炉石传说蓝贴原文以及出处详细翻译

炉石传说蓝贴原文以及出处详细翻译
炉石传说蓝贴原文以及出处详细翻译
BB关于经典卡可能退环境的帖子也是引起轩然大波，不过之前论坛帖子只是给了主要内容，虽然有蓝贴原文链接，但是不会去看原文的网友应该是大多数，这里把原文详细翻译出来，大家看一下，理解会更全面一些，大家看看吧！因为原来那个楼太高了，发在里面应该没人看得到了，所以单独开一个帖子，版主请手下留情！[s:ac:茶] 起因是官网论坛一个帖子，内容是：“标准模式最糟糕的一点是承诺经典包永远不会退环境了，大家来讨论一下。

”(之前NGA也有一个帖子讨论经典包是否该退环境的帖子，讨论也很热烈，等会儿把链接补上。

)
BB第一个回复：标准模式的目标是每一年的退环境让环境保持新鲜感。

基础卡和经典包保持不变的好处是：回归的老玩家在新环境有一定的基础，而新玩家能够体验像霍格，奥术飞弹这样非常有标志性的，能很好的介绍这款游戏的卡。

AFK一段时间的玩家，能够凭借已经拥有并且了解的一些卡(基础，经典卡)马上加入新环境，体验也会好很多。

但是这些好处，对于我们实现标准模式的大目标却有一些坏处。

我们需要大家感觉每年都有不一样，如果基础和经典卡仍然大密度的年年出现，我们就达不到标准模式的大目标(就是第一句提到的让环境保持新鲜感)。

我们知道在第一年海怪年还达不到这个目标，所以我们削弱了12张基础和经典卡，让退环境的影响更大一些。

我们一直都知道要继续观察环境，看未来第二年的标准模式是否需要更多改变。

如果看起来情况还是会和之前很相似，我们可能会看到更多削弱，或者可能会把一些经典卡牌退环境，就像之前的老瞎眼一样。

无论如何，我们的目标都是让标准模式每一年都新鲜刺激。

BB第二个回复是针对一个网友提问是否可能加强旧卡：鉴于标准模式的目标是让每年都有新鲜感，重要的是让卡牌的中坚力量出现在
新卡包，而不是在基础卡和经典卡当中。

现在还不清楚这样的平衡应该是怎么样的(卡组来自基础和经典的卡牌平均是10？注：这句是原文自己的批注，不是译者加的)，不过我们现在卡组中基础卡和经典卡的比例是过高了，每年退环境却仍然变化不大的风险很高。

增强基础和经典卡会“增加”这个风险。

如果目标是让更多酷的卡进入环境，那么在扩展包增加更多棒棒的新卡应该就可以了，并且能让环境有新鲜感。

第一个回复原文：The goal with Standard is to keep the meta fresh for each yearly rotation. There are some benefits to keeping Basic and Classic cards in Standard: Returning players have an entry-point to the new format, and new players experience classics like "Hogger" and "Arcane Missiles" that are iconic and great introductions to the game. People take breaks from Hearthstone, and being able to jump right back in with a few cards you already own and understand makes that experience a lot better.
That upside has a real downside in working directly against the big goal for Standard. It needs
to feel different each year, and if Basic and Classic cards are still appearing in large densities year after year, we will not be achieving our goals for Standard.
We knew we weren't going to get there when the Year of the Kraken began, so we nerfed 12 basic/classic cards, to put more of the weight of the meta into the rotating sets. We always knew we'd have to watch the meta to see if any future changes would be needed when we got ready for the next year of Standard. If things are looking like they are going to be too same-y for that next year, we could see more nerfs, or we might rotate some additional classic cards to Wild, like we did with Old Murk Eye. No matter what, we're committed to making Standard fresh and
exciting each new year.
第二个回复原文：Given the goal of Standard is to keep the game fresh each year, it's important to keep a lot of the power of the cards in the expansions, and not in the basic and classic sets. It's not clear what that balance of power should look like (is it ~10 cards from the basic and classic sets on average?), but we're currently skewed so high towards basic and classic cards in decks, that we are at high risk for 'samey-ness' as the years change in Standard. Buffing
Basic/Classic cards *increases* that risk. If the goal is to get more cool cards into the meta, just releasing awesome new cards in expansions should make an impact there, and still keep Standard fresh.。