跨国公司的影响【外文翻译】
财务管理外文文献及翻译--跨国公司财务
附录A:外文文献(译文)跨国公司财务有重大国外经营业务的公司经常被称作跨国公司或多国企业。
跨国公司必须考虑许多并不会对纯粹的国内企业产生直接影响的财务因素,其中包括外币汇率、各国不同的利率、国外经营所用的复杂会计方法、外国税率和外国政府的干涉等。
公司财务的基本原理仍然适用于跨国企业。
与国内企业一样,它们进行的投资项目也必须为股东提供比成本更多的收益,也必须进行财务安排,用尽可能低的成本进行融资。
净现值法则同时适用于国内经营和国外经营,但是,国外经营应用净现值法则时通常更加复杂。
也许跨国财务中最复杂的是外汇问题。
当跨国公司进行资本预算决策或融资决策时,外汇市场能为其提供信息和机会。
外汇、利率和通货膨胀三者的相互关系构成了汇率基本理论。
即:购买力平价理论、利率平价理论和预测理论。
跨国公司融资决策通常要在以下三种基本方法中加以选择,我们将讨论每种方法的优缺点。
(1) 把现金由国内输出用于国外经营业务;(2) 向投资所在国借贷;(3) 向第三国借贷。
1专业术语学习财务的学生通常会听到一个单词总在耳边嗡嗡作响:全球化( g l o b a l i z a t i o n )。
学习资金市场的全球化必须首先掌握一些新的术语,以下便是在跨国财务中,还有本章中最常用到的一些术语:(1) 美国存托证(American Depository Receipt,ADR)。
它是在美国发行的一种代表外国股权的证券,它使得外国股票可在美国上市交易。
外国公司运用以美元发行的ADR,来扩大潜在美国投资者群体。
ADR以两种形式代表大约690家外国公司:一是在某个交易所挂牌交易的ADR,称为公司保荐形式;另一种是非保荐形式,这些ADR通常由投资银行持有并为其做市。
这两种形式的ADR均可由个人投资和买卖,但报纸每天只报告保荐形式的存托证的交易情况。
(2) 交叉汇率(cross rate)。
它是指两种外国货币(通常都不是美元)之间的汇率。
跨国公司在国际贸易中的影响力
跨国公司在国际贸易中的影响力跨国公司(Multinational Corporation,MNC)已经成为当今国际经济舞台上的重要角色。
随着全球化进程的加速推进,跨国公司在国际贸易中发挥着日益重要的影响力。
在这篇文章中,我们将探讨跨国公司在国际贸易中的影响力,并解析其对各国经济、文化和社会的影响。
首先,跨国公司的出现极大地促进了国际贸易的发展。
跨国公司不受国家边界和地理限制,可以将生产线横跨多个国家,利用全球资源和市场的优势。
它们通过跨国运作,实现了生产成本的优化和规模效应的最大化。
同时,跨国公司还带动了国际分工和产业链的形成,促进了不同国家之间的经济合作与发展。
其次,跨国公司的进入给各国经济带来了巨大的影响。
跨国公司的到来,往往意味着外商直接投资的增加。
这为各国经济带来了资金、技术、管理经验和市场信息等。
特别是对于发展中国家来说,跨国公司的投资往往是它们实现经济现代化和产业升级的重要途径。
跨国公司还通过提供就业机会,促进了当地人民的就业和提高生活水平。
然而,跨国公司在国际贸易中的影响力也引发了一系列的争议。
首先是关于资源掠夺和环境破坏的问题。
一些跨国公司在开发资源的过程中,可能会忽视环境保护和社会责任,导致资源的过度开采和环境的破坏。
其次是涉及劳工权益的问题。
一些跨国公司为了降低成本,往往在一些发展中国家使用廉价劳动力,而忽视了劳工的权益和福利。
这些问题需要跨国公司加强社会责任和环保意识,推动可持续发展。
除此之外,跨国公司还在文化和社会方面产生了广泛的影响。
随着跨国公司的进入,各国之间的文化交流和融合加深。
跨国公司的产品、品牌和商业模式也在国际间传播,对当地的文化习俗和市场风格产生了影响。
此外,跨国公司还带来了一系列的社会变革,如城市化进程的加速、消费文化的传播和生活方式的改变等。
总之,跨国公司在国际贸易中发挥着重要的影响力。
它们促进了国际贸易的发展,带动了各国经济的增长和发展。
然而,跨国公司也面临着一系列的挑战和争议。
跨国公司的发展及对世界经济的影响
可编辑ppt
24
5.1.4 跨国公司的特征
可编辑ppt
25
(1)对外直接投资(FDI)是跨国 公司向外扩张的主要
第一阶段,主要是商品输出和在国 外建立销售分公司;
第二阶段,采用直接投资的方式, 绕过贸易壁垒,在国外建立生产和 销售网。
可编辑ppt
可编辑ppt
50
有助于东道国的资本形成,扩大 了生产和就业
促进了东道国企业竞争力的增强, 加快了产业结构的调整和升级 能够促进东道国的技术进步
可编辑ppt
51
5.3.2 对东道国经济的 消极影响
可编辑ppt
52
消极影响包括政治、经济、文 化等多方面的,尤其是对东道国的 技术控制和经济控制等。
可编辑ppt
联合国《2000年世界投资报告》:截至1999年底 ,跨国公司为载体的世界对外直接投资存量达 到50000亿美元,跨国公司的数量达到63000家 ,其附属公司至少达69万家,对东道国经济的 影响越来越突出。
可编辑ppt
12
跨国公司以资金、技术、品牌和销售网 络的优势驰骋世界市场,它们控制着全 球1/3的生产、2/3的国际贸易,70%的技 术专利,90%的国际直接投资 。
可编辑ppt
34
(4)跨国公司实行内部一体化 经营管理
可编辑ppt
35
公司内部实行高度集中的管理体制, 即以母公司为中心把遍布世界各地 的分支机构和子公司统一为一个有 机的整体。
可编辑ppt
36
(5)以开发新技术推动跨国公 司的发展
可编辑ppt
37
跨国公司是技术创新的主要拥 有者和技术发明的领头羊。
可编辑ppt
13
国际战略联盟成为跨国公司 发展模式的新趋势
跨国公司对发展中国家的影响
跨国公司对发展中国家的影响随着全球化的深入发展,跨国公司在全球范围内的影响日益显著。
尤其是对于发展中国家来说,跨国公司的到来既带来了机遇,也带来了挑战。
本文将从经济、社会和环境三个方面探讨跨国公司对发展中国家的影响。
一、经济影响跨国公司在发展中国家的投资和运营不仅为当地经济带来了资金流入,还带来了先进的技术和管理经验。
这些投资和技术的引入促进了当地产业的升级和创新。
跨国公司的进入不仅提供了大量的就业机会,还带来了更高的工资水平,提高了当地居民的生活水平。
此外,跨国公司还通过与当地企业的合作,促进了供应链的发展,带动了相关产业的发展。
这些都为发展中国家的经济增长提供了重要的支持。
然而,跨国公司的影响也存在一些负面效应。
首先,由于跨国公司在发展中国家的投资主要集中在资源开发和加工制造等领域,导致了发展中国家的经济结构单一化和产业结构不平衡。
其次,跨国公司的进入也带来了竞争压力,对当地中小企业形成了冲击。
这些企业往往无法与跨国公司在技术、资金和市场方面竞争,导致了一些当地企业的倒闭和失业问题。
因此,发展中国家需要制定相应的政策和措施,保护本土产业,提高自身竞争力。
二、社会影响跨国公司在发展中国家的投资和运营也对当地社会产生了深远的影响。
首先,跨国公司的到来带动了当地基础设施建设和城市化进程。
这些投资不仅改善了当地居民的生活条件,还提升了城市形象。
其次,跨国公司在当地的社会责任意识逐渐增强,积极参与当地的公益事业和社区建设,为当地社会带来了积极的影响。
然而,跨国公司的进入也带来了一些社会问题。
首先,由于跨国公司的投资主要集中在发展中国家的一些资源丰富地区,导致了资源的过度开采和环境破坏。
其次,跨国公司的进入也带来了一些劳工问题,如低工资、长工时和劳动权益的侵害。
发展中国家需要加强对跨国公司的监管,确保其在经营过程中遵守当地的法律法规,维护劳工权益和环境保护。
三、环境影响跨国公司在发展中国家的投资和运营对环境产生了深远的影响。
跨国公司怎样影响世界的
二、如何影响世界(过程):
环顾当今世界,经济全球化的进程明显 加快。世界范围内的经济技术交流与合作 日益深化,经济全球化竞争给世界各国带 来深刻而广泛的影响。在经济全球化竞争 中,具有强大竞争力的跨国公司是经济全 球化的重要推动力量。
13
1.跨国公司通过制定全球性的经营战略,加快了经济 全球化进程
5.许多大的跨国公司,由于经济、技术实力或在某 些产品生产上的优势,或对某些产品、或在某些 地区,都带有不同程度的垄断性
9
跨国公司如何影响世界
一、自身发展因素
贰
二、如何影响世界
三、具体案例分析
10
一、跨国公司自身发展因素
1.营销策略:
跨国公司的营销策略体现在:实行价格战、广 告战,力图垄断市场,获取高额利润。通过“转移 价格”牟取高额利润。
尝试与消费者建立持久的沟通关系。宝洁公司在
中国市场研究部建立了庞大的数据库,把消费者
意见及时分析、反馈给生产部门,以生产出更适
合中国消费者使用的产品。宝洁在这方面做得比
较好,为其每一个产品都结合产品特点取了相对
应的中文名称
24
如飘柔(rejoice)、潘婷(pantene)、 海飞丝(head&shoulders)、沙宣 (Sassoon)、舒肤佳(safeguard)、玉 兰油(olay)、激爽(zest)等,产品在中 国进行宣传的时候就采用其中文名称,为 消费者对产品的记忆提供了方便。
发达国家跨国公司对外直接投资,建立众多 的生产和销售分支机构,这使得产品可以直接在 东道国生产并销售,从而绕过了贸易壁垒,提高 了其产品的竞争力,为母国带来了巨大的贸易利 益。
27
3、跨国公司海外生产会导致母国“产业空 心化”。
跨国公司的经济影响及其挑战
跨国公司的经济影响及其挑战在全球化时代,跨国公司(MNCs)已成为国际经济活动的重要参与者。
它们在世界不同国家和地区开展业务,利用各国资源与市场,推动经济增长。
然而,跨国公司的兴起并不是没有代价,它们在给东道国经济带来诸多机遇的同时,也引发了一系列挑战。
本文将探讨跨国公司的经济影响以及它们所面临的挑战。
跨国公司的经济影响资金流入与投资跨国公司通常会在发展中国家投资,大量资金流入这些国家的发展项目,从而促进当地基础设施建设和技术升级。
这种投资有助于提高当地的生产能力,为经济增长提供了动力。
例如,中国引入外资的过程,使得大量资金涌入港口、交通和通信等领域,有效改善了这些基础设施,进一步推动了本地经济的发展。
就业机会的创造跨国公司的进入往往伴随着就业机会的增加。
在生产和服务过程中,这些公司需要雇用当地员工。
虽然有时它们偏向于雇佣专业技术人员和管理人员,但底层员工的招聘比例通常较高。
通过提供就业机会,跨国公司能够改善地方居民的生活水平,进而促进消费和经济增长。
技术转移与创新跨国公司在技术和管理方面通常具有较强优势,它们在全球范围内推动技术转移,提升了东道国家的技术水平。
同时,它们也会激励本地企业进行创新竞争。
比如,在IT行业,大量跨国企业设立研发中心,吸引并培养本地技术人才,从而推动整个行业的发展。
外贸与市场扩大跨国公司通常会涉足多个国际市场,从而开辟新的销售渠道。
它们通过出口产品或服务,使得东道国的外贸总额上升。
此外,跨国公司的存在也增强了竞争,有助于提高产品质量和服务水平,消费者因此获益。
尤其是在技术密集型和品牌导向型领域,跨国公司能够推动整个行业的国际化进程。
跨国公司面临的挑战政策与合规风险跨国公司在开展业务时需要遵循东道国复杂且多样化的法律法规。
不同行业、不同地区之间的政策差异将对企业运营造成直接影响。
在一些国家,政策变动可能迅速且不可预测,比如税收政策、环保法规等,这会直接影响到公司的利润和长期投资决策。
商务英语uni4译文及答案
Unit 4 Transnational EnterprisesText A 跨国公司概述在20世纪后期,国际商务已经成为重要的经济力量了。
当今,几乎没有国家在经济上是自给自足的。
在许多国家,国际商务已经触与到人们的日常生活。
如果国际商务是跨越国境实施商务的过程,那么跨国公司就是这一活动的主要参与者。
跨国公司是世界上最大的经济机构之一。
粗略的估计表明300家最大的跨国公司拥有,或者控制着全世界生产性资产的四分之一,价值约5万亿美元。
跨国公司年销售总额相当于甚至大于大多数国家的国内生产总值〔GDP〕。
跨国公司对社会发展的影响如下:1.经济增长跨国公司通过其经济活动潜在的推动社会经济增长。
事实表明,跨国公司的直接投资和资本往来可明显地促进东道国的经济增长。
例如,在过去的10年里,在匈牙利登记的国际直接投资推进了国家经济现代化进程,促进了生产力增长和重建。
虽然理论上跨国公司可以通过经济增长促进整个社会的进步,但事实上这种关系并不多见,其理由有二:其一,跨国公司是否对东道国的经济增长负有责任,这一点并不明确。
特别是发展中国家开始关注其主要产业对国际投资的依赖程度。
他们开始意识到国外分公司经常把其利润转向国外而不是在发展中国家再投资,而且跨国公司输入重要产品和服务,带给母国更多的利润从而实际上阻碍了东道国企业的发展。
其二,即使跨国公司的行为促进了东道国经济的发展,但经济发展与社会发展之间的关系是脆弱的。
虽然全球经济每年都在增长,但这种增长实际上难以解决贫困,失业等社会问题。
劳动力问题在日本是一个很严重的问题,有5.3%的失业率,国际直接投资听起来是增长生产力,但似乎也意味着更多的失业。
许多公司也深信直接投资更大程度上是一种重组而不是提供更多就业岗位。
2.技术转移跨国公司可以通过技术转移间接地推动东道国的社会进步。
技术转移有多种形式,包括硬件,如机器设备,软件,如产品和过程设计,管理培训,市场营销与质量控制技术。
毕业设计外文翻译
引言概述:正文内容:一、外文翻译的重要性1.外文翻译在学术领域的作用外文翻译可以帮助我们了解和掌握国外学术前沿,扩大我们的学术视野,促进思维的创新与交流。
2.外文翻译在商业领域的意义外文翻译在商业领域中,特别是跨国公司的经营中起到了至关重要的作用,能够帮助企业了解竞争对手的动态,并进行市场调研和产品开发。
3.外文翻译在文化交流中的作用外文翻译是促进国与国之间文化交流的重要手段,能够传播本国文化,增进两国人民的友谊。
二、外文翻译的技巧1.语言能力的培养外文翻译的首要条件是具备扎实的外语基础,需要加强对词汇、语法和表达方式的学习。
2.翻译技巧与方法翻译技巧包括对上下文的理解、逐词逐句的翻译和准确传达原意等。
同时,还可以运用翻译工具进行辅助翻译。
3.灵活运用翻译策略根据翻译的目的和要求,可以选择直译、意译或文化转换等不同的翻译策略。
三、外文翻译的难点1.语言和文化差异不同语言和文化之间的差异可能导致翻译难度增加,需要对原文进行深入理解,并灵活运用翻译技巧。
2.专业术语的翻译外文翻译中遇到的专业术语需要准确传达,这需要对相关领域的专业知识有一定的了解,可以借助词典和其他资源进行查询。
3.语义和语境的理解在翻译过程中,对原文的语义和语境理解不准确可能导致误译,需要细致入微地理解每个句子和词语的意义。
四、外文翻译中常见的问题1.语法和表达问题外文翻译中经常会涉及到语法和表达问题,需要对原文和翻译文本进行仔细对比和校正,确保语法和表达的准确性。
