2016保罗皮夫ted演讲稿

合集下载

TED演讲:越有钱越无情(中英对照版)解析

TED演讲:越有钱越无情(中英对照版)解析

越有钱越无情It's amazing what a rigged game of Monopoly can reveal. In this entertaining but sobering talk, social psychologist Paul Piff shares his research into how people behave when they feel wealthy. (Hint: badly.) But while the problem of inequality is a complex and daunting challenge, there's good news too. (Filmed at TEDx Marin.)一个被操纵的大富翁游戏能告诉我们的东西竟然有那么多!在这个有趣且发人深省的演讲中,社会心理学家保罗-皮夫分享了他对于“人感到富有时如何表现”的研究结果(暗示:很坏)。

在面对异常复杂、异常严峻的不平等问题的同时,我们也听到了好的消息。

(摄于TEDx加州马林县)Paul Piff studies how social hierarchy, inequality and emotion shape relations between individuals and groups.Why you should listen:Paul Piff is an Assistant Professor of Psychology and Social Behavior at the University of California, Irvine. In particular, he studies how wealth (having it or not having it) can affect interpersonal relationships.His surprising studies include running rigged games of Monopoly, tracking how those who drive expensive cars behave versus those driving less expensive vehicles and even determining that rich people are literally more likely to take candy from children than the less well-off. The results often don't paint a pretty picture about the motivating forces of wealth. He writes, "specifically, I have been finding that increased wealth and status in society lead to increased self-focus and, in turn, decreased compassion, altruism, and ethical behavior."What others say:“When was the last time, as Piff puts it, that you prioritized your own interests above the interests of other people? Was it yesterday, when you barked at the waitress for not delivering your cappuccino with sufficient promptness? Perhaps it was last week, when, late towork, you zoomed past a mom struggling with a stroller on the subway stairs and justified your heedlessness with a ruthless but inarguable arithmetic: Today, the 9 a.m. meeting has got to come first; that lady’s stroller can’t be my problem. Piff is one of a new generation of scientists—psychologists, economists, marketing professors, and neurobiologists—who are exploiting this moment of unprecedented income inequality to explore behaviors like those. ” —Lisa Miller, New York Magazine演讲稿正文I want you to, for a moment, think about playing a game of Monopoly, except in this game, that combination of skill, talent and luck that help earn you success in games, as in life, has been rendered irrelevant, because this game's been rigged, and you've got the upper hand. You've got more money, more opportunities to move around the board, and more access to resources. And as you think about that experience, I want you to ask yourself, how might that experience of being a privileged player in a rigged game change the way that you think about yourself and regard that other player?我想让大家花一点时间,想想一下自己正在玩大富翁游戏。

TED演讲:越有钱越无情(中英对照版).

TED演讲:越有钱越无情(中英对照版).

越有钱越无情It's amazing what a rigged game of Monopoly can reveal. In this entertaining but sobering talk, social psychologist Paul Piff shares his research into how people behave when they feel wealthy. (Hint: badly. But while the problem of inequality is a complex and daunting challenge, there's good news too. (Filmed at TEDx Marin. 一个被操纵的大富翁游戏能告诉我们的东西竟然有那么多! 在这个有趣且发人深省的演讲中,社会心理学家保罗 -皮夫分享了他对于“ 人感到富有时如何表现” 的研究结果(暗示:很坏。

在面对异常复杂、异常严峻的不平等问题的同时,我们也听到了好的消息。

(摄于 TEDx 加州马林县Paul Piff studies how social hierarchy, inequality and emotion shape relations between individuals and groups.Why you should listen:Paul Piff is an Assistant Professor of Psychology and Social Behavior at the University of California, Irvine. In particular, he studies how wealth (having it or not having it can affect interpersonal relationships.His surprising studies include running rigged games of Monopoly, tracking how those who drive expensive cars behave versus those driving less expensive vehicles and even determining that rich people are literally more likely to take candy from children than the less well-off. The results often don't paint a pretty picture about the motivating forces of wealth. He writes, "specifically, I have been finding that increased wealth and status in society lead to increased self-focus and, in turn, decreased compassion, altruism, and ethical behavior."What others say:“When was the last time, as Piff puts it, that you prioritized your own interests above the interests of other people? Was it yesterday, when you barked at the waitress fornot delivering your cappuccino with sufficient promptness? Perhaps it was last week, when, late towork, you zoomed past a mom struggling with a stroller on the subway stairs and justified your heedlessness with a ruthless but inarguable arithmetic: Today, the 9 a.m. meeting has got to come first; that lady’s stroller can’t be my problem. Piff is one of a new generation of scientists — psychologists, economists, marketing professors, and neurobiologists — who are exploiting this moment of unprecedented income inequality to explore behaviors like those. ” — Lisa Miller, New York Magazine演讲稿正文I want you to, for a moment, think about playing a game of Monopoly, except in this game, that combination of skill, talent and luck that help earn you success in games, as in life, has been rendered irrelevant, because this game's been rigged, and you've got the upper hand. You've got more money, more opportunities to move around the board, and more access to resources. And as you think about that experience, I want you to ask yourself, how might that experience of being a privileged player in a rigged game change the way that you think about yourself and regard that other player?我想让大家花一点时间, 想想一下自己正在玩大富翁游戏。

TED演讲中英文本

TED演讲中英文本

TED演讲中英文本—《怎样从错误中学习》I have been teaching for a long time, andin doing so have acquired a body of knowledge about kids and learning that Ireally wish more people would understand about the potential of students. In1931, my grandmother -- bottom left for you guys over here -- graduated fromthe eighth grade. She went to school to get the information because that'swhere the information lived. It was in the books, it was inside the teacher'shead, and she needed to go there to get the information, because that's how youlearned.Fast-forward a generation: this is theone room schoolhouse, Oak Grove, where my father went to a one roomschoolhouse. And he again had to travel to the school to get theinformation from the teacher, store it in the only portable memory he has,which is inside his own head, and take it with him, because that is howinformation was being transported from teacher to student and then used in theworld. When I was a kid, we had a set of encyclopedias at my house. It was purchased the year Iwas born, and it was extraordinary, because I did not have to wait to go to thelibrary to get to the information; the information was inside my house and itwas awesome. This was different than either generation had experienced before,and it changed the way I interacted with information even at just a smalllevel. But the information was closer to me. I could getaccess to it.我已从事教学很长一段时间,在这个过程中,获得很多关于儿童和学习的知识,但我真的希望更多人能理解学生的潜能。

TED演讲:要为自己而活

TED演讲:要为自己而活

TED演讲:要为自己而活从出生就限定在了恒定的生命规律中了: 从孩提时期的好奇和禁锢。

到少年时代的不羁和烦恼。

再到步入成年的权威和里程碑。

最后迈入老年的德高望重。

托马斯曼曾经说过,生命有它自己的规律,这是所有人必经的历程,我将经历别人所经历的一起。

生命是一往不回的湍流,有的人被裹挟着漂流了很远,有的人太早的被冲上了岸。

这短途是生命的长度,而河流,是时光的长度。

曾经觉得无谓的记录连自己都懒得回味的话,是对自己拥有的时间的亵渎,然而那就像在岸边画的沙痕,一笔一道,即便最后还屈从于风的形状。

演讲者:Joshua Prager,心理学者TED演讲稿I'm turning 44 next month, and I have the sense that 44 is going to be a very good year, a year of fulfillment, realization. I have that sense, not because of anything particular in store for me, but because I read it would be a good year in a 1968 book by Norman Mailer.下个月我就44岁了,并且我觉得44岁将成为美好的一年,充满着实现和领悟的一年。

我有这种感觉,并不是因为什么特别的事,而是我从诺曼·梅勒在1968年写的书上看到的。

"He felt his own age, forty-four ..." wrote Mailer in "The Armies of the Night," "... felt as if he were a solid embodiment of bone, muscle, heart, mind, and sentiment to be a man, as if he had arrived.""44岁, 他感觉到了岁月无情," 梅勒在《夜幕下的大军》中写到 "感觉到他自己就是骨头、肌肉、心、意识、情感组成的坚实的化身,就像他已经那个年纪了一样。

