高考听力该不该取消_高中作文
文化自信的高二作文800字
文化自信的高二作文800字以文化自信为话题的高中作文篇1中国，四大文明古国之一，经历历史长河的洗涤、冲刷、激荡，酝酿了中国上下五千年的中华文化。
你我何其幸运，生在这样一个国度，同时拥有儒家、法家、道家等文化可以学习，有五十六个民族多姿多彩的传统可以继承。
然而，我们是否知道自己正与中华文化渐行渐远呢?会写汉字就行，为了学好英语放弃汉语的思想在中小学生中滋长，中华文化何在?中国成语、诗词被肆意篡改，错别字现象普遍，中华文化何在?英文歌曲在中国的大街小巷回荡，旋律冲击着中国人的耳膜，中华文化何在?《诗经》《论语》《大学》等经典国学被国人忽视，手机网络小说充斥国人的生活，中华文化何在?明清以前，中国一直以一个大国的形象屹立在世界的东方，中国的瓷器、茶叶等珍品经丝绸之路远销世界，中国的文化影响了日本、韩国等国家。
正是因为这些成就，中国统治者盲目自大，刚愎自用，开始闭关锁国，与世界脱轨，直至西方的洋枪、洋炮打开中国的国门，中国才开始被迫接受西方殖民文化。
曾经为了文明、科学，我们舍弃了国学，拥抱了洋文，国学地位每况愈下，中文式微的背景下，我们的精神产品还剩多少?连唱歌娱乐节目都靠引进，我们的文化还剩多少?这是一个非正统教育培养起来的作家获得一个诺贝尔文学奖，央视办一个汉字听写大赛就能扭转的吗?携卷沉思，我们该如何让中华文化自信重建?最近一段时间，各地的高考改革方案陆续出台，英语科目成了最大的输家。
英语听力将被取消;尝试“一年两考”，只以等级形式呈现;语文卷增至180分，英语试卷减至100分……英语高考改革并非空穴来风，语文升、英语降的背后是中华文化的自信重建。
语文乃思想文化的载体，先在语言上自信，这样文化才能坚挺，创新上才能勃发。
文化自信源于中国经济的崛起，文化自信是必需的，可文化自信的路线图在哪里?从塑造社会人的基础教育入手应该是一个好入口。
中华民族的伟大复兴是我们的使命，中华文化自信重建更是每个国人沉甸甸的责任。
对浙江省取消高考英语听力的几点看法
从有利于学生长远的发展 样， 是汲取语言知识的手段。同时， 它与说话相结合， 能遵循英语语言教学规律，
%& 建议大学英语教师从新生的 实 际 听 说 水 平 出
发， 做好与高中英语的衔接教学。 听力不是一种孤立 （ . ）语音是语言的物质载体， 的语言能力， 而是一种阅读理解、 阅读速度、 词汇量、 语法结构、 语言知识以及听力理解的综合能力。因此， 词汇量 （ ’ ）由于英语听力的提高除了基础不好、 的原因就是对英语国家的背景知之甚少。 而中学英语 教学对这方面向来不够重视， 因此大学教师应多结合 文化背景教学来提高听力理解能力。 如英语角、 英语调 （ % ）同 时 开 辟 课 外 听 说 渠 道 ， （ 8 ） 有条件的学校鼓励学生多到网络自主学习 跟读等听说 中心， 如 到 09: 自 主 学 习 中 心 进 行 听 读 、 练习。 （责任编辑 张茂林）
省一直采用全国英语高考试题， 其中听力为 %" 分占总 受高考英语测试的正面调控作用， 同时， 中 分的 $ ! % 。 学英语这几年正处于新课程标准的宣传、 试点和全面 实施阶段， 师生对听说技能的训练空前重视。随着高 考听力难度的逐年增加，学生的听力技能也逐年提 高。“取消”这一决定引起了广大中学和大学教师的 特别是听力教学带来负面的影响。 一、 中学英语教师对此的看法
!( 与浙江省新出台的鼓励中 学 生 参 加 全 国 英 语
等级考试政策自相矛盾 为了强化高中英语教学中听说读写能力， 尤其是 听说能力的培养，促进高中学生的英语综合能力， 浙 江 省 将 在 普 通 高 中 教 育 阶 段 从 !""# 年 起 引 入 全 国 英 级考试等测评形式为一体的英语教学评估体系。 全国 教育部考试中 英语等级考试（ )*+, ）由 教 育 部 主 办 ， 心设计的以测试参考者英语知识和交际能力的硬性 英语水平测试体系。该项考试通过对考生听、 说、 读、 写等能力的全面考查， 综合评价测试者英语水平和英 语交际能力。与高中生 有 关 的 )*+, 二 级 是 该 体 系 的 的英语水平， 参加该级别考试的考生应掌握 !""" 个左 右的词汇及相关词组。)*+, 三级是该体系的中间级， 其考试要求相当于高中毕业后在大专院校又学习了 两年公共英语或自学了同等程度英语课程的水平， 参 关词组。 每个级别分笔试（包括听力）和口试两部分。 想以此来弥补 “取消” 将给中学英语教学带来的影 响。 此举是否与中学英语新课程标准的九个级别相融 合？会不会给中学生带来新的负担？是不是符合中学 生的实际？会不会受到学生的积极响应， 从而起到对
英语不应该退出高考辩论赛
英语不应该退出高考辩论赛篇一：应不应该废除死刑英语辩论赛Debate motion: wether death penalty should be abolished or not?A(应保留): Our debate motion today is whether death penalty should be abolished or not. My side insist that it should not.Death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a felony. As early as there is a law, death penalty has come into being. Even in modern society, it is still necessary. As all the nations are trying to build a law-governed society, death penalty can work as a powerful legal method to guarantee the stability of society and protect the right of the majority of people. A criminal may stop halfway as soon as he thinks up that death is the most likely outcome of his criminal acts.B(应废除): While the government should punish the crime,but we should not curb the violence with violence.Theright to life is the most essential human rights, all of the rights are on premise of life.Criminals should enjoy life rights as the same as ordinary people.And there is no any evidence show that the incident of cases have inevitable connection with the existing of capital punishment so far. And the death penalty is not more deterrent than life imprisonment. Long terms of Imprisonment have the similar effect in In terms of crime prevention.A: My opponent say that death penalty cannot deter crime, since there is no obvious increase in crime rate after death penalty is abolished.Many variables make it hard to tell what the exact influence of death