downtown urban design guidelines
0113.面向城市公共生活的街道空间设计探索——以美国的城市街道设计导则为例
0113.面向城市公共生活的街道空间设计探索——以美国的城市街道设计导则为例徐莎莎陶承洁吴立伟、陈韶龄【摘要】西方城市正着手对其街道空间的形式和功能进行重新评估,以设计导则指导街道空间的设计与质量,使街道对城市整体的投资环境、公共生活产生积极影响。
本文通过对美国大城市街道空间设计导则的分析,归纳当前发达国家城市街道设计的关注重点和发展趋势,以期对我国塑造宜居城市背景下的街道空间设计起到一定的启示作用。
【关键词】街道空间设计导则公共生活宜居城市1 街道空间设计的发展历程相对于“道路”这一标准术语,“街道”在汉语意境中是一个更具生活性的词汇。
从词义上看,街道是“街”与“道”的合称,为两边修建有连续不断的房屋建筑的道路。
在传统空间意象中,街道两侧的建筑通常为住宅、商店或饭馆,街道是融合日常生活、人行和车行交通的地方。
自从1886年1月德国人卡尔·本茨(Karl Benz)发明了人类历史上第一辆汽车,在过去的一百五十年间,以适应机动车通行要求为重心的道路设计标准日臻完善,而以往那种亲切宜人、界面连续、尺度适当的街道空间则日渐被越来越宽的城市道路所取代。
为满足现代城市交通的迅猛发展,传统街道已由社会交往空间变成了交通流动空间。
在道路的交通功能逐渐膨大的同时,城市街道的活力正在渐渐消失。
西方国家一直在反思单一的交通功能对城市街道生活多样性的破坏。
从上世纪中期雅各布斯对城市街道的研究,到80年代末新城市主义将街道重新定义为一种社交场所,越来越多的社会学家和政治学家与城市规划师和建筑师一起,意识到城市街道和城市公共生活的重要性,希望重塑人们能够面对面交流的城市公共空间,即“市民空间”(Civil Space)。
城市街道作为容纳市民公共生活的重要空间形态,其具有多样性的城市公共空间特质逐渐被大众所认知。
进入新千年以来,方兴未艾的全球化浪潮使各城市转向重视地方特质。
围绕营造充满活力的城市生活为主题,关于街道公共空间设计的技术性标准在西方国家重新得到了重视。
The Putrajaya URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Putrajaya Urban Design Guidelines (UDG) complements the land use planning for Putrajaya. The UDG is a policy document setting out policies and standards for physical development planning and design in line with the goals and objectives of the Putrajaya Master Plan. It supports the Master Plan by elaborating policies relating to residential development, landscape and urban design.UDG FrameworkThe UDG has been prepared based on the following framework:Volume 1: Rational and StrategiesVolume 2: Precinct Analysis and Development Plans∙Separate parts under this main volume deals with planning and design guidelines by individual precinct∙Each part outlines the general character and ambience of the sites and facilities to be developed and includes details on site planning, massing, urban design, circulation, access, views, vistas and townscape.Volume 3: Design GuidelineSeparate parts under this main volume deals with planning and design guidelines for individual planning subjects and urban facility as follows:∙Separate parts under this main volume deals with planning and design guidelines by individual precinct∙Volume 3 Part 1 : Residential and Residential Centres∙Volume 3 Part 2 : Public Facilities∙Volume 3 Part3 : WTT and Sub Commercial Centre∙Volume 3 Part 4 : Service Industry, Transport and Public Utilities∙Volume 3 Part 5a: Landscape∙Volume 3 Part 5b: Landscape∙Volume 3 Part 6 : Environment∙Volume 3: Part 1: Residential and Residential CentresThis UDG covers the following aspects:∙Residential∙Neighbourhood and Local CentresVolume 3: Part 2: Public FacilitiesThis UDG covers the following aspects:∙Education∙Health Service∙Markets∙Places of Worship∙Public Toilets∙Sign and Signage∙Petrol StationVolume 3: Part 3: Western Transport Terminal and Sub-Commercial Centre This UDG covers the following aspects:1. Western Transport Terminal∙Landuse and Floor Space∙Assumptions∙Concept∙Organisation∙Circulation∙Building Envelope2. Sub-Commercial Centre∙Concept and Main Land Uses∙Urban Form∙Building Form∙Pedestrian Spaces and Circulation∙Vehicular Circulation and Car Parking∙Floor Space ContentVolume 3: Part 4: Service Industry, Transport and Public UtilitiesThis UDG covers the following aspects:1. Service Industry2. Transport∙Pedestrian and Cycle Movement∙Light Rapid Transit (LRT)∙Taxi Lay-Bys § Parking∙Bus Transport3. Public Utilities∙Electricity∙Water Supply∙Wastewater∙Telecommunications∙Gas Supply∙District CoolingVolume 3 Part 5a: LandscapeThis UDG covers the following aspects:∙Landscape Conceptual Framework∙General Design Guidelines: Soft Landscape∙General Design Guidelines: Hard LandscapeVolume 3 Part 5b: LandscapeThis UDG covers the following aspects:∙Hard and Soft Landscape Components Guidelines for Specific Landscape Categories ∙Landscape Implementation Guidelines∙Management and Maintenance GuidelinesVolume 3: Part 6: EnvironmentThis UDG covers the following aspects:∙Environmental Planning∙Environmental Management Plan∙Construction Management∙Environmental Quality Management∙Habitat Creation∙Solid Waste Management∙Environmental Quality Management。
你在哪个城市英文翻译城市综合体”的英文翻译
你在哪个城市英文翻译城市综合体”的英文翻译“城市综合体”的英文翻译——Urban(City)Complex与HOPSCA (2010-11-04 13:15:04)转载标签:房产“城市综合体”的英文翻译——Urban(City)Complex与HOPSCA关于城市综合体,目前国内有两种翻译,即HOPSCA和Urban(City)Complex。
究竟哪一种翻译比较符合实际呢?在中国现时实践中所理解的“城市综合体”概念:将城市中的商业、办公、居住、酒店、展览、餐饮、会议、文娱和交通等城市生活空间的三项(有时两项也可以)以上进行组合,并在各部分间建立一种相互依存、相互助益的能动关系,从而形成一个多功能、高效率的综合体。
一、“城市综合体”应该翻译为HOPSCA?以下是第一种翻译,即认为城市综合体就是HOPSCA,的相关报道和引文:1、万达商业地产开发的第三代产品,称为“城市综合体”,英文名为HOPSCA——Hotel(酒店)、Office(写字楼)、Parking(停车场)、Shopping mall(购物中心)、Convention(会议中心)、Apartment(公寓)。
本次招商的区域为成都万达广场大型室内商业步行街,采用国际时尚的中空走廊步行街设计,全长355米? ?(http://bbs.hrb.soufun./)2、HOPSCA:音译豪布斯卡,简称城市综合体,一般位于配套成熟、交通便利之地? ?(http://newhouse.jn.soufun./)(/)3、关于HOPSCA(城市综合体)项目定位? ?(/)4、所谓城市综合体(HOPSCA),是将城市中的酒店(Hotel)、办公(Office)? ?(郭向东.浅易城市综合体物业管理[J].中国物业管理,2007)? ?HOPSCA起源于上个世纪70年代。
许多国家针对城市中心区建设改造进行了深度思考,当时开发功能区完整、建筑统一的原则逐渐流行起来。
城市规划名词外文翻译
history of cities settlement market city wall capital city imperial palace outer city imperial city neighborhood street lane hutong, alley outskirt city moat, city trench castle polis city township, town city proper suburb city classification industrial city mining city port city commercial city campus city science city scenic-tourist city resort city small city medium-sized city large city urbanization urbanization level conglomeration, agglomeration counterurbanization, deurbanization suburbanization city agglomeration megalopolis metropolitan area, conurbation city group, city cluster urban conservation historical building historical site
城市史 居民点 市[场] 城[墙] 都城 宫城 外城 皇城 里 街 巷 胡同 关厢 城濠 城堡 城邦 城市 镇 市区 郊区 城市分类 工业城市 矿业城市 港口城市 商业城市 大学城 科学城 风景旅游城市 休养城市 小城市 中等城市 大城市 城市化 城市化水平 集聚 逆城市化 郊区城市化 城市群 大城市连绵区 大城市地区 城市组团 城市历史保护 历史建筑 历史地段
TOD分类研究篇
中的一般 市 公 交, 市 郊
节点
公交
交通系统 城 市 公交 , 市
枝端
郊公交
交通系统 市郊公交 枝端
交通系统 市郊公交 末端
根据区位条件及交通条件推算,本项目基地所处位置为都市中心
二规划篇
2.1TOD指导原则
在区域规划的层面上组织增长,使其成为紧凑的、由公共交通系统支撑的城镇模式; 在公交站点周围适于步行的范围内布置商业.居住、就业岗位和公共设施; 创造适于步行的道路网络.营造适合于行人心理感受的街道空间.在各个目的地之间提供便捷、直接的联系通道; 提供多种价格、密度的住宅类型; 保护生态敏感区、滨水区,以及高质量的开敞空间; 使公共空间成为人们活动的中心.并且为建筑所占据而不是停车场; 鼓励在已有发展区域内的公共交通线路周边进行填入式开发和改造。
居民及郊区 住宅及少部分公
居民
建多元化住宅套
房、独栋住宅
多元住宅,小型零 居民及郊区 郊区住宅,少量
售
居民
公建
中等 小型
邻接交通区 Contiguous zone
多元住宅,小型零 郊区居民 售
郊区住宅
微型
通勤小镇 Commuter town
多元住宅,小型零 郊区居民 售,交通设施
郊区住宅
微型
区域通 达度
2.2TOD设计特征
土地混合开发(Diversity) TOD区域采用开发高密度住宅、商业、办公用地,同时开发服务业、娱乐、体育等公共设施的混合利用模式。混 合用途的土地使用能够有效的减少出行次数,降低出行距离,并且促进非机动方式的出行 高密度建设(Density) 高密度的开发,能够促进公交方式的选择。有研究表明,在距离轨道交通站点相同距离时,高密度的住宅区的公 交出行比例高出30%。 宜人的空间设计(Design) 传统的邻里、狭窄的街道、宜人的公共空间、尺度的多样性、与公交站点之间舒适的步行空间,有利于提高公交 出行的吸引力。 到交通站点的距离(Distance) 半径200米内为核心腹地;500-800米作为轨道站位的直接服务半径,此范围内的区域为其直接腹地;以自行车或 常规公共交通5-10分钟的到达距离(1500-3000米)作为最大服务半径,在此范围扣除直接腹地的环状区域为其 间接腹地。
当代公路设计指南在牛津郡的应用说明书
“Good design is about what humans actually feel and relate to”Street Design for All (SDA)– An update of national advice and good practice (2014) Aims1.The aim of this Position Statement is to clarify the approach to be taken by Oxfordshire County Council(OCC) to current highways design guidance, for the purposes of development control. As such, the Position Statement supports sustainable growth in Oxfordshire.2.Oxfordshire is a County of contrasts, with urban Oxford at the centre, surrounded by a number oftowns, set in a predominantly rural environment.3.This Position Statement applies for the period during, which the County C ouncil’s Residential RoadDesign Guide guidance is being updated. This guidance is published on the OCC website: Transport for new developments1 (OCC Residential Road Design Guide). It will be superseded by the publication of a revised Street & Road Design Guide.Scope4.OCC is responsible for all non-trunk roads (Strategic Road Network) in Oxfordshire. This includes allroads in Oxfordshire with the exception of:a.A34b.A43c.M40d.Private RoadsExisting National & Local Guidance5.The existing guidance, applying to non-trunk roads is contained within2:a.Manual for Streets (2007)b.Manual for Streets 2: Wider Application of the Principles (2010)6.The Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) is a maintained document providing contemporaryengineering guidance, ordinarily for the design of trunk roads, and was in place prior to the introduction of Manual for Streets (M f S). The DMRB was influential on the standards, within the OCC Residential Road Design Guide(2003) however, the principles and ‘person centred’ design philosophy which informed M f S also had an influence on it. The OCC Residential Road Design Guide, for example, embraced ‘Homezones’ and ‘people before cars’ matters subsumed into the M f S.District Design Guidance7.The Districts have all produced detailed Design Guides, which should be referred to for thedistinctiveness they seek to promote:a.Vale of White Horse DC Design Guide (March 2014)b.South Oxfordshire DC Design Guide (July 2008)c.Design and Conservation Strategy for Cherwell (2012‐2015)d.West Oxfordshire DC Design Guide (December 2013)e.Oxford Design Review Panel & Oxford City Centre Street Scene ManualGeometric Requirements8.Some of the geometric requirements contained in the OCC Residential Road Design Guide are inexcess of those in the M f S. However, the special circumstances of Oxfordshire (See §2, above - especially rural locations) dictate that in some circumstances, the standards of the DMRB may be more appropriate than those of the M f S.9.Visibility splay requirements are one such example, for which three standards apply depending onhighway speed (see M f S §2.2 for definition of ‘Streets’ and ‘Roads’):1https:///cms/content/transport-new-developments2https:///government/publications/manual-for-streetsa.Manual for Streets (2007): Cht 7 – for ‘Streets’ under 60kph;b.Manual for Streets 2: Wider Application of the Principles (2010): Cht. 10 – for ‘Streets’ over 60kph;c.The DMRB influenced OCC Residential Road Design Guide: Chapter 6 –‘Roads’.10.Especially with regard to visibility splays, it is emphasised that both volumes of the M f S, are guidancedocuments only and that local interpretation is encouraged within M f S. Both volumes of M f S were produced before the adoption of the National Planning Policy Framework(NPPF - 2012), and therefore, it is emphasised that the policy contained within NPPF takes precedence over the guidance of the M f S.11.Appropriate visibility splays are calculated according to the physics of stopping sight distances and safevehicular retardation. Different design guides make differing assumptions regarding the parameters appropriate for this. It is, hereby, emphasised that these recommendations are based on engineering criteria with an objective base relating to performance of car and driver. They are not arbitrary recommendations, therefore, and are highly sensitive to prevailing highway speeds as identified above.Objections12.Under the NPPF, the basis for a highways based objection to a planning application is wheredevelopment is considered: (i) ‘unsustainable’and / or where (ii)residual cumulative impacts of development are ‘severe’. OCC will interpret ‘unsustainable’ and ‘severe’ in the local context according to the advice contained in this document. Where appropriate, sustainability and geometric requirements are not met; objections will be made on the basis of the NPPF criteria.Street Design for All (SDA)13.The approach of M f S, is summarised in the recently published: Street Design for All (SDA) - An updateof national advice and good practice (2014). This document will be taken as the primary source of approach to development by OCC, produced as it was, following the NPPF and presenting the philosophy of the M f S. Discretion will be used by the Highway Authority where inconsistencies between SDA and OCC Residential Road Design Guide occur.14.To be clear, developers are encouraged to be innovative and obtain advice from both volumes of theM f S 1 & 2 but for the purposes of our consultation responses on planning applications the locally interpreted guidance will be used and the approach of the SDA rather than to the letter of the M f S, although it will be mindful of the M f S.15.For example, the new thinking on street corner geometry (pp. 19 SDA) is appropriate for urban areas inOxfordshire but such a design may be inappropriate for rural roads. Another reason for maintaining the standards the OCC Residential Road Design Guide in such rural locales is that the safe stopping sight distances for freight and public transport are often in excess of those for cars and recommended in M f S.16.Both volumes of M f S will be considered as playing a supporting to SDA, in terms of the more detailedadvice they provide. In this respect it should be noted that the M f S does not encourage an approach, which is slavish to the letter but one, which is within its spirit. The M f S approach is summarised within SDA. The M f S approach can briefly be characterised as encouraging designers being to incorporate a ‘sense of place’ into street-scapes and that ‘movement’ and ‘place’ functions should be optimised to context, taking into account the needs of all street users.17.SDA encourages a collaborative approach to the street scene, involving as many professional and publicvoices as possible to influence street design. Such a consultative approach is encouraged in Oxfordshire, especially if initiated at the stage when pre-application advice is being sought.Pre-application procedure18.Engagement by developers and their agents, with the pre-application procedure is encouraged by OCC.A Pre-application procedure exists to obtain wide-ranging advice from the Districts but independentlyhighways advice can be obtained. The HA substantive response will consist of a comment on the principle of development. A schedule of charges exists for further more detailed pre-application highways advice [See /newdevelopments].Road Hierarchies19. A hierarchical approach to road design is discouraged in SDA, drawing only a distinction between‘streets’ and ‘roads’ with differing degrees of ‘place’ and ‘movement’ characteristics’. For the purposes of certain transport movement functions, such as, public transport and the needs of freight, distributor-style roads may be appropriate.20.In other locations it may be appropriate that the ‘place’ function predominates and traffic speedsconducive to this should be encouraged through the use of the psychological and physical calming methods contained in M f S.Parking Standards21.SDA encourages an approach to provision of parking levels for residential developments that isadequate to serve the aspirations of residents. The NPPF, Other Planning Policies - 3 also requires that parking be adequate to meet perceived needs.22.The OCC parking standards, adopted in December 20114 are maximum parking standards. The positionthat will be adopted in the future is to consider these as indicative of expected parking levels only (See Residential Road Design Guide). Parking levels that should be provided will be considered on their individual merits and optimal parking levels may be higher or lower than those suggested in the current parking standards.23.Optimisation of parking level determination will be justified through the transport assessment process.According to scale of development this exercise may be expected to be contained within a: Design & Access Statement, Transport Statement or a Transport Assessment, as explained below.Transportation Assessment24.Thresholds for the appropriate type of supporting documentation, an application should be accompaniedby, are recommended in: ‘Travel plans, transport assessments and statements in decision-taking’5. The pre-application process will lead to scoping of the appropriate level of transport assessment.Future-proofing, Travel Planning & Sustainable Transport25.The needs of the future should be considered for any development in Oxfordshire. Oxfordshire isundergoing unprecedented levels of development. Where technological solutions and ‘smart thinking’can overcome the need for residents to concentrate on car-borne traffic then innovative means of achieving this will be encouraged, especially where they are backed with developer contributions. An example, of such an innovation might be car clubs or the provision of real time public transport information to assist with the delivery of a Travel Plan.26.Walkable neighbourhoods designed around the convenience of the pedestrian and cyclist can help fulfilthe ends of sustainable transport.27. A further example is that estate roads will be expected to be laid out such that the needs of futuredevelopment are taken into account and evidence based with swept-path analysis. One way of doing this is through the use of turning heads in locations where roads may be extended.3/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2015-03-25/HCWS488/4https:///cms/sites/default/files/folders/documents/roadsandtransport/transportpoliciesandplans/newdevelopments/parkingstanda rdsfornewresidentialdevelopments.pdf5/blog/guidance/travel-plans-transport-assessments-and-statements-in-decision-taking/。
城市地点英文词汇
