.8.0SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND STORAGE8.1See the introductory material to Chapter Four, "Organic Analytes."8.2Extracts must be stored under refrigeration in the dark and should be analyzed within 40 days of extraction.9.0QUALITY CONTROL9.1Refer to Chapter One for guidance on quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) protocols. When inconsistencies exist between QC guidelines, method-specific QC criteria take precedence over both technique-specific criteria and those criteria given in Chapter One, and technique-specific QC criteria take precedence over the criteria in Chapter One. Any effort involving the collection of analytical data should include development of a structured and systematic planning document, such as a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) or a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP), which translates project objectives and specifications into directions。
机械化学方法降解活性翠兰KN-G
机械化学方法降解活性翠兰KN-G唐晓琳;王越川;何星存;黄智;陈孟林【摘要】以活性翠兰KN-G探针反应,用自制的NiO为磨料,考察了球磨时间、物料比、球料比和球磨速率对机械化学效应降解染料的影响,结果表明,最佳球磨条件为:转速500 r/min,物料比15,球料比18,球磨15 h,其CODcr去除率可达95%左右.对样品脱色率、CODcr去除率、XRD、红外光谱等的分析表明机械化学方法可以使活性翠兰KN-G有效降解.%The mechanochemical decomposition of organic compound reactive turquoise blue KN-G was studied by using an oxide of NiO. The effects of grinding-time,material ratio,ball material ratio and rotation speed were also investigated. The decoloration rate and COD removal rate were measured. The products analysis was carried out with the use of X-ray diffraction detection (XRD) and IR. The results indicate that reactive turquoise blue KN-G was degraded effectively with mechanochemistry method.【期刊名称】《广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》【年(卷),期】2011(029)001【总页数】5页(P52-56)【关键词】活性翠兰KN-G;降解;机械化学法;NiO【作者】唐晓琳;王越川;何星存;黄智;陈孟林【作者单位】广西师范大学,环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004;广西师范大学,环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004;广西师范大学,环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004;广西师范大学,环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004;广西师范大学,环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004【正文语种】中文【中图分类】X705环境污染正在成为一个直接威胁人类生存而急待解决的全球性问题。
有机磷农药的构效关系及其对浮游生物的毒性效应
有机磷农药的构效关系及其对浮游生物的毒性效应王娜;刘莉莉;孙凯峰;段舜山【摘要】The toxicity of six organophosphorus pesticides to Scenedesmus quadricanda and Moina macrocopa were studied using quantitative structure-activity relationship theory (QSAR) and acute toxicity tests. According to QSAR theory, the toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides was determined mainly by the electropositivity of center phosphorus atom, which was influenced by the type. More specifically, toxicity was reduced as P=O bonds were replaced by P=S bonds. Replacement of hydroxy(-OH) by methoxy(-CH3O), ethoxy(-CH3CH2O) and propoxy(-CH3CH2CH2O), however, successively increased. Toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides was also reduced as P-0 bond were replaced by P-C bond. Specifically, the toxicity of chlorpyrifos and phoxim was higher than four other organophosphorus pesticides as -CH3CH2O replaced -CH3O, dichlorovos and trichlorphon were more toxic than glyphosate compared, while dichlorovos was more toxic than trichlorphon. Glyphosate-isophopylammianium was the least toxic compound as hydroxy(-OH) replaced by glycine isophopylammianium. Toxicity tests demonstrated that the EC-50 concentrations of chlorpyrifos, phoxim, trichlorphon, dichlorovos, dimethoate, glyphosate-isophopylammianium on S. Quadricanda were 6.34, 6.62, 59.53, 82.12, 141.37 and 7.25 mg·L-1 at 96 h, respectively, while, those on M. Macrocopa were 0.20, 0.12, 0.28, 0.17, 1.12 and 5.03 mg·L-1 at 48 h, respectively. The toxicity of the sixorganophosphorus pesticide to M. Macrocopa was generally ordered as -OH>=O >-O. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the utility of using QSAR with acute toxicity test for the assessment of ecological risks of organophosphorus pesticides to plankton.%以定量构效关系理论和实验室内急性毒性试验相结合研究了六种有机磷农药对四尾栅藻(S.quadricanda)和多刺裸腹溞(Moina macrocopa)的生态毒性.有机磷农药的毒性取决于磷原子的电正性,各取代基种类和构象对电荷分布作用显著.根据构效关系原理,磷氧双键(P=O)被磷硫双键(P=S)取代后毒性降低;羟基(-OH)被甲、乙、丙氧基(-CH3O、-CH3CH2O、-CH3CH2CH2O)取代后有机磷农药毒性依次增强;磷氧单键(P-O)毒性高于磷碳单键(P-C).该实验中毒死蜱、辛硫磷(-CH3CH2O)毒性高于其它四种(-CH3O),敌敌畏和敌百虫(P=O)毒性高于乐果(P=S),敌敌畏(P-O)又高于敌百虫(P-C),甘氨酸异丙胺盐取代羟基( -OH)的草甘膦毒性最低.毒性试验结果表明,毒死蜱、辛硫磷、敌百虫、敌敌畏、乐果、草甘膦异丙胺盐对四尾栅藻的96 h EC50分别为6.34、6.62、59.53、82.12、141.37和7.25 mg·L-1.它们对多刺裸腹溞的48 h LC50分别为0.20、0.12、0.28、0.17、1.12和5.03 mg·L-1.六种有机磷农药对多刺裸腹溞的毒性强度结果与QSAR分析具有较高的一致性,即表征有机磷农药毒性特征的取代基团作用的毒性强弱顺序为:-OH>=O>-O;对四尾栅藻毒性试验结果中,由于草甘膦异丙胺盐作用于植物类靶位点的特殊性,导致其对四尾栅藻毒性显著增强.综合以上研究,以构效关系理论和浮游生物毒性试验相结合进行有机磷农药的生态风险评价将更加便捷和准确.【期刊名称】《生态环境学报》【年(卷),期】2012(021)001【总页数】6页(P118-123)【关键词】有机磷农药;四尾栅藻;多刺裸腹溞;构效关系【作者】王娜;刘莉莉;孙凯峰;段舜山【作者单位】暨南大学水生生物研究中心,广东普通高校水体富营养化与赤潮防治重点实验室,广东广州510632;暨南大学水生生物研究中心,广东普通高校水体富营养化与赤潮防治重点实验室,广东广州510632;暨南大学水生生物研究中心,广东普通高校水体富营养化与赤潮防治重点实验室,广东广州510632;暨南大学水生生物研究中心,广东普通高校水体富营养化与赤潮防治重点实验室,广东广州510632【正文语种】中文【中图分类】X171.5有机磷农药以其药效高、成本低、作用方式多样、易分解,不易在人、畜体内蓄积等优势迅速取代有机氯农药,并成为20世纪80年代以来占据我国农药市场最多的一类。
二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的合成
二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的合成王晓季;吕常山【摘要】二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸是一种在钴镍萃取方面表现优异的萃取剂.以次磷酸钠和二异丁烯为原料,通过一种新的自由基反应一步合成了二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸,收率达80.4%.确定了该反应的最佳工艺条件为:选用搪瓷高压反应釜、二异丁烯与次亚磷酸钠的摩尔比为2.5:1、引发剂为偶氮二异丁腈(AIBN)、操作压力6 MPa、温度为135 ℃、反应过程中补加3次引发剂AIBN,总反应时间为32 h.【期刊名称】《四川师范大学学报(自然科学版)》【年(卷),期】2010(033)006【总页数】4页(P821-824)【关键词】二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸;萃取剂;影响因素【作者】王晓季;吕常山【作者单位】江西科技师范学院,药学院,江西,南昌,330013;江西科技师范学院,药学院,江西,南昌,330013【正文语种】中文【中图分类】O658近年来,随着有机磷化学的发展,不仅大大丰富了化学学科的内容,同时开拓了有机化学研究的新领域[1-2].有机磷化合物不仅是很好的杀虫剂,也是有机合成中重要的试剂[3]、阻燃剂等.次膦酸盐及以次膦酸盐为基础的阻燃剂可用于热塑性塑料(如PA,PBT)、纤维及纺织品的阻燃[4-5].将磷化合物引入聚醚胺类固化剂结构中,可以提高环氧树脂的阻燃性,提供了制备含磷阻燃化合物的有效方法[6].次膦酸分为单烷基取代物和双烷基取代物,单烷基次膦酸主要应用于生物制剂中间体方面;双烷基次膦酸在有机磷化合物取代基效应和构效关系研究以及溶剂萃取分离领域有重要的应用价值[7].二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸(即Cyanex272)(见图1)是一种新型的酸性次膦酸类萃取剂[8],在钴镍萃取方面表现优异[9-11].图1 二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸结构Fig.1 The structure of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid目前,只有美国、加拿大氰胺公司生产萃取剂Cyanex272[12],国内对该类产品的需求几乎全部依赖进口.因此,合成双(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸具有重要的社会价值和经济价值.目前合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸主要有格氏试剂法、AlCl3催化反应法、金属络合催化加成法、自由基加成法等[13].但已报道的方法大多存在合成步骤过长、工艺复杂、反应条件苛刻,产物难以分离提纯等不足之处.因此,我们在文献调研和前期工作的基础上,以次亚磷酸钠和二异丁烯为原料,通过一种新的自由基加成的方法一步合成了二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸,并对影响反应的各因素进行了系统研究,确定了合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的最佳工艺条件.1 实验部分1.1 仪器与试剂 BRUKER AV-400 MHz核磁共振仪,BRUKER V70傅里叶变换红外光谱仪,DF -101S集热式恒温加热磁力搅拌器,LABOROTA 4000旋转蒸发仪,不锈钢高压反应釜;搪瓷高压釜,耐压玻璃瓶;次亚磷酸钠,二异丁烯,乙酸,偶氮二异丁腈,偶氮二异庚腈,偶氮二异戊腈,偶氮二异丁酸二甲酯,过硫酸铵,过氧化苯甲酰,叔丁基过氧化物,过氧化氢等.1.2 实验操作与分析结果以乙酸作溶剂,向搪瓷高压反应釜内,投入二异丁烯与次亚磷酸钠(摩尔比为2.5∶1)和偶氮二异丁腈(AIBN,引发剂),加压至6 MPa、135℃下反应32 h.