Avatar 卡梅隆演讲——《阿凡达》之前的好奇小男孩
Avatar - Extended [阿凡达 - 加长版].Chinese
他能替我提供
地面的情报
提供敌营的状况
苏杰克,听好 我要你从内部了解纳美人
赢得他们的信任
我得知道要怎么逼他们就范
不从的话就发动猛烈攻击
- 我还跟欧葛蕾做事吗? - 台面上是
你表面上配合她
但你是对我报告
小子,你能这么做吗?
那当然
那好吧
小子,我会照顾自己人
很好
杰克,我们慢慢来
- 大拇指碰手指 - 好
- 大拇指碰手指 - 没问题
很好,你记得这个
- 搞定 - 你想坐起来
- 就坐吧 - 很好,慢慢来
不要急 躯干运动没有失调,很好
你有觉得头昏脑胀吗? 你在动脚趾
- 很好,杰克 - 太好了
末端运动控制良好
你有哪里会麻或疼痛吗?
- 很神吧 - 对
讯号从这个树根
转移到旁边的树根了 我们来采样吧
好,采样本
根据反应速度,这可能有电
诺姆,你的唾液污染样本了
对
再采一个样本
别开枪 别开枪,你会把它惹毛
它已经被惹毛了
它的皮太厚了,打不穿的
锤头巨兽在宣示地盘 不要跑,否则它会攻击
那我要做啥,跟它跳舞吗?
别动就对了
在北京动物园的复制幼虎是近五年…
…被复制的许多物种之一
我加入陆战队是为了接受磨炼 磨练自己的个性
我告诉自己 别人能通过考验,我也行
杰克!杰克!
搞清楚
我不需要你们的同情
想要公平待遇,那你来错星球了
弱肉强食
现实就是如此残酷
没有人会伸出援手
走开!放开他
英语演讲稿-经典名人英语演讲稿72:失败是人生的选项之一,但畏惧不是(导演詹姆斯.卡梅隆TED大会演讲)mp3
英语演讲稿经典名人英语演讲稿72:失败是人生的选项之一,但畏惧不是(导演詹姆斯.卡梅隆TED大会演讲)mp372. Failure Is an Option, but Fear Is Not72. 失败是人生的选项之一,但畏惧不是So, when I came back to make my next movie, which was “Avatar,”I tried to apply that same principle of leadership which is that you respect your team, and you earn their respect in return. And it really changed the dynamic, So, here I was again with a small team, in uncharted territory doing “Avatar,”coming up with new technology that didn’t exist before. Tremendously exciting. Tremendously challenging. And we became a family, over a four and half year period. And it completely changed how I do movies.当我开始拍摄《阿凡达》时,我试着将这种互相尊重的领导力原则应用在电影拍摄中。
很快,情况就真的有所改变了。
在《阿凡达》拍摄过程中,我的团队也很小,也在未知领地工作,创造新的科技。
这非常有意思,非常有挑战性。
四年半的时间,我们成为了一个家庭。
这完全改变了我拍电影的方式。
So, people have commented on how, well, you know, you brought back the ocean organisms and put them on the planet of Pandora. To me it was more of a fundamental way of doing business, the process itself, that changed as a result of that.有许论文章说,卡梅隆把海底的-些生物放到了潘多拉星球上。
《雨果》影评
写给黑白默片的立体情书——马丁·斯科塞斯的《雨果》去岁在巴黎,数次路经蒙帕纳斯(Montparnasse)车站,已看不出1960年代改造前的风貌。
1895年,这里曾有火车出轨事故。
再次与这车站相逢,在马丁•斯科塞斯首部3D电影《雨果》(Hugo,2011)里;火车事故也再现于主人公、12岁孤儿雨果的梦中。
影片改编自布莱恩•塞尔兹尼克(Brian Selznick)获得美国童书凯迪克奖(Caldecott Medal)的绘本小说《造梦的雨果》(The Invention of Hugo Cabret,2007)。
布莱恩与电影渊源已久,此书受到法国导演雷内•克莱尔电影《巴黎屋檐下》(1930)影响;他常为在影院看见自己姓氏出现于影片首尾而自豪——表兄大卫•塞尔兹尼克曾为好莱坞著名制片人,重要作品有《金刚》(1933)、《乱世佳人》(1939)等。
《雨果》编剧约翰•洛根(John Logan),与斯科塞斯合作过《飞行家》(2004)。
影片叙事线索与重点多元、交叉、转移。
1931年,巴黎,男孩雨果在蒙帕纳斯车站这公共空间孤独、秘密地生活(为避免被警察送去孤儿院),如《巴黎圣母院》、《歌剧院魅影》的儿童版,一丝狄更斯小说《雾都孤儿》或《远大前程》痕迹。
雨果的钟表匠父亲在火灾中丧生,管理车站钟表时间的伯父酗酒而后失踪。
精通钟表机械的雨果承担起伯父的责任,并试图修好父亲从博物馆带回的机器人——这是他与父亲、与过去美好生活的唯一连接,而且他相信,会写字的机器人会带给他来自父亲的讯息。
雨果不时在玩具店偷一点零件,被脾气暴躁的店主乔治严厉责罚。
雨果因此认识乔治的养女、同龄孤儿伊莎贝尔,并同她一起探寻机器人的、及乔治的秘密,而这探险,通往早期电影重要奠基者乔治•梅里埃(Georges Méliès,1861-1938),及一段珍贵的无声电影史。
在传统胶片电影遭遇数字技术冲击、电影学者惊呼“电影已死”时刻,斯科塞斯以时髦的数字3D与电脑特技技术向传统电影的辉煌过往致敬,意味深长。
《阿凡达》导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆访谈录
《阿凡达》导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆访谈录拍摄《阿凡达》(Avatar)是一个反复试验的过程。
导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆(James Cameron)在全数字化环境中创造了电影中的星球潘多拉,并开发了新的摄像机和方法用于拍摄演员的表演并将其传送到计算机生成的近乎真实的世界之中。
花了三年的时间,卡梅隆才看到他喜爱的一个完整镜头。
卡梅隆乐于进行挑战,他一直在推动影片构思和视觉效果向前发展,正如人们在《深渊》(The Abyss)和《泰坦尼克号》(Titanic)中见到的那样,但好莱坞和媒体经常嘲笑他的冒险之举和昂贵的预算。
既然获得奥斯卡提名的《阿凡达》已经成为史上票房最高的影片,全世界票房收入超过25亿美元,这名电影导演希望人们把注意力从电影成本和技术方面移开,转而细心品味《阿凡达》的环保和精神主题。
导演说这是心中想表达的观点。
卡梅隆最近与《华尔街日报》分享了他拍摄《阿凡达》的过程以及制作这部好莱坞大片的意义。
《华尔街日报》:有一种说法是,电影都是未完成的作品,它们都是被导演所抛弃的东西。
《阿凡达》与你最初在脑海中构想的一样吗?卡梅隆:这部影片超出我的预想,而且由于时间问题,也一直受到多方问询。
我们确定了放映时间,而且有一千个镜头要在最后一个月完成。
影片必须一个镜头一个镜头地进行细致入微的调整。
现在我看到完整的电影,我所有的小担心都不见了,因为这个过程做得不错。
《华尔街日报》:你把电影的制作过程形容成阵地战。
如果在拍电影的过程中你没有那种每天经受考验的感觉,如果很容易,你是不是会感觉不舒服?卡梅隆:我从来没有拍摄过容易的电影,所以我不知道那是什么感觉。
并不是我试图想办法让它变得困难,只是我追求的目标明显很困难。
而且我认为我的团队喜欢这样。
我觉得他们喜欢挑战,他们知道他们会在影片中发挥个人最好水平,而且我知道这会是对我个人来说最好的时刻。
我愿意尝试挑战自我,超越自我。
这让工作变得困难、变得有压力,但我发现我在压力下工作得最好。
奥斯卡最佳导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆TED英文演讲稿_演讲稿
奥斯卡最佳导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆TED英文演讲稿以下这篇由站整理提供的是《阿凡达》、《泰坦尼克号》的导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆(James Cameron)的一篇TED演讲。
在这个演讲里,卡梅隆回顾了自己从电影学院毕业后走上导演道路的故事。
卡梅隆告诉你,不要畏惧失败,永远不要给自己设限。
更多演讲稿范文,欢迎访问站!I grew up on a steady diet of science fiction. In high school, I took a bus to school an hour each way every day. And I was always absorbed in a book, science fiction book, which took my mind to other worlds, and satisfied, in a narrative form, this insatiable sense of curiosity that I had.And you know, that curiosity also manifested itself in the fact that whenever I wasn't in school I was out in the woods, hiking and taking "samples" -- frogs and snakes and bugs and pond water -- and bringing it back, looking at it under the microscope. You know, I was a real science geek. But it was all about trying to understand the world, understand the limits of possibility.And my love of science fiction actually seemed mirrored in 1 / 19the world around me, because what was happening, this was in the late '60s, we were going to the moon, we were exploring the deep oceans.Jacques Cousteau was coming into our living rooms with his amazing specials that showed us animals and places and a wondrous world that we could never really have previously imagined. So, that seemed to resonate with the whole science fiction part of it.And I was an artist. I could draw. I could paint. And I found that because there weren't video gamesand this saturation of CG movies and all of this imagery in the media landscape, I had to create these images in my head. You know, we all did, as kids having to read a book, and through the author's description, put something on the movie screen in our heads. And so, my response to this was to paint, to draw alien creatures, alien worlds, robots, spaceships, all that stuff. I was endlessly getting busted in math class doodling behind the textbook. That was -- the creativity