Association of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Prostate
激素类药物在抗肿瘤方面的研究进展
激素类药物在抗肿瘤方面的研究进展摘要:肿瘤是人们身体健康的大杀手之一,因此它的治疗也成为了这个世纪亟待解决的问题,迄今为止也有很多类的抗肿瘤药物问世,比如甲氨蝶呤等化疗药物和干扰素等生物制剂。
化疗药物中的激素类药物在近二三十年来也成了一个热点,其通过调节体内激素平衡来控制肿瘤,主要包括以他莫西芬为代表的抗雌激素类药物、以氟他胺为代表的抗雄激素类药物、依西美坦等芳香化酶抑制剂和诺雷德等LH-RH拮抗剂/激动剂。
关键词:激素类药物;抗肿瘤;抗雌激素;芳香化酶抑制剂;RH-LH激动剂/拮抗剂恶性肿瘤是严重威胁人类健康的常见病和多发病,尤其是当今社会环境污染严重,导致肿瘤的发病率更高。
因此抗肿瘤药物的研究也就成了当今医药界的热门项目。
迄今为止,也有了很多能够有效抑制、治疗肿瘤的药物诞生。
激素类药物是以人体或动物激素(包括与激素结构、作用原理相同的有机物)为有效成分的药物。
激素类药物作为一种药效迅速明显但副作用同时也很严重的药物,一直以来都是备受争议,但是近年来的一些研究表明能够通过和一些药物连用来降低激素的强烈副作用。
激素类药物在各个疾病领域都有不错的疗效,近年来激素类抗肿瘤药物研究有很大进展,除了一些传统的激素类用于抗肿瘤外,并有新的抗雌激素、抗雄激素、LH-RH激动剂/拮抗剂及芳香酶抑制剂等激素类药物用于肿瘤临床。
作者于本文中对不同类的激素药物做简要叙述。
1 抗雌激素类药物抗雌激素疗法是雌激素受体依赖型乳腺癌内分泌疗法的重要手段之一,这类药物可在肿瘤细胞水平与雌二醇竞争性结合雌激素受体,在细胞浆内形成与雌激素受体配体-受体的二聚体复合物[1],继而进入细胞核内,影响DNA和mRNA的合成,从而抑制癌细胞的增殖,达到治疗、控制乳腺癌的目的。
同时部分抗雌激素类药物也可以用于治疗卵巢癌和其他一些癌症的辅助治疗。
1.1他莫昔芬他莫西芬(Tamoxifen,TAM,又名三苯氧胺)是一种非激素类抗癌药, 由于其能够封闭雌激素受体(ER)所中介的细胞增殖活性而呈现拮抗雌激素作用, 故被广泛用于治疗雌激素依赖性乳腺癌和卵巢癌等恶性肿瘤[2,3]。
前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理专家共识2024(完整版)
前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理专家共识2024(完整版)摘要随着诊疗技术的进步,前列腺癌患者的5年生存率显著提升,前列腺癌进入慢性疾病管理时代。
雄激素剥夺治疗是晚期前列腺癌患者的基石治疗方案,并贯穿患者治疗的各阶段。
前列腺癌药物去势治疗后的疾病进展、治疗相关不良反应以及相关并发症已成为前列腺癌长期管理的一大难题,影响患者的生存及生活质量。
除了在诊断和治疗过程中需要注重前列腺癌的疾病管理,更应该密切随访药物去势治疗后患者的整体情况,尤其对于处于疾病治疗关键阶段的患者,应在疾病重要节点(疾病阶段起始点和治疗切换点)监测睾酮或其他指标,避免错过最佳治疗窗口期。
前列腺癌随访管理应该兼顾疾病本身治疗阶段特点(疾病分期、既往症状、预后因素及治疗方案)和患者自身诉求,定制个性化的随访策略,更好地提高患者治疗依从性,改善预后。
目前中国尚缺乏前列腺癌患者药物去势治疗后随访及生活质量管理的指南或共识,为此,中国前列腺癌研究协作组组织国内相关专家制定了前列腺癌药物去势治疗随访管理中国专家共识(2024版),以期为接受药物去势治疗前列腺癌患者的随访及生活管理提供参考,进一步改善中国前列腺癌患者的预后及生活质量。
【关键词】前列腺肿瘤;药物去势;随访;生活质量;共识在全球范围内,前列腺癌作为男性的第2大常见肿瘤,已成为一项重大的公共健康问题。
随着医学诊疗技术的进步以及前列腺癌早筛意识的不断普及,前列腺癌患者的5年生存率显著改善。
美国癌症协会发布的2023年恶性肿瘤统计数据显示,美国前列腺癌患者的5年相对生存率已达97.0%,仅次于甲状腺癌。
中国前列腺癌患者的5年生存率虽然与美国存在差距,但2012—2015年中国前列腺癌患者的年龄标化5年相对生存率也已从2003—2005年的53.8%提高至66.4%。
生存时间的延长预示前列腺癌进入慢性疾病管理阶段。
在长期的治疗和康复过程中,患者的生活质量、疾病认知、心理状态等问题应在随访期间给予相应的支持和指导。
前列腺癌化疗的发展及未来
前列腺癌化疗的发展及未来瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫;牛亦农;邢念增【摘要】前列腺癌是全球范围内男性第二常见恶性肿瘤,化学药物治疗(以下简称化疗)是晚期前列腺癌的主要治疗手段.自1997年以来,国内外已先后批准米托蒽醌、多西他赛和卡巴他赛等作为前列腺癌的化疗药物,其中多西他赛作为目前为止唯一的晚期前列腺癌阶段一线化疗药物,参与多项临床随机对照研究,用来评估新药、联合用药、序贯治疗以及早期用药对前列腺癌预后的影响.本文就前列腺癌化疗的发展历史和近年来的研究方向做一综述.【期刊名称】《首都医科大学学报》【年(卷),期】2016(037)003【总页数】8页(P299-306)【关键词】前列腺癌;化疗;预后【作者】瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫;牛亦农;邢念增【作者单位】首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020;首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020;首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737.25在全世界范围内,前列腺癌是男性第二常见恶性肿瘤,也是男性癌症中排名第五的死亡原因[1]。
国内前列腺癌发生率也逐步攀升,全国及北京肿瘤统计为男性第五位,值得关注的是全球死于前列腺癌的患者中有5%生活在中国[2-3]。
这主要是由于国内将近2/3的初诊患者已局部进展或远处转移,丧失了根治性治疗的机会,而在美国局限性前列腺癌病例占81%,淋巴结和远处转移的患者仅占12%和4%[3-4]。
前列腺癌内分泌治疗中位缓解时间为18~24个月,之后进展成去势抵抗性前列腺癌(castration resistant prostate cancer, CRPC),化学药物治疗(以下简称化疗)是转移性CRPC(metastatic CRPC,mCRPC)的重要治疗手段。
最早针对前列腺癌化疗的随机临床研究(randomized clinical trial,RCT)要追溯到1973年采用环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶的美国前列腺癌计划(National Prostatic Cancer Project),在此之前报道的化疗病例不超过100例[5-7]。
前列腺癌多学科病例讨论:盆腔淋巴结转移的前列腺癌
前列腺癌多学科病例讨论:盆腔淋巴结转移的前列腺癌戴波;叶定伟;姚伟强;程竞仪;张盛;甘华磊;刘晓航【期刊名称】《现代泌尿外科杂志》【年(卷),期】2016(021)009【总页数】4页(P705-708)【关键词】前列腺癌;盆腔淋巴结转移;内分泌治疗;前列腺癌根治术;前列腺癌根治性放疗;全身化疗【作者】戴波;叶定伟;姚伟强;程竞仪;张盛;甘华磊;刘晓航【作者单位】复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院核医学,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院病理科,上海200032;复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科,上海200032【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737主持人:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科病例汇报人:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科讨论嘉宾:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院病理科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院核医学科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科2.1 病例介绍患者男性,年龄70岁,汉族,已婚。
因“排尿费力、排尿中断6个月”就诊。
入院行直肠指检发现前列腺Ⅲ度大,中央沟消失,双侧叶质硬如石,表面结节感明显,与直肠无明显粘连。
相关实验室检查无明显异常发现。
进一步的专科检查显示:前列腺特异性抗原(prostate special antigen,PSA)181.6 ng/mL,f/t PSA:0.21。
尿流率检查示:最大尿流率下降至5.1 mL/s。
经直肠B超:前列腺实质不均质增大,符合前列腺恶性肿瘤。
患者既往无手术外伤史。
家族史无特殊。
系统回顾:高血压病史10年,口服降压药物,血压控制好。
肺片和腹盆腔彩超均无明显异常。
全身同位素发射计算机辅助断层显像(Emission Computed Tomography,ECT)骨扫描未见明显异常。
晚期前列腺癌的雄激素阻断医治
晚期前列腺癌的雄激素阻断医治【摘要】探讨间歇性雄激素阻断医治与持续性雄激素阻断医治晚期前列腺癌的疗效和不良反映。
方式65例晚期前列腺癌患者分为两组,A组34例行间歇性雄激素阻断(IAB)医治,B组31例行持续性雄激素阻断(CAB)医治,比较两组在疾病进展时间和不良反映方面的不同。
结果A组中位随访时间为个月,B组中位随访时间为个月。
A、B组疾病进展率别离为%和%,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。
A、B组疾病中位进展时间别离为个月、个月,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。
在有骨转移患者中,A、B组疾病中位进展时间别离为个月、个月,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。
在无骨转移患者中,A、B组疾病中位进展时间别离为个月、个月,两组比较不同有统计学意义(P=)。
不良反映发生率别离为A组发生潮热症状%、乳腺肿痛%、骨质疏松%。
B组发生潮热症状%、乳腺肿痛%、骨质疏松%。
两组比较不同有统计学意义:潮热症状P=,乳腺肿痛P=,骨质疏松P=。
结论对晚期前列腺癌患者IAB医治可以延缓病变的进展,减少雄激素阻断致使的不良反映,提高患者的生活质量,应作为晚期前列腺癌患者的首选医治。
【关键词】前列腺肿瘤雄激素阻断不良反映[Abstract]Objective To compare the efficacy of intermittent androgen blockade (IAB )versus total continuous androgen blockade(CAB )in the treatment of late prostate The study included 65 patients with late prostate patients (group A )received IAB,and 31 patients (group B )received time to disease progression and side effect rates was compared between the 2 The median follow-up was months in group A and months in group disease progression rate was % in group A and % in group B,with significant difference between the 2 groups (P=).The median time to disease progression was months in group A and months in group B,there was significant difference between the 2 groups (P= ).In patients with skeletal metastasis,the median time to disease progression was months in group A and months in group B,with significant difference between the 2 groups (P= ).In patients without skeletal metastasis,the median time to disease progression was months in group A and months in group B,with significant difference between the 2 groups (P= ).Side effect rates were found in more patients of group B than in group A,including hot flash (% vs %,P=),gynecomastia (% vs %,P=),osteoporosis (% vs %,P= ).Conclusion IAB is the first choice of endocrine treatment for late prostate cancer.[Key words]prostatic neoplasm; androgen blockade;side effect前列腺癌是老年男性最多见的肿瘤之一,其发病率呈逐年上升趋势[1],雄激素阻断是已失去根治机缘的晚期前列腺癌患者的首选医治方式。
内分泌治疗 英语
