北京市高考英语书面表达评分标准
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则Beijing English Composition Grading Criteria and Grading GuidelinesIn Beijing, English composition is an important aspect of the education system, and students are often required to write essays as part of their coursework. In order to effectively evaluate and grade these compositions, teachers follow a set of grading criteria and guidelines.Grading Criteria:1. Content: The content of the composition is the most crucial aspect of grading. The essay should be well-organized and coherent, with a clear thesis statement and supporting arguments. The content should also be relevant to the topic and demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject matter.2. Language Use: The use of language is also an important factor in grading. The composition should demonstrate a good command of English grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure. The language should be clear, concise, and appropriate for the intended audience.3. Creativity: Creativity is another key element in grading. A well-written composition should be engaging and original, witha unique perspective or approach to the topic. Students are encouraged to think creatively and critically in their writing.4. Organization: The organization of the composition is crucial for effective communication. The essay should have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, with smooth transitions between paragraphs. The ideas should be logically presented and the argument should be well-developed.5. Style: The style of writing is also a factor in grading. The composition should be written in a formal, academic style, with a consistent tone and voice throughout. The use of literary devices and rhetorical techniques can also enhance the quality of the writing.Grading Guidelines:1. A (90-100%): An A composition demonstrates exceptional content, language use, creativity, organization, and style. The essay is engaging, well-written, and effectively communicates the intended message. There are few to no errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.2. B (80-89%): A B composition demonstrates above-average content, language use, creativity, organization, and style. The essay is well-written and effectively communicates the intendedmessage. There may be some minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.3. C (70-79%): A C composition demonstrates average content, language use, creativity, organization, and style. The essay is adequate but may lack depth or originality. There are noticeable errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.4. D (60-69%): A D composition demonstratesbelow-average content, language use, creativity, organization, and style. The essay may be poorly written and fail to effectively communicate the intended message. There are significant errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.5. F (0-59%): An F composition demonstrates poor content, language use, creativity, organization, and style. The essay is incoherent, disjointed, or lacking in substance. There are numerous errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.In conclusion, the grading criteria and guidelines for English compositions in Beijing are designed to help teachers evaluate student writing effectively and provide constructive feedback for improvement. By following these standards, students can enhance their writing skills and achieve academic success in English composition.。
高考英语评分标准_高考英语书面表达阅卷标准
高考英语评分标准_高考英语书面表达阅卷标准高考英语书面表达阅卷标准高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准(一)评分原则：1、本题总分为25分，按5个档次给分。
2、评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的，从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
(二)评分标准：第五档(21-25分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，完全达到了预期的写作目的——覆盖所有内容要点。
——应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
——语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
——有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分)：基本完成了试题规定的任务，整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分)：未恰当完成试题规定的任务，信息未能清楚地传达给读者——漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。
——语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。
——较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分)：未完成试题规定的任务，信息未能传达给读者——明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。
北京市高考英语书面表达评分标准
高考英语书面表达评分标准高考英语书面表达题所要求的技能：1、根据不同文体，使用恰当的语言形式完成书面交际任务；2、运用恰当的句式、词汇和语法叙述、描述、表达观点和态度；3、做到文章扣题、内容充实、结构完整、逻辑性强、语意连贯。
一、情景作文（一）评分原则1、本题总分为20分，按5个档次给分。
2、评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其档次，然后以该档次的要求衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3、评分时应考虑：内容要点的完整性、上下文的连贯、词汇和句式的多样性及语言的准确性。
4、拼写、标点符号或书写影响内容表达时，应试其影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
5、词数少于60，从总分中减去1分。
完全完成了试题规定的任务。
覆盖所有内容要点。
应用较多的语法结构和词汇。
语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致；具备较强的语言运用能力。
有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
完全达到了预期的写作目的。
完全完成了试题规定的任务。
覆盖所有内容要点。
运用的句式和词汇能满足任务的要求。
语法和用词基本准确，少许错误主要是为尽可能表达丰富内容所致。
使用简单的语句间的连接成分，所写内容连贯。
达到了预期的写作目的。
基本完成了试题规定的任务。
覆盖内容要点。
运用的句式和词汇基本满足任务的要求。
语法和用词有一些错误，但不影响理解。
基本达到了预期的写作目的。
未恰当完成试题规定的任务。
漏掉或未描述清楚主要内容。
所用句式和词汇有限。
语法或用词方面的错误影响了对所写内容的理解。
未能清楚地传达信息。
未完成试题规定的任务。
明显遗漏主要内容句式单调，词汇贫乏语法或用词方面错误较多，严重影响了对所写内容的理解。
二、开放作文（15分）（一）评分原则：1.本题总分为15分，按4个档给分。
2.评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言质量初步确定其档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3.评分时应考虑：文章是否扣题，结构是否完整，内容是否充实、健康，思维是否活跃，逻辑是否清晰，语言是否准确，交际是否得体。
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准评分标准本题总分为25分，按5个档次给分。
评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
词数少于80和多于120的，从总分中减去2分。
评分时应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
评分原则第五档(21-25分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，覆盖所有内容要点。
应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，达到了预期的写作目的。
虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。
应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分)：基本完成了试题规定的任务，整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的。
虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。
应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。
应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分)：未恰当完成试题规定的任务，信息未能清楚地传达给读者。
漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。
语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。
较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分)：未完成试题规定的任务，信息未能传达给读者。
明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。
语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响对写作内容的理解。
北京英语作文评分标准
北京英语作文评分标准Beijing English Composition Scoring Criteria。