penalty has on crime rates. In addition, according to New York Times, there is only one death penalty in 300 murders. Lack of samples also makes the statistics ueliable. So there is no direct proof that can deny the deterrence of death penalty.However, those countries which banned death penalty always have a high democracy index as well as a high human development index.B: Besides being Influenced by the uncultured homomorphic revenge, death penalty has another problem---- false adjudications. False adjudications cause many innocents dead not only in abroad but also inhomeland. According to New York Times' statistics,in late 20 years, about 102 innocents was sentenced to death in the U.S.Our country also has such bloody lessons during the Cultural Revolution.What’smore, there is no opportunity to remedy the consequences of misjudgment of the death penalty.A: My opponent also mention erroneous adjudications. But nothing can be perfect. We should not abolish death penalty just because a tiny possibility of erroneous adjudications. Especially when we have other ways to reduce erroneous adjudications, like to investigate more carefully or improve the law.B: Besides this aspect,every law should suit the people's wish. Abolishing death penalty is the demand of international society and the people.According a survey from china survey,65.8% netizens approved of banning,only 34.1% insisted on remaining. From all the data above,we can draw a conclusion that banning the capital punishment is not only international demand,but also the people's needs.A: Since we mention the people's needs here,we could not forget the victim and their families' needs .Togive up putting an extreme criminal to death so easily is against the equality of life and invades the victims’dignity of life. It's better to protect cas(来自: 小龙文档网:英语不应该退出高考辩论赛)ualty rights than protect the criminal human rights.B: If one day the death penalty has no longer necessary, it will be a new chapter of the history of human civilization. of course,it will be a long process.But now,we also need to constantly improve our laws, not to put any innocent person to death execution ground.篇二：辩论赛-当前中国义务教育阶段应不应该取消英语必修课-反方四辩稿第一点、对方辩友（）。
高中英语作文范文指导与仿写
高中英语作文范文指导与仿写想要在高考英语作文中拿高分，背诵一些范文是很要必要的，但是会背更应该会仿写。
同时在写作时，一定要一定要有决心把它写好，有信心把意思表达清楚。
还要注意清英语中的表达习惯。
善于仿写一些同学的办法往往是背一堆范文，然后再到考场上进行一个“剪切”、“粘贴”的工作，真正的模仿重点永远要放在一定的句式结构上，而非个别的词汇。
有一个句式说：“…for the simple reason that…”表示某种现象的原因是什么，用在高考课程写作中，我们就可以拿来解释为什么自行车在中国如此的流行：“The bicycle is very popularin China for the simple reason that…”。
然而，很多同学一谈到原因仍然是“…because…”。
如果要表示“总是能够”的概念，很多同学提笔就会写canalways，但理想的句子应该是用双重否定表示强烈的肯定，用neverfailto。
要细心观察注意英语中一些表达上的习惯。
比如在正式文体的写作中，很少用“itisn’t”这样的略缩形式，而往往是一板一眼地写作“itisnot”。
同理，在正式文体中的日期一般不缩写，阿拉伯数字一般会用英文表达特别长的数字除外。
许多同学在写作文时，习惯于把“since”“because”“for”这样的词放在句首引导原因状语从句。
事实上，在我们见到的英语报刊杂志文章中，这样的从句一般都是放在主句之后的。
另外，中小学辅导网要灵活变通在批改过上万份同学们英语课程作文中，经常能发现一些将中文生硬地翻译成英文的表达法。
有一句话叫做“立志如山，行道如水”，写英文作文，一定要有决心把它写好，有信心把意思表达清楚，这是“立志如山”;但关键是遇到问题时要有个灵活的态度，能像流水一样变通解决问题。
有个翻译界的故事说：在某大型国际会议的招待会上，一道菜是用鸡蛋做的。
与会的客人问翻译：“What is it made of”本来是非常简单的一个问题，结果翻译太紧张，忘了“egg”这个词，但是他急中生智，回答：“It is made of MissHen’sson.”这里，就是一个灵活变通的范例。
2023年高考作文押题：英语教学比重没有必要降低
2023年高考作文押题：英语教学比重没有必要降低阅读下面的材料，根据要求写作。
材料一：中美高层战略对话会上，女翻译官张京强势出圈，圈粉无数。
当时中美对话争锋相对，为回击美方，中国外交官员作了近二十分钟的即兴发言，张京临危不乱，流畅自如、完整准确完成任务，展现了新时代大国外交人员的风采。
材料二：两会有代表建议取消英语在中小学的主课地位，不再将英语或外语设为高考必考科目，同时禁止义务教育阶段学生参加非官方的各种外语考试，让学生用更多时间学好母语，培养独立思考能力、实践能力和创新能力。
英语在现代社会、生活中的作用毋庸置疑，张京的出圈，就是英语在中国与世界交流、竞争时重要作用的一个缩影。
