研究生英语阅读教程中高级本 unit4 翻译
研究生英语课文翻译Unit 4
Explicit and Implicit Moral EducationImagine a guardsman,from the moment he falls in on parade in the morning until the moment the parade is dismissed,every conscious action he makes is predetermined and controlled.If inadvertently he does something that is not in the schedule,such as drop his rifle,he has to cover up that accident by pretending to faint.to do anything other than conform might show originality and inventiveness,but from the point of view of military ethos would be immoral.想象一下有一个卫兵,在早上从他进入一个阅兵队列开始直到这个队伍解散,他作出的每一个有意识的动作都是事先规定好并且被控制的。
如果他无意识地做了计划外的一个动作,比如弄掉了他的步枪,他只能通过装作晕倒来掩盖这个错误。
不遵守命令可能会显示你的独创性和别出心裁,但是从军队气质的角度来讲,这些行为都是不道德的。
That is an example of thorough-going explicit moral system.In it actions are rigidly divided into right ones and wrong ones,permitted ones and non-permitted ones,and everyone involved accepts this without question;and to train a participant in such a system is an explicit matter,and the simplest form of behaviour training,provided the learners acknowledge the teacher as an unquestionable authority who knows exactly what moral behaviour is.这就是一个彻底实行显性道德教育体系的例子。
考研英语阅读理解精读及解析-UNIT 4
UNIT FOURTEXT ONEAs Americas digest the news of another gun atrocity, a mall shooting in Nebraska on December 5th, they cannot be blamed for thinking that guns are in too ready supply. But an article in the latest Economic Journa suggests that the demand for illegal guns, at least, is not met as easily as people might fear. Sudhir Venkatesh, now of Columbia University, has talked to 132 gang-members, 77 prostitutes, 116 gun-owning youths, 23 gun-dealers and numerous other denizens of Chicago's Grand Boulevard and Washington Park neighbourhoods. He did not find many satisfied customers.Chicago has unusually tough restrictions on legal handguns. Even so the black market is surprisingly “thin”, attracting relatively few buyers and sellers. The authors reckon that the 48,000 residents of the two neighbourhoods buy perhaps 1,400 guns a year, compared with at least 200,000 cocaine purchases. Underground brokers sell guns for $150-350, a mark-up of perhaps 200% over the legal price. They also demand a fee of $30-50 for orchestrating the deal. Even then, 30-40% of the transactions fall through because the seller cannot secure a gun, gets cold feet or cannot agree on a location for the deal.Buyers also find it hard to verify the quality of the merchandise. They often know little about the weapons they covet. “Tony”, who owns a .38 calibre handgun, learnt how to use his weapon by fiddling with it. He even put a stone in it. “Did it fire?” Mr Venkatesh asked. “I'm not sure. I think it did,” Tony said.Fortunately for Tony and his peers, their rivals and the victims of crime cannot tell if their guns work any better than they can. Often, showing the “bulge” is enough to gain the respect of rival gangs. In robberies brandishing the weapon will usually do. Storekeepers do not wait for proof that it works.Markets can overcome thinness, the paper says; they can also overcome illegality. But they cannot overcome both. A thin market must rely on advertising or a centralised exchange: eBay, for example, has dedicated pages matching sellers of imitation pearl pins or Annette Funicello bears to the few, scattered buyers that can be found. But such solutions are too cumbersome and conspicuous for an underground market. The drugs market, by contrast, slips through the law's fingers because of the natural density of drug transactions. Dealers can always find customers on their doorstep, and buyers can reassure themselves about suppliers through repeated custom. There are no fixed and formal institutions that the police could easily throttle.Indeed, the authors argue that the gun market may be threadbare partly because the drug market is so plump. Gang-leaders are wary of gun-dealing because the extra police scrutiny that guns attract would jeopardise their earnings from coke and dope. Even Chicago's gang-leaders have to worry about the effect of crime on commerce.1.Some of the gun transactins areunsuccessful mainly because_____[A] it is not profitable as the underground price of gun far exceeds legal price.[B] Chicago has surprisingly tough restrictions on the ownership and business of guns.[C] the dealers are unable to guarntee whether the deal is really going to happen or not.[D] it is hard to testify the quality of the guns in actual situations.pared with the gun market, the drug market can be “fat” mainly because_____[A] it hardly attracts the police’s attention due to the flexibility of the business.[B] the drug dealings are taking place in higher frequency.[C] there are no fixed and formal spots for drug dealing.[D] drug is affordable to a larger number of people. 3. The word “cumbersome” (Line 4, Pargraph 5) most probably means_____[A] transparent.[B] troubling.[C] horrible.[D] stupid.4. The reason why the authors argue that the gun market may be threadbare partly because the drug market is so plump is _____[A] that the drug transaction is more prefitable thatn gun-dealing.[B] that the police are more dedicated to the gun-dealing than to the drug-dealing.[C] that the gang-leaders are suppressing the gun-dealing in order to maintain their profit from drug[D] that the gang-leaders are worried about the effect of crime on commerce.5. Towards the future of gun-dealing, the author’s attitude is _____[A] pessimistic.[B] optimistic.[C] desperate.[D] sorrowful.文章剖析:这篇文章主要介绍了目前美国枪支黑市的情况。
研究生英语阅读教程(提高级)课后习题翻译(带原文、最全版)
Lesson 11. Yesterday’s terrorism darkened, marked and forever altered the way Americans live their lives. 昨日发生的恐怖主义活动使美国人的生活暗淡无光,在他们的生活中留下了印迹,并永远地改变了他们的生活。
2. “We are going to have to learn what a lot of other countries have gone through: to manage fear at a cultural and national level,” said Charles Figley, a professor of trauma psychology at Florida State University. “We’re getting a lesson in the way fear works.”佛罗里达州立大学创伤心理学教授查尔斯?费格里说:“我们得学一学其它许多国家曾经经历过的东西,那就是从文化上和在全国范围内来应对恐惧。
”他还说:“我们正在体验恐惧是怎样起作用的。
”3. In a country long proud and even boastful of its openness—a country where an ordinary citizen can stroll through the U.S. Capitol unescorted—the terrorist attacks are likely to force Americans to a lot of that. Metal detectors now mark the front door of many government buildings, and security guards are a fixture in the lobby of most large office buildings.美国是一个一向以开放自豪甚至洋洋得意的国家,在这里,人们可以独自在美国国会大楼中闲庭信步,而现在,恐怖袭击很有可能迫使美国人处处小心,惶惶不可终日。
研究生学位英语课文全文翻译-unit4
Unit4 无子女家庭:亘古生息的反叛1二十好几的凯茜、韦恩夫妇结婚已有五年之久,膝下犹虚。
上次凯茜娘家有一个人问:“你们打算什么时候要孩子?”她答道:“我们就是孩子!”2凯茜与韦恩属于一代人数日益增长、决定不要孩子的年轻已婚夫妇群体。
最近一项调查显示在过去的五年中,年龄在25至29岁之间妇女不愿生养的百分比几乎翻了一番,在18至24岁的已婚妇女中几乎增至三倍。