内分泌治疗英语Endocrine TherapyThe endocrine system is a complex network of glands and hormones that play a crucial role in regulating various physiological processes within the human body. Hormones, the chemical messengers produced by these glands, are responsible for maintaining homeostasis, controlling growth and development, and influencing a wide range of bodily functions, from metabolism to mood. When the endocrine system malfunctions, it can lead to a variety of health issues, ranging from hormonal imbalances to chronic diseases. In such cases, endocrine therapy emerges as a vital treatment approach, aiming to restore the delicate balance of hormones and alleviate the associated symptoms.Endocrine therapy, also known as hormone therapy, is a medical treatment that involves the administration of synthetic or natural hormones to address hormonal imbalances or to target specific hormone-dependent conditions. This therapeutic approach is particularly effective in the management of various endocrine-related disorders, including thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, and certain types of cancer.One of the primary applications of endocrine therapy is in the treatment of thyroid disorders. The thyroid gland, located in the neck, is responsible for producing hormones that regulate metabolism, body temperature, and other vital functions. When the thyroid gland becomes underactive (hypothyroidism) or overactive (hyperthyroidism), it can lead to a range of symptoms, such as fatigue, weight changes, and mood disturbances. Endocrine therapy, typically in the form of synthetic thyroid hormones (e.g., levothyroxine), can be used to restore the proper balance of thyroid hormones, effectively managing the symptoms and preventing long-term complications.Another significant application of endocrine therapy is in the treatment of diabetes, a chronic condition characterized by thebody's inability to regulate blood sugar levels effectively. In type 1 diabetes, the pancreas fails to produce insulin, a hormone essential for glucose metabolism. In type 2 diabetes, the body becomes resistant to the effects of insulin. Endocrine therapy in the form of insulin administration or the use of other antidiabetic medications (e.g., metformin, GLP-1 agonists) can help maintain healthy blood sugar levels, reducing the risk of diabetic complications such as nerve damage, kidney disease, and cardiovascular problems.Endocrine therapy also plays a crucial role in the management ofhormone-dependent cancers, such as breast cancer and prostate cancer. These types of cancers are fueled by the presence of specific hormones, which promote the growth and proliferation of cancer cells. Endocrine therapy in this context aims to disrupt the cancer's dependence on hormones, either by blocking the production or action of these hormones or by directly targeting the cancer cells. This approach can be highly effective in slowing the progression of the disease, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing quality of life.In the case of breast cancer, endocrine therapy may involve the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen, or aromatase inhibitors, which block the conversion of androgens to estrogens. These medications can significantly reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival rates in patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Similarly, in prostate cancer, endocrine therapy may involve the use of androgen-deprivation therapies, which suppress the production or action of testosterone, the primary male sex hormone.Beyond these well-established applications, endocrine therapy is also being explored for the management of other health conditions, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), infertility, and certain endocrine-related mental health disorders. In PCOS, for instance, endocrine therapy may involve the use of oral contraceptives orinsulin-sensitizing medications to regulate hormonal imbalances and alleviate symptoms like irregular menstrual cycles, acne, and excessive hair growth.The success of endocrine therapy is largely dependent on the accurate diagnosis and monitoring of the underlying endocrine condition. Healthcare providers, such as endocrinologists, work closely with patients to develop personalized treatment plans, which may involve a combination of medication, lifestyle modifications, and regular monitoring of hormone levels. Patients play a crucial role in the treatment process, as adherence to the prescribed regimen and regular follow-up appointments are essential for achieving optimal outcomes.In conclusion, endocrine therapy is a vital component of modern healthcare, providing effective solutions for a wide range of endocrine-related disorders. By leveraging the power of hormones and targeted interventions, healthcare professionals can help patients restore hormonal balance, manage chronic conditions, and improve their overall health and well-being. As research in this field continues to evolve, the potential of endocrine therapy to address complex health challenges is expected to grow, offering new hope and improved quality of life for those affected by endocrine system disorders.。
前列腺小细胞癌1例报道并文献复习
前列腺小细胞癌1例报道并文献复习张国庆;郑辉;张圣明;常金;张本华【期刊名称】《泰山医学院学报》【年(卷),期】2017(038)009【总页数】3页(P1065-1067)【关键词】前列腺小细胞癌;放射治疗;化学治疗【作者】张国庆;郑辉;张圣明;常金;张本华【作者单位】泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院风湿科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安 271000;泰山医学院附属医院肿瘤科,山东泰安271000【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737.25前列腺小细胞癌非常罕见,约占前列腺肿瘤的0.5%~2%[1]。
相对于前列腺腺癌,前列腺小细胞癌有独特的临床特点,其恶性程度高,局部症状明显,远处转移风险大,诊断时多数为晚期,且对激素治疗效果差。
手术放疗化疗等常规治疗手段可以改善局部症状,但容易快速进展,整体预后较差。
既往文献报道不多,2014年10月本院收治患者1例并复习既往文献,以提高对前列腺小细胞癌疾病认识。
患者,男,55岁,因“出现尿路梗阻予以留置导尿管1周”于2014年10月15日入院。
肛诊:前列腺III度肿大,以左侧为主。
PSA 0.78 ng/ml,fPSA 0.336ng/ml,MRI:前列腺结构失常,不规则软组织肿块,符合前列腺占位表现,向上侵入膀胱,向两旁侵犯双侧精囊腺体,直肠前壁不排除受侵;直肠周围脂肪层多发肿大淋巴结;骶骨右侧份及左侧髂骨异常信号。
考虑骨转移。
CT:双肺多发结节考虑转移,肝内多发低密度灶,不除外转移瘤。
遂在B超引导下行前列腺活检术,术后病理:前列腺穿刺Y1-3,左X1-6 中X1-2 右X1均见完全性前列腺小细胞癌,免疫组化:CK(+)CgA( +) SYN(+ )KI-67( 60%) PSA(-)。
肿瘤标志物CEA 14.75 ng/ml,NSE 138 ng/ml,proGRP 156 ng/ml。
前列腺癌的CAB及IHT治疗
单用抗雄激素药 雌激素治疗 甾体类及非甾体类 抗雄激素药物 肾上腺来源雄激素 的抑制剂
内分泌治疗的方式(2)
新辅助内分泌治疗 (NHT)
辅助内分泌治疗(AHT) 间歇性内分泌治疗(IHT)
手术去势与药物去势
药物去势与手术去势等效。 药物去势: 优点:无手术危险, 无潜在精神创伤, 可间歇治疗。
患者更愿意接受LHRHa的治疗。 缺点:费用高,需每月去医院注射。 睾丸切除: 优点:单次治疗,费用低。 缺点:手术风险,潜在精神创伤,不能间歇治疗。
患者选择LHRHa的理由
避免手术(36%) 治疗有效(18%) 药物治疗方便(10%) 医生建议(10%)
MAB或CAB机制
肾上腺产生的睾酮:5~10% 睾丸产生睾酮:90~95%
LHRHa通过抑制垂体LH而抑制睾丸产生睾酮, 手术去势直接去除睾丸来源的雄激素,但均对肾 上腺来源的睾酮没有影响。
目的
减少肿瘤体积、降低临床分期、进而延 长生存率、同时将根治术的适应症扩大至 T3期。
——前列腺癌诊断治疗指南
根治术前新辅助治疗
Neoadjuvant hormonal ablative therapy
药物的选择
LHRH-A和抗雄激素 LHRH-A 抗雄激素药物 雌二醇氮芥
MAB方法疗效更为可靠。时间 3-9个 月。
T1 1/1项 有降低的趋势,但无统计学意义 T2 7/7项 降低的幅度为%至%(统计学意义) T3 3/5项 切缘阳性率从 61%-64% 降至26%-42% (统计学 意义)
2/5项 有降低的趋势,但无统计学意义 对于新辅助治疗可以降低前列腺切缘肿瘤阳性率的结论,几乎没 有异议。
——前列腺癌诊断治疗指南
• 内分泌治疗或观察等待治疗
前列腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗
前列腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗新辅助内分泌治疗(neoadjuvant hormone therapy, NHT或neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy, nADT)即根治性前列腺切除术或根治性放疗前给予辅助性的内分泌治疗。
1989年Monfette报道促黄体激素释放激素类似物和氟他胺作为根治性前列腺切除术前的辅助治疗,结果显示前列腺体积及肿瘤体积明显减小,术中失血减少,手术时间缩短,尤其发现病理标本中存在29%的T0期肿瘤。
近20年,虽然众多研究报道新辅助内分泌治疗的意义,但是由于其改善生存期的不确定,临床应用一直存在诸多争议。
前列腺癌的预后与前列腺体积、PSA水平、分期、切缘阳性以及Gleason评分等有关。
而新辅助内分泌治疗能缩小前列腺体积。
根治性前列腺切除术前3-6个月NHT治疗后,前列腺体积平均缩小20-50%(1,2),不过有研究认为体积缩小的主要是良性前列腺组织,而肿瘤体积变化不具有显著性(3)。
同时,NHT能有效降低血浆PSA水平(4),但是不需要等PSA降到极低值后再行手术治疗(5)。
多项研究认为NHT能够有效降低临床T2期前列腺癌分期,但临床T3期肿瘤NHT治疗后出现分期降低少见,即便出现也认为是临床诊断时的分期过高所致(6,7)。
切缘阳性可增加前列腺癌的局部复发、远处转移、死亡率,与其预后密切相关。
NHT能显著降低临床T2期及以下前列腺癌的切缘阳性(7,8),但临床T3期的肿瘤切缘阳性反而有所升高(9,10)。
原因可能是NHT导致前列腺与周围组织粘连,导致切除不彻底,使切缘阳性率升高。
在此之外,NHT却会增高肿瘤的Gleason评分,但有研究认为这可能是一种假象。
既然如此,那么NHT治疗能否延长患者生存期?尤其是临床T3期患者是否适合行NHT治疗?欧洲前列腺癌新辅助治疗研究组在2000年报道了402例T2-3N0M0期前列腺癌患者的随访结果。
N-Myc促进前列腺癌神经内分泌转化的研究进展
N-Myc促进前列腺癌神经内分泌转化的研究进展作者:吴大森白金玲张俊张梦琦李明凤尹玉来源:《中外医疗》2020年第26期[摘要] 前列腺癌早期对雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)治疗敏感,表现为雄激素依赖性前列腺癌(ADPC),表达腺癌标记物,后可发展为去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)。
前列腺癌经ADT 治疗后易发生神经内分泌转化,甚至演变为前列腺神经内分泌癌(NEPC),表达神经内分泌标记物。