城市地点英文词汇The urban landscape is a complex and multifaceted tapestry that encompasses a vast array of geographical features and spatial relationships. From the bustling city center to the tranquil suburbs, the language we use to describe the various components of a city reflects the intricate interplay between the built environment and the human experience. In this essay, we will delve into the rich vocabulary associated with city locations, exploring the nuances and significance of these terms.One of the most fundamental city location terms is the "downtown" or "city center." This refers to the heart of the urban area, typically characterized by a high concentration of commercial, financial, and cultural activities. The downtown is often the most densely populated and vibrant part of the city, serving as a hub for business, entertainment, and social interaction. Surrounding the downtown, we find the "suburbs," which are residential areas located on the outskirts of the city. Suburbs are generally less dense and offer a more peaceful, suburban lifestyle, often with larger homes and more green spaces.Connecting the downtown and the suburbs are the "neighborhoods," which are distinct, geographically defined areas within the city. Each neighborhood has its own unique character, atmosphere, and community. Some neighborhoods may be known for their ethnic diversity, such as "Chinatown" or "Little Italy," while others may be associated with a particular industry or cultural scene, like the "arts district" or the "tech hub."Within the city, we also find various types of "districts," which are areas designated for specific purposes or activities. For example, the "financial district" is where the major banks, investment firms, and corporate headquarters are located, while the "commercial district" is the hub of retail and shopping activities. Other districts may include the "entertainment district," the "historic district," or the "industrial district."Intersecting the city's various districts and neighborhoods are the "streets," which serve as the primary thoroughfares for transportation and movement. Streets can be classified based on their size, function, and character, such as "main streets," "side streets," "boulevards," and "avenues." The "intersection" is the point where two or more streets cross, often serving as a crucial node for traffic flow and pedestrian activity.Alongside the streets, we find the "blocks," which are the segments of land bounded by the intersecting streets. City blocks can vary in size and shape, with some being more rectangular and others more irregular. The "alley" is a narrow, secondary street that runs between or behind buildings, often used for service access or as a shortcut for pedestrians.Another important city location term is the "waterfront," which refers to the area adjacent to a body of water, such as a river, lake, or ocean. Waterfronts often serve as hubs for recreational activities, tourism, and commercial shipping. Within the waterfront, we may find "marinas," which are specialized facilities for the docking and mooring of boats and yachts.Moving away from the central city, we encounter the "outskirts," which are the peripheral areas that surround the urban core. The outskirts may include a mix of residential, industrial, and agricultural land uses, as well as natural landscapes like parks, forests, or farmland. On the very edge of the city, we find the "city limits," which demarcate the official boundaries of the municipal area.Beyond the city limits, we enter the "rural" or "countryside" areas, which are characterized by lower population density, more open spaces, and a predominance of agricultural or natural land uses. Within these rural areas, we may encounter "villages," which aresmall, often historic settlements, or "hamlets," which are even smaller, more isolated communities.Navigating the city also requires an understanding of "landmarks," which are distinctive, easily recognizable features that serve as visual reference points. Landmarks can be natural, such as a prominent hill or a river, or they can be man-made, like a famous building, monument, or statue. These landmarks often become iconic symbols of the city, helping residents and visitors alike to orient themselves and find their way around.Finally, the concept of "zoning" is crucial in understanding the spatial organization of a city. Zoning refers to the system of regulations and policies that govern the permitted uses and development patterns within different areas of the city. Different zones may be designated for residential, commercial, industrial, or mixed-use purposes, each with its own set of rules and guidelines.In conclusion, the vocabulary associated with city locations is rich and diverse, reflecting the complex and multifaceted nature of urban environments. From the bustling downtown to the tranquil suburbs, from the distinct neighborhoods to the designated districts, the language we use to describe the various components of a city helps us to navigate, understand, and appreciate the intricate tapestry of urban life. By familiarizing ourselves with this vocabulary, we cangain a deeper understanding of the spatial relationships and organizational principles that shape the cities we inhabit.。
美国建筑名校南加大USC
美国建筑名校南加大USC南加大的建筑学院正如同学校的特洛伊黑马精神一样,不仅全美排名靠前,其教学质量在圈内一直有口皆碑,其毕业生的表现并受到各大建筑事务所的诸多好评。
下面美行思远为您详细介绍美国建筑名校之南加大USC。
USC Master of Landscape Architecture Program(南加大景观建筑系)总共有三个program:1.5年适合于之前已有professional degree地,一般人数较少,3-5人;2年已有相关专业degree地,比如建筑,规划~~,人数比较多,在10-15人左右;3年适合没有任何相关设计专业背景地同学,人数较多,在10-15人左右;2年和3年的program 都在2011年得到了认证。
南加州大学对作品集要求:作品要展现学生高水平的设计分析能力,创造性解决问题的能力,形象化技术,体现在第一年对所学基础知识的理解和掌握。
作品应控制在10-25张数码图像,不接受其他电子格式或CD/DVD,不要提交原始和装订的材料。
课程设置方面:借身处洛杉矶这个super city的优势,studio,thesis,专业理论课都更多地探讨城市问题,比如urbanism, landscape infrastructure。
项目也很喜欢从洛杉矶这个城市的问题出发,比如L.A. River channelized的问题,hard, disparate downtown 的问题,ecological system的问题,基本上每年都会涉及,每个studio都以urban design 开始,然后才是更小尺度的design。
对construction等较为technical的基础知识教学比较少侧重,但还是提供了各种选修课供选择。
目前也有了一些偏向digital和physical modeling的探讨和研究,非常给力。
总体来说教学风格非常有活力,着眼点也比较与时俱进。
师资组成:对于USC的同学最大的优势和最大的劣势应该都来自于师资,说优势是因为大多数的faculty都来自practical field,洛杉矶有很多很赞的设计公司,他们的principal 很多都在USC教学,比如SWA,AECOM,OLIN,Mia Lehrer等等。
追求精细化的街道设计《伦敦街道设计导则》解读
Urban Transport of China Vol.13No.4July 2015城市交通二○一五年第十三卷第四期1《导则》的政策背景1.1伦敦的城市和交通发展概述伦敦的城市建设可追溯至公元43年,是罗马人占领英国时为平民所建。
当时道路以规则的网格结构为肌底。
直至中世纪,伦敦在无规划的基础上发展成非规则的有机街道和蜿蜒小巷。
然而,历史上著名的1666年伦敦大火几乎把当时城镇中心的房屋全部烧毁,迫使居住在当时市中心的富人迁移到市郊重建生活。
简单的网格式街道布局被沿用至今,形成了现在伦敦市中心城区的道路格局。
工业革命时期,伦敦作为世界第一大城市,也首当其冲面临污染、拥堵等一系列发展过程中不可避免的问题。
由此催生了世界Michael R.Gallagher 著,王紫瑜编译(深圳市城市规划设计研究院,广东深圳518031)摘要:自20世纪90年代,英国的交通政策就在向整合交通和土地利用规划的方向努力。
伦敦交通局于2004年发布了《伦敦街道设计导则》(以下简称《导则》),并于2009年修订。
该导则作为“更好的街道”计划的一部分,对伦敦市区的街道项目具有重要的引导作用。
首先通过叙述伦敦市街道形态与规划政策的演变,介绍《导则》的政策背景、概要内容及设计原则。
从设计流程、材料面板、街道设计指引几个方面解析《导则》的特点。
通过研究伦敦市的道路形态和街道设计现状,评述《导则》的落实与应用情况。
最后,从全过程精细化指导、规范标准补充、街道设计理念转变三个方面总结《导则》对中国城市街道设计的借鉴意义。
关键词:街道设计;导则;共享路面;交通稳静化;步行;自行车;伦敦To Pursue Delicate Street Design -Discussion on Streetscape Guidance:A Guide to Better Lon-don StreetsWritten by Michael R.Gallagher,Translated and Compiled by Wang Ziyu(The Shenzhen Urban Planning &Design Institute,Shenzhen Guangdong 518031,China)Abstract :Since the 1990s,the U.K.transportation policies have been oriented towards integrating trans-portation and land use planning.Streetscape Guidance:A guide to better London streets was released by Transport for London (TfL)in 2004and revised in 2009.The Guidance,as a part of the Better Street pro-gram,plays an important guidance role in street projects of London urban area.By stating the evolution of street development and planning policies in London,this paper introduces the policy background,main contents and design principles of the Guidance.Characteristics of the Guidance are discussed from the per-spectives of design procedures,materials selection,and street design principles.By analyzing existing street development and design,the paper reviews the implementation and application of the Guidance.Fi-nally,the paper summarizes lessons learned from the Guidance for urban street design in China in three as-pects:whole-process delicate guidance,specifications and standards supplementation,and the change of street design concept.Keywords :streets design;guidance;shared street space;traffic calming;pedestrian;bicycle;London 收稿日期:2014-01-26作者简介:Michael R.Gallagher(1969—),男,美国人,硕士,规划师,主要研究方向:规划研究。
白地理念
新加坡白色地段概念解析1.“白色地段”概念的提出1.1“白色地段”(WhiteSite)谈到“白色地段”必须首先解释“开发费”(DevelopmentCharge)和“土地溢价”(DifferentialPremium)这两个概念。
根据新加坡1964年规划法令修正案,在规划允许的情况下,开发活动可以超过规定的开发强度或变更规定的区划用途,但必须支付开发费,使得土地增值的一部分收归国有,从而使得开发控制具有较强的适应性与针对性。
对于拥有国家限制性契约(RestrictiveCovenant)的发展商在转换土地用途或使用率时,需支付“土地溢价”,土地溢价的计算方式以开发费为依据,并作出适当调整;对于没有面对限制性契约的地主在转换土地用途或使用率时,则需支付开发费。
开发费是所议定的不同用途或使用率与发展基线之间的差异。
发展基线(DevelopmentBaseline)指的是发展蓝图或获准发展计划中最高的土地使用率或用途。
开发费通常在每年3月和9月份每隔半年根据市场行情审视修改,以反映房地产市场的价格变动。
2000年12月以前,新加坡的土地政策规定“土地溢价”按照土地价差的100%计算,政府平均每年可以收取大约1.6亿新元的土地溢价。
2000年12月,新加坡政府出台了新的土地政策,规定拥有限制性契约的发展商在转化土地用途或使用率时,所需支付的“土地溢价”从土地价差的100%削减至50%,使发展商部分获得了改变用途或提高使用率所得到的增值,增加了发展商的盈利,同时也加快了政府的土地交易,提高了土地使用率。
“白色地段”(WhiteSite)是由新加坡市区重建局(URA)于1995年提出并开始试行的新概念,其目的是为发展商提供更为灵活的建设发展空间。
发展商可以根据土地开发需要,灵活决定经政府许可的土地利用性质,土地其它相关混合用途,以及各类用途用地所占比例,只要开发建设符合经允许的建设要求都是许可的,发展商在“白色地段”租赁使用期间,可以按照招标合同要求,在任何时候,根据需要自由改变混合各类用地的使用性质和用地比例,而无需交纳土地溢价。
《全球街道设计导则》简介
《全球街道设计导则》简介1背景关心街道设计的同行们已经熟悉美国NACTO于2013年发布的《Urban Street Design Guide》(美国街道设计指南)、上海在2016年10月发布的《上海市街道设计导则》;本人在早些时候曾推荐《Street Fight: Handbook For An UrbanRevolution》(街道抗争:城市革命手册)一书,其作者Janette Sadik-Kha恰是NACTO的主席。
今年5月21日,由Janette Sadik-Khan领导的Globe Designing Cities Initiative(GDCI,与NACTO一样受纽约前市长布隆伯格的慈善资助)与NACTO共同发布了《GlobeStreet Design Guide》(全球街道设计导则),目前已经能够在网上阅览全文,并可以申请免费下载。
/publication/global-street-design-guide/2 内容概述本书正文近360页,分为3篇共11章,非常详尽的介绍了街道的整体设计方法,包括价值导向、调查评估、规划原则、设计要素、运营管理等全过程非常详尽的内容,对规划师、设计师、政府管理人员、建设与维护人员都有非常实际的指导与借鉴意义。
篇章A 街道概述1 定义街道2 塑造街道3 测量与评估街道B 街道设计导则4 大城市街道设计原则5 街道场所设计6 人性化街道设计7 市政与绿化设施设计8 交通管控措施9 设计要素控制C 街道改造示例10 路段改造示例11 交叉口改造示例3 亮点介绍本导则的核心原则在于“在街道设计中优先考虑行人”,在内容中强调了行人、自行车、公交系统的设计要素,即使我们在之前的各种街道手册中已经了解到有很多理念和手法,这里仍有很多不同的阐述角度和表现形式让人耳目一新,这里介绍一些供大家先睹为快。
1)街道是市民体验城市的基础空间,街道设计应该从建筑到建筑。
完整街道空间这一理念已经越来越成熟与详细,文中更加详尽的用Setback(建筑退线)来准确定义。
理查德迈耶-美国芝加哥河发展规划
City of ChicagoRichard M. Daley, MayorDepartment of Planning and DevelopmentChristopher R. Hill, Commissioner1999C H I C A G O R I V E R C O R R ID O RD E V E L O P M E N T PL A NF OREWORD1C HAPTER O NE : I NTRODUCTIONWhy a development plan for the Chicago River?2Chicago River Development Goals 4Planning Process 6C HAPTER T WO : T HE P LANReaches and Opportunity Sites:81. North Shore Channel 10• Devon to Lawrence 12• Bryn Mawr to Foster142. Upper North Branch: City Limits to Cicero 163. Upper North Branch: Cicero to Lawrence 18• Foster to Lawrence204. Middle North Branch: Lawrence to Diversey 22• Neighborhood Overlook Prototype - 124• Neighborhood Overlook Prototype - 226• Neighborhood River Edge Improvements Prototype 28• Horner Park30• Irving Park to Addison 32• Addison to Belmont34• Industrial Area Overlook 36• Lathrop Riverwalk385. Lower North Branch: Diversey to Chicago 40• Damen to Fullerton 42• Fullerton Plaza44• Union Pacific Railroad Bridge to Webster 46• North Avenue Turning Basin486. Downtown Main Branch: Chicago to Congress 50• Erie Street Terraces52• North Branch Boardwalk 54• Riverwalk Gateway56• Rush Street Park Improvements 58• 300 South Wacker 60• Wolf Point627. South Branch Riverwalk: Congress to Halsted 648. South Branch: Halsted to Kedzie 66• South Branch Turning Basin 68• Canalport Riverwalk709. Sanitary & Ship Canal: California to City Limits 72C HAPTER T HREE : I MPLEMENTATION S TRATEGIESOverview & Setback ordinance 74Design Guidelines76Capital Improvement Program 78Environmental Recommendations79Public/Private River Development Corp.82A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS 83 B IBLIOGRAPHY86C o n t e n ts1F o r e w o r dIn 1997, the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Chicago assembled a team representing the government, private sector developers, and non-profit organizations to create a blueprint for the future of the Chicago River. Their goal was to enhance the river’s attractiveness as a natural and recreational resource, while respecting the needs of residential and business developments.The Chicago River Corridor Development Plan and Design Guidelines are results of this collaborative effort. This ten-year action plan sets forth a shared vision for the river and outlines specific recommendations for achieving that vision.Components of the plan include:D EVELOPMENT O PPORTUNITIES Specific recommendations for improvements to public and private land that support the goals of the plan.S ETBACK O RDINANCELocal legislation that provides for increased landscaped open space along the river.E NVIRONMENTAL A CTION A GENDAStrategies for preserving and enhancing the river’s natural areas.D ESIGN G UIDELINESC APITAL I MPROVEMENT P ROGRAMThe authors of this document hope that all who know and love the Chicago River will join in the thoughtful and sustainable development of this precious resource.The Chicago River through downtown Chicago2Chicago River Corridor Development PlanWhy a Development Plan for the Chicago River?Chapter One: Intro d u c t i o nThe Chicago River is one of the city’s mosttreasured and accessible natural resources, flowing through residential neighborhoods and industrial areas alike. Formerly those same industrial areas were sources of severe contamination of the river and its banks. But over the last 25 years, local and federal government agencies have invested more than $4 billion in pollution control and other water quality improvements. Both humanresidents and wildlife are returning to the river.More and more Chicagoans look to it as an attractive place to work, live, and play.This renewed interest in the river is resulting in new kinds of development. Residential andcommercial uses are replacing the more traditional industrial plants which once relied on the river for transportation of raw materials. Many of the remaining industrial uses are developing their waterfronts as amenities for their employees, with seating areas and green space. The City of Chicago created the Chicago River Corridor Development Plan and Design Guidelines as a vision and set of standards for new development that will increase public access and create new recreational opportunities for all the city’s residents.H ISTORYChicago’s phenomenal growth into a major urban center is due, in large part, to its strategic location on the Chicago River and Lake Michigan. As early as the 1600’s the river and the lake were major trade routes.By the City’s incorporation in 1836, the river had already been established as a desirable location for industrial development. The first meat packing plant adjacent to the river opened in 1829 and the first lumber mill in 1833. These two industries were located just north of Wolf Point at theconfluence of the north and south branches of the Chicago River.The completion of the Illinois and Michigan Canal in 1848 linked Lake Michigan with theMississippi River, dramatically increasing river traffic. By the 1860’s, the river had become the focus of industrial development with an emphasis on meat packing and lumber.In the city’s early history the river was also used as a sewage outlet. Waste flowed east to Lake Michigan, the city’s drinking water source,resulting in frequent outbreaks of water-borne diseases. In 1890, the Sanitary and Ship Canal was built both to protect the water supply and to provide greater shipping capacity. Theconstruction of the Canal reversed the flow of the river, sending pollution away from Lake Michigan and into the Mississippi River system. The Sanitary and Ship Canal also became the main materials transportation artery, replacing the obsolete Illinois and Michigan Canal which was eventually filled in.Chicago’s industrial legacy will likely remain a strong feature of development along the Chicago River, particularly along the South Branch and the Sanitary and Ship Canal. However, public demand for access and recreational amenities continues to grow, ensuring that future development will include a diverse mix of industrial, commercial,residential, and recreational uses.Fullerton Plaza overlook by the Chicago RiverChicago Riverwalk in Downtown ChicagoChapter One: Introduction3Southeastward view of the Chicago River over Wolf Point around 1900Burnham’s vision for the Chicago RiverChicago River Corridor Development Plan4Chicago River Development Goals1. PATHS AND GREENWAYSCreate a connected greenway along the river ,with continuous multi-use paths along at least one side of the river .• This can be accomplished through improvements to existing public paths and the creation of new path segments through private property.• Beyond the city limits, the river path can be linked to existing and proposed paths such as the Lincolnwood Trail and the Illinois and Michigan Canal Corridor.2. PUBLIC ACCESSIncrease public access to the river through the creation of overlooks and public parks. • Where feasible, private developments along the river should include opportunities for public access, such as pocket parks with seating areas.