had to find its outlet somehow.And an interesting thing happened: The Jacques Cousteau shows actually got me very excited about the fact that there was an alien world right here on Earth. I might not really go to an alien world on a spaceship someday -- that seemed pretty 2 / 19darn unlikely. But that was a world I could really go to, right here on Earth, that was as rich and exotic as anything that I had imagined from reading these books.So, I decided I was going to become a scuba diver at the age of 15. And the only problem with that was that I lived in a little village in Canada, 600 miles from the nearest ocean. But I didn't let that daunt me. I pestered my father until he finally found a scuba class in Buffalo, New York, right across the border from where we live. And I actually got certified in a pool at a YMCA in the dead of winter in Buffalo, New York. And I didn't see the ocean, a real ocean, for another two years, until we moved to California.Since then, in the intervening 40 years, I've spent about 3,000 hours underwater, and 500 hours of that was in submersibles. And I've learned that that deep-ocean environment, and even the shallow oceans,are so rich with amazing life that really is beyond our imagination. Nature's imagination is so boundlesscompared to our own meager human imagination. I still, to this day, stand in absolute awe of what I see when I make these dives. And my love affair with the ocean is ongoing, and just as strong as it ever was.3 / 19But when I chose a career as an adult, it was filmmaking. And that seemed to be the best way to reconcile this urge I had to tell stories with my urges to create images. And I was, as a kid, constantly drawing comic books, and so on. So, filmmaking was the way to put pictures and stories together, and that made sense. And of course the stories that I chose to tell were science fiction stories: "Terminator," "Aliens" and "The Abyss." And with "The Abyss," I was putting together my love of underwater and diving with filmmaking. So, you know, merging the two passions.Something interesting came out of "The Abyss," which was that to solve a specific narrative problem on that film, which was to create this kind of liquid water creature, we actually embraced computer generated animation, CG. And this resulted in the first soft-surface character, CG animation that was ever in a movie. And even though the film didn't make any money -- barely broke even, I should say -- I witnessed something amazing, which is that the audience, the global audience, was mesmerized by this apparent magic.You know, it's Arthur Clarke's law that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. They were 4 / 19seeing something magical. And so that got me very excited. And I thought, "Wow, this is something that needs to be embraced into the cinematic art." So, with "Terminator 2," which was my next film, we took that much farther. Working with ILM, we created the liquid metal dude in that film. The success hung in the balance on whether that effect would work. And it did, and we created magic again, and we had the same result with an audience -- although we did make a little more money on that one.So, drawing a line through those two dots of experience came to, "This is going to be a whole new world," this was a whole new world of creativity for film artists. So, I started a company with Stan Winston, my good friend Stan Winston, who is the premier make-up and creature designer at that time, and it was called Digital Domain. And the concept of the company was that we would leapfrog past the analog processes of optical printers and so on, and we would go right to digital production. And we actually did that and it gave us a competitive advantage for a while.But we found ourselves lagging in the mid '90s in the creature and character design stuff that we had actually 5 / 19founded the company to do. So, I wrote this piece called "Avatar," which was meant to absolutely push the envelope of visual effects, of CG effects, beyond, with realistic human emotive characters generated in CG, and the main characters would all be in CG, and the world would be in CG. And the envelope pushed back, and I was told by the folks at my company that we weren't going to be able to do this for a while.So, I shelved it, and I made this other movie about a big ship that sinks. (Laughter) You know, I went and pitched it to the studio as "'Romeo and Juliet' on a ship: "It's going to be this epic romance,passionate film." Secretly, what I wanted to do was I wanted to dive to the real wreck of "Titanic." And that's why I made the movie. (Applause) And that's the truth. Now, the studio didn't know that. But I convinced them. I said, "We're going to dive to the wreck. We're going to film it for real. We'll be using it in the opening of the film. It will be really important. It will be a great marketing hook." And I talked them into funding an expedition. (Laughter)Sounds crazy. But this goes back to that theme about your imagination creating a reality. Because we actually created a reality where six months later, I find myself in a Russian 6 / 19submersible two and a half miles down in the north Atlantic, looking at the real Titanic through a view port. Not a movie, not HD -- for real. (Applause)Now, that blew my mind. And it took a lot of preparation, we had to build cameras and lights and all kinds of things. But, it struck me how much this dive, these deep dives, was like a space mission. You know, where it was highly technical, and it required enormous planning. You get in this