Beijing, the capital city of China, has a rich history and culture, and is a city that is constantly evolving. As the center of politics, culture, and economy in China, Beijing is an important city that attracts people from all over the world. In order to evaluate the quality of English compositions about Beijing, the following scoring criteria are provided for reference.Content (40 points)。
The content of the composition should be rich and informative, covering various aspects of Beijing such asits history, culture, landmarks, and development. The composition should demonstrate a deep understanding of Beijing and provide interesting and relevant information that engages the reader. It should also reflect thewriter's personal thoughts and feelings about Beijing, andconvey a sense of passion and enthusiasm for the city.Language (30 points)。
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准(一)评分原则：1、本题总分为25分，按5个档次给分。
2、评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的，从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
(二)评分标准：第五档(21-25分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，完全达到了预期的写作目的——覆盖所有内容要点。
——应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
——语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
——有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分)：基本完成了试题规定的任务，整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分)：未恰当完成试题规定的任务，信息未能清楚地传达给读者——漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。
——语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。
——较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分)：未完成试题规定的任务，信息未能传达给读者——明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。
北京高考英语作文评分标准写作技巧_高中英语作文_
北京高考英语作文评分标准写作技巧分数往往是一根限制线，限制了我们的去向。
下面是小编给大家精心挑选的高考英语的评分标准，希望大家喜欢!供你参考和阅读!高考英语作文评分标准篇1评分档次A.第五档(很好)：(21-25分)1.完全完成了试题规定的任务。
2.覆盖所有内容要点。
3.应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
4.语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
5.有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
6.完全达到了预期的写作目的。
B.第四档(好)：(16-20分)1.完全完成了试题规定的任务。
2.虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。
3.应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
4.语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
5.应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
6.达到了预期的写作目的。
C.第三档(适当)：(11-15分)1.基本完成了试题规定的任务。
2.虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。
3.应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
4.有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。
5.应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文内容连贯。
6.整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的。
D.第二档(较差)：(6-10分)1.未恰当完成试题规定的任务。
2.漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。
3.语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
4.有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。
5.较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。
6.信息未能清楚地传达给读者。
E.第一档(差)：(1-5分)1.未完成试题规定的任务。
2.明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。
3.语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
4.较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响对写作内容的理解。
5.缺乏语句间的连接成分，内容不连贯。
6.信息未能传达给读者。
2023年北京高考英语书面表达评分标准
2023年北京高考英语书面表达评分标准全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇12023 Beijing High School English Written Expression Scoring CriteriaThe Beijing high school English written expression scoring criteria for the 2023 college entrance examination (also known as the Gaokao) evaluates students' ability to communicate effectively in written English. This document outlines the key criteria used by examiners to assess students' writing skills and assign scores accordingly.1. Task Achievement (30 points)Candidates are assessed on their ability to accurately address the prompt or question given. They should clearly present their ideas and provide relevant examples to support their arguments. The response should demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and show a logical progression of ideas.2. Coherence and Cohesion (20 points)Coherence refers to the overall clarity of the writing, including the organization of ideas, logical flow, and transitions between paragraphs. Candidates should use appropriate linking words and phrases to connect their ideas and maintain cohesion throughout the text.3. Vocabulary and Grammar (20 points)Candidates are expected to demonstrate a wide range of vocabulary and accurate use of grammar and sentence structures. They should use varied and precise vocabulary to convey their ideas effectively. Grammar errors should be minimal, and sentence structures should be varied to enhance the overall quality of the writing.4. Register and Style (15 points)Candidates should use appropriate register and style for the given task, whether formal, informal, or neutral. The tone of the writing should be consistent throughout, and students should demonstrate an understanding of different styles of writing, such as persuasive, descriptive, or narrative.5. Creativity and Originality (15 points)Candidates are encouraged to showcase their creativity and originality in their writing. This includes the use of imaginativeideas, unique perspectives, and engaging language. Awell-crafted introduction and conclusion can also enhance the overall impact of the writing.Overall, the Beijing high school English written expression scoring criteria for the 2023 college entrance examination emphasizes students' ability to communicate effectively in written English while demonstrating a wide range of language skills and creativity. By adhering to these criteria, students can improve their writing performances and achieve higher scores on the exam.篇2Beijing College Entrance Examination English Writing Evaluation Criteria 2023Introduction:The Beijing College Entrance Examination (commonly known as Gaokao) is a crucial assessment for Chinese students, determining their eligibility for enrollment in universities and colleges. The English writing section plays a significant role in assessing students' language proficiency and communication skills. In order to ensure fair and accurate evaluation, clear anddetailed criteria are essential. Here are the evaluation standards for the 2023 Beijing Gaokao English writing section:1. Content and Organization:- Relevant Content: The essay should address the given topic with relevant information and ideas. Tangential or off-topic responses will be penalized.- Thesis Statement: A clear thesis statement that presents the main argument or viewpoint of the essay is required.- Logical Structure: The essay should have a clear introduction, body paragraphs supporting the thesis, and a conclusion summarizing the main points.- Cohesiveness: Transitions between paragraphs and ideas should be smooth, ensuring a coherent flow of thoughts.2. Language Use:- Vocabulary: Varied and appropriate use of vocabulary to convey ideas effectively.