经碱洗、酸化、干燥和真空旋蒸后得目标产物,并经核磁对产物进行分析[14].31PNMR,51.350~53.861(m,P);1HNMR (CDCl3),δ:1.981(s,1H)、1.636(s,2H)、1.410 2 (s,4H)、1.255(s,4H)、1.051(s,6H)、0.842(s,18H);13CNMR(CDCl3),δ:53.04(2CH2)、40.03 (2CH2)、39.14(2quat.C)、31.22(2CH)、30.06 (6CH3)、24.32(2CH3).IR:ν/cm-1:2 940、1 475、1 365、1 171,960.二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的合成路线如图2所示.图2 二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的合成路线构Fig.2 Synthetic Route ofbis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid1.2.1 投料比对合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的影响投料比不同,将会导致目标产物的收率相差较大.考察了不同投料比对反应的影响,其结果如表1.表1 投料比(二异丁烯/次亚磷酸钠)对反应的影响*Table 1 The effect of various mol ratios on the synthesis of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid*:投料比为摩尔比.投料比单烷基次膦酸收率/%二烷基次膦酸收率/%其它收率/% 2∶1 23.4 69.9 6.7 2.5∶1 16.5 80.2 3.3 3∶1 16.2 80.4 3.4 5∶1 16.3 80.5 3.2由表1数据看出,随着次亚磷酸钠与二异丁烯摩尔比的增大,目标产物收率逐渐增大.摩尔比从2∶1增大到2.5∶1时,目标产物收率明显提高,当摩尔比高于3∶1时目标产物收率增加趋于平缓.摩尔比大于2.5∶1时,反应目标产物收率较好.投料量过小导致双烷基化反应不完全,致使单烷基化产物较多;提高投料比后,双烷基取代产物明显增多,但当投料比增大至3∶1时,双烷基取代产物增加不明显.综合产品收率和原料成本等因素,选定次亚磷酸钠/二异丁烯投料比为2.5∶1.1.2.2 不同引发剂对合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的影响不同引发剂半衰期不同,其引发效率也不同[15].我们对不同种类引发剂对反应的影响进行了研究,实验结果如表2.表2 不同引发剂对反应的影响Table 2 The effect of different initiators on the synthesis of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid16.6 80.1 3.3偶氮二异戊腈 48.8 39.6 11.6偶氮二异庚腈 49.2 40.0 10.8偶氮二异丁酸二甲酯 49.7 40.2 10.1过硫酸铵 2.3 4.1 93.6过氧化苯甲酰 15.8 78.7 5.5叔丁基过氧化物50.3 42.4 7.3过氧化氢偶氮二异丁腈40.3 37.0 22.7 /%引发剂单烷基次膦酸收率/%二烷基次膦酸收率/%其它收率由表2中数据看出,以偶氮二异丁腈、过氧化苯甲酰作该反应的引发剂可得较高收率的目标产物;叔丁基过氧化物、偶氮二异丁酸二甲酯、偶氮二异庚腈、偶氮二异戊腈、过氧化氢作引发剂时,单烷基取代物比例大于目标产物,且引发效率依次降低.过硫酸铵引发效果最差,单烷基取代物和二烷基取代物收率均较低.对比以上数据,综合引发剂成本和引发效率等因素,选定偶氮二异丁腈作引发剂.一般反应温度与引发剂活性有着密切关系,偶氮二异丁腈(AIBN)在不同温度时的半衰期也不同[15].温度太低时引发剂引发效果较差,双烷基化反应不完全;温度升高引发剂活性增强,引发效果提高,但温度过高时,引发剂易焠灭,引发效果不佳,可导致双烷基化反应不完全.综合反应温度与引发剂活性的关系选定反应温度为135℃.1.2.3 引发剂用量对合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的影响反应过程中引发剂用量不同导致反应液中自由基的浓度不同,由此将影响反应速率和目标产物的收率.因此考察了不同引发剂用量对反应的影响,结果如表3.表3 引发剂用量对反应的影响Table 3 The effect of the initiator amount on the synthesis of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid引发剂用量/g单烷基次膦酸收率/%二烷基次膦酸收率/%其它收率/% 1×0.14 11.3 67.8 20.92×0.14 13.7 70.2 16.1 3×0.14 16.3 80.1 3.6 4×0.14 16.5 80.4 3.1对比表3中数据,该反应与引发剂用量关系密切,随着引发剂用量增加,目标产物收率由67.8%增高至80.4%,变化趋势明显.但当引发剂用量超过(3 ×0.14)g时,目标产物收率增长趋于平缓.其原因是当引发剂用量不足时将导致引发不完全,自由基间相互碰撞导致自由基焠灭,使目标产物收率较低.因此,反应体系中必须保持足够量的自由基浓度,以使反应向利于生成双烷基产物的方向进行.1.2.4 反应时间对合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的影响对某些反应,延长反应时间利于反应进行和目标产物收率的提高.本文考察了反应时间对该反应的影响,其结果如表4所示.表4 反应时间对反应的影响Table 4 The effect of reaction time on the synthesis of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid反应时间/h 单烷基次膦酸收率/%二烷基次膦酸收率/%其它收率/% 50.2 36.4 13.4 16 47.2 42.5 10.3 24 30.8 62.6 6.6 32 16.7 80.1 3.2 8 40 16.4 80.3 3.3由表4数据可得,反应时间小于16 h时,反应产物以单烷基取代为主,随着反应时间的延长,二烷基取代产物比例逐渐增加,当反应时间超过32 h时,目标产物收率无明显增加.综合目标产物收率和能耗等因素,选定反应时间为32 h.1.2.5 反应压力对合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的影响偶氮二异丁腈(AIBN)在链引发阶段产生自由基的同时也释放出N2,在密闭容器内必定存在一定压力.因此本文考察了不同压力对反应的影响,结果如表5所示.表5 反应压力对反应的影响Table 5 The effect of the reaction hydrogen pressure on the synthesis of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid反应压力/MPa 单烷基次膦酸收率/%二烷基次膦酸收率/%其它收率/% 2 13.1 60.6 26.3 4 14.7 71.2 14.1 6 16.5 80.2 3.3常压23.3 32.2 35.5由表5数据可知,压力对目标产物的合成有较大影响.随着压力的升高,产物收率逐渐增加.当反应压力为6 MPa时,目标产物收率达80.2%,常压反应时收率只有32.2%.即说明加压利于反应向双烷基化的方向进行.综合反应容器耐压性和资源消耗成本等方面因素,选定反应压力为6 MPa.1.2.6 反应器材质对合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的影响在确定了原料摩尔比、引发剂种类及用量、反应温度、反应时间和压力等因素后,我们对反应器材质对反应的影响做了研究,结果如表6所示.表6 反应器材质对反应的影响Table 6 The effect of various container materials on the synthesisf of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid 容器材质单烷基次膦酸收率/% 2.4 4.1 93.5搪瓷高压反应釜 16.3 80.2 3.5耐压玻璃瓶1 16.5 80.1 3.4耐压玻璃瓶2(含铁粉) /%不锈钢高压反应釜二烷基次膦酸收率/%其它收率2.2 4.0 93.8由表6中数据看出,反应容器为搪瓷高压反应釜和耐压玻璃瓶1时,取得了令人满意的结果,目标产物收率达80%.反应容器为不锈钢高压反应釜和耐压瓶2时,目标产物收率极低.比较以上数据,可以推断该反应与反应容器材质有关,铁的存在对该反应极其不利.因此,选定搪瓷高压反应釜作反应器.2 结论综合以上,合成二(2,4,4-三甲基戊基)次膦酸的最佳工艺条件为:1)选搪瓷高压反应釜为反应容器;2)二异丁烯与次亚磷酸钠的摩尔比为2.5∶1;3)引发剂选用偶氮二异丁腈(AIBN);3)操作压力6 Mpa,反应温度为135℃;4)反应过程中引发剂AIBN补加3次,总反应时间为32 h.该方法具有的优势为:1)合成路线只需一步完成,目标产物收率较高,减少了多步合成造成的原料和能源的消耗,降低了成本;2)合成过程操作简便,原料及设备简单,工艺流程简洁明了;3)产物分离提纯过程简单,且易于操作.参考文献[1]胡文祥.双烷基膦酸的合成和性质研究[J].高等学校化学学报,1994,15(6):849-853.[2]郑可利,李西安.一种合成二烃基次膦酸的新方法[J].延安大学学报,2001,20(2):59-63.[3]郑可利,林强.二烃基次膦酸的合成研究[J].三明高等专科学校学报,1994,18(2):29-31.[4]欧育湘,李建军.阻燃剂的性能、制造及应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006.[5]崔丽丽,李巧玲,韩红丽.有机磷阻燃剂的现状及发展前景[J].当代化工,2007,36(5):512-516.[6]陈红,吴良义.磷系阻燃环氧树脂与固化剂[J].热固性树脂,2002,17(1):39-43.[7]Yuan Cheng-ye,Li Shu-sen,Hu Wen-xiang,et al.Studies on orgnophosphorus compound 61 substituent effects in organophosphorus esters[J].Heteroatom Chemistry,1993,4(1):23-31.[8]Roberton A J.Di-2,4,4'-trimethylpentylphosphinic acid and its preparation[P].US:4374780,1983-02-22.[9]Sarangi K,Redd B R,Das R P.Extraction studies of cobalt(II)and nickel(II)from chloride solutions using Na-Cyanex 272:Separation ofCo(II)/Ni(II)by the sodium salts of D2EHPA,PC88A and Cyanex 272 and their mixtures[J].Hydrometallurgy,1999,52(3):253-265.[10]Yukio N,Yao Bing-hua.Extraction equilibria of some transition metal ions by bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphinic acid[J].Talanta,1997,44(3):327-337.[11]张瑞华.Cyanex272的性质、合成、提纯和分析[J].江西科学,2001,19(4):238-243.[12]Kathryn C S,BrentHiskey J.Solvent extraction of copper by Cyanex 272,Cyanex 302 and Cyanex 301[J].Hydrometallurgy,1995,37(2):129-147.[13]杨丽,韩新字,毕成良,等.烷基次膦酸或其盐的合成方法的研究现状[J].天津化工,2009,23(2):1-3.[14]Liu Zhao-qing,Gary W.Process for the prepation of highly purified,dialkylthiophosphinic compounds[P].US:2008/0103330 A1,2008-05-01.[15]潘祖仁.高分子化学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006:24-30.。
农业专业英语词汇(O)
农业专业英语词汇(O)oak forest 柞手oak poisoning 柞市毒oasis 沙漠绿洲oasis effect 绿洲效应oat 燕麦oat bran 燕麦麸oat feed unit 燕麦饲料单位oat meal 燕麦粉oat straw 燕麦稿秆obesity 肥胖obligate photosynthesis 专性光合成obligate yeast 专性酵母菌obligatory aerobic respiration 专性有氧呼吸obligatory anaerobic bacteria 专性嫌气细菌obligatory anaerobic respiration 专性缺氧呼吸obligatory parasitic bacteria 专性寄生菌obligatory parasitism 专性寄生observation unit 观测单位observations 观察值observed individual number 甸个体数observed value 观察值obstacle by a high temperature 高温障碍obtaining of fertilization ability 受精能获得occasional species 偶见种occluded front 锢囚锋oceanic climate 海洋性气候oceanic pasture 海洋牧场ocellus 单眼ochrea 托叶鞘ochric andosol 淡暗色土ocrea 托叶鞘octopine 真蛸碱odonata 蜻蜓目odoriferous scale 香鳞oedema 浮肿oesophagostomosis of livestock 家畜结节虫病oestrogen 雌激素oestrogenic hormone 雌激素oestrosis of sheep 羊狂蝇oestrous cycle 发情周期oestrus 发情offal 杂肉offspring 后代oidiospore 分裂子oidium 分裂子oikesis 定居oil 油oil cake breaker 油饼碎裂机oil crop 油料罪oil mill by product 油坊副产品oil palm 油棕oil plant 含油植物oilseed 含油种子oily silkworm 油蚕ointment fertilizer 软膏肥料okra 秋葵oleic acid 油酸olein 三油酸甘油酯olfactory organ 嗅觉瀑oligandrous 少雄蕊的oliganthous 少花的oligocarpous 少果的oligolecithal egg 小黄卵oligomery 减数性oligophagy 寡食性oligosaccharide 