Functional Expression and Purification
Protein Expression and purification
Protein Expression and Purification22,159–164(2001)160SCOTT A.LESLEYTABLE1Genomic versus Proteomic TechnologiesGenomic technologies(DNA)Proteomic technologies(protein) Identification Determined experimentally,bioinformatics Predicted from genomic informationFunction1-dimensional information storage3-dimensional organization of chemicalfunctionalitiesBuilding blocks4bases20ϩamino acidsDetection sensitivity PCR amplification techniques Direct detection methodsSynthetic approaches Cheap and efficient oligonucleotide synthesis Limited capacity of peptide synthesismethods combined with PCRSequence determination500–700bases common by automated sequencing Direct sequencing difficult,mass spectrometry Purification Generic methods Generic methods require modification of proteinthrough gene fusionAnalysis methods Typically employ enzymes,hybridization Chemical,biophysical,biochemicaland mutagenesis),interactions between proteins(two-are of primary interest and typically are expressed in hybrid),and global protein changes(2D gels and LC–a bacterial host.Often this approach leads to problems MS).Purified protein is often required in these studies associated with expression levels and proper folding of and defines the outputs of any parallel expression and the protein of interest.Flexibility in expression options purification process.is a key parameter.Pichia or baculovirus expressionsystems can offer effective alternatives to bacterial sys-tems.Each expression scenario requires a specific vec-GENE CLONING FOR EXPRESSIONtor.Recloning cDNAs into each of these specific vectors Determining gene function through genomics typi-is extremely labor-intensive.Recombinatorial cloning cally starts from a query of a database.Sequence infor-methods provide an opportunity to minimize the effort mation for the3.9billion bases of sequence from the required for alternate expression.human genome is now available(1,2).Access and inter-Two systems are commonly used for recombinatorial pretation of this information often require sophisticated cloning and shown in Fig.1.The cre–lox recombination bioinformatics software outside the scope of this dis-system described by Elledge utilizes a single recombina-cussion.Public archives such as the Unigene Data-tion to introduce the gene of interest into a recipient base(/)or TIGR(http://vector(3).This is an in vitro reaction combined with a /)provide bioinformatic access to many in-genetic selection for the recombinant vector.In this way teresting plete genomic sequence infor-the gene of interest is cloned once into a donor vector mation is now available through Celera(http://and can then be moved into any of a number of recipient /index.cfm).Future annotation of fullplasmids for expression in different hosts or to utilize sequence information will greatly expand the access todifferent purification tags.A similar system utilizes full-length cDNA sequences.The first requirement is converting this genomic in-lambda Int/Xis/IHF recombination at att sites(4)to formation into an actual cDNA clone of that gene.Am-achieve transfer of open reading frames(ORFs).This plification of full-length cDNAs via PCR is the typical system has the advantage of a precise ORF transfer to first step.Both reverse transcriptase and amplification the expression vector rather than the cointegrant vector polymerases typically are lacking in proofreading activ-product of the cre–lox system.With either system,the ity.Care must be taken to limit the number of steps of primary limitation is that translational fusion of the amplification and to use proofreading enzymes where recombination sites is typically required to maintain possible to minimize the probability of introducing un-the flexibility and utility of the recombination method wanted mutations.Tissue selection for cDNA librariesfor expression.In those cases,such as crystallography, also is an important consideration for attempting towhere translational fusions are potentially detrimental isolate genes as they must be expressed within thatto the protein,a conventional cloning approach is library source for successful amplification.This infor-more appropriate.mation is often obtained from cDNA or oligonucleotideRegardless of the cloning method,parallel expression expression arrays.and purification requires utilization of purification Amplified gene products are cloned into appropriatetags.Many options exist for this purpose.A comprehen-vectors for expression.Depending on the source of thesive review is beyond the scope of this article.A list of gene,the host,and the end use of the protein,manydifferent vectors may be appropriate.Eukaryotic genes some commonly used tags is shown in Table2.By farHIGH-THROUGHPUT PROTEOMICS161FIG.1.Strategies of recombinatorial cloning.Individual cDNAs are cloned into a donor vector that can then be recombined into any number of recipient vectors through recombinatorial cloning.One option is to form a cointegrant plasmid through Cre-mediated recombination across a lox site.In the second scenario,a cDNA is flanked by phage lambda att sites which direct recombination into an expression vector through the use of the INT/XIS/IHF proteins.In these ways,a single donor clone can easily be transferred into any number of recipient vectors. the most common fusion is the histidine tag for purifica-analysis studies into small-scale for analysis of expres-tion on metal-chelate resins.This tag provides a sub-sion levels and properties and into large-scale for use stantial purification handle while being relatively un-with many of the proteomic applications.obtrusive as a fusion partner.Beyond purification,Small-scale expression is most useful for identifying translational fusions often provide a means to enhance those clones which express recombinant protein to high expression.The larger fusion tags such as thioredoxin levels and for evaluating the folding state of the protein. and GST often are superior in this respect.Crude expression testing is typically done by simpleSDS–PAGE analysis of whole cells.Evaluation of thefolding state is typically done by centrifugal fraction-RECOMBINANT EXPRESSION OF PROTEINation of a lysate,requiring a more gentle lysis proce-dure.Several lysozyme and mild detergent methods are Bacterial expression is most common for recombinantcommercially available for this purpose.proteins because of its ease of use and the high levelsof protein obtained.It is useful to divide expression For large-scale production for many applications,TABLE2Common Purification TagsBasis of purification Elution Reference Small tagsHistidine tag Metal affinity resin Imidizole(5)S-tag Interaction with S-protein Temperature(6) Calmodulin-binding protein Interaction with Calmodulin Calcium(7) Large tagsGlutathione S-transferase Glutathione agarose Reduced glutathione(8) Thioredoxin Phenylarsine oxide resin-Mercaptoethanol(9) Biotinylation domain Monomeric avidin resin Biotin(10) Maltose binding protein Amylose resin Maltose(11) Chitin binding protein/intein Chitin affinity Thiol(12)162SCOTT A.LESLEYtens of milligrams of protein typically are required.PURIFICATION STRATEGYEven with common bacterial expression levels,500–Proteins are highly diverse in their properties mak-1000ml of culture typically is required to provide these ing generic methods of purification difficult.Purifica-amounts.While such methods are commonplace in labo-tion tags such as described in Table2are a typical ratories,systems for parallel processing large numbers solution for purifying proteins in parallel.His-tag fu-of cultures at this level are not commercially available.sions are very common and provide a single-step chro-By developing instrumentation and optimizing media matographic purification that yields protein of suffi-and aeration conditions for high-density cell growth,cient purity for most applications.In addition,the his-our laboratory can parallel process96cultures at this tag sequence requires the addition of only six amino scale.Optical density(OD)values at600nm can reach acids to the recombinant protein,reducing the likeli-a value of40with logarithmic growth through at least hood that such a fusion will adversely affect gene func-30OD units.These cell densities allow us to producetion.A typical purification strategy is outlined in Fig.2. sufficient cell mass with65-ml culture volumes to yieldtens of milligrams of recombinant protein,sufficient for PURIFICATION AUTOMATIONmost applications.Such instrumentation is not com-Parallel processing typically involves instrumenta-monly available,but common shaking incubators cantion for automation.Lysis methods such as sonication or substitute with larger volumes.using a French press are not simple automation tasks. Recombinant expression of proteins is achievedLikewise,centrifugation is not easily integrated into through induction of a strong promoter system.Manyautomation due to problems of locating and indexing options exist in this regard including tac,T7,lambdathe rotor position.Automation of this process typically P L,and ara B promoters.It is important for parallelinvolves protocol modifications.This can easily be processing that growth and induction characteristicsachieved in small-scale methods.are consistent.For this reason,it is important to retainOn small-scale,parallel processing usually involves tight repression of expression and have a simple induc-use of a96-well plate format.Lysis is typically achieved tion procedure for high-level expression.For T7sys-using a combination of lysozyme and freeze–thaw cy-tems,the lac operator and T7lysozyme(pLysS)provide cles.Phage lysozymes are more effective than hen egg an extra level of repression.The arabinose promoter is white lysozyme for this purpose and can be combined tightly repressed in the absence of inducer and is our with nucleases to reduce viscosity and facilitate re-preferred system for parallel growth.With all of the moval of cell debris at the low g forces commonly used promoters listed,recombinant expression levels of10–with microtiter plates.Alternatively,nonionic deter-50%of total cell protein are common.gents can be employed for nondenaturing lysis.FIG.2.Generalized purification strategy of recombinant fusion protein.A common purification strategy is shown here.Proteins are purified from fermentation cultures by affinity purification.Isolated cell pellets are resuspended in an appropriate lysis buffer and disrupted by high-intensity sonication.Cell walls and insoluble debris are pelleted by centrifugation and the soluble supernatant containing the recombinant fusion protein is applied to chromatography resin containing an immobilized metal for affinity purification.Fractions containing the recombinant protein can be used directly or further purified using conventional chromatographic techniques.HIGH-THROUGHPUT PROTEOMICS163TABLE3Robotic Systems with Capabilities Adaptable to ProteinPurificationManu-facturer Instrument WebsiteQiagen BioRobot3000/Tomtec Quadra96/Matrix PlateMate /Hamilton Microlab4200/Beckman Biomek2000/Packard PlateTrak /index2.htmGilson Nebula215/index.htmlRobotic systems for nucleic acid purification are rela-tively commonplace and have recently been adapted forprotein purification.The Qiagen BioRobot3000per-forms multiple functions relevant to protein purifica-tion.It provides aspirate,dispense,pipet,vacuum fil-tration,and plate-shaking functions on a relativelycompact platform.These functions can be adapted to FIG.4.SDS–PAGE analysis of purified protein.Metal affinity chro-perform cell lysis and chromatography steps from1–2matography yields highly purified protein from a single chromato-graphic separation.This gel shows typical yields and purity obtained ml of bacterial culture.Specialized96-well plates clearfrom parallel purification using an automated purification system. cell debris via vacuum filtration and are also used toSuch proteins have been incorporated directly in successful crystalli-retain resin for chromatographic separations.The Wal-zation trials.Ten-microliter samples of12ml protein eluates from Ni-lac Quadra96also has most of these capacities and resin were separated by10%SDS–PAGE.Samples are recombinant can parallel process96or384samples.Both of thesefusions of thioredoxin to human proteins as indicated by accessionnumber.systems have been used with success in our laboratoryfor small-scale protein purification of proteins in micro-titer plates.Table3lists some robotic systems that maybe applied to small-scale protein purification.providing the throughput needed for proteomic studies Despite the difficulties,large-scale protein purifica-involving tens of thousands of proteins.We are cur-tion also can be automated.In our laboratory we simul-rently able to process approximately96–192proteins taneously process96bacterial cultures of65–70ml.per day with this system with average yields of around Instrumentation for processing96parallel cultures at10mg of purified protein.Affinity purification results that scale required development of custom roboticsin recombinant protein that is typically80–90%pure shown in Fig.3.These robotics incorporate liquid aspi-(see Fig.4)which is sufficient for most applications. rate and dispense,centrifugation,and sonication capa-Subsequent purification is sometimes necessary,for ex-bilities required for purification.Automation is key to ample,in protein crystallography,and is achieved usingFIG.3.Protein purification automation.Custom robotics for performing the purification strategy outlined in Fig.2are shown.(a)The instrument has capacity for automated liquid aspiration and dispensing,sonication,centrifugation,and fractionation.Ninety-six cultures are processed in parallel,giving up to10–50mg of purified protein per culture.(b)Expanded view of aspirate/dispense/sonicate head accessing rotor.164SCOTT A.LESLEYREFERENCESstandard ion-exchange and size-exclusion chromatog-raphy.Automation of these methods is relatively1.Venter,J.C.et al.(2001)The sequence of the human genome. straightforward employing standard FPLC and au-Science291,1304–1351.tosampler instrumentation.2.International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium(2001)Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.Nature SUMMARY409,860–921.3.Liu,Q.,Li,M.Z.,Leibham,D.,Cortez,D.,and Elledge,S.J. Determining gene function and understanding the(1999)The univector plasmid-fusion system,a method for rapid relationships and interactions of the gene products are construction of recombinant DNA without restriction enzymes.a global effort in biological studies.The approach toCurr.Biol.8,1300–1309.performing this immense task is driven by the availabil- 4.Hatley,J.L.,Temple,G.F.,and Brasch,M.A.