- Grammar: Accurate use of grammar, including proper verb tense, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure.- Sentence Variety: Utilization of different sentence structures (simple, compound, complex) to enhance the overall quality of writing.- Idiomatic Expressions: Use of idiomatic expressions and phrasal verbs to demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the English language.3. Development and Support:- Examples and Evidence: Incorporation of relevant examples, evidence, and details to support arguments and ideas.- Analysis: Critical analysis of the topic or issue, showcasing the ability to evaluate and interpret information.- Counterarguments: Addressing counterarguments and opposing viewpoints to demonstrate a balanced perspective.4. Clarity and Coherence:- Clarity: Clear and concise expression of ideas, avoiding ambiguity or confusion.- Coherence: Logical progression of ideas and arguments, with connections between sentences and paragraphs.- Consistency: Consistent tone and style throughout the essay, maintaining a coherent voice.5. Task Fulfillment:- Adherence to Prompt: Addressing all aspects of the given prompt and fulfilling the requirements of the task.- Length: Writing a sufficient number of words to meet the minimum word count specified for the essay.- Relevance: Ensuring that the content of the essay is directly related to the topic and is not irrelevant or off-topic.Conclusion:The 2023 Beijing Gaokao English writing evaluation criteria aim to provide clear guidelines for assessing students' writing skills and language proficiency. By focusing on content, language use, development, clarity, coherence, and task fulfillment, examiners can evaluate essays effectively and fairly. Students should familiarize themselves with these standards and strive to meet them in their writing to achieve success in the Beijing College Entrance Examination. Good luck to alltest-takers in 2023!篇32023 Beijing College Entrance Examination English Writing Evaluation CriteriaIntroductionThe Beijing College Entrance Examination, also known as the Gaokao, is the most important academic assessment for high school students in China. Among all the subjects tested during the Gaokao, English writing is considered as one of the essential components for evaluating students' language proficiency and writing skills. In the year 2023, the evaluation criteria for the English writing section of the Beijing Gaokao will be designed to assess students' ability to express their ideas clearly and coherently, use appropriate vocabulary and grammar, and organize their writing effectively.Evaluation CriteriaThe following are the key evaluation criteria that will be used to assess students' performance in the English writing section of the 2023 Beijing Gaokao:1. Task Fulfillment: Students will be evaluated based on their ability to address the given topic and task requirements in a comprehensive and logical manner. Their writing should clearly demonstrate an understanding of the topic and relevance to the task.2. Content and Development: Students will be assessed on the quality and depth of their ideas, arguments, and examples. They should be able to develop their points effectively and provide relevant supporting details to strengthen their arguments.3. Organization: Students' writing should have a clear and coherent structure with well-connected paragraphs and appropriate transitions. They should demonstrate effective use of introduction, body, and conclusion in their writing.4. Language Use: Students will be evaluated based on their ability to use a variety of vocabulary and sentence structures accurately and appropriately. They should demonstrate control over grammar, punctuation, spelling, and word choice.5. Style and Tone: Students should demonstrate an appropriate style and tone in their writing, depending on the given topic and task requirements. They should use language that is formal, academic, and suitable for the purpose of their writing.6. Creativity and Originality: Students will be encouraged to demonstrate creativity and originality in their writing by presenting unique perspectives, innovative ideas, or personal experiences that add depth and interest to their composition.Scoring SystemThe scoring system for the English writing section of the 2023 Beijing Gaokao will be based on a holistic approach, taking into consideration the overall quality of students' writing in terms of task fulfillment, content and development, organization, language use, style and tone, and creativity and originality. Each criterion will be assigned a specific weightage, and students will be scored on a scale of 0-100 based on their performance in each criterion.ConclusionThe 2023 Beijing Gaokao English writing evaluation criteria are designed to assess students' ability to communicate effectively in written English and demonstrate their language proficiency and writing skills. By focusing on task fulfillment, content and development, organization, language use, style and tone, and creativity and originality, the evaluation criteria aim to provide a comprehensive assessment of students' writing abilities and help them prepare for higher education and future academic endeavors.。
北京高三英语作文评分标准
北京高三英语作文评分标准The education system in China has undergone significant transformations in recent decades, with a strong emphasis on improving the quality of English language instruction at the high school level. One crucial aspect of this endeavor is the development of comprehensive and standardized scoring criteria for high school English compositions. In the city of Beijing, the local education authorities have established a robust framework to assess the writing skills of high school students, known as the Beijing High School English Composition Scoring Criteria.This scoring system serves as a comprehensive guideline for both teachers and students, ensuring a fair and consistent evaluation of English writing proficiency. The criteria are designed to assess various aspects of the composition, including content, organization, language use, and mechanics, providing a detailed framework for evaluating the students' performance.Content is a crucial component of the scoring criteria, accounting for a significant portion of the overall mark. Evaluators assess the depthand breadth of the student's understanding of the given prompt, as well as the relevance and coherence of the ideas presented. High-scoring compositions demonstrate a clear grasp of the topic, with well-developed and insightful arguments supported by relevant examples and details.Organization is