低聚糖oligotrophy 营养不足olive 橄榄olive growing 橄榄栽培olive tree 橄榄树olivine 橄榄石omasum 第三胃omasum obstruction 第三胃梗塞ombrophilous plants 适雨植物ombrophils 适雨植物ombrophobes 避雨植物ombrophobous plants 避雨植物ommateum 复眼omnivore 杂食动物omnivorous insect 杂食性昆虫omphalitis 脐炎oncogenicity 致瘤性one bottom plough 单式犁one dimension chromatography 单向色谱one seeded pod 一粒荚one sided inheritance 限性遗传one way ploughing 旋转犁耕one wheeled tractor 单轮拖拉机onion 葱头onion fly 洋葱蝇onion harvester 洋葱收获机onion set 洋葱栽子onion smut 洋葱黑粉病onion thrips 葱蓟马ontogenesis 个体发育ontogeny 个体发育oocyst 卵囊oogenesis 卵子发生opal 蛋白石open air rearing 露天育open channel 摸open delivery drill 宽行播种机open ditch drainage 玫排水open field culture 露地栽培open pollination 自由传粉open population 开放性群体opener 开沟器operation 手术operator 操纵基因opercle 蒴盖operculum 鳃盖ophiocarpous 蛇形果的opium 鸦片opium poppy 罂粟opposite phyllotaxis 对生叶序oppositifolious 对生叶的oppositional gene 对立基因optical analysis 光学分析optimum allocation 最优配置optimum balance 最适均衡optimum condition 最适条件optimum content 最适含量optimum growth temperature 最适生长温度optimum humus state 最适腐殖状态optimum leaf area 最适叶面积optimum moisture 最适水分optimum period of insemination 受精适期optimum quantity of nutrient elements 营养元素最适量optimum ratio of nutrient elements 营养元素最适比optimum temperature 最适温度optimum water capacity 最适持水量orange 橙子orangery 甜橙温室orbicular cocoon 球形茧orchard 果园orchard establishing 建立果园orchard grass 野茅orchard soil 果园土壤orchard sprayer 果园喷雾机orchitis 睾丸炎order 目order of tiller 分蘖顺次ordram 草达灭organ culture 瀑培养organ development 瀑发育organ differentiation 瀑分化organic acid 有机酸organic acid salt 有机酸盐organic amendment 有机改良剂organic chemical sedimentary rock 有机化学沉积岩organic colloid 有机胶体organic compound 有机化合物organic evolution 生物进化organic farming 有机农业organic halogen compound 有机卤化合物organic herbicide 有机除草剂organic manure 有机肥料organic mineral complex 有机无机复合体organic mixed manure 有机混合肥料organic nitrogen 有机氮organic nitrogen compound 有机氮化合物organic phosphor 有机磷organic phosphorus compound poisoning 有机磷化合物中毒organic pollutant 有机污染物organic residue 有机残留物organic sedimentary rock 有机沉积岩organic soil 有机质土organic soil conditioner 有机质土壤改良剂organic substance 有机物质organism 有机体organo illuvial horizon 有机质淀积层organoarsenic compound 有机砷化合物organoarsenic fungicide 有机砷杀菌剂organobromine compound 有机溴化合物organochlorine compound 有机氯化合物organocopper compound 有机铜化合物organofluorine compound 有机氟化合物organogenesis 瀑形成organography 瀑学organoiodine compound 有机碘化合物organoleptic analysis 瀑感觉分析organoleptic property 瀑感觉特性organomercurial compound 有机汞化合物organomineral fertilizer 有机矿质肥料organomineral nutrient 有机矿质营养organophosphorous compound 有机磷化合物organophosphorous pesticide 有机磷农药organophosphorus fungicide 有机磷杀菌剂organophosphorus insecticide 有机磷杀虫剂organosulphur compound 有机硫磺化合物oriental biter weed 南蛇藤oriental cockoach 东方蠊oriental fruit moth 梨小食心虫orientation movement 取向运动orifice of spinneret 吐丝孔original place 发生根源地original strain of mulberry silkworm 家蚕原种ornamental bird 观赏用禽ornamental foliage 观赏叶ornamental foliage plant 观叶植物ornamental plant 观赏植物ornamental shrub 观赏灌木ornithine 鸟氨酸orogenic movement 造山运动orographic effect 地形效应orographic precipitation 地形性降水orotic acid 乳清酸orthen 高灭磷orthic acrisol 典型强淋溶土orthic ferralsol 黄色铁铝土orthic greyzem 典型灰色森林土orthic luvisol 典型淋溶土orthic podzol 典型灰壤orthic solonchak 典型盐土orthic solonetz 典型碱土orthoclase 钾长石orthogonal coefficient 正交系数orthogonal design 正交排列orthogonal polynomial 正交多项式orthogonal table 正交表orthogonal transformation 正交变换orthogonality 正交性orthoptera 直翅目orthostichy 直列线ortstein 硬磐osmometer 渗透压计osmosis 渗透osmotic coefficient 渗透系数osmotic pressure 渗透压osmotic value 渗透值osteodystrophy 骨营养不良osteomalacia 骨软化osteomyelitis 骨髓炎ostertagiosis 棕色胃虫病otic capsule 听囊otic ve 听囊otter 水獭outbreak of disease 病发生outbreeding 异系交配outdoor cropping 露地栽培outdoor rearing 露天育outdoor vegetable 露地蔬菜outer glume 外颖outer leaf 边叶outlet 瘤孔outlet channel 泄水渠outward 外貌ovarian 卵巢的ovarian cyst 卵巢囊肿ovarian disease 卵巢病ovarian hypoplasia 卵巢发育不全ovariectomy 卵巢摘除ovary 子房over moisture damage 过湿害overall cultivation fallow 全面休闲overall ploughing 全面翻耕overall scattering 全面散布overcooling 过冷overdominance 超显性overfeeding 过量喂饲overflow 泛滥overflow area 泛滥地overflow bank 溢炼overflow weir 溢炼overheat 过热overmaturation 过熟overmatured silkworm 过熟蚕overripe stage 过熟期overripeness 过熟overwintering crop 越冬罪oviduct 输卵管oviporous orifice 产卵孔oviposition 产卵ovipositor 产卵管ovisac 滤泡ovocyte preservation 卵母细胞保藏ovoscopy 检卵ovulation 排卵ovule 胚珠ovule culture 胚珠培养ovum 卵子ox 去势牛ox pen 公牛栏ox stall 公牛栏oxalate 草酸盐oxalic acid 草酸oxidant 氧化剂oxidase 氧化酶oxidation 氧化oxidation degree of humus acid 腐殖酸的氧化度oxidative horizon 氧化层oxide 氧化物oxidoreductase 氧化还原酶oxidoreduction 氧化还原oxisol 氧化土oxygen 氧oxygen consumption 氧消耗oxygen in soil 土壤氧气oxyhemoglobin 氧合血红蛋白oxylophytes 适酸植物oxytetracycline 氧四环素oxyurosis of rabbit 兔蛲虫病oystershell scale 榆蛎盾蚧ozone 臭氧。
快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定土壤中有机氯及有机磷农药
快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定土壤中有机氯及有机磷农药宋晓娟;贺心然;尹明明;万延延【摘要】建立了快速溶剂萃取(ASE)-气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)同时分析土壤中8种有机氯农药(OCPs)和5种有机磷农药(OPPs)的方法.样品由正己烷-丙酮(1:1,v/v)溶液萃取,经无水硫酸钠脱水、氮吹仪浓缩后,采用硅胶(Si)固相萃取小柱进行净化,正己烷-丙酮(1:1,v/v)溶液进行洗脱,然后经HP-5MS色谱柱(30 m×0.25 mm×0.25μm)分离,在电子轰击电离源下以多反应监测(MRM)模式进行检测,内标法定量.分析结果表明,13种目标物在1.00~100μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数(R)大于0.995;加标回收率为66.8%~88.4%,能够实现准确定量;日内精密度与日间精密度均小于10%.当取样量为10.0 g时,8种OCPs的方法检出限为0.02~0.04μg/kg,5种OPPs的方法检出限为0.06~0.12μg/kg,能够满足土壤农药残留的检测要求.【期刊名称】《色谱》【年(卷),期】2018(036)010【总页数】7页(P1038-1044)【关键词】快速溶剂萃取;气相色谱-串联质谱;有机氯;有机磷;土壤【作者】宋晓娟;贺心然;尹明明;万延延【作者单位】连云港市环境监测中心站,江苏连云港 222001;连云港市环境监测中心站,江苏连云港 222001;河海大学环境学院,江苏南京 210098;连云港市环境监测中心站,江苏连云港 222001;连云港市环境监测中心站,江苏连云港 222001【正文语种】中文【中图分类】O658有机氯(organochlorine pesticides, OCPs)和有机磷(organophosphorus pesticides, OPPs)均是环境监测中备受关注的农药类物质。
OCPs是典型的持久性有机污染物,自20世纪初合成以来,曾大量用于农业生产,因其具有强毒性和生物累积性,相继被各国禁用,中国自1986年全面禁用,但时至今日仍可从各种环境介质中检出该类物质[1-3]。
TBP 磷酸三丁酯的检测方法
TRIBUTYL PHOSPHATE5034(C4H9O)3P=O MW: 266.32 CAS: 126-73-8 RTECS: TC7700000METHOD: 5034, Issue 1 EVALUATION: PARTIAL Issue 1: 15 August 1994OSHA :0.5 ppmNIOSH:0.2 ppmACGIH:0.2 ppm(1 ppm = 10.9 mg/m3 @ NTP)PROPERTIES: liquid; boiling point 293 C; density0.98 g/mL @ 20 C; VP very low @ 20 C;vapor density 9.2 (air=1); flash point 166 C(closed cup)SYNONYMS:phosphoric acid, tributyl ester; tri-n-butyl phosphate; TBP; Celluphos 4SAMPLINGMEASUREMENTAPPLICABILITY: The working range is 0.006 to 1.4 ppm (0.06 to 15 mg/m3) for a 100-L air sample. This method may be adapted to other phosphates of relatively low volatility with appropriate changes in chromatographic conditions. INTERFERENCES: Any phosphorus-containing compound that has the same retention time as the analyte is an interference.A non-polar capillary column may be used for better resolution.OTHER METHODS: This revises Method S208 [2]. Analytical methods for tributyl phosphate (TBP) have been reviewed [3]. Another packed-column GC procedure has been described recently [4]. TBP has been determined in air by capillary-column GC/NPD preceded by sampling on a glass fiber filter or XAD-7 