(2000)DNA cloningity of genomic information.To utilize this informationusing in vivo site-specific recombination.Genome Res.10,pp.1788–1795.for experimentation,however,significant effort isneeded to actually isolate and express proteins from5.Petty,K.J.(1996)Metal-chelate affinity chromatography,in“Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,”Vol.2,Wiley,New York. the genes of interest for study.The complexity of this6.Kim,J.S.,and Raines,R.T.(1993)Ribonuclease S-peptide as a effort is compounded by the large number of gene prod-carrier in fusion proteins.Protein Sci.2,348–356.ucts comprising the proteome.Parallel processing and7.Stofko-Hahn,R.E.,.Carr,D.W,and Scott,J.D.(1992)A single generic methods are required to achieve a systematicstep purification for recombinant proteins.FEBS Lett.302, and thorough evaluation of gene function.274–278.Experimental uses of proteins for structural and8.Smith,D.B.,and Johnson,K.S.(1988)Single-step purification functional studies typically require milligram amounts of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions within purified form.Unlike genomic technologies that pri-glutathione S-transferase.Gene67,31–40.marily involve the study of nucleic acids,proteomic9.Lu,Z.,DiBlasio-Smith,E.A.,Grant,K.L.,Warne,N.W.,LaVallie,studies focus on proteins.Proteins are by nature much E.R.,Collins-Racie,L.A.,Follettie,M.T.,Williamson,M.J.,more diverse in composition and properties than nucleicand McCoy,J.M.(1996)Histidine patch thioredoxins.Mutantforms of thioredoxin with metal chelating affinity that provide acids.In many ways,this makes them more interestingfor convenient purifications of thioredoxin fusion proteins.J. but also less amenable to generic methods and technolo-Biol.Chem.271,5059–5065.gies for parallel processing.Nonetheless,methods and10.Cronan,J.E.(1990)Biotination of proteins in vivo.A post-trans-instrumentation are currently available to meet this lational modification to label,purify,and study proteins.J.Biol.ing these advances will allow a systematic Chem.265,10327–33.effort at understanding biological pathways at the11.Maina,C.V.,Riggs,P.D.,Grandea,A.G.,Slatko,B.E.,Moran,molecular level.L.S.,Tagliamonte,J.A.,McReynolds,L.A.,and Guan,C.D.(1988)An Escherichia coli vector to express and purify foreign ACKNOWLEDGMENTS proteins by fusion to and separation from maltose-binding pro-tein.Gene74,365–373.The author acknowledges the help of Marc Nasoff,Heath Klock,Dan McMullan,Tanya Shin,Juli Vincent,Mike Hornsby,Mark12.Chong S.,Mersha F.B.,Comb D.G.,Scott M.E.,Landry D.,Vence L.M.,Perler F.B.,Benner J.,Kucera R.B.,Hirvonen C. Knuth,Loren Miraglia,and Jeremiah Gilmore for their contributionsto the high-throughput cloning and expression efforts.He also recog- A.,Pelletier J.J.,Paulus H.,and Xu M.Q.(1997)Single-column nizes Bob Downs,Mark Weselak,Andy Meyer,and Jim Mainquistpurification of free recombinant proteins using a self-cleavable and the rest of the GNF engineering staff for their contributions to affinity tag derived from a protein splicing element.Gene192, the custom robotics that make this effort possible.271–281.。
微生物资源及开发利用
nature
Vol 467|2 September 10| doi:10.1038 /nature 09354
Bacterial charity work leads to population-wide resistance Henry H. Lee, Michael N. Molla, Charles R. Cantor & James J. Collins
to understand microbial communities. …individual host properties
such未a来s b医od师y m或a可ss依in据de肠x, a型ge的, o区r g划en,de量r 身can打n造ot 病exp患la饮in 食the清o单bserved ente以rot及yp开es处…方,甚至至为抗生素寻求替代品。
Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome
…identify three robust clusters (referred to as enterotypes hereafter)
that人ar类e n肠ot道na微tio生n 物or 系co统nti可ne拥nt 有spe特ci定fic的…分Th类is —ind肠ic型ates further the
othf比a1n2人4th类Eeu基hruo因mpe组aann大gien1nd5ei0vc倍iodmu。apllse…m.eTnth,e…geOnveesre9t,9~%15o0f
times larger the genes are
ba超ct过er9ia9l%, in为d细ica菌tin。g that the entire cohort harbours between
羟基磷灰石_mrna纯化_解释说明以及概述
羟基磷灰石mrna纯化解释说明以及概述1. 引言1.1 概述羟基磷灰石(Hydroxyapatite,简称HA)是一种重要的无机生物材料,具有良好的生物相容性和生物活性。
其结构类似于人体骨骼组织中的主要成分,因此在医学领域具有广泛的应用前景。
而mRNA纯化则是一种重要的实验技术,用于从混合物中纯化出目标mRNA分子,以便进一步进行鉴定、定量和功能分析。
1.2 文章结构本文将首先介绍羟基磷灰石及其在生物医学领域中的重要性。
接着详细阐述mRNA纯化的原理和实验方法,并介绍了羟基磷灰石在mRNA纯化过程中的应用。
最后对羟基磷灰石mRNA纯化工作的意义进行解释和探讨,并展望未来可能的研究方向。
1.3 目的本文旨在给读者提供关于羟基磷灰石mRNA纯化的全面理解和认识,并探讨其在生物医学研究、蛋白质表达与功能分析以及其他领域中的潜在用途。
通过对该领域的深入了解,有助于推动羟基磷灰石mRNA纯化技术的进一步发展和应用。
2. 羟基磷灰石mRNA纯化2.1 羟基磷灰石介绍羟基磷灰石(Hydroxyapatite,HA)是一种常见的生物无机材料,具有良好的生物相容性和生物活性。
它主要由钙离子、磷酸盐以及羟基离子组成,并具有类似骨骼与牙釉质的化学成分和晶体结构。
由于其特殊的理化性质,羟基磷灰石被广泛应用于医药领域。
2.2 mRNA纯化原理mRNA(messenger RNA)是DNA转录过程中的一个重要产物,承担了将DNA 上的遗传信息转移到蛋白质合成过程中的功能。
在细胞内,mRNA通常与许多其他RNA种类混合存在,并且其含量非常低。
为了从细胞中纯化出高纯度的mRNA样品用于进一步实验或分析,需要使用合适的方法进行纯化。
羟基磷灰石作为一种亲和层析材料可以选择性地结合并保留带有多聚A核苷酸序列(polyA tail)的mRNA。
这是因为多数真核细胞的mRNA 3'末端都存在连续六个以上的A核苷酸,而DNA中则不含有或只含有很少的这种序列。
镍柱纯化蛋白说明书
Instruction ManualProBond TM Purification SystemFor purification of polyhistidine-containing recombinant proteinsCatalog nos. K850-01, K851-01, K852-01, K853-01, K854-01,R801-01, R801-15Version K2 September200425-0006iiTable of ContentsKit Contents and Storage (iv)Accessory Products (vi)Introduction (1)Overview (1)Methods (2)Preparing Cell Lysates (2)Purification Procedure—Native Conditions (7)Purification Procedure—Denaturing Conditions (11)Purification Procedure—Hybrid Conditions (13)Troubleshooting (15)Appendix (17)Additional Protocols (17)Recipes (18)Frequently Asked Questions (21)References (22)Technical Service (23)iiiKit Contents and StorageTypes of Products This manual is supplied with the following products:Product CatalogNo.ProBond™ Purification System K850-01ProBond™ Purification System with Antibodywith Anti-Xpress™ Antibody K851-01with Anti-myc-HRP Antibody K852-01with Anti-His(C-term)-HRP Antibody K853-01with Anti-V5-HRP Antibody K854-01ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin (50 ml) R801-01ProBond™ Nickel Chelating Resin (150 ml) R801-15ProBond™Purification System Components The ProBond™ Purification System includes enough resin, reagents, and columns for six purifications. The components are listed below. See next page for resin specifications.Component Composition Quantity ProBond™ Resin 50% slurry in 20% ethanol 12 ml5X NativePurification Buffer250 mM NaH2PO4, pH 8.02.5 M NaCl1 × 125 ml bottleGuanidinium LysisBuffer6 M Guanidine HCl20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.8500 mM NaCl1 × 60 ml bottleDenaturingBinding Buffer8 M Urea20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.8500 mM NaCl2 × 125 ml bottlesDenaturing WashBuffer8 M Urea20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0500 mM NaCl2 × 125 ml bottlesDenaturing ElutionBuffer8 M Urea20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 4.0500 mM NaCl1 × 60 ml bottleImidazole 3 M Imidazole,20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0500 mM NaCl1 × 8 ml bottlePurificationColumns10 ml columns 6Continued on next pageivKit Contents and Storage, ContinuedProBond™Purification System with Antibody The ProBond™ Purification System with Antibody includes resin, reagents, and columns as described for the ProBond™ Purification System (previous page) and 50 µl of the appropriate purified mouse monoclonal antibody. Sufficient reagents are included to perform six purifications and 25 Western blots with the antibody.For more details on the antibody specificity, subclass, and protocols for using the antibody, refer to the antibody manual supplied with the system.Storage Store ProBond™ resin at +4°C. Store buffer and columns at room temperature.Store the antibody at 4°C. Avoid repeated freezing and thawing of theantibody as it may result in loss of activity.The product is guaranteed for 6 months when stored properly.All native purification buffers are prepared from the 5X Native PurificationBuffer and the 3 M Imidazole, as described on page 7.The Denaturing Wash Buffer pH 5.3 is prepared from the Denaturing WashBuffer (pH 6.0), as described on page 11.Resin and ColumnSpecificationsProBond™ resin is precharged with Ni2+ ions and appears blue in color. It isprovided as a 50% slurry in 20% ethanol.ProBond™ resin and purification columns have the following specifications:• Binding capacity of ProBond™ resin: 1–5 mg of protein per ml of resin• Average bead size: 45–165 microns• Pore size of purification columns: 30–35 microns• Recommended flow rate: 0.5 ml/min• Maximum flow rate: 2 ml/min• Maximum linear flow rate: 700 cm/h• Column material: Polypropylene• pH stability (long term): pH 3–13• pH stability (short term): pH 2–14ProductQualificationThe ProBond™ Purification System is qualified by purifying 2 mg of myoglobinprotein on a column and performing a Bradford assay. Protein recovery mustbe 75% or higher.vAccessory ProductsAdditionalProductsThe following products are also available for order from Invitrogen:Product QuantityCatalogNo.ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin 50 ml150 mlR801-01R801-15Polypropylene columns(empty)50 R640-50Ni-NTA Agarose 10 ml25 ml R901-01 R901-15Ni-NTA Purification System 6 purifications K950-01 Ni-NTA Purification Systemwith Antibodywith Anti-Xpress™ Antibody with Anti-myc-HRP Antibody with Anti-His(C-term)-HRP Antibodywith Anti-V5-HRP Antibody 1 kit1 kit1 kit1 kitK951-01K952-01K953-01K954-01Anti-myc Antibody 50 µl R950-25 Anti-V5 Antibody 50 µl R960-25 Anti-Xpress™ Antibody 50 µl R910-25 Anti-His(C-term) Antibody 50 µl R930-25 InVision™ His-tag In-gel Stain 500 ml LC6030 InVision™ His-tag In-gelStaining Kit1 kit LC6033Pre-Cast Gels and Pre-made Buffers A large variety of pre-cast gels for SDS-PAGE and pre-made buffers for your convenience are available from Invitrogen. For details, visit our web site at or contact Technical Service (page 23).viIntroductionOverviewIntroduction The ProBond™ Purification System is designed for purification of 6xHis-tagged recombinant proteins expressed in bacteria, insect, and mammalian cells. Thesystem is designed around the high affinity and selectivity of ProBond™Nickel-Chelating Resin for recombinant fusion proteins containing six tandemhistidine residues.The ProBond™ Purification System is a complete system that includespurification buffers and resin for purifying proteins under native, denaturing,or hybrid conditions. The resulting proteins are ready for use in many targetapplications.This manual is designed to provide generic protocols that can be adapted foryour particular proteins. The optimal purification parameters will vary witheach protein being purified.ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin is used for purification of recombinant proteins expressed in bacteria, insect, and mammalian cells from any 6xHis-tagged vector. ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin exhibits high affinity and selectivity for 6xHis-tagged recombinant fusion proteins.Proteins can be purified under native, denaturing, or hybrid conditions using the ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin. Proteins bound to the resin are eluted with low pH buffer or by competition with imidazole or histidine. The resulting proteins are ready for use in target applications.Binding Characteristics ProBond™ Nickel-Chelating Resin uses the chelating ligand iminodiacetic acid (IDA) in a highly cross-linked agarose matrix. IDA binds Ni2+ ions by three coordination sites.The protocols provided in this manual are generic, and may not result in 100%pure protein. These protocols should be optimized based on the bindingcharacteristics of your particular proteins.Native VersusDenaturingConditionsThe decision to purify your 6xHis-tagged fusion proteins under native ordenaturing conditions depends on the solubility of the protein and the need toretain biological activity for downstream applications.• Use native conditions if your protein is soluble (in the supernatant afterlysis) and you want to preserve protein activity.• Use denaturing conditions if the protein is insoluble (in the pellet afterlysis) or if your downstream application does not depend on proteinactivity.• Use hybrid protocol if your protein is insoluble but you want to preserveprotein activity. Using this protocol, you prepare the lysate and columnsunder denaturing conditions and then use native buffers during the washand elution steps to refold the protein. Note that this protocol may notrestore activity for all proteins. See page 14.1MethodsPreparing Cell LysatesIntroduction Instructions for preparing lysates from bacteria, insect, and mammalian cellsusing native or denaturing conditions are described below.Materials Needed You will need the following items:• Native Binding Buffer (recipe is on page 8) for preparing lysates undernative conditions• Sonicator• 10 µg/ml RNase and 5 µg/ml DNase I (optional)• Guanidinium Lysis Buffer (supplied with the system) for preparing lysatesunder denaturing conditions• 18-gauge needle• Centrifuge• Sterile, distilled water• SDS-PAGE sample buffer• Lysozyme for preparing bacterial cell lysates• Bestatin or Leupeptin, for preparing mammalian cell lysatesProcessing Higher Amount of Starting Material Instructions for preparing lysates from specific amount of starting material (bacteria, insect, and mammalian cells) and purification with 2 ml resin under native or denaturing conditions are described in this manual.If you wish to purify your protein of interest from higher amounts of starting material, you may need to optimize the lysis protocol and purification conditions (amount of resin used for binding). The optimization depends on the expected yield of your protein and amount of resin to use for purification. Perform a pilot experiment to optimize the purification conditions and then based on the pilot experiment results, scale-up accordingly.Continued on next page2Preparing Bacterial Cell Lysate—Native Conditions Follow the procedure below to prepare bacterial cell lysate under native conditions. Scale up or down as necessary.1. Harvest cells from a 50 ml culture by centrifugation (e.g., 5000 rpm for5 minutes in a Sorvall SS-34 rotor). Resuspend the cells in 8 ml NativeBinding Buffer (recipe on page 8).2. Add 8 mg lysozyme and incubate on ice for 30 minutes.3. Using a sonicator equipped with a microtip, sonicate the solution on iceusing six 10-second bursts at high intensity with a 10-second coolingperiod between each burst.Alternatively, sonicate the solution on ice using two or three 10-secondbursts at medium intensity, then flash freeze the lysate in liquid nitrogen or a methanol dry