• Streets that dead-end at the river can be developed as overlooks for the adjacent community.Five key components frame the Chicago River Corridor Development Plan and Design Guidelines:Chapter One: Introduction53. HABITAT AND LANDSCAPINGRestore and protect landscaping and natural habitats along the river, particularly fish habitat.•Given the river’s industrial history, little of its pre-settlement “natural” character remains. As redevelopment proceeds, care should be taken to create landscaped buffers and wetlands, both to soften harsh urban edges and to support wildlife.4. RECREATIONDevelop the river as a recreational amenity ,attracting tourists and enhancing Chicago’s image as a desirable place to live, work, and visit.• Recommended recreational amenities include canoe and motorized boat launches, fishing piers, hiking and biking trails, and historical markers.5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTEncourage economic development compatible with the river as an environmental and recreational amenity .• Cafes, restaurants, and canoe rental concessions can be developed at many locations along the river.• Existing industrial and commercial businesses should be encouraged to enhance their water fronts and create landscaped seating and picnic areas for their employees.Chicago River Corridor Development Plan Planning Pro c e s sS TEERING C OMMITTEEThe planning process was overseen by a Steering Committee whose members included representatives of government agencies, non-profit organizations, and developers with interests in river development and preservation.The Steering Committee formed two sub-committees to address areas they felt required special attention:T HE S ETBACK S UBCOMMITTEE was charged with developing policies regarding a landscaped “no-build” zone at the top of the bank for the length of the river. They recommended a 30-foot setback be required to allow increased public access to the river through a continuous path and greenway. This recommendation was included as an amendment to the City’s existing Planned Development Ordinance, and was approved by the City Council on April 21, 1998. The complete text of the ordinance can be found in Chapter Three, page 71-72.T HE E NVIRONMENTAL S UBCOMMITTEE drafted objectives and an action plan for habitat and landscape protection. The objectives includedthe creation and management of riveredge buffers, the development of a bank restoration program, the creation and preservation of riparian and aquatic habitats, water quality improvement, and improved public education on river issues. Riveredge buffer recommendations have been incorporated into the Chicago River Corridor Design Guidelines.K EY P UBLIC S ECTOR P ARTNERSIndependently of the Steering Committee’s work, the Chicago Department of Planning and Development (DPD) met with key agencies of local government. These agencies will be important financial and management partners in the implementation of the River Development Plan.C HICAGO P ARKD ISTRICT(CPD), a local government body independent of the City, owns and manages 551 parks covering 7,300 acres. It enacts and enforces ordinances, rules and regulations for the protection of public property, initiates cultural, educational, and recreational programs, expands park space and beautifies existing park property.M ETROPOLITAN W ATER R ECLAMATION D ISTRICT OF G REATER C HICAGO(MWRD)owns land along the waterways and the outlying areas along the channels, and is responsible for the collection, treatment, and disposal of waste water, as well as for the regulation of water levels.C HICAGOD EPARTMENT OF T RANSPOR TATION (CDOT)is the city government agency responsible for the design and construction of most of Chicago’s roads, bridges and transit stations.C HICAGOD EPARTMENT OF THE E NVIRONMENT (CDOE) has overall responsibility for advancing the City’s environmental agenda to enhance the health of the urban ecosystem and all of its inhabitants. The department is also responsible for monitoring flood plain development compliance.C OOK C OUNTY F OREST P RESERVED ISTRICT (CCFPD) is responsible for the environmental quality and recreational use of waterways within its boundaries. The District’s mission is to protect and preserve the flora, fauna, and scenic beauties of Cook County.The Chicago River Corridor Development Plan was organized around three linked spheres of activities:•The Steering Committee provided overall policy direction.•Key partners and constituents contributed guidance on specific implementation strategies.•A series of open houses held over a six-week period provided opportunities for public comment.6Chapter One: Introduction In addition to the key government agencies, DPDmet with representatives of Mayor Daley’s BlueRibbon Fishing Committee, who offeredcomments on proposed fishing pier locations andgeneral fishing and boating policies.P UBLIC P ARTICIP ATIONThe Department of Planning and Developmentconducted a series of five open houses in river edgecommunities in March and April 1998. Theoverall plan for the river was presented at each,along with detailed descriptions of proposedimprovements on adjacent reaches.For a complete list of all committee members,participants and consultants, and their affiliations, seeacknowledgements on pages 81-83.Planning team members review river edge conditions7Chicago River Corridor Development Plan8Reaches and Development Opportunity SitesR EACHES (from north to south)1. N ORTH S HORE C HANNEL :D EVON A VENUE TO L AWRENCE A VENUEThis man-made canal connects the North Branch of the Chicago River with the northern suburbs and Lake Michigan at Wilmette Harbor. Adjacent land is publicly owned, and surrounding uses are largely residential, with limited industrial and commercial uses.2. U PPER N ORTH B RANCH :C ITY L IMITS TO C ICERO A VENUEIn this section, the North Branch of the Chicago River runs through land entirely owned by the Forest Preserve District of Cook County. The banks and channel remain natural in character,and surrounding uses are recreational and residential.3. U PPER N ORTH B RANCH :C ICERO A VENUE TO L AWRENCE A VENUEHere, the river retains its natural character as the surrounding uses change from public open space on the west to low-density residential on the east, where the river joins the North Shore Channel.4. M IDDLE N ORTH B RANCH :L AWRENCE A VENUE TO D IVERSEY A VENUEThis section of the river is a zone of transition. North of Belmont, several large parks provide recreational access. South of Belmont, rapidly changing land uses are creating a mix of residential, commercial, and industrialdevelopment with limited opportunities for public access.5. L OWER N ORTH B RANCH :D IVERSEY A VENUE TO C HICAGO A VENUEAlthough this reach is predominantly zoned for manufacturing and related uses, commercial uses have been making inroads at the river’sedge. Public access to the water’s edge is extremely limited.6. D OWNTOWN M AIN B RANCH :C HICAGO A VENUE TO C ONGRESS P ARKWAY The river’s main branch is a focal point for high-rise office, hotel and residentialdevelopment. Prospects for increased public access are strong as public plazas andriverwalks are integrated into the designs for many developments.7. S OUTH B RANCH R IVERWALK :C ONGRESS P ARKWAY TO H ALSTED S TREET Like the Middle North Branch, this reach is a zone of transition, in this case, between thehigh-rise commercial and residential development north of Roosevelt Road and the traditional industrial uses to the south. Open space is limited in nearby residential areas.8. S OUTH B RANCH :H ALSTED S TREET TO K EDZIE A VENUEThe South Branch runs through one of the city’s most robust industrial areas, including the Pilsen Model Industrial Corridor. Access to the water’s edge is limited, but demand for open space is high due to the lack of parks and playgrounds in the surrounding residential communities.9. S ANITARY & S HIP C ANAL :C ALIFORNIA A VENUE TO THE C ITY L IMITS In contrast to the North Shore Channel, the publicly owned land along this reach is leased to commercial and industrial users, limiting public access. As elsewhere on the southernmost reaches, open space is limited in nearby residential areas.D EVELOPMENT O PPORTUNITY S ITESAcross the nine reaches of the river, the plan has identified 22 Opportunity Sites. For each of the sites, specific recommendations have been made for developments that would meet one or more of the five goals of the plan.Chapter Two: T H E P L A NFor the purposes of the Chicago River Corridor Development Plan, the river has been subdivided into nine reaches,contiguous stretches that share certain geographic characteristics. Many of the reaches also include Development Opportunity Sites that have specific characteristics that make them good locations for public open space investment.Chapter Two: The Plan9City LimitsReach TwoReach FourReach SevenN o r th Shore Channel: Devon Avenue to Lawrence Av e n u eReach OneChicago River Corridor Development Plan10G OALS :•Upgrade and extend paths through publicly owned land.•Improve under- and over-bridge path connections.•Make high-traffic streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists to cross.•Improve connections to the existing on-street bike path system.•Improve connections to the suburban path system.C HARACTERISTICS :•The Channel is navigable by canoe and motor boat for its entire length, but has no navigation outlet to Lake Michigan at Wilmette Harbor,its northern terminus.•It features seven miles of non-contiguous bike trail segments.•All water-edge parcels are owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District(MWRD) although some are currently leased to private users.•Existing river edges appear “natural” andinclude habitat for migrating waterfowl such as the endangered Black Crowned Night Heron. •The surrounding community is largely residential, with limited commercial and industrial uses.C ONSTRAINTS :•High traffic volume on cross streets makes access and crossing difficult.•Water-edge parcels are narrow, limiting their usefulness as recreational areas.•Steep banks are hazardous and limit access.O PPORTUNITIES :•The potential path can be connected to paved trails beyond the city limits in Skokie, Evanston and Lincolnwood.•Several MWRD leases will expire in the next 10 to 20 years, allowing land to revert to public use.O PPORTUNITY S ITES :• Devon Avenue to Peterson Avenue• Bryn Mawr Avenue to FosterAvenueChapter Two: The Plan - Reach One11Reach One: North Shore Channel - Devon Avenue to Lawrence AvenueHowardDevonT ouhyPetersonBryn MawrFosterLawrenceExisting Green SpaceProposed River Park DevelopmentProposed Development Opportunity Site Proposed River Edge Landscaping Existing Riverwalk Path Proposed Riverwalk Path Proposed Street End Park Proposed Canoe Access Site Existing Pedestrian BridgeChicago River Corridor Development Plan12P ATHS :•Connect the path to the Lincolnwood multi-use trail north of Devon.•Create an underbridge connection at Devon Avenue east of McCormick Boulevard.•Create a path through the MWRD aeration facility south of Devon Avenue.•Upgrade and widen the path adjacent to the Lincoln Village Shopping Center parking lot. •Link the east and west banks north of Lincoln Avenue with a pedestrian bridge at Hood Street or create a bike lane and widen the sidewalk on the north side of the Lincoln Avenue bridge.•Build underbridge connections at Lincoln and Peterson on the east bank.R IVER A CCESS :•Build an overlook with a sitting area at the MWRD aeration facility south of Devon.•Create a canoe launch adjacent to the Lincoln Village Shopping Center parking lot.•Provide adequate lighting along the entire path.R ECREATION :•Create a continuous bike path that allows cyclists to avoid crossing busy streets by using underbridge connections.•Connect the west bank bike path with the neighboring community to the east with a pedestrian bridge at Hood Street.Devon to PetersonDevon Avenue forms the border between Chicago and the village of Lincolnwood to the north. The MWRD-owned land along both banks of the North Shore Channel south to Peterson Avenue is popular with cyclists and anglers. This plan calls for completing the existing multi-use path, and linking it both to the northern suburbs and the residential community to the east. Cyclists and pedestrians will be able to use underbridge connections to avoid crossing high-traffic streets, while improved path lighting will heighten visitor security.New recreational destination points include an overlook and a canoe launch.Vi e w of Pe t e rson BridgeP ROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSChapter Two: The Plan - Reach One13P ATHS :•Improve the existing path on the east bank.•Create a safe street crossing between the north and south sections of Legion Park at Bryn Mawr.•Create a water-edge nature trail on the east bank through Legion Park.•Create an underbridge connection on the west bank at Bryn Mawr.•Create an on-street connection between the path north of Foster and the Albany Street pedestrian bridge.•Create an underbridge connection on the east bank at Foster Avenue.•Improve the midblock crosswalk at Foster Avenue.•Create a new pedestrian path on the west bank adjacent to the Marine Corps and North Park University property south to the Waterfall.R IVER A CCESS :•Create a water-edge nature trail on the east bank through Legion Park.•Connect the existing multi-use path to the adjacent neighborhood at Legion Park.H ABITAT & L ANDSCAPING :•Regrade as necessary to control erosion.•Remove debris and invasive plant species.•Replant with native plant species.•Screen parking area with street trees.R ECREATION :•Clear areas for bank fishing along the east bank nature trail.•Create a continuous bike path that allowscyclists to avoid crossing busy streets by using underbridge connections.•Incorporate recreation fields and open space at the Region One High School site on the west bank.As elsewhere along the North Shore Channel, this section is flanked by publicly owned land. Legion Park runs the length of the east bank. On the west, plans for a new 14-acre Region One High School campus include open space at the water’s edge, providing a major link in the riverwalk. This plan proposes improvements to the existing multi-use trail and a new nature trail through Legion Park. Cyclists andpedestrians will be able to use underbridge connections to avoid crossing high-traffic streets.P ROPOSED I MPROVEMENTSChicago River Corridor Development Plan14B r yn Mawr to FosterExisting conditions underBryn Mawr BridgeUpper North Branch: City Limits to Cicero Av e n u eReach Tw oG OALS:•Upgrade and extend paths through publicly owned land.•Improve under- and over-bridge path connections.•Make high-traffic streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists to cross, particularly at Cicero Avenue.•Create safe grade crossings at rail lines.•Improve connections to the existing on-street bike path system.•Connect the existing trail to the North Branch Bicycle Trail.•Improve access to the river for boaters and canoers.C HARACTERISTICS:•This reach runs through Cook County Forest Preserve District land.•Banks and channel remain natural in character.•The river is accessible by boat and canoe most of the year.C ONSTRAINTS:•Golf courses and floodplains limit routes for paths adjacent to the river.•Bank vegetation is often washed away by stormwater runoff and high water.•A Forest Preserve District landscape restoration moratorium is in effect, limiting development and tree relocation.O PPORTUNITIES:•Trail segments exist through the forest preserves.•Numerous ecological restoration sites include the seven North Branch Prairie project sites. •Adjacent recreational opportunities include golfcourses, swimming pools and toboggan slides.Chapter Two: The Plan - Reach Two17Reach Two: Upper North Branch - City Limits to Cicero AvenueLawrenceBryn MawrPetersonDevonExisting Green SpaceProposed River Park DevelopmentProposed Development Opportunity Site Proposed River Edge Landscaping Existing Riverwalk Path Proposed Riverwalk Path Proposed Street End Park Proposed Canoe Access Site Existing Pedestrian BridgeCity LimitsUpper North Branch: Cicero Avenue to Lawrence AvenueReach Thre eG OALS:•Upgrade and extend paths through publiclyowned land.•Improve under- and over-bridge pathconnections.•Make high-traffic streets safer for pedestriansand cyclists to cross.•Improve connections to the existing on-streetbike path system.•Increase access to the river for canoers.C HARACTERISTICS:•Much of the river is bordered by open space,including forest preserves and parks.•Residential neighborhoods adjoin the river atseveral points.•Banks and channel remain natural in character.•The river is accessible by boat and canoe mostof the year.C ONSTRAINTS:•The river is fenced off through most ChicagoPark District parks.•Bank vegetation is often washed away bystormwater runoff and high water.O PPORTUNITIES:•Trail segments exist through parks and forest preserves.•Most river-edge land is publicly owned.