Modelling non-independent random effects in multilevel models建模的非独立随机效应的多层模型-PPT课件-

合集下载

国际自动化与计算杂志.英文版.

国际自动化与计算杂志.英文版.

国际自动化与计算杂志.英文版.1.Improved Exponential Stability Criteria for Uncertain Neutral System with Nonlinear Parameter PerturbationsFang Qiu,Ban-Tong Cui2.Robust Active Suspension Design Subject to Vehicle Inertial Parameter VariationsHai-Ping Du,Nong Zhang3.Delay-dependent Non-fragile H∞ Filtering for Uncertain Fuzzy Systems Based on Switching Fuzzy Model and Piecewise Lyapunov FunctionZhi-Le Xia,Jun-Min Li,Jiang-Rong Li4.Observer-based Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for Nonlinear Systems with Time-varying DelaysWei-Sheng Chen,Rui-Hong Li,Jing Li5.H∞ Output Feedback Control for Stochastic Systems with Mode-dependent Time-varying Delays and Markovian Jump ParametersXu-Dong Zhao,Qing-Shuang Zeng6.Delay and Its Time-derivative Dependent Robust Stability of Uncertain Neutral Systems with Saturating ActuatorsFatima El Haoussi,El Houssaine Tissir7.Parallel Fuzzy P+Fuzzy I+Fuzzy D Controller:Design and Performance EvaluationVineet Kumar,A.P.Mittal8.Observers for Descriptor Systems with Slope-restricted NonlinearitiesLin-Na Zhou,Chun-Yu Yang,Qing-Ling Zhang9.Parameterized Solution to a Class of Sylvester MatrixEquationsYu-Peng Qiao,Hong-Sheng Qi,Dai-Zhan Cheng10.Indirect Adaptive Fuzzy and Impulsive Control of Nonlinear SystemsHai-Bo Jiang11.Robust Fuzzy Tracking Control for Nonlinear Networked Control Systems with Integral Quadratic ConstraintsZhi-Sheng Chen,Yong He,Min Wu12.A Power-and Coverage-aware Clustering Scheme for Wireless Sensor NetworksLiang Xue,Xin-Ping Guan,Zhi-Xin Liu,Qing-Chao Zheng13.Guaranteed Cost Active Fault-tolerant Control of Networked Control System with Packet Dropout and Transmission DelayXiao-Yuan Luo,Mei-Jie Shang,Cai-Lian Chen,Xin-Ping Guanparison of Two Novel MRAS Based Strategies for Identifying Parameters in Permanent Magnet Synchronous MotorsKan Liu,Qiao Zhang,Zi-Qiang Zhu,Jing Zhang,An-Wen Shen,Paul Stewart15.Modeling and Analysis of Scheduling for Distributed Real-time Embedded SystemsHai-Tao Zhang,Gui-Fang Wu16.Passive Steganalysis Based on Higher Order Image Statistics of Curvelet TransformS.Geetha,Siva S.Sivatha Sindhu,N.Kamaraj17.Movement Invariants-based Algorithm for Medical Image Tilt CorrectionMei-Sen Pan,Jing-Tian Tang,Xiao-Li Yang18.Target Tracking and Obstacle Avoidance for Multi-agent SystemsJing Yan,Xin-Ping Guan,Fu-Xiao Tan19.Automatic Generation of Optimally Rigid Formations Using Decentralized MethodsRui Ren,Yu-Yan Zhang,Xiao-Yuan Luo,Shao-Bao Li20.Semi-blind Adaptive Beamforming for High-throughput Quadrature Amplitude Modulation SystemsSheng Chen,Wang Yao,Lajos Hanzo21.Throughput Analysis of IEEE 802.11 Multirate WLANs with Collision Aware Rate Adaptation AlgorithmDhanasekaran Senthilkumar,A. Krishnan22.Innovative Product Design Based on Customer Requirement Weight Calculation ModelChen-Guang Guo,Yong-Xian Liu,Shou-Ming Hou,Wei Wang23.A Service Composition Approach Based on Sequence Mining for Migrating E-learning Legacy System to SOAZhuo Zhang,Dong-Dai Zhou,Hong-Ji Yang,Shao-Chun Zhong24.Modeling of Agile Intelligent Manufacturing-oriented Production Scheduling SystemZhong-Qi Sheng,Chang-Ping Tang,Ci-Xing Lv25.Estimation of Reliability and Cost Relationship for Architecture-based SoftwareHui Guan,Wei-Ru Chen,Ning Huang,Hong-Ji Yang1.A Computer-aided Design System for Framed-mould in Autoclave ProcessingTian-Guo Jin,Feng-Yang Bi2.Wear State Recognition of Drills Based on K-means Cluster and Radial Basis Function Neural NetworkXu Yang3.The Knee Joint Design and Control of Above-knee Intelligent Bionic Leg Based on Magneto-rheological DamperHua-Long Xie,Ze-Zhong Liang,Fei Li,Li-Xin Guo4.Modeling of Pneumatic Muscle with Shape Memory Alloy and Braided SleeveBin-Rui Wang,Ying-Lian Jin,Dong Wei5.Extended Object Model for Product Configuration DesignZhi-Wei Xu,Ze-Zhong Liang,Zhong-Qi Sheng6.Analysis of Sheet Metal Extrusion Process Using Finite Element MethodXin-Cun Zhuang,Hua Xiang,Zhen Zhao7.Implementation of Enterprises' Interoperation Based on OntologyXiao-Feng Di,Yu-Shun Fan8.Path Planning Approach in Unknown EnvironmentTing-Kai Wang,Quan Dang,Pei-Yuan Pan9.Sliding Mode Variable Structure Control for Visual Servoing SystemFei Li,Hua-Long Xie10.Correlation of Direct Piezoelectric Effect on EAPap under Ambient FactorsLi-Jie Zhao,Chang-Ping Tang,Peng Gong11.XML-based Data Processing in Network Supported Collaborative DesignQi Wang,Zhong-Wei Ren,Zhong-Feng Guo12.Production Management Modelling Based on MASLi He,Zheng-Hao Wang,Ke-Long Zhang13.Experimental Tests of Autonomous Ground Vehicles with PreviewCunjia Liu,Wen-Hua Chen,John Andrews14.Modelling and Remote Control of an ExcavatorYang Liu,Mohammad Shahidul Hasan,Hong-Nian Yu15.TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision MakingJiang Jiang,Ying-Wu Chen,Da-Wei Tang,Yu-Wang Chen16.Video Analysis Based on Volumetric Event DetectionJing Wang,Zhi-Jie Xu17.Improving Decision Tree Performance by Exception HandlingAppavu Alias Balamurugan Subramanian,S.Pramala,B.Rajalakshmi,Ramasamy Rajaram18.Robustness Analysis of Discrete-time Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control with Normalized Adaptive LawsQing-Zheng Gao,Xue-Jun Xie19.A Novel Lifecycle Model for Web-based Application Development in Small and Medium EnterprisesWei Huang,Ru Li,Carsten Maple,Hong-Ji Yang,David Foskett,Vince Cleaver20.Design of a Two-dimensional Recursive Filter Using the Bees AlgorithmD. T. Pham,Ebubekir Ko(c)21.Designing Genetic Regulatory Networks Using Fuzzy Petri Nets ApproachRaed I. Hamed,Syed I. Ahson,Rafat Parveen1.State of the Art and Emerging Trends in Operations and Maintenance of Offshore Oil and Gas Production Facilities: Some Experiences and ObservationsJayantha P.Liyanage2.Statistical Safety Analysis of Maintenance Management Process of Excavator UnitsLjubisa Papic,Milorad Pantelic,Joseph Aronov,Ajit Kumar Verma3.Improving Energy and Power Efficiency Using NComputing and Approaches for Predicting Reliability of Complex Computing SystemsHoang Pham,Hoang Pham Jr.4.Running Temperature and Mechanical Stability of Grease as Maintenance Parameters of Railway BearingsJan Lundberg,Aditya Parida,Peter S(o)derholm5.Subsea Maintenance Service Delivery: Mapping Factors Influencing Scheduled Service DurationEfosa Emmanuel Uyiomendo,Tore Markeset6.A Systemic Approach to Integrated E-maintenance of Large Engineering PlantsAjit Kumar Verma,A.Srividya,P.G.Ramesh7.Authentication and Access Control in RFID Based Logistics-customs Clearance Service PlatformHui-Fang Deng,Wen Deng,Han Li,Hong-Ji Yang8.Evolutionary Trajectory Planning for an Industrial RobotR.Saravanan,S.Ramabalan,C.Balamurugan,A.Subash9.Improved Exponential Stability Criteria for Recurrent Neural Networks with Time-varying Discrete and Distributed DelaysYuan-Yuan Wu,Tao Li,Yu-Qiang Wu10.An Improved Approach to Delay-dependent Robust Stabilization for Uncertain Singular Time-delay SystemsXin Sun,Qing-Ling Zhang,Chun-Yu Yang,Zhan Su,Yong-Yun Shao11.Robust Stability of Nonlinear Plants with a Non-symmetric Prandtl-Ishlinskii Hysteresis ModelChang-An Jiang,Ming-Cong Deng,Akira Inoue12.Stability Analysis of Discrete-time Systems with Additive Time-varying DelaysXian-Ming Tang,Jin-Shou Yu13.Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delaysXu-Dong Zhao,Qing-Shuang Zeng14.H∞ Synchronization of Chaotic Systems via Delayed Feedback ControlLi Sheng,Hui-Zhong Yang15.Adaptive Fuzzy Observer Backstepping Control for a Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Time-delayShao-Cheng Tong,Ning Sheng16.Simulation-based Optimal Design of α-β-γ-δ FilterChun-Mu Wu,Paul P.Lin,Zhen-Yu Han,Shu-Rong Li17.Independent Cycle Time Assignment for Min-max SystemsWen-De Chen,Yue-Gang Tao,Hong-Nian Yu1.An Assessment Tool for Land Reuse with Artificial Intelligence MethodDieter D. Genske,Dongbin Huang,Ariane Ruff2.Interpolation of Images Using Discrete Wavelet Transform to Simulate Image Resizing as in Human VisionRohini S. Asamwar,Kishor M. Bhurchandi,Abhay S. Gandhi3.Watermarking of Digital Images in Frequency DomainSami E. I. Baba,Lala Z. Krikor,Thawar Arif,Zyad Shaaban4.An Effective Image Retrieval Mechanism Using Family-based Spatial Consistency Filtration with Object RegionJing Sun,Ying-Jie Xing5.Robust Object Tracking under Appearance Change ConditionsQi-Cong Wang,Yuan-Hao Gong,Chen-Hui Yang,Cui-Hua Li6.A Visual Attention Model for Robot Object TrackingJin-Kui Chu,Rong-Hua Li,Qing-Ying Li,Hong-Qing Wang7.SVM-based Identification and Un-calibrated Visual Servoing for Micro-manipulationXin-Han Huang,Xiang-Jin Zeng,Min Wang8.Action Control of Soccer Robots Based on Simulated Human IntelligenceTie-Jun Li,Gui-Qiang Chen,Gui-Fang Shao9.Emotional Gait Generation for a Humanoid RobotLun Xie,Zhi-Liang Wang,Wei Wang,Guo-Chen Yu10.Cultural Algorithm for Minimization of Binary Decision Diagram and Its Application in Crosstalk Fault DetectionZhong-Liang Pan,Ling Chen,Guang-Zhao Zhang11.A Novel Fuzzy Direct Torque Control System for Three-level Inverter-fed Induction MachineShu-Xi Liu,Ming-Yu Wang,Yu-Guang Chen,Shan Li12.Statistic Learning-based Defect Detection for Twill FabricsLi-Wei Han,De Xu13.Nonsaturation Throughput Enhancement of IEEE 802.11b Distributed Coordination Function for Heterogeneous Traffic under Noisy EnvironmentDhanasekaran Senthilkumar,A. Krishnan14.Structure and Dynamics of Artificial Regulatory Networks Evolved by Segmental Duplication and Divergence ModelXiang-Hong Lin,Tian-Wen Zhang15.Random Fuzzy Chance-constrained Programming Based on Adaptive Chaos Quantum Honey Bee Algorithm and Robustness AnalysisHan Xue,Xun Li,Hong-Xu Ma16.A Bit-level Text Compression Scheme Based on the ACW AlgorithmHussein A1-Bahadili,Shakir M. Hussain17.A Note on an Economic Lot-sizing Problem with Perishable Inventory and Economies of Scale Costs:Approximation Solutions and Worst Case AnalysisQing-Guo Bai,Yu-Zhong Zhang,Guang-Long Dong1.Virtual Reality: A State-of-the-Art SurveyNing-Ning Zhou,Yu-Long Deng2.Real-time Virtual Environment Signal Extraction and DenoisingUsing Programmable Graphics HardwareYang Su,Zhi-Jie Xu,Xiang-Qian Jiang3.Effective Virtual Reality Based Building Navigation Using Dynamic Loading and Path OptimizationQing-Jin Peng,Xiu-Mei Kang,Ting-Ting Zhao4.The Skin Deformation of a 3D Virtual HumanXiao-Jing Zhou,Zheng-Xu Zhao5.Technology for Simulating Crowd Evacuation BehaviorsWen-Hu Qin,Guo-Hui Su,Xiao-Na Li6.Research on Modelling Digital Paper-cut PreservationXiao-Fen Wang,Ying-Rui Liu,Wen-Sheng Zhang7.On Problems of Multicomponent System Maintenance ModellingTomasz Nowakowski,Sylwia Werbinka8.Soft Sensing Modelling Based on Optimal Selection of Secondary Variables and Its ApplicationQi Li,Cheng Shao9.Adaptive Fuzzy Dynamic Surface Control for Uncertain Nonlinear SystemsXiao-Yuan Luo,Zhi-Hao Zhu,Xin-Ping Guan10.Output Feedback for Stochastic Nonlinear Systems with Unmeasurable Inverse DynamicsXin Yu,Na Duan11.Kalman Filtering with Partial Markovian Packet LossesBao-Feng Wang,Ge Guo12.A Modified Projection Method for Linear FeasibilityProblemsYi-Ju Wang,Hong-Yu Zhang13.A Neuro-genetic Based Short-term Forecasting Framework for Network Intrusion Prediction SystemSiva S. Sivatha Sindhu,S. Geetha,M. Marikannan,A. Kannan14.New Delay-dependent Global Asymptotic Stability Condition for Hopfield Neural Networks with Time-varying DelaysGuang-Deng Zong,Jia Liu hHTTp://15.Crosscumulants Based Approaches for the Structure Identification of Volterra ModelsHouda Mathlouthi,Kamel Abederrahim,Faouzi Msahli,Gerard Favier1.Coalition Formation in Weighted Simple-majority Games under Proportional Payoff Allocation RulesZhi-Gang Cao,Xiao-Guang Yang2.Stability Analysis for Recurrent Neural Networks with Time-varying DelayYuan-Yuan Wu,Yu-Qiang Wu3.A New Type of Solution Method for the Generalized Linear Complementarity Problem over a Polyhedral ConeHong-Chun Sun,Yan-Liang Dong4.An Improved Control Algorithm for High-order Nonlinear Systems with Unmodelled DynamicsNa Duan,Fu-Nian Hu,Xin Yu5.Controller Design of High Order Nonholonomic System with Nonlinear DriftsXiu-Yun Zheng,Yu-Qiang Wu6.Directional Filter for SAR Images Based on NonsubsampledContourlet Transform and Immune Clonal SelectionXiao-Hui Yang,Li-Cheng Jiao,Deng-Feng Li7.Text Extraction and Enhancement of Binary Images Using Cellular AutomataG. Sahoo,Tapas Kumar,B.L. Rains,C.M. Bhatia8.GH2 Control for Uncertain Discrete-time-delay Fuzzy Systems Based on a Switching Fuzzy Model and Piecewise Lyapunov FunctionZhi-Le Xia,Jun-Min Li9.A New Energy Optimal Control Scheme for a Separately Excited DC Motor Based Incremental Motion DriveMilan A.Sheta,Vivek Agarwal,Paluri S.V.Nataraj10.Nonlinear Backstepping Ship Course ControllerAnna Witkowska,Roman Smierzchalski11.A New Method of Embedded Fourth Order with Four Stages to Study Raster CNN SimulationR. Ponalagusamy,S. Senthilkumar12.A Minimum-energy Path-preserving Topology Control Algorithm for Wireless Sensor NetworksJin-Zhao Lin,Xian Zhou,Yun Li13.Synchronization and Exponential Estimates of Complex Networks with Mixed Time-varying Coupling DelaysYang Dai,YunZe Cai,Xiao-Ming Xu14.Step-coordination Algorithm of Traffic Control Based on Multi-agent SystemHai-Tao Zhang,Fang Yu,Wen Li15.A Research of the Employment Problem on Common Job-seekersand GraduatesBai-Da Qu。