ice slurry. Quickly thaw the lysate at 37°C andperform two more rapid sonicate-freeze-thaw cycles.4. Optional: If the lysate is very viscous, add RNase A (10 µg/ml) andDNase I (5 µg/ml) and incubate on ice for 10–15 minutes. Alternatively,draw the lysate through a 18-gauge syringe needle several times.5. Centrifuge the lysate at 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes to pellet the cellulardebris. Transfer the supernatant to a fresh tube.Note: Some 6xHis-tagged protein may remain insoluble in the pellet, and can be recovered by preparing a denatured lysate (page 4) followed bythe denaturing purification protocol (page 12). To recover this insolubleprotein while preserving its biological activity, you can prepare thedenatured lysate and then follow the hybrid protocol on page 14. Notethat the hybrid protocol may not restore activity in all cases, and should be tested with your particular protein.6. Remove 5 µl of the lysate for SDS-PAGE analysis. Store the remaininglysate on ice or freeze at -20°C. When ready to use, proceed to theprotocol on page 7.Continued on next page3Preparing Bacterial Cell Lysate—Denaturing Conditions Follow the procedure below to prepare bacterial cell lysate under denaturing conditions:1. Equilibrate the Guanidinium Lysis Buffer, pH 7.8 (supplied with thesystem or see page 19 for recipe) to 37°C.2. Harvest cells from a 50 ml culture by centrifugation (e.g., 5000 rpm for5 minutes in a Sorvall SS-34 rotor).3. Resuspend the cell pellet in 8 ml Guanidinium Lysis Buffer from Step 1.4. Slowly rock the cells for 5–10 minutes at room temperature to ensurethorough cell lysis.5. Sonicate the cell lysate on ice with three 5-second pulses at high intensity.6. Centrifuge the lysate at 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes to pellet the cellulardebris.Transfer the supernatant to a fresh tube.7. Remove 5 µl of the lysate for SDS-PAGE analysis. Store the remaininglysate on ice or at -20°C. When ready to use, proceed to the denaturingprotocol on page 11 or hybrid protocol on page 13.Note: To perform SDS-PAGE with samples in Guanidinium Lysis Buffer, you need to dilute the samples, dialyze the samples, or perform TCAprecipitation prior to SDS-PAGE to prevent the precipitation of SDS.Harvesting Insect Cells For detailed protocols dealing with insect cell expression, consult the manual for your particular system. The following lysate protocols are for baculovirus-infected cells and are intended to be highly generic. They should be optimized for your cell lines.For baculovirus-infected insect cells, when the time point of maximal expression has been determined, large scale protein expression can be carried out. Generally, the large-scale expression is performed in 1 liter flasks seeded with cells at a density of 2 × 106 cells/ml in a total volume of 500 ml and infected with high titer viral stock at an MOI of 10 pfu/cell. At the point of maximal expression, harvest cells in 50 ml aliquots. Pellet the cells by centrifugation and store at -70°C until needed. Proceed to preparing cell lysates using native or denaturing conditions as described on the next page.Continued on next page4Preparing Insect Cell Lysate—Native Condition 1. Prepare 8 ml Native Binding Buffer (recipe on page 8) containingLeupeptin (a protease inhibitor) at a concentration of 0.5 µg/ml.2. After harvesting the cells (previous page), resuspend the cell pellet in8 ml Native Binding Buffer containing 0.5 µg/ml Leupeptin.3. Lyse the cells by two freeze-thaw cycles using a liquid nitrogen or dryice/ethanol bath and a 42°C water bath.4. Shear DNA by passing the preparation through an 18-gauge needle fourtimes.5. Centrifuge the lysate at 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes to pellet the cellulardebris.Transfer the supernatant to a fresh tube.6. Remove 5 µl of the lysate for SDS-PAGE analysis. Store remaining lysateon ice or freeze at -20°C. When ready to use, proceed to the protocol on page 7.Preparing Insect Cell Lysate—Denaturing Condition 1. After harvesting insect cells (previous page), resuspend the cell pellet in8 ml Guanidinium Lysis Buffer (supplied with the system or see page 19for recipe).2. Pass the preparation through an 18-gauge needle four times.3. Centrifuge the lysate at 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes to pellet the cellulardebris. Transfer the supernatant to a fresh tube.4. Remove 5 µl of the lysate for SDS-PAGE analysis. Store remaining lysateon ice or freeze at -20° C. When ready to use, proceed to the denaturingprotocol on page 11 or hybrid protocol on page 13.Note: To perform SDS-PAGE with samples in Guanidinium Lysis Buffer, you need to dilute the samples, dialyze the samples, or perform TCAprecipitation prior to SDS-PAGE to prevent the precipitation of SDS.Continued on next pagePreparing Mammalian Cell Lysate—Native Conditions For detailed protocols dealing with mammalian expression, consult the manual for your particular system. The following protocols are intended to be highly generic, and should be optimized for your cell lines.To produce recombinant protein, you need between 5 x 106and 1 x 107 cells. Seed cells and grow in the appropriate medium until they are 80–90% confluent. Harvest cells by trypsinization. You can freeze the cell pellet in liquid nitrogen and store at -70°C until use.1. Resuspend the cell pellet in 8 ml of Native Binding Buffer (page 8). Theaddition of protease inhibitors such as bestatin and leupeptin may benecessary depending on the cell line and expressed protein.2. Lyse the cells by two freeze-thaw cycles using a liquid nitrogen or dryice/ethanol bath and a 42°C water bath.3. Shear the DNA by passing the preparation through an 18-gauge needlefour times.4. Centrifuge the lysate at 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes to pellet the cellulardebris. Transfer the supernatant to a fresh tube.5. Remove 5 µl of the lysate for SDS-PAGE analysis. Store the remaininglysate on ice or freeze at -20° C. When ready to use, proceed to theprotocol on page 7.Preparing Mammalian Cell Lysates—Denaturing Conditions For detailed protocols dealing with mammalian expression, consult the manual for your particular system. The following protocols are intended to be highly generic, and should be optimized for your cell lines.To produce recombinant protein, you need between 5 x 106and 1 x 107 cells. Seed cells and grow in the appropriate medium until they are 80–90% confluent. Harvest cells by trypsinization. You can freeze the cell pellet in liquid nitrogen and store at -70°C until use.1. Resuspend the cell pellet in 8 ml Guanidinium Lysis Buffer (suppliedwith the system or see page 19 for recipe).2. Shear the DNA by passing the preparation through an 18-gauge needlefour times.3. Centrifuge the lysate at 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes to pellet the cellulardebris. Transfer the supernatant to a fresh tube.4. Remove 5 µl of the lysate for SDS-PAGE analysis. Store the remaininglysate on ice or freeze at -20° C until use. When ready to use, proceed to the denaturing protocol on page 11 or hybrid protocol on page 13.Note: To perform SDS-PAGE with samples in Guanidinium Lysis Buffer, you need to dilute the samples, dialyze the samples, or perform TCAprecipitation prior to SDS-PAGE to prevent the precipitation of SDS.Purification Procedure—Native ConditionsIntroduction In the following procedure, use the prepared Native Binding Buffer, NativeWash Buffer, and Native Elution Buffer, columns, and cell lysate preparedunder native conditions. Be sure to check the pH of your buffers before starting.Buffers for Native Purification All buffers for purification under native conditions are prepared from the5X Native Purification Buffer supplied with the system. Dilute and adjust the pH of the 5X Native Purification Buffer to create 1X Native Purification Buffer (page 8). From this, you can create the following buffers:• Native Binding Buffer• Native Wash Buffer• Native Elution BufferThe recipes described in this section will create sufficient buffers to perform one native purification using one kit-supplied purification column. Scale up accordingly.If you are preparing your own buffers, see page 18 for recipe.Materials Needed You will need the following items:• 5X Native Purification Buffer (supplied with the system or see page 18 forrecipe)• 3 M Imidazole (supplied with the system or see page 18 for recipe)• NaOH• HCl• Sterile distilled water• Prepared ProBond™ columns with native buffers (next page)• Lysate prepared under native conditions (page 2)Imidazole Concentration in Native Buffers Imidazole is included in the Native Wash and Elution Buffers to minimize the binding of untagged, contaminating proteins and increase the purity of the target protein with fewer wash steps. Note that, if your level of contaminating proteins is high, you may add imidazole to the Native Binding Buffer.If your protein does not bind well under these conditions, you can experiment with lowering or eliminating the imidazole in the buffers and increasing the number of wash and elution steps.Continued on next page1X Native Purification Buffer To prepare 100 ml 1X Native Purification Buffer, combine:• 80 ml of sterile distilled water• 20 ml of 5X Native Purification Buffer (supplied with the system or see page 18 for recipe)Mix well and adjust pH to 8.0 with NaOH or HCl.Native Binding Buffer Without ImidazoleUse 30 ml of the 1X Native Purification Buffer (see above for recipe) for use as the Native Binding Buffer (used for column preparation, cell lysis, and binding).With Imidazole (Optional):You can prepare the Native Binding Buffer with imidazole to reduce the binding of contaminating proteins. (Note that some His-tagged proteins may not bind under these conditions.).To prepare 30 ml Native Binding Buffer with 10 mM imidazole, combine: • 30 ml of 1X Native Purification Buffer• 100 µl of 3 M Imidazole, pH 6.0Mix well and adjust pH to 8.0 with NaOH or HCl.Native Wash Buffer To prepare 50 ml Native Wash Buffer with 20 mM imidazole, combine:• 50 ml of 1X Native Purification Buffer• 335 µl of 3 M Imidazole, pH 6.0Mix well and adjust pH to 8.0 with NaOH or HCl.Native Elution Buffer To prepare 15 ml Native Elution Buffer with 250 mM imidazole, combine:• 13.75 ml of 1X Native Purification Buffer• 1.25 ml of 3 M Imidazole, pH 6.0Mix well and adjust pH to 8.0 with NaOH or HCl.Continued on next pageDo not use strong reducing agents such as DTT with ProBond™ columns. DTTreduces the nickel ions in the resin. In addition, do not use strong chelatingagents such as EDTA or EGTA in the loading buffers or wash buffers, as thesewill strip the nickel from the columns.Be sure to check the pH of your buffers before starting.PreparingProBond™ ColumnWhen preparing a column as described below, make sure that the snap-off capat the bottom of the column remains intact. To prepare a column:1. Resuspend the ProBond™ resin in its bottle by inverting and gentlytapping the bottle repeatedly.2. Pipet or pour 2 ml of the resin into a 10-ml Purification Columnsupplied with the kit. Allow the resin to settle completely by gravity(5-10 minutes) or gently pellet it by low-speed centrifugation (1 minuteat 800 ×g). Gently aspirate the supernatant.3. Add 6 ml of sterile, distilled water and resuspend the resin byalternately inverting and gently tapping the column.4. Allow the resin to settle using gravity or centrifugation as described inStep 2, and gently aspirate the supernatant.5. For purification under Native Conditions, add 6 ml Native BindingBuffer (recipe on page 8).6. Resuspend the resin by alternately inverting and gently tapping thecolumn.7. Allow the resin to settle using gravity or centrifugation as described inStep 2, and gently aspirate the supernatant.8. Repeat Steps 5 through 7.Storing PreparedColumnsTo store a column containing resin, add 0.02% azide or 20% ethanol as apreservative and cap or parafilm the column. Store at room temperature.Continued on next pagePurification Under Native Conditions Using the native buffers, columns and cell lysate, follow the procedure below to purify proteins under native conditions:1. Add 8 ml of lysate prepared under native conditions to a preparedPurification Column (page 9).2. Bind for 30–60 minutes using gentle agitation to keep the resinsuspended in the lysate solution.3. Settle the resin by gravity or low speed centrifugation (800 ×g), andcarefully aspirate the supernatant. Save supernatant at 4°C forSDS-PAGE analysis.4. Wash with 8 ml Native Wash Buffer (page 8). Settle the resin by gravityor low speed centrifugation (800 ×g), and carefully aspirate thesupernatant. Save supernatant at 4°C for SDS-PAGE analysis.5. Repeat Step 4 three more times.6. Clamp the column in a vertical position and snap off the cap on thelower end. Elute the protein with 8–12 ml Native Elution Buffer (seepage 2). Collect 1 ml fractions and analyze with SDS-PAGE.Note: Store the eluted fractions at 4°C. If -20°C storage is required, addglycerol to the fractions. For long term storage, add protease inhibitors to the fractions.If you wish to reuse the resin to purify the same recombinant protein, wash the resin with 0.5 M NaOH for 30 minutes and equilibrate the resin in a suitable binding buffer. If you need to recharge the resin, see page 17.Purification Procedure—Denaturing ConditionsIntroduction Instructions to perform purification using denaturing conditions with prepareddenaturing buffers, columns, and cell lysate are described below.Materials Needed You will need the following items:• Denaturing Binding Buffer (supplied with the system or see page 19 forrecipe)• Denaturing Wash Buffer, pH 6.0 (supplied with the system or see page 19 forrecipe) and Denaturing Wash Buffer, pH 5.3 (see recipe below)• Denaturing Elution Buffer (supplied with the system or see page 20 forrecipe)• Prepared ProBond™ columns with Denaturing buffers (see below)• Lysate prepared under denaturing conditions (page 11)Preparing the Denaturing Wash Buffer pH 5.3 Using a 10 ml aliquot of the kit-supplied Denaturing Wash Buffer (pH 6.0), mix well, and adjust the pH to 5.3 using HCl. Use this for the Denaturing Wash Buffer pH 5.3 in Step 5 next page.Be sure to check the pH of your buffers before starting. Note that thedenaturing buffers containing urea will become more basic over time. PreparingProBond™ ColumnWhen preparing a column as described below, make sure that the snap-off capat the bottom of the column remains intact.If you are reusing the ProBond™ resin, see page 17 for recharging protocol.To prepare a column:1. Resuspend