学生应不应该对老师进行评价？ Should Teachers Be Evaluated by Students-
学生对教师评语
学生对教师的评语在教学环节中扮演着重要的角色，对教师的教学水平、教学态度和教学效果起着至关重要的评价作用。学生们对教师的评价不仅能够帮助教师了解自己在教学中的不足之处，还能够促使教师更加努力地提升自己的教学水平。下面将从不同角度来探讨学生对教师评语的重要性和作用。
（一）学生的评价能够帮助教师更好地了解自己在教学中的不足之处。在课堂上，教师往往难以全面地了解学生对自己的认可和不认可之处。因此，学生对教师的评价就显得尤为重要。通过学生对教师的评价，教师可以及时地了解到自己在教学中存在的问题，进而采取相应的措施加以改进，提高自己的教学水平。
（六）总的来说，学生对教师的评价是一种双向的交流和反馈机制，可以帮助教师更好地了解自己在教学中的不足之处，促使教师更加努力地提升自己的教学水平，加强师生之间的沟通和互动，调整教学方法和策略，不断反思自己的教学行为和教学风格，从而达到提高教学质量的目的。故而，学生对教师评语的作用不可小觑，应当充分重视，并以此为契机不断完善自己的教学能力。
（二）学生的评价可以促使教师更加努力地提升自己的教学水平。教师在得到学生的正面评价时会感到鼓舞和自豪，这种正面的反馈会激励教师更加努力地投入到教学工作中，不断提升自己的教学水平和教学质量。而在得到学生的负面评价时，教师也会思考问题所在，努力改正错误，以期提高自己的教学水平。
（三）学生对教师的评价可以加强师生之间的沟通和互动。通过学生对教师的评价，可以拉近师生之间的距离，建立起更加和谐的师生关系。教师可以通过学生的评价了解学生的想法和需求，更好地指导学生学习，帮助学生解决问题，从而促进师生之间的良好互动。
（四）学生的评价还可以帮助教师更好地调整教学方法和策略。不同的学生有不同的学习方式和学习习惯，而教师往往只能采用一种教学方法。通过学生对教师的评价，教师可以了解到不同学生的需求和偏好，从而有针对性地调整自己的教学方法和策略，更好地满足学生的学习需求，提高教学效果。
浅谈”学生对教师的评价”
浅谈”学生对教师的评价”课程改革建立了以教师自评为主，校长、教师、学生、家长共同参与的评价制度，从而促进教师不断对自己的教学行为进行分析与反思，以便在实施教学活动中不断调控。
学生做为教育的主体，评价老师是教师教学反思的一个重要举措。
学校在期末进行了学生评价教师的活动,我感觉这次评价的根本目的在于：确立衡量一个教师的标准，充分发挥教育评价的导向、激励、改进的功能。
通过评价过程的反馈、调控作用，促进每个教师不断总结、不断改进自己的工作，最终达到全面提高学校的教育教学质量的目的。
在这次评价中针对教师教学方法、教学态度、教学基本功等不同的方面进行评价。
我自己感觉到学生对教师的评价还是比较客观合理，老师的平时工作基本上得到了学生的认可。
学生作为教育的对象，是教师教育教学活动的直接参与者，他们对教师的教育教学活动有着最直接的感受和判断。
因此，教师首先要打破“师道尊严”的局面，让自己和学生建立平等、和谐、民主的师生关系；学生家长作为学生的父母和教育投资者之一，自然十分关心自己孩子在校受到什么样的教育。
促进家校协同也是学校教育的重要职责。
因此，家长评价教师是家长的一项权利，也是促进家长了解学校和教师，形成家校合力的有效途径。
学生是教育教学活动的直接参与者，学生的发展是教师工作的重心和目标，他们对教师的教育教学活动以及师生交往有着最直接的感受和判断，教师应该高度重视并及时听取他们对自己在教学、师生交往和其他方面的想法、意见和建议，并且根据学生的反映及时调整自己的教育教学策略，或者转变某些不恰当的教育教学行为。
在学习生活中，学生评价教师是客观存在的，只要我们稍稍留意学生窃窃私语的内容就会发现，学生评价教师如同教师热衷于评价他们一样乐此不疲。
学生是教师工作的一面镜子，老师的表扬，老师今天找我说话，老师帮助我把不会做的作业做完了，老师严厉地批评了我，让我重做了作业……这一切无不体现出学生在评价我们老师。
让学生走进教师，让教师聆听学生的心灵。
学生给老师打分的利与弊英语作文
学生给老师打分的利与弊英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1The Pros and Cons of Students Grading TeachersIt's the end of another semester, and we're all filling out those course evaluation forms again. Every student knows the drill - circle some numbers, leave some comments, and those sheets get sent off somewhere to be looked at by someone. But have you ever wondered if those evaluations actually make a difference? More importantly, should we students have a bigger role in evaluating our teachers? The idea of students grading their teachers is a controversial one, with good arguments on both sides. As a student myself, I can see the potential benefits but also the risks involved.On the plus side, letting students grade their teachers could lead to better teaching and a more effective learning environment for everyone. We're the ones on the receiving end of the instruction, so in many ways we're the real experts on what works and what doesn't in the classroom. By giving detailed feedback on things like teaching style, assignment workload, anduse of course materials, we can shine a light on areas where teachers are knocking it out of the park as well as areas that need improvement. This kind of direct input could be invaluable for helping good teachers get even better and struggling teachers to identify and fix any weaknesses in their approach.What's more, the threat of negative reviews from students could motivate teachers to bring their A-game to every class. If they know their performance is being scrutinized and graded, teachers might be more prepared, energetic, and engaging. It could keep them from phoning it in or relying too heavily on outdated lesson plans. In the corporate world, fear of getting panned in online reviews pushes many businesses to raise their standards of customer service. The same principle could improve academic standards and make teachers more accountable.From a student's perspective, another big perk would be feeling more invested in the learning process. Rather than just showing up and absorbing (or not absorbing) whatever is thrown at us, we'd have an active role in shaping the quality of our education. Grading teachers could give us more of a voice and an opportunity to advocate for the teaching methods that work best for our individual learning styles. It would empower us and make us more engaged participants instead of passivereceptacles. Even if our grades didn't always result in immediate changes, at least we'd know our opinions were being heard.Those are some of the upsides, but there are also plenty of potential downsides to students grading teachers that shouldn't be overlooked. One glaring issue is the difference in expertise between students and teachers. No matter how you slice it, teachers have more specialized knowledge and deeper understanding of their subject matter. We may think we know what makes a good learning experience, but teachers are the ones with extensive training on instructional methods and curriculum design. Would it be fair or wise to let people who haven't mastered the basics yet call the shots on how material is taught? It could undermine teachers' authority in the classroom or incentivize them to dumb down content to get better ratings from students.There's also a risk that students could take out frustrations on teachers in the form of harsh grades, discipline problems, or online harassment. The anonymity of grading systems might embolden students to vent or make unfair personal attacks that teachers would have no way to address. In the age of social media shaming, one bad rating could quickly spiral into a smear