capsule, you go down to this dark hostile environment where there is no hope of rescue if you can't get back by yourself. And I thought like, "Wow. I'm like, living in a science fiction movie. This is really cool."And so, I really got bitten by the bug of deep-ocean exploration. Of course, the curiosity, the science component of it -- it was everything. It was adventure, it was curiosity, it was imagination. And it was an experience that Hollywood couldn't give me. Because, you know, I could imagine a creature and we could create a visual effect for it. But I couldn't imagine what I was seeing out that window. As we did some of our subsequent expeditions, I was seeing creatures at hydrothermal vents and sometimes things that I had never seen 7 / 19before, sometimes things that no one had seen before, that actually were not described by science at the time that we saw them and imaged them.So, I was completely smitten by this, and had to do more. And so, I actually made a kind of curious decision. After the success of "Titanic," I said, "OK, I'm going to park my day job as a Hollywood movie maker, and I'm going to go be a full-time explorer for a while." And so, we started planning theseexpeditions. And we wound up going to the Bismark, and exploring it with robotic vehicles. We went back to the Titanic wreck. We took little bots that we had created that spooled a fiber optic. And the idea was to go in and do an interior survey of that ship, which had never been done. Nobody had ever looked inside the wreck. They didn't have the means to do it, so we created technology to do it.So, you know, here I am now, on the deck of Titanic, sitting in a submersible, and looking out at planks that look much like this, where I knew that the band had played. And I'm flying a little robotic vehiclethrough the corridor of the ship. When I say, "I'm operating it," but my mind is in the vehicle. I felt like I was physically present inside the shipwreck of Titanic.8 / 19And it was the most surreal kind of deja vu experience I've ever had, because I would know before I turned a corner what was going to be there before the lights of the vehicle actually revealed it, because I had walked the set for months when we were making the movie. And the set was based as an exact replica on the blueprints of the ship.So, it was this absolutely remarkable experience. And it really made me realize that the telepresence experience -- that you actually can have these robotic avatars, then your consciousness is injected into the vehicle, into this other form of existence. It was really, really quite profound. And it may be a little bit of a glimpse as to what might be happening some decades out as we start to have cyborg bodies for exploration or for other means in many sort of post-human futures that I can imagine, as a science fiction fan.So, having done these expeditions, and really beginning to appreciate what was down there, such as at the deep ocean vents where we had these amazing, amazing animals -- they're basically aliens right here on Earth. They live in an environment of chemosynthesis. They don't survive on sunlight-basedsystem the way we do. And so, you're seeing 9 / 19animals that are living next to a 500-degree-Centigradewater plumes. You think they can't possibly exist.At the same time I was getting very interested in space science as well -- again, it's the science fiction influence, as a kid. And I wound up getting involved with the space community, really involved with NASA, sitting on the NASA advisory board, planning actual space missions, going to Russia, going through the pre-cosmonaut biomedical protocols, and all these sorts of things, to actually go and fly to the international space station with our 3D camera systems. And this was fascinating. But what I wound up doing was bringing space scientists with us into the deep. And taking them down so that they had access -- astrobiologists, planetary scientists, people who were interested in these extreme environments -- taking them down to the vents, and letting them see, and take samples and test instruments, and so on.So, here we were making documentary films, but actually doing science, and actually doing space science. I'd completely closed the loop between being the science fiction fan, you know, as a kid, and doing this stuff for real. And you know, along the way in this journey of discovery, I learned a lot. I learned 10 / 19a lot about science. But I also learned a lot about leadership. Now you think director has got to be a leader, leader of, captain of the ship, and all that sort of thing.I didn't really learn about leadership until I did these expeditions. Because I had to, at a certain point, say, "What am I doing out here? Why am I doing this? What do I get out of it?" We don't make money at these damn shows. We barely break even. There is no fame in it. People sort of think I went awaybetween "Titanic" and "Avatar" and was buffing my nails someplace, sitting at the beach. Made all these films, made all these documentary films for a very limited audience.No fame, no glory, no money. What are you doing? You're doing it for the task itself, for the challenge --and the ocean is the most challenging environment there is -- for the thrill of discovery, and for that strange bond that happens when a small group of people form a tightly knit team. Because we would do these things with 10, 12 people, working for years at a time, sometimes at sea for two, three months at a time.And in that bond, you realize that the most important thing is the respect that you