而全民学习英语耗时耗力，甚至远超学习母语，也是一个不争的事实。
降低英语教学在基础教育中的地位的呼声，日趋强烈。
英语教学的比重或轻或重，对于国家和百姓都影响深远。
对此也许你有自己的思考，请综合材料，自拟标题，发表自己的主张，不得泄露个人信息，不少于800字。
要求：结合材料，选好角度，确定立意，明确文体，自拟标题；不要套作，不得抄袭。
【分析】材料一列举女翻译官张京在中美高层战略对话会上强势出圈以及圈粉无数的事例强调英语在现代社会、生活中的作用；材料二列举两会有代表建议取消英语在中小学的主课地位，不再将英语或外语设为高考必考的科目引发考生思考。
引导语针对全民学习英语耗时耗力，甚至远超学习母语的事实，提出是否降低英语教学在基础教育中的地位的问题，要求考生发表主张。
英语教学的比重或轻或重，对于国家和百姓都有影响深远，考生要立足于此作出自己的判断和理解。
英语在现代社会、生活中的作用毋庸置疑，张京的出圈，就是英语在中国与世界交流、竞争时重要作用的一个缩影。
而全民学习英语耗时耗力，甚至远超学习母语，也是一个不争的事实。
“降低英语教学在基础教育中的地位的呼声，日趋强烈”这两句暗示考生对两则材料的价值取舍不是非此即彼，而是既不能忽视英语的重要作用，又要解决全民学习英语耗时耗力，甚至远超学习母语的问题。
为什么高考不能取消英语 英语作文
高考英语：为何不可或缺In the modern era of globalization, the significance of English as a language of communication and cultural exchange has become increasingly apparent. Despite the widespread availability of translation tools and technologies, English remains a vital skill for individuals seeking education, employment, and success in today's interconnected world. This is particularly evident in the context of the Chinese education system, where the importance of English is underscored by its inclusion inthe national college entrance examination—the Gaokao. The question of whether or not the Gaokao should eliminate English is a complex one, and in this essay, we willexplore the reasons why English cannot be removed from this exam.**1. English as a Global Language**English is the most widely spoken language in the world, with over 1.5 billion native speakers and over 700 million non-native speakers. It is the official language of over 50 countries and is widely used in international organizations, business, technology, and academia. The Gaokao, as anational-level exam, aims to prepare students for the challenges of the real world. By including English, it ensures that students are equipped with the necessary language skills to compete effectively in the global marketplace.**2. English for Educational Opportunities**English is a key component of higher education and research in many disciplines, including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Many of the world's top universities and research institutions require proficiencyin English for admission and participation. By including English in the Gaokao, China ensures that its students have the opportunity to access these prestigious institutionsand engage in cutting-edge research.**3. English for Career Prospects**In today's globalized economy, employers increasingly value candidates who possess strong English communication skills. English is the language of international business, and proficiency in it can open up a wide range of career opportunities, particularly in fields such as international trade, finance, and technology. By including English in theGaokao, China is preparing its students for success in the global job market.**4. English for Cultural Exchange**English is not just a language; it is also a window to a rich cultural heritage and a vehicle for cross-cultural understanding. By learning English, students gain access to a vast library of literary works, historical documents, and artistic expressions. They are also able to engage in meaningful dialogues with people from diverse cultural backgrounds, fostering mutual respect and understanding. The inclusion of English in the Gaokao encourages students to embrace cultural diversity and to become active participants in global cultural exchange.