campaign. Even if criticism was warranted, teachers deserve basicprotections against bullying or public humiliation from the people they're trying to educate.Then there's the question of how much stock should be put into student feedback in the first place. It's an open secret that many students don't take course evaluations seriously, treating them as just another box to check before moving on to the next semester. If a grading system was too unwieldy or disruptive, students might tune it out too. And there's always the reality that some students will punish teachers for things beyond their control, like grading stringency or mandatory attendance policies set at the department level. So how useful and reliable would student grades really be?My personal take as a student? I'm not fully convinced that we should have total grading power over our teachers, but I do think our voices should carry more weight in the evaluation process. Maybe a compromise where our grades make up part of a teacher's overall performance review, along with input from peers, curriculum experts, and data on student outcomes. That might give us more say while still preserving teachers' independence and recognizing the limits of student expertise.Or maybe the answer is to stop with the high-stakes grading mindset altogether and make evaluations more of a constructivedialogue. Instead of impersonal sheets of numbers, students and teachers could have moderated conversations to discuss what's working, what's not, and how things could improve in a spirit of collaboration. That could take some of the pressure and adversarial overtones out of the equation while still giving us a forum to speak up.At the end of the day, teachers and students are on the same team striving for the same goal - an enriching, productive learning experience for all. While I don't think we students should be the ones handing down harsh grades and punishments, I do believe our insights could be better utilized to help shape that shared vision. I know I've had my fair share of teachers who were exceptional and deserve all the props in the world. But I've also had my fair share of teachers who did little more than read off of outdated PowerPoint slides to an utterly disengaged classroom. Somewhere between those two extremes is the balance we should be aiming for.So bring on the evaluations, but let's make sure all perspectives are heard and valued. It's the only way we'll keep improving and make the most of the precious years we have together to learn, grow, and prepare for the future.篇2The Pros and Cons of Students Grading TeachersSchool is a place where we come to learn, grow, and develop our skills and knowledge. At the heart of this process are our teachers - the guides who facilitate our education and help shape our minds. But what if the roles were reversed, and we, as students, had the opportunity to grade our teachers? The idea of students grading teachers has been a topic of debate for quite some time, with compelling arguments on both sides.On one hand, allowing students to grade their teachers could foster a more collaborative and accountable learning environment. After all, who better to assess the effectiveness of a teacher than the very individuals they are tasked with educating? By giving students a voice in evaluating their instructors, we could potentially identify areas where teachers excel or struggle, providing valuable feedback to help them improve their teaching methods.Imagine a scenario where a teacher's approach resonates exceptionally well with their students. Perhaps their lessons are engaging, their explanations are clear, and their passion for the subject is infectious. In such cases, positive student evaluations could serve as a well-deserved affirmation of the teacher'sefforts, potentially leading to recognition, professional development opportunities, or even merit-based incentives.Conversely, if a teacher's methods are proving ineffective or their classroom management skills are lacking, student feedback could alert administrators to potential issues that need to be addressed. This feedback loop could facilitate constructive dialogues between teachers and their supervisors, leading to targeted support, additional training, or, in extreme cases, personnel changes to ensure a more conducive learning environment.Furthermore, the mere prospect of being evaluated by students could motivate teachers to consistently bring their best efforts to the classroom. Just as students strive to perform well on assignments and exams, the knowledge that their teaching effectiveness will be assessed could incentivize instructors to stay abreast of the latest pedagogical techniques, adapt their approaches to cater to diverse learning styles, and maintain a high standard of professionalism.However, the idea of students grading teachers is not without its potential drawbacks and challenges. One of the primary concerns is the possibility of biased or subjective evaluations. Students, being human, may allow personal biasesor external factors to influence their assessments, which could lead to unfair or inaccurate judgments of a teacher's abilities.For instance, a student who struggles with a particular subject or has a personality clash with a teacher may be inclined to provide a harsher evaluation, even if the teacher's methods are sound. Conversely, a teacher