2.遗漏和加词问题翻译过程中可能会出现遗漏或者加词的情况,需要细心排查,保持原文和翻译文本的一致性。
3.歧义和模糊问题外文翻译中可能会存在歧义和模糊的词语或句子,需要根据上下文进行准确的判断和翻译。
五、外文翻译的应用1.学术研究和论文撰写外文翻译能够帮助学者了解国外学术动态,并为自己的研究提供参考资料,从而提升论文的质量和水平。
2.商业与经济领域外文翻译对于跨国公司的运营和市场开拓至关重要,可以帮助企业了解竞争对手和市场需求,为企业决策提供依据。
跨国公司对国家经济的影响
跨国公司对国家经济的影响在当今全球化的时代,跨国公司(Multinational Corporations,简称MNCs)在国家经济中扮演着举足轻重的角色。
它们的影响是多方面的,既有正面的经济效应,也存在一些负面的影响。
本文将探讨跨国公司对国家经济的影响,并深入探讨它们的积极和消极影响。
首先,跨国公司对国家经济的积极影响不可忽视。
首先,跨国公司的投资和运营为当地经济带来了大量的资金流入。
这些资金不仅用于扩大生产和提高生产力,还用于改善基础设施,并创造就业机会。
例如,一家外国汽车制造商在某个国家建厂,不仅提供了大量就业机会,还促进了该国汽车零部件产业链的发展,产生了良性的经济循环效应。
其次,跨国公司的技术和管理经验也对国家经济产生积极影响。
这些公司通常具有先进的技术和管理能力,能够引领当地企业提升其技术水平和管理水平。
例如,一个英国跨国公司进入中国市场,带来了先进的制造技术和高效的管理方法,帮助中国企业提高了产品质量和生产效率,从而增强了中国在国际市场的竞争力。
此外,跨国公司还通过进口和出口贸易促进了国际贸易的发展。
这些公司作为全球供应链的组成部分,将海外市场与本地市场相连,实现了资源和产品的跨国流动。
通过跨国贸易,国家经济可以获得更多的市场机会,并吸收和运用国外的先进技术和管理经验,从而促进经济的发展和创新。
然而,跨国公司对国家经济也存在一些负面影响。
首先,它们可能通过谋求税收优惠等手段来降低税负,从而减少对国家财政的贡献。
此外,一些跨国公司可能还通过跨国利润转移等手段,避免在某些国家纳税,进一步损害国家经济利益。
此外,跨国公司在寻求最大利润时,可能会加剧环境污染和资源短缺问题。
为了降低成本,一些跨国公司可能会在环保监管较松的国家设立生产基地,导致环境污染问题。
同时,它们也会加剧资源的消耗,如木材、水资源等。
这些不可持续的做法可能会对国家和全球经济产生长期的负面影响。
最后,跨国公司对国家经济还可能带来风险。
论文外文翻译译文题目:新兴市场跨国公司的通用国际化战略以中国公司为例
1 Introductionforeign direct investment (FDI) outflows and the remarkable rise of multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging economies. FDI outflows from emerging economies reached a record level of $553 billion in 2014, accounting for 39% of global FDI outflows compared with only 12% at the beginning of the 2000s . Emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs), as vehicles of FDI outflows from emerging economies, are expanding overseas at an increasingly large scale and at an ever-accelerating speed. In 2014 there were 123 MNEs from the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) on the Fortune Global 500 list, as compared with about 20 companies from these countries a decade ago.The evolution of EMNEs has gained attention of scholars in international business (IB) and strategic management, prompting them to rethink and develop models and theories relating to the internationalization of firms. Although there was some interest in emerging market multinationals since the early 1980s , attention to this topic became an import research in international business in the 2000s, because emerging-market firms are quickly catching up and internationalizing in recent years. Scholars are starting to take stock of what is actually known about EMNEs and what is speculation .Particularly, the rise of emerging economies such as China and India has generated a number of EMNEs, providing an opportunity for scholars to review the theories of MNEs’ internationalization in contemporary context. For example, Paul and Mas examined the common factors that had contributed to the emergence of Chinese and Indian multinationals in the global market including their focus on exports, manufacturing growth, science and technology, etc. One of the evolving research entails adopting both strategic view and international business studies, a pilot study of which derived from case studies of Indian companies proposes the generic strategies for EMNEs as they embark on an international expansion.In this research, the major question is raised as what are the generic strategies of the internationalization of Chinese firms? What are the strategic directions including the targeted countries, value chain movement, branding, and mode of entry that Chinese firms are executing in their overseas expansion? How do the choices and combination of strategic directions ultimately lead to the distinct path of Chinese internationalization? What are the firm-specific factors that have influence on the generic strategies of Chinese internationalization?We consider these questions through examination of the strategies of Chinese EMNEs as they propel increasing FDI outflows world widely. We argue that the models explaining the generic strategies of Indian multinationals can be extended and modified to the study of Chinese multinationals. We begin by selecting and describing cases of Chinese EMNEs in typical manufacturing industries. We then examine the strategic directions for each of these Chinese EMNEs in its internationalization, which include a multinational’s targeted countries, value chain activities in host country, choice of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) versus own branded manufacturer (OBM), and themode of entry. On the basis of this analysis, we identify and discuss the generic internationalization strategy that can be illustrated from Chinese EMNEs. Further discussions on several firm-specific factors e.g. the industry a multinational is concerned of, the experience of its overseas operations, R&D intensity as indicator of firm-specific advantage are used to develop practical and theoretical insights from the internationalization of Chinese EMNEs. We conclude the paper by offering a few directions for future studies of the internationalization strategies of emerging-market multinationals. We believe this study will be helpful for deepening our understanding of the internationalization of EMNEs by bringing the analysis of multinational’s generic strategy into the focus.2.Literature ReviewInternational business studies are emerged from investigations of developed economies in North America and Europe. Consequently, mainstream IB theories on internationalization have been developed based on studies of developed-country multinational enterprises (DMNEs). Such theories, for example, monopolistic advantage theory , product life cycle theory , the eclectic or ownership-internalization-location (OLI) paradigm, and the internationalization process model , have provided a strong foundation for explaining the presence of MNEs. Some scholars thus argue that the emergence of EMNCs can also be explained with these theories. For example, Dunning et al. relies on OLI framework to explain the existence of EMNEs, which have become multinationals despite their limited firm-specific advantages. Rugman argues that EMNEs do not have firm-specific advantages, and their internationalization depends on the country-specific advantages in low-cost labor, finance, economies of scale, and natural resources.On the other side, a widely accepted taxonomy of strategies such as multi-domestic, transnational, and global strategies of DMNEs