在这个似乎大胆反抗生物性和社会性的决定后面隐藏着什么原因呢?3或许最能公开坦陈心曲的无子女夫妇是《婴儿陷阱》一书的作者:埃伦,派克,其夫威廉,一位广告总经理兼全国不生养夫妇协会主席。
派克夫妇认为他们和协会均无意反对生儿育女,不过是反对迫使人们传宗接代的社会压力,它无视人们是否殷切盼望和真的需要孩子或者根本不好此道。
4“这是一种生活方式的选择,”埃伦说,“我们选择自由和自愿,清净和闲暇。
这也是一个朝哪个方向付出努力的问题——在你自己的小家庭之内或在一个大的社团之中。
这一代人面临有关地球生命延续的严重问题以及生命质量的问题。
我们的孙男孙女也许将购票去观赏最后一批红松林或排队去获取氧气配给。
有人抱怨在回家见五个孩子的途中被交通堵塞困住好几个小时,但是他们不能将孩子与交通堵塞联系起来。
在一个受到人口过剩一系列后果威胁的世界上,我们正在参与一项事业使膝下无子的生活模式为社会所接受并受世人尊重。
太多的孩子作为一种文化强制的后果而呱呱坠地,离婚和虐待儿童的相关统计充分揭露了这一结果。
”5埃伦的丈夫补充说:“每位朋友、亲戚、同事不停地给你施加压力,劝你要孩子,说什么‘发现你生活中失去的东西’。
好多好多人很晚才发现,所谓他们失去的东西其实是他们完全不适合做的事情。
”6埃伦还说:“从抱第一个洋娃娃开始,大到欣赏电视肥皂剧,成年后参加鸡尾酒会,无形之中,总有一种压力要你为人父母。
但是让我们来看看养育失败的比率吧,或许天下父母应该视为像当医生一样的专门职业。
有些人擅长此道,他们应当生养孩子;有些人一窍不通,他们应该认为他们还有其他的选择。
研究生英语教程unit 4 reading practice全文翻译
Unit4当经济变化抢占头条时,亚洲人口结构的变化至少同样深刻。
近期一篇由哈佛大学经济学家杰弗里·威廉姆森与联邦储备银行的马修·希金斯合著的文章中指出,这种人口奇迹基本上可能完全解释经济奇迹。
一篇由夏威夷大学的安德鲁·曼森与伯克利加利福尼亚大学的罗纳德·李、蒂莫西·米勒合著的文章支持这一观点。
各方经济学家都在争论,在正确的控制下,人口改变的间接结果能否刺激亚洲经济增长直至下个世纪。
当国家变得富强时,它们都将经历一个“人口过渡”时期,在此期间,发展迅速的医疗条件和高生育率将造成人口迅速的增长。
30年前亚洲大部分国家都是这种情况。
然而最终,生育率迅速下降,人口增速放缓。
这导致了人口结构概况由金字塔形(婴幼儿很多而老人很少)转变为中式灯笼形(最年轻的和最老的人很少而居中的人很多)。
对于经济而言,中年人多是好事。
它意味着大多数人口都处于适合工作的年龄段,并且“抚养比例”很低。
在西方,人口过渡期持续了一个多世纪。
但在东南亚,它只持续了短短一代人。
例如1965年,泰国女性平均拥有6个孩子,而现在只有不到三个。
非常类似的事情也发生在日本,然后是新加坡、中国台湾省、南韩和印尼。
同时,这些国家有着最强劲的经济发展速度。
而这不是巧合。
在威廉姆森早期的著作中,他估计每人每年仅靠人口年龄结构调整这一点,就能提供1.5%的GDP增长。
但并不能仅仅因为高增长率就把这一部分作为区域典型。
经济增长同样受到了高涨的存款和投资的刺激。
而这部分增长是否令人惊喜的受到人口的影响,也是各方经济学家争论的话题。
上世纪70年代早期以前,东南亚的少儿抚养负担处于高峰,那里的存款率很低。
只有等抚养负担率降低时,存款率才升高。
马萨·威廉姆森和希金斯认为,人口同样可以说明那里的本土和外来资本投资模式。
他们认为少儿抚养负担降低后,处于工作年龄段的人能存储收入中更多的部分。
结果是,他们希望亚洲国家能像日本那样,可以由资本进口国转变为资本出口国。
新世纪研究生公共英语教材阅读及翻译第四单元
Unit 4 3 kinds of fatigue●Key to ExercisesI. Comprehension Checkl.C 2.D 3.A 4.D 5.D 6.B 7.A 8.C 9.D l0.AII. V ocabulary StudyI.l.Physical 2 accumulation 3. diversity 4. precipitated 5. muscular 6. pathological 7. symptomatic 8. vigorous 9. psychologically 10. Anxiety 1l. restored 12. refreshedII.l. manifestation 2. resume 3. precipitate 4. consequence 5. diverse 6. a skimpy 7. taxing 8. prolong9. overlooked l0. vigor 11l. enhanced l2. relapseIII. (略)III. Clozel.A 2.C 3.D 4.C 5.B 6.B 7.C 8.C 9.B 10.Dll.C l2.D l3. C l4.B l5.A 16.A 17. D l8. C 19. D 20.BlV. Translationl. I find that walking along the quiet lake can provide refreshment from a day's sedentary job.2. Exercising and relaxing yourse1f is often prescribed as an effective cure for fatigue.3. The less active you are, the faster this aging process accelerates, and the more vulnerable youbecome to physical and psychoIogica1 problems.4. Even if you keep up dieting, you cannot reduce to the point where you achieve the kind of body-shaping you want.5. People thought he had happy late years during which time he did litt1e but slept and ate, yet he was often tired and depressed.6. In the past when hay was baled by hand and laundry scrubbed on a washboard, people seldom complained of tiredness. However, people feel dragged out and complain a lot in the modern time of 1aborsaving devices and convenient transportation.参考译文论三种疲劳简·布罗迪1 疲劳是人们向医生、朋友和亲戚经常抱怨的问题之一。
研究生新阶英语阅读教程 (1-9)参考译文
研究生新阶英语阅读教程(unit 1-4)参考译文unit oneText A 如何变‚末流‛为‚一流‛:哈佛对捐赠大户的回报1 初春的一个夜晚,暖意融融。
一群公司执行官、律师、石油巨子、理财经纪人、身价不菲的咨询师以及巨额财产继承人,悄然走出查尔斯宾馆和哈佛饭店的套房。
这些商界显要,男的个个头发花白,身着灰色西装──有的拄着手杖,有的则由于长期在哈佛运动队或网球队锻炼,一副运动员身材,充满活力、脸色红润;女的戴着丝巾,身穿苗条的黑色长裤,但其中几乎没有一张黑人和拉美人的面孔,他们穿过一道普通的门,走进安尼博格餐厅。
此次聚会,校内没有通报,媒体也不得报道。
2平常简朴的新生餐厅今天用连翘花和郁金香装点一新,客人们品尝着鸡尾酒、葡萄酒和牛柳、蟹黄蛋糕、芦笋尖等开胃小菜,享受着时任哈佛校长劳伦斯〃撒莫斯的殷勤。
有几位客人谈论着海斯特布丁俱乐部最近的那场演出,这个俱乐部是一个学生戏剧协会,每年春天都要上演一场音乐滑稽戏,由哈佛的男生男扮女装参加表演。
3过了一会儿,布臵在二楼阳台的哈佛乐队开始演奏‚万名哈佛人‛,客人们各自入席,烛光晚宴开始。
酒足饭饱之后,客人们兴高采烈,对撒莫斯校长的餐后致词报以阵阵掌声。
唯一例外的是,撒莫斯校长简要介绍学校计划扩大低收入家庭子女的招生,为年收入低于四万美元家庭的子女上哈佛提供免费教育,此时,校长似乎在等待在场贵宾们赞许的掌声,但竟然没有掌声。
我分析,这种令人尴尬的沉默传递了一个信号,甚至可称为威胁:你要是扩大招收低收入家庭的子女而将我们这些人的孩子拒之门外,我们就会停止数以百万计的捐款。
44月8日的这顿晚宴,拉开了哈佛大学学校资源委员会(COUR)2005年年会的序幕。
该委员会或许是高等学校里一个最具财力的顾问团,但鲜为人知,媒体亦少有提及。
实际上COUR不是一般意义上的委员会──它并不正式制定学校政策或发表正式意见──但撒莫斯同其他任何一任哈佛校长一样,离不开COUR的支持。
Unit4课文译文
Unit 4Main Reading研究随时间流逝而变得更令人兴奋威廉·D·菲利普斯几乎从记事起我就对科学萌生了兴趣,到大约五岁时,我就收集了家里用过的装东西的瓶子作为自己的“化学器材”。
我用父母给我的显微镜观察可以找到的任何东西。
科学仅仅是我童年时为之着迷的事情之一,其他的还有钓鱼、棒球、骑车和爬树。
然而随着时间的流逝,显微镜和化学比棒球棒、钓鱼竿和橄榄球头盔更吸引我的注意力。
记得在我十岁以前,我就决定要把科学作为我的终身事业,而且以一种非常有限而天真的眼光开始欣赏物理学的简单与美丽。
我在我们家屋子的地下室有一个试验室,我全然不知石棉、电和紫外光的危险,花了很多时间在那儿试验火、炸药、火箭和碳弧。
我父母并不直接参与我的科学试验,他们对我的试验持宽容的态度,甚至在家里的电路因我超负荷用电而全部短路时也是如此。
他们总是鼓励我,给我探索、学习和娱乐的自由。
上高中时,我从精彩的科学和数学课堂上得到快乐和收获,但回想起来,那些重点培养语言能力和写作技巧的课程,对我后来拓展自己的科学生涯,和科学和数学课一样重要。
我敢肯定,我高中参加的辩论赛有助于我日后更好地作科学演讲;有关写作风格的课帮助我写出更好的论文;而学习法语则大大促进了我后来跟克劳德·科恩-唐努吉的研究团队富有成果的合作。
读高中时的第二个暑假,我在特拉华大学打工做试验。
那是一次很好的经历,我从指导我的那位研究生那儿明白了一个重要的道理,他告诉我说,“一个实验物理学家就是把嗜好当作工作来谋生的人。
”在朱尼亚塔学院,我开始真正理解数学和物理学之间的联系。
作为物理学前提的微积分既是一项挑战,又是一大乐趣。
这时我开始领略到物理学和数学中的美与统一,而此前我却无法欣赏。
在朱尼亚塔我开始了电子自旋共振的研究,而在阿尔贡国家实验室度过的一学期加深了我对这一课题的理解。
这一经历帮助我成功进入麻省理工的丹·克莱普内尔研究团队攻读研究生,在那里我主攻磁矩的精密测量。
《研究生英语阅读教程中高级本》Unit1-7、Unit10课文翻译
Unit1在美国人们庆祝母亲节与父亲节,然而父母亲所受到的礼物却是不尽相同的,这篇文章研究这个问题的原因。
我们必须正视这么一个事实,丝绸领带伤害了感情。
(人们在表达感情是受到某种约束)尽管上个周末父亲节使这个五月充满了150万张纪念卡和多得使线路堵塞的长途电话,但是父亲们都明白,父亲节也是收到对方付费电话和收到引以为傲最新款领带最多的一天。
虽然老爸们不介意父亲节母亲节的差异,但是这却反映了父母亲在子女成长中的所扮演的各自不同角色。
Scott Coltrane说道,父亲节半正式的礼物说明了我们对父亲情感的矛盾的文化。
Wellford,s,c感情丰富,但是他承认在父亲节上他很难将他的感情完全地表达出来。
随着年龄的增长,他对父亲越来越有距离感,看他更像个英雄。
作为成年人他说,我对他的情感越来越深,但是我仍然会送他幽默卡和一些实用的礼物。
随着时间的改变,对父亲的态度也随之发生改变。
例如,Mr.Bridges他自己就一个已经需要照顾三个孩子的父亲。
Mr.Bridges说道:“我整年里每天都是父亲节”他并不介意这个周末他得到什么。
他经常将信藏在他孩子的背包里,告诉他们他已他们为骄傲。
最近,他的小儿子将写着“我爱你,老爸”的课堂作业藏在了他的公文包里,以作为得到赞许的回应。
Mr.Bridges说:“那比买卡片好多了”。
象Mr.Bridges这样的男人,在孩子生活中起如此积极作用,在万神殿里,父亲节的地位应该得到提升。
Ralph LaRossa《现代父权》的作者,细致地将父权文化与父权行为进行了比较。
但是,也有人说,美国人庆祝父权已经与今天的老爸们并驾齐驱了。
Frederic Brunel说:“性别角色与性别行为是随着时间的改变而改变的”。
这里有许多可能已经正在发生的标志。
例如,沃尔玛商品的特点,很少因老爸对尿片的糊涂而改变,而更多的是直面情感。
Bella Sant减肥浴场,推出了一种无微不至的项目包括修指甲和美容;以及提供令人安神的喷泉疗养和欧洲香皂。
研究生英语综合教程UNIT4课文及翻译(含汉译英英译汉)
UNIT41. Think for a moment about your own life — the activities of your day, the possessions you enjoy, the surroundings in which you live. Is there anything you don’t have at this moment that you would like to have? Anything that you have, but that you would like more of? If your answer is “no,” then congratulations — either you are well advanced on the path of Zen self-denial, or else you are a close relative of Ted Turner . The rest of us, however, would benefit from an increase in our material standard of living. This simple truth is at the very core of economics. It can be restated this way: we all face the problem of scarcity.2 Almost everything in your daily life is scarce. You would benefit from a larger room or apartment, so you have a scarcity of space. You have only two pairs of shoes and could use a third for hiking; you have a scarcity of shoes. You would love to take a trip to Chicago, but it is difficult for you to find the time or the money to go — trips to Chicago are scarce.3 Because of scarcity, each of us is forced to make choices. We must allocate our scarce time to different activities: work, play, education, sleep, shopping, and more. We