固定随机混合模型区别

固定随机混合模型区别

固定随机混合模型区别mixed model混合模型分类:统计模型2013-02-01 20:38 2170人阅读评论(0) 收藏举报混合模型是一个统计模型,包含fixed effects和random effects 两种效应的混合。

当重复衡量(1)相同的统计单元,或(2)聚类,或(3)相关的统计单元时,混合模型尤其有效。

Ronald Fisher研究亲属间性状值的相关性时,引入random effects modes。

1950年代,Charles Roy Henderson提出(1)fixed effects的BLUE(best linear unbiased estimates)和(2)random effects的BLUP(best linear unbiased predictions)。

随后,混合模型在统计研究中成为主流,包括计算maximum likelihood estimates,non-linear mixed effect modes,missing data in mixed effects modes,以及Bayesian estimation of mixed effects models等。

Fixed effects model固定效应模型应用前提是假定全部研究结果的方向与效应大小基本相同,即各独立研究的结果趋于一致,一致性检验差异无显著性。

因此,固定效应模型用于各独立研究间无差异,或差异较小的研究。

异质性小:固定,随机异质性大:随机p值p>0.05或p>0.1:固定p<=0.05或p<=0.1:随机方差分析的三种模型:固定效应模型、随机效应模型、混合效应模型固定效应模型指实验结果只想比较每一自变量项之特定类目或类别的差异及其与其他自变项之特定类目或类别间交互效果,而不想依此推论到同一自变项未包含在内的其他类目或类别的实验设计。

Random effects models是经典的线性模型的一种推广,就是把原来固定的回归系数看作是随机变量,一般都是假设来自正态分布。

基于分子模拟的多孔炭材料结构模型构建方法研究进展

基于分子模拟的多孔炭材料结构模型构建方法研究进展

化工进展Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress2024 年第 43 卷第 3 期基于分子模拟的多孔炭材料结构模型构建方法研究进展周逸寰,解强,周红阳,梁鼎成,刘金昌(中国矿业大学(北京)化学与环境工程学院,北京 100083)摘要:结构模型的构建是多孔炭材料结构表征、“构效”关系探究、吸附模拟研究等的前提和基础。

本文对基于分子模拟的多孔炭材料结构模型构建方法、应用及特点进行了综述性评介,以挥发性有机物(volatile organic compounds ,VOCs )吸附净化用活性炭的选型需求为导向,分析各种模型构建方法的适用性。

结果表明,由片段单元组装构成多孔炭结构的早期模型,能展现多孔炭材料的部分表观性质,但对多孔炭吸附性能的解析与机理阐释尚缺乏指导意义。

多孔炭结构模型构建方法可归为仿真过程法和结构重建法,前者适于炭材料微观结构演变的研究,但所需算力高;后者通过拟合多孔炭的实验、表征数据、在一定约束条件下重建模型,其中的随机填充法可以针对性地调控模型的孔结构和官能团,应用于吸附模拟研究时有助于确定吸附特定VOCs 的最优孔结构、筛选合适的活性炭,进而指导多孔炭材料的制备。

然而,对包括随机填充法在内的结构重建法,尚需掌握量化调控结构模型孔结构、表面官能团的方法与关键参数,发展能够进行多参数、多指标“构效”关系研究的多尺度化模型,才能对多孔炭材料的实际应用提供指导。

关键词:分子模拟;活性炭;结构模型;动力学模型;随机填充法中图分类号:X51;O647 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1000-6613(2024)03-1535-17Modeling of porous carbon materials based on molecular simulation:State-of-the artZHOU Yihuan ,XIE Qiang ,ZHOU Hongyang ,LIANG Dingcheng ,LIU Jinchang(School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing ), Beijing100083, China)Abstract: Modelling of porous carbon materials serves as prerequisite and foundation for the characterization, structure-performance relationship investigation and adsorption simulation study. In this article, a critical literature survey was conducted on the strategy, application and merits/demerits of approaches to modelling of porous carbon materials based on molecular simulation, and the applicability of various modelling methods was analyzed in demand oriented for screening activated carbon for the purification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The results showed that early models constructed by either fragment, basic structural units (BSUs) or basic buildings elements (BBEs) can exhibit some apparent properties of porous carbon materials. Meanwhile, they were incapable of providing guidance for the elucidation of adsorption performance and mechanism of porous carbons. Various modelling methods of porous carbon material can be classified into two groups according to their construction strategy, theDOI :10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0485收稿日期:2023-03-29;修改稿日期:2023-05-21。

隐语义模型常用的训练方法

隐语义模型常用的训练方法

隐语义模型常用的训练方法隐语义模型(Latent Semantic Model)是一种常用的文本表示方法,它可以将文本表示为一个低维的向量空间中的点,从而方便进行文本分类、聚类等任务。

在实际应用中,如何训练一个高效的隐语义模型是非常重要的。

本文将介绍隐语义模型常用的训练方法。

一、基于矩阵分解的训练方法1.1 SVD分解SVD(Singular Value Decomposition)分解是一种基于矩阵分解的方法,它可以将一个矩阵分解为三个矩阵相乘的形式,即A=UΣV^T。

其中U和V都是正交矩阵,Σ是对角线上元素为奇异值的对角矩阵。

在隐语义模型中,我们可以将用户-物品评分矩阵R分解为两个低维矩阵P和Q相乘的形式,即R≈PQ^T。

其中P表示用户向量矩阵,Q表示物品向量矩阵。

具体地,在SVD分解中,我们首先需要将评分矩阵R进行预处理。

一般来说,我们需要减去每个用户或每个物品评分的平均值,并对剩余部分进行归一化处理。

然后,我们可以使用SVD分解将处理后的评分矩阵R分解为P、Q和Σ三个矩阵。

其中,P和Q都是低维矩阵,Σ是对角线上元素为奇异值的对角矩阵。

通过调整P和Q的维度,我们可以控制模型的复杂度。

在训练过程中,我们需要使用梯度下降等方法来最小化预测评分与实际评分之间的误差。

具体地,在每次迭代中,我们可以随机选择一个用户-物品对(ui),计算预测评分pui,并根据实际评分rui更新P 和Q中相应向量的值。

具体地,更新公式如下:pu=pu+η(euiq-uλpu)qi=qi+η(euip-uλqi)其中η是学习率,λ是正则化参数,eui=rui-pui表示预测评分与实际评分之间的误差。

