企业风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文5000字
企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字
文献出处: Comell B., Financial risk control of Mergers and Acquisitions [J]. International Review of Business Research Papers, 2014, 7(2): 57-69.原文Financial risk control of Mergers and AcquisitionsComellAbstractM&A plays a significant part in capital operation activities. M&A is not only important way for capital expansion, but also effective method for resource allocation optimization. In the world around, many firms gained high growth and great achievement through M&A transactions. The cases include: the merger between German company Daimler-Benz and U.S. company Chrysler, Wal-Mart’s acquisition for British company ADSA, Exxon’s merger with Mobil and so on.Keywords: Enterprise mergers and acquisitions; Risk identification; Risk control1 Risk in enterprise mergers and acquisitionsMay encounter in the process of merger and acquisition risk: financial risk, asset risk, labor risk, market risk, cultural risk, macro policy risk and risk of laws and regulations, etc.1. 1 Financial riskRefers to the authenticity of corporate financial statements by M&A and M&A enterprises in financing and operating performance after the possible risks. Financial statements is to evaluate and determine the trading price in acquisition of important basis, its authenticity is very important to the whole deal. False statements beautify the financial and operating conditions of the target enterprise, and even the failing companies packing perfectly. Whether the financial statements of the listed companies or unlisted companies generally exists a certain degree of moisture, financial reporting risk reality In addition, the enterprise because of mergers and acquisitions may face risks, such as shortage of funds, a decline in margins has adverse effects on the development of enterprises.1. 2 Asset riskRefers to the assets of the enterprise M&A below its actual value or the assets after the merger failed to play a role of original and the formation of the risk. Enterprise merger and a variety of strategies, some of them are in order to obtain resources. In fact, enterprise asset accounts consistent with actual situation whether how much has the can be converted into cash, inventory, assets assessment is accurate and reliable, the ownership of the intangible assets is controversial, the assets disposal before delivery will be significantly less than the assets of the buyer to get the value of the contract. Because of the uncertainty of the merger and acquisition of asset quality at the same time, also may affect its role in buying businesses.1. 3 Labor riskRefers to the human resources of the enterprise merger and acquisition conditions affect purchase enterprise. Surplus staff and workers of the target enterprise burden is overweight, on-the-job worker technical proficiency, ability to accept new technology and the key positions of the worker will leave after the merger, etc., are the important factors influencing the expected cost of production.1. 4 Market riskRefers to the enterprise merger is completed, the change of the market risk to the enterprise. One of the purposes of mergers and acquisitions may be to take advantage of the original supply and marketing channels of the target enterprise save new investment enterprise develop the market. Under the condition of market economy, the enterprise reliance on market is more and more big, the original target enterprise the possibility of the scope of supply and marketing channels and to retain, will affect the expected profit of the target enterprise. From another point of view, the lack of a harmonious customer relationship, at least to a certain extent, increase the target enterprise mergers and acquisitions after the start-up capital.1. 5 Culture riskRefers to whether the two enterprise culture fusion to the risks of mergers and acquisitions, two broad and deep resources, structure integration between enterprises, inevitably touches the concept of corporate culture collision, due to incompleteinformation or different regions, and may not be able to organizational culture of the target enterprise become the consensus of the right. If the culture between two enterprises cannot unite, members will make the enterprise loss of cultural uncertainty, which generates the fuzziness and reduce dependence on enterprise, ultimately affect the realization of the expected values of M&A enterprises.2 Financial risk of M&AHowever, there are even more unsuccessful M&A transactions behind these exciting and successful ones. A study shows that 1200 Standard & Poor companies have been conducting frequent M&A transactions in recent years, but almost 70%cases ended up as failures.There are various factors that lead to the failures of M&A transactions, such as strategy, culture and finance, among which the financial factor is the key one. The success or failure of the M&A transactions largely depends upon the effectiveness of financial control activities during the process. Among the books talking about M&A, however, most focus on successful experience but few on lessons drawn from unsuccessful ones; most concentrate on financial evaluation methods but few on financial risk control. Therefore, the innovations of this thesis lie in: the author does not just talk about financial control in general terms, but rather specify the unique financial risks during each step of M&A transaction; the author digs into the factors inducing each type of risks, and then proposes feasible measures for risk prevention and control, based on the financial accounting practices, and the combination of international experience and national conditions.The thesis develops into 3 chapters. Chapter 1 defines “M&A” and several related words, and then looks back on the five M&A waves in western history. Chapter 2 talks about 3 types of financial risks during M&A process and digs into factors inducing each type of risks. Chapter 3 proposes feasible measures for risk prevention and control. At the beginning of chapter 1, the author defines M&A as follows: an advanced form of property right transaction, such as one company (firm) acquires one or more companies (firms), or two or more companies (firms) merge as one company (firm). The aim of M&A transaction is to control the property andbusiness of the other company, by purchasing all or part of its property (asset). In the following paragraph, the thesis compares and contrasts several related words with “M&A”, which are merger, acquisition, consolidation and takeover.In the chapter 1, the author also introduces the five M&A waves in western history. Such waves dramatically changed the outlook of world economy, by making many small and middle-sized companies to become multinational corporations. Therefore, a close look at this period of time would have constructive influence on our view with the emergence and development of M&A transactions. After a comprehensive survey of M&A history, we find that, with the capitalism development, M&A transactions presented diverse features and applied quite different means of financing and payment, ranging from cash, stock to leveraged buyout. Chapter 2 primarily discusses the different types of financial risks during M&A, as well as factors inducing such risks.According to the definition given by the thesis, financial risks during M&A are the possibilities of financial distress or financial loss as a result of decision-making activities, including pricing, financing and payment.Based on the M&A transaction process, financial risks can be grouped into 3 categories: decision-making risks before M&A (Strategic risk), implementation risks during M&A (Evaluation risk, financing risk and payment risk) and integration risks after M&A. Main tasks and characteristics in each step of M&A transaction are different, as well as the risk-driven factors, which interrelate and act upon each other. Considering limited space, the author mainly discusses target evaluation risk, financing and payment risk, and integration risk. In chapter 2, the thesis quotes several unsuccessful M&A cases to illustrate 3 different types of financial risks and risk-driven factors. Target evaluation risk is defined as possible financial loss incurred by acquirer as a result of target evaluation deviation. Target evaluation risk may be caused by: the acquirer’s expectation deviation for the future value and time of target’s revenue, pitfalls of financial statements, distortion of target’s stock price, the deviation of evaluation methods, as well as backward intermediaries. Financing and payment risks mainly reflect in: liquidity risk, credit risk caused by deterioratedcapital structure, financial gearing-induced solvency risk, dilution of EPS and control rights, etc.Integration risks most often present as: financial institution risk, capital management risk and financial entity risk. Chapter 3 concludes characters of financial risks that mentioned above, and then proposes detailed measures for preventing and controlling financial risks. Financial risks during M&A are comprehensive, interrelated, preventable, and dynamic. Therefore, the company should have a whole picture of these risks, and take proactive measures to control them.As for target evaluation risk control, the thesis suggests that (1) Improve information quality, more specifically, conduct financial due diligence so as to have comprehensive knowledge about the target; properly use financial statements; pay close attention to off-balance sheet resource. (2) Choose appropriate evaluation methods according to different situations, by combining other methods to improve the evaluation accuracy. Meanwhile, the author points out that, in practice the evaluation method is only a reference for price negotiation. The target price is determined by the bargaining power of both sides, and influenced by a wealth of factors such as expectation, strategic plan, and exchange rate.In view of financing and payment risk control, the author conducts thorough analysis for pros and cons of different means of financing and payment. Then the author proposes feasible measures such as issuing convertible bonds and commercial paper, considering specific conditions. To control integration risk, the author suggests start with the integration of financial strategy, the integration of financial institution, the integration of accounting system, the integration of asset and liability, and the integration of performance evaluation system. Specific measures include: the acquirer appoints person to be responsible for target’s finance; the acquirer conducts stringent property control over target’s operation; the acquirer conducts comprehensive budgeting, dynamic prevision and internal auditing.3 ConclusionsAt the end of the thesis, the author points out that many aspects still worth further investigation. For instance, this thesis mainly concentrates on qualitativeanalysis, so it would be better if quantitative analysis were introduced. Besides, the thesis can be more complete by introducing financial risk forecast model.译文企业并购中的财务风险控制作者：康奈尔摘要企业并购是资本营运活动的重要组成部分，是企业资本扩张的重要手段，也是实现资源优化配置的有效方式。
企业风险管理的英文作文
企业风险管理的英文作文英文：Enterprise risk management (ERM) is a crucial aspect of any business, as it allows companies to identify and mitigate potential risks that could negatively impact their operations. As someone who has worked in risk managementfor several years, I can attest to the importance of having a comprehensive ERM strategy in place.One of the key benefits of ERM is that it enables companies to take a proactive approach to risk management. By identifying potential risks before they occur, businesses can take steps to prevent or mitigate them, rather than simply reacting to them after the fact. This can help to minimize the impact of risks on the company's operations, reputation, and bottom line.Another benefit of ERM is that it can help companies to make more informed decisions. By having a clearunderstanding of the risks associated with differentcourses of action, businesses can make more strategic decisions that are based on a thorough analysis ofpotential risks and rewards.Of course, implementing an effective ERM strategy requires a significant amount of time and resources. However, the benefits of doing so far outweigh the costs.By investing in ERM, companies can protect themselves against potential risks, make more informed decisions, and ultimately improve their overall performance and profitability.中文：企业风险管理（ERM）是任何企业的重要组成部分，因为它可以帮助企业识别和减轻可能对其运营造成负面影响的潜在风险。
外文翻译--企业的风险管理-财务和会计方面
本科毕业论文（设计）外文翻译原文：Enterprise Risk Management:Financial and Accounting PerspectivesERM and Finance Operations: Key Financial RisksRecent financial disasters in financial and non-financial firms and in governmental agencies have led to increased emphasis on various forms of risk management such as market risk management, credit risk management, and operational risk management. Financial institutions like banks are further motivated by the need to meet various regulatory requirements for risk measurement and capital. There is an increasing tendency toward an integrated or holistic view of risks. A framework for thinking about the collective risk of a group of financial instruments and an individual security’s contribution to that collective risk wo uld be useful. A Tillinghast-Towers Perrin survey has reported that nearly half of the insurance industry used an integrated risk management process (with another 40% planning to do so), and 40% had a chief risk officer.Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is an integrated approach to achieving the enterprise’s strategic, programmatic, and financial objectives with acceptable risk. The philosophy of ERM generalizes these concepts beyond financial risks to include all kinds of risks. For example, a portfolio of equity investments has been generalized to the entire collection of risks facing an organization. A number of principles have often been found useful in practice:1. Portfolio risk can never be the simple sum of various individual risk elements.2. One has to understand various individual risk elements and their interactions in order to understand portfolio risk.3. The key risk, i.e., the most important risk, contributes most to the portfoliorisk or the risk facing the entire organization. Therefore, decision makers should be most concerned about key risk decisions.4. Using quantitative approaches to measure risk is very important. For example,a key financial market risk can broadly be defined as volatility relative to the capital markets. One measure of this risk is the cost of capital, which can be measured through models such as the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) and Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).ERM and Financial OperationsTraditional finance operations have focused on cost and efficiency in operations and processes. A firm is assumed to seek efficiency either through information technologies such as enterprise systems, or through newer operations management techniques such as shared cost/services and outsourcing. While this has been sufficient to preserve competitive advantage when these methods were novel and not widely used, use by competitors makes heavy investment in information technology highly risky. Companies, financial or not, have achieved high performance by utilizing information technology to capture and process data. The challenge today is to process the inherent uncertainties of business, in this case, through finance operations data, in order to develop a coherent strategy. Efficiency is a means to achieve strategic objectives. Where there is strategy, there is an attempt to overcome uncertainty and incomplete knowledge, to act in the face of risk.To make clear where ERM takes over from finance operations, we must examine best and first principles. While finance operations in an enterprise vary across different industries and products and services provided, effective finance operations rely on four competencies: (1) Transaction processing: creating satisfied efficiency in core finance functions, e.g., accounts payable and general ledger which are increasingly delivered through shared services or outsourcing strategies. (2) Financial and regulatory reporting: capturing regulatory and tax reporting requirements from a transactional and systems perspective. (3) Management reporting: providing various data and information for management decision making. And (4) Internal controls: providing support to effective risk management within the enterprise through thedisciplined oversight of financial, accounting and audit systems.These four competencies are similar to the COSO ERM framework, where three objective categories are identified: operational objectives, financial reporting objectives, and compliance objectives. The COSO framework defines ERM as an ongoing process for identifying and managing potential events and operations that could affect the entity’s ability to manage business risks such that they remain within its risk appetite.Finance operational activities are usually managed through various quantitative models that can be used by ERM. Value-at-Risk models have been popular, partially in response to Basel II banking guidelines. Other analytic approaches include simulation of internal risk rating systems using past data and decision analysis models. Swedish banks have been found to use credit rating categories, and that each bank reflected its own risk policy. One bank was found to have a higher level of defaults, but without adversely affecting profitability due to constraining high risk loans to low amounts. Systemic risk from overall economic systems as well as risk from networks of banks with linked loan portfolios are important. Overall economic system risk was found to be much more likely, while linked loan portfolios involved high impact but very low probability of default.Key Financial RisksTypically, the major sources of value loss in financial institutions are identified as:Market risk is exposure to the uncertain market value of a portfolio, where the underlying economic factors are such as interest rates, exchange rates, and equity and commodity prices.Credit risk is the risks that counterparty may be unable to perform on an obligation.Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. The committee indicates that this definition excludes systemic risk, legal risk and reputational risk.During the early part of the 1990s, much of the focus was on techniques formeasuring and managing market risk. As the decade progressed, this shifted to techniques of measuring and managing credit risk. By the end of the decade, firms and regulators were increasingly focusing on Operational risk.A trader holds a portfolio of commodity forwards. She knows what its market value is today, but she is uncertain as to its market value a week from today. She faces market risk. The trader employs the derivatives “greeks” to describe and to characterize the various exposures to fluctuations in financial prices inherent in a particular position or portfolio of instruments. Such a portfolio of instruments may include cash instruments, derivatives instruments, borrowing and lending. In this article, we will introduce two additional techniques for measuring and reporting risk: Value-at-Risk assessment and scenario analysis.Market risk is concerned both internally and externally. Internally, managers and traders in financial service industry need a measure that allows active, efficient management of the firm’s risk position. Externally, regulators want to be sure a financial company’s potential for catastrophic net worth loss is accurately measured and that the company’s economic capital is sufficient to survive such a loss. Although both managers and regulators want up-to-date measures of risk, they do estimate exposure to risks based on different time horizons. Bank managers and traders measures market risks on a daily basis, which is very costly and time consuming. Thus, bank managers compromise between measurement precision on the one hand and the cost and timeliness of reporting on the other.Regulators are concerned with the maximum loss a bank is likely to experience over a given horizon so that they can set the bank’s required capital (i.e., its economic net worth) to be greater than the estimated maximum loss and be almost sure that the bank will not fail over that horizon. As a result, they are concerned with the overall riskiness of a bank and have less concern with the risk of individual portfolio components. The time horizon used in computation is relatively long. For example, Under Basel II capital for market risk is based on the 10-day 99% VaR and for credit risk and operational risk is based on a 1-year 99.9% VaR.The COSO ERM CubeIn 2004, COSO published an Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework. The COSO ERM cube considers dimension of objective categories, activities, and organizational levels Table.（3.1）CategoriesThe strategic level involves overarching activities such as organizational governance, strategic objectives, business models, consideration of external forces, and other factors. The operations level is concerned with business processes, value chains, financial flows, and related issues. Reporting includes information systems as well as means to communicate organizational performance on multiple dimensions, to include finance, reputation, and intellectual property. Compliance considers organizational reporting on legal, contractual, and other regulatory requirements (including environmental).ActivitiesThe COSO process consists of a series of actions.1. Internal Environment: The process starts with identification of the organizational units, with entity level representing the overall organization. This includes actions to develop a risk management philosophy, create a risk management culture, and design a risk management organizational structure.2. Objective Setting: Each participating division, business unit, and subsidiary would then identify business objectives and strategic alternatives, reflecting vision for enterprise success. These objectives would be categorized as strategic, operations, reporting, and compliance. These objectives need to be integrated with enterprise objectives at the entity level. Objectives should be clear and strategic, and should reflect the entity-wide risk appetite.3. Event Identification: Management needs to identify events that could influence organizational performance, either positively or negatively. Risk events are identified, along with event interdependencies. (Some events are isolated, while others are correlated.) Measurement issues associated with methodologies or risk assessment techniques need to be considered. O’Donnell (2004) provided a systems view to create a map of the organization’s value chain and a taxonomy of categories to identify events that might threaten business performance.4. Risk Assessment: Each of the risks identified in Step 3 are assessed in terms of probability of occurrence, as well as the impact each risk will have on the organization. Thus both impact and likelihood are considered. Their product provides a metric for ranking risks. Assessment techniques can include point estimates, ranges, or best/worst-case scenarios.5. Risk Response: Strategies available to manage risks are developed. These can include risk acceptance, risk avoidance, risk sharing, or risk reduction. Options have been summarized into the four Ts：a. Treating a Risk: taking direct action to reduce impact or likelihoodb. Terminate a Risk: discontinue activity exposing the organization to the riskc. Transfer a Risk: insurance or contractsd. Take (or tolerate) a Risk: for areas of organizational expertise, they may decide to accept risk with the idea that they are expert at dealing with it Another view considers risk avoidance, reduction, acceptance, transfer, or seeking risks fitting the organization’s risk appetite. This is compatible with the four Ts. Avoidance is akin to terminating, acceptance to treating, reduction and transfer to transfer above, and seeking risks to toleration. Risks are necessary to lead to situations likely to offer profit, but risks should be taken only after informed business analysis. The effects of risk response on other risks should be considered.6. Control Activities: Controls needed to mitigate identified risks are selected. Implicit in this step is assessment of the costs of each risk response available, and consideration of activities to reduce risks.7. Information and Communication: Control and other risk response activities areput in place to ensure appropriate action is taken within the organization. Organizations need to ensure that information systems can measure and report risk accurately. ERM effectiveness and cost should be communicated to stakeholders.Monitoring: As part of an ongoing process, the effectiveness of plan implementation is monitored, feeding back to the control step if problems are encountered. Monitoring includes risk evaluations comparing actual event occurrences with prior estimates of probability, frequency, and cost.Event Identification: As an example of how step 3 above can be implemented, Table 3.2 provides a categorization of risks for financial institutions.Implementation IssuesPast risk management efforts have been characterized by bottom-up implementation. Effective implementation calls for top-down management, as do most organizational efforts. Without top support, lack of funding will starve most efforts. Related to that, top support is needed to coordinate efforts so that silo mentalities do not take over. COSO requires a holistic approach. If COSO is adopted within daily processes, it can effectively strengthen corporate governance. Another important issue is the application of sufficient resources to effectively implement ERM. One view of ERM, parallel to that of the CMI system used in software engineering, is as follows.1. Level 1: Compliance –review of policy and procedure with a checklist orientation, providing low value to the organization in terms of ERM.2. Level 2: Control –implementation of control frameworks, still using a checklist orientation, also providing low value to organizations.3. Level 3: Process –taking a process view across departments, focusing on effectiveness as well as efficiency, to include process mapping.4. Level 4: Risk Management – use of shared risk language, with the ability to prioritize efforts based on process mapping.5. Level 5: Enterprise Risk Management – the Nirvana of holistic risk reviews tied to entity strategy based on common risk language, viewing risk management as a process, providing high value to organizational risk management.ConclusionsRisks in a financial firm can be quantified and managed using various models. Models also provide support to organizations seeking to control enterprise risk. ERM provides tools to integrate enterprise-wide operations and finance functions and better inform strategic decisions. The promise of ERM lies in allowing managers to better understand and use their firms’ fundamental relation to uncertainty in a scientific framework: from each risk, strategy may create opportunity. We have discussed various risk modeling and reviewed some common risk measures in financial service company from the core financial and accounting perspective.Gupta and Thomson identified problems in implementing COSO. Small companies (fewer than 1,000 employees) reported a less favorable impression of COSO. Complaints in general included vagueness and nonspecificity for auditing. COSO was viewed as high-level, and thus open to interpretation at the operational level. This seems to reflect a view by most organizations reflective of Level 1 and Level 2 in Bowling and Rieger’s framework. Other complaints about COSO have been published. One is that the 1992 framework is not completely appropriate for 2006. The subsequent COSO ERM is more current, but some view it as vague, simplistic, and provides little implementation guidance.Source: David L. Olson, Desheng Wu, 2008. “Enterprise Risk Management: Financial and Accounting Perspectives”.New Frontiers in Enterprise RiskManagement,pp.25-38.译文：企业的风险管理:财务和会计方面企业风险管理和财务操作：关键的财务风险最近的金融危机导致金融公司、非金融公司和政府机构增加对各种形式的风险管理的重视，如市场风险管理，信贷风险管理，操作风险管理。