the ProBond™ resin in its bottle by inverting and gentlytapping the bottle repeatedly.2. Pipet or pour 2 ml of the resin into a 10-ml Purification Columnsupplied with the kit. Allow the resin to settle completely by gravity(5-10 minutes) or gently pellet it by low-speed centrifugation (1 minuteat 800 ×g). Gently aspirate the supernatant.3. Add 6 ml of sterile, distilled water and resuspend the resin byalternately inverting and gently tapping the column.4. Allow the resin to settle using gravity or centrifugation as described inStep 2, and gently aspirate the supernatant.5. For purification under Denaturing Conditions, add 6 ml of DenaturingBinding Buffer.6. Resuspend the resin by alternately inverting and gently tapping thecolumn.7. Allow the resin to settle using gravity or centrifugation as described inStep 2, and gently aspirate the supernatant. Repeat Steps 5 through 7.Continued on next pagePurification Procedure—Denaturing Conditions, ContinuedPurification Under Denaturing Conditions Using the denaturing buffers, columns, and cell lysate, follow the procedure below to purify proteins under denaturing conditions:1. Add 8 ml lysate prepared under denaturing conditions to a preparedPurification Column (page 11).2. Bind for 15–30 minutes at room temperature using gentle agitation (e.g.,using a rotating wheel) to keep the resin suspended in the lysatesolution. Settle the resin by gravity or low speed centrifugation (800 ×g), and carefully aspirate the supernatant.3. Wash the column with 4 ml Denaturing Binding Buffer supplied with thekit by resuspending the resin and rocking for two minutes. Settle theresin by gravity or low speed centrifugation (800 ×g), and carefullyaspirate the supernatant. Save supernatant at 4°C for SDS-PAGEanalysis. Repeat this step one more time.4. Wash the column with 4 ml Denaturing Wash Buffer, pH 6.0 supplied inthe kit by resuspending the resin and rocking for two minutes. Settle the resin by gravity or low speed centrifugation (800 ×g), and carefullyaspirate the supernatant. Save supernatant at 4°C for SDS-PAGEanalysis. Repeat this step one more time.5. Wash the column with 4 ml Denaturing Wash Buffer pH 5.3 (see recipeon previous page) by resuspending the resin and rocking for 2 minutes.Settle the resin by gravity or low speed centrifugation (800 ×g), andcarefully aspirate the supernatant. Save supernatant at 4°C for SDS-PAGE analysis. Repeat this step once more for a total of two washes with Denaturing Wash Buffer pH 5.3.6. Clamp the column in a vertical position and snap off the cap on thelower end. Elute the protein by adding 5 ml Denaturing Elution Buffersupplied with the kit. Collect 1 ml fractions and monitor the elution bytaking OD280readings of the fractions. Pool the fractions that contain the peak absorbance and dialyze against 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 0.1% Triton X-100 overnight at 4°C to remove the urea. Concentrate the dialyzedmaterial by any standard method (i.e., using 10,000 MW cut-off, low-protein binding centrifugal instruments or vacuum concentrationinstruments).If you wish to reuse the resin to purify the same recombinant protein, wash the resin with 0.5 M NaOH for 30 minutes and equilibrate the resin in a suitable binding buffer. If you need to recharge the resin, see page 17.。
人重组粒细胞集落刺激因子在大肠杆菌中的过表达说明书
IJMSVol 28, No.3, September 2003131Overexpression of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in E. coliAbstractBakground: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a cytokine that stimulates hematopoiesis and induces proliferation and differentiation of granulocyte progenitor cells as well as production of bone marrow neutrophilic granulocyte colonies. Nowadays, hu-man recombinant G-CSF(hr G-CSF) is used for the treatment of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced neutropenia, and also in patients with bone marrow transplantation.Methods: A cDNA of human G-CSF (hG-CSF) was synthesized by PCR from recombinant cloning vector, with two altered nucleotides for increasing mRNA stability and overexpression, then inserted into a pET expression vector under the control of T7 promoter and cloned in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3).Results: After culture and induction of recombinant E. coli with IPTG, we achieved a high level expression of the hG-CSF, where it represented approximately 35% of the total protein as determined by SDS-PAGE and confirmed by western blotting with polyclonal and monoclonal hG-CSF antibodies.Conclusion: rhG-CSF was produced in a significantly high quantity with a yield of 35% of total protein as determined by SDS-PAGE. Since it is easily obtained by simple purification steps, it may be cost-effective, even on an industrial scale. Iran J Med Sci 2003; 28(3):131-134.Keywords • Granulocyte colony stimulating factor, recombinant • recombinant proteins • escherichia coli.Introductionranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a hemato-poietic growth factor which stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil precursor cells as well as someof the functional properties of mature neutrophil granulocytes.1 It has been shown that G-CSF has a dramatic effect in the treatment of leukopenia, AIDS, MDS and bone marrow transplantation. It has also been reported that hrG-CSF plays an important role in modifying clinical infections secondary to chemotherapy .2 A single G-CSF gene per haploid genome exists on human chromosomeGOriginal ArticleArchive of SIDFallah M J, Akbari B, Saeedinia A.R, et al132 17 in region q21-q22. The gene consists of about 2500 nuclotides and is split by four introns.3 More than 80% of the G-CSF mRNA produced in human carcinoma cells including squamous carcinoma CHU-2 and bladder carcinoma 5637 cell lines en-code a protein of 204 amino acids (G-CSFb), while the remaining mRNA encode a protein of 207 amino acids (G-CSFa). These two different human G-CSF mRNAs are generated by alternative use of the 3' donor sequence of the intron 2 of the G-CSF gene. The N-terminal 30 amino. acids of G-CSFa and G-CSFb are the signal sequence for secretion of G-CSF. Mature G-CSFb, consists of 174 amino acids, has a molecular weight Of 18,671 and is at least 20 times more potent in colony stimulating activity than that consisting of 177 amino acids.1,4 Human G-CSF is O-glycosylated at Thr redisue (in the three amino acid deleted version) with a struc-ture of N —acetyl-neuraminic acid α(2-6)[galactose β(1-3)] N-acetylgalactosamine. The sugar moiety of the human G-CSF is not necessary for biological activity because human recombinant G-CSF pro-duced in E. coli is as active as the recombinant molecule produced in mouse cells.4,5 Several re-ports are available which point to the use of cell lines for synthesis of G-CSF cDNA.6, 7 Because the sequence bias of genes in nature and its correla-tion with tRNA are significantly different between procaryotes and eucaryotes, there is a limitation for the expression of human cDNA in E. coli system. Recently, however, the entire synthetic gene was used in order to increase the expression level of hrG-CSF.8 Also, the codon-anticodon interaction seems to be so sticky that it interferes with the translation of hG-CSF in E. coli, due to the abun-dance of GC rich codons in 5' end of hG-CSF cDNA.7 In this report, we used peripheral blood monocytes as RNA source for cDNA synthesis and its overexpression in E. coli , by altering the se-quence at the 5' end of the G-CSF-coding region and decreasing the G+C content without altering the predicted amino acids sequence.Materials and MethodsPlasmid, Bacterial strain and Reagents: pET23a was kindly provided by Biotechnology division of Pasteur Institute of Iran. E. coli Top10F' and BL21(DE3) were purchasted from Cinnagen (Iran). Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and chemical reagent were purchased from Roche. Primers were synthesised by GENE SET OLIGUS (France).Fig 1: Structure of expression vector (pET) [pETG-CSF construct]Archive of SIDOverexpression of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in E. coli133DNA Recombinant Technology: Extraction of plas-mid, digestion, isolation, ligation, transformation, identification, PCR were performed as described elsewhere.9Construction of Expression Vector: For subcloning of cDNA without signal sequence, pBluescript II sk containing 650 bp fragment, previously con-structed, was used as template in PCR by the fol-lowing:CATATGACACCCCTAGGCCCTGCC as forward primer; and GAATTCATTAGGGCTGGGCAAGGT as reverse primer.PCR product was 540 bp hG-CSF cDNA without signal sequence. Then, 540 bp fragment inserted into pET23a expression vector under control of T7 promoter.Recombinant Human G-CSF Expression: Compe-tent E. coli BL21(DE3) cells were transformed with pET23a expression vector containing the hG-CSF cDNA. E. coli cells were grown in shaker flasks at 37ºc, in LB broth medium until the absorbance of 0.7 at 600 nm was reached. 10 μl IPTG (100 mM) was then added, to induce the production of hG-CSF. After 4 h, the cells were harvested by cen-trifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min. SDS-PAGE was performed and for confirmation of rhG-CSF band in gel, western blotting with polyclonal and mono-clonal human G-CSF antibody were performed. In western blot, rabbit polyclonal antibody was used at1/1000 concentration and mouse monoclonal anti-body at 2.5 μg/ml.ResultsUsing PCR human G-CSF cDNA was obtained from previously constructed recombinant cloningvector of pBluescript SK-GCSF. 10The pBluescript containing 650 bp fragment was used as template in PCR with two primers into which Nde I and EcoR I sites were introduced . To increase mRNA stability and overexpression the forward primer was altered in two nucleotides. PCR product was 540 bp hG-CSF cDNA without signal sequence. The latter was inserted to pET23a expression vector under the control of T7 promoter (Fig 1). pETG-CSF recombinant vector transferred to E. coli BL21(DE3) strain and the transformant bacteria grown at 37˚C and induced by IPTG. The cell pellets were collected and lysed for SDS-PAGE (Fig 2). As shown in Figure 2. BL21(DE3) expressed a 18.6 KD molecular weight of G-CSF at a level of 35% of total cell protein as measured by densitometric scanning with photodoc and total lab software and Vilber lurmat Gel docu-mentation. The rhG-CSF was expressed as inclu-sion bodies. Western blotting with monoclonal and polyclonal hG-CSF antibodies confirmed the G-CSF band in gel (result not shown).DiscussionThe human G-CSF was formally first been applied to the leukopenia in US in 1991. At present, the hG-CSF is the most widely-used and clinically ef-fective haematopoietic growth factors. The ran-domized studies using rhG-CSF versus placebo after chemotherapy for cancers resulted in faster neutrophil recovery, less severe neutropenia, and infections reduced.2We constructed the procaryotic expression vec-tor pET23a containing human G-CSFb cDNA, and achieved high level expression of the hG-CSF in E. coli , which represented at least 35% of the total protein as determined by SDS-PAGE. The hG-CSF was expressed as inclusion bodies in E. coli . We used monocytes of peripheral Blood whereas Shu 2 and Nagata 3 used cell lines for RNA extrac-tion and cDNA synthesis . According to Delvin et al 7, a decrease in the G+C content of the 5' end of the coding region can increase the G-CSF expres-sion. Therefore, they altered 3-5 nucleotides in this region and reported 17% and 6.5% of the total pro-tein in the pL and trpP expression Systems whereas alteration of two nucleotides yielded 35% of the total protein of recombinant E. coli . Accord-ing to Kang et al.8, the limitation for the expression of human cDNA in E. coli system accounts for theFig 2: SDS-PAGE of E.coli BL-21 Recombinant strains. Lones, from left to right: 1. molecular weight marker (Kilodalton); 2. G-CSF (Filgrastim-Neupogen); 3. bacteria with plasmid 4 hours after induction; 4. bacteria with plasmid before induction; 5. bacteria without plasmid.Archive of SIDFallah M J, Akbari B, Saeedinia A.R, et al134 significant differences between sequence bias of genes in nature and their correlation with tRNA in procaryotes and eucaryotes. Therefore, they used the entire synthetic G-CSF genes and obtained 500-600 mg/lit rhG-CSF. We cultured recombinant E. coli in fermentor and produced 1.2 g/lit rhG-CSF. In conclusion, rhG-CSF was obtained in a signifi-cantly high quantity and the yield was 35% of total protein as determined by SDS-PAGE. Since it is easily obtained by simple purification steps, it may be cost- effective, even at an industrial scale.AcknowledgmentWe thank Vahid Sadeghi for the presentation of materials and regents and also Hossein Ali Sami for the editorial work.References1Nagata SH: Gene structure and function of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Bio es-says 1989; 10(4):113-7.2Shu zh, Qinong Y: Expression of cDNA for rhuG-CSF in E. coli and characterization of the Protein. Chin J Cancer Res 1998 ;(10):256-9. 3Nagata SH, Tsuchiya M, Asano S, et al: The chromosomal gene structure and two mRNAs for human granulocyte colony stimulating fac-tor. EMBO J 1986; 5(3):575-81.4Nagata SH, Fukunaga R: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its receptor. Prog Growth Factor Res 1991; 3(2):131-41.5 Hoglund M: Glycosilated and non-glycosilatedrecombinant huG-CSF. What is the difference? Med Oncol 1998; 15:229-33.6 Souza LM, Boone TC, Gabrilove J, et al: Re-combinant human granulocyte colony stimulat-ing factor: effects on normal and leukemia myeloid cells. Science 1986; 232(4746):61-5.7 Devlin PE, Drummond RJ, Toy P, et al: Altera-tion of amino-terminal codons of huG-CSF in-creases expression levels and allows efficient processing by methionine aminopeptidase in E. coli. Gene 1988; 65(1):13-22.8 Kang SH, Park CI, Park JH, et al: high levelexpressionn and simple purification of recom-binant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor in E. coli. Biotechnol Lett 1995; 17(7): 687-92.9 Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular cloning: alaboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Labora-tory, 1989.10 Saeedinia A, Sadeghizadeh M, Maghsoudi N,et al: Construction and cloning of human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (hG-CSF) cDNA. Modarres J M S 2003; 5(1).Archive of SID。
重组融合蛋白MBP-BSH在大肠杆菌中的表达及其纯化、功能鉴定
注:Apr. 具有氨苄青霉素抗性;Kanr. 具有卡那霉素抗性;m-MBP. 具有 MBP 双突变 A317V/I322V。
来源
实验室筛选保藏 实验室保藏 实验室保藏
日本 TaKaRa 公司 尚广东博士馈赠 尚广东博士馈赠 尚广东博士馈赠 尚广东博士馈赠 尚广东博士馈赠 尚广东博士馈赠 尚广东博士馈赠