have for them and that they have for you, that you've done a task that you can't explain to someone 11 / 19else. When you come back to the shore and you say, "We had to do this, and the fiber optic, and the attentuation, and the this and the that, all the technology of it, and the difficulty, the human-performance aspects of working at sea," you can't explain it to people. It's that thing that maybe cops have, or people in combat that have gone through something together and they know they can never explain it. Creates a bond, creates a bond of respect.So, when I came back to make my next movie, which was "Avatar," I tried to apply that same principle of leadership, which is that you respect your team, and you earn their respect in return. And it really changed the dynamic. So, here I was again with a small team, in uncharted territory, doing "Avatar," coming up with new technology that didn't exist before. Tremendously exciting. Tremendously challenging. And we became a family, over a four-and-half year period. And it completely changed how I do movies. So, people have commented on how, "Well, you know, you brought back the ocean organisms and put them on the planet of Pandora." To me, it was more of a fundamental way of doing business, the process itself, that changed as a result of that.12 / 19So, what can we synthesize out of all this? You know, what are the lessons learned? Well, I think number one is curiosity. It's the most powerful thing you own. Imagination is a force that can actually manifest a reality. And the respect of your team is more important than all the laurels in the world. I have young filmmakers come up to me and say, "Give me some advice for doing this." And I say, "Don't put limitations on yourself. Other people will do that for you -- don't do it to yourself, don't bet against yourself, and take risks."NASA has this phrase that they like: "Failure is not an option." But failure has to be an option in art and in exploration, because it's a leap of faith. And no important endeavor that required innovation was done without risk. You have to be willing to take those risks. So, that's the thought I would leave you with, is that in whatever you're doing, failure is an option, but fear is not. Thank you. (Applause) 译文:我是看科幻小说长大的。
阿凡达最详细介绍
阿凡达《阿凡达》海报概述阿凡达(Avatar)是一部科幻电影,由闻名导演执导,出品。
该影片预算超过5亿美元,成为电影史上预算最高的电影。
另外,由卡梅隆导演注入心血的全平台同名游戏《阿凡达(James Came rons Avatar: The Game)》已于2020年12月1日率先推出,游戏类型为(第三人科幻称射击动作游戏),支持3D显示器。
该片有3D、平面胶片、IMAX胶片三种制式供观众选择。
中文名:阿凡达/化身/异次元战神/外文名:Avatar出品公司:制片地区:美国导演:编剧:詹姆斯·卡梅隆制片人:詹姆斯·卡梅隆乔恩·兰道主演:,,类型:动作/惊悚/科幻/冒险片长:163分钟上映时间:2010年1月4日中国imdb编码:tt0499549美国上映时间:2009年12月18日词义解析阿凡达,化身(:अवतार,拉丁写法:Avatar)在中,最普遍被以为和众神在地面上的肉体表现形式有关。
在梵文中,化身一词具有透过沉思熟虑,而且由于特殊目的而从较高境遇“下降”,“转世”的涵义。
通俗的说,确实是降临,或说是天神附体。
是毁灭之神湿婆凡身的。
或能够明白得成神下降到人世用人的肉体施展神的力量,降世神通、天神下凡等词比较接近那个的含义。
剧情简介阿凡达美国海报故事从开始,杰克·萨利(Jake Sully,萨姆•沃辛顿饰)是一个双腿的老兵,他感觉没有任何东西值得他去战斗,因此他对被调派去潘多拉星球的采矿公司工作欣然同意。
那个上有一类别的地址都没有的元素“unobtanium”,能够吸引人类不远万里来到那个地址拓荒的缘故确实是它“unobtanium”将完全改变人类的能源产业。
可是问题是,资源丰硕的潘多拉星球并非适合人类生活,那个地址的空气对人类致命,本土的动植物都是凶猛的,极度危险。
那个地址的环境也造就了与人类不同的种族:10英尺高的蓝色类人一辈子物“Na"vi族”。
电影《阿凡达》中的后殖民主义元素解读
电影《阿凡达》中的后殖民主义元素解读作者:张瑜婉来源:《青年文学家》2016年第17期摘要:电影《阿凡达》( Avatar)是好莱坞著名导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆于2010年执导的一部3D 科幻电影,它以高超的拍摄技术和完美的画面带给观众一种视觉上的震撼。
影片中导演将思想性和技术主义有效的结合在一起,运用高超的3D 技术,为我们呈现了一个梦幻般的景象。
本文以后殖民主义的视角对电影《阿凡达》( Avatar)进行了分析,通过对各种形式的后殖民主义元素的解构剖析,对影片所蕴含的深层次文化内涵和西方殖民主义历史进行了进一步挖掘和反思。
关键词: 3D电影;《阿凡达》;后殖民主义;解读[中图分类号]:J9 [文献标识码]:A[文章编号]:1002-2139(2016)-17--01电影《阿凡达》( Avatar)是好莱坞著名导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆于2010年执导的一部3D 科幻电影,它以高超的拍摄技术和完美的画面带给观众一种视觉上的震撼。
影片中导演将思想性和技术主义有效的结合在一起,运用高超的3D 技术,为我们呈现了一个梦幻般的奇观。
一、电影《阿凡达》概述《阿凡达》以地球与“潘多拉”星球为故事背景,叙述了在遥远的未来地球资源将枯竭之时,人们企图侵占有着丰富资源的潘多拉星球,但潘多拉星球环境却极其危险不适合人类生存,人类的到来也扰乱了潘多拉星球上的土著居民——那威人的正常生活,引发了一场地球人与潘多拉人关于生存权的斗争。
故事的主人公杰克是一个可以控制经地球人和那威人DNA 混合后而克隆出阿凡达的被地球派去潘多拉寻找矿物元素的实验品,他在潘多拉星球上被卷入了当地土著争取生存权的战斗中,在与那威人的交往中他遇到了那威族人公主妮特丽,妮特丽交会了他在潘多拉星球生存的各种技能,在相处中他们相爱,在地球侵略者入侵潘多拉企图将那威人赶他们赖以生存的家园时,杰克幡然醒悟,他通过控制阿凡达带领那威人与地球掠夺者进行斗争,最终战胜地球侵略者,将他们赶出潘多拉,恢复潘多拉星球原有的宁静。
阿凡达影评赏析
阿凡达影评赏析《阿凡达》(Avatar)是一部由詹姆斯卡梅隆执导,该片还获得第67届金球奖最佳导演奖和最佳影片奖,第82届奥斯卡金像奖最佳艺术指导、最佳摄影和最佳视觉效果奖。
本文为阿凡达影评赏析,让我们通过以下的文章来了解。
范文一潘多拉是一个听从自然声音的世界,又是一个纯粹的,用人类的话来说是一个未被开化的动物性的世界,他们只有用更强的气势吓走危险已足够。
每一个世界都有着她们的规则在里面。
人类总是用着自以为是的方式扰乱这个微妙的秩序。
在潘多拉的世界里,各种生物之间是没有界限的,只用严格遵守着那个法则,和睦相处完全无需暴力和杀戮。
竞技,这种充分展示着力量美的运动,在你发出力量的那一刻你就征服了对手,无需战争,无需死亡。
但人类不懂,当奈蒂丽杀了攻击杰克的狼时,她伤心,虔诚地祈祷。
善良的潘多拉们能通连动物的世界,对于入侵者的人类也是毫无障碍的。
因此,她能说出人类语言,而人类为此却大费心思,其实真诚、善念就足以给人想想要的一切。
她爱森林里的每一个动物,但她爱“坚强的心,无所畏惧”,只因用心去看,可以让她如些轻易地洞悉一切,是没有人教会我们“用心去看”。
她的每一次拒绝地有这些“树精灵”出现,树精灵直通灵魂,只是人类会不会用手狠狠地挡开呢是奈蒂丽告诉杰克不要拒绝。
他们称树精灵为圣母“伊娃”,人的身体不过是装载灵魂的物品,这样相同的身体里栖息着不同的灵魂,正是灵魂的驻入,躯体就成为灵魂,与灵魂同一存在,你的血液里就会有灵魂的味道,每一个世界有一个世界的生存之道,当你冒然闯入时把你杯子里的水倒掉,学着去接受和适应。
你的善意终究会被懂。
苏杰克是肉体杰克在潘多拉的名字,当他被命名时,他已然进入到这个世界当中,然回到人类世界时他的周围都是人类那一套足可以毁灭地球的规则。
为了财富,人类的贪婪逼迫番多拉们出走,撕裂他们与家园的联系,是地球亚马逊的移植。
人类你什么时候才懂得停下掠夺的行动是你收获的开始呢?苏杰克开始了他的番多拉之行。
《阿凡达》(Avatar)全球首映 杜比3D影院系统和巴可投影系统独领风骚
E t r r eWa c / n e p i t h/ s
,
商, 茁壮网络 ( a e) i n 1通过大胆的产品创新与技术优化, P 全力支 影院音频处理器C 7 0 P 5 面市, 六月推出杜 比 数字影 院处理器 10 9 1 J 杜 D 持云南广电加快有线电 视规模化、 数字化、 化进程, 其综 D S 0 。 双向 为 S 2 0 截止 ̄2 0 年1月底 , 比3 数字影院系统在全球
每个屏幕都能提供电视服务 ( Vo vrS re ) T n ey c n ” E e 动式3 [镜 ( DE 可重复使用以降低观影成本 ) 即使在最大尺寸 们希望 “  ̄ , 的公司愿景不谋而合。 微软的 认证计划帮 助产业链加快了 户 向客 的荧幕上, 其画面也能细致入微。
交付个人电脑电 视解决方案的速度, 善了整体用户体验。 并改 额
中国四家电影院线选用杜比数字影院系统
大地文化传播集团 ( 大地) 中国电影集团 ( 影 )万达集团( 、 中 、 万
外资格认证省去了 制造商在将T G 3 0 L 20 整合到他们的基于Wi n —
T G2 0  ̄前处于生产阶段, L 30] 将用于采用Wid w 操作系 no s 统的上网本、 一体机和插件中。
ia e Pnl 表示高度认可。
隆的最新火爆大片《 阿凡达》 的全球首映上被采用。
整合后的云南广电网络将加快推进有线电视数字化整体转