exists , few schemes have described the strategies of EMNEs in building up their global presence . Researchers suggest that the multinationals fromemerging markets have pursued distinctive approaches to internationalization and they enjoy different specific advantages than multinationals from developed countries. At this point, the resource-based view of firms originated from strategic management has enriched IB studies in explaining the behavior of EMNEs , since the traditional strategic management approach has not yet yielded substantive knowledge within research on internationalization as a strategic process adopted by MNEs . Mathews introduces the linkage, leverage, learning (LLL) framework, which is consistent with the extended resource-based perspective, to provide the explanations of the rapid appearance of EMNCs. Luo and Tung describe that EMNEs use international expansion as a springboard to obtain new resources and capabilities via the alliances or acquisition of firms to upgrade capabilities at home and catch up to DMNCs.The rise of new multinationals from emerging markets provides researchers an opportunity with extension and modification of the models and theories of internationalization [34]. Buckley et al. [35] find strong support for the argument that aspects of the special theory e.g. the institutional factors influencing outward direct investment help to explain the behavior of Chinese MNEs, since Chinese internationalization has both a conventional and an idiosyncratic dimension. Yiu et al. studies the international venture of Chinese companies and highlights the importance of incorporating the institutional component of a multinational including networking with domestic institutions and entrepreneurial organizational transformation into existing theories of the MNEs. Goldstein argues that as emerging market multinationals are embedded in their political, social, and ethnic networks, their internationalization of business offers valuable lessons for practical and theoretical implications. Guillen and Garcia-Canal note the decline of American model of the MNEs and to what extent we need a new theory to explain the growth of EMNEs, with analysis of the distinctive internationalization of EMNEs with regard to the competitive advantages, political capabilities, expansion paths, preference of entry mode, and organizational adaptability. The study of EMNEs can thus bring context more explicitly and comprehensively into theory and deepen our understanding of how firms internationalize.Ramamurti indicates that multinationals from emerging markets follow particular paths of international expansion, which modifies some of the predictions of existing theories of MNEs. EMNEs internationalize differently since the global environment facilitates speed-up internationalization, the industry characteristics lead to different patterns, the companies exploit differences rather than similarities in foreign expansion, and they have ownership advantages that are different from DMNEs. Consequen tly, he suggests the generic strategies for EMNEs’internationalization, each of these generic strategies, for example the vertical integrator, local optimizer, low-cost partner, global consolidator, and global first-mover have resulted in distinct internationalization paths of EMNEs . Each generic strategy leverages different country-specific advantages and firm-specific advantages and results in distinct internationalization path of emerging market multinationals. Ramamurti proposes a framework of generic internationalization strategy as a common platform for the analysis of EMNEs’ internationalization and explains how the research of EMNCs can help better understand the MNEs’ internationalization process, the contextual factors, and firm-specific and location-specific ownership advantages.However, the framework is developed from the case study of Indian multinationals, which requires more rigorous empirical studies aimed at gathering and analyzing large sample data at the firm level . Generic strategies are notunique to the internationalization of Indian EMNEs, they are also relevant to other EMNEs, with distinct aspects of each emerging economy resulting in some generic strategies being more viable than others . Williamson and Zeng , who analyzed four of the biggest Chinese multinationals, namely Hisense, Wanxiang, CIMC, and Huawei, and argued that several strategies of Indian multinationals could also be observed from the internationalization of Chinese firms. Further research on a number of Chinese firms is needed for developing alternative configurations of generic strategies that contribute more explanatory power regarding the internationalization of EMNEs.The core of the analysis of generic strategies of EMNEs’ internationalization is a company’s str ategic direction in its international expansion. In the incremental internationalization model, Johanson and Vahlne explain the selection among countries and regions in which to enter, which is also analyzed in Ramamurti’s framework of EMNEs. The incremen tal internationalization model also explains a firm’s selection of its operation in the host country e.g. production base, sales subsidiaries, procurement center, which in the generic strategy is described as the movement and relocation of value chain activities. Besides, in the linkage-leverage-learning model, Bonaglia et al. discuss the implications for OEM firms originated from emerging countries that aim to upgrade to OBM status to compete on the basis of global brand rather than just on their manufacturing capabilities. The choice of OEM versus OBM direction is probably one of the most challenges for Chinese companies while they are seeking foreign markets for international growth. Finally, the rapid expansion of Chinese companies in the 2000s through merges and acquisitions of brands and production operationsother than greenfield investment has been widely discussed in several research. All of these directions e.g. targeted country, value chain movement, OEM or OBM products, and the mode of entry are analyzed in this research in consideration about the generic internationalization strategies of Chinese EMNEs.3.Research MethodologyIn this research, we analyze the strategies of Chinese EMNEs’ internationalization through multiple