Leadership style summary

合集下载

leadership style

leadership style

Adapted from “The Wall Street Journal Guide to Management” by Alan Murray, published by Harper Business.Leadership is less about your needs, and more about the needs of the people and the organization you are leading. Leadership styles are not something to be tried on like so many suits, to see which fits. Rather, they should be adapted to the particular demands of the situation, the particular requirements of the people involved and the particular challenges facing the organization.In the book “Primal Leadership,” Daniel Goleman, who popularized the notion of “Emotional Intelligence,” describes six different styles of leadership. The most effective leaders can move among these styles, adopting the one that meets the needs of the moment. They can allbeco me part of the leader’s repertoire.Visionary. This style is most appropriate when an organization needs a new direction. Its goal is to move people towards a new set of shared dreams. “Visionary leaders articulate where a group is going, but not how it will get there – setting people free to innovate, experiment, take calculated risks,” write Mr. Goleman and his coauthors.Coaching. This one-on-one style focuses on developing individuals, showing them how to improve their performance, and helping to connect their goals to the goals of the organization. Coaching works best, Mr. Goleman writes, “with employees who show initiative and want more professional development.” But it can backfire if it’s perceived as “micromanaging” an employee, and undermines his or her self-confidence.Affiliative. This style emphasizes the importance of team work, and creates harmony in a group by connecting people to each other. Mr. Goleman argues this approach is particularly valuable “when trying to heighten team harmony, incre ase morale, improve communication or repair broken trust in an organization.” But he warns against using it alone, since its emphasis on group praise can allow poor performance to go uncorrected. “Employees may perceive,” he writes, “that mediocrity is tolerated.”Democratic. This style draws on people’s knowledge and skills, and creates a group commitment to the resulting goals. It works best when the direction the organization should take is unclear, and the leader needs to tap the collective wisdom of the group. Mr. Goleman warns that this consensus-building approach can be disastrous in times of crisis, when urgent events demand quick decisions.Pacesetting. In this style, the leader sets high standards for performance. He or she is “obsessive about doing things better and faster, and asks the same of everyone.” But Mr. Goleman warns this style should be used sparingly, because it can undercut morale and make people feel as if they are failing. “Our data shows that, more often than not, pacesetting poison s the climate,” he writes.Commanding. This is classic model of “military” style leadership – probably the most often used, but the least often effective. Because it rarely involves praise and frequently employs criticism, it undercuts morale and job satisfaction. Mr. Goleman argues it is only effective in a crisis, when an urgent turnaround is needed. Even the modern military has come to recognize its limited usefulness.四种领导风格具体如下:①支持型领导(Supportive leadship):他们员工福利和个人需求极为关心。

如何成为一名有效的领导者英语作文

如何成为一名有效的领导者英语作文

如何成为一名有效的领导者英语作文In today's dynamic and rapidly changing world, the importance of effective leadership cannot be overstated. A great leader is someone who can inspire and motivate a team to achieve extraordinary results, navigate through challenges, and bring out the best in each individual. Becoming an effective leader requires a blend of skills, qualities, and experiences that are constantly honed and refined. Here are some key elements that contribute to effective leadership:1. **Vision and Direction**: An effective leader must have a clear vision for the team or organization. They must be able to articulate this vision in a way that激发了团队成员的热情和承诺。

A leader's role is to set the direction, outline the goals, and ensure that everyone is aligned with the overall objective.2. **Communication Skills**: Communication is crucial for any leader. Effective leaders are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and honestly. They listen actively, encouraging feedback and ideas from their team members.Good communication fosters trust, understanding, and cooperation.3. **Decision-Making Abilities**: Effective leaders are decisive and confident in their decisions. They gather information, assess options, and make timely decisions that align with the team's goals. They are also willing toaccept responsibility for their decisions and adjust course when necessary.4. **Leadership Styles**: No one leadership style fits all. Effective leaders are flexible and adjust their leadership style to suit the situation and the individuals they are leading. They might adopt a hands-on approach fora new team member or delegate authority to a seasoned professional.5. **Empathy and Understanding**: A great leader understands the needs, aspirations, and challenges of their team members. They empathize with their team, recognize individual strengths, and provide support and encouragement. By understanding their team, leaders can create a positive work environment where people feel valued and motivated.6. **Continuous Development**: Effective leaders are lifelong learners. They are constantly seeking feedback, reading, attending workshops, and developing new skills. They encourage their team members to do the same, fosteringa culture of continuous improvement and growth.7. **Adaptive and Resilient**: The world is constantly changing, and effective leaders must be able to adapt to these changes quickly. They must be resilient, able to bounce back from failures and challenges, and lead their team through periods of uncertainty.8. **Integrity and Authenticity**: Leaders must maintain high ethical standards and demonstrate integrityin all their actions. They should be authentic, true to their values and principles, and set an example for their team to follow.In conclusion, becoming an effective leader is a journey that requires continuous effort, learning, andself-reflection. It's about developing a blend of skills, qualities, and experiences that enable you to inspire and motivate your team towards achieving remarkable success. By cultivating these elements, you can emerge as a leader whonot only leads but also transforms and grows the team around you.**如何成为一名有效的领导者**在当今充满活力和快速变化的世界中,有效领导的重要性不言而喻。

优秀管理者的管理风格

优秀管理者的管理风格

优秀管理者的管理风格
1. Situational Leadership Style(情境领导风格)
此风格适用于不同的团队和不同情况下的领导方式,依据员工的
工作能力、技能、动机和才能,选择不同的领导方法来达到最佳的结果。

这种风格非常灵活,能够适应变化。

2. Transformational Leadership Style(变革型领导风格)
这种风格的管理者可以激发员工的内在动力和潜力,使其超越自我,追求更高的目标。

这种风格的管理者会鼓励员工创新、创造,并
且不断地提供支持和鼓励,帮助员工发挥出最大的潜力。

3. Coaching Leadership Style(教练型领导风格)
教练型领导风格的管理者会倾听员工的想法和观点,指导员工如
何做出正确的决策,并且会为员工提供帮助和支持。

这种风格的管理
者会建立和员工之间的相互信任和合作,使员工能够不断发展和成长。

4. Democratic Leadership Style(民主型领导风格)
这种风格的管理者会鼓励员工参与决策,给员工更多的自主权和
责任,建立一个团队合作的氛围。

这种风格的管理者会倾听员工的意
见和建议,并且会为员工提供支持和帮助。

5. Servant Leadership Style(仆人型领导风格)
这种风格的管理者认为自己是为团队服务的,他们会尽力满足员
工的需求和期望,并且会为员工提供支持和鼓励。

这种风格的管理者
会倾听员工的意见和建议,并且会为员工提供帮助和指导。

同时,这
种领导风格还注重员工的发展和成长。

领导风格理论

领导风格理论

领导风格理论领导风格理论(average leadership style,ALS)是由美国依阿华大学的研究者、著名心理学家勒温和他的同事们从30年代起就进行关于团体气氛和领导风格的研究。