化工 , 作 预计2 1年全面完成全省县级以上城市有线电视数字 01 化, 最终实现由小网 向大网、 由模拟向 数字、 单项向 由 双向、 用 泰景信 息科技 P 由 c电视解 决方案通 过wMC i Wi n n 户看电 向 “ 视” 视 用电 的转变。 茁壮网络也将凭借i n l P e a 产品的 d w 7 o s 的额外资格认证 优秀性能, 助力云南数字电 视事业步 八一 个崭新的发展阶段。
目的论视角下《阿凡达》中文字幕翻译策略
目的论视角下《阿凡达》中文字幕翻译策略[摘要] 电影作为大众传媒的重要方式,字幕对其传播和交流起着重要作用。
本文在目的论关照下,分析了影响字幕翻译过程的两个重要因素,即导演的拍摄意图和观众的接受度。
据此,以美片《阿凡达》(Avatar)为个案详细探讨了英语电影中文字幕的翻译策略,概括为简化法、补偿法、移植法、改写法和优化法五种策略;同时,参照源语对源语观众的影响效果,讨论了不同翻译策略操作下的翻译效果。
[关键词] 目的论;字幕;英语大片;翻译策略一、电影字幕的特点众所周知,作为一种综合性艺术,电影的成本在所有艺术中是最高的。
所以电影创作必须考虑到市场前景,为了商业上的需求,大片须最大限度符合大众口味,票房是重要指标。
字幕翻译,即电影中把源语的口头对话以同步字幕方式译为目的语,通常位于屏幕下方。
由于字幕和影视画面同时出现和消失,观众在观看图像,听取影片中声音、音乐的同时,还要阅读字幕,因此字幕或多或少对影片的声像欣赏有一定干扰。
英美影视语言与书面文学语言不同,它有口语性、文化性、大众性、综合性、及时性和简洁性的特点。
因此,进行字幕翻译时,针对其特点,采取相应的策略,否则,不恰当的字幕会破坏观众欣赏影片的兴致。
二、目的论的翻译理论目的论(Skopos theory)是20世纪70年代末由汉斯•威密尔(Hans Vermeer)提出的一种功能主义翻译观。
Skopo是希腊词,意思是“目的、机能、功能”。
所以翻译的目的是目的论中一个很重要的概念。
“目的”是指译文的交际目的。
译者在翻译过程中,总是以某个译文接受群体为对象,使译文在目的语环境中具有某种功能。
在Vermeer的目的论框架中,决定翻译活动目的的最重要因素之一便是受众,即译文预期的接受者,他们有自己的文化背景知识、对译文的期待以及交际需要。
在一部影片中,导演的拍摄意图会渗透在影片中,那么字幕的翻译应该实现导演的意图;除此之外,字幕的接受者,即观众,是否能够理解接受也是很重要的方面。
电影《阿凡达》赏析-最新年文档
电影《阿凡达》赏析-最新年文档电影《阿凡达》赏析詹姆斯卡梅隆(James Cameron)执导的《阿凡达》(Avatar)是有史以来制作规模最大、技术最先进的一部3D科幻电影。
该部电影沿袭了詹姆斯卡梅隆电影一贯的大场面、高科技、重情节的创作风格。
虽然“《阿凡达》60%的画面都是CG制作的”(李倩,15),但该片的成功并不是仅靠科技手段和特技场面的支撑,和卡梅隆以前执导的《泰坦尼克号》和《终结者1、2》(Terminator1,2)两部电影相比,《阿凡达》更加注重对人类生存及环境的哲学思考。
该部作品倾注了卡梅隆对人性、环境、未来的思考和关注。
在叙事结构方面通过蒙太奇切换手法突出了情节的对比,尤其是普罗米修斯号飞船(I.S.V Prometheus)和AMP装甲与潘多拉星球自然胜景和蓝色猎人(Aronyn)、对贪婪人性的背叛和对唯美爱情的忠贞、迈尔斯夸奇上校(Colonel Miles Quaritch)血腥的“以暴制暴”(Fight fire with fire)狂言与奥马提科亚(Omaticaya)族成员对地球人的真情施救等对比都给观众以强烈的视听和心灵的震撼。
在卡梅隆执导的《终结者1、2》中,人类最终以智慧和勇敢战胜了终结者人型机器人T-800和T-1000,但《阿凡达》中,人类的导弹和高科技除了摧毁了那威人的生活家园,却并没能如愿战胜灵鸟(Ikran)和长矛弓箭武装的那威人,在魅影骑士(Tortuk Makto)的带领下,地球人溃不成军,那个身着铠甲冷酷的迈尔斯夸奇上校也最终死于妮特丽(Neytiri)的利箭之下。
《阿凡达》激烈的矛盾冲突和唯美的特技场面具有摄人心魄的魅力,给观众留下了深刻的印象,同时该片对自然与文明、自由与爱以及太空开发的深层探讨也给观众留下了广阔的思考和解读空间。
一、对自然与文明的思考《阿凡达》凸显了当代人类经济发展与保护自然,本民族的发展和与他族和谐相处之间的困境。
该部电影强调了人是自然的一部分,动植物是相连的一个共生整体,毁坏自然,无疑是在毁灭人类的未来这一主题。
阿凡达讲稿
阿凡达创票房纪录之因讲稿——目录——一、影片概要1、影片概述2、剧情介绍3、拍摄班底4、票房纪录二、影片评价1、外媒评价2、网站分析3、影迷评价三、创纪录之因1、创纪录之剧情片名2、创纪录之导演创想3、创纪录之技术革新4、创纪录之全球推广5、创纪录之同名产品详细内容一、影片概要1、影片概述《阿凡达》(Avatar)是一部科幻电影,由著名导演詹姆斯〃卡梅隆执导,二十世纪福克斯出品,该片有2D、3D和IMAX-3D三种制式供观众选择。
影片的预算超过5亿美元,成为电影史上预算金额最高的电影。
此外,由导演詹姆斯〃卡梅隆监制的全平台同名游戏《阿凡达》(James Cameron's Avatar: The Game)于2009年12月1日推出,游戏类型为TPS(第三人称科幻称射击动作游戏),支持3D显示器。
另外,还有一些《阿凡达》周边产品及同名作品。
中文名:阿凡达/化身/异次元战神/天神下凡外文名:Avatar出品公司:二十世纪福克斯制片地区:美国导演:詹姆斯〃卡梅隆主演:萨姆〃沃辛顿,佐伊〃索尔达娜,西格妮〃韦弗类型:动作,惊悚,科幻,冒险片长:162分钟imdb编码:t t0499549中国上映时间:2010年1月4日美国上映时2009年12月18日编剧:詹姆斯〃卡梅隆制片人:詹姆斯〃卡梅隆,乔恩〃兰道间:2、剧情介绍3、拍摄班底4、票房纪录全球电影票房历史排名第一全球第一部票房突破19亿并一路到达27亿美元的影片全球影史票房最快过十亿美元记录:17天.二、影片评价1、外媒评价詹姆斯〃卡梅隆(James Cameron)证明了他的确是“世界之王”,作为视觉特效技术大军、生物设计大军、动作捕捉大军、替身演员大军、舞蹈演员大军、演员大军、音乐和音响大军的总统帅,他用让人目瞪口呆的方式把科幻片带进了21世纪,这就是《阿凡达》。
——《好莱坞记者报》这是近十年来最耀眼的电影,最后一场20分钟的大战让人血脉贲张。
阿凡达导演卡梅隆TED演讲
阿凡达导演卡梅隆T E D演讲(总5页)--本页仅作为文档封面,使用时请直接删除即可----内页可以根据需求调整合适字体及大小--阿凡达导演卡梅隆TED演讲这是一篇由网络搜集整理的关于阿凡达导演卡梅隆TED演讲的文档,希望对你能有帮助。
阿凡达导演卡梅隆TED演讲导语:《阿凡达》导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆在TED的励志演讲稿:失败是一个选项,畏惧不是。
从来没有一次探险是在有完全安全保障的情况下完成的。
你必须愿意承担这些风险。
《失败是一个选项,畏惧不是》1、科幻的童年我是看科幻小说长大的。
高中时,我连坐校车上下学时都在读着科幻小说。
这些书将我带到另一个世界,满足了我无止境的好奇。
每当我在学校,我总是在树丛中寻找一些“标本”——青蛙、蛇、昆虫……我把它们放在显微镜下观察。
我总是试图认知这个世界,想找到它可能的边界。
我对科幻小说的热爱或许是那个时代的写照。
60年代末期,人类登上了月球,去了深海。
通过电视,我们看到了不同的动物和地方。
这都是我们不曾想象的。
这种氛围中,我不知不觉地喜欢上了科幻小说。
每当我看完小说,故事中的影像就会在我脑海中不断放映。
或许是因为创造力必须找到一个发泄方式,我开始画外星人、机器人、飞船……我甚至会在数学课上在课本的背面画画。
对科幻小说的不断接触让我想到:外星人不一定生存在外太空,他们很有可能就生活在我们星球上。
所以15岁时,我决定成为一个潜水员。
而当时实现梦想唯一的问题是我生活在加拿大的一个小山村,离最近的海有6英里远。
但我父亲并没有让这成为我梦想的障碍,他在边境对岸的美国纽约州布法罗找到了一个潜水培训班。
于是我便在布法罗的一个泳池里获得了潜水证书。
直到两年后,当我们全家搬到加州,我才第一次有机会真正地潜水。
在这之后的40年里,我在海底大约总共花了3万个小时。
大海如此丰富多彩,众多神奇的生物生活其中。
比起我们的想象力,自然的想象力完全没有边界。
我想,至今我对大海的了解还是很少,但我对海洋的好奇却一直延续着。
科研课题论文:电影《阿凡达》中的人物性格解读
电视电影论文电影《阿凡达》中的人物性格解读故事发生在2154年,故事从地球开始,杰克?萨利是一个双腿瘫痪的前海军陆战队员,他觉得没有任何东西值得他去战斗,因此他对被派遣去潘多拉星球的采矿公司工作欣然接受。
一、电影《阿凡达》的剧情这个星球上有一种别的地方都没有的矿物元素“Unobtanium”,能够吸引人类不远万里来到这里拓荒的原因就是“Unobtanium”将彻底改变人类的能源产业。
但是问题是,资源丰富的潘多拉星球并不适合人类生活,这里的空气对人类致命,本土的动植物都是凶猛的掠食者,极度危险。
这里的环境也造就了与人类不同的种族:10英尺高(约3米)的蓝色类人生物“Navi族”。
Navi族不满人类拓荒者的到来,也不喜欢人类的机器在这个星球的土地上因为到处挖矿而留下的斑斑伤痕。
虽然潘多拉星球环境严酷,但人类只要带上空气过滤面罩,甚至可以裸露皮肤在潘多拉星球上作业。
但是由于人类即使学会纳威语也无法和纳威人直接交流,于是科学家们转向了克隆技术:他们将人类DNA和Navi人的DNA结合在一起,制造了一个克隆Navi人,这个克隆Navi人可以让人类的意识进驻其中,成为人类在这个星球上自由活动的“化身”。
然而并不是任何人都可以操纵这个克隆Navi人,只有DNA与他身上人类DNA配型相符的人才有这样的能力。
杰克?萨利的双胞胎哥哥是这个克隆Navi的人类DNA捐献者,他就可以操纵这个克隆Navi人,然而他被杀死了,采矿的公司为了不让砸下去的钱白砸(克隆Navi 人价格不菲),必须找到一个可以代替他操纵克隆Navi的人,这个人的DNA还必须和其配型相符,于是他们自然就找到了杰克?萨利,杰克?萨利对此很高兴,因为那意味着他又能走路了。
几年后,杰克?萨利到了潘多拉星球,他发现这里的美景简直无法用语言来形容,高达900英尺(约274米)的参天巨树、星罗棋布飘浮在空中的群山、色彩斑斓充满奇特植物的茂密雨林、晚上各种动植物还会发出光。
《阿凡达》
詹姆斯?卡梅隆(James Cameron)导演的影片《阿凡达》(Avatar)讲述的故事发生在一个名叫“潘多拉”(Pandora)的星球上,美国企业及其雇佣兵在那里建造基地,开采一种名为unobtanium的珍贵矿物元素。影片中令人惊叹以至难以置信的特效比比皆是。这是一种全新的感官体验──戴上3D眼镜,逼真的场景一开始让你觉得心旷神怡,但很快就被惊讶之情取代。波澜壮阔的宇宙场景并没有让观众陶醉很长时间,随着故事情节的深入,你越来越觉得这是发生在银河系外的一场越南战争,沉重的寓意让起初的激动心情逐渐消退。不过,在大多数时间里,你会沉浸在逼真得无懈可击的壮观场景之中。可以这么说,这部影片没有特技效果,因为整部片子就是个大特效。
英语默写
