外文翻译--动力学研究与二氧化硫反应在低温和氢氧化钙在一固定床反应器

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

翻译部分

英文原文

Kinetic study of the reaction between sulfur dioxide

and calcium hydroxide at low temperature in a

fixed-bed reactor

Abstract

A quantitative study of the influence of inlet sulfurdioxide concentration (600–3000 ppm),relative humidity (20–60%), reactortemperature(56–86℃)and different amounts (0–30 wt.%) ofinorganic additives(NaCl, CaCl2 andNaOH) on gas desulfurization has been carried out in acontinuous downflow fixed-bed reactor containing calcium hydroxide diluted with silica sand.Results show that the reaction rate does not depend on sulfur dioxide partial pressure (zero-order Kinetics) and that the temperature and the relative humidity have a positive influence on reactionrate. An apparent activation energy of 32 kJ/mol Ca(OH)2 has been estimated for the reaction.

An empirical reaction rate equation at 71.5℃and 36.7% relative humidity that includes thetype and amount of additive is proposed. It has been found that

calcium chloride is the bestadditive studied because it allows for a higher degree of sulfur dioxide removal. 2000 ElsevierScience B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Desulfurization; Sulfur dioxide; Calcium hydroxide; Kinetics; Inorganic additives

1. Introduction

The increasing concern during the last few years on the protection of the environmenthas had its influence on the design and operation of power plants, especially on thereduction of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from them. They are the mainpollutants from coal and fuel-oil combustion in power plants. Both gases are responsiblefor acid rain.

In USA and Europe, new power plants that use fuels with significant quantities ofsulfur have to meet severe standards to reduce these air pollutants. One of the majorproblems facing older power plants is that they were designed prior to the presentstandards for pollution control and therefore have no facilities on space to incorporatesuch controls.

The technologies to control sulfur dioxide emissions can be distributed into threegroups by considering if the treatment is done before, during or after the

combustion. Itseems clear that the last group of technologies cited is the most advantageous, fromvarious points of view, for power stations which have been in operation for many years.These are called FGD technologies (Flue Gas Desulfurization),and among them, themost usedare: IDS (In-Duct Scrubbing, developed by General Electric); E-So x(developed by US EPA, Babcok and Wilcox, Ohio Coal Development Office and OhioEdison), EPRIHYPAS (Hybrid Pollution Abatement System, developed by ElectricPower Research Institute), DRAVO HALT (Hydrate Addition at Low Temperature,developed by Dravo), CONSOL COOLSIDE (developed by Consolidated CoalCom-pany)and ADVACATE(developed by Acurex and US EPA). These processes are basedon the injection of a solid sorbent plus water by spraying or injecting a slurry into theduct situated between the air preheater and the particulate collection system. Calciumhydroxide or limestone are usually used as sorbents to capture sulfur dioxide and acalcium sulfiter/sulfate mixture is obtained as the reaction product.

Klingspor and Stromberg proposed a mechanism to explain the reactionbetween sulfur dioxide and calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate in the presence ofwater vapor. According to them, when the relative humidity is low (below 20%), sulfurdioxide and water can be adsorbed on the solid surface, however, no reaction occursuntil there is at least a monolayer of water molecules adsorbed on the surface. As therelative humidity increases, less sulfur dioxide can be adsorbed on the surface becausewater adsorption on the solid occurs preferentially due to intermolecular forces. Thus,sulfur dioxide has to be absorbed on the adsorbed water, forming complexes where thesulfur atom is

相关文档
最新文档