resin [5]. GC/MS [6], LC/MS [7], and LC/TID (thermionic det ection) [8] have all been shown to be useful methods for the analysis of TBP in environmental samples. Finally, a continuous pho sphorus gas analyzer has been used to monitor TBP in air [9].REAGENTS:1.Diethyl ether*, anhydrous, reagent grade.2.Tributyl phosphate*, reagent grade.3.Hydrogen, purifiedpressed air, prefiltered5.Nitrogen, purified6.Calibration stock solution, tributyl phosphate indiethyl ether*See Special Precautions EQUIPMENT:1.Sampler: 37-mm mixed cellulose estermembrane filter (0.8-µm pore size) supportedby cellulose backup pad in three-piece filterholder.NOTE:Backup filter unit is needed whensampling at temperatures above23 °C.2.Personal sampling pump, 1 to 3 L/min, withflexible polyethylene or PTFE tubing.3.Gas chromatograph equipped with a flamephotometric detector, phosphorus filter, andcolumn (p. 5034-1).4.Electronic integrator or some other suitablemethod for measuring peak areas.5.Tweezers.6.Jars: 2 oz ointment jars for sample extraction,squat form with aluminum-lined screw caps.7.Syringes, 10-µL and other convenient sizes.8.Volumetric flasks, 10-mL and other convenientsizes.9.Pipets, 10-mL and other convenient sizes.SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS: Store diethyl ether away from heat, light, and sources of ignition in a well-ventilated area. Do not leave container open. Diethyl ether can oxidize in air to form explosive peroxides, a reaction accelerated by light. Distillation and evaporation can concentrate unstable peroxides in the residue, a potentially explosive condition [10].Avoid inhalation of tributyl phosphate vapors and contact with eyes, skin, and clothing [11,12]. Handle only in a hood.SAMPLING:1.Calibrate each personal sampling pump with the representative filter cassettes in line.2.Remove cassette plugs and connect cassette filter to the personal sampling pump with flexibletubing.NOTE:If ambient temperature is above 23 °C, use two filter cassettes connected in series witha short piece of flexible tubing for sample collection. Some tributyl phosphate may existas vapor above 23 °C.3.Sample at an accurately known flow rate of 1 to 3 L/min for a total sample size of 2 to 100 L.4.Separate front and backup filter cassettes (if two cassettes were used). Firmly seal collectedsample cassettes with plugs, and pack securely for shipment.SAMPLE PREPARATION:5.Transfer the filter and backup pad to an ointment jar using tweezers.6.Pipet 10.0 mL of diethyl ether into each jar. Seal the jar immediately to minimize evaporation.7.Allow samples to stand for at least 30 min with occasional agitation.CALIBRATION AND QUALITY CONTROL:8.Calibrate daily with at least six working standards over the range of 2 to 1000 µg per sample.a.Add known amounts of calibration stock solution to 10-mL volumetric flasks and dilute tovolume with diethyl ether.b.Analyze working standards together with samples and blanks (steps 11 and 12). This willminimize the effect of variations in FPD response with time.NOTE 1:The FPD response is very sensitive to minor variations in hydrogen flow rateand, therefore, it is recommended that calibration standards be carefullyinterspersed with the samples.NOTE 2:Use of an internal standard is recommended to minimize errors caused bysample solvent evaporation and FPD response variations.c.Prepare a calibration graph of area vs. µg of tributyl phosphate per 10 mL of sample.9.Determine recovery in the concentration range of interest for each lot of filters used forsampling. Prepare three filters at each of five levels plus three media blanks.a.Spike aliquot of calibration solution onto each filter.b.After air-drying, extract filters with 10 mL diethyl ether (steps 5 through 7).c.Analyze together with working standards (steps 11 and 12).d.Prepare graph of recovery vs. µg tributyl phosphate.10.Analyze three quality control blind spikes and three analyst spikes to ensure that the calibrationgraph and recovery graph are in control.MEASUREMENT:11.Set gas chromatograph according to manufacturer's recommendations and to conditions givenon page 5034-1. Inject 5-µL sample aliquot using solvent flush technique or with autosampler.NOTE:If peak area is above linear range of the calibration graph, dilute with diethyl ether, analyze, and apply appropriate dilution factor in calculations.12.Measure peak area.CALCULATIONS:13.Determine mass, µg (corrected for recovery), of tributyl phosphate found in the sample (W) andthe average media blank (B).14.Calculate concentration of tributyl phosphate in the actual air volume sampled, V (L):EVALUATION OF METHOD:REFERENCES:[1]Backup Data Report for Tributyl Phosphate, in Documentation of the NIOSH Validation Tests,prepared under NIOSH Contract CDC-99-74-45 (1977).[2]NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 2nd. ed., V. 3, S208, U.S. Department of Health,Education, and Welfare, Publ. (NIOSH) 77-157-C (1977).[3]Davis, W., Navratil, J., Lasztity, A., and Horvath, Z., Analytical Methods [for Tributyl Phosphate],in Science and Technology of Tributyl Phosphate, Vol. 1, pp 267-327, Schulz, W. and Navratil, J., Eds., CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1984.[4]Kuno, Y., Hina, T., Akiyama, T., and Matsui, M., Simultaneous Determination of TributylPhosphate and Dibutyl Phosphate in Spent Fuel Reprocessing Streams by GasChromatography, J. Chromatogr., 537 (1-2): 489 (1991).[5]Haraguchi, K., Yamashita, T., and Shigemori, N., Sampling and Analysis of Phosphoric AcidTriesters in Ambient Air, Taiki Osen Gakkaishi, 20 (6): 407 (1985).[6]Ishikawa, S., Taketomi, M., and Shinohara, R., Determination of Trialkyl and Triaryl Phosphatesin Environmental Samples, Water Res., 19 (1): 119 (1985).[7]Barceló, D., Application of Thermospray Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry forDetermination of Organophosphorus Pesticides and Trialkyl and Triaryl Phosphates, Biomed.Environ. Mass Spectrom., 17 (5): 363 (1988).[8]Barceló, D., Maris, F., Frei, R., de Jong, G., and Brinkman, U., Determination of Trialkyl andTriaryl Phosphates by Narrow-Bore Liquid Chromatography with on-line Thermionic Detection,Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 30 (1-2): 95 (1987).[9]Parker, G., Continuous Quantitative Analysis of Low Concentrations of Tributyl Phosphate (TBP)Vapors in Flowing Air Streams, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 41 (3): 220 (1980).[10]Material Safety Data Sheet for Diethyl Ether, No. 343, General Electric Company, Schenectady,N.Y., August, 1979.[11]Material Safety Data Sheet for Tributyl Phosphate, No. 521, General Electric Company,Schenectady, N.Y., October, 1983.[12]Material Safety Data Sheet for Tributyl Phosphate, No. P1180.2, Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.(U.S.), Seattle, Washington, August 27, 1989.METHOD REVISED BY:Robert P. Streicher, Ph.D., NIOSH/DPSE.