who is overly lenient or entertains the class with unrelated anecdotes may receive glowing reviews, despite failing to effectively impart the intended knowledge or skills.There is also the risk of students using the evaluation process as a means of retaliation or exerting undue influence over their teachers. In some cases, students may threaten poor evaluations as leverage to demand better grades, preferential treatment, or other concessions, thereby undermining the integrity of the educational process.Additionally, the logistical challenges of implementing a student evaluation system should not be overlooked. Developing fair and comprehensive evaluation criteria, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality, and objectively analyzing and acting upon the feedback received would require substantial administrative resources and oversight.Despite these potential drawbacks, the benefits of student evaluations could be significant if implemented thoughtfully and with appropriate safeguards in place. One possible solution could be to incorporate student feedback as one component of a multifaceted teacher evaluation process, which also includes peer observations, administrative assessments, and objective measures of student performance.Moreover, providing comprehensive training to both students and teachers on the purpose and mechanics of the evaluation process could help mitigate issues such as bias and retaliation. Clear guidelines and rubrics could be established to ensure evaluations focus on specific, measurable aspects of teaching effectiveness, rather than subjective opinions or personal grievances.Ultimately, the decision to implement student evaluations of teachers should be carefully weighed, taking into account the unique circumstances and needs of each educational institution. While the potential benefits of fostering accountability, collaboration, and continuous improvement are compelling, the risks of bias, retaliation, and logistical challenges must also be thoughtfully addressed.As students, we have a vested interest in ensuring the highest quality of education possible. By engaging in constructive dialogues and working collaboratively with our teachers and administrators, we can collectively strive to create a learning environment that empowers both students and educators to reach their full potential.篇3The Pros and Cons of Students Grading TeachersHey, what's up? It's me, your friendly neighborhood student here to share my thoughts on this whole idea of us kids grading our teachers. It's been a hot topic of debate lately and I've got to say, I'm kind of on the fence about it. On one hand, I can definitely see some potential benefits. But on the other hand, there are also some potential downsides we need to consider. Let me break it down for you.The ProsAccountabilityOne of the biggest arguments in favor of student grading is that it could help hold teachers more accountable. Let's be real, we've all had that one teacher who was basically phoning it in, right? The one who seemed totally checked out and didn't seemto care whether we were learning or not. If students had a direct way to evaluate their performance, it could light a fire under teachers like that and motivate them to step up their game.Feedback LoopGrading from students could also create a helpful feedback loop for teachers. Sure, they get observation reports and things like that from admins, but those are often just brief snapshot looks. Having regular input directly from the students could allow teachers to really see what's working and what isn't from the people they're actually teaching every day. It might help them identify areas where they need to adjust their approach.Student VoiceAt the end of the day, us students are the main consumers of the education being provided. So doesn't it make sense that we should have some way to voice our thoughts and opinions on the quality of that education? Grading teachers could give students a sense of empowerment and validation that our perspectives actually matter. It's supposed to be about us learning, after all.The ConsBias and ImmaturityOf course, one of the biggest criticisms of student grading is the potential for bias and lack of maturity from us students. Let's be honest, a lot of us can get petty. If we don't like a teacher for whatever reason, there's a risk we could unfairly give them harsh grades out of spite rather than judging them objectively. Immaturity could absolutely skew the results in some cases.Lack of ExpertiseAnother argument against it is that students simply may not have the expertise required to properly evaluate a teacher's skills and methods. We may not fully understand all the techniques, strategies, and standards that go into effective teaching since we're not the ones who have gotten training and certification in education. Our grading could end up being misguided or missing the mark because of our lack of insider knowledge.Resistance and TensionsFinally, having students grading teachers could potentially create a really tense and adversarial dynamic in the classroom. Teachers might constantly be on edge, worried about getting bad grades from their students rather than feeling free to instruct how they see best. Students mighters might rebel against a teacher they don't like by intentionally tanking theirgrades. It could make the whole teacher-student