英语听力：走进哈佛-《Harvard Law School 哈佛法学院》
《哈佛的6堂独立思考课》英文原版
哈佛大学一直以其严谨的教育理念和丰富的教学资源而闻名于世。
作为一所世界顶尖的学府，哈佛大学一直在培养学生的独立思考能力上下足功夫。
最近，哈佛大学开设了一门名为《哈佛的6堂独立思考课》的课程，旨在帮助学生培养自主思考的能力。
今天，我们就来探讨一下这门课程的内容和意义。
1. 第一堂课：自我认知与沟通能力在这堂课上，学生将学习如何通过自我认知来提高沟通能力。
哈佛教授们将传授学生们一些简单而又实用的自我认知技巧，帮助他们更好地理解自己的情绪和行为，从而更好地与他人沟通。
2. 第二堂课：批判性思维与逻辑推理在这堂课上，学生将学习如何进行批判性思维和逻辑推理。
哈佛教授们将引导学生们进行逻辑分析，帮助他们理清复杂问题的思维逻辑，以及培养他们的批判性思维能力。
3. 第三堂课：跨学科思维与知识整合这堂课将教导学生如何进行跨学科思维和知识整合。
哈佛教授们将带领学生们通过连接不同学科的知识，拓宽他们的视野，培养他们的跨学科思维能力。
4. 第四堂课：创新思维与问题解决这堂课将教导学生创新思维和问题解决能力。
哈佛教授们将向学生们介绍一些创新思维的方法和工具，帮助他们更好地解决现实生活中的问题。
5. 第五堂课：价值观与道德决策这堂课将引导学生思考价值观和道德决策。
哈佛教授们将通过案例分析和讨论，帮助学生们理清自己的价值观，培养他们的道德决策能力。
6. 第六堂课：自主学习与未来规划最后一堂课将引导学生进行自主学习和未来规划。
哈佛教授们将教导学生如何进行有效的自主学习，帮助他们规划未来的学习和生活。
这六堂课的设置，旨在帮助学生培养独立思考的能力。
通过这些课程，学生们不仅能够提高自己的沟通能力、批判性思维能力，还能够拓宽自己的知识视野，培养自己的创新思维能力和道德决策能力，同时还能够规划好未来的学习和生活。
从我个人的观点来看，这六堂独立思考课旨在帮助学生培养独立思考的能力，是非常有意义和价值的。
在教育的道路上，除了学习专业知识外，培养学生的独立思考能力同等重要。
哈佛法学院
Harvard's main campus is located on the suburb of Charles River in Lenox, Cambridge in MA Boston Department.
哈佛主要校区位于麻州波士 顿市郊的剑桥（ Cambridge ） 查理士河（ Charles River） 河畔.
史密斯博士，一位在 罗彻斯特进行私人研 究和训练的物理学家， 并是曾受训于MIT的电 子工程师。他在罗彻 斯特大学医学中心念 完医学，并拿到了 Ph.D.学位。
Dr. Smith ,an MIT-trained electrical engineer and physician who is in private practice in Rochester, NY. He completed medical school and a Ph.D. at the University of Rochester Medical Center
Liz ,a girl coming from a family with terrible drug addiction .Her father abandoned her and her mother who finally died of drugs , leaving Liz homeless.
Austin Building
Lewis Center
The snow-covered Harvard Law School
《Legally Blonde》
The one we saw days before . It is a story about a blonde girl who has a ridiculous but interesting beginning at Harvard Law School. Eventually she finds the true herself and makes difference.
哈佛法学院自动播放
Harvard Law School
They are our alumnus and we are pround of them!
The Master of White House
Willard Mitt Romney（威拉德· 米特· 罗姆尼，1947年3月12日－）第 70任马萨诸塞州州长。1975年获得哈佛大学法学院法学士（JD）学
Harvard Law School
● ● ● ● ● ●
There are still many others But time is over So I can't list them one by one
Harvard Law School
That's all
Made by Emer (2013-11-23)
目前9名美国最高法院大法官中有6人曾在该院就读。
Supreme Court justices 最高法院大法官
艾蕾娜· 卡根（Elena Kagan， 1960年4月28日－）
史蒂芬· 杰拉尔德· 布雷耶 （1938年8月15日－）
安东尼· 麦克莱德· 肯尼 迪（1936年7月23日－）
Supreme Court justices 最高法院大法官
安东宁· 格雷戈里· 斯卡利 亚（Antonin Gregory Scalia，1936年3月11日 －）
小约翰· 格洛佛· 罗伯茨 （John Glover Roberts, Jr.，1955年1月27日－）
小奥利弗· 温德尔· 霍姆斯 （Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.）
Goldman Sachs（高盛）为跨国
前任达美航空（Delta Air Lines, Inc.） CEO Gerald Grinstein He received a JD from Harvard Law School in 1957.