purification efficiency for MBP-BSH protein than Amylose resin. In addition, His-Tag linked at the C-terminal was favorable
for the binding of nickel ions and as a result, MBP-BSH containing less impurities was obtained in a higher yield. The enzymatic
限制性内切酶 BamHⅠ和 XhoⅠ、250bp DNA Ladder Marker、λ/HindIII DNA Marker、pMD18-TTA 克 隆试剂盒、质粒提取试剂盒和 DNA 凝胶回收纯化试剂 盒 宝生物工程(大连)有限公司;Protein Marker Mid Range、氨苄青霉素、卡那霉素 上海生工生物工程技 术有限公司;酵母粉、胰蛋白胨 英国 Oxoid 公司; T4 DNA 连接酶 美国 New England Biolabs 公司;Amylose Resin、Ni-NTA Resin 德国 Novagen 公司。 1.3 bsh 基因的克隆及测序
大肠杆菌系统蛋白表达纯化流程
大肠杆菌系统蛋白表达纯化流程英文回答:Introduction:The expression and purification of proteins in Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a commonly used method in molecular biology research. E. coli is a well-studied and easily manipulated organism, making it an ideal host for protein expression. In this article, we will discuss the general workflow for the expression and purification of proteins in E. coli.Expression of the target protein:1. Gene cloning: The first step is to clone the gene encoding the target protein into an expression vector. This vector contains a promoter that drives the expression of the gene in E. coli.2. Transformation: The recombinant expression vector is then introduced into E. coli cells through a process called transformation. This results in the production of many E. coli cells carrying the target gene.3. Expression induction: The transformed E. coli cells are grown in a suitable culture medium until they reach a specific growth phase. At this point, expression of the target gene is induced by adding a chemical inducer or by changing the growth conditions.4. Protein expression: The induced E. coli cells produce the target protein, which can either be present in the soluble fraction or form insoluble aggregates called inclusion bodies.Protein purification:1. Cell lysis: The E. coli cells are harvested by centrifugation and then lysed to release the proteins. Various methods can be used for cell lysis, such as sonication, freeze-thaw cycles, or enzymatic digestion.2. Removal of cell debris: The cell lysate is then clarified by centrifugation to remove cell debris and insoluble material. The resulting supernatant contains the target protein along with other cellular components.3. Protein purification: Different purification techniques can be employed to isolate the target protein from the crude lysate. These techniques include affinity chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, size exclusion chromatography, and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. The choice of purification method depends on the properties of the target protein.4. Protein concentration: After purification, thetarget protein is often in a dilute solution. Concentration can be achieved by using techniques such as ultrafiltration or precipitation with ammonium sulfate.5. Protein characterization: The purified protein should be characterized to confirm its identity and purity. Techniques such as SDS-PAGE, western blotting, and massspectrometry can be used for protein analysis.Conclusion:The expression and purification of proteins in E. coli is a well-established and widely used technique in molecular biology research. The workflow involves gene cloning, protein expression, cell lysis, protein purification, concentration, and characterization. By following this general procedure, researchers can obtain purified proteins for further analysis and functional studies.中文回答:简介:大肠杆菌(E. coli)中的蛋白表达和纯化是分子生物学研究中常用的方法。
人补体C3功能片段rC3B的克隆表达和活性鉴定
人补体C3功能片段rC3B的克隆、表达和活性鉴定甘慧,周勇,孙萍,朱晓霞,王全立,詹林盛【摘要】本研究获取人类补体C3上与补体Ⅲ型受体(CR3)结合的功能区rC3B,并进行了表达、纯化和活性鉴定。
用基因扩增法取得rC3B 基因,并插入原核表达载体pQE30a,转化大肠杆菌 M15进行表达;用SDS PAGE电泳查验目的蛋白后以Ni2+螯合Sepharose Fast Flow 层析进行纯化;用Western blot与单核细胞黏附实验初步确认蛋白活性。
结果说明:钓取了人类补体C3的功能片段rC3B,构建了原核表达载体pQE30rC3B并在中得了到高效表达;经Ni2+固相化的螯合Sepharose Fast Flow亲和层析纯化蛋白后,蛋白纯度达80%;Western blot检测证明rC3B具有抗原性,单核细胞的黏附实验初步确认了纯化后蛋白的活性。
结论:确认了人类补体C3的这一活性区域,并取得了该蛋白的功能片段,为深切研究人类补体C3蛋白的功能和应用奠定了基础。
【关键词】原核表达Cloning, Expression and Identification of FunctionalFragment rC3B of Human Complement C3 in E. ColiAbstract This study was purposed to verify the binding part of human complement C3 to complement receptorⅢ(CRⅢ) in monocytes, the peptide rC3B, including the binding site, was expressed, purified and identified. rC3B, the binding part of human complement C3 to CRⅢ, was selected by computer aided modeling and summarizing researches published. Then, rC3B gene fragment was amplified by PCR, and cloned into prokaryotic vector pQE30a. The fusion protein rC3B was expressed in M15 and purified by Ni2+chelating affinity chromatography. The activity of rC3B was identified by Western blot and adherence assay with monocytes. The results showed that rC3B fragment was obtained, and a prokaryotic expression vector pQE30rC3B was constructed. rC3B was efficiently expressed and purified. In Western blot, the target protein showed the activity of binding with C3 antibody, while the purified protein showed the activity of adherence with monocytes. It is concluded that the recombinant C3B was obtained and identified, and this study lay the basis for the further functional analysis of C3.Key words complement C3; rC3B gene; prokaryote expression;monocyteJ Exp Hematol 2007; 15(4):827-832补体C3蛋白要紧由肝细胞和巨噬细胞产生。
Protein Expression and Purification Protocol
m temperature, or until the suspension becomes turbid and viscous due to release of the bacteria''s genomic DNA. c) In order to eliminate the extreme turbidity of the suspension, sonicate the suspensi on to shear the DNA until the turbidity is similar to that of a normal protein solution. Then centrifuge at 18,000 RPM in a Sorvall SS-34 rotor (or ~40,000 x g) for 20 minut es at 4 o C. d) Save the pellet and the supernatent. (If the solution is slighly turbid due to residua l DNA, a quick way to shear the DNA is to pass through a syringe with a needle.) Gen erally your protein is in the supernatent so simply freeze your pellets until you know where your protein is. Protein purification from this supernatent, however, will depend on the properties of the protein: its isoelectric point (pI), size, hydrophobicity, etc. (s ee below). Step 5: General protein purification protocol. How to figure out a good scheme? Here is an exampl e of a specific scheme for ubiquitin. A helpful guide from Pharmacia.
嗜热菌产酶现状的研究_潘丽贞
Science and Technology of Food Industry专题综述2012年第3期嗜热菌是应用最广泛的一种极端微生物,自1969年Brock T.D.和他的同事从美国黄石国家公园的温泉中分离到最适生长温度高达70℃的水生栖热菌,接下来30多年中嗜热菌的研究取得了重要进展,尤其近十年来嗜热菌已成为科学界的研究热点之一。
嗜热菌并非单一的菌属或菌群,而是广泛分布于各种不同的菌群中,如芽孢杆菌属、梭状芽孢杆菌属、栖热菌属、热厌氧杆菌属(Thermoanaerobacter )、闪烁杆菌属(Fervidobacterium )、热袍菌属(Thermotoga )及产水菌属(Aquifex )等[1]。
目前已有约70个属140种嗜热菌得到了鉴定,均属于古细菌及真细菌。
嗜热菌有代谢快、生长率高、世代时间短、酶的热稳定性高等优点,在造纸行业、环境保护、能源利用、烟草业、石油开采、液体燃料生产、生物转化及抗生素生产等领域都有广泛的应用。
嗜热菌的主要应用之一是嗜热酶的开发应用。
目前已知的从嗜热菌中分离出来的酶具有极高的热稳定性、传质速率高、耐有机溶剂等特点,可降低酶制剂的制备成本、提高酶促效率、减少能耗,其催化功能优于目前在各种工业生产中应用的酶,故在生物化工合成中有着广泛的应用。
1几种嗜热酶目前大多数的常温酶都发现了其对应的嗜热酶,如脂肪酶、蛋白酶、淀粉酶、纤维素酶、糖苷酶、酰胺酶、植酸酶、几丁质酶、漆酶、乙醇脱氢酶、腈水解酶、过氧化氢酶等,以下主要介绍几种用量较大以及近来新发现的酶。
1.1脂肪酶脂肪酶能够催化脂类化合物的水解、合成和酯交换,广泛应用于油脂水解、食品风味和香味改进、医药生产、皮革绢纺脱脂、低等油脂改性等,并可作为洗涤剂与化妆品的添加剂。
脂肪酶因其具有高度的立体选择性而倍受关注。
Yasser R.Abdel-Fattah 等[2]分离出一株疑似Geobacillus thermoleovorans 的脂肪酶产生菌,该菌产生的脂肪酶在60℃,pH8下稳定,经100℃处理1h ,剩余酶活为30%。
Expression---purification-and-identification-of-pr
二、蛋白纯化原则
Guidelines for Protein Purification
确定目标 (Define objectives)
for purity, activity and quantity required of final product to avoid over or under developing a method
为了生产性能更优良的蛋白质,需要对设计改造 过的蛋白质进行大量纯化,从而开发出相关产品
8
目录
前言 蛋白质纯化方法 蛋白质纯化原则 蛋白质纯化的步骤
材料的选择与预处理 蛋白质的提取 蛋白质的粗分级 蛋白质的细分级 蛋白质的鉴定
9
一、蛋白纯化方法
能从成千上万种蛋白质混合物中纯化出一 种蛋白质的原因是不同蛋白质在许多理化 性质上有着极大的不同。
方法:
通过改变pH、离子强度或加入有机试剂,促进蛋白质 分子的凝聚进而形成沉淀。
沉淀法
盐析法 有机溶剂沉淀法 等电点沉淀法
12
蛋白质在高浓度中性盐溶液中会沉淀析出, 称为盐析
盐析原理:
高浓度盐离子与蛋白质分子争夺水化水,破坏 蛋白质分子表面的水膜,同时盐离子也会影响 蛋白质分子所带电荷,从而引起蛋白质沉淀, 但通常不会引起蛋白质的变性。
分类
免疫亲和层析 生物亲和层析 金属螯合亲和层析 拟生物亲和层析
25
1.6分子形状
形状
形状的不同会导致蛋白质在离心通过溶液时, 或通过膜、凝胶过滤填料颗粒或电泳凝胶中的 小孔运动时,都会受到它的形状的影响。
方法
梯度离心的影响 电泳的影响
26
1.7变性和复性
原理
蛋白质在一定的理化条件下会失去原有的空间 结构、生物学功能及部分理化特性等称为变性。 当变性条件去除后恢复原有的空间结构及生物 学功能即为复性。
膜转运蛋白的功能性超表达和纯化
ISS N 100727626C N 1123870ΠQ中国生物化学与分子生物学报Chinese Journal of Biochemistry and M olecular Biology2007年12月23(12):1051~1058・技术与方法・膜转运蛋白的功能性超表达和纯化谢 浩3, 李其昌, 郭小明(武汉理工大学理学院生物科学与技术系,武汉 430070)摘要 膜转运蛋白结构和功能的研究是功能膜蛋白质组研究中的一个重要内容,而大量蛋白质的分离纯化是进行蛋白质的结构和功能研究的基础.目前,结构和功能膜蛋白质组学相关研究的瓶颈,在于不能有效地超量表达和纯化具有生物活性的膜转运蛋白.影响膜转运蛋白超量表达和纯化的关键因素,包括目标蛋白的拓扑学结构分析和去垢剂的选择.进行膜转运蛋白拓扑学结构的分析,对于构建用于活体表达的重组膜转运蛋白具有指导意义.去垢剂能够稳定去膜状态的膜蛋白,在膜转运蛋白的离体表达和亲和纯化以及包涵体的处理过程中具有重要的作用.本文就目前功能膜蛋白质组学研究中所涉及的有关膜转运蛋白功能性超表达和分离纯化策略及关键技术作一简述.关键词 膜转运蛋白;功能性超表达;蛋白质纯化;去垢剂;拓扑学结构中图分类号 Q51;Q78Overexpression and Purification of Membrane Transport Proteinwith N ative FunctionsXIE Hao3,LI Qi 2Chang ,G UO X iao 2Ming(Department o f Biological Science and Biotechnology ,Institute o f Science ,Wuhan Univer sity o f Technology ,Wuhan 430070,China )Abstract Structural and functional characterization of membrane transport protein is very im portant infunctional membrane proteomics ,which relies on the is olation and purification of large am ount of functional proteins.H owever ,effective overexpression and purification of biologically active membrane transport proteins are the primary bottleneck in contem porary functional and structural proteomics studies.Crucial factors influencing membrane protein overproductions include topological analysis of target proteins and selections of detergents.T opological analysis provides valuable in formation in constructing recombinant membrane transport proteins for in vivo expression.Detergents ,which used to maintain the native structure and function of lipid 2free membrane proteins ,play im portant roles in cell 2free expression ,affinity purification of membrane transport proteins ,and in vitro their refolding from inclusion bodies.In this article ,we reviewed the key strategies and crucial techniques for the overexpression and purification of membrane transport proteins in functional proteomics.K ey w ords membrane transport protein ;functional over 2expression ;protein purification ;detergent ;topological structure收稿日期:2007207209,接受日期:2007209220国家自然科学基金(N o.30600004)资助3联系人 T el :027*********,E 2mail :h.xie @Received :July 9,2007;Accepted :September 20,2007Supported by National Natural Science F oundation of China (N o.30600004)3C orresponding author T el :027*********,E 2mail :h.xie @ 能够同外界环境进行物质和信息交换是活细胞的基本特征之一.通过这种物质和信息交换的生理活动,细胞能感受环境变化,获取新陈代谢所必需的营养物质,并排出代谢产物和废物.细胞对溶质的选择性吸收和排放主要是通过细胞膜上以膜转运蛋白为基础的运输系统实现的.自从上个世纪40年代大肠杆菌乳糖转运蛋白被发现以来,生物学家对膜转运蛋白的生物化学和生理学特性进行了大量研究.随着现代分子生物学技术和生物信息学技术的发展,对膜转运蛋白的结构和功能机制的研究,逐渐成为当前功能膜蛋白质组学研究的重要内容[1~6].膜转运蛋白与膜受体蛋白和呼吸链蛋白复合体等都是典型的嵌膜蛋白.近年来,我国在膜蛋白领域取得了突破性进展,尤其是饶子和研究组对呼吸链蛋白复合体Ⅱ的结构解析更是添补了生物化学教科书的空白[7].与其它蛋白质相比,膜蛋白有以下一些特点:(1)种类多,在人类基因组中有15%~39%基因编码跨膜蛋白[8],而细菌基因组编码的基因中有3%~10%是膜转运蛋白基因[9];(2)数量少,多数膜蛋白表达量少于细胞蛋白总量的0.1%[10];(3)通过跨膜区或者共价键与磷脂双分子层相连,部分或全部嵌入膜内,有的则是跨膜分布,具有多个跨膜螺旋,需要脂膜的存在维持其结构和功能.功能膜蛋白质组学的一个重要研究领域,就是研究细胞中所有膜蛋白的功能以及实现其功能的结构基础.在功能膜蛋白质组学研究中,对于膜转运蛋白的结构和功能研究有重要的理论和应用意义.例如,对植物膜转运蛋白如离子通道蛋白的研究有助于理解农作物对养分的吸收机制和耐盐碱耐旱机制[11,12],从而在基因水平对农作物进行品种改良[13,14].很多疾病也同膜转运蛋白的异常有关,如Ⅱ型糖尿病同葡萄糖转运蛋白G lut4有关[15],对于此类膜转运蛋白的研究有助于进行新药设计和新治疗方法的研究.同时,一些细菌的抗药性也同细菌膜转运蛋白有关[16].大量蛋白质的分离纯化,是进行蛋白质的结构和功能研究的基础.通常情况下,多数膜蛋白的表达量极低,膜蛋白结构和功能研究的瓶颈在于缺少有效的对膜蛋白的超量表达和纯化的技术,以及进行结构研究的有效手段.与其他类型的膜蛋白相比,膜转运蛋白基本上都是单基因编码产物[17],能够独立行使生理功能,成为一个比较好的功能性表达和纯化的研究对象.目前常用的纯化策略是:(1)利用分子生物学技术构建含有融合亲和标签(fusion affinity tag)的重组膜蛋白;(2)优化重组膜蛋白的功能性表达;(3)分离纯化所表达的膜蛋白,并进行活性测试和结构研究.这种策略的优点在于:一方面,融合亲和标签的引入有利于检测重组膜蛋白的表达和纯化;另一方面,易于对目标蛋白进行修饰和操作,而这些修饰和操作例如定点突变等可以为蛋白结构和功能的研究提供重要的信息.应用这一策略,多种膜蛋白获得了表达和纯化[18,19],D obrovetsky等更是对来源于大肠杆菌和嗜热菌Thermotoga maritima的280种重组膜蛋白进行了表达和纯化研究,表达了其中1Π3的重组膜蛋白,并纯化了22种高表达的重组膜蛋白[20].在构建和表达重组膜蛋白时,需要综合考虑膜蛋白的基本生物学特征尤其是拓扑学结构;而在膜蛋白质的分离纯化过程中,需要考虑选择合适的去垢剂以维持膜蛋白在去膜状态下构像和功能的稳定性.以下,本文将介绍目前功能膜蛋白质组学研究中所涉及的有关膜转运蛋白表达和分离纯化策略以及关键技术所取得的进展.1 膜蛋白的拓扑学结构和构建重组膜蛋白膜蛋白的拓扑学结构主要指蛋白质序列中的跨膜片段在膜上的取向,一般遵循疏水性原则(蛋白质跨膜区域必定是高度疏水区域)和正电荷氨基酸向内原则(正电荷氨基酸倾向于位于胞质一侧)[21].受益于各项基因组计划的完成,可以很容易地获取膜蛋白的序列,并基于膜蛋白序列中氨基酸侧链的亲水和疏水特性,可以利用很多程序或网站服务预测其拓扑学结构[21,22].Fig.1显示了根据氨基酸序列,利用T oppred[23]所预测的大肠杆菌的2种核苷酸转运蛋白Nup G和NupC的拓扑学结构.虽然这2种蛋白质的功能比较相似,都是核苷酸的次级转运蛋白,其拓扑学结构却明显不同,例如Nup G的有12个跨膜螺旋,N端和C端位于胞质一侧,而NupC只有10个跨膜螺旋,N端和C端位于细胞外侧.在构建用于活体表达的重组膜蛋白时,必须考虑蛋白质的拓扑学结构,尤其是所表达膜蛋白的N 端和C端是位于胞质一侧还是细胞外侧.一方面,膜转运蛋白的异源超表达受其第1跨膜螺旋位于脂膜外侧的N端序列影响.M onne等[24]对来源于酵母线粒体的11种转运蛋白利用乳酸乳球菌Lactococcus lactis的超表达研究表明,如果去掉酵母转运蛋白第1跨膜螺旋位于膜外侧的N端序列,或将其改变为源于乳酸乳球菌的信号序列,可以将其表达水平提高10倍以上.而在构建重组膜转运蛋白时,判断是否需要引入信号序列以利于蛋白质表达的依据是膜蛋白N端的位置.以上述大肠杆菌核苷酸转运蛋白Nup G为例,Nup G属于主易化扩散载体超家族(major facilitator superfamily,MFS),其N端位置位于胞质一侧,在构建重组Nup G时,不需要考虑引入和包含信号序列[19].类似的蛋白质还有LacY、G lpF[5,6].而上述核苷酸转运蛋白NupC属于富集型核苷转运蛋白(concentrative nucleoside transporter,C NT)家族[25],其2501中国生物化学与分子生物学报23卷Fig.1 Topological prediction of nucleoside transporters NupG and NupC from Escherichia coli T opological prediction is based on the protein sequences of Nup G and NupC by using webware T oppred[23].(A)The predicted topological structure of Nup G;(B)The predicted topological structure of NupCN端位于细胞外侧.本研究表明,在构建其表达载体,尤其是需要在N端引入亲和标签如M BP蛋白质时,需要同时引入和包含信号序列,才能成功地表达目标蛋白质.另一方面,根据膜转运蛋白的拓扑学结构和氨基酸侧链的极性,可以选择需要引入的亲和标签种类和位置.亲和标签是一段氨基酸多肽或蛋白质,在重组蛋白质中引入亲和标签的目的在于判断目标蛋白是否表达以及亲和纯化目标蛋白.T able1列出了常用的亲和标签[26].这些亲和标签的共同特点是能与一定的亲和介质结合,从而有利于含融合了亲和标签的重组蛋白质的亲和纯化.在引入亲和标签时需要遵循正电荷氨基酸向内原则,否则含有亲和标签的目标蛋白质的表达将会受到影响.以上文中大肠杆菌核苷酸转运蛋白Nup G和NupC为例.组氨酸含正电荷侧链,而NupC的C端位于大肠杆菌的细胞外侧,多聚组氨酸亲和标签的引入影响了NupC 的表达.在实践中,选择了含中性氨基酸侧链较多的Strep亲和标签,所构建的含有Strep亲和标签的重组NupC的表达量远远大于含有多聚组氨酸亲和标签的重组NupC.而Nup G的C端位于胞质侧,可以在Nup G的C端引入多聚组氨酸亲和标签,符合正电荷氨基酸向内原则,所构建的重组Nup G的表达不受影响[19].其他的膜转运蛋白,如大肠杆菌乳糖转运蛋白LacY,大肠杆菌甘油232磷酸转运蛋白G lpT,大肠杆菌Na+ΠH+反向转运蛋白NhaA的研究也有类似的结果[4~6].M ohanty等[27]研究也表明,对于N端和C端都位于胞质侧的大肠杆菌水通道蛋白AqpZ 而言,对于在N端或C端分别含有6~10个组氨酸的重组AqpZ蛋白,其表达不会受多聚组氨酸的长度和位置的影响.3501第12期谢 浩等:膜转运蛋白的功能性超表达和纯化 T able1 Locations of several affinity tagsA ffinity tag LocationsHis2tag N2,C2,internal S2tag N2,C2,internal Thioredoxin N2,C2Strep2tag N2,C2S treptococcal protein G N2,C2G lutathione2S2trans ferase(G ST)N2Maltose binding protein(M BP)N2,C2Calm odulin binding protein(C BP)N2,C22 重组膜蛋白的功能性超表达根据膜蛋白的拓扑学特性构建了含有亲和标签的重组膜蛋白后,需要选择合适的表达策略并优化表达条件,以获取大量具有活性的膜蛋白,从而利于后续的分离纯化以及结构功能研究.限制膜蛋白表达的因素包括:表达宿主缺乏有效的膜蛋白折叠机制或稳定机制;;重组膜蛋白对宿主的毒性;密码子偏爱性导致的蛋白质翻译的低效率;蛋白质翻译后加工修饰的错误或缺失[28].根据所表达的膜蛋白来源,可以选择的高效表达系统包括:活体表达系统如原核表达系统和真核表达系统;以及离体表达系统[29~33].对于来源于原核生物的膜蛋白,利用大肠杆菌表达系统取得了良好的效果.大肠杆菌等革兰氏阳性菌大多数膜蛋白的表达和折叠与信号识别颗粒(signal recognition particle,SRP)有关[34].膜蛋白在翻译的同时,在SRP 的作用下插入到膜上完成折叠.对重组膜蛋白功能性表达的优化的目的在于控制翻译和折叠的相对速度以达到膜蛋白的最佳表达效果.SRP介导的膜蛋白折叠,也涉及到宿主细胞折叠机制对异源重组膜蛋白的识别和折叠效率.因此,需要优化影响膜蛋白翻译和折叠的因素,例如,表达宿主和异源膜蛋白来源的同源性、培养温度和培养基成分、共表达蛋白质的选择等.一些表达成功的例子包括:大肠杆菌乳糖转运蛋白LacY、大肠杆菌甘油232磷酸转运蛋白G lpT、大肠杆菌Na+ΠH+反向转运蛋白NhaA、大肠杆菌核苷酸转运蛋白Nup G和NupC[4~6,18~20].一些来源于真核细胞的膜转运蛋白也可以利用原核系统,如乳酸乳球菌表达系统.