企业并购财务风险分析 外文文献翻译
文献出处：Biao D. Analysis of Financial Risk Prevention in Mergers and Acquisitions[J]. International Business and Management, 2014, 9(2): 138-144.第一部分为译文，第二部分为原文。
默认格式：中文五号宋体，英文五号Times New Roma，行间距1.5倍。
企业并购财务风险的预防管理分析摘要：并购被认为是改善企业管理模式，扩大企业规模，调整产业结构的有效途径。
这种方法在世界各地的每一次盛行中都受到很多因素的影响，然而企业并购在中国的起步较晚。
复杂而快速变化的环境使得企业并购具有重大风险。
特别是并购流程每一步都有严重的财务风险。
并购存在各种财务风险，如果这些风险没有得到有效的解决和控制，任何时候都会导致企业失败。
因此，许多学者和企业家认为兼并和收购的财务风险是最大的问题。
本文将对并购财务风险提出有效的预防措施，减少财务风险带来的影响，增加并购成功机会，确保企业并购的实施。
关键词：并购，财务风险，因果关系，预防引言自1897年以来，西方资本主义国家的并购遭遇了五次浪潮。
每次并购对企业的结构优化和资源配置都起着重要的作用。
中国改革开放政策实施后，随着经济全球化的快速发展，并购成为企业扩大经营规模，实现国际化的重要途径之一。
20世纪80年代中国出现并购，当时并购行为在中国企业受到欢迎，尽管许多企业从事并购，但成功案例少。
因为并购行为有很多潜在风险，其中包括市场风险，财务风险，法律风险等。
然而，财务风险被认为是并购的主要问题。
因此，有必要研究并购和财务风险的内容，了解财务风险的特点及其影响，系统分析财务风险，具体来说，需要研究并购前的目标企业的定价风险，并购期间的支付风险和财务风险以及并购后的整合风险。
最后，本文提出了基于各种风险的预防和控制措施，这是降低财务风险并提高并购成功概率的有效途径。
中小企业的财务风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文3000字
中小企业的财务风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文3000字Financial Risk Management for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)Financial risk management is an essential aspect of business management。
particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)。
SMEs face numerous financial risks。
including credit risk。
market risk。
liquidity risk。
and nal risk。
which can significantly impact their financial stability and growth prospects。
Therefore。
the effective management of financial risks is crucialfor SMEs to survive and thrive in today's competitive business environment.One of the primary challenges for SMEs in managing financial risks is their limited resources and expertise。
Unlike large ns。
SMEs often lack the financial resources and specialized staff to develop and implement comprehensive risk management strategies。
As a result。
保险公司风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文5500字
文献出处：Beasley M S, Clune R, Hermanson D R. Enterprise risk management in Insurance [J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2014, 24(6): 521-531.（2014年最新翻译，英语专八，保证质量。
）作者：Beasley M S, Clune R, Hermanson D R文献名：Enterprise risk management in Insurance期刊名：Journal of Accounting and Public Policy年份：2014年，24卷，第6期，页码：521-531译文字数：5500字原文Enterprise Risk Management in InsuranceBeasley, Clune, HermansonTrust is a key determinants of any financial transaction. Exchanges in insurance markets are a particular type of financial transaction where a current payment – the premium –is exchanges for a promise of a future, contingent payment –the indemnity due when the casualty occurs. We argue that trust is key in fostering these type of exchanges. Trust enters two ways: because it affects the willingness of the company to supply insurance when the insured can cheat by claiming indemnities that are not due. Because it discourages people from purchasing insurance if they do not trust the company promise of readily paying the indemnity when due. We prove theoretically and empirically the relevance of trust in insurance exchanges and discuss policies to foster it.Enterprise Risk Management (hereinafter referred as “ERM”) interests a wide range of professions (e.g., actuaries, corporate financial managers, underwriters, accountants,and internal auditors), however, current ERM solutions often do not cover all risks because they are motivated by the core professional ethics and principles of these professions who design and administer them. In a typical insurance company all such professions work as a group to achieve the overriding corporate objectives.Risk can be defined as factors which prevent an organization in achieving its objectives and risks affect organizations holistically. The management of risk in isolation often misses its big picture. It is argued here that a holistic management of risk is logical and is the ultimate destination of all general management activities.Moreover, riskmanagement should not be a separate function of the business process;rather, managing downside risk and taking the opportunities from upside risk should be the key management goals. Consequently, ERM is believed as an approach to risk management, which provides a common understanding across the multidisciplinary groups of people of the organization. ERM should be proactive and its focus should be on the organizations future. Organizations often struggle to see and understand the full risk spectrum to which they are exposed and as a result they may fail to identify the most vulnerable areas of the business. The effective management of risk is truly an interdisciplinary exercise grounded on a holistic framework.Whatever name this new type of risk management is given (the literature refers to it by diverse names, such as Enterprise Risk Management, Strategic Risk Management, and Holistic Risk Management) the ultimate focus is management of all significant risks faced by the organization. Risk is an integral part of each and every action of the organization in the sense that an organization is a basket of contracts associated with risk (in terms of losses and opportunities). The idea of ERM is simple and logical, but implementation is difficult. This is because its involvement with a wide stakeholder community, which in turn involves groups from different disciplines with different beliefs and understandings. Indeed, ERM needs theories (which are the interest of academics) but a grand theory of ERM (which invariably involves an interdisciplinary concept) is far from having been achieved.Consequently, for practical proposes, what is needed is the development of a framework(a set of competent theories) and one of the key challenges of this thesis is to establish the key features of such a framework to promote the practice of ERM. Multidisciplinary Views of RiskThe objective of the research is to study the ERM of insurance companies. In line with this it is designed to investigate what is happening practically in the insurance industry at the current time in the name of ERM. The intention is to minimize the gap between the two communities (i.e., academics and practitioners) in order to contribute to the literature of risk management.In recent years ERM has emerged as a topic for discussion in the financial community,in particular, the banks and insurance sectors. Professional organizationshave published research reports on ERM. Consulting firms conducted extensive studies and surveys on the topic to support their clients. Rating agencies included the ERM concept in their rating criteria. Regulators focused more on the risk management capability of the financial organizations. Academics are slowly responding on the management of risk in a holistic framework following the initiatives of practitioners.The central idea is to bring the organization close to the market economy. Nevertheless,everybody is pushing ERM within the scope of their core professional understanding.The focus of ERM is to manage all risks in a holistic framework whatever the source and nature. There remains a strong ground of knowledge in managing risk on an isolated basis in several academic disciplines (e.g., economics, finance, psychology,sociology, etc.). But little has been done to take a holistic approach of risk beyond disciplinary silos. Moreover, the theoretical understanding of the holistic (i.e., multidisciplinary)properties of risk is still unknown. Consequently, there remains a lack of understanding in terms of a common and interdisciplinary language for ERM.Risk in FinanceIn finance, risky options involve monetary outcomes with explicit probabilities and they are evaluated in terms of their expected value and their riskiness. The traditional approach to risk in finance literature is based on a mean-variance framework of portfolio theory, i.e., selection and diversification. The idea of risk in finance is understood within the scope of systematic (non-diversifiable) risk and unsystematic (diversifiable)risk. It is recognized in finance that systematic risk is positively correlated with the rate of return. In addition, systematic risk is a non-increasing function of a firm’s growth in terms of earnings. Another established concern in finance is default risk and it is argued that the performance of the firm is linked to the firm’s default risk. A large part of finance literature deals with several techniques of measuring risks of firms’ investment portfolios (e.g., standard deviation, beta, VaR, etc.). In addition to the portfolio theory, Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) was discovered in finance to price risky assets on the perfect capital markets. Finally, derivative markets grew tremendously with the recognition of option pricing theory.Risk in EconomicsRisk in economics is understood within two separate (independent) categories, i.e.,endogenous (controllable) risk and background (uncontrollable) risk. It is recognized that economic decisions are made under uncertainty in the presence of multiple risks.Expected Utility Theory argues that peoples’ risk attitude on the size of risk (small,medium, large) is derived from the utility-of-wealth function, where the utilities of outcomes are weighted by their probabilities. Economists argue that people are risk averse (neutral) when the size of the risks is large (small).Prospect theory provides a descriptive analysis of choice under risk. In economics, the concept of risk-bearing preferences of agents for independent risks was described under the notion of “ standard risk aversion.” Most of the economic research on risk is originated on the study of decision making behavior on lotteries and other gambles. Risk in PsychologyWhile economics assumes an individual’s risk preference is a function of probabilistic beliefs, psychology explores how human judgment and behavior systematically forms such beliefs. Psychology talks about the risk taking behavior (risk preferences).It looks for the patterns of human reactions to the context, reference point,mental categories and associations that influence how people make decisions.The psychological approach to risk draws upon the notion of loss aversion that manifests itself in the related notion of “regret.” According to Willett; “risk affects economic activity through the psychological influence of uncertainty.” Managers’ attitude of risk taking is often described from the psychological point of view in terms of feelings.Psychologists argue that risk, as a multidisciplinary concept, can not be reduced meaningfully by a single quantitative treatment. Consequently, managers tend to utilize an array of risk measurers to assist them in the decision making process under uncertainty. Risk perception plays a central role in the psychological research on risk, where the key concern is how people perceive risk and how it differs to the actual outcome. Nevertheless, the psychological research on risk provides fundamental knowledge of how emotions are linked to decision making.Risk in SociologyIn sociology risk is a socially constructed phenomenon (i.e., a social problem) and defined as a strategy referring to instrumental rationality. The sociological literature on risk was originated from anthropology and psychology is dominated by two central concepts. First, risk and culture and second, risk society. The negative consequences of unwanted events (i.e., natural/chemical disasters, food safety) are the key focus of sociological researches on risk. From a sociological perspective entrepreneurs remain liable for the risk of the society and responsible to share it in proportion to their respective contributions. Practically, the responsibilities are imposed and actions are monitored by state regulators and supervisors.Nevertheless, identification of a socially acceptable threshold of risk is a key challenge of many sociological researches on risk.Convergence of Multidisciplinary Views of RiskDifferent disciplinary views of risk are obvious. Whereas, economics and finance study risk by examining the distribution of corporate returns, psychology and sociology interpret risk in terms of its behavioral components. Moreover, economists focus on the economic (i.e., commercial) value of investments in a risky situation.In contrast, sociologists argue on the moral value (i.e., sacrifice) on the risk related activities of the firm. In addition, sociologists’ criticism of economists’concern of risk is that although they rely on risk, time, and preferences while describing the issues related to risk taking, they often miss out their interrelationships(i.e., narrow perspective). Interestingly, there appears some convergence of economics and psychology in the literature of economic psychology. The intention is to include the traditional economic model of individuals’ formal rational action in the understanding of the way they actually think and behave (i.e., irrationality).In addition, behavioral finance is seen as a growing discipline with the origin of economics and psychology. In contrast to efficient market hypothesis behaviour finance provides descriptive models in making judgment under uncertainty.The origin of this convergence was due to the discovery of the prospect theory in the fulfillment of the shortcomings of von Neumann-Morgenstern’s utility theory for providing reasons of human (irrational) behavior under uncertainty (e.g., arbitrage).Although, the overriding enquiry of disciplines is the estimation of risk, theycomparing and reducing into a common metric of many types of risks are there ultimate difficulty. The key conclusion of the above analysis suggests that there exist overlaps on the disciplinary views of risk and their interrelations are emerging with the progress of risk research. In particular, the central idea of ERM is to obscure the hidden dependencies of risk beyond disciplinary silos.Insurance Industry PracticeThe practice of ERM in the ins urance industry has been drawn from the author’s PhD research completed in 2006. The initiatives of four major global European insurers(hereinafter referred as “CASES”) were studied for this purpose. Out of these four insurers one is a reinsurer and the remaining three are primary insurers. They were at various stages of designing and implementing ERM. A total of fifty-one face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with key personnel of the CASES in between the end of 2004 and the beginning of 2006. The comparative analysis (compare-and-contrast) technique was used to analyze the data and they were discussed with several industry and academic experts for the purpose of validation. Thereafter,a conceptual model of ERM was developed from the findings of the data.Findings based on the data are arranged under five dimensions. They are understanding;evaluation; structure; challenges, and performance of ERM. Understanding of ERMIt was found that the key distinction in various perceptions of ERM remains between risk measurement and risk management. Interestingly, tools and processes are found complimentary. In essence, meaning that a tool can not run without a process and vice versa. It is found that the people who work with numbers (e.g.,actuaries, finance people, etc.) are involved in the risk modeling and management(mostly concerned with the financial and core insurance risks) and tend to believe ERM is a tool. On the other hand internal auditors, company secretaries, and operational managers; whose job is related to the human, system and compliance related issues of risk are more likely to see ERM as a process.ERM: A ProcessWithin the understanding of ERM as a process, four key concepts were found. They are harmonization, standardization, integration and centralization. In fact, theyare linked to the concept of top-down and bottom-up approaches of ERM.The analysis found four key concepts of ERM. They are harmonization, standardization,integration and centralization (in decreasing order of importance). It was also found that a unique understanding of ERM does not exist within the CASES, rather ERM is seen as a combination of the four concepts and they often overlap. It is revealed that an understanding of these four concepts including their linkages is essential for designing an optimal ERM system.Linkages Amongst the Four ConceptsAlthough harmonization and standardization are seen apparently similar respondents view them differently. Whereas, harmonization allows choices between alternatives,standardization provides no flexibility. Effectively, harmonization offers a range of identical alternatives, out of which one or more can be adopted depending on the given circumstances. Although standardization does not offer such flexibility,it was found as an essential technique of ERM. Whilst harmonization accepts existing divergence to bring a state of comparability, standardization does not necessarily consider existing conventions and definitions. It focuses on a common standard, (a “top-down” approach). Inde ed, integration of competent policies and processes,models, and data (either for management use, compliance and reporting) are not possible for global insurers without harmonizing and standardizing them. Hence, the research establishes that a sequence (i.e., harmonization, standardization, integration,and then centralization) is to be maintained when ERM is being developed in practice (from an operational perspective). Above all, the process is found important to achieve a diversified risk culture across the organization to allocate risk management responsibilities to risk owners and risk takers.It has long been recognized that trust is a key ingredient in fostering economic and financial transaction and achieving business success. Years ago, Nobel prize Kenneth Arrow (1972), after recognizing the pervasiveness of mutual trust in commercial and non-commercial transactions, went so far as to state that “it can be plausibly argued that much of the economic backwardness in the world can be explained by the lack of mutual confidence”. Since then plenty of evidence has shown that aggregate trust and aggregate economic performance are linked by a strongpositive relationship. In addition, in high trust countries corporations can grow larger (La Porta et. al. (1997)) and stock markets and financial markets can prosper (Guiso et. al., 2009). As Arrow noticed, trust, while being an ingredient in most exchanges, it is likely to be particularly important in those transactions that involve an element of time. Financial transaction, being all exchanges of money over time, should be particularly dependent on trust. In fact any financial transaction, being it a loan, a purchase of a stock of a listed company, the investment in the bond of a corporation or a government or the purchase of an insurance policy, has a fundamental characteristic: its is an exchange of money today against a promise of (more) money in the future. But what leads one to believe that promise and make the exchange actually possible? This is trust.Since insurance exchanges are financial exchanges, also these exchanges are trust dependent. In insurance contracts trust is entailed in two ways. First, the insurer when entering the contract and paying the insurance premium upfront has to trust that the insurance company will pay the indemnity promptly in the case the casualty actually occurs at some time in the future. Second, the insurance company has to trust that the insurer, once the premium is paid, does not act so as to raise the risk of the casualty by adopting a more risk-taking behavior. This type of risk falls under the name of moral hazard and may be cautioned against by pricing it into the premium. Trust is entailed also because the insurer can cheat the company by pretending that a casualty actually has occurred when it did not, or by shamming a casualty or by aggravating its consequences. The possibility of frauds together with limited legal enforcement imply that the willingness of an insurance company to offer insurance to a certain pool of customers depends also on its beliefs about these pool average trustworthiness.In sum, insurance exchanges require trust on two sides. Most importantly, as will argue the two types of trust may interact in important ways; in particular limited trust on the side of the insurance company vis its customers can result in limited trust in the latter towards the company. I will discuss this issue latter.For now on I will be mostly focusing on the trust that insurers have towards thecompany and how this affects their willingness to by insurance.The entrepreneurs interviewed in the ANIA sample were asked to report their level of trust towards various entities, including: towards other people in general, other entrepreneurs, insurance companies, banks, and the stock exchange. Answers were given from a scale of zero to 10 where zero means no trust and 10 implies complete trust. There is great dispersion in the answers regarding the measurement of trust. On average, the entrepreneurs have a high level of trust towards other people in general than towards either banks or insurance companies. Average trust towards people in general is equal to 5.6 (median 6), slightly less than 13% of those interviewed had a very low trust level (not more than 2), and 15.5% had a high level of trust (equal to or more than 8)- see Figure 1, A. Trust towards other entrepreneurs has a similar average (5.7) but a lower frequency in the low levels of trust as well as the high levels; it is less probable that an entrepreneur completely distrusts or trusts another entrepreneur rather than a regular individual.These results indicate that once the degree of trust towards insurance companies is accounted for, trust towards others and towards people does not have an additional direct effect on the choice of being insured or not. But, what determines trust towards insurance companies? If this also reflects the trust that a person has in others, then this effect is not direct but indirect because it influences the trust in insurance companies. Similar reasoning can be applied also to trust towards banks and towards financial institutions in general. It is plausible that trust in insurance companies reflects the perception people have in the trustworthiness of banks and that a low level of trust in banks can translate into a low level of trust in insurance companies.We have argued that an insurance contract, being just a particular financial contract, are as such exposed to the possibility of abuse and are thus trust sensitive. In the literature, the importance of trust has been overlooked, partly because of an implicit assumption that mis-behavior in insurance markets receives full legal protection. We have argued that legal protection is never likely to be perfect even in setting with particularly efficient legal institutions. When this is the case, exchanges in insurance markets are affected by trust. Trust is required on the side on thecompany that has to trust the insurer not to commit insurance frauds by manipulating ex-post the amount of damage (or lying about its very existence), or behaving in such a way as to alter the risk faced by the company.However, trust is required on the side of the insured who has to believe that is that the insurance company complies with its contractual obligations in case of damages. We have argued and documented that the trust people on the player in insurance markets has relevant effects on peoples decisions to insure and how much to insurance to buy. Hence, in high trust communities insurance markets are more likely to prosper.This leads us naturally to asking what sort of policies can help sustain a high level of level in insurance markets. We distinguish two types of trust-enhancing policies. The first type refers to company-level policies and is meant to raise the trust people have in that company, being them existing customers or perspective customers. The second type of policies pertains to the industry and are meant, among other, to avoid the negative spillovers that misbehavior by one component of the industry has on the perceived trustworthiness of the pother members.Improve the quality of the match between the insured and the policy distributor An interesting result emerging past research and a from the ANIA survey is that trust tends to increase with the degree of affinity between who expresses and to whom the trust is directed. Peo ple tend to trust others that are more similar to them, that is have a high degree of affinity with (Bu tler and Guiso, 2010). Improving the matching between who sells and who buys insurance, choosi ng people to whom one feels akin and building stable relationships is a way of increasing the level of trust of the insured..Support the enforcement of punishment of single companies misbehaviorMisbehavior by one industry member destroys the trust that people have in the other member s of the industry. These spillovers imply that there is a role for industry level policies meant to set high standards of behavior and punish deviants, well and above any punishment that may follow fr om existing legal norms. Codes of conduct and strict rules of behavior that are shared by the indus try members and hared procedures to punish deviation would greatly contribute to keeping high le vels of trust towards each single insurance company.译文保险公司的风险管理作者：比斯利；科隆；霍曼逊信任是任何金融交易的一个关键决定因素。