勒温等人发现,团体的任务领导并不是以同样的方式表现他们的领导角色,领导者们通常使用不同的领导风格,这些不同的领导风格对团体成员的工作绩效和工作满意度有着不同的影响。

勒温等研究者力图科学地识别出最有效的领导行为,他们着眼于三种领导风格,即专制型、民主型和放任型的领导风格。

勒温认为,这三种不同的领导风格,会造成三种不同的团体氛围和工作效率。

专制型的领导者只注重工作的目标,仅仅关心工作的任务和工作的效率。

但他们对团队的成员不够关心,被领导者与领导者之间的社会心理距离比较大,领导者对被领导者缺乏敏感性,被领导者对领导者存在戒心和敌意,容易使群体成员产生挫折感和机械化的行为倾向。

专制型(autocratic) 团队的权力定位于领导者个人手中,领导者只注重工作的目标,只关心工作任务的完成和工作效率的高低,对团队成员个人不太关心。

在这种团队中,团队成员均处于一种无权参与决策的从属地位。

团队的目标和工作方针都由领导者自行制定,具体的工作安排和人员调配也由领导者个人决定。

团队成员对团队工作的意见不受领导者欢迎,也很少会被采纳。

领导者根据个人的了解与判断来监督和控制团队成员的工作。

这种家长式的作风导致了上级与下级之间存在较大的社会心理距离和隔阂,领导者对被领导者缺乏敏感性,被领导者对领导者存有戒心和敌意,下级只是被动、盲目、消极地遵守制度,执行指令。

团队中缺乏创新与合作精神,而且易于产生成员之间的攻击性行为。

民主型的领导者注重对团体成员的工作加以鼓励和协助,关心并满足团体成员的需要,营造一种民主与平等的氛围,领导者与被领导者之间的社会心理距离比较近。

在民主型的领导风格下,团体成员自己决定工作的方式和进度,工作效率比较高。

民主型(democratic) 团队的权力定位于全体成员,领导者只起到一个指导者或委员会主持人的作用,其主要任务就是在成员之间进行调解和仲裁。

管理学领导名词解释

管理学领导名词解释

管理学领导名词解释管理学领导是指在组织中负责领导和管理工作的人的集体称呼。

在管理学领域,有许多与领导相关的名词,下面我将介绍几个常见的名词及其解释。

1. 领导者(Leader):指在组织中负责领导和指导员工的人。

领导者具备良好的人际关系能力、决策能力和激励能力,能够有效地引导员工,实现组织的目标。

2. 领导风格(Leadership Style):指领导者在实施领导过程中所采用的方法和策略。

常见的领导风格包括权威型、参与型、民主型等。

领导者的领导风格对员工的工作表现和组织的绩效有着重要影响。

3. 领导力(Leadership):指领导者在履行领导职责过程中所展现出的能力和特点。

领导力分为个人领导力和组织领导力两个层面,包括任务导向型、关系导向型、变革型等不同类型的领导力。

4. 领导力开发(Leadership Development):指帮助领导者不断提升领导力水平的过程。

领导力开发可以通过培训、教育、辅导等方式进行,旨在帮助领导者发展出适应不断变化的组织环境和管理挑战的能力。

5. 领导者魅力(Charisma):指领导者具备的吸引和影响他人的特质和能力。

领导者魅力包括个人魅力和领导力魅力两个维度,能够激励员工积极参与工作,增强组织的凝聚力和激励力。

6. 战略领导(Strategic Leadership):指领导者在组织中制定与推动战略目标的过程。

战略领导包括对外部环境的分析和预测、对内部资源的合理配置和利用、以及对组织战略的制定和实施等活动。

在管理学领域,领导是组织成功的关键要素之一。

通过深入理解和研究领导的相关概念和理论,能够帮助组织更好地开展领导者的选拔、培养和评估工作,提高组织的领导力水平,实现组织的长期成功和可持续发展。

LeadershipStyles领导力类型

LeadershipStyles领导力类型

Leadership Styles
Visionary Leadership
Coaching Style
Affiliative Leadership
Democratic Leadership
Pacesemanding Leadership
Leader characteristics
How style builds resonance
He moves people towards shared dreams.
Connects what a Creates harmony
person wants; with by connecting
the organization's people to each
Inspires. Believes in own vision. Empathetic. Explains how and why people's efforts contribute to the 'dream'.
Listens. Helps people identifying their own strengths and weaknesses. Counselor. Encourages. Delegates.
The impact of
the style on the
Often ― ― when used
(business)
+++
++
+
+
Often ― ―
too exclusively or poorly
climate
When style is appropriate

流利说商务英语 Level 6 Unit 2 Part 4(一)Leadership Styles - 副本

流利说商务英语 Level 6 Unit 2 Part 4(一)Leadership Styles - 副本

流利说商务英语Level 6 Unit 2 Part 4(一)Leadership StylesA person's leadership style shows how they use power to lead other people.Since certain leadership styles will be more successful in certain situations, there is not a perfect style that fits into every business.A leader is often required to adapt their leadership style according to different situations.authoritative 有权威的;命令式的;当局的Authoritative leaders take full control of all activities and decisions on a team.They set clear directions for how work should be done and provide frequent and detailed feedback.An authoritative leadership style is effective when control is necessary, such as when there is little room for error.But if a leader is working with a very experienced team, this leadership style can seem egotistical.democratic 民主的;民主政治的;大众的Democratic leaders encourage their team to participate in the decision-making processes.They are open to ideas from team members, which helps to motivate the team.This leadership style is effective when a team needs to come up with creative solutions to problems.However, it may not work well in emergencies or when team members are not competent enough to contribute.When a team isn't experienced enough to contribute, it's better to avoid being too democratic.To succeed as an authoritative leader, one needs to be visionary and able to resolve conflicts quickly.Most people prefer to work with a democratic leader who encourages teamwork and cooperation.A leader is often required to adapt their leadership style according to situation. Authoritative leaders like to set clear directions for how work should be done. Democratic leaders are open-minded to ideas from team members.pacesetting 定速度的;带头的Pacesetting leaders set high performance standards for themselves and their staff. They pursue high work efficiency and are willing to replace whoever doesn't meet their standards.A pacesetting style can be effective when a team is already motivated and skilled and when a leader needs quick results.However, if the standards set by a leader are too high, employees could easily feel stressed and demoralized.affiliative 有亲和力的Affiliative leaders regularly encourage their team and like to nurture a sense of belonging in an organization.They help strengthen emotional bonds among team members, which creates a positive atmosphere.Therefore, an affiliative style is effective when team morale is low and needs to be improved.However, a leader should not always use this style because it can create a culture where poor performance will be tolerated.What kind of leaders tend to closely supervise their employees' work? Authoritative What kind of leadership style is the most effective when there's a need of quick results? DemocraticA pacesetting leader puts heavy pressure on team members, which may even affect their physical health.Affiliative leaders like to seek an amicable resolution to tense or difficult situations. Pacesetting leaders are willing to replace whoever doesn't meet their standards.。