must allocate our scarce spending power among different goods and services: food, furniture, movies, long-distance phone calls, and many others.4 Economists study the choices we make as individuals and how those choices shape our economy. For example, the goods that each of us decides to buy ultimately determine which goods business firms will produce. This, in turn, explains which firms and industries will hire new workers and which will lay them off.5. Economists also study the more subtle and indirect effects of individual choice on our society. Will most Americans continue to live in houses, or — like Europeans will most of us end up in apartments? Will we have an educated and well-informed citizenry? Will museums and libraries be forced to close down? Will traffic congestion in our cities continue to worsen, or is there relief in sight? These questions hinge, in large part, on the separate decisions of millions of people. To answer them requires an understanding of how people make choices under conditions of scarcity.6. Think for a moment about the goals of our society. We want a high standard of living for all citizens: clean air, safe streets, and good schools. What is holding us back from accomplishing all of these goals in a way that would satisfy everyone? You probably already know the answer: scarcity. 1. 想一想你的生活:你每天从事的活动,你所拥有的财产,你所居住的环境。
研究生英语第四单元课文翻译
成功1 一个出身卑微的年轻人从中西部来到纽约寻求发迹,他梦想以美国人特有的方式成为百万富翁,于是,他就在华尔街上碰运气。
他勤勉而精明,有时又不得不狡诈,他综合世界各地商人的经商之道,用非法的电子手段收购其他公司。
他连做梦也没想到会如此成功:他赚了1200万美元。
2 起初,这位年轻人认为一切进展顺利,在他显然已赚到1200万美元时,他忙问妻子,“难道不是很了不起吗?”3 “算不了什么,”妻子说,“你只是个无足轻重的小人物。
”4 “这怎么可能呢?”年轻人说,“我成了富翁。
我们生活在崇拜富翁的时代:报纸上经常刊登富翁与影星、小说名家以及服装设计大师的合影;盗用公司钱财的大富豪们的鼎鼎大名连中小学生都人人皆知;而发了横财的房地产骗子们的头像经常出现在印刷精美的杂志的封面上。
”5 “可你不会,”妻子说,“你还是无名小辈。
”6 “可我有1200万元,”年轻人说。
7 “有1200万的人多着呢,”妻子回答,“他们也一样默默无闻。
”8 “我可以用钱铺路,使我们成为重要的慈善舞会委员会的成员,”年轻人说,“然后,报纸就会在专栏中报道我们。
”9 “甭自我欺骗了,”妻子说,“重要的委员会里真正的富翁多的是。
我们钱这么少最终只能举办晚宴舞会之类的小型活动,给美国银屑病基金会捐点小钱。
”10 “可我在纽约第五大街上拥有一套公寓房,它价值200万美元,”年轻人说。
11 “说实话,200万美元一套的公寓房一毛钱可以买一打,”妻子说。
12 “我还拥有一辆加长型豪华轿车,”年轻人说,“它长达21.5英尺。
”13 “没哪个名人乘坐过你的车,”妻子说,“国务卿亨利•基辛格以及服装设计大师卡尔文•克莱恩听都没听说过,你是小人物一个。
”14 年轻人沉默了片刻,最后问妻子,“我让你失望了吗?”15 “你当然令我失望,”她回答说,“当初你向我求婚时,说自己将来定会有番作为。
我哪里知道你还是个无名之辈?”16年轻人一时显得很沮丧,然后,他挺了挺胸,清了清嗓子,说,“我会引人瞩目的。
研究生英语高级教程1-6单元课文翻译
老大哥,移过去一点[1] 对路易十四而言,即使在卧室里生活没有隐私都不是问题。
事实上,这是这位法国君主向那些甚至是最为显赫的贵族展示自己绝对君权的一种方式。
每天早晨,这些权贵们聚集在一起观摩太阳王起床、祈祷、上厕所、挑假发等活动。
[2] 过去这种生活——没有隐私的生活——会成为我们的未来吗? 许多未来学家、科幻小说作家和隐私权倡导者都确信会这样。
他们一直提醒人们“老大哥”在监视着我们。
闭路电视摄像头常常跟踪你的行动;你的手机会泄露你所在的位置;你的过境证和信用卡会留下数码痕迹。
现在公民有可能正受到监视。
[3] 但是,在过去的几年中,某种奇怪的事情发生了。
由于手机、数码相机和互联网的普及,监视技术被更为广泛地利用。
保安专家布鲁斯·施奈尔认为,监视技术的微型化、数字存储设备价格的下降以及能够处理大量信息的更为尖端的系统的出现等因素的结合,意味着“监视能力曾经只由政府掌握,现在或在不久的将来,会掌握在每个人手中。
”[4] 数字技术产品,如可拍照手机及互联网,与模拟技术同类产品大不相同。
数字图像与传统照片不同,能被迅速、便捷地复制并传遍全球。
另外一个重大不同是数码设备的使用更为广泛。
大多数人都随身携带着可拍照手机。
[5] 数码照相机的快速和普及使它们能做到使用胶卷的照相机做不到的事情。
比如,10月份,田纳西州纳什维尔一宗抢劫案的受害者用可拍照手机拍下了劫匪的照片和他逃走时使用的交通工具。
警方看了这些照片后,在广播里描述了这名劫匪和他的卡车,10分钟后,此人便被抓获。
[6] 然而,监视行为的大众化有利有弊。
可拍照手机导致了窥淫癖现象,从而导致了维护个人形象权的新法规的出台。
9月份,美国国会通过了“防止录像窥淫法”,该法案禁止在未经本人同意的情况下对其裸露身体的各个部位或内衣拍照。
该法案的出台是由于可拍照手机的普及以及在卧室、公共浴室、卫生间和更衣室出现隐蔽摄像头事件的增加。
同样,德国议会也通过了一项议案,禁止未经授权在建筑物内拍照。
研究生学位英语课文及翻译-Unit Four
Textual Selection1、When, at the beginning of The Iliad/伊利亚特/-and Western literature-King Agamemnon steals Achilles' slave-girl/奴隶女人/, Briseis, the king tells the world's greatest warrior/战士勇士/ that he is doing so "to let you know that I am more powerful than you, and to teach others not to bandy words with me/跟我犟嘴/ openly defy/不服从,公然反抗/ their king"'. But literary scholar/文学家/ Jonathan Gottschall believes that the true focus of Homer's epic is not royal authority/皇家权威/, but royal genes/皇家基因,皇家遗传/.2、Gottschall is one of a group of researchers/研究团队/, calling themselves literary Darwinists/文学达尔文主义者/, devoted to studying literature/文学/ using the concepts/概念/ of evolutionary/演化,进化/ biology and the empirical/以实验为依据的/, quantitative/量化的/ methods of the sciences. "Women in Homer/荷马史诗/ are not a proxy/代理人/ for status/显赫的地位/ and honour; says Gottschall. "At bottom/事实上/, the men in the stories are motivated/驱使/ by reproductive concerns/繁衍后代/. Every Homeric raid involves/荷马式的袭击/ killing the men and abducting/抢夺/ the women:' The violent world of the epics史诗中的残暴世界/, he says, reflects a society where men fought for scarce mates/少数的配偶/ and chieftains/首领/ had access to as many women as slaves/奴隶/ and concubines/宫女/. And he thinks that everything written/文学撰述/ since Homer is open to similar analysis.3、Literary Darwinism is a mode of analysis; it's also a bit of/一些,少许/ a crusade/运动/, an attempt/试图/ to shake up/撼动/ literary criticism/文学评论/. "Literary theory requires a theory of human nature/人性本质/, because literature is shaped/形状/ by human motives/动机/ and cognitive biases/认知偏见/; says Joseph Carroll of the University of Missour/密苏里/, St Louis. The problem, say the literary Darwinists/文学达尔文主义者/, is that for the past few decades/过去几十年/ the humanities/人类,人性/ have, in the case of/如果发生/ critics/评论,批评/ deconstructing texts/解构文本时/, denied/否定了/ the need for a theory of human nature, asserting/坚持/ that the study of texts can be concerned/不安的/ with nothing outside those texts. Or else/要不/ they have been stuck on theories of human nature that are rooted in/使根深蒂固/ the subjective/主观的/ and the social.4、Those influenced by Freudianism/洛伊德主义/, for example, might read a novel looking for hints/暗示提示/ of a child's sexual desire/性欲/ for its parent. A Marxist/马克思主义者/ would seek out economic and class/阶级/ conflicts/冲突/. Carroll has no truck with/不理/ this: "The theories up to/胜任/ this point have all had a little bit of the truth, but have also all been fundamentally/基本/ flawed/瑕疵/; he says. "None comes to terms with/对某事妥协/ the fundamental facts/基本事实/ of human evolution."5、Literary darwinists believe that literature/文学/ reflects a universal/普遍一般/ human nature shaped by natural selection, and as a result/作为结果/, read texts in terms of /依据/animal concerns/关系/ such as mate choice/配偶选择/, relations between kin/亲属关系/, and social hierarchies/社会阶级/. Such a scientistic approach/方法,途径/ can meet with hostility/敌对/. "At one meeting of the Modern Languages Association/协会/, someone stood up and called me a proto-fascist/原始的法西斯/; says Nancy Easterlin, an expert in Romantic literature/罗马语系专家/ at the University of New Orleans/新奥尔良/, Louisiana.///伊丝特琳利用认知学的一些观点来分析华尔华滋(William Wordsworth )《前奏》(the Prelude )的母子关系。
研究生英语系列教材上unit4 原文翻译
The following text is extracted from Marriages and Families by Nijole V.Benokraitis.下面的文章选自奈杰尔贝诺克瑞提斯的婚姻与家庭。
The book has been used as a textbook for sociology courses and women's studies in a number of universities in the United States.此书在美国的一些大学里被用作社会学和妇女研究等课程的教材,It highlights important contemporary changes in society and the family它强调了在当代社会和家庭中所发生的重要变化,and explores the choices that are available to family members,探索了家庭成员所面临的选择,as well as the constraints that many of us do not recognize.以及我们很多人都还未意识到的种种约束。