最新-ted演讲稿中英文对照 TED演讲,越有钱越无情(中英对照版) 精品

最新-ted演讲稿中英文对照 TED演讲,越有钱越无情(中英对照版) 精品

ted演讲稿中英文对照TED演讲,越有钱越无情(中英对照版).(摄于TEDx加州马林县)PaulPiffstudieshowsocialhierarchy,inequalityandemotionshaperelationsb etweenindividualsandgroups.Whyyoushouldlisten:PaulPiffisanAssistantPr ofessorofPsychologyandSocialBehaviorattheUniversityofCalifornia,Irvin e.Inparticular,hestudieshowwealth(havingitornothavingit)canaffectinte rpersonalrelationships.Hissurprisingstudiesincluderunningriggedgameso fMonopoly,trackinghowthosewhodriveexpensivecarsbehaveversusthosedrivi nglessexpensivevehiclesandevendeterminingthatrichpeopleareliterallymo relikelytotakecandyfromchildrenthanthelesswell-off.Theresultsoftendon "tpaintaprettypictureaboutthemotivatingforcesofwealth.Hewrites,\Whato therssay:Whenwasthelasttime,asPiffputsit,thatyouprioritizedyourownint erestsabovetheinterestsofotherpeopleWasityesterday,whenyoubarkedatthe waitressfornotdeliveringyourcappuccinowithsufficientpromptnessPerhaps itwaslastweek,when,latetowork,youzoomedpastamomstrugglingwithastrolle ronthesubwaystairsandjustifiedyourheedlessnesswitharuthlessbutinargua blearithmetic:Today,the9a.m.meetinghasgottoefirst;thatlady’sstrollercan’tbemyproblem.Piffisoneofanewgenerationofscientists—psychologists,economists,marketingprofessors,andneurobiologists—whoareexploitingthismomentofunprecedentedineinequalitytoexplorebehavi orslikethose.—LisaMiller,NewYorkMagazine演讲稿正文Iwantyouto,foramoment,thinkaboutplayingagameofMonopoly,exceptinthisga me,thatbinationofskill,talentandluckthathelpea.只不过在这个游戏里面,那些帮助你赢的游戏的因素,比如技巧、才能和运气在此无关紧要,就像对于人生一样,因为这个游戏被操纵了,而你已经占了上风,你有更多的钱,有更多在棋盘上移动的机会以及更对获得资源的机会.在你想象这一经历的过程中,我想让大家问一下自己,一个被操纵的游戏里面作为优势玩家的经历会如何改变你思考自己和对待对手的方式?SoweranastudyontheU.C.Berkeleycampustolookatexactlythatquestion.Webro ughtinmorethan100pairsofstrangersintothelab,andwiththeflipofacoinrand omlyassignedoneofthetwotobearichplayerinariggedgame.Theygottwotimesas muchmoney.WhentheypassedGo,theycollectedtwicethesalary,andtheygottoro llbothdiceinsteadofone,sotheygottomovearoundtheboardalotmore.(Laughte r)Andoverthecourseof15minutes,wewatchedthroughhiddencameraswhathappen ed.AndwhatIwanttodotoday,forthefirsttime,isshowyoualittlebitofwhatwes aw.You'regoingtohavetopardonthesoundquality,insomecases,becauseagain, thesewerehiddencameras.Sowe'veprovidedsubtitles.在加州大学伯克利分校,我们做了一个试验来研究这个问题.我们招募了100多对陌生人到实验室,通过投掷硬币的方式随机选中一对中的一个作为这个游戏中占上风的玩家.他们拿到了两倍的钱.当他们途径起点的时候,他们拿到两倍的工资,而且他们可以同时掷两个骰子而不是一个,所以他们可以在棋盘上移动更多.在接下来的15分钟内,我们通过隐藏的摄像头观察了现场情况.今天是第一次我想和大家分享一下我们观察到的,有的时候音质可能不太好,还请大家原谅,因为毕竟是用隐藏的摄像头,所以我们加上了字幕.RichPlayer:Howmany500sdidyouhave富玩家:你有多少张500块?PoorPlayer:Justone.穷玩家:就一张.RichPlayer:Areyouserious.富玩家:真的吗?PoorPlayer:Yeah.穷玩家:是的.RichPlayer:Ihavethree.(Laughs)Idon'tknowwhytheygavemesomuch.富玩家:我有三张.(笑声)不知道为什么他们给了我这么多.PaulPiff:Okay,soitwasquicklyapparenttoplayersthatsomethingwasup.On epersonclearlyhasalotmoremoneythantheotherperson,andyet,asthegameunfo lded,wesawverynotabledifferencesanddramaticdifferencesbegintoemergebe tweenthetwoplayers.Therichplayerstartedtomovearoundtheboardlouder,lit erallysmackingtheboardwiththeirpieceashewentaround.Weweremorelikelyto seesignsofdominanceandnonverbalsigns,displaysofpowerandcelebrationamongtherichplayers.保罗.皮夫:所以,玩家们很快就意识到这个游戏明显有点奇怪.一个玩家比另一个玩家明显有更多的钱.随着游戏慢慢展开,我们观察到两个玩家开始有一些明显不同的表现.富的玩家明显在棋盘上移动的声音更大,移动的时候几乎是在狠狠砸棋盘.我们看到富玩家们霸主信号、肢体动作,权力的显示以及相互庆祝.Wehadabowlofpretzelspositionedofftotheside.It'sonthebottomrightcorner there.Thatallowedustowatchparticipants'consummatorybehavior.Sowe'reju sttrackinghowmanypretzelsparticipantseat.我们在旁边放了一碗椒盐卷饼,就在右下角,这使得我们可以观察玩家吃椒盐卷饼的行为.我们就是看看玩家吃了多少椒盐卷饼.RichPlayer:Arethosepretzelsatrick富玩家:这些椒盐卷饼有什么猫腻吗?PoorPlayer:Idon'tknow.穷玩家:不知道啊.Okay,sonosurprises,peopleareontous.Theywonderwhatthatbowlofpretzel sisdoingthereinthefirstplace.Oneevenasks,likeyoujustsaw,isthatbowlofp retzelsthereasatrickAndyet,despitethat,thepowerofthesituationseemstoi nevitablydominate,andthoserichplayersstarttoeatmorepretzels.。

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量欢迎来到,以下是聘才XX为大家搜索整理的,欢迎大家阅读。

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量那我就这么开始吧:几年前,一个为我讲演活动的策划人打电话给我,她在电话里说:“我真很苦恼该如何在宣传单上介绍你”。

我心想,这有什么苦恼呢?她继续道:“你看,我听过你的演讲,我觉得我可以称你为研究者。

可我担心的是,如果我这么称呼你,没人会来听,因为大家普遍认为研究员是很无趣而且脱离现实。

”这说的很对。

然后她说:“但是我非常喜欢你的演讲,你的讲演就跟讲故事一样很吸引人。

我想来想去,还是觉得称你为讲故事的人比较妥当”。

而那个做学术的、感到不安的我脱口而出道:“你要叫我什么?”她说:“我要称你为讲故事的人。

”我心想:“为什么不干脆叫魔法小精灵?”我说:“让我考虑一下。

”我试着鼓起勇气。

我对自己说,我是一个讲故事的人。

我是一个从事定性研究的科研人员。

我收集故事,这就是我的工作。

或许故事就是有灵魂的数据。

或许我就是一个讲故事的人。

于是我说:“听着,要不你就称我为做研究兼讲故事的人。

”她大笑着说:”哈哈,没这么个说法呀。

“所以我是个做研究兼讲故事的人,我今天想跟大家谈论的:我们要谈论的话题是关于拓展认知。

我想给你们讲几个故事是关于我的一份研究工作,这份研究从本质上拓宽了我个人的认知,也确确实实改变了我生活、爱、工作还有教育孩子的方式。

我的故事从这里开始:当我还是个年轻的博士研究生的时候,第一年,一位研究教授对我们说:“事实是这样的,如果有一个东西你无法测量,那么它就不存在。

”我心想他只是在哄哄我们这些小孩子吧。

我说:“真的么?”他说:“这是理所当然的。

”你知道我有一个社会工作的学士文凭,一个社会工作的硕士文凭,我当时在读的是一个社会工作的博士文凭,所以我整个学术生涯都被人所包围,他们大抵相信生活是一团乱麻,接受它。

