Planar surface tracking using direct stereo

合集下载

PT1945R PT1945P 触摸屏监视器用户手册说明书

PT1945R   PT1945P 触摸屏监视器用户手册说明书

PT1945R / PT1945P Touch Screen MonitorUSER’S GUIDEThe information contained in this document is subject to change without notice.This document contains proprietary information that is protected by copyright. All rightsare reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced,translated to another languageor stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft, Inc. Other brand or product names are trademarks of their respective holders.The test results show that this device meets the FCC rules. Those limits are set to protect residential areas from the devices with harmful emission. This device will produce, use and radiate radio frequency energy. In addition, failure to follow the user’s manual to install or use this device might produce harmful interference with radio communication. Not withstanding the foregoing, it does not guarantee that this type of harmful interference does not occur in some special installations. The interference caused by this device to the reception of radio or television signals may be verified by turning it on and off. Any changes or modifications to this TFT LCD would void the user’s authority to operate this device.For more information on how to recycle your product, please visit/GREEN.Table of ContentsUsage NoticePrecautions (1)IntroductionAbout PT1945R/PT1945P (2)Touch Screen for PT1945R .. (3)Touch Screen for PT1945P .. (3)Package Overview (4)InstallationProduct Overview (5)Front View (5)PT1945R Bottom View (Without Stand) (5)PT1945P Bottom View (Without Stand) (5)Start Your Installation (6)Connecting the Display (Figure 8.1) (7)(Figure 8.1) (8)Kensington Security Slot (9)VESA Mount Your Monitor (10)Remove the Deskstand (11)User ControlsSide Panel Controls (12)How to Use the OSD Menus (13)On-Screen Display Menus (14)AppendixTroubleshooting (15)Warning Signal (16)No Signal (16)Going to Sleep (16)Out of Range (16)Product Dimensions (17)PT1945R (17)PT1945P (18)Compatibility Modes (19)Touch Screen Driver Installation (20)PT1945R Optional Calibration Tool Install (20)PT1945P Optional Calibration Tool Install (21)PT1945R Install Instructions (23)PT1945P Driver Install Instructions (25)Technical Support (26)Usage NoticePrecautionsFollow all warnings, precautions and maintenance as recommended in this user’s manual to maximize the life of your unit.Do:• Turn off the product before cleaning.• Touch screen surface may be cleaned using a soft clean cloth moistened withmild window glass commercial cleaners or 50/50 mixture of water and isopropylalcohol.• Use a soft cloth moistened with mild detergent to clean the display housing.• Use only high quality and safety approved AC/DC adapter.• Disconnect the power plug from AC outlet if the product is not going to be used foran extended period of time.Don’t:• Do not touch the LCD display screen surface with sharp or hard objects.• Do not use abrasive cleaners, waxes or solvents for your cleaning.• Do not operate the product under the following conditions:- Extremely hot, cold or humid environment.- Areas susceptible to excessive dust and dirt.- Near any appliance generating a strong magnetic field.- In direct sunlight.IntroductionAbout PT1945R/PT1945PThe PT1945R/PT1945P is a 19" flat panel screen with an active matrix,thin-film transistor (TFT) edge-lit LED liquid crystal display (LCD).This unit is to be used as commercial and light industrial equipment only. Features include:• Direct Analog signal input• Active matrix TFT LCD technology• 1280 x 1024 SXGA resolution• 19" viewable display area• 31.47 ~ 80 KHz horizontal scan• 56 ~ 75 Hz high refresh rate• 0.294mm x 0.294mm pixel pitch• Auto adjustment function• Multilingual OSD user controls• Kensington security slot• 100 mm VESA mount• Removable base for flexible mounting solutions.• PT1945R - 5-wire resistive touch screen with dual RS-232 Serial/USB controller • PT1945P - Projected Capactive touch screen with USB controller• Build-in audio-1W x 2Touch Screen for PT1945R• Analog 5-wire resistive touch screen for finger and stylus input• Surface: Anti-glare treatment• Interface: Dual RS-232 Serial/USB controller• Transmittance: 82%±5%• HID: Windows® 7/8• Driver: Windows® 7/8, VISTA, XP, 2000, ME, 98, NT 4.0, CE, XP Embedded, Linux kernel 2.6.x(32 bit & 64 bit), Apple® Mac OSTouch Screen for PT1945P• Projected Capactive touch screen for finger input only• Surface: Glare treatment• Interface: USB controller• Transmittance: 90±5%• HID: Windows® 7/8• Driver: VISTA, XP, 2000, CE, XP Embedded, Linux kernel 2.6.x (32 bit & 64 bit), Apple® Mac OSPackage OverviewDisplayPower Cord VGA Signal Cable RS-232 Cable (PT1945R only)USB Cable ( A to B)Audio-in CableLanding StripUser’s GuideCable Cover ScrewInstallationProduct Overview• Front View• PT1945R Bottom View (Without Stand)• PT1945P Bottom View (Without Stand)RS-232VGA AC IN USB POWER SWITCHAUDIO PT1945RPT1945P AC IN USB POWER SWITCHVGAAUDIOStart Your InstallationPlease follow these instructions so that you can hookup the cables to associated connector.1. Lay the display flat on an even surface.2. Move the stand into position as seen in the step 2 diagram.3. Remove the cable cover as seen in the step 3 diagram.4. Connect the cables to the appropriate connectors as seen in the step 4 diagram. Use step 4-1 diagram if using the RS-232 serial connector. Use the step 4-2 diagram if using the USB connector.5. Position all cables under the cover lip as seen in the step 5 diagram.6. Re-attach the cable cover . Remove the screw (CBM M3x6) from the accessory box, and insert the screw into the cable cover and monitor as seen in the step 5 diagram.Step 4-2Step 4-1Step 2Step 3Step 5Connecting the Display (Figure 8.1)To setup this display, please refer to the following figure and procedures.1. Be sure all equipment is turned off.2. Connect the AC power cord to the power connector on the monitor and the other end into an electrical outlet (8.1).3. Connect the D-SUB cable from the display's VGA input connector to the D-SUBconnector of your host computer and tighten the screws (8.1).4. Connector the audio-in cable from the audio input port of your display to the audio out port of your computer (8.1).5. Connect the RS-232 or USB cable from the RS-232 or USB port of your display to the RS-232 port or USB port (8.1) of your computer.6. Configure the touch screen. Refer to the “Touch Screen Driver Installation” section on page 20.7. Once the touch screen is configured, the monitor is ready for use.! Notice!To ensure the display works well with your computer, please configure the display mode of your graphics card to make it less than or equal to 1280 x 1024 resolution and make sure the timing of the display mode is compatible with the LCD display. We have listed the compatible “Video Modes” of your LCD display in the appendix (on page 19) for your reference.(Figure 8.1) PT1945RPT1945PKensington Security SlotThe monitor can be secured to your desk or any other fixed object with Kensington lock security products. The Kensington lock is not included.VESA Mount Your MonitorThis monitor conforms to the VESA Flat Panel Mounting Physical Mounting Interface standard which defines a physical mounting interface for flat panel monitors, andcorresponding with the standards of flat panel monitor mounting devices, such as wall and table arms. The VESA mounting interface is located on the back of your monitor.To mount the monitor on an UL-listed certified swing arm or other mounting fixture, follow the instructions included with the mounting fixture to be used.! Warning!Please select the proper screws!The distance between the back cover surface and the bottom of the screw hole is 11 mm. Please use four M4 screws diameter with proper length to mount your monitor.Please note: the mounting stand must be able to support at least 11 lbs ( 5Kg).VESA Mounting InterfaceRemove the DeskstandRemove 4 screws and then remove hinge.User ControlsSide Panel ControlsHow to Use the OSD MenusMenuUpDownEnterPower1. Press the “MENU” button to pop up the “on-screen menu” and press “Up” or “Down” button to select among the six functions in the main menu.2. Choose the adjustment items by pressing the “Enter ” button.3. Adjust the value of the adjustment items by pressing the “Up” or “Down” button.4. With the OSD menu on screen, press “ Menu” button to return main menu or exit OSD.5. The OSD menu will automatically close, if you have left it idle for a pre-set time.6. To Lock the OSD / Power menu buttons, please follow the instructions below.(Please note: the monitor has to be turned ON with a valid signal pre-set)(a.) Press “Menu” key , the OSD menu will pops upon display.(b.) Press and hold the “Menu” key again with the OSD menu on the screen, the OSD menu will disappear. Then press the “Power” key 1 time while the menu key is still being pressed. The “Lock/Unlock” menu will appear for 3 seconds.(c.) Use the “Enter” key to select OSD or Power setting then set at “Lock” by pushing the“UP” or “Down” button.(d.) When the “UP” or “Down” button is released, the previous setting will be saved andexit the “Lock/Unlock” menu automatically.7. To Unlock the OSD / Power menu buttons, please follow the instructions below.(Please note: the monitor has to be turned ON with a valid signal pre-set)(a.) Press and hold the “Menu” key then press the “Power” key simultaneously, the “Lock/ Unlock” menu will appear for 3 seconds.(b.) Use the “Enter” key to select OSD or Power setting then set at “Unlock” by pushing the “UP” or “Down” button.(c.) When the “UP” or “Down” button is released, the previous setting will be saved and exit the “Lock/Unlock” menu automatically.Please note:a. When the OSD Lock function is selected, this indicates that all the buttons except “power” button are now disabled.b. When the Power Lock function is selected, this indicates that the power key is disabled; user can not to turn off the monitor by “Power” key.On-Screen Display MenusMain OSD Menu:ITEM CONTENTContrast The monitor luminance level control.Brightness The monitor backlight level control.Auto Adjust Fine-tune the image to full screen automatically.Left/Right Moving screen image horizontal position to left or right. Up/Down Moving screen image vertical position to up or down. Horizontal size The screen image horizontal dot clock adjustment. Fine The screen image pixel phase adjustment.OSD Left/Right Moving OSD menu horizontal position to left or right. OSD Up/Down Moving OSD menu vertical position to up or down. OSD Time out OSD auto-disappear time selection.OSD Language OSD menu language selection. ( English, French, Japanese, Deutsch, Spanish, Italian, Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese)Factory Reset Factory default value restored.RGB Color temperature selection. (9300K, 6500K, 5500K, 7500K, User) Volume Audio volume adjustment.Mute Audio On/Off control.AppendixTroubleshootingIf you are experiencing trouble with the display, refer to the following. If the problem persists, please contact your local dealer or our service center.Problem: No image appears on screen.► Check that all the I/O and power connectors are correctly and well connected described in the "Installation" section.► Make sure the pins of the connectors are not crooked or broken.Problem: Partial Image or incorrectly displayed image.► Check to see if the resolution of your computer is higher than that of the display. ► Reconfigure the resolution of your computer to make it less than or equal to1280 x 1024.Problem: Image has vertical flickering line bars.► Use "Fine" to make an adjustment.► Check and reconfigure the display mode of the vertical refresh rate of your graphic card to make it compatible with the display.Problem: Image is unstable and flickering► Use "Horizontal size" to make an adjustment.Problem: Image is scrolling► Check and make sure the VGA signal cable (or adapter) is securely connected.► Check and reconfigure the display mode of the vertical refresh rate of yourgraphics card to make it compatible with the display.Problem: Vague image (characters and graphics)► Use “Fine” to make an adjustment. If this problem still exists,use “Horizontal size” to make an adjustment.Warning SignalIf you see warning messages on your screen, this means that the display cannot receive a clean signal from the computer graphics card.Below are the three kinds of Warning Signal. Please check the cable connections or contact your local dealer or Planar for more information.No SignalThis message means that the display has been powered on but it cannot receive any signal from the computer graphics card. Check all the power switches, power cables, and VGA signal cable.Going to SleepThe display is under the power saving mode. In addition, the display will enter power saving mode when experiencing a sudden signal disconnecting problem.The monitor can be activated by pressing any key on the keyboard, triggering the mouse or touching the screen.Out of RangeThis message means that the signal of the computer graphic card is not compatible withthe display. When the signal is not included in the “Video Modes” list we have listed in the Appendices of this manual, the monitor will display this message.Product DimensionsPT1945R431.8 mm390.9 m m358.0 m m249.6 mm219.0 m m212.0 m m67.0 mm► Side View► Top View► Front ViewPT1945P► Side View ► Top View► Front ViewCompatibility ModesMode Resolution H-Frequency (KHz) V-Frequency (Hz) IBM VGA720 x 400 31.4770IBM VGA640 x 48031.4760VESA VGA 640 x 480 37.8672VESA VGA 640 x 48037.5075VESA SVGA 800 x 600 35.1656VESA SVGA 800 x 600 37.8860VESA SVGA 800 x 60048.0872VESA SVGA 800 x 600 46.8875VESA XGA 1024 x 768 48.3660VESA XGA 1024 x 768 56.4870VESA XGA 1024 x 76860.0275VESA SXGA 1280 x 102464.0060VESA SXGA1280 x 102480.0075VESA SXGA1280 x 96060.0060VESA SXGA1152 x 86467.5075Apple Mac II640 x 48035.0066Apple Mac 832 x 62449.7275Touch Screen Driver InstallationThe PT1945R is available with both RS232 and USB connections. The touch driver is lo-cated at /support for these operating systems: Windows® 7/8, VISTA, XP, 2000, ME, 98, NT 4.0, CE, XP Embedded, Linux 2.6.x (32 bit & 64 bit),Apple® Mac OS.The PT1945P is available with USB connection. The touch driver is available at www.planar. com/support for these operating systems: Windows® 7/8, VISTA, XP, 2000, CE,XP Embedded, Linux kernel 2.6.x (32 bit & 64 bit), Apple® Mac OS. (Windows 7/8 Multi touch without driver)Please Note:1. The PT1945R/PT1945P is Microsoft® Windows® HID (Human InterfaceDevice) compatible if you use the USB touch screen interface. No additional softwaredriver is required for general operation of the touch screen. A calibration tool can beinstalled for improved touch position accuracy. See “Optional Calibration Tool Install”section for more information.2. For PT1945P, the system requires 15 seconds for Windows 7/8 to install/uninstall thetouch drivers while turning power on/off or plugging/unplugging USB cable.PT1945R Optional Calibration Tool Install:If you would like to use the Optional Calibration Tool, follow the instructions below. Please note: the calibration tool supports Windows® 7/8, VISTA, XP, XP Embedded, 2000, 98 and ME operating systems via USB only.1. Visit /support.2. Select the monitor size and then model name.3. Click on the “Load Utility” button that appears to the right of the model name.4. The HID calibration tool will automatically open. From here the user can choose to do the following:a. 4 Points Calibrationb. 9 Points Linearizationc. 25 Points Linearizationd. Cleare. Draw Testf. Advanced. In the Advanced settings area the user may do the following:i. Adjust the Double Click Area.ii. Enable auto right click and adjust the auto right click time.iii. Choose to be either in the HID Mouse Mode or HID Digitizer Mode (Windows® 7/8 only).iv. Simply click the “Apply” button once the settings are finalized.PT1945P Optional Calibration Tool Install:Calibrating the touch screen in Windows 7/8:1. Tap the Start button, Control Panel and then Hardware and Sound.2. Under Tablet PC Settings, tap Calibrate the screen for pen or touch input.3. On the Display tab, under Display options, tap Calibrate and then Yes to allow theprogram to make changes.4. Follow the on-screen instructions to calibrate the touch screen.PT1945R Install Instructions:If you are using a PC running Windows® 7/8, VISTA, XP, 2000, ME, 98, NT4.0, follow the instructions below:1. Power on the PC.2. Be sure the USB or the RS-232 Serial cable is connected from the PC to the display.3. Visit /support.4. Follow the step-by-step instructions as shown on the pop-up windows.If you are using a PC running driver Linux kernel 2.6.x (32 bit & 64 bit), follow the instructions below:1. Power on the PC.2. Be sure the USB cable is connected from the PC to the display.3. Visit /support.4. Follow the step-by-step instructions as shown on the pop-up windows.If you are using a PC running Windows® XP Embedded, follow the instructions below:Express:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the RS232 or USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Be sure that your EWF is disabled. If your EWF is enabled, please disable the EWF by using the EWF Manager command.4. Once the EWF is disabled click on the XP driver at /support. and follow the step-by-step instructions as shown on the pop-up windows.Custom:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the RS232 or USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Follow the step-by-step instructions found in the zipped file at /support. If you are using a PC running Windows® CE, follow the instructions below:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the RS232 or USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Using Platform Builder, build an image file by following the step-by-step instructions found in the zipped file at /support.If you are using a PC running Linux or Apple® Mac OS, follow the instructions below:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the RS232 or USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Follow the step-by-step instructions found in the zipped file at /support.When changing the Touch Interface (RS-232 or USB), please follow instructions below.1. Uninstall the touch driver.2. Re-start the computer.3. Remove the original Touch Interface (RS-232 or USB).4. Connect the computer to the Touch Interface (RS-232 or USB) that you would like to use.5. Install the Touch driver, then follow the step-by-step instructions as show on monitor. PLEASE NOTE!Don’t plug in both the RS-232 and USB cables!Doing so may cause a driver conflict, making your touch screen inoperable.PT1945P Driver Install Instructions:If you are using a PC running, Windows® 7/8, VISTA, XP, 2000, follow the instructions below:1. Power on the PC.2. Make sure that the USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Visit /support.4. Follow the step-by-step instructions as shown on the pop-up windows.If you are using a PC running driver Linux kernel 2.6.x (32 bit & 64 bit), follow the instructions below:1. Power on the PC.2. Make sure that the USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Visit /support.4. Follow the step-by-step instructions as shown on the pop-up windows.If you are using a PC running Windows® XP Embedded, follow the instructions below:Express:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Be sure that your EWF is disabled. If your EWF is enabled, please disable the EWF by using the EWF Manager command.4. Once the EWF is disabled click on the XP driver at /support. and follow the step-by-step instructions as shown on the pop-up windows.Custom:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Follow the step-by-step instructions found in the zipped file at /support. If you are using a PC running Windows® CE, follow the instructions below:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Using Platform Builder, build an image file by following the step-by-step instructionsfound in the zipped file at /support.If you are using a PC running Linux or Apple® Mac OS, follow the instructions below:1. Power on the computer.2. Make sure that the USB cable is connected to the computer.3. Follow the step-by-step instructions found in the zipped file at /support.Technical SupportCables and AccessoriesTo find cables and accessories for your Planar monitor, touch screen or other Planar products visit our online store at .Technical SupportVisit Planar at /support for operations manuals, touch screen drivers, warranty information and access to Planar’s Technical Library for online troubleshooting.To speak with Planar Customer Support please have you model and serial number available and dial:Planar SupportTel: 1-866-PLANAR1 (866-752-6271) or +1 503-748-5799 outside the US.Hours: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.Toll or long distance charges may apply.Planar Systems, Inc.Customer Service24x7 Online Technical Support: /support1195 NW Compton DriveBeaverton, OR 97006-1992Tel: 1-866-PLANAR1 (866-752-6271) or +1 503-748-5799 outside the United States. Hours: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week© 2018 Planar Systems, Inc. 11/19 Planar is a registered trademark of Planar Systems, Inc. Other brands and names are the property of their respective owners.Technical information in this document is subject to change without notice.020-1022-00H820490065108。