It examines the diversity of American families today,该书还审视了当今美国家庭的多样性,using cross-cultural and multicultural comparisons运用跨文化和多元文化的比较,to encourage creative thinking about the many critical issues that confront the family of the twenty-first century.以激发创造性思维来研究21世纪家庭所面临的许多严峻问题。
LOVE AND LOVING RELATIONSHIPS爱和情感连系Nijole V.Benokraitis奈杰尔·贝诺克瑞提斯Love — as both an emotion and a behavior — is essential for human survival.爱,对于人类的生存是不可或缺的。
研究生英语阅读教程(提高级_第三版) 第四单元课文
Bill ClintonHillary Rodham Clinton[1] Bill Clinton was hard to miss in the autumn of 1970. He arrived at Y ale Law School looking more like a Viking than a Rhodes Scholar returning from two years at Oxford. He was tall and handsome somewhere beneath that reddish brown beard and curly mane of hair. He also had a vitality that seemed to shoot out of his pores. When I first saw him in the law school’s student lounge, he was holding forth before a rapt audience of fellows tudents. As I walked by, I heard him say: “. . . and not only that, we grow the biggest watermelons in the world!” I asked a friend, “Who is that?” [2]“Oh, that’s Bill Clinton,” he said. “He’s from Arkansas, and that’s all he ever talks about.”[3]We would run into each other around campus, but we never actually met until one night at the Y ale law library the following spring. I was studying in the library, and Bill was standing out in the hall talking to another student, Jeff Gleckel, who was trying to persuade Bill to write for the Y ale Law Journal. I noticed that he kept looking over at me. He had been doing a lot of that. So I stood up from the desk, walked over to him and said, “If you’re going to keep looking at me, and I’m going to keep lookin g back, we might as well be introduced. I’m Hillary Rodham.” That was it. The way Bill tells the story, he couldn’t remember his own name.[4]We didn’t talk to each other again until the last day of classes in the spring of 1971. We happened to walk out of Professor Thomas Emerson’s Political and Civil Rights course at the same time. Bill asked me where I was going. I was on the way to the registrar’s office to sign up for the next semester’s classes. He told me he was heading there too. As we walked, he complimented my long flower-patterned skirt. When I told him that my mother had made it, he asked about my family and where I had grown up. We waited in line until we got to the registrar. She looked up and said, “Bill, what are you doing here? You’ve already registered.” I laughed when he confessed that he just wanted to spend time with me, and we went for a long walk that turned into our first date.[5]We both had wanted to see a Mark Rothko exhibit at the Y ale Art Gallery but, because of a labor disp ute, some of the university’s buildings, including the museum, were closed. As Bill and I walked by, he decided he could get us in if we offered to pick up the litter that had accumulated in the gallery’s courtyard. Watching him talk our way in was the fir st time I saw his persuasiveness in action. We had the entire museum to ourselves. We wandered through the galleries talking about Rothko and twentieth-century art. I admit to being surprised at his interest in and knowledge of subjects that seemed, at first, unusual for a Viking from Arkansas. We ended up in the museum’s courtyard, where I sat in the large lap of Henry Moore’s sculpture Draped Seated Woman while we talked until dark. I invited Bill tothe party my roommate, Kwan Kwan Tan, and I were throwing in our dorm room that nigh t to celebrate the end of classes. Kwan Kwan, an ethnic Chinese who had come from Burma to Yale to pursue graduate legal studies, was a delightful living companion and a graceful performer of Burmese dance. She and her husband, Bill Wang, another student, remain friends.[6]Bill came to our party but hardly said a word. Since I didn’t know him that well, I thought he must be shy, perhaps not very socially adept or just uncomfortable. I didn’t have much hope for us as a coupl e. Besides, I had a boyfriend at the time, and we had weekend plans out of town. When I came back to Yale late Sunday, Bill called and heard me coughing and hacking from the bad cold I had picked up.[7]“You sound terrible,” he said. About thirty minutes later, he knocked on my door, bearing chicken soup and orange juice. He came in, and he started talking. He could converse about anything―from African politics to countr y and western music. I asked him why he had been so quiet at my party. [8]“Because I was interested in learning more about you and your friends,”he replied.[9]I was starting to realize that this young man from Arkansas was much m ore complex than first impressions might suggest. To this day, he can astoni sh me with the connections he weaves between ideas and words and how he makes it all sound like music. I still love the way he thinks and the way helooks. One of the firs tthings I noticed about Bill was the shape of his hands . His wrists are narrow and his fingers tapered and deft, like those of a piani st or a surgeon. When we first met as students, I loved watching him turn th e pages of a book. Now his hands are showing signs of age after thousands of handshakes and golf swings and miles of signatures. They are, like their owner, weathered but still expressive, attractive and resilient.[10]Soon after Bill came to my rescue with chicken soup and orange juice, we became inseparable. In between cramming for finals and finishing up m y first year of concentration on children, we spent long hours driving aroun d in his 1970 burnt-orange Opel station wagon―truly one of the ugliest car s ever manufactured―or hanging out at the beach house on Long Island So und near Milford, Connecticut, where he lived with his roommates, Doug E akeley, Don Pogue and Bill Coleman. At a party there one night, Bill and I ended up in the kitchen talking about what each of us wanted to do after gra duation. I still didn’t know where I would live and what I would do because my interests in child advocacy and civil rights d idn’t dictate a particular pat h. Bill was absolutely certain: He would go home to Arkansas and run for p ublic office. A lot of my classmates said they intended to pursue public serv ice, but Bill was the only one who you knew for certain would actually do it .11]I told Bill about my summer plans to clerk at Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, a small law firm in Oakland, California, and he announced thathe would like to go to California with me. I was astonished. I knew he had signed on to work in Senator Georg e McGovern’s presidential campaign and that the campaign manager, Gary Hart, had asked Bill to organize the South for McGovern. The prospect of driving from one Southern state to another convincing Democrats both to support McGovern and to oppose Nixon’s p olicy in Vietnam excited him.