乳酸乳球菌表达系统有很多适于表达异源膜蛋白质的优点,例如生长速度快不需要曝气;具有很多氨基酸营养缺陷型菌株可用于标记选择;构建的质粒载体稳定性高同时转化效率高;启动子调控区域控制严谨,适于表达毒性基因产物;膜蛋白表达量高且重复性好;基因组相对较小而其它基因产物表达较少,因此易于纯化目标蛋白;表达的膜蛋白容易定位于细胞膜,因而包涵体产生的机率极低;具有较温和的蛋白质降解机制;由于具有单层细胞膜,易于测试表达的膜蛋白的活性如离子通道蛋白;所表达的膜蛋白容易增溶,易于纯化[35].利用乳酸乳球菌表达系统,多种来源于真核和原核的膜蛋白得到了活性表达,例如机械敏感性通道蛋白、人类K DE L受体蛋白、ABC转运蛋白家族的转运蛋白、上文中提到的MFS家族的转运蛋白、源于线粒体载体蛋白家族的蛋白、以及一些多肽转运蛋白[35].M onne等[24]在对源于酵母线粒体的11种膜转运蛋白N端进行了合适的加工和修饰后,利用乳酸乳球菌表达系统也取得了较好的表达效果.然而,来源于真核生物的膜蛋白的功能性表达往往涉及蛋白质加工和分选的一系列过程,利用原核表达系统通常不能取得满意的效果.T ate等[36]利用大肠杆菌、酵母、杆状病毒表达系统,和4株不同的哺乳动物培养细胞系对小鼠52羟色胺转运蛋白(rat serotonin transporter,rSERT)进行了功能性表达研究.研究表明,大肠杆菌和酵母能够表达rSERT,但是所表达的蛋白质没有活性;杆状病毒表达系统所表达的rSERT蛋白质大部分是没有糖基化因而无功能的蛋白质;只有哺乳动物培养细胞系能够表达完全糖基化具有功能的rSERT蛋白质.Higgins等[37]利用2种昆虫细胞表达系统,即稳定昆虫细胞系和杆状病毒表达系统,对来源于果蝇的1种钾离子通道蛋白进行了表达研究.结果表明,只有稳定昆虫细胞系能够表达大量正确组装的位于质膜上的糖基化的离子通道蛋白,而杆状病毒表达系统表达的离子通道蛋白大多位于细胞内部,不能正确组装.他们的研究还发现,如果利用弱的蛋白质启动子,同时表达分子伴侣,能够提高离子通道蛋白的表达效率.这些研究证实,膜蛋白在被核糖体合成后需要一定的时间和适当的机制完成加工和折叠,以及最终的定位,这对于膜蛋白的功能性表达有重要意义.在活体表达系统中,很多因素都能导致膜蛋白表达的低效率,例如所表达的膜转运蛋白对宿主细胞有毒性作用,这时可以考虑利用离体表达系统表达膜转运蛋白[38].离体表达系统还能经济有效地标记目标蛋白,满足一些特殊研究的需要如NMR研究.K lammt等[39]利用大肠杆菌离体表达系统成功地表达了多药转运蛋白EmrE、SugE、T ehA和半胱氨酸4501中国生物化学与分子生物学报23卷转运蛋白Y fiK.这些离体表达的膜蛋白以聚集状态存在,加入去垢剂后,大多数膜蛋白可以溶解,经C D 光谱检测显示其二级结构以α螺旋为主,而且溶解的EmrE 、SugE 和T ehA 能够被重组到人工脂膜上.对EmrE 重组膜蛋白脂质体的转运活性检测表明,离体表达的EmrE 具有转运活性.去垢剂具有两极性,能够稳定去膜状态下膜蛋白的稳定性,如果直接在离体表达系统加入合适的去垢剂,可以获得以溶解状态存在的膜转运蛋白,例如多药转运蛋白EmrE 和机械敏感性通道蛋白MscL [40,41].这些膜蛋白可以直接用于构建重组膜蛋白脂质体.对MscL 重组膜蛋白脂质体的研究表明,加入去垢剂后离体表达的MscL 具有同活体表达的MscL 相似的活性.因此,利用离体表达系统可以获得具有合适构像和功能活性的膜转运蛋白质.3 关于包涵体的形成和处理重组蛋白异源活体表达过程中经常遇到的2个问题是:(1)表达宿主蛋白酶系统对所表达异源目标蛋白的降解和(2)目标蛋白表达在包涵体中.对于膜蛋白而言,蛋白质大部分包埋在质膜中,避免了蛋白酶的降解.对于质膜外的膜蛋白肽链,可以在分析膜蛋白拓扑学结构后预测其蛋白酶切位点,如果怀疑表达过程中有降解发生,可以通过点突变来钝化酶切位点,避免蛋白酶降解.包涵体的形成与外源蛋白的一些主要理化特性有关,如电荷数、形成转角的氨基酸含量、半胱氨酸及脯氨酸的比例、亲水性以及氨基酸总数等均能影响形成包涵体[42].对于膜蛋白而言,由于表达宿主缺乏原宿主翻译后修饰以及协助蛋白折叠的系统,或者表达速率过快,导致所表达的膜蛋白不能正确折叠和插入质膜,也会形成包涵体.而处于还原环境的细菌胞质不能有效地完成二硫键的氧化折叠[43],也是包涵体形成的原因.当目标蛋白表达在包涵体中时,可以通过优化表达条件减少包涵体的形成.通常考虑的因素包括表达宿主和载体的选择,培养基的选择及优化,培养温度的优化,诱导条件调试,如诱导物的浓度、诱导时机、诱导时间的优化,以及对目标蛋白进行一定结构的改造[44].目前,对于如何彻底避免包涵体的形成还没有非常理想的解决办法,对于不同的膜蛋白,需要尝试不同的策略来改善和克服这一问题.另一方面,包涵体的形成有利于一些蛋白质的纯化.然而,在纯化后必须利用一定的技术使表达在包涵体中的蛋白质重新折叠恢复原有构象,此过程涉及多种影响蛋白质结构稳定的因素,如去垢剂和膜脂的成分和比例、缓冲液离子强度、温度、作用时间,关键在于用何种比例的去垢剂和膜脂分子去处理彻底变性的膜蛋白,使其重新折叠恢复构象并重组到脂膜中.包涵体中膜蛋白的复性步骤通常为:(1)用各种去垢剂将膜蛋白从包涵体中溶解;(2)加入一定比例的去垢剂Π脂质分子混合物以替换原有的去垢剂;(3)移出所有去垢剂,使膜蛋白重组到脂膜中并恢复构象[45].目前,这方面的研究已取得了一定的结果,多种膜蛋白已从大肠杆菌所表达的包涵体中纯化并重新折叠恢复原有构象.例如来源于HI V 病毒的嵌膜蛋白Vpu 蛋白质从包涵体中纯化后,重组到脂膜上能够显示离子通道活性[46];表达于包涵体的植物叶绿体的通道蛋白T oc75和光吸收复合体Ⅱ及流感病毒的质子通道M2蛋白质在不同去垢剂的作用下,也成功地重新折叠并恢复构像[47,48].此外,一些生物公司所开发的膜蛋白复性试剂盒能够被用来使表达于包涵体的膜蛋白在纯化后恢复构像,例如美国ProF oldin 公司开发的膜蛋白复性试剂盒,提供了2种方式(柱结合方式和稀释方式)和20种条件来帮助研究者选择膜蛋白最佳复性条件[49].4 去垢剂的选择和重组膜蛋白的纯化含有融合亲和标签的重组膜蛋白的纯化涉及3个主要步骤:用合适的去垢剂从质膜上释放膜蛋白;用亲和层析柱或亲和介质吸附游离的膜蛋白;洗去杂质,洗脱膜蛋白.在这一过程中对去垢剂的选择必须考虑以下2点:(1)去垢剂对目标膜蛋白的增溶效率;(2)纯化之后采取何种策略去除去垢剂以进行结构和功能研究.膜蛋白在自然状态时需要质膜支持其结构和功能,在分离纯化过程中如何维持去膜状态下膜蛋白结构和功能的稳定性致关重要,通常是用去垢剂的双极性来实现,即去垢剂同膜蛋白以及膜脂的疏水部位相互作用,削弱膜蛋白与膜脂质分子间的疏水性结合,使膜蛋白从膜脂中释放出来.游离膜蛋白的疏水部位在去垢剂的保护下,保持原有构象,因而能够维持其原有功能,如对底物或抑制物等的结合.去垢剂分为离子型和非离子型2类.离子型去垢剂如十二烷基硫酸钠(S DS ),能使蛋白质以单体的形式被分离,但蛋白质都发生了高度变性.非离子型去垢剂如十二烷基2β2D 2麦芽糖苷(n 2dodecyl 2β2D 25501第12期谢 浩等:膜转运蛋白的功能性超表达和纯化 maltoside,DDM),辛基2β2D2吡喃葡糖苷(n2octyl2β2D2 glucopyranoside,OG),T riton X2100(TX100);两性去垢剂如十二烷基二甲胺氧化物(lauryldimethylamine oxide,LDAO).非离子型去垢剂和两性去垢剂对膜蛋白质的变性作用较弱,常用于膜蛋白的离子交换和亲和层析[50].去垢剂对膜蛋白的增溶效率与去垢剂的结构和临界胶束浓度(critical micelle concentration, CMC)有关,可以通过对去垢剂的种类和浓度的改变来优化.例如,不同去垢剂在不同浓度下对大肠杆菌核苷酸转运蛋白NupC的增溶效率明显不同, DDM和LDAO对NupC有较高的溶解效率,因而,在对NupC的亲和纯化实验中,可以采用DDM和LDAO来溶解NupC.用合适的去垢剂将含有亲和标记的重组膜蛋白从质膜上溶解后,再用亲和层析柱或亲和介质吸附游离的膜蛋白来进行亲和纯化实验,纯化步骤同可溶蛋白质的亲和纯化步骤基本相似.但是,必须注意溶液中去垢剂的浓度必须保持在临界胶束浓度之上,同时溶液中需含有高浓度甘油(20%),以维持膜蛋白的疏水构像和功能的稳定性[10].Fig.2显示了作者对大肠杆菌葡糖苷酸转运蛋白G usB的亲和纯化[10].Fig.2 A ffinity purification of the glucuronide transporter G usB from Escherichia coli[10]All sam ples were incubated at37℃for30m inutes.The G usB was detected by S DS2PAGE stained with C oomassie brilliant blue.The gel was loaded as follows:lane M,m olecular weight markers;lane M m,m ixed membranes from E.coli expressing G usB;lane Pt,ins oluble materials from m ixed membranes after s olubilization in DDM;lane Sn,s olubilized proteins from m ixed membranes;lane Ub,s olubilized proteins that did not bind with Ni2NT A resin;lanes E1,E2,E3,elution fractions with im idaz ole bu ffer.Arrow points to G usB 在去膜状态下,即使有去垢剂和甘油的共同作用,大多数膜蛋白的稳定性也不强.因此,在纯化后必须根据需要很快将膜蛋白重组到人工脂膜上,构建膜蛋白脂质体,恢复膜蛋白在脂膜上的结构和功能.在这一过程中,去垢剂的浓度需降至低于其临界胶束浓度,使膜蛋白脱离去垢剂的作用,插入到脂膜上以形成人工膜蛋白脂质体.去除去垢剂或降低去垢剂浓度的方法有稀释法、凝胶过滤法、透析法、离子交换层析法、及特殊的介质吸收法例如Biobeads.采用凝胶过滤法和离子交换层析法时,不利于膜蛋白在移除去垢剂的同时与膜脂分子相互作用.透析法移除去垢剂的速率较慢,常用于膜蛋白的二维结晶实验.在构建用于功能活性研究的人工膜蛋白脂质体时,通常采用稀释法或Biobeads吸收法移除去垢剂[10,19].选用高临界胶束浓度的去垢剂有利于从系统中快速去除去垢剂,所以在膜蛋白亲和纯化的同时交换去垢剂,将低临界胶束浓度的去垢剂交换成高临界胶束浓度的去垢剂.T able2显示了几种去垢剂的临界胶束浓度[51].其中DDM的临界胶束浓度低于LDAO的临界胶束浓度,如果用DDM增溶的膜蛋白如核苷酸转运蛋白NupC,可以在纯化过程中交换成LDAO,以利于在后续膜重组实验中移去LDAO,使NupC插入到脂膜形成人工膜蛋白脂质体进行功能活性研究.T able2 CMC values of several detergents[51]Detergent CMC valueDDM(n2dodecyl2β2D2maltoside)01009%(0118mm olΠL)TX100(T riton X2100)01015%(0124mm olΠL)NP24001018%(0129mm olΠL)LDAO(lauryl dimethylamine oxide)01023%(1mm olΠL)S DS0123%(8mm olΠL)CH APS0162%(10mm olΠL)OG(n2octyl2β2D2glucopyranoside)0173%(25mm olΠL) 6501中国生物化学与分子生物学报23卷。
生物酶工程
修饰酶基因的方法主要方法 (i)定位突变 (ii)体外定向进化
(i)定位突变
定位突变(site-directed mutagenesis)是根据 酶的结构、功能和作用机制的信息,在基因水平
上精确改变酶分子中的氨基酸残基,对酶的性质 和其催化特性进行改造,产生符合特定需要的 酶。
方法:
盒式诱变 寡聚苷酸引物诱变 PCR诱变
定向进化的应用
目标酶
所需功能
方法
结果
实施菌种
卡那霉素核苷基 转移酶
枯草杆菌蛋白酶
β-内酰胺酶
对硝基苯酯酶
胸苷激酶
β-半乳糖苷酶
砷酸脱毒途径
热稳定性
作用于有机溶剂
作用于新底物
有机溶剂中的底 物特异性和活性 第五特异性 基
因理疗 底物特异性
砷酸抗性
定位诱变+选择 易错PCR+选择 DNA改组+选择 易错PCR+重组 交错延伸+选择 DNA改组+选择 DNA改组+选择
液体 发酵
Cel基因工程 菌株的筛选
2. 突变酶
定义:利用有控制地对天然酶基因进行剪 切、修饰或突变,从而改变这些酶的催化 特性、底物专一性或稳定性,使之更加符 合人们的需要。
遗传修饰改变酶的性能大致有:
(1)提高酶的活性 (2)提高酶的稳定性 (3)改变底物专一性 (4)改变酶的最适pH值 (5)改变酶对辅酶的要求 (6)改变酶的别构调节能力
克隆酶图例 生物体
酶基因
载体
宿主
克隆酶
发酵 基因工程菌
2. 基因工程菌的定义
外源基因转入微生物宿主细胞内,与宿主 细胞的遗传物质相结合,后代宿主的遗传物质 中含有外源基因,这种带上人工赋予的新的遗 传特性的宿主微生物,被称为基因工程菌。
crispr-cas9复合体构建流程
crispr-cas9复合体构建流程1.为了构建CRISPR-Cas9复合体,首先需要设计和合成cas9核酸序列。
In order to construct the CRISPR-Cas9 complex, it is necessary to design and synthesize the Cas9 nucleic acid sequence.2.接着需要选择适当的crispr RNA或gRNA序列,与cas9相结合以指导靶向基因组的位置。
Then, an appropriate CRISPR RNA or gRNA sequence needs to be selected to guide the Cas9 to the targeted position in the genome.3.将设计好的cas9和crispr RNA或gRNA序列合并形成合成DNA 片段。
The designed Cas9 and CRISPR RNA or gRNA sequences are combined to form a synthetic DNA fragment.4.制备好的合成DNA片段需要进行定向克隆到适当的表达载体中。
The prepared synthetic DNA fragment needs to be directionally cloned into an appropriate expression vector.5.表达载体通常需要包含启动子、编码区和终止子,以确保目标基因能够被正确表达。
The expression vector usually needs to contain a promoter, coding region, and terminator to ensure proper expression of the target gene.6.将构建好的表达载体转化到大肠杆菌或酵母等宿主细胞中。
EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION OF RECOMBINANT SOLUBL
专利名称:EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION OFRECOMBINANT SOLUBLE TISSUE FACTOR 发明人:REZAIE, Alireza,ESMON, Charles,T.,MORRISSEY, James, H.申请号:US1992011270申请日:19921229公开号:WO93/013211P1公开日:19930708专利内容由知识产权出版社提供摘要:A method is disclosed to make any protein in a form that can be isolated rapidly from a solution using a specific monoclonal antibody designated 'HPC-4'. It has now been determined that it is possible to form a fusion protein of the epitope with a protein to be isolated, and isolate the protein using HPC-4-based affinity chromatography. In the preferred embodiment, a specific protease cleavage site is inserted between the epitope and the protein so that the epitope can be easily removed from the isolated protein. In an example, a functionally active soluble tissue factor including the twelve amino acid epitope recognized in combination with calcium by HPC-4 and a factor Xa cleavage site was expressed from a vector inserted into a procaryotic expression system. The recombinant tissue factor can be rapidly isolated in a single chromatographic step using the HPC-4 monoclonal antibody immobilized on a suitable substrate. Once isolated, the Protein C epitope is removed by cleavage with factor Xa, leaving the functionally active, soluble tissue factor.申请人:OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION地址:US国籍:US代理机构:PABST, Patrea, L.更多信息请下载全文后查看。
鸡肝碱性磷酸酶提取及在线固定化研究
鸡肝碱性磷酸酶提取及在线固定化研究杨梅;张强;王欢;徐芬;孙彤【摘要】分别用有机溶剂沉淀法和盐析法从大骨鸡肝中提取出碱性磷酸酶,并考察了提取酶液的酶促反应动力学性质.在此基础上,利用顺序注射系统将提取酶在线固定于XC-72导电炭黑表面,制备了固定化碱性磷酸酶.结果表明,大骨鸡肝碱性磷酸酶催化磷酸苯二钠分解的最佳pH=10.8,最适温度为50℃,米氏常数为1.62 mmol/L.相比游离酶,所得固定化酶的比活力显著提高.%In this paper, the organic solvent precipitation and salting-out methods were used to extract alkaline phosphatase(ALP) from big-bone chicken liver, and the kinetic properties of the extracted ALP were also studied. Employing a sequential injection system, the extracted ALP was then on-line immobilized on the surface of XC-72 material. The results indicated that the optimum pH and temperature for ALP from big-bone chicken liver to catalyze the phenylphosphoric acid disodium were 10.8 and 50 ℃, respectively, and Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) was 1. 62 mmol/L. Compared with free enzyme, the activity of immobilized alkaline phosphatase was enhanced significantly.【期刊名称】《辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版)》【年(卷),期】2011(034)002【总页数】3页(P206-208)【关键词】碱性磷酸酶;大骨鸡;顺序注射;在线固定化【作者】杨梅;张强;王欢;徐芬;孙彤【作者单位】辽宁师范大学化学化工学院,辽宁大连116029;辽宁师范大学化学化工学院,辽宁大连116029;辽宁师范大学化学化工学院,辽宁大连116029;辽宁师范大学化学化工学院,辽宁大连116029;辽宁师范大学化学化工学院,辽宁大连116029【正文语种】中文【中图分类】O657.3碱性磷酸酶(Alkaline Phosphatase,EC 3.1.3.1,简称AKP或ALP),是一种底物专一性较低的磷酸单酯酶,广泛存在于人体、动物、植物及微生物体内[1].由于碱性磷酸酶在生物的磷酸基团代谢和转化中发挥着重要作用,所以人体碱性磷酸酶水平在临床医学上被作为诊断骨骼及肝脏类疾病的重要指标[2],而从各种动植物、微生物中提取的碱性磷酸酶被广泛应用于酶联免疫、生物传感、分子生物学领域的研究[3].商品化碱性磷酸酶主要提取自牛小肠、麦芽以及大肠杆菌等[1,4],也有用鸡组织来提取碱性磷酸酶的相关报道[5].为了提高酶的活性﹑稳定性和循环使用率,碱性磷酸酶的固定化已成为目前的研究热点[6-7].笔者在前人工作基础上,用大骨鸡肝作为酶源,分别用有机溶剂沉淀法和盐析法提取碱性磷酸酶,并且利用已构建的顺序注射-紫外可见分光光度系统[8],以XC-72/PVC为载体,对碱性磷酸酶的在线固定化以及固定前后酶比活性进行了初步研究和比较.1 实验部分1.1 仪器与试剂组织匀浆器;高速离心机KDC—16H(科大创新股份中佳分公司);UV—240紫外可见分光光度计(Shimadzu,日本);721可见分光光度计(上海第三分析仪器厂);双向注射泵(Cavro,Sunnyvale,加拿大);六位选择阀(Valco,美国).0.05 mol/L的Tris-HAc缓冲溶液(含0.01mol/L醋酸镁,pH=8.8);正丁醇;丙酮;无水乙醇;牛血清白蛋白BSA;4-氨基安替比林;磷酸苯二钠;铁氰化钾;苯酚等.本实验所用试剂皆为分析纯,水为二次蒸馏水.复合材料XC-72/PVC:取XC-72导电炭黑(美国卡波特)1.0g用混酸(22.5mL浓 HNO3+7.5mL浓 H2SO4)浸渍室温超声振荡6h,抽滤,二次水洗至中性.自然干燥后,按质量比1∶5与PVC微球混匀搅拌,使XC—72担载于PVC表面,制成XC—72/PVC复合载体材料.1.2 实验方法1.2.1 ALP提取将新鲜大骨鸡鸡肝除去结缔组织,先用0.01mol/L醋酸镁-醋酸钠溶液清洗干净,再称取2.5g鸡肝,切碎置于匀浆器中,冰水浴匀浆30min,取匀浆液于离心管中在低温高速离心机中离心(8 000r/min)20min,取上清液备用.分别用有机溶剂沉淀法和盐析法[9]提取ALP,所得粗酶蛋白溶解于pH=8.8的Tris-HAc缓冲溶液,-20℃保存待用.1.2.2 蛋白含量和酶活性测定蛋白含量的测定采用紫外分光光度法:用牛血清白蛋白作为基准蛋白,以280nm处的紫外吸收光度值对粗酶提取液中的总蛋白进行定量;实际蛋白含量采用如下校正公式[10]计算:ALP比活力的测定采用金氏法[11]:以磷酸苯二钠为底物,4-氨基安替比林和铁氰化钾为显色剂,在510nm波长处测定吸光度.规定37℃时,单位时间产生lμmoL酚的酶量为1个活力单位(U).ALP的比活力采用蛋白单位质量比活力(U/mg)和单位体积比活力(U/mL)计量.1.2.3 ALP的在线固定化ALP的在线固定化在如图1所示的顺序注射系统中进行:1个2.5mL双向注射泵用于液流的驱动;1个填充有XC-72/PVC载体的微柱结合在六位选择阀的通道6内;1个置于UV—240紫外可见分光光度计中的150μL 流通池由三通与阀5、6端口相连;所有实验步骤的控制和数据的采集均由Windows 2000操作系统下的软件FIAlab 3000(FIAlab Instruments,美国)和760CRT(上海精密科学仪器有限公司)完成;所有外部通道均用内径为0.8mm的PTFE管连结,阀与注射泵之间的储存盘管的容积约为2.4mL.ALP在线固定化和吸附水平评价方法:在图1所示的流路中,首先吸入1 500μL载液于双向注射泵中,接着由通道1以10μL/s的流速吸入300μL ALP提取液于储存盘管,然后以2μL/s的流速从通道5反向推至流通池停流,扫描吸附前ALP 的紫外可见吸收光谱,然后排空液体;再从通道1以10μL/s的流速吸入900μL ALP提取液,由通道6以2μL/s的流速推出,流经XC—72/PVC微柱后至流通池停流,扫描吸附后ALP提取液的紫外可见吸收光谱.在此过程中,ALP被吸附于XC—72表面完成固定化,同时通过ALP提取液吸附前后的紫外可见吸收光谱差异评价吸附水平.2 结果与讨论2.1 ALP提取方法比较有机溶剂沉淀法和盐析法是2种最常用的蛋白提取方法.有机溶剂沉淀法主要影响因素有有机溶剂种类、温度以及酸度等.单一有机溶剂沉淀效果不如多种溶剂交替沉淀效果好,本实验选用介电常数小的丙酮和生物毒性低的乙醇作为有机沉淀剂;为防止ALP变性,所有提取操作均在冰水浴中进行;蛋白在等电点时溶解度最低,不同来源ALP的等电点大多在4.4~7.6之间,又因为镁离子对ALP有稳定和保护作用,本实验经优化选用pH=8.8的含有乙酸镁的Tris-HAc缓冲溶液控制提取酸度.有机溶剂沉淀法所得ALP提取液的校正蛋白含量为0.79g/L(n=3),单位质量酶比活力为0.13U/mg(n=3).盐析法主要影响因素有离子强度、温度及酸度等.本实验离子强度由硫酸铵调节,经优化后按饱和度0.3到0.6顺次盐溶盐析,操作均在冰水浴中进行,酸度控制在pH=8.8,盐析后用自制半透膜透析以除去盐分.盐析法提取ALP校正蛋白含量均值为0.84g/L(n=3),单位质量酶比活力为0.12U/mg(n=3).图1 顺序注射在线固定化酶制备系统结果表明两种提取方法所得提取液ALP平均比活力相近.有机溶剂沉淀法提取ALP 的活性易受有机溶剂影响,但操作简单提取速度快;盐析法提取ALP稳定性较好,但加盐速度和加盐量不易精确控制.综合考虑,本实验采用有机溶剂沉淀法提取ALP进行性质实验.2.2 大骨鸡肝ALP的酶促反应动力学性质ALP的酶促反应动力学性质因来源不同而异.本实验以磷酸苯二钠为底物,采用金氏法考察了大骨鸡肝ALP酶促反应的最适温度、酸度以及米氏常数Km.从图2可以看出,随着温度升高,ALP的活性逐渐上升,50℃左右时ALP的活性达到最大;在一定的pH范围内,ALP的活性随着pH的增大先增大后减小,当pH值为10.8左右ALP活性较高.米氏常数Km是指当酶促反应速度达到最大反应速度一半时的底物浓度,Km值越小,酶与底物的亲和力越大,用双倒数作图法得到Km=1.62mmol/L,说明ALP与底物磷酸苯二钠有良好的亲和性.2.3 大骨鸡肝ALP在XC—72表面的吸附作用和在线固定化条件优化2.3.1 XC—72对ALP的在线吸附 ALP粗酶提取液活性低、稳定性较差、不易循环使用,而固定化酶可以克服上述不足.为此,本实验以XC—72为载体,考察了大骨鸡肝ALP在其表面的吸附能力.由于XC—72粒度太小,装柱后在流动系统中柱压过大,所以将其担载于PVC微球上再装柱.图3为ALP提取液流经XC—72/PVC微柱前后所得的紫外可见吸收光谱.从图中可以看出,在280nm处提取原液有明显的蛋白特征吸收峰,过柱流出液在280nm处吸光度值显著降低.结果表明XC—72对ALP有良好的吸附作用.图2 ALP酶促反应动力学性质图3 固定化前后ALP酶液的紫外可见吸收光谱a-原液;b-过柱流出液2.3.2 固定化条件优化酸度是影响载体与酶之间作用力的主要因素.一般要求环境的pH值介于材料和酶的等电点之间.本实验在XC—72/PVC等电点(pI=2.6)和 ALP等电点(pI=4.4~7.6)进行优化,得到最适固定化pH为7.1.在流动系统中流速直接影响ALP与XC—72的作用时间.流速过大导致作用时间缩短,流速过小将延长操作时间,增大酶失活风险.经优化后流速采用2μL/s.2.3.3 游离酶和固定化酶活性比较图4所示为大骨鸡肝ALP酶液和固定化ALP的比活力.可以看出,盐析法ALP提取液的比活力为0.12U/mg,固定化 ALP比活力为0.32U/mg,是原液的2.7倍;有机沉淀法提取液比活力为0.13U/mg,固定化ALP比活力为0.80U/mg,是原液的6.2倍.结果表明在线制备的固定化ALP能显著提高粗酶提取液的活性.图4 固定化前后ALP液及固定化ALP比活力a-原液;b-过柱流出液;c-固定化 ALP参考文献:[1]余同,张营,赵欣平,等.牛小肠碱性磷酸酶部分性质研究[J].四川大学学报:自然科学版,2009,46(6):1838-1844.[2]CHEN Y H,CHANG T C,CHANG G G.Functional expression,purification,and characterization of the extra stable human placental alkaline phosphatase in the pichia pastoris system[J].Protein Expres and Purif,2004,36:90-99.[3]DONALD W M.Perspectives in alkline phosphatase research[J].Clin Chem,1992,38(12):2486-2492.[4]BRADSHUW R A,FIORELLA L H.Amino acid sequence of E.coli alkaline phosphatase[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1981,78(6):3473-3477.[5]赵赣,钱芳,孙永学,等.鸡肝碱性磷酸酶的分离纯化及其部分性质的研究[J].上海交通大学学报:农业科学版,2003,21(3):194-198.[6]OSATHANON T,GIACHELLI C M,SOMERMAN M J.Immobilization of alkaline phosphatase on microporous nanofibrous fibrin scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J].Biomaterials,2009,30(27):4513-4521. [7]YIN Z Z,LIU Y,JIANG L P,et al.Electrochemical immunosensor of tumor necrosis factor alpha based on alkaline phosphatase functionalized nanospheres[J].Biosens Bioelectron,2011,26(5):1890-1894. [8]杨梅,白欣,耿振,等.顺序注射-紫外可见分析系统研究牛血清白蛋白在XC—72碳黑表面的在线吸附[J].辽宁师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,33(1):75-77.[9]王子佳,李红梅,弓爱君,等.蛋白质分离纯化方法研究进展[J].化学与生物工程,2009,6(8):8-11.[10]SCHLEIF R F,WENSINK P C.Practical methods in molecular biology [M].New York:Springer-Verlag,Heidelberg Berlin,1981:74-75. [11]KIND P R N,KING E J.Estimation of plasma phosphatase by determination of hydrolysed phenol with amino-antipyrine[J].J Clin Path,1954,7:322-326.。
protein expression and purification1
Synthetic E. coli promoters
-35
-10
Hybrid Promoters: ptac Promoter (Ptrp –35 +16pb + Plac –10; IPTG) ptrc Promoter (Ptrp –35 +17pb + Plac –10; IPTG)-> invitro most powerful -> in vivo 90% of ptac
protein expression yield
3 BL21*(DE3)
#1 or 2 + carry T7 polymerase under Plac Enables T7 expression 4 BL21*(DE3)pLysS/E #3 + plasmid pLysS or pLysE expressing T7 lysozyme
Utilizes T7 RNA polymerase.