**5. The Role of Translation Tools**While translation tools and technologies have made significant progress in recent years, they still fall short in many areas, particularly in terms of contextual understanding and nuanced expressions. Furthermore, these tools often require a solid foundation of English language skills to operate effectively. By including English in the Gaokao, China is ensuring that its students have a solidgrasp of the language, enabling them to make full use of translation tools when necessary.In conclusion, the inclusion of English in the Gaokaois crucial for preparing students for the challenges of the globalized world. It equips them with the necessary language skills for education, employment, and cultural exchange, enabling them to compete effectively in the international arena. While the role of translation tools and technologies cannot be ignored, they are no substitute for a solid foundation of English language skills. Therefore, the Gaokao should retain English as an essential component of its examination system.**高考英语：为何不可或缺**在全球化日益深入的现代，英语作为交流和文化交换的语言，其重要性越来越明显。
上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试
上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试1.引言1.1背景介绍上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试近年来，随着中国的经济发展和对外交往的不断加强，外语教育在中国的重要性日益凸显。
作为中国最大的城市之一，上海一直致力于提高居民的外语水平，以满足日益增长的国际交流需求。
高考作为中国学生升入大学的重要考试，对外语的测试也逐渐加强，从简单的单项选择题，发展到涵盖听力和口语的综合考察。
上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试是上海市教育局为了更好地评估学生外语水平而进行的一项重大改革。
本次测试旨在全面提高对学生外语听力和口语技能的考察，并进一步培养学生的实际语言运用能力。
通过这一测试的引入，上海的高考评价体系将更符合国际水平，为学生的大学教育和未来的就业提供更加有力的保障。
在上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试中，听力部分将重点测试学生在真实场景下听取外语材料的能力。
学生将通过听取录音或实地采访等形式，来理解并回答针对材料内容的问题。
这样的测试方式有助于提升学生对真实语言环境的适应能力，培养学生理解和应对各种语言语调和背景的能力。
另外，听说测试部分将更加注重学生的口语交际能力。
学生将参与与考官或其他考生的口语对话，通过表达自己的意见和观点，讨论和解决问题。
这种交流和互动的方式，将更加贴近实际生活和工作场景，有助于培养学生自信和流利地表达自己的能力。
除了测试形式的改变，上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试还将加大对学生综合语言运用能力的考察。
学生需要在各项能力中均能得到全面的锻炼：从听力和口语的积累，到阅读和写作的实践。
通过这种全面的考察方式，上海的高考将更加体现语言的综合能力，更加精确地评估学生的实际外语水平。
上海2025年高考外语听力与听说测试的引入将对学生的外语学习和教育产生深远影响。
学生在备战高考的过程中将更加注重听力和口语能力的培养，提高他们在真实语言环境中的应对能力。
同时，这一改革将促使学校和教师改变传统的语言教学方式，更加注重学生的实际语言运用和交流能力的培养。
高考英语减分弊大于利,辩论一辩
高考英语减分弊大于利,辩论一辩篇一：一辩陈词《高考英语改革利大于弊》尊敬的主席对方辩友观众大家好。
大家都知道北京高考英语科目分值将下调50分向“一年两考”过渡，学生可多次参加，按最好成绩计入高考总分，成绩3年内有效。
那么你对英语高考改革的利与弊是如何看待的呢？我方的观点是，英语高考改革利大于弊。
原因有三：1、从语言角度看。
高考英语改革，将从考试英语向实用英语转换，回归交流工具的本质。
英语高考试题取消传统的语法选择题，改为语段填空、增加词汇题、翻译题。
从此我们可以看出，英语考试更突出语言的实际应用，回归到学科应有的位置上，突出基础知识、基本能力。
如此下去定将打破曾经的学而不能致用的哑巴英语。
这就从客观上肯定了高考英语改革利大于弊。
2、从学生本身角度看。
英语改革，既为学生减少了学习英语的时间与精力，又为学生减轻了英语的负担，还为其他学科挤出了复习时间。
高考英语回归基础，所以对学生本身来讲是更易掌握，从而减少了时间精力。
再举个例子若A同学在高二的时候就成功的完成了英语高考，那么从此以后他就可以将原本学习英语的时间分配给其他科目，这样不仅减少了英语的负担，还提高了其他科目的成绩。
这样刚好解决了，曾经英语学科的高负担高压力的问题。
这又一步的肯定了高考英语改革利大于弊。
3、从老师的角度看。
英语改革为英语教学提供了改革空间。
由于英语高考改革为一年两考，这就给教师带来了个前所未有的问题。
那就是，部分学生通过了考试，部分没有通过，那么教师此时该如何进行教学？这是个创新性的问题。
同时高考改革将改变曾经英语教学偏重对单词的记忆，语法的讲授，再掌握考试技巧便可及格的定律。
其会使教师更加注重如何教授学生应用英语。
由此显而易见高考英语改革利大于弊。
综上三点所述，我方一致认为：高考英语改革利大于弊。
谢谢篇二：高考英语降低权重利大于弊一辩稿谢谢主席，各位评委，各位观众，大家好，今天我方的观点是高考降低英语权重利大于弊。
我们先开宗明义，‘权重’是指标在整体评价中的重要程度。
高考必考英语作文带翻译(精选8篇)