authoritative leadership style -回复

authoritative leadership style -回复

authoritative leadership style -回复什么是权威型领导风格,它的特点是什么,以及如何发展和应用这种领导风格。

权威型领导风格是一种强势且高度自信的领导方式,领导者通过明确的目标设定和全面的控制权来指导团队的行动。

这种风格的特点在于领导者具有决策能力和明确的指导方向,能够有效地协调团队成员的行为和努力,以实现组织的目标。

权威型领导风格通常有以下几个特点:1. 决策风险承担:权威型领导者有信心并有能力承担组织决策的风险。

他们通常有充分的知识和经验,并相信自己能够做出正确的决策。

2. 明确的指导方向:权威型领导者能够为团队成员制定明确的目标和行动计划。

他们清楚地知道团队应该朝着哪个方向前进,并能够为团队提供明确的指导。

3. 控制权和权威:权威型领导者通常拥有组织的控制权和决策权。

他们能够在团队中发出明确的指令,并期望团队成员按照指示执行。

他们对于达成目标的关键决策具有决定性的影响力。

4. 绩效导向:权威型领导者注重组织的绩效和成果。

他们对于达成目标和取得业绩有很高的期望,并依靠自己的影响力和能力来推动团队的工作。

要发展和应用权威型领导风格,以下是一些步骤和建议:1. 了解自己的能力和知识:权威型领导者需要具备丰富的知识和经验,并有信心自己能够做出正确的决策。

因此,你需要不断学习和提升自己的能力,使自己成为组织中的专家。

2. 与团队建立信任和尊重的关系:权威型领导者需要与团队建立紧密的关系,建立信任和尊重。

这可以通过与团队成员进行有效的沟通和协作来实现,听取他们的意见和建议,并给予认可和奖励。

3. 设定明确的目标和行动计划:权威型领导者应该能够为团队成员设定明确的目标和行动计划。

这需要你清楚地了解组织的愿景和使命,并能够将其转化为具体的目标和行动计划。

4. 建立明确的权威和控制权:作为权威型领导者,你需要建立明确的权威和控制权。

这可以通过明确的指示和要求来实现,确保团队成员按照你的方向和计划行动。

TheFourLeadershipStyles四种领导风格

TheFourLeadershipStyles四种领导风格

The Four Leadership StylesDirections: Read the following descriptions of the four leadership styles. Which best describes you as a leader? Note the contexts where you minister best and the strengths that you bring to that context or situation. Also, be aware of your weaknesses.Directors (The Strong Leadership Style)Context. Directors are task-oriented leaders. As such, they bring this strength to ministries that need more task orientation.Strengths. Directors excel at the task-oriented aspects of leadership. Some are visionaries and most set lofty goals for their ministries and regularly challenge people to accomplish those goals. They’re change agents who question the status quo and may struggle with maintaining traditions. They tend to be point pastors in their churches and are often involved in leading church planting and refocusing efforts.Weaknesses. While Directors are strong, task-oriented leaders, they often struggle with the relational side of leadership. They have to resist the temptation to take control of a ministry and to work around rather than with a ministry team.Inspirationals (The Personable Leadership Style)Context. Inspirationals are people-oriented leaders that bring this strength to ministries that need a more relational orientation. Like the Directors, they often gravitate to lead positions, especially in church contexts.Strengths. Some temperament tools call Inspirational leaders influencers because they tend to be natural born leaders, especially in relating well to people. Thus, they, too, often lead church planting and refocusing efforts.Weaknesses. However, some Inspirationals can be loud and obnoxious. They enjoy being the center of attention, and that often bothers followers. While Inspirationals are strong relationally, they may struggle at accomplishing necessary leadership tasks and may prove to be weak at administration.Diplomats. (The Supportive Leadership Style)Context. Diplomats are people-oriented leaders who, like the Inspirationals, bring a more relational orientation to the ministry context. They lead best in situations that call for a person that is caring, supportive, friendly, and patient They prefer a slower ministry pace and resist change environments because they’re concerned about the risks change brings and how it will affect people.Strengths. Other leaders praise Diplomats for their loyalty and support, especially in difficult times. They are great team players that cooperate well with their teammates in accomplishing ministry tasks.Weaknesses. Some people complain that Diplomats are so nice that it’s hard to be angry with them when you need to be-you don’t want to hurt their feelings. Diplomats would benefit by being more proactive and taking the initiative in ministry opportunities.Analyticals(The Conscientious Leadership Style)Context. Analyticals are task-oriented leaders. Thus, they can bring certain complementary, task-oriented abilities to their ministry contexts. They lead well in ministry situations calling for people that are analytical, factual, probing, detail oriented, and that demand high quality. An example is an academic or teaching setting such as a Bible college or seminary classroom. They also function well as lead pastors of churches that emphasize a strong pulpit characterized by deep Bible teaching, the teacher-pastor model.Strengths. Analyticals are conscientious, self disciplined leaders that are self-starters. They are good at evaluating their church and ministry programs and holding churches to their theological moorings. Some people are attracted to Analyticals for their careful, accurate Bible teaching. Analyticals who preach prefer to cover the Bible in depth, using lots of facts and details to support their conclusions.Weaknesses. In their leadership roles, Analyticals attempt to maintain the status quo or even look to the past and tradition for direction. Consequently, they may not see the need to move into the future and consider new ministry approaches. Analyticals have a tendency to be critical of innovative leaders that do ministry differently, and they may even stir up negative feelings toward them. They would benefit much by developing strong relational ministry skills with their staff and congregation.These leadership styles also combine to form at least sixteen different styles. For example, the Director style could have the following combinations: Director-Inspirational, Director-Diplomat, and Director-analytical. Perhaps you noted that you have a combination of two or possibly more styles.。