1.2 NMF分解NMF(Nonnegative Matrix Factorization)分解是另一种基于矩阵分解的方法,在隐语义模型中也有广泛应用。

与SVD不同的是,在NMF中要求所有矩阵元素都为非负数。

具体地,在NMF中,我们需要将评分矩阵R进行预处理,并将其分解为P和Q两个非负矩阵相乘的形式,即R≈PQ。

WeMix 4.0.3 混合效应模型使用多层次伪最大似然估计说明书

WeMix 4.0.3 混合效应模型使用多层次伪最大似然估计说明书

Package‘WeMix’November3,2023Version4.0.3Date2023-11-02Title Weighted Mixed-Effects Models Using Multilevel Pseudo MaximumLikelihood EstimationMaintainer Paul Bailey<***************>Depends lme4,R(>=3.5.0)Imports numDeriv,Matrix(>=1.5-4.1),methods,minqa,matrixStatsSuggests testthat,knitr,rmarkdown,withr,tidyr,EdSurvey(>=4.0.0),glmmTMBDescription Run mixed-effects models that include weights at every level.The WeMix pack-agefits a weighted mixed model,also known as a multilevel,mixed,or hierarchical lin-ear model(HLM).The weights could be inverse selection probabilities,such as those devel-oped for an education survey where schools are sampled probabilistically,and then students in-side of those schools are sampled probabilistically.Although mixed-effects models are al-ready available in R,WeMix is unique in implementing methods for mixed models us-ing weights at multiple levels.Both linear and logit models are supported.Mod-els may have up to three levels.Random effects are estimated using the PIRLS algo-rithm from'lme4pureR'(Walker and Bates(2013)<https:///lme4/lme4pureR>). License GPL-2VignetteBuilder knitrByteCompile trueNote This publication was prepared for NCES under Contract No.ED-IES-12-D-0002with American Institutes for Research.Mentionof trade names,commercial products,or organizations does notimply endorsement by the ernment.RoxygenNote7.2.3URL https://american-institutes-for-research.github.io/WeMix/BugReports https:///American-Institutes-for-Research/WeMix/issues Encoding UTF-8NeedsCompilation no12WeMix-package Author Emmanuel Sikali[pdr],Paul Bailey[aut,cre],Blue Webb[aut],Claire Kelley[aut],Trang Nguyen[aut],Huade Huo[aut],Steve Walker[cph](lme4pureR PIRLS function),Doug Bates[cph](lme4pureR PIRLS function),Eric Buehler[ctb],Christian Christrup Kjeldsen[ctb]Repository CRANDate/Publication2023-11-0305:30:02UTCR topics documented:WeMix-package (2)mix (3)waldTest (7)Index9 WeMix-package Estimate Weighted Mixed-Effects ModelsDescriptionThe WeMix package estimates mixed-effects models(also called multilevel models,mixed models, or HLMs)with survey weights.DetailsThis package is unique in allowing users to analyze data that may have unequal selection prob-ability at both the individual and group levels.For linear models,the model is evaluated with a weighted version of the estimating equations used by Bates,Maechler,Bolker,and Walker(2015) in lme4.In the non-linear case,WeMix uses numerical integration(Gauss-Hermite and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature)to estimate mixed-effects models with survey weights at all levels of the model.Note that lme4is the preferred way to estimate such models when there are no survey weights or weights only at the lowest level,and our estimation starts with parameters estimated in lme4.WeMix is intended for use in cases where there are weights at all levels and is only for use with fully nested data.To start using WeMix,see the vignettes covering the mathematical background of mixed-effects model estimation and use the mix function to estimate e browseVignettes(package="WeMix")to see the vignettes.mix3ReferencesBates,D.,Maechler,M.,Bolker,B.,&Walker,S.(2015).Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects ModelsUsing lme4.Journal of Statistical Software,67(1),1-48.doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01Rabe-Hesketh,S.,&Skrondal,A.(2006)Multilevel Modelling of Complex Survey Data.Journal ofthe Royal Statistical Society:Series A(Statistics in Society),169,805-827.https:///10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00426.xBates,D.&Pinheiro,J.C.(1998).Computational Methods for Multilevel Modelling.Bell labsworking paper.mix Survey Weighted Mixed-Effects ModelsDescriptionImplements a survey weighted mixed-effects model using the provided formula.Usagemix(formula,data,weights,cWeights=FALSE,center_group=NULL,center_grand=NULL,max_iteration=10,nQuad=13L,run=TRUE,verbose=FALSE,acc0=120,keepAdapting=FALSE,start=NULL,fast=FALSE,family=NULL)Argumentsformula a formula object in the style of lme4that creates the model.data a data frame containing the raw data for the model.weights a character vector of names of weight variables found in the data frame startswith units(level1)and increasing(larger groups).cWeights logical,set to TRUE to use conditional weights.Otherwise,mix expects uncon-ditional weights.4mix center_group a list where the name of each element is the name of the aggregation level, and the element is a formula of variable names to be group mean centered;for example to group mean center gender and age within the group student:list("student"=~gender+age),default value of NULL does not perform anygroup mean centering.center_grand a formula of variable names to be grand mean centered,for example to center the variable education by overall mean of education:~education.Default isNULL which does no centering.max_iteration a optional integer,for non-linear modelsfit by adaptive quadrature which lim-its number of iterations allowed before quitting.Defaults to10.This is usedbecause if the likelihood surface isflat,models may run for a very long timewithout converging.nQuad an optional integer number of quadrature points to evaluate models solved by adaptive quadrature.Only non-linear models are evaluated with adaptive quadra-ture.See notes for additional guidelines.run logical;TRUE runs the model while FALSE provides partial output for debugging or testing.Only applies to non-linear models evaluated by adaptive quadrature.verbose logical,default FALSE;set to TRUE to print results of intermediate steps of adap-tive quadrature.Only applies to non-linear models.acc0deprecated;ignored.keepAdapting logical,set to TRUE when the adaptive quadrature should adapt after every New-ton step.Defaults to FALSE.FALSE should be used for faster(but less accurate)results.Only applies to non-linear models.start optional numeric vector representing the point at which the model should start optimization;takes the shape of c(coef,vars)from results(see help).fast logical;deprecatedfamily the family;optionally used to specify generalized linear mixed models.Cur-rently only binomial()and poisson()are supported.DetailsLinear models are solved using a modification of the analytic solution developed by Bates and Pinheiro(1998).Non-linear models are solved using adaptive quadrature following the methods in STATA’s GLAMMM(Rabe-Hesketh&Skrondal,2006)and Pineiro and Chao(2006).The posterior modes used in adaptive quadrature are determined following the method in lme4pureR(Walker& Bates,2015).For additional details,see the vignettes Weighted Mixed Models:Adaptive Quadra-ture and Weighted Mixed Models:Analytical Solution which provide extensive examples as well as a description of the mathematical basis of the estimation procedure and comparisons to model specifications in other common software.Notes:•Standard errors of random effect variances are robust;see vignette for details.•To see the function that is maximized in the estimation of this model,see the section on"Model Fitting"in the Introduction to Mixed Effect Models With WeMix vignette.•When all weights above the individual level are1,this is similar to a lmer and you should use lme4because it is much faster.mix5•If starting coefficients are not provided they are estimated using lme4.•For non-linear models,when the variance of a random effect is very low(<.1),WeMix doesn’t estimate it,because very low variances create problems with numerical evaluation.In these cases,consider estimating without that random effect.•The model is estimated by maximum likelihood estimation.•Non-linear models may have up to3nested levels.•To choose the number of quadrature points for non-linear model evaluation,a balance is needed between accuracy and speed;estimation time increases quadratically with the number of points chosen.In addition,an odd number of points is traditionally used.We recommend starting at13and increasing or decreasing as needed.Valueobject of class WeMixResults.This is a list with elements:lnlf function,the likelihood function.lnl numeric,the log-likelihood of the model.coef numeric vector,the estimated coefficients of the model.ranefs the group-level random effects.SE the cluste robust(CR-0)standard errors of thefixed effects.vars numeric vector,the random effect variances.theta the theta vector.call the original call used.levels integer,the number of levels in the model.ICC numeric,the intraclass correlation coefficient.CMODE the conditional mean of the random effects.invHessian inverse of the second derivative of the likelihood function.ICC the interclass correlation.is_adaptive logical,indicates if adaptive quadrature was used for estimation.sigma the sigma value.ngroups the number of observations in each group.varDF the variance data frame in the format of the variance data frame returned by lme4.varVC the variance-covariance matrix of the random effects.cov_mat the variance-covariance matrix of thefixed effects.var_theta the variance covariance matrix of the theta terms.wgtStats statistics regarding weights,by level.ranefMat list of matrixes;each list element is a matrix of random effects by level with IDs in the rows and random effects in the columns.Author(s)Paul Bailey,Blue Webb,Claire Kelley,and Trang Nguyen6mix Examples##Not run:library(lme4)data(sleepstudy)ss1<-sleepstudy#Create weightsss1$W1<-ifelse(ss1$Subject%in%c(308,309,310),2,1)ss1$W2<-1#Run random-intercept2-level modeltwo_level<-mix(Reaction~Days+(1|Subject),data=ss1,weights=c("W1","W2"))#Run random-intercept2-level model with group-mean centeringgrp_centered<-mix(Reaction~Days+(1|Subject),data=ss1,weights=c("W1","W2"),center_group=list("Subject"=~Days))#Run three level model with random slope and intercept.#add group variables for3level modelss1$Group<-3ss1$Group<-ifelse(as.numeric(ss1$Subject)%%10<7,2,ss1$Group)ss1$Group<-ifelse(as.numeric(ss1$Subject)%%10<4,1,ss1$Group)#level-3weightsss1$W3<-ifelse(ss1$Group==2,2,1)three_level<-mix(Reaction~Days+(1|Subject)+(1+Days|Group),data=ss1,weights=c("W1","W2","W3"))#Conditional Weights#use vignette examplelibrary(EdSurvey)#read in datadownloadPISA("~/",year=2012)cntl<-readPISA("~/PISA/2012",countries="USA")data<-getData(cntl,c("schoolid","pv1math","st29q03","sc14q02","st04q01","escs","w_fschwt","w_fstuwt"),omittedLevels=FALSE,addAttributes=FALSE)#Remove NA and omitted Levelsom<-c("Invalid","N/A","Missing","Miss",NA,"(Missing)")for(i in1:ncol(data)){data<-data[!data[,i]%in%om,]}#relevel factors for modeldata$st29q03<-relevel(data$st29q03,ref="Strongly agree")data$sc14q02<-relevel(data$sc14q02,ref="Not at all")#run with unconditional weightsm1u<-mix(pv1math~st29q03+sc14q02+st04q01+escs+(1|schoolid),data=data,weights=c("w_fstuwt","w_fschwt"))summary(m1u)#conditional weightsdata$pwt2<-data$w_fschwtdata$pwt1<-data$w_fstuwt/data$w_fschwt#run with conditional weightsm1c<-mix(pv1math~st29q03+sc14q02+st04q01+escs+(1|schoolid),data=data,weights=c("pwt1","pwt2"),cWeights=TRUE)summary(m1c)#the results are,up to rounding,the same in m1u and m1c,only the calls are different ##End(Not run)waldTest Mixed Model Wald TestsDescriptionThis function calculates the Wald test for eitherfixed effects or variance parameters.UsagewaldTest(fittedModel,type=c("beta","Lambda"),coefs=NA,hypothesis=NA)ArgumentsfittedModel a model of class WeMixResults that is the result of a call to mixtype a string,one of"beta"(to test thefixed effects)or"Lambda"(to test the variance-covariance parameters for the random effects)coefs a vector containing the names of the coefficients to test.For type="beta"these must be the variable names exactly as they appear in thefixed effects table of thesummary.For type="Lambda"these must be the names exactly as they appearin the theta element of thefitted model.hypothesis the hypothesized values of beta or Lambda.If NA(the default)0will be used.DetailsBy default this function tests against the null hypothesis that all coefficients are zero.To identify which coefficients to test use the name exactly as it appears in the summary of the object.ValueObject of class WeMixWaldTest.This is a list with the following elements:wald the value of the test statistic.p the p-value for the test statistic.Based on the probabilty of the test statistic under the chi-squared distribution.df degrees of freedom used to calculate p-value.H0The vector(for a test of beta)or matrix(for tests of Lambda)containing the null hypothesis for the test.HA The vector(for a test of beta)or matrix(for tests of Lambda)containing the alternative hypothesis for the test(i.e.the values calculated by thefitted modelbeing tested.)Examples##Not run:library(lme4)#to use the example datasleepstudyU<-sleepstudysleepstudyU$weight1L1<-1sleepstudyU$weight1L2<-1wm0<-mix(Reaction~Days+(1|Subject),data=sleepstudyU,weights=c("weight1L1","weight1L2"))wm1<-mix(Reaction~Days+(1+Days|Subject),data=sleepstudyU,weights=c("weight1L1","weight1L2"))waldTest(wm0,type="beta")#test all betas#test only beta for dayswaldTest(wm0,type="beta",coefs="Days")#test only beta for intercept against hypothesis that it is1waldTest(wm0,type="beta",coefs="(Intercept)",hypothesis=c(1))waldTest(wm1,type="Lambda")#test all values of Lambda#test only some Lambdas.The names are the same as names(wm1$theta)waldTest(wm1,type="Lambda",coefs="Subject.(Intercept)")#specify test valueswaldTest(wm1,type="Lambda",coefs="Subject.(Intercept)",hypothesis=c(1))##End(Not run)Indexmix,3,7waldTest,7WeMix-package,29。