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Detection of Organophosphorus Compounds by Covalently Immobilized Organophosphorus HydrolaseJhony Orbulescu,†Celeste A.Constantine,†Vipin K.Rastogi,‡Saumil S.Shah,‡Joseph J.DeFrank,‡and Roger M.Leblanc*,†Department of Chemistry,University of Miami,Coral Gables,Florida,33146,and U.S.Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center,Biotechnology Team,Research and Technology Directorate,Aberdeen Proving Ground,Maryland21010-5423As a consequence of organophosphorus(OP)toxins posing a threat to human life globally,organophosphorus hydrolase(OPH)has become the enzyme of choice to detoxify such anophosphorus hydrolase was covalently immobilized onto a quartz substrate for utilization in paraoxon detection.The substrate was cleaned and modified prior to chemical attachment.Each modification step was monitored by imaging ellipsometry as the thickness increased with each modification step. The chemically attached OPH was labeled with a fluores-cent dye(7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin)for the detection of paraoxon in aqueous solution,ranging from 10-9to10-5M.UV-visible spectra were also acquired for the determination of the hydrolysis product of para-oxon,namely p-nitrophenol.Organophosphorus(OP)derivatives are harmful compounds found in insecticides and pesticides and are widely utilized around the world.1These OP compounds are structurally similar to nerve gases and are well-known inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase,which is responsible for transmitting nerve impulses across synaptic junctions.2As a consequence of the acute toxicity of these neurotoxins,stringent environmental monitoring programs have been implemented to ensure that both groundwater and soil concentrations of OP derivatives remain below harmful toxic levels.3Paraoxon is the oxidative desulfuration product of the pesticide parathion when in contact with oxygen.4OP compounds are poisonous when ingested,inhaled,or absorbed through the skin.Therefore,development of sensors capable of determining harmful concentrations of theses compounds would be beneficial to both human and livestock populations.3Organophosphorus hydrolase(OPH)enzyme can hydrolyze a large variety of organophosphorus compounds by producing less toxic products such as p-nitrophenol and diethyl phosphate.5OPH is one of the most studied enzymes related to its activity toward pesticides and nerve agents.It has been shown that OPH cata-lyzes hydrolysis reactions that induce cleavage in P-O,P-S,P-F, and P-CN bonds within organophosphorus neurotoxins.6Numer-ous analytical methods have been devised to detect the pres-ence of OP compounds,e.g.,gas chromatography,7,8high-per-formance liquid chromatography,9,10and other methods of detec-tion,such as electrochemical.11-14Most of these techniques are time-consuming,expensive,and complex.To overcome these dis-advantages,enzymatic bioassays have been designed for en-hanced speed of detection,high efficiency,sensitivity,and cost-effectiveness.15Several viable methodologies of enzyme immobilization are now explored.16Immobilization is important because it stabilizes the enzyme,and in many cases,the enzyme can be recovered and its activity regenerated.17These include physical immobili-zation,18-20encapsulation,21-23cross-linking,24,25and chemical bind-*Corresponding author.Tel:+1-305-284-2194.Fax:+1-305-284-6367. E-mail:rml@.†University of Miami.‡U.S.Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center.(1)Munnecke,D.J.Agric.Food Chem.1980,28,105-111.(2)Quinn,D.M.;Selwood,T.;Pryor,A.N.;Lee,B.H.;Leu,L.S.;Acheson,S.A.;Silman,I.;Doctor,B.P.;Rosenberry,T.L.In Multidisciplinary Approachesto C holinesterase Functions;Shafferman,A.,Velan,B.,Eds.;Plenum Press: New York,1992.(3)Mulchandani,A.;Pan,S.;Chen,W.Biotechnol.Prog.1999,15,130-134.(4)Boyd,M.E.Protein deficiency and pesticide toxicity;Thomas:Springfield,IL,1972.(5)Munnecke,D.M.Biotechnol.Bioeng.1979,21,2247-2261.(6)Russell,R.;Pishko,M.;Simonian,A.S.;Wild,J.R.Anal.Chem.1999,71,4909-4912.(7)Mendoza,C.E.Thin-layer chromatography.In Pesticide Analysis;Dumas,K.G.,Ed.;Marcel Dekker:New York,1981;pp1-44.(8)Das,K.G.;Kulkarni,P.S.Gas-liquid chromatography.In Pesticide Analysis;Dumas,K.G.,Ed.;Marcel Dekker:New York,1981.(9)Hanks,A.R.;Colvin,B.M.High-performance liquid chromatography.InPesticide Analysis;Dumas,K.G.,Ed.;Marcel Dekker:New York,1981;pp 99-174.(10)Barcelo,D.;Lawrence,J.F.Residue analysis of organophosphorus pesticides.In Emerging Strategies for Pesticide Analysis;Charins,T.,Sherma,J.,Eds.;CRC Press:Boca Raton,FL,1992;pp127-150.(11)Palchetti,I.;Cagnini,A.;Del Carlo,M.;Coppi,C.;Mascini,M.;Turner,A.P.F.Anal.Chim.Acta1997,337,315-321.(12)Liu,G.;Lin,Y.Anal.Chem.2005,77,5894-5901.(13)Liu,G.;Lin,Y.Anal.Chem.2006,78,835-843.(14)Lei,Y.;Mulchandani,P.;Wang,J.;Chen,W.;Mulchandani,A.Environ.Sci.Technol.2005,39,8853-8857.(15)Dumschat,C.;Muller,H.;Stein,K.;Schwede,G.Anal.Chim.Acta1991,252,7-9.(16)Liu,Y.;Wang,C.;Hsiung,K.Anal.Biochem.2001,299,130-135.(17)Mesthrige,K.W.;Amro,N.;Liu,G.Scanning2000,22,380-388.(18)Ihalainen,P.;Peltonen,ngmuir2002,18,4953-4962.(19)Yan,A.X.;Li,X.W.;Ye,Y.H.Appl.Biochem.Biotechnol.2002,101,113-129.(20)Lee,J.G.;Lee,W.C.Biotechnol.Appl.Biochem.1998,27,225-230.(21)Decher,G.Science1997,277,1232-1237.Anal.Chem.2006,78,7016-70217016Analytical Chemistry,Vol.78,No.19,October1,200610.1021/ac061118m CCC:$33.50©2006American Chemical SocietyPublished on Web08/10/2006ing to a solid substrate.26-30Covalent immobilization results in an increased stability since the attachment is not reversed by factors such as pH,ionic strength,substrate,solvent,or tem-perature.31-33The orientation can be predicted if small molecules or receptors are attached.34Metal oxide surfaces contain surface hydroxyl groups that are useful for the coupling of organic materials.35Carbon electrodes,after chemical treatment,possess different surface-associated functional groups such as carboxylic, carbonyl,lactone,and hydroxyl groups,which make the covalent attachment of enzymes possible.36,37The number of ways an enzyme can be immobilized onto the solid surface is restricted by the groups that can be modified and present on the exterior of the enzyme“shell”.Based on this restriction,we choose the modification of the free amine groups from any peripheral amino acids of the enzyme as is well known that amines can be modified easily without requiring harsh conditions that might affect the enzyme activity.In this investiga-tion,quartz slides are functionalized with(3-aminopropyl)tri-methoxysilane.The terminal amine group is then modified with diethylthiocarbamoyl chloride to form the isothiocyanate group. Isothiocyanates are known to react with amine groups in very mild conditions.OPH through the amine groups of the lysine,glutamic, or aspartic residues on the periphery of the enzyme19,38,39can react easily with the isothiocyanate groups from the