而我的观点则倾向于,生活是一团乱麻,解开它,把它整理好,再归类放入有条理的盒子里。

我当时认为我领悟到了我的方向,找到了我的工作,有能力自己去创一番事业。

TED英语演讲:脆弱不是懦弱

TED英语演讲:脆弱不是懦弱

TED英语演讲:脆弱不是懦弱与脆弱相比,羞耻(shame),是一个更加让人觉得恐怖的话题。

实际上光谈论这个话题就足以勾起人的羞耻感。

下面是小编为大家收集关于TED英语演讲:脆弱不是懦弱,欢迎借鉴参考。

TED演讲:脆弱不是懦弱,而是衡量勇气最准确的标尺演讲者:Brené Brown演讲稿I'm going to tell you a little bit about my TEDxHouston Talk.I woke up the morning after I gave that talk with the worst vulnerability hangover of my life. And I actually didn't leave my house for about three days.The first time I left was to meet a friend for lunch. And when I walked in, she was already at the table. I sat down, and she said, "God, you look like hell." I said, "Thanks. I feel really -- I'm not functioning." And she said, "What's going on?" And I said, "I just told 500 people that I became a researcher to avoid vulnerability. And that when being vulnerable emerged from my data, as absolutely essential to whole-hearted living, I told these 500 people that I had a breakdown. I had a slide that said 'Breakdown.' At what point did I think that was a good idea?"And she said, "I saw your talk live-streamed. It was not really you. It was a little different than what you usually do. But it was great."And I said, "This can't happen. YouTube, they're putting this thing on YouTube. And we're going to be talking about 600, 700 people."And she said, "Well, I think it's too late."And I said, "Let me ask you something." And she said, "Yeah."I said, "Do you remember when we were in college, really wild and kind of dumb?" She said, "Yeah." I said, "Remember whenwe'd leave a really bad message on our ex-boyfriend's answering machine?Then we'd have to break into his dorm room and then erase the tape?"And she goes, "Uh... no."Of course, the only thing I could say at that point was, "Yeah, me neither. Yeah -- me neither."And I'm thinking t o myself, "Brené, what are you doing? Why did you bring this up? Have you lost your mind? Your sisters would be perfect for this."So I looked back up and she said, "Are you really going to try to break in and steal the video before they put it on YouTube?"And I said, "I'm just thinking about it a little bit."She said, "You're like the worst vulnerability role model ever."Then I looked at her and I said something that at the time felt a little dramatic, but ended up being more prophetic than dramatic. "If 500 turns into 1,000 or 2,000, my life is over."I had no contingency plan for four million.And my life did end when that happened. And maybe the hardest part about my life ending is that I learned something hard about myself, and that was that, as much as I would be frustrated about not being able to get my work out to the world, there was a part of me that was working very hard to engineer staying small, staying right under the radar. But I want to talk about what I've learned.There's two things that I've learned in the last year. The first is: vulnerability is not weakness. And that myth is profoundly dangerous.Let me ask you honestly -- and I'll give you this warning, I'm trained as a therapist, so I can out-wait you uncomfortably -- so if you could just raise your hand that would be awesome -- how many of you honestly, when you're thinkingabout doing or saying something vulnerable think, "God, vulnerability is weakness." How many of you think of vulnerability and weakness synonymously? The majority of people. Now let me ask you this question: This past week at TED, how many of you, when you saw vulnerability up here, thought it was pure courage? Vulnerability is not weakness. I define vulnerability as emotional risk, exposure, uncertainty. It fuels our daily lives. And I've come to the belief -- this is my 12th year doing this research -- that vulnerability is our most accurate measurement of courage -- to be vulnerable, to let ourselves be seen, to be honest.One of the weird things that's happened is, after the TED explosion, I got a lot of offers to speak all over the country -- everyone from schools and parent meetings to Fortune 500 companies. And so many of the calls went like this, "Dr. Brown, we loved your TED talk.We'd like you to come in and speak. We'd appreciate it if you wouldn't mention vulnerability or shame."What would you like for me to talk about? There's three big answers. This is mostly, to be honest with you, from the business sector:innovation, creativity and change.So let me go on the record and say, vulnerability is the birthplace of innovation, creativity and change.To create is to make something that has never existed before. There's nothing more vulnerable than that. Adaptability to change is all about vulnerability.The second thing, in addition to really finally understanding the relationship between vulnerability and courage, the second thing I learned, is this: We have to talk about shame. And I'm going to be really honest with you. When I became a "vulnerability researcher"and that became the focus because of the TED talk -- and I'm not kidding.I'll give you an example. About three months ago, I was in a sporting goods store buying goggles and shin guards and all the things that parents buy at the sporting goods store. About from a hundred feet away, this is what I hear: "Vulnerability TED! Vulnerability TED!"I'm a fifth-generation Texan. Our family motto is "Lock and load." I am not a natural vulnerability researcher. So I'm like, just keep walking, she's on my six.And then I hear, "Vulnerability TED!" I turn around, I go, "Hi." She's right here and she said, "You're the shame researcher who had the breakdown."At this point, parents are, like, pulling their children close."Look away." And I'm so worn out at this point in my life, I look at her and I actually say, "It was a fricking spiritual awakening."And she looks back and does this, "I know."And she said, "We watched your TED talk in my book club. Then we read your book and we renamed ourselves 'The Breakdown Babes.'"And she said, "Our tagline is: 'We're falling apart and it feels fantastic.'"You can only imagine what it's like for me in a faculty meeting.So when I became Vulnerability TED, like an action figure -- Like Ninja Barbie, but I'm Vulnerability TED -- I thought, I'm going to leave that shame stuff behind, because I spent six years studying shame before I started writing and talking about vulnerability. And I thought, thank God, because shame is this horrible topic, no one wants to talk about it. It's the best way to shut people down on an airplane."What do you do?" "I study shame." "Oh."And I see you.But in surviving this last year, I was reminded of a cardinal rule -- not a research rule, but a moral imperative from my upbringing --"you've got to dance with the one who brung ya". And I did not learn about vulnerability and courage and creativity and innovation from studying vulnerability. I learned about these things from studying shame. And so I want to walk you in to shame. Jungian analysts call shame the swampland of the soul. And we're going to walk in. And the purpose is not to walk in and construct a home and live there. It is to put on some galoshes -- and walk through and find our way around. Here's why.We heard the most compelling call ever to have a conversation in this country, and I think globally, around race, right? Yes? We heard that. Yes? Cannot have that conversation without shame. Because you cannot talk about race without talking about privilege. And when people start talking about privilege, they get paralyzed by shame. We heard a brilliant simple solution to not killing people in surgery,which is, have a checklist. You can't fix that problem without addressing shame, because when they teach those folks how to suture,they also teach them how to stitch their self-worth to being all-powerful. And all-powerful folks don't need checklists.And I had to write down the name of this TED Fellow so I didn't mess it up here. Myshkin Ingawale, I hope I did right by you.I saw the TED Fellows my first day here. And he got up and he explained how he was driven to create some technology to help test for anemia, because people were dying unnecessarily. And he said, "I saw this need. So you know what I did? I made it." And everybody just burst into applause, and they were like "Yes!"And he said, "And it didn't work.And then I made it 32 more times, and then it worked."You know what the big secret about TED is? I can't wait to tell people this. I guess I'm doing it right now.This is like the failure conference.No, it is.You know why this place is amazing? Because very few people here are afraid to fail. And no one who gets on the stage, so far that I've seen, has not failed. I've failed miserably, many times. I don't think the world understands that, because of shame.There's a great quote that saved me this past year by Theodore Roosevelt. A lot of people refer to it as the "Man in the Arena" quote.And it goes like this: "It is not the critic who counts. It is not the man who sits and points out how the doer of deeds could have done things better and how he falls and stumbles. The credit goes to the man in the arena whose face is marred with dust and blood and sweat. But when he's in the arena, at best, he wins, and at worst, he loses, but when he fails, when he loses, he does so daring greatly."And that's what this conference, to me, is about. Life is about daring greatly, about being in the arena. When you walk up to that arena and you put your hand on the door, and you think, "I'm going in and I'm going to try this," shame is the gremlin who says, "Uh, uh.You're not good enough. You never finished that MBA. Your wife left you. I know your dad really wasn't in Luxembourg, he was in Sing Sing. I know those things that happened to you growing up. I know you don't think that you're pretty, smart, talented or powerful enough. I know your dad never paid attention, even when you made CFO." Shame is that thing.And if we can quiet it down and walk in and say, "I'm going to do this," we look up and the critic that we see pointing and laughing, 99 percent of the time is who? Us. Shame drives two big tapes -- "never good enough" -- and, if you can talk it out of that one, "who do you think you are?" The thing to understand about shame is, it's not guilt. Shame is a focus on self, guilt is a focus on behavior. Shame is "I am bad." Guilt is "I did something bad." How many of you, if you did something that was hurtful to me, would be willing to say, "I'm sorry. I made a mistake?" How many of you would be willing to say that? Guilt: I'm sorry. I made a mistake. Shame: I'm sorry. I am a mistake.There's a huge difference between shame and guilt. And here's what you need to know. Shame is highly, highly correlated with addiction, depression, violence, aggression, bullying, suicide, eating disorders. And here's what you even need to know more. Guilt, inversely correlated with those things. The ability to hold something we've done or failed to do up against who we want to be is incredibly adaptive. It's uncomfortable, but it's adaptive.The other thing you need to know about shame is it's absolutely organized by gender. If shame washes over me and washes over Chris, it's going to feel the same. Everyone sitting in here knows the warm wash of shame. We're pretty sure that the only people who don't experience shame are people who have no capacity for connection or empathy. Which means, yes, I have a little shame; no, I'm a sociopath. So I would opt for, yes, you have a little shame. Shame feels the same for men and women, but it's organized by gender.For women, the best example I can give you is Enjoli, the commercial. "I can put the wash on the line, pack the lunches, hand out the kisses and be at work at five to nine. I can bringhome the bacon, fry it up in the pan and never let you forget you're a man." For women, shame is, do it all, do it perfectly and never let them see you sweat. I don't know how much perfume that commercial sold, but I guarantee you, it moved a lot of antidepressants and anti-anxiety meds.Shame, for women, is this web of unobtainable, conflicting, competing expectations about who we're supposed to be. And it's a straight-jacket.For men, shame is not a bunch of competing, conflicting expectations. Shame is one, do not be perceived as what? Weak.I did not interview men for the first four years of my study. It wasn't until a man looked at me after a book signing, and said, "I love what say about shame, I'm curious why you didn't mention men." And I said, "I don't study men." And he said, "That's convenient."And I said, "Why?" And he said, "Because you say to reach out, tell our story, be vulnerable. But you see those books you just signed for my wife and my three daughters?" I said, "Yeah." "They'd rather me die on top of my white horse than watch me fall down. When we reach out and be vulnerable, we get the shit beat out of us. And don't tell me it's from the guys and the coaches and the dads. Because the women in my life are harder on me than anyone else."So I started interviewing men and asking questions. And what I learned is this: You show me a woman who can actually sit with a manin real vulnerability and fear, I'll show you a woman who's done incredible work. You show me a man who can sit with a woman who's just had it, she can't do it all anymore, and his first response is not, "I unloaded the dishwasher!"But he really listens -- because that's all we need -- I'll showyou a guy who's done a lot of work.Shame is an epidemic in our culture. And to get out from underneath it -- to find our way back to each other, we have to understand how it affects us and how it affects the way we're parenting, the way we're working, the way we're looking at each other. Very quickly, some research by Mahalik at Boston College. He asked, what do women need to do to conform to female norms? The top answers in this country: nice, thin, modest and use all available resources for appearance.When he asked about men, what do men in this country need to do to conform with male norms, the answers were: always show emotional control, work is first, pursue status and violence.If we're going to find our way back to each other, we have to understand and know empathy, because empathy's the antidote to shame.If you put shame in a Petri dish, it needs three things to grow exponentially: secrecy, silence and judgment. If you put the same amount in a Petri dish and douse it with empathy, it can't survive. The two most powerful words when we're in struggle: me too.And so I'll leave you with this thought. If we're going to find our way back to each other, vulnerability is going to be that path. And I know it's seductive to stand outside the arena, because I think I did it my whole life, and think to myself, I'm going to go in there and kick some ass when I'm bulletproof and when I'm perfect. And that is seductive. But the truth is, that never happens. And even if you got as perfect as you could and as bulletproof as you could possibly muster when you got in there, that's not what we want to see. We want you to go in. We want to be with you and across from you. And we just want, for ourselves and thepeople we care about and the people we work with, to dare greatly.So thank you all very much. I really appreciateit.。