单一插补与多重插补

单一插补与多重插补

单一插补方法与多重插补方法的对比及分析0.缺失数据说明Little和Rubin根据缺失机制的不同,缺失数据可分为三大类:完全随机缺失数据(MCAR),随机缺失数据(MAR)以及非随机缺失数据(NMAR)。

MCAR表示某些变量数据的缺失完全不依赖于变量或者回答者的真实情况,是严格意义上的随机缺失;MAR表示某些变量数据的缺失与回答者的真实情况是独立的;NMAR则表示变量数据的缺失与回答者的真实情况之间有相关的联系,并不是随机缺失的。

实际情况中,缺失数据对数据分析造成较大的影响,主要表现在两个方面:数据统计的功效以及会带来有偏估计。

Kim和Curry(1997)发现当有2%的数据缺失时,若采用列表删除的方法,将会带来18.3%全部信息的丢失。

Quinten和Raaijmakers(1999)的研究表明10%~35%的数据缺失会带来35%~98%的信息丢失。

可见,对缺失的数据不进行处理会给整个数据结构带来巨大的影响。

故而,在数据分析中,对缺失数据的处理至关重要,同时该部分也是目前新兴学科——数据挖掘技术的重要组成部分。

在处理缺失数据时,为了方便处理,一般假定缺失机制为MAR或者MCAR,这样可利用数理统计方法进行处理。

缺失数据的处理方法可分为三大类:直接删除法、插补法、基于模型的预测方法。

其中直接删除法最为便捷,同时也是最为粗糙的方法,该方法易造成真实信息的大量丢失,仅仅适用于极少量的数据缺失情况。

相比而言,插补法和基于统计模型的预测方法比较常用,也较为有效。

根据每个缺失值的替代值个数,可将插补方法分为单一插补和多重插补。

1.单一插补与多重插补概念单一插补是指采用一定方式,对每个由于无回答造成的缺失值只构造一个合理的替代值,并将其插补到原缺失数据的位置上,替代后构造出一个完整的数据集。

多重插补是由哈佛大学的Rubin教授在1977年首先提出的,该方法是从单一插补的基础上衍生而来的。

指给每个缺失值都构造m个替代值(m>1),从而产生了m个完全数据集,然后对每个完全数据集采用相同的数据分析方法进行处理,得到m个处理结果,然后综合这些处理结果,基于某种原则,得到最终的目标变量的估计。

双生子分析英语

双生子分析英语

Twin studyTwin studies are one of a family of designs in behavior genetics which aid the study of individual differences by highlighting the role of environmental and genetic causes on behavior.Twins are invaluable for studying these important questions because they disentangle the sharing of genes and environments. If we observe that children in a family are more similar than might be expected by chance, this may reflect shared environmental influences common to members of family - class, parenting styles, education etc. - but they will also reflect shared genes, inherited from parents.The twin design compares the similarity of identical twins who share 100% of their genes, to that of dizygotic or fraternal twins, who share only 50% of their genes. By studying many hundreds of families of twins, researchers can then understand more about the role of genetic effects, and the effects of shared and unique environment effects.Modern twin studies have shown that almost all traits are in part influenced by genetic differences, with some characteristics showing a strong influence (e.g. height), others an intermediate level (e.g. IQ) and some more complex heritabilities, with evidence for different genes affecting different elements of the trait - for instance Autism.HistoryFrancis Galton laid the foundations of behavior genetics as a branch of science.While twins have been of interest to scholars since early civilization, such as the early physician Hippocrates (5th c. BCE), who attributed similar diseases in twins to shared material circumstances, and the stoic philosopher Posidonius (1st c. BCE), who attributed such similarities to shared astrological sex circumstances, the modern history of the twin study derives from Sir Francis Galton's pioneering use of twins to study the role of genes and environment on human development and behavior. Galton, however, was unaware of the critical genetic difference between MZ and DZ twins. [1]This factor was still not understood when the first study using psychological tests was conducted by Edward Thorndike (1905) using50-pairs of twin. Notably this paper was perhaps the first statement of the idea (formulated as a testable hypothesis) that C (family effects)decline with age: comparing 9-10 and 13-14 year old twin-pairs, and normal siblings born within a few years of one another.Fatefully, however, Thorndike incorrectly reasoned that his data gave support for their being one, not two types of twins: Missing the critical distinction that makes within-family twin studies such a powerful resource in psychology and medicine. This mistake was repeated by Ronald Fisher (1919), who argued"The preponderance of twins of like sex, does indeed become a new problem, because it has been formerly believed to be due to the proportion of identical twins. So far as I am aware, however, no attempt has been made to show that twins are sufficiently alike to be regarded as identical really exist in sufficient numbers to explain the proportion of twins of like sex." [2].The first published twin study utilizing the distinction between MZ and DZ twins is sometimes cited as that of the German geneticist Hermann Werner Siemens in 1924 [3]. Chief among Siemens' innovations was the "polysymptomatic similarity diagnosis". This allowed him to overcome the barrier that had stumped Fisher and was a staple in twin research prior to the advent of molecular markers. Wilhelm Weinberg , however, had already by 1910 used the MZ-DZ distinction to calculate their respective rates from the ratios of same- and opposite-sex twins in a maternity population, worked out partitioning of covariation amongst relatives into genetic and environmental elements (anticipating Fisher and Wright) including the effect of dominance on relative's similarity, and begun the first classic-twin studies. [4]MethodsThe power of twin designs arises from the fact that twins may be either monozygotic (MZ: developing from a single fertilized egg and therefore sharing all of their alleles) – or dizygotic (DZ: developing from two fertilized eggs and therefore sharing on average 50% of their alleles, the same level of genetic similarity as found in non-twin siblings). These known differences in genetic similarity, together with a testable assumption of equal environments for MZ and DZ twins (Bouchard & Propping, 1993) creates the basis for the twin design for exploring the effects of genetic and environmental variance on a phenotype (Neale & Cardon, 1992).The basic logic of the twin study can be understood with very little mathematics beyond an understanding of correlation and the concept of variance.Like all behavior genetic research, the classic twin study begins from assessing the variance of a behavior (called a phenotype by geneticists) in a large group, and attempts to estimate how much of this is due to genetic effects (heritability), how much appears to be due to shared environmental effects, and how much is due to unique environmental effects - events occurring to one twin but not another.Typically these three components are called A (additive genetics) C (common environment) and E(unique environment); the so-called ACE Model. It is also possible to examine non-additive genetics effects (often denoted D for dominance (ADE model); see below for more complex twin designs).Given the ACE model, researchers can determine what proportion of variance in a trait is heritable, versus the proportions which are due to shared environment or unshared environment. While nearly all research is carried out using SEM programs such as the freeware Mx, the essential logic of the twin design is as follows:Monozygous (MZ) twins raised in a family share both 100% of their genes, and all of the shared environment. Any differences arising between them in these circumstances are random (unique). The correlation we observe between MZ twins provides an estimate of A+ C. Dizygous (DZ) twins have a common shared environment, and share on average 50% of their genes: so the correlation between DZ twins is a direct estimate of ½A+ C. If r is the rate observed for a particular trait, then:r mz = A + Cr dz = ½A + CThese two equations allow us to derive A, C, and E:A = 2 (r mz–r dz)C = r mz–A = 2 r dz–r mzE = 1 –r mzWhere r mz and r dz are simply the correlations of the trait in MZ and DZ twins respectively. Twice difference between MZ and DZ twins gives us A: the additive genetic effect. C is simply the MZ correlation minus our estimate of A. The random (unique) factor E is estimated directly by how much the MZ twin correlation deviates from 1. (Jinks & Fulker, 1970; Plomin, DeFries , McClearn, & McGuffin, 2001).Modern ModelingBeginning in the 1970s, research transitioned to modeling genetic, environmental effects using maximum likelihood methods (Martin & Eaves, 1977). While computationally much more complex, this approach has numerous benefits rendering it almost universal in current research.A principle benefit of modeling is the ability to explicitly compare models: Rather than simply returning a value for each component, the modeler can compute confidence intervals on parameters, and also drop or add paths. Thus, for instance an AE model can be objectively compared to a full ACE model, to test for effect of family or shared environment on behavior. Modeling also allows multivariate modeling: This is invaluable in answering questions about the genetic relationship between apparently different variables: For instance do IQ and long-term memory share genes? Do they share environmental causes? Additional benefits include the ability to deal with interval, threshold, and continuous data, retaining full information from data with missing values, integrating the latent modeling with measured variables, be they measured environments, or, now, measured molecular genetic markers such as SNPs. In addition, models avoid constraint problems in the crude correlation method: all parameters will lie, as they should between 0-1 (standardized).Modeling tools such as openMx (Neale, Boker, Xie, & Maes, 2002) and other applications suited to constraints and multiple groups have made the new techniques accessible to reasonably skilled users.AssumptionsIt can be seen from the modelling above, that the main assumption of the twin study is that of equal environments. At an intuitive level, this seems reasonable –why would parents note that two children shared their hair and eye color, and then contrive to make their IQs identical? Indeed, how could they?This assumption, however, has been directly tested. An interesting case occurs where parents believe their twins to be non-identical when in fact they are genetically MZ. Studies of a range of psychological traits indicate that these children remain as concordant as MZs raised by parents who treated them as identical.Measured similarity: A direct test of assumptions in twin designsA particularly powerful technique for testing the twin method has recently been reported by Visscher et al. Instead of using twins, this group took advantage of the fact that while siblings on average share 50% of theirgenes, the actual gene-sharing for individual sibling pairs varies around this value, essentially creating a continuum of genetic similarity or "twinness" within families. Estimates of heritability based on direct estimates of gene sharing confirm those from the twin method, providing support for the assumptions of the method.Extended twin designs and more complex genetic modelsThe basic or classical twin-design contains only MZ and DZ twins raised in their biological family. This represents only a sub-set of the possible genetic and environmental relationships. It is fair to say, therefore, that the heritability estimates from twin designs represent a first step in understanding the genetics of behavior.The variance partitioning of the twin study into additive genetic, shared, and unshared environment is a first approximation to a complete analysis taking into account gene-environment covariance and interaction, as well as other non-additive effects on behavior. The revolution in molecular genetics has provided more effective tools for describing the genome, and many researchers are pursuing molecular genetics in order to directly assess the influence of alleles and environments on traits.An initial limitation of the twin design is that is does not afford an opportunity to consider both Shared Environment and Non-additive genetic effects simultaneously. This limit can be addressed by including additional siblings to the design.A second limitation is that gene-environment correlation is not detectable as a distinct effect. Addressing this limit requires incorporating adoption models, or children-of-twins designs, to assess family influences uncorrelated with shared genetic effects.CriticismThe Twin Method has been subject to criticism from statistical genetics, statistics, and psychology, with some arguing that conclusions reached via this method are ambiguous or meaningless. Core elements of these criticisms and their rejoinders are listed below:Criticisms of Statistical MethodsIt has been argued that the statistical underpinnings of twin research are invalid. Such statistical critiques argue that heritability estimates used for most twin studies rest on restrictive assumptions which are usually not tested, and if they are, are often found to be violated by the data.For example, Peter Schonemann has criticized methods for estimating heritability developed in the 1970s. He has also argued that the heritability estimate from a twin study may reflect factors other than shared genes. Using the statistical models published in Loehlin and Nichols (1976)[5], the narrow heritability’s of HR of responses to the question “did you have your back rubbed” has been shown to work out to .92 heritable for males and .21 heritable for females, and the question “Did you wear sunglasses after dark?” is 130% heritable for males and 103% for females [6][7]Responses to Statistical CritiquesIn the days before the computer, statisticians were forced to use methods which were computationally tractable, at the cost of known limitations. Since the 1980s these approximate statistical methods have been discarded: Modern twin methods based on structural equation modeling are not subject to the limitations and heritability estimates such as those noted above are impossible[citation needed]. Critically, the newer methods allow for explicit testing of the role of different pathways and incorporation and testing of complex effects.Sampling: Twins as representative members of the populationThe results of twin studies cannot be automatically generalized beyond the population in which they have been derived. It is therefore important to understand the particular sample studied, and the nature of twins themselves.Twins are not a random sample of the population, and they differ in their developmental environment. In this sense they are not representative [8]For example: Dizygotic (DZ) twin births are affected by many factors. Some women frequently produce more than one egg at each menstrual period and, therefore, are more likely to have twins. This tendency may run in the family either in the mother's or father's side of the family, and often runs through both. Women over the age of 35 are more likely to produce two eggs. Women who have three or more children are also likely to havedizygotic twins. Artificial induction of ovulation and in vitro fertilization-embryo replacement can also give rise to DZ and MZ twins.Response to represent ativeness of twinsTwins differ very little from non-twin siblings. Measured studies on the personality and intelligence of twins suggest that they have scores on these traits very similar to those of non-twins (for instance Deary et al. 2006).Observational nature of twin studiesFor very obvious reasons, studies of twins are with almost no exceptions observational. This contrasts with, for instance, studies in plants or in animal breeding where the effects of experimentally randomized genotypes and environment combinations are measured. In human studies, we observe rather than control the exposure of individuals to different environments. [15][16][17][18]Response to the observational nature of twin studiesThe observational study and its inherent confounding of causes is common in psychology. Twin studies are in part motivated by an attempt to take advantage of the random assortment of genes between members of a family to help understand these correlations. Thus, while the twin study tells us only how genes and families affect behavior within the observed range of environments, and with the caveat that often genes and environments will covary, this is argued to be a considerable advance over the alternative, which is no knowledge of the different roles of genes and environment whatsoever.Advanced MethodologyInteractionsThe effects of genes depend on the environment they are in. Possible complex genetic effects include G*E interactions, in which the effects of a gene allele differ across different environments. Simple examples would include situations where a gene multiplies the effect of an environment (in this case the slope of response to an environment would differ between genotypes).A second effect is "GE correlation", in which certain allelles occur more frequently than others in certain environments. If a gene causes a person to enjoy reading, then children with this allele are likely to be raised in households with books in them (due to GE correlation: one or both of their parents has the allele and therefore both accumulates a book collection and passes on the book-reading allele). Such effects can be assessed by measuring the purported environmental correlate (in this case books in the home) directly.Often the role of environment seems maximal very early in life, and decreases rapidly after compulsory education begins. This is observed for instance in reading [19] as well as intelligence[20]. This is an example of a G*Age effect and allows an examination of both GE correlations due to parental environments (these are broken up with time), and of G*E correlations caused by individuals actively seeking certain environments [21].Continuous variable or Correlational studiesWhile concordance studies compare traits which are either present or absent in each twin, correlational studies compare the agreement in continuously varying traits across twins.Fig 2. Heritability for nine psychological traits as estimated from twin studies. All sources are twins raised together (sample size shown inside bars). As outlined above, identical twins (MZ twins) are twice as genetically similar as fraternal twins (DZ twins) and so heritability (h2) is approximately twice the difference in correlation between MZ and DZ twins. Unique environmental variance (e2) is reflected by the degree to which identical twins raised together are dissimilar, and is approximated by 1-MZ correlation. The effect of shared environment (c2) contributes to similarity in all cases and is approximated by the DZ correlation minus the difference between MZ and DZ correlations.。