企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字
文献出处: Comell B., Financial risk control of Mergers and Acquisitions [J]. International Review of Business Research Papers, 2014, 7(2): 57-69.原文Financial risk control of Mergers and AcquisitionsComellAbstractM&A plays a significant part in capital operation activities. M&A is not only important way for capital expansion, but also effective method for resource allocation optimization. In the world around, many firms gained high growth and great achievement through M&A transactions. The cases include: the merger between German company Daimler-Benz and U.S. company Chrysler, Wal-Mart’s acquisition for British company ADSA, Exxon’s merger with Mobil and so on.Keywords: Enterprise mergers and acquisitions; Risk identification; Risk control1 Risk in enterprise mergers and acquisitionsMay encounter in the process of merger and acquisition risk: financial risk, asset risk, labor risk, market risk, cultural risk, macro policy risk and risk of laws and regulations, etc.1. 1 Financial riskRefers to the authenticity of corporate financial statements by M&A and M&A enterprises in financing and operating performance after the possible risks. Financial statements is to evaluate and determine the trading price in acquisition of important basis, its authenticity is very important to the whole deal. False statements beautify the financial and operating conditions of the target enterprise, and even the failing companies packing perfectly. Whether the financial statements of the listed companies or unlisted companies generally exists a certain degree of moisture, financial reporting risk reality In addition, the enterprise because of mergers and acquisitions may face risks, such as shortage of funds, a decline in margins has adverse effects on the development of enterprises.1. 2 Asset riskRefers to the assets of the enterprise M&A below its actual value or the assets after the merger failed to play a role of original and the formation of the risk. Enterprise merger and a variety of strategies, some of them are in order to obtain resources. In fact, enterprise asset accounts consistent with actual situation whether how much has the can be converted into cash, inventory, assets assessment is accurate and reliable, the ownership of the intangible assets is controversial, the assets disposal before delivery will be significantly less than the assets of the buyer to get the value of the contract. Because of the uncertainty of the merger and acquisition of asset quality at the same time, also may affect its role in buying businesses.1. 3 Labor riskRefers to the human resources of the enterprise merger and acquisition conditions affect purchase enterprise. Surplus staff and workers of the target enterprise burden is overweight, on-the-job worker technical proficiency, ability to accept new technology and the key positions of the worker will leave after the merger, etc., are the important factors influencing the expected cost of production.1. 4 Market riskRefers to the enterprise merger is completed, the change of the market risk to the enterprise. One of the purposes of mergers and acquisitions may be to take advantage of the original supply and marketing channels of the target enterprise save new investment enterprise develop the market. Under the condition of market economy, the enterprise reliance on market is more and more big, the original target enterprise the possibility of the scope of supply and marketing channels and to retain, will affect the expected profit of the target enterprise. From another point of view, the lack of a harmonious customer relationship, at least to a certain extent, increase the target enterprise mergers and acquisitions after the start-up capital.1. 5 Culture riskRefers to whether the two enterprise culture fusion to the risks of mergers and acquisitions, two broad and deep resources, structure integration between enterprises, inevitably touches the concept of corporate culture collision, due to incompleteinformation or different regions, and may not be able to organizational culture of the target enterprise become the consensus of the right. If the culture between two enterprises cannot unite, members will make the enterprise loss of cultural uncertainty, which generates the fuzziness and reduce dependence on enterprise, ultimately affect the realization of the expected values of M&A enterprises.2 Financial risk of M&AHowever, there are even more unsuccessful M&A transactions behind these exciting and successful ones. A study shows that 1200 Standard & Poor companies have been conducting frequent M&A transactions in recent years, but almost 70%cases ended up as failures.There are various factors that lead to the failures of M&A transactions, such as strategy, culture and finance, among which the financial factor is the key one. The success or failure of the M&A transactions largely depends upon the effectiveness of financial control activities during the process. Among the books talking about M&A, however, most focus on successful experience but few on lessons drawn from unsuccessful ones; most concentrate on financial evaluation methods but few on financial risk control. Therefore, the innovations of this thesis lie in: the author does not just talk about financial control in general terms, but rather specify the unique financial risks during each step of M&A transaction; the author digs into the factors inducing each type of risks, and then proposes feasible measures for risk prevention and control, based on the financial accounting practices, and the combination of international experience and national conditions.The thesis develops into 3 chapters. Chapter 1 defines “M&A” and several related words, and then looks back on the five M&A waves in western history. Chapter 2 talks about 3 types of financial risks during M&A process and digs into factors inducing each type of risks. Chapter 3 proposes feasible measures for risk prevention and control. At the beginning of chapter 1, the author defines M&A as follows: an advanced form of property right transaction, such as one company (firm) acquires one or more companies (firms), or two or more companies (firms) merge as one company (firm). The aim of M&A transaction is to control the property andbusiness of the other company, by purchasing all or part of its property (asset). In the following paragraph, the thesis compares and contrasts several related words with “M&A”, which are merger, acquisition, consolidation and takeover.In the chapter 1, the author also introduces the five M&A waves in western history. Such waves dramatically changed the outlook of world economy, by making many small and middle-sized companies to become multinational corporations. Therefore, a close look at this period of time would have constructive influence on our view with the emergence and development of M&A transactions. After a comprehensive survey of M&A history, we find that, with the capitalism development, M&A transactions presented diverse features and applied quite different means of financing and payment, ranging from cash, stock to leveraged buyout. Chapter 2 primarily discusses the different types of financial risks during M&A, as well as factors inducing such risks.According to the definition given by the thesis, financial risks during M&A are the possibilities of financial distress or financial loss as a result of decision-making activities, including pricing, financing and payment.Based on the M&A transaction process, financial risks can be grouped into 3 categories: decision-making risks before M&A (Strategic risk), implementation risks during M&A (Evaluation risk, financing risk and payment risk) and integration risks after M&A. Main tasks and characteristics in each step of M&A transaction are different, as well as the risk-driven factors, which interrelate and act upon each other. Considering limited space, the author mainly discusses target evaluation risk, financing and payment risk, and integration risk. In chapter 2, the thesis quotes several unsuccessful M&A cases to illustrate 3 different types of financial risks and risk-driven factors. Target evaluation risk is defined as possible financial loss incurred by acquirer as a result of target evaluation deviation. Target evaluation risk may be caused by: the acquirer’s expectation deviation for the future value and time of target’s revenue, pitfalls of financial statements, distortion of target’s stock price, the deviation of evaluation methods, as well as backward intermediaries. Financing and payment risks mainly reflect in: liquidity risk, credit risk caused by deterioratedcapital structure, financial gearing-induced solvency risk, dilution of EPS and control rights, etc.Integration risks most often present as: financial institution risk, capital management risk and financial entity risk. Chapter 3 concludes characters of financial risks that mentioned above, and then proposes detailed measures for preventing and controlling financial risks. Financial risks during M&A are comprehensive, interrelated, preventable, and dynamic. Therefore, the company should have a whole picture of these risks, and take proactive measures to control them.As for target evaluation risk control, the thesis suggests that (1) Improve information quality, more specifically, conduct financial due diligence so as to have comprehensive knowledge about the target; properly use financial statements; pay close attention to off-balance sheet resource. (2) Choose appropriate evaluation methods according to different situations, by combining other methods to improve the evaluation accuracy. Meanwhile, the author points out that, in practice the evaluation method is only a reference for price negotiation. The target price is determined by the bargaining power of both sides, and influenced by a wealth of factors such as expectation, strategic plan, and exchange rate.In view of financing and payment risk control, the author conducts thorough analysis for pros and cons of different means of financing and payment. Then the author proposes feasible measures such as issuing convertible bonds and commercial paper, considering specific conditions. To control integration risk, the author suggests start with the integration of financial strategy, the integration of financial institution, the integration of accounting system, the integration of asset and liability, and the integration of performance evaluation system. Specific measures include: the acquirer appoints person to be responsible for target’s finance; the acquirer conducts stringent property control over target’s operation; the acquirer conducts comprehensive budgeting, dynamic prevision and internal auditing.3 ConclusionsAt the end of the thesis, the author points out that many aspects still worth further investigation. For instance, this thesis mainly concentrates on qualitativeanalysis, so it would be better if quantitative analysis were introduced. Besides, the thesis can be more complete by introducing financial risk forecast model.译文企业并购中的财务风险控制作者：康奈尔摘要企业并购是资本营运活动的重要组成部分，是企业资本扩张的重要手段，也是实现资源优化配置的有效方式。
商业银行风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献
商业银行风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)“RISK MANAGEMENT IN COMMERCIAL BANKS”(A CASE STUDY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS) - ABSTRACT ONLY1. PREAMBLE:1.1 Risk Management:The future of banking will undoubtedly rest on risk management dynamics. Only those banks that have efficient risk management system will survive in the market in the long run. The effective management of credit risk is a critical component of comprehensive risk management essential for long-term success of a banking institution. Credit risk is the oldest and biggest risk that bank, by virtue of its very nature of business, inherits. This has however, acquired a greater significance in the recent past for various reasons. Foremost among them is the wind of economic liberalization that is blowing across the globe. India is no exception to this swing towards market driven economy. Competition from within and outside the country has intensified. This has resulted in multiplicity of risks both in number and volume resulting in volatile markets. A precursor to successful management of credit risk is a clear understanding about risks involved in lending, quantifications of risks within each item of the portfolio and reaching a conclusion as to the likely composite credit risk profile of a bank.The corner stone of credit risk management is the establishment of a framework that defines corporate priorities, loan approval process, credit risk rating system, risk-adjusted pricing system, loan-review mechanism and comprehensive reporting system.1.2 Significance of the study:The fundamental business of lending has brought trouble to individual banks and entire banking system. It is, therefore, imperative that the banks are adequate systems for credit assessment of individual projects and evaluating risk associated therewith as well as the industry as a whole. Generally, Banks in India evaluate a proposal through the traditional tools of project financing, computing maximum permissible limits, assessing management capabilities and prescribing a ceiling for an industry exposure. As banks move in to a new high powered world of financial operations and trading, with new risks, the need is felt for more sophisticated and versatile instruments for risk assessment, monitoring and controlling risk exposures. It is, therefore, time that banks managements equip themselves fully to grapple with the demands of creating tools and systems capable of assessing, monitoring and controlling risk exposures in a more scientific manner.Credit Risk, that is, default by the borrower to repay lent money, remains the most important risk to manage till date. The predominance of credit risk is even reflected in the composition of economic capital, which banks are required to keep a side for protection against various risks. According to one estimate, Credit Risk takes about 70% and 30%remaining is shared between the other two primary risks, namely Market risk (change in the market price and operational risk i.e., failure of internal controls, etc.). Quality borrowers (Tier-I borrowers) were able to access the capital market directly without going through the debt route. Hence, the credit route is now more open to lesser mortals (Tier-II borrowers).With margin levels going down, banks are unable to absorb the level of loan losses. There has been very little effort to develop a method where risks could be identified and measured. Most of the banks have developed internal rating systems for their borrowers, but there hasbeen very little study to compare such ratings with the final asset classification and also to fine-tune the rating system. Also risks peculiar to each industry are not identified and evaluated openly. Data collection is regular driven. Data on industry-wise, region-wise lending, industry-wise rehabilitated loan, can provide an insight into the future course to be adopted.Better and effective strategic credit risk management process is a better way to Manage portfolio credit risk. The process provides a framework to ensure consistency between strategy and implementation that reduces potential volatility in earnings and maximize shareholders wealth. Beyond and over riding the specifics of risk modeling issues, the challenge is moving towards improved credit risk management lies in addressing banks’readiness and openness to accept change to a more transparent system, to rapidly metamorphosing markets, to more effective and efficient ways of operating and to meet market requirements and increased answerability to stake holders.There is a need for Strategic approach to Credit Risk Management (CRM) in Indian Commercial Banks, particularly in view of;(1) Higher NPAs level in comparison with global benchmark(2) RBI’ s stipulation about dividend distribution by the banks(3) Revised NPAs level and CAR norms(4) New Basel Capital Accord (Basel –II) revolutionAccording to the study conducted by ICRA Limited, the gross NPAs as a proportion of total advances for Indian Banks was 9.40 percent for financial year 2003 and 10.60 percent for financial year 20021. The value of the gross NPAs as ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was as low as 2.26 percent. Net NPAs as a proportion of net advances of Indian banks was 4.33 percent for financial year 2003 and 5.39 percent for financial year 2002. As against this, the value of net NPAs ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was 0.37 percent. Further, it was found that, the total advances of the banking sector to the commercial and agricultural sectors stood at Rs.8,00,000 crore. Of this, Rs.75,000 crore, or 9.40 percent of the total advances is bad and doubtful debt. The size of the NPAs portfolio in the Indian banking industry is close to Rs.1,00,000 crore which is around 6 percent of India’ s GDP2.The RBI has recently announced that the banks should not pay dividends at more than 33.33 percent of their net profit. It has further provided that the banks having NPA levels less than 3 percent and having Capital Adequacy Reserve Ratio (CARR) of more than 11 percent for the last two years will only be eligible to declare dividends without the permission from RBI3. This step is for strengthening the balance sheet of all the banks in the country. The banks should provide sufficient provisions from their profits so as to bring down the net NPAs level to 3 percent of their advances.NPAs are the primary indicators of credit risk. Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is another measure of credit risk. CAR is supposed to act as a buffer against credit loss, which isset at 9 percent under the RBI stipulation4. With a view to moving towards International best practices and to ensure greater transparency, it has been decided to adopt the ’ 90 days’ ‘ over due’ norm for identification of NPAs from the year ending March 31, 2004.The New Basel Capital Accord is scheduled to be implemented by the end of 2006. All the banking supervisors may have to join the Accord. Even the domestic banks in addition to internationally active banks may have to conform to the Accord principles in the coming decades. The RBI as the regulator of the Indian banking industry has shown keen interest in strengthening the system, and the individual banks have responded in good measure in orienting themselves towards global best practices.1.3 Credit Risk Management(CRM) dynamics:The world over, credit risk has proved to be the most critical of all risks faced by a banking institution. A study of bank failures in New England found that, of the 62 banks in existence before 1984, which failed from 1989 to 1992, in 58 cases it was observed that loans and advances were not being repaid in time 5 . This signifies the role of credit risk management and therefore it forms the basis of present research analysis.Researchers and risk management practitioners have constantly tried to improve on current techniques and in recent years, enormous strides have been made in the art and science of credit risk measurement and management6. Much of the progress in this field has resulted form the limitations of traditional approaches to credit risk management and with the current Bank for International Settlement’ (BIS) regulatory model. Even in banks which regularly fine-tune credit policies and streamline credit processes, it is a real challenge for credit risk managers to correctly identify pockets of risk concentration, quantify extent of risk carried, identify opportunities for diversification and balance the risk-return trade-off in their credit portfolio.The two distinct dimensions of credit risk management can readily be identified as preventive measures and curative measures. Preventive measures include risk assessment, risk measurement and risk pricing, early warning system to pick early signals of future defaults and better credit portfolio diversification. The curative measures, on the other hand, aim at minimizing post-sanction loan losses through such steps as securitization, derivative trading, risk sharing, legal enforcement etc. It is widely believed that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Therefore, the focus of the study is on preventive measures in tune with the norms prescribed by New Basel Capital Accord.The study also intends to throw some light on the two most significant developments impacting the fundamentals of credit risk management practices of banking industry – New Basel Capital Accord and Risk Based Supervision. Apart from highlighting the salient features of credit risk management prescriptions under New Basel Accord, attempts are made to codify the response of Indian banking professionals to various proposals under the accord. Similarly, RBI proposed Risk Based Supervision (RBS) is examined to capture its direction and implementation problems。
企业应收账款风险控制外文翻译文献
企业应收账款风险控制外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)原文：On Risk Control Accounts Receivable Abstract:Accounts receivable credit enterprise by way of sale of goods or services but to the cust o mers received, accounts receivable management directly affect the capital flow and economic operation of the article pointed out that enterprises should combine their actual situation, the establishment of receivables Accounts of the risk prevention mechanism, from the source control and take preventive measures not only the accounts receivable of enterprises face the risk of recovery, but also the existence of operating risks to the enterprise, from the status of receivables management business to start Analyze accounts receivable management business problems. Accounts receivable is the product of credit, credit on the one hand can improve the market competitiveness of enterprises, to expand sales, but on the other hand delayed the cash recovery time and increases the cost of collection of trade receivables, receivables from the paper The causes and management of money in terms of how to prevent the risk of accounts receivable.Key words:accounts receivable,controlIntroductionAccounts receivable is a result of external business credit products,materials, supplies, labor, etc. to purchase or receive services units to receive the funds. Enterprises can sell two basic forms, namely, credit method is way off. Cash sales approach is themost expected a sales settlement. However, in the fierce market economy, totally dependent on marketing approach is often unrealistic. Under the credit method, the enterprise in sales of products, can be provided to the buyer within a certain period of time free use of money the business of credit funds in an amount equal to the price of goods, which for the purchaser in terms of great attractive. For the enterprise is an important promotional tool, the enterprise product sales are sluggish, the market decline, the case of weak competition, or in enterprise sales of new products, new markets, in order to meet the needs of market competition and adopting various effective the credit method, it is wise for businesses. In the current market economic conditions, increased competition, with the continuous development of commercial credit, business credit sales of products means more favor. However, a large number of accounts receivable resulting in sales revenue growth can only book profits to the enterprise, can not bring business to maintain and expand the scale of production necessary for cash flow, and with the continued increase in the amount of accounts receivable, growing an average of aging, accounts receivable aging structure tends to deteriorate, may be more and more bad debt losses, to the huge enterprise production and management of potential risks. Therefore, how to effectively enhance the control and management of accounts receivable is a enterprises financial imperative.First, the business performance of accounts receivable riskAccounts receivable is an enterprise in the normal course of business, from selling goods, products or services or receive services to purchase units of a unit charge or debit the accounts of the transport fees. It is the business generated by the short-term credit product claims to offer the enterprise a commercial credit. Accounts receivable in an expanding market, increase sales revenue while also forming a receivables risk, mainly reflected in:1, accounts receivable possession of large amounts of liquidity, adding to the difficulties of shortage of working capital business. Enterprise credit products, issue stock, but can not recover the money, and enterprise customers on overdue payments can not take appropriate measures, resulting in a large number of corporate working capital was occupied by the long run will affect the flow of liquidity to enable enterprises to monetary shortage of funds, which affect the normal cost and normal production operations.2, exaggerated accounts receivable business results, so that the existence of hidden losses or loss of business. At present, revenue is recognized when the company followed the principle of accrual accounting, the accounting treatment for the occurrence of credit, debit "accounts receivable" account, credited "business income" subject to credit all revenue credited to current income, , the increase in corporate profits and the current period can not be achieved, said the cash income. According to the precautionary principle, the actual situation of enterprises according to their own accounts receivable Provision for bad debts, but in practice, in order to facilitate tax, the tax laws, administrative regulations expressly provides that the proportion of the general provision of 0.3% to 0.5%. If there is a lot of business accounts receivable, there is increased likelihood of bad debts, bad debts that actual extraction of the bad debts far exceeded. This is equal to exaggerate the company's operating results, andthe losses that may occur can not be fully estimated.3, accounts receivable increased by the loss of corporate cash flow. From handling the accounts of credit can be seen that although the company had a credit more revenue, increase profits, but did not make the cash inflow, but the company had to advance funds to pay various taxes and payment of costs and accelerate the enterprise's cash outflows.4, accounts receivable increased the opportunity cost of corporate capital losses. First of all, occupied by accounts receivable financing, which calls for accelerated turnover in the business, be rewarded, but because there are a lot of accounts receivable, in particular, the proportion of overdue accounts receivable on the rise (at present, China's late accounts receivable accounts receivable as high as 60%, while the Western countries, less than 10%), resulting in accounts receivable on the occupied capital lost its time value. Second, because the accounts receivable arising in the collection process, forcing the enterprises have to invest a lot of manpower, material and financial resources, and increased collection costs; the same time, because a lot of money by settling, the borrower time to be extended, increased interest expense. A variety of cost increase, making funds lost profit opportunities and increase the opportunity cost of capital.Third, how to control the risk of accounts receivable1, credit risk prevention policyWith the further development of China's market economy and increasing business competition, commercial credit receivables of the objective to be a competitive necessity of issuing commercial credit companies that do not attract customers to lose the competitiveness of the credit offers; course, the payment of business inevitably bring credit offers credit risk and credit policies on the manage receivables plays an important role. Credit policies include the following:(1) Credit standards. Credit standards are the company to provide commercial credit made the minimum requirements for the development of credit standards is the key to consider the customer to delay payment or refuse to pay money to bring the possibility of loss to the company size. To this end, companies need credit to customers for regular inspection and assessment of the quality of analysis on the credit quality of the testing and evaluation standards, there are three commonly used methods.First, 5C system evaluation. The system is to assess the important factor in customer credit quality, the following five aspects.