From Homeless to Harvard女儿当自强——走进哈佛的穷孩子
From Homeless to Harvard萝拉莉·萨默1998年从哈佛大学毕业，主修儿童研究，后又获得伯克利大学的教育学硕士学位。
但谁会想到，她曾经是一名落魄的街头流浪儿。
萝拉莉根据自身经历撰写的《流浪到哈佛》（Learning Joy From Dogs Without Collars）成为当年的畅销书，并受到哈佛大学著名心理分析与医学人文教授、普利策奖得主罗伯特·科尔斯博士诚意推荐。
“萝拉莉·萨默旋风”曾经狂扫美国各大平面与电子媒体，“萝拉莉·萨默”也因此成为美国无人不知、无人不晓的名字，成为“美国梦”的象征。
From Place to PlaceOn a sunny morning June 1998, twenty-one-year-old Lauralee Summer waited for the start of her graduation ceremony at Harvard University nervously, praying that this time her mother would not be late as usual. However her mother didn't show up even after the ceremony ended. Holding her certificate, she couldn't help recalling those disappointing moments: unable to catch bus on time, late for dinner and so on. Suddenly, she heard someone calling her name. She turned around and found her mother standing behind her, beaming with smile.That Lauralee Summer's mother loves her is not in question, never has been. But the mother was unable to do what most children take for granted in Lauralee's childhood: set a schedule, make sure she went to school, get meals on the table, and make a stable home. For much of Summer's childhood, mother and daughter moved from shelter to welfare hotel to temporary room to a relative's house. By the time she was 12, they had already moved 12 times.A Fresh StartIn 1989, they headed east. Summer says her mother told her that Boston “had good schools and was rich with cultural history.”Thus began a stay at shelters, welfare hotels, and rented rooms throughout the Boston area. For the first time in her life, there were rules, regular meals, and order. There Lauralee enrolled in Quincy High School. Lauralee would take her second-hand skateboard all over Quincy: It was free transportation. To give her room to do homework, her mother slept on the couch for the next four years.Thanks to her teacher, Charles Maclaughlin, Lauralee made decent grades, joined the boys' wrestling team and found a place at Harvard. She wasn't the top student in her high school class (twentieth in a class of 300), and her SATs weren't perfect (1,450 out of 1,600).But her admissions essay set her apart from the multitudes of privileged Harvard kids. “I wrote about my mom mostly, and a little about being homeless,”she says. “I wrote about wanting to help other homeless kids.”“She's special, and someday she'll do something incredible; I really believe that,”says Maclaughlin, “Her mother gave her things that are priceless—a lot of love, and a love of reading.”For a long time, she felt more comfortable around homeless people than her classmates. “I was with all these students who came from stable families,”she says. “They were brilliant and driven. I thought, I am going to be washed out.”She was on scholarship and grants, working two jobs to pay the bills. Books were too expensive, so Lauralee borrowed them from the library or photocopied chapters.On Parents' Weekend, Summer's mother took the train, hauling her belongings in several bags through Harvard Square. “From the moment I met her at the T station, where she emerged laden down with her bags and layers of clothes, I knew that my Parents' Weekend would be different from anyone else's,”writes Lauralee. While the other students were dining or shopping with parents, her mum left because she had to check in at the shelter by 6:30 pm. Forgive and UnderstandToward both her parents, Summer shows an extraordinary ability not only to forgive but to understand. “I wanted to know where the other half of my genes came from,”she says. “Meeting my dad was like being reborn at 19.I can imagine what a hard time he went through when he divorced.”She wrote him a letter when she was a sophomore in college. Her father wrote back right away, and the two have become close. Both father and daughter were surprised at the depth of feeling they discovered for each other, and what they have in common; both are athletic, driven and emotional. He came to her Harvard graduation and made a 14-day cross-country trip with her when she moved to Berkeley.“I learned to look at the world in different ways and still find joy,”when she talks about her life. “Honestly, I think my life has been so lucky in so many ways.”女儿当自强——走进哈佛的穷孩子四处飘零1998年6月，一个阳光明媚的早晨，21岁萝拉莉·萨默忐忑不安地等待着哈佛大学毕业典礼的开始。
英语听力：走进哈佛-《Learning to “fail to do something”》
Do you want to take time to stop and breathe in this fast-paced and competitive world? If your answer is yes, you may be interested in the “happiness course”at Harvard. The ^happiness course”or positive psychology1 is now the most popular course at Harvard in recent years. It adds to the Harvard spirit a new luminescent spot, that is, to live a happy life.在这个节奏很快、竞争很激烈的世界，你是否想停下来喘口气呢？如果你的回答是肯定的，你也许会对哈佛的“幸福课”感兴趣。
“幸福课”，或积极心理学，是哈佛近几年最受欢迎的课。
它给哈佛精神增添了一个新的亮点，就是“幸福地生活”。
In his class，Ben Shahar does not teach his students how to become successful. Instead, he teaches how to be happy in a simple way. In his first lecture, only 8 students came and two left midway. Then 400 came to his second lecture, and 850 to the third. By now, at least one fifth of Harvard College’s undergraduate populations of about 6,500are in this class.在本-沙哈尔的课上，他会深入浅出地教学生如何幸福，而不是教学生如何成功。
Harvard Law Review
RECENT PUBLICATIONSW E’RE A LL J OURNALISTS N OW:T HE T RANSFORMATION OF THE P RESS AND R ESHAPING OF THE L AW IN THE I NTERNET A GE. By Scott Gant. New York, N.Y.: Free Press. 2007. Pp. 240. $26.00. The rise of so-called “citizen journalists” has raised challenging ques-tions as to whether the traditional media deserves a privileged place in First Amendment jurisprudence. Scott Gant’s accessible and persua-sive new book argues that it does not. Mr. Gant sees a disconnect be-tween the vital role that nonprofessionals play in breaking news and disseminating information and the protections and privileges they re-ceive under federal and state law and practice. He criticizes many of the entrenched but under-the-radar preferences enjoyed by the estab-lished media, including heightened protection from Department of Jus-tice subpoenas and access to government buildings ranging from pris-ons to the Supreme Court. We’re All Journalists Now contends that policy considerations and constitutional principles — both the concept of equal protection and the individual rights enshrined in the First Amendment — mandate an expansive definition of what it means to be a journalist. Mr. Gant acknowledges but does not substantively treat some of the difficult issues that necessarily follow from this view, such as how to allocate limited privileges and resources when anyone who writes a blog can claim them. But his book offers a thought-provoking critique of whether the current allocation system is appro-priate to a new era of media.T HE C ASE A GAINST P ERFECTION:E THICS IN THE A GE OF G E-NETIC E NGINEERING. By Michael J. Sandel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U niversity Press. 