研究表明,N-Myc为NEPC驱动基因,可促进前列腺癌的神经内分泌转化,且高表达N-Myc的患者生存率普遍较低,靶向N-Myc相关信号通路可以为治疗前列腺癌、延缓疾病进程提供新的方向和思路。
[关键词] N-Myc;前列腺癌;神经内分泌转化[中图分类号] R737.25; ; ; ; ; [文献标识码] A; ; ; ; ; [文章编号] 1674-0742(2020)09(b)-0196-03Research Progress of N-Myc in Promoting Neuroendocrine Transformation of Prostate CancerWU Da-sen1, BAI Jin-ling1, ZHANG Jun1, ZHANG Meng-qi1, LI Ming-feng2, YIN Yu21.Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230032 China;2.Department of Pathology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230032 China[Abstract] Prostate cancer is sensitive to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the early stage. It manifests as androgen-dependent prostate cancer (ADPC), expressing adenocarcinoma markers, and can later develop into castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Prostate cancer is prone to neuroendocrine transformation after ADT treatment, and even evolves into neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate (NEPC), which expresses neuroendocrine markers. Studies have shown that N-Myc is a NEPC driving gene, which can promote the neuroendocrine transformation of prostate cancer, and the survival rate of patients with high expression of N-Myc is generally low. Targeting N-Myc related signaling pathways can be used to provide new directions and ideas for treating prostate cancer and delay disease.[Key words] N-Myc; Prostate cancer; Neuroendocrine transformation前列腺癌(prostate cancer, PCa)是男性常见的恶性肿瘤。
美国国家自然科学基金
学术英语 医学 Unit 6 Text A 翻译
Unit 6 Text A寻求临终护理数十年前,大多数人在自己家中去世,但是医疗方面的进步已经改变了这一情况。
如今,大多数美国人在医院或是疗养院中度过生命的最终时光。
他们中有些人是为了治疗疾病进了医院,有些可能是选择长期住在疗养院。
越来越多的人在生命的尽头开始选择临终关怀。
死亡没有一个称得上“合适”的地点。
何况,我们死亡的地方,大多数情况下也并非我们可以决定的。
但如果有选择的机会,每个人及其家属,都应该考虑究竟怎样的临终护理最为适合,在哪里可以享受到这样的关怀,家人和朋友能否提供帮助,以及他们应该如何支付相应的费用。
医院及疗养院64岁的George有充血性心力衰竭病史。
一天晚上,他因为胸痛被送入医院。
他与他最亲近的人事先便已决定,在任何情况下都要让医生使用最大努力来延续他的生命。
所以当他需要相应的治疗时,他选择了医院,因为那里有全天候工作的医生和护士。
医院提供一整套的治疗、检查及其他医疗照护。
一旦George的心脏出现持续衰竭,医院的重症监护病房(ICU)或冠心病重症监护病房(CCU)就可以提供及时的救护。
尽管医院有相关的规定,在有些情况下执行具有一定的弹性。
如果George的医生认为他的病情并没有因为治疗有所好转,并濒临死亡,他的家属可以要求更加宽松的探视时间。
如果他的家属想从家中给他带一些私人物品,可以向工作人员询问物品的尺寸限制或是是否需要消毒。
不论George住在ICU、CCU还是两病床的病房,其家属都可以要求更多的私人空间。
在医院环境中,对临终病人来说,身边永远会有知道该如何照料他的医务人员。
这一点令病人及其家属得以安心。
已有越来越多的人在生命尽头的时候选择疗养院,因为在这里,护理人员是随叫随到的。
疗养院有时也被称为专业护理所,在临终护理方面有利有弊。
与医院不同,疗养院里并不是全天候都有医生在场。
然而,由于临终护理可以事先安排,在病人濒临死亡时,不需要事先咨询医生而开展照护。
如果濒死病人已经在疗养院住了一段时间,家属很可能已经和护理人员建立了一定的关系,因而与医院相比,这里的护理工作更具个性化。
前列腺癌治疗药物-雄激素受体(AR)抑制剂
前列腺癌治疗药物-雄激素受体(AR)抑制剂寇芮前列腺癌(Postate cancer, PCa)是一种常见的男性恶性肿瘤,在全球范围内的发病率仅次于肺癌,排在所有男性恶性肿瘤第二位,居发达国家死亡率为癌症总死亡率的第三位[1]。
中国前列腺癌发病率逐年递增,预计到2020年前列腺癌将会成为我国男性癌症死亡的第三大疾病[2]。
引起前列腺癌的危险因素尚未明确,但是其中一些已经被确认。
最重要的因素之一是遗传。
如果一个直系亲属(兄弟或父亲)患有前列腺癌,其本人患前列腺癌的危险性会增加1倍。
2个或2个以上直系亲属患前列腺癌,相对危险性会增至5~11倍。
流行病学研究发现有前列腺癌阳性家族史的患者比那些无家族史患者的确诊年龄大约早6~7年[3]。
前列腺癌患病人群中一部分亚人群(大约9%)为“真实遗传性前列腺癌”,指的是3个或3个以上亲属患病或至少2个为早期发病(55岁以前)。
外源性因素会影响从所谓的潜伏型前列腺癌到临床型前列腺癌的进程。
这些因素的确认仍然在讨论中,但高动物脂肪饮食是一个重要的危险因素。
其他危险因素包括维生素E、硒、木脂素类、异黄酮的低摄入。
阳光暴露与前列腺癌发病率呈负相关,阳光可增加维生素D的水平,可能是前列腺癌的保护因子[4]。
在前列腺癌低发的亚洲地区,绿茶的饮用量相对较高,绿茶可能为前列腺癌的预防因子[5]。
前列腺癌发病早期是对雄激素依赖性的,其前期治疗主要采用雄激素去除疗法(Androgen deprivation therapy,ADT),包括手术去势法和药物去势法。
大多数前列腺癌患者早期对雄激素去势治疗(ADT)效果良好,病情得到缓解,但ADT不能治愈前列腺癌,经过14~30个月的中位治疗时间后,几乎所有患者病变都将逐渐发展为去势抵抗性前列腺癌(Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer,CRPC),当病情复发进展到CRPC后患者对ADT不再敏感,其中位生存期小于20个月[6]。
去势抵抗性前列腺癌潜在关键基因的生物信息学分析
·937· E-mail:zgqkyx@ ·论著·去势抵抗性前列腺癌潜在关键基因的生物信息学分析董婧婷1,衡立1,康绍叁1,刘健1,田志崇1,张立国1,张金存1,李治国2,沈宏3*,曹凤宏1*【摘要】 背景 去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)是男性常见恶性肿瘤疾病之一,病死率高,分子机制仍不十分清楚,且无有效治疗药物。
目的 应用生物信息学方法挖掘CRPC 发生、发展的关键基因,为其诊治提供新思路。
方法 从基因表达综合数据库(GEO)中下载关于人类原发性前列腺癌(PCa)和CRPC 的数据集GSE32269并进行生物信息学分析。
使用R 语言鉴定CRPC 的差异表达基因(DEGs)。
通过DAVID 软件对DEGs 进行基因本体论(GO)富集分析及京都基因和基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路分析。
利用STRING 在线数据库构建蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络进一步筛选关键基因,并对关键基因进行生存分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。
结果 通过对微阵列数据集GSE32269分析共筛选出279个DEGs,进一步通过GO 富集分析和KEGG 通路分析发现在CRPC 发展中,细胞分裂、有丝分裂和细胞周期等信号通路发挥重要作用。
PPI 网络分析筛选出15个关键基因,对关键基因进行生存分析发现:CDC20、MAD2L1和NUSAP1高表达组CRPC 患者总生存率和无病生存率均分别低于CDC20、MAD2L1和NUSAP1低表达组(P<0.05);且CDC20、MAD2L1和NUSAP1预测CPRC 发生的ROC 曲线下面积分别为0.933、0.762、0.950,提示其对CRPC 具有较高的诊断价值。
结论 CDC20、MAD2L1和NUSAP1可能是参与CRPC 发展的关键候选基因。
【关键词】 前列腺癌;去势抵抗性前列腺癌;关键基因;生物信息学【中图分类号】 R 737.25 【文献标识码】 A DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.02.010董婧婷,衡立,康绍叁,等. 去势抵抗性前列腺癌潜在关键基因的生物信息学分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25 (8):937-944. []DONG J T,HENG L,KANG S S,et al. Bioinformatic analysis of potential key genes in castration-resistant prostate cancer development[J]. Chinese General Practice,2022,25(8):937-944.Bioinformatic Analysis of Potential Key Genes in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Development DONG Jingting 1,HENG Li 1,KANG Shaosan 1,LIU Jian 1,TIAN Zhichong 1,ZHANG Liguo 1,ZHANG Jincun 1,LI Zhiguo 2,SHEN Hong 3*,CAO Fenghong 1*1.Department of Urology ,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital ,Tangshan 063000,China2.School of Public Health ,North China University of Science and Technology ,Tangshan 063210,China3.Modern Education Technology Center ,North China University of Science and Technology ,Tangshan 063000,China *Corresponding authors :SHEN Hong ,Engineer ;E-mail :shenhong@CAO Fenghong ,Chief physician ,Master supervisor ;E-mail :caofenghong@【Abstract 】 Background Castration-resistant prostate cancer(CRPC) is one of the most prevalent cancers in males with a high fatality rate. Its molecular mechanism is still unclear,and there is no effective treatment. Objective To explore the key genes involved in CRPC development using bioinformatic analysis,offering new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of CRPC. Methods The data set GSE32269 which contains human primary prostate cancer and CRPC was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database for further bioinformatic analysis. R language was used to identify differentially expressed genes(DEGs) in CRPC. Gene Ontology(GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes(KEGG) pathway analysis of DEGs were further performed by using DAVID. A protein-protein interaction(PPI) network of DEGs was constructed by using STRING database for screening potential key genes. And the identified potential key genes were further analyzed by survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis. Results 279 DEGs were identified in microarray dataset GSE32269. GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway analysis revealed that cell division,mitosis and cell cycle signaling pathways may play an important role in the development of CRPC. PPI network screening revealed that there were基金项目:河北省自然科学基金资助项目(H2019209595);河北省医学科学研究课题计划资助项目(20210212)1.063000河北省唐山市,华北理工大学附属医院泌尿外科2.063210河北省唐山市,华北理工大学公共卫生学院3.063000河北省唐山市,华北理工大学现代教育中心*通信作者:沈宏,工程师;E-mail:shenhong@ 曹凤宏,主任医师,硕士生导师;E-mail:caofenghong@ 本文数字出版日期:2022-01-27扫描二维码查看原文·938· E-mail:zgqkyx@前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)是癌症相关死亡率第二高的恶性疾病[1],目前主要采取雄激素剥夺疗法(androgen-deprivation therapy,ADT)进行治疗[2]。
慷慨善举如潮的英语作文