①Quality: Quality is the customers and reputation, that is, the possibility of obligation, this factor is critical, it is a moral credit of the subjective factor, which is required to have the management of corporate credit experience, the right to judge and keen insight.②capacity: Capacity is the customers ability to pay when the credit expires, it is according to customer financial information, especially under the regular income and expenditure data be analyzed to determine their ability to pay the purchase price.③Capital: capital refers to the customer's financial strength and financial status, indicating that the background of the customer may pay the debt, usually reflect thefinancial position of the ratio of customers include: debt ratio, current ratio, earnings coverage ratio, fixed charges coverage ratio.④collateral: collateral or credit status on the bottom line I do not know the customer and requires a disputed credit guarantee of a variety of assets.⑤economic environment: mainly refers to the economic environment can affect the ability of customers to fulfill financial responsibility of economic development trends, it is beyond the control of the customer. Corporate credit managers in considering this factor, the analysis should focus on regional economic conditions and business products related to the development of industry-specific.Second, the credit analysis. According to customer's credit information, credit screening of several major factors, the number of statistical methods used for processing classified and quantified to calculate the weights, assessment of credit quality, enterprise credit management section based on credit scores to determine the weighted credit rating .Third, credit risk model method. According to the customer's financial business risk and receivables management company's own risk to determine credit risk, the use of the principle of mathematical statistics to establish a credit risk model, which ARC (credit risk) = PR risk customers can not pay the creditors × MR (accounts receivable risk management), MR (accounts receivable risk management) is the company's own accounts receivable management system, measures methods, control and supervision, the quality of personnel and other internal factors, can affect the risk of a few accounts receivable management major factors in assessing the scores of each factor and the weights, the weighted scores obtained MR values; Similarly, PR value is the major risk factors based on ratios of financial position (cash ratio, inventory turnover, quick ratio, etc.) to assess the score of each factor, calculated using the principle of mathematical statistics weight each factor, then the integrated value is calculated PR value. Several standard methods of the above can apply for credit credit offer credit quality of customers to predict, analyze, judge, to determine whether to grant credit offers.(2) credit terms. Corporate credit conditions is the need to pay money on credit conditions, including credit terms, discounts, terms and cash discounts. Credit period is the longest business requirements to the customer time to pay; discount period is required for customers to enjoy the time of payment cash discounts; cash discount to encourage customers in the period of early payment discounts given preferential treatment. Generally provide more favorable credit terms to increase sales, but it can also bring additional burdens, such as accounts receivable will increase the opportunity cost of bad debts, cash discounts and other costs, so companies must be carefully weighed. I think we can grasp the following principles: the principle of prudence, risk principle (the principle of loose-type), the principle of cooperation. Prudence two possibilities: First, companies in the market weakness, deteriorating economic environment, companies should make a negative decision management sales strategy, market risk should be taken to avoid the principle of prudence. Second, the customer, without the ability to pay low credit quality, and poor financial situation, or do not understand the ins and outs and the dispute by the credit quality to theprecautionary principle of justice.The principle of risk can be divided into two situations: First, companies in the economic recovery increased, the product in the industry or the District of merchantability good, corporate decision-making authorities should take active sales policy. Second, the customer, the credit quality is high, financial condition, ability to pay, credit managers should be taken when issuing credit risk principles.The principle of cooperation: For SMEs, the capital less strength is poor, the general financial situation, ability to resist market risk is small, it should be taken in the aggregate principle.2, accounts receivable, risk prevention intervalSince the formation of the company credit accounts receivable, the sales and billing between the two acts of a settlement time, the interval. Interval of the recovered funds back in time to enable enterprises to have more liquidity to carry out production and service activities, and actively take the initiative to debt collection units or individuals. Bad debt losses will be reduced to a minimum, strengthen the recognition that not justify the amount of time being to let the other know and recognize the debt, in practice, can be sent to the business or personal debts confirmation or destroy a single paragraph, so that Check the arrears owed the content of individual units or signature confirmation mail, so that companies understand the availability of debt, repayment intentions each other, urging each other timely repayment, but also easy to check the authenticity of accounts receivables.For the other debts but delays longer recognized or return the book debts owed to strengthen preventive work is to understand the delay in repayment, arrears mail confirmation is not the reason to visit the other units in the field, to identify the existence of the other units or individuals, whether deliberately delayed payments, if unable to pay the debt, is facing bankruptcy, whether the cases escaping with money, etc., will cause a timely manner to the departments concerned to jointly study measures, do everything possible to receivables, reduce bad debts, bad loss account, but also to prevent blindness in future credit. If the payment has been made to identify the other party, shall immediately identify the whereabouts of, would have been diverted, whether the corruption of the unit personnel, wrong billing, etc., to ensure timely detection of errors were corrected.Even for the reputation, business or reputation has always been very high against individuals should not be relaxed, because "the portal does not close tightly, sages from the Pirates of the Heart", the unit if not often to learn about, mission, and it will part of the business or reputation of high prestige individual to ill-gotten gains, regardless of honor towards the idea of development, trust, reputation has been misused, to the unit causing serious economic losses.3, the daily management of accounts receivable risk prevention(1) enterprises in order to accelerate the turnover rate of accounts receivable, factoring risk reduction, you must do the following basic work. We must first place the accounts receivable should be registered in time, the household accounts receivable detailing the time, amount, reason, and the billing period to recover the situation and so on, and collect credit information about customers, such as access to Customerrecent balance sheet and income statement and other statements, analyze liquidity, ability to pay and the rate of business performance; second request to the customer's bank credit certificate of the client to understand the customer's deposit balance, loan conditions and settlement status; the last customer-related exchange of other suppliers of credit information companies to understand the timely payment of the customer and so on. These measures, analysis of customer's credit status in order to detect and propose a solution.(2) To strengthen management and total management of a single customer. (1) make the basis of records, level of understanding of customer payments in a timely manner.(2) Check whether the customers break through credit. (3) grasp the customer's debt credit period has expired, customers have been closely monitoring the dynamic changes in debt maturity. (4) analysis of accounts receivable turnover and average billing period, to see whether at the normal level of liquidity. (5) to strengthen aging analysis of accounts receivable. Aging analysis of accounts receivable accounts receivable ledger should be based on the setting business case may be, the general ledger accounts receivable business sales region and sales by the household setting. (3) to strengthen the management of accounts receivable ledger. Screening of the accounts receivable ledger, aging analysis to determine which needs and which does not require, or purchase a unit occurs only a few pen and the amount outstanding, as a result of product quality, dispute, or disputes resulting from breach of contract Such accounts receivable should be shown separately case by case basis and specify the reasons put forward to resolve issues.4, accounting, risk prevention(1) Select the correct extractionChina's current accounting system to prepare low corporate law provides that only accounted for bad debts, this is an accounts receivable effective risk prevention measures. 2006 "Enterprise Accounting Standards" provides enterprises the ratio of provision for bad debts 0.3% -0.5%, specifically determined by the enterprises themselves, so that different companies to solve practical problems opened up a new way. The company shall state the specific circumstances under the scope of provision for bad debts, extraction method, the division of aging and extraction ratio, in accordance with administrative privileges, general meeting of shareholders or managers (the director) or similar approval, and in accordance with the laws and administrative regulations report to the relevant provisions of the parties to the record, the extraction method for bad debts has been determined shall not be changed, you need to change, based upon the above procedures, and report to the parties approved the record, and be stated in the accounting statements.(2) Select the correct method of settlement. The right of settlement to reduce the risk of accounts receivable is also very important. Settlement between the Bank of China's enterprises are mainly the following: check settlement, foreign exchange settlement, commission collection settlement, settlement and other bank draft, corporate customers operating according to ability, capacity to repay and credit status, select the appropriate settlement of strong profitability and solvency, credit risk of large customers to choose a good way, this will help the two sides establish a relationship ofmutual trust, expand the sales network and improve competitiveness.5, accounts receivable factoring risk preventionIf the enterprise is the work done against accounts receivable in the former, and effective, will be able to grasp the size of the risk of accounts receivable, then the problem will be greatly reduced workload. But a business in the ordinary course of business can be without accounts receivable, and its purpose is simply to do preventive work is to control the line of credit and change the overall aging structure, increasing the recoverability of the existing accounts receivable. Therefore, enterprises must conduct research into prevention of accounts receivable, to establish their own processing methods and principles.First, the analysis of total receivables. Look at the accounts receivable balance is reasonable, whether the enterprise's production and management has become a burden, whether the compression of the needs and possibilities, what basis. Based on the analysis in the total amount, further the balance of accounts receivable aging analysis carried out by detailed subjects. Accounts receivable aging analysis is the quality and value of the total re-evaluation is to determine the recoverability of the account balance and determine what measures to use to resolve basis. Aging in general the smaller the longer the greater the risk the possibility of recovery.Second is to determine the collection process. According to aging analysis to determine needs and special circumstances of the customer billing, the normal billing procedures: submit a letter - Telephone collection - send people to interview - legal action. First, analysis of the causes of default, such as customer due to poor management, inability to pay, the should be further analysis is temporary or has reached bankruptcy. The reason for the temporary relaxation of the repayment period should be appropriate to help clients through difficult times. This is more compatible with the aging short, good reputation, part of the customer accounts receivable. But should also seek to extend the normal part of the total share. In order to recover more money, but the two sides can establish good business relationship.For the already bankrupt state, can not be revitalized, it should be in a timely manner to the court to be liquidated in bankruptcy pay off some debt.Third, the customer has repayment ability, but refuses to pay, the enterprises should adopt appropriate methods of debt collection. Consultation method: with the debt repayment customers, deadlines, payment methods and friendly consultations. 1, the probation law: clarifying the position of creditors or debt collection proud of the hard to move the debtor, moved their compassion. 2, the carrot and stick method: two people with debt collection, hard unwilling to compromise, soft in the stone, complement each other. Make payment by debtors. $ Fatigue War and attempting to rally: the main leaders of business debt pegged to fight a protracted war, it will collapse. Or language stimulation, so as to save face and dignity and had to pay. 3, the storm Law: explicitly tell the debtor to its proceedings. For repayment in any case fail to reach an agreement negotiations have had a lawyer to take legal action.Before taking legal action against the principle of cost-effectiveness should be considered, do not face prosecution following conditions: 1, court costs exceed the amount of the debt claim; 2, the customer value of the collateral can not write off debt,it has a wide range of social relations, prosecution may be hurt the business operation or cause damage, even if successful, the possibility of recovery of receivables is extremely limited.In short, the establishment of sound policies and effective debt collection, collection costs and to reduce the trade-off between bad debt, effective debt collection policies to a large extent by the experience of the management staff, the enterprise should have a professional knowledge is solid, experienced, responsible and accounts receivable management team can do a better job to Collection.本文摘自《黑龙江科技信息》2010年第4期，作者：孙丽译文：论企业应收账款风险的控制摘要：应收账款是企业采用赊销方式销售商品或劳务而应向顾客收取的款项，应收账款管理直接影响企业营运资金的周转和经济效益文章指出，企业要结合自身的实际情况，建立应收账款的风险防范机制，从源头控制，防患于未然企业的应收账款不仅面临着回收的风险，同时其存在也会给企业带来经营风险，从企业应收账款管理的现状入手，分析企业应收账款管理中面临的问题。
企业应收账款风险控制外文翻译文献
企业应收账款风险控制外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)原文：On Risk Control Accounts Receivable Abstract:Accounts receivable credit enterprise by way of sale of goods or services but to the cust o mers received, accounts receivable management directly affect the capital flow and economic operation of the article pointed out that enterprises should combine their actual situation, the establishment of receivables Accounts of the risk prevention mechanism, from the source control and take preventive measures not only the accounts receivable of enterprises face the risk of recovery, but also the existence of operating risks to the enterprise, from the status of receivables management business to start Analyze accounts receivable management business problems. Accounts receivable is the product of credit, credit on the one hand can improve the market competitiveness of enterprises, to expand sales, but on the other hand delayed the cash recovery time and increases the cost of collection of trade receivables, receivables from the paper The causes and management of money in terms of how to prevent the risk of accounts receivable.Key words:accounts receivable,controlIntroductionAccounts receivable is a result of external business credit products,materials, supplies, labor, etc. to purchase or receive services units to receive the funds. Enterprises can sell two basic forms, namely, credit method is way off. Cash sales approach is themost expected a sales settlement. However, in the fierce market economy, totally dependent on marketing approach is often unrealistic. Under the credit method, the enterprise in sales of products, can be provided to the buyer within a certain period of time free use of money the business of credit funds in an amount equal to the price of goods, which for the purchaser in terms of great attractive. For the enterprise is an important promotional tool, the enterprise product sales are sluggish, the market decline, the case of weak competition, or in enterprise sales of new products, new markets, in order to meet the needs of market competition and adopting various effective the credit method, it is wise for businesses. In the current market economic conditions, increased competition, with the continuous development of commercial credit, business credit sales of products means more favor. However, a large number of accounts receivable resulting in sales revenue growth can only book profits to the enterprise, can not bring business to maintain and expand the scale of production necessary for cash flow, and with the continued increase in the amount of accounts receivable, growing an average of aging, accounts receivable aging structure tends to deteriorate, may be more and more bad debt losses, to the huge enterprise production and management of potential risks. Therefore, how to effectively enhance the control and management of accounts receivable is a enterprises financial imperative.First, the business performance of accounts receivable riskAccounts receivable is an enterprise in the normal course of business, from selling goods, products or services or receive services to purchase units of a unit charge or debit the accounts of the transport fees. It is the business generated by the short-term credit product claims to offer the enterprise a commercial credit. Accounts receivable in an expanding market, increase sales revenue while also forming a receivables risk, mainly reflected in:1, accounts receivable possession of large amounts of liquidity, adding to the difficulties of shortage of working capital business. Enterprise credit products, issue stock, but can not recover the money, and enterprise customers on overdue payments can not take appropriate measures, resulting in a large number of corporate working capital was occupied by the long run will affect the flow of liquidity to enable enterprises to monetary shortage of funds, which affect the normal cost and normal production operations.2, exaggerated accounts receivable business results, so that the existence of hidden losses or loss of business. At present, revenue is recognized when the company followed the principle of accrual accounting, the accounting treatment for the occurrence of credit, debit "accounts receivable" account, credited "business income" subject to credit all revenue credited to current income, , the increase in corporate profits and the current period can not be achieved, said the cash income. According to the precautionary principle, the actual situation of enterprises according to their own accounts receivable Provision for bad debts, but in practice, in order to facilitate tax, the tax laws, administrative regulations expressly provides that the proportion of the general provision of 0.3% to 0.5%. If there is a lot of business accounts receivable, there is increased likelihood of bad debts, bad debts that actual extraction of the bad debts far exceeded. This is equal to exaggerate the company's operating results, andthe losses that may occur can not be fully estimated.3, accounts receivable increased by the loss of corporate cash flow. From handling the accounts of credit can be seen that although the company had a credit more revenue, increase profits, but did not make the cash inflow, but the company had to advance funds to pay various taxes and payment of costs and accelerate the enterprise's cash outflows.4, accounts receivable increased the opportunity cost of corporate capital losses. First of all, occupied by accounts receivable financing, which calls for accelerated turnover in the business, be rewarded, but because there are a lot of accounts receivable, in particular, the proportion of overdue accounts receivable on the rise (at present, China's late accounts receivable accounts receivable as high as 60%, while the Western countries, less than 10%), resulting in accounts receivable on the occupied capital lost its time value. Second, because the accounts receivable arising in the collection process, forcing the enterprises have to invest a lot of manpower, material and financial resources, and increased collection costs; the same time, because a lot of money by settling, the borrower time to be extended, increased interest expense. A variety of cost increase, making funds lost profit opportunities and increase the opportunity cost of capital.Third, how to control the risk of accounts receivable1, credit risk prevention policyWith the further development of China's market economy and increasing business competition, commercial credit receivables of the objective to be a competitive necessity of issuing commercial credit companies that do not attract customers to lose the competitiveness of the credit offers; course, the payment of business inevitably bring credit offers credit risk and credit policies on the manage receivables plays an important role. Credit policies include the following:(1) Credit standards. Credit standards are the company to provide commercial credit made the minimum requirements for the development of credit standards is the key to consider the customer to delay payment or refuse to pay money to bring the possibility of loss to the company size. To this end, companies need credit to customers for regular inspection and assessment of the quality of analysis on the credit quality of the testing and evaluation standards, there are three commonly used methods.First, 5C system evaluation. The system is to assess the important factor in customer credit quality, the following five aspects.①Quality: Quality is the customers and reputation, that is, the possibility of obligation, this factor is critical, it is a moral credit of the subjective factor, which is required to have the management of corporate credit experience, the right to judge and keen insight.②capacity: Capacity is the customers ability to pay when the credit expires, it is according to customer financial information, especially under the regular income and expenditure data be analyzed to determine their ability to pay the purchase price.③Capital: capital refers to the customer's financial strength and financial status, indicating that the background of the customer may pay the debt, usually reflect thefinancial position of the ratio of customers include: debt ratio, current ratio, earnings coverage ratio, fixed charges coverage ratio.④collateral: collateral or credit status on the bottom line I do not know the customer and requires a disputed credit guarantee of a variety of assets.