case study method. Firstly, we defined the multinational enterprises (MNEs) operationally and screened out a number of multinational enterprises from typical Chinese manufacturing industries. We subsequently examine the strategic directions toward internationalization for each of these cases to find any results and make further discussions about the strategies of Chinese internationalization. Since the scope of this study is focused on the more surprising and interesting Chinese manufacturing firms, companies in service and resource sector are excluded. A number of typical Chinese manufacturers are included as telecommunication equipment manufacturers, computers and peripherals manufacturers, semiconductor manufacturers, home appliances manufacturers, consumer electronics manufacturers, automobiles and motorcycles manufacturers, and auto parts manufacturers. The Global Industry Classification Standard and Hang Seng Industry Classification System are followed here. The above industries can be categorized into high-tech industries, medium-tech industries, and medium-low-tech industries according to the OECD classification .4.Insights from Case Study: Strategic DirectionsTable 1 illustrates each of the strategic directions of Chinese EMNEs’ internationalization. The target countries are the locations of FDI activities conducted by an EMNE, which is classified into south–south or south–north paradigm in this study. South–south FDIs originate in emerging economies and flow into other emerging economies. By contrast, the destinations of south–north FDIs are developed countries. “North” is broadly defined as developed countries, including North America, Europe (excluding Eastern Europe), Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. “South” comprises emerging economies in South America, Eastern Eur ope, and Asia, and includes developing and transition economies, as defined by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNTCAD). At the firm level, south–south FDI occurs when an EMNE establishes its overseas subsidiaries in emerging economies, while south–north FDI occurs when an EMNE’s overseas subsidiaries are located in developed countries. Our analysis of each of the 50 Chinese manufacturing EMNEs showed that 5 firms are only engaged in south–south FDI, 25firms in south–north FDI, and 20 firms in both south–south and south–north FDI. There were more overseas subsidiaries of Chinese EMNEs located in developed countries than in emerging economies, which reflected that south-north FDI is the major path of Chinese internationalization. Among the developed countries, the United States and Western European countries such as Germany, France, and Netherlands were the primary FDI destinations of Chinese manufacturing EMNEs.5.Insights from Case Study: Generic Internationalization StrategiesBas ed on the above analysis of Chinese multinational’s strategic directions toward internationalization, we examined and identified the generic strategy for each of the companies (as summarized in Table 1). As in the following section, each of the generic strategy illustrated from Chinese cases targets south-south or south-north expansion, moves up or down the value chain activities, provide OEM or OBM products in international markets, enter foreign countries through greenfield investment or M&A. A multinatio nal’s preference in combination with these strategic directions thus results in distinct strategies for Chinese EMNEs including local optimizer, low-cost supplier, advanced-market seeker, and global consolidator. To be noted in the case study, few firms may pursue one strategy in pure form or do so to the exclusion of other strategies, however it is conceptually useful to specify each of the strategies and its properties. We illustrate each generic strategy with cases that have come closest to pursuing that strategy. Particularly, the identification of which generic strategy a firm had pursued was based on the analysis of its major business segment. In case of Chinese automobile and motorcycle manufacturers, it was found that a firm pursued an internationalization strategy in its small business segment is different from the strategy while internationalizing its major business.1介绍新兴经济体的外国直接投资(FDI)外流和跨国企业(MNEs)的显著增长。
跨国公司的优缺点英文作文
跨国公司的优缺点英文作文Title: Advantages and Disadvantages of Multinational Corporations。
In today's globalized world, multinational corporations (MNCs) play a significant role in shaping economies, cultures, and societies worldwide. While they bring various benefits, they also pose certain challenges. This essaywill discuss the advantages and disadvantages of multinational corporations.Advantages:1. Economic Growth: MNCs contribute to economic growth by creating job opportunities, fostering innovation, and stimulating investment in host countries. They often bring advanced technologies and management practices, leading to productivity gains and overall economic development.2. Market Expansion: Multinational corporations havethe resources and expertise to enter new markets quickly. By expanding their operations globally, they can access larger customer bases, diversify their revenue streams, and reduce dependence on any single market.3. Transfer of Skills and Knowledge: MNCs facilitate the transfer of skills, knowledge, and best practices across borders. Through training programs and knowledge sharing, they help develop local talent, improve educational standards, and enhance the capabilities oflocal businesses.4. Infrastructure Development: In many cases, multinational corporations invest in infrastructure development, such as transportation networks, utilities, and telecommunications. This not only benefits their own operations but also contributes to the overall development of the host country's infrastructure.5. Global Connectivity: Multinational corporations promote global connectivity by fostering trade and investment linkages between countries. They participate inglobal value chains, enabling the efficient allocation of resources and the specialization of production across borders.Disadvantages:1. Exploitation of Labor: Critics argue that multinational corporations often exploit cheap labor in developing countries, leading to poor working conditions, low wages, and labor rights violations. This exploitation can