In todays world,acts of kindness and generosity are truly the lifeblood of a compassionate society.These actions not only touch the lives of those in need but also inspire others to contribute to the wellbeing of their communities.Here are a few examples of such benevolence that have made a significant impact.The Power of Small Gestures:A small act of kindness can go a long way.For instance,a student who helps a classmate with their homework not only aids in their academic success but also fosters a sense of camaraderie.This simple gesture can lead to a stronger,more supportive learning environment.Community Outreach Programs:Many organizations and individuals engage in community outreach to provide assistance to those less fortunate.Food drives,clothing donations,and volunteering at homeless shelters are just a few examples of how people come together to make a difference.These programs not only provide immediate relief but also raise awareness about social issues.Charitable Donations and Fundraising:Generosity is often displayed through financial contributions to causes that resonate with individuals.Charitable donations to disaster relief efforts,medical research,and educational institutions can have a profound impact on the lives of many.Fundraisers, such as charity runs or gala events,bring communities together to support a common goal. Supporting Local Businesses and Artists:In an increasingly globalized economy,supporting local businesses and artists is an act of generosity that helps sustain local economies and preserve cultural heritage.By choosing to buy from local vendors or attending performances by local artists,individuals contribute to the vibrancy of their communities.Environmental Stewardship:Acts of environmental kindness,such as planting trees,participating in beach cleanups, or reducing ones carbon footprint,are generous contributions to the health of our planet. These actions demonstrate a commitment to preserving the environment for future generations.Educational Scholarships:Offering scholarships to students in need is a generous act that can change lives.By providing financial assistance,donors enable talented individuals to pursue their educational dreams,which can lead to a ripple effect of positive change in society.Volunteering Time and Skills:Sharing ones time and skills without expecting anything in return is a selfless act of generosity.Whether its teaching a skill to someone,offering professional advice,or simply lending a listening ear,volunteering enriches the lives of both the giver and the receiver.Cultural Exchange and Understanding:Generosity can also be shown through cultural exchange programs that promote understanding and respect among different communities.By welcoming international students or participating in exchange programs,individuals contribute to a more inclusive and tolerant world.In conclusion,acts of generosity and kindness are multifaceted and can manifest in various forms.They are the threads that weave the fabric of society,bringing people together and creating a sense of unity and shared humanity.It is through these acts that we can build a world that is not only prosperous but also filled with empathy and understanding.。
伴有神经内分泌分化前列腺癌分类的进展2023
伴有神经内分泌分化前列腺癌分类的进展2023摘要伴有神经内分泌分化前列腺癌的分类、诊断标准、临床病理意义一直是病理医师关注的重点和难点。
结合2022年第5版WHO泌尿及男性生殖器官肿瘤分类,伴有神经内分泌分化的前列腺癌主要包括:(1)普通型前列腺腺癌伴局灶的神经内分泌分化i2)前列腺腺癌伴潘氏细胞样分化i3) 前列腺高分化神经内分泌肿瘤;(4)前列腺小细胞癌;(5)前列腺大细胞神经内分泌癌,以及(6)治疗相关的神经内分泌前列腺癌。
本文简要概述伴有神经内分泌分化前列腺癌分类的进展,以期为病理医师的日常实践提供诊断思路。
神经内分泌细胞广泛散布千正常的前列腺腺体之中,属千机体的弥漫性胺前体摄取脱狻化细胞家族成员之一。
前列腺的神经内分泌细胞由内胚层起源的多潜能前列腺干细胞分化而来,其确切功能尚不十分清楚,但推测与前列腺的细胞增殖和分化以及分泌上皮细胞的稳态调节有关。
前列腺的神经内分泌细胞在光镜下难以识别,免疫组织化学染色及超微结构观察提示其位千基底细胞和分泌上皮细胞之间,呈锥形、具有胞质两侧的树突状突起。
伴有神经内分泌分化的前列腺癌最初认为比较罕见,但在当代广泛的应用抗雄激素剥夺治疗(androgen deprivation therapy, ADT)之后,此类病例越来越多,已成为泌尿外科医师以及病理医师关注的重点和难点。
随着对其临床病理意义的深入研究和认识,伴有神经内分泌分化的前列腺癌的组织学分类也在不断的演化和更替,但同时也存在不少争议性的问题亟待解决。
结合2022年第5版WHO泌尿及男性生殖器官肿瘤分类,本文简要概述伴有神经内分泌分化前列腺癌的分类进展,以期为病理医师的日常实践提供诊断思路和研究方向。
一、伴有神经内分泌分化前列腺癌的组织学分类1普通型前列腺腺癌伴局灶的神经内分泌分化:形态学上典型的前列腺导管或腺泡性腺癌,在缺乏神经内分泌分化的组织学背景下(实性、巢状、梁状、缎带状、菊形团样、栅栏状结构,纤细的颗粒状或粉尘状染色质),30%~100%的病例通过免疫组织化学染色可见局灶、散在的神经内分泌标志物表达,包括嗜络粒素A(CgA入突触素、CD56等,这些神经内分泌阳性的肿瘤细胞同时也表达前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和雄激素受体(AR),其数量与前列腺腺癌的Gleason分级呈正相关,尤其是经过ADT 后或者发生在转移部位的前列腺癌,出现神经内分泌表达的瘤细胞比例更高。
2020 AUAASTROSUO晚期前列腺癌指南解读精要
现代泌尿外科杂志 2021年4月第26卷第4期345• 7 8园地•2020 APA /ASTRO /SPO 晚期前列腺癌指南解读精要赵红伟,欧阳奎(青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院泌尿外科,山东烟台264000)关键词:晚期前列腺癌;指南解读;疾病诊治中图分类号:R737. 25 文献标志码:A DOI :10. 3969/j. issn. 1009-8291 2021 04. 015为提高晚期前列腺癌(prostate cancer , P Ca)诊 治水平,2020年9月美国泌尿外科学会(A merican Urological Association , AUA )联合美国放射治疗及 肿瘤学会(American Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, ASTRO)以及泌尿科肿瘤学会(UrologicalSociety of Oncology , SUO)共同发布 了晚期 P Ca诊 治指南,现解读如下。
1早期评估及咨询1.1对于未经组织学确诊的疑似晚期PCa患者,可 从前列腺或转移部位获得组织学诊断(临床原则)。
主要转移部位包括:骨转移、内脏转移和淋巴结 转移。
1.2应根据患者的生存预期、并发症、主观倾向及肿 瘤特点来选择治疗方案。
尽量选择多学科合作的模 式(临床原则)。
2局部治疗后,无转移的生化复发(biochemical re currence, BCR)2.1预后2.1.1需告知用尽局部治疗后前列腺特异性抗原 (p rostate-specificantigen ,P SA) 的 者移的风险,并对这些患者进行PSA检测及临床评估 ( 床 )'对于激素敏感性PCa,BCR几乎总是先于临床 可发现的转移。
BCR和临床复发有相同的危险因素,包括分期、 分级和治疗前PSA水平等。
2.1.2对于局部治疗无效后BCR且有转移高危因 素,如口 P SA 倍增时间(prostate-specific antigen dou bling time,PSADT )<10个月的患者,需定期对其进 行包含计算机断层扫描(c omputed tomography , CT )、磁共振 成 像(magnetic resonance imaging, MRI)和骨扫描的分期评估(临床原则)。
达罗他胺ADE信号的挖掘与分析
达罗他胺ADE信号的挖掘与分析Δ乔丽娟1*,陈金花2,康建1 #(1.郑州大学第一附属医院药学部,郑州 450052;2.郑州大学附属肿瘤医院/河南省肿瘤医院药学部,郑州 450008)中图分类号 R979.1+9文献标志码 A 文章编号 1001-0408(2024)03-0339-04DOI 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.03.13摘要目的挖掘并分析达罗他胺的药物不良事件(ADE)信号,为其临床安全使用提供参考。
方法基于美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库收集2019年第3季度到2022年第3季度达罗他胺相关的ADE报告,采用报告比值比(ROR)法和比例报告比值(PRR)法进行数据挖掘和分析。
结果提取到达罗他胺相关的ADE报告565份,其中以达罗他胺为首要怀疑药物的ADE报告356份,挖掘得到38个ADE信号,涉及15个系统器官分类(SOC),患者年龄主要集中在65岁以上。
达罗他胺ADE信号的SOC 主要集中在各类检查,全身性疾病及给药部位各种反应,良性、恶性及性质不明的肿瘤(包括囊状和息肉状),肾脏及泌尿系统疾病等。
该药说明书中未提及的ADE信号有13个,包括前列腺特异性抗原升高、吞咽困难、认知障碍、勃起功能障碍、横纹肌溶解、男性乳腺发育、血小板计数降低等。
结论临床在使用达罗他胺时,除了关注该药说明书中提及的ADE外,还应密切关注前列腺特异性抗原升高、横纹肌溶解、男性乳腺发育、血小板计数降低等潜在ADE,以避免因ADE引起的停药或器官损伤。
关键词达罗他胺;美国FDA不良事件报告系统;报告比值比法;比例报告比值法;信号挖掘Signal mining and analysis of adverse drug event signals of darolutamideQIAO Lijuan1,CHEN Jinhua2,KANG Jian1(1. Dept. of Pharmacy,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;2. Dept. of Pharmacy,the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University/Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China)ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To explore and analyze the adverse drug event (ADE)signals of darolutamide and provide a reference for its clinical safe use.METHODS ADEs related to darotamide were collected based on the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)database from the third quarter of 2019to the third quarter of 2022. Data mining and analysis were conducted by the report odds ratio (ROR)and proportional reporting ratio (PRR)methods.RESULTS A total of 565 ADE reports related to darolutamide were extracted,356 ADE reports about darolutamide as the primary suspected drug were included,38 ADE signals with darolutamide as the primary suspected drug were excavated,involving 15system organ class (SOC),mainly concentrated in patients over 65years old. The SOC of darotamide ADE signal mainly focused on various examinations,systemic diseases and various reactions at the administration site,benign/malignant tumors or those with unknown nature (including cystic and polypoid),kidney and urinary system diseases. A total of 13 ADE signals not mentioned in the instructions included increased prostate-specific antigen,dysphagia,cognitive impairment,erectile dysfunction,rhabdomyolysis,gynecomastia and decreased platelet count,etc.CONCLUSIONS When using darolutamide,in addition to ADE in the drug instruction,we should pay close attention to potential ADE,such as increased prostate-specific antigen,rhabdomyolysis,gynecomastia and decreased platelet count, so as to avoid drug withdrawal or organ damage caused by ADE.KEYWORDS darolutamide; FDA adverse event reporting system; report odds ratio; proportional reporting ratio; signal mining前列腺癌是发生在前列腺的恶性上皮肿瘤,是男性泌尿生殖系统最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,在我国的发病率和死亡率逐年上升[1―2]。