relationship super unhealthy in a lot of cases.My ThoughtsHonestly, I can see plenty of valid points on both sides here. I do think there's some value to the student perspective being represented when it comes to evaluating teachers. We're the ones on the receiving end of their instruction every day, so we probably have insights that admins and observers just wouldn't pick up on.At the same time, I can't deny the very real risks of things like bias, lack of expertise, and souring teacher-student relations. We've got to be mature enough to understand that grading isn't just about whether we personally liked the teacher as a person. It would have to be based on legitimate critiques of their actual teaching ability. Otherwise the whole system becomes skewed and pointless.I don't know, maybe there's some kind of middle ground to be found. Like students filling out detailed surveys that get factored into a teacher's evaluations along with admin observations, testing data, and other metrics. That way our voice is heard, but not the only thing being considered. Just some food for thought.At the end of the day, I just want my teachers to be committed to actually doing a good job of educating me and my peers. If student grading could help ensure that, then I'm all for finding a fair way to make it happen. But if it's only going to lead to a toxic environment and unfair evaluations based on personal vendettas, then maybe we should scrap the idea. It's a complicated issue for sure.What do you think - yay or nay on students grading teachers? I'm really curious to hear other perspectives on this. Let me know!。
2019大学英语六级作文范文：对老师的评价
2019大学英语六级作文范文：对老师的评价题目要求：题目：Teachers' performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers.提纲：应该由学生评价1、他们和老师的接触更长，了解更充分2、他们对老师更加了解，评价更加全面3、评价人很多，能够避免偏见参考范文：Before entering the society, we are all required to receive education in schools for several years. In this process, teachers are like compasses, guiding us to walk inthe right direction. In order to enhance the reputation, all the school, whether they are primary schools or universities, take measures to evaluate their teachers. From my respective, compared with other teachers, students can make a more objective evaluation because of their long contact, comprehensive analysis and no prejudice.To begin with, students own more time contacting their teachers due to the classes they have everyday. The more frequently they contact, the more objective the evaluationthey make. For instance, when I was studied in my high school, there existed two english classes on my daily schedule. Therefore, we have to stay with our english teacher for two hours at least. She also spend some her official or evenspare time to help us explain the answers for question. Wefound that although she lacked of experience about composition, she payed enough patience in analyzing other grammar and did well in listening. However, if other teachers just visited the lesson of composition, inexact evaluation would be made by them. Long-time contact makes students more suitable to be the judge.Furthermore, not only the academic knowledge, but the moral behavior should be taken in consideration. Admittedly, other teachers would make evaluation more professionally depends on their specialty and the examination scores and ranks of the students. Nevertheless, these do not represent the comprehensive performance of a teacher. Students prefer to have the class given by a warm-hearted teacher who is willing to help us solve the problems in studying and living. Taking my physics teacher for an example. Although he was an old men who always made mistakes in his answers, we all regard him as our fathers for his kindness to aid the poor classmates, his sense of humorous to make the physics an interesting subject, and the courage learned from him to overcome the obstacles in our lives bravely. Like our physics teacher, other outstanding students should be evaluated from all respect.At the end, it is difficult to ensure the evaluation by others teachers exist no bias. The result of the evaluation is always related to the salary and promotion of a teacher. Thanks to the competitive relationship, some teachers will make prejudiced appraises. On the contrary, evaluation by students would avoid this problem, because the huge capacity of students assure the efficiency. Even if two or threedislike the teacher, the dates of other students will still be objective.In a word, taking into account all these factors mentioned above, we can safely come to the conclusion. Even though evaluations from teachers have its advantages such as higher professionalism, I persist in my point of view that teachers’ performances should be assessed by students.。
学生评价教师范文
学生评价教师范文教师是学生成长过程中至关重要的人物，他们在学生心中扮演着指导者、引路人的角色。
而学生评价教师，则是一种对教师工作的反馈和评估，有助于提高教师的教学质量和专业水平。
本文将从学生评价教师的重要性、评价标准、评价方法、评价结果的有效利用等方面展开讨论，以探索优秀学生评价教师的范文。
一、学生评价教师的重要性学生是教学活动的主体，他们对教师的评价能够客观反映教师教学质量的好坏。
学生评价教师的重要性主要体现在以下几个方面。
首先，学生评价教师可以促进教师的专业成长。
通过学生的评价，教师可以了解到自己在教学中的不足之处，从而及时进行反思和改进，不断提高自己的教学水平。
其次，学生评价教师可以改善教学环境。
学生评价教师能够使得教师和学生之间的关系更加和谐，增强师生之间的沟通和互动，为营造积极向上的教育氛围提供保障。
再次，学生评价教师可以增加教师的动力和激情。
教师会因为学生对自己的认可和鼓励而更有动力去教学，投入更多的精力和心血，为学生提供更好的教育服务。
总之，学生评价教师对于提高教师教学质量、改进教学方式、激发教师的教学热情具有重要的作用。
二、学生评价教师的标准学生评价教师的标准应当既全面又有针对性。
以下是一些常见的学生评价教师的标准。
态度：教师是否对学生的问题和困惑给予及时解答和帮助，是否尊重学生的个性和差异，是否平等对待每一个学生等。
知识水平：教师是否掌握了所教学科的基本知识，是否能够将知识传授给学生，是否能够解答学生的疑问等。