1.她蔑视一切困难,最后终于成功地横渡了英吉利海峡了.She brushed aside all the difficulties and succeeded in crossing the English Channel in the end.2.碰巧史密斯教授下周会来我们学校做讲座,那时你可以向他咨询一些建议.As it so happens, Professor Smith will give a lecture at our university next week, and then you can ask him for some advice.3.不久海伦就醒悟过来,她意识到不应该取笑男朋友想去好莱坞.Soon, Helen’s moment of clarity came. She realized that she shouldn’t have teased her boyfriend about going to Hollywood.4.工程师们花费了大量的时间和精力开发出完美的解决方案,以降低成本.Engineers spent much time and energy developing perfect solutions to reducing the cost.5.我所追求的不是写在简历上的一句话,而是让生活有目标.What I pursued was not a line on a resume, but a purpose in life.U21.我情不自禁的想到昨天晚上发生的事有点蹊跷.I couldn’t help thinking there’s something slightly strange about what had happenedyesterday evening.2.如果不是这场袭击了整个世界的金融危机,该项目本来是可以按时完成的.If it was not for the financial crisis that hit the whole world, the project could have been completed on schedule.3.去年夏天极其酷热,该地区大部分城市气温高达摄氏40度.Last summer, it was extremely hot, and the temperature of most cities in this area rose to as much as 40 degrees Celsius.4.绿灯表示这台空调的耗电量处在能效目标范围之内.The green light means that the electricity being consumed by the air-conditioner is within its efficiency target.5.当他还是一个大学生的时候,就已经开始创业了.He had started his own business when he was still a college student.U31.她如此骄傲,以至于没发现自己身上也有很多缺点.She is so proud that she doesn’t see many of her own shortcomings.2.直到生了重病,他才意识到钱不是万能的.He didn’t realize that money is not everything until he got seriously ill.3.如果没有接受你的劝告,我就会犯一个严重的错误.If I hadn’t a ccepted your suggestion, I would have made severe mistake.4.许多媒体用捏造事实的手段作为吸引更多观众的基础.Many media used fabricated facts as the basis for attracting more audiences.5.十年前,卡梅隆开始拍摄电影《阿凡达》,来自各行各业的专家加入了他的团队。
英语影评英语电影
英语影评英语电影全文共四篇示例,供读者参考第一篇示例:英语电影一直是全球影视产业中的重要组成部分,它们通过精彩的故事情节、出色的演员表现和优秀的制作团队,深受观众喜爱。
今天我们要谈论的是英语电影的影评,探讨一些优秀的英语电影作品,以及它们在全球范围内获得的成功。
我们要提到的是《阿凡达》(Avatar),这部由詹姆斯·卡梅隆执导的科幻片于2009年上映,轰动了整个电影界。
该片讲述了一个人类探险队在潘多拉星球上发现了一种珍贵资源,并试图将其开采,导致与当地部落的冲突。
影片的制作精良,包括震撼人心的视觉效果和动作场面,获得了观众和评论家的一致好评,成为当年最卖座的影片之一。
另一部备受瞩目的英语电影是《哈利·波特》系列(Harry Potter),根据J.K.罗琳的畅销小说改编而成,共拍摄了八部电影。
这个魔幻世界充满了神奇和冒险,讲述了一个孤儿男孩哈利·波特在霍格沃茨魔法学校学习魔法,并与邪恶巫师伏地魔斗争的故事。
这一系列电影在全球范围内都取得了巨大成功,吸引了数百万观众,也让主演们成为了国际巨星。
除了这些大制作的英语电影之外,还有一些小众但同样优秀的作品也值得一提。
比如《飞越疯狂边界》(Into the Wild),这部由西恩·潘执导的影片改编自真实事件,讲述了一个年轻人放弃一切物质生活,独自踏上一段自我探索之旅的故事。
影片通过细腻的情感表达和优美的画面,深深触动了许多观众的心灵,成为了一部具有深度的佳作。
英语电影在全球范围内拥有广泛的影响力,无论是大制作的商业片还是小众的独立作品,都能吸引不同类型的观众。
通过不同的题材和风格,英语电影展现了多样性和创新性,丰富了全球电影市场,也让人们享受到了更多精彩的视听盛宴。
希望未来还会有更多优秀的英语电影问世,让我们继续在银幕上探寻更多的精彩故事。
第二篇示例:《英语电影》是一种以英语为主要语言的电影,通常由英语国家制作,也是全球最受欢迎的电影类型之一。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
I grew up on a steady diet of science fiction. In high school I took a bus to school an hour each way every day. And I always absorbed in a book, science fiction book, which took my mind to other worlds, and satisfied, in a narrative form, this insatiable sense of curiosity that I had. And you know that curiosity also manifested itself in the fact that whenever I wasn’t in school I was out in the woods, hiking and taking “samples,”frogs and snakes and bugs and pond water, and bring it back, looking at it under the microscope. You know, I was a real science geek. But it was all about trying to understand the world, understand the limits of possibility. And my love of science fiction actually seemed to mirrored in the world around me, because what was happening, this was in the late’60s, we were going to the moon, we were exploring the deep oceans. Jacques Cousteau was coming into our living rooms with his amazing specials that showed us animals and places and a wondrous world that we could never really have previously imagined. So, that seemed to resonate with the whole science fiction part of it. And I was an artist. I could draw. I could paint. And I found that because there weren’t video games and this saturation of CG movies and all of this imagery in the media landscape, I had to create these images in my head. You know, we all did, as kids having to read a book, and through the author’s description put something on the movie screen in our heads. And so, my response to this was to paint, to draw alien creatures, alien worlds, robots, spaceships, all thatstuff. I was endlessly getting busted in math class doodling behind the textbook. That was, the creativity had to find its outlet somehow. And an interesting thing happened, the Jacques Cousteau shows actually got me very excited about the fact that there was an alien world right here on earth. I might not really go to an alien world on a spaceship someday. That seemed pretty darn unlikely. But that was a world I could really go to, right here on Earth, that was as rich and exotic as anything that I had imagined from reading these books. So, I decided I was going to become a scuba diver at the age of 15. And the only problem with that was that I lived in a little village in Canada, 600 miles from the nearest ocean. But I didn’t let that daunt me. I pestered my father until he finally found a scuba class in Buffalo, New York, right across the border from where we live. And I actually got certified in a pool in a YMCA in the dead of winter in Buffalo, New York. And I didn’t see the ocean, a real ocean, for another two years, until we moved to California. Since then, in the intervening 40 years, I’ve spent about 3,000 hours underwater, And 500 hours of that were in submersibles. And I’ve learned that that deep ocean environment, and even the shallow oceans, are so rich with amazing life that really is beyond our imagination. Nature’s imagination is so boundless compared to our own meager human imagination. I still, to this day, stand in absolute awe of what I see when I make these dives. And my love affair with the ocean is ongoing, and just as strong as it ever was.But, when I chose a career, as an adult, it was film making. And that seemed to be the best way to reconcile this urge I had to tell stories, with my urges to create images. And I was, as a kid, constantly drawing comic books, and so on. So, film making was the way to put pictures and stories together. And that made sense. And of course the stories that I chose to tell were science fiction stories: “Terminator,”“Aliens,”and “The Abyss.”And with “The Abyss,”I was putting together my love of underwater and diving, with film making. So, you know, merging the two passions. Something interesting came out