•State funding and concept are in place for development of a path between Ronan Park and Eugene Field Park.O PPORTUNITY S ITE: F OSTER TO LAWRENCEChapter Two: The Plan - Reach Three19Reach Three: Upper North Branch - Cicero Avenue to Lawrence AvenueExisting Green SpaceProposed River Park DevelopmentProposed Development Opportunity SiteProposed River Edge LandscapingExisting Riverwalk PathProposed Riverwalk PathProposed Street End ParkProposed Canoe Access SiteExisting Pedestrian BridgeChicago River Corridor Development Plan 20P ATHS :•Link the multi-use path on the east bank withan underbridge connection and/or an improvedstreet crossing at Foster Avenue.•Extend the North Branch multi-use trail westwith a connection at Carmen Street.•Realign the path through West River Park.•Complete the path through Ronan Park.•Extend the path south from East River Parkthrough the MWRD property to LawrenceAvenue.R IVER A CCESS :•Create overlooks with terraces to the water’sedge on either side of the waterfall.•Build a ramp from Argyle Street to a new canoelaunch in West River Park.•Build a ramp from Albany Street to a new canoelaunch on the upper North Branch.•Continue water-edge portage path between thecanoe launches.H ABITAT & L ANDSCAPING :•Improve aquatic habitat with plants, underwater structures and a sheltered bank.R ECREATION :•Build a ramp from Argyle Street to the canoe launch in West River Park.•Build a ramp from Albany Street to the canoe launch on the upper North Branch.•Continue the water-edge portage path between canoe launches.•Improve access and opportunities for fishing. •Improve access and opportunities for sitting at the water’s edge.•Rebuild the waterfall and create a safe run for small craft over structure. •Create a pull-over and drop-off point for canoes at Argyle and Albany streets.Foster to Lawre n c eThe North Shore Channel and the North Branch of the Chicago River come together at the Waterfall, which was built early in this century by the Metropolitan Sanitary District. It is popular with anglers; canoeists currently use an informal launch at Albany Street. The plan proposes enhancing these uses and increasing access to the water’s edge. Riveredge land is owned by the MWRD or the Chicago Park District. Land north of the North Branch and west of the North Shore Channel is leased by North Park University for use as an athletic field.P ROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSVi e w of the Wat e r f all from West Ri ver Pa rkMiddle North Branch: Lawrence Avenue to Damen Avenue Chicago River Corridor Development Plan22Reach FourG OALS :•Upgrade and extend paths through publiclyowned land.•Increase public access to the river.•Create additional recreational areas.•Create greenway through business areas andresidential neighborhoods.•Complete the greenway on setbacks on privatelyowned land.C HARACTERISTICS :•Rapidly changing land uses are creating a mixof residential, commercial and industrialdevelopment.•Land values are increasing as up-scale housingand commercial development occur.C ONSTRAINTS :•The river is fenced off through most ChicagoPark District parks. High land values impedeacquisition for public purposes.•Banks are often used as extensions of existingback yards, with boat docks and otherstructures common.O PPORTUNITIES :•Many streets dead-end at the water’s edge,creating opportunities for overlooks and access.•River access can be included in project plans asnew development occurs.•Horner, California and Clark parks provideexcellent access.•A City-owned ward yard on the west banksouth of Belmont provides a high visibilitybank stabilization and green-up opportunity.O PPORTUNITY S ITES :• N EIGHBORHOOD O VERLOOK P ROTOTYPES • N EIGHBORHOOD R IVER E DGE I MPROVEMENTS P ROTOTYPE • H ORNER P ARK • I RVING TO A DDISON • A DDISON TO B ELMONT • I NDUSTRIAL A REA O VERLOOK • L ATHROP RIVERWALK。
街道设计的又一实用性工具——《全球街道设计指南》中文版发行
2018年7月,《全球街道设计指南》(Global StreetDesign Guide)(以下简称《指南》)中文版由江苏凤凰科学技术出版社出版发行。
《指南》系“街道设计指南”丛书之一。
丛书还有《城市街道设计指南》《城市自行车道设计指南》《公交街道设计指南》《纽约市街道设计手册》和《雨洪管理街道设计指南》等,由美国全球城市设计倡议协会(GDCI)、美国国家城市交通官员协会(NACTO)策划和编著。
《指南》中文版(全书40.8万字)由王小斐、胡一可译,上海市城市建设设计研究总院张涛、张鎏审校,天津凤凰空间文化传媒有限公司总经销。
《指南》的编著致力于将道路变得更加安全,更具活力。
20世纪道路围绕汽车设计建造,行人空间往往狭窄。
新一代城市规划师、道路设计师和广大市民已经厌倦了这种修建原则,秉承“以人为本”“绿色出行”的理念设计新街道、改造旧路网。
《指南》灵感来源于六大洲40个国家、70个城市的成功案例,优先考虑步行、骑行和公共交通,构建多元化的街区(社区),将“道路(机动车为主)穿越城市”演化为“街道融入城市”,更好地为街上每一个人提供更安全、更高效、更稳静,宜行宜游宜憩的空间环境。
《指南》共分三部分。
第一部分关于街道,包括定义街道,阐述了街道的定义、改变衡量成功街道的标准、街道经济、服务更多人的多模式街道等;塑造街道,阐述了塑造街道的过程、与城市和区域目标保持一致、让合适的利益相关者参与其中、设定项目愿景、阶段性和临时设计策略、制度变革等;监测和评估街道,阐述了如何监测街道、总结图表等。
第二部分街道设计导则,包括为大城市设计街道、为空间设计街道、为人设计街道、公共设施和基础设施、运营和管理策略、设计控制参数等。
除阐述主要设计原则外,还细化到为行人、自行车骑行者、公共交通使用者、驾驶员、货运和服务运营商、商贩设计街道。
第三部分街道改造,包括街道和交叉路口改造。
在街道类型方面,分为行人优先空间、共享街道、社区街道、大街和林荫大道、非正规地区的街道改造等。
Urban Design Guidelines for HK
Urban Design Guidlines for Hong KongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 1IntroductionUrban Design Guidlines for HongKongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong2Urban Design Concepts and Principlesaffecting visual environment in the adjacent viewsheds. Examples to illustrate the character of physical context of Hong Kong include the setting of Central andSai Kung ViewshedUrban Design Guidlines for Hong KongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 3Urban Design Guidlines for HongKongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong4Urban Design Guidlines for Hong KongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 5Guidelines on Design IssuesCommonly Encountered in Development ProposalsGarden EstatesUrban Design Guidlines for HongKongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong6zDevelopments should be compatible with their context.Out-of-context “sore thumb”developments should be avoided, especially at the periphery of a new town.zWhere appropriate, adopt a coherent gradation in building height profile from the high density core area to the fringe /low density areas.zCreate landmarks at the civic /commercial centres or focal points where appropriate.High Density AreaLow Density AreaRural Area with Recreational ActivitiesUrban Design Guidlines for Hong KongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 7Urban Design Guidlines for HongKongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong8zCreate an active waterfront with diversity in activities and functions including restaurants,bars, retail facilities, promenades and piers. Add well-designed landscaping and street furniture where appropriate.zEncourage diversity in building mass to avoid a monotonous harbourfront image. The massing should create points of interests and nodes.zProvide promenades along the waterfront and avoid incompatible land uses. Sites along the waterfront should be reserved for cultural, tourism-related,recreational and retail activities.View Corridors BreezewaysUrban Design Guidlines for Hong KongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 9A “Wall”Varying building profile, taller buildings inland and lower on the waterfrontCoastal Elevated Roads Inland TunnelCoastal TunnelCoastal Road Avoid locating roads on waterfrontSubmerge the road underground or under the harbour edgezEncourage well landscaped green open spaces that meet the functional requirements for active and passive recreational uses.zProvide focal landmark features in open spaces to achieve orientation and create a sense of place.Cityscapea)Open SpaceszIntroduce traffic calming measures such as speed bumps and raised crossings to minimise the conflict between vehicles and pedestrians.zProvide safe, clean, accessible and interesting environments with due consideration to micro-c l i m a t e f o r p e d e s t r i a n circulation. Ease of access should be ensured for persons with disabilities.zIntegrate the provision of pedestrian linkages with that of open space networks.PedestrianisedLandscape BufferPedestrians SegregatedLinkage Bus StopzPriority should be given to controlling pollution at source. Measures such as the control of vehicles' emissions,provision of submerged or semi-s u b m e r g e d r o a d s , a n d pedestrianisation can help achieve this goal.zEncourage the provision of active street frontages and various street activities, such as shop fronts, bars,cafes at street level and human scale.Avoid locating mechanical plant rooms or “dead elevations” on these frontages.zIntroduce internal public circulation on “desire lines” to connect popular destinations.These linkages should be freely accessible to the public, should be of suitable scale depending on pedestrian flow, and should have natural light where possible.zDue considerations should be made for persons with disabilities in the design of crossings, tactile paving, braille information boards etc. Street furniture should also cater for the needs of persons with disabilities and the elderly.zRoadside planting should be encouraged. Provide attractive hard and soft landscaping to improve the quality of the street environment. Soften the hard edges with landscaping (e.g. tree planting and shrub beds where appropriate).Unobstructed PathDestinationInternalPedestrian Route DestinationDestinationSound Absorbing Road SurfaceModified Metroplan guidelines "Punctuation" of ridgelines at suitable locationsTo enhance the image of Victoria Harbour To encourage innovative building designDesign Guidelines for Layout PlanningVIEW CORRIDORS PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT ROAD HIERARCHYBREEZEWAYSBUILDING HEIGHT PROFILEBUILDINGS ENCLOSE SPACEOPEN SPACE AND LINKAGESFOCUS AND IDENTITYCONTINUOUS WATERFRONT PROMENADEBREEZEWAYSOPEN SPACE AND LINKAGESSTEPPED BUILDING HEIGHT PROFILEPUBLIC ACCESS TO AND ALONG WATERFRONTVIEW CORRIDORSSEGREGATE VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS BUILDINGS DEFINE SPACE RECOGNISABLE NEIGHBOURHOODSLANDMARKS ON WATERFRONTClubhouse Main EntranceBuffer Zone toWaterfrontPublic FootpathUrban Design Guidlines for HongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 30MAXIMISE VIEWS ROAD HIERARCHY FOCUS AND IDENTITY PUBLIC ACCESS TO AND ALONG WATERFRONTRESIDENTIAL CLUSTERSPROXIMITY TO EXISTING VILLAGEBUFFERS TO WATERFRONT AND ROADBUILDING HEIGHT PROFILEVARIETY OF HOUSE TYPESUrban Design Guidlines for HongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong31Urban Design Guidlines for HongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 32BREEZEWAYSROAD HIERARCHY OPEN SPACE LINKAGES MAXIMISE VIEWS OVER LOW INDUSTRIAL PARKSGOOD PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONLANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONESFOCUS / LANDMARKPUBLIC ACCESS TO AND ALONG WATERFRONTPOSITIVE IMAGEUrban Design Guidlines for HongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 33Urban Design Guidlines for HongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 34Implementationthe existing mechanism for implementing the urban design guidelines. The following approaches for implementation are recommended:achieving the objective of preserving views to ridgelines as administrative measureshave not found to be effective in the past. The Study suggests to accept the publicUrban Design Guidlines for Hong Urban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 35or representatives of pressure groups and to invite their contributions in the urban design implementation process.co-ordinate the development of these projects while safeguarding public interest.Urban Design Guidlines for HongUrban Design Guidelines for Hong Kong 36。
《城市滨水区设计与开发》(张庭伟等)读书笔记
•
•
•
“芝加哥河滨走廊设计大纲和标准”(Chicago River 芝加哥河滨走廊设计大纲和标准” Corridor Design Guidelines and Standards) 1999 适用于芝加哥河两岸30m范围内的开发建设。由 适用于芝加哥河两岸30m范围内的开发建设。 •
“芝加哥河沿岸地区规划”(The River edge Plan of Chicago) 1974 芝加哥河沿岸地区规划” “市中心区规划”(Chicago Central Area Plan) 1983年 市中心区规划” 1983年 市中心规划要素” 2000年 “市中心规划要素”(The Principles of Central Area Plan) 2000年 “芝加哥河城市设计大纲(市中心部分)”[Chicago River Urban 芝加哥河城市设计大纲(市中心部分) Design Guidelines (Downtown Corridor)] 1990年 1990年 城市水道沿岸综合开发法规(The 城市水道沿岸综合开发法规(The Waterway Planned Development Ordinance) “芝加哥河滨走廊发展规划”(Chicago River Corridor Development Plan) 芝加哥河滨走廊发展规划” 1999年提出芝加哥河新的发展目标及 1999年提出芝加哥河新的发展目标及 “芝加哥河滨走廊设计大纲和标准”(Chicago River Corridor Design 芝加哥河滨走廊设计大纲和标准” Guidelines and Standards)
• • • • • • •
滨水地区的用途规定 水上建筑物 滨水地区的通道 地面层的使用 码头及码头区 高度及退红线距离 停车场
Urban Design & Development Guidelines
Section 6:Urban Design & Development GuidelinesPrevious sections of the Downtown Plan present recommendations for the various functional subareas that comprise Downtown Round Lake. Each Subarea Plan includes a listing of recommendations related to building and site design that are specific to each individual subarea.This section provides a more complete listing of design guidelines and objectives for sites and buildings within the Downtown area.The guidelines and objectives address the improvement of existing sites and buildings as well as new construction, and are focused on promoting high-quality and compatible improvements and developments that will complement, enhance, and establish the traditional scale and character of Downtown. While the guidelines are specific enough to ensure design compatibility, they are also flexible enough to allow for individual creativity on the part of property owners, architects, and builders.Several of the design guidelines are illustrated in Figures 16 and 17, at the conclusion of this section.The Need forDesign GuidelinesDowntown buildings have traditionally been small in scale, with retail uses located on the ground floor and office or residential uses located on the upper floor(s).Most Downtown buildings are of masonry construction, have attractive entryway treatments and large display windows on the street level, and are characterized by earth tones in the red, buff, cream, and gray color ranges. Many have attractive brick and stonefaçade detailing, particularly on the upper floors.As Downtown continues to evolve and develop in the years ahead, it is important that improvements and new developments be compatible with the traditional scale and character of Downtown.While architectural styles need not be the same, Downtown buildings, particularly those within the same block, should be generally compatible in terms of building height, massing, proportion, materials, and color.Use and Application of theDesign GuidelinesThe guidelines and objectives presented here should be used by the Village to promote high-quality and compatible improvements and new developments within Downtown Round Lake. The guidelines should be used by Village Staff and Village officials in reviewing plans and proposals for new Downtown projects and improvements.Architects, property owners and developers should also use the guidelines as a reference as they prepare plans for new Downtown development projects.Guideline 1: Building HeightThe Downtown Core is composed primarily of two- and three-story buildings. New construction should respect the existing scale of Downtown and avoid extreme differences in building height.Two- and three-story buildings should predominate throughout the Downtown area.New buildings must be at least two stories in height in the Downtown Core. New one-story buildings are too low to maintain the urban character and “streetwall” effect and should be discouraged within the Downtown area. Corridor commercial and commercial services uses along North Cedar Lake Road and Route 134 may be appropriate for single-story construction (such as grocery stores, pharmacies, etc.).The mixed residential district in the Metra Triangle Subarea should consist of buildings that are 3 to 3 ½ stories in height, with pitched roofs and dormers.Designated rowhouse areas should consist of buildings that are 2 ½ to 3 stories in height. Both flat and pitched roof styles can be appropriate.Buildings up to four stories in height could be acceptable in select downtown locations, provided they are in character with the surrounding area. Upper story “setbacks” above the second floor should be encouraged.Guideline 2: Building Placementand OrientationMuch of the existing Downtown shopping district is characterized by continuous rows of commercial buildings constructed at the front property line. This development pattern creates a distinctive “streetwall” effect that adds visual interest, enhances the pedestrian environment, and establishes a “human” scale within the Downtown area.In the Core Downtown Subarea, new construction should be positioned at the front property line. On corner lots, new buildings should be built out to both property lines.In other subareas, buildings can be set back from the sidewalk, appropriate for the site and in keeping with adjacent uses in the district and consistent throughout each block front.New construction in the Downtown Core should occupy the entire width of the lot to avoid gaps between buildings and discontinuities in the streetwall, except where pedestrian access to rear parking is designed and planned for.Buildings throughout Downtown should face the street; the placement of buildings at odd or irregular angles to the street should be avoided. However, corner buildings might take advantage of their prominent locations with angled or recessed corner entrances or other small setbacks, particularly applicable to