[12]Although Bill had worked in Arkansas on campaigns for Senator J. William Fulbright and others, and in Connecticut for Joe Duffey and Joe Lieberman, he’d never had the chance to be in on the ground floor of a presidential campaign.[13]I tried to let the news sink in. I was thrilled.[14]“Why,” I asked, “do you want to give up the opportunity to do something you love to follow me to California?”[15]“For someone I love, that’s why,” he said.[16]He had decided, he told me, that we were destined for each other, and he didn’t want to let me go just after he’d found me.[17]Bill and I shared a small apartment near a big park not far from the University of California at Berkeley campus where the Free Speech Movement started in 1964. I spent most of my time working for Mal Burnstein researching, writing legal motions and briefs for a child custody case. Meanwhile, Bill explored Berkeley, Oakland and San Francisco. On weekends, he took me to the places he had scouted, like a restaurant inNorth Beach or a vintage clothing storeon Telegraph Avenue. I tried teaching him tennis, and we both experimented with cooking. I baked him a peach pie, something I associated with Arkansas, although I had yet to visit the state, and together we produced a palatable chicken curry for any and all occasions we hosted. Bill spent most of his time reading and then sharing with me his thoughts about books like To the Finland Station by Edmund Wilson. During our long walks, he often broke into song, frequently crooning one of his Elvis Presley favorites. [18]People have said that I knew Bill would be President one day and went around telling anyone who would listen. I don’t remember thinking that until years later, but I had one strange encounter at a small restaurant in Berkeley. I was supposed to meet Bill, but I was held up at work and arrived late. There was no sign of him, and I asked the waiter if he had seen a man of his description. A customer sitting nearby spoke up, saying, “He was here for a long time reading, and I started talking to him about books. I don’t know his name, but he’s going to be President someday.” “Yeah, right,” I said, “but do you know where he went?” [19]At the end of the summer, we returned to New Haven and rented the ground floor of 21 Edgewood Avenue for seventy-five dollars a month. That bought us a living room with a fireplace, one small bed room, a third room that served as both study and dining area, a tiny bathroom and a primitive kitchen. The floors were so uneven that plates would slide off thedining table if we didn’t keep little wooden blocks under the table legs to level them. The wind howled through cracks in the walls that we stuffed with newspapers. But despite it all, I loved our first house. We shopped for furniture at the Goodwill and Salvation Army stores and were quite proud of our student decor.[20]Our apartment was a block away from the Elm Street Diner, which we frequented because it was open all night. The local Y down the street had a yoga class that I joined, and Bill agreed to take with me―as long as I didn’t tell anybody else. He also came along to the Cathedral of Sweat, Y ale’s gothic sports center, to run mindlessly around the mezzanine track. Once he started running, he kept going. I didn’t. [21]We ate often at Basel’s, a favorite Greek restaurant, and loved going to the movies at the Lincoln, a small theater set back on a residential street. One evening after a blizzard finally stopped, we decided to go to the movies. The roads were not yet cleared, so we walked there and back through the foot-high snowdrifts, feeling very much alive and in love.[22]We both had to work to pay our way through law school, on top of the student loans we had taken out. But we still found time for politics. Bill decided to open a McGovern for President headquarters in New Haven, using his own money to rent a storefront. Most of the volunteers were Yale students and faculty because the boss of the local Democratic Party, Arthur Barbieri, was not supporting McGovern. Bill arranged for us to meet Mr.Barbieri at an Italian restaurant. At a long lunch, Bill claimed he had eight hundred volunteers ready to hit the streets to out-organize the regular party apparatus. Barbieri eventually decided to endorse McGovern. He invited us to attend the party meeting at a local Italian club, Melebus Club, where he would announce his endorsement.[23]The next week, we drove to a nondescript building and entered a door leading to a set of stairs that went down to a series of underground rooms. When Barbieri stood up to speak in the big dining room, he commanded the attention of the local county committee members―mostly men―who were there. He started by talking about the war in Vietnam and naming the boys from the New Haven area who were serving in the military and those who had died. Then he said, “Thiswar isn’t worth losing one more boy for. That’s why we should support George McGovern, who wants to bring our boys home.” This was not an immediately popular position, but as the night wore on, he pressed his case until he got a unanimous vote of support. And he delivered on his commitment, first at the state convention and then in the election when New Haven was one of the few places in America that voted for McGovern over Nixon. [24] After Christmas, Bill drove up from Hot Springs to Park Ridge to spend a few days with my family. Both my parents had met him the previous summer, but I was nervous because my dad was so uninhibited in his criticism of my boyfriends. I wondered what he would say to aSouthern Democrat with Elvis sideburns. My mother had told me that in my father’s eyes, no man would be good enough for me. She appreciated Bill’s good manners and willingness to help with the dishes. But Bill really won her over when he found her reading a philosophy book from one of her college courses and spent the next hour or so discussing it with her. It was slow going at first with my father, but he warmed up over games of cards, and in front of the television watching football bowl games. My brothers basked in Bill’s attention. My friends liked him too. After I introduced him to Betsy Johnson, her mother, Roslyn, cornered me on the way out of their house and said, “I don’t care what you do, but don’t let this one go. He’s the only one I’ve ever seen make you laugh!”。
研究生科技英语阅读课文及译文第四章