高考必考英语作文带翻译(精选8篇)高考必考英语作文带翻译篇1Today, as the development of the technology, people live a much better life than before, the average wage is promoted highly. The economy develops at the cost of polluting the environment, we can see the pollution everywhere, like the river water is dirty, the situation is so serious that we must take some action to control the environmental pollution. First, we should not throw away the rubbish, whenever we have rubbish at hand, we should keep the habit to throw it into the dustbin, sometimes the garbage can be recycled. Second, the government should make some measure to punish the industry which is not deal with the pollution well. With the government’s intervention, the businessmen will pay special attention to the pollution and dare not to ignore it. Protecting the environment needs everyone’s effort, to ourselves and our offspring’s health, we must take action to protect the environment.今天，随着科技的发展，人们比之前生活得更好，平均工资也大幅度提升。
取消英语作为高考必考科目英语作文
取消英语作为高考必考科目英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1Title: Should English Be Removed as a Compulsory Subject in College Entrance ExaminationIntroductionEnglish has been a compulsory subject in college entrance examinations for many years. However, some people argue that it should be removed as a compulsory subject. In this essay, I will examine the arguments for and against this proposition.Arguments in Favor of Removing English as a Compulsory Subject1. English is not a necessary skill for all students: Some students may have little interest or aptitude for English, and forcing them to study it as a compulsory subject may lead to frustration and a waste of time and resources.2. English proficiency can be gained through other means: In today's globalized world, there are many opportunities to improve English proficiency through online resources, languageexchange programs, and immersion experiences. Students who are motivated to learn English will find ways to do so without being required to study it in school.3. The current English curriculum may not be effective: Some critics argue that the current curriculum for teaching English in schools may be outdated or ineffective. Removing English as a compulsory subject would allow educators to rethink and redesign the curriculum to better meet the needs of students.Arguments Against Removing English as a Compulsory Subject1. English is a basic skill for communication: In today's interconnected world, English has become a lingua franca for international communication. Proficiency in English is essential for students who wish to work or study abroad, as well as for those who want to access a wide range of information and resources online.2. English proficiency is a requirement for many jobs: Many employers require candidates to have a certain level of English proficiency, regardless of the field they work in. Removing English as a compulsory subject may put students at a disadvantage when seeking employment opportunities.3. Learning a second language has cognitive benefits: Studies have shown that learning a second language can have cognitive benefits, such as improved memory, problem-solving skills, and creativity. By removing English as a compulsory subject, students may miss out on these benefits.ConclusionIn conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that English should remain a compulsory subject in college entrance examinations. English proficiency is a valuable skill that can open up many opportunities for students in today's globalized world. However, I also believe that the current curriculum for teaching English should be reviewed and updated to ensure that it is effective in helping students develop the necessary language skills.