⑤economic environment: mainly refers to the economic environment can affect the ability of customers to fulfill financial responsibility of economic development trends, it is beyond the control of the customer. Corporate credit managers in considering this factor, the analysis should focus on regional economic conditions and business products related to the development of industry-specific.Second, the credit analysis. According to customer's credit information, credit screening of several major factors, the number of statistical methods used for processing classified and quantified to calculate the weights, assessment of credit quality, enterprise credit management section based on credit scores to determine the weighted credit rating .Third, credit risk model method. According to the customer's financial business risk and receivables management company's own risk to determine credit risk, the use of the principle of mathematical statistics to establish a credit risk model, which ARC (credit risk) = PR risk customers can not pay the creditors × MR (accounts receivable risk management), MR (accounts receivable risk management) is the company's own accounts receivable management system, measures methods, control and supervision, the quality of personnel and other internal factors, can affect the risk of a few accounts receivable management major factors in assessing the scores of each factor and the weights, the weighted scores obtained MR values; Similarly, PR value is the major risk factors based on ratios of financial position (cash ratio, inventory turnover, quick ratio, etc.) to assess the score of each factor, calculated using the principle of mathematical statistics weight each factor, then the integrated value is calculated PR value. Several standard methods of the above can apply for credit credit offer credit quality of customers to predict, analyze, judge, to determine whether to grant credit offers.(2) credit terms. Corporate credit conditions is the need to pay money on credit conditions, including credit terms, discounts, terms and cash discounts. Credit period is the longest business requirements to the customer time to pay; discount period is required for customers to enjoy the time of payment cash discounts; cash discount to encourage customers in the period of early payment discounts given preferential treatment. Generally provide more favorable credit terms to increase sales, but it can also bring additional burdens, such as accounts receivable will increase the opportunity cost of bad debts, cash discounts and other costs, so companies must be carefully weighed. I think we can grasp the following principles: the principle of prudence, risk principle (the principle of loose-type), the principle of cooperation. Prudence two possibilities: First, companies in the market weakness, deteriorating economic environment, companies should make a negative decision management sales strategy, market risk should be taken to avoid the principle of prudence. Second, the customer, without the ability to pay low credit quality, and poor financial situation, or do not understand the ins and outs and the dispute by the credit quality to theprecautionary principle of justice.The principle of risk can be divided into two situations: First, companies in the economic recovery increased, the product in the industry or the District of merchantability good, corporate decision-making authorities should take active sales policy. Second, the customer, the credit quality is high, financial condition, ability to pay, credit managers should be taken when issuing credit risk principles.The principle of cooperation: For SMEs, the capital less strength is poor, the general financial situation, ability to resist market risk is small, it should be taken in the aggregate principle.2, accounts receivable, risk prevention intervalSince the formation of the company credit accounts receivable, the sales and billing between the two acts of a settlement time, the interval. Interval of the recovered funds back in time to enable enterprises to have more liquidity to carry out production and service activities, and actively take the initiative to debt collection units or individuals. Bad debt losses will be reduced to a minimum, strengthen the recognition that not justify the amount of time being to let the other know and recognize the debt, in practice, can be sent to the business or personal debts confirmation or destroy a single paragraph, so that Check the arrears owed the content of individual units or signature confirmation mail, so that companies understand the availability of debt, repayment intentions each other, urging each other timely repayment, but also easy to check the authenticity of accounts receivables.For the other debts but delays longer recognized or return the book debts owed to strengthen preventive work is to understand the delay in repayment, arrears mail confirmation is not the reason to visit the other units in the field, to identify the existence of the other units or individuals, whether deliberately delayed payments, if unable to pay the debt, is facing bankruptcy, whether the cases escaping with money, etc., will cause a timely manner to the departments concerned to jointly study measures, do everything possible to receivables, reduce bad debts, bad loss account, but also to prevent blindness in future credit. If the payment has been made to identify the other party, shall immediately identify the whereabouts of, would have been diverted, whether the corruption of the unit personnel, wrong billing, etc., to ensure timely detection of errors were corrected.Even for the reputation, business or reputation has always been very high against individuals should not be relaxed, because "the portal does not close tightly, sages from the Pirates of the Heart", the unit if not often to learn about, mission, and it will part of the business or reputation of high prestige individual to ill-gotten gains, regardless of honor towards the idea of development, trust, reputation has been misused, to the unit causing serious economic losses.3, the daily management of accounts receivable risk prevention(1) enterprises in order to accelerate the turnover rate of accounts receivable, factoring risk reduction, you must do the following basic work. We must first place the accounts receivable should be registered in time, the household accounts receivable detailing the time, amount, reason, and the billing period to recover the situation and so on, and collect credit information about customers, such as access to Customerrecent balance sheet and income statement and other statements, analyze liquidity, ability to pay and the rate of business performance; second request to the customer's bank credit certificate of the client to understand the customer's deposit balance, loan conditions and settlement status; the last customer-related exchange of other suppliers of credit information companies to understand the timely payment of the customer and so on. These measures, analysis of customer's credit status in order to detect and propose a solution.(2) To strengthen management and total management of a single customer. (1) make the basis of records, level of understanding of customer payments in a timely manner.(2) Check whether the customers break through credit. (3) grasp the customer's debt credit period has expired, customers have been closely monitoring the dynamic changes in debt maturity. (4) analysis of accounts receivable turnover and average billing period, to see whether at the normal level of liquidity. (5) to strengthen aging analysis of accounts receivable. Aging analysis of accounts receivable accounts receivable ledger should be based on the setting business case may be, the general ledger accounts receivable business sales region and sales by the household setting. (3) to strengthen the management of accounts receivable ledger. Screening of the accounts receivable ledger, aging analysis to determine which needs and which does not require, or purchase a unit occurs only a few pen and the amount outstanding, as a result of product quality, dispute, or disputes resulting from breach of contract Such accounts receivable should be shown separately case by case basis and specify the reasons put forward to resolve issues.4, accounting, risk prevention(1) Select the correct extractionChina's current accounting system to prepare low corporate law provides that only accounted for bad debts, this is an accounts receivable effective risk prevention measures. 2006 "Enterprise Accounting Standards" provides enterprises the ratio of provision for bad debts 0.3% -0.5%, specifically determined by the enterprises themselves, so that different companies to solve practical problems opened up a new way. The company shall state the specific circumstances under the scope of provision for bad debts, extraction method, the division of aging and extraction ratio, in accordance with administrative privileges, general meeting of shareholders or managers (the director) or similar approval, and in accordance with the laws and administrative regulations report to the relevant provisions of the parties to the record, the extraction method for bad debts has been determined shall not be changed, you need to change, based upon the above procedures, and report to the parties approved the record, and be stated in the accounting statements.(2) Select the correct method of settlement. The right of settlement to reduce the risk of accounts receivable is also very important. Settlement between the Bank of China's enterprises are mainly the following: check settlement, foreign exchange settlement, commission collection settlement, settlement and other bank draft, corporate customers operating according to ability, capacity to repay and credit status, select the appropriate settlement of strong profitability and solvency, credit risk of large customers to choose a good way, this will help the two sides establish a relationship ofmutual trust, expand the sales network and improve competitiveness.5, accounts receivable factoring risk preventionIf the enterprise is the work done against accounts receivable in the former, and effective, will be able to grasp the size of the risk of accounts receivable, then the problem will be greatly reduced workload. But a business in the ordinary course of business can be without accounts receivable, and its purpose is simply to do preventive work is to control the line of credit and change the overall aging structure, increasing the recoverability of the existing accounts receivable. Therefore, enterprises must conduct research into prevention of accounts receivable, to establish their own processing methods and principles.First, the analysis of total receivables. Look at the accounts receivable balance is reasonable, whether the enterprise's production and management has become a burden, whether the compression of the needs and possibilities, what basis. Based on the analysis in the total amount, further the balance of accounts receivable aging analysis carried out by detailed subjects. Accounts receivable aging analysis is the quality and value of the total re-evaluation is to determine the recoverability of the account balance and determine what measures to use to resolve basis. Aging in general the smaller the longer the greater the risk the possibility of recovery.Second is to determine the collection process. According to aging analysis to determine needs and special circumstances of the customer billing, the normal billing procedures: submit a letter - Telephone collection - send people to interview - legal action. First, analysis of the causes of default, such as customer due to poor management, inability to pay, the should be further analysis is temporary or has reached bankruptcy. The reason for the temporary relaxation of the repayment period should be appropriate to help clients through difficult times. This is more compatible with the aging short, good reputation, part of the customer accounts receivable. But should also seek to extend the normal part of the total share. In order to recover more money, but the two sides can establish good business relationship.For the already bankrupt state, can not be revitalized, it should be in a timely manner to the court to be liquidated in bankruptcy pay off some debt.Third, the customer has repayment ability, but refuses to pay, the enterprises should adopt appropriate methods of debt collection. Consultation method: with the debt repayment customers, deadlines, payment methods and friendly consultations. 1, the probation law: clarifying the position of creditors or debt collection proud of the hard to move the debtor, moved their compassion. 2, the carrot and stick method: two people with debt collection, hard unwilling to compromise, soft in the stone, complement each other. Make payment by debtors. $ Fatigue War and attempting to rally: the main leaders of business debt pegged to fight a protracted war, it will collapse. Or language stimulation, so as to save face and dignity and had to pay. 3, the storm Law: explicitly tell the debtor to its proceedings. For repayment in any case fail to reach an agreement negotiations have had a lawyer to take legal action.Before taking legal action against the principle of cost-effectiveness should be considered, do not face prosecution following conditions: 1, court costs exceed the amount of the debt claim; 2, the customer value of the collateral can not write off debt,it has a wide range of social relations, prosecution may be hurt the business operation or cause damage, even if successful, the possibility of recovery of receivables is extremely limited.In short, the establishment of sound policies and effective debt collection, collection costs and to reduce the trade-off between bad debt, effective debt collection policies to a large extent by the experience of the management staff, the enterprise should have a professional knowledge is solid, experienced, responsible and accounts receivable management team can do a better job to Collection.本文摘自《黑龙江科技信息》2010年第4期，作者：孙丽译文：论企业应收账款风险的控制摘要：应收账款是企业采用赊销方式销售商品或劳务而应向顾客收取的款项，应收账款管理直接影响企业营运资金的周转和经济效益文章指出，企业要结合自身的实际情况，建立应收账款的风险防范机制，从源头控制，防患于未然企业的应收账款不仅面临着回收的风险，同时其存在也会给企业带来经营风险，从企业应收账款管理的现状入手，分析企业应收账款管理中面临的问题。
企业风险管理【外文翻译】
本科毕业论文外文翻译译文标题：企业风险管理资料来源:风险管理杂志作者：斯蒂芬．P．达西从20世纪70年代开始，财务风险开始成为公司一项重要的不确定的资源，此后不久，处理财务风险的工具被开发出来。
这些新的工具允许财务风险被一种相似的方式管理，而这种不参杂风险的管理方式已经维持了数十年。
1972年，世界上主要的发达国家结束了一直让汇率保持稳定数十年的布雷顿森林体系协定。
布雷顿森林体系的解体引起了汇率的不稳定。
由于外汇汇率的变化，从事国际贸易的公司的资产负债表和经营业绩开始波动。
这种不稳定性影响了许多公司的表现。
同时在20世纪70年代，石油输出国组织（欧佩克）组织开发的协议要求降低生产提高产品价格，使得石油价格开始上涨。
后来，在这十年中，美联储将重点放在打击通货膨胀上（石油价格上涨的结果），而不是稳定利率，结果导致其迅速上涨，并加剧了美国的利率波动。
因此，外汇汇率、价格和利率的变动引起的财务风险成为一个主要的关注重心。
虽然财务风险主要关心的问题已经在20世纪80年代形成一个机构体系，但是并没有在这一方面开始运用标准的风险管理工具和技术，导致失败的原因是人为的将风险分类为纯粹风险和投机风险。
由于固定资产的收益，外币计价的投资和经营成果都会受到通货膨胀或者外汇汇率的影响，使得风险增加，这就是所谓的投机风险。
风险管理者在他们所经营的领域，形成一个其专业特有的风险领域，称之为纯粹风险。
当出现一个新的风险领域，并没有将其扩大吸收进他们的领域。
这样做，需要将学习财务工具知识和远离风险的费用由保险公司负责并支付。
这已经是个大胆的行动，但一个创新的思想家会支持发展风险管理。
这次失败对于风险管理领域组织来说是昂贵的。
随着企业风险管理的出现，传统的风险管理人员将被推到一个更为广泛的结合了财务风险管理和其他形式的风险分析的舞台。
因此，拒绝扩大财务风险并不能阻止风险管理者了解财务风险管理，它只是推迟了几十年。
以后，期货及其基于非财务资产交易之前的很长一段时间适应处理他们的财务风险。
企业风险管理外文文献翻译译文5000字
文献出处：Bedard J C, Hoitash R, et al. The development of the enterprise risk management theory [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2014, 30(4): 64-95.原文The development of the enterprise risk management theoryBedard J C, Hoitash RAbstractEnterprise risk management as an important field of risk management disciplines, in more than 50 years of development process of the implementation of dispersing from multiple areas of research to the integration of comprehensive risk management framework evolution, the theory of risk management and internal audit and control theory are two major theoretical sources of risk management theory has experienced from the traditional risk management, financial volatility to the development of the enterprise risk management, risk management and internal audit and control theory went through the internal accounting control and internal control integrated framework to the evolution of enterprise risk management, the development of the theory of the above two points to the direction of the enterprise risk management, finally realizes the integration development, enterprise risk management theory to become an important part of enterprise management is indispensable.Keywords: enterprise risk management, internal audit the internal control1 The first theory source, evolution of the theory of risk management"Risk management" as a kind of operation and management idea, has a long history: thousands of years ago in the west have "don't put all eggs in one basket" the proverb, the ancient Chinese famous "product valley hunger" allusions and "yicang (" system," boat was "organization have a prototype of the modern risk managementthought, and points under escort ship transportation, yuen, is effective way to spread risk, transfer risk .In the modern sense of risk management thought appeared in the first half of the 20th century, such as fayol's safe production ideas, Marshall's "risk sharing management" point of view, etc.;But risk management as a discipline system development is started in the middle of the 20th century: in 1950, gallagher in the risk management: a new stage of cost control in the paper, puts forward the concept of risk management; Johnso (1952) mentioned the problems how to deal with risks and uncertainties in farm management, which involves early enterprise (farms) of risk management problem.The emergence of risk management as a discipline real Mehr and Hedges of the enterprise risk management (1963) and C.A.Williams and Richard m. Heins "risk management and insurance" (1964) published marked. Williams and Heins thinks, "risk management is based on the risk identification, measurement and control to the smallest cost risk caused by the loss to the lowest level of management methods", risk management is not just a technology, a method, a kind of management process, and is a new and scientific management.The development of the theory of risk management.1.1The first stage: the 70 s and 1950 sTheoretical tendency mainly is the pure risk prevention and management of enterprise (adverse risk);Take the main strategy of enterprise risk management is risk avoidance and risk transfer, insurance becomes the main risk management tools. Fire events of general motors and the United States steel industry the workers went on strike to enterprise's normal operation caused serious impact and losses, become an important opportunity to promote the development of enterprise risk management theory. This phase the first important area of risk management theory, is the risk management object definition and research. Since the 20th century, scholars have been the object of risk management divided into two major categories of pure risk and speculative risk, and the pure risks as the object of risk management and the target (Denenberg, 1966; Gahin, 1967).In fact, the risk can be divided into pure risk and speculative risk is a kind of method based on the responsibility, is targeted at loss, isnot aimed at risk, so it can be divided into pure risk and speculative risk, but not as good as it can be divided into pure loss and speculative loss, because it can reflect the true respect of the risk manager more loss problem.Is the second important areas, to the enterprise decision-making and of behavior, and insurance in response to the important role of enterprise risk and universality of the study. Greene (1955) orientation is insurance buyers of risk management. A paper published in 1955, the management review "to the risk of a kind of management method", think of insurance as the most important means of enterprise risk management should be attention by the enterprise management and the shareholders, think insurance is a business spending the most valuable part of all kinds of costs. Denenberg etc. (1966) also emphasizes the insurance at this stage the important role of risk management, points out the important responsibility of the risk manager is to determine the appropriate insurance policy for the enterprise and insurance products, that will be the risk manager's name changed to "insurance and risk managers". Snider (1956), McCahill, Jr. (1971) stressed that risk management in the enterprise organization structure not only has a certain status, report to top management work, and want to maintain good communication and coordination with the finance department.A third important area is, the risk management theory into the analysis framework of mainstream economics and management.On the one hand, by the wind management theory combined with the traditional enterprise theory, the risk management of the decision-making process and the integration of enterprise's overall ing the capital asset pricing model, the decision rule of enterprise in the optimal retention ratio, cumulative franchise policy selection and choice of reserves, etc., makes the risk management theory into the financial market;And the use of marginal analysis tool to determine the optimal strategy of risk management, then further forming marks in risk management theory, and become an important area of finance (Cummins, 1976)., on the other hand, William g. Scott complex type combined with risk management organization system, through to the enterprise basic system and branch offices neat, will be the overall goal and the risk of the enterprisemanager daily target organic unification, then to the appraisal of the branch to contribution to the enterprise overall risk identification and measurement, and consider the relationship between them and the relationship between the dynamic characteristics, so as to provide theoretical sources for the development of risk management (Close,1974).1.2The second stage, the late 1970 s to the end of the 20th centuryRisk management object is mainly the business and financial results of volatility, risk management tools on the basis of insurance also achieved great development, new derivatives and alternative risk transfer (ART) play an important role.In the 1970 s, the collapse of the bretton woods system of exchange rate volatility significantly increased, oil price rising sharply, the production cost of enterprise is difficult to control;After entering the 80 s, high inflation and interest rate volatility and number of money and credit crisis makes the enterprise the management face greater uncertainty.Tool of a large number of applications in convenient enterprise risk management at the same time, also because of its characteristics of leveraged to amplify the damage due to improper use strategy of so the use of derivatives and the management strategy becomes very important.Therefore, the enterprise risk management and derivatives trading, hedge strategy should pay close attention to the competitor (Froot etc., 1994).And (2001) study found that such as Cummins, although the measurement of the risk and the liquidity as well as the decision-making has a positive connection of the underwriter, but for those who use derivatives to hedge risk, the risk index was has negative relationship with the width and depth of the hedge.1.3The third stage, since the 21st centuryAfter entering the 21st century, with the speeding up of the global economic integration, companies, increasing the risk for the influence of various risks and potential consequences will magnify, together with the complexity of the financial derivatives trading and frequency are increased rapidly, to the continuous operation of the enterprise put forward the serious challenge, the enterprise must break through thetraditional pattern of risk management, from a more comprehensive, integrated view of risk analysis and management, as a result, the comprehensive risk management stage of the development of risk management.The emergence of comprehensive risk management and application of risk management for the enterprise provides new methods and tools, its application field is very broad, from enterprises, non-profit organizations to the government are gradually introduced the analysis framework.2 Second theory sourceInternal audit and the development of control theory in the process of the evolution of enterprise risk management theory, theory of the second source is the evolution and development of internal audit and control theory.From the literature in internal audit and control of the internal accounting control, internal control integrated framework, enterprise risk management process of the overall framework, including the COSO has played a leading role, in particular, it issued two symbolic file "enterprise internal control, the overall framework" and "enterprise risk management - integrated framework".The separation of corporate ownership and control is the ultimate cause of internal audit and the emergence of a control theory, and the expansion of enterprise scale and the structure of the branch in shortage problem caused by the lack of management and control is to encourage enterprises to strengthen internal audit and control of direct motivation.2.1Internal accounting controlInternal accounting control is the first stage in the development of internal control theory.Grady (1957) pointed out that the internal accounting control is a comprehensive coordination of the organization plan and business process system, used to prevent unexpected or wrong operation to bring the asset losses, examination management decision used in accuracy and objectivity of accounting data, promote operational efficiency and encourage compliance with established policies, etc.In practice, accounting and audit personnel played a dominant role in the internalaccounting control, audit became the earliest forms of internal control, therefore, the internal control is in deepening and audit activities based on the theory of audit.But with the increase of the enterprise management activity, pure audit already cannot satisfy the needs of the enterprises, the internal control arises at the historic moment, the audit has become a part of the internal control (Haun, 1955).The internal audit activity is one of the important conditions, implement control and management of enterprises is a key component part of the internal control, is the eye of the "supervision" top management.For the internal control evaluation, the audit is the most important tools and stakeholders;At the same time, the audit data for the evaluation of internal control provides conditions, through a review of the audit data, can be a preliminary judgment of enterprise internal control system and in need of improvement, which provide ideas for the perfection of the internal control (Garbade, 1944; Mautz etc., 1966; Smith, 1972).2.2 The internal control framework as a