2007. Pp. x, 162. $18.95. In this short, approachable book, Professor Michael J. Sandel argues that many of the recent and prospective developments in bioengineering and bio-technology represent an impermissible disrespect for “[t]he ethic of giftedness” (p. 45). Acknowledging the blurry line between therapy and enhancement, Professor Sandel contends that society is treading on treacherous ethical territory. So-called advancements, such as clon-ing, sex selection, memory enhancement, and stem cell research, all re-quire a “persisting negotiation with the given” (p. 83). Professor San-del’s ultimate advice is to change the system of perfectionism to accommodate an imperfect human race, rather than to acquiesce to a culture that promotes constant improvement. Even as he succeeds in introducing the philosophical novice to the traditional style of aca-demic ethical debate, Professor Sandel’s uncomplicated prose, sparse footnoting, and frequent use of anecdotes — including a pair of deaf mothers, a stage-frightened classical musician, and a Singaporean ster-ilization experiment — render this book as accessible to lay readers as to policymakers and bioethicists.9382008]RECENT PUBLICATIONS939 T HE FBI:A H ISTORY. By Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones. New Haven, Conn.: Yale U niversity Press. 2007. Pp. viii, 317. $27.50. The FBI has been the subject of equal parts fascination and controversy throughout its history. Professor Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones presents a bal-anced account detailing the high and low points of the FBI’s history, tracing its evolution in the context of the country’s political and social developments. Whereas most accounts date the FBI’s origin to 1908, Professor Jeffreys-Jones argues that its foundations were laid in the 1870s, when the newly formed Department of Justice began employing detectives to perform undercover work in an effort to dismantle the Ku Klux Klan. This observation becomes a lens through which Pro-fessor Jeffreys-Jones reevaluates events in the FBI’s checkered history of racism. The book challenges conventional wisdom, arguing that J. Edgar Hoover’s impact has been exaggerated and that the role of at-torneys general has been underappreciated. The book chronicles the FBI’s efforts in counterespionage, the use of its resources against po-litical enemies, its rivalry with the CIA, and the various efforts to re-form and curtail its excesses. Readers of The FBI: A History will ap-preciate Professor Jeffreys-Jones’s ability to intermingle richly detailed stories with thoughtful critical assessment.F REEDOM FOR THE T HOUGHT THAT W E H ATE:T ALES OF THE F IRST A MENDMENT. By Anthony Lewis. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books. 2008. Pp. 205. $25.00. Professor Anthony Lewis provides an eminently readable and succinct primer of over 450 years of history relevant to the First Amendment. His “Tales” begin in England in 1538, the year in which King Henry VIII decreed that all printed mat-ter would require a license. Although that law was unpopular, a “sedi-tious libel” law that criminalized publishing anything critical of state leaders was carried over to Colonial America. The newly formed U nited States made “seditious libel” a federal offense in 1798. Al-though the law was intended to prevent the import of the ideology of the Jacobin Terror in France, the new law was immediately used to si-lence domestic political opponents. In a conversational style, Professor Lewis shows, case by case, the advances and regressions in First Amendment rights, from the overturning of expulsions of schoolchil-dren who refused to salute the flag to the upholding of investigational techniques during the Red Scare. He traces how powerful dissenting opinions of Supreme Court Justices led the movement toward greater First Amendment protections. He also discusses recent challenges to First Amendment jurisprudence, including obscenity, the “reporter’s privilege,” and secret wiretapping. Without lapsing into didacticism, Professor Lewis provides a gentle reminder that the robust First Amendment rights we so often take for granted were, in fact, hard-won, and remain fragile still.940HARVARD LAW REVIEW [V ol. 121:938 R 2.0. By Cass R. Sunstein. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton U niversity Press. 2007. Pp. xiii, 251. $24.95. Today, almost every-thing can be personalized, from iPod music to Yahoo! news headlines. So what’s wrong with that? Quite a lot, warns Professor Cass Sun-stein in this update to his 2001 book, . Personalization is fine — until it reaches the point at which individuals limit themselves to conversations, blogs, television, and radio that only reinforce their viewpoints. Republicans watch Fox News, while Democrats watch CNN. The end result of such information fragmentation, Professor Sunstein argues, is that people become less tolerant of others’ view-points, obtain limited information, and are less likely to reach solutions that take into account the common good. Professor Sunstein draws from statistics and a wide variety of studies to show that people adopt more extreme viewpoints when they surround themselves exclusively with like-minded people. Polarization by choice poses an insidious threat: it could strip us of the meaningful debate that a thriving repub-lic requires. Professor Sunstein offers a variety of creative solutions, from promoting public, online “deliberative democracy” forums in which many viewpoints can be debated to requiring television and ra-dio stations to disclose their public-interest activities.I MPRISONING C OMMUNITIES:H OW M ASS I NCARCERATION M AKES D ISADV ANTAGED N EIGHBORHOODS W ORSE. By Todd R. Clear. New York, N.Y.: Oxford U niversity Press. 