领导理论

领导理论

有关领导的理论很多,随着管理理论的发展,领导理论大致有四种理论学派:早期的特质理论和行为理论、近期的权变理论以及当前的领导风格理论。

按照时间的顺序,在20世纪40年代末,也就是领导理论出现的初期,研究者主要从事的是领导的特制理论的研究,其核心观点是:领导能力是天生的;从40年代末至60 末,主要进行的是领导行为理论的研究,其核心观点是:领导效能与领导行为、领导风格有关;从60年代末至80年代初,出现领导权变理论,其核心观点是:有效的领导受不同情景的影响;从80年代初至今,大量的出现了领导风格理论的研究,其主要观点是:有效的领导需要提供愿景、鼓舞和注重行动。

一、领导特性理论(Trait theories)1、传统的特性理论2、现代特性理论3、魅力型领导(Charismatic leadership)4、管理者胜任力(Managerial competencies)5、领导艺术(Romance of leadership)二、领导作风理论(Style theories)1、勒温的领导风格类型理论2、利克特的四种管理方式三、领导行为理论(Behavioral theories)1、密执安大学领导行为的研究(University of Michigan Studies)2、俄亥俄大学领导行为的研究(Ohio State Studies)3、管理方格图(The Managerial Grid)4、关怀/主动模型(Consideration/Initiating Structure)5、任务/关系导向行为(Task-oriented/relations-oriented Behavior)四、领导权变理论(Contingency Theories)1、专制-民主连续体模型2、菲德勒模型(Fiedler’s Model)3、领导参与模型(Leader-participation model)4、认知资源理论(Cognitive resource theory)5、目标-通路理论(Path-Goal theory)6、常规决策模式(Normative decision model)7、领导-成员交换理论(Leader-member exchangetheory, LMX)8、垂直对偶带/领导成员交换理论(V ertical dyad linkage/leader–member exchange)9、隐涵领导模式(implicit leadership theory),10、领导生命周期理论(Life-cycle approach to leadership)五、领导理论研究的新动向1、领导归因理论(Attribution theory of leadership)2、领导魅力理论(Charismatic leadership theory)3、处理型与变革型领导理论(transactional andtransformational leadership theory)4、超越型领导理论(Super-leadership theory)5、愿景领导(visionary leadership)6、电子化领导(E-leadership)7、领导创意人群(Leading creative people)8、跨文化领导(Leading across cultures)9、领导伦理(Ethical leadership)。

谁是最好的领导者英语作文

谁是最好的领导者英语作文

谁是最好的领导者英语作文Who is the Best Leader?Leadership is a crucial aspect of any organization, community, or country. The effectiveness of a leader can greatly impact the success and well-being of those under their guidance. However, determining who the best leader is can be a subjective and contentious matter. Different people have different opinions on what makes a great leader, and there are countless examples of influential leaders throughout history. In this essay, I will explore various qualities of effective leaders and analyze some of the most renowned leaders to ultimately determine who the best leader is.One of the most important qualities of a great leader is the ability to inspire and motivate others. A great leader can rally people around a common goal or cause and encouragethem to work together towards achieving it. They are able to ignite a sense of passion and determination in their followers, empowering them to reach their full potential. effective leaders are often empathetic and compassionate towards the needs and concerns of those they lead. They are able to listen and understand the perspectives of others, and make decisions that benefit the collective rather than just their own interests.Another essential quality of a great leader is theability to make strategic and well-informed decisions. A strong leader possesses critical thinking skills and is able to analyze complex situations to identify the best course of action. They are able to remain calm and composed under pressure, and are not easily swayed by emotional or external influences. great leaders are often visionary and forward-thinking, able to anticipate and plan for the future to ensure the continued success of their organization or community.Now, let's explore some examples of influential leaders throughout history and analyze their leadership qualities. One of the most revered leaders in history is Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi was a champion of nonviolent resistance and played a pivotal role in India's fight for independence from British rule. His leadership was characterized by his unwavering commitment to his principles, his ability to inspire and mobilize the masses, and his emphasis on compassion and empathy towards others. Gandhi's leadership was instrumental in transforming India and inspiring the global movement for civil rights and freedom.Another influential leader is Nelson Mandela, the anti-apartheid revolutionary who became the first black President of South Africa. Mandela's leadership was marked by his resilience and determination in the face of adversity, his unwavering commitment to justice and equality, and hisability to unite a divided nation. Despite spending 27 years in prison, Mandela emerged as a unifying figure and played acrucial role in ending apartheid and fostering reconciliation in South Africa.Moving on to the realm of business leadership, Steve Jobs is often cited as an exemplary leader. The co-founder of Apple Inc., Jobs was known for his visionary thinking, his ability to innovate and disrupt industries, and his unwavering dedication to excellence. Jobs's leadership transformed Apple into one of the most successful and influential companies in the world, and his legacy continues to inspire the tech industry today.In the realm of political leadership, Winston Churchill is often hailed as one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century. As the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom during World War II, Churchill's leadership was marked by his courage, resilience, and ability to rally the British people in the face of immense adversity. His inspirational speechesand steadfast resolve played a crucial role in the Allied victory against Nazi Germany.When we analyze the leadership qualities of these influential figures, it becomes clear that the best leader is one who possesses a combination of qualities such asinspiring and motivating others, making sound decisions, and demonstrating empathy and compassion towards others. While Gandhi, Mandela, Jobs, and Churchill each had their own unique leadership style, they shared these essentialqualities that made them exceptional leaders in their respective fields.In conclusion, the best leader is one who is able to inspire and motivate others, make strategic and well-informed decisions, and demonstrate empathy and compassion towards those they lead. Through the examples of influential leaders such as Gandhi, Mandela, Jobs, and Churchill, we can see how these qualities have helped them leave a lasting impact onthe world. Ultimately, the best leader is one who is able to bring out the best in others and make a positive difference in the lives of those they lead.。

领导风格英文作文

领导风格英文作文

领导风格英文作文英文:Leadership style is a crucial aspect of any organization. It can determine the success or failure of a company, as well as the satisfaction and productivity ofits employees. There are several different leadership styles, each with its own strengths and weaknesses.One leadership style is autocratic, which involves a leader who makes all the decisions and expects strict obedience from their subordinates. While this style can be effective in certain situations, such as in a crisis, it can also lead to resentment and low morale among employees.Another style is democratic, where the leader involves their subordinates in decision-making and encourages collaboration and participation. This style can lead to higher job satisfaction and creativity among employees, but can also lead to slower decision-making processes.Finally, there is the laissez-faire style, where the leader provides minimal guidance and allows their subordinates to make their own decisions. This style can be effective when working with highly skilled and motivated employees, but can also lead to confusion and lack of direction.Personally, I believe in a combination of democratic and laissez-faire leadership styles. I think it is important to involve employees in decision-making and encourage collaboration, but also to trust and empower them to make their own decisions and take ownership of their work. This can lead to a more positive and productive work environment.中文:领导风格是任何组织的重要方面。