wholeIn 1992, the COSO issued "enterprise internal control, the overall framework, system construction of the enterprise internal control system for the first time. The COSO framework of internal control, is more based on the perspective of independent accountants and auditors, puts forward the concept of enterprise internal control, think the overall internal control framework is mainly composed of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, supervision, the five elements, thus the concept of internal control to completely break through the limitation of the audit, the category of management control comprehensive development to the enterprise.COCO, Canada in 1995, the report put forward higher request to the external auditor for the enterprise internal control to join the external factors. International institute of internal auditors in 1996 published "concept and responsibility:" report, think that should be pay more attention to the contribution and role of internal audit in the organization. The risk management of card of German report, ham pell, as well as comprehensive criteria guide turn bull report is the most famous and arguably Britainthree milestones in the internal control research, especially in 1992, DE Burleigh report on internal control, the relationship between the quality of financial reporting and corporate governance as the prerequisite, attaches great importance to the significance of independent audit committee on the internal control.2.3 The enterprise risk management framework as a wholeIn 2004, the COSO committee report in 2004, on the basis of combining the requirements of the sarbanes - oakes act, formally issued "enterprise risk management - integrated framework". The analysis framework will be within the scope of the internal control in enterprise risk management, formed a broader meaning of the internal risk management framework. Therefore, the development of the theory of internal audit and control the final point to the enterprise comprehensive risk management. Reviews the development of internal audit and control, it can be seen that the theory of evolution has experienced the process of "plane, three-dimensional, three-dimensional" : in the stage of internal accounting control, control environment, control activities, and accounting system in the plane of the three elements constitute a control system;In the overall framework of internal control, the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring, five elements, evolved into a three-dimensional control system;In the overall enterprise risk management framework stage, the internal environment, goal setting, item identification, risk assessment, risk response, control activities, information and communication, monitoring, eight elements, makes the enterprise risk management, a solid control system3The development of the enterprise risk management theoryAfter entering the 21st century, the academic study of enterprise risk management, mainly focus on the following: the connotation of enterprise risk management and the target, achieve the goal of enterprise risk management mechanism, the implementation of enterprise risk management motivation as well asthe factors of the enterprise risk management.3.1 the connotation of enterprise risk managementKent d. Miller (1992) the source of the uncertainty problem of enterprise internationalization operation and performance are analyzed, and puts forward the thinking of integrated risk management, for the first time in academia the concept of integrated risk management is studied in detail. Later, scholars gradually with the definition of enterprise risk management refers to those using the method of comprehensive, integrated processing enterprise faces the risk of problems. Skipper (1994), Lisa Meulbroek (2002), enterprise risk management involves not only the profit loss without possibility, also focus on the possibility of benefits and risks. The COSO committee (2004) published an authoritative definition of enterprise risk management.3.2 Enterprise risk management goalsFor the goal of enterprise risk management, the academia mainly has a single teleology and multiple teleology two factions. The single core view of skopos theory is that the goal of enterprise risk management is to maximize the value of the shareholders of a company. Neal Enriquez (2001) pointed out that the main purpose of the enterprise risk management is in order to save a lot of trivial claims costs, facilitate enterprise of risk control, raise the value of the company. Multiple teleology of argument is that the purpose of the enterprise risk management is to achieve multiple goals in the development of enterprises. James Lam (2003), detailing the purpose of overall corporate risk management, including lower earnings volatility, to maximize the value of the shareholders of a company, and to promote professional and financial security, etc.; The COSO committee (2004) proposed the strategic target and business objectives, reporting, and compliance goals four goals.3.3The mechanism of the enterprise risk management, improve enterprise valueThe mechanism of enterprise risk management, improve enterprise value ismainly done through three ways: (1) the optimization of enterprise capital allocation. Enterprise risk management framework of capital structure management, can improve the return on equity and improve the corporate governance structure, which affects the value of the enterprise (Peter Tufano, 1996).(2) improve enterprise strategic decision level. Enterprise risk management will be integrated into the overall strategy of the enterprise risk management, covering the entire process and the development of the enterprise business, can make enterprises seize the opportunity and enhance competition ability, thus improve the performance of the company. Enterprise risk management can reduce the cost of enterprise was in financial trouble, reduce the probability of bankruptcy, reduce the influence of traditional liabilities to the company value (NeilDoherty, 2005).(3) to strengthen the management of incentive, in turn, improve the level of performance. If it can be through effective risk management measures to control the fluctuation of stock price, makes the sensitivity of management compensation to company performance is positive, so that it can solve the agency problem in corporate governance, so as to make the management efficiency and to enhance the value of the company (Aggarwal, 1999).3.4 The enterprise risk management: an empirical study of relationship between the value of the companyEnterprise risk management on earth has much impact on the promotion of enterprise value, simple qualitative analysis is difficult to get the exact conclusion. To do this through a variety of academic empirical method to research: (1) the overall level of study from the enterprise, the enterprise risk management of the company, its universality of the increase of the value of the company has a large (Cyree etc., 2004; Hoyt, etc., 2008);(2) from the specific business level, using tobin Q as substitution variables of enterprise value, found that use derivatives to hedge risk, the enterprise value of a positive growth trend (Allayannis etc., 2001; Bartram, etc., 2004; Nain, 2004; Kim, 2004);Karen berger (2007), ABB company as an example to analyze the risk communication to establish credibility and maintain the significance of the value of the company.4Summary and outlookCan clearly see through the above analysis, the theory of risk management and internal audit and control theory of the cross and integrated, makes the enterprise risk management in a more integrated and comprehensive perspective and method to deal with the risks of enterprise developing, to ensure the healthy and sustainable development of the enterprise. But in 2007 the outbreak of the subprime crisis, to the enterprise risk management to improve and perfect puts forward a new proposition: how to implement effective risk management to respondA new challenge? Have the following questions need to be further studied and discussed:4.1. The COSO - application problems of enterprise risk management framework.At present the framework is the core of enterprise risk management standards, but more from the perspective of process management is the framework to deal with the risk of enterprise, to real-time risk management is not enough attention, especially not fully consider the enterprise's solvency problems, in fact, enterprise bankruptcy is often insufficient solvency direct consequences. Therefore, the enterprise is the lack of risk management: in the analysis of enterprise risk management framework, how to pay attention to the solvency of enterprises and set up effective feasible evaluation index.4.2. The use of financial derivatives and structured finance instruments.Subprime mortgage crisis, the AIG, citigroup and other large financial institutions are far as companies used as risk reserve capital will not be able to meet the needs of the huge amount of structured products trading, high leverage multiples bring unexpected losses. Therefore, how to correctly treat and deal with problem of structured finance instruments, is the enterprise risk management cannot be ignored.4.3. The problem of corporate social responsibility and reputation.As from the simple to the requirement of enterprise profit extends to socialresponsibility and reputation, brand, and other fields, enterprise risk management must also be followed by development and extension, to include external stakeholders requirements in enterprise risk management framework, in a more broad perspective to the comprehensive risk management. Therefore, how an enterprise bear the social responsibility through sustainable risk management, realize the harmony of economic interests and social interests, is the future of enterprise risk management an important problem to be reckoned with.译文企业风险管理理论的发展贝达德；霍塔什摘要企业风险管理作为风险管理学科的一个重要领域，在50 多年的发展过程中实现了从多个领域的分散研究向全面风险管理一体化框架的演进，其中风险管理理论和内部审计与控制理论是两大理论来源，风险管理理论经历了从传统风险管理、财务波动性风险管理向企业风险管理的发展，而内部审计与控制理论也经历了内部会计控制、内部控制整体框架向企业风险管理的演进，上述两大理论的发展都指向了企业风险管理的方向，企业风险管理理论最终实现了集成发展，成为企业管理不可或缺的重要组成部分。
中英文对照外文文献 计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文文献计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献导读：就爱阅读网友为您分享以下“计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献”资讯，希望对您有所帮助，感谢您对的支持!计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文：Schedule Risk ManagementINTRODUCTIONSchedule risks are both threats and opportunities to the success of a project. Threats tend to reduce the success ofmeeting the project goals and opportunities tend to increase the success. Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, qualifying and quantifying the risks, and developing a plan to deal with them. This is routinely done during baseline schedule development as well as during schedule updates. Implementation of risk. .1计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献management starts with early planning in both budgetary cost estimating and preliminary master scheduling in order to determine budgets and schedules with a comfortable level of confidence in the completion date and final cost.While there are entire volumes addressing risk in construction projects, it is important to note that the issue of time-related risk has not been universally incorporated into planning. Assessing cost risk is more intuitive, and very often addressed through the use of heuristics, so it has become more of a standard of the industry than time-related risk management. Most estimators will automatically add a contingency toa cost estimate to cover the risk of performance based on the type of project and circumstances pertaining to theundertaking of the project. Estimators estimate this contingency using their own rules of thumb developed over years of estimating as well as estimate ingmanuals，such as Means’Cost Data or Cost Works. However, when it comes todeveloping the critical path method (CPM) schedules, risk management is often overlooked or underestimated.The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of risk management and the assessment process as well as best practices for incorporation of risk management into CPM schedule development and maintenance. For more detailed information about schedule risk, the reader should refer to risk management books, particularly those that focus on project management. One of the best resources available is David Hulett’s new book, Practical Schedule. .2计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献Risk Analysis.Any risk management program starts with a good and accurate CPM schedule, created through the use of best practices and checked for quality, reasonableness, and appropriateness of the network model. Without awell-designed and developed CPM baseline schedule, a risk management process will not be effective. The risk analysis depends upon accurate and consistent calculations of the network logic, the appropriateness of the sequencing and phasing, and a reasonable approach to estimating activity durations.Most CPM schedules are not adjusted for risk but rather are developed as if there were one right answer for the schedule’s numerical data. Generally, activity durations are established by calculation of the quantity of work represented by an activity divided by the production rate, or by sheer ‘‘gut feeling’’of the project manager or crew leader. This production rate is normally established by the contractor’s historical records or an estimating system, such as Means’, that provides an accurate data base of average production rates. Once those durations are calculated, they are often used as deterministic values, which assumes that the durations are accurate and unlikely to change. This assumption ignores the fact that the schedule is attempting to predict how long it will take to complete an activity at some unknown time in the future,using an unknown crew composition, with variableexperience, and working. .3计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献in unknown conditions. Risk management recognizes the uncertainty in duration estimating and provides a system to brain storm other risks that may occur during the project. Probability distributions are the best way to model planned activity durations, as noted by Hulett ‘‘The best way to understand the activity durations that are included in the schedule is as probabilistic statements of possible durations rather than a deterministic statement about how long the future activity will take.’’DEFINITION OF RISK TERMSThe Project Management Institute (PMI) defines project risk in its Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) as ‘‘an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive or negative effect on at least one project objective, such as time, cost, scope, or quality. A risk may have one or more causes and, if it occurs, one or more impacts.’’PMBOK adds ‘‘Risk conditions could include aspects of the project’s or organization’s environment that may contribute to project risk, such as poor projectmanagement practices, or dependency on external participants who cannot be controlled.’’Risk Management: A process designed to examine uncertainties occurring during project delivery and to implement actions dealing with those uncertainties in order to achieve project objectives The definition of risk management in PMBOK, 4th Edition, is: ‘‘systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and responding to project risk.’’. .4计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献Risk definition by AACEi Cost Engineering Terminology7 is: ‘‘the degree of dispersion or variability around the expected or ‘best’value, which is estimated to exist for the economic variable in question, e.g., a quantitative measure of the upper and lower limits which are considered reasonable for the factor being estimated.’’Time Contingency: An amount of time added to the base estimated duration to allow for unknown impacts to the project schedule, or to achieve a certain level of confidence in the estimated duration.Probability: A measure of the likelihood of occurrence of anevent.Risk register: A checklist of potential risks developed during the risk identification phase of risk management.Risk allocation: A determination of how to respond to risks, which can include shifting risk, avoiding risks, preventing or eliminating risks, and incorporating risks into the schedule. Deterministic: A calculated approach to estimating single activity duration using work quantity divided by estimated production rate.Probabilistic: The determination of risk likelihood and consequences to establish duration ranges or risk-adjusted durations that can be used in a schedule in recognition that there are no certainties in estimating future durations. Monte Carlo analysis: A probabilistic approach to determining confidence levels of completion dates for a project schedule by calculating durations as. .5计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献probability distributions.Probability distribution: The spread of durations in a statistically significant population that is used for the range of durations in probabilistic scheduling approaches.Confidence level: A measure of the statistical reliability of the prediction of project completion.What-if scenario: A modeling of a risk for use in a CPM schedule in order to predict the ramifications of an identified risk.Qualitative analysis: Occurring on the project, as well as assessing the severity of that risk should it occur and prioritizing the resultant list of risks.Quantitative analysis: The assigning of a probability to the qualitative description of the risk, ranking the risks, and calculating the potential impact from both individual risks as well as the cumulative effect of all risks identified. Exculpatory clauses: Disclaimer verbiage that is designed to shift risk. TYPES OF RISK IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTSEverything that has ever gone wrong on a construction project is a potential risk on the next project. Many project managers instinctively develop a lessons-learned list of historical risks and take steps to minimize their exposure to those risks in the future.Risks vary by industry and even by construction project type as well as by personnel involved with the project. Aroadway or bridge project has a. .6计划风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献different group of risks than a facility or building, and the selected contractors may have different degrees of influence on the level of risks to performance. If an owner attempts to save money in preconstruction services by limiting the extent of field investigation or development of as-built data, there will be a higher risk of discovery of unknown problems. The experience and competence of the architects and engineers handling the design of the project, as well as their quality control indevelopment of working drawings, directly affect the construction effort and, consequently, the risk associated with the plans and specifications.Even if the owner has been proactive in preconstruction investigation, there is always a risk of unforeseen conditions. This can be a function of the type of soils encountered, the local municipality, and its culture and history of keeping good records of obsolete utilities. If the city in which the project is to be built has a history of requiring contractors to remove all abandoned underground lines, there is a muchlower risk of underground conflicts.The selection of the project team can impact positively or negatively the probability of successful project completion. Design-bid-build projects that use procurement philosophies allowing all financially capable contractors to participate will likely experience a much higher level of risk to on-time performance than a procurement philosophy that requires qualification of proposed contractors to ensure that they have the appropriate experience and resources to construct the project. A single weak subcontractor on a project。
企业成本控制外文文献翻译作业成本法2014年译文3300多字
企业成本控制外文文献翻译作业成本法2014年译文3300多字XXX high-XXX of cost control。
The article then presents several cost control strategies that can be used by high-tech enterprises。
including cost n。
cost avoidance。
and XXX of effective cost control in the success of high-tech enterprises.nHigh-XXX when it comes to cost control。
These challenges arise from the nature of the industry。
XXX change。
high levels of n。
and the need for XXX。
high-XXX maintaining high levels of quality and XXX.XXX StrategiesOne of the most common cost control strategies used by high-XXX。
Some of the areas where cost n can be achieved include manufacturing。
research and development。
and marketing and advertising.Cost XXXAnother cost control strategy used by high-tech XXX。
high-tech enterprises may avoid unnecessary costs by using open-source are instead of proprietary are。
企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字
企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字Financial risk is one of the major XXX It refers to the risk of financial loss caused by the XXX in the value of assets。
The main types of financial risk in mergers and ns include credit risk。
interest rate risk。
exchange rate risk。
and liquidity risk。
Credit risk refers to the risk of default by the borrower。
while interest rate risk refers to the risk of XXX。
Exchange rate risk is the risk of XXX。
and liquidity risk refers to the risk of XXX.XXX。
it is XXX before the n。
including analyzing the financial status of the target company。
XXX。
and assessing the potential impact of interest rate and exchange rate XXX。
it is XXX a sound financial management system and XXX.1.2 Asset riskAsset risk refers to the risk of losses caused by the decline in the value of assets or the XXX the expected value of assets。
企业可持续发展研究外文文献翻译2014年译文3000多字
企业可持续发展研究外文文献翻译2014年译文3000多字XXX essential for its sustained。
stable。
and healthy growth。
as well as for prolonging XXX。
it is vital for the development of the enterprise and the improvement of the natural environment。
leading to the n of social development。
This article XXX enterprises。
analyzes the XXX。
XXX.Key words: Enterprise XXX。
key factors。
countermeasures.n:Enterprises in the process of development must adhere toXXX will increase market share and guarantee profit growth。
At the same time。
it is XXX。
By using natural resources and energy in a reasonable way。
enterprises XXX increase profits and expand their scale。
This will XXX.Enterprise XXX。
it XXX。
It is essential to ensure the sustained use of natural resources and energy while also XXX。
and every enterprise must walk the path of XXX.The assurance of long-term economic benefits is possible only through XXX development。
企业管理中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)译文：公司治理与高管薪酬：一个应急框架总体概述通过整合组织和体制的理论，本文开发了一个高管薪酬的应急办法和它在不同的组织和体制环境下的影响。
高管薪酬的研究大都集中在委托代理框架上，并承担一种行政奖励和业绩成果之间的关系。
我们提出了一个框架，审查了其组织的背景和潜在的互补性方面的行政补偿和不同的公司治理在不同的企业和国家水平上体现的替代效应。
我们还讨论了执行不同补偿政策方法的影响，像“软法律”和“硬法律”。
在过去的20年里，世界上越来越多的公司从一个固定的薪酬结构转变为与业绩相联系的薪酬结构，包括很大一部分的股权激励。
因此，高管补偿的经济影响的研究已经成为公司治理内部激烈争论的一个话题。
正如Bruce，Buck，和Main指出，“近年来，关于高管报酬的文献的增长速度可以与高管报酬增长本身相匹敌。
”关于高管补偿的大多数实证文献主要集中在对美国和英国的公司部门，当分析高管薪酬的不同组成部分产生的组织结果的时候。
根据理论基础，早期的研究曾试图了解在代理理论方面的高管补偿和在不同形式的激励和公司业绩方面的探索链接。
这个文献假设，股东和经理人之间的委托代理关系被激发，公司将更有效率的运作，表现得更好。
公司治理的研究大多是基于通用模型——委托代理理论的概述，以及这一框架的核心前提是，股东和管理人员有不同的方法来了解公司的具体信息和广泛的利益分歧以及风险偏好。
因此，经理作为股东的代理人可以从事对自己有利的行为而损害股东财富的最大化。
大量的文献是基于这种直接的前提和建议来约束经理的机会主义行为，股东可以使用不同的公司治理机制，包括各种以股票为基础的奖励可以统一委托人和代理人的利益。
正如Jensen 和Murphy观察，“代理理论预测补偿政策将会以满足代理人的期望效用为主要目标。
股东的目标是使财富最大化；因此代理成本理论指出，总裁的薪酬政策将取决于股东财富的变化。
”影响积极组织结果的主要指标是付费业绩敏感性，但是这种“封闭系统”法主要是在英美的代理基础文献中找到，假定经理人激励与绩效之间存在普遍的联系，很少的关注在公司被嵌入的不同背景。
企业风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献