substrate surface. Because the reaction occurs on the“outside”of the enzyme molecules,the binding sites of the OPH molecules remain available to interact with an external substrate.40An enzyme can be utilized as a bioassay if it can provide qualitative and quantitative data regarding the reaction of interest, hydrolysis of OP compounds in this case.The hydrolysis product of paraoxon is p-nitrophenol,which has absorbance in UV region, but even with its relatively high extinction coefficient( 400)18000 M-1‚cm-1),only fairly concentrated solutions of p-nitrophenol can be measured by UV-visible spectroscopy.It is well known that fluorescence spectroscopy can detect much lower concentrations than UV-visible spectroscopy.Based on this fact,we decided to label the OPH enzyme with a reliable fluorophore whose emission can be affected by the formation in solution of the p-nitrophenol during paraoxon hydrolysis.Coumarin is a widely used fluoro-phore;this UV-excitable dye possesses excellent spectroscopic properties,e.g.,large Stokes shift(larger than80nm)and medium quantum efficiency of fluorescence(Φ)0.5).These key char-acteristics make coumarin derivatives very attractive for use as labels.41,42In addition,the emission of the coumarin dye(∼430 nm)can overlap with the absorbance of the hydrolysis product, namely,p-nitrophenol(∼400nm),leading to fluorescence reso-nance energy transfer(FRET)that can quench the coumarin emission.In the present investigation,covalent binding of OPH to a silanized quartz slide was performed.Diethylthiocarbamoyl chlo-ride was employed as a reagent for modifying the amino-modified quartz slide surface,which was then used for covalently attaching enzymes.OPH was then labeled with a coumarin derivative fluorophore.This sensing device was utilized in monitoring the paraoxon hydrolysis reaction using UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopies.EXPERIMENTAL SECTIONThe quartz slides were obtained from Hellma Inc.(Plainview, NY).(3-Aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane used for the silanization of the quartz slide and diethylthiocarbamoyl chloride were obtained from Aldrich(Milwauke,WI).Carbonate-bicarbonate buffer capsules,pH9.6,were purchased from Sigma(St.Louis, MO).Spectroscopic grade solvents were obtained from Fischer Scientific(Fair Lawn,NJ).The7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin was synthesized from the commercially available7-amino-4-methylcoumarin obtained from Aldrich(Milwaukee,WI).43OPH (85-90%)(EC3.1.8.1)was isolated,extracted,and purified at the U.S.Army Laboratory(Edgewood Chemical and Biological Center, MD).A stock solution of OPH(1.8mg/mL)was prepared in100 mM bis-tris-propane,pH7.3,containing10µM Co2+.The stock solution was frozen at-4°C.The stock solution was diluted to a concentration of0.18mg/mL prior to use.Pure water was provided from the Modulab2020water purification system (Continental Water Systems Corp.,San Antonio,TX).The resis-tance and surface tension of pure water were18MΩ‚cm and72.6 mN/m at20.0(0.5°C,respectively.Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-FT-IR spectra were recorded on an Equinox55FT-IR spectrometer(Bruker Optics Inc.,Billerica,MA)with a25 reflection variable angle ATR P/N11000(Specac Inc.,Smyrna, GA)accessory.The modulation frequency was set at1666cm-1, and300scans were collected for each spectrum at a resolution of 4cm-1.KRS-5crystal was used,and the incidence angle was set at60°.The changes in thickness of the films upon modification were measured using an I-Elli2000imaging ellipsometer(Nano-film,Go¨ttingen,Germany).A Lambda900UV-visible-NIR spectrophotometer(Perkin-Elmer,Boston,MA)using a quartz cuvette of1-cm optical path length was used to measure the absorption spectra.The fluorescence spectra were obtained using a Spex Fluorolog1680spectrophotometer(Jobin Yvon,Inc., Edison,NJ).Covalent Immobilization of OPH-Coumarin.Sample sub-strates were cleaned by immersion in a chromic mixture and(22)Wei,Y.;Xu,J.G.;Feng,Q.W.J.Nanosci.Nanotechnol.2001,1,83-93.(23)Wei,Y.;Xu,J.G.;Feng,Q.W.Mater.Lett.2000,44,6-11.(24)Carbone,K.;Casarci,M.;Varrone,M.J.Appl.Polym.Sci.1999,74,1881-1889.(25)Ulbricht,M.;Papra,A.Enzyme Microb.Technol.1997,20,61-68.(26)Norde,W.;Zoungrana,T.Biotechnol.Appl.Biochem.1998,28,133-143.(27)Alkota,I.;Garbisu,C.;Llama,M.J.Enzyme Microb.Technol.1996,18,141-146.(28)Wang,P.;Dai,S.;Waezsada,S.D.Biotechnol.Bioeng.2001,74,249-255.(29)Chae,H.;Kim,E.Appl.Biochem.Biotechnol.1998,73,195-204.(30)Mateo,C.;Fernandez-Lorente,G.;Abian,O.Biomacromolecules2000,1,739-745.(31)Guilbault,G.Analytical Uses of Immobilized Enzymes;Marcel Dekker:NewYork,1984.(32)Bayramoglu,G.;Kacar,Y.;Denizli,A.;Arica,M.J.Food Eng.2002,52,367-374.(33)Willner,I.;Katz,E.Angew.Chem.,Int.Ed.2000,39,1180-1218.(34)Novak,I.;Kovac,B.J.Electron Spectrosc.Relat.Phenom.2000,113,9-13.(35)Finklea,H.;Vithanage,R.J.Phys.Chem.1982,86,3621-3626.(36)Razumas,J.;Jasaitis,J.Bioelectrochem.Bioenerg.1984,12,297-322.(37)Puri,B.R.In Chemistry and Physics of Carbon;Walker,P.L.,Jr.,Ed.;MarcelDekker:New York,1970.(38)Katz,E.;Riklin,A.;Willner,I.J.Electroanal.Chem.1993,354,129-144.(39)Willner,I.;Riklin,A.;Shoham,B.;Rivenzon,D.;Katz,E.Adv.Mater.1993,5,912-915.(40)Gregorius,K.;Theisen,M.Anal.Biochem.2001,299,84-91.(41)Kele,P.;Orbulescu,J.;Calhoun,T.L.;Leblanc,ngmuir2002,18,8523-8526.(42)Kele,P.;Orbulescu,J.;Calhoun,T.L.;Leblanc,R.M.Tetrahedron Lett.2002,43,4413-4416.(43)Kele,P.,Ph.D.Thesis,University of Miami,2002.Analytical Chemistry,Vol.78,No.19,October1,20067017sonicated for 30min.This was followed by alternate rinsing and sonication.The steps showing the covalent binding of OPH are presented in Scheme 1.In the first step prior to immobilization of OPH,the substrate cleaned and activated (OH groups on the surface),was silanized by reaction with (3-aminopropyl)trimeth-oxysilane.44The amino-modified slides were reacted with dieth-ylthiocarbamoyl chloride at 70°C for 10h in order to convert the amino to isothiocyanate groups.The isothiocyanate functional group was then used for covalent binding of OPH.45This process required another 10-h incubation time while the functionalized quartz slides were immersed in an aqueous buffered solution of OPH (0.2mg/mL OPH in 0.05M carbonate -bicarbonate buffer,pH 9.6).After immobilization,the slides were washed thoroughly to remove all unreacted and physically adsorbed OPH.The covalently attached OPH was labeled with 7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin for fluorescence spectroscopic studies.The covalently immobilized OPH -coumarin quartz slides were stored in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 8.6)prior to use.