TED英语演讲:培养出成功的孩子

TED英语演讲:培养出成功的孩子

TED英语演讲:培养出成功的孩子You know, I didnt set out to be a parenting expert. In fact, Im not very interested in parenting, per Se. Its just that theres a certain style of parenting these days that is kind of messing up kids, impending their chances to develop into themselves.我并不准备成为育儿专家。

事实上,我对育儿本身也不感爱好。

只是这些天有某种育儿风格的消失,是不利于孩子成长的,而且阻碍了他们进展自己的时机。

There’s a certain style of parenting these days that’s getting in the way. I guess what I’m saying is, we spend a lot of time being very concerned about parents who aren’t involved enough in the lives of their kids and their education or their upbringing, and rightly so.某种育儿风格的消失正阻碍着孩子的成长。

各位我要说的是,我们把大量的时间花在关心哪些父母没有足够的参加孩子的生活中,他们的教育或者抚养中,理应如此。

But at the other end of the spectrum, there’s a lot of harm going on there as well, where parents feel a kid can’t be successful unless the parent is protecting and preventing at every turn, and hovering over every happening, and micromanaging every moment, and steering their kid towards somesmall subset of colleges and careers.但从另外一个极端来说,这样做会有许多的害处,父母认为他们的孩子不会胜利,除非有父母事事的保护和阻挡,对每件事的权衡,围观管理每个时刻并引导他们对高校和职业的选择。

TED演讲:别吝啬一声感谢中英文(★)

TED演讲:别吝啬一声感谢中英文(★)

TED演讲:别吝啬一声感谢中英文(★)第一篇:TED演讲:别吝啬一声感谢中英文TED演讲:别吝啬一声感谢ura Trice is a therapist and coach, devoted to practices that help people find fulfillment.She's created a therapeutic program called Writing in Recovery that uses creative skills such as journaling and music to help people develop better self-awareness and set goals.She's taught this program at such well-known clinics as Betty Ford and Promises.She's the author of the book How to Work Any 12-Step Program.In her other life, she is the head of Laura's Wholesome Junk Food, making healthy cookies and brownies.你好我来这里是要和你谈谈赞美,赞美,感谢你的重要性,并将它具体化和真诚。

我对这方面感兴趣的方式是,当我长大了,直到大约几年前,我想对某人说谢谢,我想赞美他们,我想对我的赞美,我会阻止它。

我问自己,为什么?我感到害羞,感到尴尬。

然后我的问题就变成了,我是唯一一个这样做的人吗?所以,我决定调查。

我非常幸运的在一家康复中心工作,所以我可以看到人在面对生死与成瘾。

有时它会归结为一点简单的事情,他们的核心伤口是他们的父亲死了,而没有说他为他们感到骄傲。

但是,他们听到来自所有的家庭和朋友,父亲告诉其他人,他为他感到骄傲,但他从来没有告诉儿子。

TED演讲真正拉开人与人差距的,是知道自己贵在哪里

TED演讲真正拉开人与人差距的,是知道自己贵在哪里

TED演讲真正拉开人与人差距的,是知道自己贵在哪里hello大家好,我是达达。

你是否偶尔也会觉得,自己干得比拿得多,自己根本没有拿到应得的薪水。

但其实这个“定价”并不是源于老板觉得你值多少钱,而是源于你认为你自己值多少钱。

今天我们一起来听听定价顾问Casey Brown分享的一些故事和经验,也许可以帮助你更好地传达你的价值,并为您的卓越成就而获得报酬。

演讲者:Casey Brown演讲题目: Know your worth, and then ask for it 真正拉开人与人差距的来自TED英语演说优选00:0009:20中英文对照翻译No one will ever pay you what you're worth. They'll only ever pay you what they think you're worth. And you control their thinking, not like this, although that would be cool.没有人会为你真正的价值买单,他们只会为他们所认为的你的价值买单,并且你控制着他们的想法,不是像这样的,虽然他看起来很酷。

That would be really cool. Instead, like this: clearly defining and communicating your value are essential to being paid well for your excellence.这样看起来真的很酷,而是,像这样:清楚的定义并传达你的价值,并让你杰出的工作有所回报是非常重要的。

Anyone here want to be paid well? OK, good,then this talk is for everyone. It's got universal applicability.It's true if you're a business owner, if you're an employee, if you're a job seeker. It's true if you're a man or a woman.有人想要一份丰厚的薪水吗?好的,那么,这个讨论适用于每一个人。