12种不同类型的领导风格

12种不同类型的领导风格

12种不同类型的领导风格12 Different Types of Leadership StylesAccording to Research by asaecenter, leadership style is the way a person uses power to lead other people. Research has identified a variety of leadership styles based on the number of followers. The most appropriate leadership style depends on the function of the leader, the followers and the situation.Some leaders cannot work comfortably with a high degree of followers’ participatio n in decision making. Some employers lack the ability or the desire to assume responsibility. Furthermore, the specific situation helps determine the most effective style of interactions. Sometimes leaders must handle problems that require immediate solutions without consulting followers.What are Different Leadership Styles?We have covered 12 different types of ways people tend to lead organizations or other people. Not all of these styles would deem fit for all kind of situations, you can read them through to see which one fits right to your company or situation.12种不同类型的领导风格根据asaecenter的研究,领导风格是一个人利用权力领导他人的方式。

你认为作为上司应该具备哪些素质英文范文

你认为作为上司应该具备哪些素质英文范文

你认为作为上司应该具备哪些素质英文范文As a superior, possessing the right qualities is crucial for effective leadership and employee satisfaction. An excellent superior should embody the following attributes:1. Strong communication skillsA superior with strong communication skills caneffectively convey ideas, expectations, and feedback. They should be able to listen actively, express themselves clearly, and adapt their communication style to the specific needs of their team.2. EmpathyEmpathy is essential for a superior to understand and relate to the emotions and perspectives of their team members. This quality fosters trust, encourages open dialogue, andhelps create a supportive work environment.3. IntegrityA superior with integrity upholds strong moral principles and ethical standards. They are honest, reliable, and demonstrate consistency in their actions and decisions. Employees respect and trust leaders who embody integrity.4. DecisivenessA superior must be able to make sound decisions promptly. They should analyze information, consider the potential consequences, and act confidently. Decisive leaders inspire confidence in their team and can help navigate complex situations effectively.5. AdaptabilityAdaptability is crucial in today's rapidly changing business landscape. A superior should be able to embrace change and encourage their team to do the same. They shouldbe open to new ideas, flexible in their approach, and willing to pivot when needed.6. Strong work ethicA superior with a strong work ethic sets an example for their team members. They are dedicated, committed, andwilling to put in the effort needed to achieve success. Their hard work and dedication inspire others to do the same.7. Conflict resolution skillsConflict is inevitable in any workplace. A superior with strong conflict resolution skills can effectively navigate disagreements, mediate disputes, and find mutually beneficial solutions. This quality helps maintain a positive working environment and improves team dynamics.8. Leadership styleA superior should possess a leadership style that suits their team and organization. They may adopt a democratic,autocratic, or transformational style, depending on the situation. Effective leaders adapt their style to meet the needs of their team and foster growth.9. Inspiring vision and inspirationA superior with a clear vision for the future can inspire and motivate their team. They should be able to communicate this vision clearly and create a sense of purpose. Inspired teams are more engaged and productive.10. Empowerment and trustA superior who empowers their team and places trust in them fosters innovation and personal growth. They delegate responsibilities, provide support and guidance, and recognize the contributions of their team members.11. Development and mentoringA superior should invest time and resources in developing their team members. They should provide opportunities forlearning, growth, and advancement. Mentoring and guiding employees can lead to a more skilled and confident team.12. Problem-solving skillsA superior with strong problem-solving skills can identify challenges, analyze causes, and implement effective solutions. They encourage their team to contribute ideas and work collaboratively to overcome obstacles.13. Understanding of technology and its impactA superior should stay informed about technological advancements and understand their impact on the industry and their organization. They should be open to utilizing technology to improve processes and enhance the overall work experience.14. Ability to foster collaborationA superior should actively promote a culture of collaboration within the team. They encourage open dialogue,team-building activities, and the sharing of ideas and resources. Collaborative teams are often more creative, productive, and satisfied.15. Networking and relationship-building skillsA superior with strong networking and relationship-building skills can leverage connections to benefit the team and organization. They foster partnerships, negotiate effectively, and cultivate a positive image for their team.In conclusion, a superior must possess a diverse array of qualities to lead effectively and inspire their team. By embodying these characteristics, they can create a positive, productive, and successful work environment.。

authoritative leadership style

authoritative leadership style

authoritative leadership styleAuthoritative leadership style is a leadership approach where the leader is directive, decisive, and maintains control over decision-making and tasks. This leadership style is often characterized by clear communication, setting high standards, and providing explicit instructions to followers.In an authoritative leadership style, the leader is seen as the ultimate authority and makes key decisions without seeking input or consensus from others. They possess a strong vision and confidence in their abilities to achieve goals. This style is often used in situations where quick decision-making and efficiency are crucial.Key characteristics of authoritative leadership include:1. Clear direction: The leader provides clear instructions and expectations to their team members. They communicate goals and objectives in a direct and concise manner.2. Decisiveness: Authoritative leaders make decisions quickly and independently. They do not hesitate or second-guess themselves, which gives their team a sense of direction and stability.3. Personal responsibility: The leader takes personal responsibility for the team's performance and outcomes. They hold themselves accountable for the success or failure of the team.4. Limited input: Authoritative leaders generally limit input from subordinates when making decisions. They rely on their ownexpertise and experience to guide the decision-making process.5. Empowerment: Despite the directive nature of this leadership style, authoritative leaders still empower their team members to execute their tasks effectively. They provide resources, support, and guidance to ensure success.Benefits of authoritative leadership include the potential for efficient decision-making, clear communication, and the ability to achieve results quickly. However, this leadership style may also lead to decreased employee morale and creativity if team members feel ignored or undervalued.In summary, authoritative leadership involves a leader who is confident, directive, and maintains control over decision-making. This style can be effective in certain situations where quick and decisive action is required, but it may not be appropriate in all contexts.。

authoritative leadership style -回复

authoritative leadership style -回复

authoritative leadership style -回复什么是具有权威性的领导风格?具有权威性的领导风格是指在领导过程中,领导者以权威和果断的方式来指导团队。