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONCharacterization of the covalent reaction.ATR-IR spectros-copy was utilized to confirm the functionality of the new bonds formed.Two bands were noted at 2853and 2924cm -1after the first step of the reaction (Scheme 1A),and these peaks represent the C -H symmetric and asymmetric stretching modes,respec-tively,which is due to the presence of the alkyl chain (Figure 1).Although the amino group could not be observed from the ATR spectrum,the C -H vibration provides strong enough evidence to confirm the initial silanization step.Hereafter,the quartz slide was essentially prepared for the following steps where the aminogroups were reacted with diethylthiocarbamoyl chloride producing the isothiocyanatopropyl-modified slide (Scheme 1A,step 2).The isothiocyanate groups subsequently reacted with the amino groups on the surface of OPH.The secondary structure of OPH was investigated to confirm the presence of the enzyme (Figure 2).The IR spectrum of the enzyme shows the amide I and II bands,which are in the region of 1700-1600and 1600-1500cm -1,respectively.The two amide regions were clearly observed.The amide I region contains the greatest information for the analysis of enzyme secondary structure.The peaks were assigned to the corresponding secondary structure as shown in Table 1.It can be seen that the covalently bound OPH film exhibited absorbance bands for both the R -helix and -sheet conformations.The frequency peaks at 1657,1647,1550,and 1534cm -1correspond to the R -helix and those at 1693,1679,1634,and 1619cm -1correspond to the -sheet conformations.(44)Zehl,A.;Cech,D.Liebigs Ann.Chem.1997,3,595-600.(45)Moon,J.;Shin,J.;Kim,S.;Park,ngmuir 1996,12,4621-4624.Scheme 1.Reaction Steps for OPH Immobilization:(A)Surface Silanization and Activation;(B)Enzyme Immobilization,(C)Immobilized EnzymeLabelingFigure 1.ATR-IR spectrum of silanized quartz slide.7018Analytical Chemistry,Vol.78,No.19,October 1,2006Imaging ellipsometry was also used to characterize each step of the reaction scheme (see Scheme 1).The thickness for each step was calculated directly from the ellipsometric angles where the incident angle was set up at 53°.To calculate the thickness (d )for each step,an optical model was used that consisted of several parameters.The refractive index (n )and extinction coefficient (k )were 1.46and 0,respectively,for the substrate used.The refractive index for air and for the film was 1.0and 1.50,respectively.The amplitude (∆)and the phase (ψ)of the wave was 171.13and 4.97,respectively.The wavelength of the laser was at 532nm.The average thickness generated in the 2-D ellipsometric images in Figure 3A and B are indicated by the red color.Figure 3A presents the thickness map generated in both 2-D and 3-D for the silanization step (Scheme 1A,step 1).The average thickness of the silanization step was determined to be ∼10Å.This was in close agreement with the CPK value of 8Å.The scale of -5to +5nm,on the right side of the image,has no physical meaning and it was used only for a better illustration in terms of colors for the measured thickness.The 3-D map (Figure 3B)shows a homogeneous surface.The second step (Scheme 1A,step 2)was not imaged because the resolution of the instrument is (1Åand a theoretical value of 9Åis expected,which is ∼1Åthicker than the first step.The third step (Scheme 1B),which indicates the covalent attachment of OPH,is shown in Figure 3B.The average thickness generated is between 50and 60Å.An expected value of 58Åwas calculated based on the X-ray crystalline structure of OPH with an overall dimension of ap-proximately 51Å×55Å×51Å.46There is a good correlation between the experimental average value and the theoretical one.It can be seen that the surface is not covered homogeneously with the OPH enzyme.This is very likely the effect of the mild experimental conditions used in the OPH attachment in order to maintain the enzyme activity unaltered.As a last step,the chemically attached OPH was labeled with 7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin by reacting free amine groups from the enzyme with the isothiocyanate from the coumarin (Scheme 1C).Follow-ing surface modification and enzyme labeling,the modified slides called thereafter a sensing device was used for the investigation of the paraoxon hydrolysis by the surface-attached OPH using spectroscopic methods.UV -Visible Absorption Studies of Covalently Immobilized OPH.To ensure that the covalently attached OPH was labeled with the coumarin derivative,a UV -visible absorption spectrum of the sensing device was measured and compared to the one of 7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin in aqueous solution.Figure 4shows spectrum 1of the coumarin derivative in aqueous solution with an absorption band situated at 341nm characteristic of the coumarin derivatives.The presence of the isothiocyanate group at position 7shifts the absorption maximum to shorter wavelength as shown by spectrum 2.47This spectrum confirms the presence of the coumarin attached to the OPH enzyme.The covalently attached OPH -coumarin was exposed to paraoxon solution,which was hydrolyzed by OPH into its products diethyl phosphate and p -nitrophenol.The UV -visible absorption spectrum of paraoxon solution (1×10-6M)is shown in Figure 5,curve 1with an absorption maximum at 274nm.After recording the absorption spectrum of the paraoxon solution in a 1-cm optical path length cuvette,the sensing device was placed into the solution for 30s.The sensing device was then removed and the absorption spectrum of the solution measured again.A new band situated at 400nm was observed and corresponds to the absorp-tion maximum of the reaction product,namely,p -nitrophenol (Figure 5,curve 2).The process of placing and removing the sensing device from the paraoxon solution at different time periods permitted us to follow the kinetics of p -nitrophenol formation.As shown in the inset in Figure 5,the decrease in paraoxon absorption at 274nm was paralleled by an increase in p -nitrophenol absorption at 400nm as exposure time of the sensing device increased.The symmetry (inset in Figure 5)between the decrease in absorbance for the paraoxon and the increase in absorbance for the generated p -nitrophenol is a direct proof that an amount of paraoxon is hydrolyzed by the OPH enzyme and a similar amount of p -nitrophenol is formed,and no other effects are involved in the changes in the absorbance.An isosbestic point at 318nm in the absorption spectrum as shown in Figure 5was observed,and this suggests the presence of two species,namely,paraoxon as reactant and p -nitrophenol as product;no other intermediates were involved in the hydrolysis reaction.The meaning of the isosbestic point is that the total concentration of the two species is a constant and when the concentration of paraoxon is decreasing a similar increase in the p -nitrophenol concentration is observed.In addition,the molar absorptivity of the two species is constant at 318nm.The sensing device’s fast detection time was shown by the ability to detect(46)Benning,M.M.;Kuo,J.M.;Raushel,F.M.;Holden,H.M.Biochemistry1994,33,15001-15007.