In Namibia, about one-quarter of children have stunted growth related to poor nutrition; about 120,000 children have lost one or both parents, predominantly to HIV/AIDS, and 26% of all women aged 15 to 49 have had at least one child die."Living more sanitarily may have increased asthma, but in terms of scale and impact, that's tiny compared with the benefit of not dying from disease for lack of hygiene," says Michael Bell, an infectious disease specialist and deputy director of Healthcare Quality Promotion at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Some scientists are searching for ways to harness the immune-priming effects of microorganisms without the fatal diseases. Parasitic worms known as helminthes are leading the way.Clinical trials are under way in the U.S. and Europe testing Trichuris Suis Ova (TSO)—-a species of pig whipworm—as a treatment for peanut allergies, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and MS. A study is being designed to test it with asthma. It's also being tested with adults who have autism, which some researchers believe could be related to immunological function.Enlarge ImageCloseChina Photos/Getty ImagesA vendor's baby sits amid the chickens at a market in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.Preliminary studies seem promising: In one, when 29 patients with Crohn's disease, a disorder of the digestive tract, were given TSO every three weeks for six months, symptoms improved in 21 of them with no adverse side effects.The ova are suspended in a liquid, invisible to the naked eye. "There's no taste, nothing to feel," says Dr. Weinstock, one of the early developers who could share in the proceeds if TSO proves successful. The microscopic eggs hatch into microscopic whipworms in the gastrointestinal tract, which interact with the host's immune system and can dampen an overactive immune response, he explains. To date, there have been few side effects, he says. "As far as we know, this agent doesn't cause diarrhea," he adds. "Nothing crawls out of you."For those who fear the "ick" factor, Dr. Weinstock notes that even under normal conditions, people are teeming with microorganisms, which outnumber human cells by about 10 to 1, many of which are necessary for human health. Many foods—from yogurt to cheese to bread—also contain live bacteria and fungi.Some daily products now widely advertise that they contain probiotics, or good bacteria. But most immunologists say that those in food products have not been sufficiently studied or standardized to draw scientific conclusions about what health benefits they provide.Scientists are still working on ways to separate good germs from bad ones; in the meantime, they have a few insights: Studies have shown that children who grow up with household pets have fewer allergies and less asthma than those who don't.The CDC's Dr. Bell says that people should be vigilant about wound care since bacteria can cause problems if it gets into the blood stream, and he still advocates hand-washing. "If you're not doing it 10 times a day, you're probably not doing it enough," he says. But he and other experts say that regular soap and water are fine in most cases. Sterilizing hands iscritical mainly for health-care workers and in hospitals, where disease-causing germs are prevalent and can easily spread.Many experts advise common sense. "We don't want to say to children, 'OK, play by the dirty river bank and catch whatever you can,' " says Dr. Weinstock. "But we can say there's nothing wrong with kids playing in the dirt. They don't have to live in total sanitation, and they won't die from eating something off the floor. It's probably more healthy than not."All you need is a wormhole, the Large Hadron Collider or a rocket that goes really, really fast1 Hello. My name is Stephen Hawking. Physicist, cosmologist and something of a dreamer. Although I cannot move and I have to speak through a computer, in my mind I am free. Free to explore the universe and ask the big questions, such as: is time travel possible? Can we open a portal to the past or find a shortcut to the future? Can we ultimately use the laws of nature to become masters of time itself?1' Time travel was once considered scientific heresy. I used to avoid talking about it for fear of being labelled a crank. But these days I'm not so cautious. In fact, I'm more like the people who built Stonehenge. I'm obsessed by time. If I had a time machine I'd visit Marilyn Monroe in her prime or drop in on Galileo as he turned his telescope to the heavens. Perhaps I'd even travel to the end of the universe to find out how our whole cosmic story ends.2 To see how this might be possible, we need to look at time as physicists do - at the fourth dimension. It's not as hard as it sounds. Every attentive schoolchild knows that all physical objects, even me in my chair, exist in three dimensions. Everything has a width and a height and a length.3 But there is another kind of length, a length in time. While a human may survive for 80 years, the stones at Stonehenge, for instance, have stood around for thousands of years. And the solar system will last for billions of years. Everything has a length in time as well as space. Travelling in time means travelling through this fourth dimension.4 To see what that means, let's imagine we're doing a bit of normal, everyday car travel. Drive in a straight line and you're travelling in one dimension. Turn right or left and you add the second dimension. Drive up or down a twisty mountain road and that adds height, so that's travelling in all three dimensions. But how on Earth do we travel in time? How do we find a path through the fourth dimension?5 Let's indulge in a little science fiction for a moment. Time travel movies often feature a vast, energy-hungry machine. The machine creates a path through the fourth dimension, a tunnel through time. A time traveller, a brave, perhaps foolhardy individual, prepared for who knows what, steps into the time tunnel and emerges who knows when. The concept may be far-fetched, and the reality may be very different from this, but the idea itself is not so crazy.6 Physicists have been thinking about tunnels in time too, but we come at it from a different angle. We wonder if portals to the past or the future could ever be possible within the laws of nature. As it turns out, we think they are. What's more, we've even given them a name: wormholes. The truth is that wormholes are all around us, only they're too small to see. Wormholes are very tiny. They occur in nooks and crannies in space and time. You might find it a tough concept, but stay with me.6' A wormhole is a theoretical 'tunnel' or shortcut, predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity, that links two places in space-time - visualised