脱体涡数值分析与应用研究

脱体涡数值分析与应用研究

II
南京航空航天大学硕士学位论文
图、表清单
图 3.1 弹簧近似方法处理的二维无粘网格的变形运动 …………...………...18 图 3.2 NACA0012 翼型混合网格和边界点 …………………………………...19 图 3.3 NACA0012 翼型 Delaunay 图 …………………………………………..19 图 3.4 Delaunay 图与网格的映射关系示意 …………………...………………20 图 3.5 运动后的 Delaunay 图 ……………………………………………………20 图 3.6 运动后的混合网格图 ……………………………………………………21 图 3.7 RAE 机翼 A 表面网格的局部变形 ...…………………………………..22 图 3.8 旋转 30 度后的变形网格比较 …………………………………………..23 图 3.9 旋转 90 度后的变形网格 ………………………………………………...24 图 3.10 NLR7301 翼型不同的 Delaunay 图变形比较 …….………………….25 图 3.11 第 i 个处理器的流程图 ………………………………………………...28 图 3.12 调用 METIS_PartGraphRecursive 分区 .……………………………...29 图 3.13 调用 METIS_PartGraphKway 分区 .…………………………………..29 图 3.14 NACA0012 翼型绕流并行计算 ……………………………………….31 图 4.1 NACA0012 翼型网格图 ..………………………………………………..32 图 4.2 NACA0012 翼型计算结果 ………………………………………………33 图 4.3 ONERA M6 机翼网格 ……………………………………………………33 图 4.4 ONERA M6 机翼计算结果 ……………………………………………...34 图 4.5 ONERA M6 机翼表面压力系数分布 …………………………………..35 图 4.6 NACA0012 翼型网格和 Delaunay 三角化图 ………………………….36 图 4.7 NACA0012 振荡翼型合力系数随攻角的变化曲线 …………………..36 图 4.8 NACA0012 振荡翼型表面压力系数分布图 …………………………...38 图 4.9 NLR7301 翼型网格和 Delaunay 三角化图 …………………………….39 图 4.10 NLR7301 翼型表面压力分布曲线 …………………………………….39 图 4.11 三维振荡直机翼网格图 ………………………………………………..40 图 4.12 三维振荡直机翼表面压力的平均值分布曲线 ……………………….41 图 4.13 三维振荡直机翼表面压力的实部分布曲线 ………………………….42 图 4.14 三维振荡直机翼表面压力的虚部分布曲线 ………………………….42 图 4.15 三种翼型的厚度与形状比较 …………………………………………..43 图 4.16 NACA0015 翼型初始网格和 Delaunay 三角化图 …………….……..44

13_-_surface_micromachining

13_-_surface_micromachining

SURFACE MICROMACHININGSURFACE MICROMACHINING•Uses planar technologies to realize microstructures(thin film deposition on the bulk and selective etching)•More complex technology,but also more versatile with respect to bulk micromachining•Concepts of STRUCTURAL layer and SACRIFICIAL layer•Usually allows for better resolutions(and better surface exploitation) •Thickness of devices and cavities are limited(of the order of the micron): NO high structures NOR big masses!!!•STICTION problemSurface Micromachining Substrate (Silicon Wafer)Deposited Thin Film (~µm)Remove PR MASK P h o t o l i t h o g r a p h yEx p osu r eD e v elopEtch FilmSurface MicromachiningDeposit Structural FilmPattern & Etch Structural Film Microbridge MicrocantileverAnchor Selectively Remove First Film (Sacrificial Layer)and signal conditioning circuitry.Examples of microstructures with Surface MicromachiningMICRO GEARS & HINGESFROM SANDIA NATIONALLABS, USABasis for the adhesion of the center pivotSacrificial layer for rotor releaseRotor and statorSacrificial layer to separate rotor from the central pivotCentral pivotElectrical contacts Sacrificial oxide etch for releaseSurface Surface Micromachined Micromachined Inductor•Air bridge can be formed using sacrificial etching.Typical Device Realized by SurfaceMicromachining•Etch holes are required to reduce the time for removing sacrificial layer underneath large-area structures.Criteria for Selecting Materials andEtching Solutions•Selectivity–etch rate on sacrificial layer/etch rate on structural layer must be high •Etch rate–rapid etching rate on sacrificial layer to reduce etching time •Deposition temperature–in certain applications, it is required that the overall processing temperature be low (e.g. integration with CMOS, integration with biological materials)•Intrinsic stress of structural layer–to remain flat after release, the structural layer must have low stress •Surface smoothness–important for optical applications•Long term stabilityOther Structural or SacrificialMaterials•Structural layers–evaporated and sputtered metals such as Gold, Copper–electroplated metal (such as NiFe)–plastic material (CVD plastic)–silicon (such as epitaxy silicon or top silicon in SOI wafer)•Sacrificial layers–Photoresist,polyimide, and other organic materials–Copper•copper can be electroplated or evaporated, and is relativelyinexpensive.–Oxide by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD)•PECVD is done at lower temperature, with lower quality. It isgenerally undoped.–Thermally grown oxide•relatively low etch rate in HF.–Silicon or polysilicon•removed by gas phase silicon etchingEvaporation DryingLiquid-gas transition is harsh on MEMSTemperature P r e s s u r e BoilingPoint1atmRelease Stiction•Capillary forces of drying rinse solution pull down microstructures–Van der Waals forces are responsible for thestiction of hydrophobic surfaces–Hydrogen bonding is the dominant adhesionmechanism for hydrophilic surfaces–will devices be released after drying?•Low surface-tension liquids are best –Methanol (1st possible solution)Stiction Reduction Strategies•Reduce adhesion area–dimples or bump–low surface-energy coatings•Integrate supporting microstructures –increase tolerance of capillary forces(microfuses,photoresist sacrificial supportinglayer, …)•Sublimation drying•Supercritical drying•Vapor phase etchingStiction ReductionReduction ––Dimples or Bumps Array•Reduces contact area•Stiction is limited also duringoperative life (it may occurs forexample for humiditycondensation)Reduction ––Stiction ReductionLow Surface--Energy MaterialsLow Surface•Adoption of thin fluorinated coating to obtain an hydrophobic surface(teflon-like materials or SAM)Temporary Supporting Structures --Temporary Supporting StructuresMicrofuses•Microfuses provide mechanical support to prevent stiction•Current pulses blow fuses to release devicesSublimation DryingNo direct change from the liquid to the gaseous phase T-butyl alcohol –freezes at 26 ºCP-dichlorobenzene –freezes at 56 ºCTemperatureP r e s s u r e 1atm FreezingPointSublimation Drying Setup•Chip-scale refrigeration (temperature control with Peltier cell to implement slow variations of temperature avoiding microcracking of the microstructures)•Desiccation prevents moisture issues (to avoid acqueos vapor condensation and consequently stiction)Material T c (ºC)P c (atm)P c (psi)Water 3742183204Methanol 240801155CO 231731073TemperatureP r e s s u r e1atmP c T cThe liquid phase is removed with CO 2at a temperature and pressure higher than the critical point (where surface tension is almost zero)•Reaches very high pressures (> 70atm)–very strong chambers areneeded•Automated systems areavailableVapor Phase EtchingAnhydrous HF vapor used to avoid liquid-gas transitionOrDry Etching (plasma etching or O 2RIE with V BIAS = 0for photoresistsacrificial etching),but not easy underdiffusionTemperatureP r e s s u r e< 1atmIn In--Use Stiction•After a successful release–no release stiction•Physical contact during use–electrostatic pull down•Reduce stiction with low surface-energy coatings (FC, SAM, roughening, dimples, bumps,…)。

A Fast and Accurate Plane Detection Algorithm for Large Noisy Point Clouds Using Filtered Normals

A Fast and Accurate Plane Detection Algorithm for Large Noisy Point Clouds Using Filtered Normals