(47)Haugland,R.P.Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals ,6thed.;Molecular Probes,Inc.:Eugene,OR,1996.Figure 2.ATR-IR spectrum of covalently bound OPH.Table 1.IR Band Assignment Indicating the Secondary Structure of OPH Covalently Bound to the Quartz Slidefrequency band position (cm -1)assignment1693antiparallel -sheet or pleated turn 1679 -sheet 1657R -helix 1647amide I 1634 -sheet 1619 -sheet 1550R -helix 1534amide IIAnalytical Chemistry,Vol.78,No.19,October 1,20067019p -nitrophenol after only 30s of exposure.We interpret the waiting time of 30s as time needed for the accumulation of sufficient p -nitrophenol in solution for detection.Our reasoning is based on the previous work of Benning et al.48and Omburo et al.,49whoshowed that the paraoxon hydrolysis occurs very fast,as sug-gested by their kinetic measurements,i.e.,K m )45(5,k cat )1520(40,and k cat /K m )3.4(0.3.The mechanism and kinetics(48)Benning,M.M.;Kuo,J.M.;Raushel,F.M.;Holden,H.M.Biochemistry1995,34,7973-7978.(49)Omburo,G.A.;Kuo,J.M.;Millins,L.S.;Raushel,F.M.J.Biol.Chem.1992,19,13278-13283.Figure 3.Ellipsometric characterization:(A)and (B)2-D and 3-D images,respectively,of silanized quartz slide;(C)and (D)2-D and 3-D images,respectively,of covalently boundOPH.Figure 4.UV -visible spectra of 7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin in solution (1×10-6M,1-cm optical path length)(9)and as a label on immobilized OPH (0).Figure 5.UV -visible absorption spectra of the hydrolysis product p -nitrophenol at different time intervals for the detection of paraoxon solution (1)1×10-6M.Incubation time of the sensing device (see last modification step in Scheme 1)in paraoxon solution:(2)30s and (3-7)1,2,5,10,and 15min.Inset:decrease in paraoxon absorption (1)and the corresponding increase in p -nitrophenol absorption (4);1-cm optical path length.7020Analytical Chemistry,Vol.78,No.19,October 1,2006of paraoxon hydrolysis were recently studied in detail by Aubert et al.,50who showed that among four substrates investigated the kinetics appeared faster for paraoxon.It was also reported by Brisen ˜o-Roa et al.51that,among the organophosphorus compounds studied,the hydrolysis reaction was faster for paraoxon.Since the catalysis step is fast,the 30s was needed to accumulate p -nitrophenol at a concentration measurable by UV -visible absorption spectroscopy.This interpretation is in agreement with the data reported by Caldwell et al.52about the effect of solvent viscosity and structure -reactivity relationships.Fluorescence Emission Spectroscopic Studies of Co-valently Immobilized OPH.Fluorescence measurements were recorded at different concentrations of paraoxon solution when exposed to the sensing device.From the UV -visible spectroscopic data,it was determined that the analyte required 30s of exposure to the sensing device in order to detect the hydrolysis product,p -nitrophenol.Increasing concentration of paraoxon solutions were exposed to the sensing device,and the results are presented in Figure 6.The initial fluorescence intensity of the fluorophore is shown by curve 1(λEx )350nm,λEm )445nm).On exposure to paraoxon solution,there is a slight decrease of the fluorescence intensity (curves 1-4)followed by a more drastic quenching of the fluorescence intensity (curves 5and 6)as the chemicallybound enzyme hydrolyses paraoxon into p -nitrophenol.The mechanism responsible for the quenching of the fluorescence intensity is attributed to the Fo ¨rster FRET.The inset of Figure 6presents the spectral overlap between the absorption of p -nitro-phenol (acceptor)and fluorescence of the coumarin fluorophore (donor).As paraoxon is hydrolyzed,excited-state energy from the initially excited 7-isothiocyanato-4-methylcoumarin is transferred to p -nitrophenol,thereby leading to the observed quenching phenomenon.After enzyme-bound quartz slides were used,they were washed in water and KH 2PO 4-NaOH buffer solution (pH 8.6).Curve 7shows the fluorescence intensity after recovery.This process removed some of the product from the sensing device.Removal of the product allowed the coumarin label to regain 60%of its fluorescence intensity.Possible reasons for only 60%recovery of the fluorescence are related to the fact that the enzyme-bound quartz slide used for coumarin labeling was not sonicated but rinsed with solvent,and secondary structure alteration can occur if sonication is used.It is possible that some physically adsorbed enzyme was present on the surface.Following the experiments,storage of the modified slide in buffer solution could remove the adsorbed enzyme;thus,the recovery would give a lower percent that the initial emission of the labeled attached enzyme measured before the experiments.Second and most probable is the presence of some coumarin derivative that interacted with the enzyme surface but not chemically bonded.If so,storing the slide in buffer solution could remove the coumarin molecules adsorbed onto the enzyme surface by hydrogen bonding or π-πstacking between the aromatic ring of the coumarin and aromatic side chains of tyrosine,tryptophan,or phenylalanine present on the enzyme surface.CONCLUSIONSilanization was successfully performed to functionalize a quartz substrate in order to provide an environment suitable for the covalent binding of OPH.Rapid detection of paraoxon can be carried out using both UV -visible and fluorescence spec-troscopies.Fluorescence spectroscopy is more sensitive and allows a lower detection limit (5×10-9M)than UV -visible spectros-copy.The results were reproducible and show that the fluores-cence intensity of the immobilized OPH -coumarin was partially recovered (60%).Based on the sensitivity and high efficiency of the sensing device,it could lead to a prototype for an industrial biosensor that can be implemented for environmental monitoring of organophosphorus compounds.ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis work was supported by a grant from the U.S.Army Research Office under contract DAAD19-03-1-0131.Received for review June 20,2006.Accepted July 14,2006.AC061118M(50)Aubert,S.D.;Li,Y.C.;Raushel,F.M.Biochemistry 2004,44,5707-5715.(51)Brisen ˜o-Roa,L.;Hill,J.;Notman,S.;Sellers,D.;Smith,A.P.;Timperley,.M.;Wetherell,J.;Williams,N.H.;Williams,G.R.;Fersht,A.R.;Griffiths,A.D.J.Med.Chem.2006,49,246-255.(52)Caldwell,S.R.;Newcomb,J.R.;Schlecht,K.A.;Rauschel,F.M.Biochemistry1991,30,7438-7444.Figure 6.Fluorescence spectra of coumarin-labeled immobilized OPH in the presence of different concentrations of paraoxon solution (λexc )340nm,1-cm optical path length):(1)solid substrate labeled with OPH -coumarin,(2)5×10-9,(3)5×10-8,(4)5×10-7,(5)1×10-6,and (6)1×10-5M,and (7)recovery of slide.Inset:overlap between the absorption of the acceptor (p -nitrophenol)and the fluorescence of the donor (coumarin-labeled enzyme).Analytical Chemistry,Vol.78,No.19,October 1,20067021。