讲解能力：教师是否能够清晰、简洁地阐述教学内容，是否能够引导学生理解和掌握知识，是否能够激发学生的学习兴趣等。
互动与参与：教师是否与学生保持良好的互动，是否鼓励和引导学生积极参与课堂活动，是否能够激发学生的思考和创造力等。
纪律管理：教师是否能够有效管理课堂纪律，是否公正对待学生的行为，是否能够提供良好的学习环境等。
三、学生评价教师的方法学生评价教师的方法多种多样，可以通过问卷调查、口头反馈、课堂观察等方式进行。
老师被学生评价批评作文
Should teachers be evaluated and criticized by their students? Nowadays, many students are not satisfied enough with the quality of education on account of their poor grades on some subjects. Thus, they attribute this consequence to the lack of ability of the teachers. Some propose that students should be given the freedom to evaluate and criticize their teachers to improve this situation, while others held another view, saying that it will be difficult for teachers to maintain the classrooms order which may cause the students show no respect on their teachers. In my opinion, I agree to the latter opinion, which is based on the following reason. First of all, it is really hard for students to make a completely objective attitude towards their teachers when they are asked to complete the evaluation task. As we all know, many teachers sometimes may prefer to punish their students in an instructive way to improve students’study, which may lead to an unfavorable impression on their students, resulting in an adverse evaluation and undeserved negative comments on teachers. In addition, it will cause a popularity competition among teachers due to the evaluations that the students make, which definitely will cause the teachers try hard to gain favors from the students and compete for high rankings instead of being competent and responsible teachers. Secondly, the lazy and backward students may regard their pooracademic perform as their teachers’faults if given the right to criticize their teachers. This is obviously unfair for teachers and it may be harmful to their academic improvements. Furthermore, if teachers receive too many unfavorable comments, it will be really hard for them to focus on their academic instruction, which may make them loss the confidence and courage to teach well. Finally, if students have the freedom to assess their teachers, they tend to behave in an intolerable way since they believe that their teachers are afraid of being revenged when it comes to students’assessments. As a consequence, many teachers definitely will lose the leading right and even self-esteem in the classrooms.In conclusion, giving students the right to evaluate the teachers is not a reasonable way of school management. This method is harmful for not only teachers on running the classroom but also students on improving their academic knowledge. Personally, I think schools should come up with a better measure to promote the ability of teachers in order to give the students the best excellent education.。
学生给老师打分的利与弊英语作文
学生给老师打分的利与弊英语作文Advantages and Disadvantages of Students Grading TeachersIn recent years, some schools have implemented a system where students grade their teachers. This practice has sparked a heated debate about its merits and drawbacks. While some argue that it provides valuable feedback for teachers to improve their teaching methods, others believe that it may lead to unfair evaluations and undermine the authority of educators.One of the main advantages of students grading teachers is that it allows teachers to receive direct feedback from their students. This feedback can help teachers identify areas where they need to improve and adjust their teaching strategies accordingly. By taking students' opinions into account, teachers can create a more engaging and effective learning environment. Moreover, this system can encourage students to take an active role in their education and feel that their voices are being heard.However, there are also significant disadvantages to this approach. Firstly, students may not have the maturity or expertise to provide objective evaluations of their teachers. They may base their grades on personal preferences or biases rather than the teacher's actual performance. This can lead to unfair and inaccurate assessments that do not reflect the teacher's true abilities. Secondly, the power dynamic between teachers and students may be disrupted, potentially undermining the teacher's authority and creating a less respectful classroom atmosphere.In conclusion, while student evaluations of teachers can offer valuable insights, they should be used cautiously and in combination with other assessment methods. It is essential to maintain a balanced and respectful relationship between teachers and students to foster a positive learning environment.中文翻译：近年来,一些学校实施了学生给老师打分的制度。
考博英语作文范文：学生该不该评价老师