perpetuate income inequality and social injusticewithin and across countries.2. Environmental Degradation: MNCs sometimes prioritize profit over environmental sustainability, leading to environmental degradation and resource depletion.Activities such as deforestation, pollution, and excessive resource extraction can have adverse impacts on local ecosystems and communities.3. Market Dominance: Multinational corporations may gain significant market power in host countries, leading tomonopolistic practices, unfair competition, and the suppression of local businesses. This can hinder the development of domestic industries and limit consumer choice.4. Tax Avoidance: Some multinational corporations engage in aggressive tax avoidance strategies, exploiting loopholes in tax laws and transferring profits to low-tax jurisdictions. This deprives host countries of much-needed tax revenue, exacerbating budget deficits and hindering public investment in social welfare programs.5. Cultural Homogenization: The global expansion of multinational corporations can lead to cultural homogenization, as they promote standardized products, values, and lifestyles across different regions. This can erode cultural diversity and undermine local traditions and identities.In conclusion, multinational corporations bring both advantages and disadvantages to host countries and the global economy. While they contribute to economic growth,innovation, and global connectivity, they also face criticism for issues such as labor exploitation, environmental degradation, and market dominance. Policymakers need to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of MNCs and addressing their negative impacts through effective regulation and corporate responsibility initiatives.。
跨国公司对全球经济的影响
跨国公司对全球经济的影响跨国公司(Multinational Corporations,简称MNCs)是指在多个国家经营业务的企业,其规模庞大、操作范围广泛,对全球经济发展具有重要影响。
本文将探讨跨国公司对全球经济的影响。
1. 促进全球贸易与市场开放跨国公司通过直接投资和贸易活动,推动全球贸易的繁荣与市场开放。
这些公司通常在多个国家建立分支机构和生产基地,利用各地资源和劳动力,实现生产和销售的全球化。
通过跨国公司的运作,全球贸易得以扩大,促进了不同国家之间的互利合作,加强了国际市场的竞争与合作。
2. 技术创新与知识转移跨国公司通常在研发和科技领域具有强大实力,通过技术创新和知识转移,对全球经济产生重要影响。
这些公司在多国设立研发中心和技术转移机构,将先进的科技和管理经验引入不同国家。
通过跨国公司的技术创新和知识转移,其他国家能够借鉴先进的技术和管理模式,促进本国产业的发展,提升本国技术水平,进一步促进全球经济的整体进步。
3. 促进经济增长与就业机会跨国公司在全球范围内创造了大量的就业机会,对经济增长产生积极影响。
这些公司在各个国家设立办事机构和生产基地,提供了大量的工作岗位,带动了当地经济的发展。
同时,跨国公司还通过增加对外投资和扩大市场,促进了本国经济的增长。
这些公司的存在和发展为各国提供了良好的经济合作和发展机遇,为社会创造了更多的财富和就业机会。
4. 地区经济整合与资源配置跨国公司的进入和活动,促进了不同国家和地区之间的经济整合与资源配置。
这些公司通过直接投资和战略合作,加强了国际间产业链和价值链的联系,推动了地区经济的一体化。
它们在不同国家和地区之间调动了资源,实现了资源的高效配置和利用,为各国经济的发展提供了新的机遇。
5. 影响地方经济与社会变革跨国公司的投资和经营活动,对当地社会经济产生重要影响。
这些公司的进入,通常带来了先进的管理经验、技术和资本,推动了当地经济的发展。
同时,跨国公司还带来了先进的生产和管理模式,促使当地企业进行转型升级。
外文翻译---跨国公司的组织文化VS.民族文化
外文翻译---跨国公司的组织文化VS.民族文化毕业设计(论文)外文资料翻译学生姓名:学号:专业:设计(论文)题目:外文出处:International Journal of ManagementCases附件:1.外文资料翻译译文;2.外文原文指导教师:2012年 2 月 28 日跨国公司的组织文化VS.民族文化萨拜因舍夫克内希特概要跨国公司是世界经济的能源。
我们有足够的理由令人们专注于这篇文章,关注这一类型的公司。
分析跨国公司,事实上我们不得不承认如此的一个组织,并不是由一个同类型的企业引起,而是成千上万的企业簇拥而至,迈向全球。
大部分的跨国企业尝试在企业内部建立一种共同的组织文化(例如,建立沟通、交流价值观的研讨会)。
虽然创立这样的一种文化付出的代价非常高,会遇到不可避免的民族性或区域性文化影响。
假设组织文化,或者在一家国际企业里建立这种文化至少会付出相同的努力,某些行为的差异性均来自于民族的独特性。
这如同霍夫斯塔德(2011)跟霍夫斯塔德、明科夫(2010)所做的调查,发现、分析、总结文化差异的六个维度。
这篇文章的目的是在细节上考察民族文化与组织文化。
关键词:跨国公司文化差异组织文化民族文化介绍“跨国公司”这一术语的含义是:不仅立足于一个国家,还立足于许多不同的国家(地区)从事商业活动,满足以上条件的企业。
这样的情形给跨国公司带来许多优势(减少对一个国家在经济或政治上的依赖;不同的显著地位;商业范围内的经济规模;协合作用等。
)为了实现上面提到的优势而进行的内部文化斗争,使得企业花费更大的气力。
因此,许多跨国公司努力建立一种属于自己的组织文化,通过一种共同的“语言”或渠道来实现全球化合作。
然而却不能完全无视民族或宗教文化带来的影响。
尽管这些企业经常开展一些昂贵的项目来建立共同的组织文化,但是跨国企业里每个个体的行为与思想是千差百异。
文化差异—民族水平毫无疑问,霍夫斯塔德和他的IBM论文(《公司内部员工态度调查项目》,进行于1967年——1973年,从72个国家20种语言中调查超过11.6万人)在文化研究这一领域发挥着巨大的作用。
跨国公司的优缺点英文作文
跨国公司的优缺点英文作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成,希望大家下载以后,能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。
文档下载后可定制随意修改,请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,如想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!Cross-border companies have become increasingly popular in recent years, as they offer many advantages and disadvantages.On the one hand, cross-border companies have the advantage of being able to operate in multiple countries. This allows them to access new markets and customers, which can lead to increased profits and growth. Additionally, cross-border companies can take advantage of lower labor costs and tax rates in other countries, which can help them save money and remain competitive.However, cross-border companies also face many challenges. For example, they must navigate complex legal and regulatory systems in different countries, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Additionally, cultural differences and language barriers can make it difficult to communicate effectively with employees, customers, and suppliers in other countries.Another disadvantage of cross-border companies is the risk of political instability and currency fluctuations. Changes in government policies or economic conditions can have a significant impact on a company's operations and profitability, especially if it relies heavily on a particular country or region.Despite these challenges, many companies continue to expand their operations globally. By carefully managing risks and taking advantage of opportunities, cross-border companies can achieve success in a rapidly changing global marketplace.。
跨国公司对国际贸易的影响
跨国公司对国际贸易的影响随着全球化进程不断加速,跨国公司(MNCs)在国际贸易中扮演着越来越重要的角色。
在这个全球化的时代,跨国公司的出现和发展已经成为一个不可忽视的现象。
它们的崛起和壮大不仅对国际贸易造成了深刻的影响,而且对全球经济、社会和文化的变革产生了深远的影响。
第一部分:跨国公司的概念跨国公司是指一家企业在不同国家开展业务活动的公司,其生产和经营覆盖多个国家。
跨国公司具有很高的生产规模和技术力量,可以通过跨国合作、国际贸易等方式发挥自己的优势。
跨国公司通常有多个生产基地,可以通过技术转移、资本流动等方式进行整合和利用,形成利益联盟和竞争优势。
第二部分:跨国公司的出现和发展,对国际贸易造成了深刻的影响,其主要表现在以下几个方面:1.促进国际贸易的增长和发展跨国公司的出现和发展,扩大了国际贸易的范围和规模,促进了国际贸易的增长和发展。
跨国公司通常具有很高的生产和经营规模,通过经济的互利合作和技术的转移,促进了国际贸易的发展。
2.加剧了国际贸易的竞争和压力跨国公司在国际贸易中具有很高的市场份额和竞争优势,加剧了国际贸易的竞争和压力。
跨国公司的竞争能力往往比本土企业更强,对本土企业形成了较大的竞争压力,而这种竞争压力反过来也推动了国内企业的发展。
3.促进了国际贸易的优化和协调跨国公司在国际贸易中具有较大的资源和优势,可以通过技术转移、经验分享等方式促进国际贸易的优化和协调。
跨国公司的存在和发展,对国际贸易的协调和发展产生了积极的影响。
4.影响了国际贸易的收益和风险分配跨国公司在国际贸易中常常扮演着重要的角色,对国际贸易的收益和风险分配也产生了深刻的影响。
跨国公司往往通过技术转移和跨境资本流动,实现了在不同地区的收益分配和风险控制。
第三部分:跨国公司面临的挑战和机遇跨国公司在国际贸易中面临着诸多的挑战和机遇,在这个全球化的时代,跨国公司如何应对和把握这些挑战和机遇,成为了一个重要的课题。
1.面对贸易保护主义,跨国公司需要寻求合作和创新在当前贸易保护主义盛行的情况下,跨国公司需要采取积极的策略,寻求合作和创新,以应对国际贸易的挑战。
外文翻译--东道国市场的跨国公司、竞争和生产力
Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-CountryMarketsRichard E. CavesB. Variables and SpecificationsThe data source available for Australia provides estimates of value-added and employment in the foreign-owned and domestic sectors, and thus allows the construction for each of a crude measure of productivity —value-added per employee. We must face the hazards of measuring productivity by output per unit of a single input. Another constraint is the aggregation of the Australian data. Only 23 manufacturing industries are covered, and one of these (musical instruments, with total employment of less than one thousand and productivity in the domestic sector one-quarter of that in foreign subsidiaries) had to be discarded. Because of these and other limitations, these data will not bear the weight of some of the subtle research designs that economic theory can suggest. But those designs also require the assumption of purely competitive long-run equilibrium, foresworn at the start of this paper. We employ weaker statistical tests consistent with both the data available and the assumption about microeconomic relations set forth above. A subsequent section considers competing theoretical frame-works that would require stronger assumptions about production functions.We seek to explain value-added per worker in the home-owned sectors (VW) of Australian manufacturing industries. What matters, clearly, is the level in an industry's home-owned sector relative to that attained by competing foreign subsidiaries (VWs). In the regressions reported below the dependent variable is VWA, and VWs is placed among the independent variables to take account of its interaction with them. Regressions were also estimated with VWA/VWs as the dependent variable: the poor results suggest that the interaction of other variables with VWs needs to be utilized. Our chief hypothesis holds that a larger population of subsidiaries in an industry will, in the long run, induce higher technical efficiency and faster transfer of technology to competing domestic firms. Because productivity is being explained, it seemed important to measure subsidiaries' shares by inputs rather than outputs, and hence we employ foreign-owned firms' share of industry employment (SE). The measure is available for 1962 as well as 1966; the lagged relation was used, because the hypothesized relation between foreign share and domestic productivity should entail investment decisions and other time-consuming reallocations. The regressions reported below were run, as a check, with unlagged values of SE. The results deteriorated somewhat, but did not change greatly. The relation between SE and VWA need not be a continuous one. Perhaps what matters is the presence or absence of a "substantial" bloc of subsidiaries. A dummy variable classifying industrial into thosewith less (8 industries) and more (14 industries) than 10 per cent foreign shares displayed less explanatory power than the continuous variable SE, employed in the results reported below.If SE and VWA are related on a long-term cross-industry basis, we might also expect home-sector productivity to respond to recent changes in the shares held by subsidiaries. Hence we included the variable DSE, the change in SE between 1962 and 1966. Its sign, however, cannot be predicted confidently. It would be positive if short-term gains in the subsidiaries' share bestir the home sector to greater efficiency. On the other hand, it would be negative if disturbances affect predominantly the productivity level of the home-owned firms rather than of the subsidiaries. Also, recalling the Canadian results, a rising subsidiary share puts pressure on the profits of the home-owned sector and thus reduces one component of their value-added. We return below to the short-term dynamics of the relations among these variables.Efficiency shortfalls in a lagging sector might be enlarged if it could hold its work-force while paying wages lower than those in the more efficient sector. Ideally, home-sector wages would enter as an endogenous variable in a more elaborate model. With data limitations blocking this avenue, it remains desirable to make sure that any relation between VWA and SE is not due solely to differences in wages between the home and subsidiary sectors. Hence we add the independent variable PAS, payroll per worker in the home-owned sector divided by payroll per worker in the subsidiary sector. A positive relation is of course expected because value-added, the dependent variable, includes payroll. Also employed is the variable PAU, payroll per worker in the home-owned sector divided by (exchange-rate adjusted) payroll per worker in the corresponding United States industry. This variable fills the same defensive role as PAS, and in addition would reveal any differences between industries in supply-determined costs of labour to Australian firms, the effect of deflation by United States wages being (roughly) to remove inter-industry differences in the skill content of labour requirements.For similar purgative reasons we included in some regressions a rough measure of capital rentals per worker in the home-owned sector relative to those in the corresponding United States industry (CAU). "Capital rentals" are nothing more than value-added minus payroll, and are included in the dependent variable. As with the variable PAU, normalizing by the United States counterpart permits a loose check on the possibility that the relation of VWA to SE might be obscured by supply- determined differences among Australian industries in the cost of capital.Finally, two variables were included to test minor substantive hypotheses. The Canadian results suggest that diseconomies of small scale might influence productivity in the home-owned sector, and these would probably be more marked (ceteris paribus) in Australian industries that are small overall relative to their United States counterparts. VWA should thus be positively related to SIZE, here defined astotal employment in the Australian industry divided by employment in the corresponding United States industry. (As with SE, an input-based measure seems more appropriate than one based on output.) Our hypothesis about technical efficiency suggests that competitive pressure from whatever source should favourably affect the home-owned sector's productivity. Imports could provide such a discipline, and so we include the value of competing imports divided by the value of output for the