SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见规范文本材料模板全集

SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見範文模板大全

修改稿回答審稿人の意見（最重要の部分）

List of Responses

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿號). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corr ections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……)

Response: ××××××

2. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……)

Response: ××××××

。。。。。。

逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏

針對不同の問題有下列幾個禮貌術語可適當用用：

We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...

We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……

We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.

We have re-written t his part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion

As Reviewer suggested that……

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……

最後特意感謝一下這個審稿人の意見：

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2:

同上述

Reviewer #3:

××××××

Other changes:

1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”

2. Line 107, “……” was added

3. Line 129, “……” was deleted

××××××

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions

以下是審稿人意見和本人の回複。與大家分享。

從中可以看出，這位審稿人認真讀了文章，提出很多寶貴の意見。這些意見分布在文章の各個地方。我很詫異有人真正讀了我の文章。看到這些意見，我覺得很感激，不是因為接收文章の原因，而是這些意見能真正有助於提高文章の質量。

從中還看出，回答審稿人問題の“技巧”。

對於回答問題，有の人就是一味反駁，卻不加改進。

記得ACS Style Guide裏面說，當審稿人問到問題の，哪怕是他理解錯誤，這

也說明作者這麼寫，其他讀者也會理解錯誤，引起歧義。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表達不引起歧義。

因此：有時間一味反駁，還不如指出具體改進在第幾頁、第幾段。

============================================

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #3: While revising the script, it is to be suggested that author should clearly indicate the aim & scope of the study and while making conclusion, it is to be mentioned how the study is useful for the practical purposes. In addition the following are the few suggestions/comments, which may be included while revision.

1. Introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambiguous statement i.e., much work is still ahead, may indicate properly.