another key aspect of the scoring criteria. Evaluators examine the logical flow and coherence of the composition, looking for a clear and well-structured introduction, body paragraphs that effectively develop the main ideas, and a concluding section that effectively summarizes the key points. Effective use of transitions and cohesive devices are also considered in the assessment of organization.Language use is a critical element in the scoring criteria, as it reflects the student's command of the English language. Evaluators assess the accuracy, range, and sophistication of the vocabulary and grammatical structures employed in the composition. Compositions that demonstrate a strong grasp of English language mechanics, such as correct spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure, are more likely to receive higher scores.The scoring criteria also take into account the overall effectiveness and impact of the composition. Evaluators assess the writer's ability to engage the reader, convey a clear and compelling message, andleave a lasting impression. Compositions that demonstrate a unique perspective, creative expression, and a strong authorial voice are often rewarded with higher scores.It is important to note that the Beijing High School English Composition Scoring Criteria are not merely a set of rigid guidelines, but rather a dynamic framework that evolves to meet the changing needs of the education system. The criteria are regularly reviewed and updated by a team of experienced educators, language experts, and assessment specialists to ensure that they remain relevant and effective in evaluating the writing skills of high school students.One of the key strengths of the Beijing High School English Composition Scoring Criteria is its emphasis on holistic assessment. Rather than focusing solely on individual components, the criteria encourage evaluators to consider the composition as a whole, taking into account the interplay between different aspects of the writing. This approach allows for a more nuanced and comprehensive evaluation, recognizing the multifaceted nature of effective written communication.Moreover, the scoring criteria are designed to be transparent and accessible to both teachers and students. The detailed descriptors and scoring rubrics provide clear guidance on the expectations and standards for high-quality English compositions, enabling studentsto understand the criteria and work towards improving their writing skills.In the classroom, teachers play a crucial role in the implementation of the Beijing High School English Composition Scoring Criteria. They use the guidelines to provide constructive feedback to students, identify areas for improvement, and design targeted instructional strategies to enhance their writing abilities. By aligning their teaching practices with the scoring criteria, teachers can ensure that students are well-prepared to meet the expected standards and achieve success in their English language assessments.Beyond the classroom, the Beijing High School English Composition Scoring Criteria also serve as a valuable resource for educational policymakers and curriculum developers. By understanding the specific criteria used to evaluate student writing, these stakeholders can make informed decisions about curriculum design, teacher training, and the allocation of educational resources to support the development of strong English language skills among high school students.In conclusion, the Beijing High School English Composition Scoring Criteria represent a comprehensive and well-designed framework for assessing the writing skills of high school students. By focusing on key aspects of content, organization, language use, and overalleffectiveness, the criteria provide a robust and transparent system for evaluating student performance. The implementation of these scoring criteria has played a crucial role in improving the quality of English language instruction in Beijing's high schools, and serves as a model for other educational systems seeking to enhance the writing proficiency of their students.。
北京卷英语作文 评分标准
北京卷英语作文评分标准深度解读In the realm of English composition grading for the Beijing examination, the standards are meticulously crafted to ensure fairness, consistency, and the accurate evaluation of students' writing skills. These criteria, which are the backbone of the grading process, not only reflect the examiner's expectations but also serve as a guide for students to hone their writing abilities. Let's delve deeper into these standards and understand what they truly signify.Firstly, content is king. The essay must possess a clear and focused theme, with relevant points and examples that support the central idea. The depth and breadth of ideas matter, as does the ability to develop them in a logical and coherent manner. Moreover, the essay should demonstrate a certain level of creativity and originality in its treatment of the topic.Secondly, the organization of ideas is paramount. A well-structured essay with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusive ending is highly valued. Eachparagraph should have a distinct purpose, and thetransition between paragraphs should be smooth and natural. Language use is another crucial aspect. The essay should be free of grammatical errors and contain a rich vocabulary. The sentences should be varied and complex, avoiding monotony and repetition. Additionally, the use of appropriate language registers and stylistic devices adds to the overall quality of the writing.Furthermore, the essay's coherence and cohesion are essential. This involves the use of connectives, pronouns, and other linguistic devices to create a sense of unity and flow throughout the text. The essay should read like a coherent whole, with each part contributing to the overall message.Lastly, the essay's response to the task is evaluated. This means that the essay must address the prompt directly and comprehensively, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the topic and the ability to present a balanced argument or analysis.In summary, the Beijing English composition grading standards are comprehensive and rigorous, encompassingcontent, organization, language use, coherence, and response to the task. These criteria provide a clear roadmap for students to improve their writing skills and ensure that their efforts are accurately reflected in their grades.**北京卷英语作文评分标准深度解读**在北京卷的英语作文评分中，标准制定得十分精细，旨在确保评分的公平性、一致性和对学生写作技能准确评价。
2024年北京英语作文评分标准