A Fast and Accurate Plane Detection Algorithm for Large Noisy Point CloudsUsing Filtered Normals and Voxel GrowingJean-Emmanuel DeschaudFranc¸ois GouletteMines ParisTech,CAOR-Centre de Robotique,Math´e matiques et Syst`e mes60Boulevard Saint-Michel75272Paris Cedex06jean-emmanuel.deschaud@mines-paristech.fr francois.goulette@mines-paristech.frAbstractWith the improvement of3D scanners,we produce point clouds with more and more points often exceeding millions of points.Then we need a fast and accurate plane detection algorithm to reduce data size.In this article,we present a fast and accurate algorithm to detect planes in unorganized point clouds usingfiltered normals and voxel growing.Our work is based on afirst step in estimating better normals at the data points,even in the presence of noise.In a second step,we compute a score of local plane in each point.Then, we select the best local seed plane and in a third step start a fast and robust region growing by voxels we call voxel growing.We have evaluated and tested our algorithm on different kinds of point cloud and compared its performance to other algorithms.1.IntroductionWith the growing availability of3D scanners,we are now able to produce large datasets with millions of points.It is necessary to reduce data size,to decrease the noise and at same time to increase the quality of the model.It is in-teresting to model planar regions of these point clouds by planes.In fact,plane detection is generally afirst step of segmentation but it can be used for many applications.It is useful in computer graphics to model the environnement with basic geometry.It is used for example in modeling to detect building facades before classification.Robots do Si-multaneous Localization and Mapping(SLAM)by detect-ing planes of the environment.In our laboratory,we wanted to detect small and large building planes in point clouds of urban environments with millions of points for modeling. As mentioned in[6],the accuracy of the plane detection is important for after-steps of the modeling pipeline.We also want to be fast to be able to process point clouds with mil-lions of points.We present a novel algorithm based on re-gion growing with improvements in normal estimation and growing process.For our method,we are generic to work on different kinds of data like point clouds fromfixed scan-ner or from Mobile Mapping Systems(MMS).We also aim at detecting building facades in urban point clouds or little planes like doors,even in very large data sets.Our input is an unorganized noisy point cloud and with only three”in-tuitive”parameters,we generate a set of connected compo-nents of planar regions.We evaluate our method as well as explain and analyse the significance of each parameter. 2.Previous WorksAlthough there are many methods of segmentation in range images like in[10]or in[3],three have been thor-oughly studied for3D point clouds:region-growing, hough-transform from[14]and Random Sample Consen-sus(RANSAC)from[9].The application of recognising structures in urban laser point clouds is frequent in literature.Bauer in[4]and Boulaassal in[5]detect facades in dense3D point cloud by a RANSAC algorithm.V osselman in[23]reviews sur-face growing and3D hough transform techniques to de-tect geometric shapes.Tarsh-Kurdi in[22]detect roof planes in3D building point cloud by comparing results on hough-transform and RANSAC algorithm.They found that RANSAC is more efficient than thefirst one.Chao Chen in[6]and Yu in[25]present algorithms of segmentation in range images for the same application of detecting planar regions in an urban scene.The method in[6]is based on a region growing algorithm in range images and merges re-sults in one labelled3D point cloud.[25]uses a method different from the three we have cited:they extract a hi-erarchical subdivision of the input image built like a graph where leaf nodes represent planar regions.There are also other methods like bayesian techniques. In[16]and[8],they obtain smoothed surface from noisy point clouds with objects modeled by probability distribu-tions and it seems possible to extend this idea to point cloud segmentation.But techniques based on bayesian statistics need to optimize global statistical model and then it is diffi-cult to process points cloud larger than one million points.We present below an analysis of the two main methods used in literature:RANSAC and region-growing.Hough-transform algorithm is too time consuming for our applica-tion.To compare the complexity of the algorithm,we take a point cloud of size N with only one plane P of size n.We suppose that we want to detect this plane P and we define n min the minimum size of the plane we want to detect.The size of a plane is the area of the plane.If the data density is uniform in the point cloud then the size of a plane can be specified by its number of points.2.1.RANSACRANSAC is an algorithm initially developped by Fis-chler and Bolles in[9]that allows thefitting of models with-out trying all possibilities.RANSAC is based on the prob-ability to detect a model using the minimal set required to estimate the model.To detect a plane with RANSAC,we choose3random points(enough to estimate a plane).We compute the plane parameters with these3points.Then a score function is used to determine how the model is good for the remaining ually,the score is the number of points belonging to the plane.With noise,a point belongs to a plane if the distance from the point to the plane is less than a parameter γ.In the end,we keep the plane with the best score.Theprobability of getting the plane in thefirst trial is p=(nN )3.Therefore the probability to get it in T trials is p=1−(1−(nN )3)ing equation1and supposing n minN1,we know the number T min of minimal trials to have a probability p t to get planes of size at least n min:T min=log(1−p t)log(1−(n minN))≈log(11−p t)(Nn min)3.(1)For each trial,we test all data points to compute the score of a plane.The RANSAC algorithm complexity lies inO(N(Nn min )3)when n minN1and T min→0whenn min→N.Then RANSAC is very efficient in detecting large planes in noisy point clouds i.e.when the ratio n minN is 1but very slow to detect small planes in large pointclouds i.e.when n minN 1.After selecting the best model,another step is to extract the largest connected component of each plane.Connnected components mean that the min-imum distance between each point of the plane and others points is smaller(for distance)than afixed parameter.Schnabel et al.[20]bring two optimizations to RANSAC:the points selection is done locally and the score function has been improved.An octree isfirst created from point cloud.Points used to estimate plane parameters are chosen locally at a random depth of the octree.The score function is also different from RANSAC:instead of testing all points for one model,they test only a random subset and find the score by interpolation.The algorithm complexity lies in O(Nr4Ndn min)where r is the number of random subsets for the score function and d is the maximum octree depth. Their algorithm improves the planes detection speed but its complexity lies in O(N2)and it becomes slow on large data sets.And again we have to extract the largest connected component of each plane.2.2.Region GrowingRegion Growing algorithms work well in range images like in[18].The principle of region growing is to start with a seed region and to grow it by neighborhood when the neighbors satisfy some conditions.In range images,we have the neighbors of each point with pixel coordinates.In case of unorganized3D data,there is no information about the neighborhood in the data structure.The most common method to compute neighbors in3D is to compute a Kd-tree to search k nearest neighbors.The creation of a Kd-tree lies in O(NlogN)and the search of k nearest neighbors of one point lies in O(logN).The advantage of these region growing methods is that they are fast when there are many planes to extract,robust to noise and extract the largest con-nected component immediately.But they only use the dis-tance from point to plane to extract planes and like we will see later,it is not accurate enough to detect correct planar regions.Rabbani et al.[19]developped a method of smooth area detection that can be used for plane detection.Theyfirst estimate the normal of each point like in[13].The point with the minimum residual starts the region growing.They test k nearest neighbors of the last point added:if the an-gle between the normal of the point and the current normal of the plane is smaller than a parameterαthen they add this point to the smooth region.With Kd-tree for k nearest neighbors,the algorithm complexity is in O(N+nlogN). The complexity seems to be low but in worst case,when nN1,example for facade detection in point clouds,the complexity becomes O(NlogN).3.Voxel Growing3.1.OverviewIn this article,we present a new algorithm adapted to large data sets of unorganized3D points and optimized to be accurate and fast.Our plane detection method works in three steps.In thefirst part,we compute a better esti-mation of the normal in each point by afiltered weighted planefitting.In a second step,we compute the score of lo-cal planarity in each point.We select the best seed point that represents a good seed plane and in the third part,we grow this seed plane by adding all points close to the plane.Thegrowing step is based on a voxel growing algorithm.The filtered normals,the score function and the voxel growing are innovative contributions of our method.As an input,we need dense point clouds related to the level of detail we want to detect.As an output,we produce connected components of planes in the point cloud.This notion of connected components is linked to the data den-sity.With our method,the connected components of planes detected are linked to the parameter d of the voxel grid.Our method has 3”intuitive”parameters :d ,area min and γ.”intuitive”because there are linked to physical mea-surements.d is the voxel size used in voxel growing and also represents the connectivity of points in detected planes.γis the maximum distance between the point of a plane and the plane model,represents the plane thickness and is linked to the point cloud noise.area min represents the minimum area of planes we want to keep.3.2.Details3.2.1Local Density of Point CloudsIn a first step,we compute the local density of point clouds like in [17].For that,we find the radius r i of the sphere containing the k nearest neighbors of point i .Then we cal-culate ρi =kπr 2i.In our experiments,we find that k =50is a good number of neighbors.It is important to know the lo-cal density because many laser point clouds are made with a fixed resolution angle scanner and are therefore not evenly distributed.We use the local density in section 3.2.3for the score calculation.3.2.2Filtered Normal EstimationNormal estimation is an important part of our algorithm.The paper [7]presents and compares three normal estima-tion methods.They conclude that the weighted plane fit-ting or WPF is the fastest and the most accurate for large point clouds.WPF is an idea of Pauly and al.in [17]that the fitting plane of a point p must take into consider-ation the nearby points more than other distant ones.The normal least square is explained in [21]and is the mini-mum of ki =1(n p ·p i +d )2.The WPF is the minimum of ki =1ωi (n p ·p i +d )2where ωi =θ( p i −p )and θ(r )=e −2r 2r2i .For solving n p ,we compute the eigenvec-tor corresponding to the smallest eigenvalue of the weightedcovariance matrix C w = ki =1ωi t (p i −b w )(p i −b w )where b w is the weighted barycenter.For the three methods ex-plained in [7],we get a good approximation of normals in smooth area but we have errors in sharp corners.In fig-ure 1,we have tested the weighted normal estimation on two planes with uniform noise and forming an angle of 90˚.We can see that the normal is not correct on the corners of the planes and in the red circle.To improve the normal calculation,that improves the plane detection especially on borders of planes,we propose a filtering process in two phases.In a first step,we com-pute the weighted normals (WPF)of each point like we de-scribed it above by minimizing ki =1ωi (n p ·p i +d )2.In a second step,we compute the filtered normal by us-ing an adaptive local neighborhood.We compute the new weighted normal with the same sum minimization but keep-ing only points of the neighborhood whose normals from the first step satisfy |n p ·n i |>cos (α).With this filtering step,we have the same results in smooth areas and better results in sharp corners.We called our normal estimation filtered weighted plane fitting(FWPF).Figure 1.Weighted normal estimation of two planes with uniform noise and with 90˚angle between them.We have tested our normal estimation by computing nor-mals on synthetic data with two planes and different angles between them and with different values of the parameter α.We can see in figure 2the mean error on normal estimation for WPF and FWPF with α=20˚,30˚,40˚and 90˚.Us-ing α=90˚is the same as not doing the filtering step.We see on Figure 2that α=20˚gives smaller error in normal estimation when angles between planes is smaller than 60˚and α=30˚gives best results when angle between planes is greater than 60˚.We have considered the value α=30˚as the best results because it gives the smaller mean error in normal estimation when angle between planes vary from 20˚to 90˚.Figure 3shows the normals of the planes with 90˚angle and better results in the red circle (normals are 90˚with the plane).3.2.3The score of local planarityIn many region growing algorithms,the criteria used for the score of the local fitting plane is the residual,like in [18]or [19],i.e.the sum of the square of distance from points to the plane.We have a different score function to estimate local planarity.For that,we first compute the neighbors N i of a point p with points i whose normals n i are close toFigure parison of mean error in normal estimation of two planes with α=20˚,30˚,40˚and 90˚(=Nofiltering).Figure 3.Filtered Weighted normal estimation of two planes with uniform noise and with 90˚angle between them (α=30˚).the normal n p .More precisely,we compute N i ={p in k neighbors of i/|n i ·n p |>cos (α)}.It is a way to keep only the points which are probably on the local plane before the least square fitting.Then,we compute the local plane fitting of point p with N i neighbors by least squares like in [21].The set N i is a subset of N i of points belonging to the plane,i.e.the points for which the distance to the local plane is smaller than the parameter γ(to consider the noise).The score s of the local plane is the area of the local plane,i.e.the number of points ”in”the plane divided by the localdensity ρi (seen in section 3.2.1):the score s =card (N i)ρi.We take into consideration the area of the local plane as the score function and not the number of points or the residual in order to be more robust to the sampling distribution.3.2.4Voxel decompositionWe use a data structure that is the core of our region growing method.It is a voxel grid that speeds up the plane detection process.V oxels are small cubes of length d that partition the point cloud space.Every point of data belongs to a voxel and a voxel contains a list of points.We use the Octree Class Template in [2]to compute an Octree of the point cloud.The leaf nodes of the graph built are voxels of size d .Once the voxel grid has been computed,we start the plane detection algorithm.3.2.5Voxel GrowingWith the estimator of local planarity,we take the point p with the best score,i.e.the point with the maximum area of local plane.We have the model parameters of this best seed plane and we start with an empty set E of points belonging to the plane.The initial point p is in a voxel v 0.All the points in the initial voxel v 0for which the distance from the seed plane is less than γare added to the set E .Then,we compute new plane parameters by least square refitting with set E .Instead of growing with k nearest neighbors,we grow with voxels.Hence we test points in 26voxel neigh-bors.This is a way to search the neighborhood in con-stant time instead of O (logN )for each neighbor like with Kd-tree.In a neighbor voxel,we add to E the points for which the distance to the current plane is smaller than γand the angle between the normal computed in each point and the normal of the plane is smaller than a parameter α:|cos (n p ,n P )|>cos (α)where n p is the normal of the point p and n P is the normal of the plane P .We have tested different values of αand we empirically found that 30˚is a good value for all point clouds.If we added at least one point in E for this voxel,we compute new plane parameters from E by least square fitting and we test its 26voxel neigh-bors.It is important to perform plane least square fitting in each voxel adding because the seed plane model is not good enough with noise to be used in all voxel growing,but only in surrounding voxels.This growing process is faster than classical region growing because we do not compute least square for each point added but only for each voxel added.The least square fitting step must be computed very fast.We use the same method as explained in [18]with incre-mental update of the barycenter b and covariance matrix C like equation 2.We know with [21]that the barycen-ter b belongs to the least square plane and that the normal of the least square plane n P is the eigenvector of the smallest eigenvalue of C .b0=03x1C0=03x3.b n+1=1n+1(nb n+p n+1).C n+1=C n+nn+1t(pn+1−b n)(p n+1−b n).(2)where C n is the covariance matrix of a set of n points,b n is the barycenter vector of a set of n points and p n+1is the (n+1)point vector added to the set.This voxel growing method leads to a connected com-ponent set E because the points have been added by con-nected voxels.In our case,the minimum distance between one point and E is less than parameter d of our voxel grid. That is why the parameter d also represents the connectivity of points in detected planes.3.2.6Plane DetectionTo get all planes with an area of at least area min in the point cloud,we repeat these steps(best local seed plane choice and voxel growing)with all points by descending order of their score.Once we have a set E,whose area is bigger than area min,we keep it and classify all points in E.4.Results and Discussion4.1.Benchmark analysisTo test the improvements of our method,we have em-ployed the comparative framework of[12]based on range images.For that,we have converted all images into3D point clouds.All Point Clouds created have260k points. After our segmentation,we project labelled points on a seg-mented image and compare with the ground truth image. We have chosen our three parameters d,area min andγby optimizing the result of the10perceptron training image segmentation(the perceptron is portable scanner that pro-duces a range image of its environment).Bests results have been obtained with area min=200,γ=5and d=8 (units are not provided in the benchmark).We show the re-sults of the30perceptron images segmentation in table1. GT Regions are the mean number of ground truth planes over the30ground truth range images.Correct detection, over-segmentation,under-segmentation,missed and noise are the mean number of correct,over,under,missed and noised planes detected by methods.The tolerance80%is the minimum percentage of points we must have detected comparing to the ground truth to have a correct detection. More details are in[12].UE is a method from[12],UFPR is a method from[10]. It is important to notice that UE and UFPR are range image methods and our method is not well suited for range images but3D Point Cloud.Nevertheless,it is a good benchmark for comparison and we see in table1that the accuracy of our method is very close to the state of the art in range image segmentation.To evaluate the different improvements of our algorithm, we have tested different variants of our method.We have tested our method without normals(only with distance from points to plane),without voxel growing(with a classical region growing by k neighbors),without our FWPF nor-mal estimation(with WPF normal estimation),without our score function(with residual score function).The compari-son is visible on table2.We can see the difference of time computing between region growing and voxel growing.We have tested our algorithm with and without normals and we found that the accuracy cannot be achieved whithout normal computation.There is also a big difference in the correct de-tection between WPF and our FWPF normal estimation as we can see in thefigure4.Our FWPF normal brings a real improvement in border estimation of planes.Black points in thefigure are non classifiedpoints.Figure5.Correct Detection of our segmentation algorithm when the voxel size d changes.We would like to discuss the influence of parameters on our algorithm.We have three parameters:area min,which represents the minimum area of the plane we want to keep,γ,which represents the thickness of the plane(it is gener-aly closely tied to the noise in the point cloud and espe-cially the standard deviationσof the noise)and d,which is the minimum distance from a point to the rest of the plane. These three parameters depend on the point cloud features and the desired segmentation.For example,if we have a lot of noise,we must choose a highγvalue.If we want to detect only large planes,we set a large area min value.We also focus our analysis on the robustess of the voxel size d in our algorithm,i.e.the ratio of points vs voxels.We can see infigure5the variation of the correct detection when we change the value of d.The method seems to be robust when d is between4and10but the quality decreases when d is over10.It is due to the fact that for a large voxel size d,some planes from different objects are merged into one plane.GT Regions Correct Over-Under-Missed Noise Duration(in s)detection segmentation segmentationUE14.610.00.20.3 3.8 2.1-UFPR14.611.00.30.1 3.0 2.5-Our method14.610.90.20.1 3.30.7308Table1.Average results of different segmenters at80%compare tolerance.GT Regions Correct Over-Under-Missed Noise Duration(in s) Our method detection segmentation segmentationwithout normals14.6 5.670.10.19.4 6.570 without voxel growing14.610.70.20.1 3.40.8605 without FWPF14.69.30.20.1 5.0 1.9195 without our score function14.610.30.20.1 3.9 1.2308 with all improvements14.610.90.20.1 3.30.7308 Table2.Average results of variants of our segmenter at80%compare tolerance.4.1.1Large scale dataWe have tested our method on different kinds of data.We have segmented urban data infigure6from our Mobile Mapping System(MMS)described in[11].The mobile sys-tem generates10k pts/s with a density of50pts/m2and very noisy data(σ=0.3m).For this point cloud,we want to de-tect building facades.We have chosen area min=10m2, d=1m to have large connected components andγ=0.3m to cope with the noise.We have tested our method on point cloud from the Trim-ble VX scanner infigure7.It is a point cloud of size40k points with only20pts/m2with less noise because it is a fixed scanner(σ=0.2m).In that case,we also wanted to detect building facades and keep the same parameters ex-ceptγ=0.2m because we had less noise.We see infig-ure7that we have detected two facades.By setting a larger voxel size d value like d=10m,we detect only one plane. We choose d like area min andγaccording to the desired segmentation and to the level of detail we want to extract from the point cloud.We also tested our algorithm on the point cloud from the LEICA Cyrax scanner infigure8.This point cloud has been taken from AIM@SHAPE repository[1].It is a very dense point cloud from multiplefixed position of scanner with about400pts/m2and very little noise(σ=0.02m). In this case,we wanted to detect all the little planes to model the church in planar regions.That is why we have chosen d=0.2m,area min=1m2andγ=0.02m.Infigures6,7and8,we have,on the left,input point cloud and on the right,we only keep points detected in a plane(planes are in random colors).The red points in thesefigures are seed plane points.We can see in thesefig-ures that planes are very well detected even with high noise. Table3show the information on point clouds,results with number of planes detected and duration of the algorithm.The time includes the computation of the FWPF normalsof the point cloud.We can see in table3that our algo-rithm performs linearly in time with respect to the numberof points.The choice of parameters will have little influence on time computing.The computation time is about one mil-lisecond per point whatever the size of the point cloud(we used a PC with QuadCore Q9300and2Go of RAM).The algorithm has been implented using only one thread andin-core processing.Our goal is to compare the improve-ment of plane detection between classical region growing and our region growing with better normals for more ac-curate planes and voxel growing for faster detection.Our method seems to be compatible with out-of-core implemen-tation like described in[24]or in[15].MMS Street VX Street Church Size(points)398k42k7.6MMean Density50pts/m220pts/m2400pts/m2 Number of Planes202142Total Duration452s33s6900sTime/point 1ms 1ms 1msTable3.Results on different data.5.ConclusionIn this article,we have proposed a new method of plane detection that is fast and accurate even in presence of noise. We demonstrate its efficiency with different kinds of data and its speed in large data sets with millions of points.Our voxel growing method has a complexity of O(N)and it is able to detect large and small planes in very large data sets and can extract them directly in connected components.Figure 4.Ground truth,Our Segmentation without and with filterednormals.Figure 6.Planes detection in street point cloud generated by MMS (d =1m,area min =10m 2,γ=0.3m ).References[1]Aim@shape repository /.6[2]Octree class template /code/octree.html.4[3] A.Bab-Hadiashar and N.Gheissari.Range image segmen-tation using surface selection criterion.2006.IEEE Trans-actions on Image Processing.1[4]J.Bauer,K.Karner,K.Schindler,A.Klaus,and C.Zach.Segmentation of building models from dense 3d point-clouds.2003.Workshop of the Austrian Association for Pattern Recognition.1[5]H.Boulaassal,ndes,P.Grussenmeyer,and F.Tarsha-Kurdi.Automatic segmentation of building facades using terrestrial laser data.2007.ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scan-ning.1[6] C.C.Chen and I.Stamos.Range image segmentationfor modeling and object detection in urban scenes.2007.3DIM2007.1[7]T.K.Dey,G.Li,and J.Sun.Normal estimation for pointclouds:A comparison study for a voronoi based method.2005.Eurographics on Symposium on Point-Based Graph-ics.3[8]J.R.Diebel,S.Thrun,and M.Brunig.A bayesian methodfor probable surface reconstruction and decimation.2006.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG).1[9]M.A.Fischler and R.C.Bolles.Random sample consen-sus:A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated munications of the ACM.1,2[10]P.F.U.Gotardo,O.R.P.Bellon,and L.Silva.Range imagesegmentation by surface extraction using an improved robust estimator.2003.Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pat-tern Recognition.1,5[11] F.Goulette,F.Nashashibi,I.Abuhadrous,S.Ammoun,andurgeau.An integrated on-board laser range sensing sys-tem for on-the-way city and road modelling.2007.Interna-tional Archives of the Photogrammetry,Remote Sensing and Spacial Information Sciences.6[12] A.Hoover,G.Jean-Baptiste,and al.An experimental com-parison of range image segmentation algorithms.1996.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.5[13]H.Hoppe,T.DeRose,T.Duchamp,J.McDonald,andW.Stuetzle.Surface reconstruction from unorganized points.1992.International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.2[14]P.Hough.Method and means for recognizing complex pat-terns.1962.In US Patent.1[15]M.Isenburg,P.Lindstrom,S.Gumhold,and J.Snoeyink.Large mesh simplification using processing sequences.2003.。