专科随访小程序在公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体延伸性管理中的应用
专科随访小程序在公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体延伸性管理中的应用发布时间:2021-01-07T13:25:55.537Z 来源:《护理前沿》2020年15期作者:杨巧兰、夏敏、李子系、董洁、李春伟[导读] 2020初,一场新型冠状病毒疫情,在给临床工作带来很大的冲击的同时,也迫使我们临床医务人员进行思考和不断创新杨巧兰、夏敏、李子系、董洁、李春伟安徽医科大学第一附属医院安徽合肥 2300222020初,一场新型冠状病毒疫情,在给临床工作带来很大的冲击的同时,也迫使我们临床医务人员进行思考和不断创新。
终末期肾病(ESRD)已成为世界范围内的重大卫生问题,肾移植被公认为挽救ESRD患者生命的最佳办法,而我国面临着严峻的供肾短缺问题,公民逝世器官捐献(DCD)是解决供肾短缺的根本途径。
但据国际多个移植中心的统计,肾移植术后第1年约有75%的受者发生过不同程度的感染,26%的患者直接死亡原因是感染,其中肺部感染是肾移植术后最常见的感染,也是肾移植受者最主要的死亡原因,病死率达 40 ~78%。
国外肾移植术后1年内肺部感染的发生率为5~10%。
国内肾移植术后肺部感染的发生率为8.7~14.96%。
同时DCD肾移植受者所接受的肾脏来源供体,常有反复入住ICU、多次心肺复苏、气管插管、辅助呼吸及感染等病史,研究表明,供体急性肾损伤、器官获取与转运、冷热缺血时间以及受者年龄、伴发疾病、手术因素等使受者术后移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)的发生率高达25-50%,也是降低移植肾存活率的主要原因。
另外,肾移植术后,患者需定期检测抗排斥药物的血药浓度,以免因出现药物浓度过高或过低而出现的一系列术后并发症。
肾移植患者定期随访是维护移植肾功能正常的重要保障。
面对疫情,虽我院迅速制定了各项强有力的疫情防控措施,为坚决打赢这场疫情防控阻击战,全院上下,多部门联动,保障患者安全。
公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体与普通人群相比,肾移植受者这个群体和医院感染的发生率更高。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
REVIEWAssociation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Cardiovascular Deathin Patients With Prostate CancerA Meta-analysis of Randomized TrialsPaul L.Nguyen,MDYoujin Je,MSFabio A.B.Schutz,MDKaren E.Hoffman,MD,MPH,MHScJim C.Hu,MD,MPHArti Parekh,BAJoshua A.Beckman,MD,MScToni K.Choueiri,MDA N D R O G E N D E P R I V A T I O Ntherapy(ADT)in the form ofa gonadotropin-releasing hor-mone(GnRH)agonist is amainstay of prostate cancer treat-ment,but several studies have sug-gested that ADT may increase a pa-tient’s risk of dying from cardiovascularcauses.In2006,Keating et al1found thatGnRH agonist use was associated witha44%increased risk of incident diabe-tes,16%increase in coronary heartdisease,11%increase in myocardialinfarction(MI),and16%increase insudden cardiac death in the nationalSurveillance,Epidemiology,and EndResults–Medicare database.In2007,Tsai et al2found that ADT was associ-ated with a2.6-times increase in car-diovascular death among men receiv-ing radical prostatectomy in theCAPSURE database.In addition,D’Amico et al3reanalyzed data from2randomized trials and found that ADTuse was associated with a shorter time to fatal MI in a subgroup of men olderthan65years.On the basis of theseand other studies,4the American HeartAssociation,the American Cancer Author Affiliations are listed at the end of this article. Corresponding Author:Paul L.Nguyen,MD,Depart-ment of Radiation Oncology,Dana-Farber Cancer In-stitute,Brigham and Women’s Hospital,75Francis St, Boston,MA02115(pnguyen@).Context Whether androgen deprivation therapy(ADT)causes excess cardiovascu-lar deaths in men with prostate cancer is highly controversial and was the subject of ajoint statement by multiple medical societies and a US Food and Drug Administrationsafety warning.Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsto determine whether ADT is associated with cardiovascular mortality,prostate cancer–specific mortality(PCSM),and all-cause mortality in men with unfavorable-risk,non-metastatic prostate cancer.Data Sources A search of MEDLINE,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Central Registerof Controlled Trials databases for relevant randomized controlled trials in English be-tween January1,1966,and April11,2011.Study Selection Inclusion required nonmetastatic disease,intervention group withgonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist–based ADT,control group with no imme-diate ADT,complete information on cardiovascular deaths,and median follow-up ofmore than1year.Data Extraction Extraction was by2independent reviewers.Summary incidence,rela-tive risk(RR),and CIs were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models.Results Among4141patients from8randomized trials,cardiovascular death in pa-tients receiving ADT vs control was not significantly different(255/2200vs252/1941events;incidence,11.0%;95%CI,8.3%-14.5%;vs11.2%;95%CI,8.3%-15.0%;RR,0.93;95%CI,0.79-1.10;P=.41).ADT was not associated with excesscardiovascular death in trials of at least3years(long duration)of ADT(11.5%;95%CI,8.1%-16.0%;vs11.5%;95%CI,7.5%-17.3%;RR,0.91;95%CI,0.75-1.10;P=.34)or in trials of6months or less(short duration)of ADT(10.5%;95%CI,6.3%-17.0%;vs10.3%;95%CI,8.2%-13.0%;RR,1.00;95%CI,0.73-1.37;P=.99).Among4805patients from11trials with overall death data,ADT was associated with lowerPCSM(443/2527vs552/2278events;13.5%;95%CI,8.8%-20.3%;vs22.1%;95%CI,15.1%-31.1%;RR,0.69;95%CI,0.56-0.84;PϽ.001)and lower all-cause mor-tality(1140/2527vs1213/2278events;37.7%;95%CI,27.3%-49.4%;vs44.4%;95%CI,32.5%-57.0%;RR,0.86;95%CI,0.80-0.93;PϽ.001).Conclusion In a pooled analysis of randomized trials in unfavorable-risk prostate can-cer,ADT use was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death butwas associated with a lower risk of PCSM and all-cause mortality.JAMA.2011;306(21):For editorial comment see p2382.©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.212359Society,the American Urological Association,and the American Society for Radiation Oncology issued a joint scientific report to raise awareness of the potential linkage between ADT and cardiovascular events and stated “at this point,it is reasonable,on the basis of the above data,to state that there may be a relation between ADT and cardiovascular events and death.”5 Similarly,the US Food and Drug Administration issued a safety warning on October20,2010,requiring label-ing on GnRH agonists warning about an“increased risk of diabetes and cer-tain cardiovascular diseases(heart attack,sudden cardiac death,stroke) in men receiving these medications for the treatment of prostate cancer.”6 However,other studies have not confirmed these findings7-9and,due to the significant controversy and clini-cal concern over this issue,we per-formed an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to de-termine whether ADT is associated with cardiovascular mortality,pros-tate cancer–specific mortality(PCSM), and all-cause mortality in men with unfavorable-risk,nonmetastatic pros-tate cancer.METHODSSelection of StudiesWe reviewed MEDLINE and EMBASE citations