2024年北京英语作文评分标准In the ever-evolving landscape of global education, the importance of robust and comprehensive assessment frameworks cannot be overstated. As we approach the year 2024, the city of Beijing, renowned for its commitment to academic excellence, has unveiled a groundbreaking set of scoring criteria for English language essays. These guidelines, meticulously crafted by a team of distinguished educators and language experts, aim to elevate the standard of English writing and ensure that students are equipped with the necessary skills to thrive in an increasingly interconnected world.At the heart of the 2024 Beijing English Essay Scoring Criteria lies a holistic approach that considers not merely the technical aspects of language but also the depth of critical thinking and the ability to effectively communicate complex ideas. The criteria are designed to foster a generation of articulate and intellectually engaged individuals who can navigate the nuances of the English language with confidence and finesse.One of the key pillars of the scoring system is the assessment ofcontent and organization. Evaluators will closely examine the coherence and logical flow of the essay, ensuring that the ideas are presented in a well-structured and cohesive manner. Students will be rewarded for their ability to develop a clear thesis statement, support it with relevant and well-researched evidence, and draw insightful conclusions that demonstrate a deep understanding of the topic at hand.Equally important is the evaluation of language use and mechanics. Proficiency in grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure will be meticulously assessed, with a focus on the student's ability to employ these linguistic tools to convey their message effectively. Evaluators will also scrutinize the appropriate use of transitional devices, which play a crucial role in guiding the reader through the essay's narrative.Furthermore, the scoring criteria place a strong emphasis on the development of critical thinking skills. Students will be required to demonstrate their ability to analyze complex issues from multiple perspectives, synthesize information from diverse sources, and formulate original and well-reasoned arguments. The ability to think critically and engage in substantive discussions on a range of topics will be a key determinant of a student's success.In addition to the aforementioned criteria, the 2024 Beijing English Essay Scoring Rubric also includes a significant focus on creativityand originality. Evaluators will seek out essays that showcase the writer's unique voice, innovative approaches to problem-solving, and the ability to present familiar concepts in novel and thought-provoking ways. This emphasis on creativity aligns with the global demand for individuals who can think outside the box and contribute innovative solutions to the challenges of the 21st century.Another essential component of the scoring criteria is the assessment of research and source integration. Students will be expected to demonstrate their proficiency in locating, evaluating, and effectively incorporating relevant and credible sources into their essays. This skill not only enhances the overall quality of the written work but also prepares students for the rigors of academic research and discourse in higher education and beyond.The 2024 Beijing English Essay Scoring Criteria also place a strong emphasis on the development of cultural awareness and global competence. In an increasingly interconnected world, the ability to engage with diverse perspectives and communicate across cultural boundaries is of paramount importance. Evaluators will assess the student's capacity to address cross-cultural themes, demonstrate empathy and understanding of different worldviews, and articulate the significance of global citizenship.Finally, the scoring system will place a significant weight on theoverall clarity and sophistication of the written expression. Evaluators will scrutinize the student's ability to convey their ideas with precision, eloquence, and rhetorical finesse. This aspect of the assessment aims to nurture the development of exceptional communication skills, which are essential for success in academic, professional, and personal realms.The implementation of the 2024 Beijing English Essay Scoring Criteria represents a bold and forward-thinking initiative that will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the educational landscape. By emphasizing a multifaceted approach to assessment, the city of Beijing is poised to cultivate a generation of English language learners who are not only proficient in the mechanics of the language but also possess the critical thinking skills, cultural awareness, and creative problem-solving abilities necessary to thrive in the 21st century.As the world continues to evolve and the demand for global competence increases, the 2024 Beijing English Essay Scoring Criteria serve as a shining example of how educational systems can adapt and innovate to meet the changing needs of the modern era. This groundbreaking initiative will undoubtedly inspire other educational institutions around the world to re-evaluate their own assessment practices and strive for a more holistic and comprehensive approach to language education.In conclusion, the 2024 Beijing English Essay Scoring Criteria represent a significant step forward in the pursuit of educational excellence. By fostering a deep understanding of the English language, critical thinking, and global competence, this innovative framework will empower students to become confident and articulate communicators, ready to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the future. As the world watches with bated breath, the city of Beijing stands as a beacon of educational innovation, leading the way towards a future where the mastery of language is not merely a skill but a gateway to a more interconnected and prosperous world.。
北京英语作文评分标准