Ted演讲稿:成为机会创造者的八大法则

Ted演讲稿:成为机会创造者的八大法则

Ted演讲稿:成为机会创造者的八大法则。

要保持开放的眼界。

很多时候我们错失了机会,往往是因为我们没有看到这些机会的存在。

尤其是当我们陷入到自己的舒适区时,我们会开始忽视身边存在的很多机会。

所以保持开放的眼界,持续关注各种各样的信息来源是非常关键的。

勇敢地试错。

机会创造者不怕尝试新的事物,即使失败了也绝不会气馁。

因为对于他们来说,每一次失败都是一次锻炼,都是让他们变得更加成熟的机会。

所以,勇敢地去尝试新的事物,不要怕失败,也不要怕被他人嘲笑。

要有自信心。

机会创造者必须具备一定的自信心,因为只有自信心才能让他们更加勇敢地去尝试新的事情,不畏困难的克服各种阻碍。

所以,无论何时何地,机会创造者都应该时刻保持自信的心态。

勇于接受挑战。

当机会来临时,面对困难是不可避免的。

但是机会创造者会更加勇敢地接受这些挑战,积极应对各种困难,从而取得成功。

因为他们知道,任何成功都不是一蹴而就的,都需要经过一定的努力和付出。

要学会创新。

机会创造者往往是一些富有想象力和创新精神的人。

他们总是能够在日常工作、生活和思考中发现创新的点子,更好地创造机会。

所以,学会创新是成为机会创造者的重要法则之一。

第六,要披荆斩棘。

机会往往伴随着很多的挑战和难题,这些难题往往会阻挡我们前进的道路。

但是机会创造者却会勇敢地去解决这些难题,不断地寻找新的解决方案,不停地披荆斩棘,最终取得成功。

第七,学会合作。

机会创造者不仅仅是一个人,他们往往会通过合作取得更好的成果。

因为合作可以让我们汇聚更多的智慧和资源,从而创造更加完美的机会。

所以,学会合作是成为机会创造者的重要法则之一。

第八,始终保持激情。

激情可以让机会创造者充满动力和干劲,坚定地追求自己的目标和愿望。

只有始终保持激情,才能获得持久的动力和成就。

总之,成为一名机会创造者并不是一件容易的事情,但只要我们坚守上述八个法则,勇敢地去探索、创新和合作,就能够让自己成为一位卓越的机会创造者,赢得成功和辉煌的未来。

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量

T e d演讲稿脆弱的力量(总9页)-CAL-FENGHAI.-(YICAI)-Company One1-CAL-本页仅作为文档封面,使用请直接删除Brene Brown: The power of vulnerabilitySo, I'll start with this: a couple years ago, an event planner called me because I was going to do a speaking event. And she called, and she said, "I'm really struggling with how to write about you on the little flier." And I thought, "Well, what's the struggle"And she said, "Well, I saw you speak, and I'm going to call you a researcher, I think, but I'm afraid if I call you a researcher, no one will come, because they'll think you're boring andirrelevant." (Laughter)And I was like, "Okay." And she said, "But the thing I liked about your talk is you're a storyteller. So I think what I'll do is just call you a storyteller." And of course, the academic, insecure part of me was like, "You're going to call me a what"And she said, "I'm going to call you a storyteller." And I was like, "Why not magic pixie"(Laughter) I was like, "Let me think about this for a second." I tried to call deep on my courage. And I thought, you know, I am a storyteller. I'm a qualitative researcher. I collect stories; that's what I do. And maybe stories are just data with a soul. And maybe I'm just a storyteller. And so I said, "You know what? Why don't you just say I'm a researcher-storyteller." And she went, "Haha. There's no such thing."(Laughter) So I'm a researcher-storyteller, and I'm going to talk to you today -- we're talking about expanding perception -- andso I want to talk to you and tell some stories about a piece of my research that fundamentally expanded my perception and really actually changed the way that I live and love and work and parent.And this is where my story starts. When I was a young researcher, doctoral student, my first year I had a research professor who said to us, "Here's the thing, if you cannot measure it, it does not exist." And I thought he was just sweet-talking me. I was like, "Really"and he was like, "Absolutely." And so you have to understand that I have a bachelor's in social work, a master's in social work, and I was getting my Ph.D. in social work, so my entire academic career was surrounded by people who kind of believed in the "life's messy, love it." And I'm more of the, "life's messy, clean it up, organize it and put it into a bento box." (Laughter) And so to think that I had found my way, to found a career that takes me -- really, one of the big sayings in social work is, "Lean into the discomfort of the work." And I'm like, knock discomfort upside the head and move it over and get all A's. That was my mantra. So I was very excited about this. And so I thought, you know what, this is the career for me, because I am interested in some messy topics. But I want to be able to make them not messy. I want to understand them. I want to hack into these things I know are important and lay the code out for everyone to see.So where I started was with connection. Because, by the time you're a social worker for 10 years, what you realize is that connection is why we're here. It's what gives purpose and meaning to our lives. This is what it's all about. It doesn't matter whether you talk to peoplewho work in social justice and mental health and abuse and neglect, what we know is that connection, the ability to feel connected, is --neurobiologically that's how we're wired -- it's why we're here. SoI thought, you know what, I'm going to start with connection. Well, you know that situation where you get an evaluation from your boss, andshe tells you 37 things you do really awesome, and one thing -- an "opportunity for growth"(Laughter) And all you can think about is that opportunity for growth, right? Well, apparently this is the way my work went as well, because, when you ask people about love, they tell you about heartbreak. Whenyou ask people about belonging, they'll tell you their mostexcruciating experiences of being excluded. And when you ask people about connection, the stories they told me were about disconnection.So very quickly -- really about six weeks into this research -- I raninto this unnamed thing that absolutely unraveled connection in a way that I didn't understand or had never seen. And so I pulled back out of the research and thought, I need to figure out what this is. And it turned out to be shame. And shame is really easily understood as the fear of disconnection: Is there something about me that, if otherpeople know it or see it, that I won't be worthy of connection? The things I can tell you about it: it's universal; we all have it. The only people who don't experience shame have no capacity for human empathy or connection. No one wants to talk about it, and the less you talk about it the more you have it. What underpinned this shame, this "I'm not good enough," -- which we all know that feeling: "I'm not blank enough. I'm not thin enough, rich enough, beautiful enough, smart enough, promoted enough." The thing that underpinned this was excruciating vulnerability, this idea of, in order for connection to happen, we have to allow ourselves to be seen, really seen.And you know how I feel about vulnerability. I hate vulnerability. And so I thought, this is my chance to beat it back with my measuring stick. I'm going in, I'm going to figure this stuff out,I'm going to spend a year, I'm going to totally deconstruct shame, I'm going to understand how vulnerability works, and I'm going to outsmart it. So I was ready, and I was really excited.As you know, it's not going to turn out well. (Laughter) You know this. So, I could tell you a lot about shame, but I'd have to borrow everyone else's time. But here's what I can tell you that it boils down to -- and this may be one of the most important things that I've ever learned in the decade of doing this research. My one year turned into six years: thousands ofstories,hundreds of long interviews, focus groups. At one point, peoplewere sending me journal pagesand sending me their stories -- thousands of pieces of data in six years. And I kind of got a handle on it.I kind of understood, this is what shame is, this is how it works. I wrote a book, I published a theory, but something was not okay -- and what it was is that, if I roughly took the people I interviewed and divided them into people who really have a sense of worthiness --that's what this comes down to, a sense of worthiness -- they have a strong sense of love and belonging --and folks who struggle for it, and folks who are always wondering if they're good enough.There was only one variable that separated the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging and the people who really struggle for it. And that was, the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging believe they're worthy of love and belonging. That's it.They believe they'reworthy. And to me, the hard part of the one thing that keeps us out of connection is our fear that we're not worthy of connection, was something that, personally and professionally, I felt like I needed to understand better. So what I did is I took all of theinterviews where I saw worthiness, where I saw people living that way, and just looked at those.What do these people have in common? I have a slight office supply addiction, but that's another talk. So I had a manila folder, and I had a Sharpie, and I was like, what am I going to call thisresearch? And the first words that came to my mind were whole-hearted. These are whole-hearted people, living from this deep sense of worthiness. So I wrote at the top of the manila folder, and I started looking at the data. In fact, I did it first in a four-day very intensive data analysis, where I went back, pulled these interviews, pulled the stories, pulled the incidents.What's the theme What's the pattern My husband left town with the kids because I always go intothis Jackson Pollock crazy thing, where I'm just like writing and inmy researcher mode.And so here's what I found. What they had incommon was a sense of courage. And I want to separate courage and bravery for you for a minute. Courage, the original definition of courage,when it first came into the English language -- it's from the Latin word cor, meaning heart --and the original definition was to tell the story of who you are with your whole heart. And so these folks had, very simply, the courage to be imperfect. They had the compassion tobe kind to themselves first and then to others, because, as it turns out, we can't practice compassion with other people if we can't treat ourselves kindly. And the last was they had connection, and -- thiswas the hard part -- as a result of authenticity, they were willing to let go of who they thought they should be in order to be who theywere, which you have to absolutely do thatfor connection.The other thing that they had in common was this: They fully embraced vulnerability. They believed that what made them vulnerable made them beautiful. They didn't talk about vulnerability beingcomfortable, nor did they really talk about it being excruciating --as I had heard it earlier in the shame interviewing. They just talked about it being necessary. They talked about the willingness to say, "I love you" first, the willingness to do something where there are no guarantees, the willingness to breathe through waiting for the doctor to call after your mammogram. They're willing to invest in a relationship that may or may not work out.They thought this was fundamental.I personally thought it was betrayal. I could not believe I had pledged allegiance to research, where our job -- you know, the definition of research is to control and predict, to study phenomena, for theexplicit reason to control and predict. And now my mission to control and predict had turned up the answer that the way to live is with vulnerability and to stop controlling and predicting. This led to a little breakdown -- (Laughter) -- which actually looked more like this. (Laughter) And it did. I call it a breakdown; my therapistcalls it a spiritual awakening. A spiritual awakening sounds better than breakdown, but I assure you it was a breakdown. And I had to put my data away and go find a therapist. Let me tell you something: you know who you are when you call your friends and say, "I think I need to see somebody.Do you have any recommendations"Because about five of my friends were like, "Wooo. I wouldn't want to be your therapist." (Laughter) I was like, "What does that mean"And they're like, "I'm just saying, you know. Don't bring your measuring stick." I was like, "Okay."So I found a therapist. My first meeting with her, Diana -- I brought in my list of the way the whole-hearted live, and I sat down. And she said, "How are you"And I said, "I'm great. I'm okay." She said, "What's going on"And this is a therapist who sees therapists, because we have to go to those, because their B.S. meters are good. (Laughter) And so Isaid, "Here's the thing, I'm struggling." And she said, "What's the struggle"And I said, "Well, I have a vulnerability issue. And I know that vulnerability is the core of shame and fear and our struggle for worthiness, but it appears that it's also the birthplace of joy, of creativity, of belonging, of love. And I think I have a problem, and I need some help." And I said, "But here's the thing: no familystuff, no childhood shit." (Laughter) "I just need some strategies." (Laughter) (Applause)Thank you. So she goes likethis. (Laughter) And then I said, "It's bad, right"And she said, "It's neither good nor bad." (Laughter) "It just is what it is." And I said, "Oh my God, this is going to suck." (Laughter)And it did, and it didn't. And it took about a year. And you know how there are people that, when they realize that vulnerability and tenderness are important, that they surrender and walk into it. A:that's not me, and B: I don't even hang out with people likethat. (Laughter) For me, it was a yearlong street fight. It was a slugfest. Vulnerability pushed, I pushed back. I lost the fight, but probably won my life back.And so then I went back into the research and spent the next couple of years really trying to understand what they, the whole-hearted, what choices they were making, and what are we doing withvulnerability. Why do we struggle with it so much? Am I alone in struggling with vulnerability? No. So this is what I learned. We numb vulnerability -- when we're waiting for the call. It was funny, I sent something out on Twitter and on Facebook that says, "How would you define vulnerability? What makes you feel vulnerable"And within an hour and a half, I had 150 responses. Because I wanted to know what's out there. Having to ask my husband for help becauseI'm sick, and we're newly married; initiating sex with myhusband; initiating sex with my wife; being turned down; asking someone out; waiting for the doctor to call back;getting laid off; laying off people -- this is the world we live in. We live in a vulnerable world. And one of the ways we deal with it is we numb vulnerability.And I think there's evidence -- and it's not the only reason this evidence exists, but I think it's a huge cause -- we are the most in-debt, obese, addicted and medicated adult cohort in U.S.history. The problem is -- and I learned this from the research --that you cannot selectively numb emotion. You can't say, here's the bad stuff. Here's vulnerability, here's grief, here's shame, here's fear, here's disappointment. I don't want to feel these. I'm going to have a couple of beers and a banana nut muffin. (Laughter) I don't want to feel these. And I know that's knowing laughter. I hack into your lives for a living. God. (Laughter) You can't numb those hard feelings without numbing the other affects, our emotions. You cannot selectively numb. So when we numb those, we numb joy, we numb gratitude, we numb happiness. And then we are miserable, and we are looking for purpose and meaning, and then we feel vulnerable, so then we have a couple of beers and a banana nut muffin. And it becomes this dangerous cycle.One of the things that I think we need to think about is why and how we numb. And it doesn't just have to be addiction. The other thing wedo is we make everything that's uncertain certain. Religion has gone from a belief in faith and mystery to certainty. I'm right, you're wrong. Shut up. That's it. Just certain. The more afraid we are, the more vulnerable we are, the more afraid we are. This is what politics looks like today. There's no discourse anymore. There's noconversation. There's just blame. You know how blame is described in the research? A way to discharge pain and discomfort. We perfect. If there's anyone who wants their life to look like this, it would be me, but it doesn't work. Because what we do is we take fat from our butts and put it in our cheeks. (Laughter) Which just, I hope in 100 years, people will look back and go, "Wow."(Laughter)And we perfect, most dangerously, our children. Let me tell you what we think about children.They're hardwired for struggle when they get here. And when you hold those perfect little babies in your hand, our job is not to say, "Look at her, she's perfect. My job is just to keep her perfect -- make sure she makes the tennis team by fifth grade and Yale by seventh grade."That's not our job. Our job is to look and say, "You know whatYou're imperfect, and you're wired for struggle, but you are worthy of love and belonging." That's our job. Show me a generation of kids raised like that, and we'll end the problems I think that we see today. We pretend that what we do doesn't have an effect onpeople. We do that in our personal lives.We do that corporate --whether it's a bailout, an oil spill, a recall -- we pretend like what we're doing doesn't have a huge impact on other people. I wouldsay to companies, this is not our first rodeo, people. We just need you to be authentic and real and say, "We're sorry. We'll fix it."But there's another way, and I'll leave you with this. This is what I have found: to let ourselves be seen, deeply seen, vulnerablyseen; to love with our whole hearts, even though there's no guarantee -- and that's really hard, and I can tell you as a parent, that's excruciatingly difficult -- to practice gratitude and joy in those moments of terror, when we're wondering, "Can I love you thismuch? Can I believe in this this passionately? Can I be this fierce about this"just to be able to stop and, instead of catastrophizing what might happen, to say, "I'm just so grateful, because to feel this vulnerable means I'm alive." And the last, which I think is probably the most important, is to believe that we're enough. Because when we work from a place, I believe, that says, "I'm enough," then we stop screaming and start listening, we're kinder and gentler to the people aroundus, and we're kinder and gentler to ourselves.That's all I have. Thank you.(Applause)。