各种分布白噪声的产生

各种分布白噪声的产生
令ri=yi/231,则R就是[0, 1]上的均匀分布随机数。 BASIC、C、MATLAB中均有产生均匀分布随机数的函数可调用: RND()、RAND()、UNIFRND()
2016/7/5
哈尔滨工业大学电子工程系
8
均匀分布白噪声的产生
数学方法——伪随机数
2、联合法(组合发生器) 混和同余法实际上是通过同余等运算打乱数列0,1,…,m-1的次 序,来达到产生随机序列的目的。“打乱数列的次使之排列无规则”是 设计发生器的一个可依据的原则,基于此产生联合法: (1) 两个发生器的组合 Greenwood在1976年对两个混合同余法发生器使用组合方法,且两 个发生器的模都简单地取成2k,使组合后的发生器周期达到2k(2k-1)。 (2) n个发生器的组合 Salfi于1974年提出了一个较好的算法。
上述图书集中讨论不同分布随机数(白噪声)的产生,系统而全面。
各种分布白噪声产生的重要性
蒙特卡洛方法的实现步骤 1、构造或描述概率过程
2、实现从已知概率分布抽样
由于各种概率模型都可以看作是由各种各样的概率分布构成的,因 此产生已知概率分布的随机变量(或随机向量)就成为实现蒙特卡罗方
法模拟实验的基本手段,这也是蒙特卡罗方法被称为随机抽样的原因。
伯努利分布、离散均匀分布、几何分布、泊松分布
2016/7/5 哈尔滨工业大学电子工程系 1
主要参考图书
1. 方再根,计算机模拟和蒙特卡洛方法,北京工业学院出版社, 1988.6 2. Wolfgang Hormann et al, Automatic Nonuniform Random Variate Generation, Springer, 2004 3. J.E. Gentle, Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, 2nd Ed, Springer, 2003 4. A.M. Law, Simulation Modelling and Analysis, 3rd Ed, McGrawHill, 2000 5. Tezuka, Shu, Uniform random numbers theory and practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995 6. Dagpunar, John., Principles of random variate generation, Oxford : Clarendon Pr., 1988 7. Devroye, Luc., Non-uniform random variate generation, New York : Springer-Verlag, c1986

随即效应模型

随即效应模型

随机效应模型引言随机效应模型是一种用于分析面板数据(panel data)的统计模型。

面板数据是指在时间上对同一组体或个体进行多次观测的数据,例如经济学中的跨国公司的财务数据、医学研究中的病人的长期随访数据等。

随机效应模型能够通过考虑个体间的异质性和时间间的相关性,提供更准确的估计和推断。

一、面板数据的特点面板数据相较于传统的横截面数据(cross-sectional data)和时间序列数据(time series data),具有以下几个特点:1.个体异质性:面板数据中的个体之间可能存在差异,例如不同公司的经营策略、不同病人的基线特征等。

2.时间相关性:面板数据中的观测值在时间上是相关的,例如经济学中的季度数据、医学研究中的长期随访数据等。

3.个体固定效应:个体固定效应是指个体固有的不可观测的特征,例如公司的管理能力、病人的遗传基因等。

4.时间固定效应:时间固定效应是指时间固有的不可观测的特征,例如季节性变化、政策变化等。

面板数据的分析需要考虑上述特点,以充分利用数据并得出准确的结论。

二、随机效应模型的基本原理随机效应模型是一种通过将个体固定效应和时间固定效应引入线性回归模型中,来解决面板数据分析中存在的个体异质性和时间相关性的方法。

随机效应模型的基本形式如下:y it=α+X itβ+c i+λt+ϵit其中,y it表示第i个个体在第t个时间点的观测值,X it表示解释变量矩阵,β表示解释变量的系数,c i表示个体固定效应,λt表示时间固定效应,ϵit表示随机误差项。

个体固定效应c i是与个体相关的不可观测因素,它可以通过引入个体虚拟变量来捕捉。

时间固定效应λt是与时间相关的不可观测因素,它可以通过引入时间虚拟变量来捕捉。

三、随机效应模型的估计方法随机效应模型的估计方法有多种,常用的有最小二乘法(OLS)估计法、差分法(first difference)估计法和最大似然法(maximum likelihood)估计法。

各类效应模型的选择,遴选最优效应模型

各类效应模型的选择,遴选最优效应模型

各类效应模型的选择,遴选最优效应模型Meta分析中,随机效应模型和固定效应模型的区别Meta分析的统计方法包括固定效应模型(fixed effect model)和随机效应模型(random effect model)。

固定效应模型是假设各独立研究来自同一总体的样本,各研究的效应值只是总体参数的一次实现,各研究之间的差异只是有抽样误差引起的,不同研究之间的变异性很小。

随机效应模型是指各个研究来自不同的总体,各个研究的变异性很大,即包括了各个研究的内部的变异,每一个研究都有其相应的总体效应,meta分析的合并效应值是多个不同总体参数的加权平均。