企业风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文：Risk ManagementThis chapter reviews and discusses the basic issues and principles of risk management, including: risk acceptability (tolerability); risk reduction and the ALARP principle; cautionary and precautionary principles. And presents a case study showing the importance of these issues and principles in a practical management context. Before we take a closer look, let us briefly address some basic features of risk management.The purpose of risk management is to ensure that adequate measures are taken to protect people, the environment, and assets from possible harmful consequences of the activities being undertaken, as well as to balance different concerns, in particular risks and costs. Risk management includes measures both to avoid the hazards and toreduce their potential harm. Traditionally, in industries such as nuclear, oil, and gas, risk management was based on a prescriptive regulating regime, in which detailed requirements were set with regard to the design and operation of the arrangements. This regime has gradually been replaced by a more goal-oriented regime, putting emphasis on what to achieve rather than on the means of achieving it.Risk management is an integral aspect of a goal-oriented regime. It is acknowledged that risk cannot be eliminated but must be managed. There is nowadays an enormous drive and enthusiasm in various industries and in society as a whole to implement risk management in organizations. There are high expectations that risk management is the proper framework through which to achieve high levels of performance.Risk management involves achieving an appropriate balance between realizing opportunities for gain and minimizing losses. It is an integral part of good management practice and an essential element of good corporate governance. It is an iterative process consisting of steps that, when undertaken in sequence, can lead to a continuous improvement in decision-making and facilitate a continuous improvement in performance.To support decision-making regarding design and operation, risk analyses are carried out. They include the identification of hazards and threats, cause analyses, consequence analyses, and risk descriptions. The results are then evaluated. The totality of the analyses and the evaluations are referred to as risk assessments. Risk assessment is followed by risk treatment, which is a process involving the development and implementation of measures to modify the risk, including measures designed to avoid, reduce (“optimize”), transfer, or retain the risk. Risk transfer means sharing with another party the benefit or loss associated with a risk. It is typically affected through insurance. Risk management covers all coordinated activities in the direction and control of an organization with regard to risk.In many enterprises, the risk management tasks are divided into three main categories: strategic risk, financial risk, and operational risk. Strategic risk includes aspects and factors that are important for the e nterprise’s long-term strategy and plans,for example mergers and acquisitions, technology, competition, political conditions, legislation and regulations, and labor market. Financial risk includes the enterprise’s financial situation, and includes: Market risk, associated with the costs of goods and services, foreign exchange rates and securities (shares, bonds, etc.). Credit risk, associated with a debtor’s failure to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms. Liquidity risk, reflecting lack of access to cash; the difficulty of selling an asset in a timely manner. Operational risk is related to conditions affecting the normal operating situation: Accidental events, including failures and defects, quality deviations, natural disasters. Intended acts; sabotage, disgruntled employees, etc. Loss of competence, key personnel. Legal circumstances, associated for instance, with defective contracts and liability insurance.For an enterprise to become successful in its implementation of risk management, top management needs to be involved, and activities must be put into effect on many levels. Some important points to ensure success are: the establishment of a strategy for risk management, i.e., the principles of how the enterprise defines and implements risk management. Should one simply follow the regulatory requirements (minimal requirements), or should one be the “best in the class”? The establishment of a risk management process for the enterprise, i.e. formal processes and routines that the enterprise is to follow. The establishment of management structures, with roles and responsibilities, such that the risk analysis process becomes integrated into the organization. The implementation of analyses and support systems, such as risk analysis tools, recording systems for occurrences of various types of events, etc. The communication, training, and development of a risk management culture, so that the competence, understanding, and motivation level within the organization is enhanced. Given the above fundamentals of risk management, the next step is to develop principles and a methodology that can be used in practical decision-making. This is not, however, straightforward. There are a number of challenges and here we address some of these: establishing an informative risk picture for the various decision alternatives, using this risk picture in a decision-making context. Establishing an informative risk picture means identifying appropriate risk indices and assessments ofuncertainties. Using the risk picture in a decision making context means the definition and application of risk acceptance criteria, cost benefit analyses and the ALARP principle, which states that risk should be reduced to a level which is as low as is reasonably practicable.It is common to define and describe risks in terms of probabilities and expected values. This has, however, been challenged, since the probabilities and expected values can camouflage uncertainties; the assigned probabilities are conditional on a number of assumptions and suppositions, and they depend on the background knowledge. Uncertainties are often hidden in this background knowledge, and restricting attention to the assigned probabilities can camouflage factors that could produce surprising outcomes. By jumping directly into probabilities, important uncertainty aspects are easily truncated, and potential surprises may be left unconsidered.Let us, as an example, consider the risks, seen through the eyes of a risk analyst in the 1970s, associated with future health problems for divers working on offshore petroleum projects. The analyst assigns a value to the probability that a diver would experience health problems (properly defined) during the coming 30 years due to the diving activities. Let us assume that a value of 1 % was assigned, a number based on the knowledge available at that time. There are no strong indications that the divers will experience health problems, but we know today that these probabilities led to poor predictions. Many divers have experienced severe health problems (Avon and Vine, 2007). By restricting risk to the probability assignments alone, important aspects of uncertainty and risk are hidden. There is a lack of understanding about the underlying phenomena, but the probability assignments alone are not able to fully describe this status.Several risk perspectives and definitions have been proposed in line with this realization. For example, Avon (2007a, 2008a) defines risk as the two-dimensional combination of events/consequences and associated uncertainties (will the events occur, what the consequences will be). A closely related perspective is suggested by Avon and Renan (2008a), who define risk associated with an activity as uncertaintyabout and severity of the consequences of the activity, where severity refers to intensity, size, extension, scope and other potential measures of magnitude with respect to something that humans value (lives, the environment, money, etc.). Losses and gains, expressed for example in monetary terms or as the number of fatalities, are ways of defining the severity of the consequences. See also Avon and Christensen (2005).In the case of large uncertainties, risk assessments can support decision-making, but other principles, measures, and instruments are also required, such as the cautionary/precautionary principles as well as robustness and resilience strategies. An informative decision basis is needed, but it should be far more nuanced than can be obtained by a probabilistic analysis alone. This has been stressed by many researchers, e.g. Apostolicism (1990) and Apostolicism and Lemon (2005): qualitative risk analysis (QRA) results are never the sole basis for decision-making. Safety- and security-related decision-making is risk-informed, not risk-based. This conclusion is not, however, justified merely by referring to the need for addressing uncertainties beyond probabilities and expected values. The main issue here is the fact that risks need to be balanced with other concerns.When various solutions and measures are to be compared and a decision is to be made, the analysis and assessments that have been conducted provide a basis for such a decision. In many cases, established design principles and standards provide clear guidance. Compliance with such principles and standards must be among the first reference points when assessing risks. It is common thinking that risk management processes, and especially ALARP processes, require formal guidelines or criteria (e.g., risk acceptance criteria and cost-effectiveness indices) to simplify the decision-making. Care must; however, be shown when using this type of formal decision-making criteria, as they easily result in a mechanization of the decision-making process. Such mechanization is unfortunate because: Decision-making criteria based on risk-related numbers alone (probabilities and expected values) do not capture all the aspects of risk, costs, and benefits, no method has a precision that justifies a mechanical decision based on whether the result is overor below a numerical criterion. It is a managerial responsibility to make decisions under uncertainty, and management should be aware of the relevant risks and uncertainties.Apostolicism and Lemon (2005) adopt a pragmatic approach to risk analysis and risk management, acknowledging the difficulties of determining the probabilities of an attack. Ideally, they would like to implement a risk-informed procedure, based on expected values. However, since such an approach would require the use of probabilities that have not b een “rigorously derived”, they see themselves forced to resort to a more pragmatic approach.This is one possible approach when facing problems of large uncertainties. The risk analyses simply do not provide a sufficiently solid basis for the decision-making process. We argue along the same lines. There is a need for a management review and judgment process. It is necessary to see beyond the computed risk picture in the form of the probabilities and expected values. Traditional quantitative risk analyses fail in this respect. We acknowledge the need for analyzing risk, but question the value added by performing traditional quantitative risk analyses in the case of large uncertainties. The arbitrariness in the numbers produced can be significant, due to the uncertainties in the estimates or as a result of the uncertainty assessments being strongly dependent on the analysts.It should be acknowledged that risk cannot be accurately expressed using probabilities and expected values. A quantitative risk analysis is in many cases better replaced by a more qualitative approach, as shown in the examples above; an approach which may be referred to as a semi-quantitative approach. Quantifying risk using risk indices such as the expected number of fatalities gives an impression that risk can be expressed in a very precise way. However, in most cases, the arbitrariness is large. In a semi-quantitative approach this is acknowledged by providing a more nuanced risk picture, which includes factors that can cause “surprises” r elative to the probabilities and the expected values. Quantification often requires strong simplifications and assumptions and, as a result, important factors could be ignored or given too little (or too much) weight. In a qualitative or semi-quantitative analysis, amore comprehensive risk picture can be established, taking into account underlying factors influencing risk. In contrast to the prevailing use of quantitative risk analyses, the precision level of the risk description is in line with the accuracy of the risk analysis tools. In addition, risk quantification is very resource demanding. One needs to ask whether the resources are used in the best way. We conclude that in many cases more is gained by opening up the way to a broader, more qualitative approach, which allows for considerations beyond the probabilities and expected values.The traditional quantitative risk assessments as seen for example in the nuclear and the oil & gas industries provide a rather narrow risk picture, through calculated probabilities and expected values, and we conclude that this approach should be used with care for problems with large uncertainties. Alternative approaches highlighting the qualitative aspects are more appropriate in such cases. A broad risk description is required. This is also the case in the normative ambiguity situations, as the risk characterizations provide a basis for the risk evaluation processes. The main concern is the value judgments, but they should be supported by solid scientific assessments, showing a broad risk picture. If one tries to demonstrate that it is rational to accept risk, on a scientific basis, too narrow an approach to risk has been adopted. Recognizing uncertainty as a main component of risk is essential to successfully implement risk management, for cases of large uncertainties and normative ambiguity.A risk description should cover computed probabilities and expected values, as well as: Sensitivities showing how the risk indices depend on the background knowledge (assumptions and suppositions); Uncertainty assessments; Description of the background knowledge, including models and data used.The uncertainty assessments should not be restricted to standard probabilistic analysis, as this analysis could hide important uncertainty factors. The search for quantitative, explicit approaches for expressing the uncertainties, even beyond the subjective probabilities, may seem to be a possible way forward. However, such an approach is not recommended. Trying to be precise and to accurately express what is extremely uncertain does not make sense. Instead we recommend a more openqualitative approach to reveal such uncertainties. Some might consider this to be less attractive from a methodological and scientific point of view. Perhaps it is, but it would be more suited for solving the problem at hand, which is about the analysis and management of risk and uncertainties.Source: Terje Aven. 2010. “Risk Management”. Risk in Technological Systems, Oct, p175-198.译文：风险管理本章回顾和讨论风险管理的基本问题和原则，包括：风险可接受性（耐受性）、风险削减和安全风险管理原则、警示和预防原则，并提出了一个研究案例，说明在实际管理环境中这些问题和原则的重要性。
企业风险管理(中英文)
Futures Contracts 期货(qīhuò)合约
• A future obligates one party to buy and another to sell a specified asset in the future at a price agreed on today 一份
• The notional amount is only used to determine the cash flows 名义交易量只用来确定现金流
第十一页，共三十页。
(juédìng)
•
9、 人的价值，在招收诱惑的一瞬间被决定
。2022/2/32022/2/3Thursday , February 03, 2022
The “New” Risk Management -1980s
“新式(xīnshì)”风险管理
Financial risk management 金融风险管理 Dealt with financial risk 面对金融风险 Foreign exchange risk 外汇风险 Interest rate risk 利率风险 Equity risk 股票风险 Commodity price risk 商品价格风险 Use derivatives to hedge financial risk
• Commodity price risk 商品价格风险
– Continental Airlines – 1990 大陆航空公司
• Fuel costs not hedged 没有做到燃料价格对冲 • Oil price doubled with Gulf War 海湾战争石油价格加倍
第六页，共三十页。
项目风险管理分析中英文对照外文翻译文献
项目风险管理分析中英文对照外文翻译文献中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文：Project Risk AnalysisChapter 1 Introduction1.1 About this compendiumThis course compendium is to be used in the course “Risikostyring is projector”. The focus will be on the following topics:R isk identificationRisk structuringRisk modeling in the light of a time schedule and a cost modelRisk follows upWe will also discuss elements related to decision analysis where risk is involved, and use of life cycle cost and life cycle profit models. The course compendium comprises a large number of exercises, and it is recommended to do most of the exercises in order to get a good understanding of the topics and methods described. A separate MS Excel program, pRisk.xls has been developed in order to assist numerical calculations and to conduct Monte Carlo simulation.1.2 DefinitionsAleatory uncertaintyVariation of quantities in a population. We sometimes use the word variability rather than aleatory uncertainty.Epistemic uncertaintyLack of knowledge about the “world”, and observablequantities in particular. DependencyThe relation between the sequences of the activities in a project.Observable quantityA quantity expressing a state of the “world”, i.e. a quantity of the p hysical reality or nature, that is unknown at the time of the analysis but will, if the system being analyzed is actually implemented, take some value in the future, and possibly become known. ParameterWe use the term parameter in two ways in this report. The main use of a parameter is that it is a quantity that is a part of the risk analysis models, and for which we assign numerical values. The more academic definition of a parameter used in a probabilitystatement about an observable quantity, X, is that a parameter is a construct where the value of the parameter is the limiting value where we are not able to saturate our understanding about the observable quantity X whatsoever new information we could get hold of. Parameter estimate The numeric value we assess to a parameter.ProbabilityA measure of uncertainty of an event.RiskRisk is defined as the answer to the three questions [14]: i) what can go wrong? ii) How likely is it? And if it goes wrong, iii) what are the consequences? To describe the risk is a scenario Risk acceptanceA decision to accept a risk.Risk acceptance criterionA reference by which risk is assessed to be acceptable orunacceptable.ScheduleA plan which specifies the start and finalization point of times for the activities in a project.Stochastic dependencyTwo or more stochastic variables are (stochastically) dependent if the expectation of one stochastic variable depends on the value of one or more of the other stochastic variables. Stochastic variableA stochastic variable, or random quantity, is a quantity for which we do not know the value it will take. However, we could state statistical properties of the variable or make probability statement about the value of the quantity.1.3 DEFINITIONSUncertaintyLack of knowledge about the performance of a system, and observable quantities in particular.Chapter 2Risk ManagementGenerally, risk management is defined (IEC 60300-3-9) as a “systematic application ofmanagement policies, procedures and practices to the tasks of analyzing, evaluating and controlling risk”. It will comprise (IEC definitions in parentheses):Risk assessment, i.e.–Risk analysis (“Systematic use of available information to identify hazards and to estimate the r isk to individuals or populations, property or the environment”)–Risk evaluation (“Process in which judgments are made on the tolerability of the risk on the basis of risk analysis and takinginto account factors such as socio-economic and environmental aspects”)Risk reduction/control (Decision making, implementation and risk monitoring).There exists no common definition of risk, but for instance IEC 60300-3-9 defines risk as a “combination of the frequency, or probability, of occurrence and the consequence of a specified hazardous events”. Most definitions comprise the elements of probabilities and consequences. However, some as Klinke and Renn suggest a very wide definition, stating: “Risk refers to the possibility that human actions or events lead to consequences that affect aspects of what humans value”. So the total risk comprises the possibility of number (“all”) unwanted/hazardous events. It is part of the risk analysis to delimit which hazards to include. Further, risk usually refers to threats in the future, involving a (high) degree of uncertainty. In the following we will present the basic elements of risk management as it is proposed to be an integral part of project management.2.1 Project objectives and criteriaIn classical risk analysis of industrial systems the use of so-called risk acceptance criteria has played a central role in the last two or tree decades. Basically use of risk acceptance criteria means that some severe consequences are defined, e.g. accident with fatalities. Then we try to set an upper limit for the probability of these consequences that could be accepted, i.e. we could not accept higher probabilities in any situations. Further these probabilities could only be accepted if risk reduction is not possible, or the cost of risk reduction is very high.In recent years it has been a discussion in the risk analysis society whether it is fruitful or not to use risk acceptance criteriaaccording to the principles above. It is argued that very often risk acceptance criteria are set arbitrary, and these do not necessarily support the overall best solutions. Therefore, it could be more fruitful to use some kind of risk evaluation criteria, rather than strict acceptance criteria. In project risk management we could establish acceptance criteria related to two types of events: Events with severe consequences related to health, environment and safety.Events with severe consequences related to project costs, project quality, project duration, oreven termination of the project. In this course we will have main focus on the project costs and the duration of the project. Note that both project cost and project duration are stochastic variables and not events. Thus it is not possible to establish acceptance criteria to project cost or duration directly. Basically, there are three types of numeric values we could introduce in relation to such stochastic variables describing the project:1. Target. The target expresses our ambitions in the project. The target shall be something we are striving at, and it should be possible to reach the target. It is possible to introduce (internal) bonuses, or other rewards in order to reach the targets in a project.2. Expectation. The expectations are the value the stochastic variables will achieve in the long run, or our expectation about the outcome. The expectation is less ambitious than the target. The expectation will in a realistic way account for hazards, and threats and conditions which often contribute to the fact that the targets are not met.3. Commitment. The commitments are values related to the stochastic variables which are regulated in agreements andcontracts. For example it could be stated in the contract that a new bridge shall be completed within a given date. If we are not able to fulfill the commitments, this will usually result in economical consequences, for example penalties for defaults, or in the worst case canceling of the contract.2.2 Risk identificationA scenario is a description of a imagined sequence or chain of events, e.g. we have a water leakage, and we are not able to stop this leakage with ordinary tightening medium due to the possible environmental aspects which is not clarified at the moment. Further the green movement is also likely to enter the scene in this case. A hazard is typically related to energies, poisonous media etc, and if they are released this will result in an accident or a severe event. A threat is a wider term than hazard, and we include also aspects as “wrong” method applied, “lack of competence and experience”. The term threat is also very often used in connection with security problems, e.g. sabotage, terrorism, and vandalism.2.3 Structuring and modeling of riskIn Section 2.2 we have identified methods to identify events and threats. We now want to relate these events and threats to the explicit models we have for project costs and project duration.2.3.1 Model for project execution time/schedule modelingWhen analyzing the execution time for a project we will have a project plan and typicallya Gantt diagram as a starting point. The Gantt diagram is transformed into a so-called flow network where the connections between the activities are explicitly described. Such a flow network also comprises description of duration of the activities in terms of probability statements. The duration of each activityis stochasticVariables, which we denote Ti for activity in a flow network we might also have uncertain activities which will be carried out only under special conditions. These conditions could be described in terms of events, and we need to describe the probability of occurrence of such events. Thus, there is a set of quantities, i.e. time variables and events in the model. The objective is now to link the undesired events and threats discussed in Section 2.2 to these time variables and events. Time variables are described by a probability distribution function. Such a distribution function comprises parameters that characterize the time variable. Often a parametric probability distribution is described by the three quantities L (low), M (most likely) and H high. If an undesired event occur, it is likely that the values of L, M and H will be higher than in case this event does not occur. A way to include the result from the risk identification process is then to express the different values of L, M and H depending on whether the critical event occurs or not. If we in addition are able to assess the probability of occurrence of the critical event, the knowledge about this critical event has been completely included into the risk model. Based on such an explicit modeling of the critical event, we could also easily update the model in case of new information about the critical event is obtained, for example new information could be available at a later stage in the process and changes of the plan could still be possible in light of the new information.2.3.2 Cost modelingThe cost model is usually based on the cost breakdown structure, and the cost elements will again be functions of labor cost, overtime cost, purchase price, hour cost of rentingequipment, material cost, amount of material etc. The probabilistic modeling of cost is usually easier than for modeling project execution time. The principle is just to add a lot of cost terms, where each cost term is the product of the unit price and the number of units. We introduce price and volume as stochastic variables to describe the unit price and the number of units. The price and volume variables should also be linked to the undesired events and threats we have identified in Section 2.2. Often it is necessary to link the cost model to the schedule model. For example in case of delays it might be necessary to put more effort into the project to catch up with the problems, and these efforts could be very costly. Also, if the project is delayed we may need to pay extra cost to sub-contractors that have to postpone their support into the project.2.3.3 Uncertainty in schedule and cost modelingAs indicated above we will establish probabilistic models to describe the duration and cost of a project. The result of such a probabilistic modeling is that we treat the duration and cost as stochastic variables. Since duration and costs are stochastic variables, this means that there is uncertainty regarding the values they will take in the real project we are evaluating. Sometimes we split this uncertainty into three different categories, i) Aleatory uncertainty (variability due to e.g. weather conditions, labor conflicts, breakdown of machines etc.), ii) para meter or epistemic uncertainty due to lack of knowledge about “true” parameter values, and iii) model uncertainty due to lack of detailed, or wrong modeling. Under such thinking, the aleatory uncertainty could not be reduced; it is believed to be the result of the variability in the world which we cannot control. Uncertainty in the parameters is, however, believed to bereducible by collecting more information. Also uncertainty in the models is believed to be reducible by more detailed modeling, and decomposition of the various elements that go into the model. It is appealing to have a mental model where the uncertainty could be split into one part which we might not reduce (variability), and one part which we might reduce by thorough analysis and more investigation (increased knowledge). If we are able to demonstrate that the part of the uncertainty related to lack of knowledge and understanding has been reduced to a sufficient degree, we could then claim high confidence in the analysis. In some situation the owner or the authorities put forward requirements. Which could be interpreted as confidence regarding the quality of the analysis? It is though not always clear what is meant by such a confidence level. As an example, let E(C) be the expected cost of a p roject. A confidence statement could now be formulated as “The probability that the actual project cost is within an interval E(C) ± 10% should at least be 70%”. It is, however, not straight forward to document such a confidence level in a real analysis. T he “Successive process (trinnvisprosessen)” [4] is an attempt to demonstrate how to reduce the “uncertainty” in the result to a certain level of confidence.We also mention that Even [12] has recently questioned such an approach where there exist model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty, and emphasizes that we in the analysis should focus on the observable quantities which will become evident for us if the project is executed, e.g. the costs, and that uncertainty in these quantities represent the lack of knowledge about which values they will take in the future. This discussion is not pursuit any more in this presentation.2.4 Risk elements for follow up: Risk and opportunity registerAs risk elements and threats are identified in Section 2.2 these have to be controlled as far as possible. It is not sufficient to identify these conditions and model them in the schedule and cost models, we also have to mitigate the risk elements and threats. In order to ensure a systematic follow up of risk elements and threats it is recommended to establish a so-called threat log. The terms ?Risk Register…and ?Risk & Opportunity Register…(R&OR) is sometimes used rather than the term ?threat log.