between January1,1966,and April11,2011,and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database through April11,2011.The search terms used were prostate cancer and(androgen deprivation or androgen suppression or hormone or gonadotro-pin),with the results limited to ran-domized controlled trials in the Eng-lish language.We included only trials focused on patients with nonmeta-static and non−hormone-refractory disease and that had an intervention group with immediate ADT and a con-trol group of patients receiving no immediate ADT.For inclusion in our study,the trial had to predominantly use a GnRH agonist,have adequate information on cardiovascular deaths, and have a median follow-up of at least1year.We required a GnRH ago-nist because the large observationalstudy by Keating et al1found an excessrisk of coronary heart disease,MI,andsudden cardiac death among menwho received GnRH agonists but notthose who received orchiectomy,andbecause orchiectomy is much lesscommonly used in modern practice.When more than1publication wasidentified from the same clinical trial,we used the most recent or completereport of that trial.Quality of the trialswas assessed using the Jadad/Oxfordquality scoring system.10For analysisof PCSM and all-cause mortality,werequired trials to report those2endpoints but did not require that theyreport cardiovascular mortality.Data Extractionand Clinical End PointsData abstraction was conducted inde-pendently by2investigators(P.L.N.andA.P.)according to the Preferred Re-porting Items for Systematic Reviewsand Meta-analyses statement11and anydiscrepancies between reviewers wereresolved by consensus.For each study,we extracted the following informa-tion:first author’s name,year of pub-lication,median age of patients,num-ber of enrolled patients,inclusioncriteria,treatment groups,type of ADT,duration of ADT,number of cardiovas-cular deaths in ADT and control groups,definition of cardiovascular death,me-dian follow-up,number of PCSMdeaths,and number of overall deaths.The definition of cardiovascular deathwas accepted as defined by the studyauthors.If it was not specifically de-fined in the study,then we includedevents broadly related to cardiac dis-ease and vascular disease.Definitionsof cardiovascular disease for each in-cluded study are shown in the T ABLE,alongside the study information.3,8,9,12-19Statistical AnalysisFor the calculation of incidence,thenumber of patients with cardiovascu-lar death and the number of patientswho were treated with ADT or pla-cebo were extracted from the indi-vidual selected clinical trials.The pro-portion of patients with those adverseoutcomes and95%CIs were derivedfrom each trial.We also calculated rela-tive risks(RRs)and95%CIs of cardio-vascular death in patients assigned toADT vs controls in the same trial.Tocalculate95%CIs,the variance of a log-transformed study-specific RR was de-rived using the␦method.For studiesreporting zero events in a treatment orcontrol group,we applied a classic half-integer continuity correction to calcu-late RR and variance.We then re-peated this for the end points of PCSMand all-cause mortality.Statistical heterogeneity among trialsincluded in the meta-analysis was as-sessed by using the Cochran Q statis-tic,and inconsistency was quantifiedwith the I2statistic[100%ϫ(Q−df)/Q],which estimates the percentage oftotal variation across studies due toheterogeneity rather than chance.20Theassumption of homogeneity was con-sidered invalid for PϽ.10.Summary in-cidence and RRs were calculated usingrandom-effects or fixed-effects mod-els depending on the heterogeneity ofincluded studies.When substantialheterogeneity was not observed,thesummary estimate calculated on the ba-sis of the fixed-effects model was re-ported by using the inverse variancemethod.When substantial heteroge-neity was observed,the summary esti-mate calculated on the basis of the ran-dom-effects model was reported byusing the DerSimonian and Lairdmethod that considers both within-study and between-study variations.21For studies with separate treatmentgroups evaluating varying durations ofADT,we combined the2ADT groupsfor the overall analysis.To determine the RR of cardiovas-cular death due to ADT within particu-lar groups,we performed subgroupanalyses on trials of short course(ADTforՅ6months)or long course(ADTforՆ3years),trials with median ageof younger than70years or70years orolder,and trials in which radiation wasused.To further test for variation in theRR of cardiovascular death due to ADTADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER2360JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.21©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.by duration of ADT or median age of patients,we conducted a meta-regression analysis by modeling a log-transformed study-specific RR as a de-pendent variable and duration of ADT (Յ6months orՆ3years)or median age (Ͻ70orՆ70years)as an indepen-dent variable.In addition,publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots(ie,plots of study results against pre-cision)and with the Begg and Eggertests.Two-tailed PϽ.05was consid-ered statistically significant.All statis-tical analyses were performed by usingStata/SE version12.0software(StataCorp).RESULTSSelection of TrialsOur initial search yielded1041studies(268from MEDLINE,211fromEMBASE,and562from the CochraneCentral Register of Controlled Trials).After removing386duplicate studies,we evaluated the abstracts of655stud-Table.Baseline Characteristics and Number of CV Deaths for the Selected Trials of ADT in Nonmetastatic Prostate CancerSource MedianAge,yDefinition of CVDeath From Article StageADT MedianFollow-up,yTreatmentGroupsNo.ofPatientsNo.ofDeathsNo.ofPCSMDeathsNo.ofCVDeathsType LengthD’Amico et al,32008(DFCI95-096)73(range,49-82)Fatal MI T1b-T2b,N0Leuprolideϩflutamide6mo7.6(range,0.5-11.0)70GyϩADT1023041370Gy104441413Messing et al,122006(ECOG/EST3886)66(range,45-78)Two by vasculardisease(1ischemic bowel,1peripheral andCV);1bypulmonaryembolism;1bycerebrovasculardiseasepNϩGoserelin ororchiectomyLifelong11.9(range,9.7-14.5)RPϩADT471773RP5128251Bolla et al,132010(EORTC22863)71(IQR,67-75)70(IQR,65-75)CV death T1-T4,N0-1Goserelin3y9.1(IQR,5.1-12.6)70GyϩADT20780262270Gy2081125717Schro¨der et al,142009(EORTC30846)67(range,52-77)64(range,46-79)CV and other causes(excluded othercancers,infection,unknown causes,and prostatecancer deaths)T0-T4,pN1-3Zoladexϩcyproteroneacetate ororchiectomyLifelong a13ImmediateADT119966910DelayedADT115977010Studer et al,152006(EORTC30891)73(range,52-81)Death due to CVdiseasesT1-T4,N0-1Buserelinϩcyproteroneacetate ororchiectomyLifelong7.8ImmediateADT4922579488DeferredADT4932849997Efstathiou et al,82009(RTOG85-31)70Death from coronaryartery disease,CVdisease,CHF,cardiac arrest,cardiomyopathy,CV arrhythmia,MI,or suddendeathT3orpNϩGoserelin Lifelong8.1(range,0.2-15.1)70GyϩADT477269825270Gy46830611365Roach et al,92008(RTOG86-10)70(range,50-88)71(range,49-84)Death from MI,CHF,cardiac arrest,cardiac,arteriosclerotic CVdisease,orcardiopulmonaryarrestT2-T4,N0-1Goserelinϩflutamide4mo11.913.270GyϩADT224164653170Gy2321849626Denham et al,162011(TROG96.01)68(range,41-87)67(range,51-80)Cardiac death T2c-T4,N0Goserelinϩflutamide3-6mo10.6(IQR,6.9-11.6)66GyϩADT532198893666Gy2701367023Aus et al,172002(Aus)67(range,50-77)66(range,54-77)NA T1b-T3aNX,M0Triptorelinϩcyproteroneacetate3mo 6.8(range,0.67-8.7)ADTϩRP63113NARP alone6393NASchulman etal,182000(ESGNTPC)NA NA T2-T3,NxM0Goserelinϩflutamide3mo NA ADTϩRP19283NARP alone21085NAYee et al,192010(MSKCC)61(IQR,57-66)61(IQR,57-65)NA T1-T2,N0MxGoserelinϩflutamide3mo8.0(range,0.1-15.3)ADTϩRP72101NARP alone6450NAAbbreviations:ADT,androgen deprivation therapy;CHF,congestive heart failure;CV,cardiovascular;IQR,interquartile range;MI,myocardial infarction;NA,not applicable;PCSM,pros-tate cancer–specific mortality;RP,radical prostatectomy.a Median duration of ADT in the EORTC30846trial was5.1(95%CI,3.9-6.5)years for immediate ADT.b Median duration of ADT in the RTOG85-31trial was4.2years.