北京英语作文评分标准The Beijing English essay scoring standard is based on several criteria. First, the essay should demonstrate a strong command of the English language, including proper grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure. Second, the essay should effectively communicate ideas and information in a clear and coherent manner. Third, the essay should show creativity and originality in the use of language and expression. Finally, the essay should demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the topic at hand.The use of appropriate grammar and vocabulary is essential in scoring a Beijing English essay. This includes proper use of verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and word choice. Additionally, the essay should avoid common errors such as run-on sentences, fragments, and incorrect word usage. A strong command of grammar and vocabulary will be reflected in a higher score.In addition to grammar and vocabulary, the essay shouldeffectively communicate ideas and information. This includes organizing the essay in a logical and coherent manner, using transitions and linking words to connect ideas, and providing relevant examples and evidence to support the main points. The essay should also demonstrate an understanding of the audience and purpose, and effectively address the topic at hand.Creativity and originality in language and expression are also important in scoring a Beijing English essay. This includes using vivid and descriptive language,incorporating figurative language and literary devices, and demonstrating a unique voice and style. The essay should engage the reader and demonstrate a fresh perspective on the topic.Finally, the essay should demonstrate critical thinking and analysis. This includes evaluating and synthesizing information, making connections and drawing conclusions, and presenting a well-reasoned argument. The essay should also demonstrate an awareness of different perspectives and potential counterarguments, and effectively address them.In conclusion, the Beijing English essay scoring standard is based on several criteria, including grammar and vocabulary, effective communication, creativity and originality, and critical thinking and analysis. Essays that demonstrate a strong command of the English language, effectively communicate ideas and information, show creativity and originality, and demonstrate critical thinking and analysis will receive higher scores.。
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则Beijing English Composition Scoring Criteria and Scoring DetailsHi everyone! My name is Lily and I'm a 5th grade student in Beijing. Today I want to talk to you about how English compositions are scored here. It's really important to understand the scoring criteria and details so you can do your best on these assignments.First off, what even is an English composition? It's a piece of writing we have to do for school where we write a few paragraphs in English about a certain topic or prompt the teacher gives us. The compositions let our teachers see how well we can write and express ourselves in English.In Beijing, all our English compositions get scored based on the same big criteria - there are five main things the teachers look at. Those five criteria are: 1) Task Completion, 2) Coherence, 3) Lexical Resource, 4) Grammatical Range and Accuracy, and 5) Mechanics. Each one gets a separate score from 1 to 5.Task Completion is about how well you did the assignment and responded to the prompt. If you went totally off-topic and wrote something completely different than what you weresupposed to, you'll get a low score for Task Completion. But if you really understood the prompt and your writing responded to it fully, you'll get a high score.Coherence looks at whether your writing flows logically and is easy to follow and understand. You need to use good transitions and connecting words like "first," "next," "in addition," etc. The ideas should link together smoothly instead of jumping around randomly. Having a clear intro, body and conclusion helps too.Lexical Resource means using lots of advanced vocabulary words instead of just simple words a little kid would use. The more impressive and higher-level words you include, the better your lexical resource score will be. But don't just randomly throw in big words you don't understand - that's not good!For Grammatical Range and Accuracy, this portion of the score looks at your English grammar skills. If you make a ton of basic grammar mistakes with things like subject-verb agreement, tenses, prepositions, articles, etc. your score will be low. But if you can use advanced grammar constructions like perfect tenses, passive voice, conditionals, and more complex sentences correctly, you'll earn a higher score.Finally, Mechanics refers to things like spelling, punctuation, capitalization, formatting and general writing conventions. Make sure you spell words correctly, use appropriate end punctuation, capitalize proper nouns, have indented paragraphs, and so on. Silly little mechanical errors can lose you points.Each of those five criteria gets a rating from 1 to 5, where 5 is the best score. So the highest total score you can get on a composition is 25 out of 25 - a perfect 5 in all five areas. In general, a total score of 20+ is considered excellent, 15-19 is good, 10-14 is okay, and below 10 needs more work.There are also some more specific details and guidelines for each score level that teachers use. For example, to get a 5 for Task Completion, your response has to be "fullyaddressed and highlyrelevant to the task." A 4 means it's "addressedand relevantto thetask," while a 3 is "somewhataddressedand/orrelevanttothetask." And so on down to a 1 which means "responsesaresnothin relevanttothetask."For Coherence, a top score of 5 requires your writing to have "excellentunityandfullycohesive form" with "sophisticated connections" between ideas. I'm not totally sure what that means yet since I'm still learning, but it sounds really advanced!With Lexical Resource, a 5 is for using "awide range of vocabulary" with "rarelymistakes" andusing "idiomatic language" which means like common expressions native speakers would say. But a 1 is having just"averynarrowlexicon" ofwords and "forcedtranslationsfromnative language."I think you get the idea - there are specific criteria distinguishing each score level from 1 to 5 for all the categories. It can feel。
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则Title: Beijing English Composition Scoring Criteria and Detailed Scoring RulesHey there, fellow students! Today, I'm going to share with you something super important – the scoring criteria and detailed rules for English compositions in Beijing. As we all know, writing compositions is a big part of our English studies, and understanding how they're graded can really help us improve our writing skills.First things first, let's talk about the scoring criteria. The compositions are evaluated based on several key areas, and each area has a certain number of points assigned to it. Here's the breakdown:Content and Ideas (30 points)This part is all about the substance of your composition. The graders will look at how well you've developed your ideas, how clear and focused your writing is, and whether you've included relevant details and examples to support your points.Organization and Structure (20 points)A well-organized composition is key! The graders will check if your writing has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. They'll also assess whether your ideas flow logically