NVIDIA Direct3D 11 Tessellation技术详细介绍说明书

NVIDIA Direct3D 11 Tessellation技术详细介绍说明书
Approximating Catmull-Clark Subdivision Surface with Bicubic Patches” by Charles Loop and Scott Schaefer, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 27 No. 1 Article 8 March 2008.
Enrich Visual Details Using Direct3D 11 Tessellation
Tianyun Ni, NVIDIA
Direct3D 11 Tessellation: More Detail, Less Storage
Tianyun Ni, NVIDIA
Tessellation on Characters
Approximation rather than interpolation Requires the mesh info of a facet and its1-ring
neighborhood
PAaptpcrhoxCimoantsintgruCcattimonull-Clark SubdSivcishioenmSeusrfaces (ACC)
Vertex Shader Hull Shader
Skinning,…
•Compute Control Points (optional) •Compute LOD
Tessellator
Geometry expansion
Domain Shader Setup/Raster
Pixel Shader
Tessellation Patterns
Pixel Shader
Direct3D11 Tessellation Pipeline

生物物理化学英语词汇

生物物理化学英语词汇

生物物理化学英语词汇生物物理化学英语词汇生物物理化学英语词汇生物物理学biophysics分子生物物理学molecular biophysics生物物理化学biophysical chemistry分子动力学molecular dynamics柔性flexibility指生物大分子,如蛋白多肽链和磷脂脂肪酸链活动程度的大小。

如需转载,请注明来自:fane『翻译中国』序参数order parameter一级结构primary structure二级结构secondary structure三级结构tertiary structure四级结构quaternary structure螺旋结构helical structureα螺旋α-helixβ折叠β-pleated sheet蛋白质二级结构中的一种构象,其多肽链在空间的走向发生180°的转变。

链间氢键interchain hydrogen bond链内氢键intrachain hydrogen bondβ转角β-bend, β-turn蛋白质折叠protein folding解折叠unfolding解旋unwinding内旋转internal rotation三股螺旋triple helix, triplex螺旋度helicity分子肺molecular lung血红蛋白随氧的得失,其四级结构和亚基间距离发生显著变化,这种一张一合的情况与肺的呼吸类似,可理解为分子肺。

双螺旋duplex, double helix碱基堆积base stacking扭结kink水结构water structure结合水bound water生物能学bioenergetics[离子]近层水primary water离子与水作用,使分子沿着离子造成的电场排列,在离子周围形成结合较紧密、有序性较高的水层。

全反构型all transconfiguration扭曲构象guache conformation寻靶作用targetting二色性dichroism荧光团fluorophore荧光标记fluorescence labelling荧光探剂fluorescence probe荧光偏振fluorescence polarization荧光寿命fluorescence lifetime活性氧active oxygen超氧阴离子superoxide anion笼形结构cage structure非极性分子与水分子相互作用,使水的有序性加强;非极性分子在水中形成空穴,这种非极性分子周围的水分子形成笼形样结构。

ros双目相机内参标定原理英语

ros双目相机内参标定原理英语

ros双目相机内参标定原理英语Ros Camera Calibration for Stereo Vision.Stereo vision is a technique that uses two cameras to create a 3D model of a scene. The cameras are placed a certain distance apart, and they capture images of the same scene from slightly different perspectives. The difference in perspective between the two images can be used to calculate the depth of objects in the scene.To use stereo vision, the cameras must first be calibrated. This process involves determining the intrinsic parameters of the cameras, such as the focal length, principal point, and distortion coefficients. The intrinsic parameters can be determined using a variety of methods, including:Checkerboard calibration: This method uses a checkerboard pattern to calibrate the cameras. The checkerboard is placed in front of the cameras, and aseries of images is captured. The images are then processed to extract the checkerboard corners, and the intrinsic parameters are calculated using the known dimensions of the checkerboard.Planar calibration: This method uses a planar surfaceto calibrate the cameras. The planar surface is placed in front of the cameras, and a series of images is captured. The images are then processed to extract the plane equation, and the intrinsic parameters are calculated using the known distance between the cameras and the plane.Once the intrinsic parameters have been determined, the cameras can be calibrated using a variety of methods, including:Stereo calibration: This method uses a set of corresponding points in the two images to calibrate the cameras. The corresponding points are identified manuallyor automatically, and the extrinsic parameters arecalculated using the known distance between the cameras and the corresponding points.Self-calibration: This method uses a set of images of a moving object to calibrate the cameras. The moving object is tracked in the images, and the extrinsic parameters are calculated using the known motion of the object.Once the cameras have been calibrated, they can be used to create a 3D model of a scene. The 3D model can be used for a variety of applications, such as:Object detection: The 3D model can be used to detect objects in a scene. The objects can be identified by their shape, size, and position.Object tracking: The 3D model can be used to track objects in a scene. The objects can be tracked by their position and velocity.Scene reconstruction: The 3D model can be used to reconstruct a scene. The scene can be reconstructed by combining the 3D models of the objects in the scene.Stereo vision is a powerful technique that can be used to create 3D models of scenes. The 3D models can be used for a variety of applications, such as object detection, object tracking, and scene reconstruction.。

基于深度学习的智能车辆视觉里程计技术发展综述

基于深度学习的智能车辆视觉里程计技术发展综述

2021年第1期【摘要】针对基于模型的视觉里程计在光照条件恶劣的情况下存在鲁棒性差、回环检测准确率低、动态场景中精度不够、无法对场景进行语义理解等问题,利用深度学习可以弥补其不足。

首先,简略介绍了基于模型的里程计的研究现状,然后对比了常用的智能车数据集,将基于深度学习的视觉里程计分为有监督学习、无监督学习和模型法与深度学习结合3种,从网络结构、输入和输出特征、鲁棒性等方面进行分析,最后,讨论了基于深度学习的智能车辆视觉里程计研究热点,从视觉里程计在动态场景的鲁棒性优化、多传感器融合、场景语义分割3个方面对智能车辆视觉里程计技术的发展趋势进行了展望。

主题词:视觉里程计深度学习智能车辆位置信息中图分类号:U461.99文献标识码:ADOI:10.19620/ki.1000-3703.20200736Review on the Development of Deep Learning-Based Vision OdometerTechnologies for Intelligent VehiclesChen Tao,Fan Linkun,Li Xuchuan,Guo Congshuai(Chang ’an University,Xi ’an 710064)【Abstract 】Visual odometer can,achieve with deep learning,better performance on robustness and accuracy through solving the problems such as the weak robustness under poor illumination,low detection accuracy in close loop and insufficient accuracy in dynamic scenarios,disability in understanding the scenario semantically.Firstly,this paper briefly introduces the research status of the model-based odometer,then compares the commonly-used intelligent vehicle datasets,and then divides the learning-based visual odometer into supervised learning,unsupervised learning and hybrid model which combines model-based with deep learning-based model.Furthermore,it analyzes the learning-based visual odometer from the aspects of network structure,input and output characteristics,robustness and so on.Finally,the research hotspots of learning-based visual odometer for intelligent vehicle are discussed.The development trend of learning-based visual odometer for intelligent vehicle is discussed from 3aspects which respectively are robustness in dynamic scenarios,multi-sensor fusion,and scenario semantic segmentation.Key words:Visual odometer,Deep learning,Intelligent vehicle,Location information陈涛范林坤李旭川郭丛帅(长安大学,西安710064)*基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0807500);国家自然科学基金面上项目(51978075)。

