各向同性湍流的精确统计理论

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Exact statistical theory of

isotropic turbulence1

Ran zheng

Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics,

Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072,P.R.China

Abstract

Some physically significant consequences of recent advances in the theory of

self-preserved homogenous statistical solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations

are presented.

Keywords: isotropic turbulence, Karman-Howarth equation, exact solution

1 Introduction

Homogeneous isotropic turbulence is an idealized concept of turbulence assumed to be governed by a statistical law that is invariant under arbitrary translation (homogeneity), rotation or reflection (isotropic) of the coordinate system. This is an idealization of real turbulent motions, which are observed in nature or produced in a laboratory have much more complicated structures. This idealization was first introduced by Taylor (1935) to the theory of turbulence and used to reduce the formidable complexity of statistical expression of turbulence and thus make the subject feasible for theoretical treatment. Up to the present, a large amount of theoretical work has been devoted to this rather restricted kind of turbulence. Remarkable progress has been achieved so far in discovering the various nature of turbulence, but nevertheless our understanding of the fundamental mechanics of turbulence is still partial and unsatisfactory (Tatsumi, 1980)

The assumption of self-preservation permits an analytical determination of the energy decay in isotropic turbulence. This idea of similarity and self-preservation has played an important the development of turbulence theory for more than a half-century. The traditional approach to search for similarity solutions in turbulence has been assume the existence of a single length and velocity scale, then ask whether and under what conditions the turbulent motions admit to such solutions. Excellent contributions had been given to this direction. Von Karman and Howarth (1938) firstly deduced the basic equation, also presented a particular set of solutions of Karman-Howarth equation for the final decaying turbulence. Later on, two Russian authors, Loitsiansky (1939) and Millionshtchikov (1941), have each discussed the solutions of Karman-Howarth equation which are obtained when the term describing the effect of the triple 1 National Natural Science Foundation of China (10272018, 10572083)

velocity correlation is ignored. Their work is an extension of the “small Reynolds number” solution first put forward by von Karman and Howarth.

H.Dryden (1943) gave a useful review on this subject. Great deep research on the solutions of Karman-Howarth equation was conducted by Sedov (1944). He showed that one could use the separability constraint to obtain the analytical solution of Karman-Howarth equation. Sedov’s solution could be expressed in terms of the confluent hypergeometric function. Batchelor (1948), who was also the first to carry out a detailed study of this problem, based his analysis on the assumption that the Loitsianskii integral is a dynamic invariant- a widely accepted hypothesis that was later discovered to be invalid. Batchelor conclude that the only complete self-preserving solution that was internally consistent existed at low turbulence Reynolds numbers where the turbulent kinetic energy consistent with the final period of turbulent decay. Batchelor (1948) also found a self-preserving solution to the Karman-Howarth equation in the limit of infinite Reynolds numbers for which Loitsiansky’s integral was an invariant. Objections were later raised to the use of Loitsiansky’s integral as a dynamic invariant: at high Reynolds numbers this integral can be shown to be a weak function of time (see Proudman & Reid 1954 and Batchelor & Proudman 1956). Saffman (1967) proposed an alternative dynamic invariant which yields another power law decay

in the infinite Reynolds numbers limit (see Hinze 1975). While the results of Batchelor and Saffman formally constitute complete self-preserving solutions to the inviscid Karman-Howarth equation, it must be kept in mind that they only exhibit partial self-preservation with respect to the full viscous equation. Recently, George (1992) revived this issue concerning the existence of complete self-preserving solutions in isotropic turbulence. In an interesting paper he claimed to find a complete self-preserving solution, valid for all Reynolds numbers. George’s (1992) analysis is based on the dynamic equation for the energy spectrum rather than on the Karman-Howarth equation. Strictly speaking, the solution presented by George was an anlternative self-preserving solution to that of Karman-Howarth and Batchelor since he relaxed the constraint that the triple longitudinal velocity correlation be self-similarity in the classical sense. Speziale and Bernard (1992) reexamined this issue form a basic theoretical and computational standpoint. Several interesting conclusions had been drawn from their analysis.

From the long history stories, we know that: Decaying homogeneous and isotropic turbulence is one of the most important and extensively explored problems in fluid dynamics and a central piece in the study of turbulence. Despite all the effort, a general theory describing the decay of turbulence based on the first principles has not yet been developed. (Skrbek and Steven R.Stalp, 2000). It thus appears that the theory of self-preservation in homogeneous turbulence has many interesting features that have not yet been fully understood and are worth of further study. (see Speziale and Bernard ,1992,pp.665).

This paper offers a unified investigation of isotropic turbulence, based on the exact solutions of Karman-Howarth equation. Firstly, we will point out that new complete solution set may be exist if we adopt the Sedov (1944) method. Based on the above finds, new results could be obtained for the analysis on turbulence

相关文档
最新文档