这种领导风格强调领导者对团队目标和任务的明确规划,并通过强有力的指导和明确的期望来激励员工。

具有权威性的领导者通常决策迅速,为员工提供明确的指导,具备强大的组织能力和管理能力,并且能够有效地调动团队资源以实现组织目标。

为什么选择具有权威性的领导风格?选择具有权威性的领导风格有多个原因。

首先,这种领导风格适用于那些需要快速行动和明确指导的环境。

在面对紧急情况或需要迅速做出决策的任务时,具有权威性的领导者能够迅速做出决策,并向团队传达明确的指导,从而帮助团队实现目标。

其次,具有权威性的领导风格可以建立组织架构和工作流程。

通过明确规划和指导,领导者能够有效地管理团队,确保工作按时完成,并提高生产效率。

此外,具有权威性的领导风格可以在面对团队中的困难和挑战时提供指导和支持,帮助团队成员克服障碍并实现目标。

最后,具有权威性的领导风格可以激发员工的工作动力和职业发展。

领导者的明确期望和强有力的指导可以帮助员工了解自己的角色和职责,并提供发展所需的支持和资源。

通过与领导者密切合作,员工可以借鉴领导者的经验和知识,并不断提升自己的能力和技能。

如何在具有权威性的领导风格中发挥领导作用?在具有权威性的领导风格中发挥领导作用需要注意以下几个方面:1.明确和传达目标和期望。

作为具有权威性的领导者,你应该能够将组织的目标和期望明确传达给团队成员。

确保每个人都清楚地了解他们的角色和任务,并激励他们朝着共同目标努力。

2.提供明确的指导和反馈。

具有权威性的领导者应该能够向团队成员提供明确的指导,确保他们明白自己应该如何进行工作。

此外,及时提供反馈和评估结果,帮助员工认识到自己的优势和改进的方向,从而不断提高工作表现。

3.建立有效的沟通渠道。

作为具有权威性的领导者,你应该建立一个开放和透明的沟通渠道,使团队成员可以随时向你提问和分享意见。

authoritative leadership style -回复

authoritative leadership style -回复

authoritative leadership style -回复什么是权威领导风格?如何培养这种风格?以及它的优缺点是什么?在不同环境中适用吗?权威领导风格,也被称为威权型或专横型领导风格,是一种强有力的领导方式,其中领导者以明确和直接的方式指导团队成员,并对他们的工作进行严格的监督。

该风格强调权威性和权力,以确保任务得以顺利完成。

要培养权威领导风格,有几个关键步骤:第一步是建立权威形象。

领导者需要展现出专业性和独特的能力,以使团队成员相信他们具备领导的能力和知识。

第二步是制定明确目标和期望。

领导者应当清楚地传达任务的要求和预期,确保团队了解他们所追求的目标,并且明确他们的角色和职责。

第三步是实施有效的沟通。

领导者需要与团队成员保持沟通,并确保信息的传递清晰和准确。

沟通的双向性至关重要,领导者应鼓励团队成员提供反馈和建议。

第四步是展现果断行动。

权威领导者不仅仅是表达自己的意愿,更要以自己的行动为榜样,展示决断力和执行力。

他们需要在需要决策时迅速作出决策,以确保任务的顺利进行。

然而,权威领导风格也存在优缺点。

优点之一是它可以提供强有力的指导和方向。

权威领导风格使团队成员明确了解他们应该做什么,以及他们的目标和责任。

这有助于提高效率和准确性,并确保任务按时完成。

其次,权威领导风格能够在紧急情况下提供迅速的解决方案。

领导者的决定性和果断行动能帮助团队在困难时刻作出迅速反应,避免因过度讨论而浪费时间。

然而,权威领导风格也存在一些缺点。

它可能导致员工之间的合作减少,因为领导者通常独自作出决策,不太注重员工的意见和参与。

此外,在某些组织或环境下,权威领导风格可能不太适用。

一些创造性和创新性的工作需要开放和合作的氛围,而权威领导风格可能限制了员工的自主性和才能发挥。

总结起来,权威领导风格是一种强有力的领导方式,可以为团队提供明确的方向和强烈的指导。

它的培养包括建立权威形象、制定明确目标、实施有效沟通和展现果断行动。

介绍领导的英文作文

介绍领导的英文作文

介绍领导的英文作文英文回答:Leadership is a complex and multifaceted concept that has been studied and discussed for centuries. There is no single definition of leadership that is universally accepted, but most scholars agree that it involves the ability to influence and inspire others to achieve goals.There are many different styles of leadership, and the most effective style will vary depending on the situation. Some common leadership styles include:Autocratic leadership: This style is characterized by a single leader who makes all the decisions and has absolute authority.Democratic leadership: This style involves the leader consulting with others before making decisions.Laissez-faire leadership: This style gives team members a great deal of autonomy and freedom to make their own decisions.Good leaders possess a number of essential qualities, including:Vision: The ability to see the future and inspire others to share that vision.Communication skills: The ability to communicate effectively with others, both verbally and non-verbally.Interpersonal skills: The ability to build relationships with others and create a positive work environment.Decision-making skills: The ability to make sound decisions under pressure.Problem-solving skills: The ability to identify and solve problems effectively.Effective leaders are able to adapt their style to the situation and inspire others to achieve their goals. They are also able to build strong relationships with their followers and create a positive work environment.中文回答:领导力是一个复杂且多方面的概念,几个世纪以来一直被研究和讨论。

leadership style解读

leadership style解读

Blake and Mouton’s 管理图表
9
x
轻视工作 重视人 重视工作 重视人
对人的重视
轻视工作 轻视人
重视工作 轻视人
0
9
对工作的重视
4种领导方式
高 高度支持 低度指令 高度支持 高度指令
支持型行为
S3 S2 S4
低度支持 低度指令 低度支持 高度指令 高
S1

指令型行为
高度指令型的领导方式
情形领导模式
根据: 员工 工作 情形 的不同采取不同的领导方式,强调的是领 导者的灵活性。
情形领导的3个技能
1、 Flexibility 灵活性 2、 Diagnosis 诊断 3、 Contracting for Leadership 确定领导方式
4只轮胎
精神
情感
大脑
身体
你在的时候怎么样并不重要, 重要的是你不在的时候怎么样!
教 练 型
S4
放 手 型
S1
指 令 型


发展水平和领导方式
D4
D3
D2
D1
员工发展水平
发展水平
D1 “热情高涨的初学者 (意识不到自己能力弱) D2 “幻想破灭的观望者” (知道自己有能力) “懒于奉献的抵触者” (知道自己有能力) 完美工作表现者 (意识不到自己能力强)
采用领导方式
S1 指令型
Situational LEADERSHIP 情形领 导 方 式
Situational Leadership
由KEN BLANCHARD 和PAUL HERSY博士开发. 适用于各种不同文化背景
助你成为更有效的领导者
构筑强有力的领导班子

leadership styles(2)

leadership styles(2)
All companies (and good leaders) require a “mix” of leadership styles to be successful
5
What has Leadership Style got to with Diversity?
EKC policy
…Kodak is committed to creating a work environment where every person matters, and each is enabled to contribute his or her maximum potential to the company’s success…
6
Do we have a Leadership Style problem in Kodak?
Current business environment (and quarter-by-quarter cash management) has lead to a perception of increased autocratic directives from Rochester
A negative impact on business growth opportunities
7
What other Leadership Style issues do we have in GAR?
Within/across GAR Lack of understanding about country specific customs and cultures A perception that unless you are part of Kodak China, you are a “second class” Kodak citizen in GAR Regional and Country management (and goal setting) lacks “glue” because of SPG/silo reporting structures
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