2007. Pp. xv, 255. $35.00. In this timely and compelling new book, Professor Todd Clear challenges the politically popular claim that increased incarceration decreases crime rates. Pointing out that existing sentencing studies show a relatively marginal effect on crime rates, Professor Clear pre-sents empirical and ethnographic evidence to show that mass incar-ceration — of predominantly minority young men from impoverished neighborhoods — produces social problems within the communities that the prisoners leave behind, which in turn increase crime in those places. Highlighting the connection between the effects of incarcera-tion on ex-prisoners, including decreased earning potential and in-creased medical and psychological problems, and the increased likeli-hood that the relatives of an ex-prisoner will go to prison as well, Professor Clear argues that imprisonment saps the human capital of communities, destabilizes the relationships that would otherwise pro-vide informal social controls, and perpetuates a cycle of poverty and incarceration. Lamenting that current political debates about prison reform are unlikely to lead to solutions, Imprisoning Communities calls for sentencing law reform to decrease prison populations and for an emphasis on community justice — a justice system that encompasses not only concern for the correctness of individual case outcomes, but also for those outcomes’ effect on the community as a whole.。
哈佛大学中英介绍 英语演讲
哈佛大学是美国最早的私立大学之一，是以培养研究生和从事科学研究为主的综合性大学，哈佛大学是全美第一所大学（第二所是威廉玛丽学院，第三所是耶鲁大学）。
美国独立战争以来大量的革命先驱都出自于哈佛的门下。
哈佛大学被誉为美国政府的思想库。
这里先后诞生了八位美国总统，40位诺贝尔奖得主和30位普利策奖得主。
其商学院案例教学盛名远播。
这里也培养了缔造了微软、IBM、Facebook 等一个个商业奇迹的人。
Harvard University is the earliest one of American Private University, is to train graduate students and research oriented comprehensive university.Harvard University is the first university ( second College of William and Mary, third Yale University ). The United States since the war of independence many revolutionary pioneer from Harvard under the door. Harvard University, known as the United States government thought library. Here has the birth of the eight president of the United States, 40 Nobel Prize winners and 30 winner of the Pulitzer prize. The business school case study more famous. Here also cultivate created Microsoft, IBM, Facebook, a commercial miracle.:I hope all of you can be admitted to your ideal universities。
风雨哈佛路
风雨哈佛路作者：来源：《初中生·爱英语》2019年第04期又名：最贫穷的哈佛女孩导演：彼得·利维主演：索拉·伯奇 / 迈克·里雷 / 凯莉·林奇 / 艾伦·佩吉 / 迈克尔·莱利制片国家 / 地区：美国语言：英语《風雨哈佛路》（Homeless To Harvard： The Liz Murray Story）于2003年4月7日在美国上映，是一部催人警醒的励志电影。
影片根据同名自传体小说改编，讲述一个贫穷女孩通过自己的努力最终进入哈佛求学的真实故事。
莉丝（索拉·伯奇饰）出生于纽约的贫民窟。
脏乱无序的成长环境，酗酒吸毒的父亲，患上精神分裂症的母亲，从出生开始，生活便向莉丝展露出狰狞的面目。
母亲去世后，本就千疮百孔的家变得支离破碎，莉丝开始居无定所地流浪在城市各个角落，依靠乞讨来养活自己，被苦难充斥的日子似乎一眼能望到尽头。
但有的人即使身陷泥淖，依然拥有抬头仰望星空的勇气。
莉丝就是这样一个女孩，也许贫穷与生俱来无法选择，但自己可以决定对待生活的态度。
莉丝知道，在自己悲苦的生活之外，有一个全然不同的世界。
她从未放弃对这个世界的憧憬，而通往这个美好世界的唯一道路，便是读书成才。
于是，莉丝在求学路上开始了漫漫征程。
她从戴维校长那里争取到读书的机会，用两年的时间修完四年的课程。
在这期间，她唯一的落脚点就是B线的地铁；在餐厅兼职洗碗的时候，她将学习资料贴在水池边的墙上，边洗边复习……莉丝没有辜负自己的努力，如愿通过哈佛的入学考试。
为了支付高昂学费，她找遍所有奖学金资讯，最终申请到《纽约时报》一等奖学金。
永不退缩的奋斗让遥远的梦想变得触手可及。
影片最后，莉丝迈着自信的脚步走进哈佛的学堂。
这是电影的结束，也是莉丝崭新人生的开始。
整部电影以莉丝的成长为主线，没有激烈的情感冲突，情节上也没有戏剧化的大起大落，一个好听的声线将莉丝的故事娓娓道来。
英语听力：走进哈佛-《Pursuit of Truth“追求真理”》
When you go to Harvard, you are welcomed by “Truth”. Harvard’s motto is “Amicus Plato, Amicus Aristotle, sed Magis VERITAS”. At Harvard, you'll find that “truth”is everywhere. The words on Harvard University Seal, every schools，seals，and Harvard gate are all “Veritas”which is the Latin word for “Truth”. “Pursuit of Truth”is the fundamental and unchanging spirit and rule of Harvard University.当你走进哈佛时，迎接你的是“真理”二字。
哈佛大学的校训是“与柏拉图为友，与亚里士多德为友，更要与真理为友”。
来到哈佛，你会发现“真理”一词无处不在。
哈佛校徽、各学院的院徽、哈佛大学的校门上都有“真理”一词的拉丁文“Veritas”。
“追求真理”是哈佛大学不变的、最基本的精神和规则。
The motto is not just empty talk. Instead, it is a real yardstick1. All the decisions concerning Harvard5s fate must be measured and determined2 by this yardstick. Today’s Harvard, like all the other university, is under great pressure coming from changing social needs which in turn are the results of rapid growth of emerging industries. All of these make new and urgent demands on the major setting and talents training of a university. In face of these pressures, should Harvard accept and even cater3 to thesocial demands, and turn its students into people with practical skills demanded by the society, or should Harvard stick to its principle, and maintain its independence, preventing Harvard turning into a factory for the society? Harvard people believe that they must stick to their own principles. Harvard will develop conforming to the trend of times, but it will not be led by the nose. Universities are not founded to solve social problems. They are different from vocational schools. Universities’task is more important: to pass on to one generation of students to another the fundamental ideology4, knowledge, and methods which students need all life long.这一校训绝对不是一句空话，而是一个实实在在的尺度，所有关于学校命运的重大决定都要有这一尺度来做最终的衡量和判断。
风雨哈佛路简介英语带翻译
Conclusion 总结
In conclusion, Harvard University stands as a beacon of academic excellence and intellectual advancement. Its rich history, commitment to research and learning, and impact on the world make it a truly exceptional institution. The university continues to attract the brightest minds from around the globe and remains at the forefront of innovation and scholarship.
哈佛大学校园由历史悠久和现代化建筑混合而成，每一座建筑都为周围景观增添了美感。该大学还拥有几个博物馆、画廊和研究中心。学生可以使用最先进的设施，包括实验室、图书馆和表演空间。该校园还以其致力于可持续性和环境保护而闻名。
Impact 影响
Harvard University has had a significant impact on the academic world, producing numerous scholars, leaders, and innovators. Its alumni include some of the most influential figures in various fields, including politics, business, and the arts. The university's research has also contributed to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in science, medicine, and technology.