TED英文演讲:一心一意确实不会太难

TED英文演讲:一心一意确实不会太难

TED英文演讲:一心一意确实不会太难千万别一心多用,那样通常会减少工作效率。

要想一心一意的搞好一件事确实不会太难,就看着你用什么方法能让自身专心致志了。

Paolo Cardini博士研究生设计方案的一款手机软件就能使你一心一意,它的结构设计竟然那么简易!下边是我为大伙儿搜集有关TED英文演讲:一心一意确实不会太难,热烈欢迎参考参照。

一心一意确实不会太难演讲人:Paolo CardiniI'm a designer and an educator. I'm a multitasking person, and I push my students to fly through a very creative, multitasking design process. But how efficient is, really, this multitasking?我是一名室内设计师,另外也是位教育学家。

我很喜欢另外解决多种每日任务,另外我激励我的学生们去感受一次创造力的一心多用的设计过程。

可是多个任务另外解决的高效率到底有多少呢?Let's consider for a while the option of monotasking. A couple of examples. Look at that. This is my multitasking activity result. (Laughter) So trying to cook, answering the phone, writing SMS, and maybe uploading some pictures about this awesome barbecue.大家先考虑到下针对单任务解决的见解。

举好多个事例吧,可以看。

这是我并行处理主题活动下的結果。

(我)试着(另外)煮饭、讲电話、发信息,另外还很有可能在提交此次野餐的相片。

保罗皮夫ted演讲稿

保罗皮夫ted演讲稿

保罗皮夫ted演讲稿保罗皮夫ted演讲稿为大家整理社会心理学家保罗皮夫在ted上的精彩演讲词《越有钱越无情》,保罗皮夫在演讲中用一款游戏分析了富人与穷人的关系构造,通过游戏他证明出,财富的增加和社会地位的上升会直接导致自我中心的失控,而相反这类人群的社会责任却不能与他们的财富成为正比。

以下是具体的保罗皮夫ted演讲稿全文。

保罗皮夫ted演讲稿我想让大家花一点时间,想象一下自己正在玩大富翁游戏,只不过在这个游戏里面,那些帮助你赢得游戏的因素,比如技巧、才能和运气,在此无关紧要,就像对于人生一样。

因为这个游戏被操纵了,而你已经占了上风,你有更多的钱,有更多在棋盘上移动的机会,以及更多获得资源的机会。

在你想象这个经历的时候,我想让大家问一下自己,一个被操纵的游戏里面,作为优势玩家的经历会如何改变你思考自己和对待对手的方式?在加州大学伯克利分校,我们做了一个试验来研究这个问题:我们招募了100多对陌生人到实验室。