Australian industry (IM).III. SUMMARYThis paper tests several hypotheses about the effects of foreign direct investment on domestic-owned firms competing with foreign subsidiaries. Subsidiaries may serve as an effective competitive force, reducing the (excess) profits earned by domestic competitors and improving allocative efficiency. The profits in Canadian manufacturing industries do show a weak tendency to vary inversely with the foreign share, although the relation may depend on differential attainment of economies of scale. No relation is evident for unconcentrated industries or industries with low subsidiary shares.Foreign investment may also impel higher technical efficiency in competing domestic firms and speed the transfer of new technology to them. For Canada we find subsidiary shares unrelated to a crude measure of relative productivity levels for manufacturing industries as a whole. Canadian tariffs may help to explain this fact. In Australia's manufacturing sector, however, higher subsidiary shares do apparently coincide with higher productivity levels in competing domestic firms.B. 变量和规格对澳大利亚有用的数据来源为外资和国内部门的增值和就业提供预算,并且为生产力初步测量的构建提供了可能——每个雇员的增值。
跨国公司的经济地位与政治影响
中国对外直接投资现状二
据中国商务部统计,截至2003年底,经商务部批准的 我国非金融类海外企业累计达到7470家,中方协议投 资额114.27亿美元。其中2003年达到20.87亿美元,同 比增长112.3%。而且单项投资规模越来越大:截至 2002年底,平均每家企业投资134.20万美元;2002年 当年,平均每家投资280.86万美元;2003年,平均投 资额达到409.21万美元。亚洲是中国最大的海外投资 目的地,其次是北美、非洲和南美,最后是欧洲,而 且投资主要集中在中东欧。
跨国公司的经济地位与政治影响
Transnational Corporations: economic role and political influence on the sovereignty nations
跨国公司的定义
官方权威定义:跨国公司必须具备三个条件 一、在两个或两个以上国家建有经营实体,不管这些 实体采取何种法律形式和在哪个领域从事经营 二、这种企业在一个或更多中央决策体系下进行管理, 并有共同的政策和战略 三、这种实体通过股权或其他方式形成联系,使其中 一个或几个实体可能对别的实体施加重大影响,特别 是则草案》1985 学术权威定义:跨国公司是由母公司及其国外分支机 构组成的股份制企业或非股份制企业 ——UNCTAD《世界投资报告》1995
联合国贸发会议最近发表的世界投资报告估计,截至 2002年底,中国累计海外投资达到350亿美元,而在 1991年,中国海外的投资总额不过30亿美元左右, 1995年也只有150亿美元。中国海外投资在近10年出 现了很大的飞跃。但与美国、日本等发达国家相比, 中国海外投资存量还是很低的。截至2002年底,日本 海外资产总存量为365.9万亿日元(约合34500亿美元), 美国同期为68912.51亿美元。即便按贸发会议统计的 350亿美元计算,中国累计海外投资额只相当于日本 的百分之一,美国的千分之五。全球2003年的跨国直 接投资总额为6530亿美元,中国的海外投资额即便按 每年50亿美元计,也不到全球跨国投资总额的千分之 八,这大致相当于英法19世纪末的水平。
跨国公司的经济影响
跨国公司的经济影响随着全球化的进程不断加快,跨国公司已经成为全球经济的重要组成部分。
这些公司通过在全球范围内进行投资、生产和销售,对全球经济产生了深远的影响。
本文将探讨跨国公司的经济影响,包括积极和消极的影响。
首先,跨国公司的积极影响是显而易见的。
它们为全球经济增长做出了重要贡献。
跨国公司通过在全球范围内投资,促进了资本的流动和资源的优化配置。
这些公司不仅在本国创造了就业机会和税收收入,而且还推动了其他国家的经济发展。
此外,跨国公司的技术创新和品牌效应也促进了全球经济的发展。
这些公司通过引进新技术、开发新产品,推动了全球产业结构的升级和转型。
同时,跨国公司的全球化经营也促进了国际贸易和投资的增长,推动了全球经济的增长和繁荣。
除了对经济增长的贡献,跨国公司还对全球经济治理产生了影响。
跨国公司通过参与国际组织、制定国际规则和标准,对全球经济治理体系产生了重要影响。
这些公司通过参与国际谈判和协商,为全球经济治理体系的改革和完善提供了重要的意见和建议。
同时,跨国公司的全球化经营也促进了各国之间的经济合作和交流,推动了全球经济治理体系的不断完善。
然而,跨国公司的经济影响并非只有积极的一面。
它们也存在着一些消极的影响。
首先,跨国公司的扩张可能会导致资源分配的不公平。
一些发展中国家的资源被跨国公司所控制,导致当地经济发展受到限制,加剧了贫富差距和地区发展不平衡的问题。
此外,跨国公司的扩张还可能导致环境问题加剧。
一些跨国公司为了追求利润最大化,可能会忽视环境保护和可持续发展,导致环境污染和资源浪费等问题。
其次,跨国公司的进入可能会对当地市场的竞争格局产生影响。
一些跨国公司凭借其品牌效应和技术优势,可能会挤压当地企业的生存空间,导致市场垄断和价格波动等问题。
此外,跨国公司的扩张还可能导致知识产权侵权等问题。
一些跨国公司可能会侵犯其他国家的知识产权,导致知识产权保护体系受到破坏,进而影响技术创新和产业升级的进程。
综上所述,跨国公司的经济影响是复杂而多面的。
举例说明跨国公司的影响
举例说明跨国公司的影响【篇一:举例说明跨国公司的影响】koch制药公司有着广泛的国际业务,是美国一家大型的药业集团.1978年该公司开始与杨森公司谈判,最终在1988年确定成立一家共同拥有的从事制造业务的子公司.这个公司的领导人叫赵志宏.他在杨森公司任副总经理,同时兼任koch-yangshen公司的董事长,决定公司的基本政策.1992年,richard sanford任总经理,负责处理公司的日常事务.peterschuster和几位中国主管作为他的助手.这是一个典型的跨国公司内部文化冲突的案例.在这个案例中schuster先生和sanford先生对母国文化和当地文化的认识和理解相距甚远.schuster先生对中国文化从认同最终达到崇拜,以至于其思想和行为无一不透露着所受到的中国文化的影响.schuster先生从学习中国语言到学习中国文学乃至中国历史,进而结交了很多朋友,大学毕业后又义无反顾地来到了中国并娶了一位中国姑娘为妻.在工作中他深受中国文化的影响,注重人际关系,与中国员工打成一片,甚至于为一位中国员工被解雇求情.而sanford先生则认为,美国文化是一种比较优越的文化,美国的海外公司对中国的最大贡献是给中国带来新的思想和创新精神.一个优秀的国际业务管理人员,应以本国文化为基本准则,对当地文化要做到了解和具有直观感受,但不能为当地文化所禁锢,这样就会丧失管理效率和工作效率.由此在日常管理工作中就产生了冲突.【篇二:举例说明跨国公司的影响】内容提要:本文通过跨国公司推动世界经济一体化进程,促进并控制了国际贸易的发展推动国际资本流动的发展,加速了生产国际化,促进科技的开发利用日趋国际化这五部分,来论证其对世界经济影响不断扩大.提出对其正面影响的利用,对负面影响的控制. 关键词:跨国公司一体化国际化贫富差距健康有序跨国公司是由两个或两个以上国家的经济实体所组成,并从事生产、销售和其他经营活动的国际性大型企业,作为一种以全球市场为经营目标的企业形态。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
外文翻译原文Some Effects of the Multinational CoporationsMaterial Source:Intereconomics Author:R.Krishnamurti,GenevaThe arguments against the multinational corporations, in the terms in which they have been presented by INTERECO- NOMICS, are obviously designed to stimulate discussion and counterarguments. Therefore the generalisations in these arguments require to be given further precision, detailed qualification and balanced analysis.Multinational or international corporations follow a world-wide strategy in the interest of the head office and therefore without any ties to a country. This must necessarily lead to a conflict of interests with the host country.The nature and degree to which multinational corporations follow a world-wide strategy vary according to the particular sector or sectors in which the corporation operates, the size of the parent firm and the network of subsidiaries which it has built up in host countries. The degree of control also differs as between various decision-making areas. Broadly, the major decision-making areas are financial policies including capital expansion, export policy, pricing policy, production planning, research and development and personnel policy. The structure and the form of organization of, for example, a large US multinational corporation tends to vary from those of a relatively smaller US corporation or for that matter, of a smaller European Corporation. Nevertheless the large corporations, particularly those of the US and quite a number of the larger European corporations, follow global strategies. Integrated networks of production and market allocation arrangements form the essential elements of the world strategy of the corporation which is carried out by centralised decision-making. The extent of autonomy which any particular subsidiary may be permitted to exercise would depend on its own size, and the importance of the market or markets for which it caters.The Multinationals' Objectives In LDCsThe activities of multinational in developing countries are governed by thefollowing objectives: obtaining, maintaining or expanding a foreign market, securrng supplies of raw materials, meeting and overcoming competitive forces in the international market which necessitate the development of foreign bases both at national and regional levels; and taking advantage of low labour costs in developing countries. When the manufacturing activities of multinationals in a developing