T5
PL
High
Moderately high (temperature shift)
Utilizes E. coli RNA polymerase.
Temperature-sensitive host required. Less likelihood of "leaky" un-induced expression. Basal level; high basal level by temperatures below 30°C. No inducer.
4. Overview of the available expression systems and expression strains
多聚组氨酸融合标签在蛋白药物开发中的应用
多聚组氨酸融合标签在蛋白药物开发中的应用阮建兵;梅艳珍【摘要】纯化技术是制约蛋白质药物开发及其产业化的关键技术之一.构建多聚组氨酸标签融合蛋白,采用固定金属离子亲和层析进行纯化,是一种高效的蛋白质纯化策略.介绍多聚组氧酸融合标签在蛋白质药物开发中的应用基础和应用概况,分析多聚组氨酸标签在融合蛋白中的位置对亲和层析纯化的影响,总结常用的多聚组氧酸融合表达方式,并对其融合表达样品的预处理、亲和层析纯化条件及其对目的蛋白药物药用安全性和有效性的影响进行探讨.【期刊名称】《生物技术通报》【年(卷),期】2012(000)006【总页数】5页(P49-53)【关键词】多聚组氨酸标签;融合蛋白;蛋白药物【作者】阮建兵;梅艳珍【作者单位】武汉软件工程职业学院环境与生化工程系,武汉430205;南京师范大学生命科学学院,南京210097【正文语种】中文人类基因组计划的顺利实施及基因工程技术的突飞猛进给生物制药带来了前所未有的发展机遇,蛋白质药物作为现代生物制药的主要对象,是世界各国新药开发的重要领域。
由于蛋白质种类繁多,生物活性与空间构象直接相关,分离纯化获得具有生物活性并能满足药用需求的高纯度蛋白非常困难,多数蛋白质药物开发因其分离纯化困难导致生产成本过高而无法实现产业化。
与常规蛋白分离技术相比,固定金属离子亲和层析技术(immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography,IMAC)用于蛋白质分离,选择性高,能实现高通量、高吸附的分离,且具有一定的通用性[1]。
该技术利用蛋白表面的组氨酸、色氨酸、半胱氨酸等和固定金属离子发生亲和作用实现分离。
众多研究表明,以多聚组氨酸、色氨酸、半胱氨酸、精氨酸等为亲和标签与目的蛋白融合后再用IMAC进行纯化,效果十分显著[2]。
其中,多聚组氨酸亲和标签以其对目的蛋白性质影响小及纯化成本低廉等优点在蛋白质的亲和纯化中被应用得最为广泛,以多聚组氨酸小肽为亲和标签的融合蛋白和固定金属离子的亲和作用较普通蛋白质显著增强[2,3]。
兔辅酶Ⅱ依赖性视黄醇脱氢还原酶的功能性表达、纯化及活性鉴定
兔辅酶Ⅱ依赖性视黄醇脱氢/还原酶的功能性表达、纯化及活性鉴定【摘要】目的:用原核蛋白表达系统对兔辅酶Ⅱ依赖性视黄醇脱氢/还原酶(NRDR)进行功能性表达,并对其活性进行鉴定。
方法:从兔肝中克隆出NRDR全长序列,运用Gateway表达系统将其编码区序列构建到表达载体(pDEST 17)上,再转化到大肠杆菌(E.coli)(BL21_AI)中表达出兔NRDR蛋白并鉴定其表达形式;取工程菌裂解上清通过金属离子亲和层析纯化出目的蛋白,再运用反相高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定该酶的Km值和Vmax值。
结果:构建出含兔NRDR编码区(768bp)的表达克隆,转化到BL21_AI中表达出氨基端含6×His标签的重组兔NRDR蛋白,诱导表达4h后目的蛋白可占总蛋白量的414%;经一步亲和层析得到的兔NRDR纯度为972%,比活性提高了64倍;经HPLC测定,该酶对视黄醛的Km值为(455±033)μmol/L,Vmax为(0307±0065)μmol/(min·mg)。
结论:应用pDEST 17可在BL21_AI中对兔肝NRDR进行高效的功能性表达。
【关键词】辅酶Ⅱ依赖性视黄醇脱氢/还原酶表达纯化类视黄醇代谢[Abstract]Objective: To express the rabbit NADP(H)_dependent retinol dehydrogenase/reductase(NRDR)in prokaryotic expression system functionally, and to identify its enzyme activity.Methods: The total NRDR sequence was cloned from the rabbit liver and the coding regionof NRDR was constructed to the Gateway_based expression vector (pDEST 17), which was transformed into the Escherichiacoli(E.coli)(BL21_AI)for the protein expression. After sonication and centrifugation of the bacteria, the soluble NRDR in supernatant was purified by affinity chromatography. Furthermore, the kinetic parameters of NRDR were determined by high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC).Results: The expression vector with the desired gene(768 bp)was constructed, and then, the NRDR protein, which was harvested at the optimal time point(4 hours after induction), was successfully expressed with a 414% expression level. Moreover, the homogeneous enzyme was obtained by a one_step affinity chromatography, with purity up to 972% and specific activity 64 fold enhanced. Thevalues of the Km and the Vmax were(455±033)μmol/L and(0307±0065)μmol/(min·mg), respectively. Conclusion: The functional rabbit NRDR can be expressed effectively in BL21_AI by pDEST 17.[Key Words]NADP(H)_dependent retinoldehydrogenase/reductase;expression;purification;retinoids metabolism维甲酸是脊椎动物体内重要的生理活性物质,通过调节基因的转录参与细胞生长、形态发生、细胞分化、免疫功能调节等生理过程[1,2]。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Accepted ManuscriptFunctional Expression and Purification of CYP93C20a Plant Membrane-As‐sociated Cytochrome P450 from Medicago truncatulaZhenzhan Chang, Xiaoqiang Wang, Risheng Wei, Zhouying Liu, Hong Shan,Guizhen Fan, Hongli HuPII:S1046-5928(10)00322-0DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2010.11.012Reference:YPREP 3835To appear in:Protein Expression and PurificationReceived Date:7 April 2010Revised Date:16 November 2010Please cite this article as: Z. Chang, X. Wang, R. Wei, Z. Liu, H. Shan, G. Fan, H. Hu, Functional Expression and Purification of CYP93C20a Plant Membrane-Associated Cytochrome P450 from Medicago truncatula, Protein Expression and Purification (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2010.11.012This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.Functional Expression and Purification of CYP93C20 a PlantMembrane-Associated Cytochrome P450 from Medicago truncatulaZhenzhan Chang , Xiaoqiang Wang, Risheng Wei, Zhouying Liu, Hong Shan,Guizhen Fan, Hongli HuDepartment of Biophysics, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Beijing 100191, ChinaAddress correspondence to Dr. Zhenzhan Chang: Department of Biophysics, Peking University Health Science Center, Xue Yuan Road 38, Beijing 100191, China. Tel. +86 10 82805369; Fax: +86 10 82801444; E-mail: changz@Abbreviations used: IFS, isoflavone synthase; ALA, 5-aminolevulinic acid; IPTG, isopropyl -D-1-thiogalactopyranoside; MALDI-TOF-MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced form; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.Abstract Plants possess very large numbers of biosynthetic cytochrome P450 enzymes. In spite of the importance of these enzymes for the synthesis of bioactive plant secondary metabolites, only two plant P450 structures has been obtained to date. Isoflavone synthase (IFS) is a membrane-associated cytochrome P450 enzyme catalyzing the entry-point reaction into isoflavonoid biosynthesis. IFS from the model legume Medicago truncatula (CYP93C20) was engineered by deleting the membrane-spanning domain and inserting a hydrophilic polypeptide in the N-terminus and a four histidine tag at the C-terminus. The truncated form exhibited dramatically enhanced expression and solubility. The engineered enzyme was expressed in Escherichia coli XL1-blue cells and was purified by Ni 2+-NTA affinity chromatograph and size-exclusion chromatograph. The purified enzyme was characterized by enzyme assay, reduced carbon monoxide difference spectroscopy and peptide mass fingerprinting. The engineered soluble enzyme exhibited the same activity as the full length membrane-associated enzyme expressed in yeast. These studies suggest an approach for engineering plant membrane-associated P450s with enhanced expression and solubility for mechanistic and structural studies. Keywords : cytochrome P450; isoflavone synthase; functional expression; purification Introduction异黄酮蒺藜状苜蓿Cytochromes P450 (P450s) are external monooxygenases encoded by a superfamily of genes ubiquitously distributed in different organisms from all biological kingdoms. The P450s reactions are extremely diverse and contribute to the biotransformation of drugs, the异型生物质bioconversion of xenobiotics, the biosynthesis of physiologically important compounds such as steroids, fatty acids, fat-soluble vitamins and bile acids, the metabolism of chemical carcinogens, as well as the degradation of herbicides and insecticides [1]. Eukaryotic P450s are expressed at low levels, sometimes as P420 forms, the biologically inactive forms which possess ferrous CO Soret absorption at 420 nm [2]. Therefore their crystallization and structure determination are challenging. Progress on structural studies of mammalian P450 enzymes have been significantly advanced by the use of E. coli as a heterologous expression system. Efforts to decrease the hydrophobicity and thus increase the solubility of mammalian P450s have primarily focused on deletion of the N-terminal membrane anchor with addition of a His-tag at the C-terminus to aid in protein purification. Williams et al.crystallized and determined the structure of the first membrane-bound P450 (2C5). They expressed a soluble monomeric form compatible with growing diffraction-quality crystals by truncating the N-terminus and introducing mutations into a peripheral membrane-binding site in the F-G loop region [3]. Success in crystallographic studies of other mammalian P450s, (e.g. 2B4, 3A4, 2C8 and 2A6) [4, 5, 6, 7] and plant P450 CYP74A [8], suggested that removal of the N-terminal transmembrane domain with addition of a C-terminal His-tag is sufficient to crystallize these enzymes, without need for additional mutations in the F-G loop region.Several widely used expression systems have been developed to produce catalytically active plant P450s in bacteria, yeast and insect cells, with the yeast expression system being themost frequently used [9]. Plant P450 expression studies in E. coli have focused on the CYP74 [10, 11, 12, 13, 14] and CYP79 [15, 16, 17] families. Arabidopsis CYP90B1 [18], flavonoid 3’, 5’-hydroxylase (F 3’5’H) [19] and carotene hydroxylases (CYP97 family) [20] have also been expressed in E. coli. However, only a few plant P450s (eg. CYP74A1, CYP74C3, CYP74A2, CYP74A) have been produced in E. coli at the milligram scale necessary for crystallization studies [13, 14, 21, 8] and so far only two crystal structures of plant P450s (CYP74A2 and CYP74A) have been determined [22, 8].Here we describe the membrane-associated CYP93C20 IFS from the model legume Medicago truncatula utilizing molecular engineering techniques. We were able to obtain soluble CYP93C20 protein in milligram quantities that is functionally characterized, highly active, homogeneous and detergent-free. The CYP93C20 protein obtained is prepared for crystallographic studies. Our results describe a general methodology for molecular engineering and purification of membrane-associated plant P450 enzymes.Materials and methodsChemicalsOligonucleotides for cloning, site-directed mutagenesis and DNA sequencing were purchased from IDT (Coralville, IA, USA). Liquiritigenin was purchased from Indofine chemical company, Inc. (Hillsborough, NJ, USA), NADPH-P450 oxidoreductase (Human, recombinant) from Calbiochem-EMD Biosciences (La Jolla, CA, USA), NADPH, ALA and sodium cholate hydrate from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), IPTG from Promega (Madison, WI, USA) and Ni2+-NTA affinity resin from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA).Generation of recombinant CYP93C20 constructsAlignment of amino acid sequences of CYP93C20 from Medicago truncatula with mammalian P4502C5 and 2B4 [3, 4] was performed using ClustalW (Fig. 1). Based on the sequence alignment analysis, four truncated forms of CYP93C20 were designed and generated using the templates and primers listed in Table 1. CYP93C20 cDNA encoding M. truncatula IFS (GenBank: AY167424) served as an initial template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The forward 5’-primer was designed to introduce an Nde I restriction site and to delete codons for residues 2-18 followed by a sequence corresponding to codons for residues 19-24 of CYP93C20. The reverse 3’-primer includes an Xba I restriction site, the termination codon TTA, codons for four histidines, and a sequence complementary to codons for residues 522-517 of CYP93C20. The PCR products were digested with Nde I and Xba I, and subcloned into pCW ori+ expression vector. This cloning strategy generated the construct that we call pCW ori+ 2-18ifsH which contained 4xHis tag at the C-terminus and deleted the N-terminal 17 amino acids.The construct pCW ori+ 2-34ifsH (with further deletion of N-terminal amino acids 19-34) was generated using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis strategy (Stratagene) with pCW ori+ 2-18ifsH as template and the set of complementary primers listed in Table 1.To generate constructs with insertion of a short charged, hydrophilic polypeptide at the N-terminus, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using pCW ori+ 2-34ifsH as template with the primers shown in Table 1. This strategy replaced the N-terminal transmembrane signal anchor domain (residues 1-34) with an optimized sequence encodingthe peptide sequence MAKKTSSKGKL and inserted four codons for histidine upstream of the stop codon to facilitate purification of the enzyme. The resulting plasmid was termed pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH.In order to determine how the C-terminus sequence of CYP93C20 affects the expression and purification of CYP93C20, we deleted amino acids ARAGVADKLLSS utilizing site-directed mutagenesis with 2-34 10ifsH as the template with primers in Table 1 to generate a construct pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifs 12H.Optimization of expression of recombinant CYP93C20 in E. coliThe construct pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH was transformed into BL21(DE3) competent cells to screen expression conditions for recombinant CYP93C20. One colony of BL21(DE3)/ pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH was inoculated into 50 ml LB medium containing 100 g/ml ampicillin and incubated at 37o C and 250 rpm; 100 ml overnight cultures were started by inoculating with 0.5 ml aliquots of overnight culture. Induction of recombinant CYP93C20 was initiated at OD600 = 0.5 by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM or 1 mM; ALA was supplemented as a precursor for heme synthesis to a final concentration of 0.5 mM or 1 mM. Incubation was continued with shaking at 190 rpm at 16, 28 or 30o C. The expression level was assessed at 24, 32, 48 and 72 h by SDS-PAGE analysis.To select the best E. coli strains for expression of recombinant CYP93C20, the construct pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH was transformed into different competent cell lines. One liter batches of LB medium fortified with suitable antibiotics for BL21(DE3) cells (100 g/ml ampicillin ), XL1-blue cells (100 g/ml ampicillin and 12.5 g/ml tetracycline), JM109 cells(100 g/ml ampicillin), Rosetta (DE3) cells (50 g/ml chloramphenicol) and DH5 cells (100 g/ml ampicillin) were started in 2-liter culture flasks at 37o C and 250 rpm. At OD600= 0.4~0.6, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1mM to induce expression. ALA was supplemented at a final concentration of 0.5 mM and imidazole was added to a final concentration of 5 mM at the time of induction to stabilize holoprotein. Cultures were grown for an additional 48 h at 28o C and 190 rpm. The cultures were placed on ice for 15 min and the cells harvested by centrifugation at 5000×g for 10 min at 4°C. Enzyme was purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography from individual culture extracts. The expression level was compared by SDS-PAGE analysis.The construct pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifs 12H was also transformed into XL1-blue competent cells for determining its expression level in E. coli.UV-visible and carbon monoxide difference spectra of recombinant CYP93C20 UV-visible and carbon monoxide difference spectroscopy was performed using a dual-beam scanning Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer (Model UV-1601; Shimadzu, Milton Keynes, U.K.) A 200 ml culture of XL1-blue cells transformed with pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH was prepared as described above. The cells were harvested and resuspended in 10 ml cell lysis buffer (500 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.4, 250 mM KCl, 1 mM PMSF, 10% glycerol), followed by sonication for 10 X 20 s with 40 s intervals on ice and centrifugation at 29000 g for 45 min.The reduced-CO difference spectrum of the supernatant containing CYP93C20 was obtained according to a published method [23]. Briefly, 3 ml of the supernatant wasreduced with a few mg of sodium dithionite, and equal volumes of this preparation were distributed into sample and reference quartz cuvettes (0.7 ml) for baseline correction. CO was gently bubbled through the sample cuvette for 1 min prior to recording the difference spectrum from 500 to 400 nm.Peptide mass fingerprintingIn-gel digestion, MALDI-TOF-MS and database searching were performed according to a reported method [24]. Briefly, protein bands were excised from the SDS-PAGE gel, washed and destained completely with 50% acetonitrile in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The gel pieces were then dehydrated with acetonitrile and dried in a vacuum centrifuge. Digestion was performed overnight with bovine trypsin (10 ng/ l), stopped by addition of 10% formic acid, and the supernatant recovered. The gel pieces were extracted once with 25 l 50% acetonitrile