新标准大学英语视听说教程听力原文Unit+
Unit 1-Conversation 1**（1）Janet:So this is the Cherwell Boathouse — it's lovely! And look at those people punting! It looks quite easy.Mark:I'm not so sure about that! Janet, there's something Kate and I wanted to discuss with you. Some people in college are organizing charity events this term. We've decided to get involved.Janet:Raising money for charity? Right. In China, people raise money for charity but students don't usually do that.Mark:Students often do that here. Anyway, we're thinking of doing sponsored punting.Janet:Sponsored punting! What's that?Kate:Sponsoring is when people pay you to do something — like run a long distance. So people would be sponsoring students to punt.Janet: What a great idea! I'd love to join you! Mark:That's why we're telling you about it. So that's decided then. Let's make a list of things we need to do.Kate: I'll do that. One of the first things we should do is choose the charity.Mark: Yes. And choose a day for the event. And we need to design the sponsorship form. I've got one here.Kate:That looks fine, but we must change the wording. Who wants to do that?Mark: I'll do that. What have we got so far? Kate: Choose a charity. Also a day for the event. Change the wording on the sponsorship form... Um ... We have to decide where the punt will start from. Mark: Cherwell Boathouse, no question! It's a very beautiful route from here, apparently.Kate: I'm with you on that.Janet: Me tooJanet: I'm not used to boats — Woah!Mark: Whoops!Kate: Watch out! You nearly hit me with that thing!Mark: Sorry! I didn't mean to. ... OK, we're off! Kate: Maybe I should do the punting.Mark:It's 've got the hang of it now —give me a chance.Kate: Well, I'd like to have a go. Mark: Supposing I do the first hour. Then you can take over for a while, if you want to.Kate: Yes, great.Janet: You're really good at it, Mark! This is fantastic! It's exactly how I imagined life here! Look over there —isn't it lovely!Kate: Yes, it is.Unit 1-Conversation 2Janet: Kate, everything's organized, isn't it, for collecting the sponsorship money?Kate: Yes, I've arranged for people to get the money to me by next Friday — if they haven't paid online. I'll count it all up.Janet: Good. We'd better have a meeting soon after that, don't you think? How much have we raised?Kate: About 600.Janet: Fantastic! I'm so enjoying this!Mark: Hey guys, I've got a suggestion — how about moving over to the bank and we can have our picnic! Hey, look, there's Louise and Sophie! Mark: Whoo ...Girls: Mark!Janet: Are you all right?Mark: Er .Of course I'm all right. Kate, I think it's your turn to punt!Unit 1-Outside ViewVoice-over Harvard University in Cambridge is one of the best universities in the world. We spoke to Alex Jude, the university's Head of Communications. He explained that Harvard looks for the best and most talented students from around the world.Alex Harvard actually seeks students fromaround theworld, the best students that we can find, to studychemistry,or study literature, or study government, or business.Ourbusiness school is particularly well-known aroundthe world,as is the medical school and law school, so, um, and,and theKennedy School of Government, or the John FKennedySchool of Government, so, er, we do seek very, verytalentedstudents and we have open doors for them.Voice-over We asked five students at Harvard totell uswhat kind of social life they have.Ashley Um, well relaxing is a little hard to do around here, but basically, I mean, I still, I, I live nearby anyway, so I see a lot of my friends, and ... Um, there's a good social life here if you look for it. I go to the gym, run. So that's what I do.Adam It's, it's whatever you want it to be. It'sgood. Ifyou wanna go out party, do anything you can. If youwannasit in your room and study all night like my friendover here,you can also do that.Brian Socially, like you said, it's, it's a lot ofwhat youmake it. Um, we don't have fraternities here, and so,youknow, that's, it's obviously not as social. There's notas manyparties as there would be on another campus. Um,but on aFriday or Saturday night, there, there, there will be aparty.Usually we end up studying until about 10 o'clock.And thenwe, and then we'll go out and have fun maybe, orjust watch amovie with friends, or, you know, whatever is goingon forthe night.Jodie Not everyone would agree with me, obviously, but it's, I think it's a fun place to be. Interviewer Have you made a lot of friends?Jodie Oh, definitely.Interviewer Mm.Jodie Many.Interviewer What, what do you do with your friends?Jodie Um, well, I like to go to concerts. I'm inthreemusic groups, so I have lots of rehearsals during theweek for that. Um, just do, you know, some fun things, on the weekend.Voice-over We asked the Harvard students if theyuse theInternet.Ashley Um, I, I use it a fairly good amount.Um, ourlibrary system is online, so I use that a lot. And a lotof myclasses, you know, have to do research papers. Youcan find alot of information on there, so.Interviewer So how often do you use it, a week, a day?Ashley Um, I use it probably on more of a weekly basis. Maybe three or four times a week. Brian Oh yes, definitely. We live through theInternetactually. Well, I do a lot of research through theInternet,follow my stocks on the Internet. Um, well, eventhoughe-mail is not officially Internet, we, that's how we communicate a lot at college, so, through the e-mail. John Um, I use the internet mostly for, er,I'd say,sort of leisure purposes. I mean, I play, um, I use itfor a lotof, I don't, we don't have TV in my room, so I use it,uh, uh,go to the CNN website, keep up on current events,things likethat. Uh, I also, uh, you know, there's some littlegames toplay over the Internet. Um, just um, I go to to see what's