考博英语作文范文：学生该不该评价老师Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.I think it’s a good idea for schools to ask students to evaluate their teachers. This informs teachers of how students react both to their teaching methods and to them as individuals. Teachers can weigh the criticisms and change what they think needs to be changed. Praise from students is also valuable. It can reinforce teachers’opinions about how they’re teaching and give them confidence.It’s also helpful for school administrators to hear what students think about their teachers. It keeps administrators in touch with what’s going on in the school. It also gives them some idea of which teachers effectively reach the students. However, good administrators know that student evaluations need to be reviewed with a keen eye for prejudice and adolescent attitudes. After all, and evaluation is a good way for students to get back at teachers who expect more of them than they want to give.Evaluating teachers is also a good exercise for the students. They have to organize their thoughts about what they think of their teachers. In that way, they pinpoint for themselves what they expect of those teachers. They begin to understand what they value in a teacher and what is phony or useless. Evaluating their teachers is also a way for students to think about how they would evaluate themselves. Are they working as hard asthey should in class? Is that why their teachers are sometimes critical of their work? Isn’t that what a teacher should do—push us to try harder? Thinking about these things can help students do better in class. At the very least, they will understand better what is expected of them.Student evaluations of teachers also make students feel as if they have a voice in what happens in their schools. It makes them feel as if they’re part of the education process when their opinion is valued by the administration. Finally, it teaches them responsibility.Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.I think it’s a good idea for schools to ask students to evaluate their teachers. This informs teachers of how students react both to their teaching methods and to them as individuals. Teachers can weigh the criticisms and change what they think needs to be changed. Praise from students is also valuable. It can reinforce teachers’opinions about how they’re teaching and give them confidence.It’s also helpful for school administrators to hear what students think about their teachers. It keeps administrators in touch with what’s going on in the school. It also gives them some idea of which teachers effectively reach the students. However, good administrators know that student evaluations need to be reviewed with a keen eye for prejudice and adolescent attitudes. After all, and evaluation is a good way for studentsto get back at teachers who expect more of them than they want to give.Evaluating teachers is also a good exercise for the students. They have to organize their thoughts about what they think of their teachers. In that way, they pinpoint for themselves what they expect of those teachers. They begin to understand what they value in a teacher and what is phony or useless. Evaluating their teachers is also a way for students to think about how they would evaluate themselves. Are they working as hard as they should in class? Is that why their teachers are sometimes critical of their work? Isn’t that what a teacher should do—push us to try harder? Thinking about these things can help students do better in class. At the very least, they will understand better what is expected of them.Student evaluations of teachers also make students feel as if they have a voice in what happens in their schools. It makes them feel as if they’re part of the education process when their opinion is valued by the administration. Finally, it teaches them responsibility.。
雅思作文-5. 学生是不是可以评论和批评老师
#84:学生是不是可以评论和批评老师To improve the quality of education,people think that we should encourage our students to evaluate and criticise their teachers .Others believe that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.点击开始作答观点开头段范例Schools are sometimes advised to allow students to give comments about and even point out the mistakes of teachers in order to improve the standard of education. I agree with this proposed change, as long as it is managed well.主体段二A 学生评估老师B 鼓励孩子挑战老师的权威 C不尊重老师，老师很难维持纪律，教育质量不好解释（A-B）：学生觉得老师肯定有很多问题解释（A-B）：学生觉得自己有能力或者知识去评判老师解释（B-C）：蓄意打断，很难专注拓展思路:词伙:范文:学生观点点评学生的观点点评学生不应该评估和批评老师，老师有经验和知识，学生能系统掌握知识没有逻辑。
第二个句子更像是一个背景，和系统掌握知识没有联系。
不应该鼓励学生评价老师，课堂上失去纪律，树立老师的威信，提升教育质量逻辑混乱。
既然学生都不评价，为什么还失去纪律？A评估老师B老师针对给差评的学生C影响师生关系教学质量降低这个观点不是很有力。
学生评价教师的重要性
学生评价教师的重要性学生评价教师是一种反馈机制，旨在了解教师的教学质量和学生对教学的反应。
这种反馈对于提升教师的教学能力和改善教学质量起着重要的作用。
学生评价教师不仅有助于教师了解自己的不足和优势，还可以帮助学校和教育部门优化教学管理，促进教育改革和提高教学质量。
首先，学生评价教师能够为教师提供宝贵的反馈信息。
通过学生的评价，教师可以了解到学生对自己的教学效果和教学方式的满意度，了解学生对自己所传授的知识和技能的掌握情况。
这些反馈信息对于教师的教学改进至关重要。
教师可以根据学生的评价，对自己的教学方法进行调整和优化，从而提高教学效果和学生的学习动力。
其次，学生评价教师有助于提高学校管理水平。
学校可以根据学生的评价结果对教师进行管理和指导，制定更准确和有针对性的培训计划。
同时，评价结果也可以作为教师晋升和奖惩的依据，激励教师不断提高教育教学水平。
学生的评价结果也被用于学校的对外招生宣传，为学校的形象和声誉提供支持。
另外，学生评价教师有助于促进教育改革。
学生作为教育的直接受益者，他们的意见和建议能够为教育决策者提供重要的参考。
学生评价结果的分析和总结可以帮助教育决策者了解教育改革的方向和重点，有针对性地进行政策制定和资源配置。
同时，学生评价也可以鼓励教师创新和尝试新的教学方法，推动教育教学的不断进步。
最后，学生评价教师对于家长和社会公众来说也具有重要意义。
家长通过学生的评价了解到教师的教学水平和对孩子的影响，能够更好地配合教师工作，为孩子提供更好的学习环境和支持。
社会公众可以通过学生评价教师的结果了解到教育教学的真实情况和教育改革的进展，能够更好地参与到教育事务和社会建设中。
综上所述，学生评价教师的重要性不言而喻。
学生评价是一种有效的反馈和监督机制，有助于提高教师的教学质量，改进教育管理，推动教育改革。
学生评价不仅对于教师自身有益，也对学校、决策者、家长和社会公众都具有重要的意义。
因此，应该充分重视学生评价教师的作用，并建立健全的评价体系，确保评价结果的客观性和准确性，为教师和学生提供更好的教育环境和发展机会。
学生评价教师：必要但不主要——回应：“如何应对学生对教师的评议”
评价则能做到更高程度的客观和理性。
其 次 ，学 生评 价 教 师也 受 着 学 生 的 价 值 取
—
对 教 师 的评 价 应该 以学 生评 议 为主
—
向和 情 感 因素 的 制 约 。 比如 案 例 情境 中的 高 职 学生 ， 们 似 乎 属 于 成 熟 学 生 的 范 畴 ，但 是他 他 们 的价 值 取 向 有 差异 ， 者 说 ，他 们 的评 判 标 或 准 不 同 。在 对教 师 的评 价 中 ， 的学 生 可 能 从 有 教 师 是 否 和 蔼 可 亲 的 角 度 出发 ；有 的学 生 则 认 为 严 厉 的 教 师 才 是 好 教 师 ： 的学 生 对 于 教 师 有 的评 价 部 分 是 出 于 自 己 的 愿 望或 目的 ， 些 甚 有 至 是 有 悖 于 教 育 目标 的 。形形 色 色 的想 法 和 标 准 使 得 不 同 的学 生 对 于 同 一位 教 师有 着 不 同 的 评 价 。此 外 ，学 生 对 于 教 师 的评 价 还 可 能 带 有 个 人 的情 感 色 彩 。比 如 一 些 年轻 的教 师 比较 能 得 到学 生 的好 感 ， 们 思 想 开 放 ， 风 民 主 。 他 作 与 学生 能 有 比较 多 的共 同语 言 ， 比 较 教 学 经验 相 丰 富 的老 教 师 而言 ， ＇ ＇ 乎 更 容 易 受 到 学 生 他 ｆｆ ｒ１ ｌ． Ｊ ， 的喜 爱 和欢 迎 。 的学 生 则 会 因 为厌 恶 某 一 学 有 科 而 厌 恶 执 教 这 一 学 科 的教 师 ， 如 此 类 的 个 诸 人 情 感 因 素都 制 约 着 学生 评 价 教 师 的客 观 和 公