and smoothly from one point to the next.Language Use (20 points)This section focuses on your command of the English language. The graders will evaluate your vocabulary, grammar, sentence structure, and overall clarity of expression.Mechanics (10 points)Here, they'll look at your spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and formatting. It's important to proofread your work carefully to avoid silly mistakes!Task Fulfillment (20 points)Did you follow the instructions and respond to the prompts correctly? This part ensures that your composition stays on topic and addresses all the required elements.Now, let's dive into the detailed scoring rules for each area. Buckle up, because this is where things get a bit more technical!Content and Ideas (30 points)27-30 points: Your composition demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic, with well-developed and insightful ideas supported by relevant and specific details.23-26 points: Your ideas are clear and focused, with adequate supporting details and examples.19-22 points: Your composition shows a basic understanding of the topic, but the ideas are somewhat limited or repetitive, with minimal supporting details.15-18 points: Your ideas are underdeveloped, with little or no supporting details.0-14 points: Your composition lacks focus and coherence, with minimal or no relevant content.Organization and Structure (20 points)18-20 points: Your composition is exceptionallywell-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The ideas flow smoothly and logically.15-17 points: Your writing is well-organized, with a clear structure and logical flow of ideas.12-14 points: Your composition has a basic organizational structure, but the flow of ideas may be somewhat choppy or inconsistent.9-11 points: Your writing lacks a clear organizational structure, and the ideas are presented in a disjointed or confusing manner.0-8 points: Your composition is poorly organized, with no discernible structure or logical flow of ideas.Language Use (20 points)18-20 points: Your language use is exceptional, with a wide range of vocabulary, accurate grammar, and sophisticated sentence structures.15-17 points: Your language use is proficient, with a good range of vocabulary, mostly accurate grammar, and varied sentence structures.12-14 points: Your language use is adequate, with a basic range of vocabulary, some grammatical errors, and simple sentence structures.9-11 points: Your language use is limited, with a narrow range of vocabulary, frequent grammatical errors, and repetitive sentence structures.0-8 points: Your language use is poor, with severe grammatical errors, limited vocabulary, and incomprehensible sentence structures.Mechanics (10 points)9-10 points: Your composition demonstrates excellent mechanics, with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and formatting.7-8 points: Your mechanics are proficient, with a few minor errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, or formatting.5-6 points: Your mechanics are adequate, with some errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, or formatting that may occasionally interfere with readability.3-4 points: Your mechanics are limited, with frequent errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, or formatting that interfere with readability.0-2 points: Your mechanics are poor, with severe errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, or formatting that make your writing difficult to understand.Task Fulfillment (20 points)18-20 points: Your composition fully addresses all aspects of the task, responding to the prompts with exceptional clarity and depth.15-17 points: Your writing effectively addresses the task, responding to the prompts with proficient clarity and depth.12-14 points: Your composition adequately addresses the task, but may lack some clarity or depth in responding to the prompts.9-11 points: Your writing partially addresses the task, but fails to respond to some aspects of the prompts or lacks clarity and depth.0-8 points: Your composition does not address the task or prompts adequately, demonstrating a lack of understanding or relevance.Phew, that was a lot of information! But don't worry; as long as you keep practicing and following these guidelines, your English compositions are sure to shine. Remember, writing is a skill that takes time and effort to develop, so don't get discouraged if your scores aren't perfect right away.Keep working hard, stay focused, and most importantly, have fun with your writing! After all, expressing your thoughtsand ideas in English is an incredible opportunity to explore new worlds and connect with people from all walks of life.Good luck, my fellow writers! Let's keep those pens (or keyboards) flowing and create some amazing compositions together.。
北京高考英语作文评分
北京高考英语作文评分The Beijing high school English exam essay is scored based on several criteria. Firstly, the use of English should be natural and conversational, with a good command of vocabulary and grammar. The essay should also demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and be well-organized. Additionally, creativity and originality in the content are highly valued. Moreover, the essay should be coherent and cohesive, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Finally, the essay should be free of major errors in spelling, punctuation, and syntax.The Beijing high school English exam essay is an important part of the overall assessment. It is an opportunity for students to demonstrate their language skills and critical thinking abilities. The essay prompts are usually thought-provoking and require students to express their ideas clearly and persuasively. Therefore, it is essential for students to prepare for the essay by practicing writing on various topics and familiarizingthemselves with different writing styles.In order to score well on the Beijing high school English exam essay, students should pay attention to the structure and organization of their writing. The essay should have a strong introduction that captures thereader's attention and sets the tone for the rest of the essay. The body paragraphs should present coherent andwell-developed ideas, supported by relevant examples and evidence. Finally, the conclusion should effectively summarize the main points and leave a lasting impression on the reader.In conclusion, the Beijing high school English exam essay is an important assessment tool that evaluates students' language proficiency and critical thinking skills. By practicing writing on various topics and familiarizing themselves with different writing styles, students can improve their chances of scoring well on the essay. It is essential for students to pay attention to the structureand organization of their writing, as well as to express their ideas clearly and persuasively.。