happening, follow the Boston Red Sox, thingslikethat. Um, I think a lot of courses use it to post things,but I, Idon't usually use it that much for research, or things.I tend touse the libraries for such things, so.Unit 1-Listening inNews reportStanford University has recently changed its financial aid policy for students to make theuniversity more affordable and accessible. Students who don’t have financial aid pay about $46,000 a year just for tuition. It’s not unusual for students to be forced to decline an offer because they can’t afford to go to their dream school. The new policy means that for students whose families earn less than $125,000, tuition is fully covered by scholarship and grant aid. Those with a family income below$65,000 are not expected to pay for either tuition, or room and board. This is great news for talented students who are concerned about fees.However, Stanford is not the only top university in the United States that makes tuition affordable for students. Ivy League schools, such as Harvard, Princeton and Yale, also offer free tuition plans to students from low-income and middle-class families.Stanford and Ivy League schools can offer generous financial aid packages because they are very wealthy. They receive large annual donations that can be used for specific purposes, such as financial aid.1 What has Stanford University done recently?2 How much is the tuition a year at Stanford if students don’t receive financial aid?3 Why is Stanford University so wealthy? Passage 1Voice-over Hi, I'm Nick Carter, and this is SUR, your university radio station. This morning we went around campus to ask freshers -now half-way through their first year -the question, "How are you finding uni?" Here are some of the answers we got. Speaker 1It's cool. It's everything I hoped it would be. I'mvery ambitious, I want to be a journalist and I wantto get to the top of the profession. I've started writing for the university newspaper so I've got my foot on the ladder already.Speaker 2I'm working hard and the teaching is as good as I expected. And I've made some good friends. But I'm very homesick.I'm Nigerian and my family's so far away. I went home at Christmas for a month -that really helped, but man, I miss my family so much.Speaker 3"How am I finding uni?" It's great. It's not perfect, nothing is, but, like, I've got a brilliant social life, just brilliant, and I've made lots of friends. For the first few months I just didn't do, really enough work. But I -1 talked about it with my parents and I'm working harder now and getting good grades.Speaker 4Actually, I've been quite lonely to be honest. I'm a bit shy ... everyone else seemed to find it so easy to make friends straight away. But things have been better recently - yeah, they have. I've joined a couple of clubs and like, it really helps to get to know people when you have shared interests. So, yeah - I'm feeling a lot happier now.Speaker 5 Uni's great, I love it. My only problem-and it'squite a big problem - is money. My parents are both unemployed so, you know, they can't help mefinancially. Mygrant just isn't - it's just not enough for me to live on,so I'vetaken a part-time job as a waitress — a lot of peopleI know,like a lot, have had to do the same. I don't want tohave hugedebts at the end.Speaker 6I love my subject. History, and I'm, I'mgettingfantastic teaching here. I want to be a universitylecturer andthat means I have to get a first. I have a good sociallife butwork definitely comes first for me.Passage 2Oxford and Cambridge - two universities so similar that they are often spoken of together as "Oxbridge". They're both in the UK, fairly near London, and both regularly come top in any ranking of the world's best universities.The two universities began within a century of each other. Oxford University, now 900 years old, was founded towards the end of the 11th century. In 1209 there was a dispute between the university and the townspeople of Oxford. As a result, some of the Oxford teachers left and founded a university in the town of Cambridge, some 84 miles away. Ever since then, the two institutions have been very competitive.Unlike most modem universities, both Oxford and Cambridge consist of a large number of colleges. Oxford has 39 and Cambridge 31. Many of thesecolleges have old and very beautiful architecture, and large numbers of tourists visit them.In all UK universities, you need good grades in the national exams taken at 18. But to get into Oxford and Cambridge, it's not enough to get A grades in your exams. You also have to go for a long interview. In these interviews, students need to show that they are creative and capable of original thinking.Through the centuries, both universities have made huge contributions to British cultural life. They have produced great writers, world leaders and politicians. Cambridge, in particular, has produced scientists whose discoveries and inventions have changed our lives.Among the great university institutions is the world's most famous debating society, the Oxford Union, where undergraduates get a chance to practise speaking in public. Cambridge's comedy club Footlights has produced many first-class comedians, while some of the UK's most famous actors and actresses began their careers at The Oxford University Dramatic Society, known as OUDS. Then there's the Oxford and Cambridge Boat Race, which takes place every year in March or April, and is watched on television all over the UK.So with all this excellence in so many fields, it's not surprising that the ambition of clever students all over the world is to attend either one of these great universities.。
哈佛大学法学院
哈佛大学法学院哈佛大学法学院成立于1817年，是美国最古老、最具影响力的法学院之一。
位于马萨诸塞州的剑桥市，是哈佛大学的十二个学院之一。
该法学院拥有卓越的教育和研究环境，吸引着来自世界各地的优秀学生和教授。