可 忍 ，立 即派 班 长 将 邹 同 学 “ 送 ”到 班 主 任 押
托福作文T102：老师由学生来评价吗
Topic102：学校要求学生来评价尊重老师的教学成果，对这个做法你是否同意？Topic102 Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.［参考提纲］102、同意学生来评价老师（1）学生是消费者，他们有权力对老师进行公正的评价（2）学生来评价老师，有利于教师认真教学。
（3）学生来评价老师，有利于促进竞争。
［托福参看范文］Topic: 102I agree that school should ask students evalute their teachers. There are three reasons:The first, the educatinon is a activity that communicate each other. The information that students evaluate is given to their teacher. The teacher can improve their education skill by this information. If there are no evaluated information by student, the education activity become unilateral activity. The teacher spread their information to students, but the students' informations reflects back to teacher are very few. The evaluation can help teacher improve the their skill from time to time.。
学生评价教师的重要性
学生评价教师的重要性教师是塑造我们未来的重要角色之一，他们对学生的指导和教育起着重要的作用。
学生评价教师的重要性不容忽视。
本文将从多个角度探讨学生评价教师的重要性，包括提升教学质量、加强教师发展和促进教育改革。
第一，学生评价教师有助于提升教学质量。
学生是直接受益者，他们对教师的评价可以反映教师的教学效果。
教师应该注重学生评价，因为只有了解学生的真实感受和需求，才能更好地调整教学方式和内容，提高教学效果。
学生评价是一种及时的反馈机制，能帮助教师了解自己的优势和改进空间。
通过学生反馈，教师可以发现自己的不足之处，及时采取措施改进，提升教学质量。
第二，学生评价教师有助于加强教师的发展。
教师评价是教师成长的重要组成部分。
学生的评价可以帮助教师发现个人的短板，提醒他们在专业知识、教学方法、学生指导等方面的不足。
这些反馈将使教师更加敏感，更有动力去改善自己的不足之处，从而提高专业水平。
另外，学生评价还可以帮助教师发现自身的优势，进一步加强和发展自己的优点，使自己在教学岗位上更加突出。
第三，学生评价教师有助于促进教育改革。
随着教育的不断发展，传统的教学模式已经无法满足现代社会的需求。
学生评价可以为教育改革提供有益的经验和建议。
通过学生评价，教育管理部门可以了解到教学中存在的问题和挑战，进而制定相应的政策和措施。
学生评价可以推动教育改革的深入进行，促进学校教育的创新和进步。
第四，学生评价教师有助于促进师生关系的建立。
教师和学生的关系对于教学效果具有重要影响。
通过学生评价，学生可以在一个相对客观的角度评估教师的表现，为教师提供指导性的建议。
这样的互动可以增进师生之间的沟通和理解，并建立起更加良好的师生关系。
良好的师生关系将有助于学生成长和发展。
第五，学生评价教师有助于提高教师的职业满意度。
教师是一份独特而辛苦的职业，他们在教学过程中面临各种压力和困难。
但是，学生评价可以帮助教师感受到自己的付出和努力被认可，增强他们的自信心和满意度。
学生评价老师是与非
学生评价老师是与非学生评价老师是一种常见的现象，无论是在学校还是在社会中，都存在着学生对老师的评价。
这种评价可以是正面的，也可以是负面的。
学生评价老师的目的是为了提供反馈和改进教学质量，同时也是学生对老师教学效果的一种表达。
本文将探讨学生评价老师的意义、方法和影响。
一、学生评价老师的意义学生评价老师的意义在于促进教学质量的提高。
通过学生的评价，老师可以了解到自己的教学效果，从而及时调整教学方法和内容，提高教学质量。
同时，学生评价也可以帮助学校和教育部门了解教师的教学情况，为教师的聘用和晋升提供参考依据。
二、学生评价老师的方法学生评价老师的方法多种多样，可以通过问卷调查、面谈、小组讨论等形式进行。
问卷调查是最常见的方法，可以通过设计合理的问题，让学生对老师的教学进行评价。
面谈是一种直接的交流方式，可以让学生和老师进行深入的沟通，了解学生对老师的评价和建议。
小组讨论可以让学生在小组中交流意见，形成共识，然后向老师反馈。
三、学生评价老师的影响学生评价老师的结果对老师的教学有一定的影响。
正面的评价可以增强老师的自信心，激发教学的热情，同时也可以让老师更加明确自己的优点和不足，进一步提高教学质量。
负面的评价可以让老师反思自己的教学方法和态度，及时改进不足之处，提高教学效果。
然而，学生评价也可能存在一定的主观性和偏见，因此需要学校和教育部门对评价结果进行综合考虑。
四、学生评价老师的建议为了提高学生评价老师的效果，可以采取以下措施：1. 设计科学合理的评价指标：评价指标应该包括教学内容、教学方法、教学态度等方面，既要考虑学生的主观感受，也要考虑教学效果的客观指标。
2. 提供匿名评价的机会：学生可以通过匿名方式进行评价，这样可以更加真实地反映学生的意见和建议，避免因为担心报复而不敢表达真实想法。
3. 加强评价结果的分析和利用：学校和教育部门应该对评价结果进行综合分析，及时反馈给老师，并提供相应的培训和支持，帮助老师改进教学质量。
学生对教师评估
学生对教师评估学生对教师评估是一种评估教师教学效果的方式，通过这种评估，学校和教师可以了解到学生对教师教学的看法和建议，以便进一步提高教学质量。
本文将从学生对教师评估的重要性、评估方法和评估结果的利用三个方面来探讨学生对教师评估的意义。
第一部分：学生对教师评估的重要性学生对教师评估的重要性不言而喻。
首先，学生是教师教学活动的直接受益者，他们对教师的教学效果有着第一手的体验和感受。
只有听取学生对教师的评价，才能更准确地了解教师的优点和不足，有针对性地改进教学方法。
其次，学生对教师评估的结果可以作为评价教师绩效的参考指标，对于提高教师教学质量和促进教育改革至关重要。
最后，教师和学生之间的良好互动和有效沟通有助于建立积极、健康的教育关系，提高学生对教育的满意度。
第二部分：学生对教师评估的方法学生对教师评估可以采用多种方法，例如问卷调查、面谈、小组讨论等。
其中，问卷调查是最常见和广泛应用的方法之一。
问卷调查可以通过纸质或电子形式进行，学生可以根据自己的实际体验和感受回答问题，评价教师在教学过程中的方方面面。
面谈则更加直接和互动，学生可以与教师单独进行面对面的交流和反馈，教师可以倾听学生的声音并回应学生的需求和建议。
小组讨论可以促进学生之间的互动和交流，学生可以在小组中分享对教师的评价和建议，从不同角度去评估教师的教学效果。
这些方法的选择需要根据实际情况和教育目标进行合理搭配和使用。
第三部分：学生对教师评估结果的利用学生对教师评估的结果应该得到充分的重视和利用。
首先，学校和教师可以根据评估结果了解到学生对教师的评价和建议，及时进行教学改进和调整。
教师可以通过反思和总结，提高自身的教学能力和水平。
其次，评估结果可以被用来作为评价教师教学质量的重要依据，学校和教育管理部门可以根据评估结果对教师绩效进行评价和奖惩。
最后，评估结果还可以用于学校和教师的内外宣传，展示学校的教育品质和教师的教学成果，增强学生和家长的信心和认可。
高校学生评价老师
高校学生评价老师随着教育的发展和普及，高校学生评价老师的重要性越来越被重视。
高校学生对教师的评价不仅仅是学术水平的评价，还包括教学能力、教学态度、沟通能力等多个方面。
本文将从学生评价老师的意义、评价的方式和侧重点以及评价结果的应用等方面展开论述。
高校学生评价老师的意义首先体现在提高教学质量方面。
学生是教师工作的直接受益者，他们能够客观地评价教师的教学效果，从而对教学质量进行评估和改进。
通过学生评价，教师能够了解到自己的教学优势和不足之处，及时进行反思和改进，提高自身教学能力，进一步提高教学质量。
其次，学生评价老师还能够促进教学过程的互动与共建。
在学生评价中，学生可以提出自己对教学过程的意见和建议，教师可以根据学生的反馈及时调整教学策略，满足学生的学习需求，提高教学效果。
通过学生评价，教师和学生可以形成一个良好的互动和共建的教学环境，共同促进教学效果的提高。
高校学生评价老师的方式可以多样化，包括定期问卷调查、班会讨论、个别沟通等。
其中，定期问卷调查是最常见的一种方式。
学校可以针对每个学期的教学过程进行问卷调查，学生可以通过匿名方式对老师进行评价。
问卷调查涵盖了教师的教学内容、教学方法、教学态度、考核方式等多个方面，学生可以根据自身的实际体验进行评价，客观地反映教师的教学质量。
在学生评价老师中，需要注意的是评价的侧重点。
评价需要全面、客观、公正，不能片面地评价教师的某一个方面。
评价的侧重点应该包括教师的专业知识水平、教学方法、教学态度和与学生的沟通能力等多个方面。
只有全面评价才能更准确地反映教师的教学水平和教学效果，有利于教师的进一步提高。
最后，学生评价老师的结果应用方面，学校应该将学生评价结果作为教师评优评先的重要依据。
学校可以根据学生评价结果进行教师的绩效考核，对优秀的教师进行肯定和奖励，对不足的教师进行指导和改进。
同时，学生评价结果也应该及时反馈给教师本人，教师可以根据学生的评价结果进行自我反思和改进，不断提高教学水平。
学生对教师评估
学生对教师评估教育是每个国家的基石，而教师则承载着培养未来一代的重要责任。
然而，作为教育系统的一部分，学生对教师的评估在过去几十年间逐渐成为一个热门话题。
学生对教师的评估不仅是一种反馈机制，也是改进教学质量和提升学生学习效果的重要手段。
本文将探讨学生对教师评估的重要性、评估的方法和对教育质量的影响。
一、学生对教师评估的重要性学生是教育实施的受益者，他们对教学质量和教师态度有直接的感受。
因此，学生的反馈和意见对于教师的个人成长和教育质量的提升至关重要。
1. 提供客观反馈和改进机会学生作为参与者和见证者，能够给出无偏见的观察和评价。
他们能够提供关于教学方式、教材选择、互动与沟通等方面的真实感受和建议，帮助教师改进自己的教学方法和内容。
2. 促进教师与学生之间的互动教师和学生之间的互动是有效教学的基础。
通过学生对教师的评估，教师可以更好地了解学生的需求和期望，进而调整自己的教学策略和方法，促进更良好的教学互动。
3. 激励教师的进步和提高教育质量学生的评估结果可以作为教师个人成长和职业发展的参考，激励教师不断追求卓越。
同时，学生的评估结果也可以作为学校和教育系统评估教师绩效和提升教育质量的重要依据。
二、学生对教师评估的方法学生对教师的评估方法多种多样，根据不同的教育阶段和需求，选择合适的评估方式可以更好地了解教师的教学效果。
1. 问卷调查问卷调查是最常见也是最广泛使用的评估方法之一。
学生可以通过填写问卷来表达对教师授课内容、教学方式、教学资源等方面的看法和建议。
问卷调查通常包括定量和定性两个方面，既能收集统计数据，也能收集学生的主观意见。
2. 小组讨论和焦点小组小组讨论和焦点小组是一种面对面的交流方式，可以让学生更深入地表达对教师的意见和评价。
学生可以通过讨论和分享自己的观点，从而更好地理解和提出改进意见。
3. 口头反馈和个人面谈口头反馈和个人面谈是一种直接的评估方式，可以促进教师和学生之间的沟通与交流。
英语作文：学生是否应该对老师进行评估
英语作文：学生是否应该对老师进行评估Some people think that in order to improve the quality of education, students should be encouraged to evaluate their teachers. Others, however, think that will result in loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.思路指导：典型的D&G类双边文，可采用‘列举式写法’，这种写法清晰明了，简单粗暴，可以让阅卷者快速地get到作者的每一个观点，一一对应。