M ODULE S UMMARYM ODULE 2:C ATERPILLAR L EADERSHIPF RAMEWORK:L EADERSHIP S TYLESPage Contents Section SeeIntroduction (1)Leadership Styles as a Component of the Caterpillar Leadership Framework (2)The Six Leadership Styles (6)Appropriate Use of the Different Leadership Styles (10)Summary (13)I NTRODUCTIONWelcome to the Caterpillar Leadership Framework e-learning program. This Welcomeprogram includes the following three modules:•Module 1: Caterpillar Leadership Framework: Introduction and CaterpillarLeadership Competencies•Module 2: Caterpillar Leadership Framework: Leadership Styles•Module 3: Caterpillar Leadership Framework: Work ClimateIt is recommended that you complete these modules in this order.Content Owner: Caterpillar U College of Leadership and BusinessMany of the concepts and theoretical underpinnings expressed in this programand related materials were developed by and are proprietary to Hay Group.© 2007 Hay Acquisition Company, Inc. 2007. All Rights Reserved.Developer: Tata Interactive SystemsCaterpillar: Confidential GreenL EADERSHIP F RAMEWORKThis series of three e-learning modules is intended for: Target Audience Group BenefitLeaders taking these modules priorto attending Making Great Leaders A foundational understanding of the Caterpillar Leadership Frameworkincluded in these modules to enableyou to work with and apply theconcepts in the Making Great Leaders program.Leaders taking these modules as a refresher during a Re-assessment A reinforcement of the CaterpillarLeadership Framework conceptslearned in Making Great Leaders.Employees interested in learning more about Caterpillar leadership An understanding of the keyelements of leadership effectivenesswithin Caterpillar.Employees who want to learn more before rating their leaders who are participating in a Making Great Leaders programAn understanding of the coreCaterpillar Leadership Frameworkconcepts to enable you to providemeaningful feedback to supportleaders who are attending theMaking Great Leaders program.By the end of this module, you will be able to:• Identify the six Leadership Styles• Identify the primary objective of each Leadership Style• Recognize the situations in which each Leadership Style is most and least effective• Identify which Leadership Styles are most effective in the short-term and long-termTarget Audience ObjectivesIn the previous e-learning module you were introduced to the CaterpillarLeadership Framework and to one component of the framework, Caterpillar Leadership Competencies. In this e-learning module, you will learn about Leadership Styles. The framework defines Caterpillar leadership as a combination of:• Business context and job requirements• Leadership Competencies• Leadership Styles• Work Climate• PerformanceWhen combined, these elements result inimproved performance and results atCaterpillar. As part of Caterpillar’scommitment to leadership development,assessments are used to provide leaderswith individualized feedback on theCaterpillar Leadership Competencies,Leadership Styles, and the Work Climatethat they create.Leaders are not operating in a vacuum. Leadership happens in the context of the business, such as: • Current business environment• Business challenges• Demands of senior leadership• Happenings outside the organization• Context of your job’s requirementsIntroduction Business Contextand JobRequirementsLeadership Competencies are personal characteristics that differentiate superior performance from average performance. Caterpillar’s LeadershipCompetencies for Managers and Supervisors give rise to behaviors that lead to long-term success and ensure that people meet key objectives.Leadership Styles and Leadership Competencies are strongly linked because together they create the Work Climate that the leader’s direct reports experience. Leadership Competencies are covered in detail in a separate e-learning module.Leadership Styles refers to patterns of leadership behaviors across a widerange of situations. Research has shown that a limited number of behavioral patterns among leaders explain the majority of leadership behaviors. These are classified as the six Leadership Styles:• Directive• Visionary• Affiliative• Participative• Pacesetting• CoachingEffective leaders are able to use a wide range of these styles depending on the requirements of the specific situation. Leadership Styles and Leadership Competencies are strongly linked because together they create the Work Climate that the leader’s direct reports experience. Leadership Styles are covered in detail in this e-learning module.LeadershipCompetencies Leadership StylesWork Climate is essentially people’s perception of how it feels to work in theorganization. There are six Work Climate dimensions:• Flexibility• Responsibility• Standards• Recognition• Clarity• Team CommitmentWork Climate impacts how you feel and behave and, therefore, has a direct impact on performance and results. When leaders create a positive Work Climate for their employees, employees are motivated and engaged and will do what it takes to get the job done. Work Climate is covered in detail in a separate e-learning module.Organizations have leaders to provide the vision and strategy for anorganization, to mobilize employees around the vision and strategy, and to drive performance and results.Caterpillar is not a non-profit organization. We need to generate results for our shareholders. Since many of our employees are also shareholders, generating results is good for all of us.High performing leaders achieve 20% to 30% more discretionary effort from their people because they create a positive Work Climate which means people are more engaged, more innovative, creative, and focused.Work Climate PerformanceT HE S IX L EADERSHIP S TYLESLeadership Styles are defined as the patterns of behavior a leader adopts to Introductionplan, organize, motivate, and lead his/her team. They can help create apositive work climate for employees, which in turn results in improvedperformance.There are six Leadership Styles, however, there is no one right or wrong style;the style depends on the task, people, and situation to be managed. Each stylehas its purpose, although some have more positive applications than others.In general, leadership behavior is a function of the person and the situation:Leadership Behavior = Person x SituationLeadership Style is a function of:•The individual leader’s personal characteristics•Styles the leader has seen his/her superior, mentors, or others use•The stated values in the organization of “the right way” to manage•The specific management situations and people with whom the leaderdeals mostLeadership Styles reflect how you:•Listen•Set goals and standards•Develop action plans•Direct others•Give feedback•Reward and punish•Develop employees•Establish personal relations with employeesThe six Leadership Styles are: Leadership Style DescriptionDirective This is the Do it the way I tell you leader whoclosely controls employees and motivates by threatsand discipline.Visionary This is the Firm but fair leader who givesemployees/team members clear direction andmotivates by persuasion/influence and feedback ontask performance.AffiliativeThis is the People first, task second leader whoemphasizes good personal relationships amongemployees and motivates by trying to keep peoplehappy with fringe benefits, security, and socialactivities. Participative The Participative leader encourages employee inputin decision making and motivates by rewarding teameffort.Pacesetting This is the Do it myself leader who performs manytasks personally, expects employees/team membersto follow his/her example, and motivates by settinghigh standards and letting employees work on theirown.CoachingThis is the Developmental leader who helps andencourages employees to improve theirperformance, and motivates by providingopportunities for professional development.No one Leadership Style is right or wrong. Instead, all styles have their place. The most effective leaders are capable of exhibiting a wide range of styles and select the most appropriate style depending on the demands of the particular situation. Later in this module you will learn more about situations in which each style is more effective and less effective. You’ll also review some tips on how to improve your use of each style.Overview of theSix StylesThe primary objective of the Directive Style is to obtain immediatecompliance. The main characteristics of this style are as follows:• Gives directives rather than direction by telling employees what to do. • Expects immediate compliance.