下面将介绍哈佛大学法学院的历史、教育模式和相关项目。
哈佛大学法学院的历史可追溯到哈佛大学成立之初。
最初，该学院是由法学家兼美国首任联邦最高法院首席大法官约翰·马歇尔于1817年创立的。
马歇尔积极推动法学教育的兴起，并倡导以严谨的法学研究和教育为基础的法学院。
哈佛法学院也成为了美国法学教育的先驱，并通过不断发展壮大，成为美国最重要的法学院之一。
哈佛大学法学院的教育模式注重学术研究和实践相结合。
学生们在学术课程的同时，也会参与到实地调研和实践项目中。
这种综合教育模式旨在培养学生法律研究和实践能力的全面发展。
学院提供多种学位课程，包括法学博士（JD）、法学硕士（LLM）、法律博士（SJD）等。
此外，还设有一些学术中心和合作项目，如环境法与政策研究中心、金融法研究中心、以及与政府、企业合作的实践项目，为学生提供了更多的学习和实践机会。
哈佛大学法学院的师资力量强大。
学院聚集了来自世界各地的顶级法学教授和专家，他们具有丰富的学术和实践经验。
在这里，学生们可以与优秀的教授进行学术交流和探讨，提升自己的学术水平和研究能力。
学院还定期邀请国内外知名法学家和从业者来进行学术讲座和研讨会，为学生提供更广泛的学习资源。
除了教学和研究，哈佛大学法学院还非常注重社会责任和公共服务。
学院鼓励学生参与公益项目和法律援助服务，积极投身社会，关注社会公正和法治建设。
学院与众多法律机构和组织合作，为弱势群体提供法律援助和保护，为法律改革和发展做出了巨大贡献。
总之，哈佛大学法学院凭借其悠久的历史、世界一流的教育质量和卓越的研究实力，成为培养优秀法学人才的重要基地。
该学院致力于培养具有卓越学术能力和全面素质的法学专业人才，并为其提供广阔的学术和职业发展机会。
介绍哈佛大学英语对话范文
介绍哈佛大学英语对话范文Harvard University is renowned for its academic excellence and prestigious programs across a wide range of disciplines. Among the many offerings at this Ivy League institution, the English conversation program stands out as a unique opportunity for both international and domestic students to enhance their communication skills in the English language. This program provides a dynamic and interactive platform for participants to engage in lively discussions, practice conversational fluency, and immerse themselves in the nuances of the English language.The English conversation program at Harvard University is designed to cater to the diverse needs of students from various linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Whether you are an international student seeking to improve your English proficiency or a native English speaker looking to hone your communication abilities, this program offers a welcoming and inclusive environment that fosters personal growth and intellectual exchange.One of the key features of the Harvard English conversation programis its emphasis on practical application. Rather than solely focusing on theoretical grammar rules or vocabulary memorization, the program prioritizes real-world communication scenarios. Participants are encouraged to engage in lively discussions on a wide range of topics, from current events and popular culture to academic subjects and personal experiences. This approach not only enhances their fluency but also helps them develop a deeper understanding of the contextual usage of the English language.The program's curriculum is meticulously crafted to provide a comprehensive learning experience. Participants attend regular group sessions facilitated by experienced instructors who are well-versed in the nuances of the English language and the unique challenges faced by non-native speakers. These sessions involve a range of interactive activities, including role-playing exercises, group discussions, and individual presentations, all designed to push participants out of their comfort zones and encourage them to actively participate in the learning process.One of the standout features of the Harvard English conversation program is its emphasis on cultural exchange and understanding. Participants have the opportunity to interact with peers from diverse backgrounds, fostering a rich and dynamic learning environment. These cross-cultural interactions not only improve language skills but also cultivate a deeper appreciation for different perspectives andcultural norms. By engaging in these meaningful exchanges, participants develop a more well-rounded understanding of the English language and its global relevance.In addition to the structured group sessions, the program also offers a range of supplementary resources and activities to support the learning process. These include one-on-one tutoring sessions, language partner matching, and access to a vast array of multimedia materials, such as podcasts, videos, and online learning platforms. These resources allow participants to tailor their learning experience to their individual needs and preferences, ensuring that they can maximize their progress and achieve their language proficiency goals.The impact of the Harvard English conversation program extends far beyond the classroom. Participants often report a significant boost in their confidence and communication skills, which can have a profound effect on their academic and professional pursuits. Many graduates of the program have gone on to excel in their respective fields, leveraging their enhanced English proficiency to navigate the global landscape with greater ease and effectiveness.Moreover, the program's reputation and the prestige associated with Harvard University open up a world of opportunities for its participants. Graduates of the English conversation program are often sought after by employers and academic institutions, as theirdemonstrated commitment to language learning and their ability to communicate effectively in English are highly valued in today's interconnected world.In conclusion, the English conversation program at Harvard University is a transformative experience that goes beyond just improving language skills. It is a gateway to cultural exchange, personal growth, and expanded opportunities. Whether you are an international student looking to immerse yourself in the English-speaking world or a native speaker seeking to refine your communication abilities, this program offers a unique and enriching learning journey that can have a lasting impact on your academic and professional success. With its dynamic curriculum, experienced instructors, and supportive resources, the Harvard English conversation program is a testament to the university's commitment to fostering global engagement and linguistic excellence.。
哈佛大学校园生活情景对话（4）
哈佛大学校园生活情景对话(4)返回目录Han Meimei and John are reading magazines in the periodical reading room.H： Look, you Americans has conceived of a new method to deal with its relations with other countries.H:你看，美国想出了一种新方式去处理与其他国家的关系呢。