above as the contours of a 3-D map, where negative energy pulls space and time into the mouth of a tunnel, emerging in another universe. They remain only hypothetical, as obviously nobody has ever seen one, but have been used infilms as conduits for time travel - in Stargate (1994), for example, involving gated tunnels between universes, and in Time Bandits (1981), where their locations are shown on a celestial map7 Nothing is flat or solid. If you look closely enough at anything you'll find holes and wrinkles in it. It's a basic physical principle, and it even applies to time. Even something as smooth as a pool ball has tiny crevices, wrinkles and voids. Now it's easy to show that this is true in the first three dimensions. But trust me, it's also true of the fourth dimension. There are tiny crevices, wrinkles and voids in time. Down at the smallest of scales, smaller even than molecules, smaller than atoms, we get to a place called the quantum foam. This is where wormholes exist. Tiny tunnels or shortcuts through space and time constantly form, disappear, and reform within this quantum world. And they actually link two separate places and two different times.8 Unfortunately, these real-life time tunnels are just a billion-trillion-trillionths of a centimetre across. Way too small for a human to pass through - but here's where the notion of wormhole time machines is leading. Some scientists think it may be possible to capture a wormhole and enlarge it many trillions of times to make it big enough for a human or even a spaceship to enter.9 Given enough power and advanced technology, perhaps a giant wormhole could even be constructed in space. I'm not saying it can be done, but if it could be, it would be a truly remarkable device. One end could be here near Earth, and the other far, far away, near some distant planet.10 Theoretically, a time tunnel or wormhole could do even more than take us to other planets. If both ends were in the same place, and separated by time instead of distance, a ship could fly in and come out still near Earth, but in the distant past. Maybe dinosaurs would witness the ship coming in for a landing.11 The fastest manned vehicle in history was Apollo 10. It reached 25,000mph. But to travel in time we'll have to go more than 2,000 times faster12 Now, I realise that thinking in four dimensions is not easy, and that wormholes are a tricky concept to wrap your head around, but hang in there. I've thought up a simple experiment that could reveal if human time travel through a wormhole is possible now, or even in the future. I like simple experiments, and champagne.12' So I've combined two of my favourite things to see if time travel from the future to the past is possible.Let's imagine I'm throwing a party, a welcome reception for future time travellers. But there's a twist. I'm not letting anyone know about it until after the party has happened. I've drawn up an invitation giving the exact coordinates in time and space. I am hoping copies of it, in one form or another, will be around for many thousands of years. Maybe one day someone living in the future will find the information on the invitation and use a wormhole time machine to come back to my party, proving that time travel will, one day, be possible.In the meantime, my time traveller guests should be arriving any moment now. Five, four, three, two, one. But as I say this, no one has arrived. What a shame. I was hoping at least a future Miss Universe was going to step through the door. So why didn't the experiment work? One of the reasons might be because of a well-known problem with time travel to the past, the problem of what we call paradoxes.Paradoxes are fun to think about. The most famous one is usually called the Grandfather paradox. I have a new, simpler version I call the Mad Scientist paradox.13 I don't like the way scientists in movies are often described as mad, but in this case, it's true. This chap is determined to create a paradox, even if it costs him his life. Imagine, somehow, he's built a wormhole, a time tunnel that stretches just one minute into the past. Hawking in a scene from Star Trek with dinner guests from the past, and future: (from left) Albert Einstein, Data and Isaac Newton14 Through the wormhole, the scientist can see himself as he was one minute ago. But what if our scientist uses the wormhole to shoot his earlier self? He's now dead. So who fired the shot? It's a paradox. It just doesn't make sense. It's the sort of situation that gives cosmologists nightmares.15 This kind of time machine would violate a fundamental rule that governs the entire universe - that causes happen before effects, and never the other way around. I believe things can't make themselves impossible. If they could then there'd be nothing to stop the whole universe from descending into chaos. So I think something will always happen that prevents the paradox. Somehow there must be a reason why our scientist will never find himself in a situation where he could shoot himself. And in this case, I'm sorry to say, the wormhole itself is the problem.16 In the end, I think a wormhole like this one can't exist. And the reason for that is feedback. If you've ever been to a rock gig, you'll probably recognise this screeching noise. It's feedback. What causes it is simple. Sound enters the microphone. It's transmitted along the wires, made louder by the amplifier, and comes out at the speakers. But if too much of the sound from the speakers goes back into the mic it goes around and around in a loop getting louder each time. If no one stops it, feedback can destroy the sound system.17 The same thing will happen with a wormhole, only with radiation instead of sound. As soon as the wormhole expands, natural radiation will enter it, and end up in a loop. The feedback will become so strong it destroys the wormhole. So although tiny wormholes do exist, and it may be possible to inflate one some day, it won't last long enough to be of use asa time machine. That's the real reason no one could come back in time to my party.18 Any kind of time travel to the past through wormholes or any other method is probably impossible, otherwise paradoxes would occur. So sadly, it looks like time travel to the past is never going to happen. A disappointment for dinosaur hunters and a relief for historians.虫洞是根据爱因斯坦相对论预测的连接时空中两个不同地点的假想“隧道”或捷径,上面的三维图轮廓集中呈现了这一点:负能量将时间和空间拖入一条隧道入口,并在另一个宇宙出现。
研究生英语阅读教程课后翻译第四课
第四课
1、无论作为法定婚姻的前奏还是其替代品同居现象的频繁出现都进一步弱化了婚姻区别于其他结合形式的独立特征。
不管怎样,所有这些打破传统的结合方式一直以来都是建立在亚当-夏娃模式的异性恋基础之上的。
2、有报告说曾发生过外星人为了做繁衍后代实验而绑架地球人的事件。
但不论这些报道是否只是人们的幻觉,地球人探索宇宙寻找外星人却是事实。
3、证据是,有人为宠物修建墓地,埋藏他们忠实的、亲爱的宠物的遗骨,这些宠物就和人的亲友们一样获得尊严和敬意。
4、有人或许要问了,为什么一个人不应选择写下正式的书面誓约以声明他/她对宠物的依恋呢?
