基于聚类的多属性群决策专家权重确定方法
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
基于聚类的多属性群决策专家权重确定方法
何立华;王栎绮;张连营
【期刊名称】《运筹与管理》
【年(卷),期】2014(000)006
【摘要】对于多属性群决策中专家权重确定的问题,本文提出了基于聚类的专家权重确定方法,将专家权重分为类别间权重和类别内权重,对专家聚类步骤和类别间权重的计算方法进行了改进。
通过专家给出的判断矩阵构建相容度矩阵,利用系统聚类原理,对相容度矩阵进行聚类,得到最大相容度谱系图。
通过最大相容度间的距离和给定阈值的比较,对专家进行恰当分类,从而避免了根据现有研究步骤只能将专家分为两类的不足。
此外,在确定类别间权重时,除继续对类容量较大的类赋予较大的类别间权重系数外,还引入专家判断矩阵的属性权重一致性来反映类别间的差异,从而有效避免了当某几类专家中含有相等数目专家时,赋予这几类专家相同类别间权重系数的问题。
所提方法结构清晰、计算简便,并使得专家权重计算结果更为合理准确。
最后运用一个算例对比验证了该方法的可行性和有效
性。
%An experts’ weight determining method based on the experts ’ weights clustering analysis is proposed to determine the experts’ weights of multi-attribute group decision-making.The experts’ weight is divided into the weights between categories and within category .The steps of experts ’ clustering and the calculation method of the weights between categories are improved .The clustering pedigree chart of the maximum compatibility de-gree is got by building the expert judgment compatibility matrix according to the expert judgment matrix , making use of the system
clustering principle to cluster the compatibility degree matrix .The experts are classified proper-ly according to the comparison of the distance between the maximum compatibility degree and the given threshold value, which overcomes the shortcoming of only clustering the experts into two categories in existing literatures . In addition, while determining the weights between categories , it not only gives greater weight for the larger ca-pacity , but also reflects the difference between categories by introducing the attribute ’ s weight consistence of the experts ’ judgment matrix , which avoids giving the same weights between categories for those categories that have the same number experts .The structure of the proposed method is clear and the calculation is simple , which makes the final result of experts ’ weights more reasonable and accurate .Finally, an example is compared to val-idate the feasibility and effectiveness of the presented method .
【总页数】8页(P65-72)
【作者】何立华;王栎绮;张连营
【作者单位】中国石油大学华东经济管理学院,山东青岛 266580;中国石油大学华东经济管理学院,山东青岛 266580;天津大学管理与经济学部,天津 300072【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】C934
【相关文献】
1.汽车碰撞安全风险决策中基于复合聚类的群决策专家权重确定方法 [J], 王素娟;雷正保;赵建
2.基于交叉熵和熵的直觉模糊多属性群决策专家权重的确定 [J], 王晓杰;魏翠萍;郭婷婷
3.基于Vague集的多属性群决策专家权重的确定 [J], 万树平
4.基于确定评价专家权重方案的模糊多属性群决策方法 [J], 朱国成;赵殿品;张世英
5.基于确定评价专家权重方案的模糊多属性群决策方法 [J], 朱国成;赵殿品;张世英因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。