J： Is it soft power?J：是软实力吗?H: No, ifs smart power.H:不，是巧实力。
J: Whafs that?J：那是什么呢?H: Here it reads that “smart power is t he ability to combine hard and soft power into a wining strategy”，It’s defined by Joseph Nye. But I don’t see much difference from it. Its aim is still to maintain its super power position.H:这里所说的“巧实力”其实就是硬实力和软实力的结含，软硬兼施，从而达到不战而胜。
这是约瑟夫·柰所下的定义。
但是我觉得没什么实质上的区别，因为它的目的仍然是维持其超级霸主的地位。
J: We don’t talk about politics and diplomacy, ok? It’s too sensitive. But I can tell you something about Joseph Nye.J：我们不讨论政治和外交好吗?因为这太敏感了。
但对于这个约瑟夫·奈，我倒可以说一些他的事给H: Who’s this guy?H:他是谁呢?J: What Iwanttotalkaboutis not Nye himself, but Harvard Kennedy School from which he graduated. Or you can call it Kennedy School of Government.J:我想说的不是奈本人，而是他毕业的那所肯尼迪政府学院。
英语听力材料追溯哈佛历史
英语听力材料:追溯哈佛历史英语听力材料:追溯哈佛历史Hａn has just immigrated tｏthe Uｔed Ｓｔaｔeｓ．Hｅr new home is ｉn Camｂｒidge, Ｍasｓachｕsetts。
Joｈn ｉｓｈer new ｃ**ａte and friｅｎｄ． They are talkingａbｏuｔ tｈeir plａｎs foｒｔhｅｗeeｋeｎｄ。
J：Jｏhｎ H：ＨanJ：Haｎ，What’s your plaｎfｏｒ the weekｅｎｄj:韩梅梅，你固末有什么计划H： I plａｎ to trel ａｒound Ｈａrvaｒd Uversｉty aｎd know reａｂｏｕt it． Tｏ tell yoｕｔｈe ｔrｕth, I pｌaｎｔo aｐply for Harｖarｄafｔer ｇradｕatｉｏn ｆroｍhiｇh ｓchool。
It’ｓ better to gｅt ｔo ｋnow it. Whatａbout yoｕH:我打算去四处转转,了解一下。
实话告诉你,我计划在高中毕业之后申请哈佛。
我先了解一下哈佛。
你呢J：I get ｔogeｔheｒｗiｔh ｍy Ｃhrｉstiａn broｔhers on Saｔurda ｙs．J：我每固六都和教友们聚会。
Ｈ： Oｈ， my Gｏd! Jｏhn，I dｉdn’ｔｋnow ｙouａｒe religiｏus。
Yｏu ｊust look liｋe a sｃientｉｆｉc kook，liｋｅ Leonaｒｄ in tｈe BiｇＢａng Thｅｏｒy.H:哦,天哪！约翰，我不知道你还信教。
你看上去就像个科学狂人,像《生活大》里的那个伦纳德.Ｊ： e ｏｎ，Ｈａｎ，ｄon't makｅ a ｆuss． A loｔ of Amerｉｃans,inclｕｄiｎg manｙｓcienｔistｓ,belｉevｅ in religiｏn．Ｊ：得了，韩梅梅，别大惊小怪的。
关于哈佛大学学院情景对话
关于哈佛大学学院情景对话哈佛大学学院情景对话：哈佛法学院Han Meimei is watching the movie “Liar” on TV when there is a knock at the door.H: Hey, John, why are you here?呀，约翰，你怎么来了?J: I just went to my uncle’s and stop by. You’re watching TV?我刚去我叔叔家，顺便就过来看下你。
你在看电视吗?H: Yeah, a movie called Liar. I like Jim Carrey. He’s so funny.是啊，看电影《大话王》。
我喜欢金·凯瑞，他很搞笑。
J: A little nonsensica.有点无厘头吧。
H： I'm surprised that lawyers have such a bad reputation in America.我很吃惊，律师在美国的名声很差哦!J：It’s true that people don’t like lawyers, but they can’t live without lawyers.这是寘的，大家都不喜欢律师，但是又离不开他们。
H: Just like the rich people in the movie, they can buy freedom with money.就像电影里说的，有钱人魷能用钱买自由。
J: Do yowant to be a lawyer any more after watching the movie on TV?这电影之后你还想当一名律师吗?H: Well, this career is indeed profitable. As you said, people need lawyers all the time. But now, I have another goal.嗯，这样的职业确实很赚钱啦。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Harvard Law School (also known as Harvard Law or HLS) is one of the professional graduate school of Harvard University, and is among the most prestigious1 institution of legal education in the world. It was founded in 1817, nearly two hundred years later than Harvard College. Despite this, it is still the oldest continuously-operating law school in the United States. Like many law schools in the United States, Harvard Law School offers three major degrees: JD (Doctor of Jurisprudence), LL.M (Master of Laws), and S.J.D. (Doctor of Juridical Science).
Harvard Law School哈佛法学院是哈佛大学的专业研宄生学院之一，也是世界上最权威的法学教育机构之一。
它始建立于1817年，大约是哈佛学院建立之后的200年。
尽管如此，她仍是美国最早持续办学的法学院。
踉美国的其他许多法学院一样，哈怫法学院有3个专业学位：法学博士、法律硕士以及司法学博士。
The Law School is in the northwest of the Harvard Yard, and is close to Kennedy School of Government and Harvard-Yenching Library. The Library of Law School is the largest library in North Amenca.
法学院位于哈佛园的西北角，靠近肯尼迪政治学院和哈
佛燕京图书馆。
法学院的图书馆是北美最大的图书馆。
The Law School traces its origin to Isaac Royall, who in 1781 left from his estate in nearby Medford to Harvard University, with the proceeds intended to “endow of a Professor of Laws at said college, or a Professor of Physics and Anatomy2.”Harvard took the opportunity to fund its first chair in law, and the Roy-all chair continues to support an HLS professor today, more than 200 years later. In 1806, Royall’s heirs sold the rest of his estate and used the funds to establish a school of law at Harvard University. The Royall family coat-of-arms-three stacked wheat sheaves beneath the university motto, Veritas, was adopted as the school’s shield.
法学院的起源可以追溯到它的创始人艾萨克·罗亚尔，他于1781年在哈佛大学附近的梅德福去世并留下遗产。
他打算用这些收入来资助一个法学教授或物理和解剖学教授。
哈佛利用这个机会来资助首席法律主席。
而罗亚尔首席这一职位在200多年后，到了今天都还在继续支持哈佛的教授。
1806年，罗亚尔的继承人卖掉了他剩余的遗产，用这些基金来建立哈佛大学的一个法学院。
罗亚尔家族盾形纹章——哈佛大学校训“真理”和下面的三束小麦——成为学院的院微。
In 1827，the struggling young law school was down to only one faculty3 member and one student. In this year, an enterprising alumnus stepped in to save the school by establishing the Dane Professorship of Law, and insisting that the chair be given to Joseph Story, the nation's youngest Supreme4 Court justice. Story believed in the concept of an elite5 American law school, based on merit and dedicated6 to public service: a tradition that continues today. A second critical figure in the development of the Law School arrived on the campus in the 1870s. Dean Christopher Columbus Langdell believed that the study of law should be an interactive7 and disciplined form of education, in which students were challenged directly by teachers, and through which they learned to analyze8 cases for themselves. In 1872, Langdell introduced the Socratic method to HLS. This Socratic method of instruction demanded new teaching spaces, and Austin Hall was built on the north side of Harvard Yard to accommodate the School’s new vision.
在1827年，这个处在萌芽期努力奋斗的法学院，只剩下了学院里面的一个教员和一名学生。
在那一年，一名有事
业心的校友插手干预了这件事，通过设立戴恩法律教授来拯救这间学校，并且坚持要把首席这个头衔给国家最年轻的最高法院法官约瑟夫?斯托里。
斯托里相信美国精英法学院这个概念，其基础是功绩和为公众服务，这个传统一直持续到今天。
在法学院发展过程中起到关键作用的第二个人物是在19世纪70年代来到哈佛的。
兰格尔主任相信学习应该是一个互动的和经严格训练的教育形式。
这样学生就会直接由教师进行挑战和考验，这样他们就可以学到如何自己分析案例。
1872年，兰格尔把苏格拉底教学方法引进法学院。
该方法要求新的教学空间。
为满足这一要求，学院在哈佛园北边修建了奥斯汀大堂。