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER ©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.212361ies.After evaluating the abstract of each study,637studies were excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria.Subsequently,we carefully read the full text of each of the re-maining18trials and excluded1trial for having a follow-up of less than1 year(n=167patients)22and6trials (n=1105patients)22-28for no mention of mortality outcomes,which resulted in11trials with4805patients for PCSM and all-cause mortality end points.3,8,9,12-19Three of these trials (n=664patients)17-19had no informa-tion on cardiovascular deaths;there-fore,the remaining8trials(n=4141 patients)were ultimately selected for inclusion in the cardiovascular death meta-analysis.3,8,9,12-16Median follow-up in these8included trials ranged between7.6and13.2years.A detailed selection process is shown in F IGURE1.The baseline characteristics ofeach trial are shown in the Table.Allselected trials included patients withnonmetastatic disease who weretreated with immediate predomi-nantly GnRH-agonist–based ADT vsno immediate ADT.Local therapyconsisted of external beam radiation(5trials),surgery(4trials),or nolocal therapy(2trials).Three trialsincluded a substantial proportion ofpatients with lymph node involve-ment.The duration of ADT variedfrom3months to lifelong.Quality of the Studiesand Publication BiasAll trials included in the meta-analysis were randomized,multi-center,phase3trials.All of the trialswere open label and have all been pub-lished in full manuscript form.The Ja-dad/Oxford quality scales require adouble-blinded placebo for2of the5points.Because this would have re-quired sham injections,none of the11trials included a double-blinded pla-cebo;therefore,their maximum scorewas3out of5points(7trials),and4trials scored2out of5points.10No evi-dence of publication bias was detectedfor RR of cardiovascular death by eitherBegg test(P=.54)or Egger test(P=.11),or for the RR of PCSM(Begg test,P=.53;Egger test,P=.24),or for the RR of all-cause mortality(Begg test,P=.76;Eg-ger test,P=.72).Incidence and RRof Cardiovascular DeathAmong the2200patients who weretreated with ADT,there were255cardiovascular deaths.The overallincidence of cardiovascular deathwas11.0%(95%CI,8.3%-14.5%)inthe ADT group(heterogeneity test:Q=33.58;PϽ.001;I2=79.2%).Forthe control group,there were1941patients and252cardiovasculardeaths,for an overall incidence of11.2%(95%CI,8.3%-15.0%;hetero-geneity test:Q=33.81;PϽ.001;I2=79.3%).The corresponding RR ofcardiovascular death for ADT vs con-trol was not significant(RR,0.93;95%CI,0.79-1.10;P=.41).No sig-nificant heterogeneity was observedin the RR analysis of cardiovasculardeath(heterogeneity test:Q=5.12;P=.64;I2=0%).Results of individualtrials are shown in F IGURE2.Variation of Associationby Duration of ADTThree trials(DFCI95-096,3TROG96.01,16and RTOG86-109)with1464patients used ADT for6months or less(range,3-6months),and5trials(EORTC22863,13RTOG85-31,8EORTC30891,15EORTC30846,14andECOG/EST388612)with2667pa-tients used ADT for at least3years(range,3years to lifelong).Among pa-tients in short-course ADT trials,the in-cidence of fatal cardiovascular eventsfor ADT vs control was10.5%(95%CI,6.3%-17.0%)vs10.3%(95%CI,8.2%-13.0%),respectively,and the RR of car-diovascular death was1.00(95%CI,0.73-1.37;P=.99).Among patients inlong-course ADT trials,the incidenceof fatal cardiovascular events for ADTvs control was11.5%(95%CI,8.1%-16.0%)vs11.5%(95%CI,7.5%-17.3%),respectively,and the RR of car-diovascular death was0.91(95%CI,0.75-1.10;P=.34).When comparingthe RRs of cardiovascular death due toADT among long-course trials withshort-course trials,we did not observea statistically significant difference(P=.63).Variation of Associationby Median Age in StudyAmong the5trials with a median ageof70years or older(DFCI95-096,3RTOG85-31,8RTOG86-10,9EORTC22863,13and EORTC3089115),therewas no association between ADT andcardiovascular death(13.3%;95%CI,10.4%-16.7%;vs13.1%;95%CI,9.6%-17.6%;RR for ADT vs no ADT,0.95;95%CI,0.79-1.13;P=.53;test forheterogeneity:Q=3.49;P=.48;I2=0%).Among the3trials with a median ageof younger than70years(TROG96.01,16ECOG/EST3886,12andEORTC3084614),there was also no evi-dence of an association between ADTFigure1.Article SelectionADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy;GnRH,gonadotropin-releasing hormone.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER2362JAMA,December7,2011—Vol306,No.21©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.and cardiovascular death (7.1%;95%CI,5.4%-9.2%;vs 8.2%;95%CI,5.9%-11.3%;RR,0.88;95%CI,0.58-1.34;P =.55;test for heterogeneity:Q=1.53;P =.46;I 2=0%).When comparing the RRs of cardiovascular death due to ADT among trials with median age of younger than 70years vs 70years or older,we did not observe a statisti-cally significant difference (P =.77).Findings in Patients Who Received Radiation TherapyWhen analysis was limited to the 5trials in which definitive radiation was used (DFCI 95-096,3TROG 96.01,16RTOG 85-31,8RTOG 86-10,9and EORTC 2286313),there was also no evidence of excess cardiovascular death due to ADT (10.5%;95%CI,8.1%-13.6%;vs 11.5%;95%CI,9.8%-13.3%;RR,0.94;95%CI,0.76-1.17;P =.57;test for heteroge-neity:Q=3.87;P =.42;I 2=0%).Association of ADT With PCSMThere were 443PCSM deaths among 2527patients in the ADT group and 552PCSM deaths among 2278patients in the control group.The incidence of PCSM among men receiving ADT vs control was 13.5%(95%CI,8.8%-20.3%)vs 22.1%(95%CI,15.1%-31.1%).The RR was 0.69(95%CI,0.56-0.84;P Ͻ.001;heterogeneity test:Q=24.57;P =.006;I 2=59.3%),favor-ing ADT use (F IGURE 3).Association of ADT With Overall SurvivalThere were 1140total deaths among 2527patients in the ADT group and 1213total deaths among 2278pa-tients in the control group.The inci-dence of all-cause mortality among men receiving ADT vs control was 37.7%(95%CI,27.3%-49.4%)vs 44.4%(95%CI,32.5%-57.0%).The RR of death was 0.86(95%CI,0.80-0.93;P Ͻ.001;heterogeneity test:Q=16.86;P =.08;I 2=40.7%)(F IGURE 4).COMMENTWhether ADT causes excess cardio-vascular mortality in men with pros-tate cancer has been highly controver-sial for the last 5years and recently led to a joint statement by the Ameri-can Heart Association,the American Cancer