这两种模型用到的具体的计算公式不一样,目的都是为了使meta分析结果更可信,更加准确的表示出实际的效应。

就像如果数据符合正态分布用均数±标准差,不符合正态分布,用中位数和四位分数间距表示一样的。

一般来说,随机效应模型得出的结论偏向于保守,置信区间较大,更难以发现差异,带给我们的信息是如果各个试验的结果差异很大,需要慎重考虑是否对数据进行meta分析,作出结论的时候也要更加小心。

随机效应模型和固定效应模型的选择依据1 Q统计量:Q服从于自由度为k-1的卡方分布,Q值越大,其对应的P值越小。

P<0.05,表明研究间存在异质性,选用随机效应模型;否则不存在异质性,选用固定效应模型。

2 I square (I2):反映非抽样误差引起的差异在总变异中所占的比重。

一般认为I2>50%,表示存在明显的异质性,使用随机效应模型;如果I2≤50%,采用固定效应模型。

3.H统计量型:一般情况下,若H>1.5 提示研究间存在异质性,H<1.2则提示可认为各研究同质;若H值在1.2 和1.5之间,当H值的95%CI包含1,认为不存在显著的异质性,若没包含1则可认为存在显著的异质性。

varTestnlme 1.3.5 变异分量测试 R 软件包用户指南说明书

varTestnlme 1.3.5 变异分量测试 R 软件包用户指南说明书

Package‘varTestnlme’September22,2023Type PackageTitle Variance Components Testing for Linear and Nonlinear MixedEffects ModelsVersion1.3.5URL https:///baeyc/varTestnlme/BugReports https:///baeyc/varTestnlme/issuesMaintainer Charlotte Baey<****************************>Description An implementation of the Likelihood ratio Test(LRT)for testing that, in a(non)linear mixed effects model,the variances of a subset of the randomeffects are equal to zero.There is no restriction on the subset of variancesthat can be tested:for example,it is possible to test that all the variancesare equal to zero.Note that the implemented test is asymptotic.This package should be used on modelfits from packages'nlme','lmer',and'saemix'.Charlotte Baey and Estelle Kuhn(2019)<doi:10.18637/jss.v107.i06>.License GPL(>=2)Encoding UTF-8Imports mvtnorm,lmeresampler,alabama,Matrix,merDeriv,anocva,corpcor,quadprog,lme4,nlme,saemix,msm,foreach,methods,doParallel,parallelRoxygenNote7.2.3Suggests knitr,rmarkdown,EnvStatsVignetteBuilder knitrNeedsCompilation noAuthor Charlotte Baey[aut,cre](<https:///0000-0002-1413-1058>), Estelle Kuhn[aut]Repository CRANDate/Publication2023-09-2215:20:02UTC12alt.descR topics documented:alt.desc (2)approxWeights (3)bootinvFIM (4)bootinvFIM.lme (4)bootinvFIM.merMod (5)bootinvFIM.SaemixObject (5)dfChiBarSquare (6)extractFIM.lme (6)extractStruct (7)extractStruct.lme (7)extractStruct.merMod (8)extractStruct.SaemixObject (8)extractVarCov (9)extractVarCov.lme (9)extractVarCov.merMod (9)fim.vctest (10)null.desc (10)objFunction (11)pckName (12)print.desc.message (12)print.res.message (13)print.vctest (13)summary.vctest (14)varCompTest (14)weightsChiBarSquare (17)Index18alt.desc alt.descDescriptioncreate alternative descriptionUsagealt.desc(msdata)Argumentsmsdata a list containing the structure of the model and data,as an output from extractStruct.<package_name> functionsapproxWeights3 approxWeights Monte Carlo approximation of chi-bar-square weightsDescriptionThe chi-bar-square distribution¯χ2(I,C)is a mixture of chi-square distributions.The function provides a method to approximate the weights of the mixture components,when the number of components is known as well as the degrees of freedom of each chi-square distribution in the mix-ture,and given a vector of simulated values from the target¯χ2(I,C)distribution.Note that the estimation is based on(pseudo)-random Monte Carlo samples.For reproducible results,one should fix the seed of the(pseudo)-random number generator.UsageapproxWeights(x,df,q)Argumentsx a vector of i.i.d.random realizations of the target chi-bar-square distribution df a vector containing the degrees of freedom of the chi-squared components q the empirical quantile of x used to choose the p−2values c1,...,c p−2(seeDetails)DetailsLet us assume that there are p components in the mixture,with degrees of freedom between n1and n p.By definition of a mixture distribution,we have:P(¯χ2(I,C)≤c)=n pi=n1w i P(χ2i≤c)Choosing p−2values c1,...,c p−2,the function will generate a system of p−2equations according to the above relationship,and add two additional relationships stating that the sum of all the weights is equal to1,and that the sum of odd weights and of even weights is equal to1/2,so that we end up with a system a p equations with p variables.ValueA vector containing the estimated weights,as well as their covariance matrix.Author(s)Charlotte Baey<<****************************>>4bootinvFIM.lmebootinvFIM Approximation of the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix viaparametric bootstrapDescriptionWhen the FIM is not available,this function provides an approximation of the FIM based on an estimate of the covariance matrix of the model’s parameters obtained via parametric bootstrap.UsagebootinvFIM(m,B=1000,seed=0)Argumentsm afitted model that will be used as the basis of the parametric bootstrap(provid-ing the initial maximum likelihood estimate of the parameters and the modellingframework)B the size of the bootstrap sampleseed a seed for the random generatorValuethe empirical covariance matrix of the parameter estimates obtained on the bootstrap sample Author(s)Charlotte Baey<<****************************>>bootinvFIM.lme Compute the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix using paramet-ric bootstrapDescriptionCompute the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix using parametric bootstrapUsage##S3method for class lmebootinvFIM(m,B=1000,seed=0)Argumentsm the model under H1B the bootstrap sample sizeseed a seed for the random generatorbootinvFIM.merMod5bootinvFIM.merMod Compute the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix using paramet-ric bootstrapDescriptionCompute the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix using parametric bootstrapUsage##S3method for class merModbootinvFIM(m,B=1000,seed=0)Argumentsm the model under H1B the bootstrap sample sizeseed a seed for the random generatorbootinvFIM.SaemixObjectCompute the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix using paramet-ric bootstrapDescriptionCompute the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix using parametric bootstrapUsage##S3method for class SaemixObjectbootinvFIM(m,B=1000,seed=0)Argumentsm the model under H1B the bootstrap sample sizeseed a seed for the random generator6extractFIM.lme dfChiBarSquare Chi-bar-square degrees of freedom computationDescriptionComputation of the degrees of freedom of the chi-bar-squareUsagedfChiBarSquare(msdata)Argumentsmsdata a list containing the structure of the model and data,as an output from extractStruct.<package_name> functionsValuea list containing the vector of the degrees of freedom of the chi-bar-square and the dimensions ofthe cone of the chi-bar-square distributionextractFIM.lme Extract FIMDescriptionExtract FIMUsageextractFIM.lme(m,struct)Argumentsm the model to extract the FIM fromstruct the structure of the covariance matrix(either’full’,’diag’,or’blockdiag)extractStruct7 extractStruct Extracting models’structuresDescriptionFunctions extracting the structure of the models under both hypothesis:the number offixed and random effects,the number of testedfixed and random effects,and the residual dimension,as well as the random effects covariance structureUsageextractStruct(m1,m0,randm0)Argumentsm1the model under H1m0the model under H0randm0a boolean stating whether the model under H0contains any random effect ValueA list with the following components:detailStruct a data frame containing the list of the parameters and whether they are tested or notnameVarTested the name of the variance components being testednameFixedTestedthe name of thefixed effects being testeddims a list with the dimensions offixed and random effects,tested or not testedstructGamma the structure of the covariance matrix of the random effects diag,full or blockDiagextractStruct.lme Extract model structureDescriptionExtract model structureUsage##S3method for class lmeextractStruct(m1,m0,randm0)8extractStruct.SaemixObjectArgumentsm1thefit under H1m0thefit under H0randm0a boolean indicating whether random effects are present in m0 extractStruct.merMod Extract model structureDescriptionExtract model structureUsage##S3method for class merModextractStruct(m1,m0,randm0)Argumentsm1thefit under H1m0thefit under H0randm0a boolean indicating whether random effects are present in m0extractStruct.SaemixObjectExtract model structureDescriptionExtract model structureUsage##S3method for class SaemixObjectextractStruct(m1,m0,randm0)Argumentsm1thefit under H1m0thefit under H0randm0a boolean indicating whether random effects are present in m0extractVarCov9 extractVarCov Extract covariance matrixDescriptionExtract covariance matrix of the random effects for a modelfitted with lme4.UsageextractVarCov(m)Argumentsm afit from lme4package(either linear or nonlinear)extractVarCov.lme Extract covariance matrixDescriptionExtract covariance matrix of the random effects for a modelfitted with nlme.Usage##S3method for class lmeextractVarCov(m)Argumentsm afit from nlme package(either linear or nonlinear)extractVarCov.merMod Extract covariance matrixDescriptionExtract covariance matrix of the random effects for a modelfitted with lme4.Usage##S3method for class merModextractVarCov(m)Argumentsm afit from lme4package(either linear or nonlinear)10null.descfim.vctest Extract the Fisher Information MatrixDescriptionExtract the Fisher Information MatrixUsagefim.vctest(object)Argumentsobject an object of class vctestnull.desc null.descDescriptioncreate null.value descriptionUsagenull.desc(msdata)Argumentsmsdata a list containing the structure of the model and data,as an output from extractStruct.<package_name> functionsDetailsUseful intern functionsobjFunction11 objFunction Internal functions for constrained minimizationDescriptionGroups of functions used for the constrained minimization problem arising in the computation of the likelihood ratio test statistics.UsageobjFunction(x,cst)gradObjFunction(x,cst)symMatrixFromVect(x)ineqCstr(x,cst)jacobianIneqCstr(x,cst)eqCstr(x,cst)jacobianEqCstr(x,cst)Argumentsx A vectorcst A list of constants to be passed to the optimisation functionValuevalue of the objective function,its gradient,and the set of inequality and equality constraints Functions•objFunction():objective function to be optimized•gradObjFunction():gradient of the objective function•symMatrixFromVect():function creating a symmetric matrix from its unique elements stored in a vector•ineqCstr():set of inequality constraints•jacobianIneqCstr():jacobian of the inequality constraints•eqCstr():set of equality constraints•jacobianEqCstr():jacobian of the inequality constraintspckName Extract package name from afitted mixed-effects modelDescriptionExtract package name from afitted mixed-effects modelUsagepckName(m)Argumentsm a model with random effectsfitted with nlme,lme4or saemixValuea string giving the name of the packageprint.desc.message print.desc.messageDescriptionprint a message to indicate the null and alternative hypothesesUsage##S3method for class desc.messageprint(msdata)Argumentsmsdata a list containing the structure of the model and data,as an output from extractStruct.<package_name> functionsprint.res.message print.res.messageDescriptionprint a message with the resultsUsage##S3method for class res.message print(results)Argumentsresults an object of class vctest print.vctest PrintDescriptionPrintUsage##S3method for class vctestprint(x,...)Argumentsx an object of class vctest...additional argumentssummary.vctest SummaryDescriptionSummaryUsage##S3method for class vctestsummary(object,...)Argumentsobject an object of class vctest...additional argumentsvarCompTest Variance component testingDescriptionPerform a likelihood ratio test to test whether a subset of the variances of the random effects are equal to zero.The test is defined by two hypotheses,H0and H1,and the model under H0is assumed to be nested within the model under H1.These functions can be used on objects of class lme-,nlme-,mer-,lmerMod,glmerMod,nlmerMord or SaemixObject.It is possible to tests if any subset of the variances are equal to zero.However,the function does not currently support nested random effects,and assumes that the random effects are Gaussian.UsagevarCompTest(m1,m0,control=list(M=5000,parallel=T,nb_cores=1,B=1000),p="bounds",fim="extract",output=TRUE)##S3method for class lmevarCompTest(m1,m0,control=list(M=5000,parallel=FALSE,nb_cores=1,B=1000),p="bounds",fim="extract",output=TRUE)##S3method for class merModvarCompTest(m1,m0,control=list(M=5000,parallel=FALSE,nb_cores=1,B=1000),p="bounds",fim="extract",output=TRUE)##S3method for class SaemixObjectvarCompTest(m1,m0,control=list(M=5000,parallel=FALSE,nb_cores=1,B=1000),p="bounds",fim="extract",output=TRUE)Argumentsm1afit of the model under H1,obtained from nlme,lme4or saemixm0afit of the model under H0,obtained from the same package as m0control(optional)a list of control options for the computation of the chi-bar-weights (see Details section)p(optional)the method to be used to compute the p-value,one of:"bounds"(the default),"approx"or"both"(see Details section)fim(optional)the method to compute the Fisher Information Matrix.Options are: fim="extract"to extract the FIM computed by the package which was used tofit the models,fim="compute"to evaluate the FIM using parametric bootstrap,and fim=I with I a positive semidefinite matrix,for a FIM provided by the user.output a boolean specifying if any output should be printed in the console(default to TRUE)DetailsThe asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio test is a chi-bar-square,with weights that need to be approximated by Monte Carlo methods,apart from some specific cases where they are available explicitly.Therefore,the p-value of the test is not exact but approximated.This computation can be time-consuming,so the default behaviour of the function is to provide bounds on the exact p-value, which can be enough in practice to decide whether to reject or not the null hypothesis.This istriggered by the option p="bounds".To compute an approximation of the exact p-value, one should use the option p="approx"or p="both".When p="approx"or p="both",the weights of the chi-bar-square distribution are computed using Monte Carlo,which might involve a larger computing time.The control argument controls the options for chi-bar-square weights computation.It is a list with the following elements:M the size of the Monte Carlo simulation,i.e.the number of samples generated,parallel a boolean to specify if parallel computing should be used,and nbcores the number of cores to be used in case of parallel computing.Default is M=5000,parallel=FALSE and nb_cores=1.If parallel=TRUE but the value of nb_cores is not given,then it is set to the number of detected cores minus1ValueAn object of class htest with the following components:•statistic the likelihood ratio test statistics•null.value•alternative•parameters the parameters of the limiting chi-bar-square distribution:the degrees of freedom and the weights of the chi-bar-square components and the Fisher Information Matrix•method a character string indicating the name of the test•pvalue a named vector containing the different p-values computed by the function:using the (estimated)weights,using the random sample from the chi-bar-square distribution,and the two bounds on the p-value.Author(s)Charlotte Baey<<****************************>>ReferencesBaey C,Cournède P-H,Kuhn E,2019.Asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio test statistics for variance components in nonlinear mixed effects putational Statistics and Data Analysis135:107-122.Silvapulle MJ,Sen PK,2011.Constrained statistical inference:order,inequality and shape con-straints.Examples#load lme4package and example datasetlibrary(lme4)data(Orthodont,package="nlme")#fit the two models under H1and H0m1<-lmer(distance~1+Sex+age+age*Sex+(0+age|Subject),data=Orthodont,REML=FALSE)m0<-lm(distance~1+Sex+age+age*Sex,data=Orthodont)weightsChiBarSquare17 #compare them(order is important:m1comes first)varCompTest(m1,m0,p="bounds")#using nlmelibrary(nlme)m1<-lme(distance~1+Sex+age+age*Sex,random=pdSymm(Subject~1+age),data=Orthodont,method="ML")m0<-lme(distance~1+Sex,random=~1|Subject,data=Orthodont,method="ML") varCompTest(m1,m0)weightsChiBarSquare Monte Carlo approximation of chi-bar-square weightsDescriptionThe function provides a method to approximate the weights of the mixture components,when the number of components is known as well as the degrees of freedom of each chi-square distribution in the mixture,and given a vector of simulated values from the target¯χ2(V,C)distribution.Note that the estimation is based on(pseudo)-random Monte Carlo samples.For reproducible results, one shouldfix the seed of the(pseudo)-random number generator.UsageweightsChiBarSquare(df,V,dimsCone,orthan,control)Argumentsdf a vector with the degrees of freedom of the chi-square components of the chi-bar-square distributionV a positive semi-definite matrixdimsCone a list with the dimensions of the cone C,expressed on the parameter space scale orthan a boolean specifying whether the cone is an orthancontrol(optional)a list of control options for the computation of the chi-bar-weights, containing two elements:parallel a boolean indicating whether computationshould be done in parallel(FALSE by default),nb_cores the number of coresfor parallel computing(if parallel=TRUE but no value is given for nb_cores,itis set to number of detected cores minus1),and M the Monte Carlo sample sizefor the computation of the weights.ValueA list containing the estimated weights,the standard deviations of the estimated weights and therandom sample of M realizations from the chi-bar-square distributionIndexalt.desc,2approxWeights,3bootinvFIM,4bootinvFIM.lme,4 bootinvFIM.merMod,5 bootinvFIM.SaemixObject,5 bootstrap(bootinvFIM),4 dfChiBarSquare,6eqCstr(objFunction),11 extractFIM.lme,6 extractStruct,7 extractStruct.lme,7 extractStruct.merMod,8 extractStruct.SaemixObject,8 extractVarCov,9 extractVarCov.lme,9 extractVarCov.merMod,9fim.vctest,10 gradObjFunction(objFunction),11 ineqCstr(objFunction),11invFIM(bootinvFIM),4 jacobianEqCstr(objFunction),11 jacobianIneqCstr(objFunction),11 null.desc,10objFunction,11pckName,12print.desc.message,12print.res.message,13print.vctest,13summary.vctest,14 symMatrixFromVect(objFunction),11varCompTest,14weightsChiBarSquare,17 18。

