中国人民大学抽样设计2019综合社会抽样调查方案

Self-representative
36 Municipalities, provincial capitals and sub-provincial cities.
index
GDP Number of teachers FDI Actual used foreign investment
selected category
Other regions excluding the self-representatives
index
Density of population Proportion of non-agricultural population GDP per capita
1 Background 2 Discussion 3 Sampling Design 4 The Final Result
Outline
1 Background 2 Discussion 3 Sampling Design 4 The Final Sample
Background
1. Survey Objectives
factor analysis
GDP
Number of teachers
FDI
Actual used foreign investment
Top Five： Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen,
Tianjing
Discussion——stratification
provincial capitals and sub-provincial cities.
Discussion——stratification
Consideration
Economic level Educational level Degree of openness
Self-representative
between urban and rural groups
3
To reflect regional
discrepancy of the
development in China,
Background
2. Target Population
All the household in 31 provinces (excluding Hong Kong, Macao a nd Taiwan)
Discussion——sample size and ale: 12 000 units
Considering actual situation
Larger discrepancy among urban individuals Urban-rural ratio
Self-representative
Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Tianjin; The samples are all urban households; Primary sampling units (PSUs) are sub-districts in the five cities above; We use PPS to select 40 sub-districts as the PSUs in this stratum.
Discussion——stratification
Consideration
index
Economic level
Educational level
Degree of openness
Self-representative 36 Municipalities,
provincial capitals and sub-provincial cities.
Stage 1
40×2 SSUs
Neighborhood committee
40 PSUs
streets
Discussion——sample size and allocation
1. Self-representative
Stage
Stage
1
Stage
2
3
40 PSUs
40×2 SSUs
streets
member)
Stage 1
100 PSUs
District, county
100 x 4 x 25 = 10000 Households
Outline
1 Background 2 Discussion 3 Sampling Design 4 The Final Sample
Sampling Design
1
To fully understand
social development of urban and rural areas
Background
1. Survey Objectives
1
2
To fully understand
social development of urban and rural areas
To make comparisions
between urban and rural groups
Background
1. Survey Objectives
1
To fully understand
social development of urban and rural areas
2
To make comparisons
Sampling Design for 2019 CGSS
Yongjin Jin
School of Statistics Renmin University of China Email: jinyongjpublic.bta Website: /en/faculty
Outline
40×2×25 USUs
Household
Neighborhood committee
（household
member)
40 x 2 x 25 = 2000 housholds
Discussion——sample size and allocation
2. Selected stratum
Stage 1
7 200 Urban household
Considering operability
Neighborhood committee consisted of urban household Villagers’ committee consisted of rural household
4 800 Rural household
36 Municipalities, provincial capitals and sub-provincial cities.
Discussion——stratification
Consideration
Economic level Educational level Degree of openness
Sampling stage Administrative Divisions of China
Urban Area
Township Level: Subdistrict
Province Level
District/County Level
Rural Area
Township Level: Township/Town
Total sample size: 12 000 units
Some considering
Larger discrepancy among urban individuals Urban-rural ratio
Operational definition
Neighborhood committee consisted of urban household Villagers’ committee consisted of rural household
Futher stratification
selected category
Other regions excluding the self-representatives
Discussion——stratification
Consideration
District level（and country level
Discussion——sample size and allocation
1. Self-representative
Stage 1
40 PSUs
streets
Discussion——sample size and allocation
1. Self-representative
Stage 2
Discussion——stratification
Consideration
District level and country level
selected category Other regions excluding the self-representatives
cluster analysis
selected category Other regions excluding the self-representatives
Discussion——stratification
Consideration
District level（ urban） and county level（ rural）
Neighborhood Committee
Village Committee
Discussion——stages
Self-representative
Subdistrict or street
Neighborhood committee
household
selected stratum
District- or county-level
100 PSUs
District, county
Discussion——sample size and allocation
2. Selected stratum
Stage 2
Stage 1
100×4 SSUs
Neighborhood committee (Villagers’ committee)
units
Neighborhood committee Villagers’ committee
household
Discussion——sample size and allocation
Total sample size: 12 000 units
Discussion——sample size and allocation
District level : 19 stratum Country level : 31 stratum
index
Density of population Proportion of non-agricultural population GDP per capita
Discussion——stage
3. Sampling Method
Three-Stage stratified probability sampling A respondents selected randomly from the ultimate unit (household)
Outline
1 Background 2 Discussion 3 Sampling Design 4 The Final Sample
Discussion
Category
Category 1 Certainty unite Self-representative
必选层
Category 2
Selected unite
抽选层
Discussion——stratification
Self-representative Important unites 36 Municipalities,
100 PSUs
District, county
Discussion——sample size and allocation
2. Selected stratum
Stage 3
Stage 2
100×4 SSUs
100×4×25 USUs
Household （household
Neighborhood committee (Villagers’ committee)