buildings fronting the roundabout.Where building setbacks, side yards and surface parking lots exist along Downtown streets, the “streetwall” should be maintained through the use of landscaping,pedestrian amenities, and decorative walls or fencing.Guideline 3: Building Bulkand ProportionOlder commercial buildings within Downtown Core have relatively small footprints and are located on lots with narrow widths. While many contemporary commercial usesrequire larger spaces, new construction should respect the existing scale, massing, and proportion of traditional Downtown buildings. Where new buildings exceed the traditional 20- to 30-foot width of Downtown Core buildings, the façades should be visually divided into bays, similar to the width of traditional Downtown buildings.Rooflines, cornice treatments, and the design and placement of columns, pilasters, and windows, should be used to visually divide larger buildings and help maintain the traditional scale and proportion of the Core Downtown.Guideline 4: Architectural StyleDowntown has been developed over a period of many years and its buildings reflect a variety of architectural styles. While the Village should not attempt to dictate architectural style, it should promote new construction that complements a traditional buildingfabric.New buildings need not be historic replicas, but should offer high quality and compatible interpretations of the traditional styles present within historic and traditional Downtowns.Regardless of style, new buildings should use traditional masonry materials and should reflect the predominant scale, height, massing, and proportions of traditional Downtown buildings.Improvements and additions to existing buildings with architectural or historical interest should reinforce and enhance the original characteristics of the building rather than apply new or different stylistic treatments.The distinguishing features of Downtown’solder buildings, particularly decorative cornices, columns, reliefs, and other significant façade detailing, should be retained and restored as required.Guideline 5: Building MaterialsThe building materials most common within traditional Downtowns are earth-toned brick and stone in the red, buff, cream, and gray color ranges. Ceramic tile and terra cotta are also used as ornamentation around doors, windows and cornices.New buildings should be constructed of traditional masonry building materials such as brick or stone; these materials should be used on all sides of the building.On existing buildings with architectural or historical interest, original materials should be maintained and restored.Rough sawed wood, aluminum panels and siding, rustic shingles and shakes, and plastic or metal panels should not be permitted within the Downtown area.Guideline 6: Doors & EntrancesDoors on Downtown Core buildings should provide an open invitation to potential customers, be attractive and inviting to pedestrians, and add visual interest to the street. However, doors should be appropriately sized and in scale with a building’s façade.The front doors of new buildings should reflect the scale, placement, and proportions of traditional Downtown buildings; recessed entrances should be encouraged.Main entrances should be at the front of the building and should face the sidewalk; corner buildings might take advantage of their prominent locations with angled corner entrances.New doors on existing buildings with architectural or historical interest should be compatible with the original style and character of the façade.Guideline 7: WindowsDisplay windows on the ground floor of commercial buildings in the Downtown Core are a distinguishing feature of Downtown. They allow passersby to see merchandise within a commercial building from the sidewalk. Windows on the upper floors of traditional Downtown buildings are smaller and less prominent, but often have attractive detailing and decorative trim.Large ground-floor display windows should be strongly encouraged in new commercial construction.Windows on the upper floors of new buildings should appear to be “punched” openings within a solid wall, rather than as continuous rows of windows separated only by their frames; curtain-wall window treatments are not appropriate within Downtown. Upper floor windows should be recessed, not flush with the surface of the building.Windows on new “infill” buildings should have similar size and proportions and should be aligned with the window openings of adjacent existing buildings.Window glazing should be clear or slightly tinted; dark, mirrored, or reflective glass should not be permitted.Where existing windows are important architectural features in a building’s façade, window size and configuration should be maintained; window openings should never be covered over or boarded up.Guideline 8: Rooflines & ParapetsThe rooflines of new buildings should be similar to the rooflines of traditional Downtown buildings in terms of shape, alignment, and architectural detailing.The roofs of most commercial buildings should be flat or shallow-sloped. Gable roofs, which are acceptable within residential areas, should be discouraged within most Downtown commercial districts.Roof parapets should be encouraged to create an interesting building profile and to hide vents and other rooftop equipment.In buildings with architectural or historical interest, the original roofline and cornice treatment of existing buildings should be maintained and restored.Sloped mansard, shake or shingle roofs should not be permitted within the Core Downtown Subarea.Guideline 9: ColorColor should be used to unite the elements of a façade and to highlight architectural features. However, the colors on individual buildings should complement and be compatible with the predominant hues of nearby buildings.The predominant colors for Downtown buildings should be relatively muted and subtle. The natural brick and stone colors of red, buff, cream, and gray should predominate. Darker or lighter hues could be used as accent trim.Ceramic tile, terra-cotta, brick, stone, and glass surfaces should not be painted, unless paint already exists on these surfaces.Guideline 10: Awnings & CanopiesAwnings and canopies protect shoppers from the elements, and are an inexpensive way to add color and visual interest to the street. Awnings are temporary and movable; canopies are permanent.Awnings and canopies should be integrated into the façade and should be in character with the architectural style of the building. The color of awnings and canopies should complement and enhance the overall color scheme of the building façade.Awnings and canopies should be positioned at least eight feet above the sidewalk.Awnings should be made of a canvas or durable fabric material that can be easily cleaned.Back lit awnings and canopies, shingle and mansard canopies, and metal and plastic awnings should not be permitted within Downtown.Guideline 11: LightingThe lighting of a building’s façade can help identify stores and businesses, promote a sense of safety and security, and highlight prominent Downtown buildings and building features.Building lighting should be subtle andunderstated; light fixtures should be designed and oriented to produce minimal glare and spillover onto nearby properties.Most exterior lighting sources should be concealed; where concealment is not practical, light fixtures should be compatible with overall storefront design.Metal halide lighting creates a warm atmosphere and should be encouraged for store identification and accent lighting.Guideline 12: SignsSigns not only communicate the nature of individual businesses, but also influence the overall image and character of the Downtown area.Exterior signs should be limited to business identification and description; advertising signs should be discouraged.The size, material, color, and shape of signs should complement the architectural style and scale of the building.Wall-mounted signs should be designed as an integrated component of the buildingfaçade, and should not cover important architectural details.When a building contains multiple storefronts, signage for all businesses should be compatible in design and consistent in placement.Raised, individual letters mounted directly on the building, as well as signs that use light colors for lettering and darker colors for backgrounds, should be encouraged throughout Downtown.Guideline 13: Rear Yards& FaçadesThe rear portions of all properties should be clean, attractive and well maintained, particularly where these areas are visible to the public.The backs of existing commercial buildings should be repaired, repainted, and upgraded as required; new buildings should have attractive rear façades that are “comparable” to front façades.Secondary rear entrances to stores and shopsshould be encouraged in blocks where public parking or pedestrian walkways are located behind the buildings.Trash receptacles, dumpsters and service areas should be located inside the primary building or be fully enclosed in small masonry structures.Outdoor storage and service facilities should be screened from view along sidewalks and roadways through the use of low masonry walls or evergreen plantings.Guideline 14: Parking LotsOff-street parking lots should be designed and located so that they are safe, efficient, and do not disrupt the traditional pedestrian scale of Downtown.Parking lots should be located behind buildings or at mid block; parking in front of buildings should be avoided throughout the Core Downtown Subarea.Access to parking lots should be provided from alleys or side streets wherever possible; curb cuts and access drives should be minimized, particularly along pedestrian shopping streets and arterial routes.Parking lots should be screened from view along sidewalks and roadways through the use of low masonry walls or evergreen plantings and decorative fencing.Parking lots should have curbed perimeters; landscaped islands and clearly marked pedestrian pathways should be encouraged within the interior of parking areas.All parking lots should be paved, well marked, sufficiently lit, and provided with proper drainage.Guideline 15: Residential AreasThe Downtown Plan recommends several sites for new condominium and townhouse development. Each of these areas should be characterized by high-quality design and construction, and sites should be attractively landscaped to serve as a “transition” to Downtown commercial areas. The height of new multi-family buildings that directly border or face single-family uses should be limited to two-stories in height.New housing construction should reflect the traditional scale and character of Downtown, particularly in terms of masonry building materials, colors, mass and proportion, and fenestration.New rowhouse buildings should be located at or near the sidewalk and aligned with and “face” the street.Multi-family sites should be attractively landscaped, particularly front setbacks and the perimeter of parking and service areas. Where possible, parking to serve multi-family uses should be located inside the primary buildings; if garages are provided, they should be located behind the residential buildings and should have access via alleys or side streets.。
美国城市设计导则介述
城 市 设 计 U r b a n D e s i g n
构 对设计意向的展示和说明 对设想 的最终形态提出评价标准和引导手段
在城市设计过程中 设计导则是实 现城市设计目标和概念的具体操作手 段 它如同一个纲领性文件 指导城市 设计思想的贯彻实施 1.2 城市建设管理与导则
美国的城市设计导则是特定的经济 和行政体制下的产物 它所包含的内容 与特征是由现行的城市建设管理手段和 控制体系决定的
在美国 区划法(zoning)是对城市 建设的土地使用和设计控制的基本手段 对设计的控制主要有容积率 建筑高度 退后 建筑体块和停车位等几个方面 目 的是保护个人财产的利益 社区稳定 促 进房地产开发
有奖区划法(incentive zoning)出现 以后 设计导则作为对区划法的辅助手 段之一在设计控制中变得越来越重要 主要是对城市设计概念和不可度量标准 的说明或规定 也作为公众参与和设计 评审的标准之一 开发商若想得到某些 奖励(bonuses) 如增加建筑高度或密度 其开发设计方案必须以符合设计导则的 要求为前提
图 3 旧金山居住区设计导则控制要求
控制要求 如标志标牌 街道家具 植 被标准和铺装等
表 1 对美国几个主要城市的设计导 则进行了比较 从表 1 可以看出 美国 城市设计中设计导则大多是与城市设计 方案不能分离的一部分 大多设计导则 都是区段性的 针对不同地段编制不同 的设计导则 使导则的内容具有针对 性 不同的地段有不同的控制重点 保 证了城市形态丰富多彩 此外 设计导 则在操作形式上既是区划法的一部分 又是城市设计成果的一部分 在实施管 理上具有法律效力
全天对公众开放
表 3 圣地亚哥市总体城市设计导则中的 2 个主题
城 市 整 体 意 象 目标 加强对人与环境之间视觉和感知关系的综合开发 导则和标准
2023-2024学年重庆市高三下学期3月月考英语试题
2023-2024学年重庆市高三下学期3月月考英语试题When it comes to tricks in life, the following will be of great help, which might surprisingly end up working the magic.Hooks that helpThere’s nothing worse than throwing something into the trash bin and watching the garbage bag fall in with it. To prevent this, stick two wall hooks onto the outside of your bin(one on either side), positioned so they face downward. The next time you replace the grocery bag, loop its handles through the hooks and no matter how full the bag gets, it’ll never drop to the bottom of the bin again.Easier garbage storageYou have probably encountered this: after filling the bag with trash, it forms a vacuum (真空) seal so tight t hat it’s a struggle to lift the bag out once it’s full. What to do? Punch a couple of small holes in the sides, a few centimeters above its base. The holes will allow just enough airflow to make lifting out the trash a piece of cake.Instant bottle brushIf you have an ordinary kitchen sponge (海绵) and a fork, then you have everything you need for a DIY bottle brush. Pierce the narrowest edge of the sponge with the fork and slide the sponge down until the points of the fork are fully covered. You can now clean out the skinniest bottle with ease.Express dryingNeed washed load of laundry dried in a flash? Toss a clean, dry towel into the dryer along with all the wet stuff for the first 15 minutes of the cycle. It’ll absorb some of the moisture and speed up th e overall drying time.1. What is the key to lifting trash bags?A.The fork. B.The hook. C.The brush. D.The holes.2. Why is a dry towel used in the laundry?A.To take in water. B.To tidy the dryer.C.To clean the clothes. D.To distinguish the wet stuff.3. What does the passage mainly talk about?A.Various means of saving money. B.Creative ideas on making life fun.C.DIY solutions for life’s little dilemmas.D.Different ways to promote cooking skills. Sometimes one plus one does equal three, as was the case when Dave McNee met Claudia Mandekic 14 years ago. McNee was at a dentist appointment in Toronto when he chatted with Mandekic, whowas studying to be a teacher. When she told McNee what a headache it was to get students excited about math, he made a surprising suggestion, “Why not throw in something they enjoy, like sports?”The idea of mixing basketball and mathematics got its first shot in 2011, when the colleagues were invited to run a summer-school program for kids who’d failed Grade 9 math at Georges Secondary School.When the students showed up for their first day, they weren’t exactly thrilled. Over the next few hours, Mandekic and McNee gave the kids techniques to improve their shooting while also helping them calculate their field-goal percentage, which, in turn, taught them about fractions (分数). The winning team would be determined based on which group had the highest total percentage and had done the most efficient math. “When the bell rang, they were so fixated on collecting their data and figuring out which team won that they didn’t leave,” says Mandekic. “I realized we might be onto something.”The classes, later named BallMatics, soon spread to other Toronto schools. “I was terrible at math,” says Duane Douglas, an 8th grader. “But once I started BallMatics and realized the sport I loved was directly tied to math, it made me a lot better at it. Every time I played basketball, I was thinking about math.”McNee and Mandekic have established a private high school called Uchenna Academy since 2019, where kids with excellent basketball skills can study all subjects, train at their sport and work part-time.The value of BallMatics is clear: last year, the boys landed university scholarships for their performance in the classroom, not on the court. McNee and Mandekic believe the school’s commitment to academics is the key reason why it’s been a winner.4. What did Mandekic think of teaching math at the beginning?A.Worrying. B.Shocking. C.Boring. D.Exciting.5. What does the underlined word “fixated” in paragraph 3 mean?A.Calm. B.Impressed. C.Focused. D.Dependent.6. Duane Douglas was mentioned in paragraph 4 to ______.A.show the simplicity of math B.prove the success of BallMaticsC.stress the significance of playing D.display his passion for the school7. What is the best title of the passage?A.A Simple Entertainment B.A Surprising DiscoveryC.A Beautiful Coincidence D.A Winning CombinationMore than half the world’s population are city residents, and, by 2050, the United Nations predicts that seven in ten people will be. Architects are having to consider how architecture influences our emotional well-being in urban settings.According to Colin Ellard, a research psychologist at Waterloo University, Canada, there is a lot of eviden ce which shows “the profound impact that the design of buildings has on how we feel, how we treat one another, and our overall psychological well-being”. A study from the University of Heidelberg concluded that people raised in the countryside are less likely to have mental disorders than those raised in the city. The city of Vancouver in Canada, which