and once with 100% acetonitrile. The supernatant was combined and dried in a vacuum centrifuge. Peptides were suspended in a 1:1 (v/v) solution of 2% formic acid in acetonitrile, mixed 1:1 (v/v) with matrix (10 mg ml-1 –cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in the same solution), and spotted on a MALDI plate. MALDI-TOF-MS peptide maps were analyzed by a database search against NCBInr (release January 9, 2005) using MS-Fit () with the following parameters: Mass accuracy, 100 ppm; missed cleavage, 1; possible modifications, oxidation of Met.Purification of recombinant CYP93C20Large scale (usually 4 liters) expression with XL1-blue or BL21(DE3) cells transformed with pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH was carried out to produce recombinant CYP93C20.A 5 ml overnight culture was inoculated into 1 liter of LB medium containing 100 g/ml ampicillin and 12.5 g/ml tetracycline, maintaining the same expression conditions as used to screen competent cells.Red cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (500 mM potassium phosphate, 0.25 M NaCl, 10 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 10 mM imidazole, 0.25% sodium cholate, pH 7.4). Lysozyme (0.2 mg/ml), Dnase I (1.2 g/ml), MgSO4 (2 mM) and phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (1 mM) were added. The cells were incubated and stirred for 30 min at 4°C and homogenized by passing through a French press cell homogenizer, followed by centrifugation at 29,000 g for 1 h. The supernatant containing the CYP93C20 was applied to a Ni2+-NTA column previously equilibrated with 20 column volumes of equilibration buffer/wash buffer A (500 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol). The column was washed with: (1), 100 column volumes of equilibration buffer/wash buffer A; (2), 100 column volumes of wash buffer B (10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM -mercaptoethanol, 20 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol) and (3), 20 column volumes of wash buffer C (10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM -mercaptoethanol, 40 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol). The protein was then eluted with elution buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate, pH7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM -mercaptoethanol, 250 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol). Fractions with the highest concentration of protein were pooled. Finally the protein was purified by gel filtration on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 column eluting in gel filtration buffer (10 mM potassiumphosphate, pH 7.2, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol). The red-colored fractions were pooled and concentrated with a Vivaspin 20 concentrator (30 kDa molecular-weight cut-off, Stonehouse, UK).Assay of enzyme activity of recombinant CYP93C20Transformation of yeast WAT11 cells with the empty pYeDP60 vector and pYeDP60-IFS construct 51865 and preparation of microsomes were conducted as previously described [23]. E. coli-expressed recombinant CYP93C20 (20 M), NADPH (1 mM) and liquiritigenin (80 M) were mixed in reaction buffer (0.1 M K2HPO4, 0.4 M sucrose, 0.5 mM glutathione, pH 8.0) with approximately 1 mg of microsomes containing Arabidopsis thaliana(ATR1) NADPH-P450 reductase prepared from yeast WAT11 cells transformed with pYeDP60 vector, or 0.7 units of human NADPH-P450 oxidoreductase, and incubated overnight at 16 o C. Microsomes (1 mg) prepared from yeast WAT11 cells transformed with pYeDP60-IFS construct 51865 were incubated with liquiritigenin in reaction buffer as positive control.Following incubation, reactions were stopped and extracted three times with one volume of ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate extracts were combined, dried under a stream of N2, and the residues resuspended in 100 l methanol. HPLC analysis was performed on an Agilent HP1100 HPLC equipped with an auto sampler, quaternary pump, and diode array detector. Solvent A was 1% aqueous phosphoric acid and solvent B was acetonitrile. Reaction samples (40 l) were applied to an ODS reverse-phase column (5 m particle size, 4.6 x 250 mm) and eluted in 1% (v/v) phosphoric acid with an increasing gradient ofacetonitrile (0-5 min, 5%; 5-10 min, 5-10%; 10-25 min, 10-17%; 25-30 min, 17-23%; 30-65 min, 23-50%; 65-69 min, 50-100%) at a flow rate of 1 ml min-1. The eluants were monitored at 235, 254 and 270 nm. Isoflavonoid products were identified by comparing retention times and UV spectra with those of authentic standards.Results and discussionEffect of N-terminal and C-terminal modifications on protein expressionThe first eukaryotic P450 structure solved was that of mammalian P450 2C5 (Williams, 2000), which was engineered to delete the N-terminal membrane-spanning helix ( 3-21) and to mutate a peripheral membrane–binding site to facilitate protein expression. For solving the structure of rabbit P450 2B4, the N-terminal transmembrane domain was truncated ( 3-21) and several N-terminal residues were mutated to facilitate expression.CYP93C20 from M. truncatula is also a membrane-associated P450, and modification of its amino acid sequence is also required to enhance solubility and achieve high-level expression level. To design truncation forms of CYP93C20, its amino acid sequence was aligned with those of two structurally characterized mammalian P450s (2C5 and 2B4) [25, 3, 4, 26]. The alignment showed that the amino acid sequence identity between M. truncatula CYP93C20 and the two mammalian P450s had about 20% homology, but they share many conserved features such as the heme binding motif (Fig. 1). A conserved proline-rich region with a PXXP motif is also present in the N-terminus between the signal-anchor and catalytic domain, and previous work on cytochrome P450 2C2 and others suggested its importance inthe formation of a functional cytochrome P450 across species from humans to plants [27, 28, 29]. Based on the sequence alignment, three truncated forms of CYP93C20 were designed to delete the putative transmembrane domain ( 2-18, 2-24, 2-29) and keep the proline-rich motif. All constructs had low level or no expression in E. coli. Additionally, reduced-CO difference spectra shown the proteins existed predominately as inactive cytochrome P420 (data not shown).The construct 2-34ifsH was designed to remove the N-terminal residues 2-34. Subsequently, 2-34 10ifsH was generated to incorporate the small peptide AKKTSSKGKL in the N-terminus of 2-34ifsH by referring to the method for generateing the construct which was successful in solubilization of cytochrome 2B4 [26]. 2-34 10ifsH was transformed into BL21(DE3) cells for expression. The expression conditions were optimized with respect to temperature (28o C), time (48h), aeration (190 rpm), and concentrations of IPTG (1 mM) and ALA (0.5 mM).The optimized growth conditions were applied to cultures of different E. coli strains transformed with 2-34 10ifsH. SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 2) indicated that XL1-blue, BL21 (DE3), DH5 and Rosetta (DE3) cells gave higher level expression of the target protein than JM109 cells. However, Rosetta (DE3) and DH5 cells expressed more non-target proteins than with the other cells. XL1-blue and BL21 (DE3) cells were therefore chosen for large scale expression of CYP93C20.To analyze the effects of the C-terminal sequence on protein expression/stability, the C-terminally truncated form pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifs 12H was expressed in XL1-blue cells. The cells were less pink in color than those transformed with pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH withoutthe C-terminal truncation. Further purification trials showed that the protein did not bind well to Ni2+-NTA beads, suggesting that residues at the C-terminus of CYP93C20 are important for the enzyme to form the correct conformation.Identification of recombinant CYP93C20 by peptide mass fingerprintingTo confirm that the protein expressed and purified from E. coli was recombinant CYP93C20, peptide mass fingerprint analysis was performed with a mass spectrometry with bands excised from the Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel. High quality MALDI-TOF-MS peptide maps were obtained (Fig. 3), and analyzed by a database search against NCBInr. Two proteins were successfully identified. Band 1 from the SDS-PAGE (Fig.2) was identified as chaperone Hsp70 with 34 peptides and sequence coverage of 59%. Band 2, the major band in the SDS-PAGE, was identified as isoflavone synthase from Medicago truncatula with 13 peptides and sequence coverage of 29%.Spectral properties of recombinant engineered CYP93C20The UV-visible spectrum of CYP93C20 showed a Soret band at 391 nm and major features at 508 and 545 nm (Fig. 4). The reduced-CO difference spectrum had a characteristic peak at 450 nm; however, under the present culture conditions, a peak for cytochrome P420, the denatured form of CYP93C20, was also observed.The reduced-CO difference spectrum of microsomes from yeast expressing the full-length CYP93C20 also exhibited a major peak at 450 nm; however, after the microsomes had been kept in the spectrophotometer for 3 min, or if the enzyme remained at roomtemperature for 5-10 min prior to reduction, a peak at 420 nm would be observed. Very similar culture conditions have been used in our laboratory to express another plant P450 enzyme, allene oxide synthase, in E. coli with no appreciable degradation to cytochrome P420. Our observations suggest that CYP93C20 is inherently unstable when expressed either as the full-length protein in yeast or as an engineered form in E. coli, and may require additional factors and more careful handling to maintain it in the active P450 form during expression and purification.Purification of recombinant engineered CYP93C20The engineered CYP93C20 pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH expressed in XL1-blue or BL21(DE3) cells was purified using two chromatography steps. Chromatography on Ni2+-NTA column appeared to be an efficient purification step and led to a significant enrichment of the P450. Subsequent gel filtration chromatography resulted in nearly homogeneous CYP93C20, which appeared as a single band of SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 5).The gel filtration profile using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 preparative column showed that engineered CYP93C20 was a monomer, with a molecular weight value matching that calculated based on its primary sequence. The red-colored fractions were pooled and used for crystallization of CYP93C20. In some circumstances after gel filtration, a small proportion of soluble aggregated protein was also observed (Fig. 6). The polymer had the same purity, but with very low heme content and was not used for crystallization.Expression of the construct pCW ori+ 2-34 10ifsH in E. coli XL1-blue or BL21(DE3) cells and subsequent purification by Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography yielded ~25 mg CYP93C20 per liter of culture medium as assayed by the Bradford method [30].Enzymatic activity of recombinant engineered CYP93C20To determine whether the recombinant engineered CYP93C20 retains full catalytic activity, enzymatic activity assays were performed using liquiritigenin as substrate, in the presence of NADPH and NADPH-P450 reductase (either as microsomes from yeast expressing the Arabidopsis reductase, or commercial human P450 oxidoreductase). Reaction products were separated by HPLC and their identities confirmed by comparison of retention times and UV spectra to those of authentic standards.When E. coli expressed recombinant CYP93C20 was incubated with yeast microsomes containing plant P450 reductase, liquiritigenin, and NADPH, a major product, daidzein, was observed, along with a smaller amount of 2,7,4’-trihydroxyisoflavanone (Fig. 7b). This indicated that the engineered CYP93C20 converted liquiritigenin to 2,7,4’-trihydroxyisoflavanone, and was subsequently dehydrated non-enzymatically to daidzein. Similar amounts of daidzein were produced under these conditions when yeast-expressed full-length CYP93C20 was incubated with liquiritigenin and NADPH (Fig. 7a, b). Daidzein was also formed when the soluble engineered CYP93C20 was incubated with liquiritigenin, NADPH and human NADPH-P450 oxidoreductase, but at levels less than 10% of those produced when using the Arabidopsis reductase (Fig. 7c). Thus, the solubleengineered CYP93C20 maintained full catalytic activity when the plant P450 reductase was supplied as the electron donor from NADPH.ConclusionsOverall, our work has demonstrated that it is possible to optimize construct design and expression system to generate large amounts of soluble, active IFS. These approaches should be applicable to other plant P450s. The success in CYP93C20 expression, purification will facilitate future structural studies to understand how IFS carries out the novel aryl-ring migration for conversion of flavanone to 2-hydroxyisoflavanone, and to reveal the molecular basis of the catalysis and exquisite substrate specificity of IFS and other plant biosynthetic P450s.AcknowledgementsWe thank Dr. Z. Lei for assistance with the MALDI-TOF-MS peptide fingerprint analysis, J. Lin for initial work on cloning and expression, Dr. B. Deavours for help with HPLC analysis, Dr. L. Pedersen (NIEHS, NIH) for kindly providing pCWori+ vector, Dr. F. W. Dahlquist (Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon) for permission to use pCWori+, Drs. R. A. Dixon and C.C. Yin for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grant 30970572 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.Figure LegendsFig. 1. Alignment of amino acid sequences of CYP93C20 from Medicago truncatula with rabbit P450s 2C5 and 2B4. Box A indicates the proline-rich region (Kemper, 2004). Box B indicates the highly conserved “I” helix suggested to be involved in O2 binding by P450s, and box C highlights the heme binding motif (Graham-Lorence, 1996). Conserved residues are highlighted. Sequence analysis was performed using ClustalW search on DeCypher Protein Sequences.Fig. 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of engineered CYP93C20 expressed in different E. coli competent cells. BLs, XLs, JMs, DHs, RSs indicated the supernatant of BL21(DE3), XL1-blue, JM109, DH5 , Rosetta (DE3), respectively; BLp, XLp, JMp, DHp, RSp indicated the protein of each cell which was purified with Ni2+-NTA affinity column. Bands 1 and 2 were excised for protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting.Fig. 3. Peptide mass spectrums obtained using MALDI-TOF-MS. Mass spectral peaks are labeled with monoisotopic mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) values used for database searching. IFS (A) and chaperone Hsp70 (B) were successfully identified using the NCBInr database.Fig. 4. UV-visible absorption spectrum (A) and CO difference spectrum (B) of supernatant of engineered CYP93C20 expressed in E. coli XL1-blue cells.Fig. 5. SDS-PAGE analysis of the purification of CYP93C20 expressed in XL1 blue cells. Lanes 1-3, fractions eluted from Ni2+-NTA with 250 mM imidazole; Lane 4, cell supernatant; Lane 5, fraction from gel filtration chromatography; Lane 7, Pre-stained protein standardsFig. 6. Gel filtration chromatography of CYP93C20 on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 column. Elution was monitored at 280 nm at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.Fig. 7. HPLC elution profiles of enzyme assay mixtures. a, yeast microsomes from pYeDP60-IFS 51865 strain incubated with liquiritigenin and NADPH; b, CYP93C20 incubated with liquiritigenin, NADPH and yeast microsome from pYeDP60 control strain (expressing Arabidopsis P450 reductase); c, CYP93C20 incubated with liquiritigenin, NADPH and human NADPH-P450 oxidoreductase; d, Liquiritigenin standard. L, liquiririgenin; D, Daidzein; H, 2,7,4’-trihydroxyisoflavanone.。