Matlab的第三方工具箱大全

Matlab的第三方工具箱大全

Matlab的第三方工具箱大全(按住CTRL点击连接就可以到达每个工具箱的主页面来下载了)Matlab Toolboxes∙ADCPtools - acoustic doppler current profiler data processing∙AFDesign - designing analog and digital filters∙AIRES - automatic integration of reusable embedded software∙Air-Sea - air-sea flux estimates in oceanography∙Animation - developing scientific animations∙ARfit - estimation of parameters and eigenmodes of multivariate autoregressive methods∙ARMASA - power spectrum estimation∙AR-Toolkit - computer vision tracking∙Auditory - auditory models∙b4m - interval arithmetic∙Bayes Net - inference and learning for directed graphical models∙Binaural Modeling - calculating binaural cross-correlograms of sound∙Bode Step - design of control systems with maximized feedback∙Bootstrap - for resampling, hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation ∙BrainStorm - MEG and EEG data visualization and processing∙BSTEX - equation viewer∙CALFEM - interactive program for teaching the finite element method∙Calibr - for calibrating CCD cameras∙Camera Calibration∙Captain - non-stationary time series analysis and forecasting∙CHMMBOX - for coupled hidden Markov modeling using max imum likelihood EM ∙Classification - supervised and unsupervised classification algorithms∙CLOSID∙Cluster - for analysis of Gaussian mixture models for data set clustering∙Clustering - cluster analysis∙ClusterPack - cluster analysis∙COLEA - speech analysis∙CompEcon - solving problems in economics and finance∙Complex - for estimating temporal and spatial signal complexities∙Computational Statistics∙Coral - seismic waveform analysis∙DACE - kriging approximations to computer models∙DAIHM - data assimilation in hydrological and hydrodynamic models∙Data Visualization∙DBT - radar array processing∙DDE-BIFTOOL - bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations∙Denoise - for removing noise from signals∙DiffMan - solv ing differential equations on manifolds∙Dimensional Analysis -∙DIPimage - scientific image processing∙Direct - Laplace transform inversion via the direct integration method∙DirectSD - analysis and design of computer controlled systems with process-oriented models∙DMsuite - differentiation matrix suite∙DMTTEQ - design and test time domain equalizer design methods∙DrawFilt - drawing digital and analog filters∙DSFWAV - spline interpolation with Dean wave solutions∙DWT - discrete wavelet transforms∙EasyKrig∙Econometrics∙EEGLAB∙EigTool - graphical tool for nonsymmetric eigenproblems∙EMSC - separating light scattering and absorbance by extended multiplicative signal correction∙Engineering Vibration∙FastICA - fixed-point algorithm for ICA and projection pursuit∙FDC - flight dynamics and control∙FDtools - fractional delay filter design∙FlexICA - for independent components analysis∙FMBPC - fuzzy model-based predictive control∙ForWaRD - Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution∙FracLab - fractal analysis for signal processing∙FSBOX - stepwise forward and backward selection of features using linear regression∙GABLE - geometric algebra tutorial∙GAOT - genetic algorithm optimization∙Garch - estimating and diagnosing heteroskedasticity in time series models∙GCE Data - managing, analyzing and displaying data and metadata stored using the GCE data structure specification∙GCSV - growing cell structure visualization∙GEMANOVA - fitting multilinear ANOVA models∙Genetic Algorithm∙Geodetic - geodetic calculations∙GHSOM - growing hierarchical self-organizing map∙glmlab - general linear models∙GPIB - wrapper for GPIB library from National Instrument∙GTM - generative topographic mapping, a model for density modeling and data visualization∙GVF - gradient vector flow for finding 3-D object boundaries∙HFRadarmap - converts HF radar data from radial current vectors to total vectors ∙HFRC - importing, processing and manipulating HF radar data∙Hilbert - Hilbert transform by the rational eigenfunction expansion method∙HMM - hidden Markov models∙HMMBOX - for hidden Markov modeling using maximum likelihood EM∙HUTear - auditory modeling∙ICALAB - signal and image processing using ICA and higher order statistics∙Imputation - analysis of incomplete datasets∙IPEM - perception based musical analysisJMatLink - Matlab Java classesKalman - Bayesian Kalman filterKalman Filter - filtering, smoothing and parameter estimation (using EM) for linear dynamical systemsKALMTOOL - state estimation of nonlinear systemsKautz - Kautz filter designKrigingLDestimate - estimation of scaling exponentsLDPC - low density parity check codesLISQ - wavelet lifting scheme on quincunx gridsLKER - Laguerre kernel estimation toolLMAM-OLMAM - Levenberg Marquardt with Adaptive Momentum algorithm for training feedforward neural networksLow-Field NMR - for exponential fitting, phase correction of quadrature data and slicing LPSVM - Newton method for LP support vector machine for machine learning problems LSDPTOOL - robust control system design using the loop shaping design procedure LS-SVMlabLSVM - Lagrangian support vector machine for machine learning problemsLyngby - functional neuroimagingMARBOX - for multivariate autogressive modeling and cross-spectral estimation MatArray - analysis of microarray dataMatrix Computation- constructing test matrices, computing matrix factorizations, visualizing matrices, and direct search optimizationMCAT - Monte Carlo analysisMDP - Markov decision processesMESHPART - graph and mesh partioning methodsMILES - maximum likelihood fitting using ordinary least squares algorithmsMIMO - multidimensional code synthesisMissing - functions for handling missing data valuesM_Map - geographic mapping toolsMODCONS - multi-objective control system designMOEA - multi-objective evolutionary algorithmsMS - estimation of multiscaling exponentsMultiblock - analysis and regression on several data blocks simultaneously Multiscale Shape AnalysisMusic Analysis - feature extraction from raw audio signals for content-based music retrievalMWM - multifractal wavelet modelNetCDFNetlab - neural network algorithmsNiDAQ - data acquisition using the NiDAQ libraryNEDM - nonlinear economic dynamic modelsNMM - numerical methods in Matlab textNNCTRL - design and simulation of control systems based on neural networks NNSYSID - neural net based identification of nonlinear dynamic systemsNSVM - newton support vector machine for solv ing machine learning problems NURBS - non-uniform rational B-splinesN-way - analysis of multiway data with multilinear modelsOpenFEM - finite element developmentPCNN - pulse coupled neural networksPeruna - signal processing and analysisPhiVis- probabilistic hierarchical interactive visualization, i.e. functions for visual analysis of multivariate continuous dataPlanar Manipulator - simulation of n-DOF planar manipulatorsPRT ools - pattern recognitionpsignifit - testing hyptheses about psychometric functionsPSVM - proximal support vector machine for solving machine learning problems Psychophysics - vision researchPyrTools - multi-scale image processingRBF - radial basis function neural networksRBN - simulation of synchronous and asynchronous random boolean networks ReBEL - sigma-point Kalman filtersRegression - basic multivariate data analysis and regressionRegularization ToolsRegularization Tools XPRestore ToolsRobot - robotics functions, e.g. kinematics, dynamics and trajectory generation Robust Calibration - robust calibration in statsRRMT - rainfall-runoff modellingSAM - structure and motionSchwarz-Christoffel - computation of conformal maps to polygonally bounded regions SDH - smoothed data histogramSeaGrid - orthogonal grid makerSEA-MAT - oceanographic analysisSLS - sparse least squaresSolvOpt - solver for local optimization problemsSOM - self-organizing mapSOSTOOLS - solving sums of squares (SOS) optimization problemsSpatial and Geometric AnalysisSpatial RegressionSpatial StatisticsSpectral MethodsSPM - statistical parametric mappingSSVM - smooth support vector machine for solving machine learning problems STATBAG - for linear regression, feature selection, generation of data, and significance testingStatBox - statistical routinesStatistical Pattern Recognition - pattern recognition methodsStixbox - statisticsSVM - implements support vector machinesSVM ClassifierSymbolic Robot DynamicsTEMPLAR - wavelet-based template learning and pattern classificationTextClust - model-based document clusteringTextureSynth - analyzing and synthesizing visual texturesTfMin - continous 3-D minimum time orbit transfer around EarthTime-Frequency - analyzing non-stationary signals using time-frequency distributions Tree-Ring - tasks in tree-ring analysisTSA - uni- and multivariate, stationary and non-stationary time series analysisTSTOOL - nonlinear time series analysisT_Tide - harmonic analysis of tidesUTVtools - computing and modifying rank-revealing URV and UTV decompositions Uvi_Wave - wavelet analysisvarimax - orthogonal rotation of EOFsVBHMM - variation Bayesian hidden Markov modelsVBMFA - variational Bayesian mixtures of factor analyzersVMT- VRML Molecule Toolbox, for animating results from molecular dynamics experimentsVOICEBOXVRMLplot - generates interactive VRML 2.0 graphs and animationsVSVtools - computing and modifying symmetric rank-revealing decompositions WAFO - wave analysis for fatique and oceanographyWarpTB - frequency-warped signal processingWAVEKIT - wavelet analysisWaveLab - wavelet analysisWeeks - Laplace transform inversion via the Weeks methodWetCDF - NetCDF interfaceWHMT - wavelet-domain hidden Markov tree modelsWInHD - Wavelet-based inverse halftoning via deconvolutionWSCT - weighted sequences clustering toolkitXMLTree - XML parserYAADA - analyze single particle mass spectrum dataZMAP - quantitative seismicity analysis。

从卫星 SA R 海洋图像中检测 船目标及其航迹

从卫星 SA R 海洋图像中检测 船目标及其航迹

第21卷 第4期宇 航 学 报Vol121No14 2000年10月JOURNAL OF ASTR ONAUTICS Oct12000从卫星SAR海洋图像中检测船目标及其航迹周红建(北京9236信箱・北京・100076)张 翠 王正志 周宗潭(国防科技大学自动控制系302教研室遥感组・长沙・410073) 摘 要 从卫星SAR海洋图像中检测船目标及其航迹是一项很有意义的工作。

由于船目标有强的角反射,它的雷达回波信号比较强,在SAR图像中的灰度值比较高。

先检测船目标,再在船的周围寻找航迹的检测方案比较合理。

文中先介绍了船目标的检测问题。

提出应用非线性拉伸的方法增强船目标,运用形态学滤波的方法消除斑点,通过取阈值方法检测出船目标后,统计船目标的长度以及中心位置等重要信息。

检测出船目标后,使用曲线扫描的方法来进一步检测航迹特征。

文中详细讨论了曲线扫描的扫描中心的确定、扫描半径和扫描步长选取等问题,并运用多项式拟合的方法对扫描曲线进行分析,给出了航迹特征存在的准则。

最后,应用实际的SAR图像对算法进行了测试,结果表明,方案合理。

主题词 合成孔径雷达 卫星图像 船目标 航迹 检测DETECTION OF SHIP AN D SHIP WAKEFROM SATE LL ITE SAR IMAGER YZhou Hongjian(No.8Research Institute,PLAAF・Beijing・100076)Zhang Cui Wang Zhengzhi Zhou Z ongtan(Department of Automatic Control,NUDT・Changsha・410073) Abstract Detecting ship and ship wake from satellite SAR imagery is significant.Because of strong corner reflection,returned signals from ship are strong and ship in SAR imagery is very bright feature.It would be reasonable to detect ship first rather than ship wake.In the paper we introduce the problem of ship detection.We declare that it is effective to apply non2linear stretch to enhance ship objects and to apply intensity morphological operators to eliminate speckles.Thus ships can be i2收稿日期:1999年6月15日,修回日期:2000年3月3日dentified with few false alarms using simple threshold technique.After that we apapaly curve scan tosearch ship wake around the ship.We discuss some problems such as determining the center of curvescan,determining the radius of curve scan,determining the step of curve scan and so on.Then weanalyze the curve scan data using chebyshev polynomial approximation.The criterion that we use todetermine ship wake from curve scan is given in the paper.Finally,we use some satellite SAR im2ageries to test our scheme.The result shows that te scheme is good.K ey w ords Synthetic apprture radar Satellite imagery Ship Ship wake detection从美国的Seasat2A得到的很多合成孔径雷达(Synthetic Aperture Radar,简称SAR)海洋图像中,可以看到海上航行的船目标和航迹特征。

mocha中文教程

mocha中文教程
的设置取决于在剪辑运动。
在跟踪标签,你会发现标运动一节。在那里,您可以选择
你想摩卡参数后效果追踪。在这个例子中,保持
默认设置的议案平移,旋转和剪切+量表
Dealing with Obstructions or Reflective Surfaces
In some cases there are parts of an image that can alter the effectiveness of the
在通用X样条的工作,更好地跟踪,尤其是运动的角度来看,
尽管如此,贝塞尔样的灵活,是业界样条标准。
1-point style tracking in mocha for After Effects
Most tracking applications use points or regions for tracking. mocha for After
technology. This rock-solid tracker can function as a simple point tracker, which
follows only the position of an object. It can function as a 2-point tracker, which
此外,摩卡后效果将默认到一个目录来输出工作
所谓的“结果”将在您的剪辑导入同一文件夹中创建。这是
的相对路径选择行为。如果您选择的绝对路径,你可以
指定完整的路径名,你想摩卡后效果'输出
去一方直接键入路径名称,或选择浅灰色打开图标。
摩卡后效果将同时存储和缓存文件的项目在这里
项目设置和输出点

Gamma5

Gamma5

1 Introduction
The measurement of the inclusive neutral current deep inelastic scattering (DIS) cross section (ep ! eX ) has been one of the prime tasks at HERA. Its precise determination is required in the accessible kinematic range for the understanding of proton substructure and precision tests of QCD. A new, preliminary, result is presented here based on data taken with the H1 detector in 1997 comprising two samples: For momentum transfers squared Q2 > 10 GeV2 the full data taken in the year 1997 has been analyzed using a luminosity of 15 pb?1 . The acceptance of the backward apparatus with the calorimeter SPACAL and the planar drift chamber BDC extends to Q2 120 GeV2 . Very large values of the inelasticity variable y = Q2 =sx are reached in the acceptance region of the central jet drift chamber (CJC) which permits subtraction of the photoproduction background using the measured charge of the scattered positron candidate. Here x is the Bjorken scale variable and s is the centre of mass energy s = 4EeEp determined by the positron and proton beam energies Ee and Ep. For 2 Q2 < 10 GeV2 a data sample with a luminosity of 2 pb?1 was collected in a dedicated run using minimum bias triggers at the end of the 1997 running period. The measurement accuracy was improved and its range extended towards low values of y in the acceptance region of the backward silicon tracker (BST) which has been used for the rst time in the inclusive cross section measurement for track and vertex reconstruction and for photoproduction background rejection. This paper describes the analysis of the new data which leads to a number of results presented here: The deep inelastic scattering cross section is measured with a statistical precision of about 1%. The systematic uncertainty has reached a new level of accuracy with values between about 3% and 4% in the bulk region of this data which are compared with the previous H1 measurements 1{4]. The improved accuracy permits a new analysis of the proton structure function F2 (x; Q2 ) and of the DIS cross section using NLO QCD and including data of the muon-nucleon xed target experiments and also the preliminary high Q2 200 GeV2 cross section data recently released by H1 5]. The data has been used to measure at xed Q2 the derivative of the reduced cross section r , @ =@ log y, which is determined accurately due to the large data statistics and cancellation of systematic e ects. Using this cross section derivative data a novel method is introduced to access at large y the longitudinal structure function FL (x; Q2 ) extending its determination to the region of low Q2 . The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the cross section measurement, i.e. the DIS kinematics, the H1 detector, the event selection and simulation, and the resulting cross section data. In Section 3 the QCD analysis is presented. Section 4 discusses the high y cross section measurement and the results on the extraction of the longitudinal structure function. A short summary is given in Section 5. 1

Matlab的第三方工具箱全套整合(强烈推荐)