is surrounded by mountains and ocean, recognises the need to connect with nature. It has included protecting ocean and mountain views in its urban planning guidelines. For example, tall buildings are set up in strategic locations that don’t block scenic views for downtown residents.The British designer Thomas Heatherwick wants to make architecture less soulless and boring. He told The Guardian, “We need to fe arlessly demand interestingness and make buildings that enrich our senses.” He has listed seven characteristics of a boring building. These include being too flat and straight. He says lack of depth means light and shadow cannot play on surfaces, while straight lines are at odds with nature and make buildings dull.However, making buildings interesting is not always easy, as architect Rafael Vinoly found out in 2013 when he created the 37-store y skyscraper in London. The building was admired for its curved exterior walls covered in reflective glass. However, it acted like a magnifying glass and reflected light which melted nearby cars and almost set fire to a carpet. A screen had to be added to prevent the building causing further damage.So, for your own well-being, surround yourself with buildings that bring you joy, and ideally a view of nature.8. Why are tall buildings located in certain places in Vancouver?A.To protect people’s mental health.B.To follow the tradition of the city.C.To caution people against disorder. D.To reveal the prosperity of the area.9. Which kind of building is Thomas’ preference?A.One with straight lines. B.One having flat surfaces.C.One having a security system. D.One with innovative patterns.10. What did Rafael Vinoly fail to consider in his design?A.Boldness. B.Creativity. C.Practicality. D.Flexibility.11. What is the purpose of the passage?A.To call on people to live in big cities.B.To compare buildings in different cities.C.To stress the importance of healthy emotion.D.To convince people of emotional impact by buildings.According to legend, the first-ever marathon was so exhausting that the Greek messenger, who dashed 40km from the battlefield to Athens, collapsed and died. Over the past 2,500 years, humans have become better at running. Eight of the ten fastest times in female marathon have been recordedsince 2022. This can to a large extent be explained by the development of a new generation of hyper-bouncy running shoes—“super-shoes”—that offer athletes greater assistance. Such has been the improvement that some have questioned whether the technology is now too dominant.No doubt that athletes are breaking records because of their footwear. Both Nike and Adidas have persuaded World Athletics to permit shoes with chunky, foam soles(鞋底), which act as springs. When their feet compress the super-shoes into the ground, the runners receive more energy as they push off again. In 2017 Nike announced the new technology allowed athletes to use 4% less energy than they would if wearing a regular shoe.Those who would like the shoes banned worry that the balance between the runners’ ability and footwear has become twisted. Plainly, though, this is a long way from shoes that matter more than runners. A club runner may set a personal best in a pair of Nike Alphaflys, but she is not going to outrun Ms. Assefa(world champion) wearing regular shoes. World Athletics insists such super-shoes should be available to all athletes in order to be legal, so there is no risk of results being determined by a lack of access to the best equipment.Part of the appeal of sports is that they show humans on an upward trajectory (轨迹), becoming stronger, faster and fitter. Technology has always contributed to this. But as the sports industry has more investment, the motivations to find an edge in performance have grown, whether in kit, diet or game strategy. Surely, advances have to be controlled. But banning super-shoes would be opposing progress and difficult to enforce. This is a genie (精灵)that cannot be returned to its shoebox.12. What has improved female marathon records since 2022?A.The changes of rules. B.The advance in sports kit.C.The assistance of coaches. D.The development of humans.13. What is centered on about super-shoes in paragraph 2?A.The principle. B.The history. C.The challenge. D.The drawback. 14. Which of the following might the author agree with?A.Ms. Assefa runs slowly in regular shoes. B.Using super-shoes is regarded asdishonest.C.Nike Alphaflys better athletes’ performance. D.Access to super shoes determines athletes’ success.15. What does the last paragraph imply?A.Athletics should not embrace super-shoes.B.There is nothing to fear about technological advances.C.Not all investments have led to advances in technology.D.It is impossible for sports industry to control super-shoes.Up to 80% of premature heart disease can be prevented by making specific lifestyle choices. Some strategies, such as exercising and managing weight, are well known. 16 . “A small change in your everyday routine can potentially have a big impact in the long run,” says preventive cardiologist Dr. Beth Abramson.Get eight hours of sleep“ 17 ,” says Dr. Arya Sharma, founder of the Canadian Obesity Network. If we’re slee p deprived, our bodies also have more difficulty controlling blood pressure, inflammation(发炎) and glucose levels. These factors can all have an impact on heart health.18“We know that loneliness is a risk factor for heart health,” says Abramson. “Volun teering gets you out and creates a social network.” Research published in Psychosomatic Medicine in 2020 showed that a feeling of purpose in life is linked to a lower likelihood of heart attack.Avoid polluted airExposure to this kind of pollution over time raises your risk of heart disease. Breathing in pollutants may irritate arteries (动脉) and increase inflammation. Even short periods of exposure are unhealthy for people who already have other cardiovascular risks, such as high blood pressure. 19 .Eat breakfastA recent study found that healthy people who skipped breakfast were almost twice more likely to have heart disease six years later than those consuming a substantial morning meal. One possible reason, “If you eat a proper breakfast, you’re less l ikely to be hungry later and make poor food choices,” says Abramson.“ 20 .”I was resting when Jenny called. “There’s a thing that ________ you,” she said. “My cat found a mouse and I don’t know how you feel about cats with mice, although I have the ________ that you are afraid of bugs.”“Bugs are afraid of me.” I said. Having been bitten by a spider, I decided my new ________ was simple: get them befor e they get you. “I will get it.”The mouse was under the ________ when I arrived. After putting a broom handle beneath to force surrender, which ________, I walked beside the fridge, armed with a box.It was a good plan, but it didn’t ________ according to plan. The box created a no-escape trap, the mouse ventured out and I slammed the box down. ________, the only thing inside the box was its tail, and the mouse was struggling to escape.Meanwhile, sensing Jenny was going ________ on the mouse, I said, “Don’t you dare name it! It’s not your pet.” The mouse then crawled up on the broom handle, and we were now eyeball to eyeball.I ________ for something else to get the mouse. She rushed over, and then a spatula (抹刀) descended over my shoulder.“What? This is a MOUSE not a MOUSSE (奶油)!” Another container was handed. Despite my two-box move, the mouse ________ and shot back under the fridge.I told Jenny to leave the kitchen light on, hoping the mouse would stay under the fridge and not________ her bedroom at night.After my departure, she found the mouse ________ in the sunlight, with the cat alongside, soaking up the rays as well. They seemed a(n) ________ couple. Learning from my ________, she got a box with a lid, and the mouse jumped in the box and helped her ________ the lid.21.A.connects B.involves C.contacts D.reminds22.A.imagination B.expectation C.vision D.impression23.A.practice B.philosophy C.note D.moral24.A.fridge B.bed C.table D.box25.A.succeeded B.helped C.failed D.spoiled26.A.go B.appear C.pass D.carry27.A.Unfortunately B.Luckily C.Thankfully D.Helplessly28.A.regretful B.sorrowful C.tough D.soft29.A.claimed B.applied C.shouted D.cared30.A.survived B.escaped C.rolled D.tripped31.A.wander around B.stare at C.clean up D.flee from32.A.saddened B.bathed C.floating D.crying33.A.distant B.loyal C.cute D.abandoned34.A.warnings B.observations C.instructions D.mistakes35.A.open B.break C.close D.empty阅读下面短文,在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。
downtown
downtownDowntown: Exploring the Heart of the CityIntroductionDowntown areas are the bustling epicenters of cities around the world. With their vibrant energy, diverse offerings, and iconic urban landscapes, downtown districts attract residents, visitors, and businesses alike. In this document, we will delve into the concept of downtown, its historical significance, its role in urban development, and the key features that make it an integral part of any city.I. Historical SignificanceDowntown areas often have a rich history that dates back to the foundation of a city. They are usually the oldest parts of urban centers, serving as the original core around which the city grew. Downtown areas have witnessed the rise and fall of civilizations, the birth of industries, and the emergence of cultural landmarks. These areas often retain remnants of their history through historic landmarks, architectural designs, and preserved cultural sites.II. Economic ImportanceDowntown areas are not only the commercial centers of cities but also the economic engines driving regional growth. They provide a platform for diverse businesses, from small boutiques to large corporations, to thrive. Downtowns attract tourists, shoppers, and employees, boosting the local economy and creating job opportunities. The concentration of businesses and amenities in downtown areas contributes to the creation of a vibrant marketplace and a hub for innovation.III. Cultural and Entertainment HubDowntown areas are famous for their abundant cultural and entertainment offerings. They often house museums, art galleries, theaters, and concert halls, showcasing the local and international talent. From renowned Broadway shows to independent art exhibitions, downtowns offer a range of cultural experiences to cater to different tastes. Moreover, downtown districts are known for their lively nightlife, with numerous bars, clubs, and restaurants, making them popular destinations for socializing and enjoying a night out.IV. Architectural MarvelsThe architecture of downtown areas is a key element that sets them apart from other parts of the city. Many downtown districts have preserved their historical buildings, representing a blend of different architectural styles. From classical to modern, these structures tell the story of the city's evolution. Downtown areas also often feature iconic landmarks and skyscrapers that contribute to the city's distinctive skyline.V. Transportation HubDowntown areas are typically the transportation centers of cities, connecting different parts of the city through various modes of transportation. They are often served by multiple bus, subway, and tram lines, making them easily accessible to residents and visitors alike. Well-designed road systems and pedestrian-friendly streets further enhance the accessibility of downtown areas. Additionally, downtowns often have parking structures and bike lanes, encouraging sustainable transportation methods.VI. Urban Renewal and DevelopmentDowntown areas are constantly evolving, adapting to the changing needs of cities. Urban renewal projects are frequently undertaken to revitalize and modernize downtown districts, attracting businesses, residents, and tourists. These projects involve upgrading infrastructure, beautifying public spaces, and developing mixed-use buildings. Urban planners strive to strike a balance between preserving historical elements and incorporating new developments that meet the requirements of a modern city.ConclusionDowntown areas are the beating heart of cities, pulsating with vitality, diversity, and economic growth. They combine history, culture, and commerce to create vibrant urban centers where people live, work, and play. The importance of downtowns cannot be overstated, as they contribute significantly to a city's identity, economy, and sense of community. Whether it's exploring architectural marvels, enjoying cultural experiences, or discovering hidden gems, downtowns offer something for everyone. So next time you find yourself in a new city, make sure to head downtown and immerse yourself in the magical urban experience it offers.。
雅思听力 7分场景词汇
场景词汇补充租房城区:downtown, city centre, urban, suburb(an), outskirt, rural 金钱:rent, bill, deposit, credit card, cash, check/cheque, charge 人:landlord, landlady, tenant, guest, host family, agency个人信息:occupation, subject , academic, diet, vegetarian, allergy 要求:furnished (house / flat / apartment), basic, decoration, studio, suite, harbor, balcony, bathtub, garden, fence, indoor swimming pool, glass roof, garage, (court)yard, (double / twin / single / guest / shared) room, piano, bedsit, basement, fridge / freezer / refrigerator, microwave oven, air conditioner, dishwasher, heater, toaster, pillow, bed sheet, laundry, recycling, lamp, towel, mirror, calendar, gloves, cinema旅游交通:(by) minibus, minivan, train/railway, coach, ferry, cab, canoe, caravan, economy class, double-deck, shuttle bus, cable car, bicycle, helicopter, flight, route类型:guided tour, tour without guide, group/self-drive tour, coastal时间:departure, arrival, autumn, peak season目的地:church, village, gallery, exhibition, castle, temple, palace, cathedral, museum, cave, cottage, market, barber shop, massage, water park, waterfall, bridge, lookout point, view, waterfall, island 优惠:free intranet, free breakfast, free lunch, 20% discount, room service地名:U.K., London, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Edinburgh, Bristol, Liverpool, Manchester, Australia, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, New Zealand, Canada, Toronto, Vancouver, New York, Seattle, Washington D.C, Mexico, Malaysia, Vietnam, Africa, India, France, Japan, European求职招聘:vacancy, position, post, recruit, hire, employ, (employee/employer), job enquiry渠道:website, radio, newspaper, a friend, magazine类型:full-time, part-time, internship, temporary, permanent职业:waiter, coach, cook, cleaning, gardening, lifting, builder, receptionist, customer, consultant, assistant, secretary, dentist, nurse, reporter, director, researcher, composer, translator, window dressing, senior advisor, cashier, advertising, regional manager, branch manager, van driver时间:day shift, late shift, day off, time off, break, starting date, variable, flexible, fixed待遇:on a……basis (daily/weekly/monthly), total……pay, free meal, free transportation, free training, salary, extra pay, sick pay要求:diploma, degree, certificate, driving license, truck license, work permit, reference, recommendation letter, resume, qualification银行账户:account, (savings/current/cheque/deposit) account, (credit/debit)card金额:(minimum/maximum/opening) sum, credit limit (annual) interest (rate), exchange rate安保:security, password交易:transaction, transfer, initial, currency exchange, apply for a loan, deposit, draw, withdraw保险物品:car, house, property, laptop, keyboard, smoke alarm, plate, accident, stolen, lost, broken, damage, total value业务:insurance claim, witness, coverage, level, type, contract, terms, insurance value, citizen公司:castle hill, northern star, red flag, construction, advance活动项目名称:Yoga, rock climbing, surfing, wind surfing, sailing, horse riding, table tennis, golf, baseball, race, diving, fishing, cookery, bakery, pottery, exercise, indoor, outdoor, picnic, carpet, blanket, craft, circus, comedy, acrobatic, magic, fireworks, performance, opera, orientation, fireworks,chess, judo, violin, guitar, football, field, college, chairman, entertainment, horror, action会员:membership, club office, privilege, leaflet, fee, annual, discount, register注意事项:dress code, clothes, casual, comfortable, formal, suit, fancy dress, costume, sportswear, boots, sandal, uniform, vest, jeans, trousers, pants, jacket, helmet, hat, sun cream, back row, wheelchair, wetsuit, prevention, supervision购物物品:goods, item, groceries, cosmetics, sample, souvenir, equipment, second-hand, automatic, manual材质:texture, fabrics, leather, silk, velvet, wool, plastic, artificial, pure评价:best-seller, must-buy, essential, reliable, reasonable, cutting-edge, dangerous, satisfactory, disappointed, awful,old-fashioned, trend地图起点:entrance, gate, information centre, reception, stairs方向:top, bottom, north(ern), south(ern), west(ern), east(ern)街道型:(T-)junction, intersection, crossing, zebra crossing, corner, path, footpath, pavement, sidewalk区域/摆设型:corridor, aisle, area, foyer, ground floor形状:Circle (circular), Triangle (triangular), Rectangle (rectangular), Square, Cube, Ring, corner地点:spa, massage room, bar, club, gym, display area, conference room, lunch room, music