北京市高考英语作文评分标准
北京市高考英语作文评分标准深度解析The English composition section of the BeijingMunicipal College Entrance Examination (BMCEE) is acritical component that requires students to demonstrate their proficiency in written English. The scoring criteria for this section are designed to evaluate various aspectsof writing, including content, structure, language use, and mechanics. Understanding these criteria is crucial for students to excel in this section.**Content**Content is the foundation of any composition. In the BMCEE, it is evaluated based on whether the composition addresses the given topic, the relevance and adequacy of ideas, and the logical flow of content. To score well in content, students should ensure that their composition ison-topic, well-organized, and contains relevant andcoherent ideas.**Structure**Structure refers to the organization of the composition.A well-structured composition should have a clearintroduction, body paragraphs that develop the ideas introduced in the introduction, and a concluding paragraph that ties everything together. Each paragraph should have a clear topic sentence and supporting details. Students are advised to plan their composition before writing to ensure a logical and coherent structure.**Language Use**Language use is evaluated based on the accuracy, range, and appropriateness of vocabulary and grammar. Students are expected to use a variety of vocabulary and sentence structures to express their ideas effectively. Avoiding common grammatical errors and using accurate vocabulary can significantly improve one's score in this section.**Mechanics**Mechanics refer to the technical aspects of writing, such as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. While these may seem minor, they can significantly affect the readability and overall impression of the composition. Students should proofread their work carefully to ensure that there are no spelling errors, punctuation mistakes, or inconsistencies in capitalization.In conclusion, the scoring criteria for the BMCEE English composition section are comprehensive and cover various aspects of writing. Understanding and applying these criteria can help students improve their writing skills and achieve better scores in the examination. With practice and attention to detail, students can master the art of writing an effective and coherent English composition that meets the high standards of the BMCEE. **北京市高考英语作文评分标准深度剖析**北京市高考英语作文评分标准是衡量学生英语写作能力的重要标准，它不仅要求学生在内容上做到紧扣主题、观点明确，而且在语言使用、篇章结构和写作技巧等方面都有一定的要求。
北京高考英语作文评分标准
北京高考英语作文评分标准北京高考英语作文评分标准是考生备考的重要内容之一，了解评分标准对于提高作文水平和应对高考作文题目至关重要。
下面将详细介绍北京高考英语作文评分标准，希望对广大考生有所帮助。
首先，北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在表达上要准确。
这意味着考生需要避免语法错误、词汇错误和句子结构错误。
在写作时，考生应尽量避免使用一些不熟悉的词汇和句型，以免出现错误。
另外，考生在表达观点时要清晰明了，避免模棱两可的表达，以免影响阅卷老师的理解。
其次，北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在内容上要有深度。
这就要求考生在写作时要有自己的独特见解，不仅仅是简单地罗列事实和观点，更要有深入的分析和思考。
考生可以通过举例、对比、引用名人名言等方式来增加作文的深度，展现出自己的思考和理解能力。
再次，北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在结构上要合理。
这意味着考生在写作时要有清晰的逻辑结构，避免内容杂乱无章，让阅卷老师能够顺利理解和阅读。
考生可以通过使用段落、连接词、过渡句等手段来构建作文的结构，使整篇文章通顺流畅。
最后，北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在语言上要生动。
这就要求考生在写作时要有生动的语言表达，避免平淡乏味的表达方式。
考生可以通过使用形象生动的词语、修辞手法、比喻等方式来增加作文的生动性，吸引阅卷老师的注意力。
综上所述，北京高考英语作文评分标准对考生的要求是全面的，不仅要求考生在语言表达上准确、生动，还要求考生在内容深度和结构合理上有所突破。
希望广大考生能够在备考时重视作文评分标准，不断提高自己的写作水平，取得优异的成绩。
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准(一)评分原则：1、本题总分为25分，按5个档次给分。
2、评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的，从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
(二)评分标准：第五档(21-25分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，完全达到了预期的写作目的——覆盖所有内容要点。
——应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
——语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
——有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分)：完全完成了试题规定的任务，达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分)：基本完成了试题规定的任务，整体而言，基本达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分)：未恰当完成试题规定的任务，信息未能清楚地传达给读者——漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容。
——语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容的理解。
——较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分)：未完成试题规定的任务，信息未能传达给读者——明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理解试题要求。
高考英语书面表达评分标准
高考英语书面表达评分标准一、评分原则1、本题总分为30分,按5个档次给分。
2、评分时,应根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次,然后以该档次的要求衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的,从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时,应注意的主要内容:内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性、上下文连贯性及语言的得体性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面,评分时,应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
6、如书写较差,以至影响交际,将分数降低一个档次。
二、内容要点:(略)三、各档次的给分范围和要求:第五档次(很好):(25-30分)完全完成了试题规定的任务。
-覆盖所有内容要点。
-应用较多的语法结构和词汇。
-语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误,但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
-有效地使用了语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
完全达到了预期的写作目的。
第四档(好)(19-24分)完全完成了试题规定的任务。
-----虽漏掉1、2个次重点,但覆盖所有主要内容。
------应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
------语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确,些许错误主要是因尝试复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
------应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
达到了预期的写作目的。
第三档(适当):(13-18)基本完成了试题规定的任务。
------虽漏掉一些内容,但覆盖所有主要内容。
------应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
------有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,但不影响理解。
------应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文内容连贯。
整体而言,基本达到了预期的写作目的。
第二档(较差):(7—12分)未恰当完成试题规定的任务。
------漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容,写了一些无关内容。
------语法结构单调,词汇知识有限。
------有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响了对写作内容的理解。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
高考英语书面表达评分标准
高考英语书面表达题所要求的技能：
1、根据不同文体，使用恰当的语言形式完成书面交际任务；
2、运用恰当的句式、词汇和语法叙述、描述、表达观点和态度；
3、做到文章扣题、内容充实、结构完整、逻辑性强、语意连贯。
一、情景作文
（一）评分原则
1、本题总分为20分，按5个档次给分。
2、评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其档次，然后以该档次的要求衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3、评分时应考虑：内容要点的完整性、上下文的连贯、词汇和句式的多样性及语言的准确性。
4、拼写、标点符号或书写影响内容表达时，应试其影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
5、词数少于60，从总分中减去1分。
二、开放作文（15分）
（一）评分原则：
1.本题总分为15分，按4个档给分。
2.评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言质量初步确定其档次，然后以该档次的要求来衡量，确定或调整档
次，最后给分。
3.评分时应考虑：文章是否扣题，结构是否完整，内容是否充实、健康，思维是否活跃，逻辑是否清晰，
语言是否准确，交际是否得体。
4.拼写、标点符号或书写影响内容表达时，应视其影响程度予以考虑。
英美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
5.词汇少于50，从总分中减去1分。