• Controls tightly.• Relies on negative, corrective feedback.• Motivates by stating the negative consequences of noncompliance.The primary objective of the Visionary Style is to provide long-term directionand vision. The main characteristics of this style are as follows: • Develops and articulates a clear vision.• Solicits employee perspectives on the vision.• Sees “selling the vision” as key.• Persuades employees by explaining the “whys” in terms of employees’ or the organization’s long-term interests.• Sets standards and monitors performance in relation to the larger vision. • Uses a balance of positive and negative feedback to motivate.The primary objective of the Affiliative Style is to create harmony. The maincharacteristics of this style are as follows:• Is most concerned with promoting positive interactions and team development.• Places emphasis on addressing employees’ personal needs.• Identifies opportunities for positive feedback; stresses the importance of employee morale on performance.• Avoids performance-related confrontations.• Rewards personal characteristics more than job performance.Directive Style Visionary Style Affiliative StyleThe primary objective of the Participative Style is to build commitment andgenerate new ideas. The main characteristics of this style are as follows • Trusts that employees can develop the appropriate direction for themselves.• Invites employees to participate in the development of decisions; seeks opportunities for consensus.• Holds many meetings and listens to employees’ concerns.• Rewards adequate performance; rarely gives negative feedback.The primary objective of the Pacesetting Style is to accomplish tasks to highstandards of excellence. The main characteristics of this style are as follows: • Leads by example.• Has high standards and expects others to know the rationale behind what is being modeled.• Is apprehensive about delegating and takes responsibility away if high performance is not forthcoming.• Has little sympathy for poor performance.• Rescues the situation or gives detailed task instruction when employees experience difficulties.The primary objective of the Coaching Style is to build the long-termprofessional development of others. The main characteristics of this style are as follows:• Helps employees identify their unique strengths and weaknesses. • Encourages employees to establish development goals.• Reaches agreement with employees on the leader’s and employees’ roles in the development process.• Provides ongoing instruction, as well as feedback.• May trade off immediate standards of performance for long-term development.Participative Style Pacesetting Style Coaching StyleA PPROPRIATE U SE OF THE D IFFERENT L EADERSHIP S TYLESEffective leaders need to apply a range of styles in the right situations. Thescreens that follow provide some general guidance on situations where leadersshould and should not use the different styles.The table below shows the situations where the Directive Style is mosteffective and where it is least effective.Most Effective Least Effective•When applied to relativelystraightforward tasks•In crisis situations, whenemployees need clear directionsand the leader has moreinformation than the employees •When deviations fromcompliance will result in seriousproblems (e.g., enforcing safetyregulations)•With problem employees, when all else has failed •When applied to tasks that are not straightforward; the morecomplex the task, the moreineffective this style becomes •Over the long term, because employees are not beingdeveloped and they tend to rebel, resist passively, or leave•In extended interactions with self- motivated employeescapable of directing, andmonitoring their own workThe table below shows the situations where the Visionary Style is most effective and where it is least effective.Most Effective Least Effective•When a new vision or a clear direction and standards areneeded (i.e., in times of change) •When the leader is perceived to be the “expert” or “authority” •With new employees whodepend on the leader for activeguidance •When the leader is not perceived as credible•When there is a need for speed •When there is a lack of ability to executeIntroduction When to use the Directive Style?When to use the Visionary StyleThe table below shows the situations where the Affiliative Style is most effective and where it is least effective.Most Effective Least Effective•When used as part of a repertoire •When tasks are routine andemployees’ performanceadequate•When giving personal help (i.e., counseling)•In getting diverse, conflicting groups of individuals to worktogether harmoniously •When employees’ performance is inadequate and correctiveperformance feedback isnecessary•In complex situations needing clear direction and control •With employees who are task- oriented or uninterested infriendship with their leaderThe table below shows the situations where the Participative Style is most effective and where it is least effective.Most Effective Least Effective•When employees are competent •When employees must becoordinated as a team •When idea generation is critical to success •When there's no time to hold meetings•When employees areincompetent, lack crucialinformation, or need closesupervisionWhen to use the Affiliative Style? When to use the Participative Style?The table below shows the situations where the Pacesetting Style is most effective and where it is least effective.Most Effective Least Effective•In ambiguous situations where employees need to look to theleader as an example of howthey should proceed•When employees are highly motivated, competent, and knowtheir jobs•When quick results are required •When the leader cannot do all his/her work personally •(i.e., when the organization grows, requiring increaseddelegation)•When employees need direction, development, and coordinationThe table below shows the situations where the Coaching Style is most effective and where it is least effective.Most Effective Least Effective•When employees acknowledge a discrepancy between theircurrent level of performance andwhere they ideally would like tobe•With employees who aremotivated to take initiative, beinnovative, and seek professional development •When the leader lacks expertise •When employees require much task direction and feedbackWhen to use the Pacesetting Style?When to use the Coaching Style?S UMMARYYou have come to the end of the module Leadership Styles. Some of the Summaryimportant points covered in this module are:•Leadership Styles refers to patterns of leadership behaviors across a widerange of situations.•The Directive Style is effective in crisis situations, in relativelystraightforward tasks, and with problem employees.•The Visionary Style is effective in times of change, with new employees,and in situations where the leader is perceived to be the expert.•The Affiliative Style is effective when used as part of a repertoire, whentasks are routine, when giving personal help, and in getting diverseindividuals to work together harmoniously.•The Participative Style is effective when employees are competent, whenthey must coordinate as a team, and when idea generation is critical tosuccess.•The Pacesetting Style is effective when employees are highly motivated,when quick results are required, and also in ambiguous situations whereemployees need to look to the leader as an example.•The Coaching Style is effective when employees acknowledge aperformance discrepancy, and with employees who are motivated to takeinitiative and be innovative.。

相关文档
最新文档