room, manager’s office, market garden, fish farm, library, media centre, restroom, dinning room, bathroom, bookshop, playground, showroom, restaurant, main entrance, theatre, health centre易错:bag collection, information booth, internet access point, head office, nursery, medical services, lock-up garage, fringe stage, spare room, complaint office形式:compulsory, selective/elective/optional, lecture, tutorial, seminar, internship, field trip, program考核:midterm, final, dissertation, thesis, paper, essay, journal, case study, research, survey, questionnaire, observation, interview, deadline, extension专业:computer science, engineering, architecture, statistics, biology, law, archeology, psychology, anthropology, sociology, economics, history, philosophy时间:(academic/school) year, semester, term, session, duration作业前:preparation, background reading, proposal, objectives, schedule, outline, syllabus, design, checklist, target, handouts, task, article, investigation, method(ology), criteria, catalogue中:literature review, data collection, experiment, record, tape, repetition, dictation, note-taking, subtitles, analyze (analysis), random, measurement, draft, delivery, assessment, presentation, (in)valid, (in)accurate, well-organized, concern, cooperation后:due, summary, findings, edit, format, layout, evaluation, drawback, attachment, appendix, reference动物:species, creature, frog, birds, insects, eggs, goose, swan, sea horse, hens, goats, dinosaur, crocodile, turtle, dolphin, whale, shark, camel, nest, spider, earthworm, germ, injured animals, training animals, shell, life cycle, lifespan, killer whale, migration patterns, feather, breed, feed, skin texture, skeleton, bones, layers, weight, bacteria, endangered, rival, survive, food chain, blood, navigation, navigational skill, gene, pair, guard, fence, wild (n.), wildlife植物:vegetation, branch(es), leaves, plants, timber, blossom, pollinate, organic, corn, fiber, seed, stem, lid, gravity, coral reef, rubber tree, disease, immune system, irrigation, fertilize, weeds, root, liquid, nutrition环境:coastline, mineral, metal, concrete, fuel, flooding, drought, crystal, estimate, volcano, storm, thunderstorm, erosion, rocks, cliff, mud, dirt, humidity, rainfall, cloud, solar, settlement, scenery, oxygen, wetland, isolation, insulation, garbage, traditional industry, radar, natural gas, gases, carbon dioxides, standard grade, current, loss of soil, disposal, be contaminated, negative effect, soil damage, atmosphere, temperature, circumstances, antiseptic, ozone layer, rubbish, bins, vertical, cabin, harvest, grain, green tax社会:plastic, man-made, advertisement, emotion, public transport, government, domestic, politician, election, vote, tax, procedure, strategies, authority, innovation, aspirations, entertainments, steel, pipe, dam, storage, monopoly, therapy, morality, revert, motor, conference centre, tunnel, petrol station, shortage, labour, workforce, dismiss, strike, flu, heritage, antique, golden rush, legal problem, illegal acts, urban area, poverty, business, trade, portraits, symbolism, myths, gender, efficiency, residents, income, tribe, medicine, signature, ingredients, aging, facilities, bonus, effectiveness, condition, weather, body fluids, eye contacts, TV chat show, apologize, excitement, fight, cultural, rubber blanket, fold, paper jam, air pump, railway tracks, distribution, poison, population, crop, hunting, moderate, liberty, adventure, visa, range, resources, prime motivation, diary, distance, sound effect, chocolate, reactions, movement, sunset, software, import, export, mapping, frequency, commercial, knowledge, object, mathematics, packaging, donation, competition, poster, taste, clay, arrow, spear, marriage, concentrated, profit, wheel, booklet, picture framing, darkroom, detail, knee, sprain, stick, headache, painkiller, regular, fear, relationship, solution, sign, oversea, similar, decision, straight, camera, self-centered, passive, stimulation, fire places, occupancy, unanswered, candle, digestion, ceremony, campus, retail, steel,prevalent, superstar, submission, admission, antifreeze, climate, current, external, powder, perfume, representative, package, privacy, advice, creative, networkers, rare glass, soldier, mechanism, genetic, display, materials, type, oldest, monument, text, direction, printing, calm, appearance, behavior, group size, production, department, owner, satellite, signals, navigate, heavy, warm up, oil, empty, rationally, willing, instinct, financial, reward, boiler, neighbor, connect, laboratory, background, passive learner, personality, stimulate, expand, seal, habits, chart, cause, robbery, teenagers, desert, theatre, oven, man-made, diversity, spare, coloured, ink, wealthy, large scale, protein, shape, surface, depth, damage, power, energy, monitor, gradual, bricks, trash, written, lifestyle, gun, coins, car taxes, polluted(contaminated), situational, cotton, chemist, dock。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINESThese Downtown Urban Design Guidelines are a component of the City of Portland’s Downtown Plan entitled Downtown Vision: A Celebration of Urban Living and a Plan for Portland’s Future and of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. They are supporting reference documents for the City’s B-3 Downtown Business District Zoning Ordinance and Site Plan Standards, and a companion to the Technical and Design Standards and Guidelines for the City of Portland.The Signage, Awnings and Canopies section contained herein supercede the Signage requirements of the Urban Renewal Plan for Maine Way (pages 9-11 of Planning Report #29-76: Urban Renewal Plan for Maine Way, amended May 1976.)IntroductionDowntown Portland is the center of the region’s business, governmental, cultural, and residential communities. It is also a physical environment comprised of a variety of individual buildings, streetscapes, parks, and districts in which people carry on with day-to-day interactions. As a physical environment, it should be designed to facilitate these uses in a setting that has beauty, is comfortable and secure, which provides amenity and interest for the pedestrian, and which celebrates the coming together of people in a concentrated pedestrian world. It is important that incremental changes to the physical environment through development or rehabilitation proposals continue to enhance the physical environment.These guidelines are provided for the use of individual property owners and the development community in understanding the expectations of the greater community for the development of the Downtown. This represents a documentation of concerns which have been central issues within project reviews of proposed development in the past, and is an attempt to make the review process more understandable and predictable for the development community. These Guidelines are also intended to provide guidance and consistency for City staff and Planning Board development review. Finally, these Guidelines are intended to provide the public with a clearer presentation of important design issues to assure they reflect public concerns while providing a framework for public comment and involvement in the development process.These Urban Design Guidelines are not intended to restrict the creativity of developers or designers in responding to the challenges of a given site. Rather they provide a framework of issues with which to be concerned in assuring that a creative design solution is compatible with the character of Portland’s Downtown environment and is sensitive to pedestrian needs. These Guidelines are presented as a discussion of issues that specific site plan standards are intended to address. Unless otherwise provided for within the City Ordinances, these are guidelines only, a framework not to be ignored but flexible enough in intent, interpretation, and application to allow and encourage the developer and associated designers to come forward with creative and distinctive design solutions.PurposesThe underlying purposes of the Urban Design Guidelines are as follows:1. Aesthetic - To respect and build upon the human-scaled and historic building fabric of theDowntown while creating a more attractive, desirable, high quality, rich and diverseenvironment.2. Pedestrian Use - To increase pedestrian activity through the enhanced character, comfort,and interest of the pedestrian environment.3. Accessibility - To assure accessibility to all.4. Culture - To increase and support the integration of arts and culture throughout theDowntown environment.5. Economic - To recognize the fundamental relationships between property values,livability, and the character and quality of the physical environment; to protect andenhance public and private investments throughout the Downtown by assuring respectful and compatible new development; and to minimize development costs by providingspecific guidelines at the outset of the development process.DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINESTABLE OF CONTENTSI. Relationship to Pedestrian Environment (4)A. Distinguish the lower 35 feet of building facades (4)B. Pedestrian Activities District (11)C. Sidewalks and Open Space (13)II. Relationship to Existing Development (23)A. Integrate with, respect and enhance (24)B. Standards for Increasing setback beyond street build-to line (32)III. Roof-Top Appurtenances (33)IV. Shadow Impact on Open Space (34)V. Wind Impacts (35)VI. Setback from Existing Structures (36)VII. Building Tops (37)VIII. View Corridors, Visual Landmarks, and Gateways (38)IX. Signage/Awnings/Canopies (42)I. RELATIONSHIP TO PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENTA. Distinguish the lower 35 feet of building facadesStandard: “The exterior design of portions of buildings within the first thirty-five (35)feet of height shall enhance the character, attractiveness, comfort, security, and usability of the street level pedestrian environment . . .”The most significant features of a building which are perceived at street level by thetypical pedestrian moving through the Downtown are storefronts and building facadeswithin immediate view and reach. While one’s peripheral view encompassesconsiderably more of a given façade and in fact draws in the context of other nearbybuildings and open spaces, the focus of attention for each building is usually the firstapproximately thirty-five feet of building height. This portion of each building is readily perceived as an individual composition but allow more broadly as a component of theseries of street facades and elements of a continuing streetscape involving all suchfacades along a given block or street. Throughout Downtown Portland, it is typically this first thirty-five feet or so, or the first two to three stories of buildings whi9ch are the most heavily articulated, create and sustain the greatest pedestrian interest, and in fact present themselves as the base of larger buildings.Building entrances and display windows are typically the predominant elements of thisDowntown street-level environment. The character and design of these elements are vital in assuring that frequent pedestrian access to and from buildings is provided ormaintained, and that the excitement of walking about the Downtown is supported by arich, varied and interesting environment.1. Storefronts and building facades- Relationship to Context: In general, the design of storefronts andthe facades of lower portions of buildings should relate to the architectureof the rest of the building and should demonstrate a unified overallbuilding design.Where alterations are made to existing buildings facades and storefronts,such alterations should respect and be compatible with the specificfeatures and characteristics of the building of which it is a part.Characteristic elements of traditional storefront design relating to specificstyles of building, including such prominent features as entrances(generally recessed) and display windows, the storefront bulkhead, piersand framing, transom windows corresponding to typically tall interior firstfloor space, and a sign panel often topped by a cornice, are common pointsof reference for both rehabilitations and for contemporary designsolutions.Where alterations to designated historic structures and within designated historic districts are involved, standards and guidelines found in the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance will be the basis for review. For other existing structures, existing original or significant features or evidence of such that might be found through historical research or physical evidence can provide a basis for storefront restoration or for contemporary design which is compatible with the rest of the building.Where signage is provided on or adjacent to a storefront, the signage should generally be incidental to the storefront and should not overwhelm the building façade. Specific signage, awning and canopy guidelines are provided elsewhere for proposed installations in the Pedestrian Activities District (PAD) and PAD encouragement areas, as well as where such installations involve historic properties.- Pedestrian-character: The design of storefronts should complement the pedestrian activity being accessible and visible from the public sidewalk.- Materials and detailing: The design of storefronts and lower building facades should include the selection of high quality materials and detailing which relate to the rest of the building and to the surrounding context, and which convey a sense of permanence, durability, and richness in character. Ease of maintenance and a commitment to continuing upkeep are important considerations.- Transparency: A predominance of glass which assures transparency between interior activities or products and pedestrian activity on the streets and sidewalks is very important to the vitality of the pedestrian environment. Glass should be used on the street level which assures visibility for pedestrian interest and, to the extent feasible, assures that there are obvious “eyes on the street” or a sense of security as a result of indoor and outdoor activity being readily visible. The placement of landscaping or other exterior features immediately adjacent to entrances and window openings can enhance the attractiveness of a property but should be careful not to substantially diminish visibility into or out of such openings.- Contemporary design: Where creating a new façade through construction of an infill building within an existing building context, storefront design and building facades should respect the general pattern of storefront and façade design found in that surrounding context. Such design should draw from those surrounding buildings which themselves meet the guidelines presented herein. Contemporary design is encouraged where it reflects an understanding and respect for traditional patterns of storefront composition and design.2. BuildingentrancesThe traditional pattern of development in Downtown Portland resulted forthe most part in incremental construction of individual buildings overextended periods of time. Typically, these buildings each had individualbuilding entrances providing immediate access to street-fronting shops and businesses. Street level access also was provided to upper story activitiesthrough a separate entry. This pattern of frequent building entrancesserving a large number of street-level businesses provided for considerable street-level pedestrian activity and encouraged pedestrian circulation.New development in the Downtown and rehabilitation or alterations ofexisting buildings should continue this pattern of frequent access.- Compatibility with the building façade: Entrances are one ofseveral building components which collectively comprise the overall baseof a building. The design of building entrances should be considered as an integral component of a building’s façade and should relate to the overallfaçade in terms of its style and scale, quality of design, and selection ofmaterials and detailing.- Prominence along the street: The placement and design ofentrances to buildings and businesses should be readily identifiable andhave a prominence on the building’s street façade. Such entrances shouldnot overpower the façade but should be designed so to complement thecharacter and features of the building façade and storefront while clearlyannouncing the point of entry. The traditional method of recessingentrances, of utilizing signage, canopies and awnings, and of thoughtfuland directed lighting can all help to define an entrance’s prominence.- Access to the street: Access to each street-level business should be maintained directly from the street wherever possible. Where buildingsmay contain multiple street-level tenants which are served by interioraccess or circulation, prominent access directly from the street should beprovided as well to the extent feasible. In addition, building facadesfronting on publicly accessible open space should provide access in thesame manner as street-fronting facades. Consideration in satisfying thisguideline will be given to situations where changing topography maymake direct access (particularly accessible for special needs) difficult orimpractical. Every effort should be made to make these portions ofbuildings accessible, as well as attractive and of interest to the pedestrian.