country are essentially designed to enter, retain or expand the domestic market, the subsidiary may have a certain degree of autonomy in determining the level of domestic production and pricing policy, as long as it does not enter the international market, and the products in question are simple manufactures not involving the continuing supply of up-to-date technology. But if the subsidiary wants to enter the world market or expand its product lines or obtain up-to-date technology and know-how, or even make substantial capital outlay, considerations of the parent firm's global strategy will surely have a decisive effect. The USA accounts for the largest number of these large corporations, with a significant number coming also from Japan, the Federal Republic of Germany, the UK and France. Other countries, such as the Netherlands and Switzerland, have also a number of large multinationals.There are a large number of medium and small size enterprises of West European origin with networks of subsidiaries in developing countries. Sufficient evidence is not available on the extent of centraiised decision-making policies followed by the medium size and smaller enterprises, as compared with the large corporations. The general impression seems to be that the former probably apply policies which are less tightly knit and enforced from the centre than the latter. This is probably the case with subsidiaries in developing countries, which are themselves well established. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that the parent company foregoes control over major policies even in such cases.While the worldwide strategies of the multinational corporations may well be drawn up by the head office in the light of the interest of the corporation as a whole, this does not mean that the strategy is automatically not in harmony with the interests of the constituent parts of the corporation or of the country in which it operates. Obviously the stronger the position of individual subsidiaries, the greater will be their say on the strategy adopted. The decisions will inevitably reflect compromises within the power structure of the corporation.Necessary Adaptations of Worldwide StrategiesThe multinational corporation has necessarily to take into account, to a varying extent, the interests of the governments of both parent and host countries, asexpressed in their various laws and policies, namely requirements under antitrust laws or competition policies, national bans on sales of exports to particular countries, foreign exchange control and other screening procedures, etc. These undoubtedly affect the strategy of the multinational corporation, which is required to adapt its decisions to these legal and policy stipulations of governments. To the extent that these interests are difficult to reconcile, conflicts of interests arise. The question of permanent sovereignty over natural resources, which is generally accepted by the international community under various resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly has often been raised in connexion with cases involving nationalisation.As far as manufacturing industries are concerned, developing countries account only for relatively small shares of world production and trade. The developing countries' subsidiaries of multinational corporations will therefore have only a very limited influence on the corporations' worldwide strategy and their activities may well be fitted into a particular strategy agreed upon for the corporation as a whole. Whether this will lead to conflicts of interests between the developing country's government and the multinational corporation will depend on a number of factors, such as[] commitments by the parent company or head office for plant expansion in other countries,[] commitments or decisions with regard to exports for example, agreement that a particular subsidiary should supply particular markets,[] previous commitments or decisions with regard to the supply of specific raw materials and inermediate goods for example, the purchasing of such goods within the corporation, rather than using similar domestic goods which are available, [] decisions to process raw materials extracted by a subsidiary in a developing country in another country.If conflicts are to be limited both within the corporation and between the corporation and governments, obviously the worldwide strategy of a multinational corporation will need to adapt constantly to changing conditions and policies of governments. Above all, what is important is that multinational corporations should with regard to their activities in developing countries pay greater attention to the interests and desires of these countries for a faster rate of economic expansion and increased foreign exchange earnings.Multinationals have often used political and economic pressure specially in less developed countries (LDCs), in order to bring about political actions which suit theireconomic interests.The application of global policies by the multinational corporations frequently gives rise to conflicts. Because of the size, power and resources of the corporations, governments, particularly those of developing countries often feel that they do not have the power to deal or negotiate effectively with them. Frequently the domestic jurisdiction of the host country is inadequate. In many developing countries, despite general policies to encourage direct foreign investment, there is often suspicion that the multinational corporation is a foreign agent that tends to acquire control in key economic sectors. Many developed countries also have a similar experience, and like the developing countries, attempt to exercise control over the activities of the multinationals. The political aspect of the relationship of the host country to the corporation and vice versa assumes prominence in connexion with the issues of sovereignty over natural resources and the control of key industries. It also arises when cases of political interference occur and become public. The developing countries generally have weak negotiating power and not infrequently lack necessary information and expertise in their dealings with multinationals. These also create tensions.译文跨国公司的影响资料来源: 共同经济体作者:R.Krishnamurti,Geneva 对跨国公司的观点,在他们的条款已被国际经济学组学提出,显然是旨在鼓励讨论和反驳。