of “The Abyss,” which was that to solve a specific narrative problem on that film, which was to create this kind of liquid water creature, we actually embraced computer generated animation, CG. And this resulted in the first soft-surface character, CG animation that was ever in a movie. And even though the film didn’t make any money, barely broke even, I should say, I witnessed something amazing, which is that the audience, the global audience, was mesmerized by this apparent magic. You know, it’s Arthur Clark’s law that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. They were seeing something magical. And so that got me very excited. And I thought, “wow, this is something that needs to be embraced into the cinematic art.” So, with “Terminator2,” which was next film, we took that much farther. Working with ILM, we created the liquid metal dude in that film. The success hung in the balance on whether that effect would work.And it did. And we created magic again. And we had the same result with an audience. Although we did make a little more money on that one. So, drawing a line through those two dots of experience, came to, this is going to be a whole new world, this was a whole new world of creativity for film artists. So, I started a company with Stan Winston, my good friend S W, who is the premier make-up and creature designer at that time, and it was called Digital Domain. And the concept of the company was that we would leap-frog past the analog processes of optical printers and so on, and we would go right to digital production. And we actually did that and it gave us a competitive advantage for a while. But we found ourselves lagging in the mid’90s in the creature and character design stuff that we had actually founded the company to do. So, I wrote this piece called “Avatar,”which was meant to absolutely push the envelop of visual effects, of CG effects, beyond, with realistic human emotive characters generated in CG. And the main characters would all be in CG. And the world would be in CG. And the envelope pushed back. And I was told by the folks at my company that we weren’t going to be able to do this for a while. So, I shelved it, and I made this other movie about a big ship that sinks. You know, I went and pitched it to the studio as “Romeo and Juliet’ on a ship.” It’s going to be this epic romance, passionate film. Secretly, what I wanted to do was I wanted to dive to the real wreck of “Titanic.” And that’s why I made the move. And that’s the truth. Now, thestudio didn’t know that. But I convinced them. I said, “We’re going to dive to the wreck. We’re going to film it for real. We’ll be using it in the opening of the film. It will be really important. It will be a great marketing hook.” And I talked them into funding an expedition. Sounds crazy. But this goes back to that theme about your imagination creating a reality. Because we actually created a reality where six months later I find myself in a Russian submersible two and a half miles down in the north Atlantic, looking at the real Titanic through a view port, not a movie, not HD, for real. Now, that blew my mind. And it tool a lot of preparation, we had to build cameras and lights and all kinds of things. But, it struck me know much this dive, these deep dives was like a space mission. You know, where it was highly technical, and it required enormous planning. You get in this capsule, you go down to this dark hostile environment where there is no hope of rescue if you can’t get back by yourself. And I thought like, “Wow. I am like living in a science fiction movie. This is really cool.”And so, I really got bitten by the bug of deep ocean exploration. Of course, the curiosity, the science component of it. It was everything. It was adventure. It was curiosity. It was imagination. And it was an experience that Hollywood couldn’t give me. Because, you know, I could imagine a creature and we could create a visual effect for it. But I couldn’t imagine what I was seeing out that window. As we did some of our subsequent expeditions I was seeing creatures at hydrothermal ventsand sometimes things that I had never seen before, sometimes things that no one had seen before, that actually were not described by science at the time that we saw them and imaged them. So, I was completely smitten by this, and had to do more.And so, I actually made a kind of curious decision. After the success of “Titanic,” I said, “Okay, I’m going to park my day job as a Hollywood movie maker, and I’m going to be a full time explorer for a while.” And so, we stared planning these expeditions. And we would up going to the Bismark, and exploring it with robotic vehicles. We went back to the Titanic wreck. We took little bots that we had created that spooled a fiber optic. And the idea was to go in and do an interior survey of that ship, which had never been done. Nobody had ever looked inside the wreck. They didn’t have the means to do it, so we created technology to do it. So, you know, here I am now, on the deck of Titanic, sitting in a submersible, and looking out at planks that look much like this, where I knew that the band had played. And I’m flying a little robotic vehicle through the corridor of the ship. When I say, I’m operating it, but my mind is in the vehicle. I felt like I was physically present inside the shipwreck of Titanic. And it was the most surreal kind of déjàvu experience I’ve ever had, because I would know before I turned a corner what was going to be there before the lights of the vehicle actually revealed it, because I had