Matlab的第三方工具箱全套整合(强烈推荐)
CompEcon- solving problems in economics and finance
Complex- for estimating temporal and spatial signal complexities
Computational Statistics
Coral- seismic waveform analysis
2007-8-2915:04
#1
littleboy
助理工程师
精华0
积分49
帖子76
水位164
技术分0
JMatLink- Matlab Java classes
Kalman- Bayesian Kalman filter
Kalman Filter- filtering, smoothing and parameter estimation (using EM) for linear dynamical systems
DMsuite- differentiation matrix suite
DMTTEQ- design and test time domain equalizer design methods
DrawFilt- drawing digitaland analog filters
DSFWAV- spline interpolation with Dean wave solutions
FSBOX- stepwise forward and backward selection of features using linear regression
GABLE- geometric algebra tutorial
GAOT- genetic algorithm optimization

catia_ClassA

catia_ClassA

DASSAULT SYSTEMES – May 2003
Page 12
© 1997 – 2001 DASSAULT SYSTEMES
R11 Content (3)
Scene
Direct access to tree, especially external analyses Show/Hide commands Improved update mechanism (update sequence, last reactor) Error Management (automatic pop up, complete scene information)
© 1997 – 2001 DASSAULT SYSTEMES
Functionality
G3 Matching Fillet-Flange Section Modeling
DASSAULT SYSTEMES – May 2003
Page 7
Global Process for Aesthetic Shapes:
Objective: to give an exhaustive view of
Internal Sensitive Public
CATIA V5 products Used by: IBM/BPs/DS
Audience: Application engineers
Version 5 Release 11
DASSAULT SYSTEMES – May 2003
Page 11
© 1997 – 2001 DASSAULT SYSTEMES
R11 Content (2)
Approximation
Command-specific tabs (and parameters) Usage in all relevant commands, e.g. Offset Curves, Curve On Analysis, …

面积矢量——精选推荐

面积矢量——精选推荐

⾯积⽮量Vector areaFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, searchIn geometry, for a finite planar surface of scalar area S, the vector areais defined as a vector whose magnitude is S and whose direction is perpendicular to the plane, as determined by the right hand rule on the rim (moving one's right hand counterclockwise around the rim, when the palm of the hand is "touching" the surface, and the straight thumb indicates the direction).For an orientable surface S composed of a set S i of flat facet areas, the vector area of the surface is given bywhere is the unit normal vector to the area S i.For bounded, oriented curved surfaces that are sufficiently well-behaved, we can still define vector area. First, we split the surface into infinitesimal elements, each of which is effectively flat. For each infinitesimal element of area, we have an area vector, also infinitesimal.where is the local unit vector perpendicular to dS. Integrating gives the vector area for the surface.For a curved or faceted surface, the vector area is smaller in magnitude than the area. As an extreme example, a closed surface can possess arbitrarily large area, but its vector area is necessarily zero.[1] Surfaces that share a boundary may have very different areas, but they must have the same vector area---the vector area is entirely determined by the boundary. These are consequences of Stokes theorem.The concept of an area vector simplifies the equation for determining the flux through the surface. Consider a planar surface in a uniform field. The flux can be written as the dot product of the field and area vector. This is much simpler than multiplying the field strength by the surface area and the cosine of the angle between the field and the surface normal.Vector AreaFigure 4: A vector area.Suppose that we have a plane surface of scalar area . We can define a vector area whose magnitude is , and whose direction is perpendicular to the plane, in the sense determined by a right-hand grip rule on the rim--see Fig. 4. This quantity clearly possesses both magnitude and direction. But is it a true vector? Well, we know that if the normal to the surface makes an angle with the -axis then the area seen looking along the -direction is . Let this be the -component of . Similarly, if the normal makes an angle with the -axis then the area seen looking along the -direction is . Let this be the -component of . If we limit ourselves to a surface whose normal is perpendicular to the -direction then . It follows that . If we rotate the basis about the -axis by degrees, which is equivalent to rotating the normal to the surface about the -axis by degrees, then(13)which is the correct transformation rule for the -component of a vector. The other components transform correctly as well. This proves that a vector area is a true vector.According to the vector addition theorem, the projected area of two plane surfaces, joined together at a line, looking along the -direction (say) is the -component of the resultant of the vector areas of the two surfaces. Likewise, for many joined-up plane areas, the projected area in the -direction, which is the same as the projected area of the rim in the -direction, is the -component of the resultant of all the vector areas: i.e.,(14)If we approach a limit, by letting the number of plane facets increase, and their areas reduce, then we obtain a continuous surface denoted by the resultant vector area(15)It is clear that the projected area of the rim in the -direction is just . Note that the vector area of a given surface is completely determined by its rim. So, two different surfaces sharing the same rim both possess the same vector area.In conclusion, a loop (not all in one plane) has a vector area which is the resultant of the vector areas of any surface ending on the loop. The components of are the projected areas of the loop in the directions of the basis vectors. As a corollary, a closed surface has , since it does not possess a rim.⾯积⽮量S=|S|*n,n是垂直于平⾯的单位⽮量|S|是⾯积⽮量的模,也就是我们通常理解的⾯积是这么理解的,因为⽮量X积是⽮量,⼤⼩恰好等于ABSINA^B(平⾏四边形⾯积公式),所以为了描述上的⽅便就把⽮量X积说成了⽮量⾯积,这其实不是数学上的⼏何⾯积⽽是具有物理意义的⾯积了。

AFM JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE 197, 348–352 (1998)

AFM  JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE 197, 348–352 (1998)

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE197,348–352(1998)ARTICLE NO.CS975247Direct Measurement of Interactions between Adsorbed Protein LayersUsing an Atomic Force MicroscopeW.Richard Bowen,1Nidal Hilal,Robert W.Lovitt,and Chris J.Wright Biochemical Engineering Group,Centre for Complex Fluids Processing,Department of Chemical and Biological Processing Engineering,University of Wales Swansea,Swansea,SA28PP,United KingdomReceived July22,1997;accepted October17,1997Thefirst direct measurements of protein–protein interac-An atomic force microscope(AFM)in conjunction with the tions were made using the surface forces apparatus(SFA) colloid probe technique has been used to measure directly the(5–7),using protein-coated mica surfaces.The force curves interaction of adsorbed layers of the protein bovine serum albumin measured were interpreted in terms of DLVO theory but (BSA).The BSA was adsorbed on both a silica colloid probe andwere not directly related to the known surface properties of a silica surface.Measurements of force–distance curves were madethe proteins.A possible alternative approach is to use an at various salt concentrations and pHs.The measured force–dis-atomic force microscope(AFM)(8).This technique has tance curves were in good quantitative agreement with predictionsbeen used to measure the interactions between materials in based on the DLVO theory using zeta potentials(outer Helmholtzair and in solution(9–16).The geometry of AFM cantilever plane potentials)calculated for BSA from an independently vali-dated site-binding–site-dissociation surface model.The paper tips is not simple,and in some cases is not precisely known, hence provides a direct confirmation that the AFM colloid probe making comparison with theory difficult.However,attaching technique can provide a useful means of directly quantifying the a sphere to the cantilever instead of a tip makes it possible interaction of biological macromolecules.᭧1998Academic Press to measure interactions between surfaces of known geometry Key Words:atomic force microscope;colloid probe;BSA;DLVO.and hence facilitates theoretical interpretation of the results(9).Such attached spheres are termed colloid probes.The AFM technique has a number of advantages over the1.INTRODUCTIONSFA approach.Firstly,the use of colloid probes and planar Proteins are the most abundant organic molecules found insurfaces allows measurements to be made with many types living systems(1).Proteins may act as enzymes,antibodies,of materials.Secondly,the small area of contact betwen antibiotics,peptide hormones,transport molecules,andprobe and planar surface minimizes problems with contami-structural components.As a consequence,proteins occupy nation.Thirdly,the AFM allows quantification of the mor-phology of the surfaces under study using the same instru-a dominant position within biotechnology.The methods ofproduction,purification,storage,and application of proteins ment.However,the AFM technique has not been previously are diverse due to the wide structural variety of the mole-used to directly measure protein–protein interactions.The cules.However,protein–protein and protein–surface inter-purpose of the present paper is to report such a study for actions are important for all of these processes(2).Hence,the protein BSA.The protein has been adsorbed onto both a fundamental understanding of such interactions is im-a silica colloid probe and a planar silica surface.Further, portant in the understanding and optimization of protein pro-the force–distance curves measured have been quantitatively duction in biotechnology.For example,protein precipitation,analysed using the DLVO theory including an independentlyverified site-dissociation–site-binding model of the BSA which is a widely used purification method requires exactcontrol of protein–protein interactions as a function of pH surface.and ionic strength(3).Again,theoretical descriptions ofprotein–protein interactions can be exploited in terms of 2.MATERIALS AND METHODSprocess prediction,control and optimization in the case ofmembrane ultrafiltration(4),which is a widely used method The AFM used was an Autoprobe CP-100(Park Scientific of protein concentration.Clearly,the description of pro-Instruments).In order to study the surface morphology of cesses such as these would benefit from direct measurement the clean and protein-coated planar silica surfaces,they were of the protein–protein interactions on which they are based.imaged in double-layer mode in0.01M NaCl solution atpH8.0with a scan rate of0.5Hz and2561256pixel 1To whom correspondence should be addressed.resolution.The cantilevers used for imaging were Ultralevers3480021-9797/98$25.00Copyright᭧1998by Academic PressAll rights of reproduction in any form reserved.349AFM MEASUREMENT OF PROTEIN LAYER INTERACTIONSFIG.1.SEM image of a silica colloid probe.(Park Scientific Instruments)of high aspect ratio with a force.A number of different methods for the determination specified spring constant of0.4N/m.For quantitative analy-of spring constant have been reported(17).In the present sis of the images the AFM imaging program was used.work,the spring constant specified by the manufacturer was Colloid probes were made by attaching a silica sphereused,0.4N/m.This was in good agreement with that calcu-(Ç5m m,Polysciences Inc.)with Loctite Glass Bond(Loc-lated from the dimensions of the cantilever(18).The zero tite Ltd)to a standard V-shaped AFM tipless cantilever.of force was chosen where the deflection was independent During the attachment procedure,the tipless Ultralever was of the piezo position(where the colloid probe and the planar mounted into the head of the AFM.The sphere and a thinsurface were far apart).Forces reported are normalized by layer of the glue were placed next to each other on a glass the radius of the sphere attached to the cantilever.It is also surface.The manual stage translator and the stepper motornecessary to define the zero of distance,at which the colloid of the microscope were used in manipulation tofirst coat probe and the planar surface come into contact.For this,the the end of the cantilever with glue and then pick up a singledeflection of the cantilever from its position at large dis-sphere.Great care was taken not to coat the lower surface tances was subtracted from piezo movement values,point of the sphere with the glue.Figure1shows a scanningby point.The plot of this difference(x-axis)against force electron microscope image of a colloid probe made in this(y-axis)becomes vertical at the point of contact.This de-way.Spheres of this type have been shown to have a maxi-fines the beginning of the region of constant compliance mum peak-to-valley roughness of3nm over an area of where the output of the photodiode becomes a linear function 0.45m m2(9).The planar silica surfaces had been preparedof the sample displacement.We have found that this method by oxidation of polished silicon wafers to give a500nm identifies the onset of this region more effectively than the thick oxide coating on both sides(Virginia Semiconductormethod normally used(9).Force distance curves are re-Inc.,USA).ported for thefirst approach of the colloid probe to the planar The Autoprobe allows measurement of the force betweensurface.the colloid probe and a sample as a function of the displace-Protein-coated surfaces were prepared by adsorbing bo-ment of the sample,where the sample displacement is variedvine serum albumin(BSA,Sigma Chemical Company,prod-using a piezoelectric crystal.A laser beam reflected from uct no.A-3912,lyophilized powder,fraction V,96–99% the back of the cantilever falls onto a split photodiode whichalbumin)onto the silica surfaces.The planar silica surface detects small changes in the deflection of the cantilever.To was immersed in a solution of1g/L BSA in0.01M NaClsolution at pH5.0for3h at25ЊC.In the case of the silica convert the deflection to a force it is necessary to know thespring constant of the cantilever and to define the zero of sphere,the colloid probe was lowered toward the protein350BOWEN ET AL.solution until the sphere made contact with the solution sur-face.The probe was then withdrawn slightly while surface tension maintained the sphere in contact with the solution.This prevented contact of the solution with the gold-coated back of the cantilever.The conditions were otherwise as for the planar surface.The planar surface and probe were rinsed before use to remove loosely bound protein.Such a proce-dure is known to result in a single layer of strongly bound protein at oxide surfaces (19).3.THEORETICAL BACKGROUNDFor the interaction between a sphere of the size used in the present work and a planar surface,the force measured (F )may be related to the free energy of interaction between parallel plates using DLVO theory and the Derjaguin approx-imation (20),FIG.2.Normalized force vs separation distance for (l )silica–silica and (᭿)BSA–BSA;0.01M NaCl,pH 8.0.F /R Å2p (V R /V A )[1]be calculated from refractive index versus wavelength data where R is the radius of the sphere,V R is the electrical using a Cauchy plot and a computationally efficient means double-layer interaction energy per unit area between flat of approximating the screened,retarded Lifshitz–Hamaker plates,and V A is the London–van der Waals interaction en-constant (4,24).To simplify the present calculations,the ergy per unit area between flat plates.limiting case of an unscreened,unretarded Hamaker constant V R may be calculated numerically from a solution of the was used,A 131Å0.753110020J.Due to the low value nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation (21,22).The calcu-of the Hamaker constant,no minimum is apparent in the lation requires a knowledge of the electrical properties of theoretical curves presented.the interacting surfaces and the choice of an appropriate boundary condition.We have previously shown that the zeta 4.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONpotential (outer Helmholtz plane potential)of BSA may be 4.1.Adsorption of BSAcalculated using a site-dissociation–site-binding approach from a knowledge of the amino acid sequence of the protein Using the AFM it is possible to image directly the planar and a two-site chloride binding model,giving excellent silica surface before and after protein adsorption.The clean agreement with experimental data over a range of pH and silica surface was very smooth.Numerical analysis showed ionic strength.In such calculations the outer Helmholtz plane that it had an rms-roughness of only 0.27nm with a maxi-is defined as occurring at a single hydrated counterion radius mum peak-to-valley distance of 4.2nm,over an area of 0.5from the protein surface (23).We have also shown that m m 10.5m m.After adsorption the surface was essentially BSA–BSA interactions may be well-described using a con-completely covered by protein.The rms-roughness of the stant zeta potential boundary condition in the solution of the protein coated surface was 1.4nm with a maximum peak-Poisson–Boltzmann equation (4,23).Such calculated zeta to-valley distance of 13.2nm.In this context it is worth potentials and such a boundary condition will hence be used noting that BSA is ellipsiodal with dimensions 11.612.7in the interpretation of experimental force–distance curves 12.7nm (25).The rms-roughness therefore indicates that in the present work.There are no adjustable parameters in a relatively uniform coating of the surface by the protein the e of calculated zeta-potentials avoids the has been achieved.The maximum peak-to-valley distance difficult experimental task of exactly matching pH and ionic may indicate some multilayer adsorption or else some ten-strength (especially at lower ionic strengths)for both AFM dency for the protein to adsorb in different orientations.and electrophoretic mobility measurements.In order to confirm the effect of protein adsorption on the V A may be calculated from the expression,force of interaction between colloid probe and planar sur-face,systematic measurements with the clean colloid probe and the clean planar silica surface were made under the same V A Å0A 13112p D 2[2]conditions as used for BSA–BSA interaction studies.Such results are not presented in detail here as similar experiments have been described and interpreted in detail previously (9,where A 131is the appropriate Hamaker constant and D is the separation distance.The Hamaker constant for proteins may16).However,Fig.2shows a comparison of F /R vs D data351AFM MEASUREMENT OF PROTEIN LAYER INTERACTIONSfor silica–silica interactions and BSA–BSA interactions un-der identical solution conditions of0.01M NaCl solution atpH8.0.It may be seen that the magnitude of F/R is substan-tially greater in the case of the silica–silica interaction dueto the substantially higher surface potential of the silica un-der the experimental conditions.4.2.Force–Distance Measurements for BSA–BSAFigure3shows F/R vs D plots for a BSA-coated colloidprobe and a BSA-coated planar surface at pH8.0and NaClconcentrations of0.1,0.01,0.001,and0.0002M.The resultsshowed good reproducibility within the limits of the defini-tion of the zero distance(see later).It may be seen that therange and magnitude of the interactions decrease as the ionicstrength increases.Also shown in thefigure are theoreticallines calculated using DLVO theory and the site-dissocia-tion–site-binding model for calculation of zeta potential as FIG.4.Normalized force vs separation distance for BSA–BSA interac-decribed in Section3.The values of zeta potential used intions at two pH values,0.01M NaCl:(᭿)pH8.0;(l)pH6.0.The linesare theoretical predictions.the calculations were028.6mV(0.1M),040.8mV(0.01M),054.9mV(0.001M),and067.9mV(0.0002M).Itmay be seen that overall there is good agreement with theat pH5.0,which is close to the isoelectric point of the experimental and predicted values,especially at the higherprotein.However,under these conditions it was difficult to salt concentrations.The main deviation occurs in0.0002Mmeasure the long-range interaction reproducibly.solution where the experimental values of force are greaterIn a previous study using the SFA,the interactions be-than the predictions.tween adsorbed BSA layers were measured in0.0002M Figure4shows F/R vs D plots for a BSA-coated colloidNaCl at pH5.5and0.0004M NaCl at pH3.5(5).In order probe and a BSA-coated planar surface in0.01M NaClto interpret the F/R vs D curves a surface potential of the solution and at pH values of8.0and6.0.Predictions basedBSA ofÇ0130mV had to be used.This is unrealistically on the method of Section3are also shown using calculatedhigh,and the reasons for the high values of F/R requiring zeta potential values of040.8mV(pH8.0)and09.9mVthe assumption of such a high potential in that work are not (pH6.0),respectively.There is good agreement betweenclear.The good agreement between predictions and experi-the experiments and predictions regarding the variation ofment in the present work shows,in contrast,that the AFM F/R with pH.An attempt was made to measure F/R vs Dtechnique is really measuring the BSA–BSA interactions ina way which correlates well with independent characteriza-tion of the BSA surface properties.However,Ref.(5)also showed an advantage of the SFAapproach,which is that it allows a direct measurement ofthe distance of closest approach between adsorbed layers.In that case this suggested that BSA adsorbed end-on at pH5.5.With the AFM technique there is a possible uncertaintyof a few nanometers in the definition of the zero-distance,especially for soft surfaces such as adsorbed BSA layers.The good match between prediction and experiment suggeststhat this is not significant at the higher ionic strengths andhigh pH.However,it may provide an explanation of thedeviation between prediction and experiment at the lowestionic strength,perhaps as the strong repulsive interactionsbetween BSA molecules may lead to more open packing ofmolecules on the surfaces under these conditions.Conforma-tional changes at the lowest ionic strength,which is far fromthe usual environment for BSA,may also lead to changes FIG.3.Normalized force vs separation distance for BSA–BSA interac-affecting both surface properties and geometry.Some uncer-tions at four NaCl concentrations,pH8.0:(l)0.1M;(᭿)0.01M;(᭡)0.001M;(᭢)0.0002M.The lines are theoretical predictions.tainty in the zero-distance may also be responsible for the352BOWEN ET AL.4.Bowen,W.R.,and Williams,P.M.,Biotechnol.Bioeng.50,125 discrepancy between prediction and experiment for the(1996).shortest distances at pH6.0.Another possible explanation5.Fitzpatrick,H.,Luckham,P.F.,Eriksen,S.,and Hammond,K.,Col-is that an additional force,such as a steric force,may contrib-loids Surf.65,43(1992).ute to the interaction at short distances. 6.Gallinet,J.-P.,and Gauthier-Manuel,B.,Colloids Surf.68,189(1992).7.Hato,M.,Murata,M.,and Yoshida,T.,Colloids Surf.109,345(1996).8.Binnig,G.,Quate,C.,and Gerber,G.,Phys.Rev.Lett.56,930(1986).5.CONCLUSIONS9.Ducker,W.A.,Senden,T.J.,and Pashley,R.M.,Langmuir8,1831(1992).The paper has shown how direct measurement of the inter-10.Lin,X.Y.,Creuzet,F.,and Arribart,H.,J.Phys.Chem.97,7272 action of adsorbed layers of the protein BSA may be made(1993).by using an AFM in conjunction with a colloid probe.In11.Atkins,D.T.,and Pashley,R.M.,Langmuir9,2232(1993). particular,the measured force–distance curves were in good12.Li,Y.Q.,Tao,N.J.,Pan,J.,Garcia,A.A.,and Lindsay,S.M.,Lang-muir9,637(1993).quantitative agreement with predictions based on the DLVO13.Rutland.M.W.,and Senden,T.J.,Langmuir9,412(1993). theory and zeta potential values calculated for BSA using14.Bowen,W.R.,Hilal,N.,Lovitt,R.W.,Sharif,A.O.,and Williams,a site-binding–site-dissociation surface model.This henceP.M.,J.Membr.Sci.126,77(1997).provides a direct confirmation that the AFM colloid rson,I.,Drummond,C.J.,Chan,D.Y.C.,and Grieser,F.,Langmuir technique can provide a useful means of directly quantifying13,2109(1997).16.Hartley,P.G.,Larson,I.,and Scales,P.J.,Langmuir13,2207(1997). the interaction of biological macromolecules.17.Cleveland,J.P.,Manne,S.,Bocek,D.,and Hansma,P.K.,Rev.Sci.Instrum.64,403(1993).ACKNOWLEDGMENTS18.Timoshenko,S.,‘‘Strength of materials,’’pp.137–175.Krieger Pub-lishing Company,Melbourne,FL,1985.This work was funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences19.Bowen,W.R.,and Hughes,D.T.,J.Membr.Sci.51,189(1990). Research Council.We thank Adel Sharif and Paul Williams for valuable20.Israelachvili,J.N.,‘‘Intermolecular and surface forces,’’2nd edition. discussions on the theoretical analysis of data.Academic Press,London,1991.21.Bowen,W.R.,and Sharif.A.O.,Proc.R.Soc.London A452,2121REFERENCES(1996).22.Bowen,W.R.,and Sharif,A.O.,J.Colloid Interface Sci.187,363 1.Zubay,G.,‘‘Biochemistry.’’Addison-Wesley,Reading,MA,1983.(1997).2.Claesson,P.M.,Blomberg,E.,Froberg,J.C.,Nylander,T.,and Arne-23.Bowen,W.R.,and Williams,P.M.,J.Colloid Interface Sci.184,241brant,T.,Adv.Colloid Interface Sci.57,161(1995).(1996).3.Garcia, F.A.P.,in‘‘Recovery processes for biological materials’’24.Bowen,W.R.,and Jenner,F.,Adv.Colloid Interface Sci.56,201(1995).(J.F.Kennedy,and J.M.S.Cabral,Eds.),Chap.12,p.355.Wiley,New York,1993.25.Norde,W.,and Lyklema,J.,J.Colloid Interface Sci.66,257(1978).。