篇2The debate surrounding whether English should be a required subject in the college entrance examination (Gaokao) in China has been ongoing for years. Those in favor of keeping English as a compulsory subject argue that it is a global language necessary for communication and can provide more opportunities for students. Conversely, opponents believe thatthe current English education system in China has major flaws and that forcing students to pass an English exam may not accurately reflect their language proficiency. In my opinion, I believe that English should no longer be a mandatory subject in the Gaokao for several reasons.First and foremost, the current English education system in China places too much emphasis on exam-oriented learning rather than practical language skills. Students spend years memorizing vocabulary and grammar rules in order to pass the high-stakes exam, but they often struggle to use English inreal-life situations. This results in a lack of practical language proficiency among students, which defeats the purpose of learning a language in the first place. Canceling English as a mandatory subject in the Gaokao would allow students to focus on developing genuine language skills rather than just preparing for an exam.Furthermore, the implementation of English as a compulsory subject in the Gaokao has led to an increase in stress and pressure on students. Many students feel overwhelmed by the need to excel in English in addition to other subjects, leading to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression. By removing English as a required subject, students would have theopportunity to explore other areas of interest and reduce the burden of excessive studying and exam pressure.Additionally, canceling English as a mandatory subject in the Gaokao would promote diversity and allow students to pursue their unique interests and talents. Not all students have an aptitude for languages, and forcing them to pass an English exam may hinder their academic performance and overallwell-being. By allowing students to choose whether or not to study English, they can focus on subjects that they excel in and are passionate about, leading to a more well-rounded education system.Moreover, with the advancement of technology and globalization, English is becoming more accessible and integrated into our daily lives. Many students have access to English language learning resources outside of the classroom, such as online courses and language exchange programs. Therefore, mandating English as a required subject in the Gaokao may be unnecessary as students can independently improve their language skills through these alternative methods.In conclusion, I believe that canceling English as a mandatory subject in the Gaokao would benefit students by reducing stress, promoting diversity, and allowing for a more practical andeffective language learning experience. While English is undoubtedly an important language for communication and global opportunities, the current education system in China needs to be reformed to better serve the needs and well-being of students. By giving students the choice to study English based on their interests and abilities, we can create a more balanced and inclusive education system.篇3Canceling English as a compulsory subject in the college entrance examination has sparked a heated debate in recent years. Supporters argue that students should have the freedom to choose their own paths of study, while opponents believe that English proficiency is essential in today's globalized world. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the argument and present my own opinion.On one hand, those in favor of canceling English in the college entrance examination believe that forcing students to study a subject they may not be interested in or excel at is counterproductive. They argue that students should be allowed to focus on subjects that align with their strengths and interests, rather than being required to dedicate time and effort to a subject that may not benefit them in the long run. Furthermore,they believe that removing English from the high-stakes exam will reduce the pressure on students and allow them to pursue their passions without the fear of failure.On the other hand, opponents of canceling English as a compulsory subject argue that English proficiency is crucial in today's globalized world. They point out that English is the lingua franca of business, science, and technology, and that proficiency in the language can open up a world of opportunities for students. Additionally, they argue that removing English from the college entrance examination could lead to a decline in the overall English proficiency of students, putting them at a disadvantage in the global job market.In my opinion, while I understand the arguments of both sides, I believe that canceling English as a compulsory subject in the college entrance examination would be a mistake. English proficiency is indeed essential in today's world, and removing it from the exam could have negative repercussions for students in the long run. However, I also believe that students should have the freedom to choose their own paths of study and should not be forced to study subjects that do not interest them.Instead of canceling English as a compulsory subject, I believe that the education system should be reformed to betteraccommodate the needs and interests of students. Schools should offer a wide range of elective courses in addition to the core subjects, allowing students to tailor their education to their individual strengths and interests. This would give students the opportunity to explore their passions and develop skills that will benefit them in the future, while still ensuring that they have a strong foundation in English and other essential subjects.In conclusion, canceling English as a compulsory subject in the college entrance examination is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While I believe that English proficiency is essential in today's globalized world, I also believe that students should have the freedom to choose their own paths of study. By reforming the education system to better accommodate the needs and interests of students, we can ensure that students receive a well-rounded education that prepares them for success in the future.。
树立文化自信的高三作文800字汇总
树立文化自信的高三作文800字汇总我们要找回我们的文化自信，让中国文化雄立于世界文化之林!这里给大家分享一些以树立文化自信为话题的高中作文，希望对大家有所帮助。
以树立文化自信为话题的高中作文篇1“哒哒哒”的敲击声已成为当下随处可见的一种现象，还会有多少人愿意拿起笔在纸上书写我们的中国汉字;电子书及各类被大众追捧的打油诗等被人们当作了工作学习之外的生活调味品，还会有多少人愿意耐下性子手捧着厚厚的一本书在汉字之间品味中华文化的博大精深;每年都会有大批人为过“洋节”忙得不亦说乎，还会有多少人愿意关注一下属于我们自己的中国节日，重温一下中华上下五千年的历史变迁…………种种文化缺失的现象无疑不在向国家、社会、人民传达着一个危险的信号，我们需要点亮中华文化自信之灯，让它永葆青春和活力，永远点亮在我们每一位国人心中。
习总书记曾多次在会议中指出“文化是一个国家、一个民族的灵魂。
文化兴国运兴，文化强民族强。
没有高度的文化自信，没有文化的繁荣兴盛，就没有中华民族伟大复兴。
”当下党正带领各族人民为实现中华民族伟大复兴而砥砺奋进，如何提高文化软实力，建立文化自信成为了我们首要迫切解决的问题，为此需要国家、社会、人民各方的协同配合。
点亮中华文化自信之灯需要国家各项制度设施的有效保障。
“没有规矩不成方圆”，文化自信的回归需要国家在文化方面各项_制度政策的颁布实施及一些必要的文化设施的组织建立安排，提高公共文化服务水平，让世界都能感受到中华文化一直都在并且活在每一位国人心中，源远流长、永葆锋芒。