通过投掷硬币的方式,随机选定一对中的一个作为这个游戏中占上风的玩家。

他们拿到了两倍的钱,当他们途径起点的时候,他们拿到两倍的工资,而且他们可以同时掷两个骰子而不是一个,所以他们可以在棋盘上移动更多。

(笑声)在接下来的15分钟内,我们通过隐藏的摄像头观察了现场情况。

今天是第一次,我想和大家分享一下我们观察到的,有的时候音质可能不太好,还请大家原谅。

因为毕竟是用隐藏的摄像头,所以我们加上了字幕:富玩家:“你有多少张500块?”穷玩家:“就一张”。

富玩家:“真的吗?!”穷玩家:“是啊。

”富玩家:“我有三张。

(笑声)不知道为什么他们给了我那么多。

”所以玩家们很快就意识到,这个游戏明显有点奇怪一个玩家比另一个玩家,明显有更多的钱。

随着游戏慢慢展开,我们观察到两个玩家,开始有一些明显不同的表现。

富的玩家在棋盘上移动的声音更大,移动的时候几乎是在狠狠砸棋盘,我们看到了富玩家们更多的“霸主”信号、肢体动作、权力的显露以及互相庆祝。

TED演讲稿想要真正的成功自己向上的时候要拉别人一把

TED演讲稿想要真正的成功自己向上的时候要拉别人一把

想要真正的成功自己向上的时候要拉别人一把When it comes to our careers, the analogy we've been given is a ladder. We're climbing climbing, climbing, seeing just how high we can get. But if we want to be a part of organizations that are diverse and inclusive and truly reflect the world that we live in,that's simply not enough. While we climb, we also need to lift.It's no secret that our companies andorganizations rarely have leadership teams that represent the communities they serve. That makes them less effective in their work, less innovative and less profitable too. We need more women steering the ship, more people of color at the helm, more folks with disabilities in charge, more immigrants setting the tone, more queer and trans folks calling the shots. So whether you're a new hire who’s a proud member ofone or more ofthesegroups or a longtime leader who is none of the above, each ofus has a role to play in making this happen.Success is no longer about our individualambitions, but about how we build something greater together. My mother introduced me to this concept of lifting while you climb.当谈论到我们的职业,职业晋升通常被比喻为阶梯。

2016年罗胖跨年演讲文稿笔记版解析

2016年罗胖跨年演讲文稿笔记版解析

2016年罗胖跨年演讲的笔记版这篇演讲是捕捉未来历史之风的一篇极其精彩的演讲稿,让普通人对当下和未来有了深刻的认知。

作者首先从2016年三大典型事件出发,再具体到专家对中国经济形势的判断以及作者从四个角度提出了反向解释。

这些共同指向了一个观点:“黑天鹅事件”频出是当代的特征,这就说明我们正处在一个急速变化的时代,迷茫是所有现代人的问题。

因为有迷茫,很多人把自己对世界的理解建构在专家的宏观预测上,作者反对这种做法,他给出的观点是“宏观是我们必须承受的,微观才是我们能有所作为的地方”,比了解宏观更重要的是微观地思考,对于创业者应该积极思考“还有哪些问题没有解决、如何找到应对策略”,这是应对未来变化的一个根本之道。

接着,作者结合指出当下的环境中,社会有五大问题尚待创业者去解决,这也是创业者的机会点所在。

目前大巨头们已经把市场瓜分完毕,作为创业者们有两条路可选择,一是依托巨头,从为其服务中成为与他们共生者;二是要精耕细作,深挖用户价值。

如何深挖用户价值,作者用“五只黑天鹅”做比喻,指出未来用户需求所在。

第一个观点(时间战场):对于未来的用户,时间是无比宝贵的。

在与竞争者争夺时间这场战争中,我们可以从两点挖掘,1.就是帮别人省时间;2.就是帮别人把省下来的时间浪费在那些美好的事物上。

第二个观点(消费升级):在一个物质极大丰富的商品世界里,用户逐渐认识到任何消费都不止是金钱而已,还有时间、空间、精力的消费。

这些对时间、空间、精力都很宝贵的现代人而言,消费已经从掏不起钱的问题转移到耗不起时间的问题。

消费升级的方向是“父爱逻辑”,不要试图迎合消费者,让他们在现有的、看似很多选择、却都不尽如人意的商品和服务中去选择,创业者自身要先升级,要从产品到服务,从初级的服务到更好服务的演进中提供给消费者越来越贴心的商品和服务。

第三个观点(智能革命):智能革命的最大问题是,人如果还想仰仗自己在某个领域的长期积累而成为专家的理想将被人工智能的彻底打破。

ted十大著名演讲稿

ted十大著名演讲稿

ted十大著名演讲稿TED是一个全球著名的非营利组织。

该组织的使命是传播思想、鼓励创新和促进交流。

TED的演讲是备受推崇的演讲,在全球范围内都收到了广泛的关注和认可。

下面,我将为大家介绍TED十大著名演讲稿。

1.肯·罗宾逊: “改变教育中的教学方式”肯·罗宾逊在这个演讲中分享了他对教育的看法。

他认为,传统的教育模式太单调了,忽略了学生的创造力和想象力。

他呼吁我们采用更富有创造性和启发性的教学方式,以培养更有创新力的人才。

2.约瑟夫·普林斯: “计算机科学”约瑟夫·普林斯在这个演讲中分享了他对计算机科学的热情。

他强调了计算机科学的重要性,并解释了计算机科学如何改变我们的世界。

他呼吁我们更多地关注计算机科学,并将其作为我们生活中的重要组成部分。

3.布伦丹·布朗: “演讲的力量”布伦丹·布朗在这个演讲中分享了他对演讲的看法。

他说,演讲可以改变世界,可以传递知识,可以启发思考。

他教授了一些关于演讲的技巧和原则,帮助听众更好地理解演讲的力量。

4.黛安娜·尤瑟: “领导艺术”黛安娜·尤瑟在这个演讲中分享了她对领导艺术的研究。

她解释了领导艺术对组织和个人的影响,并分享了一些培养领导力的技巧和方法。

5.丹尼尔·科恩曼: “了解人类”丹尼尔·科恩曼在这个演讲中分享了他对人类了解的研究。

他解释了人类思维的不足,以及如何加强我们的人类认知能力。

他通过提供正确的信息和知识来提高人类的理解力。

6.帕特里克·唐威利: “与云朵商量”帕特里克·唐威利在这个演讲中分享了他与云朵的对话。

他通过展示云朵和自然环境之间的相互作用来表达观点。

他通过与云朵的沟通,呼吁我们更加关注环境和自然。

7.夏洛特·哈钦斯: “肉类产业的真相”夏洛特·哈钦斯在这个演讲中分享了她对肉类产业的调查。

她揭示了肉类生产环节中的残酷和不人道。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

2016保罗皮夫ted演讲稿保罗皮夫ted演讲稿为大家整理社会心理学家保罗皮夫在ted上的精彩演讲词《越有钱越无情》,保罗皮夫在演讲中用一款游戏分析了富人与穷人的关系构造,通过游戏他证明出,财富的增加和社会地位的上升会直接导致自我中心的失控,而相反这类人群的社会责任却不能与他们的财富成为正比。

以下是具体的保罗皮夫ted演讲稿全文。

保罗皮夫ted演讲稿我想让大家花一点时间,想象一下自己正在玩大富翁游戏,只不过在这个游戏里面,那些帮助你赢得游戏的因素,比如技巧、才能和运气,在此无关紧要,就像对于人生一样。

因为这个游戏被操纵了,而你已经占了上风,你有更多的钱,有更多在棋盘上移动的机会,以及更多获得资源的机会。

在你想象这个经历的时候,我想让大家问一下自己,一个被操纵的游戏里面,作为优势玩家的经历会如何改变你思考自己和对待对手的方式? 在加州大学伯克利分校,我们做了一个试验来研究这个问题:我们招募了100多对陌生人到实验室。

通过投掷硬币的方式,随机选定一对中的一个作为这个游戏中占上风的玩家。

他们拿到了两倍的钱,当他们途径起点的时候,他们拿到两倍的工资,而且他们可以同时掷两个骰子而不是一个,所以他们可以在棋盘上移动更多。

(笑声)在接下来的15分钟内,我们通过隐藏的摄像头观察了现场情况。

今天是第一次,我想和大家分享一下我们观察到的,有的时候音质可能不太好,还请大家原谅。

因为毕竟是用隐藏的摄像头,所以我们加上了字幕:富玩家:"你有多少张500块?"穷玩家:"就一张"。

富玩家:"真的吗?!"穷玩家:"是啊。

"富玩家:"我有三张。

(笑声)不知道为什么他们给了我那么多。

"所以玩家们很快就意识到,这个游戏明显有点奇怪一个玩家比另一个玩家,明显有更多的钱。

随着游戏慢慢展开,我们观察到两个玩家,开始有一些明显不同的表现。

富的玩家在棋盘上移动的声音更大,移动的时候几乎是在狠狠砸棋盘,我们看到了富玩家们更多的"霸主"信号、肢体动作、权力的显露以及互相庆祝。

我们在旁边放了一碗椒盐卷饼,就在右下角,这使得我们可以观察玩家吃椒盐卷饼的行为,我们就是看看玩家吃了多少椒盐卷饼。

富玩家:"这些椒盐卷饼有什么猫腻么?"穷玩家:"不知道啊。

"好吧,不出所料,大家觉得有问题。

起先他们好奇那一碗椒盐卷饼为什么会在那里,就像你刚才看到的其中一个甚至问:"这碗椒盐卷饼有什么猫腻么?"但尽管如此,整个现场的主导形势还是不可避免,那些富的玩家开始吃更多的椒盐卷饼。