ImportanceofthePre-RequisiteSubject

ImportanceofthePre-RequisiteSubject

Importance of the Pre-Requisite SubjectK.Kadirgama, M.M.Noor, M.R.M.Rejab, A.N.M.Rose, N.M. Zuki N.M., M.S.M.Sani, A.Sulaiman,R.A.Bakar, Abdullah IbrahimUniversiti Malaysia Pahang,***************.myABSTRACTIn this paper, it describes how the pre-requisite subjects influence the student’s performance in Heat transfer subject in University Malaysia Pahang (UMP). The Pre-requisite for Heat transfer in UMP are Thermodynamics I and Thermodynamics II. Randomly 30 mechanical engineering students were picked to analysis their performance from Thermodynamics I to Heat transfer. Regression analysis and Neural Network were used to prove the effect of prerequisite subject toward Heat transfer. The analysis shows that Thermodynamics I highly affect the performance of Heat transfer. The results show that the students who excellent in Thermodynamics I, their performance in Thermodynamics II also the same and goes to Heat transfer. Those students who scored badly in their Thermodynamics I, the results for the Thermodynamics II and Heat transfer are similar to Thermodynamics I. This shows the foundation must be solid, if the students want to do better in Heat transfer.INTRODUCTIONPre-requisite means course required as preparation for entry into a more advanced academic course or program [1]. Regression analysis is a technique used for the modeling and analysis of numerical data consisting of values of a dependent variable (response variable) and of one or more independent variables (explanatory variables). The dependent variable in the regression equation is modelled as a function of the independent variables, corresponding parameters ("constants"), and an error term. The error term is treated as a random variable. It represents unexplained variation in the dependent variable. The parameters are estimated so as to give a "best fit" of the data. Most commonly the best fit is evaluated by using the least squares method, but other criteria have also been used [1].Regression can be used for prediction (including forecasting of time-series data), inference, hypothesis testing, and modelling of causal relationships. These uses of regression rely heavily on the underlying assumptions being satisfied. Regression analysis has been criticized as being misused for these purposes in many cases where the appropriate assumptions cannot be verified to hold [1, 2]. One factor contributing to the misuse of regression is that it can take considerably more skill to critique a model than to fit a model [3].However, when a sample consists of various groups of individuals such as males and females, or different intervention groups, regression analysis can be performed to examine whether the effects of independent variables on a dependent variable differ across groups, either in terms of intercept or slope. These groups can be considered from different populations (e.g., male population or female population), and the population is considered heterogeneous in that these subpopulations may require different population parameters to adequately capture their characteristics. Since this source of population heterogeneity is based on observed group memberships such as gender, the data can be analyzed using regression models by taking into consideration multiple groups. In the methodology literature, subpopulations that can be identified beforehand are called groups [4, 5].Model can account for all kinds of individual differences. Regression mixture models described here are a part of a general framework of finite mixture models [6] and can be viewed as a combination of the conventional regression model and the classic latent class model [7, 8]. It should be noted that there are various types of regression mixture models [7], but this only focus on the linear regression mixture model. Thefollowing sections will first describe some unique characteristics of the linear regression mixture model in comparison to the conventional linear regression model, including integration of covariates into the model. Second, a step-by-step regression mixture analysis of empirical data demonstrates how the linear regression mixture model may be used by incorporating population heterogeneity into the model.Ko et al. [9] have introduced an unsupervised, self-organised neural network combined with an adaptive time-series AR modelling algorithm to monitor tool breakage in milling operations. The machining parameters and average peak force have been used to build the AR model and neural network. Lee and Lee [10] have used a neural network-based approach to show that by using the force ratio, flank wear can be predicted within 8% to 11.9% error and by using force increment, the prediction error can be kept within 10.3% of the actual wear. Choudhury et al. [11] have used an optical fiber to sense the dimensional changes of the work-piece and correlated it to the tool wear using a neural network approach. Dimla and Lister [12] have acquired the data of cutting force, vibration and measured wear during turning and a neural network has been trained to distinguish the tool state.This paper will describe the influence of prerequisite subject toward Heat transfer. The analysis will be done using regression method and Neural Network.REGRESSION METHODIn linear regression, the model specification is that the dependent variable, yi is a linear combination of the parameters (but need not be linear in the independent variables). For example, in simple linear regression for modelling N data points there is one independent variable: xi, and two parameters, β0 and β1 [2]:Results from the 30 mechanical engineering students were collected. There are mixed between female and male, no age different, different of background and all the students from same class. Regression analysis was done to check the most dominant variables (Thermodynamics I and Thermodynamics II) effect towards response (Heat transfer). Table 1 shows the marks of the students.Table 1: Marks for the subjects.Student Thermodynamics1 Thermodynamics2Heat transfer1 85 83 852 51 50 533 67 65 694 55 61 555 44 51 516 64 63 557 42 50 498 54 63 609 58 50 5810 52 61 6011 69 77 7712 58 64 6813 57 61 6814 71 68 6015 61 70 7316 53 66 6217 60 71 5918 45 55 5719 47 60 5620 62 77 6921 45 60 53(1)22 40 52 3723 53 70 6224 53 61 7025 56 60 7326 51 63 6927 44 62 5728 40 58 5229 62 80 7130 47 63 46MULTILAYER PERCEPTIONS NEURAL NETWORKIn the current application, the objective is to use the supervised network with multilayer perceptrons and train with the back-propagation algorithm (with momentum). The components of the input pattern consist of the control variables used in the student performance (Thermodynamics I and Thermodynamics II), whereas the components of the output pattern represent the responses from sensors (Heat transfer). During the training process, initially all patterns in the training set were presented to the network and the corresponding error parameter (sum of squared errors over the neurons in the output layer) was found for each of them. Then the pattern with the maximum error was found which was used for changing the synaptic weights. Once the weights were changed, all the training patterns were again fed to the network and the pattern with the maximum error was then found. This process was continued till the maximum error in the training set became less than the allowable error specified by the user. This method has the advantage of avoiding a large number of computations, as only the pattern with the maximum error was used for changing the weights. Fig.1 shows the neural network computational mode with 2-5-1 structure.Fig. 1: Neural Network with 2-5-1 structure. Heat transferThermodynamic IIRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe regression equation as below:Heat transfer = 8.04 + 0.498 Thermodynamics I + 0.408 Thermodynamics II (2)Equation 2 shows that Thermodynamics I is more dominant compare with Thermodynamics II. One can notice that, increase in Thermodynamics I and Thermodynamics II it will increase the result in Heat transfer. Table 2 show that Thermodynamics really significantly effect the heat transfer. It means, those have a very good foundation in Thermodynamics I, they can do better in Heat transfer. The p-value in the Analysis of Variance Table 2 (0.000) indicates that the relationship between Thermodynamics I and Thermodynamics II is statistically significant at an a-level of 0.05. This is also shown by the p-value for the estimated coefficient of Thermodynamics I, which is 0.008 as shown in Table 3.Table 2: Analysis of VarianceFPSSMSSource DF22.64936.93Regression 2 1873.87Residual Error 27 1117.6 41.39Total 29 2991.47Table 3: Estimated coefficientTCoefPSEPredictor Coef0.920.3678.771Constant 8.043Thermodynamics1 0.498 0.1734 2.870.008Thermodynamics2 0.4079 0.2032 2.01 0.055Fig. 2 shows the sensitivity test. The test shows that Thermodynamics I is the main effect for the heat transfer. The results for the sensitivity test and regression analysis show the same results.Fig.2: Sensitivity TestCONCLUSIONThe regression analysis and Neural Network is very useful tool to do analysis in term of measure student performance and importance of prerequisite subject. The results prove that Thermodynamics I effect lot the student performance in Heat transfer. The foundation subject must be very strong, if the students want to perform better in Thermodynamics II and Heat transfer. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe authors would like to express their deep gratitude to Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) for provided the financial support.REFERENCESRichard A. Berk, Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique, Sage Publications (2004)David A. Freedman, Statistical Models: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press (2005)R. Dennis Cook; Sanford Weisberg "Criticism and Influence Analysis in Regression", Sociological Methodology, Vol. 13. (1982), pp. 313-361.Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21-39.Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882-891.Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method. Psychological Methods, 6, 18-34.Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.T. J .Ko, D. W Cho, M. Y. Jung,” On-line Monitoring of Tool Breakage in Face Milling: Using a Self-Organized Neural Network”, Journal of Manufacturing systems, 14(1998), pp. 80-90.J.H. Lee, S.J. Lee,” One step ahead prediction of flank wear using cutting force”, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact, 39 (1999), pp 1747–1760.S.K. Chaudhury, V.K. Jain, C.V.V. Rama Rao,” On-line monitoring of tool wear in turning using a neural network”; Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact, 39 (1999), pp 489–504.D.E. Dimla, P.M. Lister,” On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring. II: tool state classification using multi-layer perceptron neural network”, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact ,40 (2000), pp 769–781。