Society,the American Uro-logical Association,and the American Society for Radiation Oncology that there may be a relationship between ADT and cardiovascular events and death,and a safety warning by the Food and Drug Administration requiring GnRH agonist manufactur-ers to warn about an increased risk of diabetes,heart attack,sudden cardiac death,and stroke.5,6Because most of the data raising concern about the effect of ADT on cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death has been retrospective,we performed ameta-analysis of prospective random-ized trials comparing immediate GnRH-agonist–based ADT vs no ADT or deferred ADT for men with non-metastatic,unfavorable-risk prostate cancer.In our study of 4141patients in 8randomized trials with median follow-up of 7.6to 13.2years,we could not find any evidence that ADT causes excess cardiovascular mortal-ity.Our study suggests that for the population as a whole,there is either no adverse effect of ADT on cardio-vascular mortality or the magnitude of this effect is likely rather small.In our analysis,we could not find a subgroup in which ADT was associ-ated with excess cardiovascular mor-tality.Specifically,we did not see an ex-cess risk of cardiovascular mortality due to ADT among men receiving short-course ADT (Յ6months),men receiv-ing long-course ADT (Ն3years),men receiving radiation,or in trials in which the median age of enrollment was 70years or older.As shown in some of the individual trials,our meta-analysis found that the use of ADT in men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer is as-sociated with improved prostate can-cer–specific survival and overall sur-vival.Of note,these improved survival findings only apply to men with unfa-vorable-risk prostate cancer,because the trials analyzed generally did not contain men with low-risk disease,aFigure 2.Relative Risk of Cardiovascular Deaths Associated With ADT Among Patients With Prostate CancerRelative Risk (95% CI)No./Total No. of EventsSourceADT Control Relative Risk (95% CI)P Value D’Amico et al,3 2008 (DFCI 95-096)13/10213/104 1.02 (0.50-2.09).96Bolla et al,13 2010 (EORTC 22863)22/20717/208 1.30 (0.71-2.38).39Schröder et al,14 2009 (EORTC 30846)10/11910/1150.97 (0.42-2.23).94Studer et al,15 2006 (EORTC 30891)88/49297/4930.91 (0.70-1.18).4752/47765/468Efstathiou et al,8 2009 (RTOG 85-31)0.78 (0.56-1.10).17Roach et al,9 2008 (RTOG 86-10)31/22426/232 1.23 (0.76-2.01).40Denham et al,16 2011 (TROG 96.01)36/53223/2700.79 (0.48-1.31).37OverallTest for heterogeneity: Q = 5.12; P = .64; I 2 = 0%255/2200252/19410.93 (0.79-1.10).41Messing et al,12 2006 (ECOG/EST 3886)3/471/51 3.26 (0.35-30.2).30ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy.The summary relative risk of cardiovascular deaths was calculated using a fixed-effects model.The size of the squares indicates the weight of the study,which is the inverse variance of the effect estimate.The diamond indicates the summary relative risk.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.JAMA,December 7,2011—Vol 306,No.212363group for whom there is no compel-ling evidence that ADT improves sur-vival.Overall,the results of our study should be generally reassuring to most men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer considering ADT,because it was associated with improved survival without a measurable excess in cardio-vascular mortality,but a few impor-tant points need to be raised.First,none of the trials were stratified by preexisting cardiovascular comorbid-ity;therefore,our study cannot exclude the possibility that a small subgroup of men with underlying car-diac disease (even if controlled)could experience excess cardiovascular mor-tality due to ADT.29For example,a post hoc reanalysis of one of the trials included in our meta-analysis (DFCI 95-0963)found that men with moder-ate to severe comorbidity (mainly car-diac)appeared to have poorer overall survival when treated with ADT and radiation vs radiation alone,although this difference was not statistically significant (P =.08).3In addition,a retrospective review of a large data set of men who were treated with brachytherapy-based radiation found that although 95%of the men were not harmed by ADT,the 5%of men with a prior history of MI or conges-tive heart failure (CHF)appeared to have a higher incidence of all-causeFigure 3.Relative Risk of Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality Associated With ADT Among Patients With Prostate CancerRelative Risk (95% CI)No./Total No. of EventsSourceADT Control Relative Risk (95% CI)P Value Aus et al,17 2002 (Aus)3/633/63 1.00 (0.21-4.77)>.99D’Amico et al,3 2008 (DFCI 95-096)4/10214/1040.29 (0.10-0.86).03Bolla et al,13 2010 (EORTC 22863)26/20757/2080.46 (0.30-0.70)<.001Schröder et al,14 2009 (EORTC 30846)69/11970/1150.95 (0.77-1.18).65Studer et al,15 2006 (EORTC 30891)94/49299/4930.95 (0.74-1.23).70Yee et al,19 2010 (MSKCC)1/720/64 2.67 (0.11-64.4).373/1925/210Schulman et al,18 2000 (ESGNTPC)0.66 (0.16-2.71).5582/477113/468Efstathiou et al,8 2009 (RTOG 85-31)0.71 (0.55-0.92).009Roach et al,9 2008 (RTOG 86-10)65/22496/2320.70 (0.54-0.91).007Denham et al,16 2011 (TROG 96.01)89/53270/2700.65 (0.49-0.85).002OverallTest for heterogeneity: Q = 24.57; P = .006; I 2 = 59.3%443/2527552/22780.69 (0.56-0.84)<.001Messing et al,12 2006 (ECOG/EST 3886)7/4725/510.30 (0.15-0.64).002ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy.The summary relative risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality was calculated using a random-effects model.The size of the squares indicates the weight of the study,which is the inverse variance of the effect estimate.The diamond indicates the summary relative risk.Figure 4.Relative Risk of All-Cause Mortality Associated With ADT AmongPatients With Prostate CancerRelative Risk (95% CI)No./Total No. of EventsSourceADT Control Relative Risk (95% CI)P Value Aus et al,17 2002 (Aus)11/639/63 1.22 (0.54-2.74).63D’Amico et al,3 2008 (DFCI 95-096)30/10244/1040.70 (0.48-1.01).06Bolla et al,13 2010 (EORTC 22863)80/207112/2080.72 (0.58-0.89).002Schröder et al,14 2009 (EORTC 30846)96/11997/1150.96 (0.85-1.08).46Studer et al,15 2006 (EORTC 30891)257/492284/4930.91 (0.81-1.02).09Yee et al,19 2010 (MSKCC)10/725/64 1.78 (0.64-4.93).278/1928/210Schulman et al,18 2000 (ESGNTPC) 1.09 (0.42-2.86).86269/477306/468Efstathiou et al,8 2009 (RTOG 85-31)0.86 (0.78-0.96).005Roach et al,9 2008 (RTOG 86-10)164/224184/2320.92 (0.83-1.02).13Denham et al,16 2011 (TROG 96.01)198/532136/2700.74 (0.63-0.87)<.001OverallTest for heterogeneity: Q = 16.86; P = .08; I 2 = 40.7%1140/25271213/22780.86 (0.80-0.93)<.001Messing et al,12 2006 (ECOG/EST 3886)17/4728/510.66 (0.42-1.04).07ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy.The summary relative risk of all-cause mortality was calculated using a random-effects model.The size of the squares indicates the weight of the study,which is the inverse variance of the effect estimate.The diamond indicates the summary relative risk.ADT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN PROSTATE CANCER2364JAMA,December 7,2011—Vol 306,No.21©2011American Medical Association.All rights reserved.。