中法海洋卫星微波散射计在轨性能验证

中法海洋卫星微波散射计在轨性能验证

0254-6124/2020/40(3)-425-07Chin.J.Space Sci.空间科学学报DONG Xiaolong,ZHU Di,LIN Wenming,ZHANG Kuo,YUN Risheng,LIU Jianqiang,LANG Shuyan,DING Zhenyu,MA Jianying,XU Xingou.Orbit performances validation for CFOSAT scatterometer(in Chinese).Chin.J.Space Sci.,2020,40(3): 425-431.D01:10.11728/cjss2020.03.425中法海洋卫星微波散射计在轨性能验证董晓龙朱迪1林文明3张阔^云日升1刘建强4郎姝燕"丁振宇5马剑英1徐星欧11(中国科学院国家空间科学中心北京100190)2(中国科学院大学北京100049)3(南京信息工程大学海洋科学学院南京210044)4(自然资源部国家卫星海洋应用中心北京100081)5(航天东方红卫星有限公司北京100094)扌商要中法海洋卫星(CFOSAT)微波散射计是国际上第一个旋转扇形波束体制散射计,通过优化雷达观测几何实现对地面目标多角度和多方位的高精度测量,提高海面风场、土壤湿度和海冰面积等地球物理参数的反演精度.根据CFOSAT卫星2018年10月发射以来的在轨测试数据,结合散射计系统特点,分析验证了星上定标数据和后向散射系数反演结果的正确性,并对CFOSAT首批科学数据进行了定量分析和系统评价.结果表明,CFOSAT 散射计在轨工作状态良好,实际性能与设计预期一致,风速测量精度优于1.5m.s“,风向测量精度优于15°,空间分辨率可达12.5km,在近岸风场监测、土壤湿度遥感和海冰面积估计等应用领域具有独特的优势.关键i司中法海洋卫星,散射计,海面风场,后向散射系数中图分类号V474Orbit Performances Validation forCFOSAT ScatterometerDONG Xiaolong1,2ZHU Di1LIN Wenming3ZHANG Kuo12YUN Risheng1LIU Jianqiang4LANG Shuyan4DING Zhenyu5MA Jianying1XU Xingou11(National Space Science Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing100190)2(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing100049)3(School of Marine Sciences,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing210044) 4(National Satellite Oceanic Application Service,Ministry of Natural Resources,Beijing100081)5(DFH Satellite Co.,Ltd.,Beijing100094)*国家自然科学青年基金项目(41706197)和中国科学院微波遥感技术重点实验室开放研究基金项目共同资助2020-03-13收到原稿,2020-04-01收到修定稿E-mail:****************426Chin.J.Space Sci.空间科学学报2020,40(3)Abstract The first rotating fanbeam scatterometer onboard China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT)is able to observe Earth's surface at different incidence and azimuth angles using innova­tive observing geometry,and in turn to improve the Tetrieval of sea surface wind,soil moisture,sea ice extent,etc.After the CFOSAT was launched in October2018,the performances of the CFOSAT SeatteFometer(CSCAT)are being tested in orbit.This paper provides an overview of the CSCAT system,and then summarizes the key parameters of CSCAT tested in orbit,including calibration sig­nal analyses,system noise analyses,and radar backscatter processing results analyses.Consequently, the first wind retrieval results of CSCAT are analyzed to assess the system performance.The wind speed accuracy of CSCAT is better than1.5m-s_1,and the wind direction accuracy is better than 15°.The special resolution is better than12.5km.All these results show that CSCAT generally works well in orbit and has a unique advantage in the monitoring of nearshore winds,soil moisture, and sea ice extent.Key words China-France Oceanography Satellite(CFOSAT),Scatterometer,Sea surface winds, Radar backscatter0弓I言1中法海洋卫星微波散射计中法海洋卫星是由中国和法国联合研制,用于海洋动力环境观测与研究的科研卫星•其搭载两台有效载荷,分别为由中国科学院国家空间科学中心研制的微波散射计和法国国家空间中心(CNES)研制的雷达波谱仪⑴.卫星由航天东方红卫星有限公司研制,地面系统由自然资源部国家卫星海洋应用中心负责.中法海洋卫星于2018年10月30日发射,可获取全球海面风场、海浪谱以及有效波高等海洋动力参数,有助于更好地认识和掌握海洋动力过程及变化规律,为海洋预报提供海浪谱、海面风场等多参量的初始场信息,改进海况预报及同化模型,提高对巨浪、热带风暴、风暴潮等灾害性海况预报的精度与时效.中法海洋卫星对海浪、海面风场进行同步监测,可为海洋科学研究、全球气候变化提供实测数据并且积累长时间序列历史数据.微波散射计是中法海洋卫星中方的唯一有效载荷,由中国科学院国家空间科学中心研制,是国际上首个星载旋转扇形波束体制散射计,也是中国首次从方案设计论证、载荷技术实现、数据处理与反演全链条自主创新实现的散射计.该散射计通过获取海面后向散射系数,实现海面风场测量.其测量数据可应用于海洋地球物理学、海洋动力学、海洋气候与环境监测、海冰监测等研究.此外,微波散射计还可用于测量土壤湿度、植被分布等Pl.旋转扇形波束散射计是一种新体制微波散射计.中法海洋卫星微波散射计是目前唯一在轨运行的该体制散射计.图1给出了中法海洋卫星在轨工作状态,散射计天线位于卫星下部面向地球的安装面,红色为散射计辐射波束.图2为散射计参加中法海洋卫星整星测试时的状态.星载微波散射计是一种精确测量地球表面雷达后向散射系数的主动式微波雷达,结合地球物理模型函数(GMF)可反演25〜50km中等尺度的全球海面风场同.散射计在陆地和极区测量到的<7°还可以分别用于土壤湿度遥感和海冰面积估计⑷%根据微波散射计测量海面风场的原理•海面风场测量的关键是在保证测量精度的基础上获得多个入射方位角图1中法海洋卫星在轨工作状态Fig.1Schematic drawing of CFOSAT in orbit董晓龙等:中法海洋卫星微波散射计在轨性能验证427的散射系数,以准确反演风速和风向.因此,不同方位向后向散射系数测量的独立样本数量及其测量精度直接关系到风场反演的精度.固定扇形波束散射计可以提供几个特定方位角的海面后向散射系数观测值,但不能获得方位向后向散射系数的连续观测.旋转扫描笔形波束散射计可以获得方位向的连续观测,但在俯仰向仅采用1〜2个点波束进行离散观测,测量足印较小冏.旋转扇形波束散射计可以同时获得俯仰向和方位向海面后向散射系数的连续观测.该仪器的最大优点在于缩短了同一海面的多方位角组合观测时间,有利于高相干的测量数据,从而可以提高风场反演的精度.降低处理过程的复杂度.在风向反演及风向去模糊过程中,多角度观测数据有利于提高风向的反演精度⑺.旋转扇形波束散射计单次观测足印较大,获得后向散射独立样本数较多.因此,相对笔形波束可以采用较低的天线扫描转速,降低天线旋转对平台的影响,避免动量轮等姿控设备的使用,从而实现载荷和平台的小型化并且降低卫星及发射成本.同时.低转速有利于获得更高的方位向后向散射测量数据冗余,通过分辨率增强处理技术可以进一步提高测量单元的空间分辨率.旋转扇形波束散射计在俯仰方向具有连续的观测足印和更高的空间分辨率,其数据在近海岸风场开发.海冰、极冰监测以及陆地应用方面具有明显优势.本文基于CFOSAT散射计(CSCAT)的系统特性及CSCAT关键技术流程、对CSCAT首批在轨科学数据进行分析,系统评估这种新体制散射计的性图2CFOSAT电性能测试Fig.2CFOSAT electrical testing 能.探讨CSCAT新体制的潜在应用价值及未来发展趋势.2载荷主要指标在轨测试CSCAT工作在Ku波段,轨道高度为52()km.载荷系统主要参数测试结果见表1.在轨测试主要通过遥测数据、下传的科学数据和地面定标器完成.CSCAT有三个定标通道:信号定标,内部噪声定标以及外部噪声定标.信号定标是将部分发射能量耦合至接收机测量,以补偿发射信道和接收信道的增益波动,并利用比例定标法将对绝对接收功率的测量值转换为接收电压的测量值和定标值比值的测量值.内部噪声定标是测量位于卫星舱内的噪声源提供的热噪声能量,而外部噪声定标用于测量来自天线的外部环境辐射噪声功率.内部噪声定标和外部噪声定标用于估计接收机噪声的下限.因此,通过回波能量减去噪声能量的方式.可以得到散射信号能量的无偏估计冈.图3给出了信号定标以及外部噪声和内部噪声定标的原理.图4和图5分别给出了散射计在轨工作时三种定标信号随时间变化的波形.从图4和图5中可以看出:内定标信号稳定且平滑,这表明散射计的发射机和接收机在卫星在轨运行期间保持了良好的工作表1散射计系统参数的测试结果Table1Test results of CSCATsystem parameter参数指标测试方法轨道高度520 km卫星定轨数据倾角97.5°离心率0.0频率13.256GHz±0.5kHz地面定标器带宽0.5MHz极化HH,VV发射功率>120W内定标信号、功率遥测天线转速 3.4radmin-1科学数据.角度遥测脉冲重复频率150Hz科学数据母线电压28V电压遥测总功率140W电压、电流遥测数据传输速率220kbits-1科学数据428Chin. J. Space Sci. 空间科学学报 2020, 40(3)CompositionsLPF1/2:EMC filtersD. Power monitoring detector Ns : Internal noise source PortsPi:BJ-140 to TWTA P 2-BJ-140 to antenna Py : BJ-140 to RF receiverCalibration loop Internal noise loop External noise loop图3散射计定标原理Fig. 3 Calibration loops of CSCAT(a)图4 VV 极化的信号定标、外部噪声和内部噪声定标信号Fig. 4 Signal calibration, external noise and internalnoise calibration signal of VV polarization(a)图5 HH 极化的信号定标、外部噪声和内部噪声定标信号Fig. 5 Signal calibration, external noise and internalnoise calibration signal of HH polarization状态;外部噪声有连续波动,这主要是因为外部噪声受地表亮温变化影响,陆地上的外部噪声明显高于海洋上的外部噪声.图4和图5中的内部噪声比外部噪声更稳定,这主要是因为内部噪声是测量位于星体内部的噪声源,温度波动较小.3后向散射系数测量结果计算后向散射系数是CFOSAT 散射计数据预处 理系统的关键环节,也是获得高质量风场数据的前提.后向散射系数是散射计的一级数据、而散射计星上输出的原始数值是信号通道能量耳、内定标通 道能量E c 和外部噪声通道能量E n .因此,CSCAT预处理软件首先对后两者进行量纲转换,使转换后的内定标信号E ;、外部噪声值E'n 和信号通道的输出 结果具有相同的量纲.后向散射系数计算公式为[9]其中:K 为内定标环路总的增益和损耗,包括发射机 耦合器到天线之间的损耗、天线到接收机耦合器之间的损耗、定标衰减器的损耗、发射机定向耦合器 的耦合度和接收机定向耦合器的耦合度;X 表示雷达方程除发射功率和后向散射系数之外所有因子的 综合结果,包括天线增益、卫星到观测点的距离、电 磁波频率和传播损耗以及分辨单元面积等【训.利用式(1)可以计算每个条带的后向散射系数.散射计数据预处理系统用来生产后向散射系数 数据.利用数据验证预处理算法,测试和分析载荷的 功能及数据质量.图6和图7分别给出了散射计在第3337轨的 W 极化和HH 极化的后向散射系数空 间分布.由图6和图7可以看到:海洋区域的后向散射系数通常小于陆地;南大洋西风带的<7° 一般大于 其他区域海面的<7°; CSCAT 的a°动态范围与以往董晓龙等:中法海洋卫星微波散射计在轨性能验证429卫星散射计的L 空间分布特征基本一致.利用海陆 边界<7°的梯度变化可以验证后向散射系数几何定位的准确性.因此,图6和图7定性证明了 CSCAT 后向散射系数的正确性U1.图8和图9是第3337轨的VV 极化和HH 极化后向散射系数随天线方位角及俯仰角的变化情况, 入射角为36°,风速为lOm-s-1.图中的绿线和红线 为利用NSCAT-4的GMF 模型仿真得到的后向散射系数.由图8和图9可以看到,实测数据随方位角的 变化趋势与模型预测结果一致.4海面风场反演中法海洋卫星微波散射计可以提供12.5km 和25km 两种网格分辨率的海面风场数据.其中,12.5km 网格风场是目前星载散射计能够获取的分辨率最高的海面风场数据,可为台风监测、近岸海洋动力 过程和海冰监测等应用提供重要的数据支撑.图1() 给出了这两种分辨率下探测到的海面风场.由图1()可见,提高风场的网格分辨率,一方面可以获取更靠近海陆边界的风场数据.另一方面也可以获取更 加精细的海面风场结构特征.根据国家卫星海洋应用中心的CFOSAT 在轨测试评审报告,CSCAT对ECMWF 的风速精度在1.26〜1.48m ・s —之间,风 向精度在11。