风险模型与非寿险精算学 (53)

风险模型与非寿险精算学 (53)
4 4 Exam-style question
Casualty Actuarial Science CS2 Actuarial Statistics 2
1 Properties of a univariate time series 2 Stationary random series 3 Main linear models of time series 4 Exam-style question
Casualty Actuarial Science CS2 Actuarial Statistics 2
1 Properties of a univariate time series 2 Stationary random series 3 Main linear models of time series 4 Exam-style question
Syllabus objectives I
1 1. Explain the concept and general properties of stationary, I(0), and integrated, I(1), univariate time series.
2 2. Explain the concept of a stationary random series. 3 4. Know the notation for backwards shift operator, backwards
Casualty Actuarial Science CS2 Actuarial Statistics 2
1 Properties of a univariate time series 2 Stationary random series 3 Main linear models of time series 4 Exam-style question

增益模型(uplift modeling)的原理与实践

增益模型(uplift modeling)的原理与实践

增益模型(uplift modeling)的原理与实践1. 引言1.1 概述增益模型(uplift modeling),也称为个体处理效应估计(Individual Treatment Effect Estimation),是一种用于评估干预措施对个体行为的影响程度的预测模型。

与传统的预测模型不同,增益模型专注于识别出能够带来正向效应的个体,即对干预措施做出积极响应的人群。

在许多场景下,我们希望了解干预措施对某一特定指标(如销售量、用户转化率等)产生的效果。

传统的机器学习模型往往只能提供整体的预测结果,无法区分干预组和非干预组之间的差异。

而增益模型通过建立一个个体级别的反事实框架,有助于准确评估出每个个体因进行干预而产生变化的概率。

1.2 文章结构本文将以增益模型为主题,介绍其原理及实践应用。

首先,在第二部分将详细阐述增益模型的基本原理,并介绍常用的增益模型算法。

然后,在第三部分中,将深入探讨增益模型在实际应用中的关键步骤,包括选择适合的业务场景、数据准备与特征工程以及模型训练与评估。

接下来,在第四部分将从营销领域的视角,通过具体案例分析展示增益模型在提升广告点击率、改善转化率以及优化精细定向广告投放策略方面的应用。

最后,在第五部分进行总结,并对增益模型未来发展趋势进行展望。

1.3 目的本文旨在介绍增益模型原理和实践应用,帮助读者深入了解该模型能够如何利用个体级别信息进行干预效果评估和预测。

通过阅读本文,读者可以掌握选择适合的算法、数据处理方法以及构建有效增益模型的关键技巧,并能够在实际营销场景中应用该模型来优化决策策略,提升商业效益。

2. 增益模型的原理2.1 什么是增益模型增益模型(Uplift modeling)是一种预测模型,用于分析和预测营销活动或干预措施对个体行为的影响。

与传统的推荐系统或分类模型不同,增益模型的目标不仅在于准确地预测个体的行为,还在于识别出具有干预效果的个体,并通过针对这些个体采取有针对性的干预手段来提高整体效果。

R包的分类介绍

R包的分类介绍

R的包分类介绍1.空间数据分析包1)分类空间数据(Classes for spatial data)2)处理空间数据(Handling spatial data)3)读写空间数据(Reading and writing spatial data)4)点格局分析(Point pattern analysis)5)地质统计学(Geostatistics)6)疾病制图和地区数据分析(Disease mapping and areal dataanalysis)7)生态学分析(Ecological analysis)2.机器学习包1)神经网络(Neural Networks)2)递归拆分(Recursive Partitioning)3)随机森林(Random Forests)4)Regularized and Shrinkage Methods5)Boosting6)支持向量机(Support Vector Machines)7)贝叶斯方法(Bayesian Methods)8)基于遗传算法的最优化(Optimization using Genetic Algorithms)9)关联规则(Association Rules)10)模型选择和确认(Model selection and validation)11)统计学习基础(Elements of Statistical Learning)3.多元统计包1)多元数据可视化(Visualising multivariate data)2)假设检验(Hypothesis testing)3)多元分布(Multivariate distributions)4)线形模型(Linear models)5)投影方法(Projection methods)6)主坐标/尺度方法(Principal coordinates / scaling methods)7)无监督分类(Unsupervised classification)8)有监督分类和判别分析(Supervised classification anddiscriminant analysis)9)对应分析(Correspondence analysis)10)前向查找(Forward search)11)缺失数据(Missing data)12)隐变量方法(Latent variable approaches)13)非高斯数据建模(Modelling non-Gaussian data)14)矩阵处理(Matrix manipulations)15)其它(Miscellaneous utitlies)4.药物(代谢)动力学数据分析5.计量经济学1)线形回归模型(Linear regression models)2)微观计量经济学(Microeconometrics)3)其它的回归模型(Further regression models)4)基本的时间序列架构(Basic time series infrastructure)5)时间序列建模(Time series modelling)6)矩阵处理(Matrix manipulations)7)放回再抽样(Bootstrap)8)不平等(Inequality)9)结构变化(Structural change)10)数据集(Data sets)1.R分析空间数据(Spatial Data)的包主要包括两部分:1)导入导出空间数据2)分析空间数据功能及函数包:1)分类空间数据(Classes for spatial data):包sp(/web/packages/sp/index.html)为不同类型的空间数据设计了不同的类,如:点(points),栅格(grids),线(lines),环(rings),多边形(polygons)。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。




Fixed
Random level 2 level 1 residual
The
u j , e ij
are assumed independent.
But this is sometimes unrealistic:
• Repeated measures growth models with closely spaced occasions
0 j 0 u0 j 1 j 1 u1 j
A model for (non-independent) level 1 residuals might be written:
2 Cov( e , e ) f ( s ) ij i s , j e
s f( s ) e
Link functions
Link function f(s). From left to right; hyperbolic, logit, log
Parameters and estimation
We need to estimate the parameters of the correlation function, the variances and the fixed effects. We propose an MCMC algorithm and have programmed this for general 2- level models where correlations can exist at either or both levels and responses can be normal or binary. Steps are a mixture of Gibbs and MH sampling with adaptive proposal distributions and suitable diffuse priors
1
0
Leading to an exponential decay function. (Goldstein and Healy 1994)
Schools in competition
2 2 yXu ( ) e , e ~ N ( 0 , ) , u ~ N ( 0 , ) i j i j j i j i j e j u
f ( t t ) , t t 1 2 1 2
f e t t
1 2
t t 1 2
In discrete time (equal intervals) this is a standard first order autoregressive model We fit a 4-th degree polynomial with and without random linear coefficient
Work using the ALSPAC cohort is currently underway.
Other link functions
Logit:
f f e / ( e 1 ) j k
j k j k
பைடு நூலகம்
Log:
jk e
f jk
These have the following forms
• Schools competing for resources in a ‘zero-sum’ environment
Repeated measures growth curves
A simple model of linear growth with random slopes:
y ij 0 j 1 j t ij e ij
Modelling non-independent random effects in multilevel models
William Browne Harvey Goldstein University of Bristol
A standard multilevel (VC) model
2 2 yXu ( ) e , e ~ N ( 0 , ) , u ~ N ( 0 , ) i j i j j i j i j e j u
If we can specify a suitable (set of ) distance functions then we can estimate the relevant parameters.
One possibility is to use the extent of overlap between appropriately defined catchment areas.



D e fin e th eh y b e rb o lic lin kfu n c tio n
1 f ( j1 j2) 1| z 1 z 2|
j j (e
12
f j1j2
1 )/(e j1j2 1 )
f
where this correlation is inversely proportional to the (resource) distance between the schools | z1 z 2 | .
Example 1: Growth data
The data are 9 measurements on 20 boys around age 13, approximately 3 months apart Fitting a 2-level model with random linear and quadratic coefficients does not remove residual autocorrelation among level 1 residuals. We model the correlation as a negative exponentially decreasing function of the time difference We use a log (exponential) link since correlations should be positive
相关文档
最新文档