- Accessibility: All buildings should be barrier-free and accessibleto the physically handicapped and to others who find themselves withspecial needs. The range of special needs typically encountered in theDowntown includes such situations a negotiating a baby carriage orstroller, ushering small children, accommodating physical and visuallimitations of the elderly or handicapped, and others. Access for everyone should be provided in a manner which provides an interesting and positive pedestrian experience and which preserves human dignity.facades3. BlankThe placement of street-level building facades which contain expanses ofwall area with no windows, no entrances, and no other elements orfeatures providing pedestrian interest and supporting pedestrian circulation and activity represent a serious detriment to the vitality and viability of apedestrian-oriented street environment. The continuity of lively, invitingand visually appealing street-level facades is extremely important inencouraging pedestrian movement. When blank facades are located inmid-block areas, they tend to create gaps in this continuity which theaverage shopper or tourist will find at least disheartening and at most adeterrent to proceeding further along a particular street. When suchfacades are located at corners of blocks, they effectively can isolate entireblocks or areas of the Downtown from lively and frequent pedestriancirculation.Blank facades located along pedestrian-oriented streets or along publiclyaccessible open space are discouraged. The maximum length of blank orundifferentiated facades should not exceed thirty feet generally throughout the Downtown, and should not exceed 15 feet within the PedestrianActivities District. The preferred manner for differentiating a façade is toincorporate additional storefronts or with display windows and entrancesas frequently as possible. For interior uses which require large volumes of windowless space, every effort should be made to contain these useswithin the central portion of a site away from street fronting facades of the building. Having such uses on the interior of a site allows the perimeter of the property to retain pedestrian-oriented use.In some cases, due to topographic change or windowless interior useswhich cannot be located in any other portion of a site, building entrancesand large windows may not be feasible. In such situations, it is importantthat the design of such facades incorporate significant features of visualinterest which will maintain the interest of the pedestrian. Such featuresmight include relatively shallow display cases or display windows,substantial three-dimensional architectural ornamentation or artistictreatment, the incorporation of some special water or landscape feature, or some combination of thereof. Any such special feature should relatepositively to the character of the remainder of the building, and tosurrounding buildings.features4. SpecialA variety of special building and street features have been explored incities across the country in attempts to address sometimes adverse climatic conditions while providing enhanced pedestrian comfort. Incorporation of any of these features requires extreme care first in understanding theimpact such a feature might have on the character and quality of street-level pedestrian activity, and second on the relationship such features have to a historic building context and to special qualities such as viewcorridors and prominent gateway entrances to the City.- Arcades: Arcades are roofed passages with shops on one or bothsides. The most common situations find arcades placed along a streetfrontage, with the first floor retail space set back beneath an overhangcreated by the upper floors of the rest of the building. Arcades, by virtueof the overhang, provide protection from rain, snow, and direct sunlight.Such arcades are not generally found today in Downtown Portland,although historically such protection from the elements was often found asa result of an extensive use of retractable awnings placed on manycommercial buildings. Issues which should be considered whenincorporating such features include: preserving existing street walls while comfortably integrating these features into an existing streetscape;assuring that active uses are placed along the recessed street level;assuring that an adequate but not excessive pedestrian circulation area isprovided; and assuring that ample lighting and pedestrian interest ismaintained. Arcade lighting should thoroughly light the interior of thearcade, with no dark areas or shadowy corners within the arcade. Anyattempts to incorporate arcades on existing buildings should take care notto detract from the existing building’s character nor remove or obscuresignificant features of historic properties.A second type of arcade is the through-block connection, where a passageway is created linking one street typically with another parallel street. Particularly in long blocks, such connections should encourage pedestrian circulation between active pedestrian-oriented streets and between such streets and specific activity generators such as hotels, major office or retail buildings, and convention or cultural facilities. In a few selective instances, there may be an opportunity to expand such a through-block connection into a galleria, or larger pedestrian open space which becomes a major pedestrian destination in itself. Dead-end arcades, or arcades which may make a connection to a single destination anchor, such as an art museum, must be carefully considered to assure that the pedestrian connection can remain safe, pleasant, and viable at times when activity at the anchor is low or non-existent.For this second type of arcade to be successful, the level of activity anticipated must be carefully examined and the character and quality of design must be exceptional. Special care must be taken in the siting of all such interior connections to provide active uses along the arcade while assuring that existing street-fronting pedestrian uses are not diminished in their attractiveness to pedestrian circulation and activity.Where all of the above issues have been carefully addressed, these various types of arcades can be a positive contribution to the pedestrian streetscape.- Skywalks and elevated walkways: The introduction of covered or fully enclosed walkways bridging over streets and connecting the second stories of buildings have been implemented in a variety of cities and situations around this country and in Canada. The extent of such systems can range substantially, from a relatively simple connection between a hotel or office building to a parking garage, to an extensive system tying together large portions of downtowns through interior climate-controlled passageways. Studies of those skywalk systems reveal a number of critical issues which must be addressed before any such program, large or small, is undertaken in Downtown Portland. Consideration must be given to the following:i. the impact of such an upper level system on existing street-level activity and businesses, respecting the principle thatthe character and liveliness of the street-level pedestrianenvironment is of utmost importance and should bereinforced at every opportunity;ii. the potential segregation of users who might frequent the walkway system versus the street, respecting the principleof Downtown Vision that for Portland to take the greatestadvantage of its urban character, all people regardless ofsocial or economic status must come together to share in acommon experience;iii. the potential impact of such a system on the visualcharacter of Downtown Portland, with concerns over theintegration of such construction with a largely historicbuilding environment and the potential visual obstructionswhich could detract from the character of the Downtown oreliminate significant views to natural or buildinglandmarks; andiv. the need for a coordinate program of provision andmaintenance of any such system, assuring universalparticipation of property owners along a particular route,common levels of maintenance and hours of access, andadequate levels of pedestrian activity, supportingpedestrian-oriented uses, and pedestrian interest andamenity.Downtown Vision, the Plan for Portland’s Downtown, doesnot incorporate a comprehensive network of skywalks dueto the numerous critical issues cited above. In specialcircumstances, however, the provision of skywalks may bedesirable. The provision of any such system should not beapproved until the Planning Board and the City Councildetermine that all issues are suitably addressed andresolved in favor of an enhanced pedestrian environment.Easements and site plans should not be approved until theseissues are suitably resolved.- Street closings and pedestrian malls: The closure of public streets to create pedestrian malls has been tried with mixed success in a variety of situations around the country and abroad. The range of possibilities intended to encourage pedestrian activity on key streets runs from total prohibition of vehicles, to access for public transit and high ridership vehicles only, to closure only on special occasions (i.e. street fairs or carnivals) or for weekend shopping and entertainment (at a time when deliveries and service access demands are at a minimum). The trend in recent years has been to re-open those streets once completely closed to vehicular traffic. In any of the possible scenarios, consideration must be given to the following:i. the relationship of vehicular traffic, visibility from vehicles,on-street parking, and drop-off areas to the businesses andinstitutions along the streets that would be closed orrestricted;ii. the effect of closure on maintaining necessary access forservice and deliveries; andiii. the design and dimensions of the street, focusing on thescale and character of the space to be devoted to pedestriancirculation. The expected number of pedestrians must berelated to the amount of space to be provided to assure thatadequate space is provided. Interaction and face-to-facecontacts are important to lively pedestrian space therefore itis also important that excessive space does not create asense of low activity or diminish the interpersonal contacts.The quality, quantity, and character of pedestrian amenities,including such features as paving materials, lighting,benches and other seating, public art, landscaping, andstreet entertainment are all important design andprogramming issues vital to a lively pedestrianenvironment.In general, the permanent closure of streets in theDowntown is discouraged. A proposal for any suchpedestrian mall should not be approved until the PlanningBoard and City Council have determined that all suchissues have been suitably addressed and resolved in favorof a viable business and cultural economy and an enhancedpedestrian environment. For proposals for extensiveclosures or for closure of significant streets, a trial period orportion of closure should be instituted prior to committingpermanent alterations and improvements.B. Pedestrian Activities District (PAD)Standard: “In addition to subsection 1 (a through d), proposed development and substantial building alterations located within the Pedestrian Activities District (PAD) overlay zone . . . shall be designed and constructed to accommodate pedestrian-oriented uses at the street level. Proposed development located within the PAD encouragement areas which is not initially constructed to accommodate pedestrian-oriented activities at the street-level shall be designed to have the capability of accommodating pedestrian-oriented uses through non-structural building alterations.”Factors that should be considered include:1. Exterior design of street level building façadeThe design of the exterior street-level façade should consider the visualrelationship of proposed or potential entrances, window, and display openings tothe overall design of the building. The introduction of new window or dooropenings or the shifting of openings should be considered in the initial façadedesign to assure that what may initially be a balanced and appropriate design for a façade is flexible over time and that future changes might be anticipated to assure future compatibility.2. Design and placement of impenetrable exterior building featuresIn portions of buildings where street-level pedestrian-oriented uses are required or encouraged, it is important to locate impenetrable features (i.e. columns, piers,bearing walls, retaining walls, and mechanical/h.v.a.c. equipment) in suchlocations that do not create obstacles to accessible and viable pedestrian uses.Such features, by their very presence and by the difficulty and associated expense with which they might be modified, can become impediments to street-level uses or to future renovation which will accommodate such uses.andaccessibility to the street3. OrientationThe design and construction of street-level facades along pedestrian orientedstreets should assure that street-fronting uses would be oriented to and accessible from the street wherever feasible. Orientation to the street should involvesignificant and prominent entrance opportunities, significant visibility of interioruses from the street, and prominent signage, awnings, or other identification ofinterior uses. Such orientation should not have the appearance of a serviceentrance or “back door”, but rather should appear as a primary, inviting pedestrian entrance to the building.Accessibility from the street should be provided wherever feasible. Finished floor elevations and entrance elevations relative to sidewalk topographic elevationsshould be established with the intention of maximizing opportunities for building entrances along street4. Adequacy of interior layoutJust as impenetrable exterior building features can be an obstacle to use of street-level building floor area, the interior layout of such space can impact its viability for pedestrian uses. The first forty (40) feet of floor area along specified streetfrontages in the Pedestrian Activities District should be laid out to accommodateretail or other pedestrian oriented uses. An approximately comparable portion of floor areas along PAD encouragement areas should be designed and constructedto accommodate the broadest possible variety of floor layouts, or be able to bemodified at reasonable cost to accommodate future pedestrian oriented uses.Placement of exterior building features as in (b) above, as well as the placementof interior features such as columns, bearing walls, stairs, elevators, andmechanical systems should support the layout of pedestrian oriented uses ratherthan divide a space into areas which can be difficult to utilize effectively or withflexibility.5. Continuity of street level usesContinuity of pedestrian-oriented uses along designated street frontages isimportant to encourage pedestrian interest, movement and safety. Whereverpossible, service entrances and vehicular entrances to parking lots, parkinggarages, drive-thru services, or other similar uses which interrupt the continuity ofstreet-level uses should not be located along pedestrian oriented streets. Wheresuch uses are unavoidable, extraordinary care should be taken to assure that thepedestrian environment remains both attractive and safe, and such interruptionsshould be kept to a minimum in both numbers of lengths. In such instances, thepedestrian should clearly have priority. Pedestrian paving patterns shouldcontinue across driveway entrances and should remain flush, with no steps orsignificant ramping introduced in order to accommodate vehicular access.Vehicular speeds should be kept to an absolute minimum. Lighting should assureboth pedestrian comfort and safety.C. Sidewalk Areas and Open SpaceStandard: “The design of publicly accessible sidewalk areas and open space shallcomplement the general pattern of the Downtown pedestrian environment, conform with special City of Portland streetscape programs described in the Technical and DesignStandards and Guidelines, and enhance the attractiveness, comfort, security, andusability of the pedestrian environment.”crosswalk,and street paving materials1. Sidewalk,- Sidewalk: The design and construction of sidewalks and openspace paving are important components of the pedestrian environment.Historically, the Downtown has been characterized by brick sidewalks andthe City’s general sidewalk maintenance and reconstruction program callsfor brick sidewalks. Important factors which must be of concern in theinstallation and maintenance of brick sidewalks include the compatibilitywith adjoining or nearby paving surfaces, the appropriateness of thepaving material in relation to proposed or existing buildings which areadjacent to the sidewalk, appropriateness during all seasons, and thecharacter, durability, and ease of maintenance of the proposed material.。