… A R&OR is best managed by a database solution, for example an MS-Access Database. Each row in the database represents one risk element or threat. The fields in such a database could vary, but the following fields seems reasonable: ? ID. An identifier is required in order to keep track of the threat in relation to the quantitative risk models, to follow up actions ET.Description. A description of the threat is necessary in order to understand the content of the problem. It could be necessary to state the immediate consequences (e.g. occupational accident), but also consequences in terms of the main objectives of the project, e.g. time and costs.Likelihood or probability. A judgment regarding how probable it is that the threat or the risk condition will be released in terms of e.g. undesired or critical events.Impact. If possible, give a direct impact on cost and schedule if the event occurs, either by an expected impact, or by L, M and H values.References to cost and schedule. In order to update the schedule and cost models it is convenient to give an explicit reference from the R&OR into the schedule and cost models. ? Manageability. Here it is descried how the threat could beinfluenced, either by implementing measures to eliminate the threat prior to it reveals it self, or measures in orderto reduce the consequences in case of the threat will materialize.Alert information. It is important to be aware of information that could indicate the development of the threat before it eventually will materialize. If such information is available we could implement relevant measures if necessary. For example it could be possible to take ground samples at a certain cost, but utilizing the information from such samples could enable us to choose appropriate methods for tunnel penetration.Measures. List of measures that could be implemented to reduce the risk.Deadline and responsible. Identification of who is responsible for implementing and follow up of the measure or threat, and any deadlines.Status. Both with respect to the threat and any measure it is valuable to specify the development, i.e. did the treat reveal it self into undesired events with unwanted consequences, did the measure play any positive effect etc.2.5 Correction and controlAs the project develops the R&OR is the primary control tool for risk follow up. By following the status of the various threats, risk elements and measures we could monitor the risk in the project. This information should of course be linked to the time and cost plans. If a given threat does not reveal in terms of undesired events, the time and cost estimates could be lowered and this gain could be utilized in other part of the project, or in other projects. In the opposite situation it is necessary to increase the time and cost estimates, and we need to consider newmeasures, and maybe spend some of the reserves to catch up in case of an expected delay. During the life cycle of a project it will occur new threats and risk elements which we did not foresee in the initial risk identification process. Such threats must continuously be entered into the R&OR, and measures need to be considered.一、介绍（一）关于本纲要本课程纲要过程中研究的是“风险也是一种项目”。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
文献出处：Bedard J C, Hoitash R, et al. The development of the enterprise risk management theory [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2014, 30(4): 64-95.（声明：本译文归百度文库所有，完整译文请到百度文库。
）原文The development of the enterprise risk management theoryBedard J C, Hoitash RAbstractEnterprise risk management as an important field of risk management disciplines, in more than 50 years of development process of the implementation of dispersing from multiple areas of research to the integration of comprehensive risk management framework evolution, the theory of risk management and internal audit and control theory are two major theoretical sources of risk management theory has experienced from the traditional risk management, financial volatility to the development of the enterprise risk management, risk management and internal audit and control theory went through the internal accounting control and internal control integrated framework to the evolution of enterprise risk management, the development of the theory of the above two points to the direction of the enterprise risk management, finally realizes the integration development, enterprise risk management theory to become an important part of enterprise management is indispensable.Keywords: enterprise risk management, internal audit the internal control1 The first theory source, evolution of the theory of risk management"Risk management" as a kind of operation and management idea, has a long history: thousands of years ago in the west have "don't put all eggs in one basket" the proverb, the ancient Chinese famous "product valley hunger" allusions and "yicang ("system," boat was "organization have a prototype of the modern risk management thought, and points under escort ship transportation, yuen, is effective way to spread risk, transfer risk .In the modern sense of risk management thought appeared in the first half of the 20th century, such as fayol's safe production ideas, Marshall's "risk sharing management" point of view, etc.;But risk management as a discipline system development is started in the middle of the 20th century: in 1950, gallagher in the risk management: a new stage of cost control in the paper, puts forward the concept of risk management; Johnso (1952) mentioned the problems how to deal with risks and uncertainties in farm management, which involves early enterprise (farms) of risk management problem.The emergence of risk management as a discipline real Mehr and Hedges of the enterprise risk management (1963) and C.A.Williams and Richard m. Heins "risk management and insurance" (1964) published marked. Williams and Heins thinks, "risk management is based on the risk identification, measurement and control to the smallest cost risk caused by the loss to the lowest level of management methods", risk management is not just a technology, a method, a kind of management process, and is a new and scientific management.The development of the theory of risk management.1.1The first stage: the 70 s and 1950 sTheoretical tendency mainly is the pure risk prevention and management of enterprise (adverse risk);Take the main strategy of enterprise risk management is risk avoidance and risk transfer, insurance becomes the main risk management tools. Fire events of general motors and the United States steel industry the workers went on strike to enterprise's normal operation caused serious impact and losses, become an important opportunity to promote the development of enterprise risk management theory. This phase the first important area of risk management theory, is the risk management object definition and research. Since the 20th century, scholars have been the object of risk management divided into two major categories of pure risk and speculative risk, and the pure risks as the object of risk management and the target (Denenberg, 1966; Gahin, 1967).In fact, the risk can be divided into pure risk andspeculative risk is a kind of method based on the responsibility, is targeted at loss, is not aimed at risk, so it can be divided into pure risk and speculative risk, but not as good as it can be divided into pure loss and speculative loss, because it can reflect the true respect of the risk manager more loss problem.Is the second important areas, to the enterprise decision-making and of behavior, and insurance in response to the important role of enterprise risk and universality of the study. Greene (1955) orientation is insurance buyers of risk management. A paper published in 1955, the management review "to the risk of a kind of management method", think of insurance as the most important means of enterprise risk management should be attention by the enterprise management and the shareholders, think insurance is a business spending the most valuable part of all kinds of costs. Denenberg etc. (1966) also emphasizes the insurance at this stage the important role of risk management, points out the important responsibility of the risk manager is to determine the appropriate insurance policy for the enterprise and insurance products, that will be the risk manager's name changed to "insurance and risk managers". Snider (1956), McCahill, Jr. (1971) stressed that risk management in the enterprise organization structure not only has a certain status, report to top management work, and want to maintain good communication and coordination with the finance department.A third important area is, the risk management theory into the analysis framework of mainstream economics and management.On the one hand, by the wind management theory combined with the traditional enterprise theory, the risk management of the decision-making process and the integration of enterprise's overall ing the capital asset pricing model, the decision rule of enterprise in the optimal retention ratio, cumulative franchise policy selection and choice of reserves, etc., makes the risk management theory into the financial market;And the use of marginal analysis tool to determine the optimal strategy of risk management, then further forming marks in risk management theory, and become an important area of finance (Cummins, 1976)., on the other hand, William g. Scott complex type combined with risk management organization system, through to the enterprise basicsystem and branch offices neat, will be the overall goal and the risk of the enterprise manager daily target organic unification, then to the appraisal of the branch to contribution to the enterprise overall risk identification and measurement, and consider the relationship between them and the relationship between the dynamic characteristics, so as to provide theoretical sources for the development of risk management (Close,1974).1.2The second stage, the late 1970 s to the end of the 20th centuryRisk management object is mainly the business and financial results of volatility, risk management tools on the basis of insurance also achieved great development, new derivatives and alternative risk transfer (ART) play an important role.In the 1970 s, the collapse of the bretton woods system of exchange rate volatility significantly increased, oil price rising sharply, the production cost of enterprise is difficult to control;After entering the 80 s, high inflation and interest rate volatility and number of money and credit crisis makes the enterprise the management face greater uncertainty.Tool of a large number of applications in convenient enterprise risk management at the same time, also because of its characteristics of leveraged to amplify the damage due to improper use strategy of so the use of derivatives and the management strategy becomes very important.Therefore, the enterprise risk management and derivatives trading, hedge strategy should pay close attention to the competitor (Froot etc., 1994).And (2001) study found that such as Cummins, although the measurement of the risk and the liquidity as well as the decision-making has a positive connection of the underwriter, but for those who use derivatives to hedge risk, the risk index was has negative relationship with the width and depth of the hedge.1.3The third stage, since the 21st centuryAfter entering the 21st century, with the speeding up of the global economic integration, companies, increasing the risk for the influence of various risks and potential consequences will magnify, together with the complexity of the financial derivatives trading and frequency are increased rapidly, to the continuous operation ofthe enterprise put forward the serious challenge, the enterprise must break through the traditional pattern of risk management, from a more comprehensive, integrated view of risk analysis and management, as a result, the comprehensive risk management stage of the development of risk management.The emergence of comprehensive risk management and application of risk management for the enterprise provides new methods and tools, its application field is very broad, from enterprises, non-profit organizations to the government are gradually introduced the analysis framework.2 Second theory sourceInternal audit and the development of control theory in the process of the evolution of enterprise risk management theory, theory of the second source is the evolution and development of internal audit and control theory.From the literature in internal audit and control of the internal accounting control, internal control integrated framework, enterprise risk management process of the overall framework, including the COSO has played a leading role, in particular, it issued two symbolic file "enterprise internal control, the overall framework" and "enterprise risk management - integrated framework".The separation of corporate ownership and control is the ultimate cause of internal audit and the emergence of a control theory, and the expansion of enterprise scale and the structure of the branch in shortage problem caused by the lack of management and control is to encourage enterprises to strengthen internal audit and control of direct motivation.2.1Internal accounting controlInternal accounting control is the first stage in the development of internal control theory.Grady (1957) pointed out that the internal accounting control is a comprehensive coordination of the organization plan and business process system, used to prevent unexpected or wrong operation to bring the asset losses, examination management decision used in accuracy and objectivity of accounting data, promote operational efficiency and encourage compliance with established policies, etc.In practice, accounting and audit personnel played a dominant role in the internal accounting control, audit became the earliest forms of internal control, therefore, the internal control is in deepening and audit activities based on the theory of audit.But with the increase of the enterprise management activity, pure audit already cannot satisfy the needs of the enterprises, the internal control arises at the historic moment, the audit has become a part of the internal control (Haun, 1955).The internal audit activity is one of the important conditions, implement control and management of enterprises is a key component part of the internal control, is the eye of the "supervision" top management.For the internal control evaluation, the audit is the most important tools and stakeholders;At the same time, the audit data for the evaluation of internal control provides conditions, through a review of the audit data, can be a preliminary judgment of enterprise internal control system and in need of improvement, which provide ideas for the perfection of the internal control (Garbade, 1944; Mautz etc., 1966; Smith, 1972).2.2 The internal control framework as a wholeIn 1992, the COSO issued "enterprise internal control, the overall framework, system construction of the enterprise internal control system for the first time. The COSO framework of internal control, is more based on the perspective of independent accountants and auditors, puts forward the concept of enterprise internal control, think the overall internal control framework is mainly composed of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, supervision, the five elements, thus the concept of internal control to completely break through the limitation of the audit, the category of management control comprehensive development to the enterprise.COCO, Canada in 1995, the report put forward higher request to the external auditor for the enterprise internal control to join the external factors. International institute of internal auditors in 1996 published "concept and responsibility:" report, think that should be pay more attention to the contribution and role of internal audit in the organization. The risk management of card of German report, ham pell, as well ascomprehensive criteria guide turn bull report is the most famous and arguably Britain three milestones in the internal control research, especially in 1992, DE Burleigh report on internal control, the relationship between the quality of financial reporting and corporate governance as the prerequisite, attaches great importance to the significance of independent audit committee on the internal control.2.3 The enterprise risk management framework as a wholeIn 2004, the COSO committee report in 2004, on the basis of combining the requirements of the sarbanes - oakes act, formally issued "enterprise risk management - integrated framework". The analysis framework will be within the scope of the internal control in enterprise risk management, formed a broader meaning of the internal risk management framework. Therefore, the development of the theory of internal audit and control the final point to the enterprise comprehensive risk management. Reviews the development of internal audit and control, it can be seen that the theory of evolution has experienced the process of "plane, three-dimensional, three-dimensional" : in the stage of internal accounting control, control environment, control activities, and accounting system in the plane of the three elements constitute a control system;In the overall framework of internal control, the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring, five elements, evolved into a three-dimensional control system;In the overall enterprise risk management framework stage, the internal environment, goal setting, item identification, risk assessment, risk response, control activities, information and communication, monitoring, eight elements, makes the enterprise risk management, a solid control system3The development of the enterprise risk management theoryAfter entering the 21st century, the academic study of enterprise risk management, mainly focus on the following: the connotation of enterprise risk management and the target, achieve the goal of enterprise risk managementmechanism, the implementation of enterprise risk management motivation as well as the factors of the enterprise risk management.3.1 the connotation of enterprise risk managementKent d. Miller (1992) the source of the uncertainty problem of enterprise internationalization operation and performance are analyzed, and puts forward the thinking of integrated risk management, for the first time in academia the concept of integrated risk management is studied in detail. Later, scholars gradually with the definition of enterprise risk management refers to those using the method of comprehensive, integrated processing enterprise faces the risk of problems. Skipper (1994), Lisa Meulbroek (2002), enterprise risk management involves not only the profit loss without possibility, also focus on the possibility of benefits and risks. The COSO committee (2004) published an authoritative definition of enterprise risk management.3.2 Enterprise risk management goalsFor the goal of enterprise risk management, the academia mainly has a single teleology and multiple teleology two factions. The single core view of skopos theory is that the goal of enterprise risk management is to maximize the value of the shareholders of a company. Neal Enriquez (2001) pointed out that the main purpose of the enterprise risk management is in order to save a lot of trivial claims costs, facilitate enterprise of risk control, raise the value of the company. Multiple teleology of argument is that the purpose of the enterprise risk management is to achieve multiple goals in the development of enterprises. James Lam (2003), detailing the purpose of overall corporate risk management, including lower earnings volatility, to maximize the value of the shareholders of a company, and to promote professional and financial security, etc.; The COSO committee (2004) proposed the strategic target and business objectives, reporting, and compliance goals four goals.3.3The mechanism of the enterprise risk management, improve enterprise valueThe mechanism of enterprise risk management, improve enterprise value is mainly done through three ways: (1) the optimization of enterprise capital allocation. Enterprise risk management framework of capital structure management, can improve the return on equity and improve the corporate governance structure, which affects the value of the enterprise (Peter Tufano, 1996).(2) improve enterprise strategic decision level. Enterprise risk management will be integrated into the overall strategy of the enterprise risk management, covering the entire process and the development of the enterprise business, can make enterprises seize the opportunity and enhance competition ability, thus improve the performance of the company. Enterprise risk management can reduce the cost of enterprise was in financial trouble, reduce the probability of bankruptcy, reduce the influence of traditional liabilities to the company value (NeilDoherty, 2005).(3) to strengthen the management of incentive, in turn, improve the level of performance. If it can be through effective risk management measures to control the fluctuation of stock price, makes the sensitivity of management compensation to company performance is positive, so that it can solve the agency problem in corporate governance, so as to make the management efficiency and to enhance the value of the company (Aggarwal, 1999).3.4 The enterprise risk management: an empirical study of relationship between the value of the companyEnterprise risk management on earth has much impact on the promotion of enterprise value, simple qualitative analysis is difficult to get the exact conclusion. To do this through a variety of academic empirical method to research: (1) the overall level of study from the enterprise, the enterprise risk management of the company, its universality of the increase of the value of the company has a large (Cyree etc., 2004; Hoyt, etc., 2008);(2) from the specific business level, using tobin Q as substitution variables of enterprise value, found that use derivatives to hedge risk, the enterprise value of a positive growth trend (Allayannis etc., 2001; Bartram, etc., 2004; Nain, 2004; Kim, 2004);Karen berger (2007), ABB company as an example to analyze the risk communication to establish credibility and maintain the significance of the valueof the company.4Summary and outlookCan clearly see through the above analysis, the theory of risk management and internal audit and control theory of the cross and integrated, makes the enterprise risk management in a more integrated and comprehensive perspective and method to deal with the risks of enterprise developing, to ensure the healthy and sustainable development of the enterprise. But in 2007 the outbreak of the subprime crisis, to the enterprise risk management to improve and perfect puts forward a new proposition: how to implement effective risk management to respondA new challenge? Have the following questions need to be further studied and discussed:4.1. The COSO - application problems of enterprise risk management framework.At present the framework is the core of enterprise risk management standards, but more from the perspective of process management is the framework to deal with the risk of enterprise, to real-time risk management is not enough attention, especially not fully consider the enterprise's solvency problems, in fact, enterprise bankruptcy is often insufficient solvency direct consequences. Therefore, the enterprise is the lack of risk management: in the analysis of enterprise risk management framework, how to pay attention to the solvency of enterprises and set up effective feasible evaluation index.4.2. The use of financial derivatives and structured finance instruments.Subprime mortgage crisis, the AIG, citigroup and other large financial institutions are far as companies used as risk reserve capital will not be able to meet the needs of the huge amount of structured products trading, high leverage multiples bring unexpected losses. Therefore, how to correctly treat and deal with problem of structured finance instruments, is the enterprise risk management cannot be ignored.4.3. The problem of corporate social responsibility and reputation.As from the simple to the requirement of enterprise profit extends to social responsibility and reputation, brand, and other fields, enterprise risk management must also be followed by development and extension, to include external stakeholders requirements in enterprise risk management framework, in a more broad perspective to the comprehensive risk management. Therefore, how an enterprise bear the social responsibility through sustainable risk management, realize the harmony of economic interests and social interests, is the future of enterprise risk management an important problem to be reckoned with.译文企业风险管理理论的发展贝达德；霍塔什摘要企业风险管理作为风险管理学科的一个重要领域，在50 多年的发展过程中实现了从多个领域的分散研究向全面风险管理一体化框架的演进，其中风险管理理论和内部审计与控制理论是两大理论来源，风险管理理论经历了从传统风险管理、财务波动性风险管理向企业风险管理的发展，而内部审计与控制理论也经历了内部会计控制、内部控制整体框架向企业风险管理的演进，上述两大理论的发展都指向了企业风险管理的方向，企业风险管理理论最终实现了集成发展，成为企业管理不可或缺的重要组成部分。