FESTO EXCM系列平面轮廓机械臂产品介绍说明书

FESTO EXCM系列平面轮廓机械臂产品介绍说明书

Solutions for Benchtop AutomationDesign principleEXCM can approach any position within its workspace. There c irculating toothed belt, driven by fixed motors, moves the slide within a two-dimensional area.Kinematic and Drive Package The dual axis ServoLite drive internally transforms the X-Y coordinates and p r ovides servo control of both motors.Flexible Control ModesI/Os for simple control of up to 32 positions. Integrated CANopen and Ethernet for flexible position and velocity data transfer from a PLC or PC.EXCM-10This inexpensive, compact gantry employs plain brush bearings for a cost effective handling solution for applications involving light payloads with low dynamic demands.EXCM-30Well suited for assembly and handling of small parts with pay-loads of up to 3 kg. The EXCM-30 is scalable and configurable model in the mini gantry series. The convenient mounting holes on the slide unit allows for the addition of a third axis for 3D positioning tasks.An extremely compact design for a maximized workspace. Thekinematic concept e nsures low moving masses and fixed motorarrangement substantially reduces the requirement for cablemanagement. The pre-parameterized drive unit EXCM-ST simplifiesapplication configuration and commissioning.P S I 909.5.e n 2014/03Laboratory processesEXCM-10/EXCM-30 is ideal for applications in pre- and post- analytical laboratory processes:1 Sample preparation andtransport, identification of samples by means of barcode scanners, or to open and close containers2 Sample distribution o n testsystems such as Microtiter® plates3 Post-analytical processessuch as incubation,d ispensing and archiving Wide range of possible applications Festo Corporation 395 Moreland Road Hauppauge, NY 11788Call: (800) 993 3786Fax: (800) 963 3786Email: customer.service@us. E N – S u b j e c t t o c h a n g eEXCM-10EXCM-30Stroke X axis [mm]150, 260, 300, 360, 460, 700Standard: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500On request: 90 … 700Stroke Y-axis [mm]110110, 160, 210, 260, 310, 360Max. working load [kg] 0.53Max. speed [m/s]0.30.5Max. acceleration [m/s2]310Repetition accuracy [mm]± 0.1± 0.05Positioning accuracy [mm]± 0.5 absolute± 0.5 absoluteTransport of samples for identifica -tion by means of barcode scannersEXCM-10 with integrated kinematic and drive EXCM-30 with motor mounting at top (optionally at bottom)Optional dual axis drive for EXCM-30Technical dataSmall parts assemblyand electronics industryThe EXCM-30 is the ideal answer to the requirements of small parts assembly and e lectronics production. Significantly improve productivity by automating small parts handling. Reduce machine footprint by employing compact solutions.Possible applications:•Feeding, screwing andmounting of small components •Setting adhesive points•Electronic tests: approach to contact points, resistance tests •Flexible positioning ofworkpieces and components •Palletting/depalletting operations•Desktop production/assemblyScrewing of electronic components。

飞机结构件平顶筋顶面骨架分区计算方法

飞机结构件平顶筋顶面骨架分区计算方法

飞机结构件平顶筋顶面骨架分区计算方法郑祖杰;周敏;郑国磊;朱俊标【摘要】为了提高飞机结构件复杂平顶筋的数控加工编程效率与质量,提出基于分治思想的平面域骨架分区计算方法,利用骨架生成飞机结构件平顶筋数控加工刀轨,以解决飞机结构件中平顶筋数控编程效率低且质量不稳定等问题.首先基于分治思想给出由完整平面域、分支子区域和单元区域构成的层次模型;然后依据层次模型对平面域进行分区,逐步跟踪迭代求解单元区域内的单元骨架,通过单元骨架拼接得到完整平面域的骨架;最后利用骨架生成飞机结构件平顶筋数控加工刀轨.通过实例测试结果验证了所提方法的可行性和有效性.%To improve the efficiency and quality of NC machining programming for complex ribs top planar surface in Aircraft Structural Parts (ASP),a skeleton computation method with sub-domain division was presented based on idea of divide and conquer,and the tool paths for top planar surface of ribs in Aircraft Structural Parts(ASP) was generated to solve the problems of NC machining programming such as low efficiency and unstable quality.A multilevel model of planar domain consisted of integrated domain,branch sub-domain and element domain was proposed.Secondly,after subdomain division According to the multi-level model,the subdomain was made for planar domain,and the element skeleton within element domain was computed by iterative tracking step by step.By connecting element skeleton,the skeleton of integrated domain was obtained.By utilizing the skeleton of integrated domain,NC machining tool path for top planar surface of ribs was generated.Examples were given to illustrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method.【期刊名称】《计算机集成制造系统》【年(卷),期】2017(023)011【总页数】7页(P2407-2413)【关键词】飞机结构件;平顶筋;分治思想;骨架计算;刀轨生成;数控加工【作者】郑祖杰;周敏;郑国磊;朱俊标【作者单位】北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院,北京100191;中国农业大学工学院,北京 100083;北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院,北京100191;北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院,北京100191【正文语种】中文【中图分类】TP3910 引言骨架计算技术自Blum[1]于1967年提出至今,已被大量应用于生物信息分析、图形检索、数控加工[2]等领域,随着应用的深入,对骨架计算的精度和效率的要求越来越高。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
is the application of a linear transformation to the image pair that forces collinearity amongst conjugate epipolar lines and aligns them with the horizontal image axis. The transformation is pre-computed during calibration from the epipolar geometry. [20, 4]
2 Planar Disparities
To efficiently track a plane, we can make use of a property that planar surfaces exhibit when viewed in non-verged stereo images. In general, there is a well-known homography that maps the image plane of one image to the plane of another image. In the following discussion, let (u, v, w) be image plane coordinates, (x, y, z) be world coordinates, (α , β ) correspond to an arbitrary image pair, and s be an arbitrary scale factor. We call the homographic matrix {H : h1 . . . h9 }. uβ uα h1 h2 h3 (1) s vα = h 4 h 5 h 6 vβ wα h7 h8 h9 wβ It would suffice to track the nine parameters of H . However, one can simplify the tracking problem because of the rectified pair of images. Since conjugate epipolar lines are collinear and horizontal, the mapping becomes a simple linear function in three variables (see Figure 1 for a graphical depiction of this property). uβ uα h1 h2 h3 s v = 0 1 0 v (2) w 0 0 1 w Thus, the disparity from this function is uβ − uα .
Disparity
Position
Figure 1. When viewed through non-verged stereo, the disparity of a planar surface can be represented as a linear function. Here, a 2d representation is shown for clarity.
1 Introduction
Inferring properties of the real-world through one or many images is fundamental to the field of computer vision. Often it is beneficial to have knowledge of a significant surface or set of surfaces during the inference process. One such surface is the planar surface. Many methods have been proposed to solve this problem for the monocular [10, 11] and binocular [17, 15], calibrated and uncalibrated cameras (similar to using sequences of images [3, 2, 5, 19]) . A common solution involves a disparity map computation. A disparity map is a matrix of correspondence offsets between two images [20]. The disparity map calculation employs expensive neighborhood correlation routines that often yield sparse maps for typical scenes. However, the method makes no assumptions about the environment and has been widely used for the case of general stereo vision. In contrast to the general solution discussed above, our method exploits a property that planar surfaces exhibit when viewed through a non-verged stereo camera. A well known transformation, called a homography, can be employed to warp the plane in one image onto the plane in another image [4]. When using rectified images1 , the epipolar geometry reduces the homography to a linear function that yields the disparity value on the plane between the images. We use a direct method to perform the tracking. Direct methods use quantities that are calculated directly from image intensity values [9, 17]. Our
u =
x z y v = z Tf z =ent in Equation 5 that, because we are viewing a planar surface in a calibrated stereo camera, we can make use of the known T and remove the z from the equation. The resulting map (Equation 6) is expressed in image coordinates centered about the known optical center. h1 u + h2 v + h3 = −D TA h1 = E TB h2 = E T fC h3 = sx E (6)
we can manipulate the equation so that it becomes a linear map. In the following equations, f is the focal length, sx is the pixel size scale factor, T is the baseline of the stereo system, and D is the disparity. y E x A + B +C = − z z z Tf [Au + Bv + C ] = −D sx E (4) (5)
Planar Surface Tracking Using Direct Stereo
Jason Corso, Greg Hager Computational Interaction and Robotics Laboratory The Johns Hopkins University 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, USA {jcorso,hager}@ Abstract
2.1 Algebraic Derivation
In this section, we show an algebraic derivation of (2). Here, we assume that the image plane lies at w = 1 without loss of generality. If we first take the equation of a plane in three-dimensional space, Ax + By + Cz + E = 0, (3)
1 Rectification
method has descended from earlier image registration and enhancement techniques [14, 12] and from visual tracking [6]. Similarly, it poses the tracking problem as one of objective function minimization. Doing so incorporates a vote from many pixels in the image and computes a least-squares estimate of the global motion parameters in question to sub-pixel levels. In the remainder of this paper we motivate and discuss our algorithm. Then, we present an analysis of its capabilities, our implementation, and some experimental results. Finally, we conclude with an application to augmented reality and some possible extensions to the algorithm is presented.
相关文档
最新文档