5、尽管忠实于主人的宠物不能用言语表达愿意结成这种关系,但它们的誓言可以从见证宠物与主人间关爱和亲密联系的旁观者那里获得。
6、提出异种间婚姻的可能性实际上意味着只要双方因明确的关爱之情和一生不渝的忠诚而休戚相关,那么婚姻作为从社会角度和心理角度被认可的关系就不一定仅仅限于人与人之间。
7、毕竟,这种结合不会给无生命物体带来多少法律收益。
无论它能给我们增加任何收益,我们都已经拥有了这些物质财产。
8、实际上,有朝一日,婚姻原本的概念也可能会成为失落的世界中语义学上的一个古董而已。
研究生英语阅读教程(提高级_第三版)翻译2、4、6、7、9、11、13
Lesson 21 、It is a cliche,as it is to take of apocalypse and nightmare, but when something is beyond our experience,we reach for the points of reference we have.说到世界末日和噩梦又是老生常谈,但是当事情超出我们的经验时,我们总会寻找现有的东西作为参照。
2、Lest you should ever forget the smallness of being human, the iconic Mount Fuji, instantly recognizable yet somehow different on every viewing is an extinct volcano.唯恐你会忘记作为人类的渺小,标志性的富士山,一眼即能认出但不知何故每次观看又呈现出不同景象,就是一座死火山。
3、It surprised me, over the following months that the gas attack seemed to dominate the national media coverage, whereas Kobe, after the initial weeks of horrifying footage,slipped somewhat into the background.在随后的几个月里,让我吃惊的是毒气攻击似乎占据了国家媒体报道的主要内容,而神户大地震经过了最初几周骇人听闻的电视报道后,已经退居次位了。
4、Rather than immersing ourselves in the language of horror films and the end of the world, when the time is right to try to glimpse this new territory, we might for thought reach fora book by Japan’s most popular contemporary novelist.我们不能沉浸在恐怖片和世界末日的语言中,在合适的时间,如果想要了解这一新的领域,我们可以考虑看看日本最流行的现代小说家的一本书。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Is One Successful by Chance or by Fate?一个人的成功靠机遇还是命运?In the scientific world of controlled experiment, chance is seldom acknowledged as a contributing factor in important discoveries. There are, however, rare exceptions. In 1945 three men shared the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine for the discovery and isolation of penicillin. How rare was this serendipitous event and was the discovery of penicillin really the result of an unexpected chance observation by a single researcher?在控制试验的领域,机遇很少时候会被认为是重大发现的主要原因。
但是,却也有例外。
1945年,三名科学家由于发现并提取青霉素而获得诺贝尔生理学或医学家奖。
这个偶然发现的事件是多么难得,青霉素的发现真是由一个研究者在不可预料的情形下偶然发现的观察结果吗?The scientific method is typically noted for its orderliness and control; In fact, we are taught that without these characteristics, experimental research may yield invalid results. Therefore, chance should play little or no role in the process of the scientific method. But what is chance? When is chance truly an accident and when is it foreseeable? Historically, some chance discoveries have led to startling new ideas that eventually directed important further scientific investigation of natural phenomena.科学方法通常以规律性与可操作性而著称;事实上,如果我们没有这些要素的引导,试验性研究就可能得到无效的结果。
因此,在科学方法发展的过程中,机遇所起的作用微乎其微。
但是,什么是机遇呢?机遇真的是偶然的吗?它是可以预见吗?在历史上,一些偶然的发现产生了令人吃劲的新思想,并且这些思想最终指引着对于自然现象的进行进一步的科学调研。
If the role of science is to examine the world around us in a way which uncovers new and sometimes unexpected information, then science itself is intrinsically surprising. Even a deliberate scientific search for information may lead to an unexpected chance observation or discovery. But to have meaning, every observation or discovery must fit into a pre-existing pattern of ideas in the observer’s mind. Just as a word means little out of context, a new observation or discovery needs a proper context in which to fit in order to be most meaningful. In other words, the mind must be prepared to receive the germ of a new idea. What is “chance” for the unprepared mind may be afascinating springboard to new ideas for the prepared mind.如果科学是通过揭示新事物和意外现象来探索我们周围的世界,那科学的本质是令人吃惊的,甚至一位老练的科学家在查找信息的时候,会有意外的观察与发现。
但是这意味着,每一次观察与发现必须与观察者头脑中的某些预想的东西相吻合。
就像一个词离开了语境就没有了意义,一个新观察和新发现需要一个与之相适应的背景,才会使其变得更有意义。
换而言之,头脑必须做好接受新思想萌芽的准备。
对于没有准备的人而言,称作机遇的东西,对于那些已经为新思想做好准备的人们就是具有吸引力的跳板。
Louis Pasteur wrote,” in the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind. ”Discovery, like learning, is a phenomenon that takes place in the human brain. The brain configures an event as a new pattern based on previous assumptions that were present at the onset of the event. Lewis Thomas, renowned science author and former president of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center stated,” I’m not as fond of the notion of serendipity as I used to be. It seems to me now that as you get research going …things are bound to begin happening if you’ve got your wits about you. You create the lucky accidents.” Many scientists agree with that position.Louis Pasteur写到,“在观察领域,机会只垂青那些有准备的大脑。
”像学习一样,发现是一种在人类大脑里面发生的现象。
大脑对形成一个新东西的事件是基于先前的假定,这个先前的假定是一开始就存在的。
Lewis Thomas,著名科学作者,曾是纪念斯隆-凯特林癌症中心主席说:“像以前一样,我不怎么喜欢运气这个观念,现在对我来说似乎是这样的,当你在研究的时候,如果你能随机应变,某些事总能发生,偶然幸运的事是由你自己创造的。
”许多科学家同意这样的看法。
Let’s return to a discussion of the discovery and isolation of penicillin—a process which involved a series of chance events spanning at least half a century and building on knowledge gained as early as 1,5000 BC. It was at this time that written records described the use of molds and fermented materials as therapeutic agents. Similarly, the use of chemicals as medicines is described in ancient Greek writing of fifth century BC. These early treatments—which probably either cured or killed the patients—were carried out without a firm understanding of either the active agents or the cellular processes involved. It was not until the late nineteenth century that progress was made on this front and a concerted effort was made to identify and isolate substances that would inhibit or destroy the causative agents of knownhuman disease. And still, ” chance” played a role.回过来让我们探讨一下青霉素的提取和发现的争论上来,这一过程包括了一系列偶然事件,这些事情跨越了至少半个世纪,并且早在公元前15世纪就建立其知识体系,也就在那时有文字记载描述了真菌和酵母菌可作为治疗的媒介物。
与此类似,在公元前5世纪的古希腊就有利用化学物质作为药物的记载。
这些早期治疗方法,既没有理解媒介活性,也没有对真菌中包含的细胞变化过程进行了解。
直到19世纪后期,经过共同的努力来识辨和提取物质,这些物质能够抑制或破坏那些诱发人们已知疾病的媒介。
最终,机遇在其中只是扮演了一个角色。
In the late 1800’s bacteriologist and microbiologist set out indentify substances with therapeutic potential. One of the greatest problems faced by these scientists during their studies was the contamination of “pure” cultures by invading microorganisms, especially fungi or bacteria----a problem which still plagues the modern day microbiologist. It is this problem of contamination which is most often identified as leading to the “chance”observation that eventually led to the discovery of penicillin.十九世纪后期,细菌学家和微生物学家们开始着手辨别那些具有潜在医疗效果的物资。