walkedthe set for months when we were making the movie. And the set was based as an exact replica on the blueprints of the ship. So, it was this absolutely remarkable experience. And it really made me realize that the telepresence experience that you actually can have these robotic avatars, then your consciousness is injected into the vehicle, into this other form of existence. It was really really quite profound. And may be a little bit of a glimpse as to what might be happening some decades out as we start to have cyborg bodies for exploration or for other means in many sort of post-human futures that I can imagine, as a science fiction fan. So, having done these expeditions, and really beginning to appreciate what was down there, such as at the deep ocean vents where we had these amazing amazing animals. They are basically aliens right here on Earth. They live in an environment of chemosynthesis. They don’t survive on sunlight based system the way we do. And so, you’re seeing animals that are living next to a 500 degree Centigrade water plumes. You think they can’t possibly exist. At the same time I was getting very interested in space science as well, again, it’s the science fiction influence, as a kid. And I wound getting involved with the space community, really involved with NASA, sitting on the NASA advisory board, planning actual space missions, going to Russia, going to the pre-cosmonaut biomedical protocols, and all these sorts of things, to actually go and fly to the international space station with our 3D camera systems. And this wasfascinating. But what I wound up doing was bringing space scientists with us into the deep. And taking them down so that they had access astrobiologists, planetary scientists, people who were interested in these extreme environments, taking them down to the vents, and letting them see, and take samples and test instruments, and so on. So, here we were making documentary films, but actually doing science, and actually doing space science. I’d completely closed the loop between being the science fiction fan, you know, as a kid, and doing this stuff for real. And you know, along the way in this journey of discovery, I learned a lot. I learned a lot about science. But I also learned a lot about leadership. Now you think director has got to be a leader, leader of, captain of the ship, and all that sort of thing. I didn’t really learn about leadership until I did these expeditions. Because I had to, at a certain point, say, “What am I doing out here? Why am I doing this? What do I get out of it?” We don’t make money at these damn shows. We barely break even. There is no fame in it. People sort of think I went away between “Titanic” and “Avatar” and was buffing my nails someplace, sitting at the beach. Made all these films, made all these documentary films for a very limited audience. No fame, no glory, no money. What are you doing? You’re doing it for the task itself, for the challenge —and the ocean is the most challenging environment there is, for the thrill of discovery, and for that strange bond that happens when a small group of people form a tightly knit team.Because we would do these things with 10-12 people working for years at a time. Sometimes at sea for 2-3 months at a time. And in that bond, you realize that the most important thing is the respect that you have for them and that they have for you, that you’ve done a task that you can’t explain to someone else. When you come back to the shore and you say, “We had to do this, and the fiber optic, and the attenuation, and the this and that, all the technology of it, and the difficulty, the human performance aspects of working at sea, you can’t explain it to people. It’s that thing that maybe cops have, or people in combat that have gone through something together and they know they can never explain it. Creates a bond, creates a bond of respect. So, when I came back to make my next movie, which was “Avatar,” I tried to apply that same principle of leadership which is that you respect your team, and you earn their respect in return. And it really changed the dynamic. So, here I was again with a small team, in uncharted territory doing “Avatar,” coming up with new technology that didn’t exist before. Tremendously exciting. Tremendously challenging. And we became a family, over a four and half year period. And it completely changed how I do movies. So, people have commented on how, well, you know, you brought back the ocean organisms and put them on the planer of Pandora. To me it was more of a fundamental way of doing business, the process itself, that changed as a result of that. So, what can we synthesize out of all this? You know, what are the lessonslearned? Well, I think number one is curiosity. It’s the most powerful thing you own. Imagination is a force that can actually manifest a reality. And the respect of your team is more important than all the laurels in the world. I have young film makers come up to me and say, “Give me some advice for doing this.”And I say, “Don’t put limitations on yourself. Other people will do that for you, don’t do it to yourself, don’t bet against yourself. And take risks.” NASA has this phrase that they like: “Failure is not an option.” But failure has to be an option in art and in exploration, because it’s a leap of faith. And no important endeavor that required innovation was done without risk. You have to be willing to take those risks. So, that’s the thought I would leave you with, is that in whatever you’re doing, failure is an option, but fear is not. Thank you.。