富玩家:"我爱椒盐卷饼。

"游戏继续进行,我们发现了一个很明显的、有趣现象,就是富玩家开始对另一个玩家表现得不友好,对那些可怜玩家的贫穷困境越来越不敏感,开始越来越频繁的炫富,更喜欢展示他们正在做的一切。

富玩家:"我什么都买得起。

"穷玩家:"你有多少钱?"富玩家:"你还欠我24块,你很快就要输光了,我要买它,我太多钱了。

那么多花都花不完的钱。

"富玩家2:"我要把整个棋盘都买下来!"富玩家3:"你很快就要没钱了,我已经差不多不可战胜了。

"下面是我觉得一个非常非常有意思的现象。

在15分钟要结束的时候,我们请玩家谈论他们在游戏中的经历。

当富玩家谈论,他们在这个被操纵的游戏里面为什么必胜的时候?他们提到了自己为了买到不同地产和赢得游戏所做的努力,而他们忽略了这个游戏一开始的不同形势,也就是投掷硬币随机决定了他们哪一个获得优势,而这对我们理解大脑如何看待优势提供了非常好的启发。

我们可以用这个大富翁的游戏作比喻来理解我们的社会以及社会分层——也就是有的人有大量的财富和地位,而很多人没有。

他们仅有很少的财富和地位,以及很少获得宝贵资源的机会。

我和我的同事在过去的7年里一直在做的,就是研究这些不同层次的影响。

全国范围内的大量研究都表明:当一个人的财富增加时,他们的同情心和同理心下降,而他们的优越感增加,也更注重个人利益。

在调查中,我们发现富有的人更可能把贪婪定义为好的,把对个人利益的追求定义为有利的、道德的。

今天我想谈的就是这种个人利益思维的影响,谈谈为什么我们应该关注这些影响以及我们能做些什么?我们在这一领域最初做的一些研究,观察了助人行为。

社会心理学家称之为亲社会行为。

我们很想知道什么人更倾向于给其他人提供帮助,富人还是穷人?其中一个研究,我们把一个社区的富人和穷人都带到了实验室,给了每个人10美元。

我们告诉他们:"他们可以把这10块钱给自己用,也可以把其中一部分拿出来分享。

如果他们愿意的话,跟一个陌生人分享,一个永远不会再相遇的陌生人。

我们观察人们给了多少?那些年收入为25000,甚至低于15000美元的人和那些年收入为15万,甚至20万的人比起来多给了44%。

我们还让人们玩游戏,看看什么人更可能为了赢得一个奖品而作弊。

其中一个游戏,我们其实操纵了电脑使得某些数字不可能出现,这个游戏里面你不可能超过12,然而越富有的人越有可能在这个游戏中作弊,去争取那个最终能够赢取50美元现金的分数,可能性甚至高达3到4倍。

我们还做了另一个实验,观察人们是否会从糖罐里面拿糖,糖罐上清楚地写着:给小朋友预留......(笑声)我是认真的,我知道这听上去像我在讲笑话。

我们明确地告诉了参与者这一罐糖是给隔壁发展中心的小朋友准备的。

然后我们观察这些参与者拿了多少糖果?那些感觉富有的参与者比那些感觉贫穷的参与者多拿了两倍的糖果。

我们还研究了汽车,不只是汽车,而是不同类型汽车的司机,谁更倾向于做一些违法的事情。

其中一个实验我们观察了司机在碰到行人(我们安排的)过马路时的停车行为。

在加州大家都知道法律规定碰到行人要过马路,我们必须停车。

下面我告诉大家我们是怎样做的:左侧是我们的研究人员装作一个行人,他正要过马路,这时候红色的卡车停了下来,当然这是在加州。

很快一辆巴士呼啸而过,差点要撞倒我们的行人(笑声)这是一辆比较贵的车,一辆普锐斯开过来,一辆宝马车也一样。

几天内,我们测试了几百辆车记录。

我们发现随着车价的增加,司机违法的倾向也增加了,而在我们的廉价车系里没有一辆车做出违法行为,而在我们的昂贵车系里有接近50%的车都违法了,我们还做其它研究并发现越有钱的人越有可能在谈判中说谎,赞同工作中的不道德行为,比如从收银台偷现金、受贿、忽悠顾客等。

我并不是说只是有钱人会表现出类似的行为,完全不是。

事实上,我觉得我们每个人在我们日常的分分秒秒中都要跟这些动机作斗争。

什么时候以及是否把我们的利益置于他人的利益之上,这很容易理解。

因为美国梦告诉我们,每个人都有同等的机会可以成功、发达,只要我们足够努力,而这也意味着有的时候,你需要把自己的利益置于你周边人的利益和幸福之上。

但是我们的发现是你越有钱,则越有可能去追求一种个人的成功、个人的成果和成就,这可能是建立在对旁人的损害之上。

这里我为大家画出了在过去20年里每个1/5和最高5%人口的平均家庭收入。

1993年,每个1/5之间的收入差异还是相当大的,我们不难看出其中的差别。

但是在过去的20年里面,这种巨大差异最终成为了顶层人群与其他所有人之间的鸿沟。

事实是顶层20%的人口拥有整个国家接近90%的财富,我们正在经历史无前例的经济上的不平等,而这不仅意味着财富更多地聚集在为数很少的一群人手里,还意味着美国梦对越来越多的人来说都变得越来越遥远。

如果事实果真如我们发现的那样,你越有钱就越发觉得这些财富是你应得的,越会把自己的利益置于他人的利益之上,越会做那些利己的事情,那么没有理由可以相信。

这个现状会有所改变,事实上我们有更多的理由认为,情况会变得更糟糕。

这是在接下来的20年内保持和原来一样,相同线性速率的情况。

不平等,经济上的不平等,是我们每个人都要关心的问题。

不仅是因为社会底层的人,而是因为经济不平等会让个人和集体都变得糟糕。

有很多来自世界各地顶级实验室非常有说服力的研究,展示了日益增加的经济不平等造成的影响范围。

那些我们非常关心的东西,如身体健康、社会信任,都会随着不平等的增加而削弱。

同样的社会中消极的东西,比如肥胖、暴力、徒刑和惩罚,都会随着经济不平等的增加而加剧,而这些后果不是少数人所经历的,而是会影响社会的各个阶层,即使是在顶层的人也要遭受这些后果。

那我们该怎么办呢?这些带有延续性的、有害的消极影响,看上去像是什么东西失控了,而我们无能为力,特别是作为个人更是无能为力。

但是事实上,我们发现在我们自己的实验室研究中小小的心理干预,价值观的小小改变,某些特定的微小暗示就可以将平等和同理心恢复。

比如提醒人们合作的好处或者社区的优点,就能够让富人和穷人一样关注平等。

其中一个关于儿童贫困的实验,看过这个视频后,我们观察了他们为实验中一个压抑的陌生人提供帮助的积极性。

富人变得和穷人一样大方,他们愿意花时间帮助别人,帮助那些陌生人,这意味着这些差别不是与生俱来或一成不变的,它们很容易改变。

只需要价值观的微小变化、同情心的一点点推动和同理心的轻微触碰。

在实验室之外,我们也开始看到社会上的改变。

比尔•盖茨在哈佛的开学典礼演讲中说到这个社会所面临的问题:"不平等是我们目前面临的最严峻挑战。

"他谈论了我们应该如何战胜它,他说:"人类最伟大的进步不在于它的各种发现,而在于如何将这些发现用于削弱不平等。

"我们国家100多个最富有的人,正在承诺将他们一半的财产捐赠给慈善事业,还有很多草根运动的出现,比如"我们是那百分之一"、"资源一代"、"共同的财富"等,在这些组织中那些最有优势的成员,那些1%的人和其他有钱的人,正在利用自己的优势、经济资源与不平等抗争,通过倡导社会政策、社会价值的改变、人类行为的改变,这有悖于他们自身的经济利益,但却会最终重建美国梦!谢谢!(掌声)相关推荐:ted演讲稿大全。

相关文档
最新文档