一般这种文章得分不会太低，实乃逻辑不好的学生的上分求稳神技。
The feasibility of evaluation system for teachers are widely discussed in society. This system can be adopted to improve the teaching quality indeed, but it may bring several problems as well. Personally, the advantages of students evaluation outweigh the disadvantages.There are three main benefits to develop this evaluation system. First, this can motivate teachers to improve their instruction. Empirically, motivations come from pressure, teachers must transform higher pressure into workig enthusiasm. Second, students can help schools managers identify low-performing teachers. Traditional evaluative criteria for teachers may depend on students’ average scores solely, leaving academic achievement aside, students’ experience should also be considered. Third, teachers can know students’ real needs by evaluation system. Because many students dare not chat with teachers directly, evaluation system might be an alternative to express their needs.Nevertheless, some drawbacks are also inevitable. First,some students may give irresponsible evaluations since negative emotions to teachers. Not all students are rational, hence the results of evaluation are probably unreliable. In addition, this might cause tension between teachers and students. If teachers are punished due to bad evaluations, which may reduce the communication between teachers and students. Finally, teachers may ingratiate themselves with students instead of concentrating on teaching quality.In conclusion, students’ feedback is capable of improving teaching effectiveness, but students should be encouraged to evaluate teachers’ performance responsibly.。
雅思作文-5.学生是不是可以评论和批评老师
#84: 学生是否是能够议论和责备老师To improve the quality of education,people think that we should encourage our students to evaluate and criticise their teachers .Othersbelieve that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.点击开始作答看法开头段典范Schools are sometimes advised to allow students to give comments about and even point out the mistakes of teachers in order to improve the standard of education. I agree with this proposed change, as long as it is managed well.主体段二A 学生评估老师B 鼓舞孩子挑战老师的威望C 不尊敬老师，老师很难保持纪律，教育质量不好解说（ A-B）：学生感觉老师一定有好多问题解说（ A-B）：学生感觉自己有能力或许知识去评判老师解说（ B-C）：蓄意打断，很难专注拓展思路 :词伙 :范文 :学生看法议论学生的看法学生不该当评估和责备老师，老师有经验和知识，学生能系统掌握知识不该当鼓舞学生议论老师，讲堂上失掉议论没有逻辑。
第二个句子更像是一个背景，和系统掌握知识没有联系。
逻辑杂乱。
既然学生都不议论，为何纪律，建立老师的威望，提高教育质量还失掉纪律？A 评估老师B 老师针对给差评的学生这个看法不是很有力。
由于评估能够是C 影响师生关系教课质量降低匿名的。
大学里学生评价老师
大学里学生评价老师一、引言在大学里，学生评价老师是一项非常重要的工作。
通过学生的评价，既可以了解教师在教学过程中的优势和亮点，也能发现教师在教学中的不足，从而及时进行改进和提高。
本文将从学生评价老师的重要性、方法以及评价结果的利用等方面进行分析和探讨。
二、学生评价老师的重要性1.提高教学质量学生评价老师是一种重要的反馈机制，能够帮助教师了解学生对自己教学的认可度、满意度和意见建议，从而调整教学策略、改善授课方法，提高教学质量。
2.增加学习动力学生评价老师能够让学生感受到他们的声音被重视和关注，从而增加他们对课程的兴趣和学习的积极性，激发学习动力。
3.促进教学改革学生评价反映了学生对教学内容、方式和效果的评判，这种反馈能够为教学改革提供有力支持和参考，促进教学改革的顺利进行。
三、学生评价老师的方法1.问卷调查问卷调查是一种常用的学生评价老师的方法，通过设计合理的问题，让学生进行匿名评价，既能全面了解学生对教师的评价，又能保护学生的隐私。
2.面谈访谈面谈访谈是一种直接交流的方式，能够更加深入地了解学生对教师的意见和建议，同时也更加关注学生的个别差异，有助于提出具体的改进措施。
3.课堂观察通过对教学过程进行观察和录像，在课后进行分析和评价，能够客观地了解教师在课堂上的教学效果和学生的反应，有助于提出针对性的改进意见。
四、学生评价结果的利用1.向教师反馈学生评价结果应及时向教师反馈，让教师了解学生对自己的评价，从而能够及时调整教学策略、改进教学方法。
2.评优与评聘学生评价结果可以作为评优与评聘的重要依据，通过评价结果对教师进行综合评估，对于选拔优秀教师以及提高教师教学质量有重要意义。
3.加强教师培训学生评价结果也可以为教师培训提供参考，对于发现教师在教学中的不足，针对性地进行培训和提高，以提升教师整体素质。
五、学生评价老师的问题与对策1.隐私保护问题学生评价需要保护学生的隐私，应当采取匿名评价的方式，确保学生能够放心、自由地表达自己的意见和看法。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
学生应不应该对老师进行评价？ Should Teachers Be Evaluated by
Students?
Teachers often get a chance to evaluate their students. Now the situation has changed. Schools allow students to evaluate the work of their teachers. This causes discussions about whether teachers should be evaluated by students. The views vary from person to person, and I prefer to say yes to this act because it provides a good way for teachers to learn their disadvantages and improve the quality of teaching.
老师经常有机会评价学生。
现在情况以及发生改变了。
学校允许学生对老师的工作进行评价。
这引起了关于学生该不该对老师进行评价的讨论。
每个人的观点各不相同，我觉得应该，因为它给老师提供了一个从他们的缺点中学习并提高教学质量的好方法。
Firstly, it's a good way for students to express their opinions about teachers and lectures. From the expression, teachers can learn their advantages and disadvantages, which is important to improve their teaching skills. Secondly, students often evaluate teachers by doing some questionnaires, which are questions and selections on the paper, ranging from teachers skills to homework arrangement. Teachers can get much useful information from these questionnaires. Besides, the evaluated result will be submitted to school leaders who will judge whether the teacher is qualified or not. Finally, students will be motivated to pay more attention during classes and to listen to lectures more regularly, since they will be asked to give their own opinions about what they've heard. Of course, when students do the evaluations, they should be objective and impartial so that the evaluated result can be more useful and persuasive.
首先，这是学生表达他们对老师和课堂的看法的一个好途径。
从反馈中，老师可以从优点和缺点中学习，这对提高教学技能很重要。
其次，学生通过有问题和选择的问卷对老师进行评价，问题从教师技能到作业布置不等。
教师可以从这些问题中得到更多有用信息。
此外，评价结果会交给学校领导，他们会判断老师是否合格。
最后，学生会更有动力，课堂上更注意听课，上课更有规律，因为他们会被提问对所听到的给出自己的观点。
当然，学生评估的时候应该客观公正，这样评估结果才更有用更具说服力。
From what has been discussed above, we may confidently come to conclusion that teachers should be evaluated by students.
从以上的讨论我们可以有信心地得出结论，老师应该被学生评价。