点亮中华文化自信之灯需要社会各界的保驾护航。
各式文艺演出、各类有关弘扬中国文化的演讲比赛、诗歌朗诵等需要社会各界的鼎力配合，使其形成“百花齐放百家争鸣”的社会氛围，让国人爱上属于我们自己独一无二的传统文化，并绽放别样的魅力。
点亮中华文化自信之灯需要人民的全力拥护。
从诗经、楚辞、汉赋，到唐诗、宋词、元曲、明清小说等;从屈原、李杜，到三苏，再到元曲四大家、曹雪芹……在中国文艺历史星河中，有太多灿烂的不朽作品，也有太多才华横溢的文化巨星。
高考英语改革的看法
高考英语改革的看法一、引言高考英语是中国教育改革的重要组成部分，其改革趋势和方向受到广泛关注。
本文将从考试模式、考试内容、考试评价方式和学科地位四个方面，探讨高考英语改革的看法。
二、考试模式改革过去的高考英语考试模式主要是笔试，而现在越来越多的省份开始尝试将口语纳入高考英语考试范围。
这种改革旨在提高学生的英语口语表达能力，培养其语言应用能力，以更好地适应全球化的发展趋势。
此外，一些省份还尝试采用机考形式，以更好地评估学生的英语实际应用能力。
三、考试内容改革高考英语的内容也在不断改革。
过去的高考英语更注重语法和词汇知识的考核，而现在则更加注重对学生实际应用能力的考核，如阅读理解、写作和口语表达等。
这种改革可以更好地评估学生的英语水平，培养其实际应用能力，而非单纯地记忆知识。
四、考试评价方式改革高考英语的考试评价方式也在逐渐改革。
过去的高考英语主要采用百分制评分，而现在则逐渐采用等级制评分，以更好地反映学生的英语水平差异。
这种改革可以更好地评估学生的英语能力，同时减轻学生的压力，更好地发挥其潜力。
五、学科地位改革高考英语的学科地位也在逐渐改变。
过去的高考英语只是作为一门学科存在，而现在则更加注重其实用性。
许多高校在招生时也开始关注学生的英语水平，并将其作为录取的重要参考因素。
这种改革可以更好地体现英语学科的重要性，同时也可以更好地培养学生的英语应用能力。
六、结论高考英语的改革是中国教育改革的重要组成部分，旨在提高学生的英语应用能力，更好地适应全球化的发展趋势。
从考试模式、考试内容、考试评价方式和学科地位四个方面的改革来看，高考英语的改革取得了显著的成效。
然而，仍需注意到一些问题，如口语纳入考试范围可能会增加学生的压力，百分制评分改为等级制评分可能会影响学生的排名等。
因此，在未来的改革中，需要进一步优化考试模式和评价方式，以更好地发挥其作用。
七、建议为了更好地推进高考英语的改革，提出以下建议：1.进一步优化考试模式，如口语考试的比重和形式可以更加灵活多样，以更好地评估学生的口语表达能力；2.进一步优化考试内容，如增加实际应用能力的考核比重，减少纯知识记忆的考核内容；3.进一步完善考试评价方式，如采用更加科学的评分方式，以更好地反映学生的实际英语水平；4.进一步提高英语学科的地位，如加强其在整体教育中的重要性，以更好地促进学生的全面发展。
假如给我三天听力高中作文
假设给我三天听力高中作文我在一个无声的世界里，只有各种各样的手势让我与他人沟通。
随着年龄的增长，我渴望着，乞求着：让我拥有三天听力，好吗？假设给我三天听力，我一定先去听妈妈爽朗的笑声、爸爸严肃的说话声。
那笑声一定脆如银铃，那说话声必定蕴涵着人生的哲理。
我会快乐地听，喜悦地听。
也许我还不能完全听懂，但我仍会用去体会这美妙且充满亲情的声音。
假设给我三天听力，我会静静聆听大自然捎来的声音。
那落叶飘落时与地面相擦的声音，一定伴有抑扬顿挫的旋律。
那点敲击窗玻璃的声音，一定含有欢快跳跃的“小蝌蚪”。
其中，一定会有上帝要告诉我的小秘密。
那蝴蝶扇动翅膀的声音，据老师说是低于20分贝，人类是无法听见的。
但我不信，我一定能够听得懂，听得到的。
假设给我三天听力，我一定要去买一盘贝多芬钢琴曲的CD，假设给我三天听力作文。
我要反复品味《命运》。
贝多芬也失去了听力，我要从他的作品中找出那种坚持不懈的力量，顽强不屈的意志。
在我回到无声世界之后，鼓励自己顽强奋斗，视嘲笑白眼于不顾，坚信：走自己的路，让别人说去吧。
假设给我三天听力，我一定会到喧闹的街道上走走。
刺耳的鸣笛声，成了梦幻之音，有旋转的跌荡起伏的美。
粗鲁的吵架声，也成了声音中欢蹦乱跳的音符，为原本无趣的生活增添了一个小调。
那大声的讨价还价声，却成了此起彼伏的插曲，别有情趣。
我珍视这珍贵的、拥有声音的三天，我一定不会休息的。
我想做的还有好多好多，可我只有三天。
这三天中，我一定会张开、张大耳朵，认真去听，开始一次短暂却又充满诱惑的声音之旅。
我会精心安排，决不让这72小时从我的指缝间悄悄溜走。
美妙的声音引起了我心灵的共鸣。
突然，有一丝声音，在我的耳边，很弱、很朦胧，渐渐地、渐渐地，越来越清晰了。
呵！我能听见声音了！我终于能够听见声音了！。
2023全国新高考Ⅰ卷英语试题及答案解析
2023全国新高考Ⅰ卷英语试题及答案解析2023全国新高考Ⅰ卷英语试题及答案解析2023全国新高考Ⅰ卷英语试题还未出炉,待高考结束后,我会第一时间更新2023全国新高考Ⅰ卷英语试题,供大家对比、估分、模拟使用。
英语各题型答题技巧和〔方法〕一、听力听力是高考试卷中的第一道大题，分值很大。
听力除了本身的难度，还对个人的整体发挥有很大的影响，不少人就是由于听力没听懂，所以就乱了，以至于后面也没能发挥出正常水平。
听力其实就是两点。
第一，听到数字时立刻记录，当然高考英语没那么简洁，第一个听到的数字往往是干扰选项，并不是答案，一般后面消失的数字才是答案。
其次，听力有时候听不懂，问题也不是关于数字的，这时就要联想平常的训练，往往那些平常练习中的〔英语听力〕高频词汇假如消失了，那么一般就是答案。
二、阅读阅读我这里也给出两大类方法，一类是先看问题，猜想大意，然后带着问题阅读。
其次类，先扫瞄〔文章〕。
对于第一类，先看问题时，肯定要懂得把几个问题关联起来，猜想大意，记住问题问了什么，然后读文章，不肯定要读懂，只要找出文章中自己需要的部分。
其次类，先要扫瞄文章，把每一段讲了什么记录下来，然后看问题，再回过头来，找出对应段落，细读，最终找出答案。
三、完形填空完形填空往往比阅读更难做，它不仅要求考生明白大意，而且对考生词汇量的要求也很高。
选项中经常会给出几个意思相近的词，这时那个在考试大纲中常常消失的词汇，一般是答案，由于高考不是为了犯难人，而是为了催促更多人努力猎取学问，而那些大纲中的高频词汇，也就是重点词汇。
四、语法填空提到语法许多人就头疼，不过英语语法没有汉语那么冗杂，依据许多老师的建议，只要把汉语语法中的主谓宾语和定状补语弄清晰，那么英语语法也没有什么困难。
我统计近三年全国卷发觉，没有一个语法填空，填的是所给词汇的原型，一般过去分词、如今分词、不定式、分词做状语等是高频考点。
五、短文改错目前全国卷的短文改错是非常，一共有十处错误，但是假如考生改的超过了十处，那么以前十个为准。
高考满分750分英语听力作文各多少分
高考满分750分英语听力作文各多少分高考满分750分英语听力30分，作文20分。
具体评判打分标准如下:
第五档(很好)：(21~25分)
1、完完成了试题规定的任务。
2、覆盖所有内容要点。
3、应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
4、语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
5、有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑。
6、完全达到了预期的写作目的。
第四档(好)：(16~20分)
1、完詮完成了试题规定的任务。
2、虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容。
3、应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
4、语法结构或词汇方面应基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。